Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MINUTES - 06052007 - D.1
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS �' L`' Contra FROM: Mary N. Piepho, Supervisor District 3 , Costa DATE: June 3' 2007 '�v County - Sra cbun'� SUBJECT: Ordinance For No Tow Zone SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: ADOPT Ordinance No. 2007-22, which would prohibit waterskiing on Indian Slough and on a portion of Werner Dredger Cut near Discovery Bay. FISCAL IMPACT If the ordinance is adopted, enforcement costs will depend on the number of ordinance violations. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS Ordinance No. 2007-22 would prohibit waterskiing, and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type vessel, on Indian,Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek. These waterways are located adjacent to and north of Discovery Bay. The purpose of the ordinance is to address a serious safety problem along the waterways affected by the ordinance. These waterways have multiple blind turns. It is difficult for vessel operators to navigate these blind turns and also avoid boats towing waterskiers who stop or circle back to retrieve downed waterskiiers. There have been several major injury accidents involving waterskiers and personal watercraft along these waterways in recent years, including some fatal accidents. Continued on Attachment: ❑ SIGNAT RE: ❑ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR E MENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE ❑ APPROVE F] OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON b�f os(�a I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED ❑ OTHER taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on SEE -ATX*" :'W". the date shown. VOTE OF SUPERVISORS_ UNANIMOUS(ABSENT No N E ) ATTESTED: Ofo�oSh AYES: NOES: JOHN CULLEN, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Administrator CONTACT: Lea Castleberry,Deputy Chief of Staff,820-8683 1 CC: Sheriff's Office,Marine Patrol Division By Deputy County Counsel I Background (continued): The state Harbors and Navigation Code authorizes the County to adopt regulations that prohibit waterskiing in portions of County waterways. Harbors and Navigation Code section 268 authorizes counties to "adopt restrictions concerning the navigation and operation of vessels and water skis, aquaplanes, or similar devices subject to the provisions of subdivision (a) of Section 660, "and extends this authority to all navigable waterways. Harbors and Navigation Code section 660(a)authorizes counties to adopt ordinances that pertain to special-use areas. A"special-use area"is "all or a portion of a waterway that is set aside for specified uses or activities to the exclusion of other incompatible uses or activities." (Harb. &Nay. Code 651 (v).) "Water skis, an aquaplane, or a similar device"includes "all forms of water skiing,barefoot skiing, skiing on skim boards, knee boards, or other contrivances, parasailing, ski kiting, or any activity where a person is towed behind or alongside a boat." (Harb. &Nay. Code 651 (bb).) The courts have upheld the authority of a county to establish a special use area in a waterway where certain types of watercraft are excluded from the area. (Personal Watercraft Coalition v. Marin County Bd. of Supervisors (2002) 100 Cal.App.4`h 129.) If the ordinance is adopted by the Board of Supervisors, the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department and Marine Patrol will be authorized to enforce it. (C.C.C. Ord. Code, 410-2.012.) The attached ordinance would authorize the sheriff to place regulatory markers indicating the no ski zone at the boundaries of the special use areas. (14 CCR, 7003.) The California Department of Boating and Waterways has reviewed the attached ordinance and determined it is in conformity with the special-use area provision of the Harbors and Navigation Code section 660(a). On May 15, 2007, when this ordinance was introduced by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, Supervisor Piepho proposed moving the date of adoption from May 22 to June 5 to allow an additional two weeks for additional community outreach. The Town of Discovery Bay CSD held a Community Forum on May 30, 2007 which attracted approximately 300 residents and non-residents of Discovery Bay. Many in attendance had expressed very strong views on how the proposed ordinance would affect them and their enjoyment of the sloughs. At the conclusion of the Community Forum, the Town of Discovery Bay CSD acted to request an amendment to the original introduced county ordinance 2007-22 to reduce the distance of the defined "special-use area" from Werner Dredger Cut to the Discovery Bay Marina Channel entrance on Indian Slough, and remove the portion from the Discovery Bay Marina Channel east to Old River. ORDINANCE NO. 2007-22 WATERSKENG PROHIBITION The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows (omitting the parenthetical footnotes from the official text of the enacted or amended provisions of the County Ordinance Code): SECTION I. SUMMARY. This ordinance prohibits waterskiing, and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel, on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek, near Discovery Bay. SECTION II. Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code, to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis, an aquaplane, or a similar device, nor shall any person ride water skis, an aquaplane, or a similar device, in any of the special use areas designated in subsection (b) of this section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough, between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a) at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection (b). (Ord. 2007-22 § 2.) SECTION III. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage, and within 15 days after passage shall be published once with the names of supervisors voting for or against it in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper published in this County. ORDINANCE NO. 2007-22 1 PASSED on , by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: JOHN CULLS Clerk of the and of Supervisors Board Chair and Count Administrator By: [SEAL] Deputy TL 007\Board of Supervisors\waterski ord-final.wpd ORDINANCE NO. 2007-22 2 ADDENDUM to DA May 22, 2007 On this day, the Board of Supervisors considered adopting Ordinance No. 2007-22, which would prohibit water skiing near Discovery Bay. Supervisor Piepho introduced the item with comments accompanied by a PowerPoint presentation [attached]. She commented that the dangers of the specified waterway have been recognized by the Coast Guard Auxiliary, the Sheriff, and the Contra Costa Times, and said the conditions deserve attention. She noted that the Board of Supervisors delayed adoption of the ordinance to allow additional time for community outreach, which has included several newspaper and television stories and a Discovery Bay Community Services District (CSD) meeting attended by over 300 people. Supervisor Piepho said that as a result of the response to the outreach she is proposing an amendment to the ordinance to abbreviate the affected area of Indian Slough, so that rather than stretching from the intersection of Kellogg Creek to Old River, it would stretch from the intersection of Kellogg Creek east to the Discovery Channel, also known as the Discovery Bay Marina Entrance Channel. She noted that while it has been difficult to find balance on the issue, the primary concern is safety. She said the main critical boating season is from April to September and noted she would also be willing to consider a seasonal amendment. Sheriff Warren Rupf addressed the Board saying he has always felt that some laws cannot be properly enforced because they do not have popular support. He suggested that this is an opportunity to build a law that could have popular support, and suggested considering an ordinance that would prohibit waterskiing from the period of Memorial Day though Labor Day between 10:00 a.m. and sunset. He expressed support of the proposed change to the affected area, saying he had been persuaded by claims that, were the ban to affect a larger area, ski traffic would be driven further down the waterway creating a new dangerous area. He also suggested that the Army Corps of Engineers could be asked to address issues such as stumps and docks that keep skiers from having a straightaway on Werner Cut. Sheriff Rupf also commented on the need for boater education, and said that while he is opposed to boater licensing because it is more bureaucracy and more cost, he does support the movement for mandatory boater education. Supervisor Uilkema asked how many marine patrol boats are in service in the area. Sheriff Rupf responded that five boats are in service now,but added that his department works with the marine patrols of other area counties and said that regionally, there is a system of cooperation in place for seamless enforcement. Supervisor Uilkema asked if the County has the capability to enforce the law if it is passed. Sheriff Rupf responded yes, if the law has popular support. He added that education will also be necessary. Supervisor Piepho commented that of the letters opposing the ban as proposed, most acknowledge that the area is dangerous. She called for public comment. May 22, 2007 Item D.1: Ordinance No. 2007-22 Page 2 of 4 David Piepho, President of the Discovery Bay Community Services District(CSD), asked the Board to consider the following amendments to the ordinance, developed as a result of the LSD's community outreach efforts: (1)to pull back the restricted area from Old River to the Discovery Bay Marina; (2) limiting the ban to weekends only. The following people also spoke in support of the ordinance: Virgil Koehne, Discovery Bay CSD; Walter MacVittie,Discovery Bay CSD; Jennifer Mixon; Robert Doran. The following people spoke against all or part of the ordinance: David Dove, Discovery Bay resident; Rick Palmer,Discovery Bay resident; Paul Van Emmeril, Discovery Bay resident; Jeff Barber, Discovery Bay resident; Scott Smith,Discovery Bay resident; Eric Schultz, Discovery Bay resident; Scott Rister, Discovery Bay resident; Matt Baker,Discovery Bay resident; Richard Hobin, Discovery Bay resident; Bill Honeycutt, Discovery Bay resident; Keith Erickson, Discovery Bay resident; Dave Kroske,Discovery Bay resident; Scott Pellaton,Discovery Bay resident; Jeff Dawson,Discovery Bay resident; Fred Taverner,Discovery Bay resident; Rob de la Cruz, Discovery Bay resident; Tim Martin,Discovery Bay resident; Todd Scruggs, Discovery Bay resident; Heather Item, Discovery Bay resident; Kristen Hamstra,Discovery Bay resident; Richard Sellers,Discovery Bay resident; Michael Greggans, Discovery Bay resident; Michael Jolley, San Ramon resident; Linda Rhodes, Pleasanton resident. E-mail and written correspondence were also received from the following individuals in opposition to all or part of the proposed ordinance: Larry Ligon, Bay Area Water Ski Club and Discovery Bay resident; Jeff Barber, Discovery Bay resident; Roxy Rhodes,Discovery Bay resident; Linda Rhodes,Discovery Bay resident; Michael Jolley, Discovery Bay resident; Scott Rister, Discovery Bay resident; Matt Stewart,Discovery Bay resident; May 22, 2007 Item D.1: Ordinance No. 2007-22 Page 3 of 4 Robert W. de la Cruz,Discovery Bay resident; Dave Kroske,Discovery Bay resident; Todd Scruggs; Kent Shain,Middle River Ski Club; Sean O'Toole,Discovery Bay resident; Bill Honeycutt,Discovery Bay resident; Fred Taverner, Discovery Bay resident; Steve Margason, Discovery Bay resident; Wayne Smith, Discovery Bay resident; Nick Von Euw, Discovery Bay resident; Kay Stenn,Discovery Bay resident; Mark Varnes, Discovery Bay resident; Scott and Lynne Miley, Discovery Bay residents; Jimy Uranwala; Kathleen Brewington; Al Wolden, Antioch resident; James Daughters; Michelle Paxton; Cindy, Orwood Resort; Ray and Susan Qualls; Rick Palmer, Discovery Bay resident; Curtis Weller, Discovery Bay resident; Michelle Paxton; Blythe Bruntz•, Jenny Mitchell,Brentwood resident; Steve Marin,Discovery Bay resident; Matthew Stewart; Donald Davis,Discovery Bay resident; Paul Van Emmerik. Also submitted to the Clerk for the record was a petition opposing Ordinance 2007-22, originally submitted to the Town of Discovery Bay, and copies of e-mail correspondence opposing the ban submitted through www.deltawaterskiban.org. The Chair returned the discussion to the Board. Supervisor Glover said that growth in the area is also an important factor. He said that the Board will not cut off the ability of residents to enjoy the Delta as a whole, but said we need to consider the dangers of this particular area. He said he supports the proposed Memorial Day to Labor Day amendment, as well as the amendment to limit the ban to weekends only. He said that while he appreciates the Sheriff's recommendation to limit the ban to specific times of day, he said that he would be concerned that it could create a gap in the ability to enforce the ordinance effectively. He noted that the Board may want to revisit the issue in a year to see if the ordinance has worked or needs to be adjusted. Supervisor Bonilla said that this proposed ordinance has been an excellent example of community involvement but said that she would be uncomfortable defining specific ordinance wording today. She said she'd like time to consider the input of the Sheriff and the Discovery Bay CSD, as well as allowing more time for local input. May 22, 2007 Item D.1: Ordinance No. 2007-22 Page 4 of 4 Supervisor Piepho said that the Sheriff's Department was involved in drafting the ordinance, and noted that law enforcement has said a 24-hour ordinance is best as far as the ability to enforce it. She said we need to give law enforcement the tools they need to do their job. She said she supports amending the ordinance to limit the ban to the area proposed by Discovery Bay CSD in their June 4, 2007 letter to the Board, and limiting the ban to weekends and holidays from April to September. She also said it is important to explore options to improve the conditions on Werner Cut. She noted that the Marine Patrol makes monthly reports at the regular Discovery Bay CSD meetings, and said that is a good opportunity for discussions to continue. She also asked the Marine Patrol to return to the Board with updates. Supervisor Gioia commented that to say all we need is education misses the point of trying to ensure safety. He said he thinks the proposed amendments come very close to the compromises recommended by the community. Supervisor Bonilla said she remains concerned that more community involvement could provide a result with more support. She also suggested that a ban from Memorial Day to Labor Day would provide easier to remember start and end dates for the ban. Supervisor Uilkema suggested a referral to the Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee in one year's time for a review that would subsequently be brought before the Board, in order to determine if any modifications to the ordinance need to be made. By a unanimous vote with none absent, the Board of Supervisors took the following action: AMENDED Ordinance No. 2007-22, which would prohibit waterskiing on a portion of the Delta, to affect the area between the intersection of Kellogg Creek and Indian Slough north to the entrance of the Orwood Resort, and the entire section of Indian Slough waterway from the intersection of Kellogg Creek east to the Discovery Channel/Discovery Bay Marina Entrance Channel, and to make the prohibition effective on Memorial Day, July 4`h, Labor Day, and every Saturday and Sunday from April 1 through September 30 yearly; and FIXED June 12, 2007 for adoption. r vtsBiAiri�Y TOWN OF DISCOVERY BAY CSD 1800 Willow Lake Road,Discovery Bay,CA 94514 Telephone: (925) 634-1131 Fax: (925) 513-2705 Board Members President-David Piepho DApiepho@sbcglobal.net V.P.-Shannon Murphy-Teixeira s.murphy-teixeira@sbcglobal.net Treasurer-Patty Knight plhewitt@us.ibm.com Director-Bob Doran dbredbob@sbcglobal.net June 4, 2007 Director-Dave Dove ddove@sbcglobal.net Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors C/o Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 651 Pine Street, Room 106 Martinez, CA 94553 RE: Amendment of the Request for the"No Waterskiing Zones"Proposed Ordinance No. 2007-22 ffi —Discovery Bay Dear Honorable Board of Supervisors: The Town of Discovery Bay Community Services District (CSD) Board of Directors held a Special Meeting on Wednesday, May 30, 2007 and Sunday, June 3, 2007 in an effort to address the entire community of Discovery Bay regarding the proposed County Ordinance No. 2007-22, which would ban, 3 in a special-use area, all forms of water skiing, barefoot skiing, skiing on skim boards or knee boards, parasailing, ski kiting, and any other activity where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel. In our previous letter to you dated August 6, 2006, we asked that the ban be specifically at two (2) areas that are listed below: • Kellogg Creek-the stretch of waterway from the intersection of Kellogg Creek and Indian Slough north to the entrance of the Orwood Resort via what is known as Dredgers Cut. ;r • Indian Slough-the entire stretch of Indian Slough waterway from the intersection of Kellogg Creek east to Old River. After receiving several entails, letters, and comments from the community for and against this ban, we would like to recommend to the Board of Supervisor to amend the ban to be during Saturdays and Sundays year round and at the two (2)areas that are listed below: • Kellogg Creek-the stretch of waterway from the intersection of Kellogg Creek and Indian Slough north to the entrance of the Orwood Resort via what is known as Dredgers Cut. • Indian Slough-the entire stretch of Indian Slough waterway from the intersection of Kellogg Creek east to the Discovery Channel also known as the Discovery Bay Marina Entrance Channel. t x � s Opm Please find attached a map showing the waterways in question that are highlighted for your review. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at(925) 634-1131. Res ectfully, Vir it oehne, General Manager Town of Discovery Bay CSD //ca Cc: Raynor Tsuneyoshi,Director-California Dept. of Boating&Waterways Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department—Marine Patrol John Caprio,Owner—Orwood Resort Jeff Dawson,Harbor Master—Discovery Bay Yacht Harbor Attachment-Map r, a �r 4. 1,F. fir. 2 _ tea; •Y a£.y'i` hn pRa J .IeR n, 1 s, C outtty of Contra Cam Office of the :gpfjeriff Warren E.Rupf Sheriff March 21, 2007 Honorable Mary N. Piepho Supervisor, District III 309 Diablo Road Danville, CA. 94526 Dear Supervisor Piepho: Lieutenant Mark Williams who is assigned to the Marine Services Unit recently surveyed the area by way of water in which the Board would like to adopt an ordinance that establishes a "special use area" and excludes waterskiing on Indian Slough. Based on Lieutenant Williams' survey of the area, he saw that the waterways were narrow and consisted of blind intersections. After reviewing the draft ordinance authored by County Counsel and dated March 9, 2007, 1 anticipate that a "no ski zone" in the proposed area would enhance public safety by reducing the number of vessel related accidents. Accordingly, I strongly believe that education of the ordinance is equally important as the enforcement of the ordinance itself. The fiscal impact to the Marine Services Unit would be minimal in regard to enforcement because this newly proposed ordinance would be enforced like any other ordinance. This is an ordinance that would be enforced during the Marine Patrol staff's normal duty shift. Or, "specific"enforcement would occur for example in the event it was observed that there was an increase in violations or vessel related accidents. The signs cou d'be posted onle isting pilings. Lieutenant Williams estimated that 6 signs would be aduate with an esti ated total cost of$1200. 1 suggest that any Board Order assign funding for our Public Wo s Department. Sincerel , W Rupf, She WER:mw Cc: John Cullen, County Administrator Maurice Shui, Public Works Department Commander Kevin Ryan, Field Operations Bureau Post Office Box 391.Martinez California 94553-0039 (925)335-1500 Mary PiephoBOS/CCC To 05/30/2007 03:09 PM cc bcc Subject Fw:Proposed No Tow Zone in the Discovery Bay area "Lowell Richards" <ler@lerichards.com> To 'Mary Piepho'"<MPiep@bos.cccounty.us> 05/30/2007 03:07 PM cc Please respond to <ler lerichards.com> Subject RE: Proposed No Tow Zone in the Discovery Bay area I suggest the following: 1. Enforcement of a weekend & holiday ban would not be a problem, so long as the terms are defined so as not to be ambiguous. On the other hand, such a limitation to time may be missing the point of the legislation. If the problem is visibility of approaching boats, not merely high traffic, a time limitation makes no sense. If anything, persons involved may have a false sense of security when overall traffic is lighter. 2. Speed zones are very difficult to enforce for a number of factors. Boating speed zones worldwide are couched in terms of wake vs. no wake because the ways of measuring boat speed are inaccurate bat best. Enforcement officers are not trained in speed estimation, nor are they equipped with speed measuring equipment. Finally, speed measuring equipment in boats is highly inaccurate, especially at low speeds, making it difficult for boaters to tell if they are in compliance with the law. Also, a speed zone would still not address the real issue that is the target of the legislation, dangerous visual conditions in that particular stretch of waterway. I hope this helps. Lowell Richards From: Mary Piepho[mailto:MPlep@bos.cccounty.usl Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 2:50 PM To: ler@lerichards.com Subject: Proposed No Tow Zone in the Discovery Bay area %mportance: High Judge Richards,The County Board of Supervisors has introduced language to create a"No-Tow-Special Use Area" in Werner Dredger Cut and Indian Slough near Discovery Bay. Two questions that have arisen from the community that I wish to ask for your opinion: I i I DRAFT MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF THE DIRECTORS OF THE TOWN OF DISCOVERY BAY CSD Wednesday,May 30,2007 DISCOVERY BAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL—GYMNASIUM*(Please note location of Meeting)* 1700 WILLOW LAKE ROAD DISCOVERY BAY,CALIFORNIA SPECIAL MEETING 7:00p.m. A. ROLL CALL President Piepho reported that all directors were present. He then led in the Pledge of Allegiance B. PUBLIC COMMENTS Held during Item C. C. NEW BUSINESS FOR BOARD CONSIDERATION 1. Presentation on Proposed No-Ski Zone Ordinance (Various Agencies) President Piepho explained how this issue was initiated and the process it has taken to this time. Supervisor Piepho made a presentation regarding the initiation of this Ordinance. She stated that the vote by the Board of Supervisors on the Ordinance will be on Tuesday June 5, 2007 in Martinez. Sergeant Doug Powell of the Sheriff's Marine Patrol spoke next. He stated that he had patrolled the area personally for 5 years. He presented the issues based on conditions of the area. He presented the statistics from the Marine Patrol for the area. He stated that the Sheriff's Office supports the Ordinance as it is written and they believe that it would enhance the public safety for the people of Discovery Bay, for the people of the County and the citizens. He then opened to questions. Captain Ryan of the Sheriff's Office stated that they support anything that they believe enhances public safety. He further stated that whether or not the Ordinance passes is up to the legislators. An audience member asked the Sergeant how many of the accidents, that he was on the scene for were water skiing accidents. He responded that none of the accidents were caused by water skiing. The audience member asked what were the causes of the majority of the accidents. The Sergeant responded that the accidents were caused by different operators, in different watercraft. The four fatalities that were reported were a carbon monoxide poisoning, which they will not include,two were bass boats on the wrong side of the channel and one was a jet ski versus a vessel in the middle of the night. An audience member asked what the safe speed limit would be after dusk. The Sergeant responded that it would depend on lighting conditions, it depends on the current, it depends on the knowledge of the vessel operator, but the book says what ever is safe and prevalent at the time for the conditions, so they take it at that. The audience member commented that then there is no set speed limit. The Sergeant responded"No there is not." An audience member Jerry stated that he pulls water skiers every Saturday and Sunday approximately 200 miles a month. He stated that one thing he teaches everybody is that he never drops people on a blind corner. He stated that he feels the proposed Ordinance will cause more safety issues by dropping skiers at a place of three or four intersections together. He also stated that he would rather go down to north Victoria, the twin sloughs and the railroad bridge all those areas are great water skiing areas, he would not ski in the area where Old River and Indian Slough come together, the water is too rough there. Sergeant Powell commented that that area might be a problem and that he believes some people are proposing to move the east end of the No-Ski Zone back to the Discovery Bay Marina entrance. An audience member 1 I 10"RAFT asked why are they just targeting the Water Skiers when there are Jet Skiers out there who have contact with the water as well. The Sergeant responded that is why 80% of his stops are education stops. An audience member commented that this Ordinance applies to mostly the uneducated boaters. He further asked if the fact that there will be no skiers in the area, might those inexperienced boaters not take that as a license to go faster. He further asked if it was not true that speed was the cause of most of these accidents, not skiers in the water. The Sergeant responded that the accidents are mostly from Rules of the Road violations,not necessarily speed. An audience member commented that they had mentioned blind curves. He asked, according to the California Boating ABC's, "If you have a blind curve is it not a speed issue that you are going too fast for the conditions?" The Sergeant responded "It can be, yes". The audience member further stated that "Isn't the regulation that you have people stop in half your sight distance?" The Sergeant responded yes. The audience member stated "So if you can't see you are going too fast. Therefore a blind turn does not exist." The Sergeant responded "Or dark conditions, yes." The audience member stated "So when you are mentioning blind turn, you really mean a turn when somebody is going too fast." The Sergeant responded "That area that we are talking about has comers that you can't see around." There was further discussion as to the definition of a blind corner. An audience member stated "My question relates to the NO-Ski Zone period versus certain times, like weekends and busy holidays. You put in the handouts that it would be confusing for boaters who are not from here. Let me ask you a question, if you are driving down the road in a city you have never been in before and you come to a stop sign and it say "No Left Turn between 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m." and you are there at 8:00 a.m. and you make a left turn, do you get a ticket for that?" The Sergeant responded that you should. The audience member continued "So if you put up a sign saying"No-Ski on Weekends and Holidays between such-and-such a time" wouldn't they still be responsible for that? Because I ski out there during the week and I rarely ever see anybody out there." The Sergeant responded that if that were how the Ordinance was written then yes you would receive a ticket. He further responded that the problem with comparing the vehicle code to the harbors and navigation code is you are supposed to get a driver's license before you drive a car,to operate a boat no education is required, whatsoever. An audience member stated "You have spent the first ten minutes talking about excessive speed, drunk drivers and predominately weekend problems with safety, do you think it is fair to target the water skiers and not the drunk drivers and the excessive speeders?" The Sergeant responded "To answer the question: Are we punishing the Water Skiers in that area? I don't feel that we are. The weekends and the holidays are the most dangerous. Sure can you go out there during the middle of the week and not find a single boat around there You can, I believe that, I've seen it, I've been out there, I've been that one boat. However enforcing the law on weekends and holidays could create some confusion; I said that it could be treated like a HOV lane. The reason the Ordinance was written the way is was, was so it would be easy to follow." Supervisor Piepho stated that the Ordinance was written as a 24/7 No-Ski Zone because accidents happen 24/7, not just on holidays and weekends. She further stated that she had talked to two (2) Judges about the same issues and questions that the community had been asking her and they responded that "Such a limitation may be missing the point of the proposed legislation. If the problem is visibility of approaching boats, not merely high traffic, a time limitation makes no sense. If anything persons involved may have a false sense of security when overall traffic is lighter. The point being it takes two (2) boats to cause traffic, not twenty." The Supervisor sighted a comment from a skier at the meeting held in Martinez on Tuesday who stated that he had been out skiing that morning and a bass boat came around the corner on the wrong side of the channel, he was at risk and that is the point of the ordinance. Supervisor Piepho commented that speed zones are very difficult to enforce for a number of factors. Boating speed zones world wide are measured on weight versus no weight. Officers may not be trained in speed estimation nor are they equipped with speed measuring 2 I I I I DRAFT equipment. Also, speed measuring equipment for boats is highly inaccurate, especially at low speeds making it difficult for boaters to tell if they are in compliance or not. General Manager Koehne was asked to clarify what the board policies and jurisdiction are. General Manager Koehne explained that in the name Town of Discovery Bay CSD,the CSD stands for community services district. Their jurisdiction surrounds drinking water, wastewater, landscaping,parks and community center. He stated that by law they cannot take any money that they take for those areas and spend them for anything else. He stated that there had been a question about why the board could not notify the Town of an issue like this, but the board cannot spend Water and Wastewater money, Park money on notifying the public about something other than issues regarding those funds. 2. Discuss and Comment on Proposed No-Ski Zone Ordinance At this time President Piepho stated that they would go to Public Comment. He stated that petitions had been brought in with 1400 signatures, and there were another 150 signatures collected tonight. He stated the originals will be sent to the Board of Supervisors and a copy will be kept on file in the District Office. Audience member Tim Martin came to the podium. He stated that he wished to applaud the board for noticing the problem. He stated that the group was there to state that they do not feel this ordinance solves the problem and may in fact cause people to speed more in the area to get to places were they can ski. He stated that as a developer attending many meetings that this is the largest turn out he has seen and that whether for or against he thinks it is great to see the community turn out. He stated that they have spent the last couple of weeks researching the statistics. He explained that they see the issue as a problem with speeding and drunk drivers not the skiers in the water. He asked that the board listen to what they have to say tonight and that they really take it into consideration when they vote. Audience member Jeff Barber came to the podium and stated that he had the real statistics that have not been presented; he has more than three minutes worth. He stated that before the meeting he was told that he could present these. He commended the CSD for trying to make the waterways more safe, but they do not commend the way they got started. He reported the information from the May 17, 2006 minutes. He reported that according to the State of California Department of Boating and Waterways statistics for the last available year you are actually 8.5 times more likely to die in a boating accident related to fishing than skiing. He stated that in our local waters there has never been a skiing related fatality. He stated that in 1998 there was a fishing related fatality where speeding was listed as the cause. He reported that the same report listed a 23% decline year to year boating accidents, and a 27% decline in boating fatalities. He reported that in our local water there was a 25% decline in overall accidents in 2006 compared to 2005. He further reported that there were no local skiing accidents or injuries reported in 2005 or 2006. He stated that they looked back to 2000 and there was not a single accident causing a skier to be injured. He stated that in the same period the non skier accidents reported were for 9 cases of excessive speed, 9 cases of inexperienced operator and 6 cases of inattentive operator. He reported that according to the Department of Boating and Waterways that 16%of all boating accidents involve skiing, our local 12 year history is 14.1%. He stated that you are safer skiing than boating or fishing in the area. He reported that since the beginning of 2005 there has not been one water skiing accident or injury reported. He stated that the statistics reported at the Board of Supervisors meeting were inaccurate. He stated that the Supervisor reported that "There have been several major injury accidents involving water skiers and personal water craft along these waterways in recent years including four fatalities". He stated that that was not true. He stated that to date there have only been three deaths, not four and none of the fatalities have had anything to do with water skiing. He reported that 83%of water skiing accidents in the State of California are self induced and do not involve another boat and is not location dependent. In the statistics that are from the State, 100% of the water ski accidents within the range of Discovery Bay are self induced and do not involve another boat. He further stated that 95%of all water ski 3 CRAFT accidents in the State and 77% of all boating accidents occur between May and September, 56% of all boating accident occur on the weekends, not including holidays and 88% of all boating accidents occur in the afternoon. Audience member Frank Middleton stated that the previous speakers had already spoken on what he wanted to say. He is against the No-Ski Zone. Audience member Cindy McClellan of Orwood Resort came to the podium with her Lawyer, Richard H. to represent her family. He stated that he was here to notify the board of the defects in the notice procedure that was used. He reported that specifically the defect is that as referenced the notice given on May 17,2006 states as follows: Discuss and Direction on Request to Make a Portion of Indian Slough a No-Ski Zone. He stated that the notice is very important, the government code specifically requires in Section #54956, that when you give a notice you must indicate to the people hearing for that notice the specific topic for discussion. He further stated that that Section also limits the ability for discussion outside of those designated. The practical purpose or the problem created by the failure to give proper notice back on May 17, 2006 is the fact that Orwood was not able to fully participate in these matters. Specifically it did not have notice until two weeks ago of the full direction that this board is taking. I know that someone is going to indicate that that is not correct because on May 7, 2006 there was a letter that was sent out that Orwood received notice. He stated that they have no indication that there was ever a mailing or receipt at that facility. He further stated that Orwood Resort's address is Brentwood and they are in the Knightsen Sphere of Influence and that both Brentwood and Knightsen should have been notified and been able to participate in these discussions. He further stated that the second issue that they are concerned with is the jurisdictional issue of the scope of this action and these hearings here in Discovery Bay. He further stated that Orwood Resort supports all the boating community and public safety in the Delta. Supervisor Piepho stated that she appreciated that Orwood Resort was involved in the process, but that she wanted to identify the agency for notification. She stated that this is a County Ordinance and the County is the jurisdiction that does the notification with the introduction of the Ordinance. She stated that once the Ordinance is adopted it will go through the public hearing and public notification process. Audience member Rick Palmer came to the podium. He stated that he has been a resident on Discovery Point for the past 17 years. He stated that he is here tonight to oppose the Ordinance for a No-Ski Zone on Indian Slough. He stated that for the past 19 years he has been a fire fighter in San Jose and for the past 4 of those 19 years he has been a Fire Captain. He stated that his home faces directly toward Indian Slough and is raised four feet off the levee, it is located four blocks west of Lido Bay and this gives him an excellent advantage point to gage the various water sport activity and traffic on Indian Slough at any given time of the day. He stated that as a father, career fire fighter and concerned citizen he stated that this part of the delta is no more dangerous than any other part, it only takes two boats and there is over a thousand miles of navigatable water. He stated that last Friday of Memorial Day Weekend between 6 a.m. and 11 a.m. there were only 8 boats that passed on Indian Slough. He stated that it is his opinion that Indian Slough is free of congestion during the week. He stated that he observes off shore boats speeding and personal water craft doing donuts even in the evening. He stated that he feels that this ordinance is treating the symptom not the problem. He stated that to implement this Ordinacne would lower his property value because people buy their homes in Discovery Bay because of the ability to reach fast water quickly. He asked to stop the pending No-Ski Zone legislation. Audience member Rich Sellers came to the podium. He stated that he is a 13 year Discovery Bay homeowner, (his wife passed out a handout to the board), and his parents have lived in Discovery Bay for 18 years. He stated that he bought his home in Discovery Bay because he wanted to live where you play. He stated that he, the Board and the rest of the community all want a safe boating area. He stated that he felt that the board has gone about this the wrong way. He stated that in the ABC's of Boating that he received with his boat registration on page 18 (one of the handouts) it says that "local laws may also restrict skiing certain times 4 DORAFT during the day and in certain areas". He stated that he received another pamphlet from the DMV called Towing Sports and it says in the middle `Before beginning to ski local laws may also restrict towing sports at certain times during the day and in certain areas. There may also be local speed restrictions. Know the local rules where you go boating and find out in advance about the local hazards". He stated that he had taken a vacation at Lake Powell and was told that his children could not operate a wave runner without a license, but that was in Utah and when he crossed the Lake into Arizona they did not have to have a license to ride a wave runner and the Sheriffs enforced that ruling. He stated that he went on the Madera County website and looked into the current Madera County Ordinances that exist on Bass Lake;those ordinances come to 23 different ordinances. He stated that they propose a"Special Caution Safety Zone"with different times, it may be difficult to enforce,but it can be done. Audience member Scott Pellaton came to the podium. He stated that he had been around this Delta for 45 years. He stated that he has been a resident since 1984 and has logged more hours on the slough than probably many of the people in the room and he has never been in a boating accident nor has he had an injury while skiing or wakeboarding. He stated that even though there was a public notice he does not feel that the public was notified correctly, he does not remember a newspaper article until about a month ago. He stated that this issue started a year and one half ago and asked why the public was not notified about it at that time. He stated that he feels that the facts have not been made aware to the public and by relating the deaths on the water to a No-Ski Zone people associate the deaths with water-skiing. He stated that there is a lot of support against the No-Ski Zone. He asks that the board reconsider the Ordinance, skiers are not the problem, they have proven this with facts, the problem is speed and people not paying attention to the rules. Audience member Mike Temby came to the podium. He stated that that area is a dangerous area. He stated that he learned to water ski in the Orwood area and his parents taught him water safety. He asked that the Sheriff's Department become consultants and tells parents and boaters that aren't aware of the danger in the area on weekends and holidays to move to another area. He asked that the Sheriff's Department enforce the existing laws of boaters drinking and speeding in the area. President Piepho asked that since they have reached the halfway mark of the meeting they would start hearing from the people for the No-Ski Zone Ordinance. Audience member Ray Tetreault came to the podium. He stated that he was on the Board last year and that he was the one that started the request for an Ordinance. He stated that he started it because he was on his way home in his Houseboat on Indian Slough coming through the Blind curve and since there are no breaks on a boat and there have been so many times when a skier falls in front of a boat that he does not want to hurt somebody, nor does he want to be put in that position. He stated that people don't report these close calls and accidents when they try to avoid a skier. He stated that when he proposed the No-Ski Zone he proposed it to be on Indian Slough from the Discovery Bay Marina entrance to where Kellogg Creek comes into it on the back side of Discovery Bay. He stated that he feels that that part of Indian Slough is dangerous and he does not need to have people killed to act on something that he thinks is unsafe. Audience member Walter MacVittie came to the podium. He stated that this Ordinance is not against water skiers, this is about an area that is congested with boats and personal watercraft, large off-shores, etc. He stated that in the past ten years the traffic in this area has increased enormously, probably doubled or tripled. He stated that he has been in this area for 18 1/2 years and he comes out to the fast water on the western entrance from Discovery Bay on Kellogg Creek to Indian Slough. He and his wife both ski and they will not ski in that area because they feel it is not safe and that is the issue, safety. Audience member Jennifer Mixon came to the podium and stated that she is in agreement with the ordinance. She has been in the situation of almost hitting a skier, she was coming in from being out on the water and was following a skier, the boat towing the skier tried to turn around and in the process dropped the skier not far in front of her and she cut her speed completely and was just barely able to miss the man who reached out and grabbed her bow and apologized for the 5 RAFT maneuver they did in front of her, putting her in a bad position. She stated that she thought the area was too congested and dangerous for skiers, so she supports the Ordinance. An audience member came to the podium and stated that he had been a large cruise owner for 18 years. He stated that the congestion in Indian Slough has made it a dangerous area. When he brings his cruiser through that area to come home he has a hard time avoiding the skiers and personal watercraft owners that are cutting back and forth in the slough. He stated that his wake is large enough that the skiers and boarders and jet skiers cannot cross it without dumping and it puts them in danger of being hit. He would like to see the Ordinance put into force before people get hurt. Audience member John Fritz came to the podium and stated that he has been a property owner in Discovery Bay since 1979. He commented that the signs that have been put up have been defaced and torn down. He stated that the wakes from all the traffic in the area are causing the levees to break down. He also stated that he feels the U.S. Coast Guard should be included in this discussion. Audience member Steve Reid came to the Podium and stated that he is for and against the No-Ski Zone. He stated that he does not pull on Indian Slough; he feels that it is dangerous. He stated that he would like to see the No-Ski Zone have time limits and that the east end of the zone be pulled back to the Discovery Bay Marina entrance. Audience member Mike Dohren stated that he wanted to thank everyone involved and the opportunity for everyone to speak their minds. He stated that he had made notes before he came to the meeting and now he has to rewrite everything based on what he has heard at this meeting. He stated that he wanted to reiterate a few things that he had heard. He stated that he had heard a lot of people comment that the process has been flawed. He stated that he is not saying that it was intended to be perfect there are always imperfections but maybe they should have considered other alternatives that hadn't been considered, some of which have been presented tonight. He stated that maybe the board should step back and consider some of the other options that have been mentioned and do a little more research before they rush forward with this Ordinance. Audience member Bill Honeycutt came to the podium and stated that he has been a resident for about 17 years. He stated that he wanted to let the board know that water skiers are some of the safest people on the water, and that they work with the Sheriff and The U.S. Coast Guard putting on driver's clinics. He stated that he is heavily involved with all the local Water Ski clubs and they are very safety conscious, and that they have a lot of close calls due to idiots on the water. He stated that he would like to see the board reconsider. Audience member Lisa Black was called,but had already left, her card read that she was for the Ordinance. Audience member Steve Stanratt came to the podium and stated he has been boating and skiing on the Delta since 1963. He stated that he has lived in Discovery Bay since 1982 and he has been a member of the Berkeley Water Ski Club for over 20 years and has skied competitively for over 15 years. He stated that water skiers are some of the safest boaters out there, he stated that he has more issue with the fast boats,the off-shore boats, the Kawasaki's that advertise 250 hp for a jet ski. He asked"A jet skier is going to fall in the water, is the board going to include them?" He stated that this ordinance does not address the real issue. He stated that the problem is not water-skiers, it is speed, it is drunks, it is ignorance. Audience member Vince Vargas came to the podium and stated that his main concern is not only the traffic that is out there. He stated that it's not the water skiers that are from ski clubs and are aware of water safety. He stated that there are more boats coming all the time. He stated that he feels there needs to be something done to make Indian Slough safer than it is today. Audience member Jim Kellogg came to the podium and stated that he supports the Sheriff's Department; it is their job to enforce the laws. He stated that he has been skiing the Delta since 1960; he has lived in Discovery Bay for about 1 and lh years. He stated that he hopes once the decision is made that the community will put it behind them and not hold grudges. He stated that he hoped the board would look at the input from both sides and possibly make some amendment to satisfy everyone. He then asked Supervisor Piepho to put the item on the Supervisor's agenda in a place that everyone could come to after work. Audience member Vince V. came to the podium and 6 FT stated that from the second floor of his house he can see all the way to Orwood. He stated he can see all the area that is affected by this. He stated that he feels that the No-Ski Zone should be weekend enforcement. He stated that he does not feel that would be confusing and during the week there is not congestion. He stated that none of the accidents talked about today would have been eliminated by the No-Ski Zone. Audience member Alex Baca came to the podium and stated that she has been playing in Discovery Bay since she was about 2 years old. She stated that she was representing the young community of Discovery Bay and most of the speakers are not representing them. She stated that they are going to be the ones most affected by this Zone. She stated that they have years ahead of them to ski on Indian Slough. She stated that they don't ski on Indian Slough during the weekends; they ski during the week. Last Tuesday she wake boarded from Discovery Bay to Orwood and saw only one boat. She asks that the board not penalize the youth of Discovery Bay Audience member Rob de la Cruz came to the podium and stated that he lives in Discovery Bay and he also works on the water on a daily basis. He stated that he sees all kinds of crazy boaters out there. He stated that he would not ski on Indian Slough on weekends, but on the week days the water is beautiful and does not have traffic. He asked that the board reconsidered the 24/7 part of the No-Ski Zone. Audience member Todd Scruggs came to the podium and stated that removing the skiers would not remove the congestion in Indian Slough. He suggested that the Sheriff Offices would support a Zone from May 15th to September 15th on Weekends only. He stated that the board is charging the safest group of boaters. He asked that they crack down on boats going 100 mph. He stated that this has been a community of water skiers since he was little, if you take that away you might as well move to Philadelphia. An audience member came to the podium and stated that 50% of the accidents involve bass fisherman. He stated that after hearing the information presented he would like to oppose the No-Ski Zone on Indian Slough, because he feels that Indian Slough is no more dangerous than any other place on the Delta. Audience member John Liss, resident for 15 years, came to the podium and stated that he would like to reiterate the statistics and he feels that they need to look at this ordinance again and give it more time to make a correct decision. Audience member Jason Bordelon of Discovery Bay and stated that this is a matter of common sense. He stated that he would not put his kid in the water of Indian Slough on a weekend. He stated that people need to be educated, instead of taking things away from the people that live here. He commented on how when the people of Antioch came out against the trailer and RV ordinance it was revoked. He asked the board to PLEASE rethink this item. Audience member Rodrigo Donoso came to the podium and stated that he feels that the solution to this problem is education. He stated people on the water have to be educated. An audience member came to the podium and stated that she wanted to say on behalf of Orwood that people are launching from Orwood, but the drunks are coming from everywhere. She stated that we all have to take responsibility for ourselves. She stated that a lot of people don't have time to drive out to Victoria or twin sloughs. She stated that she and a lot of people had bought their homes so that they could take a quick ski before or after work so this ordinance is not fair to them. She stated that she agrees with the issue of education, and that there is a need for licensing which would be a source of income to get more Sheriffs out on the water. She also commented about the possibility of another marina being put in Discovery Bay and causing more traffic. Audience member Mark Varnes came to the podium and stated the he has lived in Discovery Bay for 8 years. He stated he has been driving ski boats and pulling skiers for over thirty years. The first fifteen years of driving boats and skiing he did in Wisconsin and due to their congestion they listened to all the constituents and decided to put into force restrictions for the weekends and holidays involving all watercraft on the lakes. He stated that this was more than twenty years ago and the sheriffs were able to enforce it at that time. He stated that he does not put his children in the water in that area on the weekends and holidays. He proposes that there should be an Ordinance for weekends and holidays and for all watercraft. Audience member Linda Taylor came to the podium and stated 7 DRAFT that she was there to talk about the democratic process. She stated that the Board of Directors and the Board of Supervisors have the opportunity to show that the democratic process is still working. She stated that the crowd is using the democratic process to have their voices heard and have come to you with a well thought out solution. She asked that the Board of Directors and the Board of Supervisors listen to the community and show them that democracy is not dead. President Piepho stated that he had received the same amount of e-mails for as against this ordinance. President Piepho asked for board comment. Director Dove stated that the issue of speed had been brought up and if they are not careful they may get a 5 mph zone. He stated that he agrees with the congestion on weekends and holidays. He stated that he would like to pull back the zone to the Discovery Bay Marina entrance and have time slots. Director Doran stated that he has always wanted to see this many people come out for a meeting. He stated that everyone had something good to say and they will take a look at the issues brought up. Vice- President Murphy-Teixeira stated that the issue of safety has come up all through the meeting. She stated that it is also said "but were good skiers and boaters and the trouble is mostly on the weekends." She stated that some of those uneducated people on the water are also on the water during the week. She stated that she would support the proposed change that Director Dove suggested as far as the reduction on the length of the zone but she does not know how they would be able to enforce the time slots. She stated that they are not targeting skiers; they are trying to protect skiers. She stated that now that this issue has been brought to the boards attention as a safety issue she supports it as a 24/7 zone. Treasurer Knight stated that the board is not targeting skiers. She further stated that she hoped that the Town would come out to support the Bill to have boaters licensed and that they would come out to support boater education as much as they have come out for this issue. She stated that she supports bringing the proposed zone back to the Discovery Bay Marina entrance, but as far as the 24/7 is concerned she feels she needs to go with the county and their information and their responsibility to enforce it. President Piepho stated that he realizes that this is a passionate issue and he is happy to see the people coming out for this. He stated that there are many things the board has to take into consideration and the safety for the community is a very large part of that. He stated that he chooses to follow the Boating and Waterways statistics and the Marine Sheriff Statistics because they are not as personally involved. He stated that Indian Slough has dangerous conditions despite the congestion, and that the Sheriff's have stated that this is the most dangerous area in the Delta. Director Doran made a motion to move the East Boundary of the No-Tow Zone to the Discovery Bay Marina Channel. Treasurer Knight 2°d the motion. No further discussion from the board. (4 ayes, 1 nos,0 abstain) D. ADJOURNMENT 1. Adjourned at 9:55p.m.to next Regular Meeting on June 6,2007 at 7:00p.m. LH 6/3/07 8 I DRAFT of (or(amr MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF THE DIRECTORS OF THE TOWN OF DISCOVERY BAY CSD SUNDAY,,LUNE 3,2007 DISTRICT OFFICE 1800 WILLOW LAKE ROAD DISCOVERY BAY,CALIFORNIA SPECIAL MEETING 10:00a.m. A. ROLL CALL President Piepho called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. He stated that all directors were present. B. BUSINESS FOR BOARD CONSIDERATION 1. Furrther Consideration and Comment to the Board of Supervisors on the Proposed No Ski Zone County Ordinance 2007-22 (Piepho) President Piepho stated lie had called the meeting to take another look at the Proposed No Ski Zone County Ordinance 2007-22. He also stated that the County Board of Supervisors are the ones making the final decision on this ordinance. He stated that at the meeting on May 30, 2007 the board had made the concession to shorten the length of the No Ski Zone on the east end from Old River to the Discovery Bay Marina entrance channel. He restated that the main issue is safety. He stated after the meeting on May 30°i he has thought about how the ordinance could keep the boaters safe and still be available to the skiers who feel that during the week the waters are less crowded and therefore safe for skiing. He stated that everyone at all the meetings and in the emails have said that the area is dangerous, but the skiers argue that they are not the cause of the accidents in the area. He stated that he came to the conclusion that if they could create an Ordinance or amend this Ordinance so that it would be a weekends only ban, but 24 hours a day and year around, it would be easy to understand and enforce. He stated that this would give the Board of Supervisors something to enforce this year. This ordinance will still take thirty days to implement, so it will not take effect until the middle of the summer. He then opened the issue up to the board. Director Dove stated that he had been thinking a lot about the issue and he stated that they are trying to acknowledge that they have a congested area. He stated that during his forty years out here there are no accidents that can be contributed to the skiing. He stated he would rather see it be from Mid-May to Mid-September when it is most congested. Director Doran stated that safety is the concern. He would be willing to go with the weekends only Ban, but he would prefer to have it a four day ban, Friday through Monday. Vice-President Murphy-Teixeira stated that she had been talking to and hearing from the community about this issue. She stated that she has been hearing the extremes, "If there is a speeding and congestion issue, then let's put in a 5 mph Zone and be done with it." And she has heard "I like to even ski in the middle of December when there is no one out there, why should the Ban be all year around?" But she said no one has said it is a safe area out there. She stated that she wanted to hear more from the community, but if someone gets hurt on a Tuesday they will need to come back and do more. She stated that she did not want to have to feel responsible for not doing enough to keep people safe in the area. She stated that she wanted to speak again after the public speaks. Treasurer Knight stated that she had heard that some people were not necessarily against the Ban but that they need to put in an ordinance that makes sense. She stated that she would like to find out from the board if they would delay this ordinance thirty days and put together a committee, both for and against, with the Marine Patrol, and get an agreement on all the facts and they would make a recommendation to the Board for the community. She stated that she believes it is dangerous out there, and is for the ordinance, but would be willing to see 1 ti 1 DRAFT what a committee would come up with. She stated that she does not want to target the skiers, but just getting people out of the water is important. President Piepho stated that he would not want to delay the vote; he stated that the Board of Supervisors are set to make a decision on Tuesday. He stated that they do have a year to come back and revisit the Ordinance and see if it needs to be changed then. Supervisor Piepho came to the podium and stated that there have been fifty nine accidents in the last ten years between Orwood and Discovery Bay Marina. She stated that forty had injuries and eleven were skiing accidents. Director Dove asked if those statistics could be plotted on a time and date basis. Supervisor Piepho stated that the fourth highest day of accidents is Wednesday. There was then discussion about how much to take into account the statistics since the Marine Patrol is not out there all the time. An audience member stated that the eleven skiing accidents did not involve other boats; they were skiers falling and hurting themselves, that type of accident. He commented also that boaters need to slow down and be more aware of what is a safe speed in their particular type of boat. There was then discussion about how and if awareness for safety by conditions can be enforced. Audience member Walter MacVittie commented on the growth in the community and the congestion that brings. He stated that he was not so much concerned about the skiers at the meeting, but more so about the children teaming to ski in the area, or the children being pulled on tubes in the area. He further stated that he felt that Friday night was also a busy night on the water, especially coming out of Orwood. He stated he was also concerned about the Holidays that fall on Mondays or other weekdays. He also stated that he would like to see an ad-hoe committee put into place after the Ordinance to watch the results of the ordinance and see if changes need to be made. Audience member Jeff Barber stated that four of the accidents in the statistics are involving Personal Water Crafts. He also stated that other areas such as Madera County use signs with very specific restrictions of times and days posted on signs. An audience member recommended that there be "Caution" signs put up at the Marina and in the middle of the slough and maybe a sign saying "Towing Is Not Recommended, High Traffic Area" and then have the Marine Patrol the area extensively and see how much that cuts the problem down without having to make an Ordinance. He stated that there needs to be more education and awareness. He asked that the board ask the Supervisors Board to stop and revisit the issue before making an Ordinance that does not address the real issue. President Piepho stated that he had received a-mails and talked to community members that feel the area is very dangerous and that it should be a No-Ski Zone. He has heard these people state that they would be willing to compromise and have the Ordinance be weekends and holidays, but no less. He stated that he needs to represent their wishes also. Audience member Tetreault stated that he would be willing to go with the Holidays and Weekends. He stated that he liked the idea of the "Caution" signs and awareness being brought to the boaters. An audience member stated that he feels that the awareness of safety needs to be addressed by the Marine Patrol, and that the Supervisor and the Board can advise them to educate people in this area and arrest the people drinking on the water. He also feels that we should be pro-active and tell boaters in the area that are skiing that this is a congested area and that they should ski elsewhere during the busy times. An audience member stated that Discovery Bay is known for its water skiing,there are tournaments and events about water skiing. He stated that statistically it is shown that you are in more danger swimming in the marina, fishing or crossing the street than by water skiing. He stated that the one thing that the majority of people come to Discovery Bay for is being taken away. There was continued discussion about the water skiers not being the cause of the accidents on the slough. There was discussion about the lack of awareness of this issue in the community in the past year. Supervisor Piepho came to the podium and read the list of notices and newspaper articles and correspondence listed on the agendas to and from the Supervisors office regarding the No-Ski Zone. An audience member made a suggestion of a Neighborhood Watch for boating on the slough. Audience member Jeff Dawson stated that he had been on the Marine Patrol and that the water in Discovery Bay is no more 2 I ZhelpRIFT dangerous than any other part of the delta. He stated that he and Orwood would be willing to with boater education. He stated that he does not feel that the Discovery Bay residents are the problem. Director Doran made a motion to amend the No-Ski Zone Ordinance to be during Saturdays and Sundays year round and the east end of the No-Ski Zone to be at the Discovery Bay Marina channel. President Piepho 2`d the motion, The motion passed, (3 ayes, 2 nos, 0 abstain) C. ADJOURNMENT 1. The Meeting was adjourned at 11:55 a.m. to the next Regular Meeting on June 6, 2007. LH 6/03/07 3 f o� Mary Piepho/BOS/CCC To 06/04/2007 08:05 PM cc bcc Subject Fw:Town meeting 5/20/07,no waterski zone "Roy Pearson" <ra ears comcast.net> p @ To <dist3@bos.cccounty.us> 05/30/2007 08:37 PM cc <r.doranl234@sbcglobal.net>,<d.piepho@sbcglobal.net>, Please respond to "Roy Pearson"<rapears@comcast.net> "Roy Pearson" Subject Town meeting 5/20/07,no waterski zone <rapears@comcast.net> Dear Mary, Roy and I attended the meeting tonight until 7:36 pm , when people started questioning the sheriff, and then started speaking out of turn and yelling things out. Please thank the two representatives from the sheriffs office for the information and personal experience. We were embarrassed at how rude people were to them, and how frankly stupid their question was, "are you supporting this ordinance."They already stated they did. Their question really was about changing it to exclude the area east of DB to old river. We commend David Piepho for reminding the crowd that if the meeting got out of hand the meeting would end. I do apologize for not staying to show our support of the ordinance. Both yourself, David and the sheriff department where very informative. The Sheriff stated that this is the most dangerous stretch of water in the county. We also thought it considerate of David to state that he would consider alternatives to this ordinance, opting out the area east of DB to old river. Obviously people were not listening. You also mentioned that it is fiction that a no ski zone would be a prelude to a 5 mile an hour zone. WE JUST WANT TO STATE FOR THE RECORD THAT WE DO NOT SUPPORT THIS BEING A 5 MILE AN HOUR ZONE. It would take entirely too long to get to skiing water, and the houses far back in DB forever to get to fast water, since they already have almost forever to get there. However, we support it being left in. WE support this ordinance just as written, it would be hard to enforce a sign posting no ski area only on weekends and holidays. WE have lived in DB for 29 years,we have had a ski boat or wakeboard boat during these years, and at one time a houseboat which was moored at Cruiser Haven(it's name back then). The area from Orwood Resort to DB, has changed and IS very dangerous and we never ever tow anyone there. The area from DB east to old river has become much more busy in the past few years, add to that wakeboard boats, (like snowboarders), and jet ski's, big, huge boats of all kinds, waves beyond big, and we very rarely tow there anymore. It only takes a few big, huge boats to throw up big waves. NOW add to that all the flips and tricks our sons, and other boarders like to try, that in itself can be a health hazard, and you have a recipe for disaster/death. Add to that extreme sports, some people just don't think about what could happen, they just go for it, but we have to watch. Roy and I both saw a man's dead body brought in to the DB marina and put out on the deck, the story was he was driving a ski boat and a bass boat came along fast, on the wrong side of the ROAD, hit the boat, went over, hit the top portion of his body and killed him. It was a sobering site. I Thank you for coming out tonight, and letting the people of DB have a voice. We hope the meeting didn't become any more rowdy. Sincerely, Roy and Karen Pearson email address: ragears(a)_comcast.net Home ph#925-634-1849 "Larry Lind" To <MPiep@bos.cccounty.us>, <LLind@deltabluegrass.com> <distl@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us>, <gayle@bos.cccounty.us>,<dist4@bos.cccounty.us>, 06/04/2007 06:23 PM cc bcc Subject Contra Costa County 6/5/07 Sup Meeting: Proposed Ban of Towables on Delta Waterways From Orwood Marina to End of Discovery Bay History: <p This message has been replied to. June 4, 2007 Board Members, I did not hear about the Special Sunday Meeting until today, but I'm thankful to the board for doing so. The news reported the board was offering to amend ban on all towables from all the time to weekends, and thank you for that. One of the prominent things I heard at last week's meeting was the blatantly obvious, those of us that live in the Discovery Bay community don't pull anyone in the proposed ban areas on summer/busy weekends. We're looking to be where it isn't crowded before letting someone slip into the water to be towed. That a gentleman spent an hour(11 pm-2pm)during the peak busy time on Memorial Weekend searching for and failing to find 1 single person being towed does not surprise me in the least, as most boaters do exhibit basic common sense. However, I'm concerned about the safety out there on summer weekends, and sometimes the few, lacking any semblance of common sense, show up and they don't see the danger of putting someone out into the crowded water to be towed, and thus I am open to hearing some reasonable actions being taken for the overall community safety. What really concerns me about the boards proposed ban (24 hours/365 days), is as strongly as I believe it'd reflect a complete lack of any common sense to drop someone into to the water in the proposed area to be towed in the middle of a busy weekend, I see the boards proposal as comparably showing lack of common sense. The busy times(high boat traffic) in the proposed ban area are the summer weekends, from Memorial Day through Labor Day. That's fourteen weekends or 28 days plus the 3 holidays(Memorial Day, 4th of July& Labor Day)=31 Days. That leaves 334 (365-31)or well over 90%of the days where high boat traffic doesn't exist. Why the proposal was for 365 days just leaves me shaking my head in pure disbelief at the boards proposal. Shifting to weekends only is an improvement, but April, October(all non summer months), what boat traffic are you imagining exists? If the board was proposing a ban on weekends&holidays from Memorial Day to Labor Day, or even pushing to extend it from mid May to mid September, or even possibly thinking long term future and proposing May-September,whether I agreed or not, I could at least see what appears to be a rational thought process by this board. But proposing a ban that includes January-April, October-December, that's so incredibly ;q unbelievable(without even a hint of a boat traffic issue existing), anyone voting yes for that losses all my trust, in all regards. It means either, that in spite of what ever education they may have, they don't have an ounce of common sense, or it means that at least someone on the board is reaping a personal gain with this action. Either way, as the proposal currently exists, a yes vote breaks all trust, to the extent those individuals will never receive another yes vote from me. Thank you for your time and attention, Lary Lind 1575 Willow Lake Road Discovery Bay, CA 94514 05/20/2007 10:51 AM cc <kshain@linkline.com>, <dist1@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us>, <gayle@bos.cccounty.us>, <dist4@bos.cccounty.us>, <dist5@bos.cccounty.us> Subject RE:2007-22 Discovery Bay 5MPH I I From: kent shain [mailto:kshain@garlic.com] Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 10:48 AM To: 'dist3@bos.cccounty.us' Cc: 'kshain@iinkline.com' Subject: 2007-22 Discovery Bay 5MPH Mary Piepho I have been using the Delta for skiing around Discovery Bay since 1969. I'm the President of Middle River Ski Club located near Bullfrog Marina on Middle River.As you could imagine the Delta has become over crowded with ski boats,jet skis, large house boats and cruisers. Since e 1969 1 have seen many accidents some related to speed others to drunks behind the wheel others related to inexperienced drivers and skiers.The canals are to narrow between Orwood, Discovery Bay and Old river to support skiing and other water sports withoutendangering'the lives of people and equipment. Discover Bay and Orwood have outgrown the size of the water way in that area. j It's a long 5mph cruise out to the main canal but with the volume of boat traffic in that area I believe for the safety of all concerned it should be turned into a slow zone. l Thank You Kent Shain I President Middle River Ski Club i I I "Mark Capalongan" To <dist3@bos.cccounty.us>,<MPiep@bos.cccounty.us> <markc@stratamet.com> cc 05/31/2007 03:01 PM bcc Subject the Water ski Ban on Indian Slough Dear Ms. Piepho, Although well intentioned, this ban will in all likelihood increase the accident rate near Discovery Bay instead of decrease it. I'm sure you have heard all the arguments and statistics relevant to this situation. Please be aware that the majority of your constituents are against this idea, myself included. There are many of us although not a permanent voting resident of Contra Costa County, can still vote with our wallet and I for one have the option of taking my three boats to another county that is more aligned with my needs. A vote for this ban can also motivate me to send quite a bit of money to whomever runs against you in the next election ! If you really want to enhance safety on the Delta then support a mandatory licensing of boat drivers on the delta. The Bay Area Waterski Club insists that all our drivers take and pass an 8 hour safety course that includes driving skills and classroom instruction. To date, we have certified over 300 ski boat drivers on the delta, making this place safer with every one. For the 12 years our club has been on the Delta, we have never had a single injury accident despite thousands of hours of ski time. We support safe skiing on the delta. We do not support unsubstantiated and unstudied knee-jerk reactions like closing certain sloughs on the delta to towed watersports while other activities remain unaffected. You are solving the wrong problem and worsening others at the same time. If you have any questions regarding my stance or the seriousness of this situation, I welcome your call. Thanks, -Mark Capalongan Post President Bay Area Waterski Club (510) 710-2005 Bethel Harbor Bethel Island, CA 94511 TIMES WATCHDOG Boating a perilous pastime By Thomas Peele CONTRA COSTA TIMES Contra Costa Times Article Launched:07/02/2006 01:06:01 Prl PDT Boaters who ignore or don't know basic safety rules cause 88 percent of reported recreational boating accidents in Northern California's waters,a Times analysis of U.S. Coast Guard data shows. The unforgiving nature of narrow,curving rivers and sloughs,faster and faster boats,reckless behavior and the lack of mandatory boater education in California combine to make the state's inland waterways more dangerous to people in small boats than even the vast Pacific Ocean. As tens of thousands of boaters flock this month to rivers,remote mountain lakes and reservoirs,and the notoriously dangerous San Joaquin Delta,the data shows that people are often injured or killed in boating accidents that could be prevented with common sense. "When you have horsepower, particularly on personal watercraft and ski boats,people smell those gas fumes and they lose about 100 IQ points,"said Cary Smith, president of the California Boating Safety Officers Association. Between 1995 and 2004 there were 4,754 reported recreational boating accidents in Northern California and the two Nevada counties on the eastern side of Lake Tahoe, according to data analyzed by the Times.Those accidents claimed 364 lives and injured 3,033 people. During a nine-year period that could be more deeply analyzed by accident location, more accidents were reported,for instance,on Lake Berryessa in Napa County,248, Lake Shasta in Shasta County,455, and the five-county Delta region, 1,061,than in the Pacific from Monterey County to Oregon, 191. Eighty-eight percent of accidents in inland waters can be blamed on the behavior of boat drivers and passengers,such as speeding,drinking, inattention,overcrowding crafts and letting people drive who lack the knowledge to do so safely, according to the data. In the Delta,that figure rose to 92 percent. In contrast,the Coast Guard and the National Boating Safety Council report,the nationwide average for accidents blamed on boaters'behavior is 70 percent. "We have so much power and strength in these boats now,"said Chris Lauritzen,owner of an Oakley marina and a vice president of the California Marina Recreation Association.'There are boats out here that can go 70 mph.There are no brakes on a boat." No training required State law requires boaters to follow basic rules of the road.They must sound a horn when passing a boat going in the same direction.They must not go too fast for the immediate conditions,which on California's lakes and rivers are often crowded.They must raise a flag when someone is in the water around their boat, such as a skier waiting to be pulled. But California is one of just 16 states that doesn't require boaters to take educational Gasses to learn those rules.There's no state boating license.There's no mandated training. The data shows the overwhelming need for the state to put in place mandatory training before allowing people to drive boats,Smith and other safety experts said. "Training means less chance to make preventable mistakes,"said Paul Newman,a Coast Guard recreational boating specialist. "The problem is all you need to buy a boat is a handful of money,"said Elroy Booker of a Antioch,a veteran boater who is a member of the Ebony Boat Club near isleton. Booker said a friend recently bought a boat to replace one he's fished with for a decade.When Booker saw the new boat http://www.contracostatimes.com/portlet/articleihtml/fragments/print_article.j sp?articleld=... 5/28/2007 he gave his friend a pop safety quiz. He pointed to a red light on the side of the craft and asked"What's that for?" The man replied"'I have no idea,"'Booker said. The light is supposed to be lit when a boater is returning to harbor. It's one of the most simple boating rules:R for both red and returning. It is a way of letting other people on the water know a boater's direction and intention. "He had no idea,"Booker said."None.And he's been boating out here 10 years." Chief David James,who commands the Coast Guard station at Rio Vista,has worked all over the country during his 20- year career.The waters of Northern California and the behavior of people who boat there make him,for the first time, "fear for my own guys out there,and they patrol it every day.This is the scariest place I've seen for operating a boat." James said he was perplexed when he was transferred to California and found that state doesn't mandate boater safety training. "It's an eye-opener when you come out here with as much water as California has and(boater education)is not a requirement,"he said. "People buy a boat and you see them putting it in the same day.Then they come around the bends doing 40(mph)and there's no way to avoid a head-on.What you have is inexperience and too much speed." "If there was a law" An accident blamed on speed and inexperience killed Michael P. Blondell on Italian Slough in southeastern Contra Costa on May 12,2002. Blondell,a former Navy Seal,and his wife and daughter were cruising around a bend in the slough when another boat came straight at them. 'There was very little time,"his widow,Susan E. Blondell said. The other driver"wasn't steering properly. He kept turning right into us." Susan Blondell later learned that the other driver had never piloted a boat before. His craft was crowed with people.A teenager on board was paralyzed in the accident. "It was his first time out on a boat,"she said of the other driver."If there was a law, if people had to have a license, I really think it wouldn't have happened." For more than 20 years the National Transportation Safety Board has urged states to pass laws to make boater education mandatory.The last effort in California was in 1999,when Gov. Gray Davis vetoed a bill that would have required boaters to pass a written test and obtain a certificate. Davis saw no need to make boaters"run the gauntlet of yet another government bureaucracy to obtain licenses to pilot their boats,"he wrote in a veto message. Mandatory education and testing,in other states have reduced accidents and fatalities, said Bill Gossard,the NTSB's recreational boating safety program coordinator. "You just can't have people out on the water driving around willy-nilly in a high-speed vessel,"he said. Most of the state's that have yet to adopt mandatory training are in the west where there is still a culture"where folks don't want anyone to tell them what to do,"Gossard said."It's one of the last bastions of freedom." Data from states that passed mandatory education show a reduction in accidents after the regulatory change. In Alabama, for example,annual boating deaths dropped 44 percent over five years, according to Coast Guard data. Some people involved in boating might agree to training if it was made clear to them how such a system would work,said Don Abbott,executive director of the California Yacht Brokers Association. "We really don't want licenses. Who's going to do it?What do you do about rental places?Right now there are too many .what-ifs,"'he said. "We need something,but how are we going to do it?" The California Department of Boating and Waterways will conduct two public hearings later this summer to gather input from boaters on mandatory education. The department has not taken a position, its spokeswoman,June Iljana said. http://www.contracostatimes.com/portlet/article/html/fragments/print_article.j sp?articleld=... 5/28/2007 Department Director Raynor Tsuneyoshi did not respond to several requests for interviews."I don't see a benefit to the boaters of California or the department in the director being interviewed." Iljana said. Someone will die North of Discover Bay, narrow Indian Slough bends into an S-curve. It links Discovery Bay and a popular nearby launching ramp on Werner Cut with Old River. It is one of the more dangerous water bodies in the Delta,the Times analysis shows. Thirty-six accidents—four of them fatal—were reported in Indian Slough and Werner Cut in the nine-year period from 1995-99 and 2001-04.Accident location data for 2000 was not available. Fifty-three more accidents occurred on Old River—eight of them fatal—during the same time. The number of reported accidents probably doesn't reflect all the mishaps that occur, said Cary Smith,the president of the state Boating Safety Officer's Association. State law requires that boaters report any accident that results in$500 or more damage to a boat or an injury that requires hospitalization. "There is more going on out there than we are seeing in the data,"Smith said. As boaters raced along Indian Slough on a recent Saturday afternoon,young men on personal watercraft,commonly referred to by the Kawasaki trademark name Jet Skis,steered toward the edge of a levee when the boats approached the way children playing ball in a street might run to the curb when a car approached. But just as the boats passed,the young men gunned their motors and raced into the cresting wake as close to the boats' sterns as they could get,launching into the air, landing hard on the riled water as more boats bore down on them,not slowing. Revelers crowded aboard the boats,their skin glistening with sun screen and tanning oils,waved beer cans and cocktail glasses to onlookers. Few,if any,were wearing a life jacket. "No one goes out for a day of boating and thinks someone is going to die,"said Paul Newman,the Coast Guard recreational boating specialist. But people do die while boating,often because simple safe-boating rules are ignored. Four deaths On the levee above Indian Slough,two wooden crosses stand faded and cracking as boaters speed past them. A deflated balloon is tied to one with a ribbon, a tiny pink plastic heart to the other. They stand near where Gail Vadala, Gene Potts and Dina Nuccio died in separate accidents that typify boating safety issues.A few hundred yards away on Werner Cut,a fourth person, Soft Hale,also died. Vadala,a 29-year-old medical technician,was riding a Yamaha Wave Ventura personal watercraft when she turned into the path of 20-foot boat that struck her broadside.A woman riding another personal watercraft next to her escaped without injury.The accident was blamed on Vadala's inexperience. , Potts, 53,suffered a massive head injury when the borrowed 19-foot ski boat he was driving collided with a 19-foot bass boat carrying three Oakland men,who survived. The accident was blamed on the drivers not knowing basic boating rules of how to avoid each other as they came around a bend. Both boats were going more than 20 miles per hour when they hit head-on, according to the database. Hale,41,died when the personal watercraft he was driving collided with a 28-foot motor boat at night.The accident was blamed on lack of proper lighting on the crafts that might have allowed the drivers to see each other. Nuccio was 6 and not wearing a life jacket as state law requires for children. Exhaust fumes overwhelmed her and she fell into the water and drowned. Nuccio's mother,Carla Nuccio, and her boyfriend, Roger Marks,were each sentenced to two years'probation after pleading no contest to misdemeanor child endangerment charges. http://www.contracostatimes.com/portlet/article/html/fragments/print article.j sp?articleld=... 5/28/2007 Carla Nuccio insisted that she did nothing wrong."If it was windy it never would have happened,"she said. Nuccio's father,John Nuccio,45,of Iola in Amador County said he supports mandatory boater education. "It's as important as hunter safety,"he said.The state requires anyone obtaining a hunting license for the first time to complete a safety class. Driving a boat"is like a car. I don't see the difference(between a car)and a boat." "I won't go out" The Times analysis shows that Vadala was one of 35 people killed in Northern California during a nine-year period while riding a personal wartercraft.All occurred on inland water bodies. "Jet Skis are a pain in the neck,"said Jim Corsaunt, owner of Marine Tech in Isleton. "They jump your wake.They buzz around your boat." "They just go too fast,"said James Mack of Dublin, a member of the Coast Guard Auxiliary."Discovery Bay is g trouble spot.You get water skiers and fishermen and Jet Skis and cruisers.When you get that mix in there, it gets dangerous." In all,there were 1,478 personal watercrafts involved in accidents during the nine years that could be analyzed. The medium age of the drivers was 24. More than 95 percent of the accidents occurred in inland waters,with the most, 136,on Lake Berryessa. Berryessa is a 23-mile-long man-made reservoir east of Napa Valley.From the deck of his home high on the lake's south end, Dr. Patrick J. Szucs, 54,an avid boater,can see miles of water and on weekends hundreds of boats and personal watercrafts. "I look out there and I can count 200 boats,and that might be light,and I won't go out,"Szucs said. 'They intentionally take risks. Four boats will be coming at you and instead of moving to the side,they try to squeeze through" A boat unlike a car can't be slowed by stomping on a brake and even at slower speeds people can be ejected from a boat into the water, he said,"An inexperienced driver in a boat is more dangerous than an inexperienced driver in a car." Szucs also keeps boats in the Delta and Richmond. "People party too much and use bad judgment.You get six or seven people running around on the boat without lifejackets;'he said. The single biggest thing that can immediately make boater's safer is to wear lifejackets at all times when on the water, safety officers said. "We wear them every time we go out,"said James,the Coast Guard chief in Rio Vista. "It isn't for show.They save your life. Life jackets are something that should key into mariners' heads when they see the Coast Guard personnel with them on 24-7." The Coast Guard data base shows the stark reality of not wearing a life jacket. In the nine-year period that could be analyzed, the data shows that 230 of the accident victims drowned. Of the 230 drowning victims, 157 could not swim. Of the 157 non-swimmers who drowned, 138 of them weren't wearing life jackets. Thomas Peele is a Times investigative reporter. Reach him at 925-977-8463 or tpeele@cctimes.com. Close Window Send To Printer http://www.contracostatimes.com/portict/article/html/fragments/print article.jsp?articleld=... 5/28/2007 I J Accident dates, locations not made public record By Thomas Peele CONTRA COSTA TIMES Contra Costa Times Article Launched:07/02/2006 01:12:08 PM PDT The California Department of Boating and Waterways does not consider the location and date of boating accidents to be public records, a position that government access advocates say weakens public safety. "It's confidential,"said department spokeswoman,June Iljana. Boating accident data that the Times analyzed were obtained from the U.S.Coast Guard,which obtained them from the department.The data included the date and specific locations of boating accidents. But for the year 2000,the locations were missing in the Coast Guard data. When the Times asked the Boating and Waterways Department for the information under the California Public Records Act,the department's top lawyer,Joy Fisher, refused the request,claiming that the state harbor and navigation laws exempt the information from disclosure. Fisher also asked the Coast Guard to stop making the information public. That the department refuses to make accident location available to the public"is absolutely asinine,"said Tom Newton, general counsel to the California Newspaper Publisher's Association. "A boating accident is a public event.Taxpayer funds go to investigate it.There is noting private,about it,"Newton said."A government entity that is supposed to protect the public is harming the public and using a questionable interpretation of the law to do so." There is clearly a public need for the information, said Peter Scheer of the California First Amendment Coalition,an open government group. "The public has a significant interest in knowing about boating accidents and the location of boating accidents just as it does about information concerning car accidents,"Scheer said."It's the kind of data that a government agency would want to disseminate as far as possible but they are trying to suppress the data." Fisher did not respond to requests for comment for this story. In a June 5 letter to Times attorney Karl Olson, Fisher wrote that information in boating accident reports such as locations can be released only to"persons who have been affected by the accident or who represent people who have been affected by the accident." The information is collected from affidavits that boaters involved in accidents fill out and from law enforcement reports. In contrast,the Highway Patrol and other law enforcement agencies disclose the location of automobile accidents daily. The CHP reports the locations within minutes on its Web site. Telling the public where boating accidents occur might lead boaters to slow down and drive more responsibly,said Sgt. Will Duke of the Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office Marine Unit. "It would make it safer if you and I know the same stuff," Duke said. The boating department is funded through boating registrations,fuel taxes and other fees tapped from the state's$13 billion recreational boating industry. "One way to look at it is that(disclosing accident locations)is bad for(the boating)business,"said Cary Smith, president of the California Boating Safety Officers Association. The release of accident locations on specific bodies of water,especially lakes, might cause people not to boat there,Smith said, adding that he agreed information should be publicly available. http://www.contracostatimes.com/portlet/article/html/fragments/print article.j sp?articleld=... 5/28/2007 Close Window Send To Printer http://www.contracostatimes.com/portlet/article/html/fragments/print article.j sp?articleld=... 5/28/2007 I 1 Public Comment: Ordinance 2007-22 (Received after Friday, June 1, 2007) Board of Supervisors Meeting: June 5, 2007 "Larry Ligon" To: comments@ cob.cccounty.us <Iarry_ligon@sbcgloba cc: Lnet> Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website 06/04/2007 07:55 PM Please respond to"Larry Ligon" This message was sent from: http: //www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm ------------------------------------------------------------ Name of sender: Larry Ligon Address of sender: 5597 Marlin Dr. , Discovery Bay Phone of sender: 707-322-1157 Email of sender: larry_ligon@sbcglobal.net Agenda Date: 06/05/07 Agenda Iteml: Dl Agenda Item2: ------------------------- COMMENTS ----------- -------------- Hello Supervisors, June 4, 2007 The Bay Area Water Ski Club and I are opposed to the proposed ordinance 2007-22 prohibiting waterskiing sports in Indian Slew & Warner Cut near Discovery Bay as explained below. I have been skiing on the Delta for over 50 years, a resident of Discovery Bay for 24 years, Vice-president of the Bay Area Water Ski Club and have been teaching a comprehensive 8 hour ski boat safety course for the last 10 years. Through this experience I have developed significant expertise on boating safety on the Delta. 1) The overwhelming number of accidents on the Delta have NOT been caused by the towing of skiers, wake boarders etc. , but almost exclusively caused by alcohol and lack of driver education. State boating statistics back this up. Therefore, banning skiing near Discovery will not improve the potential accident rate even in crowded conditions. 2) As a member of the CCC Sheriff's Marine Patrol has pointed out, the ordinance may raise the risk of accidents near the entrance to Indian Slew off Old River. This is a very high traffic area since Old River is the main North/.South thoroughfare in this portion of the Delta and this also has four blind corners formed by the intersection of Old River, Indian Slew and Woodard/N. Victoria Canals. If skiing is prohibited in Indian Slew, skiers may be temped to drop into the water at the entrance to Indian Slew putting them at risk with the combination of four way traffic and blind corners. 3) In addition, this ordinance will likely divert the very limited and precious resources of the CCC Sheriff's Marine Patrol from higher priorities to enforce an ordinance with little benefit. 4) The crowded conditions in Indian Slew occur only during the mid portions of the day on Saturday, Sunday and some holidays. Weekend mornings and weekdays are rarely crowded and provide some of the best skiing conditions close to Discovery Bay. 5) It would be unfortunate to eliminate one of the key Discovery Bay attributes and the enjoyment of prime public resources for no obvious benefit. We believe there are higher priorities for the Supervisors to consider if they wish to improve boating safety on the Delta. 1) Increase the funding for the Sheriff's Marine Patrol. This is our first line of defense to educate and enforce the current boating safety regulations. 2) Support mandatory education and licensing of boat drivers. Currently, unqualified individuals can easily purchase a boat or personal watercraft capable of speeds of 60 to over 100 MPH and have no clue on how to safely use them. 3) Support more restrictive alcohol regulations. For example, alcoholic drinking and open containers of alcohol are allowed even on small boats, but not autos. Please vote NO on this ordinance that restricts one of the most enjoyable and safe activities on the Delta with no obvious benefit to boating safety. Thank you, Larry Ligon 5597 Marlin Drive Discovery Bay, Ca. 94514 707-322-1157 Larry_ligon@sbcglobal.net ------------------------------------------------------------ } z (I � I a "jeff barber" To: comments(�cob.cccounty.us <jeffbarber@earthlink. cc: net> Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website 06/04/2007 08:25 PM Please respond to"jeff barber" This message was sent from: http: //www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm ------------------------------------------------------------ Name of sender: jeff barber Address of sender: 5736 Starfish Ct. DB, CA 94514 Phone of sender: 925 337-1872 Email of sender: jeffbarber@earthlink.net Agenda Date: 06/05/07 Agenda Iteml: Agenda Item2: D.1 ------------------------- COMMENTS ------------------------- Dear BoS, As part of the DB watersports community I am writing to tell you that we are not satisfied with the CSD's modified tow-behind watersports ban recommendation. However, we commend the BoS for sending the issue back to the Town of DB for public comment and reconsideration. At this point we still firmly belive the proposed ordinace, even with the consesions that have been made, is fundementialy flawed. First the proposed ordiance containd an outrageous error totally overlooked by all but the DB watersports community. Second and most importantly the proposal totally misses the primary opportunity to increase boating safety. Last but not least it unfairly targets the ONLY Delta user group with absolutely no record of being involved in or causing boating accidents. How did we get to this point? It happed as you recognized by not including the community and local experts in crafting the original CSD recommendation. There was no study of the facts, no attempt to seek outside opinions and absolutely no attempt to look at real safety/accident information. The CSD went forward only based on the desires of three individuals. The BoS took that recommendation and ran it up the flag pole but did not perform any true due diligence. The absolute evidence is that the CSD/BoS proposed ordinace created a treacherous "drop zone" in the middle of a 5 way intersection. No individual, agency or group identified this grievous error. Immediately upon seeing the proposed ordinance the DB watersports community brought the issue to the surface and CSD acknowledged the error. Even prior to the 5/30/07 public forum the CSD intended to fix the error by moving the beginning of the ban back to a "safer" location. This is non-refutable evidence that involving the ! community from the beginning would have resulted in a better proposal. We sincerely hope that for the sake of minimizing harm done and improved safety, it is not too late to do just that. The other fundamental flaw pertains to this proposal in no way addressing what has been shown to be the cause of multiple accidents and deaths in the identified waters. The following quote is word for word from the 5/15/07 supervisors meeting. "There have been several major injury accidents involving waterskiers and PWC along these waterways in recent years including 4 fatalities" . At the 5/30/07 form all persons fond of using the above quote were put on notice that without question that comment regarding the deaths is false and misleading as there have only been three deaths not 4 (the fourth was inside DB and carbon monoxide related) . NONE of the 3 deaths had anything to do with watersports. Further, as far back and anyone has looked (we have the data back to 2000 and others have it back to 1995) there has NEVER been a tow-behind watersports injury that was not self-induced. To be clear...there has NEVER been a watersports injury that was location related or involved a second boat (per the CA Department of Boating Waterways) . We belive given what you have been lead to belive, that you the BoS honestly have to be surprised at being told this given all the watersports accident and lack of safety rhetoric that has been freely bantered from the bully pulpit. We can however factually tell you that two of the three deaths quoted involved PWC and four of the ! eight fast-water collisions reported since 2000 involved PWC. Based on these real and verifiable facts we belive the ban as proposed is not in the public interest as it misses the logical solution and does not materially address the issue of improving safety. We implore the BoS to stay the process and ask the BoS to cause the DB CSD to appoint an adhoc committee to within 30 days develop a comprehensive proposal to the BoS (as an example, along the lines of what the Madera County BoS has done to deal with boating safety in their county) . If the BoS chooses to disregard the real safety issue and the lack of previous, study we ask that the CSD's current revised recommendation be modified from a " 52 weekend prohibition to one that prohibits tow behind sports after 11am on weekends and national holidays between May 15 and September 15 (note, the CSD's modified proposal to the BoS does not include three of the busiest boating days of the year, we find this quite perplexing...our proposal would include Memorial Day, The 4th, and Labor Day) . Following is a summary and cursory analysis of the real CA State and DB local accident information as provide by DBW though a FOI request (this information was obtained on 5/30/07) . Per DBW's recommendation the years reviewed in detail were 2000 through present. Comparisons made to CA averages are based on the last available Annual Boating Safety Summary from the DBW website. In CA a person was 8.5 times more likely to die in a boating accident related to fishing than skiing (17 vs. 2) . In our local waters there has never been a skiing related fatality but in 1998 there was a fishing related death where excessive speed was listed as the primary cause. The same DBW report shows an overall 23% decline in year to year boating accidents and 27% decline in fatalities. In our local waters there was a 25% decline in overall accidents in 2006 compared to 2005. So far during 107 there has been only one accident (excessive speed related) . There has not been a fatality near DB related to a boating accident for seven and a half years. 4 In fact there were NO reported local skiing accidents or injuries in either 105 or `06. But more importantly we looked as far back as 2000 at the specific underlying causes of every skiing accident reported near Discovery Bay and their was not a single incident of another boat causing a skier accident or injury. State wide 83% of WS accidents are self induced. DB's rate is an amazing 100% In every respect compared to the rest of the state you are safer if you ski in the waters proximate to DB. We should be proud of this fact. We should be even more proud that since the beginning of 2005 there has not been one single WS related accident or injury even of the self-induced variety. In the state 95% of all watersports accidents and 77% of all boating accidents occur between May and September. In the state 56% of all boating accidents occur on weekends NOT including holidays. And 88% of all boating accidents occur in the afternoon. In the DB waters there can be no comparison to the state watersports accident distribution by month or time of day because there have been no actual accidents to compare. At the expense of being repetitive we would like to conclude by reinforcing the key points. 1) The accident, injury and fatality stats pertaining to the DB waters in question have been unfairly miss-stated, misconstrued and used inappropriately. Our recent research which comes directly from the DBW paints a far different picture than we were all lead (or mislead) to belive. The last boating death proximate to DB was in November of 1999. Two of the three death related boating accidents involved a PWC; the other involved fishing boats.... .NO WATERSKIERS! One accident occurred at night, one mid-morning and one in the late afternoon. Both daytime fatalities occurred on weekends. During the last 6.5 years there have only been 3 watersking related incidents reported on the subject waters and NONE since 2004. None of the watersking incidents were serious and all were self induced and did not involve a boat collision. 2) The BoS proposed ordinace was not based on ANY due diligence and was fatally flawed (by CSD's own admission) from the beginning. Even the revised version amazingly ignores summer holidays. 3) In the subject waters PWC's have been involved in 66% of the deaths and 50% of the fast-water collisions, while watersports have been involved in NO deaths and NO collisions. This proposed ordinance completely ignores a safety reality and unfairly focuses on a false perception brought forward by three individuals, fostered by false innuendo and substantiated to not have been studied. Madera County already has a program in place to comprehensively address improved boating safety that in no way takes away any users ability to use and enjoy the waterways. In closing we must also mention that two local businesses were not properly notified of this process. We also must say that although your intentions were proper and appreciated in causing the DB public forum, we knew before both votes were taken (on 5-30-07 and on 5-3-07) exactly what the outcome would be. There seemed to be a lot of talking but not much listening. The 1500 who signed the petition to oppose and hundreds who turned out to oppose at the 5/30/07 public forum largely feel ignored. For all of the above reasons we beg of the BoS to stay the process while the entire matter of boating safety proximate to DB is properly evaluated. Although we disagree with any ban being enacted prior to a proper evaluation, the twice modified ban proposed by the DB CSD is completely unrealistic unless it is further modified to include holidays and to only be in-force after Ilam on weekends between May 15 and Sept 15. We sincerely ask that each Supervisor to individually address these issues and make their own decision, not simply defer to the wishes of another Supervisor. We make this appeal in large part due to the dissemination of misleading information intended to unfairly enlist support for the proposed ordinance. Yours truly, Jeff Barber 5736 Starfish Ct Discovery Bay, CA 925 337-1872 ------------------------------------------------------------ "Roxy Rhodes" To: comments@ cob:cccounty.us <rrrroxxy@yahoo.com cc: > Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website 06/05/2007 03:58 AM Please respond to"Roxy Rhodes" This message was sent from: http: //www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm ------------------------------------------------------------ Name of sender: Roxy Rhodes Address of sender: 3460 Zion Canyon Court 94588 Phone of sender: 925-918-3665 Email of sender: rrrroxxy@yahoo.com Agenda Date: 06/05/07 Agenda Iteml: D.1 Agenda Item2: ------------------------- COMMENTS ------------------------- Dear Supervisors, I have to be at school so I can't go to your meeting and tell you in person. But please vote no. Please don't ban wakeboarding on Discovery Bay or anywhere else on the Delta. I also love to ride the tube and I don't want you to ban that either. It would be better to just give tickets to people who get drunk they shouldn't be on the water in the first place. Thank you thank thank you! Roxy Rhodes ------------------------------------------------------------ "Linda Rhodes" To: comments @cob.cccounty.us <waterskiingirl@yahoo cc: .com> Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website 06/05/2007 04:23 AM Please respond to "Linda Rhodes" This message was sent from: http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm ------------------------------------------------------------ Name of sender: Linda Rhodes Address of sender: P.O. Box 685, Pleasanton, CA Phone of sender: Email of sender: waterskiingirl@yahoo.com Agenda Date: 06/05/07 Agenda Iteml: D.1 Agenda Item2: ------------------------- COMMENTS ----------------------- Regarding the proposed ordinance 2007-22: PLEASE VOTE NO. I am not a resident of your county; however, my family and I are usually go water skiing on the Delta almost every weekend during the summer. We frequently use the launch facilities at Orwood Resort, as it is one of the most convenient locations for us to access the Delta. We never put someone in the water if the conditions are unsafe, whether it's on Indian Slough or anywhere else. We have gone water skiing on Indian Slough on summer weekends when it's empty, and we go further out into the Delta when Indian Slough is sometimes busy. This ordinance is ill-conceived, although perhaps well-intentioned. If you are serious about safety, however, you should target those who .practice unsafe boat and personal watercraft driving, not those who are innocently enjoying this great natural resource. Thank you for your serious consideration of this matter. Linda Rhodes Pleasanton, CA ------------------------------------------------------------ "Michael Jolley" To: comments@ cob.cccounty.us <mikeskiw@gmail.com cc: > Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website 06/04/2007 07:01 AM Please respond to "Michael Jolley" This message was sent from: http: //www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm ------------------------------------------------------------ Name of sender: Michael Jolley Address of sender: 14 Ute Ct. , San Ramon, CA Phone of sender: 925-866-1010 Email of sender: mikeskiw@gmail.com Agenda Date: 06/05/07 Agenda Iteml: Agenda Item2: D.1 ------------------------- COMMENTS --------- ---------------- I recommend the Board of Supervisors remove or re-draft Ordinance No. 2007-22, which would prohibit waterskiing near Discovery Bay, as recommended by Supervisor Piepho. This ordinance will not make our waterways safer. Well documented statistics indicate alcohol and speed are the number 1 and 2 causes of injuries and deaths on this waterway. The current ordinance is misdirected and does not address the true hazards on these waterways. I have been frequenting this particular waterway since 1967 . The biggest hazard I see on these waterways are the large offshore style speedboats operating at speeds too high for reasonable control on these narrow waterways. Please consider our highways as the model to follow. Reasonable speed limits on these waterways will save lives. I question the motivation for any proposed ordinance that does not include mention of speed or alcohol restrictions, two biggest injury causes. Thank you, Michael Jolley ------------------------------------------------------------ BOS District1 To: <Scott.Rister@novate.com> 05/31/2007 09:35 AM cc: Jane Pennington/COB/CCC Subject: Re: No Ski Zone proposaID Mr. Rister, Thank you for taking the time to write to me regarding the water ski issue in Discovery Bay. While I am revieiwing your comments, I've also forwarded your e-mail to the Clerk of the Board for official recording. Thank you. Supervisor John Gioia 11780 San Pablo Ave. Ste D EI Cerrito, CA 94530 510-374-3231 Phone 510-374-3429 Fax "Scott Rister" <Scott.Rister@novate.com> "Scott Rister" *' <Scott.Rister@novate.com> To <dist1@bos.co.contra=costa.ca.us> 05/31/2007 09:32 AM cc Please respond to Subject No Ski Zone proposal <Scott.R ister@ novate.com> Hi, My name is Scott Rister, I am a 20+yr. resident of Discovery Bay. I live and have lived on Indian Slough for over 10 of those 20 yrs. I am submitting this letter to you to express my concerns over the recent ordinance passed by the County Board of Supervisors to prohibit water skiing on Indian Slough and Werner Cut(2007-22). 1 am adamantly opposed to such a ban for the simple reason that it will not solve or even reduce any of the existing safety issues. I was at the town meeting last night(5-30) and am writing you because I don't think that you were there and believe you should be aware of how it went. The meeting started with the Marine patrol stating the statistics of the accidents and deaths in this area over that past decade or so. At first these statistics seemed to imply that such a ban would help prevent these accidents, that's how they were presented. However, when asked specifically about each accident it was made clear that the proposed ban would not have prevented a single incident! Not one. Nor were any of these accidents even remotely related to water skiing. This was made clear by the very marine patrol that was brought in to speak on the benefits of the proposed ban. Following this, statements were made by both Mary and David Piepho. Both of them made the statement that this stretch of water is not only dangerous but is dangerous 365 days a year, 24 hrs. a day. This statement being made, to quite the requests that the ban be modified to include weekends and holidays ONLY and during the"peak" (summer) season. This statement is not only completely false but is absolutely ludicrous. If it were not so serious it would be laughable. These statements are either made out of complete ignorance of the facts or just plain and simple lies. I ski these waters year around, and believe me when I say, their is not a lot of water activity in the winter months. The occasional fisherman. I'll try and wrap this up quickly, bottom line, many very well prepared speakers spoke in opposition to the ban (yes their were a few in favor). Those opposed brought with them the true facts and statistics in the area. These facts made it quite clear that this ban will not do anything to increase water safety in the area. Facts that would be very hard to dismiss, yet that is exactly what happened. I found it absolutely appalling that the CSD and County representatives could simply turn the deaf ear. The facts simply do not support this ban so it raises the question of what is the true driving force behind this. I can only guess for now, but it is so clear it is not about safety. Finally a proposal was made to shorten the length of the no ski zone to the Discovery Bay Marina slough. I believe this is a great first step. It removes the safety factor of placing bodies in the water at Old River. However, this is not enough. We are not far from a reasonable compromise. Include the weekend only/summer season aspect into the ban, and I believe you will meet very little opposition if any. This will provide the desired effect without negatively impacting thousands. Finally, finally (sorry, I'm trying to wrap up). The people who spoke in favor of the ban ALL pointed out their concern was a FEAR of not being able to stop their boats in time if a skier were to fall in front of them. Again this is ONLY an issue during the highly congested times and trust me again, most people do not tow skiers in the area during this time. But I want to point out, these people do have another option if they are not comfortable in these sloughs during these times. They can still get out to"fast"water and wider area's by taking the slow(5mph)side of Indian slough. This will take them slightly longer but will only effect them, not 1000's of others and will address their concerns. The people who would like to ski these waters during the"off' hours do not have that option. Thank you for your time. Scott Rister 925-516-1305 1 BOS Districtl To: "m-astewart@juno.com" <m-astewart@juno.com> 05/31/2007 09:39 AM cc: BOS District3/BOS/CCC@CCC,Jane Pennington/COB/CCC Subject: Re: No on Ordinance 2007-22[ Mr. Stewart, Thank you for taking the time to write to me regarding the water ski issue in Discovery Bay. While I am reviewing your comments, I've also forwarded your e-mail to Supervisor Mary Piepho's office and to the Clerk of the Board for official recording. Thank you. Supervisor John Gioia 11780 San Pablo Ave. Ste D EI Cerrito, CA 94530 510-374-3231 Phone 510-374-3429 Fax "m-astewart@juno.com" <m-astewart@juno.com> "m-astewart@juno.com" ' <m-astewart@juno.com> To distl@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us 05/30/2007 09:49 PM cc Subject No on Ordinance 2007-22 Dear Mr. Gioia: This proposed Ordinance is Really Stupid! Citing the statistics about accidents being higher on Holidays doesn't support the Watersports Ban in the proposed areas. I believe that those statistics can be used for the Highways during the Holidays also. Do the "brainy" Stupervisors, I mean Supervisors want to close down the freeways or change the speed limit from 65 mph to 5 mph. That would be dangerous, and that is what they are proposing for this area of the Delta. It is Stupid!!. Also, aren't U.S. citizens given the right to the "...pursuit of happiness.." This is clearly against that. Thanks, Matt Stewart Public Comment: Ordinance 2007-22 (As of Friday,June 1,2007, as distributed to agenda full packet recipients) Board of Supervisors Meeting: June 5, 2007 _ 05/18/2007 09:25 AM cc Subject Indian Slough It is my opinion and the opinion of every single individual I have talked with, without exception, that the proposed ordinance for Werner Cut and Indian slough is a mistake. You are being extremely shortsighted slamming this thing through without taking a single solitary look at the will of the people. Please abandon the feeble excuse that this has been on the agenda for a year. Once again, every single person I talked with was blindsided by this proposed ordinance. The weekdays are the days we enjoy. Calm, serene, peaceful, very little traffic. The weekends are only tolerated as a necessary evil. This ban affects the very reason we live here. Free enjoyment of our waterways is the very reason we have made sacrifices and adjustments in our lives to live and play in Discovery Bay. I would support a ban on weekends and Holidays, not the absolute 24/7 ban that you propose. I am a 12 year resident, local business owner, member of the Chamber of Commerce and I work on the water daily sometimes side by side with the Sheriffs Marine Patrol. I vote and I intend to be heard. Thank you. Robert W. de la Cruz Sean Alexander Marine Services Seal Marine.Salvage 4480 Discovery Point Discovery Bay , CA 98505 Tel. 925-634-8744 Fax. 925-634-8641 TF 800-722-6789 05/18/2007 04:08 PM cc ` Subject Do NOT support ban on waterskiing on Indian Slough !!! Supervisor Gioia: My name is Dave Kroske. I am a resident of Discovery Bay(1225 Willow Lake Rd),and have been skiing on the California Delta for the last 40 years. 1 am submitting this letter to express my concern with a recent ordinance passed(2007-22)by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors to prohibit waterskiing on Indian Slough and Werner Cut. I do not support this measure for the following concerns: This ordinance was passed under the presumption that prohibiting waterskiing on this section of the delta would reduce the number of boating accidents that occur each year. A section of Indian Slough in question is over 800 feet wide and is the widest section of the delta within miles. We know from the research of these accidents that have occurred over the last nine years,that none included a water skier or even a water-ski boat. There have been 4 fatal accidents over the last 9 years. 2 died while operating bass fishing boats, 1 died in ajet ski-"cigarette"boat crash, and I died of carbon monoxide poisoning. I am concerned that this will only create more unsafe conditions because the new the ski zone begins at the intersection of Indian Slough and Middle River. This 5 way intersection of levees is recognized by the Sheriff's department and locals as one of the busiest intersections in the California Delta. The following questions remain and I feel it is imperative as a community,that we have the opportunity to further discuss this ordinance before it is instituted. *What research was done that suggested this ordinance would prevent accidents or alleviate congestion in this section of the Delta? *How will this unfunded mandate be put into place?Are the financial and human resources in place to efficiently and effectively institute this ordinance? * How will a sign posted in one section of the delta save lives in other areas of the delta when you are essentially moving the congestion further up the waterways? *How will the measure be enforced? What fines will be collected? Where will that money go to? *Legislation already exists to that allows the Sheriffs Department to use discretion and cite unsafe boating. Maybe we should explore allotting the Sheriffs department the proper funding to uphold the laws we already have. *Does this ordinance accurately reflect the views of the constituents of Discovery Bay? We can all agree that safe boating is priority for everyone. However I cannot support an ordinance that is not researched based,nor has the fiscal or sufficient human resources behind it to actually be implemented. Sincerely, Dave Kroske 1225 Willow Lake Rd Discovery Bay,CA 94514 925-634-3844 dist1@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us, dist3@bos.cccounty.us, ` dist4@bos.cccounty.us, dist5@bos.cccounty.us, gayle@bos.cccounty.us, marypiepho@sbcglobal.net, plhewitt@us.ibm.com, plhewitt@us.ibm.com, s.murphy.teixeira@sbeglobal.net cc Subject Fw: Stop the delta watersports ban Please add this to the public record in opposition to Ordinance 2007-22 Todd Scruggs (925)437-5054 ----- Forwarded Message ---- Prom: "Steen, Kaye <kay.stenn@hp.conv To: 'infoC�deltawaterskiban.org Cc: k—stenn@lyahoo.com Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2007 1:36:50 PM Subject: Stop the 1 do NOT support, the water ski towing ban out front. of Discovery Bay. This is why 1 purchased my home here 15 years ago. We frequently only have time for a short, ski run in the off hours before after work etc. This is not fair to ban the primary reason for the popularity of this area to exist. Why else would anyone buy in this area. There are alternatives... If tllis ban goes into effect.: It will not reduce water accidents, It, will not, change the water craft safety, It will eoL help the popularity of the area, It will in fact drive down home prices, It will reduce the cimount of capital gain when I sell my home, It will reduce my home investment, It will lead to fewer boat sales, It will frustrate the most home boat owners, It will create unnessary time to get to skiable water, It will cost us more due I.o the need for more marine patrol, It. will lead to a 5mph zone, It will reduce skiing opportunities, It will piss me off! It, would have been nice to give us a few months to know w1ml, was being proposed so we could have spoken up sooner. I saw nothing of this in my mail (or email). This is not fair and it is not right. Plus the slieriff marine patrol experts do NOT feel strongly that this will make any difference either. Kay ;teen 650-224-2222 cell 05/20/2007 10:51 AM cc <kshain@linkline.com>, <distl@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us>, ' <gayle@bos.cccounty.us>, <dist4@bos.cccounty.us>, <dist5@bos.cccou nty.us> Subject RE: 2007-22 Discovery Bay 5MPH From: kent shain [mailto:kshain@garlic.com] Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 10:48 AM To: 'dist3@bos.cccounty.us' Cc: 'kshain@linkline.com' Subject: 2007-22 Discovery Bay 5MPH Mary Piepho I have been using the Delta for skiing around Discovery Bay since 1969. I'm the President of Middle River Ski Club located near Bullfrog Marina on Middle River.As you could imagine the Delta has become over crowded with ski boats,jet skis, large house boats and cruisers. Since 1969 1 have seen many accidents some related to speed others to drunks behind the wheel others related to inexperienced drivers and skiers.The canals are to narrow between Orwood, Discovery Bay and Old river to support skiing and other water sports without endangering the lives of people and equipment. Discover Bay and Orwood have outgrown the size of the water way in that area. It's a long 5mph cruise out to the main canal but with the volume of boat traffic in that area I believe for the safety of all concerned it should be turned into a slow zone. Thank You Kent Shain President Middle River Ski Club 05/21/2007 12:28 AM <ddove@sbcglobal.net>, <DAPiepho@sbcglobal.net> cc <MPiep@bos.cccounty.us>, <distl@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us>, <gayle@bos.cccounty.us>, <dist4@bos.cccounty.us>, <dist5@bos.cccounty.us> Subject Waterski ban Dear CSD, 1 am writing to ask you to reconsider the proposed ordinance banning water sports in Discovery Bay. I have now spent a great deal of time reviewing the accident statistics for this slough, as well as for the state in general. The simple fact is that waterskiing is not a significant risk on these sloughs, or on any other congested waterway in the state. On average there are 2 water ski related deaths per year statewide. Even looking at all water ski related injuries, 60% were due to not wearing a PFD. Even fishing was responsible for 7x more deaths than waterskiing. As such you are solving a problem that does not exist. And in doing so you are unnecessarily discriminating against a large group of people that play a significant role in our community. More importantly you are NOT solving the problem that does exist. There certainly have been accidents on Indian Slough, I've seen a couple personally. It seems to this humble observer that a speed limit would be far more effective, and would have already saved lives. In comparison it's a simple fact that a water ski ban would not have prevented a single death on these sloughs. If you really care about safety, I beg you to consider an ordinance that actually addresses safety. We've read the minutes, and you all clearly know that this ban was not the result of a careful study, but instead a simple suggestion. Please take the time to review the facts, reconsider your position, and work with Conta Costa's large water ski community to find a real solution. This can still be a win-win that dramatically improves safety without unfairly targeting one group. Skiers will happily support a reasonable solution that addresses real safety issues. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sean O'Toole Discovery Bay, Ca Cc: Board of Supervisors Terrance Cheung To: Paige D'Angelo/BOS/CCC@CCC, Jane Pennington/COB/CCC@CCC 05/21/2007 12:16 PM cc: Subject: Fw: Reconsider ordnance 2007-22 FYI... Terrance Cheung Chief of Staff I Office of Supervisor John Gioia I Contra Costa County 11780 San Pablo Avenue, Suite D I EI Cerrito, CA 94530 (510) 374-3231 - Office 1 (510) 374-3429- Fax 1 (415) 990-2087 -Cell tcheu@bos.cccounty.us webpage: http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/disl/ -----Forwarded by Terrance Cheung/BOS/CCC on 05/21/2007 12:15 PM----- Ak Cheung/BOS/CCC 05/21/2007 12:15 PM To bill.honeycutt@hp.com cc d Subject Fw: Reconsider ordnance 2007-22 Dear Mr. Honeycutt, Thank you for taking the time to write to Supervisor Gioia about this issue and letting us know your concerns. Because this is also a District III issue, our office has forwarded your e-mail to Supervisor Mary Piepho's office, and the Contra Costa Clerk of the Board for recording. Terrance Cheung Chief of Staff I Office of Supervisor John Gioia I Contra Costa County 11780 San Pablo Avenue, Suite D I EI Cerrito, CA 94530 (510) 374-3231 -Office 1 (510) 374-3429 - Fax 1 (415) 990-2087 -Cell tcheu@bos.cccounty.us webpage: http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/deparUdisl/ -----Forwarded by BOS Districtl/BOS/CCC on 05/18/2007 09:09 AM----- "Honeycutt,William N" <bill.honey cutt@hp.com> To <distl@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us> 05/17/2007 04:47 PM cc Subject Reconsider ordnance 2007-22 John, We moved to Discovery Bay about fifteen years ago purchased a home in Indian Bay to be near fast water. This would enable us to water-ski in the morning before work and/or water-ski in the evening after work in which we continue to do at present time. We water skied competitively for eleven years and used this for training we do not compete any more but still enjoy skiing as much as possible. This is a big reason why we live near fast water and a big part of our lives. We host many family outings and get together so the family can enjoy visiting Discovery Bay and to take pleasure in all the water activates. My first concern is that it will now affect the price of my home, second the life style in that which I'm a custom to enjoying,third the affect it will have on the community and last the affect it will have on business in Discovery Bay Harbor Area and Orwood Resort. I hope you'd think again on passing this ordnance 2007-22 and/or vote NO Bill Honeycutt 747 Willow Lake Rd. Discovery Bay, CA. 94514 Phone: 925-516-1074 E-Mail bill.honevcuttkhp.com BOS District1 To: Fred Taverner<taverner@pacbell.net> 05/23/2007 04:38 PM cc: Jane Pennington/COB/CCC, Paige D'Angelo/BOS/CCC@CCC Subject: Re: Discovery Bay Waterski BanLJ Mr, Taverner, Thank you for taking the time to write to Supervisor Gioia about the water ski issue in Discovery Bay. While Supervisor Gioia is reviewing your comments, we've also forwarded your e-mail to Supervisor Mary Piepho's office and to the Clerk of Board for official recording. Cynthia Harvey, Staff Supervisor John Gioia 11780 San Pablo Ave. Ste D EI Cerrito, CA 94530 510-374-3231 Phone 510-374-3429 Fax Fred Taverner<taverner@pacbell.net> Fred Taverner <taverner@pacbell.net> To dist1@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us 05/23/2007 09:55 AM cc Fred Taverner<taverner@pacbell.net> Subject Discovery Bay Waterski Ban Dear Supervisor Gioia, Regarding proposed Contra Costa County Ordinance 2007-22, prohibiting waterskiing near Discovery Bay, I ask that you seriously reconsider your position on this matter as I do not support this ordinance. As a Discovery Bay resident significantly impacted by this proposed legislation, I feel that this ordinance, as written, is far too stringent for the circumstances. Certainly, the Delta, at times, can be a dangerous place, and I am fully in favor of proactively promoting safety wherever possible. However, in this case, that danger does not exist on a 7 day a week, 24 hour a day basis. As the Contra Costa Sheriff's Office has noted, the area in question is most dangerous on weekends and holidays. Were you to travel there during the week, you would find no such evidence to support this ban. Additionally, many local residents use this area during the week for water sports, and know better than to do the same on the weekends and holidays. Those residents, many of whom moved to the area specifically for its close access to water sports, are being unduly punished by this action. I have two suggestions as a compromise to this proposed ordinance. First, prohibit water sports activities in this area during weekends (Saturday and Sunday) and major holidays (Memorial Day, 4th of July, and Labor Day) from May 15th through September 15th of each year. In this way, you provide a measure of safety during the most crowded and dangerous periods, while also allowing local residents and others unrestricted access when the waterway is typically uncrowded. Second, I suggest that you reduce the area in question here from the end of Indian Slough (at its intersection with Old River) to that part of Indian Slough which meets the entrance to the Discovery Bay Marina. The section of Indian Slough to the East of Discovery Bay Marina is far wider than that to the West and provides a safer area for starting a skier than does the proposed ban limit. Additionally, this new location was the intent of the originator of this proposal, a Discovery Bay resident. This person never intended for such a ban to carry eastward to the end of Indian Slough. It is my hope that you consider my opinions and suggestions seriously. Please disapprove Contra Costa County Ordinance 2007-22, perhaps to reintroduce it with the aforementioned changes. Sincerely, Fred Taverner 958 Lido Circle Discovery Bay, CA 94514 925-513-1912 Fred Taverner taverner@pacbell.net Terrance Cheung To: Paige D'Angelo/BOS/CCC@CCC, Jane Pennington/COB/CCC@CCC 05/23/2007 03:56 PM cc: Cynthia Harvey/BOS/CCC@CCC Subject: Fw: Discovery Bay Water Ski Ban FYI... Terrance Cheung Chief of Staff I Office of Supervisor John Gioia I Contra Costa County 11780 San Pablo Avenue, Suite D I EI Cerrito, CA 94530 (510) 374-3231 -Office 1 (510) 374-3429 - Fax 1 (415) 990-2087 -Cell tcheu@bos.cccounty.us webpage: http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/disl/ -----Forwarded by Terrance Cheung/BOS/CCC on 05/23/2007 03:56 PM----- Terrance Cheung/BOS/CCC 05/23/2007 03:55 PM To Steve.Margason@TycoHealthcare.com cc n Subject Fw: Discovery Bay Water Ski Ban Mr. Margason, Thank you for taking the time to write to Supervisor Gioia about the water ski issue in Discovery Bay. While Supervisor Gioia is reviewing your comments, we've also forwarded your e-mail to Supervisor Mary Piepho's office and to the Clerk of the Board for official recording. Terrance Cheung Chief of Staff I Office of Supervisor John Gioia I Contra Costa County 11780 San Pablo Avenue, Suite D I EI Cerrito, CA 94530 (510) 374-3231 -Office 1 (510) 374-3429- Fax tcheu@bos.cccounty.us webpage: http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/disl/ -----Forwarded by BOS Districtl/BOS/CCC on 05/23/2007 08:25 AM----- "Margason,Steve" <Steve.Margason@TycoHeal To <distl@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us>, thcare.com> <gayle@bos.cccounty.us>, <dist4@bos.cccounty.us>, 05/22/2007 02:32 PM <dist5@bos.cccounty.us> cc Subject Discovery Bay Water Ski Ban To Whom It May Concern: My name is Steve Margason. I have been skiing on the California Delta for the last 40 years. I am submitting this letter to express my concern with a recent ordinance passed (2007-22) by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors to prohibit waterskiing on Indian Slough and Werner Cut. I do not support this measure for the following concerns: This ordinance was passed under the presumption that prohibiting waterskiing on this section of the delta would reduce the number of boating accidents that occur each year. A section of Indian Slough in question is over 800 feet wide and is the widest section of the delta within miles. We know from the research of these accidents that have occurred over the last nine years, that none included a water skier or even a water-ski boat. There have been 4 fatal accidents over the last 9 years. 2 died while operating bass fishing boats, 1 died in a jet ski- "cigarette"boat crash, and 1 died of carbon monoxide poisoning. I am concerned that this will only create more unsafe conditions because the new the ski zone begins at the intersection of Indian Slough and Middle River. This 5 way intersection of levees is recognized by the Sheriff's department and locals as one of the busiest intersections in the California Delta. The following questions remain and I feel it is imperative as a community, that we have the opportunity to further discuss this ordinance before it is instituted. • What research was done that suggested this ordinance would prevent accidents or alleviate congestion in this section of the Delta? • How will this unfunded mandate be put into place? Are the financial and human resources in place to efficiently and effectively institute this ordinance? • How will a sign posted in one section of the delta save lives in other areas of the delta when you are essentially moving the congestion further up the waterways? • How will the measure be enforced? What fines will be collected? Where will that money go to? • Legislation already exists to that allows the Sheriffs Department to use discretion and cite unsafe boating. Maybe we should explore allotting the Sheriffs department the proper funding to uphold the laws we already have. • Does this ordinance accurately reflect the views of the constituents of Discovery Bay? We can all agree that safe boating is priority for everyone. However I cannot support an ordinance that is not researched based, nor has the fiscal or sufficient human resources behind it to actually be implemented. Sincerely, Steve Margason Terrance Cheung To: Jane Penn ington/COB/CCC@CCC, Paige D'Angelo/BOS/CCC@CCC cc: 05/23/2007 03:51 PM Subject: Fw:Water ski ban on Indian Slough FYI... Terrance Cheung Chief of Staff I Office of Supervisor John Gioia I Contra Costa County 11780 San Pablo Avenue, Suite D I EI Cerrito, CA 94530 (510) 374-3231 -Office 1 (510) 374-3429- Fax 1 (415) 990-2087-Cell tcheu@bos.cccounty.us webpage: http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/disl/ -----Forwarded by Terrance Cheung/BOS/CCC on 05/23/2007 03:51 PM----- BOS Districtl/BOS/CCC 05/23/2007 08:26 AM To Terrance Cheung/BOS/CCC@CCC cc Subject Fw:Water ski ban on Indian Slough Supervisor John Gioia 11780 San Pablo Ave. Ste D EI Cerrito, CA 94530 510-374-3231 Phone 510-374-3429 Fax ----- Forwarded by BOS Districtl/BOS/CCC on 05/23/2007 08:26 AM----- SmittyDWB@aol.com 05/22/2007 04:36 PM To distl@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us cc Subject Water ski ban on Indian Slough I am Shocked you and the other Supervisors voted in a ban outlawing skiing in Indian Slough. This ski area is extremely safe during the week and is used by most Discover Bay residence. This ban is not needed, and not wanted by most of the Discover Bay residence. I can only hope you listen to the majority of the residence and overturn the ban placed on Indian Slough. Thank you for your time Wayne Smith 1651 Dune Point Ct. Discovery Bay, Ca. See what's free at AOL.com. BOS Districtl To: Nick Von Euw<chevy88trk@yahoo.com> 05!24/2007 09:26 AM cc: Paige D'Angelo/BOS/CCC@CCC,Jane Pennington/COB/CCC Subject: Re: opposing waker ski band Mr. Von Euw, Thank you for taking the time to write to Supervisor Gioia about the water ski issue in Discovery Bay. While Supervisor Gioia is reviewing your comments, we've forwarded your e-mail to Supervisor Mary Piepho's office and to the Clerk of the Board for official recording. Cynthia Harvey, Staff Supervisor John Gioia 11780 San Pablo Ave. Ste D EI Cerrito, CA 94530 510-374-3231 Phone 510-374-3429 Fax Nick Von Euw<chevy88trk@yahoo.com> Nick Von Euw <chevy88trk@yahoo.com> To distl@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us 05/23/2007 08:08 PM cc 4 Subject opposing waker ski ban Dear John Gioia, Regarding proposed Contra Costa County Ordinance 2007-22, prohibiting waterskiing near Discovery Bay, I ask that you seriously reconsider your position on this matter as I do not support this ordinance . I feel that this ordinance, as written, is far too stringent for the circumstances . Certainly, the Delta, at times, can be a dangerous place, and I am fully in favor of proactively promoting safety wherever possible . However, in this case, that danger does not exist on a 7 day a week, 24 hour a day basis . As the Contra Costa Sheriff ' s Office has noted, the area in question is most dangerous on weekends and holidays . Were you to travel there during the week, you would find no such evidence to support this ban. Additionally, many local residents use this area during the week for water sports, and know better than to do the same on the weekends and holidays . Those residents, many of whom moved to the area specifically for its close access to water sports, are being unduly punished by this action. I have a suggestion as a compromise to this proposed ordinance. First, prohibit water sports activities in this area during weekends (Saturday and Sunday) and major holidays (Memorial Day, 4th of July, and Labor Day) from May 15th through September 15th of each year. In this way, you provide a measure of safety during the most crowded and dangerous periods, while also allowing local residents and others unrestricted access when the waterway is typically uncrowded. It is my hope that you consider my opinions and suggestions seriously. Please disapprove Contra Costa County Ordinance 2007-22 . Sincerely, Nick Von Euw 925 Lido Circle Discovery Bay CA 94514 925-634-1919 Sick sense of humor?Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. BOS District1 To: "Stenn, Kay"<kay.stenn@hp.com> 05/24/2007 09:41 AM cc: Paige D'Angelo/BOS/CCC@CCC,Jane Pennington/COB/CCC Subject: Re: NO-Discovery Bay Waterski BanD Ms. Stenn, Thank you for taking the time to write to Supervisor Gioia about the water ski issue in Discovery Bay. While Supervisor Gioia is reviewing your comments, we've also forwarded your e-mail to Supervisor Mary Piepho's office and to the Clerk of the Board for official recording. Cynthia Harvey, Staff Supervisor John Gioia 11780 San Pablo Ave. Ste D EI Cerrito, CA 94530 510-374-3231 Phone 510-374-3429 Fax "Stenn, Kay" <kay.stenn@hp.com> "Stenn, Kay" <kay.stenn@hp.com> To <dist3@bos.cccounty.us>, <info@deltawaterskiban.org>, 05/23/2007 11:00 AM <dist1 @bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us>, <gayle@bos.cccounty.us>, <dist4@bos.cccounty.us>, <dist5@bos.cccounty.us> cc <k_stenn@yahoo.com> Subject NO-Discovery Bay Waterski Ban I do NOT support the water ski towing ban out front of Discovery Bay. This is why I purchased my home here 15 years ago. We frequently only have time for a short ski run in the off hours before/after work etc. This is not fair to ban the primary reason for the popularity of this area to exist. Why else would anyone buy in this area and pay a premium for homes closer to fast water. There are alternatives. . . If this ban goes into effect: It will NOT reduce water accidents, It will NOT change the water craft safety, It will NOT help the popularity of the area, It will in fact drive down home prices, It will reduce the amount of capital gain when I sell my home, It will reduce my home investment, It will lead to fewer boat sales, It will frustrate the most home/boat owners, It will create unnessary time to get to skiable water, It will cost us more due to the need for more marine patrol, It will lead to a 5mph zone, It will reduce skiing opportunities, It will piss me off! It would have been nice to give us a few months to know what was being proposed so we could have spoken up sooner. I saw nothing of this in my mail (or email) . This is not fair and it is not right. Plus the sheriff marine patrol experts do NOT feel strongly that this will make any difference either. Kay Stenn K_stenn@yahoo.com 650-224-2222 cell -----Original Message----- From] markvbftr@aol.com To: esherbert@ectimes.com Cc: keitHifilice..com; rno@(Jeltaskier.con); seanth(Jeltaskiencom; (loran_fanlily 'ccomcast.net; t,martirl�jlee—associates.com; caricker r)sbcglobal.nel.; msperrer o hotmail.coin; wrrichardson(�?earthlink.net; rayrnond.gibsorn@axa—advisors.com; ncalskierl �!hotmail.com Sent: Wed, 16 May 2007 11:34 AM Subject: Delta hldian Slough, Werner Cut statistics — Conta Costa Times... Good morning Erin, I wanted to follow up with some comments regarding your story concerning banning skiing along Indian Slough and Werner Cut dated 4-27-07. I first wanted to thank you for doing what many influences and proponents of this proposal have failed to do and that was to allow and print the input of one of our high profile Discovery Bay residents. To those comments I'd like to add some observations and food for thought.. As many of my esteemed neighbors will agree, Indian and Werner can get very congested and dangerous certain tunes of the week during our peak summer months. I'd like to offer the most. recent, statistics submitted by the California Department of Boating and Waterways. Granted these statistics are from 2002, yet I haven't, seen any other more topical study so please bear with me. The intention is that by banning waterskiing and other towed activities, the accident rates, incidences, injuries and casualties will decrease. Let me throw some numbers at you and see if you agree targeting the waterski community is the answer to this issue. • Personal Watercraft (PWC) such as Jet Skis account for 18 percent, of registered vessels, but were involved in 25 percent of the accidents on the Delta. • Cabin motor boats and houseboats accounted for 35% of all accidents. • Nearly 25 percent, of all boating injuries occurred on three—day holidays for Memorial Day, 4th of duly and Labor Day. • Alcohol played a role in 38 percent of fatal boating accidents in 2004, nearly twice the 2003 rate of 21 percent.. • Operators age 2t to 30 were involved in more accidents than any other age group 9 Waterskiing accidents account for 131 of the total accidents in the Delta relative to the number being inch high in larger more open bodies of water (32% on Lake Ahasta and 19% on Lake Berryessa). • 65% of all boating accidents of any kind take place on the weekend with a total of 25% of all accidents occuring on holiday weekends. • Personal Note: The only boats I have ever seen beached on the hard Delta were offshore race boats on a Delta poker run as documented by the local rag in Discovery Bay. Given this set, of data, it seems really clear that the waterski community is being targeted when waterskiing is such a relatively small contribution to the danger on the Delta. 1 submit. that, banning waterskiing and towing activities does nothing to address wreckless boaters, chunk boaters, large cabin cruisres, Personal Watercraft and inexperienced boaters which do contribute to the danger in that particular area of the Delta. It's also clear that the level of danger on Indian Slough and Werner Cut, is significantly different depending on the time of day, week, year and holiday schedule. Personally, I have observed Indian Slough and Werner cut, vacant most weekday afternoons and weekend mornings. I'd be interested to see the statistics augmented to account for those times of the day to determine Delta safety. My final thought. Target, the appropriate behavior and targetthe appropriate windows of time that. offer the greatest amout. of protection for the safe and responsible boaters, fisherman and skiers of Discovery Bay. Mark Varnes 8 year Discovery Bay resident and waterskier -----Original Message----- Sent.: Wed, 16 May 2007 7:21 AM Subject: w—ski issue message from David Piepho 5-15-07 Thank you for following, up. As I mentioned today, I will attempt to convene (host) a meeting so that we. can review any additional comment. f The Town of Discovery Bay CSD meets ltwice a month and given that we already have our next meeting posted and agendized, we will have to call a special meeting. We will attempt, to schedule it toward the end of the month in an effort to give you proper notice. Additionally, I will speak to the rest, of the board and our legal council this week to make sure this meets with approval as well. I have included your CC list, on this reply as well so, that. all interested parties will be aware of our efforts. As always, I remain available to discuss any issues, concerns or suggestions that, you may have. Thank you for taking time today to make your comments known. David CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic transmission may contain information which is confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, or disseminate this message nor any part of it nor any attachments. If you have received this message in error, please immediately delete the message and arty attachments from your system without reading the content and notify the sender immediately of the inadvertent transmission. There is no legal intent, on Hie part of the sender to waive any privilege including but not ]united to copyrights, the att.orney/client., the reporter source, and the provider/client privileges that may attach to this communication and or it's contents. C 2007 All Contents All Rights Reserved D. Piepho AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out, more about; what's free from AOL al. AOL.com. BOS District3 To: Jane Pennington/COB/CCC@CCC r 05/24/2007 10:19 AM cc: 4r Subject: Fw: Opposition to Water Ski Ban Office of Supervisor Mary N. Piepho Contra Costa County, District III 309 Diablo Road Danville, California 94526 Ph: (925) 820-8683 Fax: (925) 820-6627 1200 Central Blvd., Suite B Brentwood, California 94513 Ph: (925) 240-7260 Fax: (925)240-7261 email: dist3@bos.cccounty.us SUPERVISORIAL STAFF: Lea Castleberry, Asst. to the Chief of Staff Amy Prentice, Administrative Assistant Karyn Cornell, Field Representative Gina Ferretti, Field Representative -----Forwarded by BOS District3/BOS/CCC on 05/24/2007 10:19 AM----- info@deltawaterskiban.org To dist1@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us, dist3@bos.cccounty.us, 05/21/2007 11:49 PM dist4@bos.cccounty.us, dist5@bos.cccounty.us, gayle@bos.cccounty.us, plhewitt@us.ibm.com, s.murphy.teixeira@sbcglobal.net cc Subject Fw: Opposition to Water Ski Ban Please add the following comments below in opposition to ordinance 2007-22 to the official public record for the next regular Board of Supervisors meeting for the Discovery Bay CSD public record. ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Lynne Miley <orwoodgirl@yalloo.com> To: iilfoC�kleltawai,erskiban.org Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 7:19:58 PM Subject: Opposition to Water Ski Ban The Board of Supervisors and ultimately the CCCSD will dispatch signage identifying the proposed "no ski / no pull'zone but, in actuality the sign should say "no speed limit"! This nonsensical approach will give a green light—"go as fast as you can" to every offshore boat, speed boat and PWC to proceed without caution or vigilance knowing there will not be a skier or recreation craft around each corner, bend or I straight......... It is not"if' but, "when" this situation will cause a catastrophic accident on this stretch of waterway if the no ski/no pull zone is implemented. And if this prognostication is correct, the next step for the Board will be to mandate a 5 MPH zone (as rumored) effectively eliminating any advantage of living near"express water". Maybe those whom live out in Clipper Estates don't mind the additional spell, but they certainly don't speak for us! Let's gauge by commonsense and courtesy not impulse......... Scott and Lynne Miley 4440 Discovery Point Discovery Bay, CA Lynne The fish are hit.img. Get more visitors on your site using Yahoos Search Marketing. BOS District3 To: Jane Pennington/COB/CCC@CCC 05/24/200710:22 AM cc: Subject: Fw: Delta waterskiing ban fyi.. Office of Supervisor Mary N. Piepho Contra Costa County, District III 309 Diablo Road Danville, California 94526 Ph: (925) 820-8683 Fax: (925) 820-6627 1200 Central Blvd., Suite B Brentwood, California 94513 Ph: (925)240-7260 Fax: (925) 240-7261 email: dist3@bos.cccounty.us SUPERVISORIAL STAFF: Lea Castleberry, Asst. to the Chief of Staff Amy Prentice, Administrative Assistant Karyn Cornell, Field Representative Gina Ferretti, Field Representative -----Forwarded by BOS District3/BOS/CCC on 05/24/2007 10:22 AM----- info@deltawaterskiban.org 05/21/2007 11:45 PM To dist1@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us, dist3@bos.cccounty.us, dist4@bos.cccounty.us, dist5@bos.cccounty.us, gayle@bos.cccounty.us, plhewitt@us.ibm.com, s.murphy.teixeira@sbcglobal.net cc Subject Fw: Delta waterskiing ban Please add the following comments below in opposition to ordinance 2007-22 to the official public record for the next regular Board of Supervisors meeting for the Discovery Bay CSD public record. ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: limy Uranwala <jsti�j)turiikeytest.corn> To: info��deltaw�ct.erskjban.org Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 9:02:39 AM Subject: Delta waterskiing ban People get killed on highways so should we ban all vehicles on them? Or make them all go 5mph? Attack the CAUSE of the problem: Hefty fines on those casuing accidents, whoever they may be. Also, everyone knows a great many accidents are from people with too much alcohol in them, so if ifs dangerous to drink and drive on roads, its even more so on waterways with no lanes and other controls, so why not some legal limit for body alcohol content? Waterskiiers don't want to get hurt and are just as keen as anyone on safe waterways. More so because WE are the ones who get hurt by drunk idiots running over us in the water. Jimy Uranwala BOS District3 To: Jane Pennington/COB/CCC@CCC cc: 05/24/2007 10:22 AM Subject: Fw: Opposition to the ban on skiing Office of Supervisor Mary N. Piepho Contra Costa County, District III 309 Diablo Road Danville, California 94526 Ph: (925) 820-8683 Fax: (925) 820-6627 1200 Central Blvd., Suite B Brentwood, California 94513 Ph: (925) 240-7260 Fax: (925) 240-7261 email: dist3@bos.cccounty.us SUPERVISORIAL STAFF: Lea Castleberry, Asst. to the Chief of Staff Amy Prentice, Administrative Assistant Karyn Cornell, Field Representative Gina Ferretti, Field Representative ----- Forwarded by BOS District3/BOS/CCC on 05/24/2007 10:23 AM----- info@deltawaterskiban.org 05/21/2007 11:42 PM To distl@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us, dist3@bos.cccounty.us, dist4@bos.cccounty.us, dist5@bos.cccounty.us, gayle@bos.cccounty.us, plhewitt@us.ibm.com, s.murphy.teixeira@sbcglobal.net cc Subject Fw:Opposition to the ban on skiing Please add the following comments below in opposition to ordinance 2007-22 to the official public record for the next regular Board of Supervisors meeting for the Discovery Bay CSD public record. ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: kathy <eiderlawkathy@sbcglobal.iiet> To: info(Odeltawaterskit)an.org Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 10:22:31 AM Subject: Opposition to the ban on skiing I have been an active water enthusiast on the Delta for over 20 years. I think this proposed ban on waterskiing is a totally ineffective way to halt the problem, which is alcohol and excessive speed of boats mostly like cigarette boats, built only for speed, which make no sense to anyone, except males between 15 and 25 who have some wierd need for speed. So make a 40 mph zone(between say noon and 7 pm. or crack down on alcohol on the Delta whether it is the driver or occupants, that makes a lot more sense. Requiring more education on boat driving would also be a better and more effective solution like a special liscense to drive a boat requiring driver education and boating safety which we used to have to get a driver's license for a car. Or raise the age limit of driving to 21.....that might be helpful as well. Kathleen Brewington Attorney 555 Soquel Avenue Sutie 320 Satna Cruz, CA 95062 (831) 459-8498 SOS District3 To: Jane Pennington/COB/CCC@CCC 05/24/2007 10:23 AM cc: Subject: Fw: Ban of Water Skiing Office of Supervisor Mary N. Piepho Contra Costa County, District III 309 Diablo Road Danville, California 94526 Ph: (925) 820-8683 Fax: (925) 820-6627 1200 Central Blvd., Suite B Brentwood, California 94513 Ph: (925) 240-7260 Fax: (925) 240-7261 email: dist3@bos.cccounty.us SUPERVISORIAL STAFF: Lea Castleberry, Asst. to the Chief of Staff Amy Prentice, Administrative Assistant Karyn Cornell, Field Representative Gina Ferretti, Field Representative ----- Forwarded by BOS District3/BOS/CCC on 05/24/200710:23 AM----- info@deltawaterskiban.org To distl@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us,dist3@bos.cccounty.us, 05/21/2007 11:40 PM dist4@bos.cccounty.us, dist5@bos.cccounty.us, gayle@bos.cccounty.us, plhewitt@us.ibm.com, s.murphy.teixeira@sbcglobal.net cc Subject Fw: Fwd: Ban of Water Skiing Please add the following comments below in opposition to ordinance 2007-22 to the official public record for the next regular Board of Supervisors meeting for the Discovery Bay CSD public record. ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: michele Baca <michele@)acfloors.net> To: info(�.deltawaterskiban.org ,ent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:10:57 PM Subject: Fwd: Ban of Water Skiing ,lust, thought. 1 would pass this letter along. I was cc'd this morning. Michele Begin forwarded message: From: Lynn Bunnell <lynnbunnellkmae.com> Date: May 17, 2007 10:42:33 AM PDT To: dist3 bos.cccount .us Subject: Ban of Water Sluing This, is to express my opposition to the proposed ban on water skiing in Indian Slough, Ordinance 2007-22. 1 agree this is a congested area and water skiing, wake boarding acid t.owiiig of other water toys with people kids should be restricted during periods of high traffic which occurs on weekends and holidays. My opposition is because during the rest of the time this ordinance is penalizing residents of Discovery Bay by not allowing thein Hie use of the waterways when it is not otherwise congested. I recoinrnend the ordinance be altered to ban towing activities on weekends and designated public holidays. The article in the Coid.ra Costa Times stated that one of the sheriff deputies stated that it, would be easier to enforce a full bine ban than one covering weekends acid holidays. That is an ignorant statement that anyone who lives near acid uses the waterways knows. First of all, there is almost no patrol presence during the week so it, would be rare that a violation would ever be discovered by the patrol. Perhaps a citizen aware of the ordinance would call and report a violation causing a patrol to be dispatched during a period when the activity is posing no threat anyway, thereby wasting resources that could be saved for a time when there presence had some meaning. Second, staffing for low activity periods iii order to enforce this ban covers a much greater period of time Lliaii busy periods of time. If it were easier to staff for full time enforcement than part tune enforcement I wonder why cities don't, save money by employing meter maids every day of the week. hi reality, no bau A all should be needed, common sense says that. when there is a lot of boating activity, for your own and your family's safety you should travel to an area of less activity before commencing your water play activities. So [he ban you are enacting only applies to those who have no common sense to begin with. Training and teaching of the common sense required to be a responsible boater is the real solution. Lynn Bunnell Discovery Bay Resident It appears to me there is a conflict of interest here. What's next no boats under 25 feet. You people need to stop trying to take our liberties away just to suit your personnel needs. This isn't about safety, the numbers bear out the fact drinking and inexperience are causing the injuries. I believe you need to rethink this and align your self with a better overall cause like mandatory boater safety course. Al Wolden Antioch resident and concerned boater. BOS District3 To: Jane Pennington/COB/CCC@CCC , � 05/24/2007 10:23 AM cc: IZI Subject: Fw: Delta Water Skiing Ban Letter Office of Supervisor Mary N. Piepho Contra Costa County, District III 309 Diablo Road Danville, California 94526 Ph: (925) 820-8683 Fax: (925) 820-6627 1200 Central Blvd., Suite B Brentwood, California 94513 Ph: (925)240-7260 Fax: (925)240-7261 email: dist3@bos.cccounty.us SUPERVISORIAL STAFF: Lea Castleberry, Asst. to the Chief of Staff Amy Prentice, Administrative Assistant Karyn Cornell, Field Representative Gina Ferretti, Field Representative ----- Forwarded by BOS District3/BOS/CCC on 05/24/2007 10:23 AM----- info@deftawaterskiban.org To dist1@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us, dist3@bos.cccounty.us, 05/21/2007 11:27 PM dist4@bos.cccounty.us, dist5@bos.cccounty.us, gayle@bos.cccounty.us, plhewitt@us.ibm.com, s.murphy.teixeira@sbcglobal.net cc Subject Fw: Delta Water Skiing Ban Letter Please add the following comments below in opposition to ordinance 2007-22 to the official public record for the next regular Board of Supervisors meeting for the Discovery Bay CSD public record. ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: JAMES DAUGHTERS <jdaugllters@sbeglobal.net.; To: info@deltawat.erskiban.org Sent.: Friday, May 18, 2007 8:26:26 PM ;;object: Delta Water Skiing Ban Letter Thank you for taking action on this matter. While I personally believe waterskhng there are much better locations for waterskiing than Indian Sloiigh given the poor conditions and boat traffic, I am always averse to more government oversight and legislation. Contra Costa County currently has more than sufficient, legislation in place to address problems as they pertain to acts of unsafe boating. Please feel free to forward the attached form letter to the respective parties concerned in the action. My only disclosure being I am not a resident, of nor voter in Contra Costa Comity. Best Regards, James Daugliters WaterSWOrdinancelndianSloug.doc N'6;'N BOS District3 To: Jane Pennington/COB/CCC@CCC 05/24/2007 10:23 AM cc: Subject: Fw: Discovery Bay ordinance-a comment from a local fyi.. Office of Supervisor Mary N. Piepho Contra Costa County, District III 309 Diablo Road Danville, California 94526 Ph: (925) 820-8683 Fax: (925) 820-6627 1200 Central Blvd., Suite B Brentwood, California 94513 Ph: (925) 240-7260 Fax: (925)240-7261 email: dist3@bos.cccounty.us SUPERVISORIAL STAFF: Lea Castleberry, Asst. to the Chief of Staff Amy Prentice, Administrative Assistant Karyn Cornell, Field Representative Gina Ferretti, Field Representative -----Forwarded by BOS District3/BOS/CCC on 05/24/2007 10:23 AM----- i nfo@deltawaterski ban,org ;. To dist1@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us, dist3@bos.cccounty.us, 05/21/2007 11:23 PM To dist5@bos.cccounty.us, gayle@bos.cccounty.us, plhewitt@us.ibm.com, s.murphy.teixeira@sbcglobal.net cc Subject Fw: Discovery Bay ordinance-a comment from a local Please add the following comments below in opposition to ordinance 2007-22 to the official public record for the next regular Board of Supervisors meeting for the Discovery Bay CSD public record. ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Michelle Paxton <rnpaxl.on(,divcap.net> TO: info�deitawaterskiban.org Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2007 11:29:51 AM Subject: Discovery Bay ordinance — a comment from a local Hello there, To whom it may concern. I have been waterskiing on the delta for 16 years in this area and other areas. Also, a member of the BAWSC (bay area water ski club) and other organizations. The area marked in red from Orwood Marina to Discovery Bay Marina is heavily populated and has traffic on the weekends. There has to be a compromise! I think it should be a no wakeboard/ski zone on the weekends only, midweek with less people it should be ok to ski or wakeboard. There are other areas to handle this situation/issues. Please call or email if I can be of any assistance is supporting the ban. Also, not too sure why Grant line/Tracy Oasis is to be shut down/dammed as well, this is a great area to ski and very minimal traffic, the more places you shut down, the more traffic into other areas, we need to be able to spread out. Sincerely, Michelle Paxton Mortgage Loan Consultant Diversified Capital Funding mpaxton(@divcap.net www.divcaP.net/agents/mPaxton Office (408) 540-1142 x26 Fax (408) 540-1159 P.S. I build my business by referrals from past clients, business associates, friends, and family members. If I can assist anyone you know who is thinking of buying, selling, refinancing real estate or purchasing an investment property, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. I ¢ BOS District3 To: Jane Pennington/COB/CCC@CCC r 05/24/2007 10:23 AM cc: Subject: Fw:watersports ban Office of Supervisor Mary N. Piepho Contra Costa County, District III 309 Diablo Road Danville, California 94526 Ph: (925) 820-8683 Fax: (925) 820-6627 1200 Central Blvd., Suite B Brentwood, California 94513 Ph: (925) 240-7260 Fax: (925)240-7261 email: dist3@bos.cccounty.us SUPERVISORIAL STAFF: Lea Castleberry, Asst. to the Chief of Staff Amy Prentice, Administrative Assistant Karyn Cornell, Field Representative Gina Ferretti, Field Representative -----Forwarded by BOS District3/BOS/CCC on 05/24/2007 10:23 AM----- info@deltawaterskiban.org 05/21/2007 11:15 PM To dist1@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us,dist3@bos.cccounty.us, dist4@bos.cccounty.us, dist5@bos.cccounty.us, gayle@bos.cccounty.us, plhewitt@us.ibm.com, s.murphy.teixeira@sbcglobal.net cc Subject Fw:watersports ban Please add the following comments below in opposition to ordinance 2007-22 to the official public record for the next regular Board of Supervisors meeting for the Discovery Bay CSD public record. ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: "orwoo(lresort�l)juno.com" <orwoodresort@juno.com> To: info((!)deltawaterskiban.org Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 7:57:41 AM Subject: watersports ban Hi This is from Orwood Resort. Our (,ustomers launch at our 1'�wility because they enjoy watesports on the Orwood Slough. We are concerned that by banning watersports oil this slough it will just, make that waterway a freeway for Offshores and jet. skiis. They will not be as cautious as they would be if they knew people are in the water. This ban could make that, waterway even more dangerous. Let ns know when the meeting will be, we will be there. Cindy at Orwood Resort Hi This message is from Orwood Resort. Our customers launch at our facility because they enjoy watesports on the Orwood Slough. We are concerned that by banning watersports on this slough it will just make that waterway a freeway for Offshores and jet skiis. They will not be as cautious as they would be if they knew people are in the water. This ban could make that waterway even more dangerous. Let us know when the meeting will be, we will be there. Cindy at Orwood Resort BOS District3 To: Jane Pennington/COB/CCC@CCC �s 05/24/2007 10:23 AM Subject: Fw: ski ban Office of Supervisor Mary N. Piepho Contra Costa County, District III 309 Diablo Road Danville, California 94526 Ph: (925) 820-8683 Fax: (925) 820-6627 1200 Central Blvd., Suite B Brentwood, California 94513 Ph: (925)240-7260 Fax: (925) 240-7261 email: dist3@bos.cccounty.us SUPERVISORIAL STAFF: Lea Castleberry, Asst. to the Chief of Staff Amy Prentice, Administrative Assistant Karyn Cornell, Field Representative Gina Ferretti, Field Representative -----Forwarded by BOS District3/130S/CCC on 05/24/2007 10:23 AM ----- info@deltawaterskiban.org 05/21/2007 11:07 PM To dist1@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us, dist3@bos.cccounty.us, dist4@bos.cccounty.us, dist5@bos.cccounty.us, gayle@bos.cccounty.us, plhewitt@us.ibm.com, s.murphy.teixeira@sbcglobal.net cc Subject Fw: ski ban Please add the following comments in opposition to ordinance 2007-22 to the official public record for the next regular Board of Supervisors meeting. ----- Forwarded Message ---- Froin: susan quails <zappersue t�st)eglobal.net.> To: infoCdeltawat,erslc]ban.org Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 4:34:49 PM Subject: ski ban We oppose Delta the water skiing ban No supportive evidence . Appears to be favoring developers . Ray and Susan Qualls 4561 Clipper Dr. I "CATHERINE To: comments Qcob.cccounty.us KINTNER" cc: <CATHERINEKINTNER Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website @YAHOO.COM> 05/22/2007 11:04 AM Please respond to "CATHERINE KINTNER" This message was sent from: http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm ------------------------------------------------------------ Name of sender: CATHERINE KINTNER Address of sender: 500 AVE G REDONDO BEACH CA Phone of sender: 310-000-0000 Email of sender: CATHERINEKINTNER@YAHOO.COM Agenda Date: Agenda Iteml: D.1 Agenda Item2 : ------------------------- COMMENTS ---------------------- PLEASE INVESTIGATE IMMEDIATELY!! ! PRISONS GUARDS WHO WALK IN AND OUT ,OF PRISONS EVERYDAY ARE ENDANGERING THE PUBLIC WITH CONTAGIOUS COMMUNICABLE DISEASES! ! ! ! HELP! ! ! ! PRESIDENT BUSH VICE PRES. U.S. CONGRESS FBI CIA DIR. , NATIONAL SECURITY DIV. SUPREME COURT GOVERNORS OF ALL 50 STATES MAYORS OF ALL LOCAL CITIES AND TOWNS PRISON ADMINISTRATORS, WARDENS AND GUARDS UNICOR DAVID SPEAR, CHAIRMAN OF BD OF UNICOR DEPT. OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION I AM VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE THREAT OF CHOLERA, MALARIA, DIPTHERIA, DYSENTERY AND OTHER COMMUNICABLE DISEASES IN THE PRISON SYSTEM OF THE U.S. OF AMERICA DUE TO TERRIBLE THIRD REICH HITLER REPLICANT SCHWARTZENNER-BUSH REGIME AUSCHWITZ CONCENTRATION DEATH CAMP CONDITIONS. ALSO, I HEARD THERE IS VERY LITTLE FOOD, NO MEDICAL AND DENTAL TREATMENT OF PEOPLE IN THE PRISONS. DAILY NERVE GASSINGS, CHAIN GANGS, AND PEOPLE ILLEGALLY IMPRISONED WITH NO DUE PROCESS. IS THIS AMERICA IN 2007? WHY ARE PEOPLE BEING IMPRISONED WITH NO TRIALS BY A JURY OF THEIR PEERS WITH "FOR LIFE SENTENCES"? WHY ARE THERE NO RELIGIOUS SERVICES IN THE PRISONS ESPECIALLY FOR CATHOLICS WHO NEED THE HOLY SACRAMENTS ADMINISTERED TO THEM? I WROTE YOU IN DEC. 2006, AND I WANT TO KNOW IF YOU HAVE FOLLOWED THROUGH ON INVESTIGATING THE TERRIBLE CONDITIONS THAT THE BELOVED FAMILY MEMBERS ARE BEING FORCED TO ENDURE? ALSO, I WANT TO KNOW IF THERE ARE DAILY ATTENDANCE RECORDS FOR EACH PRISON? ALSO, WHERE AND HOW ARE THE BODIES OF THE PEOPLE WHO DIE IN THE PRISON SYSTEM SENT AND TO WHOM AND HOW ARE THEY DISPOSED OF? ARE THEY RETURNED TO THEIR LOVED ONES? ARE THEIR INTERNAL ORGANS BEING HARVESTED WHILE THEY ARE STILL ALIVE AND UNWILLING DONORS? (ESPECIALLY THE PRISON FOR LIFE PEOPLE. ) WHY ARE PEOPLE-LOST IN THE PRISON SYSTEM? WHY ARE DRUGS BEING MADE AND DISTRIBUTED IN THE PRISONS? I KNOW AND HAVE HEARD PEOPLE SPEAK ABOUT PRISON CONDITIONS AT AA MEETINGS, AND I WANT TO KNOW IF IT IS TRUE AND WHAT THE GOVERNMENT CONTRACT HIREES OF WE, THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, ARE DOING TO GET LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS INTO AMERICA AGAIN IN EVERY ARENA INCLUDING AND ESPECIALLY THE PRISON SYSTEM. I HEARD THAT THERE ARE "DEATH SQUADS" IN EVERY PRISON THAT IS COMPRISED OF PRISON WARDENS OR GUARDS, AND WHO EXECUTE ANYONE THEY WANT TO OR GET ORDERS TO AND TAKE THEIR INTERNAL ORGANS FOR RESALE. SINCERELY YOURS, CATHERINE KINTNER THE LADY OF THE SILVER SWORD OF LIGHT AND TRUTH STEVEN SEAGAL'S "HAIKU POEM" AND "TRUE LOVE FOR ALL ETERNITY" P.S. PLEASE NOTE THE ATTACHED E-MAIL WHICH DESCRIBES THE IMMINENT POSSIBILITY OF CLASS ACTION SUITS AGAINST THE U.S. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES OF WE, THE PEOPLE OF THE U.S. , WITH BOTH LEGAL CRIMINAL AND CIVIL FINANCIAL PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL LIABILITY FACTORS. GOOD LUCK TO YOU WHO TAKE NO ACTION TO STOP ILLEGAL BEHAVIOR! ! ! Note: forwarded message attached. --------------------------------- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:15:11 -0800 (PST) From: "Catherine Kintner" <catherinekintner@yahoo.com> Subject: Angola Prison, Louisiana Chain Gangs, Murders and Federal, State and Local Liabiliity Class Action Lawsuit To: comments@whitehouse.gov, vice—president@whitehouse.gov, catherinekintner@yahoo.com Dear President Bush, Merry Christmas to you, Mrs. Bush and your beloved family and friends. I am a great supporter of your Presidency as I know it must be a very difficult and challenging job, and I believe with all my heart that you are all very devoted to the best interests of the country and all the Americcan citizens. I myself, as a 28+ years Instrument of Spiritual Healing of the Real Ascended Hosts of Shamballa and the Universe Who serve God and all Humanity, am constantly challenged to be of service spiritually to all the world. I am currently on the Psychic World Wide Web serving as a Spiritual Healing Instrument singing Songs of Prayer, and saying Affirmations to build enormous amounts of THE INVINCIBLE POWER AND LIGHT OF GOD THAT NEVER FAILS TO HEAL through my Instrumentality to help Heal our Beloved Country of the United States of America. How I have wept and mourned over the many problems in America and the sufferings of her people. I want you to know that I am trying to get help for the poor souls still on horrendous horrifying chain gangs, both men and women. God never will accept this behavior. I know you and Mrs. Bush are God loving, Christ Consciousness individuals who have DIRECT VOICE COMMUNICATION with Ascended Beings - Angels and Legions of God who HEAL, HELP AND PROTECT all the people of this Planetary System both in Spirit and on Earth. May God Bless you and protect you in every way always, and all in the Global Community. By the way, I read both of the speeches that you and Mrs. Bush gave in Sept. 2006 in 'VITAL SPEECHES" while attending LA Harbor College. One was to the United Nations and one to the Clinton Consortium. It gave me such hope for America and the World to know how many beautiful humanitarian, Christ Consciousness programs and policies you are implementing. I beg your compassionate mercy for the people on the chain gangs and in prisons accross the U.S. of America. I personally met and spoke to individuals (male and female) who have been on chain gangs in America since 2000. I believe this violates every one of their Federal and State and God-given inalienable rights. I also know someone who was in prison in Los Angeles, California and prison guards brought in huge hoses and gassed the people with a nerve gas on an ALMOST DAILY BASIS. Many of them, I believe were being held without bail and had not yet been sentenced in a court of law. Some of them were probably Veterans, Disabled Veterans of Foreign Wars, and National Citizens of Foreign Countries. THESE PRISONS ARE SO LIKE AUSCHWITZ CONCENTRATION CAMP IN HITLER'S THIRD REICH IN GERMANY, and I have wept cconstantly over the horror that is happening in this country's prison system PLEASE HELP THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA TO REGAIN THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND MAY FREEDOM, JUSTICE AND LIBERTY REIGN IN GOD'S GREAT COUNTRY, AMERICA, FOREVER MORE! ! ! ! ! I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and the Country for which it stands, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, with Freedom and Justice for All! ! ! Catherine Kintner December 14, 2006 Attorney General of Louisiana Governor Kathleen Babineaux Blanco Raymond S. Blanco Secretary Richard Stalder Deputy Secretary Jannitto Antoine Undersecretary Bernard "Trey" Boudreaux, III Asst. Secretary of Adult Services Whalen Gibbs Chairman of Pardon Board Ronald D. Cox Charman of Parole Board Diana "Dee" Simon To Whom It May Concern: Please be hereby advised that I am exercising my inalienable rights under the Constitution of the United States of America as a citizen of this Sacred, ONE NATION, UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, FOR FREEDOM AND JUSTICE FOR ALL, COUNTRY THAT BELONGS TO GOD! ! ! I want you to know that I am presently contacting the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Washington, D.C. regarding Angola Prison, Louisiana and evidence received from a former inmate that Angola Prison is operating the MOST VICIOUS, CRUEL, INHUMANE CHAIN GANGS in the United States of America. I have received testimony from credible sources, and the allegations include conditions and cruelties beyond belief and witness of MURDER by prison guards. Also be advised that I am preparing a class action lawsuit representing the persons incarcerated in Angola Prison against the State of Louisiana and many State and Prison officials, including but not exclusive to the above. I suggest you bring this situation into complete accord with the Federal law of the United States of America IMMEDIATELY. If found guilty, I believe the State of Louisiana and various individuals will be liable with regard to both their private assets and charged with civil disobedience of U.S. Federal law. Good Day. Catherine Kintner ------------------------------------------------------------ "Rick Palmer" To: comments@cob.cccounty.us <caricker@sbcglobal.n cc: et> Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website 05/25/2007 08:02 AM Please respond to"Rick Palmer" This message was sent from: http: //www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm --------------------------------------------------- Name of sender: Rick Palmer Address of sender: 4500 Discovery Pt. Phone of sender: 925-634-0896 Email of sender: caricker@sbcglobal.net Agenda Date: 05-15-07 Agenda Iteml: Agenda Item2 : D.1 ------------------------- COMMENTS ------------------------- 05-25-07 Rick Palmer Against Water Ski Ban! My name is Rick Palmer my address is 4500 Discovery Point, I have been a resident here in Discovery Bay since 1990. My deck faces North towards Indian Slough just by the Lido Bay entrance. I am firmly against this Water Ski Ban. You can count on me to be at the meeting on May 30th and also the meeting on June 5th in Martinez. I am in the process of gathering signatures for a petition against this ban and will bring those documents to the meetings. Rick Palmer 4500 Discovery Pt. . Discovery Bay CA 94514c 925-354-0468h 925-634-0896 ------------------------------------------------------------ "Curtis Weller" To: comments@ cob.cccounty.us <clweller@pacbell.net> cc: 05/25/2007 02:33 PM Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website Please respond to "Curtis Weller" This message was sent from: http: //www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm ------------------------------------------------------------ Name of sender: Curtis Weller Address of sender: 4821 Spinnaker Way Phone of sender: 925-997-2890 Email of sender: clweller@pacbell.net Agenda Date: 05/30/07 Agenda Item1: Agenda Item2: D.1 ------------------------- COMMENTS ------ ------------------- RE: Ordinance 2007-22 prohibiting waterskiing near Discovery Bay Regarding proposed Contra Costa County Ordinance 2007-22, prohibiting waterskiing near Discovery Bay, I ask that you seriously reconsider your position on this matter as I do not support this ordinance. I feel that this ordinance, as written, is far too stringent for the circumstances. Certainly, the Delta, at times, can be a dangerous place, and I am fully in favor of proactively promoting safety wherever possible. However,' in this case, that danger does not exist on a 7 day a week, 24 hour a day basis. As the Contra Costa Sheriff's Office has noted, the area in question is most dangerous on weekends and holidays. Were you to travel there during the week, you would find no such evidence to support this ban. Additionally, many local residents use this area during the week for water sports, and know better than to do the same on the weekends and holidays. Those residents, many of whom moved to the area specifically for its close access to water sports, are being unduly punished by this action. I have three suggestions as a compromise to this proposed ordinance. First, prohibit water sports activities in this area during weekends (Saturday and Sunday) and major holidays (Memorial Day, 4th of July, and Labor Day) from May 15th through September 15th of each year. In this way, you provide a measure of safety during the most crowded and dangerous periods, while also allowing local residents and others unrestricted access when the waterway is typically uncrowded. Second, I suggest that you reduce the area in question here from the end of Indian Slough (at its intersection with Old River) to that part of Indian Slough which meets the entrance to the Discovery Bay Marina. The section of Indian Slough to the East of Discovery Bay Marina is far wider than that to the West and provides a safer area for starting a skier than does the proposed ban limit. Additionally, this new location was the intent of the originator of this proposal, a Discovery Bay resident. This person never intended for such a ban to carry eastward to the end of Indian Slough. Third, consider a speed limit for this section of Indian Slough rather than a ban on skiing, tubing etc. From my own experiences in this waterway, boats traveling at high rates of speed pose the greatest risk to the safety of other boaters and those enjoying fishing and other watersports activities. A reasonable limit of 30 miles per hour along this stretch of waterway would be a way of greatly reducing the risks associated with speed in this waterway. It is my hope that you consider my opinions and suggestions seriously. Please disapprove Contra Costa County Ordinance 2007-22, perhaps to reintroduce it with the aforementioned changes. Sincerely, Curtis Weller 4821 Spinnaker Way Discovery Bay, CA 94514 925-997-2890 ------------------------------------------------------------ "Michelle Paxton" To: comments@cob.cccounty.us `3# <mpaxton@divcap.net cc: > Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website 05/29/2007 07:12 AM Please respond to "Michelle Paxton" This message was sent from: http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendaco=ents_form.htm ------------------------------------------------------------ Name of sender: Michelle Paxton Address of sender: 954 La Barbera Dr. Phone of sender: 408-289-9152 Email of sender: mpaxton@divcap.net Agenda Date: 5/28/07 Agenda Item1: Agenda Item2 : D.1 ------------------------- COMMENTS ------------------------- This is in regarding the Discovery Bay ordinance to make Orwood slough to Twin sloughs a no ski/no wake zone! I have been skiing and enjoying the area for more than 16 years. I think the excuse is to build the area with homes and docks. How does this help greenhouse affects etc. Please compromise, how about the weekends only no skiing/boarding, weekdays are for the locals and those that live there and know what they are doing. ------------------------------------------------------------ "Blythe Bruntz" To: comments@cob.cccounty.us <blythe@juniper.net> cc: 05/29/2007 07:30 AM Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website Please respond to "Blythe Bruntz" This message was sent from: http: //www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm ------------------------------------------------------------ Name of sender: Blythe Bruntz Address of sender: 5548 Starfish Place Phone of sender: 925-240-1460 Email of sender: blythe@juniper.net Agenda Date: 5/30/07 Agenda Iteml: Agenda Item2 : D.1 ------------------------- COMMENTS ------------------------- Ordinance 2007-22 prohibiting waterskiing near Discovery Bay I support keeping the current law which allows watersports in the proposed waterski ban area, and enforcing the current law for violators who are driving drunk or wrecklessly for the reasons outlined below. I agree that safety if .an issue, and would support a ban on holiday weekends and from the hours of noon-5pm when the area is overcrowded. Otherwise, I see absolutely no reason to outlaw watersports in the area in which I have PAID DEARLY to "LIVE WHERE I PLAY" ! ! Not a single death in this area is due to watersports - this ordinance unfairly targets watersports enthusiasts. * Accidents in this area are largely due to excessive speed and alcohol - this ordinance wouldn't have prevented a single death. * This ordinance essentially creates a freeway from Orwood to Old River, likely increasing speeds and accidents. It is a killer. * This ordinance paves the way for a 5MPH zone putting the watersports we all love in further jeopardy. The supporters say this isn't true, but isn't it the logical next step after the next death due to excessive speed and drinking. * This ordinance paves the way for more deep water development - Private Island Homes will require this to be a 5MPH zone, this is the first step. BOTTOM LINE: This isn't about safety! If it were it would address the cause of accidents! It DOESN'T. ------------------------------------------------------------ BOS District1 To: Jenny Mitchell<jentle_leo@yahoo.com> 05/29/2007 09:28 AM cc: Jane Pennington/COB/CCC Subject: Re:Watersports Ban( Ms. Mitchell, Thank you for taking the time to write to Supervisor Gioia about the water ski issue in Discovery Bay. While Supervisor Gioia is reviewing your comments, we've also forwarded your e-mail to the Clerk of the Board for official recording. Cynthia Harvey, Staff Supervisor John Gioia 11750 San Pablo Ave. Ste D EI Cerrito, CA 94530 510-374-3231 Phone 510-374-3429 Fax Jenny Mitchell <jentle_leo@yahoo.com> Jenny Mitchell <jentle_leo@yahoo.com> To dist3@bos.cccounty.us,dist1@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us, 05/25/2007 04:10 PM gayle@bos.cccounty.us, dist4@bos.cccounty.us, dist5@bos.cccounty.us cc Subject Watersports Ban Dear Board of Supervisors, Regarding proposed Contra Costa County Ordinance 2007-22, prohibiting waterskiing near Discovery Bay, I ask that you seriously reconsider your position on this matter as I do not support this ordinance . I feel that this ordinance, as written, is far too stringent for the circumstances . Certainly, the Delta, at times, can be a dangerous place, and I am fully in favor of proactively promoting safety wherever possible. However, in this case, that danger does not exist on a 7 day a week, 24 hour a day basis . As the Contra Costa Sheriff ' s Office has noted, the area in question is most dangerous on weekends and holidays . were you to travel there during the week, you would find no such evidence to support this ban. Additionally, many local residents use this area during the week for water sports, and know better than to do the same on the weekends and holidays . Those residents, many of whom moved to the area specifically for its close access to water sports, are being unduly punished by this action. I have two suggestions as a compromise to this proposed ordinance . First, prohibit water sports activities in this area during weekends (Saturday and Sunday) and major holidays (Memorial Day, 4th of July, and Labor Day) from May 15th through September 15th of each year. In this way, you provide a measure of safety during the most crowded and dangerous periods, while also allowing local residents and others unrestricted access when the waterway is typically uncrowded. Second, I suggest that you reduce the area in question here from the end of Indian Slough (at its intersection with Old River) to that part of Indian Slough which meets the entrance to the Discovery Bay Marina. The section of Indian Slough to the East of Discovery Bay Marina is far wider than that to the West and provides a safer area for starting a skier than does the proposed ban limit . Additionally, this new location was the intent of the originator of this proposal, a Discovery Bay resident . This person never intended for such a ban to carry eastward to the end of Indian Slough. It is my hope that you consider my opinions and suggestions seriously. Please disapprove Contra Costa County Ordinance 2007-22 , perhaps to reintroduce it with the aforementioned changes . Sincerely, Jenny Mitchell 8312 Lone Tree Way Brentwood, CA 94513 (925) 628-6992 You snooze, you lose. Get messages ASAP with AutoCheck in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. "steve martin" To: comments@cob.cccounty.us ' <smartin955@aol.com cc: > Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website 05/31/2007 01:40 PM Please respond to"steve martin" This message was sent from: http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendaco=ents_form.htm ------------------------------------------------------------ Name of sender: steve martin Address of sender: Discovery Bay Ca Phone of sender: 925 634 2352 Email of sender: smartin955@aol.com Agenda Date: 06/05/07 Agenda Iteml: ,07-22 Agenda Item2: ------------------------- COMMENTS ------------------------- I ask the county supervisors to not implement the year-round ban on watersports on Indian Slough and the Orwood cut. It is unreasonable to enact this ban across the entire year and every day. A more reasonable approach would be to limit enforcement to weekends and holidays between Memorial Day and Labor day. ------------------------------------------------------------ "Matthew Stewart" To: comments@cob.cccounty.us " <m-astewart@juno.co cc: m> Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website 05/29/2007 05:59 PM Please respond to "Matthew Stewart" This message was sent from: http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm ------------------------------------------------------------ Name of sender: Matthew Stewart Address of sender: 4127 Thornton Avenue Phone of sender: 510.794.7617 Email of sender: m-astewart@juno.com Agenda Date: Agenda Iteml: Agenda Item2: D.1 ------------------------- COMMENTS ------------------------- No on Ordinance 2007-22 . ------------------------------------------------------------ "Donald Davis" To: comments@ cob.cccounty.us rt <cosmicmos@aol.com cc: > Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website 05/31/2007 11:31 AM Please respond to "Donald Davis" This message was sent from: http: //www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm -------------------- --------------------------------------- Name of sender: Donald Davis Address of sender: 4761 Spinnaker Way Phone of sender: 925 516 3745 Email of sender: cosmicmos@aol.com Agenda Date: Agenda Iteml: 27 Agenda Item2 : ------------------------- COMMENTS ------------------------- I support the water ski Ban- I am a Discovery Bay resident. I boat and fish the delta frequently ------------------------------------------------------------ i PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: TOWN OF DISCOVERY BAY 6 ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION H.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION M.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and signing this petition I am reLyistering my opposition to Ord.2007-22&2. WaterskiinE vrohibited: Name lease dnnt/t)�: Address, City State lease Tint : Signature: 1 �IC</A�'L CoRfGG�9Ns S"36�IPivE1eG��L �j'�erYuC� � i%v( �•.-'�' Ei 41 - aq 2 a^ �ruz+ or S 3 Sim i�Y�a 17, s�vvc�i �o,ti q 400/"j G�cEc isSs AI" LArP 6 - 7 ,Odd 24W C 8 2()6� OYFces5 P©T r�j- 10 ��'�.rEe D (,G aermn l`7 v-f- MR AAA�tj rZ 7:1 12 ^^% \ t caVeR 13 f-1r��• SPa�Iv a`�3� �ihtt-. acA 14 r � W�� 5 b � . 15 Signatures Collected By:... Name Please Print x215 f\e^ Signature: Address, City State: *1(5 WA(00LOk ICd, i SL (�JI� Oft Date: A4&1 7,0"01 (Please copy blarWsheet if needed) T1 H I PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the inicrsection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 2. Waterskiine vrohibited: Name lease print): Address,City State lease print): Signature: 1 arp 18o'(4 `ole-'a � L�5}r� Va1rEy ea-A-m Al LA 2 re-`Art ' CA qt-1L- G w!�Al� ufv,�, law I,gI. cr+- 3 bi5�d t3a- C$ aK51�1 esv> syr'y AZ 5 b*'y r- e VA 6O L I 'D . UVI Z2C 7 0 �v s 10 � �3/v JJ.,B 44 11 12 13 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print) Signature: 7` Address, City State: jj-lO 91XIef, X20 2 1Sy,<91V e4. Date: � ZS- ,9 (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSIOING PROHIBITION TION L SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on an Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 4106.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By enmy name address and s' TAddress, petition I am registeringm o sition to Ord.2007-22 2. Watersldin robibited: Name lease print): C' State lease print): Signature: a n u�` L01 Ue Dv-. 10*lsW-t C4 2 w� Vk7 oId EUA aya�l¢ 3 SWanvur) (tau+mer 44Zq fV6aaaauo. La. MYJ CA 4 Gam, 3�� l�un�h;i/ p✓ grehfuc `l�4 -Ali-7&2g OPA 114", 17%Q�k e-10- 6 av dle rin't WC(- 7 s SR- 131-a,4 r 10 11 12 13 14 15 OSignatures Collected By: Name Please Print) S4C0g5911j Si nature: / a Address, city state: aqyineRtuluy j-V5Cav /34c/C1-MLS-/� Date: SI 30/07 (Please copy blank sheet if neE ed) I FROM COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS 925-757-972 (WED)MAY 30 2007 8:38/ST. 8:37/No. 6819854125 P PETITION OPPOSING oRDINANCE 2007-22§2.'WATERSKIING p1;OHMITION: (This ordinance 1s piaooed to be adopted on Jane 3, W') - Text Follo»s: v�z��c��o,Zo��zw�zE�s�tG�Aot�l�lo1� ftON'1_ SUMMARY.This Ordinance prohibits waterakiing,mrd an ettrer aativiti�u whcrt a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on .inn Slough and on the portion of Plemer Dredger Cut between the Otwood Road bridge-Wild the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Grafi=near Discovcry .Bay. $F.CTiON II.Secbon 414-6.1322 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 41".022 Wanerskling prohibited. (a) No person shall operate:any vessel that is putting or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,not shall any person ride water lids,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts scctiou. (b) The following waterways sac di igmated as special use areas: (1) The cmircty of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Gut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Wenner LhedWr Cut between the Orwood Road bridgee on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south (c) The sheriff u.authorized to place regulatory marlcsrs giving notice of the restriction specified in subsoction(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(h).(Ord.2407-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTWE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage 13y entering In Aame address and s' nin thin etitio0 I am Orin m a sition tb Ord.2W7-22 2. Waterslciia prohibited: Plaroe ►ease rint : Addles City Stage (ease Tint : Signature. 1 C,,l(bert D1r>� (r.nf"z 18 [�j t- ke C:# •, wt>�� - ` _ �vlh_ 2 bAva �44e-k- G,00 FQ2ta'Si R,kj V-N 3 She,.W Pow; 3 y t V At, ,/ v4 c e a �_(�11/` 1 • hl i e S S5 �..Ock��k-4'Q- r V e lA^ 7 Cjo33 e Oli�!o.� i ,moi 10 &xnt Cx� 11 �' � E c^G'.� 1 C p (o�i3 Sov Ft�too Dt f3� `-- A�— � Q.�i e n�woo Ci CA gtiS13 12.. orJ !acti o Gn 9`f553 --- SN S v�cr• �virn lin dA- 13 OJZ 14 4X C' 15 signatures Collected t3 : Name Please Printj Si natu Address, City State: Pf- t.Up� SGctL& Qs- �/� Date: O Om copy bi sheet 1f needed) I PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROIIfiBIITIION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ring my name address and s" in g this petition I am reldstering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiing probibited: Name lease print): Address City State lease print): Si nat 1 to4o 2 1Lusm AUA0 74� (,liltaA) 3 UriMCD10f 11 533 r1W&CyeelL 4 NV la -� 1 /6 5 t gD. lt� s v Y►r> ,` 5 y//o2 /�/D l�/�JVIi0 3-6 �. i WO s 10 1 d 11 to 12 ��� tl� 13 � y I�tLW 1A/� lam/ 14 vt p4U og tA4 II /5 q 15 C I >, '(\fig —t� G 1 J IOW t / 14 Signatures Coll ted By: Name(Please Print) ( '1 Si nature: 46411.4 Cl11 Address, Ci State: 1p;- g6pukt Qy-c ( Date: 5= V (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 3 r PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROIIIIBITIION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSHIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY,This ordinance prohibits watetskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410.6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION Ill.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ring my name address and signing this petition I am Legistering registeringmy opposition to Ord.2007-224 Z 1�aterskiinobit d: Name lease print): Address,City State leasee"print): S na ur 2 NA L/W MA ( M (o C�t- 3 5 6 \ 7 8 - A s J IVVI 10 t� 11 /9 JS /V02 rff PO W 12 k Cef A-5 /�t i✓) �.ry �liJ i%J l `� 13 t(1y-*—;' 01 �G. I L)(,S T)i Scau nnT 13)c?d 14 b'� �c�-K IM I W ftnb 51P ST RLD O D D 15 I L-A 9A\MoQ E f(6 5 ( W ISo MP DQ I v Ve Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print f% Signature. Address, City State: 0. Date: b ` b (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibit;;waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION 11.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the:south. (c);The.sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designat,d in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By in ring my name t:ddress and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to tOrd.2007-22 8 2. Waterskiin 'ro ' ' ed: Name lease pint): Address, City State lease print): Signa r P 3C �`l fS1 ^ 7j '�Ccs er 2 �3q� tl P�. s. 15 oJ2- 7 b 3 U L-l;'llr lel' ( 'L r1kSC 5 2� C Z ss3� ;s�� ®t tas« - 7 ' 1�� 01 s <►�jc I�ft '�� ll)' te( - 9 LS��3 pczl , �—� © OF 10 Pl- 11 12 J)) t 'ARIA �� L� I✓U ���� I T 13 �N—i—�-_�sS �-, C,rf F'%r' 1 : iJ L a L A lis 14 15 �V Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print e.�� 0 '7'V-& Sin re' Address, City State:A7MS /iSc�Al- / 6-�4 D5W: (P ease copy blank sheet i need (d)141VL � � '� �� � / - PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSIKIING PROMITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: TOWN OF DISCOVERY BAY CE1V1's ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the'Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en erine my name address and si nin this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22&2.1 Waterskiinprohibited: Name lease print): Address, City State lease print): Signature: 1 Petition handed out at boat show 2 Signatures per sheet: Number of sheets: Total: 3 95 12 plus 8 Faxed in 300 13 1 13 4 92 1 Faxed in 12 5 9 2 Faxed in 18 6 8 1 Faxed in 8 7 6 1 Faxed in 6 8 5 9 Faxed in 6 9 3 1 3 10 11 Thos G'Ira p Qdldlot ansa 12 363 13 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name (Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) I PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: Y- 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. Z`^ (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 6 2. Waterskiinprohibited: Name• lease Tint : Address, Cit State lease Tint : Signature: 1 � 0m 1 S() k ;G C 2 )a me 5 ��i e 5 11 Fe��� In, ���(n uer a t!f4 3 . xl R 4 r 1 e Vi - - 5G GLck 6 41 dyer X05 �A �I(I �,/a 6i�en+,, � 7 AA x �p W n USO ✓jk�j<,M n L2 s ) )5LI c4aA /2 gOki,& 3f5V�4 -df BrPyThAWMAU P.0, 10 i .��0 s2s2Q0 12 0(1�111C(� Suy�p t r 1�rjA \ Cet'1-t C4 13A Y?A 13 fPM-mceA 64& 13 \. v 14 .X 15 u ` l'MR 12 fV 1 tel' C+ 0l/\ �,�/t1�)Cioj Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print % "r g Sin ure: Address, City State: 2 w-t1Vs) 6�-e VJ r ✓e Date: 2 (Please copy blank sheet i neede ) �r it PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSHIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSHIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Wemer Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease Tint : Signature: 1 SOlpiriol, , , 319 or i i ,n CA ;1 Y 2 -2nn��, l" AJC A �irU cG A!;'5 Ql MOIA C4, 1S VeY 3 W uvi WtvA i5A-46 {LlYfi�� aI�L� 1 Cp( I_.ls(D,oai`(b qv$ 'N. rSlv-� Ol. '61ien 0,3�A' CA 5 (370, s �tf� ( �3Co5 c t�lllow 1S? tie+��I rs i a ( twt CYimnTerracel PDyiet)t oWd CA �o L-C)Z 0 yo. 1j C,0,Y g M l�r( v�S jeoc�nCow4I U9 - 10 At�S�� a1 Uq5 Vo-rb'i Vr `re ItdoWoO�-lCA 11 ��Cf'l r� Tle E�h�' ��l 1 l�Lc�ka�►.� �v nj�(�vl inN>�� � 12 Ido t, 16 Oct AC-e-LW &k k.&�—L &� 131EAIr 14 > - ht✓ c 95 Daq? Dr . e�- -roua 15 I� ( 1 r oo, a �Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print G W44,1 S a Si nature: Address, City State: �[[ixJ � ve- aJcr 64, C6 Date: 2� (Please copy blank sheet if needed) /(S PETPI'ION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay, SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markets giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007.22§2.) SECTION M.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and signiing this petition I am re$dstering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 Waterski' ro ' rted: Name lease print): Address,City State lease print): Si G 4t110FTb.-J /S 17elf61 Gl71^14AI '4 0Of I, 9 �ndw��c�, �' ro 3 0-p� rN� 4 LJV 2g a-( �^-�i. ✓!r_c.0 a. < A Finn) Gfi 5 e Xe `f C]t ,6W Vw s 5'- �. Alm A WV vi":kodo a e �'G�!'l S Gni 7" �!/ S✓�f 9 C r- KPS- 1 p� I G�. U,Sw.got •�-- 10 fvfvie# ',5bfkCom te5 772— JSP 12 49(-4q VO r d- 3119 o r W1 13 ST 39 l Wfla 11sr Wy A1� 14 15 WArw-r Cr I, Si natures Collected By: Name Please Print Wh<y1'%St1W Signature: Address City State: ai.C41 ctCfCJ Date: —� (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 7 7 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROMBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION L SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION It.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Wemer Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ing my name address and signin g this petition I am reEdstering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. WaterskiinL7 Drobibited: Name lease print): Address,C4 State lease print): Signature: 1 PWLs aroft D 6>ftu palkut �y1 2 Lis,, osv f P e V' 3 N 2 i .sD� n !d l,a rlttc �} r' ( e tom( 4 I 4 v O6 (`J I9 R�Xt4f t lSCff I f 5 - g i'� i 7U 6 '!1 - i—� q I i3 Co 7 IInnnn 4 UG 1,114 G'1cxC� a t X��-� OD �r ZyAV-4 1', 10 5of010 , -;aQa El ?rl 12 13 14 15 IGS` �� a a Signatures Collected By, Name Please Print Kos}.t 1 i nature: Address, Citv State: IR 2 C W,llo& Date: (Please copy blank sheet if n ded) I Qf J PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION H.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days atter passage By en ring my name address and signing this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2.1 Waterskiin rohibited: Name ase Tint : Address,City State lease print): Signature: l o1n I c I{qF�. 2H 2 1�, A,t(e,R-[ J GT 3 A�I ZTKd1(1 Al $-�633�-D15Cd v 4 5 �b ` L �Gi tr�� (�.1 S3 � ;.e /Ujio�l s 4Nnbrm--mcth 59y 7'Osc rma spur+ $ am aa S LAA BeoolLl'ww 594 i aseanm/br P`�ivt ood ,o 66 San ejsor) I q(00 Shell Cpvr:f Ad E ,5-oil '1460 C7'-- 12 7'-- ,2 91CY- )! � �,2 x'62 �,�+►L�S 13 14 v t;n 2 r c gp���7ya Des + u 15 sl �Y Ell�wl., Si natures Collected By: Name Please Pdnt �* (' A&v(,-jXfk Si nature: Address, City State: � R Y-V�- Date: 22 (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION L SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION H.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiinprohibited: Name lease print): Address,ClState lease print): Si nature: 1 hog ew &FIE Z1179 ovrH�w Rd 165b W, CtAWAVaL 3 I 3 ClYVIt ry 4 a 3 ( ()i'uu n 0 rz— 6 jar (/ L I'Ve'rMC-?re, 4A 'id-5r2 3�1�6N Mi�iokl u1v . 3 3q l d 0 Rr:5oz7a u ( 60X.0 -4266 8 Stjxe, L cr /- r✓rr- R g 5 i g 9 ° a" (44 1qS3k 'J '?C��.�AC ��10 D1, 10 �� ' p 6'e"L /� O 11 D 5 d 12 , oij& b 32. 0 Ael94,2Al; // 02379 lxIZa�,'✓G du'✓c 13 s 2 <i1<Inl ` 9Y=l l Pq��tf A 14 )1�4rre> `rcHfl��7 Ccs. �i�o( valley Z�rli .Dr 15 SCO e, Loq 6 est a( `TyS 13 Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signat Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETI'T'ION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2W7-22 §2.WATERSEEING PROHIBMON: anis ordinance hs planned to be adopted on Jose s,2007) - TextFollows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 W'ATERSKMG PROffiBMON ON L SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits watetsldmg,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Curt between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 4101.022 is added to the County Ordinance Coda,to read: 410.6.022 Watersiding prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use area designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian SIough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Crock on the west (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south (c).The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers g�ivi ng Mice of*c restriction specifie d m subsectiwt(a)at the boundaries ofthe special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord 2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This otdmanco baoomes effective 30 days atter passage Bye ' my name address and shumb g this petition I am Mghaft mn to Ord 2007-22 2 Waters hibited: Name lease print): Address,My State ease print): S nature: 3 �� - 4 , � Lobs �o S Sq O �11c�2 ZZI '� 275'��r.4��1e. ✓�/ZL�4,�f s G / �v�e �ivT/✓c a r -�-9 4AC PoWt Zj ' 0 8 P 10 �la �/Qi h �7a DILL Gt1 a �/�� Co 11 3 CU;kilp r 12 13 s4g n 4-ci7 AV-e- CQS-�raVy1 C� 14 e Iq l l5 Slkr4a Mt. &sVD&4, C� 15 UeNl J4975 (o56 . an lea ffo .ter _Signatures Colleted BSI: Name(Please Print) S' nature Address,City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) I� I PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIIVG PROIIIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBI'T'ION TION L SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits watecskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on \elan Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION IIL EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days atter passage By en ring my name address and s' in this Detition I am registering MV 01MOSitiOn to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiinprohibited: Name lease print): Address,City State lease print): Signature: 1 2e�� Ili 3� &w6"rAve. �mn) 3 .� SS 1 4 I-SaVN- Q b U `e 0 l i W w C� Q L ���, as sa-� � R s rive `MA\j L Q9 gk,� 10 11 12 Sd l 13 'n . 14 P 15 ly1�0� Ada OSignatures Collected By: Name Please Print �A Of,6Signature: Address, City State: o 1 ` .(-�� C 05,(e,AA-,0W Date: (Pleaw copy blank sheet if needed) r(P 3 1� PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROMBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - 'Pert Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKHNG PROHIBITION TION L SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near ascovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Wemer Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south (c).The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION 111.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By c ring my name address and sign' this petition I gm EgIlLering EX opvwition to Ord.2007-22&2.1 Waterskiing prohibited: Name lease print): Address,City State lease Print): Signature: 2 20Un V-`oDig -�a Z�� 3 W 4 O i rc�aZG� 6 9r6y1V9M -#�/ 044 mid�-kA.r�OMI l� t�� 6 fv 2Ji On (nlA`[ 8 o K 51. o d 9 i 10 Q06 ,-,�TcnhA 11 k k SGS-JF\CM Q 12 101 cw� 13 a-0 V4- -&v c 14 15 RM�jllv I n IVA- OSi natures Collected By: Name Please Print Si nature: Address City State: `310( llr Clc� Q PrCr-\- g( Date: !E—2—a (Please copy blank sheet if needed) S/3lgF� • �f3£(y63 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22§2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinanee is planned to be adopted on Jane 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION ON L SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel on Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the Cotmly Orman x Code,to read 4106.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of trills section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) the entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cat and Kellogg Creek on the wesL (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south (c)_The sheriff isanthorized to place regulatory markers giving Mice of the restriction specHied'in subsection(a)at the boundaries ofthe special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION IIL EFFFAMVE DATE"This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By este ' name address and this n I sin m o n to Ord.2007-22 8 2 Watersrobibited: Name lease print): Address,My State lease print): Si nature: GAg4T13 1 64 0 /4-If'✓✓esJ-Pa-V l Y t j z (�1f Si Il 1 E - s-f ��- Cqu 4 SaVI UjG0&-allj C(g 6 ,. 8 d � s 10 s f er 11Ino 13 14 4 t•{ CSS f N yr Sq- a�rioo 15 �n� ' t ///�1 4 OSignatures Collected Name(Please Print) S' nature: Address City State: (Ple6e copy blank sheet if needed) 51 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Wenner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION If.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFEC FIVE DATE.This ordinance becomesrreffective.30.days.after-passage By enterin m name address and si nin this etitiop I am registerin2 my opposition to Ord.2007-22 2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease print): Address i State lease print): Signature: ap7' 1 N lco Mn L'.� 9YS/S� 2 C - < f OC o Q ftAW9�1fS7 zV6r? 4 f �h / �/ uotC �ew�r'� N. 5 V tC/L OO 1I 1 'q IV 6 ✓e K;uf 10 k o-llk� Qml 11 12 Jv` ,' v 1?iCAg�r�7 13 R6 -62 ✓'e CV (-AC- . lit 14 ( �Gl�CZ VS ��, I nx boS3Z 1/� 15 f ll� l ( �✓ 7 /r,U/ Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSICIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION 11.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis;an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the sjuth. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION 1I1.EFFEC FIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si nin this' etition I am isterin m opposition to Ord.2007-22 8 2. Waters fine rohibited: Name(please rint : Address, Ci—State lease print): Signature: 1 L��S K192 �� G3 ViO � Azv, ILJ' vI jZb' LJ4� 2 E P05 ql� oV-r G 3 4 5Q 540 ' t s 14/t tSt�. 40' 47 s rz lam/7 1 I *US 'P �g-tosff 7` r Is Ez a 12 l \ 15 13 14 wig 15 Signatures Collected By: Name (Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) F� PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION:., (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June S,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Ray. SECTION It.Section 4 to-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,m aquaplane,or a similar device.nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device.in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the s)uth. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice ol'the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ont.2007-22§2.) SECTION Ill.EFFEC CIV E DATE,This ordinance becomes effective 30 da s alter ansa e By enterin m name address and signing this petitio ,.. ame lease rin : Address Ct tate lease tint : atur Y1 4:9CHo Q 2 f�'N 3 LAItGt� 4 5 t 2 6 s 7 {,{A 10 f6 r-,k-ttVD 12 Mfllw 14 " VIC Ll Sign CoBy` Name (Please Print) �L?M C& Signature: Address, itState: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) I PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION% (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION t. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Onvood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery fray. SECTION It.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis•an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west: (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Onvood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg'Creek on the F Juth. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III. EF FEC H V E DA"1'E.'Phis ordinance becomes elective 30 da sager ossa e By en ering niv name address and si nin this petitio aWalmim- ' BIN Name (please print): Address,Ct tate lease print): Si nature: I .( 101� t,r( H z 3 4 �� O%QAEM S tS� �7 r 5 elr1 6 7 e �n 12 � 9 bCoJS oc� �iqc> 13 IV ���J l G v1LS tN Cr°[ 14 ' / I Ill 01F 5 1nmoo :� QY�t►m )ads Ven (/QL�� Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) gnature: Addre_ss_City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) y PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION:. (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June S,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type ofvessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion or Wemer Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION It.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The tollowing waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Wenner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the e)uth. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION I II. EFFEC.H V E DATE.'this ordinance becomes effective 30 da sager sa e By enterin m name address and si nin this titin Name lease print): Address Ct fate lease print): Si ature: GQ GI Liz✓ _ 1 - vCt 2 _ I 1fit Pe 1 4 �i8� �r>�5' , alvemtom. 5 ! —s/ 6 o �/ sr✓ &a 7 Mo g VL �J N. l5 F cl lei~e 5 IF R11- 10 11 ,l 12� �4� 1a ll �5 lia rA) s 2tt" Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: ,t (Please copy blank sheet if needed) a PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION:. (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June S,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type ofvessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION I1.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any orthe special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west'. j (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Stough and Kellogg Creek 4 on the ejuth. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION 111. EFFEC I`I V E DATE.This ordinance becomes ef7ective 30 da sager assa e By en ering my name address and si nin this petitio S ") Name (please print): Ad/dre�ss Ci /c tate leasee rint : Si naxure: 1 Q IVT)l 1CA 44kk(c 4 0/0 OF g I sA O �`�� 10 12 13 14 .112��' �'stfcAS $Sg 10 G'mu eta Crrpjr 15 - Signatures ollected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address. City State: Date: tMease copy blank sheet if needed) 1 I PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION:. (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery flay. SECTION Il.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiinp,prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The lbllowing waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) 'I'he entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Wemer Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek, on the a)ulh. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markets giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION 111. EFFEC FI V E DATE.11tis ordinance becomes eRi:ctive 30 da sager assn e By en ering mv name address and signing this petitio Name lease print): Address Ci `tate.. leasee print : Signature- if 6 i nature:if6 i '340-3 Qc, 3 �. c► ( 646 366 Sart) Carlos . Pv11� ff 5 Ok S I 6 V Vt I!J 6L10C (,' 1 UJ Pqi,, IC 2 jv \J-0 e e� G � Ol ti, 9M7 �/ wl 1,56 „ (S�e 12 lip 13 'A is ,5 r dZz Si natjeollected By: Name(Please Print) ignatu e: Address.City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) G i PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION:._ (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on' Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the'intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION 11.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410.6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device-in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. - (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and.Kellogg Creek on the s'.mth. (e) The sheriff is authorized u)place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special.use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22 C 2.) SECTION Ill.EFFEC FIVE DATE.'fhis ordinance becomes effective 30 da s ofter assn e By en ring my name address and si nin this plattio _.. Name le se rint : A�dddreess, Ci `fate lease ri t : Si na r : ' 35 3 *uwd qw--5-9990 4 /UeS S` n kroc}k lJr ave fw - I s U-�t�0.! i C. C t.Q 12 t n D or e 13 // q�p ']4 131-71 15 _Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print Si re: Address,City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 1 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION:. (This ordinance is planned to be adopted an June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type orvessel,om,- Indian Stough and on the portion of Wemer Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery flay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiinp prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (I) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west: (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the a)uth. (c) The sherifl'is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the specialuse . areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION 111. EFFF.0 I'IVE DATE.This ordinance becomes elective 30 da salter sa e By en ering my name address and signing this petitio Name pease print): Address,C1 te talease print): Signature: 1 C�i e 1 t� r r 13r 2 n ff Seca 3 NIL1� z4h,5W K W Z Gtr .604'I. Nc 4 1�� s��� I i9y Clerk- enJ✓�co(�� s (`�A rIC Ew�UI��' SOK �� �C -VL4�Jq& 7 "As ?-C& a kC—o 9 10 JVS�Yl �YlO�J 5�g1{ llvreL p tc�`y`° �� � 12 6�1 ft1G/ ��Wee 6/9, 13 1a �� 1 SC FA ignatures Collected B Name Please Print Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 13 I PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION:. (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June S,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERS.KIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits water-skiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near• Discovery Bay. SECTION 11.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410.6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shat I operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device.not shall any person ride water skis an aquaplane,or a similar device.in any of the special use areas deli(mated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (t) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on thewesii. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the s Juth. (c) The sheril7'is authorized u,place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the speeial.use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22 0 2.) SECTION Ill.EFFEC,HVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 34 da s after S e t , m name address and By enterin st nm this etitio a f X" ' :... ...-_ _.. . _ Name lease print}: Address G tate lease print): Signature: C 2-q 2 JULIA arreold 3 _ ON C C pq �1� � - 'f I. ✓A i 5 �<t A c 6 /CIO c�w rr�J Sq St 7,55 a !s SICK 9 (1A eiC&'"(-S 10 t 1J Uu &"/o (�t/tct r i h 6. Q c 9-k513 t2 13 kt Al ' . 14 �azie 40 A� S [ tG!"n� 51gZ CaC4 t Signatures Collected By: Name (Please-Print) Signature: Date: Address,City State: < (please cagy blank sheet if needed) yy PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION:. (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Stough and on the portion of Wemer Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near ' Discovery Bay. SECTION It.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis;aril aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of 4ndian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Wemer Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Wemer Dredger Cut between the Onvood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the a Juth. (c) The sherit)'is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice orthe restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22 Q 2.) SECTION III. EFFEC.FIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes eltective. da s after assa e By enterin m name address and si nin this etitio . , Name lease print): Address Ct tate lease rint : Si n ure: ewe ii Cq rteW 95-6 K8 2 I cl t2e�1 s 3C � � q 7 AA cut714 ti, ED o u 8 7 a lz7f� f7a - 9 7ff ST2 'T t -- 9 baa 10 IV" 12 ,3 iP�t�� O C¢ffOwr�rt/ "11q l ;5-t !r lrvt(✓ZN DR- Lpalcurz- ignatures Collected By: Name (Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) jJ: . i PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22§2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (The ordinance is planned to be adopted on Jane%2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSIUiG PROMMON ON L SUMMARY.This ordinance probibits waterstiing,and an other Activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410.6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 4106.022 Watersidiag prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south (c).The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries ofthe special use . areas designated in subsection ft(Ord 2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFWTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days atter passage Bye ' my name address and this petition I am ring M1 2plEftu to Ord.2007 222 iteUMM rohr'bited: Name leaseprint): Address,City Stater leaseprint): Si nature: us-if, ��09 PI 9y 2c 3 VWM f I A a MMoo�15 �O a 4J l D�pi'S6 ,G<'t cit ;�i�G �SCo 7 L(ti�R L �,,, S1.31 r�raolj of 8 f s .5v�s v;)li e )ar N. Pmclsor-c c4. 10 11 U 5� ®. 12 / 13M ' (/ f JI�I Ctjhi'I �IO I'1 d��ccw.� 14 15 Signatures Collected : Name Please Print rl i( tan Si nature: Address, City State: S$o 1 Qo-Ue, oci�-- 4-. !See,. cI `((-�fi ? Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is phoned to be adopted on Jane 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSIQING PROHIBITION ON L SUMMARY.This ordinance pmhibhs wao"Skim&and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410.6.022 is added to the Cotmty Ordinance Cod*to rc&: 4106.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water.skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the cast and the intersection of Wang Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. , (c)_The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory madras giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECnVF DATE.This office becomes effective 30 days after passage Bye ' my name address and signk g this petition I am registering jnv g222dihn.19 LOrd.2007-22 8 2. WatersWaftEdift grobibited: Name lease print): Address,MY State ease Print): Si ne: 2 �y K�iQ2 I�yLZao��bD *j&:- 0A)L)OIL 4 r2 3 ,f/ /D /.f/.(/SOsJ �S"// iIlDQOe rJJ ul ( 9.5'G4 r 4 6 7 W3, 0�Qw VJkt\�%wks Gu.t. L$ s 1017% y�,�� l 12 aclm 13 14 15 OSignatures Collected 13y: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address,City State: Data: (Please copy bleak sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO, 2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a persc n is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and t e intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified n subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE,This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering iny name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiing prohibited: Name lease print): Address, City State lease print): Signature: 2 �f 4� D"ctu o A'or.*7,' rr't- LR 3 1- 13re7 0' C--y 9 55 4 JOCEW14 MANA14I AILA' 4840 MkNC041 Pe. ,C.V.I (A 945 t5 5 J0A �ek`e `b 5� OQ11 N% q s '6{" "545 s ,C!/ 2/00 �f.G �. s ,n19/6 C- �20 J LL L 9 4'k- E4cks' 1Scour Bl.�r 9 Y 10 11 12 13 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: 6ZO ,Scoth-/ i L. �1S/ Date: OWO (Pleasi copy blank sheet i need d) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSIOING PROHIBITION 7iscove ON LSUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Otwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek near ry Bay. SECTION U.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterslding prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south (c).The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en Ang my name address and s' ing this petition I am MCilLerine 31 opposition to Ord.2007-22 6 2 Waterskiinprohibited: Name lease print): Address,City State lease ring : Si tur 23oS 5 • L{�.t9litg ' h _ hc� 4mo QY�ot,� 3 e l�tscov C k t 4 nn 41 S(o 6t5LC.Z)Q t�js I (� 6 rlvY�1 �IGNAt2i1Sr9 O �iSGOU CA 9451`f �• ..1 u D. 8 I ren 1,16 s �Av� /006' itr w s 10 11 12 13 14 15 OSignatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) l PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION:. (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel;on Indian Slough and on the portion of Wemer Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION 11.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 4104.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an. aquaplane,or a similar device, in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (I) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Wenner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the e)uth. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special.use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22 §2.) SECTION I it.EFFEC.HV E DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 da s all assa e By entcrin m name address and signing this etitio Name (please print): Address Ci tate"lease print): Si ature: 2 1 t 20�� 3 8t 4 4coo 5 6 t-1 LAID r � a C�l�►5 �A��° S w rass �rt.�r �, C s 10 12 13 . '14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address. City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) i PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,ora similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device.in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west, (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the Fjuth. (c) The sheriff'is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION❑l. EFFEC.I'IVE DATE."Chis ordinance becomes e%ctive. da s after ansa e 71 By en ering my name address and si nin this petitio +Ialp):RT ist rin' " g` oit;of - 7=22 2i)'Wat Name lease print): Address,Ci S at`p Spllease print): Si nature: h 2 U �r 3 4 5- 6 . 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: ('['his ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION 11.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis.an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the s wth. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION 111. EFFEC 1'1 VE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 da s after assa e B enterin un name address and si nin this etitiott athkra ist rt" n .8'` `" onitb Y Urd 007-22 ater§kl�c "tali Name lease print): Address, Si n 1 ekok 114i' 1CoG�vy �u�a 3 oc-k.>- rf-o,rt Z`yv� 4 5f� Cl G� /� 1� Oct015-0w 49J<-�-' 5 1V'49144�& ZZ25 6 7 s s 10 11 12 13 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) I i PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiine vrohibited: Name lease print): Address,City State lease print): Signature: G/a X14 SSG 2 4190hWaZ4 41--03 Del ( JQ ,Cv P'aA1> � C4 ,���sS6E 3 br Pia c k' geu3 De,l Vdt a-;-/ v, Vlec� apt �, � CA 9tej 4 5 g 7 g 9 ' 10 12 13 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print ✓71'4Y. U c✓ Si nature: Address, City State: (403 FL V t4 r- PICA-Ycd-9 Y Y-66 Date: SAO 7- (Please copy blank,sheet.if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSKHNG PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: TOWN OF DIS O a RY BAY ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION 0 SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of IndianSlough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ring my name address and si nin this petition I am registering rn-y o2l2osition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiinprohibited: Name lease print): Address, City State lease print): Signature: Petition circulated from 5/17107 through 1 5/20/07 (4 days) 2 Signatures per sheet: Number of sheets: Total: 1s 58 870 3 14 6 84 4 12 2 24 5 10 1 10 6 9 .1 9 7 7 1 7 8 6 1 6 9 4 1 4 10 2 1 2 11 1 1 1 12 13 TOAD Mgnatungso 19016 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name (Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) I PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007=22 §2. WATERSIGING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSIGING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 4104.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION M.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en.ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiing Prohibited: Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease print): Signature: 2 r ,l W a✓ 3 4 ^� c 10� I P�d� I oLn-c—lie-'ev vt Cts �'. 6 Y JGt l- 7 C 0 (aj 1G �,�CC�� ZkJ4 8 Q o 'eZ 10 eS� /" s Z3 i` 4�{ /jA1<-_ 0 pis4 oytz( i3>`y X31 V0Z: r 12 1 a 35 D iTxuqLVAI vot 13 14 n Yr 1'e 15 -Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print i natu e: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) I PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSIGING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Curt between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION M.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registerjn2 my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease Tint : Sin ure: V/ f 10 V-&-x 1�eq_l jW11— lop 2 3 4 5 �ov� 5033 8 qlq dfrlc1QQrs. 9 11 A)APV 1"0 6174� 1z w Q� i(►ZP� ��� 13 . c -xv� C-.)Ie�(►le2 Cl . ,;t/e1-1^10 - 14 J"'( CQ(1DoPA 2-521 15CGA J . 'j SqJ V_ Ve UA, VA WU.O.r: -Signatures Collected Bi Name Please Print Si nature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) ^ PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 WatersUng prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the cast and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en eringy my name a nd signing this petition I am registering my opposition to Or 2007-22 6 2. aterskiin bited: Na leas rint : Address, C1tX State lease dnt signature VV 1 o � vcc, � t S7�a 7-azdoaz 2 ` Sol 7 Ca4o-r-z", w 3Arn�o&a 302,00 490, W fVA IL. C v q153 3 $ r � Q C J A-rdLDV 9 12,- r'J 7i F� 0001,I 13 SOD / 14 Ca 15 Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 3 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibi"waterskiing,and all other-activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredget Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. ' SECTION U.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. L (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en.ering my name address and si ninLY this petition I am re isterin my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2,)Waterskiine vrobibited: Nowe lease Tint • I I Address, City State leasAAe\\print): Si n t re 1 2 5 3°� l1s 3 i�A�tJ �v„1-r a} ZL'i� L A V4C-.3 aoJ 4 5 6 8 s ;- I f�olckC . 1, -d �, 9 !! I 1d �vUA�5 i' Yl � r 12 /e szy 13 c7 C�(��"�� ►v�'� f!.j /1/Y� 14 l ( Ir-lI opiGriE� ood AOpozl 15 3 (lu IreI 1 01 S natu Colle ed B Name Please Print Si t re: _Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) C l PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSIGING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION R.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing probibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways-arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction,specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) 1 SECTION III.EFFECTIVE-DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and sign! g this petition I am registering my ovPosition to Ord.2007-22 2. WatersiWing inrohibited: Name lease print): Address, City State lease print): Signature: low 3 aC�e1 Lf4 Yb D b i k v. 4 r _ AAAL 1. 1� 5 N CC SS 6 M ARLtk-S CA 6 �I ( it, I I I - 9 JGSv� �L" S/ / ��e� L 4 10 ,2 13 14V Q 15 Al Slg 'atures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2.WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiin rohibited: Namelease dnt : Address, City State lease print): Signature: 2 Cm 3 1126/6 jr-14 r ' 4 5 Atsio954 QrSca V eP 1,14-IN " r 6 7 CA a 11 12 �3Sg bd-i�t s�3' irsEZ ois-�T cam✓ 13 \j owin PVIJP 014 '-VOW 06 14 ,C C 65_ � ( t 15 Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: r (Please copy blank sheet if needed) I I PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSIGING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the cast and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord 2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease print): Address, City State lease Tint : Signature: 1 2 i 1' 3 � Ql/ FVi o4Z r 0 �l r�✓0 �� ��`l- 5 6 6 i 7 8 41 1 I/M 14' s )�; ��- l � 1 , 9 10 11 12 13 U 14 15 Signature Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signat Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person-is towed behind-ofany type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskling prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance-becomes effective 30 days after passage By en rinst my name address and si nin this petition I am rezisterinu my o osition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name (please tint): Address, City State lease tint : Signature: 1 vl crGa 2 90-7 2 3 4 5 A 441 &AZCr�z- T 6 a< r. by9Cf/ v�e!j2 �P S� 1 ✓u 2 e !� 2 OZ ,2LZ Ma "ann rAVL A0 13 €t� 2131 Po2Zs��c-c. i�ca✓-t � �1 14 �7 L 15 � lrJ S�gnatures Collected By: Name Please Print Si nature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) n PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Wemer Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION IIL EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 6 2.)Waterskiing vrohibited.: Name lease lint : Address, City State lease lint : Si natu l 1 C� i ISS >'► SI L� 3 V 4 l� i t� 5 on I c 11 I-r/ 2160 g ,rw v& L C f, 6 (-2 06 00cesS C. 7 �,� ,h ��U 6)sLd� 8 f e ��I2v ale ��G�ci s �D� ► � � i� � � 'hnAf; ' 10 t C 11 I f r1L 12 ill Y oz wN N -a 13 \^ ��3 7, �' l-t.4-/ nv 6.,lr v (,4 V 14 L A&A �A 7-- 07-5'15 /o.✓e e�c i+v e l� l� i 15 � �(YY )[i) ad Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) ignature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 1 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION M.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en.ering my name address and si nin this petition I am registerinz my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Watersktin2 Drohlbited. Name lease tint : Address, City State— lease tint : ,1 Signature: Zf t�� ✓t C G I 5. C G.�ySb 2 1 � � 3 ( v Qt�� �i Z Z 4 5c�7S �z 9yszry , q eqgI ' 7 O `6 67 8. 9 10 11 12 4U44 l f,� �I(,ra�tsbl0 13 57c:> 5 (?��� f ` At W.A .. 14 15 -Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print Si na e: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) J f7 1 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSHIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSHIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION M.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22&2. Waterskiing Drohlbited: Name lease tint : Address,City State lease tint : Signature: Loov-mv P� hoop �ouo-v u5 2 ✓1 6 SBl'�� GQbirlto mtnT tZVI rn4y a M Citi M rA n �; is 0 '� k� 5 �S 236 S e,c b''r I a " �la��- iwb�►' 8 babot/ 9 NA 10 11 CJ1 V IlJ" ✓� �T 12 1 1 ) Za r\ ` Zkla 13 L� �ufrt v�F� fi r� 15 QUc/0j lq�S6, ::260Y< A Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) Ij PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSIGING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the cast and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION M.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and sign! g this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiin2 Drohibited. Name lease print): Address, City State lease Tint : Signature: 1 �( 'Vow U-xeL'( � 01f 64 nn__ 11 2 0vt � L6 I J I )(f I G,,eS) 3Gt 5 6 Lw S�okv J k )� g i 9 10 , Y_ 1J 0 7W , 11 Y t/� SGUIN� 62G� SAI �°�� i7isc, 12 n 13 (AU , 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the cast and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION M.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after e By enterin m name address and si nin this petition I am re isterin o osition t Ord.2007-22 6 2 W skim r hibited: Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease nn . Si na e: fecuku ga Q Do C'6e 2 0.5s b 4 O r Ire 5 TL l g ! ,sem 1'1t,,JtLv� D(( 6 Cil 7 TooN (,( rm e�4 'bar-0 / g i^ s 10 11 12 ��so, CO11 or 3zG'j T 13 (V � �, CA- 14 t CG�J��L° �� ✓ 1.� tr-Q- C' ..pp � nn 15 en N;m Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signatu e: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 1 3 I s PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Wemer Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes.effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and sign! this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease Tint : Si nature: 2 C° ss � �r ells �� dA 3 4 5 6 6D 7 11120/4) t9'dJL�9t�( !q(q W ju10uJ�3 ✓ 8 � /1W IJnVal Wf6 O� - s� 11 12 row 13 r w l— ``// F 14 15 ✓ L 6 i Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) /!� PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSHIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and ail other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of WemerDredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION M Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si nin this petition 1 am registering my opposition to Ord.20W-2N 2. ate skiine nrohibited: Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease print): ' ria e: 1 i k2CIOh I n 5 2s�� Mur VA L h , 2R4Kt r/) �'� Viva 94 A- 3 ► 9M� "C,47V 2e�-kc , Dv. e74j5 4 I l 5 .�� / /2 T 6 Awl 1bgp 57W GA-rF At/AY C T. 7Wd �&O 8 V1 11 12 r 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 1 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the cast and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si nin this petition I am registering my opuosition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiing urohibited: Name (please lint : Ad'2�(dressss,/C.iitt fta� State lease Tint : Si ature: 2 3 4 ( 0 tLJ� l LSI If/� V�c 5 3 I -fp�Q.( vew 6 ISSO "\Jv S11q TA(A V1 Vf 1 � 7 �la'S A)t-k4mL4kt4 9 ���� XZA014 pp. 1&ce�d rZe" 10 59 1-4-61P 11 U I se 'C, �U l^N� Q) rS,C W-e —n-4 io4 z� LO A- N. 12 Q39 W01-IMAL) 1 C 13 Oe d( �f i 14 111A 0 15 Vb1I (2e/ 2Z WF r2 oakfe- Signatures 611ected By: Name(Please ri t) Signatur . Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 1 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si nin this petition I am re 'sterin my ogRosition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiing Drohlbited: Name lease rint : Address, City State lease print):. Signature: 1 �R i L Sa-r ct.I✓ i a— 2 TtQ15 QO e4 Al 2 ✓/r' r/ �I S�Sa S4lfr/a.� rSCavP�. !44 f 3 � 4 Y1 � . GjUhtJ � [w r7 7y , su �a 5 '5cof 1-6( 6 ��. �1Gso� `�� ►7► oAgf�V- 49 L' 7'216(ACOM& 12 .v s G s wNr 5c6rcp e-qo anile (. 10 1112 13 .3-305- 14 3-3°.T14 1 V7 15 +'I'—ick Signatures Collected By: Name (Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 1� PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance C e,to read: 410-6.022 Watersiding prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing wat skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the cast and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si nin this petition I am re isterin my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiing prohibited: Name lease tint : Address, Citx State (please Tint : Signature-, 2 -;'� L 4 i Ih awn tO civ v'm 5 Nov. W 1*a \ CAi(IM 6 \.f C l/ eell 7 qac' o 8 (04A v 17 ue ? S ll 10 �(A frAxA 14 11 Alm& (Z co- 12 +.VVQ, I �' 13 �j r�i✓ / ' 1.50 S�ar��gY�t C 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) �S i PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits watcrskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff'is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and sign! this petition I am resisterin2 my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Watersliiin robibited: Name lease tint : Address, City State lease tint : Si nature: 1 Ja�1 4f1Jer_'5akjSP�Cq 2 54C�-,, lac. s 3 s 6 4 C 9V of,Le 7 7,7 Ae - s 41 ic K.ZY0Cc t t7 ���s dze cfi , 9 5�aw ('Alb C 10 �s�� C� � ZL-( q 11 T v w '►L�r � 2 1 vo hq �v d� , y M„e1Kt 12 (�,LCLA A ICY, 14 � WD^� JJ1• �ILt G� 1 l r��� 15 CENI`�S I22� MW 1 Ct ; -Signatures Collected By- Name Please Print Si n ture: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 'q PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSHIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my o osition to Ord.2007-22 6 2. Waterskiing Drohibited.: Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease Tint : Si ture: LA 01 SA AW � 1 32� �ro�iI1U 3 `j%'; 4 5 s 7 2_1j C S�5 t` oe -S 4 10 ( IS 11 s 9s�6G 12 ai-Q11C 13 �G(iL C ��f� �O Cr LD 14ZVL ( 15 Q �1 VAN Q(A Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: _Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 'n PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay, SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en.ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22&2. Waters 'in vrobibited. Name lease I print): Address, Cit State lease print): Si n i`7 t $f NGS 2 +-1 12 �-v�^ (' a4 t LT'h_r_cLQ RAq 40 , 2 jt> f+d y V3 3 Y 5 1'� 'vl '<6G:i �ar�T(iiGf , 6 T4 Zz C) 7 ZL45t,soa fit_ �`Ilo s cu V __Durvu o,,v A Cu,L 10 1 Ne z�� 11 12 �j; l Ha" t 133 l 5or�&t S�'i l 13 1. 1 O� S'aa\ c �—_( P 14 _Aalkorw emrO 15 ( uj , Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) / PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSHIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION M Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ring my name address and sign! this petition I am registering my owposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiing Drobibited. Name lease Tint : Address City State lease Tint : Signature: 13D I 2 s AA 'CZfZ� �b �G Y�0 Cruz C`} 6 MA,WV49r'/0 2y I (n, CL s d 1 IS s e We(c/k /V11 lAt,lc1cor A 10 12 13 -Signaturia Collected By: Name Please Print Si nature. Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 1 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION M.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registerin2 my opposition to Ord.2007-22 6 2. Waterskiinprohibited: Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease Tint : Signature: 2 ( A �v� - r %� Lr �r trey tv, C_ ex � 4 RS �T�S l - ta3cs cavno nc way 416Ae E6_ s CCG o�l G%2Gl�Tt'�iiL r �� s l ¢l La r3rt�rt Ut 11 / ' l 1 P-4)✓ 12 a , 13 2CA c Sr 14 1 5Va Q 15 64 !WILI A�Xevol Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Iignature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) l� PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities when:a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION 11.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am re2istering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiing Drohibited: Name lease print): Address, City State lease print): Signature: /409 ` . S` MS'S .Yj�p c 9¢sa. op - 3 �- j � Nll� "a aux t`f7 c SI s Ilk 4 V �� tPX �Y 5 7S s avz)ox folk qm! ` n 975- Discos -Ry �y cv a SG 7-I ot�.tt_mon c-* 9 u V) S ,rer 'gc.- G u%14 10 '.luWk1 ;13.4' Disco � s v 12f�, L _ yf'C 4!`� ��j�lcJ l cCr O/rcI,< 13f- 14 t �t fl� 4��4 ACot�C { L M. U 15 �I lel O a Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Si ure: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) t� l PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSIGING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION R.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By e ering my name address and sign! this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiin robibited: Name lease print): Address, City State lease tint : Signature: Ar kakci5 5 C-0-"'e�-r qW,C4 2 a S s0�4rCad i Ci Ci r trA 1.4 3 ayr(D an r�2 4 CCk?atc. ;137 G W 6-7 r-A , 5yl W 1 1 V� ' I �kSC&�jerl 6 r V- Ski to lr l 0� �G a 9 10 12 1, 13hl\+ 9 w 2z ZC.o o 141 14 Ov\ f\ ��S S c ufj'i:�T /-OvP 15 C.1-0V �AGU��ORrvG t7 '3cuv, r RA Signatures Collected By: Name(Please P nt) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2.WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiing prohibited: Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease Tint : Signature: 2 +L 3 6 Pte' 4 . ( G�A ! Cil C4 5 c� l��la� e VJ c r 6 IA"Y,?�Ifcd X30 D9 7 s- I D an CJ-�16 R-►- jj 9 C 4&W Olv WAvep dlN l� 12 13 \ Vv i �� 1Z�L T kNA 14 `; vSir, CG �-U Z61 � ^lP'Zt1r t 15 Signatures Collected By: Name(Pleas Print) igna ure: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) �� I PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERWING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskung prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering tuy name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22&2. Waterskiing Prohibited. Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease dnt : Signature: 1 % sfr� 2 ��aJ:S Rn-r-K 3 5 ) , �N+ Cn L 2.3A/ 1--.1"aAr-)A15 1 4 6 f l(� Le_��t`Q S `Z r2 7 Q 1l O� W N O U R 0 8 , 10 q 11 0 lrl v 1� 12 ron 13 r 1 — 14 / L /7�T�-Grp 15 kf let Merl CT O C. J Signatures Col cted By: Name Please Print) Wqn(a6e,,11 Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) i �/ PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: Z (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cert and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and sign! g this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22&2 e s "n rohibited: Name lease rint : Address, City State lease rint : i llo f 3 � ,� R)ARL-usf Cr �$ 4 / -YAA 6- 6 r La0� -S dP` c F 6 &Jae 10 §ovI l -t f 0c( A-� .S( Utc l 12 97 Sift G1# C/bql* 13 �t1M� �1 �uSec) 14 00e O f�-- 155 Si natures Collected Name Please Print Si nature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSICIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the cast and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION M.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registerine my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease print): Address, City State lease print): Signature: 2 I q 3 a ,cey, G1 EL�Qev'— A--- 5 l Y' 6 \ \ 7 � ,0�) I .41 y 9 t7 10 -A*r%.4 OL A& 7676kdl f, 11C 13 ' raw�erucoy °Y 14 `CLr/ h i,7 15 3 km ShNtLq= D�'$0 Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address i State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) �g PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSIGING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION`III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si nin this petition I am re isterin my opposition to Ord.2007-22 6 2. WatersklinLy Drohibited: Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease Tint : Sin ur 1 SAVACL 111 425 ska S%mkqr'-<4 Cour1E C 2 / 3 F"^e c 1 I ' a q K /o V C t ape LoKf f R 4 ,1 CSW� � I ISS N 5 Lw I►5�6 gln� i (1nA.�liU� 8 611— V1 LA 9 /E V I L If �C) 12 S4ei �� `JF` �• �,�,,,� 13 �E(� i 'L1` g inAe,IGt Cr't� bWaA�� 14 �4�IG6N1 l Signatures Collected By: Name (Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank.sheet if needed) 30 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSHIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSHIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION 11.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registerinlZ my opposition to Ord.2007-22 2. Waterskii"2 prohibited: Name lease print): Address, City State lease print): Signature: 1 3�'�lira�t Y �l�'r► �l.��scnl��r� P-���s S 2 3 4 U thWOM A-0 5 - 100 U IfCAM ¢ l 6 -r 5 O 5 �A"'rj Or- 7 `Z v VA g S -z f`-� a 11 12 13 14 15 f 1/i 5 Con le ` e4 lotD' Signatures Collected By: Name (Please Print) Signature: Address City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) -3/ PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Test Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vesse,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. -AAj SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is,pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the cast and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 6 2. Waterskiinprohibited: ame lease print): Address, City State lease dnt : -SW na 2 uV-k*rr "9k _10C� i5 t rf) 3 4 5 6 R ti� �� ✓ --7711 �� C a M 4s, 14 70 7j--c 's 9 1► r II 1 t 10 12 (� VYlac 10 S I I 13 �� 14 OaV�- sAJW 15 j7Pr 2�..0 t ra to �ba� roc N Ma T t� Signatures Collected By: Name (Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) I I PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE No,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION M.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si nin this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 6 2.1 Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease lint : Address, City State lease lint : Signature: 1 tAfIN,tGl� 2 y 3 i Or teV-- 01�)W l 4 t ii T>,l 5 s $ C/V Rls-wX� �d YCec4 9 @ Sc 11 6U V1 LA S 9;o &4 K�S' /19-, L 12 n 6 DG r U 13 CeCat � � 14 15 � 54iW, �'-J Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) .33 i PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSHIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. , (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si nim this petition I am rep_isterinil my onnosition to Ord.2007-22&2.1 Waterskiin prohibited- Name leatsee prirft,. Address, City State lease print): Si nature: 1 N/l b I 3 / 4 Aw�hotf 5_ 5 1 ts Q�- 6-65 s L 17 Av P tPDwW ' 9 10 Sco `PO !/�� GL,t a/-AbW r Ile 12 t/ l 13 �I R � �(9A 9 f'� - -ae' - 4 14 rct 15 a c l�` � ` i TZ Qom( VQ �. Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. ' (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) a SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am reggistering my opposition to Ord.20 -22 Waterskii ibited: Name lease dnt : j�,. Address, City State lease dnt : i natur : 1 '/ SAIL Ll j2 2 X11 3 t 4 5 �aaetztq g '.)®il� G�5e-4-\ 6�:5 , 470 b :S_c-carer R Blvd CkNiy -r 7 (L 0)1-N1 -/ �.%' Ev LAetoA. -8 V s L U5 L Lf . f 11 Ld2 _. 10 A n-:'DV 47 .......... ,( m 12 Cis 1t lyn Lc>t ago E, 1 MfSW", 1 L)Z. 13 /J r An 900--)tn macL\n r, 14 15 1 Let VY Signatures Collected By: Name (Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 6 2. Waterskiinprohibited: Name (please Tint): Address, City State lease pdnt : sigriatuw T 2 = S e w A e ,57 6 S4 A i R -C1g k PC , e�uJ 3 Aouj L� n 4 LI nc�a d1 vel( 1-,))u 9 ami a Cr 5 c� a��7 d Cfi c 6 02B I'1 7 1 . c I� SVhklit VK 8 l2 .cam P& A s Ob ce- JA q z 10 1� 11,t Py tr/O6C� � 11 A t 12 l t � .� 5`c a B� L� Z- 13 C L 14 15 F G Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Or-wood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opimsition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease print): Address, City State lease Tint : Signature: / , on ita 114 C6,,bs -)�Q MwVavk C{, O" �e �✓ w1 �flS CJ;(�iS C7- �w Vn4l)l �� 10A 5 A �R 74 Svvttk tb�,NT k3 7 UlAlvo'A �5 s / a 10 12a C`OUan I 4� F 13 14 lq7t ItA �J 15 �wfi�'w 1 ! ©rrw O Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 37 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION M Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and sign! g this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22&2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease Tint : Address,City State lease Tint : Signature: 1tog — 2 Da.Jld vq�Acw V� 3 / h/ J 4 5o/S w7 C ✓r�o �' 1 7 Q)Vk556 T1 PY c, s q 5 bl�> 3W D g l� 10 11 `mow, ��CXN a'O>ti c- it 12 &aA 13 l 14 ??AJ ( P1eX C, 15 \S _`i' -7a\ Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print nature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) $ PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSIGING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between,,the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION 11.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si nin this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease print): Sin re: 1 "01W ® i 5 Cot)--Q 2 V CIN `cP / 4 65-5:z r s 5 6 �a 7 V� �- z7-�r�t 12��Ila 8 1011 ZZZ�GCt r / / cthl 12 /020� 13 ` 93t) L -1rcbGI/l,- 'O� 14 15 PrpVl CroSS 5DLI � .)ICA`7C OCt.r r� Signatures Collected By: Name (Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) ,✓9 I PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION 11.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: ® (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south.- (c) outh.(c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) lj SECTION TIL EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22&2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name leaseprint): Address, City State lease dnt : Signature: 2 3 S 0't , a LSN 4 ' 11 WI eo)I1� ` 5 T1�r6C �� Orao C 5�'Pr t y-P 6 7 Lev V1, I'CIV 8 Je*5 c 10 r �ri Le � �Z rules 11 13 --� Yj 14 1�c ,i TO z C eJct- J- Li 15 0.4 , Signatures Collected By: Name (Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) Y PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSIMNG PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits watcrskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION H.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boon s'of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my na addr s and si ning this petition I am registerin2 my opposition to Ord.2007z2'2,411 007-2 , aterskiin' ibited: Name ase ri : Address,City State lease rint : i 'ture: �' . 1 am z° ld .�„�ul �2 ,i; 3c` a (� c�c k-1660044 L , 4 - 1�l 1 Z� Z�S % �MU�/vS ��' 5 ( 6 aji-ItL q6 6 0 7 � - 01 a 06wt-!: rj2b i7�i VI�f ova U D 9 10 —Z 11 �b � .J �� ✓aI ��if 12 Chi QLE %5m 1 �. 13 v VACS 0.1, j J 14 SInatur Collected BY: Name Please Print Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) / PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and sign! g this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. WaterskiinLy Prohlbited: Name lease tint : Address, City State lease tint : Si ure: i 1 l/ 2 1 -� So2 ��loc�I C 9 3 c,J q0(9 4 s cv y�9 / � �sT�l ✓gse . �2 � ltito s /` d- 12- { tj&iD,-/ 4bk 9 �/7— 65o VJCr O Q Z S Z r ti. 10 - � 11 �l°C 'l 6 12 13 14 t0� S )ov— I 15 Si natures Collected By: Name Please Print Si nature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSHIING PROHIBITION: ( ! (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION H.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskung prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the cast and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Wemer Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION M.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si nin this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiing prohibited: Name lease print): Address, City State lease print): Signature: acl n 641 0 q f 4 Do 5 s t� C D akl4w� � . fC 9 A AJN4 / x & 10 1�t � P2 f[ - � r2-T-A CT 11 12 C�c( a Dq — d C) 13 l� PjTU'`1 GA'�(Cf,A— - vel. \ 14 � h ��l / L1/��� C 1 15 Si natures ColQted By: Name Please Print Signature: l i� Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Wemer Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering niy name address and si nin this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 6 2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease tint : Address, City State lease lint : Signature: C rpt vv � ✓P,l Cfi C� �D 2 e--A 3 6'dIfr7 J'rrS7V-o1Q>r�':Y G� 4 66"70 5 s C_art J^?�WS aoy g 1 qtr` ry`c V Ll 7 W ?lro A�iN TS LO-tj 10 - �J t /��f 11 :563 bi}�1nb7►1 L� DKd Y 12 �FJl�l W 1 U, W 0-WgMrtil C-Z b r&( 13 14 O S, t / uMIU-4 Q k omyt 15 M!5 LWO N Signatures Collected By: Name(Pleas(VPtint) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (I) The en irety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Wemer Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff.is authorized to place regulatory markers.giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFF.0 FIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my na.,ne address and signine this etition,I am o osition to Ord-2007=22 2- Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease print)i Address,Ci State lease print): Si nature: ( I Octt se ov-e,1.j 13,4 y 1 Eco`1�+- �1M►` �j5ro ..,� 1�W C� 2 3 4 5 1 5S C1:9- 6 c�1� vI t�c,� (JC) W caS I C or-k�y el .� 9 3WI x7 !I 10 11 t � V, �1n, � UVM► u D 12 (/ 13 cs61 /'706 VA 14 15 ✓ 1 L (�'? �+ Cfi `/S G' Signatures Collected By: Name (Please Print) Signature: Address City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 7J PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUW ARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Wemer Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION 11.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION 111.EFFEC FIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective.30.days.after_passage By en ering my name address and signing thisetition 1 am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease print): Address, Ci State lease not : Si ture: 1 (,p(q�,�S 7A to 1 �A' � Cowt�� 2 1A As; 611�4121 ��t e I �r*_Vv �7 3 462h,, le-7 c4 6 S 7 Oa 2 Jere(✓1 Gq,�ne- 7� c>?terc�S ro �.a� 4A6�t oU1 8 k;n 2-eL 5 o�� R�.v,«a Yeru� ' s 12�C Jorila�o �( 513Zc►�I.1t�vw, Hl� vQ wKcl\acN 10 YY11KE �-9�1 `1 IA QIZ 6& 11 12 �`tA1s�1� t7� 1 OoLP�I N pL 13 14 ,JR-0- Z 6� Z } V� 4�t L q rL--� 15 11141 k4n P dL'yL ' Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Sign ture: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (Chis ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and or,the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,er a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFEC rIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am re tsterin m o osition toOrd.2007-22 2. Waterskiin d: rohibite . Name " lease print): Address, CiStaW -lease �int�'—" — Si nature: 1 TOM—(1 f3 (�&tlm Oak C� - a 2 Meer 3 0 s P los a 4Vel a4el s 7 x --7 8 ;V441"< 7r--rLI3 -7 1AovtA W, liv£amv GA pi iro s 4�a 10 0 t4� Gt(nc�vt �►nVY�i, l�u�Vnere.C�4 � � 12InG l 3'1I S �d�rnbv b�L u°Y ,-5', 13 14 tie�V�t� 15 3 7F Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) q? PETITION•OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel;on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION It.Sectiost 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That potion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the South. (c) The sheriff iS authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFEC rlVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and signing this etitionI am my opposition to Ord.2007-22 6 2. Waterskiin rohitiited: Name lease print): Address,City State lease riot : Si nature: 1 Lori Cit c o6� o 2d 2 J� 3 lel { U)Glo 4 t^ vs. 6 VU Q 7g�SCl�v hAmuxa C� 11 8 lfl G� 10 11 a Vh CtV4k"yam 51�Aseodelc oCdffe)(-C� UttS � C�- Az 12 //lam� r l�� Gas 13 UU U \�� 14 5 Fe7�eVlrz,Of 15 Q( 9 b+'; ecr 11MY YU0 Ave , (05 EjC*-$1O Signatures Collected By: Name (Please Print) Signature: Address City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) I PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKUNG PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION U.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and signin this petition I am registerine my opposition to Ord.2007-22 2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease print): Address City State lease print): ftnature: 2 4 � � C/ 5 li f X77 S r VtO�K �t�' -N T"f l 7 Vko .- tt54ti Q M s rJ IL 1'r 112k '121� qTsiva Lrj 19 O 57- tas4a 10 LV $S �- 12 1AJe GIPa l S` 5 <� " 13 14 2rL f ridCrmti� OO ,tl 1 S Signatures Collected BW: Name Please Print r CN Si natu : - Address, City State: S WWeOtikh Ra. cn 3WY574q fiWDate: ldft /ef ^0 (Please copy blank sheet if n ded) LN I PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION 11.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section- (b) ection(b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the cast and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By entering/myname address and signing this petitionl am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-2 2. Waterskiinprohibited: Na a lease print): Ad-drre�ss,City State lease print): Sin ure: 17 12-12 2 i / eer 5677- Drakes' 3 VVes( 4 31-e zz e 7 3 a./�/� A S� 1{ ' !/e/ u/< a 7"aa 5 A1�X ��rs I'�15 b�scovc 13a Blvdi1{M� 7 (5U Z4jWvjTC- g 1 V I �l Ow- 9 1 11 /� A,� l l �� �`�/� /� 2 S`� GGcmSt✓ .tlY✓ �1n1✓. 12 1.1 GVCD GeC*(e,69- \ 13 n D I til Stc�e 14 15WgYp� G Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print $ L S Si nature: Address, City State: /,;L7 1 ( 1o,S (A- Date: 1 ^07 (Please copy blank sheet if n ded) 4) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (Phis ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ring rnV name address and signing this petition I am registering my ooposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiine Drohibited: Name lease print): /Address,City State lease print): Signature: 1 � 'rl n J V /'0 S�( r k .. 2 &bw S 3 l G l Q/� o 3 W I o'n%n) ;44A q9 �' 4 W1. � lqtsok 15) Ow 0 5 6 7 ♦? U U( O 2 O Gl DV P-oaj �424 ald LS C41 8 1 �r� I (�• s 10 5C>PZ> �cxil 1405 ( wy 1H 11 lg'F-- NfDA QL4SI L 12 l r �E%lam 13 Q 14 f-60 tioa n 15 Sig natures Collected By: Name Please Print S Si n to e: Address, City State: .'Z &ADate: 1-7 - 6-7 (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the cast and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. '(2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. i (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ring my name address and signing this petifion I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiing prohibited: 'Name(pleaseprint): Address,City State leaseprint): Signature: �275-wci1aw(�(�e�� OJccu �j i y 3 .? J� . 4 C,�s�� SJvc� i r/c i P� , S�iscevc�i yCf� 5 IPS OLU 6 01 7 ! a`� -1 C 8 e e — . ' 9 Lo-b c y C � �� 10 a tvtvW ✓�- 10,0 '50.4 se rj 12 14 1§ 71 15 Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print 5� � Si nature: Address, City State: /:;L'2 f JJ/ .4 r Date: 17-07 (Please copy blank sheet if needed) S�� PETMON OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION H.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ring my name address and s' in this petition I am revistering my o2position to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiing Drobibited: Name I ase print): Address,City State lease print): Si 1 II (J��0 y0�1 2 400 1(k 5 o S3 N cllr,r 13. F 3fl' Gam, a v w 0-6. p 4 h jaw 5 MA Oj U t4 cle W 6 37P f p � _ _ 8 ;41"f 1.4 V I 9 10 11 L 5&iT) Vm6dy C�— YAC—A 12 tQ• No toep 4 LMrONdK D Q • 13 Z✓A r 14 15 MMfA (� Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print Si nature: Address, City State: /3. Date: My (Please copy blank sheet if needed) �3 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION U.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Wemer Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and signing this petition I am reldstering my opposition to Ord.2007-22&2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease print): Address,Ci State lease print): Si ture: 1 apton- W SSD �ourA e�-{ Scva,v1 -Fte s e r41f-8a4YLj3 e-1— 2.1f e 3 y04Pqd&e"k si 4 / e �` /�l0lf/ .Zt'� .G3slrt Dta�,6� lv� '°fie l ��� � sl)00C " s r G _ 9 -� 3 9 - ry / S6.7 le L� 11 Qj a1 S�12 esk qtr ® S751 SI-"dk-,J J,-,ve 13 #lt.Li r-t YJ q Ater 2 W:7 ti.,,,d vvd 104 14 SIS 15 � 55 a SRR KSS Signatures Collected E Name Please Print gS ig atutl!r Address,City State: a 7IJ 1( o6,1 W `51A Date: -0 (Please copy blank sheet if needed) a PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22&2. Waterskling iprohibited: Name lease dfit): Address, City State lease Tint : Signature: 1 l � L � � -✓ l./ I 2 r h 3 � rtc/r// l� W� o s oto/m r� Erl 020�� �i„�L r s o 7� it�I ��5 v1. 7 �W el j a► 64t 1215C0 jGn V Al2 g Sal re.q se'r 80159- VV- TaM cr1�- 10 lc 7Qgclo C� kl4A--\- `� �{ 1� �L � 12 ;Q�4 13 �l'�GL I i ICtt/4-, ( <�L X x '� 14 15fI�� _L Cw) S (5Tpg, SI natures Collected By: Name (Pie se Pdnt) /J l Si nature. Address, City State: ✓e i1 a5w Date: J� (Please copy blpfik sheet if needed) �j PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION H.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Wemer Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2) SECTION UL EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registeriniz my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskling Drohibited: Name lease rint : Address, Cit State lease Tint : Signature: 1 hilt c OL 3 4 J0l/f IG 5 E7 "Ic-onip OLqle r=7 RD s ' s C�U b C'4vn 9 +� c� �J Q�1 �.►Jo>� ' pZ 10 '_ Aeey 0/c�I 2y/0 Q L1 CT 11 Sl/� �-�Ort Iju o1 12 S, G'0-los uO a m 13 2� 8 O QC L 14 15 o In e- I a MC4 -bn PO (0_3 / LQ Signatures Collected By: Ncame Please Print i nature Address, City State: Date: a (Please copy blank keet if needed) 6// PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION H.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION ITI.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si nin2 this petition I am registeriniz my opposition to Ord.2007-22&2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease lint : Address, City State lease lint : Signature: L3 ! �Jt) ro�/3 Ca b ri N o N. P 3 4 ,_;EBF .�.dul.4orc/ 2a/4 i•�jddor; Cr �.j i�c'r-2��j 11600 �o (5f0 Drive s 7 C 8 tlm4e s L•4�'�V'j Mo. i` z3/G �J�Y L-� Zz Dg pita. 11 13 U I!l/C �'^"'Y�I 43 14 15 VE $.ACtc Signatures Collected By: C Name Please Print Signature: Address, City State: 7 / Date: (Please copy 151ink sheet if needed) ' S PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSICIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION It.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways are designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and signin g this petition I amreidstering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiing prohibited: Name lease print): Address,City State lease print): Signature: 40 D60,00 CV4 7BqLl 1V d 1 2 `��2 1l Ca CG C 12D �lymor� 3 ►�t I C���S?°( 2� SlS �oJe 1'i �� . \ 4 ��11✓k/ I� IC�JI / �G / /k 5 �DII�� C as 1�arc �Pa- 1 6 9 M'tV1lC t cbfn n B1 !� ct + C fr7 CIL,6 9 v Dr LOYV�� VX/2L- 10 4- de i c o 11 U 1252 �-4�LLU�I r �wc�, fE�RC::�kc L-13 WCao clslcl(= V=)Rtvc 12 pc IG bcaR c I�t� c r-t-rw oc�d c/� 5t a 13 C � f pY1 2aVsCo°vV9 kA ,im C U� C J'o5orl S $ l / � , 14 w� ia✓t� 8 f-,- Yw o S l3 V5 ci\Ag GQ-. 15 �rr�vwd C1� °iN�t3 Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print ZC-C- �4rt tkcvrvls Si nature: Address, City State: 'ir�5ak& �� -Un Date: S p (Please copy blank sheet if neede ) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel'that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. A) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By e ring my name address and si nin this petition I am registering my o mosition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiinprohibited: Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease Tint : Signature: 2 ck5 G k Wl0 �a0 corxxw, LJCW 3 iV►C!-mac cX1��i�/lC � Sar n M ei f7>70 4 5 ( 6 r ,ej P, s 8 t Z V�im/Elz LNC Ali/low Lla`� 2�,Q 11 Ct �u d, , I 13 tv,, d �C 12 13 15 Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION H.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Wemer Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en.ering my name address and si ning this petition I am relZistering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 2.MaterskiinE Prohibited. Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease Tint : Si na 11,1164 Z Amso4a �41a,0�4 e�C.'o/ ��.4 _'4641� 2 S 3 !.Jews/51'r'm" w w91/mow /WJ - 1 , 4 '�l� < �✓� Com- 5 / �✓'! moi^ CZ «4 S � ez 6 8 0, J - v / \.. •vU 1 10 arstj L( LAI( CD � ►� I �� l 11 \2 O b Q G 12 J vv/ 4i1Z_L'0�i L 13 6 V 15 TV: -Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print i n ure: Address, City State: Da (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 60 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHMITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and signing this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiinprohibited: Name lease print): I L Address,City State lease print): Signature: All 1 rl 1aV� �lD 71 A Q Jt 2 -ce Cl.P S Cltrtns , tom, 3 ' qq 4 k3l del gt� 7 ?C-6e I hemSPn 35 b vs v �K�t500 s �v►ykin 61,19 v�Ul �,Si itis 608 �r-�l�l ►ts r �t�. 10 QSc.a N�o 9 Y t 11IS r aSe{ a�� p 437A-Arcel✓Ap el► 3Gnt)eeSDeafII / 12 I�'GtV t^ C(65h 13 SS 4/�r'Y 93�Zd' n 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print Signature: r Address, Ci State: Date: mIq r0—? (Please copy blank sheet ifdeeded) IC�/t� PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance Is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Or-wood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ring my name address and si ning this petition I am re isterin my o osition to Ord.2007-22 6 2. Waterskling prohibited. Name lease print): Address, City State lease print): Signature: 2 ,,� 52 ( E o oyd 3 l 5 3 cah > 4 J bVUq Srnn «-3 ) DUN P YIf 01. � ' � 5 A 6 �W -5Ch0tj03 Z13`5 -R6-7a C oM V611 8 410 10C-¢- 11 I e irn 1 Gu l/mea 4,12 , 12 13 g a I'I �/ll2 f/i�' l PJ%A- 14 �1l/tlYr /VL LS�N f/� /b, I°I���� t�7' —!Mv 15 Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION H.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION 111.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 6 2. Waterskiinprohibited: Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease Tint : Signature: 1 2 I I 3 4 �� n � ��-� �o G451� a a 5 1�21'f.A cl�011 6 5 5��� '-;/,Z x srX? Akil osetru fez 2a� W i nk - j- `o o—% s N a2cr�t e� aq - 10 A9^ C2 IC 12 €95 f3A i-PFPA NI�-� i(Z 3A4 13 L 'GjA- 14 % r� 3 77 /�dlr/VXdf Pf!flC/1S $i1 co 15 Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 3 6 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSMING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION M Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ring my name address and si nin this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease print): Address, City State lease print): Signature: It 7 J� 1 < Te J Gv/^S 3a �z C-� • t) 2 U 6 s 0A4 1&)4J. 0 3 � /7-;1-- 4 Lrr7v�. 7Z4 5 �, P LV Q A I s 4L c s D5 . 6 L 10 &LO 11 12 13 t e 14o 15 _Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) (T i PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance Is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIWG PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION H.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the cast and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION M.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and sign! g this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 6 2.1 Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease Tint : Si nat re: q� 2 wfl 3 d 4 M1�(Lt t,�U� �11G 5ca�vtY 5 11W Lisa a2l JOW(IIJANt ()Jk4. M M L 6 s mos ~I N� l '. 6 7 , 8 Ow Ktsmn zav� 9 /�//h^' rr-(1111W 7y16 UI, 9r r cf r1eOftey13Q 10 11 CA�xz k 127LI 13 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print k Si natur Address, City State:�6- 151-0;leapv'� 4,�vo � Date: (Please copy b sheet if needed 1 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSMING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ring my name address and si nin this petition I am rej!isterin2 my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease Tint : Signature: 1 G / 2 3 za�jV! f?rl/I f Z07 I la l4C'I<� Crl- 4 � 5 6 /V 7 41-9 4K5o 5 v-a is P 9 10 �} 1 �L.C7 Std �l GIu3vev� Q1 If 11 (:�1CWG(e, g'3 2#+64M )� 12 13 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name (Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date:. (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 6� PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Wemer Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION 11.Sectior 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers.giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFEC HVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si nin this petitiorFl am re isterin m opposition to Ord.2007-22 6 2. Waterskiin prohibit d: Name lease print): Address, Ci—State--lease ain`t : Si ure: 1 t ell o d S' 4/ Ale LtNcrn urC%� 2 ` �i y l ��t 4 -- 3 W -736 6YA &q1&1j 14 5 - n o® s aS5 « Yidw- S . ST, 0. L-ONen c a V Qtu.� / 9 10 Off„- 1 4\Z0y 11 12 13 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name (Please Print) Signature: Address City State: Date. (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 67 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Test Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. .(2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registerin2 my opposition to Ord.2007-22&2.1 Waterskling nrobibited: Name lease Tint : Address, City State lease Tint : Signature: 2 3 C+A�vVI�t.L 4 6 � A JV'Af4d40fX_. C)VSLC%OW CkAA1 4A 7 lA M14 .0 313 EwEbt:7 PLr, N Ba- *oz./ 8 Rill d ekkz�6, 9 V7 SZr i 10 11 12 13 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print C 2t/Si natur Address, City State: 45e>71 / d Date: l? (Please copy blank sheet if needed) g 6 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKHNG PROHIBITION SECTION L SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portionof Wemer Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c).The sheriffis authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ring my name address and sign' "this pertition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22§2. Waterskiinprohibited: Name lease print): Address,City State lease print): Signature: >Tp� ARr lel �E�As�f1iC/U 2lqatf /✓EVJL6 AV's' ^® 1 , �✓ ns6 c s i-9 py� 2t�ta C CcI- : %��J _ jj �)Lt S)eS(z ar\so Due -t-- -2- 3 5 7 v �` 8 9 10 „ 12 13 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 6Y PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION 11.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION 111.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en eriuR my name address and si ning this petitioA am reeistering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 2.) terskiiniz, ohibited: Name lease print): Address, City State lease print): I Si natur 2AP 3 !/�J /� 7 vV� pts ✓ 4 r� ►c,4z �-� wow ,(� A 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 'a 15 Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 70 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Text Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSIQING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si ning this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 6 2. Waterskiinprohibited: Name lease print): Address,City State lease print): Signature: 1 (hrj5 Arkley gItj 0pr oj7ux pry M0 r1do1 (-4 C 2 / 01/P/l s 3 M\("/v RP wqc, C �. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name(Please Print) Signature: Address, City State: Date: (Please copy blank sheet if needed) 7� 1 PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 §2.WATERSIGING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION IL Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION III.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ring my name address and si nin this petition I am re isterin my opposition to Ord,2007-22&2. Waterskiing vrohibited: Name lease print): Address, City State lease Tint : Signature: 5&V/ 5T?-k6o4kD IP-1-6 1 H.l�iP�NL'pis�E�E/✓�rti�EB rsisecl✓ 2 234V CW ys`/Y - 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Signatures Collected By: Name Please Print Si natu Address, City State$ 7 rj c Date: 6 (Please copy Wmk sheet if needed 7� I PETITION OPPOSING ORDINANCE 2007-22 § 2. WATERSKIING PROHIBITION: (This ordinance is planned to be adopted on June 5,2007) - Teat Follows: ORDINANCE NO,2007-22 WATERSKIING PROHIBITION SECTION I. SUMMARY.This ordinance prohibits waterskiing,and all other activities where a person is towed behind or alongside any type of vessel,on Indian Slough and on the portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek,near Discovery Bay. SECTION II.Section 410-6.022 is added to the County Ordinance Code,to read: 410-6.022 Waterskiing prohibited. (a) No person shall operate any vessel that is pulling or towing water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,nor shall any person ride water skis,an aquaplane,or a similar device,in any of the special use areas designated in subsection(b)of tilts section. (b) The following waterways arc designated as special use areas: (1) The entirety of Indian Slough,between Old River on the east and the intersection of Werner Dredger Cut and Kellogg Creek on the west. (2) That portion of Werner Dredger Cut between the Orwood Road bridge on the north and the intersection of Indian Slough and Kellogg Creek on the south. (c) The sheriff is authorized to place regulatory markers giving notice of the restriction specified in subsection(a)at the boundaries of the special use areas designated in subsection(b).(Ord.2007-22§2.) SECTION M.EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage By en ering my name address and si nin this petition I am registering my opposition to Ord.2007-22 4 2. Waterskiin rohibited: Name lease print): Address, City State lease print): Si n ture: j/V 41 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 Signatures Collected By: Name Please Pri (/7/,lC/7.`Si nature. Address, City State: -5-5771 . Date: 'S-- ZC (Please copy blank sh&et if needed) �3 &[5107 Paul Van Emmerik 2132 Portside Ct Discovery Bay Statement against the proposed water-ski ban. The subjects of this proposal are waterways that are rarely used by any boater during normal work days. These waterways are ideal for water-skiing at those times and some boaters take advantage of this opportunity after school or work. A recap of what I have witnessed and heard--- I attended the Town Meeting where-in the great majority of about 400-600 people and a petition signed by over 1500 local residents let it be known that the proposed ban was based on erroneous information. According to the Sheriff Water Patrol, never has any fatality been blamed on water ski activities,wake boarding or any other tow by boat sport. The Sheriff stated that most of the accidents/incidents were caused by speed, operator error,or boating on the wrong side of the waterway. At the present time we have adequate rules to control these issues, provided manpower is made available. To ban the tow by boat sport is discriminatory, and may lower the value of my property since it may no longer be as desirable a place to live and play. If the tow sports are banned we should also ban the jet skis,go fast boats, fishing boats, sailboats, paddle boats,big boats,and all other boats. I am fundamentally against proposals that take my rights away, particularly when it may lower the value of my property. I keep hearing that people for the ban also have rights. And I agree. They have a right to be heard. Very few were heard, and those that did speak were a definite minority and did not always state correct facts and strayed off the subject. I believe in the democratic process where the majority speaks for the community,not the minority, or individual board members. I also believe that elected officials must support the will of the people, not their own will. To support other than the majority is destructive and very conducive to ending any political career. The subject waterways are mostly used during week-end and holidays and at times are crowded. During workdays there is hardly anyone on it. It would be a shame to close these waterways at those times. Thank you. i Hello Supervisor Piepho, June 4, 2007 The Bay Area Water Ski Club and I are opposed to the proposed ordinance 2007-22 prohibiting waterskiing sports in Indian Slew& Warner Cut near Discovery Bay as explained below. I have been skiing on the Delta for over 50 years, a resident of Discovery Bay for 24 years, Vice-president of the Bay Area Water Ski Club and have been):e� comprehensive 8 hour ski boat safety course for the last 10 years. Through this experience I have developed significant expertise on boating safety on the Delta. 1) The overwhelming number of accidents on the Delta have NOT been caused by the towing of skiers, wake boarders etc., but almost exclusively caused by alcohol and lack of driver education. State boating statistics back this up. Therefore, banning skiing near Discovery will not improve the potential accident rate in crowded conditions. 2) As a member of the CCC Sheriffs Marine Patrol has pointed out, the ordinance may raise the risk of accidents near the entrance to Indian Slew off Old River. This is a very high traffic area since Old River is the main North/South thoroughfare in this portion of the Delta and this also has four blind corners formed by the intersection of Old River, Indian Slew and Woodard/N. Victoria Canals. If skiing is prohibited in Indian Slew, skiers may be temped to drop into the water at the entrance to Indian Slew putting them at risk with the combination of four way traffic and blind corners. 3) In addition, this ordinance will likely divert the very limited and precious resources of the CCC Sheriffs Marine Patrol from higher priorities to enforce an ordinance with little benefit. 4) The crowded conditions in Indian Slew occur only during the mid portions of the day on Saturday, Sunday and some holidays. Weekend mornings and weekdays are rarely crowded and provide some of the best n skiing conditions close to Discovery Bay. 5) It would be unfortunate to eliminate one of the key Discovery Bay attributes and the enjoyment of prime public resources for no obvious benefit. We believe there are higher priorities for the Supervisors to consider if they wish to improve boating safety on the Delta. 1) Increase the funding for the Sheriffs Marine Patrol. This is our first line of defense to educate and enforce the current boating safety regulations. 2) Support mandatory education and licensing of boat drivers. Currently, unqualified individuals can easily purchase a boat or personal watercraft capable of speeds of 60 to over 100 MPH and have no clue on how to safely use them. 3) Support more restrictive alcohol regulations. For example, alcoholic drinking and open containers of alcohol are allowed even on small boats, but not autos. Please vote NO on this ordinance that restricts one of the most enjoyable and safe activities on the Delta with no obvious benefit to safety. Thank you, Larry Ligon Vice-president Bay Area Water Ski Club 5597 Marlin Drive Discovery Bay, Ca. 94514 707-322-1157 Larryjigon@sbcglobal.net Print http://us.f574.mail.vahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1 \ From: Barry Anthony(barry.anthony@mac.com) To: info@dettawaterskiban.org tl Wn Date: Friday, May 25, 2007 9:49:59 AM �05 Subject: The Ban! Q I've never hard of such ridiculous measures. How about cracking down on big speed boats doing a 100 +MPH! This community has been a water ski community since I was child.THat is what this place is all about. It's part of the appeal and Vibe of Discovery Bay. You May as well fill the delta in with dirt while your at it! ----------------- --- r. V')O/')MY7 F?d0 ANA �Y Tint http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: michele baca(michele@acfloors.net) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:10:57 PM Subject: Fwd: Ban of Water Skiing ---- ----- ---- Just thought I would pass this letter along. I was cc'd this morning. Michele Begin forwarded message: From: Lynn Bunnell<lynnbunneil(a)mac.com> Date: May 17,2007 10:42:33 AM PDT To: dist3(c)bos:cccounty:us - - - Subject: Ban of Water Skiing This is to express my opposition to the proposed ban on water skiing in Indian Slough, Ordinance 2007-22. I agree this is a congested area and water skiing, wake boarding and towing of other water toys with people/kids should be restricted during periods of high traffic which occurs on weekends and holidays. My_opposition is because during the rest of the time this ordinance is penalizing residents of Discovery Bay by not allowing them the use of the waterways when it is not otherwise congested. I recommend the ordinance be altered to ban towing activities on weekends and designated public holidays. The article in the Contra Costa Times stated that one of the sheriff deputies stated that it would be easier to enforce a full time ban than one covering weekends and holidays. That is an ignorant statement that anyone who lives near and uses the waterways knows. First of all, there is almost no patrol presence during the week so it would be rare that a violation would ever be discovered by the patrol. Perhaps a citizen aware of the ordinance would call and report a violation causing a patrol to be dispatched during a period when the activity is posing no threat anyway, thereby wasting resources that could be saved for a time when there presence had some meaning. Second, staffing for low activity periods in order to enforce this ban covers a much greater period of time than busy periods of time. If it were easier to staff for full time enforcement than part time enforcement I wonder why cities don't save money by employing meter maids every day of the week. In reality, no ban at all should be needed, common sense says that when there is a lot of boating activity, for your own and your family's safety you should travel to an area of less activity before commencing your water play activities. So the ban you are enacting only applies to those who have no common sense to begin with. Training and teaching of the common sense required to be a responsible boater is the real solution. Lynn Bunnell Discovery Bay Resident r 5/29/2007 6:58 AM 'Tint http://us.f574.maii.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: Matt Baker (Matt Baker@emcorgroup.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Thursday, May 17, 2007 8:01:55 PM Subject: Sign me up! It's funny but I'm sure one of the Indian Slough "accidents"was Spencer landing on his dome trying a new wakeboard trick and got a concussion. I'm sure that's one them but it had nothing to do with Indian Slough, other boats, etc. It could have happened anywhere, on any part of the delta, lake, or ocean. I'm not a fan of statistics because there is no way to qualify them. Ifs simply a"boating accident" causing personal injury requiring medical attention and it happened on Indian Slough. Keep me informed. Thanks; Matt Baker EMCOR Service/ Mesa Energy Systems, Inc OF 510 259 2150 FX 510 217 3989 CP 510 755 2284 DC 116"24604*4 matt_baker@emcorgroup.com This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. 5/29/2007 6:56 AM a Print Pagel of 2 From: matt-baker@comcast.net (matt-baker@comcast.net) To: dist3@bos.cccounty.us; distl@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us; gayle@bos.cccounty.us; dist4@bos.cccounty.us; dist5@bos.cccounty.us Date: Saturday, June 2, 2007 11:13:06 PM Cc: Assemblymember.Houston@assembly.ca.gov; Erika.Freeman@asm.ca.gov Subject: Ordinance 2007-22;No,No,No to this misguided and dangerous ordinance Supervisors Peipho, Gioia, Uilkema, Bonilla, and Glover- You must vote no on this absolutely preposterous ordinance being rammed down the throats of us, the residents of Discovery Bay and other local communities who use these two waterways. This proposal has not been investigated by anyone with a single speck of credibility. It is a biased piece of legislation that would NOT have prevented any of the skiing accidents currently on record. There has not been one single boat vs. skier incident ever recorded. My son is one of the "serious" water skier incidents on record. He fell while wake boarding and got a concussion. Doesn't matter that it could have happened on any body of water on this entire planet. But the fact that it happened on the "dangerous" Indian Slough means that this particular stretch of water is some how a hazard to him specifically and to all towed individuals. Does that make sense to anyone?If I hear one more hollow argument about safety I'm going to scream. This prophylactic measure turns this same stretch of congested water into a high speed expressway. The "blind" spots haven't changed. They will have only been exacerbated by even greater boat speeds. Does that make sense to anyone? Having been a resident of this community for the last 21 years I can honestly say that I've never been more proud of the citizens we have in this town fighting against this ridiculous ordinance. This is a truly galvanizing watershed moment for us all, from young families, to grown families,retired citizens, and even the "shredders". The voices are singular,No to the DBMAC and no to this ban that does not address real safety issues. As locals, we address these congested pieces of water like this; on weekends you don't ski here and on holidays you don't ski here. Pretty simple huh?As for those in favor of the ordinance there were 4 members of the community who spoke at the meeting. The first one was the former council member who initially dreamt this thing up, the second one was some guy totally off point complaining about erosion and Rec 800, the third one was a lady I don't want anywhere near me when I'm out on any part of the delta let alone Indian Slough, or Werner Cut as she does not maintain a safe boating distance when traveling behind people on skis as she admitted to us all, and the fourth was some cabin cruiser owner posturing about the 6' swells he throws off his boat and how boats can't get by him without bow washing and dropping their skiers. People like the last two are the "real" hazards out here. Not the boaters with skiers. Conversely the opponents of this ban would be conservatively placed at 300+people for the special sham meeting the other night, 1500+ signatures on a petition to oppose this ban, hundreds of letters to the DBMAC stating their disagreement with the ban. I only wish you had either been here (excluding supervisor Peipho who was in attendance although representing the ban), or had the opportunity to view a video of this meeting. The proponents on the DBMAC board simply drank the Kool-Aid foisted on them by others and failed at each and every opportunity to really hear what this community wants. So what's the solution?... only offered up about 25-30 times at our town sham of a meeting the other night including one of the board members, ..ban skiing and towables on weekends and national holidays. Simple. The proponents claim this solution to be "difficult to enforce". Let me see, we've got car pool lanes that we seem to manage special times and days, and we've got other time or date sensitive restrictions that we deal with everyday. Heck there's a stream up in the mountains that I love to fish in that's got different restrictions for different months of the year. This is just not a reasonable objection especially considering the lack of marine patrols in this area. Why have them respond to a call to come http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 A Print Page 2 of 2 �r out and ticket me when I'm out there at lam, or 7pm on a weekday when there's not a single soul around as was the case this last Thursday and Friday evenings? What a waste of our limited but valuable enforcement resources. So please, I implore you, do not pass this ordinance. It is illogical, specious at best, and a violation of the duties of the DBMAC to represent the people who elected them to their positions. We are not their children to establish rules without hearing our voices. We provided several hundred such voices just the other night and for the last several weeks when the curtain was pulled back on this obvious power grabbing political stunt. As the president of the DBMAC cited some "industry standard" the other night I couldn't help but be reminded how the industry standards I look to when making important personal and professional decisions affecting not only myself but others, are guidance from those more knowledgable than myself,personal introspection, investigation, logic, reason, and critical measured thought. There's not a single iota of any of that contained anywhere in this ordinance. Vote no on Ordinance 2007-22. Thank You. Matt Baker http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 i 'riot http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: Berry, Kristy(Kristy.Berry@anritsu.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:58:41 AM Subject: BANNING skiing on the Delta Hi, I just would like to oppose banning skiing on the Delta. Boats are not flying through the delta with skiers behind them -they fly through the delta when they are not pulling skiers. The problem is that people need to slow down and pay attention - not ban the skiers that are just trying to have a good time!! Please re-consider this action. If you crackdown on the partiers going out on the Delta to drink and not think the safety will improve. Banning skiing on the delta is only going to promote it becoming a bigger party place! Thanks! Kristy Berry This message is intended for the use of the individual/entity to whom it is addressed. This message may contain privileged information exempt from disclosure. If you are not the addressee, distribution or copying of this message, or dissemination of the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you should receive this message in error, please destroy it, or return to sender. Thank You. cM0MAA7rern ?rint http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: Kevin Berry (kevin@creativefoamshapes.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 11:24:53 AM Subject: Waterski Ban My name is Kevin Berry and have grown up waterskiing on the delta around Discovery Bay and am shocked to hear of a potential closure/ban of waterskiing. Just wanted to voice my opinion that I don't feel this is justified. The issues that some may have can be resolved in other ways without a blatant disregard for public use. I am in support of a safe environment with use for all. This is not the means in which to do so. Regards, Kevin Berry i f i 5/29/2007 6:51 AM Tint http://us_f574.mail.yahoo.com/de/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: kathy(elderlawkathy@sbcglobal.net) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Friday, May 18, 2007 10:22:31 AM Subject: Opposition to the ban on skiing I have been an active water enthusiast on the Delta for over 20 years. I think this proposed ban on waterskiing is a totally ineffective way to halt the problem,which is alcohol and excessive speed of boats mostly like cigarette boats, built only for speed, which make no sense to anyone, except males between 15 and 25 who have some wierd need for speed. So make a 40 mph zone (between say noon and 7 pm. or crack down on alcohol on the Delta whether it is the driver or occupants, that makes a lot more sense. Requiring more education on boat driving would also be a better and more effective solution like a special liscense to drive a boat requiring driver education and boating safety which we used to have to get a driver's license for a car. Or raise the age limit of driving to 21.....that might be helpful as well. Kathleen Brewington ---Attorney- 555 --Attorney- 555 Soquel Avenue Sutie 320 Satna Cruz, CA 95062 (831) 459-8498 5/29/2007 6:58 A I Print Page 1 of 1 From: Blythe Bruntz (blythe@juniper.net) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 10:15:01 AM Cc: Bruntz Dave Work Subject: Ordinance 2007-22 prohibiting waterskiing near Discovery Bay I support keeping the current law which allows watersports in the proposed waterski ban area, and enforcing the current law for violators who are driving drunk or wrecklessly for the reasons outlined below. I agree that safety if an issue, and would support a ban on holiday weekends and from the hours of noon-5pm when the area is overcrowded. Otherwise, I see absolutely no reason to outlaw watersports in the area in which I have PAID DEARLY to "LIVE WHERE I PLAY"!! Not a single death in this area is due to watersports -this ordinance unfairly targets watersports enthusiasts. * Accidents in this area are largely due to excessive speed and alcohol-this ordinance wouldn't have prevented a single death. * This ordinance essentially creates a freeway from Orwood to Old River , likely increasing speeds and accidents. It is a killer. ----------------------- ------ - - - -- This ordinance paves the way for a 5MPH zone putting the watersports we all love in further jeopardy. The supporters say this isn't true, but isn't it the logical next step after the next death due to excessive speed and drinking. * This ordinance paves the way for more deep water development-Private Island Homes will require this to be a 5MPH zone, this is the first step. BOTTOM LINE: This isn't about safety! If it were it would address the cause of accidents! It DOESN'T. Blythe Bruntz Human Resources Juniper Networks 1194 N.Mathilda Avenue Sunnyvale,CA 94089 408-745-8129 For I3R assistance.please send a helpdesk ticket to:IIR i http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/de/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 5/29/2007 s i Print Page 1 of 2 From: Dave Bruntz (bruntz@postini.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 10:32:44 AM Subject: Ordinance 2007-22 prohibiting waterskiing near Discovery Bay I supportkeeping the current law allows watersports in the proposed waterski ban area, and enforcing the current law for violators who are driving drunk or wrecklessly for the reasons outlined below. I agree that safety if an issue, and would support a ban on holiday weekends and from the hours of noon-5pm when the area is overcrowded. Otherwise, I see absolutely no reason to outlaw watersports in the area in which I have PAID DEARLY to "LIVE WHERE I PLAY"ll Not a single death in this area is due to watersports —this ordinance unfairly targets watersports enthusiasts. * Accidents in this area are largely due to excessive speed and alcohol—this ordinance wouldn't have prevented a single death. * This ordinance essentially creates a freeway from Orwood to Old River , likely increasing speeds and accidents. It is a killer. -- - ----- - - - ----------------- ----- - -- ----- -- — -- * This ordinance paves the way for a 5MPH zone putting the watersports we all love in further jeopardy. The supporters say this isn't true, but isn't it the logical next step after the next death due to excessive speed and drinking. * This ordinance paves the way for more deep water development—Private Island Homes will require this to be a 5MPH zone, this is the first step. BOTTOM LINE: This isn't about safety! If it were it would address the cause of accidents! It DOESN'T. David Bruntz Systems Engineer Postini, Inc. 959 Skyway Road Suite 200 San Carlos, CA 94070 bruntz postini.com PH: 650-486-8158 Cell: 650-743-8156 http://us.f574.mail:yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x -- 5/29/2007 - - Print http://us.f574.maii.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: Yvonne Crenshaw(yvonnecrenshaw@msn.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Thursday, May 24, 2007 8:50:51 AM Subject: Delta Ski Ban I would like to voice my opinion and attend the meetings. Please put me on the email list. I would also like to see the map that shows where they are planning to ban the skiing if you could send it to me. It was not attached to the email that I got. Warm Regards, 4 Yvonne Crenshaw RD/1VIAX Associates Direct: (925) 260-5873 www.TeamCrenshaw.com - - C Oualitp Service Certified _. 5/29/2007 6:49 AN Print Page 1 of 1 From: Mark D (wakeboarderl213@gmail.com)- To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 12:27:20 PM Subject: Please don't ban watersports on the Delta Dear County Officials, I am writing regarding the proposed ban of waterskiiing and wakeboarding on the Delta. Such a ban would serve no discernable purpose other than to bring an end to watersports activities enjoyed by hundreds of people each summer. In no way are waterskiing and wakeboarding doing any damage to property on the Delta or bringing harm to other boaters. The vast majority of accidents caused on the Delta, indeed on any waterway, are caused by excessive alcohol consumption and reckless speeding, not by the towing of a waterskiier or wakeboarder behind a boat. Almost all watersports enthusiasts are responsible people who respect the rules of boating and just want enjoy the sun and the water like everyone else. In fact, there have been no deaths due to watersports in this area, which raises a question as to the logic of prohibiting such inherently safe activities. A better solution would be to go after those who are directly responsible for most boating accidents—those who drink and drive on the Delta. Please consider these points before making a decision that could negatively impact many civil and law-abiding citizens of the area. Respectfully, Mark Duer http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/de/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 5/29/2007-- - To Whom It May Concern: My name is James Daughters. I am a long time member of the Discovery Bay Yacht Harbor -and-have been skiing on the California_Delta for the over 20 years. I am submitting this letter to express my concern with a recent ordinance passed (2007-22) by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors to prohibit waterskiing on Indian Slough and Werner Cut. I do not support this measure for the following concerns: This ordinance was passed under the presumption that prohibiting waterskiing on this section of the delta would reduce the number of boating accidents that occur each year. A section of Indian Slough in question is over 800 feet wide and is the widest section of the delta within miles. We know from the research of these accidents that have occurred over the last nine years, that none included a water skier or even a water-ski boat. There have been 4 fatal - - - - ------- - accidents over the last 9 years. 2 died while operatinq bass fishing boats, 1 died in a jet ski- `cigarette" boat crash, and 1 died of carbon monoxide poisoning. I am concerned that this will only create more unsafe conditions because the new the ski zone begins at the intersection of Indian Slough and Middle River. This 5-way intersection of levees is recognized by the Sheriff' s department and locals as one of the busiest intersections in the California Delta. The following questions remain and I feel it is imperative as a community, that we have the opportunity to further discuss this ordinance before it is instituted. ----` ➢ What research was done that suggested this ordinance would prevent accidents or alleviate congestion in this section of the Delta? ➢ How will this unfunded mandate be put into place? Are the financial and human resources in place to efficiently and effectively institute this ordinance? ➢ How will a sign posted in one section of the delta save lives in other areas of the delta when you are essentially moving the congestion further up the waterways? ➢ How will the measure be enforced? What fines will be collected? Where will that money go to? ➢ Legislation already exists to that allows the Sheriffs Department to use discretion and cite unsafe boating. Maybe we should explore allotting the Sheriffs department the proper funding to uphold the laws we already have. ➢ Does this ordinance accurately reflect the views of the constituents of Discovery Bay? We can all agree that safe boating is priority for everyone. However, I cannot support an ordinance that is not research based nor has the fiscal or sufficient human resources behind it to actually be implemented. Sincerely, James Daughters PO Box 515 Glenbrook, NV 89413 rint http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.comldc/launch?action=welcoxnc&YY=135... From: JAMES DAUGHTERS odaughters@sbcglobai.net) To: info@deitawaterskiban.org Date: Friday, May 18, 2007 8:26:26 PM Subject: Delta Water Skiing Ban Letter Thank you for taking action on this matter. While I personally believe waterskiing there are much better locations for waterskiing than Indian Slough given the poor conditions and boat traffic, I am always averse to more government oversight and legislation_ Contra Costa.County currently has more than sufficient legislation in place to address problems as they pertain to acts of unsafe boating. Please feel free to forward the attached form letter to the respective parties concerned in the action. My only disclosure being I am not a resident of nor voter in Contra Costa County. Best Regards, James Daughters 5/29/2007 6:57 AD Print Page 1 of 1 From: Devin (ioskeletor@gmail.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 9:32:30 PM Subject: wanted to know how the town hall meeting went? Hello I am a concerned citizen of Discovery Bay, I really don't want this ban to become effective. For one it rediculous whats the point in living in Discovery Bay if you can have fun here anymore? Plus don't the statistics show that the majority of the fatalities in this region are responsible by irresponsible boating practices and alcohol. In fact non of the fatalities are result of experienced wakeboarders and skiers. I don't understand what prompted this ban? Was it an inntiative by a person in Disco Bay, was it a mandate by the sheriffs thinking it might protect us?what are the circumstances of this? I wish that I could have attended the town hall meeting and shown my support, but I had an appendectomy earlier this week and have been sprawled out on my couch in recovery, but I still want to show my support for those that are resisting the ban. Devin Cooke I am also curious if the ban passes (hopefully it doesn't) what will be the punishment or fine for skiing or wakeboarding? http://us.f574.maii.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 Print Page 1 of 1 From: Diprete, Catheryne (Catheryne.Diprete@morganstanley.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 9:05:43 AM Subject: Ordinance 2007-22 prohibiting waterskiing near Discovery Bay I can't understand why anyone would propose this ordinance. Anyone truly concerned with safety would be addressing alcohol and boater education, not trying to eliminate water skiiers. It is clearly not for the reasons expressed, so what is the real agenda here? Catheryne NPrete, CFP®, Financial Advisor Assistant Branch Manager Morgan Stanley 1 McInnis Parkway San Rafael, CA 94903 Ph (415) 444-1243, Fax (415)444-1250 catheryne.diprete@morgaristanley.com BE ADVISED:it is important that you do not use e-mail to request,authorize or effect the purchase or sale of any security or commodity,to send fund transfer instructions,or to effect any other transactions.Any such request,orders,or instructions that you send will not be accepted and will not be processed by Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley's Code of Conduct is a Culture of Excellence.All incoming correspondence should be business related and respect our code.All e-mail sent to or from this address will be received or otherwise recorded by the Morgan Stanley corporate e-mail system and is subject to archival,monitoring or review by,and/or disclosure to any other party as required by law. Should you wish to correspond with the recipient of your communication on a personal matter,please contact him/her for the appropriate electronic ------------address-------------- -- -- Important Notice to Recipients: It is important that you do not use e-mail to request,authorize or effect the purchase or sale of any security or commodity,to send fund transfer instructions,or to effect any other transactions.Any such request,orders,or instructions that you send will not be accepted and will not be processed by Morgan Stanley. http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1-505000334&x -5/29/2007 Print Page 1 of 1 From: Caroldivita@aol.com (Caroldivita@aol.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 12:01:22 PM Subject: Water ski ordinance To Whom it May Concern, I have been water skiing on the delta for 15 years. It was my dream to live here. After many years of hard work I was able to purchase my dream home here in Discovery Bay in September 2001. 1 go out waterskiing year round at least 3 times per week. It is my passion. It is why I live here. This Ordinance would prohibit me from doing this as often as I do because of the time constraints to get to water I can ski in!! I also fear that it will decrease my property value!! This Ordinance will not decrease accidents, it will increase accidents!!! I support a safety course or some sort of certification for boating safety in the future. I fear this is not safety related but has an underlying purpose, not to the benefit of anyone but people and agencies (developers and the likes) for monetary reasons!! I strongly oppose this Ordinance!! Please keep me informed of any future action that may be necessary for me to take. I would like to be involved to help thwart this Ordinance and work on solutions that may be necessary!! Thank you for your time and attention!!!! Carol Divita See what's free at AOL.com. http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 'rint http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: ericksonkeith@comcast.net (ericksonkeith@comcast.net) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:20:01 AM Subject: Email Contact Please add me to the list to stop this nonsense. ericksonkeith(a,comcast.net Thanks, Keith Erickson i 5/29/2007 6:54 AM Print http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: Nick Von Euw(chevy88trk@yahoo.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 8:24:34 PM Subject: opposing waker ski ban I am extremely against Ordinance 2007-22. One of the main reasons I moved here is to be able to enjoy my favorite activity on the weekdays after work. I understand on weekends this area is dangerous and i do agree that people shouldn't be skiing there. I refuse to ski in that area on weekends just because of all the traffic. But on the weekdays? when no one is around that just doesn't make sense. I will definitely be at the meeting on May 30 to show my support. Nick Von Euw We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TVs Guilty Pleasures list. �f, 1i?9i?007 6-4() AM Print Page 1 of 1 From: Chris Feduniw (Chris_Feduniw@yahoo.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 9:32:53 AM Subject: Objection to proposed Ordinance NO 2007-22 5/30/07 Subject: Objection to proposed Ordinance NO 2007-22 To Whom It May Concern: As a boat owner who berths his boat at Holland Riverside Marina and member of the Bay Area Water- Ski Club my family and I frequently use the water-ways mentioned in Ordinance NO 2007-22 and I strongly object to the proposed ban restricting towable water-sports in this area. While we are all concerned with safety on our water-ways it is unclear how this ban will further improve safety on the Delta. Last weekend my family was up visiting friends at Discovery Bay and my 6 year hold daughter noticed the posters in the area regarding the proposed ban and had several questions I could not answer relative to this ban that I hope the proponents of this ban can answer in such a way a six year old who is enjoying water-sports on the Delta can understand which are: 1. Don't we put up a RED flag to notify other boats that we have someone in the water so they know to be careful so why do they want to ban water-sports?" 2. Isn't there a rule that says a boat needs to stay a certain distance away from another boat towing someone? 3. Can't the police give someone a ticket who is not driving safe near skiers? 4. Why can't everyone just share the delta and spread out a bit .. is just isn't fair to not allow skiers to share the water with other boaters. In addition to addressing my six year olds questions, I also would like to know what supporting data suggest that safety would be improved in these sloughs as a result of banning water-sports. My understanding is Waterskiing and wakeboarding accidents account for 13% of the total accidents in the Delta, while PWC account for 25 percent of the accidents on the Delta and Cabin motor boats and houseboats accounted for 35% of all the accidents and in just about all cases all boating accidents were Alcohol related. Clearly there is a misrepresentation of what is most dangerous to the general public. I challenge the proponents of this Ordinance to do some real research and actually explore some case studies, you will find that most water-ski accidents are indeed caused by other boaters simply not practicing safe boating rules. It's preposterous to think that a skier motoring in a straight line going 25 MPH is to blame when he or she gets run over by a boat capable of going 110 MPH. If all boats were to operate at ski speeds and people were to have enough time to perform an evasive maneuver(this is what happens when you SLOW DOWN!!!), many lives would be saved. Who really needs to go 60 MPH on a small narrow waterway? To blame skiers for others mistakes is simply unjust. I beg you to review the issues and really take a closer look on what can be done to reduce the risks. The numbers and research indicate that towable Water-sports are not the culprit here. Please, let's address the issues and make boating on the Slough safe for everyone. Sincerely, The Feduniw Family http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=l 505000334&x 6/4/2007 From: Chris Feduniw (Chris Feduniw@yahoo.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 9:32:53 AM Subject: Objection to proposed Ordinance NO 2007-22 5/30/07 Subject: Objection to proposed Ordinance NO 2007-22 To Whom It May Concern: As a boat owner who berths his boat at Holland Riverside Marina and member of the Bay Area Water- Ski Club my family and I frequently use the water-ways mentioned in Ordinance NO 2007-22 and I strongly object to the proposed ban restricting towable water-sports in this area. While we are all concerned with safety on our water-wav Print Page I of 1 From: Chris Fagnani (shutterman@comcast.net) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Thursday, May 31, 2007 3:00:00 PM Subject: FW: ski ban From: Chris Fagnani [mailto:shutterman@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 2:57 PM To: 'dist3@bos.cccounty.us' Subject: ski ban Supervisor Piepho, My name is Chris Fagnani and I attended last nights town meeting. I am so upset with the arrogance that what displayed at that meeting. It was heated at times, but I am convinced it was elevated by the arrogance shown by our politicians. You know very well who was in attendance. We were not wakeboard punks that don't vote, we were old timers that have voted for you numerous times. I would strongly recommend you adjust your tin ear, and listen to us voters. I voted for you thinking you were in line with Lynn Leach, and Guy Houston. I am starting to think you are more in line with Nancy Pelosi, and Hilary Clinton. Please make us proud and do what your constituents are asking you to do. Finally, I heard comparisons last night that this issue was on parallel with the RV storage issue. I can assure you that this issue goes to the heart of why us residents moved to Discovery Bay . We will not forget this happened. Each time we boat through these waters at 6:30 am on a Thursday we will be reminded of your next campaign slogan " live where you can't play" . Regards, Chris Fagnani (r) 1433 Willow Lake Rd. http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 i Print Page 1 of 1 From: Kathy Goss (bossgoss@yahoo.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Friday, June 1, 2007 10:38:34 AM Cc: Kathy Goss Subject: Opposition to Ordinance 2007-22 prohibiting waterskiing near Discovery I am dismayed at the likelihood of a water-sports ban in the Discovery Bay Delta waterways. Especially considering that it will allow for cigarette boats, bass boats and PWC's, the true hazards to the Delta, in my opinion, and according to statistics, to fly through the waterways and our community. We purchased our home in 2000 in order to get to "fast water" quickly. We presently live 8 minutes from "fast water," but with the proposed ban, I might as well have stayed in Livermore and launched out of Lazy M, as I could've reached a skiable slough faster from Livermore than I could from my own home in Discovery Bay. We have all paid the price to live in a fabulous water community; in high home prices, in long commutes, in limited educational choices. Now to have the sole purpose stripped away by what seems like an attempt at pocket lining by a powerful boat lobby and real estate developers is outrageous. I'm all for safety and the good of the community. But let's do it the right way. The stats simply don't support the ban. Let's do a traffic survey and address the real problem; high speed boats, alcohol consumption, and uneducated boaters. Let's keep Discovery Bay a paradise in the Bay Area. Respectfully Submitted, Kathy Goss 4898 Cabrillo Point Discovery Bay, CA http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=l 505000334&x 6/4/2007 Print Page 1 of 4 From: Kristen Hamstra(hamstraw@ix.netcom.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Friday, June 1, 2007 9:50:31 AM Subject: FW: Against the no ski ordinance Thought I would send in my e-mail correspondence with David. See you in Martinez! From: Kristen Hamstra [mailto:hamstraw@ix.netcom.com] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 9:45 AM To: 'David' Cc: 'John Gioia'; 'Gayle B. Uilkema'; 'Susan Bonilla'; 'Federal Glover'; 's.murphy.teixeira@sbcglobal.net; 'plhewitt@us.ibm.com'; 'dbredbob@sbcglobal.net' Subject: RE: Against the no ski ordinance David, I have not been able to get last night's meeting off my mind. I know the forum seemed as if the people spoke; maybe yelled at times with emotional frustration, what really bothers me is I don't feel the words fell on open ears. Your e-mail to me already said what you predetermined what the outcome would be. So what lays heavy on my heart is the community came up with wonderful ideas to make our delta safer. They worked hard to get information on plans that were already working for other water ways, they went the extra mile to get the statistics and they fell on these closed ears. I believe that this will do nothing for our community, neither in safety nor in property values. I liked what Linda Taylor had to say at the very end, you had the opportunity to make this a win-win situation. I would have liked to believe that pleasing the community was important to you, after all the community voted you in to be their voice. I was very disappointed in our due process of law. The biggest disappointment was having my kids at the meeting and they never want to go to anything like this again because it doesn't make a difference. To them it was a big waste of time. Perhaps they are right. I want to encourage my kids to get out there and vote,just as I model for them by voting. This could have been a win-win and you never gave it another thought. This affects more than one situation; it affects out kids and the future of politics. Sadly yours of the community, Kristen Hamstra 1275 Willow Lake Rd Discovery Bay 925-634-5441 From: David [mailto:Dapiepho@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 9:46 PM To: 'Kristen Hamstra' Subject: RE: Against the no ski ordinance Kristen, http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 Print Page 2 of 4 Thank you so much for forwarding this to me. I really appreciate your passion and your commitment to communicating your thoughts. I remember you and did listen to your comments. Especially the one regarding the proposed zone ending in what you considered to be a dangerous area. Therefore I am prepared to ask the board(s)to consider reducing the no ski zone area to terminate at the Discovery Bay marina channel. Your comments do make a difference and even thought some would have you believe different we are listening. If you want to discuss any of the other issues that you raised I would be happy to speak with you directly. I know the public process can appear frustrating, but perhaps a better understanding might help. Lastly thank you for taking the time out of your day to drive out to Martinez last week to make your thoughts known. I personally think it made a difference. p.s. It looks like we will be hosting a public meeting here in DB on the 30th of this month from 7p.m.-9p.m.. We are working on finalizing a location and it will be announced very soon. Respectfully, Dauid CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic transmission may contain information which is confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise legally exempt from,disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, or disseminate this message nor any part of it nor any attachments. If you have received this message in error, please immediately delete the message and any attachments from your system without reading the content and notify the sender immediately of the inadvertent transmission. There is no legal intent on the part of the sender to waive any privilege including but not limited to copyrights, the attorney/client, the reporter/source, and the provider/client privileges that may attach to this communication and or it's contents. © 2007 All Contents All Rights Reserved D. Piepho From: Kristen Hamstra [mailto:hamstraw@ix.netcom.com] Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 9:29 PM To: DAPiepho@sbcglobal.net Subject: Against the no ski ordinance David Piepho, I was in Martinez on Tuesday and wanted to make sure you knew where I stood on this issue so l am forwarding my message I sent the Supervisors. Thanks so much for reading my letter. Thanks, Kristen Hamstra http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 Print Page 3 of 4 May 12, 2007 County Supervisors I am writing in regards to item D.1 introducing ordinance No. 2007-22 which prohibits waterskiing near Discovery Bay. I believe this ordinance has not been given thorough consideration, nor do I believe people of the community have been given a chance to voice how they feel. I have lived in Discovery Bay for 16 years and have enjoyed the waterways for over 30 years. I moved here for location, location, location to not just fast water, but ski-able water. Pushing the skiable water further away only pushes the inexperienced and reckless drivers further away. The area at the end of Indian slough has cross traffic from every direction, which is more dangerous. This only moves the problem. We need to educate boat drivers by requiring they get a boat driving license. This would be a preventative solution. We have some busy times on the waterways which are directly related to weekends and holidays. During the week it is still as I remember it as a kid, hardly any boats. Why would you pass an ordinance that would affect us year around when the crowded days are so few. It is as if the few unsafe drivers are hurting the many, who would be the residents of Discovery Bay. The danger on the waterways could also be related to drunk driving, so why not ban the poker runs, which have been notorious for over drinking and crazy driving. Changing Indian Slough to a no ski zone isn't the answer, education is. I am not sure how many of the Supervisors have actually been on the waterways and know how to maneuver through our Delta or ski, but I have spent an extensive time on the waterways and am against this ordinance. This ordinance is being pushed through much too quickly without due diligence of studies, reports, and experience. This ordinance is one step closer to making Indian Slough a 5-mile an hour zone in order to benefit the Private Island Homes development. To me it seems to coincidental that these issues are in the forefront together and the first set of plans had no deep water access and now we have a thousand. I am wondering who is in who's back pocket. It will be interesting to see whose campaign budget will benefit from this transaction. It seems very strange to me that our boating community has not been notified; no survey has been taken or case studies have been done. Not everyone reads the newspaper, common courtesy would send out a mailer to all residents of the Discovery Bay Community. As of today due diligence has not been done, don't be hasty passing this ordinance without the proper input from the public. Study the issues and come up with a better solution because I firmly believe this is not it! I believe that the proper review will render a decision and ordinance I can support. Kristen Hamstra 1275 Willow Lake Rd Discovery Bay, CA 94514 925-634-5441 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467/Virus Database: 269.7.6/813 -Release Date: 5/20/2007 7:54 AM http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 1 Print Page 4 of 4 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467/Virus Database:269.7.6/814-Release Date: 5/21/2007 2:01 PM http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 i a Print Page 1 of 3 From: Ken Hanna (khanna@therma.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Friday, June 1, 2007 6:48:09 AM Subject: FW: An Open letter on the proposed No Ski/No Tow ordinance for Discovery Bay Ca. From: Bill Klipp [mailto:billklipp@earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 2:11 PM To: dapiepho@sbcglobal.net; s.murphy.teixeira@sbcglobal.net; plhewitt@us.ibm.com; r.doran1234@sbcglobal.net; ddove@sbcglobal.net; gayle@bos.cccounty.us; distl@boss.cccounty.us; dist2@boss.cccounty.us; dist3@boss.cccounty.us; d ist4@ boss.cccou nty.us; dist5@boss.cccounty.us; (case@bos.cccounty.us; dfras@bos.cccounty.us; ediok@bos.cccounty.us; Ireic@bos.cccounty.us Cc: svanderstine@hotmail.com; raymond.gibson@axa-advisors.com; billklipp@earthlink.net; Askcapndrew@aol.com; spynedoctor@gmail.com; aortiz@apr.com; mblatz@apr.com; ciruli@earthlink.net; caldelta@californiadelta.org; Dbfsanitasparks@aol.com; karen@mannappraisal.com; invest@ifn.net; cubicdesign@sbcglobal.net; (garner@apr.com; davesherman@juno.com; staciaruff@yahoo.com; chris@chrisacpa.com; MARLA2054@aol.com; QikTurn@aol.com; rickbaeseman@sbcglobal.net; cscafire@yahoo.com;jay-opal@coldwellbanker.com; aerialexpressions@pacbell.net; boatstacker@yahoo.com; Enmooney@aol.com; edlandry@comcast.net; vk1800todb@sbcglobal.net; mike-sells-homes@sbcglobal.net; thawk3@comcast.net; banyas@sbcglobal.net; rcwilson_us@yahoo.com; slichlyter@thegrid.net; marston@marstonmyers.com; info@deltawebs.com; ntso@coakley-heagerty.com; denisebanyas@sbcglobal.net; tmeyer@byron.kl2.ca.us; rolson@kw.com; SportingEdgeShop@aol.com; ekennedy@apr.com; ca1800todb@sbcglobal.net; sherie@discoverybayliving.com; pallypug@pacbell.net, dpachuck@cisco.com; erinspivak@comcast.net; todd@acsmarine.com; brian@epochgraphics.com; DELTALIFESTYLE@aol.com; jacqueline.hanel@jmmdhs.com; discoverybaypreschool@yahoo.com; lisa@selldbay.com; bhart@apr.com; renert2u@clearwire.net; benottm@sutterhealth.org; blatz@prodigy.net; Michaellfoster@aol.com; dltafolk@sbcglobal.net; info@teamelitehomes.com; info@discoverybayrealestate.com; bill@riverboatmarinecenter.com; willowberm@hotmail.com; herman-helens@houseboats.com; teamlarson@msn.com; sheron@selldbay.com; bill.Loftin@coldwellbanker.com; rgreen@cojobay.com; discovery@coldwellbanker.com; bonnie@giftsofthevine.com; mari@rozettrealty.com; deugenio@coakley- heagerty.com; aberg@financialtitle.com; DEEDEE12175@aol.com; shellys@sbcglobal.net; Iaplayadeedee@sbcglobal.net; CASEATONS@aol.com; dbelementssalon@sbcglobal.net; hcleaning@sbcglobal.net; elhultz@sbcglobal.net; trayse@spablusoleil.com; karl@riverboatmarina.com; wakemom211@yahoo.com; vk1800todb@sbcglobal.com; Icampos@apr.com; rkeefers@sbcglobal.net; info@dayspablu.com; sportsbarandsteakhouse@yahoo.com; chrisayres@sbcglobal.net; trayse@dayspablu.com; trayse@mail.com; jacksoncustomhomes@yahoo.com; dockdocktor@yahoo.com; lozano@inland-marine.net; info@californiadelta.org; spellaton@sbcglobal.net; ruggieroscatering@sbcglobal.net; anita@DBFS.BIZ; gnutzmanm@aol.com; Barbara.Hepner@johnmuirhealth.com; trishdaley@sbcglobal.net; info@h20craft.com; rlblatz@yahoo.com; vk.1800todb@sbcglobal.net; ktemby@kw.com; Jacqueline.Hanel@johnmuirhealth.com; WestMarine@e.westmarine.com; lisa.hultz@century2l.com; samedayblinds@comcast.net; thedeltaflyer@sbcglobal.net; smkraut@yahoo.com; csteele@coldwellbanker.com; Jerry@MortgageMarket.net; lynda_myers@sbcglobal.net; discobaydental@yahoo.com; saiello@apr.com; jcarlson@apr.com; swood@apr.com; roger@spablusoleil.com; smccormick@apr.com; dbstoddards@sbcglobal.net; rdarcey@pacbell.net; corsellospad@earthlink.net; mcclelland_cindy@yahoo.com; scottsalvatori@hotmail.com; daveturcott@sbcglobal.net; rogedohnsen@yahoo.com;justaskdenise@sbcglobal.net; aadvantage03@sbcgloba1.net; steveco@jps.net; balfourplazaca@dreamdinners.com; sheristoddard@yahoo.com; chrissor_2000@yahoo.com; autocatdirect@comcast.net; SpyneDoctor@aol.com; mjalderl@comcast.net; escrow314@yahoo.com; RMCBil1B@aol.com; nancydames@comcast.net; kim.korth@yahoo.com; LINDA; Brewer Joan; Bruntz Blyth; Bruntz Dave work; Calvin Ed; Campos Ric; Capp Robert; Chris & Heidi Glanz; DBYC Jim Rombough; DBYC Joan Jett; DBYC Roxie Pfarr; Denise &Steve; Denise Sklar; Don Morrison; Don Morrison work; Dove Byran; DoveMedia; Eric Loe; Ferrero Greg; Fitzpatrick Dave; Hall Brian; Hefner Robert; Loe Lisa work; Manning Chris work; Murzyn Debbie; Parker Marrianne; Perrone Dennis; Phil Riedy; Puccinelli Ron; Smith Christi summer; Spivak Erin home; Spivak Greg home; Steve Nicolas; Wayne Sheri; dhatfield@cctimes.com; http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 Print Page 2 of 3 jlee@so.cccounty.us; cmcmillan@cctimes.com; kkeane@cctimes.com; newsrelease@cctimes.com; editor@brentwoodpress.com; jchamoures@brentwoodpress.com; cbarone@brentwoodpress.com; kararey@brentwoodpress.com; droberts@brentwoodpress.com; info@californiadelta.org; info@discoverybaychamber.org; contact@orwoodresort.com Subject: An Open letter on the proposed No Ski/ No Tow ordinance for Discovery Bay Ca. Was the Discovery Bay Community Forum Democracy in Action or a Sham? On May 30th the Discovery Bay CSD Board and County Supervisor Mary Piepho held a hastily scheduled community forum to seek community input on the proposed No Ski /No Tow ordinance for Discovery Bay. While this may have been positioned as a community outreach effort the fact is the CSD previously did virtually nothing to solicit(they may have even avoided it)public comment on this important issue and was ultimately forced by 2 other County Supervisors to seek additional public comment at the last minute. Over 600 people showed up last night filling the Elementary School gym. A grassroots petition with over 1500 signatures against the ordinance was also presented. Speaker after Speaker presented evidence disputing the facts presented by Mary and David Piepho and other proponents of the ordinance. Speaker after Speaker addressed the Board and Supervisor Piepho in support of the community's desire to improve water safety. Yet Speaker after Speaker spoke about how this ordinance was poorly written and will be ineffective. Speaker after Speaker provided additional statistical facts about local boating accidents and how none involved water- skiers or people being towed. Speaker after Speaker offered alternative recommendations to address the real issues of boating congestion, excessive speed and boating safety/education. Speaker after Speaker spoke about the flawed process the CSD utilized on this important issue that impacts nearly every resident of Discovery Bay and many surrounding communities and businesses. More importantly the Speakers spoke about the lack process and due diligence by the CSD Board and some of its members. Speaker after Speaker suggested and even pleaded with the Discovery Bay CSD to take more time to study the facts and alternatives to create an ordinance that will actually address the real safety issues. Never in the history of the Town of Discovery Bay has the community come out in such large numbers on a topic. In the end David Piepho President of the CSD board just repeated that he had 20 letters for and 20 against so the community was split in half. Was he blind to the voices of the 600+ in attendance does he think the 1500+ signatures against the ordinance is irrelevant?What sense does it make to seek public opinion and ignore it and not even slow down the process to revisit the facts and to consider the well thought out alternative safety proposals presented at the forum. Director Dave Dove was the one lone voice of reason suggesting more study and review and maybe a ban that considered the real issue which is congestion on weekends and holidays. All the facts and experts say the real issue is periodic congestion (too many boats in a small area), excessive speed and poor boating education not water skiing. The resolution by the CSD will only funnel boating activity to an even more concentrated area resulting in additional and more significant safety issues. It will be interesting to see how the CSD Board, Mary Piepho and other County Supervisors deal with the proposal to add 4000- 6000 new houses to Discovery Bay and the resulting boating safety issues. Mary Piepho, it's a bit disingenuous to ban all water sports 24 hours a day 365 days a year while supporting the addition of 4000 - 6000 more boats to Discovery Bay . Mary what are you thinking? To the CSD Board members, Why couldn't you just put the ordinance on hold until a more thorough review could be performed? The community elected you to represent us, is it too much to ask that you take the time to listen? The people of Discovery Bay want to improve boating safety why will you not take the necessary time to produce an ordinance that will address the real safety issues? http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 Print Page 3 of 3 I hope the majority of the members of the County Board of Supervisors is more experienced and open minded then the CSD Board and will recommend more time to study the facts and the proposed alternatives so the people of Discovery Bay will have a more thought-out and effective ordinance to improve water safety throughout our community while balancing the rights of boaters. If you would like to voice your opinion to the CSD Board or the County Supervisors their email address can be found above in the TO: line of this email Bill Klipp Discovery Bay, Ca. billk_1ip _&arth_l.ink_.n..et Skype phone #: bill.klipp Check out my Photo Website: www.wkimages.net http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 Print Page 1 of 1 From: Carol Harmon(ctharmon@sbcglobal.net) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Thursday, May 31, 2007 11:42:58 AM Subject: Ordinance 2007-22 prohibiting waterskiing in Discovery Bay once again our government feels they need to play the "big brother" role. According to the statistics presented water-skiers are not the problem around Discovery Bay, drunks and inexperienced boaters are. why are our representatives trying to penalize the people who are responsible on the water and not address the root problem? we need more law enforcement on the weekends on our waterways not legislation banning all tow behind activities. I, for one, will not forget this come election time. sincerely, Carol T Harmon Discovery Bay resident http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 tint http://us.f574,mail.yahoo.conVdc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: info@deltawaterskiban.org (info@deltawaterskiban.org) To: DAPiepho@sbcglobal.net; ddove@sbcglobal.net; distl@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us-, dist3@bos.cccounty.us; dist4@bos.cccounty.us; dist5@bos.cccounty.us;gayle@bos.cccounty.us; marypiepho@sbcglobal.net; plhewitt@us.ibm.com; r.doran1234@sbcg1obal.net; s.murphyAeixeira@sbcglobal.net Date: Friday,May 18, 2007 1:06:07 AM Subject: Fw: Ban Watersports? Huge Mistake!! -----Forwarded Message---- From: Stephen Hiltscher<stephen@smartmoneytalks.com> To: info@deltawaterskiban.org -Sent: Thursday;May 17, 2007 4:01:43 PM Subject: Ban Watersports?Huge Mistake!! To Whom It May Concern: As a frequent visitor to Discovery Bay I feel compelled to write and voice my concern over the proposed Ordinance No. 2007-22. 1 understand the concern for public safety and the goals to keep them safe, but this Ordinance does not address the real dangers afflicting Indian Slough. The restriction of towable Watersports largely misses the goal of restricting the activities that-most-endanger4he public.Waterskiing-and wakeboarding accidents account for 13% of the total accidents in the Delta,while PWC account for 25 percent of the accidents on the Delta and Cabin motor boats and houseboats accounted for 35% of all the accidents. Clearly there is a misrepresentation of what is most dangerous to the general public. We all know the real killer on our nation's waterways.Alcohol. In 2004 it played a role in 38 percent of fatal boating accidents nationwide. While I know Law Enforcement does an earnest job trying to keep those who break the law and drink from operating a boat, it is a very hard problem to enforce. We need to focus on the real issues at hand. It is ludicrous to blame a small niche of the boating world for all the accidents and punish only them. This ordinance has categorically placed all blame on the one group whom, I daresay, knows the most about boating and respects the laws on a higher level than any other member of the boating community. We know that it can be dangerous and we go the extra mile to insure our own and others' safety. I challenge you to do some real research and actually explore some case studies, you will find that most waterski accidents are indeed caused by other boaters simply not practicing safe boating rules. It's preposterous to think that a skier motoring in a straight line going 25 MPH is to blame when he or she gets run over by a boat capable of going 110 MPH. If all boats were to operate at ski speeds and people were to have enough time to perform an evasive maneuver (this is what happens when you SLOW DOWN!!% many lives would be saved. Who really needs to go 60 MPH on a small narrow waterway?To blame skiers for others mistakes is simply unjust. I beg you to review the issues and really take a closer took on what can be done to reduce the risks. The numbers and research indicate that towable Watersports are not the culprit here. Please, let's address the issues and make boating on the Slough safe for everyone. Sincerely, Stephen A. Hiltscher 5/29/2007 6:59 AM rint http://us.f574.mail.vahoo.comfdc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: info@deltawaterskiban.org (info@deltawaterskiban.org) To: DAPiepho@sbcglobal.net; ddove@sbcglobal.net; distl@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us; dist3@bos.cccounty.us; dist4@bos.cccounty.us; dist5@bos.cccounty.us; gayle@bos.cccounty.us; marypiepho@sbcglobal.net; plhewitt@us.ibm.com; r.doran 1234@sbcglobal.net-, s.murphy.teixeira@sbcglobal.net Date: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:04:52 AM Subject: Fw: Stop The Watersports Ban for the Delta in Contra Costa County ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: "Honeycutt, William N" <bill.honeycutt@hp.com> To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Sent:-Thursday;May 17, 2007 4:39:23 PM Subject: Stop The Watersports Ban for the Delta in Contra Costa County Hello, We moved to Discovery Bay about fifteen years ago purchased a home in Indian Bay to be near fast water. This would enable us to water-ski in the morning before work and/or water-ski in the evening after work in which we continue to do at present time. We water skied competitively for eleven years and used ---this-for--training_we-donot compete any more but still enjpy skiing as much as possible. This is a big reason why we live near fast water and a big part of our lives. We host many family outing"— soman ge together so the family can enjoy visiting Discovery Bay and to take pleasure in all the water activates. My first concern is that it will now affect the price of my home, second the life style in that which I'm a custom to enjoying, third the affect it will have on the community and last the affect it will have on business in Discovery Bay Harbor Area and Orwood Resort. I hope you'd think again on passing this ordnance 2007-22 and/or vote NO Bill Honeycutt 747 Willow Lake Rd. Discovery Bay, CA. 94514 Phone: 925-516-1074 E-Mail bill.honeycutt(_.hp.com 5/29/2007 6:59 AT I Print Page 1 of 1 From: Art Jacobsen (itsgoodhealth@yahoo.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Wednesday,May 30, 2007 5:01:19 PM5 Subject: Re: Our Rights Water ski united, Tonight will be busy and I know the voices of the community with speak volumes to the ELECTED Leaders. I just know that its hard to convince a Donkey to change and the piephos are arrogants asses that see the Delta only as a stepping stone. Let the Leader of a recall know I would love to meet to move forward and not duplicate and clog the process. I was on the Delta Monday and also realize if they increase the slow zones it will crowd the fast water. Thanks, Art 925-698-4348 fnfo@deltawaterskiban.org wrote: Hi Art, Thanks for your email. I believe the paperwork for recalling piepho has been filed already or is in the works. Thanks for your support. Best Regards, me ----- Original Message ---- From: Art Jacobsen <itsgoodhealth@yahoo.com> To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 10:36:17 PM Subject: Our Rights Dear Water Ski Ban, East county is a Joke as far a politics, we have sub standard service and now The Big Shot Politicians are telling us what to do. I say total BS to our supervisor Mrs Pipeo and her husband for not bringing enhancements to our community. I am up for a recall of Mary and David for sticking with this and not bringing in common sense. I grew up in Brentwood and need to know what we need to get these Jokers out. This is a waste of time for us to be spending on our recreational rights. Get the Dump out of East County, get the roads fixed and modernized and get us public safety like the rest of the county. Get the Sheriff stopping the crack heads and dopers not the people out trying to have a little fun. Mary and David will wilt like a dry flower with a little heat because the are only in this for themselves and the headlines. They will try to appease all at the meeting but will be back with some other headline if we don't take them out now. Art Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that-gives answers, not web links. Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and always stay connected to friends. http://us.f574.maii.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 Print http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: Art Jacobsen (itsgoodhealth@yahoo.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Sunday, May 27, 2007 10:36:17 PM Subject: Our Rights Dear Water Ski Ban, East county is a Joke as far a politics,we have sub standard service and now The Big Shot Politicians are telling us what to do. I say total BS to our supervisor Mrs Pipeo and her husband for not bringing enhancements to our community. I am up for a recall of Mary and David for sticking with this and not bringing in common sense. I grew up in Brentwood and need to know what we need to get these Jokers out. This is a waste of time for us to be spending on our recreational rights_ Get the Dump out of East County, get the roads fixed and modernized and get us public safety like the rest of the county. Get the Sheriff stopping the crack heads and dopers not the people out trying to have a little fun. Mary and David will wilt like a dry flower with a little heat because the are only in this for themselves and the headlines. They will try to appease all at the meeting but will be back with some other headline if we don't take them out now. Art Yahoos oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links. I of 1 5/29/2007 6:48 AM Print Page 1 of 1 From: Jim Mattison Omattison@sbcglobal.net) To: dist5@bos.cccounty.us Date: Saturday, June 2, 2007 12:55:18 PM Cc: distl@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us; gayle@bos.cccounty.us; dist4@bos.cccounty.us; Assemblymember.Houston@assembly.ca.gov; Erika.Freeman@asm.ca.gov Subject: Discovery Bay ski ban. Federal, I understand you were one of two supervisors that realized that NO ONE in Discovery Bay knew of the proposed ban on water skiing in portions of our Delta and asked that there be a community meeting to discuss this major issue. Thank you for that as this is a very big deal to many of us in Discovery Bay. After finally learning of all the facts, it is interesting how this was almost approved with out any ones knowledge in Discovery Bay. As we had our community meeting last Wednesday there were approximately 600-700 people that showed up and talked for over 3 hours against the ban. Unfortunately our supervisor tried to get this passed with out our knowledge and that alone has made this community very upset. Secondly, most of the information she and one of the members of the CSD board ( her husband ) gave us was heavily skewed with wrong information they were giving to the community. Fortunately we have diligent and smart folks who live here and retained lots of information from the Sheriffs office, Dept. of water ways and many other entities proving 90 % of what was being told to us was incorrect. Including the fact that no one has been injured in that proposed banned area from being towed. We as skiers and wakeborders are very aware and concerned of who we tow and if there is to much activity in any area of the delta we would not put our friends or family in harms way. We have all realized there is some hidden agenda here and we will ask you and the others to either oppose this ban in it's entirety or continue it for at least a year as more facts from other entities must be obtained. The reason we live in Discovery bay is to use our water ways for skiing, wakebording and other great activity's. You will hear on Tuesday many of the reasons why this ban is very flawed and we will ask you and the other supervisors to listen to our community spokes people as many of us work and will not be able to attend. What you will hear has been echoed by the 2000 signatures against the ban and many hundreds of others who have not had a chance to sign this or show up for meetings as we had to get the word out in less than a week what was being jammed down our throats with out our knowledge. We are asking you to do the right thing and not approve this ban at all on June 5th. Please obtain the info you need from a non biased third party, not from our supervisor and her husband who's two friends who have asked for this ban. If anything needs to happen it is education and certification for any one who uses our California water ways. Thanks for your time, Jim Mattison 925.570.4511 Discovery Bay http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 Print http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From:Kelly Mallek(kmallek22@hotrnail.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Friday, May 25, 2007 10:17:46 AM . Subject: DONT BAN WATERSPORTS IN THE DELTA! ARE YOU KIDDING ME!P DISCOVERY BAY IS KNOWN FOR ITS AMAZING WATERSPORT ACTIVITY AND WORLD WIDE KNOWN ATHELETES IN THIS AREA! DISCOVERY BAY HAS THE DELTA AS A BACKYARD TO EVERYONE WHO LIVES HERE AND HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPERIENCE THE LIFESTYLE OF HIGH CLASS LIVING. THERE ARE ACCIDENTS EVERYWHERE YOU LOOK, SKIING, WAKEBOARDING, TUBING AND ALL OTHER WATERSPORTS ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY OF THESE ACTIONS! NST LIKE DRUNK DRIVING CAUSES ACCIDENTS,DRUNK BOATING IS JUST THE SAME! THATS WHAT YOU NEED TO FOCUS ON AND LOOK AT IN THIS SITUATION! IF YOURS LOOKING TO PREVENT ACCIDENTS IN THE DELTA YOU ARE HANDLING IT THE WRONG WAY! GET A HOLD OF DRUNK DRIVERS AND PARTYING ON THE DELTA AND NOT THE FUN ACTIVITES THIS WONDERFUL PLACE OFFERS! I GREW UP HERE FOR 20 YEARS OF MY LIFE AND THERE IS NO OTHER PLACE LIKE IT, BELIEVE ME,IVE LOOKED! IF YOU TAKE ALL OF OUR WATERSPORTS AWAY FROM US, YOU ARE TAKING AWAY OUR HOME! THIS IS NOT THE RIGHT THING TO DO AND WILL NOT BE SOLVING ANY PROBLEMS! -REALISTICA-LLY,YOURECREATING NEWISSUES-AND-PROBLEMS-IN-OURCOMMUNITY!–_ -- -- DO NOT BAN WATERSPORTS FROM THE DELTA IN DISCOVERY BAY!!!! -KELLY MALLEK 2447 PINEHURST CT. DISCOVERY BAY, CA 94514 RESIDENT OF 20 YEARS. More photos, more messages, more storage—get 2GB with Windows Live Hotmail. http://imagine-windowsliN,e.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT TAGHM migration HM mini 2G 05( f, ;i?9i?n076-dx AM Tint http://us.f574.mail.yaboo.com/dcJlaunch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: Tim Mattison Omattison@sbcglobal.net) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Friday, May 18, 2007 6:01:14 AM Subject: Ban on skiiing We go out every Tuesday and Thursday momings at 6.00 AM and a tot of nights after work to wakeboard. There is no one in the delta in the momings and very few at night. Our runs begin from lido bay and end at lido bay as that is were we live. When there are a lot of boats in the water(weekends) no one tries to ski in rough water anyway.This ordinance make absolutely no sense at all. Don't punish the people who live here as that is way we moved here in the first place. If you don't like boats in the delta then just stay home or move. Why doesn't California just make every one who uses a watercraft take a class and let that educate people of what the rules and laws are. Now that makes more sense. I still have not heard why this ban is even being addressed? Please let me know when the meeting is so I may attend. Thanks, Jim Mattison "Make it Happen" 925.570.4511 " No Excuses" { 5/29/2007 6:58 Al Print http:l/us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/de/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: Linda Mendoza(linmancra@yahoo.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 12:07:47 PM Cc: Linda; Rebeka Afaola Jarquin; Craig Subject:-Delta Ban of Waterskiing - We would like to voice our dismay at the inititation and passing of this Ordinance. We are decidedly against this Ordinance. We believe that the safety problem should be directed to alchohol and drugs, etc. not the aforementioned Water Skiing. I am the Regional Safety Director for the USA Waterski &NWSRA organization for National Waterski Racing Assn. There we have skiing at its best with speeds well beyond 90 so I have experience with the Delta Waterways and the causes and effects of Safety and waterskiing. Please voice our opinion and add us to the email list so that we may attend the Meeting. Sincerely, Jorge& Linda Mendoza Safety Director, NWSRA&USA Waterski organization Craig Jarquin Jesse &Rebeka Afuola NWSRA members and participants www.nwsra.net and wvv.usawaterski.otg Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. CNnlnAA } L.CO AAA i rint http://us.f574.maiLyahoo:com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: Lynne Miley (orwoodgirl@yahoo.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Thursday, May 17, 2007 7:19:58 PM Subject: Opposition to Water Ski Ban The Board of Supervisors and ultimately the CCCSD will dispatch signage identifying the proposed "no ski/no pull"zone but, in actuality the sign should say"no speed limit"! This nonsensical approach will give a green light— "go as fast as you can" to every offshore boat, speed boat and PWC to proceed without caution or vigilance knowing there will not be a skier or recreation craft around each comer, bend or straight......... It is not"if" but, "when" this situation will cause a catastrophic accident on this stretch of waterway if the no ski / no pull zone is implemented. And if this prognostication is correct, the next step for the Board will be to mandate a 5 MPH zone (as rumored) effectively eliminating any advantage of living near"express water". Maybe those whom live out in Clipper Estates don't mind the additional spell, but they certainly don't speak for us! Let's gauge by commonsense and courtesy not impulse......... Scott and Lynne Miley 4440_Discovery Point Discovery Bay, CA Lynne - T-he-fish-are-biting.------------ - ------- —�` Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing. 5/29/2007 6:59 AD I Print http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: Noack, Shirl (SNoack@cotnmercewest.net) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 1:36:41 PM Subject: water ski ban I'm a Discovery Bay resident and have been for the past 14 years. I do not support the ordinance. The fact is, we "Live where we Play". Think of all the residents who live out near Hwy 4 and have the slow ride up to fast water currently. It will only make their ride (30 to 45 minutes) much longer! They commute everyday in vehicle traffic and this potential ordinance will increase their water commute to fast water. This is absurd! This is wrong and "WE"the residents should not be penalized. ---------------- ---- ci 5/29/2007 6.50 AM i Page 1 of 1 Todd Scruggs From: Sean O'Toole [sean@foreclosureradar.com] Sent=Saturday, May-1-9 2-00 1-235PM -- To: Todd Scruggs' Subject: Another bullet point This ordinance makes a blind high speed 3 way intersection the starting point for watersports. Far more dangerous than at the end of a slough next to a 5MPH zone where it is now. This proposal is about anything but safety. 5/29/2007 i 4 Page 1 of 2 Todd Scruggs From: Sean O'Toole [sea n@fo reclosureradar.com] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2-M7-4-.42 PM To: sean@deltaskier.com Cc: esherbert@ecbmes.com; editor@brentwoodpress.com;deltanavigator@aol.com Subject: RE: Delta Website Updated Brian, A couple of us have tried to get the stats. Here is what I do know from the 2004 California Boating Safety Report: Water-skiing related accidents accounted for 16% of all accidents, and only 5% of fatalities statewide. To put this into perspective we are talking about 2 water-ski related deaths statewide!!! As for the Delta, it turns out to be relatively safe... with lakes representing 75% of water-ski accidents, and the Delta only 9% And of all those accidents, including deaths, less than 10% were due to a skier being hit by another vessel. This is the problem we are told so desperately needs to be addressed. Doing the math,-here is desperately trying to save usrf om: 2-deaths statewide, of which 9% occurred on the Delta, of which 10% involved another vessel. This works out to be 1 water-skier every 10 years being killed ANYWHERE on the Delta by another boat. The notion that this is about safety is absolutely ridiculous. You are more likely to be killed crossing the street. Having lived at an entrance to that slough for 4 years, and skiing regularly on it for 8 years, the accidents I have seen have been related to excessive speed and drinking -not skiing, wakeboarding, or even tubing. This ordinance does nothing to address the real problem, and as such this is just a first step to a 5M PH zone. Did you just hear your house value drop 20 percent? I did. Sean O'Toole Discovery Bay, CA P.S. Due to the VERY large list of people I'm sending this to, I've BCC'd everyone except the press, and removed full names below. From: Brian Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 2:57 PM Subject: Re: Delta Website Updated Todd, Thanks for pointing me to the updated website. Attached is the text of the proposed ordinance. Pm most curious about the following statement in the text that is being used to justify the ban on these waterways: 5/29/2007 ` _ o Page 2 of 2 "There have been several major injury accidents involving waterskiiers and personal watercraft along these waterways in recent years, including some fatal accidents." Has any documentatin been provided by the Board of Supervisors or Supervisor Piepho to support this claim2 Thanks, Brian The site has been updated www.deltawaterskiban.org 5/29/2007 l 1 'Tint http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: orwoodresort@juno.com(orwoodresort@juno.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Monday, May 21, 2007 7:57:41 AM Subject: watersports ban . Hi This message is from Orwood Resort. Our customers launch at our facility because they enjoy watesports on the Orwood Slough. We are concerned that by banning watersports on this slough it will just make that waterway a freeway for Offshores and jet skiis. They will not be as cautious as they would be if they knew people are in the water. This ban could make that waterway even more dangerous. Let us know when the meeting will be, we will be there. Cindy at Orwood Resort 5/29/2007 6:56 AN Print http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: Richard Palmer(caricker@sbcglobal.net) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Friday, May 25, 2007 10:14:20 AM Subject: 05-25-07 Rick Palmer against Water Ski Ban Hello and thanks for the info. My name is Rick Palmer my address is 4500 Discovery Point, my deck faces North towards Indian Slough just by the Lido Bay entrance. I am firmly against this Water Ski Ban. You can count on me to be at the meeting on May 30th and also the meeting on June 5th in Martinez. I am in the process of gathering signatures for a petition against this ban and will bring those documents to the meetings. Please inform me if there is anything else I can do. Rick Palmer 4500 Discovery Pt. Discovery Bay CA 94514 c 925-354-0468 h 925-634-0896 of t snonnm A•Qo ANJ I I rint http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: Michelle Paxton (mpaxton@divcap.net) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Saturday, May 19, 2007 11:29:51 AM Subject: Discovery Bay ordinance- a comment from a local Hello there, To whom it may concern. I have been waterskiing on the delta for 16 years in this area and other areas. Also, a member of the BAWSC (bay area water ski club) and other organizations. The area marked in red from Orwood Marina to Discovery Bay Marina is heavily populated and has traffic on the weekends. There has to be a compromise! I think it should be a no wakeboard/ski zone on the weekends only, midweek with less people it should be ok to ski or wakeboard. There are other areas to handle this situation/issues. Please call or email if I can be of any assistance is supporting the ban. Also, not too sure why Grant line/Tracy Oasis is to be-shut down/dammed as well, this is_a.great area to ski and very minimal traffic, the more places you shut down, the more traffic into other areas, we need to be able to spread out. Sincerely, Michelle Paxton Mortgage Loan Consultant Diversified Capital Funding --mpaxton@givcap.net- www.divcap.net/agents/mpaxton Office (408) 540-1142 x26 Fax (408) 540-1159 P.S. I build my business by referrals from past clients, business associates, friends, and family members. If I can assist anyone you know who is thinking of buying, selling, refinancing real estate or purchasing an investment property, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. 5/29/2007 6:57 AN I 'rint http://us,f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: Thomas Perry (tperry@kroloffcom) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 6:37:59 PM Subject: FW: discovery bay- proposed ban please see attached- had wrong address initially Thomas O. Perry Kroloff, Belcher, Smart, Perry& Christopherson 7540 Shoreline Drive Stockton, CA 95219 Office Telephone (direct): 209/956-7348 Office facsimile: 209/478-0354 Mobile Telephone: 209/481-6982 E-mail: tpehyAkroloff.com This message is confidential,intended only for the named recipient(s)and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.If you are not the intended recipient(s),you are notified that the dissemination,distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error,or are not the named recipient(s),please notify the sender at the e-mail address above and delete this e-mail from _--your-computer.-Receipt-by-anyone other_than the named recipient(s)Js not a waiver of any attorney-client,work product, or other applicable privilege. TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230,we inform you that any U.S.federal tax advice contained in this communication(including any attachments),unless otherwise specifically stated,was not intended or written to be used,and cannot be used for the purpose of(1)avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or(2) promoting,marketing or recommending to another parry any matters addressed herein. From: Thomas Perry Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 6:33 PM To: 'info@waterskiban.org' Subject: discovery bay- proposed ban i am very much oppossed to this restriction. water and boating safety needs to be addressed in a comprehensive way after careful study of the conditions. water skiing is involved in a miniscule number of accidents. it is usually boats at high speed- not towing anybody-or alcohol or untrained operators of personal watercraft that are the cause of accidents. sincerely, thomas o. perry Kroloff, Belcher, Smart, Perry & Christopherson 7540 Shoreline Drive Stockton, CA 95219 Office Telephone (direct): 209/956-7348 Office Facsimile: 209/478-0354 Mobile Telephone: 209/481-6982 E-mail: tperry(cD_kroloff.com ;i')4/7007 6-5A ATV I Print http://us.f574.mail.vahoo.com/dellautich?action=welcome&YY=135... From: Chris Proft(cdp2966@yahoo.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Wednesday,May 23, 2007 6:39:59 PM Subject: Re: CSD Board Laws -I m replyrn tg tg oo Piepho because the anis another attempt for the government to oppress the rights of its citizens.. I will look into the laws regarding conflict of interest... The will of the people are not being met.. Mary-you should try doing something productive..like getting the streets repaved, widening Vasco Rd. (You should be putting pressure on the our county and Alameda county to get Vasco widened)How about dredging the delta that is filled with silt and way above the level of safety they were designed for. Or are you afraid of taking on environmentalists?It amazes me that yo can try to invoke laws that the people don't want or need. As an officer I know we have enough laws on the books. Try getting more deputies on the street and water.. Maybe they can enforce that current laws that exist. You and your husband out of bounds on the will of the people-I cannot tell you how disappointed I am that you have — become-a-self serving-politician. --- - - - - -- - ---We need less government not more. I will be sure make this clear to the community and when I vote.. Sincerely Chris Proft 634-3009 >DISCUSS THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE PROHIBITING >WATERSKIING ON INDIAN SLOUGH AND WERNER DREDGER CUT >FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE >Contact: Katyn Cornell >May 25, 2006 > (925)240-7260 >BRENTWOOD—Contra Costa County Supervisor, Mary N. >Piepho,District III today announced that her >office in partnership with the Town of Discovery Bay > Community Services District will be holding a > special foram to discuss the proposed Ordinance >Prohibiting Waterskiing on Werner Dredger Cut and >Indian Slough near Discovery Bay. > >The special meeting will take place on May 30th from > 7:00pm-9:00pm at the Discovery Bay Elementary > School in the gymnasium, located at 1700 Willow Lake >Road in Discovery Bay. of Z 5/29/2007 6:50 AM 'Tint http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.conVdc/launch?action=welcome&,YY=135... From: susan quails (zappersue@sbcglobal.net) To: info@deltawaterskiban.ore Date: Monday, May 21, 2007 4:34:49 PM Subject: ski ban We oppose Delta the water skiing ban No supportive evidence , Appears to be favoring developers . Ray and Susan Qualls 4561 Clipper Dr. _r 5/29/2007 6:56 AM Print Page 1 of 1 From: Scott Rister (Scott.Rister@novate.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 10:37:19 AM Subject: What's it really about?? Hi, Anyone who has done any research at all can see that this ban is not about safety as it is being sold to the people. The facts don't support that. When the area becomes congested skiers/boarders, etc, avoid it. No one wants to put themselves or their passengers in danger. The ban as proposed will clearly make the situation worse putting people in the water at a very busy intersection, where now, it is extremely rare to see someone in the water, at the intersection of Old River and Indian slough. Why don't we see people in the water there now? Its Dangerous and anyone can see that. So, if it is not about safety as advertised, what is it about? Could it be the proposed development to the East of Discovery Bay, which coincidentally is located on the VERY wide section of Indian Slough that is included in the ban? Something doesn't look right to me. See you all at the meeting. Scott =1505000 5/29/2007 http://us.f574.mail.yaboo.com/de/launch?action=welcome&YY334&x- - Print Page 1 of 1 From: Mark W. Schwartz (mwschwartz@bayhilltx.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 9:29:45 AM Subject: Waterski ban oppostion As a resident of Discovery Bay , I adamantly oppose the waterski/watersports ban being proposed in the Discovery Bay area. The facts do not support the restrictive and arbitrary actions taking place. Having boated in the Delta and Discovery Bay area for many years, I firmly believe the focus is for improving safety is being placed in the wrong area. The focus should be on alcohol and boating, an obvious cause of the majority of bad decisions and poor boating. This proposed ban sounds like a poorly justified and poorly thought out knee jerk reaction to address a problem which really does not exist. There are other reasons this ban is being proposed, which are not exactly clear at this time. Mark http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/de/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 J Page 1 of 1 Todd Scruggs From: Brian Schwartz[bcschwartz@yahoo.com] Sent-.Thursday-May-1-�20OT 406-AM— -- — To: todds@sbcglobal.net Subject: Delta water ski ban Todd, Just found out about the proposed ordinance to ban waterskiing in Discovery Bay. Do you have the actual ordinance 2007-22 you can send me? The maps I've seen don't make it clear on what the restriction is, what water it covers and the reason this is being proposed. My family has several boats we use in the Delta and launch out of Discovery Bay. I don't like the idea of this area becoming some country club for only yachts and cigar boats, but I'm reserving final judgement until I can read the ordinance for myself. Thanks, Brian Schwartz beschwartz@yahoo.com (925)577-5566 Brian Schwartz bcschwartz@yahoo.com 5/29/2007 Print Page 1 of 2 From: Mark W. Schwartz (mwschwartz@bayhilltx.com) To: Assemblymember.Houston@assembly.ca.gov; Erika.Freeman@asm.ca.gov Date: Friday, June 1, 2007 5:41:57 PM Cc: info@deltawaterskiban.org; dist3@bos.cccounty.us; dist5@bos.cccounty.us; dist4@bos.cccounty.us; gayle@bos.cccounty.us; 1@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us Subject: NO on Tow ban in the Discovery Bay area Dear Assemblyman Houston and Erika, I have been boating in the delta for many years, and currently own a home in Discovery Bay . The Delta is a unique and magnificent resource for water enthusiasts in and around Sacraments and the bay area. I have practically raised my kids on the delta, spending every summer boating almost every weekend and then some. The delta's waterways make it very unique—it has wonderful fishing, some of the best waterskiing and wakeboarding conditions in the world, and its miles of waterways make it a great place to explore in both large cruisers, go fast boats, as well as little jet skis. We all share the waterways, at times crowded waterways, but we all also for the most part get along and make it work, and work well. As with any human endeavor(especially those involving speed, sport and the outdoors)there is some risk to boating in the delta,just like there is risk in driving on our roadways to get to the delta. But when all is said and done, the delta is not an unusually dangerous place for skiers or boaters (only drunken boaters). The proposed ban on towing is trying to solve a problem which doesn't exist—accidents involving people in the water colliding with boats in the discovery bay area waterways. The reason the ban makes no sense is that there is NO proof what so ever that this is a problem—there are no statistics of any kind which indicates accidents like this are a problem, or in fact have happened!! (I have boated on many parts of the Delta, and this area is NOT the most crowded area on the local water, and skiing is quite popular in all of these areas). Eliminating towing in the area will not, in any way, decrease the traffic, traffic speed, or the jet skis flying through that area. In fact, it will likely make it worse as people speed up knowing there are not skiers, as well as people speeding through the area to get to the towable areas. It is well documented that most accidents on the water come from alcohol—this rule will have no impact on this aspect. It is also well documented that more accidents are caused by large cruisers and jet skis, and this law would no NOTHING, in not make it worse, to address these safety issues. This rule was proposed by people who have no data to support the existence of a problem. In fact, based on public testimony I heard in Discovery Bay, the request for the ban is based on their desire to drive their big boats in the areas without having to worry (share the waterways)about skiers. As mentioned above, we all share the waterways, and I am grateful to have such a wonderful natural area to enjoy with my family. We all work together to make it work for all of us. Don't let a few who can't get along make fail for everyone. This law could also have a measurable impact on property values in Discovery Bay . Given the current state of the real estate market, I think this would be a very un-popular penalty to homeowners in the area, especially given there is no foundation that skiers in the area are or have been a safety issue. This cannot be the first of more regulations which would start destroying the usability and access to ALL citizens who wish to enjoy the area. Again, while there have been some accidents, NONE on these were caused by a skier and a boat, and given that NO human endeavor like this is perfectly safe, there is always some risk in getting into any boat, including a row boat!! Given what is really a very safe activity given the number of people who access this area, I believe it is highly un justified to enact the proposed ban on towing in this area. Please vote no on this restrictive measure, and allow ALL of us to enjoy the wonderful waterways we have been blessed with. Mark Mark W. Schwartz, Ph.D. President& CEO Bayhill Therapeutics http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 Print Page 2 of 2 3400 W Bayshore Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 P: 650-320-2801 F: 650-320-2815 mwschwartz@bayhilltx. com http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 MICHAEL WAYNE SMITH 2280 LAKEWOOD PLACE MARTINEZ, CA 94553 (925) 250-3208 To Whom It May Concern: My name is Michael Smith. I am a part time resident of Discovery Bay, and have been skiing on the California Delta for the last 20 years. I am submitting this letter to express my concern with a recent ordinance passed (2007-22)by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors to prohibit waterskiing on Indian Slough and Werner Cut. I do not support this measure for the following concerns: This ordinance was passed under the presumption that prohibiting waterskiing on this section of the delta would reduce the number of boating accidents that occur each year. A-section of Indian Slough in question-is over 800 feet wide-and is the widest section of the delta within miles. We know from the research of these accidents that have occurred over the last nine years, that none included a water skier or even a water-ski boat. There have been 4 fatal accidents over the last 9 years. 2 died while operating bass fishing boats, 1 died in a jet ski- "cigarette" boat crash, and 1 died of carbon monoxide poisoning. I am concerned that this will only create more unsafe conditions because the new the ski zone begins at the intersection of Indian Slough and Middle River. This 5 way intersection of levees is recognized by the Sheriff s department and locals as one of - -the-busiest intersections-in-the_CaliforniaDelta.____ The following questions remain and I feel it is imperative as a community, that we have the opportunity to further discuss this ordinance before it is instituted. • What research was done that suggested this ordinance would prevent accidents or alleviate congestion in this section of the Delta? • How will this unfunded mandate be put into place? Are the financial and human resources in place to efficiently and effectively institute this ordinance? • How will a sign posted in one section of the delta save lives in other areas of the delta when you are essentially moving the congestion further up the waterways? • How will the measure be enforced? What fines will be collected? Where will that money go to? • Legislation already exists to that allows the Sheriffs Department to use discretion and cite unsafe boating. Maybe we should explore allotting the Sheriffs department the proper funding to uphold the laws we already have. • Does this ordinance accurately reflect the views of the constituents of Discovery Bay? We can all agree that safe boating is priority for everyone. However I cannot support an ordinance that is not researched based, nor has the fiscal or sufficient human resources behind it to actually be implemented. Sincerely, Michael Smith rint http://us,f574.mail.yahoo.comfdc/launch?action=welcome&YY=13 5... From: Stenn, Kay (kay.stenn@hp.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 7:17:46 AM Subject: Stop the Waterski ban This ban is stupid and won't change anything. Wayne Smith . smittydwb@aol.com 5/29/2007 6:56 AM i i 'rint http://us.f574.znail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: Stern, Kay(kay.stenn@hp.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 4:53:41 PM Subject: Waterski Ban I do NOT support this ban... "This ordinance makes a blind high speed 5 way intersection the starting point for watersports. Far more dangerous than at the end of a slough next to a 5 MPH zone where it is now. This proposal is about anything but safety. After focusing on the stats it is becoming more and more clear and they simply don't indicate that skiing is the problem here. The facts are really clear. There are only 2 waterski related deaths a year statewide. Only 1 of 16 accidents on these sloughs was waterski related, and ZERO deaths. —___Eishing_has.a.higher,accident_rate_in both the stale and in these sloughs, yet skiers are targeted. The number one cause of accidents in this area is excessive speed, yet skiers are targeted. Skiers believe they are being unfairly discriminated against, and that this ban won't do anything to improve safety. Skiers are ready and willing to support solutions that actually improve safety, but stand firmly against arbitrary bans that do nothing." Sincerely, Kay Kay Smith _r 5/29/2007 6:53 AM Print http://us.£574.mail.vahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: Stenn, Kay(kay.stenn@hp.com) To: dist3@bos.cccounty.us; info@deltawaterskiban.org; distl@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us; gayle@bos.cccounty.us; dist4@bos.cccounty.us; dist5@bos.cccounty.us Date: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 11:00:18 AM - Cc:_k_stenn@y4hoo.com ___ _ Subject: NO -Discovery Bay Waterski Ban I do NOT support the water ski towing ban out front of Discovery Bay. This is why I purchased my home here 15 years ago. We frequently only have time for a short ski run in the off hours before/after work etc. This is not fair to ban the primary reason for the popularity of this area to exist. Why else would anyone buy in this area and pay a premium for homes closer to fast water. There are alternatives... If this ban goes into effect: It wil]NOT reduce water accidents, It will NOT change the water craft safety, It will NOT help the popularity of the area, It will in fact drive down home prices, It will reduce the amount of capital gain when I sell my home, It will reducemy homeinvestment, It will lead to fewer boat sales, It will fiustrate the most home/boat owners, It will create unnessary time to get to skiable water, It will cost us more due to the need for more marine patrol, It will lead to a 5mph zone, It will reduce skiing opportunities, It will piss me off! It would have been nice to give us a few months to know what was being proposed so we could have spoken up sooner. I saw nothing of this in my mail (or email). This is not fair and it is not right. Plus the sheriff marine patrol experts do NOT feel strongly that this will make any difference either. Kay Stenn K—Stenn@yaboo.com 650-224-2222 cell of 1 5/29/2007 6:51 AM I Print Page 1 of 1 From: m-astewart@juno.com (m-astewart@juno.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 9:30:54 PM Subject: No on Ordinance 2007-22 This proposed Ordinance is Really Stupid! Citing the statistics about accidents being higher on Holidays doesn't support the Whole Ban in the proposed area. I believe that those statistics can be used for the Highways during the Holidays also. Do the "brainy" Stupervisors, I mean Supervisors want to close down the freeways or change the speed limit from 65 mph to 5 mph. That would be dangerous, and that is what they are proposing for this area of the Delta. It is Stupid!!. Also, aren't U.S. citizens given the right to the "...pursuit of happiness.." This is clearly against that. Thanks, Matt Stewart http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 Print Page 1 of 1 From: Dave Theobald (dave@turmaninc.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:00:43 AM Subject: Water ski ban needs to be defeated I am a resident of Discovery Bay and I think this legislation is ridiculous. Please do not pass this restriction. Dave "Creating environments where people want to be" Dave Theobald President TURMAN Commercial Painters 2055 Research Dr. Livermore CA 94550 925-455-2270 DL 925-455-9097 Fax 925-260-0024 CP Mailto_:dave_@turmaninc.com e http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 Print Page 1 of 1 From: Rachel Treff(tigwith4@sbcglobal.net) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Friday, June 1, 2007 7:10:59 PM Subject: I am NOT in support of this measure. All though their intentions are fine,this measure will just concentrate the boating traffic in other more dangerous corners. I would also like to note that originally when bonds were sold to finance the construction of the Las Vaqueros reservoir, it was planned to be open to all water sports. After the bonds were passed, it was quickly changed to no boating. Here again the local water sports enthusiast is getting the short end of the stick! http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 I Print Page 1 of 1 From: Rachel Treff(tigwith4@sbcglobal.net) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Saturday, June 2, 2007 2:07:16 PM Subject: Re: Perhaps we should offer up with a solution of just adding more "warning" signs to the area, in hopes that both sides can get what they want.This might be a good alternative to a all out ban. info@deltawaterskiban.org wrote: I believe that if we all show up on Tuesday in Martinez at the supervisors meeting at 9:30 we will have a major impact. We need to make a large showing and things will be different. Trust me on this. I will know more in a day or so. See you in Martinez on Tuesday. Thanks, me ----- Original Message ---- From: Rachel Treff<tigwith4@sbcglobal.net> To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Sent: Friday, June 1, 2007 7:10:59 PM Subject: I am NOT in support of this measure. All though their intentions are fine, this measure will just concentrate the boating traffic in other more dangerous corners. I would also like to note that originally when bonds were sold to finance the construction of the Las Vaqueros reservoir, it was planned to be open to all water sports. After the bonds were passed, it was quickly changed to no boating. Here again the local water sports enthusiast is getting the short end of the stick! http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/de/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 I Print Page 1 of 1 From: Karryl Turney (karrylt@yahoo.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 9:44:24 AM Subject: Ordinance 2007-22 prohibiting waterskiing near Discovery Bay o womis may concern: I strongly oppose this ordinance: Not a single death in this area is due to watersports —this ordinance unfairly targets watersports enthusiasts. * Accidents in this area are largely due to excessive speed and alcohol—this ordinance wouldn't have prevented a single death. * This ordinance essentially creates a freeway from Orwood to Old River, likely increasing speeds and accidents. It is a killer. * --- ---- - - - -------- ---------------- This -------------This ordinance paves the way for a 5MPH zone putting the watersports we all love in further jeopardy. The supporters say this isn't true, but isn't it the logical next step after the next death due to excessive speed and drinking. * This ordinance paves the way for more deep water development—Private Island Homes will require this to be a 5MPH zone, this is the first step. BOTTOM LINE: This isn't about safety! If it were it would address the cause of accidents! It DOESN'T. Disc_overt' Bay has prided itself on being the place to "Live Where You Play". Our very way of life is under attack. Don't believe for a second it is anything less. Even if you 100% agree that something needs to be done to improve safety, you should NOT support this ordinance. As would be done for any road, a traffic study should be done, and an effective plan to address the REAL safety problem should be identified. Sincerely, Karryl L. Tumey TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. http://ds.f574.mail:yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x - - 5/29/2007 tint http:l/us.f574.maiLyahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welconle&YY=135... Frotu: Jimy Uranwala(jsu@turnkeytest.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Friday, May 18, 2007 9:02:39 AM Subject: Delta waterskiing ban People get killed on highways so should we ban all vehicles on them? Or make them all go 5mph? Attack the CAUSE of the problem: Hefty fines on those casuing accidents, whoever they may be. Also, everyone knows a great many accidents are from people with too much alcohol in them, so if it's dangerous to drink and drive on roads, its even more so on waterways with no lanes and other controls, so why not some legal limit for body alcohol content? Waterskiiers don't want to get hurt and are just as keen as anyone on safe waterways, More so because WE are the ones who get hurt by drunk idiots running over us in the water. Jimy Uranwala 5[29/2007 6:58.4, I Tint http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/laimch?action--welcome&YY=135... From: markvbftr@aol.com (markvbftr@aol.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Thursday, May 17, 2007 7:37:57 AM Subject: Fwd: Delta Indian Slough, Werner Cut statistics - Contra Costa Times... fyi ------ ------ -----Original Message----- From: markvbftr@aol.com To: esherbert@cctimes.com Cc: jeffbarber@earthlink.net; keith@filice.com; mo@deltaskier.com; sean@deltaskier.com; doran-family@comcast.net; tmartin@lee-associates.com; caricker@sbcglobal.net; msperrer@hotmail.com; wrrichardson@earthIink.net; raymond.gibson@axa-advisors.com; ncalskierl@hotmaii.com - Sent: Wed,_16-May.2007. 11,:34 AM Subject: Delta Indian Slough, Werner Cut statistics - Conta Costa Times... Good morning Erin, I wanted to follow up with some comments regarding your story concerning banning skiing along Indian Slough and Werner Cut dated 4-27-07. 1 first wanted to thank you for doing what many influences and proponents of this proposal have failed to do and that was to allow and print the input of one of our high profile Discovery Bay residents. To those comments I'd-like-to-add-some-observations-and-fGod-for-t-hought.-As-man.y-otmy---___ esteemed neighbors will agree, Indian and Werner can get very congested and dangerous certain times of the week during our peak summer months. I'd like to offer the most recent statistics submitted by the California Department of Boating and Waterways. Granted these statistics are from 2002, yet I haven't seen any other more topical study so please bear with me. The intention is that by banning waterskiing and other towed activities, the accident rates, incidences, injuries and casualties will decrease. Let me throw some numbers at you and see if you agree targeting the waterski community is the answer to this issue. • Personal Watercraft (PWC) such as let Skis account for 18 percent of registered vessels, but were involved in 25 percent of the accidents on the Delta. • Cabin motor boats and houseboats accounted for 35% of all accidents. • Nearly 25 percent of all boating injuries occurred on three-day holidays for Memorial Day, 4th of July and Labor Day. • Alcohol played a role in 38 percent of fatal boating accidents in 2004, nearly twice the 2003 rate of 21 percent. • operators age 21 to 30 were involved in more accidents than any other age group 5/29/2007 7:00 Al 1 Tint http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... • Waterskiing accidents account for 13% of the total accidents in the Delta relative to the number being much high in larger more open bodies of water (32% on Lake Shasta and 19% on Lake Berryessa). • 65% of all boating accidents of any kind take place on the weekend with a total of 25% of all accidents occuring on holiday weekends. • Personal Note: The only boats I have ever seen beached on the hard Delta were offshore race boats on a Delta poker run as documented by the local rag in Discovery Bay. Given this set of data, it seems really clear that the waterski community is being targeted when waterskiing is such a relatively small contribution to the danger on the Delta. I submit that banning waterskiing and towing activities does nothing to address wreckless boaters, drunk boaters, large cabin cruisres, Personal Watercraft and inexperienced boaters which do contribute to the danger in that particular area of the Delta. It's also clear that the level of danger on Indian Slough and Werner Cut is significantly different depending on the time of day, week, year and holiday schedule. Personally, I have observed Indian Slough and Werner cut vacant most weekday afternoons and weekend mornings. I'd be interested to see the statistics augmented to account ----for-those-times-of-the daytc determine Delta safety. My final thought: Target the appropriate behavior and target the appropriate windows of time that offer the greatest amout of protection for the safe and responsible boaters, fisherman and skiers of Discovery Bay. Mark Varnes 8 year Discovery Bay resident and waterskier -----Original Message----- Sent: Wed, 16 May 2007 7:21 AM Subject: w-ski issue message from David Piepho 5-15-07 Thank you for following up. As I mentioned today, I will attempt to convene (host) a meeting so that we can review any additional comment. The Town of Discovery Bay CSD meets twice a month and given that we already have our next meeting posted and agendized, we will have to call a special meeting. We will attempt to schedule it toward the end of the month in an effort to give you proper notice. Additionally, I will speak to the rest Of the board and our legal council this week to make sure this meets with approval as well. I have included your CC list on this reply as well so that all interested parties will be aware of our efforts. As always, I remain available to discuss any issues, concerns or suggestions that you may have. 5/29/2007 7:00 AM i tint h ://us.f574.mai1. ahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... ttP Y a 7 Thank you for taking time today to mage your comments known. David CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic transmission may contain information which is confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, or disseminate this message nor any part of it nor any attachments. If you have received this message in error, please immediately delete the message and any attachments from your system without reading the content and notify the sender immediately of the inadvertent transmission. There is no legal intent on the part of the sender to waive any privilege including but not limited to copyrights, the attorney/client, the reporter/source, and the provider/client privileges that may attach to this communication and or it's contents. C 2007 All Contents All Rights Reserved D. Piepho AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. i/79/7007 7.00 AM I Print Page 1 of 1 From: VANEMMERIK@aol.com (VANEMMERIK@aol.com) To: DApiepho@sbcglobal.net Date: Friday, June 1, 2007 10:38:26 PM Cc: info@deltawaterskiban.org Subject: Re: ski ban. Mr. Piepho, You still don't see the picture. You have over 1500 petitions against the proposal in addition to the majority of the hundreds of people that were at the meeting. That equates to about 20 percent of the D.B.population. The D.B. people want to use that water during weekdays when there's hardly any traffic on it. Take you boat off the hoist and go see for yourself that it isn't crowded on weekdays. Please don't tell me that this can not be enforced. Yes, you as an individual may not agree, but you have the responsibility to listen to the people that put you were you are. In closing, we all hope that a compromise can be obtained. One solution is restricting the ski-ban to weekends and holidays. Please reconsider the will of the people. See what's free at AOL.com. http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=15050003 34&x 6/4/2007 Print Page 1 of 1 From: VANEMMERIK@aol.com (VANEMMERIK@aol.com) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Friday, June 1, 2007 4:28:14 PM Subject: Re:ski-ban Mr. Piepho, After reading the C.C. Times, I was totally disgusted that you voted in favor of the proposed No-Ski Zone Ordinance following the Town Meeting on May 29. Was I in the wrong place, or weren't you there mentally to listen to all the comments that were made.. Were you also blind to the over 1500 petitions that were presented to you before the meeting? On retrospect, I should not have been surprised after observing your non-verbal communications all evening. You never displayed any interest in the comments and facts that were presented and just sat there pompously keeping vigil on the three minute clock. Your mind was made up and nothing was going to change it. As an elected official, I would think that the 1500 petitions and the hundreds of people in attendance should have an impact on your decision making process. Mr. Piepho, how many petitions do you need to change your mind? Let us know and we will get them. Also, aren't elected officials supposed to listen to their constituencies? Remember, if you don't, there will always be someone that will! Paul Van Emmerik See what's free at AOL.com. http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.comJdc/launch?action=welcome&YY=1505000334&x 6/4/2007 i Print http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... G From: Launa Weller(Iweller@pacbell.net) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Friday, May 25, 2007 9:06:47 PM Subject: Waterski Ban-Please forward to officials RE: Ordinance 2007-22 prohibiting waterskiing near Discovery Bay Regarding proposed Contra Costa County Ordinance 2007-22, prohibiting waterskiing near Discovery Bay, I ask that you seriously reconsider your position on this matter as I do not support this ordinance. I feel that this ordinance, as written, is far too stringent for the circumstances. Certainly, the Delta, at times, can be a dangerous place, and I am fully in favor of proactively promoting safety wherever possible. However, in this case, that danger does not exist on a 7 day a week, 24 hour a day basis. As the Contra Costa Sheriffs Office has noted, the area in question is most dangerous on weekends and holidays. Were ---- -------Y-ou to--- ----------- - - - - - - - - - travel there during the week, you would find no such evidence to support this ban. Additionally, many local residents use this area during the week for water sports, and know better than to do the same on the weekends and holidays. Those residents, many of whom moved to the area specifically for its close access to water sports, are being unduly punished by this action. I have three suggestions as a compromise to this proposed ordinance. First, prohibit water sports activities in this area during weekends (Saturday and Sunday) and major holidays (Memorial Day, 4th of July, and Labor Day) from May 15th through September 15th of each year. In this way, you provide a measure of safety during the most crowded and dangerous periods, while also allowing local residents and others unrestricted access when the waterway is typically uncrowded. Second, I suggest that you reduce the area in question here from the end of Indian Slough(at its intersection with Old River)to that part of Indian Slough which meets the entrance to the Discovery Bay Marina. The section of Indian Slough to the ^F 5/29/2007 7:02 AM i Print http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?action=welcome&YY=135... East of Discovery Bay Marina is far wider than that to the West and provides a safer area for starting a skier than does the proposed ban limit. Additionally, this new - location was the iliTe-n-6f-the—riginawof-this graposal,a 73 scow ryBay resi��ii tJI lu person never intended for such a ban to carry eastward to the end of Indian Slough. Third, consider a speed limit for this section of Indian Slough rather than a ban on skiing, tubing etc. From my own experiences in this waterway, boats traveling at high rates of speed pose the greatest risk to the safety of other boaters and those enjoying fishing and other watersports activities. A reasonable limit of 30 miles per hour along this stretch of waterway would be a way of greatly reducing the risks associated with speed in this waterway. It is my hope that you consider my opinions and suggestions seriously. Please disapprove Contra Costa County Ordinance 2007-22, perhaps to reintroduce it with the aforementioned changes. Sincerely, Curtis Weller 4821 Spinnaker Way Discovery Bay, CA 94514 925-997-2890 of 2 5/29/2007 7:02 AM l� I i rint, http://us.f574.mail.yahoo.com/dcAaunch?action=welcome&YY=135... From: A1 (alwolden@comcast.net) To: info@deltawaterskiban.org Date: Friday, May 18, 2007 6:17:06 PM Subject: Waterski ban Here is the quick letter I sent. It appears to me there is a conflict of interest here. What's next no boats under 25 feet. You people need to stop trying to take our liberties away just to suit your personnel needs. This isn't about safety, the numbers bear out the fact drinking and inexperience are causing the injuries. I believe you need to rethink this and align your self with a better overall cause like mandatory boater safety course. Al Wolden Antioch resident and concemed boater. 5/29/2007 6:58 AM I REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM Q Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item #:..b Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. / My comments will be' ❑ Genera / Personal information is optional. This speaker's card will be incorporated into the public record of t/hiis/meeting. ❑ For Name (PRINT): iCgAEL (� 1\ �9 G f�"Iy `5 Against ��/ To ensure your name is announced correctly,you may want to include its phonetic spelling _ I wish to speak on the subject of: 1 Address: 5 .3& R V-0? LA �{ fZ /� �. W Tr-- /2 S k 1 " l3 A &1_ City: Phone: 7Z 1-Z el 7 1 am speaking for: g Myself Im do not-want to speak but would like to ❑ Organization: leave comments for the Board'to consider (Use the back of this form) , 1 I i i REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item#: o Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: / 7 speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be: ,Jx/Genera Personal information is optional. This speaker's card will be incorporated into the public record•of this meeting, For Name (PRINT): 1 k d ,5 M7' ❑ Against To ensure your nine is announced con-ectly,you may want to include its phonetic spelling q /J ❑ I wish to speak on the subject of: / Address: " / 2 0 C14 U/2 (L L U U r ice^ �j A 1115 1s Au 7. A City: )l 6 Y /5A Phone: _SCJ .7'-7 I ain speaking for: �( Myself ❑ Organization: ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this form) i REO EST TO:SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on A"endaItem#: Af Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: ��� { speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair: My comments will be: ❑ .Gener Personal information is optional. This speaker's card will be incorporated into the public record of this meeting, ] For Name(PRINT): ✓!7,.-,-/�c�'� �= El Against To ensure your name is announced correctly,you may)vane to include its phonetic spelling I wish to speak on the subject of: Address: City: Phone: I am speaking for: ❑ Myself El Organization: ❑ I do not want to speak but wouldlike to leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this form) i i 1 REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak" on Agenda Item#: 1 Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the - Date: speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be'. General Personal iriforniatiori is optional. This speaker's card will be incorporated into the public record of this meeting. For Name(PRINT): (J/.40iZee aw'� ❑" Against To ensure your name is ounounced correctly,you may want to include its phonetic spelling ❑ I wish to speak-on the subject of: Address: 12000 City: �4 Phone: I am speaking for: ❑ Myself ❑ I do not.want to speak but would like to ,fel Organization: erg" leave comments for the Board to consider .7/,6�,4 (Use the back of this form) i REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) 1 wish to s0eak on Agenda Item#: Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: — c9.- speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. r Pei'soaal informationinformationis optioilirl. This speaker's card My commentswill will be: ❑ General immporated into the public recoPd of this meeting. ❑ For Name(PRINT): ,J A, ✓ .C�/ �/D VICE Against To ensure your wane is armounced correctCy,you may want to include its phonetic spelling ❑ I wish to speak on the subject of- Address: £Address: y,.viPeSS City: /.JtsCoV 21 i t�AY Phone: 9.2 5 513 -75 50 I am speaking for: [? Myself ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to ❑ Organization: leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this form) i i REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish.to sneak on Agenda Item #: -� 1 Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: speaker's podium; and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be: `,� Gener Personal it forinatiott is optional. This speaker's eai d will be incoiparated into the public recoor'dd if this ineeting. ❑ For Name(PRINT): 7 ' �? - ❑ Against To ensure your ndiue is muioanced correctly,you niay wa»t to include its phonetic spelling I wish to speak on the subje t of: Address: )�� ( T City: ? Phone: �a5 Ll7Sy N6 I am speaking for: l Myself / V I ❑ Indo not want to speak but would like to ❑ Organization: leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this form) f i REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item#: Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be: ❑ .General Personal information is optional. This speaker's card will be ' (:�) incorporated into the public recor d of this ineetinig. ❑ For Name(PRINT):1Jz— (U/� �' l�'l �i/�ll� Against To ensure your name is announced correctly,you may want to include its pJzonettc spelling I wish to speak on the subject of: Address: City: 7 Phone: 1 am speaking for: ❑ Myself ❑ Organization: ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this form) J REQUEST TO SPEAK FORINT(3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Itein#: Complete this forth and place it in the upright box near the Date: raswto '2c� �- speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be: 95, Gen ra Personal information is optional. This speaker's card will be incoiporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For Name(PPJNT): ❑ Against To ensure vour name is anuouuced correctty,you ntay want to iuclude its phonetic speAlug I wish to speak on the subject of: Address: 15T3(a 4�6,f T-CSlrb C.i • , �c� Scl. kv City: (,Vh%X Lf 19t , Phone: (C12S) �?6-1 V�2Z I am speaking for: NO Myself ❑ Organization: ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this form) 1 I REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM(3 Minute Limit). I wish to speak on Agenda Item#: Complete this form and place it in the upright box near'the Date: 42 speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be. ❑ General Personal ittforniation is optional. This speaker's card will be incorporated into the public record of this ineeting. For Name(PRINT): e7i�� jda✓ � [13" Against To ensure your nonce is announced correctlyy u pray want to include its phonetic spelling O I wish to speak on the sub"ect o`f: ' Address: � Y 7 7T?/ �/�' . City: If Phone: 7Z-- I am speaking for: Myself C) I do not.want to speak but would like to O Organizations leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this forst) 1 I J j REQUEST.TO SPEAK FORM(3 Minute Limit) I wish-to speak on A enda Item#: ✓ "� Complete this form and place it in the upright box near"the Date: �D 7 © 7 speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be' C7 General Personal information is optional. This speaker's cdrd will be ittcotporated into the public record of this meeting. E) For �Name (PRINT): I Cr/A}-rl— `IDS C`, X Against To ensure your naive is mmounced correctJv,you may want to include its phonetic spelling . I wish to speak on the subject of: Address: I Ll. Lf 7-C C> W AIZA Sly 1 QAAG City: S/+nl Phone: gas &0(0 I am speaking for: Myself (]• I do not.want to speak but would like to O Organization: leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this form) I i REQUEST TO SPEAK FORINT Q Minute Limit) I wish to s eik on A ehda Item#:No - 2�st Complete this form and place it in the upright box near"the Date: speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be' ❑ General Personal information is optional. This speaker's caM will be incorporated into the public record of this meeting. El For c rr El Against Name(PRINT): S Co" S r1n�+ To ensure your name is announced correctly,you unay want to include its phonetic spelling ❑ I wish to speak.on the subject of: Address: I tOct QtScoyed�z 13pgy BI-!e City: �oSC.© yed� 13W`-1 Q Phone: 97.6-- -3 $" Z- 1 3'8' I ani speaking for: 131, yself . ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to Organization: leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of ibis form) i REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to sneak on Agenda Item Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: 0 & 105 107 speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comment'swill be. ❑ General Personal it forniatioii is optional. This speake'r's card iirill be into porated into the public record of this meeting. ❑_,/AainstFor p ,p \ �� Name(PRINT): � e v�-m-0._ 1'�. uwTYX�s' EY"Against 1'9 ensarre your pante is announcedcorrectly,you may want to inciitde its phonetic spelling I wish to-speak on the subject of: Address; P • S �..L I Z©0 City: e-u s a.,ACa-w �ty1-a c e (l�ro `�, v�+✓ Phone: ul k; t o u I am speaking for: Q' Myself ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to ❑ Organization: leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this forni) REQUEST TO'SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on A 'enda Item#: Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: 6 speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. (v My comments will be ❑ .Gener Personal information is optional. This speaker's card will be incorporated into they public record of this iheeting.J For Name(PRINT): C7. Against To ensure your name is amotmced correctly,you may movant to include its phonetic spelling I8! I wish to speak on the subject of: Address: /� 06 / ?leillCck- 4eD7:Zc City: Dt,-Ce o o e! TY Phone: I am speaking for: Myself ❑ Organization: ❑ Ido riot want to speak but would like to leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of thisform) I i REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item#:��, 1 Complete this form and lace it in the upright box near the - ' P P . Date: speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be: Er-'Genera(v) Peisoinal information is optiondl. This spedker's edrd will be incotyorated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For ❑ Against Name (PRINT): 1 o ensure vour name is announced correct{v,you may want to include its phonetic spelling ❑ I wish to speak`on the subject of: Address: tA✓ Ai Ale City: Phone: IJ - ��Map I am speaking for: Myself ❑ 1 do not want to speak but would like to Organization: leave comments-for the Board to consider (Use the back of tis forth) REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to s eak on A `erida Item #: �" 1 Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. i Personal inforinati611 is optional. This speaker's card will be My comments will be: ❑ Gene incorporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For Name(PRINT): �C Crr 12 11 Against jTo ensure your name is announced correctly,yott may want to include its phonetic spelling ❑ I wish to speak on the subject of- Address- y-ex PO I city: y e t/ Phone: I'am speaking for: U�—myself ❑ Organization:. ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this form) REQUEST"TO SPEAK FORAM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to sneak on Agenda Item Complete this form and place it in the uptight box near the Date: V 0 tit IC7—, speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be: ❑ General Personal inforitiation is optiondl. 7his speaker's card will be incotporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For Name (PRINT): f�,4 1�/.� G1_ Against To ensure vour name is announced correctly,you may want to include its phonetic spelling I wish to speak on the subject of: j Address: t-- I� C t cI� T 11•E "L77'� �thlA;t'!l S l'--� City: 15�-GUZ--7 ��� �1�a , I j Phone: &P3 q 8 1 I am speaking for: '15l Myself ❑ I do not-want to speak but would like to Organization: leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this form) I REQUEST TO.SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) hwish to s` eak on Ag enda item # Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: speaker'spodium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My.comments will be'. ❑ . Gener j Pers'oiial itiforniatioh is optfoiial. This speak'er's card will be iricoiporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For Natne (PRINT): �e i�� rtrick-Str, ❑ Against . To enstnr your name is announced correctly,yon ntay want to include its phonetic spelling ❑ I wish to speak on the subject of- Address: ? f: Address: �� �tSGmOsry [ , Ivjn7t°(��1 tl - City: �V6LQI) ?Lr7 Phone: V/o-GZO), I amspeaking for: [A) Myself I do not want to speak but would like to ❑ Organization: leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this forth) I REQUEST TO'SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item#: . Complete this form and lace it m the upright box near the p pDate: ``' speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair: My comments will be: ❑ ;Genera Personal h formation is optional. This speaker's card will be incorporated into the public record of this meeting. El For Name(PRINT): - 0-,h6, rd, �(�, La Against To ensure your name is announced correctly,you may wan to include its phonetic spelling I wish to speak on the subject of- Address: /y// .A4/ Jji(lL' City: i �7D� cA ct�SXAIAN $7L42te61 Phone: I am speaking for: -❑ Myself Organization: QY WC)U�D ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this form) REQUEST,TO SPEAKTORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item# ` Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: .,. , U'Af. - { 1 00 , nl speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be: ❑ General Personal it forinati611 is optional. This speaker's card will be 1 .. incorporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For Name (PRINT): ( (' 41V�, L° (t I LTJ Against To ensive your mmne is announced correctly,you onify want io include its phonetic spelling . fQ I wish to speak on the subject of: j Address: VVI,l l 4W ((4 { t�.� i� 6 �Vlct InCT . . City: t f 6y�o'll l,c.y C l� 9 y n y 047- a Phone: 2-- 16 Y I ams speaking for: NMyself i P ❑ Organization: ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this forma) { REQUEST TO. SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to s" eak on A enda Item # ),00-�,-DOS Complete this forth and place it in the upright box near the Date: speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My.comments will be' ❑ General Persoiial itiforinatiort is optional. This speaker's card will be hicoiporated into th puJbll�ircfrecord of thiss�m_�eeetintg.. ❑ For Name(PRINT): Tr V V`—eJJ NL— / Against To ensure vote-mmne is announced correctly,you ntay want to include its phonetic spelling / ' I // ,^, `` ❑ I wish to speak.on the subject of, Address: Wyt-wtj C.�17 AD D - 0604105- - . �-A/`� I City: 1 Phone: I am speaking for: LV Myself ge /) ❑ 1 do not-want to speak but would like to j �ganization, �i�Z S leave comments for the Board to consider <d � (Use the back of this form) t/ I i REQUEST TO SPEAK'FORM (3 Minute Li nit) I wish to speak ori Agenda Item #: . Complete this form and place it in theupright box near the Date: speaker's podium, and wait to be called by.the Chair. My comments will be: ❑ General Personal it formation is optional. This speaker's card will be { incoiporaled into the public record of this sheeting. ❑ For Name (PRINT): ca,` Y" /. Z rl- ! _ Against To ensure your name is announced coi'iectly,you may want to include its phonetic spelling . ❑ I.wish to speak on the subject of: Address: 47'( i city: U 2@...q rw et-o cq Phone: 2o .q S'( f 1 3 I am speaking for: Myself ❑ Organization: ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this fibrin) j REQUEST TO_SPEAK FORM(3 Minute Limit) I wish to s" eak on Agenda Item #: Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date:G":'0 -7 (A speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be ❑ Genera Personal iitforination is optional. This speaker's card will be memporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For Name (PRINT): JGC� G�r w��. I� Against To ensure your name is announced con-ec6v ydu may want to incliide its phonetic spelling I wish to speak.on the subject of: i Address: City: i Phone: I am speaking for: l Myself ❑ I do not-want to speak but would like to ❑ Organization: leave eomments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this form) j REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on/A enda Item#: Complete this form and place it in the upright box near"the Date: speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be` ❑ Genera Personal information is optional. This speakers cc&d will be incorporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For Name (PRINT): T ( L �[ U n�� Against To ensure your name is announced correctly,you may want to include its phonetic spelling ❑ I wish to speak on the subject of. Address: ct S U. U&o C� City: l C.©V Ej- j Phone: — J 1T '- k I am speaking for: ( ;j Myself ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to ❑ Organization: leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this form) REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM(3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak ou A eiida Item#: f Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be El General Personal information is optional. This speaker's card will be' incorporated into t! is record of this meeting. ❑ For j Name(PRINT): e�� C Y �� (��L�� El---Against To ensureyoiu mmne is announced correctly, ou nray want to include its phonetics eIt'urg I wish to 71- on the subject Address: City: �r��,/��i � � ���� i0i✓ o� i� fl���~� Phone: ��J� ell I ,A1 I am speaking for: Myself El I do not.want to speak but would like to ❑ Organization: leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this form) I I REQUEST.TO SPEAKTORM(3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item#: J - Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. 777 My comments will be: ❑ Genera Personal information is optional. This speaker's card will be i incorporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For Name(PRINT): Against To ensure your name is announced correctly you may want to include its phonetic spelling _ �rI? I wish to speak on the subject of Address: 1 City: 6 UE' r Af Phone: �d O 9 —0/0/1*' f am speaking for: ❑ Myself ❑ Organization: , ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to 21 leave leave comments for the Board to consider 1- (Use the back of this,fornz) REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM(3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item #: Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be: ❑ General Personal information is optional. This speaker's card will be incorporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For � ) ) Name: -laGfd I� Cf V Against Q G'/_ � y 1F� I wish to speak on the subject of: Address: �i CJS ��/�//� Cao 7- City: Lv " ` S Phone: q�- S` 1 3 7'" T5 S L r Clj ® ,h ave C� I am speaking for: Myself ❑ Organization: ❑ Ido not want to speak but would like to leave comments for the Board to consider (use the back of this form) I REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item #: � Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: 5- speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be: ❑ General Personal information is optional. This speaker's card mill be U/ incorporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For Name: Against ��I�,.-/��.G6==i"�I,� / 1 �/ ,� �1� X I wish to speak on the subject of- Address: £ Address: P4e,0005c-o Qi n j,,yrrAlz P City: /�f��r1c� -� 91 &V LP?- 2Z /9J SFi//mob Phone: 9Z S l�_ /=%Z 5� /-sui.a I rrrrn I t a t I am speaking for: Myself ❑ Organization: ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to leave comments for the Board to consider (use the back of this form) i REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item#: Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. I My comments will be: ❑ General Personal it formation is optional. This speaker's card will be ittcotporated into the public record of this ineeting. For Name(PRINT): El Against To ensure your name is announced correctly,you maywant to include its phonetic spelling I wish to speak on the subject of: Address: �OJr 2)m r flb 4-oty gr:Aiy-nyir. City: l 1 S CO V�r cL '—SSC Phone: Tam speaking for: Myself 3 ❑ Organization: ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to i leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this,fortit) i REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to s eak on Agenda Item #: z4ZYY2 Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be: ❑ General Personal information is optional. This speaker's card will be incorporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For �J G`� � �� �-�.�.C��'►'"� - Against Name: �-- L I wish to speak on the subject o£ Address: � � ", �b + �a a + �` tic City: a -A c4 Phone: `' :2 I am speaking for, Myself ❑ Organization: ❑ I do.not want to speak but would like to leave comments for the Board to consider (use the back of this farm) )QUEST.TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit)' I wish to speak on Agenda Item Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: �- speaker's podium, and wait to be called by-the Chair. My comments will be: ❑ Gener Personal information is optional. This speaker's card will be incorporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For Name(PRINT). fleaAl e,r r�em 2' Against To ensure your name is atn ounced correctly,you may want to include its phonetic spelling . El .I wish to speak on the subject of- Address: £Address: .DJsCoye,^V !�pp u �Iyd. City: D l.5 CyQ_ U_ q V Phone: 9a aqo` 9a� � f ani speaking for: Myself ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to ❑ Organization: p leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this forni) i REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3.Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item#: ID, Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: 2flz7"1 speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. My comments will be: ❑ General Personal it forination is optional. This speaker's card will be incorporated into the public record ofthis meeting. ElFor Name (PRINT): c-T*, -gym91RA Against 7o ensure your name is announced correcdv,you may want to include its phonetic spelling I wish to speak on thesubjectof: Address: [215- City: D( S (OKr t2c, Phone: "t b 3 Lf FJ 14'y( (� �,U(1A� i C`Lt96 I am speaking for: 'V] Myself U-' ❑ 1 do 'not want to speak but would like to ❑ Organization: leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this form) I I R,QUEST TO. SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish, to speak on Agenda Item#: Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date: 5 r speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair. / My comments will be: CO Gener \ Personal information is optional. This speaker's card will be incorporated into the public record of this meeting." ❑ For Name (PRINT): �(I�. , 11 LICE'2 ❑ Against To ensure your rnanie is announced correctly,you nnay ivarit to include its phonetic spelling 1 Ll I wish to speak on the subject of.- Address: fAddress: City: MPV Phone: Z� , M Ln I am speaking for: ❑ Myself W Organization: COM M6 ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to leave comments for the Board to consider (Use the back of this forst) " PRESORTED -- 1 •, STANDARD - PAID } U.S.POSTAGE lz" . �` PERMIT#48 - �' UA1lfLSLS.U'L`S• Ol/L5WL'JV��IJJr���l�tl ®�C���`�'� , a 19`p 11 4w% i SU s Vol. 5, No. 22 inciuding Byron Supvounding Communities www.discoverybaypress.co June 1, 2007 Remembering the fallen heroes ♦The Oprah Winfrey show by Rick Lemyre has inspired �W-F Staff Writer one local x youth to those who'd been to y ,. Memorial Day observances at raise money thldrsave � Union Cemetery before, the en scene was comfortingly fa- miliar. Folding chairs set up r alongside the veterans' moms- trafficking inGhana. Find ment held about 100 people, out more on Page 3. the songs and music of Liberty High School students rang out, t and service members in crisp _ ♦Liberty High School uniforms stood patiently await- announced ing their turn to speak. But there were differences its 2007 scholarship r , m y b too, between what went on +rrecipients. there Monday and what'shap- Read aboutm pened in years past.The crowd, = i t _ these super �� a once a collection of aging veter- . xi � SenlOfS On ., ° ' ,' ans and their families,is young- ".- er now. The number of people Page 6. -- - who wish to remember the fallen,and the number of fallen themselves are both growing as * For a glimpse at all the action happening at the war continues. The link,according to Ma- rine-Lt. Col,.Keith Canevaro, check out Page 17. the keynote speaker, is that Photo by Rick Lemyre Americans continue to serve VFW Post 10789 Ladies Auxiliary President Agnes Perkins, left, assisted by Paulette Cooper their country as their forefa- This Liberty athlete vault and Elizabeth`Ham, places a wreath on the grave of'Sgt. Charles R. McCurtain,Vietnam War ed his casualty and namesake of the post, during Memorial Day observances on Monday. see Memorial page 4 way to the state track Safet u as boat season - Iaunehes cand field hami- ,_ 4 champ. 1� onships. 1 by Ruth Roberts t " Read Staff Writer J about his feat on Page 18. With the summer boating i' r season kicking ofd'this weekend, Zi the good news is that there have i `s' t , Inside been no fatalities in the Contra _ h Costa ounty area of the Delta Calendars................... 26 in fouryears, and boating asci- - dents throughout the Delta last Community................. 3 year fell to their lowest level in Education .................... 6 at least seven years." Neighbors.................. 24 cials are knocking on fi- s _V7 Opinion ..................... 10 berglass that the good news will r' A continue this season. s �` Sports......................... 18 "The Delta attracts a lot of different activities,notjust boat- X81, - ' r - ing,g, said Amy Rigby, boating "a " accident analyst for the Depart- Photo by Dave Roberts East County. ment�ng-and—Water- Boating accidents and injuries decreased last year on the Contra Costa County portion of the Living Section ways. "And when you have all Delta, and there have been no fatalities in four years. t�ctivities in one place,and combine that with people going up effort by the Marine Patrol and we're cracking down on safer out there on the water than_ Automotive............... 27 too fast,sure,you see some acci- to enforce the rules. those drivers who are intoxicat- the freeway." said Rigby. "And Classifieds.................. 21 dents. But overall, out there (in "I think we're looking at ed.It's making for a much safer it could be even safer if people Dining 14 the Delta) those numbers are lower numbers right now be- environment." followed the rules of road when Health & Beauty....... 11 down." cause the work we've been do- Rigby was asked if boating they're boating,such as yielding Kids & Recreation..... 18 Lt. Mark Williams of the ing is starting to pay off," said on the Delta is safer that driving to oncoming traffic." Delta Marine Patrol attnbutes Williams. "We're being proac- a car on he fr .w y It remains to be seen just New Homes................. 2 . the decrease to an-`increase in tive about educating boaters to "Well, when you put it in boatereducation,and,astepped-t� the-rules and,hazards=out here,%�.those terms,,yes Jt certain'-'is ; _ ; see Boating,page 5 _ ' THE PRESS I June 1, 2007 r th 1 r ; v r • ♦ ♦' . in, , fe , tat • ar "PERFECTION PLUS... - POPULAR WATERFRONT FLOORPLAN a $1,890,000 Dswvery 8ayql� $986,000 Discovery Pay SUMMERTIME FUN AT ROME $659,000 Brentwood �w s COME HOME TO PLAYv GREAT BEGINNINGS � - $899,000 Discovery bay $399,000 Discovery BayIN DEMAND � • $494,000 Brentwood - .. TOTALLY UPGRADEDPREMIUM ROME $315;000 Antiock " " +' � r` •• ` $1,199,000 Danville YOU WON'T BELIEVE YOUR EYES $210,000 Brentwood 50 NICE'1NIT1E 3 8EDROOMS v . , SUPERIOR LIDO SAY LOCATION $86,995 Brentwoodr .,` -" • � � "' $ 99;000 Discovery Bay COMFORT LIVING . ' . .. $62,999 Brentwood I GREATCHOICE s , p SRINGBO4T5 - •$78,950 Brentwood --_ - �•e. - �' ' �- .. Discovery Bay ... „ .' ULTIMATE LOCATION ... - $79,000.Brentwood r _TT 04 fJj � �,� visit' us on the Web, ND Hl- View All Our Fine List np and VirtualTours Y. Leod ng ibe Woy ro -(> Wcuwr.Jayand0pal.com • e .',.fes �,S',�a-,ti �+>•�.r, $�"��-' � s. _ _----.,-.... 141=1-n.racwty mercers;except-mose—ol-pprometry and a member of ios presented bear any possible It's just not relevant to us as fac- serving as administrators." the Pleasant Hill City Council. BILL K L I P P • From the community tf ✓? C'Oy�ry��Z >�S 6�2-0� P!�,f�2/ Was Discovery Bay oriitreach or sham? ®NMAY 30THE Discov- ery Bay Community Set- vices er vices District Board and .x'"� 1� 'Y C .�•m` .ff yv :� Y p County Supervisor Mary Pieph0 {," z�`��n�s� held a hastily scheduled commu ��: �� �a nityforumtOSeekCOrnunity � � iiV �1 _ a «. k 11A input on the proposed No - e% Ski/No Tow ordinance for Dis xE . s & �" covery Bay. :a l is j Although this may havey= " I z e IiY fi � l 1'i�jt' been positioned as a commu- nity ommu nity outreach effort the fact is In - the CSD previously did virtu- ally nothing to solicit (they may have even avoided it) public � � � " comment on this importantd � s sue and was ultimately forced �� �� �� .' �t by two other county superVl- - �''e 'R�i ' �, s r3 v ,�d ,�� ?• a sots to seek additional public , ,% � `, � � Comment at the last ICllnute. -•fie. � . � ;�� r�,-time °, & �o,:�� �-• .^ More than 600 people KARL MONDONRIMES FILE showed up, filling an elemen- A RESIDENT of Discovery Bay argues that the forum held last week to obtain input about a proposed tary school gym.A grassroots ban on some boating activities was nothing more than a sham. petition with more than 1,500 signatures against the ordi- many surrounding communi- it and not even slow,down the To the CSD board members: nance was also presented. ties and businesses. process to revisit the facts and Why couldn't you just put the or- Speaker after speaker pre More importantly the speak- to consider the well-thought- dinance on hold until a more sented evidence disputm'g the ers spoke about the lack of out alternative safety proposals thorough review could be per- facts presented by Mary and process and due diligence by presented at the forum? formed?The community elected David Piepho and other propo- the CSD board and some of its Director Dave Dove was the you to represent us,is it too nents of the ordinance.Speaker members. one lone voice of reason sug- much to ask that you take the after speaker addressed the Speaker after speaker sug- gesting more study and review time to listen? board and Supervisor Piepho in gested and even pleaded with and maybe a ban that consid- The people of Discovery Bay support of the community's de- the Discovery Bay CSD to take ered the real issue,which is ' want to improve boating safety. sire to improve water safety. more time to study the facts congestion on weekends and Why will you not take the neces- . Yet speaker after speaker and alternatives to create an holidays.All the facts and ex- sary time to produce an ordi- spoke about how this ordi- ordinance that will actually ad- perts say the real issue is peri- nance that will address the real nance was poorly written and dress the real safety issues. odic congestion (too many safety issues? will be ineffective. Speaker af- Never in the history of the boats in a small area),exces- I hope the majority of the ter speaker provided additional town of Discovery Bay has the sive speed and poor boating members of the county board of statistical facts about local community come out in such education, not water skiing. supervisors are more experi- boating accidents and how large numbers on a topic. In It will be interesting to see enced and open-minded than the none involved water-skiers or the end, David Piepho,presi- how the CSD board,Mary CSD board and will recommend people being towed. Speaker dent of the CSD board just re- Piepho and other county supervi- more time to study the facts and after speaker offered alterna- peated that he had 20 letters sots deal with the proposal to the proposed alternatives so Dis- tive recommendations to ad- for and 20 against so the com- add 4,000 to 6,000 new houses to covery Bay will have a more dress the real issues of boating munity was split in half. Discovery Bay and the resulting thought-out and effective ordi- congestion,excessive speed Was he deaf to the voices of boating safety issues. nance to improve water safety and boating safety/education. the 600-plus in attendance? To Mary Piepho:It's a bit while balancing the rights of Speaker after speaker spoke Does he think the 1,500-plus disingenuous to ban all water boaters.Contact the CSD board , about the flawed process the signatures against the ordi- sports 24 hours a day 365 days a to make your voice heard. CSD used on this important is- nance are irrelevant? year while supporting the addi- sue that impacts nearly every What sense does it make to tion of 4,000 to 6,000 more boats Klipp is a resident of Discovery resident of Discovery Bay and seek public opinion and ignore to Discovery Bay. Bay. •1024766 Resolution •16,000:1 Contrast Ratio •Wintlows Vista'"'Business < e < • 4 � ��)I •16-bit Color nn •1024MB DDR2 memory,160GB Hard Drive rgp� raµ'� •1400x1050 Resolution •Filter Bright 2 0004�C� •LlghlScrrbe DVDRW with Double Layer •600:1 Contrast Ratio Ab Anti-Glare Technology •Intel PROfWireless 3945AI3G,14.1" 8ms Response Time �i " '"•. '� •3 HDMI,2'Component,1 P7 . . . . . 7 nputWXGA HD Screen r, Limit 1 Per Customer 11 700 n (J00 9 42 e o 50 (fin ..'1®!9°D J®0 = '�!�"-30 =d '20911-30 = '260"-7V PLASMA` ��. 09 PLASMA �z 3fl9 Regular'° 'Instant-In Store Price Maibin � _ Price Savings After Instant Rebate Regular Instant In-StorePrice Mail-In HDTV seta.kunm HDTV �"' � Savings Ater Instant Savings Noe Savings Afterinstant Rebels After It #5203807 #5202067 #5200827 Limit 1 Per Customer &Mail-In Rebate #4878070 Savings &M Apple Q'.��IO®ZIO 4GB iPod a # ^ � � • . PIXMA MP160 Nano SLlverNano go COMPACT New Slimmer ,00 PHOTOSMART AND STYLISH Aluminum Design C7180 ALL-IN-ONE ALL-IN-ONE 1606 EXTERNAL DUAL •Double the Battery ; .pont,Scan,Co and Fax FORMAT DVD DRIVE Life py, PHOTO PRINTER 216 WIDESCREEN LCD MORITOR Phots to 31 PPM color,32 Black ,Print Resolution U to 4600 •16x DVD+/-R •1680 x 1050 Resolution (Up to 24 Hours) Photos as fast as 12 seconds p •Microscopic 2-Picoliter-Ink •USB 2.0 and Flrewire Connectivity •1000:1 Contrast Ratio •1.5"Color Display •Six Individual Inks•Memory Card Slot ,Scans Up to 600 dpi with 48 •4x DVD+R Double-Layer •5ms Response Time •3- Color Display O� •DVI&VGA '1 (40%Brighter) 09 •Built-in Wireless , • f I •Beautiful Photos that Last u ' _ �C.,� d 9 •Holds Up to Networking n!1LRbished to In-Store Mail-in (� Z�7 �7Y 1000 Songs a a ��eay-lrO_ na yY Factory Price Rebate pryer Rebate In-Store Mail In / 77 __y��y"))/J a110ns Price Rebate After Rebate Aneutlwezed Regular Instant Vv/#4367305 #4991351fSPrice Savings After Instant Savings 8796 Omit i Per Customer #5265537 Limit t Per Customer #5007985 Limit 1 Per Customer - - 16x DVD-R ti A Fr) E1ectrol m �: 100 PACK �r , NO REBATE ' 4 REQUIRED! 3 �, • 4G.B E 4MERIWQOD= �'G B: P0INERLINE TU MOBILE LAPTOP ETHERNET µ USB 2.0 FLASH DRIVE USB FILASH:DRIVE• CART 'i •Operates on Existing Home O yy Not AVailablb In Our Palo Alto .100%Plug Play,No Config Limit 1 Per (U �� Jr n" Store ' or Software Setup Needed Limit 1 Per '' HomePlug 1.0 Compliant Customer In Store Rebate a Customer Price Rebate After Rebate Price for art OnlyLimit 2 Per-Customer.lia . . .... . . .. . .. . .. .... . #4990091._.Limit 1 Per Customer O 39 i #4863410 #4997451 z :R<' AssemblyRequvad - s t ' #4585337 �..`#4909701 - " YOUR BEST SOFTWARE BUYS ARE ALWAYS T F Y SF ®gyp } fs, 0 4VirusScan IN WHITE � �{ � �F,. Office Home . •',. ORAL P1N . and'Stud®ntPlus 2007 ed� 'Rebate Oiler Does Not Reluntl the 2007 Sales Tax Paid by the Customer L x d :- !3 USE r °a, .- r a tICEkFE GSIS r 4 4 f(f� �—F F` " 1 1 .q, ' (� D �i .f�/ y �v 'Atter Instant ' P �/L(7�'y PC CD ROM r r - Regular Instant Mail In Sevin s A WITH THREE BONUS _ N{NTENDgDS-• I PC Cil am#5089485 #4943331 Pride Savings Renate Mail-In t�e6ate GAMES INCLUDES: BUNDLE WITH 4 C,L="'F .:• ,, _j •PSP Hardware BONUS GAMES J U3 pl •��a y -Virtue Tennis °� INCLUDES: w•.w: •Grip Shift •Nintendo DSLite Hardware '•'"`"`�""'" "i` i'�� •Frantix •Space Invaders Revolution•Prince Of Persia '� . . •Sudoku Mania Limu t bundle (s5 0 I D) •Bomberman A O 99 r r ,:'r r e r • , x Per customer �l )n/ CONSOLE BUNDLE // CONSOLE BUNDLE C7 ;i #527®6087.. .__.C. ._�.11l•///. .VVV'.p.V.�+...A...p. #5271,33A7/#527134.7/#5C27135�a ,'n ?`—•— � Bj �� U� G�R r�i{p vY MQY AL sq �A�O- �fa7 F �#5129456 #5184596 #5129296 #5220327mm,_,_./-�:: T SONY. , LCi clutlDwegA^^auDeeAa r � '�"� '�"' � HN7rT1r" PP3' pp ouer���.' •� =u PaaJE4TIDX XOTV ,. OQ DOLBY � D I O 1 T A L �:: Cyb Clearzrae Item Otter Limited to r � D I O I T A L �� ' Instock Irene.Selectan Vanes OWT4tl Li; 4 ° •• coo cn oa co a E p as tra �- 1. ayv � o h �7 w ° w o , o (� aT ✓o v� e0i r° C rDI of S < td C ' T g ? rn °° ac ❑ �� ry m_ o a ON -+. cryo as G r. ro ca aq ° 6. w cryo cnio °°q ti a o to m . a o w tC oho CD � cDti . l< cr CD o To' E o+ m w tp m rn rn p p C° J � + � tz co Cr R O A N -tom C3 :•p O coo B' call. a' w r am M t CL ai o ° a' C7 o o 4C r a o CD CO `C n R A> �' R. cp R O T Z-.• " O. x O 3 O F M { Q'* coo '+ C Co O Co : G ro cryo co (V o • ! • Nl . 5 �' T C �• G � O 6' co y ..: co y ,� Z, g � 0 W y �" �•`�, Fry' TL I iv ... n coo y co .1 =+� ='_ cY tl�a zrCL ; f•' i,. " r.9 ry 1 x C, P11- 0 a ti O' ry p .� !ry0 "� rD 00° 0 o , m o 2004 2005 2006 ZrD LAID so o�hj o CL Ik 0) o 6 Q t o ,v oc. � ,o rs CID � Cm m �' T. a CD oa (� t � O Oo ar co N p Oma 0. ff' ei CCD O O. aoa w p n a inw �n a p tz we w = w co r- ° v lV 01 ro0 `C 3 cr � 1 .�� mom M ib� I , Y o N `Z �• d '=f14 rn N b a t3 c» m m C oo o 0 so aT rn CD O'rD SD - N fv l< 'N•r O a 4LI000 J Y A 1 Q V !_ L O ,� C C �' c6 � 'd V...1 O m •� � a> ++ � � O x � as is . N E c ^ t' L EN E'+ N #q ++ pp +� N N GT N m as 0 C-0 ' 00 Z OmOaCiO3 � —Q .�W� .o,+nAcU i,.bU� vqO°' 'Yp� NE O O z M at nN° O a a EiuEm yz wtoO � as at at a °mE � Gmi O O ° . 0 0 QJ 3s vin m OmUvi yahk3 " `� d F' Y y 7. cid wal N � Lq o �vXt bo cd42 Gs Tvz iii a at at zi at 0 'OLvi ai y ',L.+ Wat ID •b�D NX" .0 +' nFy1 a.i Fy1 O kn`�..+ •C +'"',S� i.i t O at p ro H Ln b .0.lv) 7 . ° 'm u 'j at ° l po c tat .M o E� H Cl y« 0jE ri 3 m L V i C L > jr + + N Z N C: 1 't % 41 N } C N t•. - - m L w NN C C d to ro 7 Ot FT �o z � tE ,C �F.t r