Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04242007 - C.47 . .... o - Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - TO: osTa—---- County FROM: DENNIS M. BARRY, AICP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR - 1 DATE: April 24, 2007 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF RICHMOND TO OVERSEE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2006/2007 NORTH RICHMOND WASTE & RECOVERY MITIGATION FEE EXPENDITURE PLAN (supervisorial District i) (Contract #49335-Amendment#1) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Community Development Director,or his designee,to execute an amendment to the Interagency Agreement with the City of Richmond, effective April 25, 2007 to increase the payment limit of$606,823 by $472,658 to a new payment limit in the amount not to exceed $1,079,481, with no change to the term expiration date of December 31, 2007. FISCAL IMPACT No impact to the County General Fund. The cost of the agreement is being paid using Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee funding which Republic Services is required to pay monthly for materials accepted at the Bulk Material Processing Center(including the Golden Bear Transfer Station/Waste Recycling Center) located at the West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill in the North Richmond area. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS Republic Services began collecting and paying to the County a per ton Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee ("Mitigation Fee") in February 2006, which is subject to the joint-control of the City and County, pursuant to the requirements of the Land Use Permits for the West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill ("WCCSL") Bulk Materials Processing Center("BMPC"), which includes the Golden Bear Transfer Station/Waste Recycling Center. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: B YES SIGNATURE 1' RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECO ME ATION OF BO D COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE (S): J ACTION OF BOARD APPROVED AS RECOMMENDEDOTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE .UNANIMOUS (ABSENT) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE AI3SENT: ABSTAIN: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: Raymond Wong (925-335-1282) ATTESTED Zp.O cc: Community Development Department (CDD) JO N CULLEN, CLERK OF Joanne Bohren, Auditor-Controller THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS County Administrator AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Deidra Dingman, CDD � BY , DEPUTY DAIllegal Dumping\BMPC Mitigation Fee CommitteeUty-County Contract\City-County_BO_4-5-07.doc Amendment to Interagency Agreement with City of Richmond for North Richmond Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan April 24, 2007 Page 2 BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS (continued) In July 2004, the City of Richmond ("Agency")and Contra Costa County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU")agreeing to jointly administer Mitigation Fees collected from the WCCSL BMPC, for the benefit of the incorporated and unincorporated North Richmond area. The MOU requires that the Mitigation Fee monies be paid to the County and held in a dedicated account. A Committee was formed pursuant to the terms of the MOU for the specific purpose of preparing a recommended two year Expenditure Plan which is subject to final approval of the Richmond City Council and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. This Expenditure Plan provides a means for the City and County tojointly administer the Mitigation Fee funding for the benefit of the host community,as described in the BMPC Draft Environmental Impact Report dated November 2003. The first Expenditure Plan was approved by the Richmond City Council and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors in September 2006 and the Amended Expenditure Plan was approved by the City Council and Board of Supervisors on April 3,2007("Expenditure Plan"as used hereafter refers to the 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan,as may be amended from time to time by the City Council and Board of Supervisors). This contract will provide a framework for the County to transfer Mitigation Fee monies to the City for administrative staff costs related to the implementation and oversight of the Expenditure Plan as well as other expenses directly related to each activity ("Strategy") described in the Expenditure Plan which the Agency will directly oversee/administer. This agreement amendment provides funding for additional Strategies which the Agency will directly oversee/administer as a result of amendments to the Expenditure Plan which were approved by the City and County on April 3, 2007. DAIllegal Dumping\BMPC Mitigation Fee CommitteeUty-County Contract\City-County_BO_4-5-07.doc ' Cout.ra Costa Count.v CONTRACT AMENDMENT AGREEMENT Ntirrlbcr 419335 Standard Form 1;7 (Purchase of Services - Long Form) bund/(h g' 111/1. Revised 2002 Account ;r 2310 Other r 1. Identification of Contract to be Amended. Number: 49335) Effective Date: January 16, 2007 Department.: Con1n11.init.y D(:velol)rnent -A111CII(II71ent #1 Sul)ject.: Interagency Atirecinent between COMM Costa COLIMIF Community Developmcut Departmcnt.and City of'Riclunond for North Ricllrnond Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan 2. Parties. The COurIII?ol'Cor1C1-a Costa,California (County), lor-its Dcpartment earned above, al id die following named Contractor inuwally agree and promise as follows: Contactor: City of Richmond Capacity: A Public Agency Address: 1401 Marina Way South, R1c11mond,.CA 94804 3. Amendment Date. The effective date of this Contract Alnendnici t.Agreement is April 2.5, 2007 . 4. Amendment Specifications. The Contract identified above is hereby amended as set.forth in the°Arnendnient. SI)CCilicatiorls" att<iclle(I licreto which are incorporated herein by reference. 5. Siti atures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ATTEST: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By By Chairman/Designee Deputy CONTRACTOR Name of business entity, Nance of business entity By By (Signature of individual or officer) (Signature of individual or officer) (Print name and title A, if applicable) (Print name and title B, if applicable) Note to Contractor:For Corporations(profit or nonprofit).the contract must be signed by two officers.Signature A must be that of the president or vice-president and Si;atatureB must be that of die secretary or assistant secretary(Cisil Code Section 1190 and Corporations Code Section 313). All signatures must be acknowledged as set forth on Form L'-. L % (Page 1 of 1) 49335 Amendment Specifications 1) In consideration for assignment of additional Agency's Obligations per the attached revised Service Plan and its Table A, Contra Costa County, on behalf of its Community Development Department (County), and the City of Richmond (Agency) hereby agree to increase the payment-limit by $472,658.00 to a new total payment limit of $1,079,481.00. All contract terms remain unchanged, in full force, and in effect except as specifically set forth below: Interagency Agreement Number 49335 is hereby amended as follows: "4. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Agency under this Contract shall not exceed $1,079,481.00." "6. Agency's Obligations. The Service Plan and Table A thereto and attached to the original agreement are hereby superseded by the revised Service Plan and Table A thereto attached to this amendment." "8. Project. The 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan Implementation thereto and attached to the original agreement is hereby superseded by the Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan thereto attached to this amendment." Initials: Agency County Dept. Contra Costa County SERVICE PLAN Number Standard Form L-3 (Purchase of Services) Revised 2002 A. Background: In July 2004, the City of Richmond ("Agency") and Contra Costa County ("County") entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") agreeing to jointly administer Mitigation Fee (as such term is defined in the Expenditure Plan) monies collected from the West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill ("WCCSL") Bulk Materials Processing Center ("BMPC"), including the Golden Bear Transfer Station/Waste Recycling Center, for the benefit of the incorporated and unincorporated North Richmond area. A Committee was formed pursuant to the terms of the MOU for the specific purpose of.preparing a recommended two year Expenditure Plan which is subject to final approval of the Richmond City Council and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. This Expenditure Plan provides a means to jointly administer the Mitigation Fee funding for the benefit of the host community, as described in the BMPC Draft Environmental Impact Report dated November 2003. The first Expenditure Plan was approved by the Richmond City Council and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors in September 2006. The term "Expenditure Plan" as used herein refers to the Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan ("Plan"), which was amended by both parties in April 2007. The Plan may be further amended from time to time by the City Council and Board of Supervisors, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The MOU requires that the Mitigation Fee monies be paid to the County and held in a dedicated account. This Agreement is intended to provide a framework for the County to transfer Mitigation Fee monies to the Agency for its administrative staff costs related to the implementation and oversight of the Plan as well as other expenses directly related to each activity described in the Plan which the Agency will directly.oversee/administer. B. Agency's Obligations: • Agency Staff Costs to Implement Plan: Agency shall oversee the implementation of the majority of the Plan, for an amount not to exceed $19,740. Administrative oversight to be provided by the Agency includes, but is not limited to, coordinating community input/involvement, conducting research/meetings, writing reports regarding status of implementation as well as final report to be presented to the Agency and County summarizing the outcome of each Strategy and staffing Committee meetings as needed. • Strategy 1 - Bulky Clean-ups: Agency shall implement "Strategy 1: Bulky Clean-ups" as described in the Plan, for an amount not to exceed $32,800. Agency shall coordinate the distribution of the bulky clean-ups and the tracking and reporting of the Richmond Sanitary Services residents that actually requested and received subsidized bulky clean-ups. • Strategy 2 - Neighborhood Clean-ups: Agency shall implement "Strategy 2: Neighborhood Clean-ups" as described in the Plan, for an amount not to exceed $18,000. Agency shall coordinate one or more neighborhood clean-up events in the Mitigation Fee Area. • Strategy 3 - Voucher System: Agency shall implement "Strategy 3: Voucher System" as described in the Plan, for an amount not to exceed $64,000. Agency shall coordinate the distribution of disposal vouchers and the tracking and reporting of the residents which actually requested and redeemed disposal vouchers. • Strategy 4 - Community Services Coordinator: Agency shall implement "Strategy 4: Community Services Coordinator" as described in the Plan, for an amount not to exceed $69,350. The Coordinator position will be hired through the Community Housing Development Corporation of North Richmond. • Strategy 5 - Bilingual Outreach Services Coordinator: Agency shall implement "Strategy 5: Bilingual Outreach Services Coordinator" as described in the Plan, for an amount not to exceed L-3 (Page 1 of 5) first receiving written approval from the County Community Development Director or his designee. Agency may also expend up to $140,000 for improvements to Shields-Reid Park and up to$75,000 for Third Street Ballfield improvements. • Entire Service Plan: Agency shall only expend funding provided under this Agreement for Strategies that are described in the Expenditure Plan and identified in "Table A: Budget" on the last page of this Service Plan. Agency shall provide County Community Development Director or his designee with adequate documentation in a final report related to all activities for which any funding is being requested under this Agreement. Activities and costs must be categorized within each of the Expenditure Plan Strategies. C. County's Obligations: 1. Payment Provisions Agency shall perform the above-described services for an amount not-to-exceed $1,079,481 (maximum amount for each Strategy is detailed in "Table A: Budget" on the last page of this Service Plan). Agency shall submit invoices to County as described below: a. Administrative Staff Costs: Upon execution of this agreement, Agency may submit one or more invoice(s), which together do not exceed $19,740, for administrative staff costs associated with the implementation and oversight of the Expenditure Plan. Upon County's review and approval of such invoices, County shall advance such invoice amounts to Agency. Agency should send summary of actual staff costs, no later than March 31, 2008 which itemizes staff title(s), number of hours and hourly rate(s). Unexpended funding shall be returned to the County no later than March 31, 2008, unless otherwise agreed to in writing. b. Strategies — Initial Payments: Upon execution of the original agreement, Agency submitted invoice(s) for total funding allocated to Strategies 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 17 as well as portions of Strategies 6 (not to exceed $5,500) and 18 (not to exceed $247,208). Upon execution of the amended agreement, Agency may submit invoice(s) for total funding allocated to Strategies 7 and 11 as well as portions of Strategies 8 (not to exceed $20,000), 9 (not to exceed $45,000) and 13 (not to exceed $10,000). Invoices should include breakdown of funding requested per Strategy. Upon County's review and approval of invoices submitted by Agency for the foregoing Strategies, County shall advance such invoice amounts to Agency (each such advance, an "Advance Payment"). Agency must submit final report upon conclusion of services detailing actual expenses for each Strategy for which the Agency received an Advance Payment and the exact amount of unexpended funding for each Strategy, .if applicable. Unexpended funding shall be returned to the County no later than March 31, 2008, unless otherwise agreed to in writing. c. Strategies — Advance Payments: Agency may submit invoice(s) for remainder of funding allocated for Strategies 6, 8, 9, 13, 14 and 18 only after receiving written approval from the County Community Development Director or his designee. To request such approval, Agency must submit work plan detailing proposed tasks and projected cost per task. Invoice should include breakdown of funding requested per Strategy. Upon County's review and approval of such pre-authorized invoices, County shall advance such invoice amounts to Agency (each such advance, an 'Authorized Advance Payment"). Agency must submit final report upon conclusion of services detailing actual expenses for each Strategy for which the Agency received an Authorized Advance Payment and the exact amount of unexpended funding for each Strategy, if applicable. Unexpended funding shall be returned to the County no later than March 31, 2008, unless otherwise agreed to in writing. d. Strategies — Reimbursement Payments: Agency may submit invoice(s) periodically for actual costs of services provided related to any Strategies for which the Agency did not receive payment in advance. Invoice should include breakdown by type of expense (e.g. labor, printing, etc.) and number of units (for labor costs include staff titles, hourly rates and L-3 (Page 3 of 5) Contra Costa County SERVICE PLAN Number_________ Standard Form L-3 (Purchase of Services) Revised 2002 TABLE A: BUDGET Total Expenditure Initial Advance Initial Advance Remaining Advance # Strategy Amount Allowed Payments(Max) Amendment Reimbursement Payments(Max) Payments(Max) 1 Bulky Clean-ups $ 32,800 $ 32,800 2 Neighborhood Clean-ups $ 18,000 $ 18,000 3 Voucher System $ 64,000 $ 64,000 4 Community Services Coordinator $ 69,350 $ 6050 5 Bilingual Outreach Services/Coordinator $ 27,087 $ 27,087 6 Public Relations Campaign $ 75,848 $ 5,500 $ 70,348 (includes PSAs&Outreach Materials) 7 City/County Pick-up from Right-of-Way $ 146,000 $ 146,000 8 Vacant Lot Clean-up $ 40,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 9 Vacant Lot Fencing $ 90,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 11 Graffiti Abatement $ 58,240 $ 58,240 13 Increase Nighttime Patrols $ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 14 Surveillance Cameras $ 118,418 $ 118,418 17 Beautification ' 1:31'36 131361 Neighborhood Landscaping Projects $ 12,000 $ 12,000 Servicing Additional Street Cans(Weekly) $ 1,136 $ 1,136 18 CommunityInvolvement 28.6.x86239 654, sem' Stipends(WCCUSD students&Youth Build) $ 40,000 $ 32,208 $ 7,792 Mentorship Program $ 31,862 $ 31,862 Shields Reid Playground Equipment $ 125,000 $ 125,000 Shields Reid Soccer Field Lighting $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Third St. Ballfield sod repairs $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Third St. Ballfield irrigation $ 50,000 $ 50,000 City Administration/Staffing $ 19,740 $ 19,740 Prevention&Education Strategies Subtotal $ 287,085 $ 216,737 $ - $ 70,348 Prevention&Education Strategies Subtotal $ 472,658 $ - $ 279,240 $ 193,418 Community Investment Strategies Subtotal $ 299,998 $ 260,344 $ . - $ 39,654 Grand Total $ 1,079,481 $ 496,821 $ 279,240 $ 303,420 L-3(Page 5 of 5) Printed:4/5/2007 Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan INTRODUCTION The Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee was established as a result of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) dated November 2003 for the WCCSL Bulk Materials Processing Center (BMPC) and Related Actions (Project). The Project involved new and expanded processing and resource recovery operations on both the incorporated and unincorporated area of the Project site, which the EIR concluded would impact the host community. To mitigate this impact Mitigation Measure 4-5 called for a Mitigation Fee to benefit the host community, described as follows: "Mitigation Fee. The facility operator shall pay a Mitigation Fee of an amount to be determined by the applicable permitting authority(ies) to defray annual costs associated with collection and disposal of illegally dumped waste and associated impacts in North Richmond and adjacent areas. The mitigation fee should be subject to the joint-control of the City and County and should be collected on all solid waste and processible materials received at the facility consistent with the existing mitigation fee collected at the Central IRRF." In July 2004, the City of Richmond and Contra Costa County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agreeing to jointly administer Mitigation Fee monies collected from the BMPC for the benefit of the incorporated and unincorporated North Richmond area. This North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Joint Expenditure Planning Committee (Committee)was formed pursuant to the terms of the MOU for the specific purpose of preparing a recommended two year Expenditure Plan. This Expenditure Plan provides a means to jointly administer the Mitigation Fee funding for the benefit of the host community, as described in the EIR. The Expenditure Plan is subject to final approval of the Richmond City Council and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. BUDGET The attached Budget.Table is incorporated herein by reference. The Budget was developed based on revenue estimates with multiple variables (e.g. number of tons of recovered materials vs. solid waste, per ton gate rate charged and amount of CPI- adjusted per ton Mitigation Fee). Revenue projections may deviate from those provided by Republic and used to prepare the attached Budget Table. Revised:3J9)0`;' .............................. Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan accepted in the current on-call clean-ups through Richmond Sanitary Service (RSS) • Cost for each on-call pick-up of bulky items/extra waste is $41 which does not include the disposal charge which varies based on the item and quantity (e.g. non-freon appliances = $25/ea, mattress/sofa = $17.50/ea, etc.) • Recommended allocation of$32,800 would subsidize 800 bulky item pick- ups (flat pick-up fee only, residents-still-respon-Bible-form ust be used in conjunction with disposal vouchers disposal charge) 2. Neighborhood Clean-ups • Fund one or more neighborhood clean-up events peg-yea-rin the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area • Explore feasibility of providing one or more events exclusively for creek clean-up and/or bulky items and other materials not accepted through the on-call clean-ups (e.g. tires) • Cost for neighborhood clean-ups can vary significantly 4hree neighborhood-clean-ups recently-prov+dried-in.the City-ef-R+shmend averaged-$9;004-each • Recommended allocation of$18,000 would fund one or more clean-up events depending primarily on quantity of waste accepted 3. Voucher System • Fund subsidy program to provide residents in the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area with vouchers for disposal at Republic's Iandf-4/transfer station on Parr Blvd. • Explore-feas+bility..efproperty clean-up-vouchers that could-be-given.to Research options for residents in these areas that are unable to remove waste from their property due to age or disability • City of San Pablo provides residents with up to eight $5 vouchers per household per year upon request, residents must prove residency when picking up vouchers at City Hall-and-when4edeeming-vrGuchers--at4and-ill gate (vouchers do-not-expire after six months, hG ever--RSS only receives the subsidy for vouchers that are actually redeemed) • Recommended allocation of$64,000 would subsidize 12,800 vouchers ($5 each) 4. Community Services Coordinator • Fund full-time Community Services Coordinator through the Community Housing and Development Corporation of North Richmond (existing position being funded by County through 2006) • Community Services Coordinator handles various responsibilities related to illegal dumping and blight in North Richmond including but not limited to: o respond to 1-800-No Dumping calls regarding illegal dumping in North Richmond, Revised:.3./9?12UC7 Page 3 of 10 Printed:3/20/2007 Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan brochures (e.g. County's Illegal Dumping Brochures & Richmond's Good Neighbor Brochure), periodic community news letter---about-iilegaFdum- pinglbfight..issues;-advertisements in Contra Costa Times and other West County publications (listing illegal dumping prosecutions, highlighting educational information that is targeted for season or current events, etc.) o identify most effective methods of distribution (eliminate approaches that have not been effective enough in the past) • Recommended allocation of$75,848 could be adjusted if needed to fit within the budget (e.g. reduced to accommodate revenue below the projected amount) ABATEMENT& ENFORCEMENT 7. City/County Pick-up from Right-of-Way • Fund consolidated pick-up program for illegal dumping in the public right- of-way located within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area to supplement similar services provided by RSS in the designated Hot Spot Route • Consolidating pick-up within the right of way in unincorporated & incorporated areas using the City of Richmond Public Works staff is expected to create a stable level of service, minimize delays and maximize efficiencies • City would pick-up of items from public right-of-way located outside of the RSS Hot Spot Route as well as items not suitable for collection in the compactor truck used to service the RSS Hot Spot Route (Hot Spot Route referrals would provided to the City by the Community Services Coordinator) • Recommended allocation of$146,000 would fund incremental cost for City to provide pick-up in the unincorporated & incorporated areas for an average of 30 hours per wee ktwo-days.per-week 8. Vacant Lot Clean-up • Fund clean-up of illegal dumping on vacant lots within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area where existing code enforcement processes, staffing levels. and/or funding prove to be inadequate • Prior to cleaning up-vacant-lotsAs appropriate, require property owners to sign contract agreeing to fence their property and/or sign waivers allowing clean-up of waste on property • Cost of Vv_acant lot clean-ups (abatements) handled-by-the County cost an average-of-92,0GO per-lot:--however the-actual-costs-can vary significantly • Recommended allocation of$40,000 would fund undetermined number of vacant lots depending on the amount of illegally dumped waste on each lot 9. Vacant Lot Fencing Revised:319/007 Page 5 of 10 Printed:3/20/2007 Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan o build & file cases specific to instances of commercial dumping, which are suitable for prosecution o conduct targeted sting operations to catch illegal dumpers (law enforcement strike-team(s) may also be available to conduct sting operations) • Recommended allocation of$137,000 would fund -a full-time Sheriff Deputy on per-diem basica pro-rated schedule and purchase-efoffset related the costs of (e.g, equipment, fuel, insurance and depreciation associated with operating a patrol vehicle-equipped-with-necessary emergency.equipment 13. Increase Nighttime Patrols • Fund increased nighttime patrols within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area to target specific locations/timeframes where illegal dumping occurs most regularly • Using City and/or County law enforcement officer(s) or a private security firm for nighttime patrols would-be the-most-co-st-efieetiveas a means of supplementing existing patrols by local law enforcement • Recommended allocation of $58,240 would fund one private security officer or overtime for City and/or County law enforcement officer werkiR -appFex4matoly-2-4-hours-per-week 14. Surveillance Cameras • Fund surveillance cameras program within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area to target specific locations where illegal dumping occurs most regularly • Determine if more cost effective to purchase surveillance system(s) or hire private firm to manage surveillance system • Factors that affect the cost to install, maintain and operate a surveillance system includes: types of cameras, number of locations to be monitored, quantities of cameras needed per location, property owner approval, adjusting settings/angle, operator training, retrieval/review of photographic evidence (wireless or film) as well as relocation and repair as needed • The following would be considered prior to selecting the typed of surveillance cameras to be purchased: o Ppotential feasibility/cost/benefit of adding onto outc-ome-of-City's high—quality wireless surveillance camera system(s) RFP e-utilize GARB's-seFveilia+pc e-ean-te �ystefn-o-�e-trial-bas+s--te-4est-a high-quality surveillance system-and determine whether.such a system..would be-effective to aid-in prosecuting actual instances of illegal..dumping-in-the-North Richmond-area o potential of low quality surveillance camera systems to act as deterrent • Recommended allocation of$118,418 could be adjusted if needed to fit within the budget (e.g. reduced to accommodate revenue below the projected amount) Revised:3/9/2007 Page 7 of 10 Printed:3/20/2007 Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste& Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan o regular pruning to maintain any vegetation that is compromising visibility in locations used for illegal dumping o new community gardens (recruit community and/or school group to start project) on sites subject to dumping • Recommended allocation of$12,000 could be adjusted if needed to fit within the budget (e.g. reduced to accommodate revenue below the projected amount) B. Servicing Additional Street Cans • Fund collection services for three new street cans within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area (cans to be purchased with grant obtained by Keep North Richmond Beautiful) • Recommended allocation of$1,136 would fund weekly collection for three street cans for calendar year 2007 18. Community Involvement A. Stipends • Fund stipends to West Contra .Costa Unified School District students, Young Adult Empowerment Center Advisory Council -and Youth Build members for illegal dumping abatement and beautification programs within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area • Recommended allocation of$40,000 could be adjusted if needed to fit within the budget (e.g. reduced to accommodate revenue below the projected amount). . B. Mentorship Program • Fund mentoring program within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area, the program should be designed after taking the following into consideration: ecommunity-input-regarding-needs/priorities o existing programs in the North Richmond area that incorporate mentoring opportunities o potential opportunities to customize new or existing mentoring programs to specifically aid in efforts to combat illegal dumping and blight • Recommended allocation of$31,862 could be adjusted if needed to fit within the budget (e.g. reduced to accommodate revenue below the projected amount) C. Shields Reid Playground Equipment • Fund purchase and installation of new playground equipment and rubberized surfacing for Shields Reid park • Recommended allocation of$125,000 is an estimated one-time fixed cost provided by the City-Public Works Department Revised:3/Q;'2007 Page 9 Of 10 Printed:3/20/2007 Budget Table - North Richmond Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan (2006-2007) Funding Biannual Allocation Total Expense, #of Units # Strategy Expenditure (Projected Per Unit Cost Included in 2- (2006-2007) Biannual for Activity" Year Budget Revenue) depends on#of Pick-up=$41(not 1 Bulky Clean-ups $ 32,800 apo units including Disposal) 20-yard Debris depends on#of Box=$265(City) variable 2 Neighborhood Clean-ups $ 18,000 units OR$526.02+ (2 events based on $110.44/ton over 4 City average) tons(County) depends on#of Disposal Voucher 3 Voucher System $ 64,000 p units =$5 12,soo 20/p ($299,998) Annual Labor= 1 year 4 Community Services Coordinator $ 69,350 $ 129,350 $69,350 (County funding remaining$60k) 5 Bilingual Outreach Services/Coordinator $ 40,000 depends on n/a n/a usage can be Public Relations Campaign designed to fit 6 (includes PSAs&Outreach Materials) $ 75,848 within available n/a n/a budget 7 City/County Pick-up from Right-of-Way $ 146,000 $ 146,000 Per Hour=$93.60 .1560 (approx) (15 hours/ week) depends on#of Lot=$2,000 8 Vacant Lot Clean-up $ 40,000 lots&cost per (average) 20 lot depends on#of Fence=$4,500 9 Vacant Lot Fencing $ 90,000 fences&cost 20 per fence (average) 10 Code Enforcement Staff $ 129,097 $ 129,097 Annual Salary= 1 $129,097 11 Graffiti Abatement $ 58,240 $ 58,240 Per Hour=$37.33 1560 (approx) (15 hours/week) 12 Illegal Dumping Investigator/Officer $ 137,000 60% $ 137,000 Per Hour=$25- 4160 hours r 1 ($899 995) Vehicle=$33,000 vehicle 13 Increase Nighttime Patrols $ 58,240 depends on#of per Hour=$28 2080 units (20 hours/week) depends#of 14 Surveillance Cameras $ 118,418 units&whether Camera=$2,500 49(approx) infrastructure is (approx) needed depends on#of Reward=$250- 15 Reward System $ 30,000 rewards& $1,000 30-120 reward amounts Annual Quarter- 2 year 16 Illegal Dumping Prosecutor $ 93,000 $ 93,000 Time Salary= (City funding $46,500 1 remaining) Revised: 7/20/2006 Total cost for labor/Der unit items calculated for 2-year period. Page A-1 of A-2 Printed:10127/2006 (t#ach c Collu-a Costa County CONTRACT AMENDMENT AGREEMENT Number 49M):; Staiulard Form 1 7 (Purchase of Services - Long Form) Fun(I/OI-g# 1 114 Revised 2002 Account # 2310 Other 1. Identification of Contract to be Amended. Number: 49335 Ell"Calve Date: January 16, 2007 Department: Conlmulut.y Devel(opm)ent - Anicii(Iiiient.f'#1 Sul),cc.t: Interagency Agreement between Contra Costa County Cominurlitj- Development Department and Cita ol'Richinond for North Richmond Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan 2. Parties. 'I'hc Coullt.y of'Contra Costa, California (Count}-), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor Inutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: City of Richmond Capacity: A Public Agency Address: 1401 Marina Way South, Richmond, CA 94804 3. Amendment Date. Tlic effective (late of this Contract.Amendment Agreement is April 25, 2007 . 4. Amendment Specifications. '1'hc Contract ideiltif led above is hereby amended as set forth in the".knicndnlcnt. Specifications" attached hereLo which are incorporated herein by reference. 5. Signatures. These signatures attest d1c parties' agreelllent hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ATTEST: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By By Chairman/Designee Deputy CONTRACTOR Name of business entity Name of business entire- By By (Signature of individual or officer) (Signature of individual or officer) (Print name and title A, if applicable) (Print name and title B, if applicable) Dote to Contractor:For Corporations(profit or nonprofit),the contract must he signed by Rvo officers.Signature A must be than ofthe president or vict>pnesident and Siatatute 13 must be than of the secretat,or assistant xcretara(CM1 Code Section 1190 and Corporations Code Section 313). All signatures must he acknowledged as set forth on Form L-1. L-7 (Page: I of 1) 49335 Amendment Specifications 1) In consideration for assignment of additional Agency's Obligations per the attached revised Service Plan and its Table A, Contra Costa County, on behalf of its Community Development Department (County), and the City of Richmond (Agency) hereby agree to increase the payment limit by $472,658.00 to a new total payment limit of $1,079,481.00. All contract terms remain unchanged, in full force, and in effect except as specifically set forth below: Interagency Agreement Number 49335 is hereby amended as follows: ".4. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Agency under this Contract shall not exceed $1,079,481.00." "6. Agency's Obligations. The Service Plan and Table A thereto and attached to the original agreement are hereby superseded by the revised Service Plan and Table A thereto attached to this amendment." "8. Project. The 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan Implementation thereto and attached to the original agreement is hereby superseded by the Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan thereto attached to this amendment." Initials: Agency County Dept. Contra Costa County SERVICE PLAN Number Standard Form L-3 (Purchase of Services) Revised 2002 A. Background: In July 2004, the City of Richmond ("Agency") and Contra Costa County ("County") entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") agreeing to jointly administer Mitigation Fee (as such term is defined in the Expenditure Plan) monies collected from the West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill ("WCCSL") Bulk Materials Processing Center ("BMPC"), including the Golden Bear Transfer Station/Waste Recycling Center, for the benefit of the incorporated and unincorporated-North Richmond area. A Committee was formed pursuant to the terms of the MOU for the specific purpose of preparing a recommended two year Expenditure Plan which is subject to final approval of the Richmond City Council and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. This Expenditure Plan provides a means to jointly administer the Mitigation Fee funding for the benefit of the host community, as described in the BMPC Draft Environmental Impact Report dated November 2003. The first Expenditure Plan was approved by the Richmond City Council and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors in September 2006. The term "Expenditure Plan" as used herein refers to the Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan ("Plan"), which was amended by both parties in April 2007. The Plan may be further amended from time to time by the City Council and Board of Supervisors, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The MOU requires that the Mitigation Fee monies be paid to the County and held in a dedicated account. This Agreement is intended to provide a framework for the County to transfer Mitigation Fee monies to the Agency for its administrative staff costs related to the implementation and oversight of the Plan as well as other expenses directly related to each activity described in the Plan which the Agency will directly oversee/administer. B. Agency's Obligations: • Agency Staff Costs to Implement Plan: Agency shall oversee the implementation of the majority of the Plan, for an amount not to exceed $19,740. Administrative oversight to be provided by the Agency includes, but is not limited to, coordinating community input/involvement, conducting research/meetings, writing reports regarding status of implementation as well as final report to be presented to the Agency and County summarizing the outcome of each Strategy and staffing Committee meetings as needed. • Strategy 1 - Bulky Clean-ups: Agency shall implement "Strategy 1: Bulky Clean-ups" as described in the Plan, for an amount not to exceed $32,800. Agency shall coordinate the distribution of the bulky clean-ups and the tracking and reporting of the Richmond Sanitary Services residents that actually requested and received subsidized bulky clean-ups. • Strategy 2 - Neighborhood Clean-ups: Agency shall implement "Strategy 2: Neighborhood Clean-ups" as described in the Plan, for an amount not to exceed $18,000. Agency shall coordinate one or more neighborhood clean-up events in the Mitigation Fee Area. • Strategy 3 - Voucher System: Agency shall implement "Strategy 3: Voucher System" as described in the Plan, for an amount not to exceed $64,000. Agency shall coordinate the distribution of disposal vouchers and the.tracking and reporting of the residents Which actually requested and redeemed disposal vouchers. • Strategy 4 - Community Services Coordinator: Agency shall implement "Strategy 4: Community Services Coordinator' as described in the Plan, for an amount not to exceed $69,350. The Coordinator position will be hired through the Community Housing Development Corporation of North Richmond. Strategy 5 - Bilingual Outreach Services Coordinator: Agency shall implement "Strategy 5: Bilingual Outreach Services Coordinator" as described in the Plan, for an amount not to exceed L-3 (Page 1 oi'5) first receiving written approval from the County Community Development Director or his designee. Agency may also expend up to $140,000 for improvements to Shields-Reid Park and up to $75,000 for Third Street Ballfield improvements. • Entire Service Plan: Agency shall only expend funding provided under this Agreement for Strategies that are described in the Expenditure Plan and identified in "Table A: Budget" on the last page of this Service Plan. Agency shall provide County Community Development Director or his designee with adequate documentation in a final report related to all activities for which any funding is being requested under this Agreement. Activities and costs must be categorized within each of the Expenditure Plan Strategies. C. County's Obligations: 1. Payment Provisions Agency shall perform the above-described services for an amount not-to-exceed $1,079,481 (maximum amount for each Strategy is detailed in "Table A: Budget" on the last page of this Service Plan). Agency shall submit invoices to County as described below: a. Administrative Staff Costs: Upon execution of this agreement, Agency may submit one or more invoice(s), which together do not exceed $19,740, for administrative staff costs associated with the implementation and oversight of the Expenditure Plan. Upon County's review and approval of such invoices, County shall advance such invoice amounts to Agency. Agency should send summary of actual staff costs, no later than March 31, 2008 which itemizes staff title(s), number of hours and hourly rate(s). Unexpended funding shall be returned to the County no later than March 31, 2008, unless otherwise agreed to in writing. b. Strategies — Initial Payments: Upon execution of the original agreement, Agency submitted invoice(s) for total funding allocated to Strategies 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 17 as well as portions of Strategies 6 (not to exceed $5,500) and 18 (not to exceed $247,208). Upon execution of the amended agreement, Agency may submit invoice(s) for total funding allocated to Strategies 7 and 11 as well as portions of Strategies 8 (not to exceed $20,000), 9 (not to exceed $45,000) and 13 (not to exceed $10,000). Invoices should include breakdown of funding requested per Strategy. Upon County's review and approval of invoices submitted by Agency for the foregoing Strategies, County shall advance such invoice amounts to Agency (each such advance, an "Advance Payment"). Agency must submit final report upon conclusion of services detailing actual expenses for each Strategy for which the Agency received an Advance Payment and the exact amount of unexpended funding for each Strategy, if applicable. Unexpended funding shall be returned to the County no later than March 31, 2008, unless otherwise agreed to in writing. c. Strategies — Advance Payments: Agency may submit invoice(s) for remainder of funding allocated for Strategies 6, 8, 9, 13, 14 and 18 only after receiving written approval from the County Community Development Director or his designee. To request such approval, Agency must submit work plan detailing proposed tasks and projected cost per task. Invoice should include breakdown of funding requested per Strategy. Upon County's review and approval of such pre-authorized invoices, County shall advance such invoice amounts to Agency (each such advance, an 'Authorized Advance Payment"). Agency must submit final report upon conclusion of services detailing actual expenses for each Strategy for which the Agency received an Authorized Advance Payment and the exact amount of unexpended funding for each Strategy, if applicable. Unexpended funding shall be returned to-the County no later than March 31, 2008, unless otherwise agreed to in writing. d. Strategies — Reimbursement Payments: Agency may submit invoice(s) periodically for actual costs of services provided related to any Strategies for which the Agency did not receive payment in advance. Invoice should include breakdown by type of expense (e.g. labor, printing, etc.) and number of units (for labor costs include staff titles, hourly rates and L-3 (Page 3 of 5) Contra Costa County SERVICE PLAN Number_________ Standard Form L-3 (Purchase of Services) Revised 2002 TABLE A: BUDGET Total Expenditure Initial Advance Initial Advance Remaining Advance # Strategy Amount Allowed Payments(Max) Amendment Reimbursement Payments(Max) Payments(Max) 1 Bulky Clean-ups $ . 32,800 $ 32,800 2 Neighborhood Clean-ups $ 18,000 $ 18,000 3 Voucher System $ 64,000 $ 64,000 4 Community Services Coordinator $ 69,350 $ 69350 5 Bilingual Outreach Services/Coordinator $ 27,087 $ 27,087 6 Public Relations Campaign $ 75,848 $ 5,500 $ 70,348 (includes PSAs&Outreach Materials) 7 City/County Pick-up from Right-of-Way $ 146,000 $ 146,000 8 Vacant Lot Clean-up $ 40,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 9 Vacant Lot Fencing $ 90,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 . 11 Graffiti Abatement $ 58,240 $ 58,240 13 Increase Nighttime Patrols $ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 14 Surveillance Cameras $ 118,418 $ 118,418 17 Beautification <.. 3�136 $... . 13;136;.:..:.;� ; • �, '$F ���. ; `�-:; Neighborhood Landscaping Projects $ 12,000 $ 12,000 Servicing Additional Street Cans(Weekly) $ 1,136 $ 1,136 18 Community Involvement i26ei,ki:':$# 247 208 ..m �:T: : :: . .. Stipends(WCCUSD students&Youth Build) $ 40,000 $ 32,208 $ 7,792 Mentorship Program $ 31,862 $ 31,862 Shields Reid Playground Equipment $ 125,000 $ 125,000 Shields Reid Soccer Field Lighting $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Third St. Ballfield sod repairs $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Third St. Ballfield irrigation $ 50,000 $ 50,000 City Administration/Staffing $ 19,740 $ 19,740 Prevention&Education Strategies Subtotal $ 287,085 $ 216,737 $ - $ 70,348 Prevention&Education Strategies Subtotal $ 472,658 $ - $ 279,240 $ 193,418 Community Investment Strategies Subtotal $ 299,998 $ 260,344 $ - $ 39,654 Grand Total $ 1,079,481 $ 496,821 $ 279,240 $ 303,420 L-3(Page 5 of 5) Panted:4152007 Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan INTRODUCTION The Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee was established as a result of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) dated November 2003 for the WCCSL Bulk Materials Processing Center (BMPC) and Related Actions (Project). The Project involved new and expanded processing and resource recovery operations on both the incorporated and unincorporated area of the Project site, which the EIR concluded would impact the host community. To mitigate this impact Mitigation Measure 4-5 called for a Mitigation Fee to benefit the host community, described as follows: "Mitigation Fee. The facility operator shall pay a Mitigation Fee of an amount to be determined by the applicable permitting authority(ies) to defray annual costs associated with collection and disposal of illegally dumped waste and associated impacts in North Richmond and adjacent areas. The mitigation fee should be subject to the joint-control of the City and County and should be collected on all solid.waste and processible materials received at the facility consistent with the existing mitigation fee collected at the Central IRRF." In July 2004, the City of Richmond and Contra Costa County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agreeing to jointly administer Mitigation Fee monies collected from the BMPC for the benefit of the incorporated and unincorporated North Richmond area. This North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Joint Expenditure Planning Committee (Committee)was formed pursuant to the terms of the MOU for the specific purpose of preparing a recommended two year Expenditure Plan. This Expenditure Plan provides a means to jointly administer the Mitigation Fee funding for the benefit of the host community, as described in the EIR. The Expenditure Plan is subject to final approval of the Richmond City Council and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. BUDGET The attached Budget Table is incorporated herein by reference. The Budget was developed based on revenue estimates with multiple variables (e.g. number of tons of recovered materials vs. solid waste, per ton gate rate charged and amount of CPI- adjusted per ton Mitigation Fee). Revenue projections may deviate from those provided by Republic and used to prepare the attached Budget Table. Revised:: Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan accepted in the current on-call clean-ups through Richmond Sanitary Service (RSS) • Cost for each on-call pick-up of bulky items/extra waste is $41 which does not include the disposal charge which varies based on the item and quantity (e.g. non-freon appliances = $25/ea, mattress/sofa = $17.50/ea, etc.) • Recommended allocation of$32,800 would-subsidize 800 bulky item pick- ups (flat pick-up fee only, msidertts still-responsible#ormust be used in conjunction with disposal vouchers-disposal charge) 2. Neighborhood Clean-ups • Fund one or more neighborhood clean-up events per--year-in the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area • Explore feasibility of providing one or more events exclusively for creek clean-up and/or bulky items and other materials not accepted through the on-call clean-ups (e.g. tires) • Cost for neighborhood clean-ups can vary significantly--three neighborhood-glean-ups.reconfly.provide-d-in--the-City-o#-R+shmond averaged $9;-004each • Recommended allocation of$18,000 would fund one or more clean-up events depending primarily on quantity of waste accepted 3. Voucher System • Fund subsidy program to provide residents in the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area with vouchers for disposal at Republic's landfill/transfer station on Parr Blvd. • Explore feasibility.ofpraperty.clean-up-vouchers that.could.be.given-to Research options for residents in these areas that are unable to remove waste from their property due to age or disability • City of San Pablo provides residents with up to eight $5 vouchers per household per year upon request, residents must prove residency when picking up vouchers at City Halkand-A4hep-redeeming vouchers-at landfill gate (vouchers do-tet expire after six months, however.RSS only receives the subsidy for vouchers that are actually redeemed) • Recommended allocation of$64,000 would subsidize 12,800 vouchers ($5 each) 4. Community Services Coordinator • Fund full-time Community Services Coordinator through the Community Housing and Development Corporation of North Richmond (existing position being funded by County through 2006) • Community Services Coordinator handles various responsibilities related to illegal dumping and blight in North Richmond including but not limited to: o respond to 1-800-No Dumping calls regarding illegal dumping in North Richmond, Revised:3'S/2G:7. Page 3 of 10 Printed:3/20/2007 Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan brochures (e.g. County's Illegal Dumping Brochures & Richmond's Good Neighbor Brochure), periodic community newsletter-about4flega}dumpirvg/-blight--issues:-advertisements in Contra Costa Times and other West County publications (listing illegal dumping prosecutions, highlighting educational information that is targeted for season or current events, etc.) o identify most effective methods of distribution (eliminate approaches that have not been effective enough in the past) • Recommended allocation of$75,848 could be adjusted if needed to fit within the budget (e.g. reduced to accommodate revenue below the projected amount) ABATEMENT& ENFORCEMENT 7. City/County Pick-up from Right-of-Way • Fund consolidated pick-up program for illegal dumping in the public right- of-way located within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area to supplement similar services provided by RSS in the designated Hot Spot Route • Consolidating pick-up within the right of way in unincorporated & incorporated areas using the City of Richmond Public Works staff is expected to create a stable level of service, minimize delays and maximize efficiencies • City would pick-up of items from public right-of-way located outside of the RSS Hot Spot Route as well as items not suitable for collection in the compactor truck used to service the RSS Hot Spot Route (Hot Spot Route referrals would provided to the City by the Community Services Coordinator) • Recommended allocation of$146,000 would fund incremental cost for City to provide pick-up in the unincorporated & incorporated areas for an average of 30 hours per wee ktwo.days-perweek 8. Vacant Lot Clean-up • Fund clean-up of illegal dumping on vacant lots within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area where existing code enforcement processes. staffing levels. and/or funding prove to be inadequate • Prior-to cleaning up vacant lotsAs appropriate, require property owners to sign contract agreeing to fence their property and/or sign waivers allowing clean-up of waste on property • Cost of Vvacant lot clean-ups (abatements) handled by-the Gounty-Gost an average-of.$.2-000 pe-r-lot,howeve4--tk►e-aotual--costs-can vary significantly • Recommended allocation of$40,000 would fund undetermined number of vacant lots depending on the amount of illegally dumped waste on each lot 9. Vacant Lot Fencing Revised:M)!200 f Page 5 of 10 Printed:3/20/2007 Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste& Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan o build & file cases specific to instances of commercial dumping, which are suitable for prosecution . o conduct targeted sting operations to catch illegal dumpers (law enforcement strike-team(s) may also be available to conduct sting operations) • Recommended allocation of$137,000 would fund a full-time Sheriff Deputy on per diem basisapro-rated schedule and purchase-efoffset related the costs of (e.g. equipment, fuel. insurance and depreciation associated with operating a patrol vehicle/-equipped-with-necessary emergeR­G­y-equ+prnent 13. Increase Nighttime Patrols • Fund increased nighttime patrols within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area to target specific locations/timeframes where illegal dumping occurs most regularly • Using City and/or County law enforcement officer(s) or a private security firm for nighttime patrols would-be the-most--cost-effeetiveas a means of supplementing existing patrols by local law enforcement • Recommended allocation of$58,240 would fund one private security officer or overtime for City and/or County law enforcement officerjs� workingapp-Fex4rnatel�-2- -hotK-s-per-week 14. Surveillance Cameras • Fund surveillance cameras program within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area to target specific locations where illegal dumping occurs most regularly • Determine if more cost effective to purchase surveillance system(s) or hire private firm to manage surveillance system • Factors that affect the cost to install, maintain and operate a surveillance system includes: types of cameras, number of locations to be monitored, quantities of cameras needed per location, property owner approval, adjusting settings/angle, operator training, retrieval/review of photographic evidence (wireless or film) as well as relocation and repair as needed • The following would be considered prior to selecting the typed of surveillance cameras to be purchased: o Ppotential feasibility/cost/benefit of adding onto outeflme--Gf-City's high–quality wireless surveillance camera system(s) RFP eut4lize..CARB'.s-surveillance camera system on a-trial basis-to-test-.a high-quality surveillance system-and-determine whether such-a system would be effective to aid-in prosecuting actual instances of illegal--dumping in4he-North Richr-end area o potential of low quality surveillance camera systems to act as deterrent • Recommended allocation of$118,418 could be adjusted if needed to fit within the budget (e.g. reduced to accommodate revenue below the projected amount) Revised:3 9L)00t7 Page 7 of 10 Printed:3/20/2007 Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste& Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan o regular pruning to maintain any vegetation that is compromising visibility in locations used for illegal dumping o new community gardens (recruit community and/or school.group to start project) on sites subject to dumping • Recommended allocation of$12,000 could be adjusted if needed to fit within the budget (e.g. reduced to accommodate revenue below the projected amount) B. Servicinq Additional Street Cans • Fund collection services for three new street cans within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area (cans to be purchased with grant obtained by Keep North Richmond Beautiful) • Recommended allocation of$1,136 would fund weekly collection for three street cans for calendar year 2007 .18. Community Involvement A. Stipends • Fund stipends to West Contra Costa Unified School District students_ Young Adult Empowerment Center Advisory Council and Youth Build members for illegal dumping abatement and beautification programs within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area • Recommended allocation of$40,000 could be adjusted if needed to fit within the budget (e.g. reduced to accommodate revenue below the projected amount) B. Mentorship Program • Fund mentoring program within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area, the program should be designed after taking the following into consideration: -,G9mmu-nity-4np{ Ut.reg_ard+Ag-needs/priorities o existing programs in the North Richmond area that incorporate mentoring opportunities o potential opportunities to customize new or existing mentoring programs to specifically aid in efforts to combat illegal dumping and blight • Recommended allocation of$31,862 could be adjusted if needed to fit within the budget (e.g. reduced to accommodate revenue below the projected amount) C. Shields Reid Playground Equipment • Fund purchase and installation of new playground equipment and rubberized surfacing for Shields Reid park • Recommended allocation of$125,000 is an estimated one-time fixed cost provided by-the-City Public Warks Department Revised: 19/.200, Page 9 of 10 Printed:3/20/2007 Budget Table - North Richmond Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan (2006-2007) Funding Biannual Allocation #of Units gy for Activity # Strategy Expenditure (Projected Total Expense Per Unit Cost Included in 2- ' (2006-2007) Biannual Year Budget Revenue) depends on#of Pick-up=$41(not 1 Bulky Clean-ups $ 32,800 units including Disposal) 800 20-yard Debris depends on#of Box=$265(City) variable 2 Neighborhood Clean-ups $ 18,000 units OR$526.02'+ (2 events based on $110.44/ton over 4 City average) tons(County) depends on#of Disposal Voucher 3 Voucher System $ 64,000 o units =$5 12,800 20/o ($299,998) Annual Labor= 1 year 4 Community Services Coordinator $ 69,350 $ 129,350 (County funding $69,350 remaining$60k) 5 Bilingual Outreach Services/Coordinator $ 40,000 depends on n/a nla usage can be Public Relations Campaign designed to fit 6 (includes PSAs&Outreach Materials) $ 75'848 within available nta n/a budget 7 City/County Pick-up from Right-of-Way $ 146,000 $ 146,000 Per Hour=$93.60 1560 (approx) (15 hours/week) depends on#of Lot=$2,000 8 Vacant Lot Clean-up $ 40,000 lots&cost per (average) 20 lot depends on#of Fence=$4,500 9 Vacant Lot Fencing $ 90,000 fences&cost 20 per fence (average) = 10 Code Enforcement Staff $ 129,097 $ 129,097 Annual Salary$129 097 1 11 Graffiti Abatement $ 58,240 $ 58,240 Per Hour=$37.33 1560 (approx) (15 hours/week) 12 Illegal Dumping Investigator/Officer $ 137,000 60% $ 137,000 Per Hour=$25+ 4160 hours+1 ($899,995) Vehicle=$33,000 vehicle on#of 13 Increase Nighttime Patrols $ 58,240 dependsunits Per Hour=$28 2080 (20 hours/week) depends#of 14 Surveillance Cameras $ 116,416 units&whether Camera=$2,500 49(approx) infrastructure is (approx) needed depends on#of Reward=$250- 15 Reward System $ 30,000 rewards& 30-120 reward amounts $1,000 Annual Quarter- 2 year 16 Illegal Dumping Prosecutor $ 93,000 $ 93.000 Time Salary= (City funding $46.500 remaining) Revised: 7/20/2006 Total cost for labor/per unit items calculated for 2-year period. Page A-1 of A-2 Printed:10/27/2006 Contra COSUI Coc.futNI CONTRACT AMENDMENT AGRI,"E ENT Number /1933:5 Standard Forni I-r7 (Purchase of Services - Long Form) Ft.nrd/Ol; # I 114 Revised 2002 Account # 2310 ��j Other # 1. Identification of Contract to be Amended. Gil�t�/ I t/ 7/ Nurnbet-: 4.9335 Ellective Date: Januan- 1 G, 2007 Department: Community Development- Amendment #1 Subject: Interagency Agreement between Contra Costa County Community Development Department and City ol'Ilichinond for North Richmond Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan 2. Parties. The County,of Contra Costa, California (Count}), for its Department named above, and Ilse following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as lollows: Contractor: City of Richmond Capacity: A Public Agency Address: 1401 Marina Way South, Richmond, CA 94804 3. Amendment Date. The effective date of dris Contract A-mendment Agrecmetrt is April 25, 2007 . 4. Amendment Specifications. Tire Coiitraci i(lerrtifie(1 above is hereby amended as set firth in the"Airrerufinent Specifications" attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference. 5. Signatures. 'these signatures attest die parties'agreerrrent.hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA BOARD O SUP R RS ATTEST: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By By Ch" , Designee Deputy CONTRACTOR Nanie of business entity Name of business entity By By (Signature of individual,or officer) (Signature of individual or officer) (Print name and title A, if applicable) (Print name and title B, if applicable) Note to Contractor:For Corporations(profit or nonprofit).the contract must be signed by nvo officers.Signature A must be that of the president or vice-president and Signature l3 nntstbe that of the secretary or assistant secretary(CM]Code Section 1190 and Corporations Code Section 313!. All signatures must be acknowledged as set forth on Form L--. L-7 (Page 1 of 1) 49335 Amendment Specifications 1) In consideration for assignment of additional Agency's Obligations per the attached revised Service Plan and its Table A, Contra Costa County, on behalf of its Community Development Department (County), and the City of Richmond (Agency) hereby agree to increase the payment limit by $472,658.00 to a new total payment limit of $1,079,481.00. All contract terms remain unchanged, in full force, and in effect except as specifically set forth below: Interagency Agreement Number 49335 is hereby amended as follows: "4. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Agency under this Contract shall not exceed $1,079,481.00." "6. Agency's Obligations. The Service Plan and Table A thereto and attached to the original agreement are hereby superseded by the revised Service Plan and Table A thereto attached to this amendment." "8. Project. The 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan Implementation thereto and attached to the original agreement is hereby superseded by the Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan thereto attached to this amendment." Initials: Agency County Dept. Contra Costa County SERVICE PLAN Number Standard Form L-3 (Purchase of Services) Revised 2002 A. Background: In July 2004, the City of Richmond ("Agency") and Contra Costa County ("County") entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") agreeing to jointly administer Mitigation Fee (as such term is defined in the Expenditure Plan) monies collected from the West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill ("WCCSL") Bulk Materials Processing Center ("BMPC"), including the Golden Bear Transfer Station/Waste Recycling Center, for the benefit of the incorporated and unincorporated North Richmond area. A Committee was formed pursuant to the terms of the MOU for the specific purpose of preparing a recommended two year Expenditure Plan which is subject to final approval of the Richmond City Council and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. This Expenditure Plan provides a means to jointly administer the Mitigation Fee funding for the benefit of the host community, as described in the BMPC Draft Environmental Impact Report dated November 2003. The first Expenditure Plan was approved by the Richmond City Council and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors in September 2006. The term "Expenditure Plan" as used herein refers to the Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan ("Plan"), which was amended by both parties in April 2007. The Plan may be further amended from time to time by the City Council and Board of Supervisors, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The MOU requires that the Mitigation Fee monies be paid to the County and held in a dedicated account. This Agreement is intended to provide a framework for the County to transfer Mitigation Fee monies to the Agency for its administrative staff costs related to the implementation and oversight of the Plan as well as other expenses directly related to each activity described in the Plan which the Agency will directly oversee/administer. B. Agency's Obligations: • Agency Staff Costs to Implement Plan: Agency shall oversee the implementation of the majority of the Plan, for an amount not to exceed $19,740. Administrative oversight to be provided by the Agency includes, but is not limited to, coordinating community input/involvement, conducting research/meetings, writing reports regarding status of implementation as well as final report to be presented to the Agency and County summarizing the outcome of each Strategy and staffing Committee meetings as needed. • Strategy. 1 -.Bulky Clean-ups: Agency shall implement "Strategy 1: Bulky Clean-ups" as described in the.Plan, for an amount not to exceed $32,800. Agency shall coordinate the distribution of the bulky clean-ups and the tracking and reporting of the Richmond Sanitary Services residents that actually requested and received subsidized bulky clean-ups. • Strategy 2 - Neighborhood Clean-ups: Agency shall implement "Strategy 2: Neighborhood Clean-ups" as described in the Plan, for an amount not to exceed $18,000. Agency shall coordinate one or more neighborhood clean-up events in the Mitigation Fee.Area. • Strategy 3 - Voucher System: Agency shall implement "Strategy 3: Voucher System" as described in the Plan, for an amount not to exceed $64,000. Agency shall coordinate the distribution of disposal vouchers and the tracking and reporting of the residents which actually requested and redeemed disposal vouchers. • Strategy 4 - Community Services Coordinator: Agency shall implement "Strategy 4: Community Services Coordinator" as described in the Plan, for an amount not to exceed $69,350. The Coordinator position will be hired through the Community Housing Development Corporation of North Richmond. • Strategy 5 - Bilingual Outreach Services Coordinator: Agency shall implement"Strategy 5: Bilingual Outreach Services Coordinator" as described in the Plan, for an amount not to exceed L-3 (Page 1 of 5) first receiving written approval from the County Community Development Director or his designee. Agency may also expend up to $140,000 for improvements to Shields-Reid Park and up to $75,000 for Third Street Ballfield improvements. • Entire Service Plan: Agency shall only expend funding provided under this Agreement for Strategies that are described in the Expenditure Plan and identified in "Table A: Budget" on the last page of this Service Plan. Agency shall provide County Community Development Director or his designee with adequate documentation in a final report related to all activities. for which any funding is being requested under this Agreement. Activities and costs must be categorized within each of the Expenditure Plan Strategies. C. County's Obligations: 1. Payment Provisions Agency shall perform the above-described services for an amount not-to-exceed $1,079,481 (maximum amount for each Strategy is detailed in "Table A: Budget" on the last page of.this Service Plan). Agency shall submit invoices to County as described below: a. Administrative Staff Costs: Upon execution of this agreement, Agency may submit one or more invoice(s), which together do not exceed $19,740, for administrative staff costs associated with the implementation and oversight of the Expenditure Plan. Upon County's review and approval of such invoices, County shall advance such invoice amounts to Agency. Agency should send summary of actual staff costs, no later than March 31, 2008 which itemizes staff title(s), number of hours and hourly rate(s). Unexpended funding shall be returned to the County no later than March.31, 2008, unless otherwise agreed to in writing. b. Strategies — Initial Payments: Upon execution of the original agreement, Agency submitted invoice(s) for total funding allocated to Strategies 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 17 as well as portions of Strategies 6 (not to exceed $5,500) and 18 (not to exceed $247,208).'Upon execution of the amended agreement, Agency may submit invoice(s) for total funding allocated to Strategies 7 and 11 as well as ,portions of Strategies 8 (not to exceed $20,000), 9 (not to exceed $45,000) and 13 (not to exceed $10,000). Invoices should include breakdown of funding requested per Strategy. Upon County's review and approval of invoices submitted by Agency for the foregoing Strategies, County shall advance such invoice amounts to Agency (each such advance, an "Advance Payment"). Agency must submit final report upon conclusion of services detailing actual expenses for each Strategy for which the Agency received an Advance Payment and the exact amount of unexpended funding for each Strategy, if applicable. Unexpended funding shall be returned to the County no later than March 31, 2008, unless otherwise agreed to in writing. c. Strategies — Advance Payments: Agency may submit invoice(s) for remainder of funding allocated for Strategies 6, 8, 9, 13, 14 and 18 only after receiving written approval from the County Community Development Director or his designee. To request such approval, Agency must submit work plan detailing proposed tasks and projected cost per task. Invoice should include breakdown of funding requested per Strategy. Upon County's review and approval of such pre-authorized invoices, County shall advance such invoice amounts to Agency (each such advance, an `Authorized Advance Payment"). Agency must submit final report upon conclusion of services detailing actual expenses for each Strategy for Which the Agency received an Authorized Advance Payment and the exact amount of unexpended funding for each Strategy, if applicable. Unexpended funding shall be returned to the County no later than March 31, 2008, unless otherwise agreed to in writing. d. Strategies — Reimbursement Payments: Agency may submit invoice(s) periodically for actual costs of services provided related to any Strategies. for which the Agency did not receive payment in advance. Invoice should include breakdown by type of expense (e.g. labor, printing, etc.) and number of units (for labor costs include staff titles, hourly rates and L-3 (Page 3 of 5) Contra Costa County SERVICE PLAN Number_________ Standard Form L-3 (Purchase of Services) Revised 2002 TABLE A: BUDGET Total Expenditure Initial Advance Initial Advance Remaining Advance # StrategyAmendment Reimbursement Amount Allowed Payments(Max) payments(Max) Payments(Max) 1 Bulky Clean-ups $ 32,800 $ 32,800 2 Neighborhood Clean-ups $ 18,000 $ 18,000 3 Voucher System $ 64,000 $ 64,000 4 Community Services Coordinator $ 69,350 $ 69,350 5 Bilingual Outreach Services/Coordinator $ 27,087 $ 27,087 6 Public Relations Campaign $ 75,848 $ 5,500 $ 70,348 (includes PSAs&Outreach Materials) 7 City/County Pick-up from Right-of-Way $ 146,000 $ 146,000 8 Vacant Lot Clean-up $ 40,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 9 Vacant Lot Fencing $ 90,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 11 Graffiti Abatement $ 58,240 $ 58,240 13 Increase Nighttime Patrols $ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 14 Surveillance Cameras $ 118,418 $ 118,418 17 Beautification a . ` s $:...:1F3,1 36 ; 13136;k ,b : Neighborhood Landscaping Projects $ 12,000 $ 12,000 Servicing Additional Street Cans(Weekly) $ 1,136 $ 1,136 18 Community Involvement $' 286;862' $'":`247;208 '> Stipends(WCCUSD students&Youth Build) $ 40,000 $ 32,208 $ 7,792 Mentorship Program $ 31,862 $ 31,862 Shields Reid Playground Equipment $ 125,000 $ 125,000 Shields Reid Soccer Field Lighting $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Third St.Ballfield sod repairs $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Third St.Ballfield irrigation $ 50,000 $ 50,000 City Administration/Staffing $ 19,740 $ 19,740 Prevention&Education Strategies Subtotal $ 287,085 $ 216,737 $ - $ 70,348 Prevention&Education Strategies Subtotal $ 472,658 $ - $ 279,240 $ 193,418 Community Investment Strategies Subtotal $ 299,998 $ 260,344 $ - $ 39,654 Grand Total $ 1,079,481 $ 496,821 $ 279,240 $ 303,420 L-3(Page 5 of 5) Printed 4/5/2007 Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan INTRODUCTION The Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee was established as a result of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) dated November 2003 for the WCCSL Bulk Materials Processing Center (BMPC) and Related Actions (Project). The Project involved new andexpanded processing and resource recovery operations on both the incorporated and unincorporated area of the Project site, which the EIR concluded would impact the host community. To mitigate this impact Mitigation Measure 4-5 called for a Mitigation Fee to benefit the host community, described as follows: "Mitigation Fee. The facility operator shall pay a Mitigation Fee of an amount to be determined by the applicable permitting authority(ies) to defray annual costs associated withcollection and disposal of illegally dumped waste and associated impacts in North Richmond and adjacent areas. The mitigation fee should be subject to the joint-control of the City and County and should be collected on all solid waste and processible materials received at the facility consistent with the existing mitigation fee collected at the Central IRRF." In July 2004, the City of Richmond and Contra Costa County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agreeing to jointly administer Mitigation Fee monies collected from the BMPC for the benefit of the incorporated and unincorporated North Richmond area. This North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Joint Expenditure Planning Committee (Committee)was formed pursuant to the terms of the MOU for the specific purpose of preparing a recommended two year Expenditure Plan. This Expenditure Plan provides a means to jointly administer the Mitigation Fee funding for the benefit of the host community, as described in the EIR. The Expenditure Plan is subject to final approval of the Richmond City Council and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. BUDGET The attached Budget.Table is incorporated herein by reference. The Budget was developed based on revenue estimates with multiple variables (e.g. number of tons of recovered materials vs. solid waste, per ton gate rate charged and amount of CPI- adjusted per ton Mitigation Fee). Revenue projections may deviate from those provided by Republic and used to prepare the attached Budget Table. Revised: !�)%.20. 0-7 ........................... Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan accepted in the current on-call clean-ups through Richmond Sanitary Service (RSS) • Cost for each on-call pick-up of bulky items/extra waste is $41 which does not include the disposal charge which varies based on the item and quantity (e.g. non-freon appliances = $25/ea, mattress/sofa = $17.50/ea, etc.) • Recommended allocation of$32,800 would subsidize 800 bulky item pick- ups (flat pick-up fee only, residents-still-responsible formust be used in conjunction with disposal vouchers disposal-charge) 2. Neighborhood Clean-ups • Fund one or more neighborhood clean-up events per-yeaf-in the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area • Explore feasibility of providing one or more events exclusively for creek clean-up and/or bulky items and other materials not accepted through the on-call clean-ups (e.g. tires) • Cost for neighborhood clean-ups can vary significantly-thfee neighborhood-clean-ups recently.provided-+n-the City of Richmond avera-ged_$g;NQ--each • Recommended allocation of$18,000 would fund one or more clean-up events depending primarily on quantity of waste accepted 3. Voucher System • Fund subsidy program to provide residents in the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area with vouchers for disposal at Republic's lendf Wtransfer station on Parr Blvd. • Explore--feasibility-ofpropelty--clear}-up-vouchers--that-could-be-given-tc Research options for residents in these areas that are unable to remove waste from their property due to age or disability • City of San Pablo provides residents with up to eight $5 vouchers per household per year upon request, residents must prove residency when picking up vouchers at City Hall-and.whef�-redeem-ing-veuchers--at-4a-Rdfitl gate (vouchers do fit-expire after six months, howevef-RSS only receives the subsidy for vouchers that are actually redeemed) • Recommended allocation of$64,000 would subsidize 12,800 vouchers ($5 each) 4. Community Services Coordinator • Fund full-time Community Services Coordinator through the Community Housing and Development Corporation of North Richmond (existing position being funded by County through 2006) • Community Services Coordinator handles various responsibilities related to illegal dumping and blight in North Richmond including but not limited to: o respond to 1-800-No Dumping calls regarding illegal dumping in North Richmond, Revised:3 9-1.2..)O7. Page 3 of 10 Printed:3/20/2007 Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste &Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan brochures (e.g. County's Illegal Dumping Brochures & Richmond's Good Neighbor Brochure), periodic community newsletter about-illegal-dur piiRglbtight--issues--advertisements in Contra Costa Times and other West County publications (listing illegal dumping prosecutions, highlighting educational information that is targeted for season or current events, etc.) o identify most effective methods of distribution (eliminate approaches that have not been effective enough in the past) • Recommended allocation of$75,848 could be adjusted if needed to fit within the budget (e.g. reduced to accommodate revenue below the projected amount) ABATEMENT& ENFORCEMENT 7. City/County Pick-up from Right-of-Way • Fund consolidated pick-up program for illegal dumping in the public right- of-way located within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area to supplement similar services provided by RSS in the designated Hot Spot Route • Consolidating pick-up within the right of way in unincorporated & incorporated areas using the City of Richmond Public Works staff is expected to create a stable level of service, minimize delays and maximize efficiencies • City would pick-up of items from public right-of-way located outside of the RSS Hot Spot Route as well as items not suitable for collection in the compactor truck used to service the RSS Hot Spot Route (Hot Spot Route referrals would provided to the City by the Community Services Coordinator) • Recommended allocation of$146,000 would fund incremental cost for City to provide pick-up in the unincorporated & incorporated areas for an average of 30 hours per wee ktwo-days per-week 8. Vacant Lot Clean-up • Fund clean-up of illegal dumping on vacant lots within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area where existing code enforcement processes, staffing levels, and/or funding prove to be inadequate • Prior-to cleaning up vacant lotsAs appropriate, require property owners to sign contract agreeing to fence their property and/or sign waivers allowing clean-up of waste on property I • Cost of Vv_acant lot clean-ups (abatements) handled-by-the County--c.ost-an -o average f-S2-004 peg-tat however-the-aotual-costs-can vary significantly • Recommended allocation of$40,000 would fund undetermined number of vacant lots depending on the amount of illegally dumped waste on each lot 9. Vacant Lot Fencing Revised:2,19!200-7 Page 5 of 10 Printed:3/20/2007 Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan o build & file cases specific to instances of commercial dumping, which are suitable for prosecution o conduct targeted sting operations to catch illegal dumpers (law enforcement strike-team(s) may also be available to conduct sting operations) • Recommended allocation of $137,000 would fund -a full-time Sheriff Deputy on per-there basisa pro-rated schedule and purchase efoffset related the costs of(e.g, equipment, fuel, insurance and.depreciation associated with operating a patrol vehicle/equippedwith necessary er-nergency--equip_ment 13. Increase Nighttime Patrols • Fund increased nighttime patrols within the Mitigation Fee Primary. Funding Area to target specific locations/timeframes where illegal dumping occurs most regularly • Using City and/or County law enforcement officer(s) or a private security firm for nighttime patrols wool-d-be-the-mes-ce-s#-ef-eetiveas a means of supplementing existing patrols by local law enforcement • Recommended allocation of$58,240 would fund one private security officer or overtime for City and/or County law enforcement officerfs uvea appre ireateay-2-0 f�eurs pe eek 14. Surveillance Cameras • Fund surveillance cameras program within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area to target specific locations where illegal dumping occurs most regularly • Determine if more cost effective to purchase surveillance system(s) or hire private firm to manage surveillance system • Factors that affect the cost to install, maintain and operate a surveillance system includes: types of cameras, number of locations to be monitored, quantities of cameras needed per location, property owner approval, adjusting settings/angle, operator training, retrieval/review of photographic evidence (wireless or film) as well as relocation and repair as needed • The following would be considered prior to selecting the typeu of surveillance cameras to be purchased: o Ppotential feasibility/cost/benefit of adding onto outc©me-ef-City's _high—quality wireless surveillance camera system(s) IFP autilize CA--B=s-sur-veillartce camera-system-on--a-trial-basis 4"est-a high-quality surveillance system and-determine whether-such a s-ystem would be effective to aid-in prosecuting actual instances of illegalAumpfng in-the.North Ric.l4mend..area o potential of low quality surveillance camera systems to act as deterrent • Recommended allocation of $118,418 could be adjusted if needed to fit within the budget (e.g. reduced to accommodate revenue below the projected amount) Revised:M112007 Page 7 of 10 Printed:3120/2007 Amended 2006/2007 North Richmond Waste& Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan o regular pruning to maintain any vegetation that is compromising visibility in locations used for illegal dumping o new community gardens (recruit community and/or school group to start project) on sites subject to dumping • Recommended allocation of$12,000 could be adjusted if needed to fit within the budget (e.g. reduced to accommodate revenue below the projected amount) B. Servicing Additional Street Cans • Fund collection services for three new street cans within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area (cans to be purchased with grant obtained by Keep North Richmond Beautiful) • Recommended allocation of$1,136 would fund weekly collection for three street cans for calendar year 2007 18. Community Involvement A. Stipends • Fund stipends to West Contra Costa Unified School District students, Young Adult Empowerment Center Advisory Council --and Youth Build members for illegal dumping abatement and beautification programs within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area • Recommended allocation of$40,000 could be adjusted if needed to fit within the budget (e.g. reduced to accommodate revenue below the projected amount) B. Mentorship Proqram • Fund mentoring program within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area, the program should be designed after taking the following into consideration: eGOM eunity-input regarding-needs/priorities o existing programs in the North Richmond area that incorporate mentoring opportunities o potential opportunities to customize new or existing mentoring programs to specifically aid in efforts to combat illegal dumping and blight • Recommended allocation of$31,862 could be adjusted if needed to fit within the budget (e.g. reduced to accommodate revenue below the projected amount) C. Shields Reid Play-round Equipment • Fund purchase and installation of new playground equipment and rubberized surfacing for Shields Reid park • Recommended allocation of$125,000 is an estimated one-time fixed cost provided by the City Public Works Department Revised:319,12007 Page 9 of 10 Printed:3/20/2007 Budget Table - North Richmond Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan (2006-2007) Funding Biannual Allocation #of Units Total Expense # Strategy Expenditure (Projected Per Unit Cost included in 2- 2006-2007 for Activity ( ) Biannual Year Budget Revenue) depends on#of Pick-up=$41(not 1 Bulky Clean-ups $ 32,800 units including Disposal) 800 20-yard Debris depends on#of Box=$265(City) variable 2 Neighborhood Clean-ups $ 18,000 units OR$526.02+ (2 events based on $110.44/ton over 4 City average) tons(County) depends on#of Disposal Voucher ' 3 Voucher System $ 64,000 o units =$s 12,800 20/o ($299,998) Annual Labor= 1 year . 4 Community Services Coordinator $ 69,350 $ 129,350 $69,350 (County funding remaining$60k) 5 Bilingual Outreach Services/Coordinator $ 40,000 depends on n/a n/a usage can be Public Relations Campaign designed to fit 6 (includes PSAs&Outreach Materials) $ 75,848 within available n/a n/a budget 7 City/County Pick-up from Right-of-Way $ 146,000 $ 146,000 Per Hour=$93.60 156 (approx) (15 hours/week) depends on#of Lot=$2,000 8 Vacant Lot Clean-up $ 40,000 lots&cost per (average) 20 lot depends on#of Fence=$4,500 9 Vacant Lot Fencing $ 90,000 fences&cost 20 per fence Annual Salary (average) = 10 Code Enforcement Staff $ 129,097 $ 129,097 $129,097 1 11 Graffiti Abatement $ 58,240 $ 58,240 Per Hour=$37.33 1560 (approx) (15 hours/week) 12 Illegal Dumping Investigator/Officer $ 137,000 60% $ 137,000 Per Hour=$25+ 4160 hours+1 ($899,995) Vehicle=$33,000 vehicle on#of 13 Increase Nighttime Patrols $ 58,240 dependsunits Per Hour=$28 2080 (20 hours/week) depends#of 14 Surveillance Cameras $ 118,418 units&whether Camera=$2,500 49(approx) infrastructure is (approx) needed depends on#of Reward=$250- 15 Reward System $ 30,000 rewards& $1,000 30-120 reward amounts Annual Quarter- 2 year 16 Illegal Dumping Prosecutor $ 93,000 $ 93,000 Time Salary= (City funding $46,500 remaining) Revised: 7/20/2006 Total cost for labor/Der unit items calculated for 2-year period. Page A-1 of A-2 Printed:10127/2006