Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05012007 - C.44 Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: FINANCE COMMITTEE Costa John Gioia Chair 'off Mary N. Piepho q �oUn County DATE: May 1, 2007 C. SUBJECT: FACILITIES LIFE-CYCLE INVESTMENT PROGRAM SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: - ACCEPT report from the Finance Committee on the selection of a firm;to provide facilities condition assessments as part of the County's Facilities Life-Cycle Investment Program; and.AUTHORIZE the General Services Director to execute a contract with ISES Corporation, in,/an_gim. t not to exceed $380,000, to provide facilitiesilcondition assessments on approximately 100 County owned buildings, for the period May 1, 2007 through completion. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost to provide the facilities condition assessments will be paid for with FY 2006/07 funds from undesignated capital reserves; however, a portion of these costs will be State and Federally reimbursable. BACKGROUND: On July 6, 2006 the Finance Committee considered a Facilities Life-Cycle Investment Program (FLIP) and directed staff to return to'their Committee with a facility assessment plan, timeline, and estimation of cost and revenue sources. The Committee specifically requested that the program segregate minor versus major improvements, include County owned facilities only, provide enough information for each building to verify that General Fund monies are not spent on non-General fund buildings, and include Health Services in the program. In a follow-up report to the Finance Committee on November 2, 2006, the General Services Department was authorized to issue a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) to identify a qualified consultant to provide facilities condition assessments for approximately 90 County buildings totaling 3 million square feet as noted on Attachment (the actual number of buildings is 100). Subsequent to the Committee's direction, the General Services Department issued a SOQ for consultant services to CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED ACTION OF BOARD ON � ^�(� � OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON MINUTES OF UNANIMOUS(ABSENT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. �/�" _ ) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Contact: Lisa Driscoll 335-1023 Cc: County Administrator ATTESTED I All County Departments I JOHN CU EN,CLER OF THE BOARD OFSUPERVISORS BY: C DEPUTY i 1 Facilities Life-Cycle Investment Program May 1, 2007 Page Two (2) provide the facilities condition assessments. Twelve firms submitted SOQs from which five firms were short-listed. A selection,committee comprised of County staff from the Employment and Human Services Department, County Administrator's Office, and the General Services Department conducted interviews and ranked the short-listed firms. Thereafter, the top three rated firms were required to provide software demonstrations to the selection committee including staff from the Department of Information Technology. References were contacted and ISES Corporation was selected as the most qualified. Facilities Condition Assessment Process ISES Corporation will provide a comprehensive database that catalogs current deferred maintenance and future capital renewal costs for County buildings. The database will describe and assess the condition of building systems (roof, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, structural, etc.), facility deficiencies, recommended corrective action, estimated cost to correct deficiencies, and priorities of the recommended corrective actions to enable staff to: - Establish credible information for qualified decision-making and budgeting - Prioritize short-term maintenance plans and identify long-term strategies - Identify and estimate the cost of current deferred maintenance backlog - Define equity and parity issues to guide equitable funding decisions - Forecast future expenditures - Develop qualified maintenance work plans with the annual budget process It is estimated that the facilities condition assessment process will take 27 weeks to complete. Thereafter, staff will return to the Finance Committee with plans to address identified deferred maintenance deficiencies. It is expected that significant funds will be required to bring facilities up to a minimum repair level before the on-going cost of maintenance can be covered by an increase in occupancy cost. At that time, staff will also have detailed information available to determine the costs associated with the General Fund and the level of funding expected from non-General Fund sources.