HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06032008 - SD.5 s. L
��.-_-----.-.--•o�
ContraBOARD OF SUPERVISORS :
Costa
FROM: JULIA R. BUEREN, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR �,1 o
oSrA COUr3' ti V o U n t Y
DATE: June 3, 2008
SUBJECT: HEARING to ADOPT Resolution No. 2008/*** accepting tabulation of mail-in ballots for
Subdivision 05-8950, Pleasant Hill BART area. (County Service Area M-31 Funds) (Warren Lai,
Public Works Department) (District IV)
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
HEARING to ADOPT Resolution No. 2008/3" accepting tabulation of mail-in ballots, confirming the
Engineer's Report, and authorizing the levy of charges for transportation demand services for County Service
Area(CSA)M-31, Subdivision 05-8950.
1 A<
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact to the County;General Fund. All costs will be covered with revenue from County Service
Area(CSA) M-31.
Continued on Attachment:X SIGNATURE:
ECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD'COMMITTEE
✓APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
.ACTION OF Br ON.,;;,.,c . e APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OT R
OF SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an
JW:ab action taken,and entered he minutes of the Board of
G:\SpDist\Board Orders\2008\6-3-08Board Reso(Hearing)-SD05-8950_M-31.doc Supervisors on the date own.
Orig.Div:Public Works(Special Districts)
Contact: Warren Lai(313-2180) 1
cc: County Administrator
ATTESTED:
Assessor
Auditor-Controller JOHN C E erk of the Board of Supervisors and
Community Development County Admi s ator
County Counsel
Deputy
a�
SV-S' G- 7-oy
SUBJECT: HEARING to ADOPT Resolution No., 2008/*** accepting tabulation of mail-in ballots for
Subdivision 05-8950, Pleasant Hill BART area. (County Service Area M-31 Funds) (Warren Lai,
Public Works Department) (District IV)
DATE: June 3, 2008
PAGE: 2
REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS AND BACKGROUND:
CSA M-31 was formed pursuant,,to the County Service Area Law to ensure the proper flow of funds for the
ongoing operation, maintenance and servicing of transportation demand services in the Pleasant Hill BART
area.
The developer is required by a Condition of Approval to annex Subdivision 05-8950 into CSA M-31 to ensure
continued reduction in vehicular trips within the Pleasant Hill BART area. In order to levy a new assessment on
the parcels located within Subdivision 05-8950, Proposition 218 requires majority approval from the affected
property owners. This Board Order and Resolution comply with the requirements for levying new assessments
under,Proposition 218.
CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Without Board of Supervisors' approval, this project will not be in compliance with the Conditions of Approval
for Subdivision 05-8950 and an alternative means to finance transportation demand services would have to be
found.
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA S S
Adopted this Resolution on June 31, 2008 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES: /`/4f'! e
ABSENT: v -+z
ABSTAIN: U,-y2-- RESOLUTION NO. 2008/3G 6
SUBJECT: HEARING to ADOPT Resolution No. 2008/:3( accepting tabulation of mail-in ballots,
confirming the Eng'ineer's Report , and authorizing the levy of charges for transportation demand
services for Subdivision 05{-8950, Pleasant Hill BART area. (County Service Area M-31 Funds)
(Warren Lai, Public Works'Department)(District IV)
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa'County RESOLVES:
1. In accordance with California Government Code 25210.82, on April 15, 2008, the Board of Supervisors
adopted Resolution No. 2008/262 ;accepting an Engineer's Report for charges for County Service Area
M-31 (CSA M-31), which included the exterior boundaries of the territory proposed for annexation.
2. Resolution No. 2008/262,also declared the Board's intention to levy and collect charges to reduce
vehicular trips within CSA M-31 for Fiscal Year 2007/2008 and set a public hearing for June 3, 2008.
Notice of the hearing was given in'the time and manner required by law.
3. Notices and ballots have been mailed to the property owner of record as required by Section.4 of Article
XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 218), and the returned ballots are ready to be tabulated.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board FINDS, DETERMINES and RESOLVES that:
1. A public hearing was held before this Board on June 3, 2008, at 9:30 a.m. At the hearing, the Engineer
of Work presented to the Board all ballots received from property owners within Subdivision 05-8950.
The Board heard and considered all protests against the proposed assessments and tabulated the returned
ballots according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected properties. The Board also
afforded to every interested person an opportunity to make a protest to the Engineer's Report, either in
writing or orally, and the Board considered each protest.
2. A majority protest,as defined in Section 4 (e) of Article XIIID of the California Constitution and Section
25210.84 of the Government Code,'does not exist.
3. The Board hereby approves the proposed annexation of Subdivision OS-8950, confirms the diagram and
assessment as set forth in the Engineer's Report, and authorizes the levy of charges for fiscal year
2007/2008 to;be collected on the tax rolls.
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy
G:\SpDist\Board Orders\2008\6-3-08Board Reso(Hearing)-SD05-8950_M-31.doc of an action taken and entered on the minutes of.
Orig.Dept.:Public Works Department(Special Districts) the Board of Supervis on the date shown.
Contact: Warren Lai(313-2180) _
cc: Assessor ATTESTED:
Audi to Administr . JOHN C Clerk of the Board of
County Administrator,
County counsel Superv' ors a ounty Administrator
�, epu�
Resolution No. 20 L
Public Works Department
255'Glacier Drive, Martinez
DATE: June 3, 2008
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: JULIA R. BUEREN, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Results of the Ballots Cast"in the Proposed Annexation of in Subdivision.05-8950 into CSA M-
31
1, JULIA R. BUEREN, Public Works Director for the County of Contra Costa, State of California, having
canvassed the return of all votes cast in the proposed annexation of Subdivision 05-8950 into County Service
Area M-31 held on June 3, 2008 do hereby certify the following to be a full, true and correct Statement of
Results of all votes cast on the following measure:
County Service Area M-31 Annexation and Annual Assessment for
Subdivision 05-8950
Yes No
I further certify that the total number of ballots cast in the proposed annexation of Subdivision 05-8950 into
County Service Area M-31 at said election was and attached hereto are the total ballots received for
and against annexation and assessment. .
G:\SpDist\Board Orders\2008\6-3-08 Board Reso(Hearing)-SD05-8950_M-31.doc
ANNEXATION REPORT
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SERVICE AREA M-31
(Pleasant Hill Bart Station Area)
Transportation Demand Management Services
Benefit Assessment District
April 15, 2008
� .. '� ,'�i xw ,errJ• �s
i� ry
7
� .. "�.
s rs 5l '
r �
Board of Supervisors
John Gioia, District 1
Gayle B. Uilkema, District 2
Mary Piepho, District 3
Susan Bonilla, District 4
Federal Glover, District 5
Prepared by
Contra Costa County
Public Works Department
a
., ill
CSA M-31 TDMAnnexation Report
Fiscal Year 2007-08 BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
On April 23, 2002, the Board;of Supervisors approved Resolution Nos. 2002/256 and 2002/257
which recommended to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Contra Costa County
(LAFCO) the formation of County Service Area (CSA) M-31, Pleasant Hill BART Station Area.
The property located within CSA M-31 receives a special and distinct benefit over and above the
general,benefits received��by the;.public at-large in the form of extended transportation demand
management services. These 1 extended transportation services consist of the implementation of
Transportation'Demand Management programs as discussed in this report and in the Plan for
Providing Services for CSA M-31 which is on file with LAFCO. Resolution 2002/256 further
stated that CSA M-31 service's should be supported by a benefit assessment or special tax levy
on parcels that receive this special,and distinct benefit from the CSA M-31 services.
On June 11, 2002 the Board of Supervisors conducted a public hearing and subsequently
approved Resolution 2002/362;which authorized the annual levy of assessments on the parcels
located within CSA M-311'to fund Transportation Demand Management programs.
On July 10, 2002, LAFCO conducted a public hearing and subsequently approved Resolution
02-19 which formed CSA',M 31.
Each year since Fiscal Year 2002-03 assessments have been levied within CSA M-31.
The Pleasant Hill BART Station Area is a transit village in which residents and employees have
a variety of travel mode options. A core element of the travel mode options for residents and
employees, and a key traffic mitigation measure in the CEQA documents certified at the time of
adoption and amendment' of';the Pleasant Hill BART Specific Plan was the establishment of
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs. TDM programs include carpooling,
vanpooling, ridesharing; flex time, staggered work hours, guaranteed ride home, telecommuting,
etc. The property owners within CSA M-31 collectively had a mandate to achieve at least 30%
TDM performance (i.e. 30% or more of the area employees arrive at work via something other
than a single occupied car).
The Contra Costa I Ce°ntre'� Association is the collective mechanism by which the
developer/property owner's obligation for TDM programs is undertaken. The Contra Costa
Centre Association is alp' private non-profit corporation whose membership consists of the
property owners in the area. The Contra Costa Centre Association has been in existence since
the mid 1980s.
The following is a list of_programs and services that have been proposed to be funded in FY
2007-08 by CSA M-31:
1) Transit Subsidy(!Program: Purchase a $48 value BART ticket for $45 and receive one
BART ticket free. The purchaser must pledge to take BART to work a minimum of
three days per week
a) Transit Subsidy'Program No. 1: 110 participants for six months
b) Transit Subsidy Program No. 2: 100 participants for four months
A -
NAContra\FY07-08\CSA M-31\EngRpt\M-31_Epg_Report(032408).doc
- 1 -
5D 6--
CSA
CSA M-31 TDM Annexation Report
Fiscal Year 2007-08 BACKGROUND
2) Carpool Incentive Program: Provide two Chevron gas cards per carpool per month for
six months.
a) 20 carpools for 6 months
3) Bus Subsidy Program: Receive a $53 value County Connection bus pass for six
months.
a) 10 participants for 6 months
4) Bike-to-Work Incentive Program: Bike to work at least three times per week for three
months, a minimum; of 12 times per month, and receive one free $48 value BART
ticket.
5) Vanpool Program: All fuel for vanpools commuting to Contra Costa Centre is paid by
the TDM Program. Additionally, TDM program pay's $50 per month towards vehicle
insurance due to $5;,000;000 liability requirement by Contra Costa County. Van # 2
runs from Davis;Street, Vacaville, to Oak Road, Walnut Creek, from 6:00 — 7:30 am.
and from 3:30 - 4:30 pm. Van # 3 runs from Sonoma Blvd., Vallejo, to Oak Road,
Walnut Creek, from 6:45"—8:00 am. and from 5:00—6:00 pm.
6) Noontime Shuttle: The!'noontime shuttle runs from 10:30 am. — 2:10 pm, Monday
through Friday, with stops at all Centre buildings and between the Contra Costa Centre
and Countrywood Shopping Mall.
7) Intrago Light EV Rental,System: The Contra Costa Centre partners with Intrago LLC
to provide employees with access to local vehicles (segways, electric bicycles,bicycles,
electric scooters' and NEV vehicles) to use through the Transit Village during the
workday. Employees are able to check out vehicles electronically from a kiosk located
at the Urban West and Pacific Plaza buildings.
8) Marketing Plan: The marketing plan develops newsletters, posters, brochures and
promotional handouts and hosts events and transportation fairs to ensure Centre area
workers are informed of the various commute alternatives, subsidies and incentives
available to them through the Contra Costa Centre Transportation Demand
Management Program.
These TDM services may,be amended annually, including the addition or deletion of the services
as required to meet the 30% TDM performance goal as determined by the Contra Costa County
in consultation with the Contra Costa Centre Association or its successor.
PROPOSED CSA M-31 ANNEXATION AND ASSESSMENT PROCESS
In FY 2007-08, the County is proposing to annex additional territory into CSA M-31 and to levy
an annual benefit assessment for TDM services on these annexed parcels. As required by the
County Service Area Law and Proposition 218, the Board,shall adopt a resolution initiating
proceedings for annexation and the levying of a benefit assessment,which resolution shall:
a) Set forth the exterior boundaries of the territory proposed for annexation;
b) State that the territory will be benefited by annexation;
NAContra\FY07-08\CSA M-31\EngRpt\M-31_Eng_Report(032408).doc
- 2 -
CSA M-31 TDMAnnexation Report
Fiscal Year 2007-08 BACKGROUND
c) Fix a time, date, and place of hearing on the proposed annexation and levying of a
benefit assessment,.which shall be not less than 45 days nor more than 60 days after
the date of adoption of the resolution initiating proceedings; and
d) State that any interested person desiring to make written protest against such,
annexation and/or levy of assessment shall do so by written communication,
containing the signature of the protestant and street address or some other
identification of the property owned by the protestant, filed with the clerk not later
than the hour set for hearing.
The Clerk shall give notice of the proposed CSA M-31 annexation hearing by mailing a notice to
each property owner within the territory proposed to be annexed, and by publishing a notice in a
newspaper of general circulation at least once, not more than 30 nor less than 10 days prior to the
hearing. At the hearing, all interested persons shall be given the opportunity to present evidence
and testimony for or against the proposed annexation into CSA M-31. Any person who has filed
a written protest may withdraw the written protest at any time prior to the conclusion of the
hearing. A majority protest for the proposed annexation into CSA M-31 shall be deemed to
exist, and the proposed annexation shall be abandoned, if the Board finds that written protests
filed and not withdrawn prior to the conclusion of the hearing represent more than 50 percent of
the assessed value of the land therein.
If a majority protest has not beo&filed,.the Board, not later than 30 days after the conclusion of
the hearing, shall adopt aresolution making one of the following determinations:
1) Disapproving the proposed annexation;
2) Approving the proposed annexation; or
3) Approvingthe annexation; but excluding any lands which the Board finds will not
be benefited from the TDM services.
In conformance with the annexation of territory into the assessment district, County staff will
mail a notice and ballot to each affected property owner located within the boundaries of the
territory to be annexed. This ballot will ask each property owner if they support the annexation
into the assessment district and authorize the levy of an annual.benefit assessment to fund TDM
services. All ballots received prior to the close of the public input portion of the public hearing
will then be opened and tabulated. If it is determined that there;is majority support to annexation
into the assessment district and levy the benefit assessment the Board may adopt a resolution
confirming the annexation and levy of assessment. Majority support is obtained if there are
more ballots received voting "YES" weighted by assessment amount than there are ballots
received voting"NO"weighted by assessment amount. "
This Annexation Report; 1) sets forth the exterior boundaries of the territory proposed for
annexation, 2) demonstrates the 'annexation territory will receive a special and direct benefit
from the TDM services, and 3) provides the justification for the calculation and levy of benefit
assessments. The Report was prepared by a registered professional engineer certified by the
State of California. This Annexation Report complies with the requirements of California
Constitution Article XIIIC and XIIID ("Proposition 218"); Government Code section 25210.77a;
,and Contra Costa County Code Article 1012-2.6.
NAContra\FY07-08\CSA M-31\EngRpt\M-31_Eng_Report(032408).doc
- 3 -
CSA M-31 TDMAnnexation Report
Fiscal Year 2007-08 BACKGROUND
The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors will hold a Public Hearing on June 3, 2008,
regarding the annexation of additional territory into CSA M-31 and the establishment of a
benefit assessment for such territory. The Board will provide an opportunity for any interested
person to be heard. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, assuming there is not a majority
protest; the Board may adopt a resolution confirming the annexation of additional territory into
CSA M-31 and authorize the levyof annual assessments.
Payment of these annual assessments for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the
same time as payments are made for their annual property taxes. All funds collected through the
assessments must be placed in a special fund and can only be used for the purposes stated within
this Report.
N:\Contra\FY07-08\CSA M-31\EngRpt\M-31_Eng_Report(032408).doc
-4 -
CSA M-31 TDMAnnexation Report
Fiscal Year 2007-08 ANNEXATION REPORT
ANNEXATION REPORT FOR
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SERVICE AREA M-31
PLEASANT HILL BART STATION AREA
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT SERVICES BENEFIT ASSESSMENT
FISCAL YEAR 2007/2008
is
Pursuant to the County Service,Area Law (commencing with Section 25210 of the California
Government), Proposition 218, and in accordance with the Resolution of Intention, being
Resolution No, , accepting the Annexation Report, adopted by Contra Costa County
Board of Supervisors, April 15, 2008, and in connection with the proceedings for:
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SERVICE AREA M-31
PLEASANT HILL BART STATION AREA
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT SERVICES BENEFIT ASSESSMENT
Herein after referred to as the "CSA M-31", I, Warren Lai, the duly appointed ENGINEER OF
WORK, submit herewith this "Report" consisting of three (3) parts as follows (as requested in
Section 25210.77a(a)of the California Government Code):
PART A: METHOD OF ASSESSMENT & ASSESSMENT LIST
This part contains a description of each parcel of real property receiving TDM services from
CSA M-31, the amount of assessment for each parcel for Fiscal Year 2007-08, calculated in
conformity with the assessments methodology described herein.
PART B: ESTIMATE OF COST
This part contains an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements for Fiscal Year 2007-08,
including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith, is as set forth on the lists
thereof, attached hereto.
PART C: CSA M-31 DIAGRAM
This part incorporates a diagram showing the exterior boundaries and the lines and dimensions
of each lot or parcel of land currently with CSA M-31and the proposed annexation area. The
lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of
the Contra Costa County Assessor for the year when this Report was prepared. The Assessor's
maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.
N:\Contra\FY07-68\CSA M-31\EngRpt\M-31_Eng'_Report(032408).doc
- 5 -
cJ Ji�
CSA M-31 TDMAnnexation Repprt PART A.
Fiscal Year 2007-08` METHODOLOGY & ASSESSMENT LIST
PART A
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT & ASSESSMENT LIST
Special and General Benefit
Proposition 218 provides,'that "only special benefits are assessable" and defines a special benefit
as a particular and distinct benefit conferred on real property and not a general benefit received
by the public at large. 'The Transportation Demand Management (TDM) services provided
within CSA M-31 are deemed a special benefit and only serve the commercial and residential
parcels located within the boundaries of the District. No TDM services will be provided to the
general public. Therefore no general benefit subsidy is required, however, the County has, and
may continue, to subsidize various TDM programs.
Property Classification
Developed Residential Property: Developed Residential Property consists of property which
has had a residential building permit.issued prior to April 30 and is classified by the County
Assessor's office as single-family'residential, multi-family residential, apartment, condominium,
townhome, townhouse, co-op, cluster home or any other type of property which has been
developed for residential',use for which occupants live and occupy for extended periods of time.
Developed Residential Property does not include hotel and motel use.
Developed Commercial Property: Developed Commercial Property consists of property
which has had a commercialu building permit issued prior to April 30 and is classified by the
County Assessor's office as commercial property. Developed Commercial Property includes,
but is not limited to, retail stores and shopping centers, office buildings, conference centers,
hotels and motels, or any other type of property which has been developed for commercial use.
Exempt' Property: Exempt property consists of property not classified as Developed
Residential Property,or Developed Commercial Property. However, Exempt Property does
include property that had been ,previously classified as Developed Residential Property or
Developed Commercial Property 'Which has subsequently had.the building structure located on
the parcel demolished prior to April 30. This parcel would then remain as an Exempt Property
until such time another building permit is issued prior to April 30 to reclassify the parcel as
Developed Residential Property or Developed Commercial Property. Exempt Property also
includes: parking,lots, parking garages, roadways, open space and undeveloped property for
which a building permit has not been issued prior to April 30.
Benefit Assessment Methodology for Developed Residential Property
It is anticipated that not all of the",TDM programs will be provided to the Developed Residential
Property owners. The most viable programs to reduce the number of single occupied vehicular
trips are the Shuttle Program,in;conjunction with the Marketing Program. The cost to provide
these programs to the Developed Residential Property owners at build-out is estimated to be
$28,386.36 per year (in FY 2007-08 dollars). Since each residential unit will be similar in size
and will receive the same'degree of benefit from the residential TDM programs, each residential
unit will be charged an equal share of the Residential TDM program costs. It is anticipated that
there will be 522 residential units at build-out within the proposed annexation area. Therefore,
N:\Contra\FY07-08\CSA.M-31\EngRpt\M-31 Eng_Report(032408).doc
- 6 -
CSA M-31 TDM Annexation Report PART A
Fiscal Year 2007-08 METHODOLOGY& ASSESSMENT LIST
the maximum annual assessment that can be levied is $54.38 per residential unit ($28,386.36
.units) in FY 2007-08 dollars. 'This maximum assessment may be adjusted annually to reflect the
prior year's change in the Consumer price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers for the Bay
Area: San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose. The base CPI index to be used for future calculations is
June 2007 (216.123). Any change in the assessment rate per residential unit, which is the result
of the change in the CPI shall not be deemed an increase in the assessment subject to the
requirements of Proposition 218.`1
Benefit Assessment Methodolou for Developed Commercial Property
It is anticipated that all TDM programs will be provided to the Developed Commercial Property
owners. The.cost to provide these TDM services to Developed Commercial Property owners at
build-out is estimated to!be $238,121.84 per year (in FY 2007-08 dollars). For Developed
Commercial Property the amount of building floor area directly correlates to the number of
potential employees located on each parcel. These total floor area numbers are used to calculate
the proportional special benefit received by each Developed Commercial Parcel within.the
District. Building floor area is defined by the gross square footage of the buildings exclusive of
parking. The building floor;numbers are shown on the FY 2007-08 Assessment List on the
following page and will serve`as the basis for calculation of the annual assessment for Developed
Commercial Property. It isoanticipated that there will be` 2,487,190 sq. ft. of commercial
development at build-out within the proposed District. Therefore, the maximum assessment rate
per sq. ft. that can be levied is approximately $0.0957 per sq. ft. ($23.8,121.84/2,487,190 sq. ft.)
in FY 2007-08 dollars. This 'maximum assessment may be adjusted annually to reflect the prior
year's change in the Consumer price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers for the Bay Area:
San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose. 'i The base CPI index to be used for future calculations is June
2007 (216.123): Any change in..'the assessment rate per square foot of Building Floor Area,
which is the result of the change in the CPI shall not be deemed an increase in the assessment
subject to the requirements of'Proposition 218.
New Development within the CSA
If, prior to April 30 of"each year, a new building permit is issued for any residential or
commercial parcel withini,�CSA M-31 it shall be classified as a Developed Residential Property or
Developed Commercial Property respectively and assessed the ensuing fiscal year. All exempt
properties will not be assessed.
c
r
NAContra\FY07-08\CSA M-31\EngRpt\M-31 Eng_Report(032408).doc
- 7 -
CSA M-31 TDM Annexation Report PART A
Fiscal Year 2007-08 METHODOLOGY&ASSESSMENT LIST
Table No. 1 below shows a listing of those parcels to be assessed for Fiscal Year 2007-08 and
their maximum assessment that could be levied for Fiscal Year 2007-08.
TABLE 1: FY 2007-08 Assessment List
Maximum Maximum,
Estimated FY 2007-08 FY 2007-08
Assessor Estimated Commercial Residential Commercial FY 2007-08
Parcel No. Residential Units Building Sq.Ft. Assessment Assessment Assessment Property Owner Name
148-202-057 0 51,000. $0.00 . $4,882.70 . $4,774.48 WALNUT VIEW PROPERTIES
148-221-033 0 102,000 $0.00 $9,765.41 $9,548.96 HOFMANN KENNETH H&MARTHA
148-250-083 0 216,400 $0.00 $20,717.99 $20,258.76 ASHFORD WALNUT CREEK LP
148-250-090 0 205,700 $0.00 $19,693.57 $19,257.06 WALNUT CREEK PROPERTIES INC
148-250-091 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 WALNUT CREEK PROPERTIES INC
148-270-050 0 30,000 $0.00 $2,872.18 $2,808.52 TREAT PLAZA OFFICE LLC&11 LLC
148-470-001 0 375,000 $0.00 $35,902.24 $35,106.45 CA-TREAT TOWERS LP
148-470-002, 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CA-TREAT TOWERS LP
148-480-007 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SPK-OAK ROAD 1
148-480-009 0 49,000 $0.00 $4,691.23 $4,587.24 SPK-OAK ROAD II
148-480-010 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PMI PLAZA LLC
148-480-011 0 195,000 $0.00 $18,669.16 $18,255.36 PMI PLAZA LLC
148-480-012 0 157,000 $0.00 $15,031.07 $14,697.90 SPK-OAK ROAD I
172-011-022 0 253,500 $0.00 $24,269.91 $23,731.96 CALIF STATE TEACHERS RETIR SYS
172-013-005 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CALIF STATE TEACHERS RETIR SYS
172-020-042 0 125,000 $0.00 $11,967.41 $11,702.15 PERA URBAN WEST CORP
172-020-046 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 . $0.00 TONG JAMES&MEI FONG
172-020-047 0 200,000 $0.00 $19,147.86 $18,723.44 TONG JAMES&MEI FONG
172-031-022 0 80,000 $0.00 $7,659.14 . $7,489.38 JOHN MUIR MEDICAL CENTER
172-031-023 0 122,000 $0.00 $11,680.19 $11,421.30 1450 TREAT BOULEVARD INC
172-031-024 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1450 TREAT BOULEVARD INC
172-031-025 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 LORD VIRGINIA L
Subtotal 0 2,161,600 $0:00 $206,950.08 $202,362.96
Proposed Annexation Area
Maximum .Maximum
Estimated FY 2007-08 FY 2007-08
Assessor Estimated Commercial Residential Commercial FY 2007-08
Parcel No.* Residential Units Building Sq.Ft. Assessment Assessment Assessment Property Owner Name
SD05-8950,Lot No. 1 "100 0 $5,438.00 $0.00 $0.00 SAN FRANCISCO BART DISTRICT
SD05-8950,Lot No.2 205 16,630 $11,147.90 $1,592.14 $0.00 SAN FRANCISCO BART DISTRICT
SD05-8950,Lot No.3 184 18,960 $10,005.92 $1,815.22 $0.00 SAN FRANCISCO BART DISTRICT
SD05-8950,Lot No.4 0 290,000 $0.00 $27,764.40 $0.00 SAN FRANCISCO BART DISTRICT
SD05-8950,Lot No.5 33 0 $1,794.54 $0.00 $0.00 SAN FRANCISCO BART DISTRICT
SD05-8950,Lot No.6 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SAN FRANCISCO BART DISTRICT
SD05-8950,Lot No.7 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SAN FRANCISCO BART DISTRICT
SD05-8950,Lot No.8 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SAN FRANCISCO BART DISTRICT
SD05-8950,Lot No.9 ; 0 0 $0.00 $0_00 $0.00 SAN FRANCISCO BART DISTRICT
Subtotal 522 325,590 $28,386.36 $31,171.76 $0.00
Total 2,487,190 $28,386.36 $238,121.84 $202,362.96
*The Assessor Parcel Numbers for the annexation area include 148-221-015,034,035,036,038&148-250-071
Levy Code: 'G1
Fund: 2476
Revenue: 9895
N:\Contra\FY07-08\CSA M-3l\EngR0t\M-3l_Eng=-Report(032408).doc
- 8 - r
CSA M-31 TDM Annexation Report PART B
Fiscal Year 2007-08 'f ESTIMATE OF COST
PART B
ESTIMATE OF COST
The FY 2007-08 budgeted and future revenues and expenditures are shown on the following
page. A special fund has been set up for the collection of revenues and expenditures for CSA M-
31. The total cost to provide;the TDM services can be recovered from the collection of
assessments. Incidental expenses including administration, engineering fees, legal fees and all
other costs associated with the'TDM services may also included.
N:\Contra\FY07-08\CSA Pit-31\EngRpt\M-31 Eng_Report(032408).doc
- 9 -
i
CSA M-31 TDM Annexation Report PART B
Fiscal Year 2007-08 ESTIMATE OF COST
TABLE 2: Transportation Demand Management Program
FY 2007-08"Budgeted and Future Annexation Revenues and Expenditures
Future Future Maximum
FY 2007-08 Residential Commercial Future
BudgetedAnnexation Annexation Revenues
Revenue Sources Revenues Revenues Revenues (FY07-08 Dollars)
Contra Costa Centre TDM Reserves $125,651 $0 $0 $125,651
CSA M-31 Fund Balance as of July 1,2007 : $141,971 $0 $0 $141,971
CSA M-31 FY2007-08 Assessment Levy $200,000 $28,386 $31,172 $259,558
Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency $39,389 $0 $0 $39,389
$507,011 $28,386 $31,172 $566,569
Future Future Maximum
FY 2007-08 Residential Commercial Future
Budgeted Annexation Annexation Expenditures
Core TDM Program, Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures (FY07-08 Dollars)
Mid-Day Shuttle Program
Replacement Van Purchase,Tax&License $77,800 $0 $0 $77,800
Marketing,Signage,Schedules $10,000 $0 $1,239 $11,239
Shuttle Operations $42,000 $7,710 $5,206 $54,916
Transit Subsidy Program $48,000 $0 $5,949 $53,949
Carpool Incentive Program $6,000 $0 $744 $6,744
Vanpool Program $21,000 $0 $2,603 $23,603
Bus Subsidy Program, $3,200 $0 $397 $3,597
Bike-to-Work Program $500 $0 $62 $562
.Marketing $25,000 $15,002 $3,099 $43,101
Insurance $25,000 $0 $3,099 $28,099
Program Staff $32,550 $0 $4,034 $36,584
Benefits Program $3,255 $0 $403 $3,658
Contra Costa Centre Association Management $35,000 $5,674 $4,337 $45,011
Contingency $10,000 $0 $0 $10,000
Core TDM Program,Subtotal $339,305 $28,386 $31,172 $398,863
Future Future Maximum
FY 2007-08 Residential Commercial Future
Budgeted Annexation Annexation Expenditures
Intrago GoPointMobile Stations Program Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures (FY07-08 Dollars)
Video Surveillance Camera $22,689 $0 $0 $22,689
Electrical Instal lationLUpgrades $16,700 $0 $0 $16,700
Capital Expense Subtotal $39,389 $0 $0 $39,389
Marketing Materials/Website $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000
Installation Logistics Coordinator $6,750 $0 $0 $6,750
Systems Management. $22,500 $0 $0 $22,500
Contingencies $10,000 $0 $0 $10,000
Management Subtotal $42,250 $0 $0 $42,250
Site Construction&Retrofitting $4,800 $0 $0 $4,800
Insurance $10,000 $0 $0 $10,000
NEV Purchase $10,000 $0 $0 $10,000,
Other Expenses Subtotal $24,800 $0 $0 $24,800
Intrago GoPoint Mobile Stations Program Subtotal.' $106,439 $0 $0 $106,439
TDM Program Expenditure Total $445,744 $28,386 $31,172 $505,302 ,
Estimated Fund Balance-June 30,2008 $619267 $0 . $0 $619267
N:\Contra\FY07-08\CSA M-31\EngRpt\M-3,]_Epg_Report(032408).doc
7 10 -
15
CSA M-31 TDM Annexation Report PART C G d�
Fiscal Year 2007-08 CSA M-31 DIAGRAM
PART C
CSA M-31 DIAGRAM
The boundaries of CSA M-31 and the proposed area to be annexed are completely within the
boundaries of Contra Costa County. On the following page is a reduced map showing the
boundaries of CSA M-31 and:the;,proposed area to be annexed into CSA M-31. The lines and
dimensions of each lot or parcel are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra
Costa County Assessor, for the"year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by
reference herein and made part of this Report.
N:\Contra\FY07-08\CSA M-31\EngRpt\M-3,1_Eng_Report(032408).doc
- 11 -