HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 05151984 - 84-293 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Resolution on MAY 15, 1984, by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Fanden, Schroder, McPeak, Torlakson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
RESOLUTION NO. 84/ 293
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Powers (Gov. Code Section 25526.5)
SUBJECT: Sale of County
Surplus Real Property
Rule Court
Walnut Creek Area
Project No. 0662-604157
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT:
On June 14, 1983, the Board adopted Resolution No. 83/838, which vacated Rule
Court, Walnut Creek. This Board hereby DETERMINES that the portion of Rule Court
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, is no longer necessary for the County or
other public purposes and its estimated value does not exceed Ten Thousand Dollars.
In consideration of payment of $2,500.00, the Board hereby APPROVES the sale
of said property to LaVonne H. McDonald and AUTHORIZES the Chairman to sign a Quitclaim
Deed on behalf of the County.
The Real Property Division is DIRECTED to cause said deed to be delivered to
grantee upon receipt of payment in full .
The Board hereby FINDS that the project is exempt from Environmental Impact
Report requirements as a Class 12 Categorical Exemption under County Guidelines and
DIRECTS the Public Works Director to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk.
The project has been determined to conform to the County General Plan.
I hereby ter"that this is a true and correct Copt►of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: c" / 5, / Ci
J.R. OLSSON, COUNTY CLERK
and ex officio Clerk of the Board
By Deputy
Orig. Dept.: Public Works (R/P)
cc: Public Works Accounting
Auditor-Controller
County Counsel
BR.RULE5.T4
RESOLUTION NO. 84/ 293
00 06
I
Vacation No. 1895
Rule Court
Quitclaim
EXHIBIT "A"
A portion of the County of Contra Costa road known as Rule Court formerly
known as Boulevard Way, being a portion of PARCEL 3 as said parcel was described
in the "RELINQUISHMENT OF STATE HIGHWAY IN THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, ROADS
IV-C, C-75, 107-A, B; A RELINQUISHMENT NO. 22124" recorded September 4, 1962
in Book 4195 at page 323 of Official Records of Contra Costa County, California,
described as follows:
Beginning on the northwesterly right of way line of Boulevard Way (84.00
feet in right of way width) at the northeasterly terminus of the course with
a bearing and distance of "North 650 58' 19" East, 141.12 feet" as described
in said PARCEL 3 (4195 OR 323); thence. from said point of beginning, along
the northwesterly right of way line of Rule Court, North 310 45' 19" East
154.58 feet to the northerly line of Lot 11 as said Lot is shown on the map
of Floraland Tract Subdivision filed July 19, 1913 in Book 10 of Naps at
page 241, records of Contra Costa County; thence leaving said northwesterly
line of Rule Court South 500 27' 00" East 24.47 feet to a point from which
a radial line of a curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 67.00
feet bears South 500 27' 00" East; thence southwesterly along the arc of
said curve, through a central angle of 70 47' 410, a distance of 9.11 feet;
thence South 310 45' 19" West 104.34 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangent
curve, concave to the northwest having a radius of 10.00 feet through a central
angle of 340 13' 0011, an arc distance of 5.97 feet; thence South 650 58' 19"
West 38.94 feet to the point of beginning.
Containing an area of 3,204 square feet of land more or less.
Bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California
Coordinate System Zone III. To obtain ground distance multiply distances
used by 1.0000746.
RESERVING THEREFROM, pursuant to the provisions of Section 8340 of the Streets
and Highways Code, the easement and right at any time, or from time to time,
to construct, maintain, operate, replace, remove and renew sanitary sewers
and storm drains and appurtenant structures in, upon, over and across any
highway or part thereof proposed to be abandoned and pursuant to any existing
franchise or renewals thereof, or otherwise, to construct, maintain, operate,
replace, remove, renew and enlarge lines of pipe, conduits, cables, wires,
poles, and other convenient structures, equipment and fixtures for the operation
of .gas pipelines, telegraphic and telephone lines, railroad lines and for
the transportation or distribution of electric energy, petroleum and its
products, ammonia, water, and for incidental purposes, including access to
protect the property from all hazards in, upon and over the area hereinbefore
described to be quitclaimed.--
00 007
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DATE: May --'-', 1S,;, 19; A• MATTER OF RECORD
SUBJECT: SALE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY ON RULE COURT, WALNUT CREEK AREA
The Board on April 24, 1984, deferred to this date action on
the recommendation of ' the Public Works Director to sell surplus real
property on Rule Court to Lavonne McDonald, and. Kern W. Schumacher
and Joy Pritchard.
Supervisor R. I. Schroder , who was on vacation when this
matter was submitted to the Board, advised that he has reviewed the
recommendation of the Public Works Director and concurs with same.
Mr . M. Pritchard, P. 0. Box 454, Carmel Valley, appeared and
expressed agreement with the recommendation of the Public Works
Director .
Rodney A. Marraccini , attorney representing Mrs. McDonald,
advised that his client concurs with the prior vacation of the
County' s interest in Rule Court, but is in disagreement with the
division of the land between the two property owners. He explained
that the tenants living on the McDonald property have been using a
. portion of the vacated land for parking spaces and requested that the
dividing line be redrawn to provide for the assignment of the area now
used as parking spaces to the McDonald property.
V. J. Westman, County Counsel, advised that the County' s
interest is terminated by the execution of the Quit Claim, that the
lines dividing the vacated land were drawn in accordance with county
procedures, and that staff research has not revealed any information
to indicate that the lines were drawn improperly.
The Board considered the comments presented, and proceeded
to adopt Resolutions 84/292 and 84/293.
2 MAT.REC
f
00 008