HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06172008 - C.58 To: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra_ { -
Costa
FROM: Warren E. Rupf, Sheriff-Coroner
:. 4o County
DATE: April 22, 2008 q couK
SUBJECT: APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chair to enter into an agreement to participate in the
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chair to enter into an agreement to participate in the Sacramento-San Joaquin
Delta Flood Response Group.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
No County Costs.
BACKGROUND:
Contra Costa is one of five counties containing portions of the primary Delta within its jurisdictional
boundaries. Each of the counties contains segments of levee and other flood control works that could
experience catastrophic failure resulting in a significant threat to public safety, a hazard to public and private
properties, and a risk to economic well-being. (Flooding within segments of the Delta is an ongoing risk, and
coordinated preparedness and response planning are pivotal to the effective management of potential inundation
emergencies within the primary Delta region.
Effective response requires close interaction at all levels of government, coupled with integrated public
involvement. The Sheriffs Office Emergency Services Division has worked with representatives from the other
involved counties for the past several monthslto address various emergency planning and response-related issues
surrounding flood hazards. Utilizing an integrated multi-agency approach, the five involved county emergency
management agencies have worked to establish a mechanism for facilitating effective inter jurisdictional
response to major Delta flooding incidents.
The agreement represents an attempt on the part of the five counties to take a primary lead in coordinating local
government response to Delta flood emergencies. The Sheriffs Office Emergency Services Division has
worked in cooperation with the counties of Sacramento, San Joaquin, Solano and Yolo as well as the State
Department of Water Resources, the US Coast Guard,the Army Corps of Engineers,the Federal Emergency
Management Agency, the Delta Protection Commission, and the Governor's Office of Homeland Security in
this effort.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE:
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
_APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S): �y yj
ACTION OF BOA D N<Jn e, N �"'�� APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED C(rHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: i AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THEDATESHOWN.
ATTESTED v "� `q 0L
JOHN CULLEN,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Contact TODD McCOWN,5 1553
cc: SHERIFF'S OFFICE(CONTRACTS)-TM
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR—EEV— BY ��✓V DEPUTY
AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
CONTRACTOR
j .
AGREEMENT NO. 07-76
AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION IN
SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA FLOOD RESPONSE GROUP
This Agreement is made this 17th day of April, 2007, by and between the
Counties of Solano, Contra Costa, Sacramento, San Joaquin, and Yolo, subdivisions of
the State of California.
I
i
RECITALS:
i
Whereas,the potential for a catastrophic flood caused by natural or man made
agents in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Delta has been clearly demonstrated during the
floods of 1995, 1997, 1998, 2004 and 2006;and
Whereas, such catastrophic floods simultaneously impact large hydrological
basins encompassing multiple political jurisdictions thereby making such political
boundaries a hindrance to most effective organization and coordination of emergency
response to threats to the integrity of Delta levee systems;and
I
Whereas, there is currently no formal process for the identification and
implementation of opportunities for improving regional flood response such as improved
basin-wide coordination of available levee floodlight resources; and
Whereas, creation of a rel ional flood planning group to recommend joint action
to governing authorities of participating jurisdictions sharing the common hydrological
conditions of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta would provide a mechanism for creating
such beneficial regional flood response processes;
THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
j ARTICLE 1. CREATION OF THE SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
FLOOD RESPONSE GROUP
i
The parties to this Agreement hereby create and recognize the "Sacramento-San
Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group" for the purpose of enhancing regional flood
response processes that would benefit all participating jurisdictions.
i�
This group shall constitute a planning and response partnership responsible for
. developing specific recommendations to governing bodies of participating jurisdictions,
and to relevant Federal and State agencies, for joint action in the area of planned regional
response to threats to the integrity of levee systems.
i
Members of the "Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group"may,
upon approval of recommendations by local governing bodies,jointly act to implement
such recommendations as appropriate.
i
i
1
ARTICLE 2. CONSIDERATION
The consideration under this Agreement is the mutual advantage of increased
protection afforded to each of the parties to this Agreement. There shall not be any
monetary compensation required fromlany party to another parry unless jointly developed
and approved through separate agreements. Any costs for implementing recommended
regional response improvements shalllbe borne by the individual participating
jurisdictions under an agreed upon flancing plan.
ARTICLE 3. FLOOD RESPONSE GROUP ORGANIZATION
I
The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group Steering Committee
shall consist of one representative of each of the party jurisdictions to this Agreement.
Such representative, and two alternates, will be appointed in writing by the governing
body approving this Agreement. The Committee may only act if a quorum of its
membership is present. A quorum shall be defined as a majority of its entire
membership. The Committee may only approve an action by a majority vote of its entire
membership. All meetings of the Committee shall comply with the requirements of the
Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Sections 54950 et seq.). Authority to act to
implement jointly agreed upon recommendations may be delegated by governing bodies
of participating jurisdictions.
The Flood Response Group shall set policies and procedures subsequent to
identification, development, and approval of action recommendations. Such
recommendations for joint regional action will then be forwarded for review and action
by governing bodies of parties to this Agreement or their designee.
The Flood Response GrIp will designate a chairperson to the committee. Any
duly designated chairperson shall serve no more than two years before rotation of this
function to a new jurisdictional representative. Additional staff of participating
jurisdictions may participate . planning subcommittees as determined by the Steering
Committee.
State and Federal agencies, including the United States Army Corps of Engineers,
will be invited to participate in meeting and planning sessions for the purposes of
enhancing final products,ensuring consistency with State and Federal planning efforts,
and promoting appropriate changes in State and Federal operational procedures.
I
ARTICLE 4. MEETING FREQUENCY AND LOCALE
The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group Steering Committee
shall meet at least four times a year within the boundaries of one of the parties to this
Agreement.
2
j
ARTICLE 5. ' TERM OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall be effective from the date executed by all the parties until
January 1, 2017. This Agreement may,be terminated prior to the conclusion of the term
by mutual agreement of a majority of the member parties.
ARTICLE 6. WITHDRAWAL OF PARTY
Any party to this Agreement may withdraw as a party to this Agreement prior to
the termination of the term of this Agreement upon giving 90 days prior written notice to
the other parties.
ARTICLE 7. ADDITIONAL PARTIES
Additional patties, who are I County, city, State agency, or Federal agency with
jurisdiction within the area affected by the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their
tributaries may join in this Agreement and become member entities upon execution of an
Exhibit to this Agreement in which the entity agrees to be subject to the conditions and
terms of this Agreement.
The executed Exhibit shalil become a part of this Agreement automatically after
the expiration of thirty days following notification by the new party to all other parties of
the execution of the Exhibit. Thereafter,the entity shall be considered to be a party to
this Agreement unless the entitylwithdraws as provided herein. Provided, however, in the
event any existing party to the Agreement gives the others notice of its objection to the
addition of the particular entity to the Agreement within the thirty day notice period,the
addition of such party to the Agreement shall require the consent of three-fourths of the
then member parties. I
ARTICLE 8. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
Each of the parties agrl a to indemnify and hold the other parties harmless and
waives all claims for compensation for any loss, damage,,personal injury, or death
incurred in consequence of the acts or omissions of the indemnifying party's own
employees and agents in the performance of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 9. SAL I ES,EMPLOYMENT, AND WORKER'S
COMPENSATION BENEFITS
The salaries, emploIment and Worker's Compensation benefits of each employee
participating in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group shall be the
responsibility of the party employing the individual.
3
j
i
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party hereto has executed this Agreement on the
day and year set forth above.
COUNTY OF YOLO.
r
M ik Yamada, it A dD°•®F
Yolo County Boar of Su �}sr ., "" °•s
Attest: •``£3
Ana Morales Clerk �''•`-- `�
Board of Supervisors
A owed
RoW fruit rivon, County Counsel
4
I
Exhibit for Addition of Party to the
Agreement for Participation in
the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group
The undersigned jurisdiction/agency jurisdiction/agencyagrees to become a party the
2007 Agreement For Participation in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response
Group and to be bound to all the terms and conditions set out therein. It is understood
that pursuant to Article 7 of the Agreement that this jurisdiction/agency shall
automatically become a party to the Agreement thirty(30) days following notification of
the execution of this Exhibit to all the existing parties to the Agreement, provided that
there is no objection by any of them whereupon three fourths of the existing parties must
agree to the entry of this jurisdiction In the event that the undersigned desires to
withdraw as a party to the Agreement, such withdrawal shall be effective upon receipt of
notice of withdrawal by this jurisdiction as long as this jurisdiction has provided notice of
the withdrawal in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement to other existing
parties.
By:
Title
Jurisdiction
5
i
I
i
Adopted by Delta Protection Commission
November 16, 2006
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS COMPELLING NEED
The Sacramento and San Joaquin River Delta is a complex region. It is a confluence of cultures,
economies, ecosystems, politics, and dependencies. And it is a region at risk. Catastrophic natural
and subsequent human disaster could happen at any time and any place from flood and/or seismic
related levee failures. This diversity and uncertainty demands proactive regional leadership.
There is a compelling need for a single entity to facilitate regional problem solving that addresses
myriad risk scenarios, protects Delta citizens, and respects jurisdictional diversity. The Delta
Protection Commission should lead these discussions for the following reasons:
1. The regional complexity of the Delta(i.e., multiple governmental and infrastructure
jurisdictions, natural features,etc)demands unique, innovative, and unified methods to
respond to emergencies in a nimble and effective manner. The current Standardized
Emergency Management System (iSEMS) provides the bedrock of local and statewide
response however, the nuances of Delta conditions require more than SEMS offers.
2. Hurricane Katrina,the Jones Tract levee failure, and the Delta flood events of 1986, 1997,
and 2006 provide tangible examples of social risk, uncertainty, and the challenge to
coordinate and serve citizens du ling crisis. The"fog of crisis" is inevitable but should and
can be lessened by thoughtful and appropriate planning. An absence of a coordinated
response places Delta citizens atl heightened risk—especially for a truly catastrophic event
that has yet to occur, but has been predicted for the future.
3. Coordinated education is essential to prepare Delta citizens to help themselves during a crisis
until and after first responders arrive. For the first 3-5 days the Delta region will be largely on
its own to cope. Pooling resources from several jurisdictions will provide unified messages,
coordinated preparedness, andlleverage cost efficiencies that will benefit all Delta
organizations and citizens. I
4. The economic well-being of Delta communities depends on an ability to be and appear
sustainable. Given the inherent uncertainty of where a crisis would occur,the absence of a
regional, comprehensive approach to address Delta catastrophic risks calls such social and
economic sustainability into question.
5. All Delta communities and geographic areas are not the same. Some may be at more risk than
others due to physical location, adjacency to infrastructure, age of structures,condition of
levees, and other conditions. A regional problem solving approach needs to address and
respect this diversity, offering options to communities that want choices, and autonomy to
communities that do not. This approach is best lead by an organization of the Delta that
understands the region and has the collective interests of the wider community in mind.
6. `Flood fighting' is a critical component of emergency response. However, flood fighting
focuses on the physical aspects of a crisis. The Delta needs equivalent methods to address the
social aspects of a flood crisis. Whether it is evacuation coordination, communicating, or
dealing with mass care& shelter,the Delta needs comprehensive, multi-scenario planning to
protect lives and property. Such planning starts with focused dialogue. Funding may be
I
I
I
I
I
available to proceed with many of these efforts through the Federal Department of Homeland
Security or other entity. The Commission is in a unique position to advocate for many of
these benefits and provide a focused voice for the regions needs—and act as a single focal
point through which to build a sustainable and comprehensive emergency planning initiative.
The collective vision of current emergency management specialists from Delta jurisdictions is a
region that benefits from seamless coordination for response needs unhindered by geographic of
jurisdictional lines; an educated and informed population ready to help themselves as well as to
support their community; coordinated management of flood fight crews, supplies and equipment
in1he Delta basin through a real-time, shared logistics system; and enhanced operability of
communications systems during and eventl that allows for fluid interaction and response
coordination. This desired condition is potentially achievable—but only if one centralized
organization asserts the leadership to coordinate the diverse interests and needs of the Delta
region and provides the catalyst for public safety advanced planning.
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-0380
APPROVE OF SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA FLOOD RESPONSE GROUP
�GREEMENT
WHEREAS, the potential for a clatastrophic flood caused by natural or man made agents
in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta has been clearly demonstrated during the floods 1986,
1997, and 2006; and
WHEREAS, such catastrophic floods simultaneously impact large hydrological basins
encompassing multiple political jurisdictions thereby making such political boundaries a
hindrance to most effective organization and coordination of emergency response to threats to
the integrity of Delta levee systems; and
WHEREAS, there is currently no formal process for the identification and
implementation of opportunities for improving regional flood response such as improved basin-
wide coordination of available levee floo I fight resources; and
WHEREAS, creation of a regio I al flood planning group to recommend joint action to
governing authorities of participating ju lisdictions sharing the common hydrological conditions
of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta would provide a mechanism for creating such beneficial
regional food response processes, and
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Supervisors, County of Sacramento, hereby
approves the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group Agreement.
On a motion by Supervisor Peters seconded by Supervisor
MacGl ashan the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Sacrament o, State of California, this 3rd day of April 2007, by the
following vote,to wit:
AYES: Supervisors, MacGlashan, Peters, Yee, Nottoli x f r E
NOES: Supervisors, None APR 0 3 2007
ABSENT: Supervisors, Dickinson .,� �t,
4
A$STA1N: SupervisgrsNone
Tcfz—
BY CF
" h ton
25103 of the Government
nt Code
z 47 if fho dacomm has been
Y'3 adman of the Board of on Supervisor,,;,County
Of S.11,i i'icilt0 �lv
g r Chair of the Board of Supervisors
r � a
Alm
r of Sacramento County, California
BY
Dspuiy CIM',Board of Supervisors
The foregoing is a correct copy of a resg9Jgn
adopted by the Board.o'r Supervisors,Sa.ci riento
County,Caiitornia
Clerk, Boarif of Supervisors /y
Z
Dated/
By -
Agreement for Participation in
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group
IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS
AGREEMENT AS FOLLOWS:
COUN Y F-SAN JOAQUIN
By :S y
Clerc v for ow, C a ' n
L'
itle �
011 0 ANO
i
B /-----
Clerk Michae . Rea
g , Chairman
;Title
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
By
Clerk,
Title
QCs • COUNTY OF YOLO
r
B
re" r
^s • 'tle C IP.LJI.
COUNTY OF CGNTR. A COSTA
Clerk
Title _f 1ax ow ra C5f
Page 4 of 5
Contra
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
.x Costa
FROM: Warren E. Rupf, Sheriff-Coroner
County
COs''--•------'-`s"
DATE: April 22,2008 rA coox�{
SUBJECT: APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chair to enter into an agreement to participate in the
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chair to enter into an agreement to participate in the Sacramento-San Joaquin
Delta Flood Response Group.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
No County Costs.
BACKGROUND:
Contra Costa is one of five counties containing portions of the primary Delta within its jurisdictional
boundaries. Each of the counties contains segments of levee and other flood control works that could
experience catastrophic failure resulting in a significant threat to public safety, a hazard to public and private
properties, and a risk to economic well-being. Flooding within segments of the Delta is an ongoing risk, and
coordinated preparedness and response planning are pivotal to the effective management of potential inundation
emergencies within the primary Delta region.
Effective response requires close interaction at all levels of government, coupled with integrated public
involvement. The Sheriffs Office Emergency Services Division has worked with representatives from the other
involved counties for the past several months to address various emergency planning and response-related issues
surrounding flood hazards. Utilizing an integrated multi-agency approach, the five involved county emergency
management agencies have worked to establish a mechanism for facilitating effective inter jurisdictional
response to major Delta flooding incidents.
The agreement represents an attempt on the part of the five counties to take a primary lead in coordinating local
government response to Delta flood emergencies. The Sheriffs Office Emergency Services Division has
worked in cooperation with the counties of Sacramento, San Joaquin, Solano and Yolo as well as the State
Department of Water Resources, the US Coasts Guard,the Army Corps of Engineers, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency, the Delta Protection Commission, and the Governor's Office of Homeland Security in
this effort.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE:
_ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
_,,ZAPPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S): ' ! •j
ACTION OF BOA D N APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT I AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
ATTESTED
JOHN CULLEN,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Contact. TODD.McCOWN,;5,-1553
M SHERIFF'S OFFICE(CONTRACTS)-TM
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR—EW-CLL BY ,DEPUTY
AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
CONTRACTOR
AGREEMENT NO. 07-76
AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION IN
SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQ;UIN DELTA FLOOD RESPONSE GROUP
This Agreement is made this 17th day of April, 2007, by and between the
Counties of Solano, Contra Costa, Sacramento, San Joaquin, and Yolo, subdivisions of
the State of California
RECITALS:
Whereas, the potential for a catastrophic flood caused by natural or man made
agents in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Delta has been clearly demonstrated during the
floods of 1995, 1997, 1998, 2004 and 2006;and
Whereas, such catastrophic floods simultaneously impact large hydrological
basinsencompassing multiple political jurisdictions thereby making such political
boundaries a hindrance to most effective organization and coordination of emergency
response to threats to the integrity of Delta levee systems; and
Whereas,there is currently Io formal process for the identification and
implementation of opportunities for improving regional flood response such as improved
basin-wide coordination of available levee floodfight resources; and
Whereas, creation of a regional flood planning group to recommend joint action
to governing authorities of participating jurisdictions sharing the common hydrological
conditions of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta would provide a mechanism for creating
such beneficial regional flood response processes;
THE PARTIES AGREE I FOLLOWS:
ARTICLE 1. CREATION OF THE SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
FLOOD RESPONSE GROUP
The parties to this Agreement hereby create and recognize the "Sacramento-San
Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group" for the purpose of enhancing regional flood
response processes that would benefit all participating jurisdictions.
This group shall constitute a planning and response partnership responsible for
developing specific recommendations to governing bodies of participating jurisdictions,
and to relevant Federal and State agencies, for joint action in the area of planned regional
response to threats to the« I integrity, of levee systems.
Members of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group„may,
upon approval of recommendations by local governing bodies,jointly act to implement
such recommendations as appropriate.
1
ARTICLE 2. CONSIDERATION
The consideration under this Agreement is the mutual advantage of increased
protection afforded to each of the parties to this Agreement. There shall not be any
monetary compensation required from any party to another parry unless jointly developed
and approved through separate agreements. Any costs for implementing recommended
regional response improvements shall be borne by the individual participating
jurisdictions under an agreed upon financing plan.
ARTICLE 3. FLOOD RESPONSE GROUP ORGANIZATION
The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group Steering Committee
shall consist of one representative of each of the party jurisdictions to this Agreement.
Such representative, and two alternates, will be appointed in writing by the governing
body approving this Agreement. The Committee may only act if a quorum of its
membership is present. A quorum shall be defined as a majority of its entire
membership. The Committee may only approve an action by a majority vote of its entire
membership. All meetings of the Committee shall comply with the requirements of the
Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Sections 54950 et seq.). Authority to act to
implement jointly agreed upon recommendations may be delegated by governing bodies
of participating jurisdictions.
The Flood Response Group shall set policies and procedures subsequent to
identification, development, and approval of action recommendations. Such
recommendations for joint regionals action will then be forwarded for review and action
by governing bodies of parties to this Agreement or their designee.
The Flood Response Group will designate a chairperson to the committee. Any
duly designated chairperson shall serve no more than two years before rotation of this
function to a new jurisdictional representative. Additional staff of participating
jurisdictions may participate in planning subcommittees as determined by the Steering
Committee.
State and Federal agencies, including the United States Army Corps of Engineers,
will be invited to participate in meeting and planning sessions for the purposes of
enhancing final products, ensuring consistency with State and Federal planning efforts,
and promoting appropriate changes in State and Federal operational procedures.
ARTICLE 4. MEETING FREQUENCY AND LOCALE
The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group Steering Committee
shall meet at least four times a year within the boundaries of one of the parties to this
Agreement.
2
ARTICLE 5. TERM OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall be effective from the date executed by all the parties until
January 1, 2017. This Agreement may be terminated prior to the conclusion of the term
by mutual agreement of a majority of the member parties.
ARTICLE 6. WITHDRAWAL OF PARTY
Any party to this Agreement may withdraw as a party to this Agreement prior to
the termination of the term of this Agreement upon giving 90 days prior written notice to
the other parties.
ARTICLE 7. ADDITIONAL PARTIES
AdditionalP arties, who are I County, city, State agency, or Federal agency with
jurisdiction within the area affected by the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their
tributaries may join in this Agreement and become member entities upon execution of an
Exhibit to this Agreement in which the entity agrees to be subject to the conditions and
terms of this Agreement.
The executed Exhibit shall become a part of this Agreement automatically after
the expiration of thirty days following notification by the new party to all other parties of
the execution of the Exhibit. Thereafter,the entity shall be considered to be a party to
this Agreement unless the entity withdraws as provided herein. Provided, however, in the
event any existing party to the Agreement gives the others notice of its objection to the
addition of the particular entity to the Agreement within the thirty day notice period,the
addition of such parry to the Agreement shall require the consent of three-fourths of the
then member parties.
ARTICLE 8. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
Each of the parties agree to indemnify and hold the other parties harmless and
waives all claims for compensation for any loss, damage, personal injury, or death
incurred in consequence of the acts or omissions of the indemnifying party's own
employees and agents in the performance of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 9. SALARIES, EMPLOYMENT, AND WORKER'S
COMPENSATION BENEFITS
The salaries, employment and Worker's Compensation benefits of each employee
participating in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group shall be the
responsibility of the party employing the individual.
3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the party hereto has executed this Agreement on the
day and year set forth above.
COUNTY OF YOLO
r
M ik Yamada, O NIK D,0p
Yolo County Boar of Ss`uk """ %;;•:4'
°.6.,
Attest:
Ana Morales, Clerk
�f
Board of Supervisors �4..� ;�`.'`-r • c, '
a
App oved to Form:
Ro Trui r' on, County Counsel
4
Exhibit for Addition of Party to the
Agreement for Participation in
the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group
The undersigned jurisdiction/agency agrees to become a party to the
2007 Agreement For Participation in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response
Group and to be bound to all the terms and conditions set out therein. It is understood
that pursuant to Article 7 of the Agreement that this jurisdiction/agency shall
automatically become a party to the Agreement thirty(30) days following notification of
the execution of this Exhibit to all the existing parties to the Agreement, provided that
there is no objection by any of them whereupon three fourths of the existing parties must
agree to the entry of this jurisdiction. In the event that the undersigned desires to
withdraw as a party to the Agreement, such withdrawal shall be effective upon receipt of
notice of withdrawal by this jurisdiction as long as this jurisdiction has provided notice of
the withdrawal in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement to other existing
parties.
By:
Title
Jurisdiction
5
Adopted by Delta Protection Cor m'ssion
November 16, 2006
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS COMPELLING NEED
The Sacramento and San Joaquin River Delta is a complex region. It is a confluence of cultures,
economies, ecosystems, politics,and dependencies. And it is a region at risk. Catastrophic natural
and subsequent human disaster could happen at any time and any place from flood and/or seismic
related levee failures. This diversity and uncertainty demands proactive regional leadership.
There is a compelling need for a single entity to facilitate regional problem solving that addresses
myriad risk scenarios, protects Delta citizens,and respects jurisdictional diversity. The Delta
Protection Commission should lead these discussions for the following reasons:
I. The regional complexity of the Dela(i.e., multiple governmental and infrastructure
jurisdictions, natural features, etc)demands unique, innovative,and unified methods to
respond to emergencies in a nimble and effective manner. The current Standardized
Emergency Management System (SEMS) provides the bedrock of local and statewide
response however,the nuances of Delta conditions require more than SEMS offers.
2. Hurricane Katrina,the Jones Tract levee failure, and the Delta flood events of 1986, 1997,
and 2006 provide tangible examples of social risk, uncertainty, and the challenge to
coordinate and serve citizens during crisis. The"fog of crisis"is inevitable but should and
can be lessened by thoughtful and appropriate planning. An absence of a coordinated
response places Delta citizens at heightened risk—especially for a truly catastrophic event
that has yet to occur, but has been predicted for the future.
3. Coordinated education is essential to prepare Delta citizens to help themselves during a crisis
until and after first responders arrive. For the first 3-5 days the Delta region will be largely on
its own to cope. Pooling resources from several jurisdictions will provide unified messages,
coordinated preparedness, and leverage cost efficiencies that will benefit all.Delta
organizations and citizens.
4. The economic well-being of Delta(communities depends on an ability to be and appear
sustainable. Given the inherent uncertainty of where a crisis would occur,the absence of a
regional, comprehensive approach to address Delta catastrophic risks calls such social and
economic sustainability into question.
5. All Delta communities and geographic areas are not the same. Some may be at more risk than
others due to physical location, adjacency to infrastructure, age of structures, condition of
levees, and other conditions. A regional problem solving approach needs to address and
respect this diversity, offering options to communities that want choices, and autonomy to
communities that do not.This app
as th
omp
foach is best lead by an organization of the Delta that
understands the region and he collective interests of the wider community in mind.
6. `Flood fighting' is a critical conent of emergency response. However, flood fighting
focuses on the physical aspects of a crisis.The Delta needs equivalent methods to address the
social aspects of a flood crisis. Whether it is evacuation coordination, communicating,or
dealing with mass care& shelter,rhe Delta needs comprehensive, multi-scenario planning to
protect lives and property. Such planning starts with focused dialogue. Funding may be
available to proceed with many of these efforts through the Federal Department of Homeland
Security or other entity. The Com r�I ission is in a unique position to advocate for many of
these benefits and provide a focused voice for the regions needs—and act as a single focal
point through which to build a sustainable and comprehensive emergency planning initiative.
The collective vision of current emergency management specialists from Delta jurisdictions is a
region that benefits from seamless coordination for response needs unhindered by geographic of
jurisdictional lines; an educated and informed population ready to help themselves as well as to
support their community; coordinated management of flood fight crews, supplies and equipment
in the Delta basin through a real-time, shared logistics system; and enhanced operability of
communications systems during and event that allows for fluid interaction and response
coordination. This desired condition is potentially achievable—but only if one centralized
organization asserts the leadership to coordinate the diverse interests and needs of the Delta
region and provides the catalyst for public safety advanced planning.
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-0380
APPROVE OF SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA FLOOD RESPONSE GROUP
GREEMENT
WHEREAS, the potential for a catastrophic flood caused by natural or man made agents
in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta has been clearly demonstrated during the floods 1986,
1997, and 2006; and
WHEREAS, such catastrophic floods simultaneously impact large hydrological basins
encompassing' multiple political jurisdictions thereby making such political boundaries a
hindrance to most effective organization and coordination of emergency response to threats to
the integrity of Delta levee systems; and
WHEREAS, there is currently no formal process for the identification and
implementation of opportunities for improving regional flood response such as improved basin-
wide coordination of available levee flood fight resources; and
WHEREAS, creation of a regional flood planning group to recommend joint action to
governing authorities of participating jul isdictions sharing the common hydrological conditions
of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta would provide a mechanism for creating such beneficial
regional food response processes, and
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Supervisors, County of Sacramento, hereby
approves the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group Agreement.
On a motion by Supervisor Peters seconded by Supervisor
'MacGl ashan , the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Sacramento, State of California, this 3rd day of April 2007, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Supervisors, MacGlashan; Peters, Yee, Nottoli I L
E5
NOES: Supervisors, None APR 0 3 2007
ABSENT: Supervisors, Dickinson
BY
C �K
_.A$STAW: Su None
None
2 Tl ,.^.,ion 25103 of the Government Code
. ✓ >,� ..�s ..
=',47 of the document has been
iairman of the Board of Supervisors,County
y� 4` of S,^c 16ato onD
f Chair of the Board of Supervisors
1yof Sacramento County, California
rrii l�4- By ,
3 ` Y Daputy CM,Board of Supervisors
s The foregoing is a comet copy of a rsri' �^n
adopted by the 8orrd of 5ttp°r"i1�J J,�:or4 yenta
County,Caii orn a?�
Clerk, Boarif of Supervisors pato /y�.;
Agreement for Participation in
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group
IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS
AGREEMENT AS FOLLOWS:
COUNTY 9F SAN JOAQUIN
By
j�eF'+r ClercVY for owC a' n
L
itle �j
0/ O 0 ANO
B Slerk'� Title Michaell. Reag /Chairman
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
By �Z&
Clerk
Title
®• �„E� COUNTY OF YOLO
o
B
tle
le J6
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
By
Clerk
Title
Page 4 of 5
Agreement for Participation in
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group
IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS
AGREEMENT AS FOLLOWS:
COUNT OFSAN JOAQUIN
By U Y
A�
:10" Clerk `• ) ict.or MoChairoman
Y' Title
Ay TY O SO A O
C
/...---
Clerk el J. Cagan, 1hairman
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
ZI [ti`rL�v�� By
Clerk �� �
Title(.�►�e►n� e�►Ys,(n •S�n�'s.,r1
D° •,
COUNTY OF Y O
Cle . .
. r Tale
n,�'q��ej ee.e••
•r^
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
By
Clerk
Title
Page 4 of 5
Agreement for Participation in
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group
IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS
AGREEMENT AS FOLLOWS:
COUVTYPF SAN JOAQUIN
By
CC�rro((,cn� y
o�
Dep'fj Cler ictor Xow C irman
Title �
OUN %'OF ANO
i
eL
B �—
Clerk Micha . Reag , Chairman
itle
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
(� By
Clerk
Title � � S sari
COUNTY OF YOLO
Clerk p
v
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
By
Clerk
Title
Page 4 of 5
Agreement for Participation in
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group
IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS
AGREEMENT AS FOLLOWS:
a�R4 COUNTY O SAN JOAQUIN
r•
By JIMLI UIN= y
Clerk ��for Mow, C firma
6 ,p Title <�/l�
0 T OF ANO
B "
Clerk Title Michael J. Reagan,6hairman
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
C� By
Jerk
Title .L wiz,4110-;s
o
'
...... OUNTY OF YOLO
Clerk
itle C" Lr�
SAP°". rnrnun ° �A vV ' '
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
By
Clerk
Title
Page 4 of 5
Agreement for Participation in
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Flood Response Group
IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS
AGREEMENT AS FOLLOWS:
�o,.?�`•'•'•" � ZiFA
UIN
By ���f `� y r
�y Clerk
TitleVictor Moya
TOF O ANO
Clerk
/tle Michael eagan hairman
,
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
By
Cleric
Title (/Itze.,i 1. '8" i_w
O AU D°01 COUNTY OF YOLO
b e
be �
e
e
,� a rr rr!l is 1111111�••°C ` �/`FYI � �// � I
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
By
Clerk
Title
Page 4 of 5