HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 06032003 - 70-158 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Rall } RESOLUTION NO. 70/158
of Contra Costa, County
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 196,E -. 19*30
It has been ascertained: from the assessment roll and from
records in the a.ssesserz s office that taxes have been levied or
charged erroneously or illegally for the reasons as stated below;
and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Cade, Section
4986, the following uncollected tax., penalty, or costs heretofore
or hereafter leviod or charged, should be cancelled: in whole or
in part on the following assessments:
Code 66028 - Assessment leo« 2186, .Edward .A« Carney is assessed
for personal property with an assessed valuation. of $803 plus 10
penalty of° 8 for failure to fie within the time required by law*
This is an erroneous assessment since the assessee was not in business
on the lien date.
It has been ascertained .from the assessment roll and from
papers in the ,Assessor's office what was intended and: what should
have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant Ito Revenue and Taxa-
tion Code 4831, the following defects in description and/or form
and clerical errors of the 'assessor on the roll should be corrected.*
Code 1 010 - Assessment No. 2456, Slavo R gisieh, Inc, is
erroneously assessed for personal property with a valuation, of
$9,840# An audit discloses that there has been a clerical error
of the assessor in calculating assessed value, therefore, assessed
valuation should be corrected to $7,820«
« Mea mai, XislstOf Assessor
March 24, 1970
cc: Assessor (0. Giese) Page 1 of 2
Auditor
Tax Collector
RES OLUT I O NO. 70/158
FuRTIM, for the 1968-69'' f.iseal year:
It has been ascerta nod by the assessor from an audit of
the ass+esseers books of account or etherpapers that there has been
a. ''defe-ot of doseription or dlerioal +error or the assoisee in his
property statement or in other Information or reeorde furnished to
the assessor which caused the assessor to asvess personal property
which should not have been assessed or to assess it at a snha sn-
tially highor valuation. than he would have entered on .the' roil if
the information had been eorreetly furni hod* and therefore,' pur-
suant to the Rsvenue and Taxation Code, ection_ 1 631;5', the a$sensor
certifies to the auditor that the following 'eorreotion should'' be
made 6n the assessment 'roll:
Code 66047 - assessment Ind. 2014# D. ko Hewitt is erroneouel,-
assessed for personal property withs, valuation of $40,660. An audit
discloses than taxpayer reported ezeessive inventory on his property-
statement; therefore, assessed valuation should be aorreeted to
$930-
I hereby consent to the
0orreetions and ehanges ;in'
the above resolutions.
JOHN B. CTAUSU.. County Counsel
BY.
Ro 0. Seaton ' Deputy
Assistant Assessor
March >4,, 1970
Adopted by the Board this 24th >'day of March, 1970,
RE CLPTiaN NO* 7PA58
'age 2 of