Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05012007 - D.5 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS r� .. .o Contra '- ' Costa FROM: Dennis M. Barry, AICP .,;, County Director of Community Development `�r tax / DATE: May 1, 2007 . SUBJECT: HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 1. OPEN a public hearing to receive comments on the proposed Contra Costa County Park Capital Improvement Plan ("Parks CIP"), identifying the park and recreational improvements to be funded by Park Impact Fees. 2. CLOSE the public hearing an CONSIDER the proposed Parks CIP. 3. CONSIDER the proposed Negative Declaration regarding the adoption of the Parks CIP and any comments received during t public review process. 4. FIND on the basis of the whole.record, including the initial study and all comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the adoption of the Parks CIP will have a significant effect on the environment, and that the Negative Declaration reflects the Board's independent judgment and analysis. a 5. ADOPT the Negative Decla kation and specify that the Community Development Department, located at 651 Pine Street, Martinez, is the custodian of the documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based. 6. ADOPT RESOLUTION No. 2007/228, adopting the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan, dated January 2007. 7. DIRECT the Community Development Director to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. 8. DIRECT the Community Development Director to arrange for payment of the$75 handling fee to the County Clerk for filing the Notice of Determination. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: r; ® YES ❑ NO SIGNATURE: �� _X_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR E OMMEN ION OF BOA COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED QJKER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A NANIMOUS (ABSENT, �) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN YESU: NOES: ? ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: Robert T. Calkins, 335-7220 ATTESTED Z_�rrd Orig: Community Development/CD,BG JOHN CUL N, CLERK cc: County Administrator f OF THE BOA D OF SUPERVISORS County Counsel AND COU ADMINISTRATOR Public Works Auditor-Controller BY D Y "" FISCAL IMPACT No impact on the General Fund is expected from this action. CEQA COMPLIANCE Staff completed an Initial Study and determined that adopting the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan will not have a significant impact on the environment. A Notice of Public Review and Intent to Adopt a Proposed Negative Declaration was published on April 4, 2007, and comments were due by April 23, 2007. No comments were received. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION If the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan is not adopted, Ordinance No. 2007-17 could not be adopted and the County would therefore be unable to collect the proposed park impact fees.. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS Background: The Parks, Creeks,,:and Trails Committee (PCTC), staffed by representatives of the Community Development and Public Works departments, was formed in 2001 to . improve interdepartmental coordination on park matters. The PCTC meets to address day-to-day business and to formulate recommendations to sustain and improve the County's parks over.the long term. On December 9, 2003, the Board directed the Community Development and Public Works directors to review the County's park dedication'!fees, which had not been adjusted since 1990. On June 5, 2005, the Board accepted the Park Impact Fee Nexus Study (Study) and directed staff, with guidance from the Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee (TWIC), to present for future Board consideration, draft ordinances to implement the new park impact fees and park dedication requirements (Quimby) described in the Study. Attached is the final Park Impact Fees Nexus Study, dated February 2007, prepared by SCI Consulting Group. Drafts of the Study were reviewed by the TW IC in August 2004, and in April and May 2005. Staff also met and conferred with the Cod Inty's Developer Liaison Committee (DLC) in September 2004. The DLC asked a few clarifying questions but did not express any concerns with the implementation of the proposed fees outlined in the Study`: One of the recommendations contained in the Study is that the County should establish a new park impact fee to fairly allocate the costs of park development to all new residential development in the unincorporated County pursuant to and in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code, §66000 et. seq.) In order to impose a park immpact fee, the County has to show, among other things, that there is a reasonable relationship or"nexus"between new development on which the fee will be imposed and the need for the new park and recreatio',nal facilities to be funded with the fees. The facilities must also be identified. Staff determined that thejjbest way to identify these facilities was with a capital improvement plan. Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Prepared by the PCTC over the last several months, the Parks CIP outlines park,and recreational facility improvements needed in order to provide park and recreational services to the growing communities in the unincorporated areas of the County. The proposed improvements will be financed, in part,.by revenues from the County's proposed park impact fee pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act. Fees collected under the County's park dedication ordinance may also be used to fundi improvements identified in the Parks CIP. Based on the projected population increase of the unincorporated County during the next five years (2007 — 2001), and the parkland standard of 3 acres of parkland for each 1,000 new residents, the County will need to develop and additional 32.1 acres of new parkland (see Table 2 of Parks CIP). The Parks CIP identifies a total of 13 new1parks throughout the County totaling almost 43 acres at a projected cost of over$30.2 million. In addition, the Parks CIP identifies four new community centers in the east, west, north and south parts of the��County; and two support facilities to address maintenance and administrative needs in the west andleast parts of the County. The Parks CIP also identifies a variety of improvements to the 23 existing parks in the County and the seven "school parks"where the County has a joint use agreement with the applicable School District for use of the recreation facilities. KD\\fs-cd\users$\rcalkins\CDBG\Park Dedication Trust Fund\Board Order re Park Nexus Study and CIP(Parks CIP)double space.doc ii .I Attachments: 1., Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan prepared by the Contra Costa County Parks, Creeks and Trails Committee, dated January 2007 2. Park Impact Fee Nexus Study, dated February 2007 3. Notice of Public Review and',,Intent to Adopt a Proposed Negative Declaration 4. Initial Study (Environmental Checklist Form), dated April 3, 2007 5. Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Review and Intent to Adopt a Proposed Negative Declaration 6. Notice of Public Hearing published April 20 and 23, 2007 7. Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of a Public Hearing 8. Resolution No. 2007/228 L f' I. KD\\fs-cd\users$\rcalkins\CDBG\Park Dedication Trust Fund\Board Order re Park Nexus Study and C[P(Parks C1P)double space.doc THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Resolution on 7, by the following vote: AXES: Gioia,Uilkema, Bonilla,Glover and Piepho _ jff NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN:None ° SrA COUK� Resolution No. 2007/228 SUBJECT: Adoption of the'Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan Whereas, in 2001, the County Parks, Creeks, and Trails Committee (PCTC), staffed by representatives of the Community Development and Public Works departments, was formed to improve interdepartmental coordination on park matters in the County; and Whereas, on June 5, 2005, the Board accepted the draft Park Impact Fees Nexus Study("Study") prepared by SCI Consulting Group and directed staff, with guidance from the Board's Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee,.to present for future consideration draft ordinances to implement a new park impact fee and revised';park dedication and in-lieu fee requirements described in the Study; and Whereas, the final Study, dated February 2007, recommended the County establish a new park impact fee to fairly allocate the cost of park development to all new residential development in the unincorporated County, pursuant to and in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code, §66000 et.seq.); and Whereas, in order to establish the park impact fee, the County must, among other things, identify the public facilities to be financed with the fees, pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code, §66001 subd. (a)(2)); and Whereas, it has been determined that the best way to identify the new park and recreational facilities to be funded with the park impact fees is by adopting a Parks Capital Improvement Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board hereby adopts the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan, dated January 2007, in accordance with Government Code Section 66002. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown: ATTESTED: CA&Io� JOHN CULLEN, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County Administra or B puty �r 1-d7 Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan a^. 5 Y [ m "NO, ✓ssTM �� 4 r Prepared by: Contra Costa County'; Final Parks, Creeks and Trails Committee January 2007 i Y (This page intentionally left blank.) 7 � Overview/ Introduction By direction of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and the Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee ("TWIC"), the Community Development Department and the Public Works Department are coordinating park and recreational facilities planning through a regular, interdepartmental committee process. Prepared by I'the Parks, Creeks and Trails Committee ("PCTC"), this Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan ("Parks CIP") outlines park and recreational facility improvements needed in order to!'provide park and recreational services to the growing communities in the unincorporated areas of the County. The proposed improvements outlined in the Parks CIP will be financed by revenues from the County's fee in lieu of parkland dedication, pursuant to the Quimby Act (Gov. Code, § 66477) and a new park impact fee to be enacted pursuant to th1e Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code, § 66000 et. seq.) The County's parkland dedication requirement and in-lieu fees have been updated to reflect current land values and the County's maximum allowable park acreage per capita standard under the Quimby Act. These fees are required under the County's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 9, Division 920 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code) and may be used to develop new or rehabilitate existing parks or recreational facilities. The new park impact fee will be used to finance the costs of park improvements to serve new development. The combination of Quimby Act fees and park impact fees imposed on new residential development provides a sound and comprehensive park fee program.. The imposition of both fees ensures that park improvement costs attributable tol new residential development (subdivided or non-subdivided) are fully recovered. Contra Costa County Parks, Creeks and Trails Committee Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan Pagel Table of Contents Overview/Introduction .................................................................................................................................1 Table 1 -Park Capital Improvement Plan-Cost Summary..........................................................................3 Table 2-Parks Needed to Serve New Development, 2007-2011................................................................4 Table 3-Summary of New Park Construction..............................................................................................5 Table 4-Summary of Existing Park Improvements......................................................................................6 Table 5-Summary of School Park Improvements.......................................................................................7 NewPark Capital Projects.......................:...:................................................................................................9 Existing Park Improvement Projects...........................................................................................................24 School Park Improvement Projects.............................................................................................................48 New Community Use and Support Facility Projects...................................................................................56 Appendix A—Vacant Land Valuation ........:..............................................................................:.................64 Appendix B-Typical Neighborhood Park Pro Forma............:....................................................................66 Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan Page 2 w r Table 1 - Park.Capital Improvement Plan -Cost Summary f� New Parks Parkland Acquisition Costs $17,562,120 Park Improvement Costs $12,801,921 New Acres 42.90 Parkland Acquistion Cost Per Acre West and Central County $500,000 East County $350,000 Park Improvement Cost per Acre $298,413 Existing Parks Park Improvements $23,325,000 Afftected Acres 77.46 Park Improvement Cost per Acre $301,123 Total Parks Total Land Acquistion Costs $17,562,120 Total Improvement Costs $36,126,921 Total New and Improved Acres 120.36 Average Park Improvement Cost per Acre $300,157 Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan' Page 3 Table 2 - Parks Needed to Serve New Development, 2007-2011 Contra Costa County, Unincorporated Projected Area Projected Area Parks Needed (3 acres YearPopulation ' .. Population Growth per 1,000 Population) 2006 161,380 1,870 5.6 2007 16_3,271_ 1,8925.7 2008 1,914 ..�.___v.__... 165,185 _.W..._w.�_.�.�. ___ ......__... �,� 5.7m�.�.,._m....._._.,�. _.......0 .,..,,. ...__,.,_ �................. _. __._ ...,,., .... : .... 2009167,121 1,936 5.8 _ ___......�.... .........,,..__,...�.... .,_.�� 2010 169,080 1,959 5.9 2011 170,203 1,123 3.4 2007-2011 1003 32.1 Source: Association of Bay Area Governments and California Department of Finance(DOF),E5 Report Notes: Based on the assumed growth rates from the 2003 ABAG population projections and the 2005 DOF population projections for the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County. I Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan Page 4 Y n !I LO N CL O r- v r- r° O£ f- co r- O f-£ f-< M CO N M v M M# O) C)) LO CD O` rn Cn oD( r a V#5 OM� O O 0 O 'er O O� O Ol CD Ml co �E M '5 w v# L# 1v M v M M# M M3 C# M# N# N„, N CN, M{ NN O£ to I; col N } Ci Mi cei M O t # l�0 C . I� I� O I� 'ICD` O( � M co N IL O O} M; O� O� O O� d s C3 CTI O 06 �! r Ep M �t M M M M CCD)# M? M M' ME f-[ O di �` N �' N wj w EA' et Vi w M€ 00 O r� Dt V3- N CU 1�q 6R ERi CR d3 fR CA CR ` 641� l ++ 'a c o� o o o� of C3 :o� of o� o� o€ of o o. V C Cc 0 0 0 0 CR O C) 0 C) Cl 0, N” Og N {p �p O' O( 01 0' O O O! O O 0 r 03, r J C7 O! d, di CD 0 O OI CT O` LO` N O: O L= tn; 03 LO O# O' O 0f co NE w H 7 to( to ti �# r- i O to r t0 i 61- CO' Cp C Q Nu �` r£ r< r. ri N" �s N N V). K 0 Q fA C!3 to CR CR'i 6%1 64 Ci? r CL (V0 O, O Di ol oi O=. ch` ozo o u a� E 3 r L61 L6 O t0 'CM to O LO L N �I N > C O f0 CL N ' � U S P 4 i N M y ( # v i E 1 al Ol yw= E; U ; �# z O U 0 N ' 1 �i W iY 7 �;< Y a)E 0- > +' of m' m co)Uil Ys cs Y Yt a` _ c. ELI I o El El �' -off �� aoj U£ Hi o o' '� vE a IL c); Us; c �# a) E m o m > m F- �t m e �` U a o ; C (VC§ N y4 m� N€ �s O' O —_ d O' Y ( fit O( �# a) S C Z �, N` 4. �# 0� �� LSO O Z€i L' L, (D N jp CO` W Ni N NE cn Oi Oi N° C€ N= p U Z m m m m' ❑jW' _= Zi a; rn 0 U m c 0 U i 1 CO 0 0) 03 d Y C�f O-_ O of CDr 0, o; 0 O, O' O?. O( O 0 o Ol O O O; O Ot O, 0` of O O OE O O+ O O' O O< o O# O O,' O 0' Ot Oj O€ O; O€ of 0',: O O; O d dF 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O="O, O' O O O o; O 0, o 0� O O o€ o O O 1-1N( LO10) OtO� O£ O� L CO LC) 1- r€ 1� M to O OIO� O u 00 Lf) r O 3 to O) O! CD r. N s O g t CO CD N E N. 1-, CO< CD r- N d Cl � 6% N M M s 1-1 N 1-� 1- O L z � 0! y EA O VA€ V)CN L w. C.) - - ER EA% EPr b4 -r, O' ra r r r r: M• N 69 EA N9 fA( H9 fA? ff} Eli 69 ; EAN CL1 F i ! 1 C IA' r; o o; ool o 0 0= o o, M` o Co o: o oCl. Co€ Co= o 0 01 o m d a) NI S. Lo. O; OI O; r MFM O€ r, N O O! O Oi O Ch€, Oi r. O M3 C) o% O N, N N O CO" O€ O fes' vi e-j Og to N ►n 0 d � O' 1- O I l C co I S € E € { CO OL CL E E i E i c( W I ( O: O { N U; a CD M L£cn € —C ca N a a . 3 C ' C= C �� € y( CEI N' Oi ; 4) H. E O O € D Ui U N = N`j 1 L L O" CL 1 (700 of M9[(9 f E S F Y £ CT' ml -0 U y! E�, Yj �� ps C/�; •gip M m c L CO C; O; Y� COa Ej O O 1 Ml CL E LI O a Y' 7 l O N€ O; U`' L a. Y Nj Ws N' Y€ 01 " Os Yl Nj N Q'1 Ni N' Y a �€ CC >+I co O E' YP � �. N = L N d } f0. f-: Y C€ 4?t N O? C)° Y, ( a tL V-1m« f L Oi �€ Y N O a€ y �' aQi m rn".� o' tL1 O� 01 Y c" v� �: Uf ml aEi` �` x O � L mF 0 m o �= O >. 0� of0. >� o, W cu E' O O)l >, =i U Q Y€ N� O c "I z Mi O.. O p 0 =F `�-{ O' >,a "'i O wq C' O O` >., N, N V€ > Ni O Z£ Qf m M, UI W 2= 2 M` 2 a( n-€ W: Ui U( H c O U m N O U OS L C O U � k . o\ o\ o` to oi . > \ . ■: �<�1�\«: k \ \ \ \ \ \ .co « .Woo 2 \ \ \ \ o\ « . . © . �a:0. ■ \ \ \ ° . � e $\ o\ e, ■: �. �: e p o\ ■, .�\ . ■\ ■ o � vs. U> C3. »\ s\«\ a1A< ° to t OD ai CL t 1 _ oil , <� kG V: v 555 � q olut cc CO tm N [f' #N' I.L. a cc FS L'�L�• C '. N� O }� �'FO 3'> '0UEOfi' O oQ. CLOOC N = �OO N 0� OQ ODt3-le 4)1 l5icb CL Ue �J y: £ 0 co E > C oo0o`cov o U."n' Z I— E K1`C? CF) N ��fi4,0� Cliff R6 OpO, CD �c- r0• Ce) tt"€ C1 U n- o f 0 m '01 Qts > too N CC►� Q { _ IL N l o CL„ u ai f i cs cOa tat $451 ��E £ F E cis � (o J O O C; N O «+ iCL, t7' i 01,O `Zy Ii.SG t 1 :. `p "'O �-{ ..1c m=`c�: «s 4 css x o a#co: w .� �- o: _ �€LY �is c k= i0.= ° �c€ ` o '� aa)i a, }o 0 O,Y< o N N a� to l eL r p to t N @ E' O O `€q) O� Q p YO O ,; ?, O° v to G }CLFV �, m D. S C3, U 4CL Co i coCo V 'N€�€�- Qa w `O 5+, f ;'C"6 O to ?+{ >x C J to rn D c� y Q a N a G W .o a. d 2 G O U ' o U c 0 v O C>LO 4 Lc) w OOps€00"0'100OQOO`tT1 1 O M tD4O W O<O O j , 0. { . �j o3i����oD10 ,r.i I Os , co U O f. Ote-3tl) O?O N'O C uii di cc rJCD Ef##E0 Vc- ifs 'E+ �6n,b d W tL i F a _ E a € € £ 3 £ v til d CDe ?a CniC IS, ta� NF.Nt C V £C �€01 ¢ j iJ3 o i m c £ rn i IE m Fo �'4 �� i°: c1 E.ci v Q `€ot y1 ; E E cmc i c °- is, E > ` ol �Ul EF o aNi� c'a;da,Q'' c O" � trn U •o . k c � wtiCL rn: a 'o ? (Dj ol p V tip-= oi Nl U of HiQ pCj €C: c, s c` a End i� v a C -p'sf In a c� Cc o CL N-' NE s to IL Zia d m Et° C N % }y , L O. U V 7+ C> Z Mir O C N C U tt) N ` ,. O m Q { £ f N p C O 7L N U = C''C i Cf1 N> O p U chi a`> ta Q m o o cn ` _ m > JtSS > y > C i v �,_ O O N t6 Ea ., O F U o IL cl) 01" °� a ocn cn`;aa; �' ma= , < Uo ai a >mvi OmEo0 amiamma=oA -j (L 0a wv z t � IOt0=01NIOD€CO€Oiolo c) sM 0 {"d N IOi(0:01r�ItO M3N£OsOaO:ODi £ ;,a. £ � W O o M1oIOIL!ct, oto oiao _ C� y I V IOtM V NIM[(Oiv#CD[OD NF.O p 40 d 0 l� IOt�€�-{lni�iN sr E.Ef?t�g�"�t € i IT § IL w IM4fi,w,it91EA€fA ERl )fwcelfs €rte W ill Cl • � I � I IU � � 3 f � im >a � IwD£yoIa. 1LT 0l C01 1 N Ul 3(D1 C� I j I; 1 pg C 0 £O NN y d Ni>1mi0tE m lu)10> O to I> Ifi [ a > ; d o ctv+ �.£ yl o;v Q 9 0 E ml tm rntpiia` CL m .1C N N O I CUNf0`Ni UNN£,a C1 a)lOCiOp CD 42) c IL O 0 � EQU .p C p M CL lo ca V LO a. a U x �' W > Q o > �' 1 D p` o U O Q c,L) 0 U. U.V f0" C N F N 1 s N C. a U U () v o _ N V1 m U. U f0 O C s E U lo ; Q Q U U d N i € [ 1 € E >tv I Z N I a ( (i i g1 'Dim 1 !£ 3 1 N /\ N' o E > N O O1 d 'J 0 Ti N y Y N > 7( U;Vi�( �J' Y •_��+ Q imp :giO V O != 0 N > 1 1.21 ) 1 O pi 01: i fm U >. Ni C! 51 >° i �6 '~ rn c >, >, Q d _Q cm . of i ! M-m1U1`°j c C m m E<of �' of v, Gf N E N o c O O , IC' � N N >. NOI�oi 4), W E 0I 011 G).1 01r 2, (V fN m;: E U t0 •o O _CL CL N_ E K 3 f 0 Ni(Oi cc Os NI Oi'to £ �`� �Cj N;.V C NI O,w€ O m`£ C Z Q U IZ (L U m H W IELIC)Imim � F-'M U)I /);w 21m lIoIW- it O? 2 M; U i � t 'p +' E0i0 010cOi0i0€O€o}O€o O U)E Lr) C14 d N E030=01cp'� COi010i0[O€O 090)1 %� I W V #oEao(O€chid€co€Ofco101O1oiO>r �rn o, N €ojr-io1ri�to€o c i�0io41to4Co 40 a 0 � €t1')trlf�f(O€c0€ch#�II�€M80 'd•€cp€O E # €st O N rtER itFf NH64� 9 16a, 9M W €�' i S 96q CL io € € ( EF 1 ' i i O= E a. V 9O I W t N� i a3j O ( 1 Z . E a3 ?. a7i N E € C a)E;O? Nr m a �1p3 1rn `cn Ol v# cn 1 N c, l —0 c �t K ,c EI a E CD E €� m'°�� ' w 1 aci� cm >i m o a> N d 'ch °' c rn Ni E m 1 9012 ' ( at a E3dU p > E.o o > Q � im v E asi N c mm c� i ' calm! �1 Q v t0 a ° N ci N€ =o , U U� aa), 4) 01m €N �gaE � € O c UX L 4)1 N�1 O Q O N a. g a m c c a cIc o m g p Q € m MN m m N M m LO N O O a1 i.0 i m ca `as j$ t1 1 N ( _ vio /� t U �/ arl (6 Q _ £ C f 3 C a� 7 ° N C O N y Nf O; 3 € ( c ? N OE O O RI J 0 N N Y cc > ° �3 y _ Q 1m �� U 2 O '= O a a3 _ "'< V€U 71 7j O): a33 V€>,'y' C, •v> > 0 w C a Q F j a3€ V€N1 °a C N,m [Q# E O" 7 ° ( N p O C Q .,� _ ( � O �,�. imlU#• Q''LL a °_., c0, v a o m T E n Q c O ° w 1�i� a� a�; >; �' m. ° rn o ° o, m a�, W co E£ U O E O O N a) a) �^ N �• N =i U! O g €yi�t C a)E u U'L_i }' Y; m M O '' N E K [Qi N, N+N€ O;N# Oi iZ1 �.._ Ne V Q, N=a) O �; to 1 C z Q U a m U in I— w 1a.1a im > t—;mlfn=fA � 2€m;a 0;�1� 0; z J:a ; U 1 i t ' th Q +' O O`Of0<0 0€00€O":O 030110 10 to #Ca C7:DfiCfl ao 010 0.0 0S0tA3 ~ 3 w D aoio,cel;r�#(o,o€ca a oso,0 �- rn �rn O r l0 r€tn Q;OICV OHO@tf) O`aD€ 0 € CL D E t cr—, t0 CO M#10;h+ M CAv tO,CAF � € it Et`4 (V EA€N..EF? —€r!VkWEA3EA#tA;CV ?N 1 rc 1 O W 3 IyJ€ 0 € 1 � 4 a•Q, � 3 01 l € f ( 'UJir a 3 V: dN it Q s 0, �d ➢ V i € Z 21 a7 s 2= P a 0 N .• .. v a v o a N o aa) c E Q 8 6E €10g N N �; N UM) g N O O a) a) > } 5(,} C' a t Vie -N c C t3£ O O . Cid Oa O{ C€E' O CL > CCd # N i �O Me Q. a Q � O;� N i C tAtCL N:mi d- a>,. N t0 tti i6 y^� O �1{� � Q€w:Q U Cp 0. CL CL Q C. CO;L��C)#Ni O LL o a) 0%0; c c c c ca d �rcl) t/a m o m CL z � � c CL 0 -0 ns m m m "as::Uo CION N N N '• 1 8 r i 1 C �r t} € 0 m m m m m LO N m€... _ 'o; v € 1 Ns 78Z a) .CL �t f O a) i. O O = i 1 0 N: 0; C N O Q C G O ¢ tC1 ai 8) Qicj� C€ # C �* `- m Q# E'. U crn >. �, 4 a- +� 2�Q Zsa) m U np.U_._ tL,a 0` a� U as C cn rn. 0cr' v ro d N E CL 0- N a) N �'N `� a) C U O C C':� C: N:N U.-C,; y Y, n E O 0 o Q = N E �i O'Q m s m O a); O. R fa SC< N V` O N CU:.. O Cc, II) O d U O. Q U (A F tttUi Z.Z Gt IL:OitL.Z`Q' Z �_�; t r Q m o V x ol '� 1Q• t � � ;Ya t i C), d '# L o 0 v` � �,•� E � t � bpi �S >� � � 4't 7 i O;N .✓� � F F �. 4 r 0• r;. � r _ d ✓ N ! "i � , t � t ) -o03 vac lw e'po CP f U ci t m4 �a o 7 C co m:m ca 0 W. �< trtp o �, Y � o .... � E, t v •� s'sT N �,,, �- o E •�y x cc'.�,p f� O N ca NGL Cn'.N i �•<�y,N,,msN A y ✓ T O Q) Z d .. PIS y 0't0 0 0 0€010.0100€OIO �I Lf) ' �d 0l0i0I €apt C):OtO8Oloio40) E W IS O €0)p Go:0dCTCTC0i01t0€C{010 Oar 6 d ca E l0pl� 0i'401610IN 010110 6'sC6 t0 i m 0 ILO3rjI�E�Ott0(MItOII�iM)O)£st€(030) J P a 0. ++ IF-04 161?691 69.1 1EA8N1 O6%64 W rt6F} ER{ . i 3fR+ i 3� i EA 1 t € 3 € €6f} a 6 (i 0 I E 1 € £ f 'a 1 El [{ I $Of F F 3 t 0 E cn { f VE U Y g� a > C i Y .-. U i € _O' W gg 1 € c IT cc mCLi cm L) CL e € 71111 ; 1 IQ y I U€ - E w €O a rn; E m rn€a)• i o f c o c;�, _ c€E. E m £off �i d v E aci c a)' t a) O n j rn a> >, a7 €c.)6 a) O, 11 1 E;ca a�i o og c A C €� U Ej Os, j�'Q'Ni d rn£01 a# a LO Q V t C;� O �+ NI f6.OaQ C E j OI M C. €0{ N€ r € 5L`t LCp w Oj ` m rn rn i c m1 NlFi z�,OI ;� a > �' Ep'a� 4. Uia3' d€Wia NIN'EO °7 4-€ 1 p) U 0 > O H € Utt N; i�1 VI O{ Q=CIUE p�U Ol 1P a> V) N N O T Q oC9 � EOQ OI U v1�1 €�1 i c of E N O F C Q)i a),+. �! C w CP G O€tg� N> >' a d U d J fn?fn£QiH'JiQ'iUla Ulfn -j 4 y<� yy s r3 OQ' a)€ N t .N. 0 7; Q) a) �i a) 0• > C �C .0 C Q CL .O.., =O£ Y Y c6 � Q SIU O CO C >+ >, U U �, m m W U U m LO N E i 1 1 0`bi �€ i 5 N zal� C avi Eo p Z U '= C U 0 Cl) N �' U .0 C P # ' jt C� 1 g 'moi t LO �i f V' C ? C J V7 C Q € N Oi 0t�3 ( C €mE O E) O IL ` O C •> Y ', 1U€U€ _ £ '� �3 M1 C M` >` of O G -0 m O€N. O a LO O L� i C !� j >+ >, Q ¢ Q) ` O 01-01 a71U;m;UI Cz Oa a7€ O, E:•O a- 01 i O 4) a) E a) N 0 O o w cn �` �`>,' mE( v)i E o= a,°oy m v; °' U CL a a� €Y; a� c£vEC c: c c � � w co' E O E N a) N >. ON) i E -0 '_ a) d as RS O O O �' N E K ; p m a3'fNOs O N1 0, 0- z Q N N _= O m. C z Q 0 a a U io F- w I(Li�9smlm;>;~Iin U)I ),Im aIo:ix;X,o z f6ia 0 r 'p �'' O60€OCO'� GO£O O€080€OiOaf�! j' $tn I 0 d y t0 GD C) T€O O Oito1020?OIO°r I 100 W a �O CO O§CO Nt V O!tA Op030 0 0( a� O OSOCCOHMiCD OiMiCO9�it�ICO GD p� to tt7tM9�!►plMfl�EO?�fTl�?N€MIS id IL ++ O T ({�1T IEA 6%64€Ei?EEfl EREti?EEi} T �W O GD tEA' d�lf W � 3� � � 1 � ,� ( ice, I E IE40 [ [ s }kUJi 10 f € g(DF loLLI CIS L cc O U Ern =c I W ;o? N 20€ C7I a 'N CT CD. i O C o c o 1 0 ; c E' r at E 3 c rc € to I rni N rnI to >E ca € > CL N -O QI CEJ EtS O E 3ic 'I 4LLI � r M w o tm, W' tr c.91 mj(iv,Zt C f w O� j � " aa a Y + OIod o !gl s EI NH 00 U) 10 N ,f oO tM,N€— 1( Urn 0 an C a N "T N O €C1 CL N€ N..2;r- C rn' C=C = �:tiUlN; �E CL c m �-€ o< :31 m€ m€ o oar a O :3 oidlow) U U (Di w IL o to U Q o m' M >, o ° a> >E m m c U Q c Q c UI m o m o o tG C N O E to O O I I g F mf CO( to } O O O y !. �+ ' i N€ O O N ._ F Nam Y U Cn Ntm Q C S t ! C r t21 Cain C Nl O O N' d G) O: CE C N 7 _ O !0 -01 N t6 h Y to 7` € EUIUs� i 7:. Y ¢ Imcol i '� U El > C f7 IL O �= O -a to > �� O _I O to. O1 C'' m N 0. N, Ei O i > > Oe CL E E C' C- N O N N N3 'Y: N CE U C_E3 C CIS C C iW O N `y{ d �p i m !CS O N E jt t6t O€ Co Ccoi O NE O` d.>ia 0 Y U d> NS N LS' O c c z ¢ U a a U [A w €a (71m1m > F- mcncn � 2ma;O lY0 z -30- 0 G 10 H oo'o€o000:000ozo �n i� w {1 O o aoo osrtOi M mio=� 03.0 0 0�0) ;rn a) N 10 V si = . # i0 E N O '•E ,o) f d Q ++ L0aNifR1N?Efla�i�3EF}EA".FREER=WC14 °O W ¢g ER ER' 61)61% g fA I C64 a. S E € aC7 t +69 £0 f i i 3 g V j B ca E qCYQ € N; Cl) 3 > c Z' O w cc! c, N O q y O f6 ►• oECL € O V O Os�` O w` 1 O) y y c o ci u c E a 1 E d C> a) y ��w �E� m E €� Eal samO o U' a) o > €� E1 o a >,'Q, ,c a Y a coas3 l 3 c=>. WEE; i s IL V 3 c NI O ' 01 7f L U a) O H U N0 1�E N V O';NsQ ylV O)i C Q E N O € C N N �? Lo 0,� V N O U a Q V a3 X aU=U JQ w N y Q) O a) c 0 > > Uc a v o i LLJ Q U .0 _ aN �vI 0 U U s f U U O) O r 'e $ E V C c 1 O E f S £ M; Of W U U Q' 4) N Z IL a) ; v E Mn C O O fA a3 i O 0[ O) 0 (D Co 0 C �' O c, v7 C 11 01� U> UO 0 J C v o IL O 2 Q o - p0 c a N oc � EO w mUO O) p Ba -Im !� -LLCL ai o E aao ° E Ot6. mcm a)=0 a) H m El U O D O N N N N >, �; c U O E c C &'C a)"y. V` a)' 4) R O O = N E K m, a): a) O£a) O Q �'a Y M Uf O_ a): 0) O �. c`a c z Q U a a U w f- w a; co, i-;m v�"v��� z€m a=0;�i�'O z J-a" 0 Go 0 d W EO CO€O COIN X10%O€O'er 0 N W +' O 40 OIN to CF),00tC7:CD itD T @O V 10 s c7 Lo m I— v Ln CM l C61 ? PCO lOd Q E Ln F r t EA T 6%t Ef}EH'ER EH 69 Lh z � Q a - H ist �vajj y9 �, �64 $; Y. W € 3 F £ 3 ry t s a g jj p N i V 1 { V 333 T rW t CL fE F i ttt 3 i U, £ w� 3 ail coa 'C)i 1ui _ 3 E Q Mf is r�^� U i FL U to C7 c. N Uj p O` P g O€ON : FE NO O€ P N N C) > _ O E Lo C)i 0€ , & N N OCL , J = Oco- — Oo-Ld.1i O Q c Ef rn cn E rn M 6 0 "' i a c _ m =ra an d o € m IL _o U '° c�v � m m,....' � � v 4� m .. a> o '� Mi C O Vi a E?Q,N3 Q io a 0 > o o c �- m Q c6 CL E O OX ca O E U U O £ c c c T 0 @Cc i O N — U U m c'? p U w Q U U H O N >. c Oi Z a) i s a) O w O Q °) 4)` oo Y Q :3, Cj cc > N G O U U x w o = O v m Q —1 o=m o€ c' m a�z E m w O uyi o a o = o c.Q;� U m UE �£ a o' m. U a o N (1) 4)d w. >, o'�,Y ani c coi C€ �' c c�,.g c,�; �, d m C) E E rv° vi;— c U o ss c C), CO; U .� a W p O O O N E K O 0= CS C3 O. N- O' Q s' Y C3..V O C) C);- O c Z Q U d U fn H W d-;U' imim'> d•O:1'i0' 0 + Z J 0 T #� ^ OsOdcO"J' coicDO 00A00rn Q rte.+ O OtU3 OM€MdcO€o3G0 O<d C3 d T€ m wtu r€ursaroicvd€dswrs do0 sd. o. ps.- r-€m€t�3t7'�tr`�}*rn st cern =CD ern 3 Ff3 §EF?'EAY t IL C-4- € O LY +Ft7£ o��. i ! to c f z x Ej luj >cn€ € ol I to O' t0%' a) € tIf� O N t.mDi '. 4)" ' G'� O c cam? a0` # 0 %d ' N U N i Qi > Ns O €d Na� N E mf o O a n. d i Lo' C€ rta' �' N O, CL' t o a 101 cf 0i ca c �, t"W — icl ml.� .f cE m ca o, o. tm cc m C E O = Cy M, O N O yew t c€ :3r �',��.` < 0= tU No a � mc ..=o o.. Q. .a U EO "�' d N C c0)*� Oi Dt U v p cc IGOt N O;._ Q; ti «+ u� H O o c .X >=c ,,, • a o v: ool 01 O O U U m O p > O Y (D; :-: N € Z io rn U c a c o0 o f c) to a� ca a ¢ Co d € ° a;�` :2 `¢ u, >" -� cca Y � c 1 U�t);O ,O1 of s m U:>. us c o p, C = Q ? t0 Q ` t0?U:m Ui C fs'LL 4# V `� C) W- w _ O a -- ,m .I E l rn CSS N ° a� �+ m.E m d N ay E mfl N N O *' ''� t� Y N=O U`�1 E ;�G U a N?�:cam' O �', `m p N M A N.. f!/ C U O Edd O O O = N f X E tlS m f0 m O. N O+ Q of tt; z ¢ 0 a a w ,a N d W lo'CD o€(p= 0OOo .� OOi0E = �OfO id) D LU 0 lo;00�O MiM colt)coO?O1O OF.- 0� N €OI�SO€�?� O`03Nt0=OStCI Oi00 :O Q OP�ih COCDjM lnEt�FM30 �OiO 0 a d i+ to NifA;N€613� €ER?b90EHFEA W CA . 0 w bN4�€ E�{ M �3 a f O sC S E NOf € 1 Y I ' ` (D I O of cc u! O w S Z a) a3 p iO'j c USI Oi p N V = o ° dol uj w i M = � OF N o w S O o1' a1 = C�i c i o' [ i c 1 E n£ E aoi o m= ° as �< csw m E` y cL€ i °_ n > U Ei o� >,¢,L � o" E �,¢ cE t ° E Fv, t, rn Pm o a yr ns Nva a3 �° Q v:w v a3 i n E a) N,u! o '� 1 rn U a a s C9i� E;¢ v �, o`er � t� m (0 N O C i a)`e a) o Ic C to! C C'= O L N 1 p t)€ o- o m = � o; ofm o; o VAC n€-Cf°CO cc � ° n U U X = T V (D 2 O N 0 0 n c ° v d L) Q m U d _ V C >Ev IL +r j N N \ yy f s ; { £ f N gP a) L �� r �[ C ; �£ �€ V V C z Y O U a) of O Q t6 y f N; O€ O O` O O 'C as ¢ U O p II' U ° ahCl) o t > > t a E n n r� a) N Mn �,' N Y (D C!U � E! C C C c;�i y m !0 O N �� a3° a3 03 03 O a)€O" n 3':�Oy Y, (LO`U' CL a4) N p c N" c Z ¢ U (L �..� U) �— w f0.`s(� m}m �;�,m �i�3.LL Is�;�.s0'�;'�_O Z ,J'0. - V [C1�0`Cc, 3C0.N£'cta0{a€C (C::), LUa €a cn o v#ca,N�sr-;a{A ot4��oCD;aod ?r m (� �� V tt9Tttar CO{fis r; '6? a Q N§W Nl1�sr MSCVi69£Nsr 1— 10 IL il! d3{IL g � W € s a € € £a 1 E cy£ t € FLu U�l £ F (D A. � CO ; > s € I LU + Z£aV £ yq E a` ...�!O, ()t _ a) 1 t p1r d l i ;51 CA s. M tK7EC V€ $ 21 _ mo io„ w£ 0): > ; 2 821, lmi Co ; ° aN m 0' u (7s21 1 a. LUm;Q If �. m vs E ° a ar >. Q d o o m 2 CL _ y v U U O o f t F- { �a _ a C, s '0 a. _ ( N s i i N O t? U? N UCD p C a N U) y U m G. > �ta) a5 m = m a* O m u E.01 wm ° a ai E = atNe}mwmaa >:EcEn.crnCn#o €E v w =, E _C s=<nm auo= N �, OO aO N O x Oacoo O z z na. m --. U G d y peO.Os E i S p N w Oto rOaO;� Ol N E �"� OON+ 1 ? N N N d eER a .Ot i r' U P a' U k o tN4 Y € ?� c � t N 1N� O '—1 Ui i N C Or c.E �N 5, > NI O?' s s o 1 [ = O LU i a m U) o O DN mo € p p _U O O O C y w co .N. L N iIN's a d 0 m ami j RL C).Q'sQ W 'O w w X O C C 7 ?� m > > v CL m 5+ c a a Q- > m m c c rn Q O O ,� r m O E Q Q O L L > M W U F- CV ISL \ cC € { C O NtM �. Y O C m 0 m E �r O" W O - L N C — s �€ i ;�, C� ..rte+ `� im £ U m a) 3 m > m c U U x Q IL w :j O Q a ¢ o .a m U pmp �j€ m a)3 E?a1 - o N 'C C +-' ++ .Q - a LL a O' a� a� E a� a� o O m ` a� m �. N m- N E tmrn aVi o O. N U O Oa O N E H �, cN6'€ N; Cs U O y 'V (Dto U +N+ m O m m O N' O Q ._ m'._ a N' N w O c w { 0NO€O.� CO N1O€O�O O�aG O N NpO jr Cr)If— TdOO€O'r_ ul I'N1 o O) CD ff� aD;�1<O€N C)£N'CO � 0� oD Q E iC04N10£N?U-J£N rjMtN 0) �O a ER fR..� H9'lfl ER„EAifA EA4ff} _ '.d' _ O LN ER d9 w „ € O m !— w I > i m w CW O F 1 J¢Q Lu O, p . j I € •� { U) > ol m W rta U: 1 z O m N fn-•� HS W fA£ C€ 11 E { C cnU N, a) N c, E E ° c; c£ m > N 6 1 P � y N. N N€€ O U) I O d E' a3 0 C N I C a m o m 3i c=¢€ c! ECL LLJ ml ml E ¢ rn wl CL o °_ coo ° s rn �- N a) lQ C a d IL a N N ¢ m m m O £ } > C H F H N N - E CL m C ° (� (D Q U) i �= a� 3 m ns c M U U Y ¢ m w wO Ucr, ° moa. Q oso � an. E o 0�13 E °o7C . � N CD a CL A O O 00 00 N K E. (0;(6 n3 N£ O N=O� Q � �'Y NU O'N=N'- O C z ¢ U a s U in N . N a Y . tea. o- Z N V Q3 1 •0 y fl" N O W e 7 � U � � a i l o v N O U O U fl H ?090€OIOIO ( j d0 N AD 080?Ot0 CD 0 10{OiOitn(O sLn N E ivir�iio�� � ; 3 !N W F i { V 3333 j p} E {V E 1 7 6 { ? a o z toi C .C3 CO I O ! Cc N CV wCL E E E IML Q >. C. 1 0 o=:I Q) mf f S C a to a EH � m �{ i € m O C X �• OO CD _ N Q 3 E C$ C014 ao i C Gl O j I C Y O N O .Q l0 y Nt 0 m N 7E 0 �- o '_' O c`o of o m co� >, v,' C ° w C Q 1 N:—g N Cs N.N fOr - O, ? N p y O Q d .._ C �� O' O �'� Vim1U € &'" 3 04 t 9 p Gi N E d N N O O N N U) E OI! U a O O L N! U O E d d N N O N �, Nom- � _� Ci U!O Es C: C 'o N,Ni U N£ °.3 m lO O /O� //�� //�� +_ �/N� E_ �C E//N� `//N��t:t�/yN��[�/ym� 0\\ (DL(DI/c? a� �� /�y,TY1g(y��P•/(�Jf O.'�Q/Ii/Q/)(,-' O C Z Q U (L LL 0 U F- W 3Lie Vfm;m / r W?V/I VJ_LLsiiW LLf OiLL LLfO,' Z - ; O N . d y O€OiOiO i €O E V €otoSoEo� o E € Og01C N [ €N W ; (6a� w,mmwuw..�. ur., urmmA. ,.wwg i £ a) I s t £ € € jj I aft i = I j U) I i I U 01 C+ t a i I ! W E 1wi 0rn, 'Os € CL 9E 10 O C 'p: � C€ V , Et ca € o ( £ E o O w ml �O ' Z a a) mi I E a ' Qi (cD Eli o' -0 1 a orn o f a as i-0 'SE § I m c 0loia0' a)i i U IL co E o C c c Q v d € _ IM o m ca U U m LO m U m U U m O N E € o E tm o M od € a� o= o€ J a) 5 m N Y f6 > 7 U Y� Ql mI U IL p O '� aS Q C 3 < (atU- OE f03 Ot C € l9 O; c); � E O N O C a O = �tm '� �`� tnm�to �'° Q?�i� 0 aS U of 0 E 0 N O ;;, t!A€ N N >, a) a) N t62 Q LL W {O O 3a€1 )OOE tQSNPO O 9a € a) U - C Z U a CL . i N 1 Co? t t OO £ CL £ i € cn £ E £ 1 i a CL CL i a p H � o � f 5z CL N m N p C,lA 9 cd Q E W N i j E p = U Q p 1 E m C O N Q C O .m W IL a) o°. o a L c co � c E m o o mm D Q m N N s Z N Q € € CO N ++ f— Y O U N O O Q N d N£ Otm £7 N E 1 0 IL N > Y N 1 C VU �1 Y Q m U O 0 O N U O O tm, G1 N N N C O O _ ,U?� O N.`�. y N' fA E= O) OI �€V£a p'y V! U E D E O. d N N N H ?,'Ntw �` U O E' C C �' C N Wt U !C O O O O N E c0,c0^ M0 N: O N' O. O c$', _ Y c0 V a 04N p o Q z 0 a a.. w wix'O Z U d W Of0=030` � N (' OiGt0io C toof'.00 £E9<EHzO i In � i � _ � i (� a ) 69€69 j IT & S q C N, C%4 ° CD Y t I d i a ? m v' Mj b cn W > � , O` q ( m N}453 jj 1 a ami C E f C!a3micyi � elm: O: i { CL O 2 N .+t O n. N j a O W£ °E; m i i rn fq Dca w n.CO O X O ` O o d CL Q U � 1 E2 00 U U 0D 0 V U U U U N N d C p Z L: ()Cl) N ca s m F i N a) > Q _ wC yU Y O as rn N Cai )ca i:21 QCorn a a O 2 -a m O Wll>g, Ey;';m�oO7c.> amUaS o.c yw E aD W o � o ° O as EC E 0 N a)Q ) N �;N' y NEC V O E. C O C O N=V O +O+ c0 O O N E 'x as ca ns a) O a) O'd U z Q U a a L in w .a olm:m > � m cnIcn;Ei1 m N d p £O O C� N �y �< f j 1 i s w § y F \V 4 { £ d 05<p O N cYL � tD +- K CD CD. i O G � � 4�. � ��'�}- ,t'° ,lbs 0)•�'`i p� � � p o,ptL' -5 < N U �% � ' ZCD� N i £ M 'O p� � V OE 010 � £ � € LO CL O N E £ ( 1 0= i { CO N: j ; Y E i i O a)• # � a L g U Q N' Y 'O ( O j g C D1 i a a3 a7 O i j E O O Z G •N M E '' a) N{ C )( O E N f W N C N N C �:'�I OLi r ofiE " Z a7 C " O 1 > 3 O. C O tm � {O Q£ £ Q)E £ { { C CL _ `C •` E -p E o a> a �O cc, a 0 Y ^ 0.19 ca (aw ,j'NO x: 00 O U IL o n1 T p, o c o b >; a a y 0 c MSU rn a) .0 fC N Occ ca p -0 m ai c az x d o o a� n a) (� c as a� n m as a c m Q 3 -j o as a CL N = V N r�r -T { it r r>:rEr r=.r (V _ Q d U = _ r Y L £ 1 a1 { a Z C C a E Q) a) O to Z+ a3 O j 0 i> NCa U —_ ca N i U — r .r{ H O• C C U fn al c°'a Q a C 7: c ; tM O Y O y d { a) 0! :3 �' [ C T' L 0 O e`a J N N • Y f6 > ji C m N U > ViU 7 Y .= Q W C" i c0 "- y c T >, Q a Q � of — U, c= m m O y O C ,� p C ` O O � � m'U Q'LLa 0: Z6 U Q� N E a) a) O �; t N O al 3' ..Ln; a) y 0) m a)s U O` y L" N Q N N N W T N w W' N V�0 .`.— C -0- C N'iA U O{ a0+ N N !L 'O O N E_ k (0 a3 a3 i a7 O O O .O Z Q 0 a a 0 fn F- W C� m:m',� H=m c/)=cA;R 2;M: 0,W fr"O% Z — U O O OtOEO. { O M CD l�0 VO€oi0 0: o m iE Cf); - O AD I rn a .. W f i € £ O J F � I i /Z Ii _ I I # s co € €€ z rn: ¢j H { r S r # £ # W O O' (Di c N O( q t E 1 ( I c O ,a E [ of # E Coo, IL o c € c i rn rn` m Ag N # d i a V O CL Y C CO 'o w x dO c Z o ca ao a° i = 5 m CD U U m . O til o Za. N N O Z Co y T O V d N Q C 7 C i OI: g s'C O O .. d d N: O OI C Ta N 7 O N Y IC > 7� Ui O '�i m U a O O a f0 > C t UI U O OI D1 tp 'V T h:Cca c w T T Q a Q m 2 o o .01 M!C-) c, -£� m o ° o d N E N N O �;, to N N` T N O) O) O`V 0 y € tfJ E E O O N N E N N+=`Ns C`: U:O E`er U.N:iA U = �+ A O O "- x m' l0> O N O sZ �i.— cp .— CL (D N — O c z Q U a a U in i= w .a=c9 m;m >;� mscn W,it = m a,0 � 0 z £OOOOiOOOOO p M d U! O"O€O O£O 090:0 51 O O OOSO O,OtO OO O V t61v lOiwlcTloio 64p i L0 N O£I-IO?Nt040 f0`€r r d7 l d Lp;Ef}'sOtCD col'. ER too U) ER' EA N to€ k yC £ �O j a (Di E C7 > _ z CL c l La= H :.E rn a `-o , c t cE :_ aU cs � ca 41 ( � € m — c > d v C o'U1 N a m oay s E u, E OG) rn � vonsE 0 fl C W c,L6 L6 c£rt�+ s y O Q U .0 fw€ 07€Q3. a v °o ami E C, t ♦Luh E a� o CLU) 3 o E ai EE �: m o o rn >,vm C c 0) m a CL =J Zli J c� ¢ mr t V Q c x o' N Ea� a� 3 Cop a cf U'o m O ¢ m' CL a O O L U N r; N j N J v Q' U U r N1 r C E .£......, w E N a v Z N ! ' w CL Q t £ E U) a E 0) O U) i 03 O L N td 0) L O N o Q m 0> f N O= 0� CI >, 0) 7 O O t0 J 03 Y N > > V ;� Y 'Q m 7 O U d O m '>p -M > U €V 0; OS O 01 - t0 N U >, y =O' = N O y O d p C Ofd � m U �' �£a,'U-;a,EO LC a� E a) a)Q m o a� m oYa'i = v^,� E � c€�=`-' 0'' �' a� ayi c 07 �p O 2 15 Oi O` N E x m �! M N! O N O Q �t Y,to U (r- 20) N p a W' z Q v a. U in w 'a �Ew; a `"' O 510 a ofcaa a ,S�V i 64,k;NiU')1O`, 'yyt N 613, s � NI e>I Cai(� Cal . r� a c, > t � � � o ;> a E£ ; o. :oto io ( 3 o Z os `m •c �c � � , a a C; — E C7 C. y. O. ; vl of m CL Q X M Q �. ca tm d j NF yr r r v tCf V U Q r t KD r a r 3 J N Q U U U d N r 4 # 3 1 CL _ E O Z N V ,{ — to y E y Cis ,N( a 1 h c ca w UU o 0 CD m a)",m:w'E o 0 a L O 'o Q �E i� U m?U,� C:r a 10, s O w O N O Ill O N H! ?* N "t Ni NIG U O �;O 1C �`'U 0: d O :S O O 01 d �? LL 0 N N tQd C6 �s N;Ot N€ O Q 'Sn•— tC:.— (7 Z Q 0 7 Q. tl U (n F— UJ Ea C91m,m > F—`� (!?tU)„fY =:�►x;n-'p'�t�?p' Z d C OkOtO t 00 M a) i0 Ot1) �j tC OHO€eCL - i LO V. j LU Ei `g E I £ } i S t Y{{E £ £ { Q. Z y` L W l_^CD f I.L O NCD d { >O O CL CL jj yai. a' aa) m Y a d ,�9J;Z; n ca jj d m Q i Y Q oC > .. Q c c o 0a. o N N U U N r O J Y m U U m v N Z a) £ r ` € _ a. E { t € U fn N N $ O o p�c o Q m d o o >, �. O co _lz cc a. QE j.21 mC13CNU0 y >, >, Q a _ U OO,, O d � d N a. a N C)- C) W ; >. N .Y' N C U 'C �;C Ci,fl'C C N£ Cyt N 0 O O .. N E x �''O cc. M O C) Oi Q �; �c �: U Q C) € O C Z Q U n. Q U W F- W a c9:m`m >,F-.Mlu) tq W.=lMAL;O1w a' O Z o U M % 11 7i�k Wt is z E tf" E f , Y cD (► t £ � _ S iE �i, U tss; 3 N .5(5S a} , ow � 4 a k co :w o U d o w v T U V 0 ? � V W t3 S2 Ot U O a=Fax U.0- a N d o p� NC V i4tU C4I N,� Us G a� / tD co > i a,Ts C,� o_ tois ca Q -�u�, c u oa ° o. O '.£ ; T 0' tt�l1-� 2.m` m t N W ' a- 2 M C:) 11 i to oca ul is co h i V E F E fl z f i £ a E i _ c E J C1r t f � fl. C d Q }4 a � G t N d .. a E O N X 0. c m T T 0 U N O O o p rn m p N U CD as c°'a a ¢ y U U rn o J r`!' pu?+ �'o�` p jp N,:• > V U0aG#-� .1G m6-"UV mQ-,EO(�: O w p o ;p U- N � m 2 on rnQ bi p..�(D N r . 0ao YQ) U C; oo vCU EE o a maC7rtL � QS Z Z Q Ua V N F- y H 10 0040=:010 € t1) (O(00030€O � pf �� tO0 �ih€ICtr€O w r r€rl64dFa 0 f O ui f L f (n € 3 f £ 1i In,cecc ca CL d J E piCD U �€ Z ca o• f m cn Oo-,O7 £U1 I 1 E W w rn O d CN O U G> f0;C'O N o E 1-Or O Q G1 t 3 e S ( > O ri O3i ml W C �392 C€ pal Z �6 wl IV€O .Ci N I _ € W _� v m3Y£ a£E it Mi C o ai ai r aDm o€(D r a Y c L E a ZfZ (7 3lix 4 O X IO aj OS N O C N IZ CL0 N p N o U U U O N g 3 o Z, € m ° Z U m a� y :Y o m O Q d m o °� U dJ a`�i cu y to > >t U UI �1 Y1 �Q m; U w p O Q d Q m-�oU mFp m, o,mm ca E°ocn O w o C C o c o -a..0,�f y m U �� 4. o o 0 CL O N y N N €�, O'w:Y (D! C U;�€ �s _C' Ct�:•V e0 �C O O O = N _E K fO. fNO i to cc o£ N t O. O. � 'O �e 1 fII'V Q- N' N w O `: c Z Q U a a` U cn W n C91m m > ►- m'(n€v)"W 2#m;( 0 tr Ix. Z O H 1OiO4O 0 010 € g O +-' CD M O €06010 O;O O,O; V 1O O'iOO.O1O3O' O { N 11*-lO€o1O1�IC01O [ I € l H SER NI69 �� i IC7 I w � I 1 j i o � E 1 F s CL 3' �C y F € C 1� d �� 11 01 OLa iM 0I 121 i S ? >O 1 `; a € E s Cl L C3 N1 O a3CL �__ Iasi E ; E CO c.f �tt �< c m O O s Mt Oj ol U1 Ci _U m OtIt 1 p m E > y C C L. ?(D N El a CO F O 0EL lw�zl CL m 2 rn Q O N m U U m O O ( i� i #1—€ iN �i 1 3 N F U U H v N OI IL `' c , -a caa) p) �. c p c O O O Q ma y 1 a)' 1= 7£ jI1j m99 N, 7 O O O O Q a ¢ 2c.� U m. :03! mac1a)'� mE O i w O N c C c o _ .�6 O ci�;� rn m V'. � .?o rn U ai a) a) N a) O �, :�s� a)€a) >+ 9 N U) E 9 c) CAN U 01 E O p O N N E N #m om �€N =t C,U O€ � c0 Y U N W U€Li w N€ W 'p O x 1 fa s O, N, O< 0 :._ RS.._ Q' a)c a) O •x c z ¢ U . a a cv in F- w aC7 COm > t-?m m m �:2;m d Om � O z w rn M �,C7 do w ;O is O N La i u>i eR Q £ i f £ R 4 t c Ln y _a low � F S con Q i1 €£ � l L4 Q Q G G C £Q IL O Q 0. O S" Qi G G� N O O O q1 U C) a t £ O O O O C? '� U U U a> 0 o p °' O ° N a t) a a °' CL _E may. jam O Q N �" s F t0; p+ O p Z 'U fl G am }l e1 Qi u u a p 4 COa4 Ni o o C lei x: ""£Qj m > U a _ 11T O j .* � 9 y � > c .�� isU'0'��Q � to,� coc�:ao V Rt U; U A ►�- d. m m p, O O g e( d Q _ ;: Q Q N > m; N y E a ayaai Q' G �£�' MI S >• w o u3QCW0 Ecc;acvu,£capc a N N N d Q N f�fJ T N N U O t1 �C„ V a N N .r, a O d a a. N a� � � ;cc m:m;co o Co£�;� � �,=i [t-,Q OC;�'p z U E Q . Q Q Z Q. U CL l� M N F010 O � 0 Oit01 _ € E q 1 co a to€W 3 N Ems, £ id'} ' s F 10 F t j s € l € 1 ¢ j C/)v E W L £ E 1U) a _ 1 C d m im > I > � �' i € O. F a Ec E E I c � 'a � w # 1 ? � F � •Q m c E m o v T a �'o 1 U p E m d F= Rm' a OV x C t O ECL c a = t o O C O m m O IL LL W W Z ui N i 3 F N 1 = m O NI ca Im, i CD Y p N O Cc C O Q t6 m O O 3 C€ w $ O OA o m` o m Una0 a) m o m m E a n N m v >, °�`�.- �c a> c; U'v E: _c c` p " c �' U) a) ai' m m E o o := N E K m " m m o m=o oa �:oY c`a �4a a) a) o c z ¢ 0 a 0- U in W is C7 m€Im ico=COI(f)W,z^m°a€O W .0 z c0 s y ' � r H 5a t o CD o=a a ( Af) a W � � { g p £ x % Z cn pg ' SS { # 5 s L s F w U 1 co c gg V O :Rtf s N O 41 d g f 3 O CL O L. 4 1m £ ; { C (U O tC v F O C1 O O A CL C i LL O r N O O O. iw i O E ` d a > 0 0 O aa a a as Co CL O N E CD ojf 0' CD cl d E Q. m V U LD N CLCL O L V m O F„ g p a F v a s si o N c CO o Q m ; V �`d m C C a a U) n: a a�; >.. [a> _ c o c o .. x a>:- a�, as a E as v CD a> H i �, N = c U o o. M%21 a as a3 c E o E O O N K , CO; M' 0 a� o- a 3 z C 0 n`. a w a c7 m,m > t-_m€as.ua -� H o o= o 10V oo. E An AD' i o a e7 tCVtie, i M LU ( { S 1 CO 0 g i £$$£ F ( f £ E F E E i C/) E E a o Ot LU N � i c = a� aa) Y c0: N _ O c• a � i d .N+ 1 fa C L Ci 'O 07 U m 1 N (' ° C7 N 7 V i U c N CO >, C ` Np € cn CD cc O ` 0.0 _ ca O CL Q i cc CL _j rn Q Q CD W st W U U U o CV Z � € ILQ C a) o in of p L C j C cc a. c y 3 >, >, Q a.0 00 Q as o o mUpfOpU c, � � o ° o d N E N N O 'i=+ �' N N;j N N' N E, CT DI N:U Ci N L` N V 'C E Q. Q N N U! >,E N "'y: C U O E• C C �'C d N U. N .�+ m ca v o ° = N E K caM-mCOowoa3- m .° aa) o. i o 0 z Q U a a U in F= w .a0°mm > i--,mcncn � 2ma o � X50 z 0 H p,pp i p CN i f f, IF E , i co i € W E d 'v i E > C CL o is v a 0 ca U U C a0i T o. v 4 U) Y 0 cc IL Y C O K O D p Q U N U Q O (1) O m c 4) O N o U V tr) p r z N Z U = O a) F- c v U �` rn o 0 0 O _ t0 ) Co > Y m C +3+ d O O 2 -0 N > U: U O p Ca) E Q Q N O O N N w Y N C:U C C C N 10 a" O 0 0, . N E 'X cc m Ca (aa O a)"O Q 6 Y N= N �' O 0 Z Q U a a U m f— w a<C9 m°m >;I—,m,�n rn � 2 m>0. O'W X 0 z U .o w o o 3 o v ,p m 0 1&0 o o o, E � � E a . 3 � t E d � { H { F i 1 1 E Cf) MCO CD € X € E W cli 0 co C) i s £ { { r d � t a 4. a i E € co N Q { { CL . m H O N' U U C N' d > N Mj d U a z O_y •X V > Q to N CL > p w U U m p o r� rr' r rir:r Mn p U) CO 0 U U F- t0 N { { Z .O IL { N O W O CI O U fn N (0 Q a C C L0. =. ` O y C C O y N. O �E £ C T m 0 J v_i > U' O C C Y _E.Q y .0 >+ A Q ¢ D7 O N U N C s 7._f6 f0 E: O y .� m.0 o 0 N E N N N O �, N � N N >+ N; to �;II) CA N:U C O`': N �' w E '�6 E Q O_ N O O V! A N.:'� y'. N C U.O E- C C �;-C N Nt U N w m m 'O O �-' N E 1C O c6 co c0! O 4), O: d Y 0..V Q d= N O O z ¢ U, a s U in H w .a (7 m;mi> F-!miO CJ) 2 m d'O;OFW 0? z LO as H oo'o 0 0 .r o E o � ca 1 N a '� ER€�N}tA' W I i j a O S F i C j U to CD I ? CD V Z IM CO Q Z H a i i j 'Bm Q 1 ' W O { i N �o co Hto ( a J d p O € ? a = w Q �;m N c o a� �° a O f0cn 0 O O Ct V O W = a :fit o m ti Q > > , GIO = c E U U Q rn i r O O fq f!1 Q U U U O N c o o in .sev� y ° N c o m o o O 2CD U c w :E ns Q ° — o �Forn, coo; o O w > >, �, Q a w i .fl to O, 1 U o>N O E �. o d N E N N O O �, c/) ° N€ N; 9, NF wF Of � O; v OLS d —i N O E O O �_ N N f�6+ N W:',N G: U O. ' 0 �C �?U'Q' NE V L! N !� O �C N to, lo'O: N O Q.• i..— .— t6,._' O C z Q U a a U co I—: w a=c7 m m > F- m-cnEcn a,=£m a-0°,0: X10; z U 0 v k � o m t a ` E r CY Q s p^3o # jj k � 1 a U3 € QCcT x t0 a N RS K,p t s ,k ca � a A ma _ a CD 4 k o . to. o { o V 0 0 0 0 d rn U U co { t IM CD# O CS ON �� y t4 a. Og ,, r O N U O S tr N 1G t0 „O U s IO 0 CD 1 N "tis , N V w C U :°; O Q n o = ;v�'.� °r`,N w o � 05, cmoo 7°ho- COD3�`U' wo '�= m5 dmt o ca Q U a- Z , c rn £ V i F 9LO 40o t A V €;%r) i ul £ s� Z CD f? ` t0CD t00 oto O O O Yyr G• go # i ti T U U O O N d c aD v V m c 7 "�} } 0 4t N m o .�£ F.L SG V A N O co N N U V � d7` O O 6 C t6` N r «� o o o C;, U- n..' °o m o N L) N U W . ga ai,m,N N «0. OF- CD, d o EoO •a. O �=. Z ' a rn m a Y 4 a woo Do 0 H V � w W � td6 7 � U t4 O00O v t6� n U 0 U a U o H o o=o;o'o ov d 00000£ o � m o0 0 o0=.0' o a V,61vrn 0 9 £ 1 ` i y , 0 ? i & m Y .U £ i M V ( d C'L (DI J m 1 �£ zz rn O c d= c = ° °j c C cn •� E E t c _ ° H � � af0ic' CL U L = C of E N m C U d C a3 O 'C a) " a) ofCL ci Z s c a > aa) m`m tl E a C a) Q y U £ s a O ° N d E c Ni d N L4_ W o a) O L) O U v E o ° > oa £ N C C >+ O a . i cc E Ec u)m n 0 ut E ti Q O ° N r C) fca C) lA O C N N"s Q Q cn U U ri CN E � i E ow o,' Z U m ns a) U •. f H 221 c o m m rn o _ c rn as :3o c o Q m m 0 3 c >, � °: o IL o O -o co o — ° rn m ° �, U) C >, . >+ Q d Q O) o: = m U c i as as E!.2 0 0 a) E a) m ° o :, fn m a): �,.,_; a) w ` m rn a) v a)' W E �6 E Q a N y N N �=N "-:��.�. C' U C)' E` C'� " N=U, O' w N O p 0 0 +_ N E ii ��( N f0 f6:f6 s O a) O O �$-C Y: N .V CL a) Q); O C z Q 0 a a v w i= w "a c7imlm > t-;,m a;O;w woo z 0 f U) xi a o o too Q F p.6,�•stify O t � k 1 kj E � 3 i k N vj S � Gia. � y � G t k ' S yy£ i i lb ti N F f y 7 c>a .01 i ✓ V 4 O LT. G' 71 p �✓ N N O N uo 0 0 a x co U co d � � •� `� k :� `� .E�� v N T✓:Q to, r T CV N-co o R -k d U N $ o O;C 5 to u. 4 O d 40 .CR`m.� 0.. O l � N p> Qy !� 0 1..rA 0''i� E 5 a °' to `C t oo'000 o m IA V ,E €oti•;�n rn=co j € � � W 1 1 FE s t 3 1 O € t f 3 0 U) 0 a 0 CL s C N y E O` �co i5 0 i 0 0 0 y 1. a€m U=(n o u U d E CO Wo=CL m,�; y a E (a t o m a W O X c c c i 0 ` N D D v fl C O ` fCd (06 C C Q OO E E N t00 U) U Uch O o € W W U Lo N CL C (LD: vJ mQ # C m P Y O o N 07 N O. 7 j Cf N£ 7 O IL J N m yUV 73 i-CS # _{Q 'm U O 0 2 'O m va — O m p DI, m N- w C Q O m O Q ,� � i Q�la O, O d N fl CL N N , V! >,� ='Yf N C1 U"C .C! C,�z C€ O Of N` y cLo E �O N Mi— C U? O " N:N:U w t0 O O O `O a N K m:m m= M;Z: 45i ol 0� cu!.21 O_. mi N,:i O C z Q v a a. v in w N, N ( O } 1 N Cs � d Zlci 4 � � t0 V �p�rJ'3S E { c tl ; t 1 f a } i i ttt 444 S � 2 } m ty6 �- tt3 a !V UY G � o -a .. racl > O t atp+ a 00 O ^ Li s d s3 i E. ^p C G >, O O a N l a a! O O N ILirk ; U N IiJ � `- x N i CL Ln O I o. c ttl c C N O O is V i .+ € a G G v m ++ N Q O° Oi 0"tC 'l J14 V O y N 1L C U ftS C 1 a€p t6'I C 1 C N O.LL f 0. O nS W N w J ap2 Q G tQC. s .O NmU� p = mE ai N 4i0%Uo p - aGci 3G0a,."O�✓d` N��",r�N,` 2 Fn CL .: a U t � t c° 10 IE H 6a iW a3 t ( S € /^ S E 1 E f O E V/v S c O N E F U 4 E m i Y • � £ E £ � Q a rn ( ? 2 U E E p E 0 UC E2 N N. 7 °c E E N _ a) O p E O a O. O a E IL oN N m co � c y a c ❑ v o o m E, o v m ,o i i V s m •� O i 0 t w s 0 m Il ift ( f- p — 0 — o E _ > >> (L o :9c 4) Mc c to rL C ClE ❑ w QCL o ,� 0 0 a� v o _ m M 0 o v �€ M Q (n H O N 3 3 E aaa) a m o in �, 2+ �a C 3 U N = _ o s c Y U f/) N Q C CM f0 22 O c c W N N. O, O O IC N �i N Y m O V,: —` Y = Q m U a O '= p a5 > U C 1 O O m- a3 V �, y 1 c c0 21 o N 7 Q d Q = 0 -p?�p.�EU.mFU c 7s� 0, O CD m E a .a N 0 `�; N,, .Y m e coi C E',c c�; . c,°, �' m m to 'D O O O :. N E N"f0, f6- f0 O E N O d �$i a Y U Q N Q). O c z ¢ U a` a` tv in i= w m m >'F-;.m U)IU);� 2 m a 0,01- �;O; z r � ° ++ fM6613�' d E S � • 3 � € € t g € E � E CL E £ U � € U (0: a r N � d < a U U C C d C _U CL L CL a. N NI a z d O N y 5 5 Q CL d p W C N. CC O Q i O O 'NO p E E O t C LO Lo _� U V CD O Oco � w CL N ° y �, �+ �p 1 QI 0 ` C 0C:O O T 0 N 10 O CE �, a) O O R 3 m > m = ° U U aCM o O v m Q co= ° co o ° y m "w, o 0 LL CL 0 a� aD E Q Q y o a°i w c m °�;Y' m c a) c c (D' U a), N t6 �O O i= N E x .N° f0 f0 N+ O N. O' C. a Y ca-",.2 O- N'� a) O c z Q U a U w aCDm.ma;0o �=;0'� z 0 LO a o o oLO U o o o rn Lo m a W E f0 O Ix Co t � 3 t U cn c H U 1 a +r d c c a� m � E cm > ` CL v v o- F E c c a c n n E = E C130 1 O O _ d E U U) o o o _ m;o o �. o a ea 2fn CO 0 " w m _ v v m a Zt " w a o (D aD jE ca w w X E o , c c o v n o v a c m " o o° ' Q . o E E r co ! E S € O CO 0 U O O fA N W U L6 N t = z 4i CL € C M 0 c o c to o f6 o Q m o a� o- 3 i A 3 m 'ca U U` Q m CL o O v m > oorn moo v, U) C Q d ¢ c 0' 6 �£�fU CO L) cy ��za o' m. o d N E C Q . N o' N N : >+ N: Y �" C U'� Fr of C�z C. C.�, �' �. N !E6 O +r N E �, 'X f0 t6.. co,' N,O N"o': Q ?�;'6 Y �`pa U Q a) N"-: 0 Z Q U (L CL U fA w ,a;rC�?m=.m;>#t-:m cn.cj);:of 2.m W 0Of D� 0 Z U i W to N a �o 'a- E 0 ° 1► _ U Soo ca � T ti 4 V 3 2 U R 0 U m 0 U G 340, dO y ap O �'M'�t0' j W w O O O,f� M?NiM ( sC0 N _ V O IE 0 M, CO; j 4. w rn €� r, C,! W � E a £ t € E i 4 £ j o a �-'D rt+C£ HCl (r7O: « S � NVQ EUiC S � I O �S• i�id a C 7 7, CE ( I E WWq 1 1N > C '. ( E 1 Oji � g fl. o c E U iW O E LL i pT i 2 i Z C C dQ C{ C �E-£0 j � S G1 U U >+ ca Q, O C U € O t GO 0 U1 � O. msLL�W �:JlQa c U U 3 XO i E m o . E CL O U U Q m o o m m m Z Z Z f- H H v N w � o £ Z \ L ? I_ E 5 3 } Cal J VJ � p .•a � Qt + N f £O" 7 E C >1 � � 7 £ O N lC W _ !C N U LL o wl zdE{d vQN >r N .•UvU. dv ;ON�+Nm C E N N U=� OOO N = � U Cal W O N 03 N NUc Y+ +O U La La i + UCmm m=in€c�s�`;2imaai0�� � O z o U Q d HOFO=LoSM€v)�O { N (L ++ O O OI�tMjN!Ml (p rn tl1 V O,ciici A1N�M d i r 03 0 O+Mjr (prCN Ops O d LU d ii dq O € s € i i n. E' € m °f a U n ( c ai c: C� o E. 1 ;U E ii`p.c (rn 4) g ? CL E ID I ao a°i �` CL o t o a FvE lw 1 . O E m iirn y C c d {Q �_ ° m of I O d U U T Q O O cc a €m%LL to J?Q1 i i c U U X Co O n U U j O) O O m m m O O Z 0 W H H H v N Z a) t € 3 t 9 s a. E N s Otm p ` V rr N U t/1 ` O 'V J h = C ; N Olo C m U Y LL CI .� 03 C) m:U 3 O '07 N E N N C O ° �, `(/) � UI N: �+ w N'., M E:Dl tmN.U a` 0 y E E a Q N N O h ; >,', N �s C U O E C C �i C a)'W U:L; C C A 'C O N E sm; m{ M! M: N O Q U Y m .U, Q N N ... z Q U a d U in r w .a'O=mm > ii Ww O I Op O €M N C') 0) N j Q IEpo-M€rPCpjr:pMp $p 1 a a. �rER3fi?€fAffR � [ 3N v a s I ¢ W ( f € cu o; ( a U c �Cl304 j q a C 7`O c E_, 0) C Nf to W N'�' C) a) O' d CO y cs0l d cc I a N a iW E y cc uici is . mia d� m c c a) z ° v °£ c ° ° .� o c,v_, d � CD U U �, a ° •c ° r 00 V y p a) c t)IL 'r, = o o E 7 U U p CL S Q f O O O Q V U U c d Q a) m m m z W W 1— H F— sr N " @ Z O N € € _ € i Q — LCL 3€ P € E of jjjjfCD € O N C O = ca d N 'Q♦': 7 c �, p U. al i Cal C6 'd Op Q= LQ 9 coY0 r. °a€'- — O , O E 1 � N ,11 O a);> w a) OOd U€ C ; N , Ma) aE aa) y E -NO /1 E s Cl; O O! O 9s3N �nnO § Va) a) O zw U�Cn z O w OHO � d Otis1 O co Q d H O.O E to cM In O W +r O EO O€f—+cMiNEM tD a1 N m V O O;;°O:LO.LV M' i O E O Msr CO;r€tO 0 d O tQ EA fA t W IL 0 t t � F E i t E 3 £ f f ! S S � d 3 S # i O F C r F E N a� W a: CL c E Ei c CD tr E wWC7, (D >ixm as Ou; � ° S O �' ' rnifl m O C) U CO)LU a ? w �, y rn rntu c c ° a w 7 fOAUo O O O O Cg W N:N a: Ai a d U U Q d C O L oD O O ca O. mLL f/);�;J Q m m n E CL O O Q C) i ai ai Z N fl LL i 1 Q E co C6. rn, T O �' Q C ' 7 C ; Of O 7 O C C O [6 d N� 0, 3 F i. C �. 7 ,, O Cp N 3 [O > VN = U,V 7 Y€ Q m U O O O N U: O CO; O Oz t6= N U >'' CO C y >. T Q U- O '6;�i, (OAU m"s.0 C 7j� f0'. I O to C C C O C <� N W �a Q ` O CO U E N E O. O. O O N N �;N ,� Y N c U E C C.0 -V" c - O N d N CEO O O O N E X �`O CO N O N O Q �: O Y tOP•U; O N a) O C z ¢ U a a U in i= w a=(� m m;>;�,m �n mem z m alO a�:m=0 z a `+ � •v R ,a c d .. 0� E •� � � N T a a� V � � � � . � � �► t!1 "� 0 U R 0 v m ' o y O 0r O.CO t Lo M CO W �O lAeCO OO ri j M m CO) V O N?N COIN Ni 0 CSO CL a + CM 69.64 fA N W a f p } f I £ i � t 1 t t e f t j O s I t Qom; F U d w c .. Q N. U) N CR O �? CU sW U 1 i > a> E U � o E E Wa� I a> >1 d :° m o;ui a) ° a o c a o �- 1 rn ° = m d r W E N �£ m pL C7l 0 m IL LL C d arCl'Cf as�r..£ t f f y O H €OL O N;U UloI j O O N:0 76 _ �j U U U X a o m m —M O ,� to N N O_ - 3 i o OU U U Q .m U � m m 0 d ° 0 0 o Q o r Z - U U U Z r N j 1 _..,,,. Q `j LL j E y g ° LU rr i N v O N C O _� 0) C9 p O 00 CU' ma� ,O Q w o -p .O � U OLO 0 .° macn Uw E N N s U CQ 'C7 O OL O` .N N E N N LYiI C U O �:'C6,Y U N N U L z Q U a d cv in i= w a C7�m m >£H,m;v� rn w z m,a 0 =;x,04 z fi °D 0 �t _cli "'.4 o to E<� 0016 tH`16W6Wtft1, U t � p i G � d 0, s 1111 " p N 1 09 ( € .C� Nu- Gt i to N C N (�;y "C7 Lco l A O Z` t"4 0, ICS k 0 O O R U U U V tb r N Q Qto.Ac U U 1 O 0. U to N G p O Z N .jr tp L.� O G N C' O' to U,V tts€U'.CDU �r D1 cl)O v �'.vl)%L),'c. O U oN ca > Q ca r�o ° <i. U CD'CL ° W Z v (D a� rn m IL L. !r z M r:, r Lf); O O N 1 V ti M r, o Cl) I- (0' -v-; M Cb cv) O co M M � 'V LOa N 'It C-41 0 (O: O to{ I� CO{ r r-1 ti O M Q. d O ,(n N, CO (n f 1- GO O eF r co- M 1- M j O CO O, O r: O 1- to 1 p O£ M: (61 CO I'ZI IC`' O N IT LO o CO 4 N Nco M' O (O= 0) (p j r (O' m CO r r t0' r r; 1 O; M M f N I CO. CA CO f r V N N' M` V Q CAE co Lo O O O€ O OD o f el i CO M€ co M; M CO- (n v � M; M M N p flryl EA ff}; fA C-4 r° fA d4 d9 694 6% 64 6% vi tR 1 d9': ff} d�} fAt 6%, fl} d�1 EA; CL ( 64 6n, F co I F-:` N M{. CO M r 1 t(); O 00 I- (O f N M' f� r- (0 O Vp C-4 021 Nt CO Nj ui O' O£ Vj O M m (n m N M (n r- N r f (0 r r', Cl), J r M i f f 01 O1, CO 01 OOf O ol O? co O'i O of o€ O' 0, Of: O OI O 0' CO O O C)f O� N o+' O 0 Ol 01 0 0€ 01 O O( O, O, o O; O Oi 0 O. C7) O Ol `€ O v 01 Cl, O 0 i ol 0} O€ Of O CD O 0° O O' O. O O; O; O O IL' pp& M O M e 01 (6€ 0 CTI o ( 1 O O; O CT C LO O LC-L&L61 . O (C){ (A� CO O; CO ((y f CO I O Ln( I� et'..0, O; O o E O I-I CO E M f� rn 1 o F O` i d t LOr, LO i I� o' C14, � N'. tO€ of 0) � 00 I N Y 1- OD i � LLQ{ r- (0 N, V':, In t t0 O€ O1 :1 N r fA'1 fA, r4 r' r M ER r{ r ` d4' d4: N r; O" ffi, EH. N fA 6% fA € 69 d4€ 6a 0) 64 w of fA WY fR69, r € t $ £ 5 { R M_ M€ N M `Q N M N r� O` M M- N M' N€ M', M° M: N M! O O oio o 0 0 oEo o^ oio; o o; o 0 0 0 0 0 0= 0 0 0 0 w+ NI C N 'C C, (o' N N' >O N' y N c1 V', C '3', �. al m: m Cl) m m m} i m. OE ' a): ` LL N IZ O A€ Y` Y Y m m' m m m my. m m m m m YI YI Y c ea m a o� ° c e eE e e a= a ey e c e€ m m me m m_ m m; ca E J V 1C ?� �< �° N N, Ni Of N? N a)[ a) N€ N: N W W W W W' W W; W; y 0 U Ui U U- U U; U U U U' U o - � Y � f. CL Y y H O Y d =, O O: N N N N' O{ ° G) O€ O O O. Oc >,` C O- N: a) �+ Cc CO� a) E 1 V O O: O O t O E a) U m a /^m'. U CE Ojj O C_ Ui U C O U U 5' 3 I.L -04 i Y CO (){ (.� Y E Y V m Y 1 ° ' A Y^. °: V t) C' O ++ YE UJ k (DI (D m co 'c O; 01m1c 'c m� o{ c QU)i 0{ w' � a) p Q= / ml ln� mi co d3 mi ml, Q/�� a ! d $ Vi. ml a ae _ mi 'm` U c rn E U �E ° o (D °; m c I 7 m, (O J 'O1 to OE Q �` N i IA>{ O: a): Of I 4) O; o C C ' -01 �{ .+ 0, p C: (D -O t, C. Co' a) N J N£ ri N O Of a)1 C: a) m LL N ) J O N N: �: Ci CO' J' �= OS C O 3 �', N. LL O' Y: IL U c{ LL a)', o °' o �+ U N ° �' .. N U U. U! U N U N fii (ni C of a) N4 J• LL �, Ili N 7; 0€ m Q'. �` CO ' �? LL of O; O C- +' r: M` �j LL r; t J1 i LLF 3, f. . �i �a mi �; (/� f/)' N; N' U' U) [n �" CO- C)' f4 Q �{ i 7 aff f € 0 co:: CO: o r N€ M (() CO: I-, co € I O U m c 0 U East Contra Costa County Vacant Land Valuation $800,000 \w $700,000 $800,000 s _ w $500,000 $400,000 I� $300,000 P $200,000 $100,000 Comparables Central Contra Costa County Vacant Land Valuation $3,500,000 $3,000,000 t ' g ' $2,500,000 I ' " M $2,000,000 $1,500000 ' ass fio' $1,000000 $500,000 $0 Comparables West Contra Costa County Vacant Land Valuation Land Value $1,000,00041'—,� sump on �ni0D 000 $800,000 $400,000 $200,600 $0 Comparables Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan Page 65 Appendix B Typical Neighborhood Park Pro Forma Unit Cost p „ .. ., . ,.v . .(installed)�,. ... ., F Total Cost Descn tion � Unit Quantity Site Grading and Clearing $1.00 s.f. 217,800 $217,800 _..,_. ....._. .,... _.......... _ __.... .. ....._. .....,. Site Utilities (storm electrical sanitary) $70,000 I.S. 1 $70,000 Automatic Irrigation $1.50 s.f. 174,240 $261,360 _..... ......... ....., ..._ _. Turf Area $0.50 s.f. 130,680 $65,340 Landscaping (trees scrubs groundcover, etc) . $3.00 s f 43,560 $130,680 Restrooms $150,000 I.S. 1 $150,000 Concrete Pathways $5.00 s.f. 14,520 $72,600 Picnic Areas and Amenities $30,000 I.S. 1 $30,000 Children's Play Areas $90 000 I s 1 $90,000 ,_.., _.,,,_..... ...., ___.. .,__. _..,,,,_.,... ....... ... Sports Court $45,000 1.S. 1 $45,000 Lighting $60,000 I s 1 $60,000 Subtotal $1,192,780 Architectural, engineering, site design, site selection, CEQA Compliance 25% of Total $298,195 Total Cost(5 Acre Park) $1,490,975 Average Cost per Acre(Rounded) $298,000 Source: Prepared by Gail Donaldson, Gates&Associates and Lisa Carnahan and Dave Edmonds, Contra Costa County Public Works Department Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan Page 66 V' COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA PARK IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY FEBRUARY 2007 FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY i E PREPARED BY: iC®nsultingGroup 4745 Mangels Boulevard Fairfield,CA 94534 Phone 707.430.4300 Fax 707.430.4319 www.sci-cg.com Page Acknowledgements This report was prepared by SCI Consulting Group (formerly Shilts Consultants, Inc.). under contract with the County of Contra Costa.. The work was accomplished under the general direction of Robert Calkins, CDBG Program Manager with the Contra Costa County Community Development Department. We would also like to acknowledge special efforts made by particular County staff: Dennis Bary, Community Development Department John Kopchik, Community Development Department Abigail Fateman, Community Development Department Hillary Heard, Community Development Department Lisa Carnahan, Public Works Department Dave Edmonds, Public Works Department Dante Morabe, Public Works Department Wick Smith, Land Information Systems Jim Kennedy, Community Development Department Linda Wilcox, Office of the County Counsel Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 -� County of Contra Costa � _'10onsuttingGroup Page ii Table of Contents SECTION 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........................................................................................1 1.1 Summary of General Findings............ ......... ....... ....................................................... 2 1.2 Summary of Recommendations...................................................................................... 3 1.3 Organization of the Study....................I........................................................................... SECTION 2. PARK DEDICATION REQUIREMENT AND IN-LIEU FEES (QUIMBY)..................5 2.1 . Parkland Standard......................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Parkland Dedication Requirement(Quimby)................................................................... 6 2.3 Parkland Acquisition Costs per Capita............................................................................ 7 2.4 In-Lieu Fees(Quimby).......................... .......... 8 SECTION 3. PARK IMPACT FEES(AB 1600)....:........................................................................9 3.1 Parkland Acquisition Costs per Capita............................................................................ 9 3.2 Parkland Development Cost per Capita.........................................................................10 3.3 Community Use Facilities Cost per Capita.......................................................... .....11 3.4 Support Facilities Cost per Capita .................................................................................12 3.5 Park Impact Fees Calculation.........................................................................................13 3.6 Park Impact Fees Credit.,................. .... .. ........................................................................14 3.7 Nexus Findings..............................................................................................................15 SECTION4. APPENDICES......................................................................................................:.17 Appendix A. Contra Costa County Owned Park Inventory....................................................18 Appendix B. Recent Vacant.Land Sales(Contra Costa County)...........................................19 Appendix C. Average Household Size by Housing Type Appendix D. Park Development Fees by Jurisdiction (SFR Fees Only)................................24 Appendix E. Contra Costa County Park Capital Improvement Plan......................................25 Park,hpact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa . ConsuttingGroup Page iii List of Tables Table 1 —Recommended Parkland Dedication Requirement(Quimby)............................................3 Table 2—Recommended In-Lieu'Fees(Quimby) ................... 3 Table 3—Recommended Park Impact Fees.....................................................................................4 Table 4—Parkland Dedication Requirement...........................................................'.............:............6 Table 5—Parkland Acquisition Cost per Capita(West I Central County)..........................................7 Table 6—Parkland Acquisition Cost per Capita(East County).......................... ...,.. ....:.'........... ........7 Table 7—In Lieu Fees(West/Central County)................................................................................8 Table 8—In-Lieu Fees(East County)...........................................................................:...................8 Table 9—Parkland Acquisition Cast per Capita.................. Table 10—Parkland Development Cost per Capita.........................................................................10 Table 11 —Community Use Facilities per Capita Standard.............................................................11 Table 12—Community Use Facilities Cost per Capita...............:....................................................11 Table 13—Support Facilities per Capita Standard..........................................................................12 Table 14—Support Facilities Cost per Capita.................................................................................12 Table 15—Park Impact Fees Cost Components(West t Central County).......................................13 Table 16—Park Impact Fees(East County)............................................... Table 17—Summary of Park Impact Fees......................................................................................14 Table 18—Contra Costa County Owned Park Inventory.................................................................18 Table 19—Vacant Land Valuation.................................................................................................,19 Table 20—Average HousehoI&Size by Housing Type................................................... ...............23 Table 21 —Park Development Fees by Jurisdiction, 2007...............................................:..:...........24 Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa SClConsutt:ngC roup Page 1 Section 1. Executive Summary This Park Impact Fees Nexus Study("Study")was prepared pursuant to the "Mitigation fee Act" as found in Government Code§66000 et.seq. and the"Quimby Act" as codified in Government Code § 66477, The purpose of this Study is to establish the legal and policy basis for calculating the imposition of park impact fees on new residential development within the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County("County'). The County is initiating preparation of a Parks and Trails Master Plan ("Master Plan") to provide a "comprehensive and feasible vision" of the park and recreational facility needs of the current and. future residents of the unincorporated areas of the County. In order to provide adequate funding to, achieve these long-term objectives, this Study proposes two types of park fees. First, the County's parkland dedication requirement and in-lieu fees are updated to reflect current land values and the County's, maximum allowable park acreage per capita standard under the Quimby Act. The land and/or fees ("Quimby Act in lieu fees") are required as a condition of subdivision map approval and may be used to develop new or rehabilitate existing parks or recreational facilities. Secondly, a park impact fee, as authorized by the passage of AB 1600 (known as the Mitigation Fee Act), is proposed to finance the costs of park improvements to serve new development. In general, these fees may only be used to develop new park or recreational facilities. They are justified as an offset to the future impact of residential development on the County's existing park and recreational facilities. The combination of Quimby Act fees and park impact fees imposed on new residential development provides a sound and comprehensive park fee program. The imposition of both fees ensures that financial impact from all residential development (subdivided or non-subdivided projects) on County parks and recreational facilities are fully recovered. Furthermore, the parkland dedication requirement under the Quimby Act allows the County to require the dedication of land for park facilities. With only Quimby in-lieu fees in place, the County could only accept fees for the cost of land acquisition and purchase the land via willing sellers. Moreover, the park impact fees also provide for park development costs, including the costs of community use facilities, administrative facilities and maintenance facilities. Under the Quimby Act, only the cost of.land acquisition is allowed in the calculation.' Even though land value is the only cost component allowed in the calculation of the Quimby in-lieu fee,revenue from such fees may be spent on parkland acquisition and development of new parks or rehabilitation of existing parks. Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 �,tCcansutt�n �� County of Contra Costa Page 2 Procedurally, this Study recommends that the County subject all residential development to the park impact fee and that residential development subject to the Quimby Act receive a credit against the park impact fee equal to the value of land dedicated or fees paid in-lieu of dedication. Since the need for park and recreational services is inherently population-driven, this Nexus Study utilizes.a per capita standard-based methodology to calculate the County's park impact fees. Under this method, the cost components are first defined on a per capita basis. The per capita costs are based on average unit costs from the Parks CIP and level of service ("LOS") standards. The total per capita costs for pack and recreation facilities,needed for new residential development are then applied to four residential land uses according their respective average household population to establish a cost/fee per unit. 1.1 Summary of General Findings Based on a review of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan ("Parks CIP"), the General Plan and applicable County ordinances,the following general findings are presented: 1. The Quimby Act allows for a higher standard than 3.0 acres for every 1,000 residents if the jurisdiction provides a ,higher acreage per capita. However, the County historically has provided less than 3.0 acres; therefore, the minimum standards of 3.0 park acres per 1,000 population will be;used in this Study. 2. The Parks CIP outlines new parks to be constructed.and improvements at existing parks over the next five years to serve existing residents and new residents from new development. According to the Parks CIP, the average cost of new park construction is $298,413 per acre and the average cost of park improvements at existing parks is $301,123 per acre. 3. The County's parkland dedication requirement and in-lieu fee ordinance has not been updated since 1990. Pursuant to Chapter 920-6 of the County Ordinance Code, the County currently requires 350 square feet of land per new dwelling unit to be dedicated for park and recreational purposes. In subdivisions containing fewer than 50 parcels, only the payment of fees is required. Those fees are currently$2,000 per dwelling unit, except for East County,where the fee is$1,350 per dwelling unit. 4. The County's current park dedication requirement and in-lieu fees are based on 1990 U.S. Census figures for average household size; land values of $145,000 (West and Central County) and $75,000 (East County); and include park development costs of $85,000 per acre. Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 y �- ■ County of Contra Costa y`IConsuttingGroup r Page 3 1.2 Summary of Recommendations Based on the findings presented in the Study,the following recommendations are presented: 1. The County's parkland dedication requirement ordinance should be amended to reflect average household size, based on the 2000 U.S. Census, of the four housing types shown below. Table 1 —Recommended Parkland Dedication Requirement(Quimby) Quimby Park Dedication Requirement(Sq.Ft per Housing Types Dwelling Unit) Single-Family Detached 391 Townhomes 311 Multi-Family Unit 282 Mobile Home 263 2. The County's in-lieu fees ordinance should be amended to reflect changes in land values and the average household size (based on the 2000 U.S. Census) for the four housing types shown below. Since land costs in the eastern areas of the County were found to be relatively lower than the rest of the County, separate in-lieu fees for East Contra Costa County should be maintained. The recommended in-lieu fees are presented in the following table. Table 2—Recommended In-Lieu Fees(Quimby) Quimby In-Lieu Fee (Central and West Quimby In-Lieu Fee Housing Types County) (East County) Single-Family Detached $4,489 $3,142 Townhomes $3,571 $2,499 Multi-Family Unit $3,233 $2,263 Mobile Home $3,014 $2,109 Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 ttrnsuttin ` County of Contra Costa group Page 4 3. The County should establish new park impact fees to fairly allocate the costs of park development to all new';!residential development. The following park impact fees for the County are recommended: Table 3—Recommended Park Impact Fees Park Impact Fees per Dwelling Unit West 1 Central Contra East Contra Categories'i Costa County Costa County Single-Family Detached $7,238 $5,891 Townhomes $5,757 $4,686 Multi-Family Unit $5,213 $4,243 Mobile Home $4,859 $3,955 Second Units $2,419 $1,969 4. If the County requires 9 developer, as a condition of project approval,to dedicate parkland, to pay fees in-lieu of parkland dedication and/or construct facilities or improvements, the park impact fees imposed on that development project should be.adjusted to reflect a credit for the cost of the dedicated parkland, facilities or improvements constructed, or amount of fees paid in-lieu of parkland dedication by the developer. 5. The parkland dedication requirement and in-lieu fees should be adopted and implemented in accordance with the; applicable provisions of the Quimby Act (Gov. Code, § 66477 et. seq.). 6. The County's new park impact fees should be adopted and implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Mitigation Fee Act(Gov. Code, §66000 et. seq.). 1.3 Organization of the Study This Study has four sections and is organized as follows: Section 1 provides a general summary of findings and recommendations. • Section 2 updates the County's park dedication requirement and in lieu fee pursuant to the Quimby Act. • Section 3 calculates park impact fees as authorized by the Mitigation Fee Act. • Section 4 includes the;appendices to the Study. Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 ^� County of Contra Costa SiC;onsultingG roup i Page 5 Section 2. Park Dedication Requirement and In-Lieu Fees (Quimby) The Government Code contains specific enabling legislation for the acquisition and development of community and neighborhood parks by a city or county. This legislation, codified as Section 66477 of the Government Code and known commonly as the "Quimby Act," establishes criteria for charging new development for park facilities based on specific park standards. This Section presents the calculation of the park dedication requirement and in-lieu fees based on the per capita cost of land acquisition in West/Central County and East County for different residential land uses in the County. 2.1 Parkland Standard Based on the County's current park inventory, the County currently owns approximately 75.7 acres of developed parkland. This represents a ratio of 0.5 acres of County owned and developed parkland for every 1,000 people in the unincorporated areas of the County.2 Under the Quimby Act, "the dedication of land, or payment of fees, or both, cannot exceed the proportionate amount necessary to provide three acres of park area per 1,000 persons residing within the subdivision, unless the amount of existing neighborhood and community park area exceeds that limit." Though not relevant to unincorporated Contra Costa County, if existing park area exceeds three acres per 1,000 persons, the legislative body may adopt the calculated amount as a higher standard not to exceed five acres per 1,000 persons residing within a subdivision.3 Since the County's existing park area for the unincorporated areas is less than 3.0 acres per 1,000 residents, the County's maximum dedication and/or fee allowed under the Quimby Act is three acres of parkland for every 1,000 persons. (Appendix A presents the County's owned parkland inventory.) 2 The County also owns 39.2 acres of undeveloped parkland. However, the Quimby Act allows for only developed parkland to be included in the calculation of the existing park to 1,000 population ratio. 3 Government Code§66477(a)(2). Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa S CtCcsnsuttin 9 P Page 6 2.2 Parkland Dedication Requirement(Quimby) Based on the minimum per capita standard of 3 acres per 1,000 residents allowed by the Quimby Act,the formula for calculating the dedication of land for the County is as follows: Proposed Average .003 Number of Units X Household Size X (3 Acres per 1,000 by Housing Type by Housing Type Population) Table 4 presents the parkland dedication requirement on a square footage per housing type basis. As detailed in Appendix C, the average number of persons per dwelling unit is determined on the basis of the housing type and the average.household size as of the 2000 U.S. Census. Table 4—Parkland Dedication Requirement Average Allowable Standard Household Size (3 Acres per 1,000 . Allowable Sq.Ft. Housing Type per Dwelling Unit Population) per Dwelling Unit Single-Family Detached2.993 0.003 391 Townhomes 2.380 0.003 311 Multi-Family Unit 2.155 0.003 282 Mobile Home 2.009 .0.003 263 For example, a single-family subdivision of 500 detached units would require a 4.5 acre land dedication for park and recreational facilities. 500 391 195,500 Sq.Ft or 4.5 Single-Family X Allowable Sq. Ft = Acres of Dedication Detached per Single-Family Parkland for the Residential Units Detached Unit Subdivision Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa 0w'iConsuttingGroup Page 7 2.3 Parkland Acquisition Costs per Capita Table 5 below presents the per capita cost for parkland acquisition based on land acquisition cost estimates from the Parks CIP. As shown, land value for West and Central County is estimated to be $500,000 per acre. However, in the eastern areas of the County, land values are relatively lower than other areas of the County. Therefore, as shown in Table 6, the per capita cost for parkland acquisition in East Contra Costa County assumes a land value of $350,000 per acre. Arguments for.higher land costs can be made; however, the presented amounts per acre appear be the most appropriate conservative figures for the purposes of this Study.4 Table 5—Parkland Acquisition Cost per Capita(West I Central County) Acres per 1,000 Acres per Land Cost Fee Component PopulationCapita' Cost Per Acre per Capita Parkland Acquisition 3.0 0.003 $500,000 $1,500 Notes: ' Ba$ed on 3.0 acres per 1,000 population Quimby standard. Table 6—Parkland Acquisition Cost per Capita(East County) Land Cost Per Acres per 1,000 Acres per Acre(East Cost Fee Component Population' Capita Contra Costa) per Capita Parkland Acquisition 3.0 .0.003 $350,000 $1,050 Notes: ' Based on 3.0 acres per 1,000 population Quimby standard. ^Assumed land values are based on vacant land sales in Contra Costa County as presented in the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Appendix B to this Study. Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 x Consuttin � County of Contra Costa P Page 8 2.4 In-Lieu Fees(Quimby) The following tables present the' calculation of the in-lieu fees based on the per capita land cost from Section 2.3.5 As previously mentioned, land costs in the eastern areas of the County were found to be relatively lower than the rest of the County. Therefore, separate in-lieu fees for East i. Contra Costa County are necessary. Pursuant to the Quimby Act, such fees may be used for parkland acquisition, park development and the rehabilitation of existing park and recreational facilities. Table 7—In Lieu Fees(West/Central County) Average Household Size Park Acquisition In-Lieu Fees per Housing Type per Dwelling Unit Cost per Capita Dwelling Unit Single-Family Detached 2.993 $1,500 $4,489 Townhomes 2.380 $1,500 $3,571 Multi-Family Unit 2.155 $1,500 $3,233 Mobile Home 2.009 $1,500 $3,014 Table 8—In-Lieu Fees(East County) Average Household Size Park Acquisition In-Lieu Fees per Housing Type per Dwelling Unit Cost per Capita Dwelling Unit Single-Family Detached 2.993 $1,050 $3,142 Townhomes 2.380 $1,050 $2,499 MultkFamily Unit 2.155 $1,050 $2,263 Mobile Home 2.009 $1,050 $2,109 5 Per capita land costs are based upon recent vacant land sales in Contra Costa County as presented in Appendix B. Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa " "Consulting-roup Page 9 Section 3. Park.Impact Fees (AB 1600) This Section presents the calculation of the park impact fees based on the per capita cost for acquisition, development of park, community use, and support facilities and associated costs for the different residential land uses in the County. In order to impose such fees, this Section will demonstrate that a reasonable relationship or "nexus" exists between new development that occurs within the unincorporated areas of the' County and the need for additional developed parkland and recreational facilities as a result of new development. More specifically, this Study will present findings in order to meet the.procedural requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act, also known as AB 1600, which are as follows: 1. Identify the purpose of the fee. 2. Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. 3. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. 4. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. 5. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. 3.1 Parkland Acquisition Costs per Capita Because the Quimby Act applies only to subdivisions, the acquisition of parkland to serve the residents from non-subdivision projects(e.g., apartment projects, single units on existing parcels or residential second units) must be handled though park impact fees. On the following page, Table 9 summaries the per capita cost of acquiring parkland in the unincorporated areas of the County. Again, parkland acquisition costs are based on land value estimates of$500,000 per acre for West and Central County and $350,000 per acre for East County fromthe Parks CIP. As shown,the 3.0 acre per 1,000 population standard is multiplied by the estimated per acre cost to arrive at a per capita cost for each County area. Park impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 .. County of Contra Costa 'f ,nnsuttingGroup Page 10 Table 9,1—Parkland Acquisition Cost per Capita Land Cost Per Parkland Acquisition Acres per 1,000 Acres per Acre(East Cost Fee Component PopulationCapita Contra Costa) per Capita West/Central County 3.0 0.003 $500,000 $1,500 East County 3.0 0.003 $350,000 $1,050 Notes: 'Based on 3.0 acres per 1,000 population standard from the County Parks CIP, 2 Based on vacant land estimates from the County Parks CIP, 3.2 Parkland Development Costper Capita Table 10 calculates the per capita cost of providing future park development in the unincorporated areas of the County. As presented, the 3.0 acre per 1,000 population level of service standard is multiplied by the average per acre cost for parkland development to arrive at a per capita cost.6 The average park development cost per acre shown represents average estimated current dollar costs for typical neighborhood park improvements similar to those in existing County parks. Any facilities other than restrooms, such as community centers or support facilities, are included as separate cost components. Table 10—Parkland Development Cost per Capita Average Park Acres per 1,000 Acres per Development Cost Fee Component Population' Capita' Cost per Acre 2 per Capita Parkland Development 3.0 0.003 $298,413 $895.24 Source: Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan Notes: i; ' Based on 3.0 acres per 1,000 population standard from County Parks CIP. 2 Average new park development cost per acre from the County Parks CIP. 6 The average park development cost per acre is from the Parks CIP. Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007MMM— County of Contra Costa SCIConsuftingGroup Page 11 3.3 Community Use Facilities Cost per Capita The residents in the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County currently have use of three County-owned community use facilities.? As shown in Table 11, these facilities provide 7,200 square feet of useable space to the unincorporated area residents served by the County. Therefore, the existing level of service for community use facilities is 45.8 square feet per 1,000 residents. Table 11 —Community Use Facilities per Capita Standard Existing Sq.Ft. Existing Space Current per 1,000 Facility per Sq.Ft. Population Population Crockett Community Center 4,000 157,350 25.4 Lefty Gomez Recreation Building 800 157,350 5.1 Montara Bay Park Community Center 2,400 157,350 15.3 Total Community Use Facilities 7,200 45.8 Source: Contra Costa County,Public Works Department The.Parks CIP identifies four new community centers to be constructed by 2011. Based on this existing level of service and using the average construction cost of$300 per square foot from the Parks CIP, the total cost per capita is $13.75 (or $13,750 per 1,000 new residents in the County unincorporated areas).s Table,12—Community Use Facilities Cost per Capita Construction Level of Service Cost Cost Per Fee Component Standard per Sq.Ft.' Capita 2 Community Use Facilities 45.8 sq,ft per 1,000 population $300 $13.75 Notes: Average total construction cost per square foot for community use facility projects in the Parks CIP. 2 Construction cost per sq.ft.multiplied by the existing level of service per capita. 7 The facilities used to calculate the existing level of service per capita is limited to facilities owned by the County. The County also has facility joint-use agreements with other public agencies. e Since all of the existing community use facilities are located in parks, the cost of land acquisition is included in the parkland acquisition component of the park impact fees. Park impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 lf�ansuttrnrcau County of Contra Costa 5 p Page 12 3.4 Support Facilities Cost per Capita As the County's population grows, the County's administrative and maintenance facilities will be impacted, requiring increased space to serve the new residents of the unincorporated areas of the County. Table 13 shows then approximate existing level of service per 1,000 residents for administrative and maintenancepark facilities. Table 13;—Support Facilities per Capita Standard Existing Sq.Ft. Existing Space Current per 1,000 Facility per Sq.Ft. Population Population Park Administrative Facilities r 2,700 157,350 17.2 Park Maintenance Facilities 2,800 157,350 17.8 Total Support Facilities . 5,500 35.0 Source: Contra Costa County,Public Works Department Notes: The estimated square footage of administrative facilities represents the total area occupied by Special Districts in the Public Works Building and General Services Department offices. The Parks CIP identifies a new maintenance facility and a new administrative facility to be constructed within the next five'years. As shown, the County will require an additional 35.0 square feet of support facilities per 1,000 new residents to maintain the existing level of support facilities currently provided by the County. Based on the average construction cost of$276 per square foot from the Park CIP, the total Cost per capita is $9.66 (or $9,660 per 1,000 new residents in the County unincorporated area). Table 14—Support Facilities Cost per Capita Construction Cost Fee Components Level of Service Standard Cost Per Sq.Ft. per Capita Park Administrative Facilities 17.2 sq.ft.per.1,000 population $276 $4.74 Park Maintenance Facilities 17.8 sq.ft.per 1,000 population $276 $4.92 Total Support Facilty Costs $9.66 Notes: Average construction cost per.sq..'ft.multiplied by the existing level of service per capita. Park impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa S"=tC:onsultingGroup Page 13 3.5 Park Impact Fees Calculation Tables 15 and 16 presents the calculation of the park impact fees based on the per capita cost components for West/Central'County and East County. The average household size for the four housing types is multiplied by the per capita cost for parkland acquisition, parkland development; community uses facilities and support facilities costs to arrive at the park impact fees per dwelling unit.9 This Study also incorporates the addition of another residential unit to an existing property as a fifth category (labeled as "Second Residential Units.") Insufficient data exists to calculate the average household occupancy of second residential units in the County; therefore, a conservative estimate of 1.0 person per unit is utilized. Table 15-Park Impact Fees Cost.Components (West 1 Central County) Per Capita Cost Components Park Impact Parkland Parkland Community Support Fees per Categories Acquisition Development Use Facilities Facilities Dwelling Unit' Single Family Detached $4,488.93 $2,679.11 $41.14 $28.91 $7,238 Townhomes $3,570.68 $2,131.07 $32.72 $22.99 $5,757 . Multi-Family Unit $3,233.19 $1,929.65 $29.63 $20.82 $5,213 Mobile Home Unit $3,013.57 $1,798.58 $27.62 $19.41 $4,859 Second Residential Units $1,500.00 $895.24 $13.75 $9.66 $2,419 Notes: The fees are rounded to the nearest dollar. 9 Appendix C provides the calculation of the average household size for each housing type. Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa C'lC.onsuttingGr-oup Page 14 Table 16—Park Impact Fees(East County) Per Capita Cost Components Park Impact I?arkland Parkland Community Support Fees per Categories Acquisition Development Use Facilities Facilities Dwelling Unit Single Family Detached $3,142.25 $2,679.11 $41.14 $28.91 $5,891 Townhomes $2,499.47 $2,131.07 $32.72 $22.99 $4,686 Multi-Family Unit $2,263.23 $1,929.65 $29.63 $20.82 $4,243 Mobile Home Unit $2,109.50 $1,798.58 $27.62 $19.41 $3,955 Second Residential Units $1,050.00 $895.24 $13.75 $9.66 $1,969 Notes: ' The fees are rounded to the nearest dollar. A summary of the park impact fees for West/Central County and East County are presented in the table below. Table 17—Summary of Park Impact Fees Park Impact Fees per Dwelling Unit West I Central Contra East Contra Categories Costa County Costa County Single-Family Detached $7,238 $5,891 Townhomes , $5,757 $4,686 Multi-Family Unit $5,213 $4,243 Mobile Home $4,859 $3,955 Second Units $2,419 $1,969 ' The fees are rounded to the nearest dollar. 3.6 Park Impact Fees Credit If the County requires a developer, as a condition of approval of a development project, to dedicate parkland, to pay fees in-lieu of parkland dedication and/or to construct facilities or improvements, the park impact fees imposed'on that development project should be adjusted to reflect a credit for the cost of the dedicated parkland, facilities or improvements constructed, or amount of fees paid in-lieu of parkland dedication by the developer. Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 .misrn�m"'1If"�a County of Contra Costa 1Consutting�roup Page 15 3.7 Nexus Findings This sub-section frames the results of Section 3 in terms of the legislated requirements to demonstrate the legal justification of the park impact fees. The justification of the park impact fees on new development must provide information as set forth in Government Code § 66000 et seq. These requirements are discussed below. Purpose of Fees The purpose of the park impact fees are to acquire and develop parkland, improve existing parks and recreation facilities and provide recreational and community use and support facilities to meet the needs of the new residential population within the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County. Use of Fees The park impact fee proceeds will be used for(1) parkland acquisition and (2) the development of the park and recreational improvements identified in the Parks CIP (including but not limited to costs of design, construction and associated California Environmental Quality Act compliance activities). The park impact fee proceeds may not be used to fund park maintenance or operational costs. Relationship Between Use of Fees and Type of Development New residential development in the unincorporated areas of the County will create additional demand for parks and recreational services. In order to adequately serve additional population to be housed in new development, new park and recreation facilities and support facilities are needed and existing parks need to be improved to accommodate the additional demand for parks and recreation services generated by new development. The new park and park rehabilitation projects are identified in the Parks CIP. The use of the park impact fees (acquisition, construction and rehabilitation of park and recreational facilities) is therefore reasonably related to the type of development project(new residential development) upon which the fee will be imposed. Relationship Between the Need for Improvements and Type of Development Since the need for park and recreational services is inherently population-driven, new residents from new development will increase the demand for park and recreational services and the associated need for park and recreational facilities to serve them. To meet this additional demand, new parks should be constructed and existing parks should be rehabilitated so they can accommodate additional increased use. Therefore, a reasonable relationship exists between the need for new and rehabilitated park and recreational facilities and the new residential development projects upon which the park impact fee will be imposed. Park impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa > £Cansuttingiraup Page 16 Relationship Between the Amount of the Fees and the Costs Attributable to New Development The cost of park and recreatji ional facility improvements attributable to a unit of residential development are defined on a cost per capita basis and based on average unit costs from the Parks CIP and the County's level of service standards for providing such facilities. The park impact fee is determined by applying the total cost per capita to four residential land uses according to their respective average housel fold size. There is therefore a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fees and the costs of the park and recreational facilities attributable to the new residential development upon which the fee will be imposed. Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa B 'Consutt`ngGroup Page 17 Section 4. Appendices Appendix A. Contra Costa County Owned.Park Inventory Appendix B. Recent Vacant Land Sales(Contra Costa County) Appendix C. Average Household Size per Housing Type Appendix D. Park Development Fees by Jurisdiction(SFR Fees Only) Appendix E. Contra Costa County Park Capital Improvement Plan . 1 Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa zr.`tConsuttingGroup Page 18 Appendix A. Contra Costa County Owned Park Inventory Table 18—Contra Costa County Owned Park Inventory i. Park Name Acreage Location Crockett Community Center 0.6 Crockett Lefty Gomez Recreation Building 11.0 Rodeo Montalvin Park 7.0 San Pablo Montara Bay Park Community Center 4.0 San Pablo North Richmond Ball Field 3.5 Richmond Rodeo Creek Trail 2.5 Rodeo Alamo Elementary School and Park 2.5 Alamo Clyde Park 2.0 Clyde Hap Magee Park 16.3 Danville Livoma Park 4.4 Alamo Marie Porter Park 0.2 Clyde Cornell Park 10.0 Discovery Bay Lynbrook Park 4.1 Bay Point Slifer Park 6.4 Discovery Bay Boeger Park 0.5 Bay Point Hickory Meadows Park 0.3 Bay Point Viewpoint Park 0.3 Bay Point Total County Developed Parkland 75.7 Source: County of Contra Costa,Public Works Department Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa tConsuttingGroup Page 19 Appendix B. Recent Vacant Land Sales (Contra Costa County) Table 19-Vacant Land Valuation Average Location Price per Price per Sq. Sale Property Description City Quadrant Sales Date Sales Price ' Acres Acre Ft 1 Site for 87 SFR Lots Hercules West Jan-03 $20,558,000 21.6 $950,044 $21.81 2 SFR Site Hercules West May-03 $5,163,426 8.4 $615,503 $14.13 3 20 Unit Subdivision Site San Pablo West Mar-02 $1,500,000 2.7 $556,261 $12.77 4 25 SFR Lot EI Sobrante West Jan-03. $2,783,000 5.2 $538,837 $12.37 1 Condominum Site Walnut Creek Central Mar-04 $1,950,000 0.7 $2,867,555 $65.83 2 Single Tenant Low Rise Site Pleasant Hill Central Feb-04 $265,000 0.3. $1,012,770 $23.25 3 Site for 146 Multi Family Units Concord Central Jul-02 $4,40.0,000 4.8 $910,840 $20.91 4 .M1 Zoned Lot Concord Central Apr-03 $250,000 0.3 $862,052 $19.79 5 33 Lot Subdivsion Site Martinez Central Jan-02 $1,579,000 3.1 $514,444 $11.81 6 9 SFR Lots Walnut Creek Central Jan-01 $1,440,000 3.5 $415,127 $9.53 7 SFR Site Walnut Creek Central Jan-04 $1,900,000 5.0 $379,843 $8.72 8 P1 P Zoned Res.Acreage Martinez Central May-00 $3,500,000 9.8 $356,321 $8.18 9 PD Zoned Acreage Concord Central Dec-03 $899,000 2.7 $332,798 $7.64 10 Church and Preschool Site San Ramon Central Dec-03 $1,200,000 3.6 $332,363 $7.63 1.1 5 Lot SFR Subdivision Site Walnut Creek Central Nov-02 $1,700,000 5.2 $328,007 $7.53 1 R-B Zoned Site Antioch East May-03 $875,000 1.3 $683,456 $15.69 2 SFR Subdivision Site Brentwood East Dec-02 $7,480,000 12.7 $590,674 $13.56 3 Public School Site Brentwood East May-03 $535,000 1.1 $466,963 $10.72 4 37 SFR Lots Brentwood East Jan-03 $2,775,000 6.6 $419,918 $9.64 5 P-D-C Zoned Site Brentwood East Oct-03 $1,695,000 4.9 $347,173 $7.97 6 147 SFR Lots Brentwood East Jun-02 $10,294,496 31.4 $327,571 $7.52 7 R-B Zoned Site Oakley East Jul-03 $400,000 1.2 $326,700 $7.50 8 SFR Site Antioch East Feb-04 $745,000 3.1 $236,531 $5.43 Source:Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 [Consulting Group of Contra Costa 3 Page 20 I, West Contra Costa County Vacant Land Valuation $1,000,000 �3 $800,000 - } FIN $600,000 ., E $400,000 $200,000 �s $0 Comparables Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa . IConsutt:nq roup Page 21 Central Contra Costa County Vacant Land Valuation $3,500,000 4,11, s l"M jj'Nk $3,000,000 04 NOW l FA a all $2,500,000 ^ �; ,TO� �� � �� $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000jr E r ' $500,000 $a Comparables Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa � ;ConsuttingGraup Page 22 East Contra Costa.County Vacant Land Valuation $800,000 ^ :�gomomk $700,000 a3 $600,000WE �U-NOMM a eWWI Ot 1 41 & '3 riY fii P d 4 $500,000 am,; $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 t $100,000. ' N- $0 Comparables Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa ' .tConssisttingGroup Page 23 Appendix C. Average Household Size by Housing Type Since the park fees are based on per capita need and level of service, this Study.recommends the . allocation of the park fees to the different residential land uses (or housing types), since different housing types have different household sizes. Based on 2000 U.S. Census information, Table 20 presents the average household size calculation for four housing types: detached single-family homes, attached single-family homes(or townhomes), multi-family residences and mobile homes._ Table 20—Average Household Size by Housing Type Contra Costa County Total Vacant Occupied Total Average Housing Housing . Housing Number of Household Housing Type Units Units Units Occupants Size Single-Family Detached 232,050 4,732 227,318 680,276 2.993 Townhomes. 29,976 963 29,013 69,064 2.380 Multi-Family Unit 84,994 4,170 80,824 174,213 2.155 Mobile Home 7,120 486 6,634 13,328 2.009 Average.(2000 Census) 354,140 10,351 343,789 936,881 2.725 Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa -1consuhtingGroup Page 24 Appendix D. Park Development Fees by Jurisdiction (SFR Fees Only) Table 21-Park Development Fees by Jurisdiction, 2007 Total Park Fees Jurisdiction Park Fees per Single Family Residence(SFR) (SFR) County of Contra Costa East County-$1,350 SFR $1,350-$2,000 (Current) Balance of County-$2,000 SFR County of Contra Costa Parkland In Lieu Fee-$4,489 SFR(West/Central)/$3,142 SFR(East) $5,891 -$7,238 (Proposed) Park Impact Fee-$2,749 SFR EM ME Town of Danville Parkland Dedication In-Lieu Fee $7,873 City of Oakley Parkland Dedication In-Lieu Fee,Park Facilities and Public Facilities Fees $8,080 City of Walnut Creek Parkland Dedication In-Lieu Fee $6,000-$8,000 City of Brentwood Capital Improvement Fee,Parks&Trails $6,777 City of Martinez Parkland In-Lieu Fee-$4,111 SFR $6,298 Park and Recreation Fees for Facilties$2,187 SFR City of Antioch Parkland In-Lieu Fee-$1,050 SFR(Charged at time of building permit.) $1,050-$5,180 City of Orinda Parkland Dedication In-Lieu Fee $12,274 City of Concord Parkland Fee $8,170 City of Layafette Parkland In-Lieu Fee $6,118 Town of Clayton Parkland Dedication In-Lieu Fee $2,569 Town of Moraga Formula Only. FMV of land is determined at time of map approval. Formula City of Plesant Hill Formula Only. FMV of land is determined at time of map approval. Formula City of Pittsburg Parkland Dedication Requirement x FMV land determined by appraisal. Formula City of San Ramon Parkland In-Lieu Fee based on 3-acres per 1,000 population and FMV Formula City of San Pablo Formula Only. FMV of land is determined at time of map approval. Formula Other Tri-Valley Cities City of Dublin Parkland In-Lieu Fee-$14,981 SFR $16,118 Public Facilities Fee(Park Improvement Component)-$5,137 SFR City of Livermore Park Fee $13,315 City of Pleasanton Parkland bedication In-Lieu Fee-$9,707 SFR $13,082 Public Facilities Fee-$3,375 SFR Other City of Fremont Parkland Dedication In-Lieu Fee-$15,666 SFR $23,636 Park Facilities-$7,970 SFR City of Hayward Parklandj'Dedication In-Lieu Fee $11,953 San Leandro Parkland';Acquisition Fee-$11,279 SFR $13,167 Park Improvement Fee-$1,888 SFR County of Alameda Park Fee-$11,550 SFR $11,550 Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa 8lConsuftingGroup Page 25 Appendix E. Contra Costa County Park Capital Improvement Plan . Reference is hereby made to the Contra Costa County Park Capita Improvement Plan which is on file at the Contra Costa County Public Works Department since it is too voluminous to be bound with this Nexus Study. Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,2007 County of Contra Costa - -" ConsuttingGroup Com m u n 1 Ly Dermis M.berry,AIUF Contra Community Development Director Development Costa Department C0►U11ty 2530 Arnold Drive Suite 194 Martinez, California 94553-881 Phone: (925) 335.7220x �� April 3;2007 NOTICE OF PUBLIC REVIEW AND INTENT TO ADOPT A PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the State of California Public Resources Code and the"Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended to date, this is to advise you that the Community Development Department of Contra Costa County has prepared an initial study on the following project: 1. Adoption of Ordinance No. 2007-191, amending the County's Park Dedication Ordinance (Division 920 of the County Ordinance Code). 2. Adoption of Ordinance No. 2007-17 establishing a Park Impact Fee. 3. Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan. The proposed amendments to the Park Dedication Ordinance include: increasing the land dedication requirements; increasing the amount of fees required in lieu of land dedication; and providing a waiver of dedication and,fee requirements for specified affordable housing developments.The existing and proposed in lieu fees are: Existing Proposed West/ Existing West/ Proposed Categories Central County East County Central County East County Single-Family Detached$2,000 $1,350 $4,489 $3,142 Townhomes $2,000 $1,350 $3,571 $2,499 Multi-Family Unit $2,004 $1,354 $3,233 $2,263 Mobile Home $2,000 $1,350 $3,014 $2,109 The proposed Park Impact Fee ordinance provides for the adoption of fees to be used for the acquisition of parkland and development of parks and recreation facilities required to serve new resi all,@IQPAC*4 areas of Contra Costa County. Currently,the County does not assess a park ' pac fe . T - prop s Ojliiirk mg t Fees are: West/ Categories Central County East County Single-Family Detached$7,238 $5,891 APR 0 4 2.007 Townhomes $5,757 $4,686 � COUN I YCLERK Multi-Family Unit $5,213 $4,243 � N.�.,� Mobile Home $4,859 $3,955 1 TA Second Units $2,419 $1,969 1 BY t� -DEPUTY The proposed Contra Costa County :Parks Capital Improvement Plan outlines park and recreational facility improvements needed in order to provide park and recreational services to the growing communities in the unincorporated areas of the County which will be partially financed with the funds collected from the Park Impact Fee. Office Hours Monday - Friday:8:00 a.m.- 5:00 p.m. Office is closed the 1 st, 3rd &5th Fridays of each month y No potentially significant environmental impacts have been identified in the initial study. A copy of the Negative Declaration and all documents referenced in the Negative Declaration may be reviewed in the offices of the Community Development Department,at McBrien Administration Building,651 Pine Street,4`h Floor,North Wing; or Community-Development Department,Redevelopment Division,at 2530 Arnold Drive,Suite 190,Martinez,during normal business hours. Public Comment Period-The period for accepting comments on the adequacy of the environmental documents starts on April 4,2007 and ends at 5:00 p.m.,Monday,April 23,2007. Any comments should be in writing and submitted to the following address: Contra Costa County Community Development Department 2530 Arnold Drive, Suite 190. Martinez, CA 94553 rcalk@cd.cccounty.us Atm: Robert T.Calkins,Principal Planner It is anticipated that the proposed Negative Declaration will be considered for adoption at a meeting of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors tentatively set for Tuesday,May 1,2007. The meeting is anticipated to be held at 1:00 p.m. at the Board of Supervisor's Chambers at 651 Pine Street,Martinez, CA. It is expected that the Board of Supervisors will also conduct hearings on the proposed Ordinances and the CIP at the same meeting. Interested. 'es may contact staff at the above number to confirm the time and date of the hearing. r 130 lkins Principal Planner Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: a. Adoption of Ordinance No. 2007-19, amending the County's Park Dedication Ordinance (Division 920 of the County Ordinance Code) b. Adoption of Ordinance No. 2007-17, establishing a Park Impact Fee C. Adoption of Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: Contra Costa County Community Development Department 2530 Arnold Drive, Suite 190 Martinez, CA 94553 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Robert T.Calkins (925)335-7220 4. Project Location: Unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Contra Costa County Community Development Department 2530 Arnold Drive, Suite 190 Martinez, CA 94553 6. General Plan Designation: Countywide 7. Zoning: Countywide 8. Description of Project: The proposed amendments to the Park Dedication Ordinance include:increasing the land dedication requirements;increasing theamount of fees required in lieu of land dedication;and providing a waiver of dedication and fee requirements for specified affordable housing developments. The proposed Park Impact Fee Ordinance provides for the adoption of fees to be used for the acquisition of parkland and development of parks and recreation facilities required to serve new residential development in unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County. Currently,the County does not assess a park impact fee. The proposed Contra.Costa,County Parks Capital Improvement Plan (Parks CIP)outlines park and recreational facility improvements needed in order to provide park and recreational services to the growing communities in the unincorporated areas of the County and which will be partially financed with the funds collected from the Park Impact Fee. The Parks CIP is divided into the following four categories: a. Construction ofnew parks(Appendix A improvements I —1.4),and new community use and support facilities(Appendix A improvements 45—50). b. Improvements to existing parks (Appendix A improvements 15 — 37). The Parks CIP proposes to add additional lighting at three parks where lighting already exists(Appendix A 1 improvements 15,22 and 23).Any new lighting or improvements to exiting light fixtures will ensure that these fixtures do not create glare and shine onto adjacent properties. During construction of each of the proposed improvements,applicable storm water runoff restrictions of Contra Costa County will be observed. All proposed restrooms and drinking fountains will comply with environmental health requirements and/or applicable public sanitation requirements. C. Improvements to parks on school property(Appendix A improvements 38—44). None of the anticipated improvements are generators of emissions that could negatively impact human health or the environment,nor would they generate sufficient vehicular traffic to indirectly constitute a significant secondary effect. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Countywide (various including residential) l 0. Other public agencies whose approval is required(e.g.,permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): School Districts:San Ramon Valley,John Swett,Richmond, Cities of Danville and Walnut Creek 2 li ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked bel°bw would be potentially affected by this project,involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning Transportation/ _ Public Services Population&Housing Circulation _ Utilities & Service Geological Problems _ Biological Resources Systems Water Energy & Mineral _ Aesthetics Air Quality Resources _ Cultural Resources Mandatory Findings of Hazards Recreation Significance 7 Noise ✓ No new Potentially: Significant Impacts Identified i 3 DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ✓ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on anattached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s)on the environment,but at least one effect(1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets,if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. _ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed u on a proposed r 'ect. . April 3, 2007 Signature Date Robert T. Calkins CCC Community Development Department Prepared By For ignature Approved By 4 SOURCES In the process of preparing the Checklist and conducting the evaluation,the following references (which are available for review at the Contra Costa County Community Development Department, 651 Pine Street 5th Floor-North Wing,Martinez)were consulted: 4 • The County General Plan(2005-2020)and EIR on the General Plan • Countywide General Pian andZoning Maps • Draft Park Impact Fees Nexus Study prepared by SCI Consulting Inc.,dated February 2007 • Draft Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan prepared by the Contra Costa County Parks, Creeks and Trails Committee, dated January 2007. • Draft ordinance amending the'County's Park Dedication Ordinance • Draft Park Impact Fee ordinance • Appendix A—Summary of Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Potentially significant Impact, Potentially Unless Less than significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact I. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic ✓ vista?(Source 1-4) b. Substantially damage scenic resources, ✓ including, but not' limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Source 1-4) C. Substantially degrade the existing visual ✓ _ character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Source 1-4) d. Create a new source of substantial light or ✓_ glare which would. adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?(Source 1-4) SUMMARY(a-d): Amendment of Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption: Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting the Park Impact Fee Ordinance will not result in any impacts to aesthetic resources because the ordinances propose primarily raising the current park in lieu fee and adding a new park impact fee. The environmental impacts of the proposed improvements to be financed with the proposed fees are analyzed under the"Adoption of Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan" below. 5 Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks.Capital Improvement Plan: a Construction of New Parks;Community Centers and Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15145 of the CEQA Guidelines,because specific sites have not yet been identified for new parks and community use and support facilities, an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the proposed improvements cannot be completed. Further environmental CEQA analysis will be performed once specific locations are identified to determine if there are any impacts to aesthetic resources resulting from the development of specific improvements. Improvements to Existing Parks: The proposed improvements to existing parks will have a less than significant impact on the aesthetics of the parks and surrounding properties. Generally, the proposed improvements include installing the following: new playground structures,picnic facilities,restrooms, paths and walkways(access improvements)and landscaping, and irrigation and correcting drainage problems. New and upgraded lighting is proposed to be installed only at Lefty Gomez, Hickory Meadows, and Andrew Young parks,where lighting already exists(see Appendix A improvements 23,22, and 15). These lights will be designed and installed so as to not create any additional impacts on surrounding neighborhoods. Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements at existing schools where the County has a joint.use agreement with the School District generally include improving the existing sport field(s) and constructing restroom facilities. Improvements to school parks must be approved by the applicable School District. These improvements will have less than a significant impact on the aesthetics of these areas because no new lighting is proposed. Potentially significant Impact, Potentially Unless Less than significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Il. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model(1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use.in assessing impacts on agricultural and farmland. Would the project: a. Convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland or ✓ Farmland or Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? (Source 1-4) 6 b. Conflict with existin&zoning for agricultural ✓ use,or a Williamson Act contract?(Source 1- 4) C. Involve other changes in the existing ✓ environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland,to non-agricultural use?(Source I- 4) SUMMARY fa-c): Amendment of Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption: Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting the Park Impact Fee Ordinance will not result in any impacts to agricultural resources because the ordinances propose primarily raising the current park in lieu fee and adding a new park impact fee. The environmental impacts of the proposed improvements to be financed with the proposed fees are analyzed under the"Adoption of Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan"below. Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Construction New Parks,Community Centers and Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15145 of the CEQA Guidelines,because specific sites have not yet been identified for new parks, and community use and support facilities, an assessment of the potential environmental impact of the specific improvements will be performed at a;later date.Further CEQA analysis will be performed once specific locations are identified to determine if there are any impacts to agricultural resources resulting from the development of specific improvements. Improvements to Existing Parks: ,The proposed improvements to existing parks will have less than significant impacts on the agricultural resources of the specific site and surrounding properties because none of the parks are located on agricultural or farmland. The improvements instead will enhance existing recreational resources. Generally,the proposed improvements include installing the following: new playground structures,picnic facilities,restrooms,paths and walkways(access improvements), landscaping, irrigation and correcting drainage problems. Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements at existing schools where the County has a joint use agreement with the School District generally include improving the existing sport field(s)and constructing restroom facilities. The proposed improvements must be approved by the applicable School District. These improvements will not impact any agricultural resources. The parks within this category are already developed and not located on any agricultural or farmland and therefore no changes in land use and no impacts on agricultural resources are expected. 7 Potentially significant Impact, Potentially Unless Less than significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ✓ applicable air quality plan(Source: 1-4) b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute to _ ✓ an existing or projected air quality violation? (Source 1-4) C. Result in a cumulatively considerable net ✓ increase of any criteria pollutant for which.the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (Source 1-4) d. Expose sensitive .receptors to substantial ✓, pollutant concentrations?(Source 1-4) e. Create objectionable odors affecting a _ ✓ substantial number of people? (Source 1-4) SUMMARY(a-e): Amendment of Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption: Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting the Park Impact Fee Ordinance will not result in any impacts to air quality because the ordinances propose primarily raising the current park in lieu fee and adding a new,park impact fee. The environmental impacts of the proposed improvements to be financed with the proposed fees are analyzed under the"Adoption of Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan"below. Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Construction of New Parks, Community Centers and Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15145 of the CEQA Guidelines,because specific sites have not yet been identified for new parks, and new community use and support facilities, an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the specific improvements will be performed at a later date. Further CEQA analysis will be performed once specific locations are identified to determine if there are any impacts to air quality resources resulting from the development of specific improvements. 8 Improvements to Existing Parks: The proposed improvements to existing parks will have less than significant impacts on the air quality of the areas. Generally,the proposed improvements include installing the following: new playground structures,picnic facilities,restrooms, paths and walkways (access improvements),landscaping, correcting irrigation and drainage problems. The proposed improvements are expected to encourage more neighborhood residents to use local recreational facilities instead of driving to other resources. None of the proposed improvements will negatively impact the air quality of the area because none of the anticipated improvements are generators of emissions which could negatively impact human health or the environment, nor'''would they generate sufficient vehicular traffic to indirectly constitute a significant secondary effect. Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements at existing schools where the County has a joint use agreement with the School District generally include improving the existing.sport field(s)and construction of restroom facilities. The proposed improvements must be approved by the applicable School District. These proposed improvements will not impact the air quality of the area because they will not conflict with any air quality plan or create objectionable odors and none of the anticipated improvements are generators of emissions which could negatively impact human health or the environment,nor would they generate sufficient vehicular traffic to indirectly constitute a significant secondary effect. Potentially significant Impact, Potentially Unless Less than significant Mitigation Significant IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact a. Have a substantiat adverse effect, either ✓ directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate,sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, polices, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service?(Source 1-4) b. Have a substantial; adverse effect on any ✓_ riparian habitat or, other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,policies,regulations or by the California Department of Fish Fand Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?(Source 1-4) C. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ✓ protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption,or other means?(Source 1-4) d. Interfere substantially with the movement of ✓_ any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species Or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or 9 impede the use of native.wildlife nursery sites? (Source 1-4) e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ✓ protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance? (Source 1- 4) SUMMARY Jane): Amendment of Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption: Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting the Park Impact Fee Ordinance will not result in any impacts to biological resources because the ordinances-propose primarily raising the current park in lieu fee and adding a new park impact fee. The environmental impacts of the proposed improvements to be financed with the proposed fees are analyzed under the"Adoption of Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan"below. Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Construction of New Parks,Community Centers,and Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15145 of the CEQA Guidelines,because specific sites have not yet been identified for new parks,and new community use and support facilities an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the specific projects will be performed at a later date. Further CEQA analysis will be performed once a specific location is identified to determine if there are any impacts to biological resources resulting from the development of a specific project. Improvements to Existing Parks: The proposed improvements to existing parks will have no or less than significant impacts on biological resources of the sites and surrounding properties because the parks are not currently located in any riparian habitat or sensitive natural community. Generally,the proposed improvements include installing the following: new playground structures,picnic facilities,restrooms, paths and walkways(access improvements), landscaping,and correcting irrigation and drainage problems. The improvements will enhance existing recreational resources and not conflict with any local policy or ordinance protecting biological resources, including tree preservation ordinances. Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements at existing schools where the County has a joint use agreement with the School District generally include improving the existing sport fleld(s)and construction of restroom facilities, and must be approved by the applicable School District. These proposed improvements will enhance existing recreational resources and not conflict with any local policy or ordinance protecting biological resources, including tree preservation ordinances, and because they are not located in any riparian habitat or sensitive natural community are not anticipated to have any adverse impacts on biological resources. 10 Potentially significant Impact, Potentially Unless Less than significant Mitigation significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES.`Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the ✓ significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? (Source 1-4) b. Cause a substantial ,adverse change in the !+r significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to§15064.5?(Source 1-1) C. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique ✓ paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?(Source 1-4) d. Disturb any human remains, including those ✓ interred outside of formal cemeteries? (Source 1-4) SUMMARY(a-d): Amendment of Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption: Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting the Park Impact Fee Ordinance will not result in any impacts to cultural resources because the ordinances propose primarily raising the current park in lieu fee and adding a new park impact fee. The environmental impacts of the proposed improvements to be financed with the proposed fees are analyzed under the"Adoption of Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan" below. Adoption of the Contra Costa Couniv Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Construction of New Parks,Community Centers and Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15145 of the.CEQA Guidelines,because specific sites have not yet been identified for new parks, and new community use and support facilities, an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the specific .improvements will be performed at a later date. Further CEQA analysis will be performed once a specific location is identified to determine ifthere are any impacts to cultural resources resulting from the development of specific improvements. Improvements to Existing Parks: Generally,the proposed improvements include installing the following: new playground structures,picnic facilities,restrooms,paths and walkways(access improvements), landscaping,and correcting irrigation and drainage problems. The improvements as proposed are not anticipated to disturb any human remains or cause a substantial adverse change in historical or archaelogical resources. However, during construction if any significant cultural materials such as artifacts,human burials or the like are encountered during construction operations, such operations shall cease within 20 feet of the find,the County shall be notified within 24 hours and a qualified archaeologist contacted and retained for further recommendations. 11 Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements at existing schools where the County has a joint use agreement with the School District generally include improving the existing sport field(s) and construction of restroom facilities,must be approved by the applicable School District and will comply with the State guidelines. The improvements as proposed are not anticipated to disturb any human remains or cause a substantial.adverse change in historical or archaelogical resources. However, during construction if any significant cultural materials such as artifacts,human burials or the like are encountered during construction operations, such operations shall cease within 20 feet of the find,the appropriate officials shall be notified within.24 hours and a qualified archaeologist contacted and retained for further recommendations. Potentially significant Impact, Potentially Unless Less than a significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated . Impact No Impact VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -Would the project? a. Expose people or structures to potential ✓ substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. (Source 1-4) 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? (Source 1-4) 3. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?(Source 1-4) 4. Landslides?(Source 1-4) b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of _ ✓ topsoil? (Source 1--4) C. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is ✓_ unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,liquefaction or collapse? (Source 1-4) d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in ✓ Table 18-1-B of.the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (Source 1-4) e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting ✓ 12 the.use of septic tanks or alternative waste disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? . (Source 1-4) SUMMARY fa-e): Amendment of Park.Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting the Park Impact Fee Ordinance will not result in any impacts to geology and soils because the ordinances propose primarily raising the current park in lieu fee and adding a new park impact fee. The environmental impacts of the proposed improvements to be financed with the proposed fees are analyzed under the`,`Adoption of Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan" below. Adoption of the Contra Costa Count;Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Construction of New.Parks,Community Centers and Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15145 of the CEQA Guidelines,because specific sites have not yet been identified for new parks,and community use and support facilities,an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the specific improvements will be performed at alater date. Further CEQA analysis will be performed once a specific location is identified to determine if there are any impacts to geologic or soil resources resulting from the development of specific improvements. Improvements to Existing Parks: The proposed improvements to existing parks will have no or less than significant impacts on geology or soils of the area. Generally,the proposed improvements include installing the following: new playground structures,picnic facilities,restrooms,paths and walkways (access improvements), landscaping,i and correcting irrigation and drainage problems. In fact,the proposed improvements include correcting drainage issues and soil erosion problems at many of the parks. New restrooms will be designed/constructed in a manner to meet current Uniform Building Code requirements, which will lessen the potential for these structures to be impacted by earthquakes or other geologic events. Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements at existing schools where the County has a joint use agreement with the School District generally include improving the existing sport field(s)and construction of restroom facilities,and must be approved by the applicable School District. New construction will meet the standards set forth by the State Architect and therefore not create substantial risk to life or property,and therefore no impact is anticipated. Potentially significant Impact, Potentially Unless Less than significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS- Would the project: a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the ✓_ _ environment through the routine transport, 13 use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Source 1--4) b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the _ ✓ environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?(Source 1-4) C. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous ✓ or acutely hazardous materials,substances,or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?(Source 1-4) d. Be located on a site which is included on a ✓_ list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government code Section . 65862.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Source 1-4) e. For a project located within an airport land use ✓_ plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted; within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. f. For a project within the vicinity of a private ✓ airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g.. Impair implementation of or physically ✓ interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Source 1-4) h. Expose people or structures 'to a significant ✓_ risk of loss,injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (Source 1-4) SUMMARY(a-h): Amendment of Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption: Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting the Park Impact Fee Ordinance will not create any hazards or expose people to hazardous materials because the ordinances propose primarily raising the current park in lieu fee . and adding a new park impact fee. The environmental impacts of the proposed improvements to be financed with the proposed fees are analyzed under the"Adoption of Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan"below. 14 Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Construction of New Parks,Community Centers.and Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15145 of the CEQA Guidelines,because specific sites have not yet been identified for new parks, and new community use and support facilities, an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the specific improvements will be performed at a later date. Further CEQA analysis will be performed once a specific location is identified to determine if there are any impacts to people from hazards or hazardous materials resulting from the development of specific improvements. Improvements to Existing Parks: The proposed improvements to existing parks will not expose users to hazardous materials, create a significant hazard, interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or result in the emission of hazardous materials, accordingly no impact is anticipated. Generally,the proposed improvements include installing-the fallowing: new playground structures,picnic facilities,restrooms, paths and walkways(access improvements), landscaping,and correcting irrigation and drainage problems. Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements at existing schools where the County has a joint use agreement with the School District generally include improving the existing sport field(s)and construction of restroom facilities. These improvements must be approved by the applicable School District. Because none of the proposed improvements will expose users to hazardous materials, create a significant hazard,or interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or result in the emission of hazardous materials,no impact is anticipated. Potentially significant Impact, Potentially Unless Less than significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY- Would the project: a. Violate any water quality standards or waste ✓ discharge requirements?(Source 1-4) b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ✓_ interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? (Source 1-4) C. Substantially alter; the existing drainage ✓ pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site?(Source I- 4) d. Substantially alter the existing drainage ✓_ 15 pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site?(Source 1-4) e. Create or contribute runoff water which would ✓ exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoM. (Source 1-4) f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ✓ (Source 1--4) g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard ✓ area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Source 1-4) h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area ✓ structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Source 1-4) i. Expose people or structures to a significant ✓ risk of loss,injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? (Source 1-4) j. Inundation by seethe, tsunami, or mudflow? ✓ (Source 1-4) SUMMARY(a-D: Amendment of Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption: Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting the Park Impact Fee Ordinance will not result in any impacts to hydrology and water quality because the ordinances propose primarily raising the current park in lieu fee and adding a new park impact fee. The environmental impacts of the proposed improvements to be financed with the proposed fees are analyzed under the"Adoption of Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan"below. Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Construction of New Parks,Community Centers and Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15445 of the CEQA Guidelines,because specific sites have not yet been identified for new parks, and new community use and support facilities, an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the specific improvements will be performed at a later date. Further environmental CEQA analysis will be performed once a specific location is identified to determine if there are any impacts to hydrology or water-quality resulting from the development of specific improvements. 16 Improvements to Existing Parks: The proposed improvements to existing parks will not impact the quality of the hydrology or water quality of the area. Generally,the proposed improvements include installing the following: new playground structures,picnic facilities,restrooms,paths and walkways (access improvements),landscaping,and correcting irrigation and drainage problems.Proposed improvements to the drainage pattern and infrastructure at several parks will actually improve the drainage patterns.None of the existing parks expose users to risk related to flooding, according to the Contra Costa County Public Works Flood Rate Insurance maps.New restrooms will meet applicable building codes related to waste water discharge. Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements at existing schools where the County has a joint use agreement with the School District generally include improving the existing sport field(s)and construction of restroom facilities. These improvements must be approved by the applicable School District. New restrooms will meet applicable building codes related to waste water discharge,and therefore no impacts to hydrology or water quality are anticipated. Potentially significant Impact,' Potentially Unless Less than significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: . No Impact a. Physically divide an established community? ✓ (Source 1-4) b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, %/ policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Source 1-4) C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan?.{Source 1-4) SUMMARY (a-c1: Amendment of Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption: Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting;the Park Impact Fee Ordinance will not result in any impacts to land use or planning. Currently,the County Ordinance Code and requires developers of new residential property to pay park dedication fees or dedicate land for park purposes. Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adoptingla Park Impact Fee Ordinance will not conflict with any applicable land use policy or regulation and is consistent with State law. 17 Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Construction of New Parks,Community Centers and Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15145 of the CEQA Guidelines,because specific sites have not yet been identified for new parks, and new community use and support facilities,an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the specific improvements will be performed at.a later date. Further CEQA analysis will be performed once a specific location is identified to determine if there are any impacts to land use or planning resources resulting from the development of specific improvements. Improvements to Existing Parks: The proposed improvements to existing parks will not conflict with any applicable land use plan. Generally,the proposed improvements include installing the following: new playground structures,picnic facilities,restrooms,paths and walkways(access improvements), landscaping,and correcting irrigation and drainage problems. The proposed improvements are consistent with the current land use designations and will not alter the,use of the property,physically divide an established community or conflict with a habitat conservation plan. Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements at existing schools where the County has a joint use agreement with the School District generally include improving the existing sport field(s)and construction of restroom facilities. These improvements must be approved by the applicable School District and therefore will not conflict with State law. The proposed improvements are consistent with the current land use designations and will not alter the use of the property,physically divide an established community or conflict with a habitat conservation plan. Potentially significant Impact, Potentially Unless Less than significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact X. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Result in the loss of availability of a known ✓_ mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Source 1-4) b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally- _ ✓ important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Source 1-4) SUMMARY (a-b): Amendment of Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption: Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting the Park Impact Fee Ordinance will not result in any impacts to mineral resources because the ordinances propose primarily raising the current park in lieu fee and adding a new park impact fee. The environmental impacts.of the proposed improvements to be financed with the proposed fees are analyzed under the"Adoption of Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan below. 18 Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Construction of New Parks,Commi.inity Centers and Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15145 of the CEQA Guidelines,because specific sites have not yet been identified for new parks,and new community use and support facilities, an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the specific improvements will be performed at a later date. Further environmental CEQA analysis will be performed once a specific location is identified to determine if there are any impacts to mineral resources resulting from the development of specific improvements Improvements to Existing Parks: The proposed improvements to existing parks will not result in the loss of any mineral resources because,no known mineral resources currently exist on any of the sites, according to the County General Plan.'Generally,the proposed improvements include installing the following:, new playground structures',picnic facilities,restroorns,paths and walkways(access improvements),landscaping,and correcting irrigation and drainage problems. Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements at existing schools where the County has ajoint use agreement with the School District generally include improving the existing sport field(s)and construction of restroom facilities. These improvements must be approved by the applicable School District and will be coordinated with the State to ensure compliance with applicable State regulations. The proposed improvem'ents will not result in the loss of any mineral resources because no known mineral resources currently exist on any of the sites, according to the County General Plan. Potentially Potentially significant Impact, Less than significant Unless Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated impact impact XI. NOISE. Would the project create: a. Exposure of persons to; or generation of ✓ noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable'standards of other agencies?(Source 1-4) b. Exposure of,persons to or generation of ✓ excessive ground home vibration or ground borne noise levels? (Source 1-4) c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient ✓ noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?(Source 1-4) d, A substantial temporary or periodic increase ✓ in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?(Sourced-4) t. e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where sucKa plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use :airport, would the project expose people residing, or working 19 in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? SUMMARY(a-fl: Amendment of Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption: Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting the Park Impact Fee Ordinance will not result in any noise impacts because the ordinances propose primarily raising the current park in lieu fee and adding a new park impact fee. The environmental impacts of the proposed improvements to be financed with the proposed fees are analyzed under.the"Adoption of Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan"below. Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Construction of New Parks, Community Centers and Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15145 of the CEQA guidelines,because specific sites have not yet been identified for new parks, and new community use and support facilities, an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the specific improvements will be performed at a later date.Further CEQA analysis will be performed once a specific location is identified to determine if there are any impacts to noise quality resulting from the development of specific improvements. Improvements to Existing Parks: Generally,the proposed improvements to existing parks include installing the following: new playground structures,picnic facilities,restrooms,paths and walkways (access improvements), landscaping, irrigation and correcting drainage problems.It is expected that the proposed improvements may result in more users of the park thereby increasing noise but this increase is consistent with the purpose of the recreational site and is considered temporary in nature and therefore considered a less than significant impact. Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements at existing schools where the County has a joint use agreement with the School District generally include improving the existing sport field(s)and construction of restroom facilities. These improvements must be approved by the applicable School.District. The proposed improvements will enhance existing facilities, and therefore it is anticipated that the improvements will not create a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise level in the area. r . 20 1 Potentially significant Impact, Potentially Unless Less than significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING— Would the project: a. Induce substantial population growth in an ✓ area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly(for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?(Source 1-4) b. Displace substantiate numbers of existing _ ✓ housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?(Source 1-4) C. Displace substantial numbers of people ✓ necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?(Source 1-4) SUMMARY(a-c): Amendment of Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption: Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting the Park Impact Fee Ordinance will not result in any impacts to population growth and the need for housing because the ordinances propose primarily raising the current park in lieu fee and adding a new park impact fee. The environmental impacts of the proposed improvements to be financed with the proposed fees are analyzed under the"Adoption of Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan"below. Adoption of the Contra Costa Countv Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Construction of New Parks,Community Centers and Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15145 of the CEQA guidelines,because specific sites have not yet been identified for new parks, and new community use and support facilities; an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the specific improvements will be performed at a later date. Further environmental CEQA analysis will be performed once a specific location is identified to determine if there are any impacts to the population or the need for housing resulting from the development of specific improvements. Improvements to Existing Parks: The proposed improvements to existing parks will not induce substantial population growth, or displace people necessitating the construction of replacement housing. Generally,the proposed improvements include installing the following: new playground structures,picnic facilities,restrooms,paths and walkways(access improvements), landscaping, and correcting irrigation and drainage problems. Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements,which must be approved by the applicable School District, generally include improving the existing sport.field(s)and construction of restroom facilities. Because the proposed improvements at the schools will not induce substantial population growth, or displace people necessitating the construction of replacement housing,no impact is anticipated. 21 Potentially significant Impact, Potentially Unless Less than significant Mitigation . Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES -Would the project: a. Would the project result in substantial ✓ adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts; in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 1. Fire Protection? 2. Police Protection? 3. Schools? 4. Parks? 5. Other Public facilities? (Source 1-4) SUMMARY: Amendment of Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption: Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting the Park Impact Fee Ordinance will not result in any impacts to public services because the ordinances propose primarily raising the current park in lieu fee and adding a new park impact fee. The environmental impacts of the proposed improvements to be financed with the proposed fees are analyzed under the"Adoption of Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan" below. Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Construction of New Parks,Community Centers and.Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15145 of the CEQA guidelines, because specific sites have not yet been identified for new parks, and new community use and support facilities,an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the specific projects will be performed at a later date. Further CEQA analysis will be performed once a specific location is-identified to determine if there are any impacts to public service resources resulting from the development of specific improvements. Improvements to Existing Parks: The proposed improvements to existing parks will improve the quality of the recreational facilities and may result in a higher level of use. However,the parks are currently being served by the Sheriff's Department and County fire districts and this slight increase in use will not create an adverse impact that would result in the need for new governmental services. Generally,the proposed improvements include installing the following: new playground structures, picnic facilities,restrooms, paths and walkways(access improvements), landscaping, irrigation and correcting drainage problems. 22 Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements at existing schools where the County has ajoint use agreement withilthe School District generally include improving the existing sport field(s)and construction of restroom fLilities. The proposed improvements must be approved by the applicable School District. The improvements will improve the quality of the recreational facilities and may result in a higher level of use. However the parks are currently being served by the Sheriff's Department and County fire districts and this slight increase in use will not create an adverse physical impact resulting in the need for new governmental services.. Potentially significant impact, Potentially Unless Less than significant Mitigation Significant XIV. RECREATION- Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?(Source 1-4) b. Does the project include recreational facilities V/ or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Source 1-4) SUMMARY(a-b): Amendment of Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption: Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting the Park Impact Fee Ordinance will provide the County with a comprehensive park fee program to increase the park acreage with the County and improve existing parks. Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Construction of New Parks,Community Centers and Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15145 of the CEQA guidelines, because specific sites have not yet been identified for new parks, and new community use and support facilities, an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the specific improvements will be performed at a later date. Further CEQA analysis will be performed once a specific location is identified to determine if there are any impacts to recreation resources resulting from the development of specific improvements. . Improvements to Existing Parks:,The proposedimprovements to existing.parks may result in a slight increase in the number of people using the existing parks but not to a point where there will be significant adverse impact on the physical condition of the parks and their infrastructure. No physical expansion (additional land)is Proposed aspart]of these improvements. Generally,the proposed improvements include installing the following: new playground structures,picnic facilities,restrooms,paths and walkways(access improvements), I andscaping, irrigation and correcting drainage problems. 33 Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements at existing schools where the County has a joint use agreement with the School District generally include improving the existing sport field(s)and construction of restroom facilities. All of the proposed improvements will be contained within the existing boundaries of the subject school and may result in a slight increase in the number of people using the park facilities,but not to a point where there will be significant adverse impact on the physical condition of the parks and their infrastructure. Potentially significant Impact, Potentially Unless Less than significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XIV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project: a. Cause an increase in traffic which is ✓_ substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and,capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (Source 1-4) b. Exceed,either individually or cumulatively,a _ ✓ _ level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?(Source 1-4) C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, ✓ including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks?(Source 1-4) d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design ✓ feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? (Source 1-4) e. Result in inadequate emergency access? ✓ f Result in inadequate parking capacity? ✓ g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or ✓ programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g.,bus turnouts,bicycle racks)?(Source I- 4) SUMMARY (a-p,) : Amendment of Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption: Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting the Park Impact Fee Ordinance will not result in any impacts to transportation/traffic because the ordinances propose primarily raising the current park in lieu fee and adding a new park impact fee. The environmental impacts of the proposed improvements to be financed 24 with the proposed fees are analyzed under the"Adoption of Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan"below. Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Construction of New Parks,Community Centers and Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15145 of the CEQA Guidelines,because specific sites have not yet been identified for new parks, and new community use and support facilities,an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the specific improvements will be performed at a later date. Further CEQA analysis will be performed once a specific location is identified to determine if there are any impacts to transportation or traffic resulting from the development of specific improvements. Improvements to Existing Parks: The proposed improvements to existing parks may create additional local users of the facilities,but will nat cause traffic to exceed the service standards established by the County or have a significant impact of traffic patterns. Generally,the proposed improvements include installing the following: new playground structures,picnic facilities,restrooms,paths and walkways (access improvements), landscaping, irrigation and correcting drainage problems.Access through the parks will be enhanced by new walkways and pathways. Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements at existing schools where the County has a joint use agreement with the School District generally include improving the existing sport field(s)and construction of restroom facilities. The proposed improvements must be approved by the applicable School District. No new sport fields are proposed so additional traffic to the sites is not expected and no new parking areas are proposed. The proposed improvements may result in a slight increase in local users of the facilities,but will not result in a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips or cause traffic to exceed the service standards established by the County. Potentially significant Impact, Potentially Unless Less than significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS-Would the project: a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of ✓ the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (Source 1-4) b. Require or result in«the construction of new ✓ water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of ekisting facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Source 1-4) C. Require or result iri the construction of new ✓ storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Source 1-4) d. Have sufficient water supplies available to ✓ 25 serve the project from existing entitlement and resources, or are new or expanded entitlement needed?(Source 1-4) e.i Result in a determination by the wastewater ✓ treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to .serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments?(Source 1-4) f Be served by a landfill with .sufficient ✓ permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?(Source 1-4) g. Comply with federal, state and local statutes ✓ and regulations related to solid waste?(Source 1-4) SUMMARY(agl: Amendment of Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption: Amending the'Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting the Park Impact Fee Ordinance will not result in anyimpacts to utilities and service systems because the ordinances propose primarily raising the current park in lieu fee and adding a new park impact fee. The environmental impacts of the proposed improvements to be financed with the proposed fees are analyzed under the"Adoption of Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan"below. Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Construction of New Parks, Community Centers and Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15145 of the CEQA Guidelines,because specific sites have not yevbeen identified for new parks, and new community use and support facilities, an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the specific improvements will be.performed at a later date.Further CEQA analysis will be performed once a specific location is identified to determine if there are any impacts to utilities and service systems resulting from the development of specific improvements. Improvements to Existing Parks: The proposed improvements(particularly the construction of new restroom facilities)to existing parks may require additional utilities and service lines to be brought to the sites.Because these existing parks are currently being served by the applicable water and sanitary sewer districts,the proposed improvements will not have a significant impact on the environment. Generally,the proposed improvements include installing the following: new playground structures,picnic facilities, restrooms,paths and walkways(access improvements), landscaping and irrigation and correcting drainage problems. Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements at existing schools where the County has a joint use agreement with the School District generally include improving the existing sport field(s)and construction of restroom facilities. The proposed improvements must be approved by the applicable School District. Because these existing parks are currently being served by the applicable water and sanitary sewer districts,the proposed improvements will not have a significant impact on the environment. 26 Potentially significant Impact, Potentially Unless Less than significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XVI MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE- I. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade ✓ the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish and wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?(Source 1-4) b. Does the project have impacts that are ✓ individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? (Source 1-4) C. Does the project have environmental effects ✓ which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? (Source 1-4) SUMMARY(a-c): Amendment of Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Impact Fee Ordinance Adoption: Amending the Park Dedication Ordinance and adopting the Park Impact Fee Ordinance do not have the potential to degrade the environment,affect fish or wildlife habitat,threaten or eliminate a plant or animal community,or result in significant impacts to cultural resources because the ordinances propose primarily raising the current park in lieu fee and adding a new park impact fee. H:\CDBG\Park Dedication Trust Fund\Draft Initial Study.doc 27 Adoution of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Construction of New Parks,Community Centers and Support Facilities: Pursuant to Section 15145 of the CEQA Guidelines,because specific sites have not yet been identified for new parks,and new community use and support facilities, an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the specific projects will be performed at a later date. Further CEQA analysis will be performed once a specific location is identified to determine if there are any significant environmental impacts to resulting from the development of specific improvements. Improvements to Existing.Parks: The proposed improvements will enhance the quality of existing parks, are consistent with the County's General Plan, are not located near existing fish and wildlife habitats or threaten or eliminate endangered plant or animals. Therefore, no substantial adverse effects are anticipated. Improvements to Parks on School Property: The proposed improvements at existing schools where the County has a joint use agreement with the School District will enhance the quality of existing parks, are not located near existing fish and wildlife habitats or threaten or eliminate endangered plant or animals. Therefore,no substantial adverse effects are anticipated and the improvements will not result in cumulative impacts. 28 I m E2 0 C')w a) > m < m < -D z Ln p M CD w 0 0 0 ml �< w w w 0 CD CD ox CD CD rL o :r 0 .10 cr 0 M 0 A 0 0 0 o -u E; w Q w C, 0 -V 2. a m p 0 17 lo C3 @ CD < ;71 0 > w g o Pr m T (-D. fu RL m 'o C) =r m 90 w RL -3 m m . 0 M = En 0 m ;,L 0 0 0 CD :3 fn 0 R- C) :mo m 0 ma B 0 —in "D ID CL Zr M o 0 0 M Q ID M CD C,) Z 5L 0 cn R , -0 ID m = = 0 0 0 4� a, < co 0 A 5L E; m o m 42 RL B C) cn 0 a EL m CD CL m C3 a m 0 R (D 0. 0 z m o. x cr E-L w 0— R 0 0 0 m CD -< ZZZZZZZZ z Z .z z C 01, 0* 0) x x 9 x x x x x x x x k 0 x x x x x x x x x x x x 0 0 rt X x x x x x x x x x x x x x 7;7 fA C) pis w x x x x x x x x x O sap CD CD Cyj x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x XIX x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x . . . x x x x x x x ;pal x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x ollCD x x x x x x x x x AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION (NOTICE) PROJECT: • Adoption of Ordinance NO. 2007-19, amending the County's Park Dedication Ordinance (Division 920 of the County Ordinance Code) • Adoption of Ordinance No. 2007-17, establishing a Park Impact Fee • Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan DATE NOTICED MAILED: April 3, 2007 I do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the referenced Notice was mailed to the addresses on the attached list. Robert T. Calkins I do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the referenced Notice was mailed to the addresses on the attached list. P Danielle Kelly 0.3/21/2007 14:28 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLERK OR THE 57201 P!(3. 188 D01_ 1 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONTRA COSTA CO. LIBRARY COUNTYADMINISTRATOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S OFFICE SUSAN CALDWELL 651 PINE STREET 625 COURT STRF..ET 1750 OAK PARK BLVD MARTINEZ,CA 94553 MARTINEZ, CA 94553 PLEASANT KILL, CA 94523 CONTRA COSTA FIRE DISTRICT CROCKETT CARQU.INEZ EAST CONTRA COSTA FIRE MIKE GEORGE FIRE, DISTRICT 134, OAK STREET 2010 GEARY ROAD 746 LORING AVENUE BRENTWOOD. CA.94513 PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 CROCKETT, CA 94525 CONTRA COSTA-PUBLIC WORKS CCC FLOOD CONTROL_AND CONTRA COSTA.CO. SHERIFF MISCELLANEOUS SPEC. DISTRICTS WATERCONSE-RVATTON DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE SVCS—FINANCE 255 GLACIER DRIVE 255 GLACIER DRIVE 651 PINE STREET 7'11 FLOOR MARTINEZ. CA 94553 NIARTINLZ, CA 94553 MARTINEZ_, CA 94553 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SAN RAMON VALLEY FIRE KENSINGTON .FIRE DISTRICT WATER AGENCY PROTECTION 217 ARLINGTON AVENUE 651 PINE STREET NORTH WING 1500 BOLI_INGER CANYON ROAD . K,f_NSINI GTON, CA 94707 MARTIIvfiEZ,CA 9x553 SAN RA-MON. CA 94583 RODEO --L-fERCLJLES FIRE MORAGA-ORINDA FIRE CONTRA COSTA RESOURCE PROTECTION .DISTRICT PROTECTION DISTRTCT CONSERVATION PRO PRO REFCON VALLEY ROAR 33 ORJNDA WAY 5552 CLAYTON ROAD HERCULES, CA 94547 ORTNDA>C.4 94563 CONCORD, CA 94521 �I KENSINGTON COMMUNITY DIABLO COMMUNITY SERVICE CONTRA COSTA MOSQUITO SERVICES DISTRICT DISTRICT ABATEMENT DISTRICT 217 ARLINGTON AVENUE P.O. BOX 702 155 MASON CIRCLE KENSINGTON, CA 94707 DIABLO, CA 94528 CONCORD, CA .94520 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA NTT. VIEW SANITARY DISTRICT TRONI-IOUSE SANITARY DISTRICT SANITARY DISTRICT P.O. BOX 2757 PO BOX 1105 5019 IMT3OFF PLACE MARTINEZ, CA 94553 MARTINEZ, CA 94553 OAKT_Elc', CA 94561` RODEO SANITARY DISTRICT WEST COUNTY WAST WAV T!?iZ 800 SAN PABLO AVENUE DISTRICT STEGE SANITARY DISTRICT RODEO, CA 94572 2910 HILLTOP DRIVE P.O. BOX 537EL_CERRITO,CA 94530RICHMOND,CA 9480G BYRON SANITARY DISTRICT CROCKETT—VALONA SANITARY DELTA DIAl3LO SANITA'T'ION P.O. BOX 382 DISTRICT DISTRICT BYRON, CA 94514 P.O. BOX 578 2500 PITTS BU RG-ANT IOCI-1 CROCKETT, CA 94525 HIGHWAY ANTIOCH, CA 94509 LOS MEDANOS HEALTI.-ICARE MT. DIART 0 T-I'EALTI-TCARE WEST CONTRA COSTA DISTRICT DISTRICT HLALTFJ.CARE DISTRICT P.O. BOX 8698 2580 PARK.AVENUE SUITE 1 2000 VALE ROAD PITTSBURG, CA 94563 CONCORD, CA 94520 RICHNIOND, CA 94806 F:3:•y1: ��J4�'1 la:�t UfJ KH U n I H �_ _. UUf•!I'f !Lth'k, Ut- I I-It -i �'(,�k�l P•lU.1%JrJ l,+elG AMBROSE RECREATION AND A-LAMO-LAFAYETTE CEMETERY BYRON, BRENTWOOD, PARK DISTRICT DISTRICTTKNIGKTSEN UNION CLM.ETJERY 3105 WILLOW PASS ROAD 3285 MT. DIABL O BLVD, Ip 0 BOX 551 PITTSBURG. CA 94565 LAFAYETTE,CA 94549 BRENTWOOD, CA 94513 ' PLEASANT I.-JILL RECREATION ROLLINGWOOD-WILART GREEN VALLEY RECREATION& PARK DISTRICT RECREATION AND PARK PARK DISTRICT 1.47 GREGORY LANE P 0 BOX 112 PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 2395 GREISNWOOD DRIVE DIABLO, CA 94528 SAN PABLO, CA 94806 i BETI-M-L ISLAND MUNICIPAL CONTRA.COSTA WATER DISTRICT CASTLE ROCK COUNTY WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT P.O. OR! P.O. BOX 244 CONCORD, C CA 94524 00'FINE CREEK ROAD BETH'E.L ISLAND, CA 94511 WALNUT CREEK,CA 94598 EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY EAST BAY MUD SPECIAL A.LAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA DISTRICT DISTRICT I TRANSIT DISTRICT P.O. BOK 24055 F.O. BOX 211,055 1600 FRANKLIN STREET OAKLAND, CA 94623 OAKLAND.CA 94623 OAKLAND, CA 94612 BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DIST 13AY AREA AIR QUALITY DU3I-IN-SAN RAMON TREASURY OFFICE MANAGEMI NT DISTRICT SERVICES DISTRICT P.O. BOX 12688 . 939 ELLIS STRE'.ET 7051 DUBLIN BLVD OAKLAND, CA 94604 SAN.FRANCISCO, CA 941.09 . DUBLIN, CA 94568 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISCOVERY BAY RECLAMATION/ DISTRICT RLCL.1`ti.MATION 'DISTRICT 800 DRAINAGE DISTRICTP.O. BOX 5381 P.O. BOX 262 OAK-LAND, CA 94605 DISCOVERY BAY, CA 9451.4 P.O. BOX 262 BYRON, CA 94514 4 i EAST CONTRA COSTA IRRIGATION BYRON-312-TI-IANY IRRIGATION I . DISTRICT DISTRICT CITY OF CLAYTON MARY PELLETICR 626 First Street . P.O. BOX 160 BRENTWOOD, CA 94513 BYRON. CA 94514 6004 HERITAGE TRAIL CLAYTON CA 94517 CITY OF CONCORD CITY OF BRENTWOOD CITY OF SAN PABLO PEGGY LEFEBVRE PAMELA ERL ER BRADLEY WARD 1950 PARKSIDF DR 708 THIRD ST ONE ALVARADO SQUARE CONCORD CA 94519-2578 BRENTWOOD CA 94513 SAN PA13LO CA 94806 CITY OF EL CERWT'O CITY OF WALNUT CREEK CITY OF PLEASANT RILL MARY DODGF EDMUND SUEN RICK RICCI C 10890 SAN PA.BLO AVENUE 1666 N NLA1N STREET 1.00 GREGORY LANE CL CE.RRITO CA 94530 WALNUT CR3 LK CA 94596 PLf ASANT HILL CA 94523 CITY Of MARTINEZ CITY OF ANTIOCFI CITY OF PITTSBURG DIANE.PCRKIN MARIE SIMONS 525 (-IENR.ICTTA STREET JULIE BRO\kN 65 CIVIC AVENUE MARTINEZ CA 94553 PO BOX 5007 ANTIOCH CA 94.531-5007 PITTSBURG CA 94565 .07-/21/2007 14:2e CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLERK OF THE 7 57201 I � CITY Of HERCULES CITY OF PINOLE CITY OF RICHMOND ; TIM HANSEN RICFARD LOOMIS PATRICK SAMSELL I J.J. CIVIC DRIVE 2131 PEAR.STREET 1401 MARINA WAY, SOUTH i HERCULES CA 94547 . PTNOLE CA 94564 RICHMOND CA 94804 CITY OF LAFAYETTE TOWN CF INIORAGA TOWN OF DANVILLE TRACY" ROBINSON JENNIFER LAU F.LfLA13ETH HUDSON 3675 MT, DIABLO BLVD.,STE,210 PO 130X 188 310 LA GONDA WAY LAFAYETTE CA 94549 MORAGA CA 94556 DANVILLE CA 94526 I i CITY OF SAN RANfONCITY OF ORINDA CITY OF PAUL AI3F.OLSOh1EY EVA ROWARD RADIA WOOD PA AB Street 2222 CAMINO RAMON 26 ORINDA WAY OAKLEY, CA 94561 SAN RAMON CA 94583 OR.INDA CA 94563 TOWN OF DISCOVERY BAY PLEASANT.HJLL LTG DIST 1 SVC AREA R-8 WALNUT CRTC ATTN: Virgil Koehne C/O CITY OF PLEASANT (TILL CIO CITY OF WALNUT CREEK 1800 Willow Luke Road 1.00 GREGORY LANE 1666 N MAIN STREET Discovery Bay, CA 94514-1060 PLEASANT f-IILI, CA 94523 WALNUT CREEK. CA 94596. CLAYTON LTG MICE DIST I MARTINEZ PINE RIDG.E. MTCE MARTINEZ PARKING DIST 1 CSO CITY OF CLAYTON C/O CITY OJr MARTINEZ C/O CITY OF MARTfNCZ 6000 HERITAGE TRAIL 525 IHENRIETTA STREET 525 HENRIETTA STREET CLAYTON, CA 94517 MARTINEZ CA 94553 MARTINEZ CA 94553 LAFAYETTE CORE AREA MTCE LAFAYETTE STREET LTG MTCE 21, CONCORD VALLEY TLRP,MTCE C/O CITY OF LAFAYETTE C/O CITY OF LAFAYLTTE C/O CITY OF CONCORD 3675 MT, DIABLO BLVD„STF-210 3675 MT DIABLO BLVD..STE.210 1950 PARKSIDE- DRIVE LAFAYETTE CA 94-54.9 LAFAYETTE CA 94549 CONCORD CA 94519-2578 CONCORD K.IRKWOOD MTCE. 1 CONCORD BLHN TERR ST.LTG P. HILL DIABLO VISTA WATER DIST C/O CITY OF CONCORD GO CITY OF CONCORD C/O CITY OF PLEASANT HILL 1950 PA.RKSIDL• DRIVE 1950 PARKSTDL DRIVE 100 GREGORY LANE CONCORD CA 94519-2578 CONCORD CA 94519-2578 PLEASANT f-1I1-1-CA 94523 ANTIOCH PARKING MTCE IA MORAGA STREET LTG MTCT: 1. OAKLEY POLICE SERVICES CIO CITY Or ANTIOCH 0/0 TOWN Or MORAGA CIO CITY OF OAKLEY PO BOX 5007_ PO BOX 1.89 3331 Main SIrCCI ANTIOCH CA 94531-5007 MORAGA CA 94556 OAKLEY CA 94561 i. ANTIOCH BRENTWOOD CONCORD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PO BO:K 5007 708 T1=17RD STREET 1950 PARKSIDE DRIVE ANTIOCH CA 91509 BRENTWOOD CA 945.13 COINCORD CA 94519 ' 1 CLAYTON HERCULES EL CERRITO R.EWEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 0000 HERITAGE TRAIL i H CIVIC DRJV.E 10890 SAN PABLO AVENUE CLAYTON CA 94317 HERCULES CA 94547 EL CERRITO CA 94530 14:28 CONTRR COSTR COUNTY CLERK OF THE 57201 N0. 18B 904 PINOLE 'PITTSBURG RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 21.31 PEAR STREET '65 CIVIC A\rENUL- PO BOX 4046 PINOLE CA 94564 PITTSBURG CA 94565 RICHMOND CA 94804 WALNUT CREEK nAWLLE SAN PABLO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1666 N MAIN STREET 510 LA GON.DA WAY ONE ALVARA.DO SQUARE WALNUT CREEK CA 94596 DANVILLE CA 94526. SrtN PARLO CA 94806 I I PLEASANT HILL LAFAYETTE REDEVELOPMENT SAN RAMON REDEVELOPMENT ! REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENCY AGENCY 100 GREGORY LANE '3675 MT. DI.ALBLO BLVD.,STE.210 2222 CAMINO RAMON PLEASANT HILI:., CA 94523 -LAFAYETT.E, CA 94549 SAN RAMON, CA 94563 CONTRA COSTA. COUNTV OAKLEY RE.DELOPMENT CROCKETT COMM SRVCS DIST. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 'AGENCY ATTN: KENT PETERSON 2530 Arnold .Drive, Sgitc 190 3231 Main Street P. 0. BOAC 578 Martinez, CA 94553 OAKLEY, CA 94561 CROCKETT. CA 94521 ,i i S:TAX DIVISION;CALENDARS-CONTACTS!LABL•LSIS]32557 MAILING LABELS . I I I II N OTICE OF A PUB1 ,1C EARING . You are hereby notified that on TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2007, at approximately 1 :00 p.m. and thereafter in Room 107, McBrien Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors will conduct public hearings on and consider each of the following matters: 1. Adoption of Ordinance No. 2007-19, amending the County's Park Dedication Ordinance (Division 920 of the County Ordinance Code). 2. Adoption of Ordinance No.2007-17,establishing a Park Impact Fee. 3. Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan. The proposed amendments to the Park Dedication Ordinance include: increasing the land dedication requirements; increasing the amount of fees required in lieu of land dedication; and providing a"waiver of dedication and fee requirements for specified affordable housing developments. The proposed Park Impact Fee ordinance provides for the adoption of developer fees to be used for the acquisition of parkland and development of park and recreation improvements needed to serve new residential development in unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County. The proposed Contra Costa County Parks Capital Improvement Plan outlines park and recreational facility improvements needed in order to provide park and recreational services to the growing communities in the unincorporated areas of the County. Data indicating the estimated costs of providing the park and recreation improvements and land acquisitions to be lfunded with the Park Dedication in-lieu fee and the Park Impact Fee, and the revenue sources anticipated to provide the improvements and complete the acquisitions, Mare available by contacting Bob Calkins, Contra Costa Community Development Department, 2530 Arnold Drive, Suite 190, Martinez, CA. Phone: (925) 335-7220, Email: rcaik@cd.cccounty.us For purposes of compliance;with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), A Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been issued for this project. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the County at, or prior to, the public hearing. i AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING Project: 1. Adoption of Ordinance No. 2007-19, amending the County's Park Dedication Ordinance (Division 920 of the County Ordinance Code). 2. Adoption of Ordinance No. 2007-17, establishing a Park Impact Fee. 3. Adoption of the Contra Costa County Parks Improvement Plan. Date Noticed Mailed: April 13, 2007 I do hearby declare under;penalty of perjury that the referenced Notice was mailed to the addresses on the attached list. C Robert T. Calkins I do hearby declare under,penalty of perjury that the referenced Notice was mailed to the addresses on the attached list. R / p Susan Childers Braddock& Logan/Jeff Lawrence Davidon Homes Hoffman Land Dev. Construction 4155 Blackhawk Plaza Circle Steve Abbs Beth Burns #201 1600 S. Main Street, Ste#150 1380 Galaxy Way Danville, CA 94506-4613 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Concord, CA 94522 Home Builders Assoc. of Paramount Homes SEECON Financial & Company Northern CA - Bob Glover Peter Hellman Jay F. Torres-Muga P.O. Box 5160 P.O. Box 429 4021 Port Chicago Hwy. San Ramon, CA 94583-5160 Concord, CA 94522-0429 Concord, CA 94520 CCC County Administrator CCC Auditor-Controller's Office CCC Library 651 Pine Street 625 Court Street Susan Caldwell 1750 Oak Park Blvd. Martinez, CA 94553 Martinez, CA 94553 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Contra Costa Fire District Crockett Carquinez Fire District East Contra Costa Fire Mike George 746 Loring Avenue 134.Oak Street 2010 Geary Road Crockett, CA 94525 Brentwood, CA 94513 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Contra Costa Public Works CCC Flood Control and CCC Sheriff Administrative Misc. Spec. Districts Water Conservation District Services-Finance 255 Glacier Drive 255 Glacier Drive 651 Pine Street, 71h Floor Martinez, CA 94553 Martinez, CA 94553 Martinez, CA 94553 CCC Water Agency San Ramon Valley Fire 651 Pine Street Protection Kensington Fire District North Wing 1500 Bollinger Canyon Road 217 Arlington AvenueKensington, CA 94707 Martinez, CA 94553 San Ramon, CA 94583 Rodeo-Hercules Fire Moraga-Orinda Fire Contra Costa Resource Protection District Protection District Conservation 1680 Refugio Valley Road' 33 Orinda Way 5552 Clayton Road Hercules, CA 94547 Orinda,CA 94563 Concord, CA 94521 Kensington Community Diablo Community Service Contra Costa Mosquito Services District District Abatement District 217 Arlington Avenue P.O. Box 702 155 Mason Circle Kensington, CA 94707 Diablo, CA 94528 Concord, CA 94520 Central Contra Costa Mt. View Sanitary District Ironhorse Sanitary District . Sanitary District: P.O. Box 2757 P.O. Box 1105 5019 Imhoff Place Martinez, CA 94553 Oakley, CA 94561 Martinez, CA 94553 Rodeo Sanitary District West County Wastewater.District Stage Sanitary District 800 San Pablo Avenue 2910 Hilltop Drive P.O. Box 537 Rodeo, CA 94572 Richmond, CA 94806 EI Cerrito, CA 94530 Byron Sanitary District Crockett-Valona Delta Diablo P.O. Box 382 Sanitary District Sanitation District Byron, CA 94514 P.O. Box 578 2500 Pittsburg-Antioch Hwy. Crockett, CA 94525 Antioch, CA 94509 Los Medanos Mt, Diablo West Contra Costa Healthcare District Healthcare District Healthcare District P.O. Box 8698 25.80 Park Avenue, Suite #1 2000 Vale Road Pittsburg, CA 94565 Concord, CA 94520 Richmond, CA 94806 Alamo-Lafayette Byron, Brentwood Ambrose Recreation and Cemetery District Knightsen Union Cemetery Park District 3285 Mt. Diablo Blvd. P.O. Box 551 3105 Willow Pass Road Lafayette, CA 94549 Brentwood, CA 94513 Pittsburg, CA 94565 Green Valley Recreation and Pleasant Hill Recreation and Roll ingwood-Wilart Park District Park District Park and Recreation P.O. Box 112 147 Gregory Avenue .2395 Greenwood Drive Diablo, CA 94528 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 San Pablo, CA 94806 Bethel Island Contra Costa Water District Castle Rock County Municipal Improvement P.O. Box H2O Water District P.O. Box 244 ConcordCA 94524 200 Pine Creek Road , Bethel Island, CA 94511 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 East Bay Municipal East Bay MUD Alameda-Contra Costa Utility District Special District 1 Transit District P.O. Box 24055 P.O. Box 24055 1600 Franklin Street Oakland, CA 94623 Oakland, CA 94623 Oakland, CA 94612 Bay Area Rapid Transit Bay Area Air Quality Dublin-San Ramon District Treasury Office Management District Services District P.O. Box 12688 939 Ellis Street 7051 Dublin Blvd. Oakland, CA 94604 San Francisco, CA 94109 Dublin, CA 94568 East Bay Regional Discovery Bay Reclamation District 800 Park District Reclamation/Drainage District P.O. Box 5381 P.O. Box 262 P.O. Box 262 Oakland, CA 94605 Discovery Bay, CA 94514 Byron, CA 94514 East Contra Costa Byron-Bethany City of Clayton Irrigation District Irrigation District Mary Pelletier 626 First Street P.O. Box 160 6000 Heritage Trail Brentwood, CA 94513 Byron, CA 94514 Clayton, CA 94517 City of Concord City of Brentwood City of San Pablo Peggy Lefebvre Pamela Ehler Bradley Ward 1950 Parkside Drive 708 Third Street One Alvarado Square Concord, CA 94519-2578 Brentwood, CA 94513 Pleasant Hill, CA 94806 City of EI Cerrito City of Walnut Creek City of Pleasant Hill Mary Dodge . Edmund Suen Rich Ricci 10890 San Pablo Avenue 1666 N. Main Street 100 Gregory Lane EI Cerrito, CA 94530 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 City of Martinez City of Antioch City of Pittsburg Diane Perkin Julie Brown Marie Simons 525 Henrietta Street P.O. Box 5007 65 Civic Avenue Martinez, CA 94553 Antioch, CA 94531-5007 Pittsburg, CA 94565 CITY OF HERCULES CITY OF PINOLE CITY.OF RICHMOND Tim Hansen Richard Loomis Patrick Samsell 111 Civic Drive 2131 Pear Street 1401 Marina Way, South Hercules, CA 94547 Pinole, CA 94564 Richmond, CA 94804 City of Lafayette TOWN OF MORAGA TOWN OF DANVILLE Tracy Robinson Jennifer Lau Elizabeth Hudson 3675 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Ste# 210 . P.O. Box 188 510 La Gonda Way Lafayette, CA 94549 Moraga, CA 94556 Danville, CA 94526 CITY OF SAN RAMON CITY OF ORINDA CITY OF OAKLEY Eva Howard Radha Wood Paul Abelson 22 Camino Ramon 26 Orinda Way 3231 Main Street San Ramon, CA 94583 Orinda, CA 94563 Oakley, CA 94561 TOWN OF DISCOVERY BAY Pleasant Hill LTG District 1 Svc Area R-8 Walnut Creek ATTN: Virgil Koehne C/O City of Pleasant Hill C/O City of Walnut Creek 1800 Willow Lake Road 100 Gregory Lane 1666 N. Main Street Discovery Bay, CA 94514-1060 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Clayton Ltg Mtce District 1 Martinez Pine Ridge Mtce Martinez Parking District 1 C/O City of Clayton C/O City of Martinez C/O City of Martinez 6000 Heritage Trail 525 Henrietta Street 525 Henrietta Street Clayton, CA 94517 Martinez, CA 94553 Martinez, CA 94553 Lafayette Core Area Mtce. Lafayette Street Ltg Mtce Z1 Concord Valley Terrace Mtce C/O City of Lafayette C/O City of Lafayette C/O City of Concord 3675 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Ste# 210 3675 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Ste# 210 1950 Parkside Drive Lafayette, CA 94549 Lafayette, CA 94549 Concord, CA 94519-2578 Concord Kirkwood Mtce 1 Concord Blhn Terrace St Ltg P. Hill, Diablo Vista Water District C/O City of Concord C/O City of Concord C/O City of Pleasant Hill 1950 Parkside Drive 1950 Parkside Drive 100 Gregory Lane Concord, CA 94519-2578 Concord, CA 94519-2578 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Antioch Parking Mtce 1 A Moraga Street Ltg Mtce 1 Oakley Police Services. C/O City of Antioch C/O Town of Moraga C/O City of Oakley P.O..Box 5007 P.O. Box 188 3231 Main Street Antioch, CA 94531-5007 Moraga, Ca 94556 Oakley, CA 94561 ANTIOCH REDEVELOPMENT BRENTWOOD CONCORD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENCY 11 P.O. Box 5007 70,8 Third Street 1950 Parkside Drive Antioch, CA 94509 Brentwood, CA 94513 Concord, CA 94519 `I CLAYTON REDEVELOPMENT HERCULES REDEVLOPMENT EL CERRITO AGENCY AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 6000 Heritage Trail 111 Civic Drive 10890 San Pablo Avenue Clayton; CA 94517 Hercules, CA 94547 EI Cerrito, Ca 94530 PINOLE REDEVELOPMENT PITTSBURG RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENCY 2131 Pear Street 65:;Civic Avenue P.O. Box 4046 Pinole, CA 94564 Pittsburg, CA 94565 Richmond, CA 94804 WALNUT CREEK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IDA,,, NVILLE REDEVELOPMENT SAN PABLO AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1666 N. Main Street 51;0 La Gonda Way One Alvarado Square Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Danville, CA 94526 San Pablo, CA 94806 PLEASANT HILL LAFAYETTE SAN RAMON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 100 Gregory Lane 36;75 Mt. Diablo Blvd, Ste# 210 2222 Camino Ramon Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Lafayette, CA 94549 San Ramon, CA 94583 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY OAKLEY REDEVLEOPMENT CROCKETT COMM SRVC DIST REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENCY Attn: -Kent Peterson 2530 Arnold Drive, Suite #190 3231 Main Street P.O. Box 578 Martinez, CA 94553 Oakley, CA 94561 Crockett, CA 94525 City of Antioch City of Brentwood City of Clayton P.O. Box 5007 708 Third Street 6000 Heritage Trail Antioch, CA 94531-5007 Brentwood, CA 94513-1396 Clayton, CA 94517-1250 City of Concord Town of Danville City of EI Cerrito 1950 Parkside Drive 51;0 La Gonda Way 10890 San Pablo Avenue Concord, CA 94519-2578 Danville, CA 94526-1722 EI Cerrito, CA 94530-2392 City of Hercules City of Lafayette City of Martinez 111 Civic Drive 3675 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Ste# 210 525 Henrietta Street Hercules, CA 94547-2392 Lafayette, CA 94549 Martinez, CA 94553-2337 Town of Moraga City of Oakley City of Orinda P.O. Box 188 3231 Main Street P.O. Box 2000 Moraga, CA 94556 Oakley, CA 94561 Orinda, CA 94563 i City of Pleasant Hill City of Pinole City of Pittsburg 100 Gregory Lane 2131 Pear Street 65 Civic Avenue Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-3323 Pinole, CA 94564-1716 Pittsburg, CA 94565 City of Richmond City of San Pablo City of San Ramon Rich Marina Way South One Alvarado Square 2222 Camino Ramon Richmond, CA 94804 San Pablo, Ca .94806 San Ramon, Ca 94583-1372 } City of Walnut Creek 666 North Main Street Walnut Creek, CA 94596