Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06052007 - C.46 TO: Board of Supervisors Contra FROM: Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee - -� j. (Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, Chair) R Costa DATE: May 14, 2007 County SUBJECT: Adopt positions on transportation legislation SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPT"support" positions for AB 478 and SB 445 and AUTHORIZE the Chair to sign support letters, as recommended by the Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee. FISCAL IMPACT NONE to the General Fund. AB 478 has no financial implications for the County. If SB 445 is passed, the study it requires would lead to recommendations for new ways of funding transportation improvements in California, which would benefit the County in the long run. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR X RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S)?/ Su rvisor ale B. Uilkema ervisor Federal D. Glover ACTION OF BOARD ON M 77APPROVED AS AECOMMENDEDX_ OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN YES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: John Greitzer (925/335-1201) cc: Community Development Department (CDD) ATTESTED J. Bueren, PWD JOHN CULLEN, CLERK OF L. Delaney, CAO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS S. Goetz, CDD AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR G:\Transportation\TWIC\2007\Board Orders\june 5legislation.doc BY DEPUTY TRANSPORTATION LEGISLATION May 14, 2007 Page 2 BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The Transportation,Water and Infrastructure Committee on May 14 reviewed several bills and recommended the Board of Supervisors adopt "support" positions on two of the bills, AB 478 and SB 445. AB 478, by Assemblymember Lois Wolk (D-Davis), would amend the Vehicle Code to allow more effective lighting devices for bicyclists, and would require that bicyclists use the required lighting and helmets on shared-use paths as well as roadways. Current law applies these safety requirements only to roadways. The bill would allow bicyclists the option of wearing reflective devices on their shoes or ankles, instead of on each pedal as is currently required. Bicyclists believe this could provide better visibility because the shoe or ankle of the rider may be more visible to motorists than the pedal underneath. Assemblymember Wolk had introduced a similar bill several years ago, and the bill appeared on its way to passage when an oil pipeline ruptured and spilled oil into the Suisun Marsh. To deal with the emergency, Assemblymember Wolk amended her bicycle bill and used it to address repair and clean-up issues in the Suisun Marsh. Assemblymember Wolk has now reintroduced the bicycle safety bill with AB 478. The bill is co- sponsored by the California Bicycle Coalition and the Sacramento County Sheriffs Department. The bill is supported by the East Bay Bicycle Coalition. AB 478 is consistent with the County's goal of encouraging safety improvements in the transportation system. The bill has passed the Assembly and is in the Senate Committee on Transportation and Housing. SB 445, by Senator Tom Torlakson, would create an 11-member task force to study and recommend new ways of financing transportation improvements in California. The bill was introduced in recognition of the fact that revenue from the fuel excise tax(commonly known as the"gas tax")—the primary statewide source of transportation funding—has not kept pace with transportation needs since motor vehicles have become more fuel efficient over the years.The task force would be required to report to the legislature and the governor by January 1, 2009 with recommendations based on its findings. Senator Torlakson's staff has indicated it is his intent to minimize the cost of managing the task force and the study, by having either.Caltrans or the California Transportation Commission fund and perform the study using their own resources, without an additional budget allocation specifically for the study. The Transportation,Water and Infrastructure Committee supports this approach as outlined in the draft letter of support for the Chair's signature.The bill is currently in the Senate Appropriations Committee. Exhibit A is the letter of support for the Chair's signature, for AB 478. Exhibit B is the letter of support for the Chair's signature, for SB 445. Exhibit C is the full text of both bills, as reviewed by the Transportation,Water and Infrastructure Committee on May 14. EXHIBIT A The Board of Supervisors Contra John Cullen Clerk of the Board Costa a,d County Administration Building countyAd,,,;n;straax 651 Pine Street,Room 106 County (925)335-1900 Martinez,California 94553-4068 a - n John Gioia,District I c r F Gayle B.Uilkema,District II Mary N.Piephu,District III O Susan Bonilla,District IV {,"+°'3"' a,C - Federal D.Glover, District V v (Girl 101iN June 5 2007 The Honorable Lois Wolk 8th Assembly District State Capitol P.O. Box 942849 Sacramento, CA 94249-0008 Dear Assemblymember Wolk: The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors today adopted a position of support for your bill, AB 478, which would improve bicyclist safety on roadways and bike paths. The bill's inclusion of shared-use paths is important here in Contra Costa County where we have numerous paths that are heavily used by bicyclists and pedestrians. AB 478 will provide bicyclists with more options for safety lighting, helping to ensure bicyclists can be seek by others after dark. The bill is consistent with Contra Costa County's goal of improving safety throughout the transportation system. Thank you for your efforts to improve safety for bicyclists and other transportation system users. Sincerely, Mary N. Piepho, Chair Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors MNPUG G:\Transportation\TWIC\2007\Board Orders\june 5 legislation exhibit A.doc c: Members,Board of Supervisors The Hon.A.Lowenthal,Chair,and Members, Senate Transportation&Housing Committee D.Barry,Community Development Director L.Delaney,County Administrator's Office M. Shin,Public Works Director M.Watts,California Strategies&Advocacy EXHIBIT B The Board of Supervisors Contra John Cullen P Clcrk of the Board Costa and County Administration Building County Adm»nistraam 651 Pine Street,Room 106 County (925)335-1900 Martinez,California 94553-4068 County St John Gioia,District I Gayle B.Uilkema,District II Mary N.Piepho,District Ili Susan Bonilla,District IV Federal D.Glover, District V S r't MIT June 5 2007 The Honorable Tom Torlakson 7th Senate District State Capitol Room 5050 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Senator Torlakson: The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors today adopted a position of support for your bill, SB 445, which would create a Road Users Task Force to explore new ways to finance transportation improvements in California. The Board is acutely aware of the need to develop reliable long-term revenue sources for transportation that keep up with the costs of our transportation needs. We look forward to the recommendations that would come from the study that your bill calls for. Additionally, we support efforts to have the task force and its study staffed, managed and funded through existing state resources, such as Caltrans or the California Transportation Commission. It is important to be efficient and economical, no matter how important the study may be. Thank you for your efforts to improve transportation in Contra Costa County and elsewhere. Sincerely, Mary N. Piepho,.Chair Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors MNPUG G:\Transportation\TWIC\2007\Board Orders\june 5 legislation exhibit B.doc c: Members,Board of Supervisors Members,Senate Appropriations Committee The Hon.L.Hancock, 14`"Assembly District The Hon.M.DeSaulnier, l Ith Assembly District The Hon. G.Houston, 15th Assembly District D.Barry,Community Development Director L.Delaney,County Administrator's Office M. Shiu,Public Works Director M.Watts,California Strategies&Advocacy i EXHIBIT C CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE=2007-08 REGULAR SESSION ASSEMBLY BILL No. 478 Introduced by Assembly Member Wolk February 20,2007 An act to amend Section 21201 of the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 478, as introduced,Wolk. Vehicles:bicycle safety. (1) The Vehicle Code regulates the safe operation of bicycles on highways and roadways.Operation of a bicycle upon a highway,during darkness,requires the use of an illuminated lamp and certain specified reflecting devices. It is a crime to violate any provision of the Vehicle Code. This bill would expand the places where the operator of a bicycle is required to use an illuminated lamp and certain specified reflecting devices to shared use pathways, as defined.The bill would expand the requirement that the operator of the bicycle have reflectors on each pedal to include the option of having reflectors on his or her shoes or ankles. Because this bill would create a new crime,this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes. 99 AB 478 —2— The 2—The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Section 21201 of the Vehicle Code is amended 2 to read: 3 21201. (a) No person shall operate a bicycle on'a roadway 4 unless it is equipped with a brake which will enable the operator 5 to make one braked wheel skid on dry,level,clean pavement. 6 (b) No person shall operate on the highway–any a bicycle 7 equipped with handlebars so raised that the operator must elevate 8his hands above the level of his shoulders in order to grasp the 9 normal steering grip area. 10 (c) No person shall operate upon-any a highway a bicycle whien 11 is oF stieh a size as to prevent that is of a size that prevents the 12 operator from safely stopping the bicycle, supporting it in an 13 upright position with at least one foot on the ground,and restarting 14 it in a safe manner. 15 (d) Every bieyele operated upon any highway during darkness. 16 , 17 while the bieyele is in mation, ilitiminates the highway in front a 18 19 frant the sides of the bieyele-, (2) with a red refleetor on the rea 20 whielt shall be visible from a distanee of 500 feet to the rear whe 21 22 vehiele; (3) with a white or yellow refleetar an eaeb pedal visib! 23 from the ffent and rear of the bieyele fiant a distanee of 200 feet; 24 and (4) with a wh-ite or yellow refleetar on eaeh side forward a 25 the eenter of the bieyele,and with a white or red refleeter en eae 26 side to the rear of the eenter of the bieyele, 27 whieh an equipped with refleetarized tires on the front and th-e 28 rear need not be eqttipped with these side refleetors.Stieh refleeter.s 29 and re Peet-anizzeed tires shall be of a type ineeting reqttiretnents 30 established by the department. 31 (d) A.bicycle operated upon a highway or a shared use pathway 32 during darkness shall be equipped with all of the following: 33 (1) A lamp emitting a white light that, while the bicycle is in 34 motion, illuminates the highway or shared use pathway in front 35 of the bicyclist and is visible from a distance.of 300 feet in front 36 and from the sides of the bicycle. 99 -3— AB 478 1 (2) A red reflector on the rear that shall be visible from a 2 distance of 500 feet to the rear when directly in front of lawful 3 upper beams of headlamps on a motor vehicle. 4 (3) A white or yellow reflector on each pedal, shoe, or ankle 5 visible from the front and rear of the bicycle from a distance of 6 200 feet. 7 (4) A white or yellow reflector on each side forward of the center 8 of the bicycle, and a white or red reflector on each side to the rear 9 of the center of the bicycle, except that bicycles that are equipped 10 with reflectorized tires on the front and the rear need not be 11 equipped with these side reflectors. 12 The reflectors and reflectorized tires shall be of a type meeting 13 requirements established by the department. 14 (e) A lamp or lamp combination,emitting a white light,attached 15 to the operator and visible from a distance of 300 feet in front and 16 from the sides of the bicycle, may be used in lieu of the lamp 17 required by-elatm paragraph(1)of subdivision(d). 18 (0 For purposes of this section, "shared use pathway"means 19 a pathway that bicycles share with vehicles,pedestrians, or both. 20 SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to 21 Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because 22 the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school 23 district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or 24 infraction,eliminates a crime or infraction,or changes the penalty 25 for a crime or infraction,within the meaning of Section 17556 of 26 the.Government Code,or changes the definition of a crime within 27 the meaning of Section 6 of Article )MB of the California 28 Constitution. O 99 AMENDED IN SENATE MAY 8,2007 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 23, 2007 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 17,2007 AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 26, 2007 SENATE BILL No. 445 Introduced by Senator Torlakson February 21,2007 An act to add and repeal Section 87-to of the Streets and Highways Code,relating to transportation. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 445,as amended, Torlakson. Road User Task Force. Existing law provides various sources of revenue to fund state highway and local road maintenance, operation, and improvement, including a state-imposed per-gallon fuel tax of 18 cents. This bill would create, until January 1, 2009, the Road User Task Force, with 14 members appointed by the Legislature, Governor, California Transportation Commission, city and county organizations, and other specified entities. The bill would require the task force to hold at least 3 public hearings around the state and to report to the Legislature and Governor by January 1, 2009, on alternatives to the current system of taxing road users through per-gallon fuel taxes.The bill would make legislative findings and declarations in that regard. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no. 95 SB 445 —2— The 2—The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the 2 following: 3 (a) An efficient transportation system is critical for California's 4 economy and quality of life. 5 (b) Per-gallon taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel and truck weight 6 fees are the dominant sources of funding for highway system 7 maintenance and expansion. 8 (c) The revenues currently available for state highways and 9 local roads are inadequate to preserve and maintain existing 10 infrastructure and to provide funds for improvements that would 11 reduce congestion and improve mobility. 12 (d) Increased vehicle fuel efficiency provides valuable energy 13 conservation and environmental benefits. However, per-gallon 14 fuel taxes will steadily generate less revenue as vehicles become 15 more fuel efficient and alternative sources of fuel are identified. 16 Declining revenues per vehicle mile traveled,coupled with inflation 17 and increasing construction costs, causes this revenue source to 18 fall short of meeting the state's transportation revenue needs. 19 (e) Between 1994,when fuel taxes were last adjusted,and 2006, 20 travel on the state highway system increased by 27 percent, from 21 144.2 billion to 183.4 billion vehicle miles traveled. Similarly, 22 travel on the local street and road system over the same period 23 increased by 12 percent, from 127.6 billion to 143 billion vehicle 24 miles traveled. Collectively, both the state and local systems 25 support nearly 20 percent more traffic today than just 12 years 26 ago. 27 (f) Thus,the trend is not favorable and,over time,the per-gallon 28 fuel tax will become a less effective mechanism for meeting 29 California's long-term transportation needs. 30 (g) It is therefore appropriate to convene a task force to consider 31 and make recommendations concerning alternatives to the current 32 system of taxing highway users through per-gallon fuel taxes. 33 SEC.2. Section 87 is added to the Streets and Highways Code, 34 to read: 35 87. (a) There is hereby created the Road User Task Force, 36 which shall consist of 14 members, as follows: 37 (1) Two members appointed by the Senate Committee on Rules. . 38 (2) Two members appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly. 95 -3— SB 445 1 (3) Two members appointed by the Governor. 2 (4) Three members appointed by the California Transportation 3 Commission. In making appointments under this paragraph, the 4 commission shall consider individuals who are representative of 5 highway users'groups, including transit providers,the California 6 transportation research community, and national transportation 7 research and transportation policy bodies. 8 (5) One member appointed by the League of California Cities. 9 (6) One member appointed by the California State Association 10 of Counties. 11 (7) One member appointed by the California Transit Association. 12 (8) One representative from the California State Automobile 13 Association,on behalf of the motoring public. 14 (9) One representative from the Automobile Club of Southern 15 California,on behalf of the motoring public. 16 (b) The Road User Task Force shall conduct at least three public 17 hearings on alternative road user funding mechanisms.One hearing 18 each shall be conducted in southern California,the central valley, 19 and northern California. 20 (c) The Road User Task' Force shall submit a report to the 21 Legislature and Governor by January 1, 2009, with 22 recommendations on alternatives to the current system of taxing 23 road users through per-gallon fuel taxes. 24 (d) Appointees to the Road User Task Force shall receive no 25 salary or compensation other than reimbursement of actual and ' 26 necessary expenses for attendance at meetings and hearings. 27 (e) Strict conflict-of-interest provisions shall be applicable for 28 each appointed member of the Road User Task Force and the 29 appointed members shall reflect the ethnic, cultural, and 30 geographic diversity of this state. 31 () This section shall remain in effect only until January],2009, 32 and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that 33 is enacted before January 1, 2009, deletes or extends that date. O 95