HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 06032003 - 70-118 .....................................................................
...................................
IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes
of the Assessment Roll RESOLUTION NO, 70/118
of Contra Costa County
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 196-9- 190-70
it has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the Assessorts office what was intended and what should
have been assessed; and, thereforeo pursuant to the Revenue and
Taxation Code, Section 48310 the following defects in description
and/or form and clerical error of the assessor on the roll should be
corrected for the second installment of taxes; and, further, all or
any portion of uncollected tax, penalty or costst heretofore or
hereafter levied erroneously or illegally due to such error should
be cancelled pursuant to Section 4986 (1) (b) and/or 4986 (1) (d)
of the Revenue and Taxation Code:
in Code Area 8001v Rcl. No 534-141-0150 D. m. and Lydia
D. Brodehl are erroneously assessed with Land $1,260 and Improvements
$2,850, a Total assessed value of $4,110, due to error in using
the wrong factors when computing appraised value of property. This
assessment should be corrected to read: Land $1,130, improvements
$2,560, a Total assessed value of $3,690.
I,lvo
R. O. SEATON
Assistant Assessor
Copies to: Assessor (Mrs. Kettle)
Auditor
Tax Collector
Page I of 4
RBSOLUTION NO. 70/118
...........
.. .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.. __ ...._ ....................._..... .... ....... .__.. ........ ........ ............. .......................
in Code Area 8084, leo, 513-399» 345 .RedeveloPMerat
Aq.ency of Richmond is erroneously entered as as,sessee on this parcel,,
due to clerical error in transferring; the document recorded
July 3,'', 1967 in volume 5402 page 219 of Official Records* The
document covered only a Iportion 6f this parcel, and the whose parcel:
was erroneously transferred, This parcel» should be deleted from the
roll and the following parcels entered on, the roll,
In Code Area 80840 Pcl., oto* 513-399-046, Elizabeth Mo Brace
should be entered as assessee and assessed for property described as
Town of Stege dor lot 2 Elk 1. This' should be entered with assessed
values of .and $1,,506 and. rmprovement's $2,890, a Total' assessed
value of $4,390.
In Code Area 9084, Pct, No. 513-39,9,-047,, Redevelopment
Agency of Richmond should be entered as assessee for property desc-
ribed as Town of Stege For lot 2 'Blk 1. 1 This should: be entered on
the Nontaxable roll. with Land $1,500,', Improvements $3,`1301, a Total
assessed value of $4,630*
In Code Area 9000, Pcl# No. 178--330-003t ,A.luerus' C. Janssen
is 'erroneously assessed with Improvements $500, as such impr�►w+aments
did not exist on lien date. This assessment should be corrected to
read.- Land` only $6,130.
In Code Area 14-002, PC14 No4 246-050-0121-012, S gene< E. &
Kathryn Petersen are erroneously entered as assessees oil this. parcel,
due to clerical error in transferring
the document recorded Mauch 30$
1968, in Volume 5584 page 215 of Official Records. The document
covered only a portion of this parcel and the whole parcel was
erroneously transferred, This parcel' should be deleted from the roll
and the following parcels entered on the roll*
In Code Area. 14002 . 'Pcl j, NO. 2464-050 -017 William U. &
Eleanor McKee should be assessed with property described as Re'c'ord of
, Icy 43 LSM 31 Por Pct 8 479 acres. Assessed value should be
Land only $740.
In Code Area 140023, Pcl. No* 246-050--01.8� Eugene E. &
Kathryn Petersen should be assessed with property described as
Record of. Survey 43 LSM 31 Por Pcl .B 3.03> acres. Assessed value
should be Land only $31,630,
Tn Code Area 53002, Pcl. No, 051-061-0160 Frank Mac ial 2/3
and Rosalind Fertadv 1f.3 are erroneously assessed with Land $8,340
and Improvements $160. .a Total assessed value<of $8:5€4+E1, due to
mapping` error in describing the parcel as 6*488 acres,; This parcel
should be corrected to read: 3.b0acnes, with .and $4,6301, Improve**
ments $140, a Total assessed value cif $407704
R. 0. $EATON
.Assistant Assessor
RZSOLUTIOX Q. 7£1/118
Pape 2 of 4
i
in Cade Area 66083, Pcl# No. 209-070-.0131„ City Title'
Insurance Co, is erroneea sly assessed with Land $4. +650 due to error
in describing The property as 39.22 acreswhen: actual acreage was
only 33.40 acres, This aSsessment should be corrected to read.-
33.49 acres* with assessed value of Laud $3.9703, a Total assessment
of ';$3.,9700
in Code Area 66090, Pel, No, 20%-070-014, City Title '
insurance Co. is erroneously assessed with Land $332,1101, due to
error in describing the property as 337.118 acres.. when actual acreage
was only 322.349 acres. This assessment should be corrected to read:
32 349 acres, with 'Land> $317$510:$ l Iprovements $6,780 (no' change),
a Total` assessed value of $324#3100
In Code Area 660391 Pct.. Nb. 208-240 020 Martha Fazio is
erroneously assessed with hand 42,5 t3 for property erroneously
described as 55.53 acres,, result nq X'n an overassessment of this
parcel* The acreage should be corrected to 53,132 acres and the
assessed value should be as follows: Land $40,6946
in Cade area 66092, Pct* No, 209-070-QI21 City Title
Insuranceoa ►any is erroneously asst.Ssed with Lard $44*iWo, due to
error in describing 'the property ',as X8.92' acres when the:'
he parcel
contained only 34.+ 6' ,ores. This assessment should be corrected to
read 34.906 acres, and assessed values' corrected to read: Land'''
$31150303, Improv ents $ly C (no 'change), a Total 'assessed value of
In .Code Area 790322} Pc l:• No. 1t3€3-230 -031.9, Eunice' Vary 'W nkle
is erroneously assessed with Land $11), due to clerical error in over-
loo it'g this parcel transferred to the United 'Stades ofAmerica in
document recorded in Book 5648 page 326 on 16--18-68 This paroel
should be deleted from the roll. '
in Code Area. 79480, Pc.l* No 1b9-0901•-003;, Contra Costa
County is erroneously entered as NoW... . abbe -pro erty with a Land
value o $5$03, else to mapping errior as this parcel is parto a
richt of way. Thi s assessment should' be deleted from the roll,
R. t SEATM
Assstat assessor
Page 3' of 4
RESOLUTION NO. 70/118
In Coe Area 82007 Pcl',` No 031-121-034, Robert A. &
Kikue Culpepper are erroneous assessed with 'Improvements of
$3,150, due to a structure whicha portion: of such
value being removed prior to lien date. This assessment should be
corrected to x'ead. Land', $14800 ('na change) , improvements $31*050$
a Total assessed value of $4$850.
r' 1 hereby consent to the above
rW, channel and/or correctioii s*
� y
R. 0. SEATON JOHN .B. CLAUSES
A,.ssistant Assessor
COUNTY CC?T SEL
By '+ Deputy
------------
RESOL ION NO 70/118
Page'; 4 of 4