HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02072006 - C.98 TO:� BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - "_
: ........ Contra
FROM`. DENNIS BARRY,AICP {` Costa
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: February 7,2006 County
SUBJECT: Biennial Compliance Checklist and Capital Improvement Program for Measure C-1988
Growth Management Program
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. FIND that the proposed 2006-2012 Capital Improvement Program(CIP)for Parks and
Sheriff Facilities is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(see
Exhibit A);
2. ADOPT the 2006-2012 CIP for Parks and Sheriff. Facilities(see Exhibit B);
3. APPROVE the completed Biennial Compliance Checklist(See Exhibit C)and find that
the County's policies and programs conform to the requirements for compliance.with
the Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and Growth Management Program;
4. AUTHORIZE the Chair of.the Board of Supervisor's to sign the completed Checklist.
FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of the CIP for Parks and Sheriff Facilities and the approval of the Biennial
Compliance Checklist(Checklist)qualify the County to receive its Fiscal Year 2005/2006
and 2006/2007 allocations of Measure C-1988"return to source"revenues,estimated to be
approximately$2.2 million annually.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
The County biennially submits a compliance checklist to the Contra Costa Transportation
Authority(Authority)to receive the County's portion of the 18 percent of sales tax funds
available for local street maintenance and improvements.
Two related actions must precede completion and submittal of the Checklist:
1. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review of the proposed 2006 Capital
Improvement Program(CIP)for Parks and Sheriff Facilities;and
2. Adoption of this CIP for Park and Sheriff Facilities.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE: Pt-.�•�3
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMIT EE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE (S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON o- m APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT y ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE
SHOWN.
Contact: Hillary Heard,(925/335-1278) /
cc: Community Development Department(CDD) ATTESTED
Public Works Department JOHN SWEETEN,CLERK OF
Sheriff's Office THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
CCTA(via CDD) A�D COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
By ;DEPUTY
G:1Transportation\HillarylMeasure C 2004 20051BO Checkllst\Draft Board Order_Fe606.doc
Biennial Compliance Checklist and CIP-for Measure C-1998
FEBRUARY 7,2006
Page 2
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS(CONTINUED)
To comply with CEQA, Department staff has found pursuant to adopted County CEQA
Guidelines that the CIP for Parks and Sheriff Facilities is,not a project subject to CEQA
(see Exhibit A).This follows from the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that
have the potential to cause significant adverse effects to the environment. All capital
facilities programmed are either fully committed, constructed, awaiting occupancy, or
undergoing separate environmental review.Underthe provisions of Section 15061(b)3,of
the State and County CEQA guidelines, it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that adoption of the CIP for Parks and Sheriff Facilities could have a significant
effect on the environment.
The CIP for.Parks and Sheriff Facilities (see Exhibit B) was prepared as part of the
County's Development Mitigation Program. The CIP is authorized by Implementation
Measure 4-n of the County General Plan.Any capital projects sponsored by the County
and necessary to maintain adopted levels of performance must be identified in a five-year
CIP.Funding sources for the complete cost of the improvements,and phasing,if.any,must
also be identified in the CIP.The CIP demonstrates that development anticipated between
2006 and 2012 will maintain compliance with the performance standards for parks and
sheriff facilities.
Table 5 of the CIP shows no expansion or acquisition of sheriff facilities is proposed forthe
seven-year period for patrol and investigation use. The existing "surplus" capacity is
expected to be sufficient to accommodate population growth during this period. It is likely
that future updates of the CIP will need to identify construction or acquisition of additional
facilities.
The Checklist covers actions and decisions taken by the County during the 2004 and 2005
calendar years.The Checklist covers the following areas:
— Complying with Action Plans for Regional Routes of Significance;
— Participating in the Regional Traffic Mitigation Program(RTMP);
— Providing Housing Options and Job opportunities;
Complying with performance standards for transportation and other urban
services;
Participating in cooperative multi-jurisdictional planning;
— Maintaining a 5-Year Capital Improvement Program;
— Implementing a.Transportation System Management Ordinance;
Meeting minimum expenditures for street and road maintenance;and
Posting signs for construction projects receiving more than $250,000 in
Measure C funds.
The County has satisfied all Checklist requirements during 2004 and 2005 calendar years.
All traffic level of service standards and performance standards for other urban services in
I the unincorporated area were maintained.The County implemented all the required plans,
programs and ordinances for mitigating local and regional transportation impacts of
development projects, providing housing and job,opportunities ,and constructing the
necessary capital improvements for urban services.County road projects and expenditures
have met the Measure C-1988 requirements.The Board of Supervisors has participated in
or taken actions during the year consistent with the multi-jurisdictional transportation
planning process established by Measure C-1988.
CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION
Failure to adopt the CIP for Parks and Sheriff Facilities or approve'the Checklist will prevent
the County for qualifying for its Fiscal Year allocations for 2005/2006 of"return to source"
funds. Funds will be available for allocation beginning July 1,2006
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A: Determination that an Activity is not a Project Subject to the California Environmental Quality
Act.
Exhibit B: Contra Costa County Development Mitigation Program,2006-2012 Capital Improvement for
Parks and Sheriff Facilities.
Exhibit C:,_ ..,Contra d&taff Transportation Authority Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist.
EXHIBIT A .
DETERMINATION THAT AN ACTIVITY IS NOT A PROJECT SUBJECT TO THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALTIY ACT(CEQA)
FILE NO.CP 06-10
ACTIVITY NAME: Contra Costa County Development Mitigation Program:Capital
ImprovementProgram for Parks and Sheriff Facilities
PREPARED BY: Hillary P.Heard DATE: February 7,2006
This activity is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to Section 15061(b)of
Chapter 3 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the
environment.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY:
Adoption of a Capital Improvements Program for the provision of Parks and Sheriff facilities in
order to demonstrate compliance with the provisions of Measure C-1988. No significant change
in the environment will result from the adoption of this program: all capital facilities
programmed are either fully committed or constructed, and awaiting occupancy or are
undergoing separate environmental review. Projects which may be funded in the future
consistent with this program which are as yet undefined will be subject to review under the
California Environmental Quality Act.
LOCATION:
Countywide in the County of Contra Costa,State of California.
Date:February 7,2006 Reviewed by:
Community Development Department Representative
G:\Transportation\Hillary\Measure C 2004_2005\CIP\CIP_CEQUA_2006.doc
EXHIBIT B
Contra Costa County
Development Mitigation Program
2006-2012
Capital Improvement Program for
Parks and Sheriff Facilities
Prepared by
Contra Costa County
Community Development Department
January 2006
I. INRODUCTION
This document is Contra Costa County's Capital Improvement Program(CIP)for providing park
and Sheriff Facilities in the unincorporated area of the County. A companion document,the
County Road Improvement Program,describes transportation projects to mitigate the
transportation impacts of new development as well as to facilitate access to housing
opportunities for all income levels. Both documents respond to the requirements of the Contra
Costa Transportation Authority's Biennial Compliance Checklist,which is used to measure how
well individual jurisdictions are complying with the requirements of the growth management
program of Measure C-88.
The Measure G=88 growth management program requires local jurisdictions to develop a five-
year capital improvement program to meet and maintain adopted performance standards. It is
Contra Costa Transportation Authority policy that all capital improvement programs be amended
annually,taking into account changes in project costs,funding sources,project development and
timing. Jurisdictions can avoid annual updates by developing longer range capital improvement
programs. The County has elected to use a seven-year horizon for the CIP.
Because the CIP is based on a seven-year horizon,2006-2012,growth estimates for that time
period are presented in Section I1. Section III of the CIP reviews the performance standards,
which were established by the Growth Management Element in the Contra Costa County
General Plan,and describes the status of County's compliance with these standards based on the
estimated population growth. Section N describes the program facilities needed to meet the
demands of future growth as dictated by the performance standards set forth in the Growth
Management Element.
IL POPULATION ESTIMATES
Table 1 provides an estimate of past population growth in the unincorporated area since adoption
of the County's Growth Management Element in 1991. It also describes projected population
growth for the seven-year period of the CIP,2006-2012. These forecasts are based on ABAG's
Projections 2000,as adjusted by the Community Development Department to reflect the actual
growth recorded on the unincorporated area between 1991-2005.
TABLE 1
PAST AND PROJECTED POPULATION GROWTH
IN UNINCORPORATED CONTRA COSTA
AREA 1991-2005 2006-2012
East County 8,779* 4,700
Central County 14,678** 2,500
West County 2,923 2,450
TOTAL 26,380 9,650
* Includes growth in Oakley up to year 2000.
**
Does not include the growth in Dougherty Valley,which ABAG assigns to City of San Ramon.
5
III. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The Growth Management Element established standards for the provision of certain public
services in the unincorporated areas. These performance standards are applied to all
development that was approved since the adoption of the County General Plan in January 1991.
The standards are established for the entire unincorporated area;therefore,the following
evaluation is on a countywide basis.
Park Facilities:The growth management standard for park facilities is three acres of
neighborhood parks per 1,000 population. Table 2 evaluates this standard as of 2005. This
evaluation is based on population growth for the 1991 -2005 time period and the park acreage
opened during that period.
Since January 1991,the County has opened approximately 116 acres of new park facilities that
meet the neighborhood park classification. Actual park construction exceeded the growth
management standard by 37 acres. These facilities represent a broad range of accomplishments,
including contribution to joint school/park facilities,pro-rated credit for park facilities of cities or
special districts funded partially by County revenues or land-dedication,and linear parks that
serve the local area. See Appendix A for a description of these park facilities.
TABLE 2
EVALUATION OF COMPLIANCE
WITH THE PARK FACILITIES STANDARD AS OF 2005
REQUIRED FACILITIES
FACILITIES OPENED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)
79 acres 116 acres 37 acres
Sheriff Facilities: The growth management standard for Sheriff facilities is 155 square feet of
patrol and investigation facilities per 1,000 population. The definition of this standard was
amended in 1997 by the Board of Supervisors to include support facilities within the definition
of Sheriff patrol and investigation functions. This amendment was adopted due to the fact that
the prior definition of Sheriff facilities included only the patrol and investigation facilities and
excluded other support facilities. Since 1991,a large amount of the square footage constructed
by the Sheriff included these support facilities.The modification of the standard to include
support facilities was intended to ensure consistency with the strategy employed by the Sheriff in
providing the capital facilities needed for a growing population.
Table 3 evaluates compliance with the performance standard as of 2005. The evaluation is based
on population growth for 1991-2005 time period and the square footage of Sheriff Facilities
opened as of 2002. The population growth between 1991 and 2005 created a demand for 4,089
square feet of patrol,investigation and support facilities. Since 1991,the County has opened
8,181 square feet of facilities that serve patrol,investigation and support activities. Actual
Sheriff Facility construction exceeded the growth management standard by 4,092 square feet.
See Appendix B for the inventory of Sheriff Facilities.
5
TABLE 3
EVALUATION OF COMPLIANCE
WITH SHERIFF FACILITIES STANDARD AS OF 2005
REQUIRED FACILITIES
FACILITIES OPENED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)
4,089 sq.ft. 8,181 sq.ft. 4,092 sq.ft.
IV. SEVEN-YEAR PROGRAM FOR PARK AND SHERIFF FACILITIES
The Measure C-88 growth management program requires that capital improvement programs
include approved projects,their estimated costs and a financial plan for providing the
improvements. This section describes a seven-year program of projects to maintain compliance
with the County's adopted growth management standards for park and Sheriff Facilities.
Park Facilities:The projected growth during the 2006-2012 time period will generate the need
for 29 acres of neighborhood and community parks. Table 4 describes the park facilities
programmed for construction during the 2006 to 2012 time period. Nearly 55 acres of
neighborhood parks are programmed for construction. By adding the acreage from Table 4 to
the current"surplus"of 37 acres,programmed park construction will exceed the performance
standard by approximately 63 acres based on the growth projected to occur in the unincorporated
area by 2012.The formula utilized to evaluate this need for facilities in 2012 is detailed in Table
5.
Parks are financed largely by park dedication fees assessed against new development in the
unincorporated area.These fees amount to$1,350 per dwelling unit in eastern Contra Costa and
$2,000 per dwelling unit elsewhere.County regulations allow these fees to be satisfied through
direct payments,dedication of land,or dedication of improved park facilities to the County.
Unless otherwise indicated,the parks shown on Table 4 occur on County-owned parcels or land
dedicated by developers to the County. Expenditures are for park improvements only.
In 1996,the Board of Supervisors approved an implementation program for County parks,
recreation and trail facilities that included a review of the park dedication fee structure.In 2001,
the County departments providing staff support for park development formed the Parks,Creeks,
and Trails Committee. The Committee has undertaken efforts to review and update the existing
park dedication fee structure. This review has occurred through a Park Impact Fee Nexus Study
which was approved by the Board in 2005.The final revisions to the park dedication fee
ordinance governing the fee structure is currently still underway as of January 2006.
The Committee is also in the process of launching a Parks Master Plan.It is hoped this master
planning effort will assist the County in evaluating current and existing park acreage and to
ensure the performance standard will be met in the future.
5
Sheriff Facilities:The projected growth during the 2006-2012 time period will generate the need
for 1,496 square feet of Sheriff facilities to serve patrol and investigation activities. The surplus
square footage resulting from Sheriff facilities opened as of 2002 is 4,092 sq.ft.This"surplus"
of facility capacity is sufficient to serve all growth.projected to occur in the unincorporated area
by 2012,with approximately 2,596 sq.feet of capacity remaining by that time. The formula
utilized to evaluate this need for facilities in 2012 is detailed in Table 5.
No construction or acquisition of additional sheriff facilities is programmed for the next seven
years.Existing capacity is expected to be sufficient to accommodate population growth for the
next seven years,but probably not more than that. Due to the fact that there is no future
construction programmed and past years surplus capacity will be utilized,it may be difficult to
demonstrate compliance with the growth management standard in future years.
In 1997,the Board of Supervisors approved a recommendation of their Finance Committee to
request the Sheriff,in cooperation with the County Administrator,to prepare a master plan that
addresses the long tern needs for patrol and investigation activities in the unincorporated area
and to evaluate potential revenue sources to fund implementation of the master plan.This master
plan,when completed,could help guide future updates of the CIP.
Fees are currently in place for new development in the unincorporated area to provide ongoing
support for Sheriff operations. The fees do not cover additional facilities that may be needed in
the future. The master plan for patrol and investigation facilities could examine potential
revenue for such facilities.
Since 1991,a significant inventory of space for patrol and investigation activities has been made
available on a short-term basis to the Sheriff through donations or leases. These facilities total
2,660 square feet and are listed in Appendix C. The Sheriff recommends that this space not be
claimed by the Board for the purpose of meeting the growth management standard for Sheriff
Facilities. This CIP is consistent with that recommendation.
5
N
O
N
N q U N CGS.N.rn
A N
(A 69 69 69 69 64 (%O pl
O�
G N
O ^
O O � NO O�C70 N
M
o M
N
_c hOr10 Nt00.-�OOO
W F O Ml N O N O N N O Vt VI d
Ep w Vl A (n
V V
u N N �
�h h Orn O N1 O O O O O h - W W
O O !n O
z
z r OvwU2 u u u U W v
j v0
W .J o
o vv vvQ v'v o: CL
St
w '
a z V z z a U z z U U U d
a� v�
A b �.
wX
u f�a m v Y6°N
o.�
G y y 0 � p X 0 0 0 C4� A O�°`O lO
o X. EpF
a. U4 W--2>R14mmI l Zxl
APPENDICIES
_NNN N N NN MMS V r V'✓1`O- NNN
N N NN
N N N N N N N
4
co O
UA
O O N h O rel O vl O_¢v�d 0 0 0[�M M M M M O sf O v�M�'t�n V O 1'O N M •+
a 3 �
[] O U
q O O N Yl O M O vl O_d'O O M 0 0 0 �/1 vl'h vl O V O Vl M 0
n7�nNNOCO-+oO.Z�OO�W tV IJci OOOOC V��ONOOIV CJ V Ovi IDO
29
w Fa
T T
w U U
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w o 0 0 o w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 v o 0 0.0
z w E 0-E-E_ c w wx E °c °F °cti °e4 °Cwx ° w w
w ° o 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 o W o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'o v o 0 0 0 0
O 'C L L-�F.-G- �.Ar,.AC o� F-=t L.-L�.•OF .�C .00�C�C�.�G U.�CC ALF F
C m 00 50 G EG 0 u .OrG 00 CO 00 CG 00 00 W 00�0 OD 00 W W CO CO�0 00 a CO 00 00
F F zzzzzzzzUzzzwzUzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZ-ZZZZZ -
3
x � A�
L W ° « v « Y « ww-ww
O .FW.Y iW. -
?> c o°,.y ,'>o °x a°i 0 0 0 0 0 0— ° ° '> o o '� o o a
W 0 0 0 6 05 0 ,F p� � vm wcncocncncn Er
H n a �°
° V rJ' ,F �.� >`W T R W ° ttl O O ___ W t�3 a W ° 5 ✓°i N._._ W
FwZ ¢ awmdU3mmFrA(aw¢zaHwwwwwwOaZQZLI G1C]n faAm
P.
qOq
d x v
a ti: a x
R MW
w .o U U
'z O C X Tb C N� � U b
' o.a� g u �•v j .? C v U W
>�O '���+>aa ��1- `vim q` .
U. 4go 0
o'"1
m o
b E v a m ro Q ^m Fo d 4 d W
CIO
a AE-a.az C�UU nuuN U>o >axzA v, zaHzzv
O
U
_ F
yv U o
>,w o a
m3 E'- O w v c—CQ x u x £u F_ UU. .
�wmo°'� y�a ��a0aF° Nas0 OWX � cvixm0. mA�'C ra
a..°c F5 0 v Eo A '� m m o w
gw W v ma a �.� o ❑ 5U a5 Ey v x�`aE a.w." L'� 6 .a
�a C ry v
oO o d v o¢ uin w0 0 O
UQUvU m 1U
gClgPrn> F
V)C� d
e � v
A
e E A
ee�
dV
y Q�
N W C
o y
F o �
� d 000Qroa_Q¢_¢�o QQa7oo7aoo�000Qo oQ �07000�n v1 00000 0
Ili
0 O M N O O N
b 0 v M z N z z z T z z N N a\0 v v O O N N 7 O z N r M O h O O V I
U - -N M •--� M 7 Nl.--� 4 c ^^o0 n b
z etl d
o
H
¢ 0000r00000 h rMQooQNQoQ00000 e.. �o7o0 C>
e � � ^N nrZ o,z ooz Nz 000a o�N NnooMv_
[_ ;0 N N N r1 ri ri N o b M N M b V R
fVJ7[c7l .=034 N
4 .
{l
z �xv
04do o 0 0 0 d d d 6 0 0 0 o Q d o d Q o Q Q Q o o e a M o a o N rn o^o 0
lir__oo Mto... o
20
Ww
w r ^
o^
^C
w > .> noo npooywwow w o o aLa n
C
o
-' Q C 5 C:�Q' F �.cJ N L W
W m. 3 m o v v c o v Q'°.o o o 0 0
.n S .n ��a'�.N'� 'M Q ° C U W u00
O
W l o w o E o ,C.�.� ons > c N H.�h U v�,v o 0 0 o _
O (4 o c A p. n ❑ ° o E c o'a c e 2 v 2 e c u U a w c c
a y °y 0 p a .-.Q .-. o y � 7 0 -Y ^ v^
b x x.c x �,6 ° o.^ E'u '� E ° 'E o o d w.� 0 0
Z a�a°daa°Qa C]UU�n EU['�Ud QUQ W°QUU�33 UODUU
O 0
F
U
O
J
� T
>o
u ❑� Leu 'a v"n� >> dzzd
,C°. t4°'Q y.7. r"n W in rn vl ro `cd."o A h m n cC b s r"n ab o❑ `v a'
o
E o ^.� C.Fi
o n � 'o c o - 7 c c 3 o °3 °C7 3 U
o°ornO C7,�ao axUUUw W -C7�_'>
O� h M�0 ^
N--'a� O�h O�N �^N 0 0 0 N 0 0^N d•�V l ; N��O�� L 0 0�O O�
O L � •m
C C O v N N [NJ �N1 y o N a r N
w 'b o 0 L .G d d U U N N Ol W N N L L G U N V O D v G
e ° ° C ° W W u C C C C C C C_ C C,C C C C __ p O,C C C E E' y ,C
C ° U U G j y pC� •7Ln Ln O O Yr+- rL: rL�
I
1
i
' ooaoaoo
C ry`
G7'O
V]
=xv
V �
Q ¢o a o a o Q
U tdo ea000 z
b z
a w �
Ori E -
G
Q 9
Ud c
O d¢d¢d¢ Q
z� .14 Zzzzzzz
F
W
F
2
W �a Pwo.ww
rxn v} ,�
Q
a z
Q v
U 94
T
z
wmGn td
01
v E
> c�.c da
a "c
a�(atriC}w'RSW
"EXHIBIT C
CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Allocation of 18%Local Street Maintenance&Improvement Funds
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period:Calendar Years 2004&2005
Compliance Checklist
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
1. Action Plans YES No
a. Is the jurisdiction implementing the actions called for in the applicable
Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance for all designated
Regional Routes within the jurisdiction?
b. Has the jurisdiction implemented the following procedures as outlined
in the applicable Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance?
i. Circulation of environmental documents,
ii. Analysis of the impacts of proposed General Plan amendments and
recommendation of changes to Action Plans,and
iii.Conditioning the approval of projects consistent with Action Plan
policies?
c. Has the jurisdiction followed the procedures for RTPC review of ® ❑
General Plan Amendments as called for in Authority Resolution No.
95-06-G(see Exhibit 6).
2. Regional Transportation Mitigation Program YES No
a. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a local development ® ❑
mitigation program to ensure that new development pays its fair share
of the impact mitigation costs associated with that development?
b. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a regional transportation
mitigation program,including regional traffic mitigation fees,
assessments,or other mitigation as appropriate?
Issued January,2006 Compliance Checklist
Page 1
Compliance Checklist
Reporting Jurisdiction:Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period:Calendar Years 2004&2005
3. Housing Options and Job Opportunities YES NO
a. Has the jurisdiction adopted a third-revision Housing Element that has ® El
been found by the State Department of Housing and Community
Development to comply with State Law?
b. Has the jurisdiction adopted a Housing Element that complies with the
requirements of-§65583 et seq.of the Government Code,by:
• Identifying local responsibilities for meeting regional housing needs,
■ Establishing goals and policies for meeting those needs,and
Outlining a 5-year programof actions to implement the Housing
Element?
c. Has the jurisdiction submitted a report to the Authority regarding
development of an implementation program that creates housing
opportunities for all income levels?Exhibit 7 includes a Sample
Housing Report.
d. Does the jurisdiction's General Plan—or other adopted policy
document or report--evaluate the effects of planned land uses on local,
subregional and regional travel patterns and propose land use policies
and a pattern of land uses that would promote more efficient use of the
transportation system?
4. Growth Management Element: Performance
Standards YES NO
a. As part of its General Plan,has the jurisdiction adopted a Growth
Management Element which is in substantial compliance with the
Authority's Model Growth Management Element?
b. Does the jurisdiction now comply with adopted performance standards, ® 0
or expect to comply with the standards within the next five years
through implementation of its Capital Improvement Program?
Issued January,2006 Compliance Checklist
Page 2
Compliance Checklist
Reporting Jurisdiction:Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period:Calendar Years 2004&2005
5. Growth Management Element:Traffic level-of
Service Standards YES NO N/A
a. Using the Authority's Technical Procedures,have traffic impact ® El ❑
studies been conducted as part of development review for all projects
estimated to generate more than 100 peak-hour vehicle trips?
b. Does the jurisdiction maintain a list of Reporting Intersections on non- ® ❑ ❑
regional routes,and measure the level of service at those intersections
every two years?
c. Do all Reporting Intersections meet LOS standards through actual ® ❑ D
measurement,or after assuming implementation of five-year capital
improvement program and accounting for changes in travel demand?
d. Does a request for Findings of Special Circumstances for those
intersections that do not and will not meet LOS standards,accompany
this checklist?
e. Has the jurisdiction ever been granted a Findings of Special
Circumstances by the Authority?
6. Participation in Cooperative,Multi-Jurisdictional
Planning YES No
a. Over the past year,has the jurisdiction's Council/Board member ® El
regularly participated in meetings of the appropriate Regional
Transportation Planning Committee,and have the jurisdiction's local
representatives to the Regional Transportation Planning Committee
regularly reported on the activities of the Regional Committee to the
jurisdiction's council or board? (Note:Each RTPC should have a
policy which defines what constitutes regular attendance of
Council/Board members at RTPC meetings.)
b. As needed,has the jurisdiction made available,as input into the
countywide transportation computer model,data on land use and traffic
patterns?
Issued January,2006 Compliance Checklist
Page 3
Compliance Checklist
Reporting Jurisdiction:Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period:Calendar Years 2004&2005
7. Five-Year Capital Improvement Program YES NO
Does the jurisdiction have an adopted five-year capital improvement ® ❑
program(CIP)that estimates project costs and includes a plan that
outlines general mechanisms for financing transportation and public.
facilities,including fire,police,parks,sanitary facilities,water and
flood control?
8. Transportation Systems Management Program YES NO
Has the jurisdiction adopted a transportation systems management
ordinance or resolution that incorporates required policies consistent
with the updated model ordinance prepared by the Authority for use by
local agencies?
9. Maintenance of Effort(MoE) YES NO
Has the jurisdiction met the MoE requirements of Measure C as stated ® FJ
in Section 6 of the Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and
Growth Management Ordinance?
10. Posting of Signs YES NO N/A
Has the jurisdiction posted signs meeting Authority specifications for ® .
all projects exceeding$250,000 that are funded,in whole or in part,
with Measure C funds?
11. Other Considerations YES NO N/A
If the jurisdiction believes that the requirements of Measure C have
been satisfied in a way not indicated on this checklist,has an
explanation been attached below?
Issued January,2006 Compliance Checklist
Page 4
Compliance Checklist
Reporting Jurisdiction:Contra Costa Countv
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period:Calendar Years 2004&2005
12. Review and Approval of Checklist
This checklist was prepared by:
Signature: Date:
Name and Title: ,Hillary Heard.Senior Planner
Phone: (925)335-1278
The council/board of Contra Costa County has reviewed the completed checklist and found
that the policies and programs of the jurisdiction as reported herein confonn to the
requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and Growth
Management Program.
Certified Signature: Date:
Name and Title:
Attest Signature: Date:
City/Town/County Clerk
Name:
Issued January,2006 Compliance Checklist
Page 5
CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
� Allocation of 18%Local Street Maintenance&Improvement Funds
. For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period:Calendar Years 2004&2005
Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
(Note:This form is available in electronic media in Word OO format.)
Information Requested by Checklist Questions
1. Action Plans
a. Please summarize steps taken during last year to implement the actions,programs,and
measures called for in the applicable Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance:
See Attacment A. Please note that Actions,Programs and Measures that do not
include Contra Costa County are not listed.
b. Attach,list and briefly describe any General Plan Amendments that were approved during
the reporting period. Please specify which amendments affected ability to meet the
standards in the Growth Management Element and/or affected ability to implement Action
Plan policies or meet Traffic Service Objectives. hidicate if amendments were forwarded
to the jurisdiction's RTPC for review,and describe the results of that review relative to
Action Plan implementation:
See Attachment B.
2. Regional Transportation Mitigation Program
a. Describe progress on implementation of the regional transportation mitigation program:
Contra Costa County has been implementing regional mitigation programs in
West,Central,East and South County Areas.
Issued January,2006 Checklist Attachments
Page 1
Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction:Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2004-05 and 2006-07
Reporting Period:Calendar Years 2004&2005
3. Housing Options and Job Opportunities
a. Please list the date of State Department of Housing and Community Development(HCD)
compliance finding for the jurisdiction's third-revision Housing Element and attach the
HCD-approval letter:
Contra Costa County submitted its new Housing Element to the state prior to the
December 2001 deadline.The State Department of Housing and Community
Development certified the County's compliance on March 26,2002(see
Attachment C.
b. If HCD found that the Housing Element did not comply with State law,please list the date
of adoption and resolution number of the jurisdiction's finding that its third-revision
Housing Element complies with State law. Also state what actions have been taken during
the reporting period to contribute toward achieving the housing allocations established by
ABAG for all income levels.
N.A.
C. Please attach a report on the jurisdiction's development of an implementation program that
creates housing opportunities for all income levels(see Sample Report—Exhibit 7).
See Attachment D
4. Growth Management Element: Performance Standards
a. If the jurisdiction does not currently meet its adopted performance standards,please
describe what actions the jurisdiction intends to take to bring it into compliance within the
next five years,including actions contained in the adopted five-year capital improvement
program:
N.A.
Issued January,2006 Checklist Attachments
Page 2
Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction:Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2004-05 and 2006-07
Reporting Period:Calendar Years 2004&2005
5. Growth Management Element:Traffic Level of Service(LOS)
Standards
a. Please list all projects that generated more than 100 peak hour trips,indicate whether a
traffic impact study was conducted,and indicate if a Findings of Consistency with
Standards was made(include resolution number):
All projects approved by the County that generated more than 100 peak hour trips
are listed in Attachment E.
b. Please list Reporting Intersections,dates of counts and LOS monitoring results. Also
attach LOS calculations.•Explain reasons for any LOS exceedances and proposed
mitigation through implementation of the 5-year CIP or other mechanism.
See Attachment F.Please note the following two subject intersections are no
longer in the County's jurisdiction:Intersection 2,Solano Way/Marsh
Drive/Oilvera Road is in the City of Concord;Intersection 13;Cypress
Road/Sellers Avenue is in the City of Oakley.For the sake of consistency these
intersections are listed as part of the reporting intersections but no counts were
taken and LOS calculations were not performed.In future Compliance Checklists
they will not be listed with other Reporting Intersections in County.
C. Please list intersections for which the Authority has adopted Findings of Special
Circumstances and describe actions taken over the past year to carry out required
conditions of compliance:
N.A.
7. Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Please list resolution number and date of adoption of most recent five-year CIP.If CTP
implementation is required to meet traffic LOS or performance standards,state the number
of years for which this condition has prevailed.
The CIP for Parks and Sheriff Facilities,2006-2012,was adopted February,7,
2006.
A draft update of the County Road Improvement Program has also been released
and adoption is anticipated prior to June 30,2006.
Issued January,2006 Checklist Attachments
Page 3
Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction:Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2004-05 and 2006-07
Reporting Period:Calendar Years 2004&2005
8. Transportation Systems Management Program
Date of Ordinance or Resolution Adoption 1/21/03
Resolution Number #2003-02
9. Maintenance of Effort(MoE)
Please indicate the jurisdiction's MoE requirement and MoE expenditures for the past two
fiscal years(FY 2001-02 and FY 2d02-03).
MOE Requirement $420,000 per year
MOE Expenditures $631,639 FY 2003-2004
$555,348 FY 2004-05
11. Other Considerations
Please specify any alternative methods of achieving compliance for any components for
the Measure C Growth Management Program.
N.A.
Issued January,2006 Checklist Attachments
Page 4
I
LIST OF EXHIBITS
1. List of Acronyms
2. Allocations of Local Street Maintenance and Improvement Funds for FY 2003-04(estimated)
3. Ordinance 01-01,Amending the Measure C Expenditure Plan with Reference to the Growth
Management Program:Biennial Compliance Reporting and TSM Resolution
4. Authority Resolution 01-0I-G(Revision 1)regarding allocation of Measure C Local Street
Maintenance and Improvement(18 percent)Funds
5. Authority Resolution 92-03-G regarding circulation of environmental documents(pertains to
question l.b.i)
6. Authority Resolution 95-06-G regarding the general plan review process(pertains to question
l.c). This resolution includes a flow chart depicting the general plan review process adopted
by the Authority in July 1995
7. Sample Housing Repo
8 Model TSAI n_a:..anee(revised Beeember.1996)
Issued January,2006 Checklist Exhibits
Page 1
LIST OF EXHIBITS
1. List of Acronyms
2. Allocations of Local Street Maintenance and Improvement Funds for FY 2005-06(estimated)
3. Ordinance 01-01,Amending the Measure C Expenditure Plan with Reference to the Growth
Management Program:Biennial Compliance Reporting and TSM Resolution
4. Authority Resolution 01-01-G(Revision 1)regarding allocation of Measure C Local Street
Maintenance and Improvement(18 percent)Funds
5. Authority Resolution 92-03-G regarding circulation of environmental documents(pertains to
question Lb.i)
6. Authority Resolution 95-06-G regarding the general plan review process(pertains to question
l.c). This resolution includes a flow chart depicting the general plan review process adopted
by the Authority in July 1995
8. Model TSM OrdinaRee(revised Deeembef 1996)
Issued January,2006 Checklist Exhibits
Page 1
EXHIBIT 1
LIST OF ACRONYMS
ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments
CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority(Authority)
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CIP Capital Improvement Plan
CMP Congestion Management Program
GMP Growth Management Program
HCD The State Housing and Community Development Department
LOS (Traffic)Level of Service
RTMP Regional Transportation Mitigation Program
RTPC Regional Transportation Planning Committee(or Regional Committee)
Issued January,2006 Checklist Exhibits
Page 2
EXHIBIT 2
Draft Estimated FY 05-06 16%Funds to Local Jurisdictions
FY 2005-06
Percentage` Estimated Allocation
Antioch 8.44% $1,079,000
Brentwood 3.23% $413,000
Clayton 1.58% $202,000
Concord 11.17% $1,427,000
County 17.74% $2,266,000
Danville 4.50% $575,000
EI Cerrito 2.56% $327,000
Hercules 2.25% $287,000
Lafayette 2.92% $373,000
Martinez 3.74% $478,000
Moraga 1.93% $246,000
Oakley 3.46% $442,000
Orinda 2.61% $334,000
Pinole 2.09% $267,000
Pittsburg 5.36% $685,000
Pleasant Hill 3.70% $473,000
Richmond 9.07% $1,159,000
San Pablo 2.55% $326,000
San Ramon 4.88% $623,000
Walnut Creek 6.22% $795,000
Total 100.00% $12,779,000
'Percentage based upon State Department of
Finance population(January 2003),Caltrans
2001 Road Mileage,and initial base allocation
ISI
EXHIBIT 3
ORDINANCE 01-01,AMENDING THE MEASURE C EXPENDITURE PLAN WITH
I REFERENCE TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM: BIENNIAL
COMPLIANCE REPORTING AND TSM RESOLUTION
WHEREAS,the Contra Costa Transportation Authority(the"Authority")is the administrator of
the Growth Management Program within the Measure C Expenditure Plan implemented as a part
of Measure C,which was adopted as Ordinance 88-01 and approved by the voters of the County
of Contra Costa at the November 6,1988 general election;and
WHEREAS,pursuant to the Growth Management Program,a portion of sales tax revenues shall
be returned to the cities within the County and the County(each a"jurisdiction"and collectively
the"jurisdictions"),subject to compliance by each such jurisdiction with the terms and
conditions contained in the Growth Management Program;and
WHEREAS,one of the requirements for compliance with the provisions of the Growth
Management Program is the submission by each such jurisdiction of a statement of compliance,
confirming to the Authority,that the jurisdiction is in compliance with the requirements of the
Measure C Growth Management Program;and
WHEREAS,the Authority has implemented a checklist whereby local jurisdictions may confirm
that they meet this requirement;and
WHEREAS,the Authority has determined it to be in the best interests of the Authority and
consistent with the purpose and intent of the Growth Management Program to allow all
jurisdictions to file biennial checklists;and
WHEREAS,the Growth Management Program requires that each jurisdiction adopt a
Transportation Systems Management(TSM)ordinance or alternative mitigation;and
WHEREAS,the Authority has determined that it would be in its best interest to provide that
each jurisdiction may adopt a TSM ordinance,resolution or alternative mitigation;
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Amend the Measure C Expenditure Plan,Growth Management Program at the paragraph
under the heading"Allocation of Funds"to read as follows:
ALLOCATION OF FUNDS
The Authority will atmually review and annually allocate funds to cities and the county.
In allocating funds,the Authority shall make findings based on a the most recent
statement of compliance submitted by each city and the county regarding the Growth
Management Program. Each jurisdiction shall biennially prepare and file, in accordance
with policies and procedures adopted by the Authority,a statement of compliance or
checklist.
In order tTo receive local street maintenance and improvement funds from the Authority,
each jurisdiction shall biennially submit a statement of compliance with the Growth
I Management Program. Jurisdictions may use funds allocated under this provision to
comply with these administrative requirements. The Authority will review this statement
and make findings regarding the jurisdiction's efforts. If the jurisdiction's efforts are
found satisfactory,the jurisdiction will be allocated its share of local street maintenance
and improvement funding annually over a two year period.
i
1 Because of the great variation among the jurisdictions,'it is expected that the Authority
will need some flexibility in determining compliance with the Growth Management
Program. Generally,this flexibility may take the form of the Authority setting deadlines
for achieving one or more requirements as a condition of receiving local street
maintenance and improvement funds. After expiration of any applicable compliance
deadlines,a noncomplying local jurisdiction's local street maintenance and improvements
funds shall revert to the Authority for allocation to projects contained in the Expenditure
Plan which are not fully funded and which are of broader regional significance.
2. Amend paragraph 8 of the Expenditure Plan,Growth Management Program,to read as
follows:
8. ADOPT A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT(TSM)
ORDINANCE,RESOLUTION OR ALTERNATIVE MITIGATION.
To promote carpools,vanpools and park and ride lots,the Transportation Authority will
draft and adopt a Model Transportation Systems Management Ordinance for use by local
jurisdictions in developing local ordinances or resolutions for adoption and
implementation. Upon approval of the Authority,cities with a small employment base
may adopt alternative mitigation measures in lieu of adopting such ordinance or
resolution.
The foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted at a meeting of the Authority on the date set
forth below and,subject to override in accordance with the provisions of Section 8 of the
Measure C Ordinance,shall be effective on the 45'h day following the date of notice given to
the jurisdictions in accordance with the provisions of such Section 8.
Millie Greenberg,Chair
This ORDINANCE was duly adopted at a meeting of
the Contra Costa Transportation Authority held on
January 17 7atRWAVON tCreekCalifornia.
Atte t:
Robert K.McCleary,Executive Director
Ordinance Amend5.DOC
EXHIBIT 4
ORIGINAL
L
J
CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
RESOLUTION#01-01-G(Revision 1)
RE: Authority policy regarding allocation of Measure C Local Street Maintenance
and Improvement(18 percent)Funds
WHEREAS, the voters of Contra Costa approved the Measure C Transportation
Improvement and Growth Management Program in November 1988;and
WHEREAS,Measure C includes a Local Street Maintenance and Improvements Program,
whereby 18 percent of annual sales tax revenues are returned to local jurisdictions on a
formula basis for local,subregional and regional transportation projects as determined by
cities and the county,including street and road maintenance and/or transit improvements;and
WHEREAS,under Measure C,these Local Street Maintenance and Improvement(18%)
funds shall be allocated annually to each jurisdiction;and
WHEREAS,the Authority adopted the Growth Management Implementation Documents in
December 1990 which included an annual compliance checklist for the determination of local
compliance with the Growth Management Program(GMP);and
' WHEREAS,in August 1999,the Authority embarked on a comprehensive effort to review
the Measure C GMP to define a new GMP for a possible sales tax extension program beyond
2009,and to identify whether any"mid-course"corrections were warranted for immediate
implementation;and
WHEREAS,in September 2000,the Authority's Citizen's Advisory Committee(CAC)
recommended in its proposal for GMP revisions that the local jurisdictions found to be in
.compliance with the GMP should be allowed to submit a GMP Checklist every other year,
rather than annually as required in the existing program;and
WHEREAS,shifting from annual to biennial compliance reporting requires that the Measure
C Expenditure Plan be amended;and
WHEREAS,following that comprehensive review,in October 2000,the Authority approved
circulation of a proposed amendment to Measure C that would allow jurisdictions that were
in compliance with the GMP to shift from annual to biennial reporting,which was
subsequently revised in December 2000 to apply to all jurisdictions;and
WHEREAS,upon determining that the local jurisdictions and RTPCs supported the biennial
reporting proposal,on January 17,2001,the Authority amended the Measure C Expenditure
Plan(see Ordinance 01-01)to allow all jurisdictions to shift from annual compliance
reporting to biennial reporting;and
Resolution 01-01-G
January 17,2001
January 16,2001(Rev. 1)
Page 2 of 4
WHEREAS,the Authority's implementation of Ordinance 01-01 requires that a number of
procedural and policy issues such as the timing of biennial checklist issuance,and annual
payment of funds in the"off year"be addressed;and
WHEREAS,the Authority issued the Calendar Year(CY) 1999 GMP Compliance Checklist
in January 2000,and local jurisdictions must complete and submit that Checklist by June 30,
2001 to receive an allocation of FY 1999-00 18%Funds;and
WHEREAS,Authority adoption of Ordinance 01-01 effectively waives the requirement for
the Authority to issue the CY 2000 Checklist,which under existing policy would have been
released by January 31,2001;and
WHEREAS,Ordinance 01-01 enables local jurisdictions to receive their FY 00-01 and
future`off-year"funds without a compliance review;
NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the Authority hereby adopts the following
policies for biennial reporting,payments of 18 percent funds,findings of noncompliance,and
the treatment of unallocated funds withheld from jurisdictions found to be out of compliance
with the GMP;
(1) Transitioning to Biennial Reporting:
a. Effective Date:The procedures and policies necessary for successful
transition from annual to biennial reporting,with continued annual allocation
of 18%Funds,shall commence simultaneously with the effective date of
Ordinance Amendment 01-01,which,unless overridden in accordance with
Section 81,is 45 days beyond the date of the Authority's adoption of the
amendments.
b. Initial"off year"payment:The Authority shall allocate 18%funds for FY
2000-01 one year following its review and approval of each jurisdiction's CY
1999 Checklist and allocation of FY 99-00 funds. The CY 1999 Checklist
was issued in January 2000,is due by June 30,2001,and Authority approval
of a 1999 Checklist is required for allocation of FY 99-00 funds.
(2) Biennial Reporting:
a. Checklist Issuance:The first Biennial Growth Management Checklist shall be
issued by January 31,2002 and shall require that local jurisdictions report on
their growth management program activities for CYs 2000&2001.
Subsequent biennial Checklists shall be issued by January 31 of each even-
numbered year thereafter(2004,2006,2008,and 2010).
b. Checklist Submittal Deadline:.After the Checklist has been issued,each
jurisdiction will be given until June 301h of each odd-numbered year(a
1 Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and Growth Management Ordinance 88-01(Measure C),page 19.
C!`CCTA Pilo\L;\ud¢rci[q'COO"Al1`Risu Ill-UI rceLdnc
: Resolution 01-01-G
January 17,2001
January 16,2001(Rev. 1)
Page 3 of 4
seventeen month window for submittal)to submit its completed checklist or a
Statement of Progress to the Authority. To comply with the GMP,a
jurisdiction must submit a Checklist and the Authority must approve that
Checklist.
(3) Payment of 18 Percent Funds:
a. Payments Based Upon Authority Compliance Review.Funds for even-
numbered FYs will be available for allocation on July 1 of each even-
numbered year following the FY in which the funds have been accrued,
provided a jurisdiction has submitted a.Biennial Checklist and has been found
in compliance with the GMP.The Authority retains the funds until a
jurisdiction comes into compliance with the GMP.
b. "Off-year"payments:Funds for odd-numbered FYs will be available for
allocation on July 1 of each odd-numbered year following the FY in which the
funds have been accrued.The Authority shall make"off-year"18 percent
payments on the one-year anniversary of the previous year's payment.
(4) Findings of Noncompliance and Treatment of Unallocated Funds:
a. Non-submittal:If ajurisdiction has not submitted its checklist or a Statement
of Progress and request for extension by the above-specified date,it will be
found out of compliance.For jurisdictions that do submit-their checklist and
are found out of compliance,the Authority would issue a Findings of
Noncompliance stating the reason for noncompliance and the deadline for
curing the defects in the jurisdiction's checklist.If a jurisdiction submits its
checklist in advance of the June M'h date and is found out of compliance,in
no case shall the deadline for compliance be before the June 30'h date.
b. Statement of Progress:A Statement of Progress shall consist of a letter
approved by the jurisdiction's Council/Board including: a)progress made on
compliance with the GMP;and b)a proposed schedule for submittal of a
completed GMP Checklist.The Authority will respond in writing to each
Statement of Progress,indicating approval or the need for revision. The
Authority may reject a Statement of Progress and set deadlines for a
jurisdiction's Checklist submittal.It is the intent of the Authority to have all
checklists approved within one year following the initial June 30'h deadline.
c. Withholding of Funds:The Authority shall withhold funds from local
jurisdictions found to be out of compliance with the GMP,and by written
issuance of a Findings of Noncompliance may set deadlines and impose
conditions for achieving compliance.
d. Reinstatement of Compliance:Gaps in compliance would be permissible;
however,a jurisdiction would not be eligible to receive 18%Funds for a year
when,based upon Authority review of its biennial checklist,it is found to be
j out of compliance with the GMP."Off-year"payments would also be
withheld.
c::.CCT.e ,,::-i.a„u
Resolution 01-01-G
January 17,2001
January 16;2001(Rev.1)
Page 4 of 4
e. Treatment of Unallocated Funds:After expiration of a compliance deadline,
a non-complying jurisdiction's 18%Funds will revert to the Authority for
allocation to projects contained in Measure C that are not fully funded,are of
high priority,and are of broader regional significance.
f. Interest Accrual:No interest will be accrued to local jurisdictions on behalf
of their unallocated 18%Funds.
g. Retroactive Findings:When a response on a formerly approved checklist is
'discovered which would have led to a Findings of Noncompliance,and that
condition continues,the Authority will issue a Findings of Noncompliance.
Current and future year allocations will be withheld until the condition is
corrected.No retroactive action will be taken.
(5) The Authority hereby rescinds Resolution#94-02-G adopted on October 19,
1994,and hereby adopts In its place,this Resolution 01-01-G.
This RESOLUTION was entered into at a
meeting of the Contra Costa Transportation
Authority held January 17,2001,in Walnut
Creek,California.
o ald P.Freitas, hal
Attest:
r.r
114 'Cad.
Robe eClpa ytExecutive Di ector
Adopted: January 17, 01
Revision 1: January 16,2002
1
C;:{'C:TA 1'ilrs.i.:1ttlhnriW_'00'<l01\Rl's001-01 rc,L.doc
EXHIBIT 5
CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
RESOLUTION NO.92-03-G
RE:Policy for notification of Regional Transportation Planning Committees of proposed
projects and General Plan amendments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips.
WHEREAS the Authority's Growth Management Program has been defined in the
Implementation Documents published in December 1990; and
WHEREAS the Implementation Documents describe the contents and requirements of Action
Plans for Routes of Regional Significance to establish and achieve traffic service objectives
on Regional Routes; and
WHEREAS the Action Plans shall establish a process for the circulation and review of
Environmental Documents such as Negative Declarations, and Environmental Impact
Reports/Statements; and
WHEREAS as an interim measure, the Authority wishes to facilitate notification of affected
jurisdictions of the preparation of environmental documents for proposed projects or General
Plan amendments that generate more than 100 peak hour vehicle trips so that affected
jurisdictions may comment on draft environmental documents; and
WHEREAS the Authority has brought this issue to its Technical Coordinating Committee,
and the committee has forwarded a recommendation to the Planning and Governmental
Affairs Committee for consideration by the Authority.
NOW, THEREFORE
(1)BE IT RESOLVED THAT for any proposed project or General Plan amendment that
generates more than 100 trips during the peak hour for which an environmental document
(either a Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report/Statement(EIR/EIS))is
being prepared, the Lead Agency shall notify all Regional Transportation Planning
Committee Chairs or designated Staff Person; and
Resolution 92-03-G Page 1 or 2
3.tel, 1992
(2)BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT notification shall be made at the following two
critical junctures:
a) upon issuance of a Notice of Intent to issue a Negative Declaration or a Notice
of Preparation for an EIRMIS; and
b) upon completion of a Negative Declaration or a Draft EIR/EIS (Notice of
Completion);and
(3)BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Regional Committees shall in turn notify
jurisdictions within its subarea as appropriate so that affected jurisdictionsmay comment on
proposed projects; and
(4)BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT pursuant to thisresolution and in accordance
with the Implementation Documents, the Regional Committees shall adopt as part of the
Action Plans procedures for the review and circulation of environmental documents. These
procedures will supplement the requirements for circulation of environmental documents set
forth herein.
This resolution was entered into at a
regular meeting of the Contra Costa Transportation
Authority held'4w tl. if, 1992 in Walnut Creek, CA.
On, hau Attes. Robert cClear}
Executive irector
cirro.W.eir
Resolution 9243-G Page 2 of 2
3,tg;1992
EXHIBIT 6
Contra Costa Transportation Authority
Resolution 95-06-G
RE: APPROVAL OF THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW PROCESS
FOR THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
1) WHEREAS, Measure C requires the Authority "to establish a forum to cooperate in
easing cumulative traffic impacts. This will be accomplished through the Regional
Transportation Planning Committees . . .;"' and
2) WHEREAS, Measure C also stated that "Use of the countywide transportation computer
model provides an opportunity to test General Plan(s) transportation and land use
alternatives, and to assist cities and the county in determining the impact of major
development projects proposed for General Plan Amendments. This would provide a
quantitative basis for inter jurisdictional negotiation to mitigate cumulative regional traffic
impacts;*2 and
3) 'WHEREAS, Measure C further requires that "The Authority,jointly, with affected local
jurisdictions, shall determine and periodically review the application of Traffic Service
Standards ori routes of regional significance. The review will take into account traffic
originating outside of the county or jurisdiction, and environmental and financial
considerations. Local jurisdictions, through the forum provided by the Authority, shall
jointly determine the appropriate measures and programs for mitigation of regional traffic
impacts. (See Section 5)";and
4) WHEREAS, in response to these mandates the Authority adopted in December, 1990
Implementation Documents, specifying that the Action Plan process, the establishment of
Traffic Service Objectives and Actions, the General Plan Amendment Review process, and
the Conflict Resolution process would be used to meet the requirements outlined above; and
5) WHEREAS, the Authority will separately approve the details_of the Conflict Resolution
process to be used in the event of disputes between jurisdictions; and
6) WHEREAS, to recognize the differences between jurisdictions, 'and the flexibility
provided to it within Measure C to judge compliance with the Growth Management Program,
the Authority has agreed to ultimately evaluate compliance with Measure C, as it relates to
review and negotiation of proposed General Plan Amendments, on the basis of"good faith;"
"Ibe 1988 Measure C Expenditure Plan, Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and
Growth Management Program, p. 11, Paragraph 5. (Adopted August 1988)
2lbid.
'b-id. P. 10.
Resolution 95-06-G
July 19, 1995
Page 2
the Authority has agreed to ultimately evaluate compliance with Measure.C, as it relates to
review and negotiation of proposed General Plan Amendments, on the basis of"good faith;"
1) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Authority hereby adopts the
attached summary(Attachment A)and flowchart (Attachment B) to serve as the General
Plan Amendment Review process required by Measure C; and
2) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in so doing, the Authority will,evaluate the
compliance of individual jurisdictions at the time of its.review of the Annual Compliance
Checklist submittal by the jurisdiction; and
3) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Authority will review each Agency's "good
faith" participation in the Growth Management Program during its annual review of the
Compliance Checklists. Good faith participation will be evaluated in consideration of the
following factors:
3.1 Analysis-Was the Countywide(or Regional) traffic model used to evaluate
projects with the potential to impact Routes of Regional Significance?
3.2 Evaluation-Were impacts to Routes of Regional Significance identified and
appropriate and feasible mitigations defined?
3.3 Notification-Were all affected agencies properly notified?
3.4 Meet and Confer-Did the Agency meet and confer with neighboring
jurisdictions, RTPCs and other who expressed interest in and/or concerns about
proposed projects?
3.5 Responsiveness to concernslcomments-Did the Agency agree to evaluate
specific concerns and project impacts? Were they responsive and did they attempt
to resolve and work out issues and concems7 Did the Agency propose to and/or
agree to participate in conflict resolution? (Attachment.0 includes examples of
"good faith" which the Authority may use, but is not,limited.to, individually or in
combination, in its assessment of a jurisdiction's responsiveness to concerns and
attempts to resolve issues, including its proposed.mitigation of impacts.)and
4) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Authority shall consider the concerns of both
the jurisdictions generating traffic as a result of a General Plan Amendment, and those of the
recipient(s)of such traffic, equally, in malting its evaluation of"good faith."
Resolution 95-06-0
July 19, 1995
Page 3
Julie Pierce, Chair
This RESOLUTION was entered into at a
meeting of the Contra Costa Transportation
Authority held July 19, 1995 in
Walnut Creek, California
Attest: `
RobertCl Executive hector
rlslresalutaskes95-OG.fn!
Resolution 95-06-G
July 19, 1995
Page A-1 ATTACHMENT A
OVERVIEW OF THE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW PROCESS
1. The process shall be concurrent with the CEQA time line for preparationof a
Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report. It is recognized that Conflict
Resolution could extend the process beyond the date of expected CEQA certification
and corresponding approval of the project. However,every effort should be made by
both the project sponsor and by concerned jurisdictions to address potential issues of
conflict within the time frame provided under CEQA. Early identification of
problems and consultation with affected jurisdictions is recommended. All affected
jurisdictions shall participate in one Conflict Resolution process, if necessary,,for
each General Plan Amendment.
i
2. The process requires that a jurisdiction study the impacts of a proposed GPA on the
Action Plan when the size of the GPA exceeds the threshold size established by the
RTPC in its Action Plan; or 500 peak hour trips if such threshold has not been
established.
i
3. The GPA sponsor may approve the GPA without consequence if: (1) the GPA does
not adversely affect the ability of local jurisdictions to meet the Traffic Service
Objectives(ISOs)or to implement the agreed-upon actions in the Action Plans; or (2)
the GPA and/or Action Plan have been amended to mitigate the impact on the
regional system relative to TSOs and actions, to the satisfaction of the affected RTPC;
or (3) the affected RTPC has agreed to amend the Action Plan; or (4)the Conflict
Resolution process has been otherwise successful. When any of these conditions is
satisfied, the sponsor and the local RTPC shall advise the Authority. Failure to
satisfy one of these conditions could result in a finding of non-compliance by the
Authority, unless the Authority finds the jurisdiction has acted in good faith to
negotiate resolution of conflicts.
Sponsoring jurisdictions must work in "good faith" to address all concerns raised
during the CEQA review process for proposed GPAs. The Authority's evaluation of
"good faith" will consider the factors detailed in Item 6 below, and the sponsoring
Agency's responsiveness to concerns raised by other RTPCs and other Agencies.
4. The jurisdiction preparing the GPA should notify all impacted RT .C(s) and
jurisdictions as early as possible of potential impacts with respect to previously
approved TSOs and actions. Concerned jurisdictions may voice concerns to the GPA
sponsor, the RTPC, and the Authority regarding impact on TSOs by commenting: on
the Notice of Preparation; on the draft Negative Declaration or EIR and/or prior to
project approval.
5. If a conflict should arise during review by the affected RTPC(s) and or during CEQA
reviews of proposed GPA proposals, any party to the conflict may,call for initiation
of conflict resolution. The parties may utilize the Authority's conflict resolution
process, or an alternative process, as long as it is acceptable to the parties to the
conflict. The Authority, during its annual review of the Compliance Checklists, will
i
Resolution 95-06-G
July 19, 1995
Page A-2 ATTACHIV YNT A
evaluate each party's "good faith" efforts to resolve conflicts. Failure to participate
in conflict resolution could be the basis for a finding of non-compliance.
6. Good faith participation in the Measure C program will be evaluated annually in
consideration of the.following factors:
6.1 Analysis -Was the Countywide(or Regional) traffic model used to evaluate .
projects with the potential to impact Routes of Regional Significance?
6.2 Evaluation Were impacts to Routes of Regional Significance identified and.
appropriate land feasible mitigations defined?
6.3 Notifications-Were all affected Agencies properly notified?
6.4 Meet and Confer-Did the Agency meet and confer with neighboring
jurisdictions, RTPC(s) and others who expressed interest in and/or concerns
about proposed projects?
6.5 Responsiveness to concerns/comments -Did the Agency agree to evaluate
specific concerns and project impacts? Were they responsive and did they
attempt to resolve and work out issues and concerns? Did the Agency propose
to and/or agree to participate in conflict resolution? (Attachment C includes
examples of"good faith" which the Authority may use, but is not limited to,
individually or in combination, in its assessment of a jurisdiction's
responsiveness to concerns and attempts to resolve issues, including its
proposed mitigation of impacts.)
j
i
i
I
i
i
(YmVI&nlimm95Uw95 Wg.ala
I
r
i
( ° `0C 0'
n+—
�m °,O y°"
E
o O �� a s z
,¢Q LLJ
LLL
U:= 0 Q o 13 ----,-----; E o
D Q)
N J c Is I c Ic z z
N s 1 V I
�'-----------I a n o n '
I �d0
1--------- ------------------, N
vj
fz-9 IY130 N qu°ww° I E
U
Jag .a.°e.o,Yla.
� �< I----- ----i e s
3 I ➢ A I I E� � L
E
R D 'Oil
E I Y L
Z s S I �$�/
(
` I I
I I
x
I Yup°n I
p gwww°° odJ.il
IdON°�clu°ww I
-palW Y130
or°
43 i
a CIS!
I--—— ——— --------------- --- 3
go WI. E.$
5 I f{IIaWWW�� Y I
xsr� I gD
ggs I--------------- -------
j
-----
Resolution 95-06-G
July 19, 1995
Page C-1 Attachment C
EXAMPLES OF "GOOD FAITH"
PARTICIPATION IN CONFLICT RESOLUTION PROCESS
Formal written documentation verifying that some of the following or similar proposals have
been offered to resolve conflicts in the conflict resolution process:
General Plan Amendments
1. For the jurisdiction proposing development as sponsor of the GPA:
• Reduce development densities;
• Phase in development based on measurement of TSO(s), with development
stopping if TSO(s) are exceeded;
• Revise the mix of land use to encourage more internal trips, or more balance
between internal and external trips;
• Identified project mitigations which can be demonstrated to meet TSO(s),'and
offered to defray the cost of those improvements which are proportionately
attributable to the development;
• If no project improvements have been identified by the effected jurisdiction(s),
offer to transfer funds to the effected jurisdiction(s) for mitigation which will be
identified in the future, consistent with AB 1600 requirements;
• Offer to accept metering on roadways in effected communities, and build
"reservoir" capacity within the development;
• Revise the urban design to encourage local trips for shopping, recreation, and
non-commute purposes, including consideration of facilitating pedestrian, bicycle
and/or transit trips;
• Offer to pay for peak hour transit services connecting to major transit hubs, for an
extended period of time;
• Include fiber-optics cables for communications; and work with telephone and cable
providers to provide ISDN and other high-capacity electronic capabilities to serve
homes and businesses.
2. For a "downstream"jurisdiction receiving traffic from a new development:
• Agree to accept capacity improvements to local arterials and highways which are
not in fundamental conflict with the jurisdiction's socio-economic character;
• Consider non-physical improvements or minor physical modifications to enhance
carrying capacity of local streets and roads, and freeways, such as: signal
interconnections; auxiliary and turning lanes; signalized pedestrian crossings;
Resolution 95-06-G
July 19, 1995
-Page C-2 Attachment C
pedestrian overcrossings; frontage roads to limit access to major;facilities;
revisions to parking to add lanes; etc.
• Accept additional transit service provided by the new development;
• Accept work associated with necessary utility upgrades to provide enhanced
electronic communications;
0 Consider supporting project alternatives which would serve the new development
that do not significantly impact the downstream jurisdiction, in pursuit of funding
resources external to the affected jurisdictions.
• Support park and ride lots and intermodal transit facilities that could consolidate
trips and reduce through traffic which would otherwise utilize affected roads.
3. In each case of conflict, "good faithwould of course also be assessed-within the
context of pre-existing legal agreements and understandings between the jurisdictions,
and any other relevant information.
TSO Adoption
1. Jurisdiction within which the facility is located, if it is'a traffic recipient:
• Proposes TSO(s) that are no more stringent than evidenced by traffic in 1990;
•. Shows flexibility in considering altemative TSOs that would not dramatically.
worsen the character of the jurisdiction if implemented;
0 Considers how facility improvements could accomplish desired TSO(s), without
rejecting them "out of hand."
2. Jurisdiction which is a traffic generator:
a Proposes TSO(s)that are meaningful,and not"whatever is needed to satisfy the
development."
Proposes alternative TSO(s) if necessary to promote continued.dialogue.and
discussion.
• Recognizes the socio-economic character of the recipient jurisdiction in proposing
any TSO(s) and capital projects to accomplish them deemed necessary to
accommodate the development.
p1aa195p1aa\res95.06.atc
i
i
I
1J j� Yl C6L1 U O
�F�.�J! �MwiR1' ,Q��"( b�pjp y��q�lj p b�'f�• y,6 'J M y� iy 'Tl
h"'I �:b ��� �j 1' ,�,7 � $ �� � �� � � � � •G+0. ,° °
fj .0 U S `� ❑
W
F �rmz70
G�
ca a5 v SS �c -Oa VI.-
aL'`
++ t C V 0.x1 p U � a~i C � s Q.i6
Q `Gv 'Ftq,3•5 j Q 6. `� Qa c F t J o o U
� Cf�x'b
��4;.O�� V,¢�3i fJ 1ip^y�'d � �. 2a N y �� 6� p•p p a�co
chC a Z.2
ti '} ���:Q'..7. Q Q•^moi �'Q' Q '�.•-moi
u
[�Wy] rr``
V � N N
cu I' ago 25
jg
E.-. v
r!' U 'eq',b�o• 3 0. X o Q h �,°vX' v,o
,iib+,_y k Lj f .V.L t�1 N �O y.•yL N °•U d
qu70Qcra0Z
Y
ii xaxC��
a�
o � M
g� v a .-•, q
c v ou o
O .. aa� C� a�❑jj..� mopp .,� �� j '�'o.n
v'��
_ N d
�
fi U
vi g
o
49
• roc auk � w U v�« c a n w•r2 °.p •>
4S f¢ c 3
a�j 0i`•� " aCi°" >!c,.
H
Ow d< NNry or
d FC Ok t "'
E•« $ aaS.?�. v 3.a c m` `� G m 4� °' a•c
a0.b a°U!�,
'o
+� ',a.•a"a a w' c I� c 3 a•E G u—
o wo
�o [ �3Z �o�l� UYz v U
EU�U d _
soBUNa « °Iv t ;t4
3a«�kE
U.
V _
4 �'sjoo
2N F•C aU+•�g3 vUNi
Y d N U: d a a
wx o S .^U'S v" .° E4 E �« v 3F E¢Saa ° 3« y
RMP
U
Ln
f7 d a
U
i1 f i
d�
� I
H vN
3y xuiw •�
O•_ o>
Eb bo
Eo °
t tl
U t °
ua
Ofi;:p+
�� W
IM
v
q'E 4
g d o 9
y.
o
y; o RQr GG� �a � E >
aY U tf B 8 y •�..S c F U v,
I
4
I
08-2Lj
c
p:
kNw o n N `• y c �c [ c A> Lo. 4 E
>'ysrr i. o ti d m v U
y R o'`-',�iiwy Roc vm oa
,xay=m 25 $_ o f E V � •�.c v Q F U cG E
�rp.�.:$ „y� o ` 4 gee s•orn av U
d•.x Wm o ^V 4 e V °
m o
Uv '� Ev'�h_o yyw .o �•' � ceae`++ a. �30`C°'�' � CCo �+' o °•iE
'tW r�� O U d ° �,��'E - � � o A N rqG R A y L C P.rc O �•C y°�
ae o a'FgOdy.o'y.J_K
�
C o 3a. u,iF 3 uFy,w L'$F9 u G ... y
i qff'' , U 3 o v m•„ v H Fa ... v... D E Q Ll •� a= v y
Ou• as Q U a F,g v o b op o N �,H 9 -o o v y m
m ° °v ° N U v $.� x .5 >•Z'�9 u o r o 4
api'sfN. w1.cO. u� o E a.vb H.av¢.5 ° ova c ay .: u E �''" p•4u d
� A+ ay, " = vn'� � ��` c `�v�� �'.oaN � u �o�aEio�'•Ea.= t3
�F o RU.-.a 9... o Hc o o mV a.o v oC
Q w.5•O aEi g n 21-
o .m o o
�'L .r "•ob �3�v m a�U `o ° �n"-".a ¢ o E
F � "8'�� Ory p�!�UN•O� z p^ R� 7 �°i R^ >U O � �� �N �N� �� O n�iOS-•��•
yaR�•t�U- 3-.0a uo sv..° 9 o+c. o
U U
In
Z ° z °
p,vo�
C4 n o c c
H o$ R
E 7
Y A a 'g,o v
46,
S o v ao>
Ril 0
b�,'44e3•Ii F•�: v y p d �
F �t7 rw z A� Pr O z I
t qx
P Ofi V
�F4 tti U2:L1a � ,
sro-p•°3 0 .a
p%m m v
tea'; Q ¢
c
Pg•� b0
a
ff m
9E 8
v a
ME.
v d
��; o 0
F ;p
6 > v X
N� C 0
iM,i Eq
� ar" C 0 o rn
' ,I
�pk'Ot' .Z ', 'C s � 0 0� t•�� a� �v 7 � p� > qm� a� F �o a `y'C E:u
0 0. 0 �+S 5 �. •t, v
g"y m ° m C c y i C7 Q bD'a ❑ o i ti ti C'" i y " ' 4
°
mC �� c
d�^EUr 4fi i � m a 4•. C u
v Y m
�y t 'a � '{�'v� •S �� w v 5:° ,v yrs. W �C � -a � a'a' o b o-o °
> 4
C4.y
1� o t o o'v p o 'O o o o `�_�
U'�.� U�
n. c�-� S �N �> N b N� O� �° N �:d N � N d � N N � OQ i N n •a U °b
C u o0 fi 7U 5 [
5� 55w5a. ° �v $,�4QneQn
O O O
"s
U U 'CU
144�ry U� UL U�
z w z
O
N b b b
U U
f O i
i
piu4
V u='b_J7 o o o o
u,
PLO N N N N
a.d v
b
y C
T> .LN ..
Q� J(
oau I
i
1,. 3 3 •3
o``•�` o
'rlj v ymy v q 0
a £e DtQ
r
R
U 0.E
°- u w o a Ea o n o E N o d
"qAk. O W V 4❑ O N
O
7
J C'7'4 C .� O .�5� F•EI ar] C 2 ...
O g a 8 0 °F
axv � s ��b uu
- „j1i m3�N �� v o o � ` o� 5 �,5 �•o>.N ` °g°c ° > �+
�o,'�u�p� E-c �� �2 �9 �� U'� �• ° o a y Fo a d o � ti`c
�V E C e i �ti a •�c � 6-�C7 �L 9d i0� o ,�°d w `.`�i,v.� � � ^�
p�� O pp° 3 o`ob�1 qua �q � �� �f'. p® YC� � _R d y� C ?`• • ?. Ri '� ��.,b
�s`� E a n o °Z � � a� •'pQ,� � g`56��� �r b v c b Y � v�
N,XG. U o � .0 a ybN °•c� •b � �� �q �j'� YS c1'��.�'tl OO b p� � C p i'
E A d S O b i�ro ❑ .tSS S5] L°' `° G'' v'a ea c o N 'o
p•"Cr,4 a� o
o
8 9 ` ] o•& oro
-r�,�.���� � �.� > S� SCJ Swa S•�'wS G� RSA�a•o a�7 3 o S[— S� � �U
r,
G aU U U U
� •fl •O b
tE 'Ob k n y
Q
.pry ` Uvai UZn' Uy O E}• ¢z ¢z z o Qcn
Z
a a a
cq
rl
k
u4
COSY:
i.
RF v
s,ds ar
EF
p v
r
' O
ok; 8
p
a�R �'7 Op U t GNG yUy .b•� U O
itl
m Gc c pa� a c v ?
VV. c W.E U
's01.> o o H e
•'r N $ p, 3 $ �� �.`c_ w �f Ea- o pa� .c d m o 4
U 4�E o- ._ E«y U °• o U ys, o U y b a s
Nx' 4. a W 0. U i c n c o a o o U s'•eu 0 '° o
..r.�-•y°' .2 oo' o�cy ��U u'n Q� 3 « '3wU cs
c 3 0 0
A`•y' yo o �s - o o ? ,on � 7rE� U o pU m.S Gam
w <n c, - Zs a ;;O „ o � o E � ❑ a0 os vo,
p i7 c ` o p o tlQ 4 3 U
U.�
',°-; v ...a
m q` d m.e a
0.¢'"a :?._,o > ❑ y...._ aC�
q(•Vtll�. O � G � N 5 d d V O•�N U b"�O �0�0 w` a k b O V� U.Y E N p p LL � k'y �a
�d of o o. 0. o •q o� 40 2•eaUU o ��., E �:9 ca r�q�a cF v �.c>i o."'U°Q
0, a o ..4 c d z F`o.'o" ° U c« r�W o3
rt g..`�-,..s h G � a��� U� z� > c E u s� F ��.�? U�w U fG o c•�U.d'>8� c
t rn.° ri v Q v-ha c¢a �" o o c`o ° �o m u fn.N y U
N $aci N N'C v o a i o .�°.F a c °��'
9fn : osvor �� -r.�.d� ° �n" �cU.�.� UU3 v� a�ainUd �
ti
u
V".s
'-U I •-U U 'GU
Thr"U� U� U�
z.o ,Qz
z
m
401,
`u
00 N
ru
` o
O N
O E W
j A v 0 Z
r�
bpFq'
Fa U Q to
Y I E CD w
044 id 7 O E'C �~ 4 J O.�
G
R p{ q "o �o U
c > E,� vi G, Y F'O^
R ❑ m „g a e c [
I
I
I
i
i
iia s m � y n � `� � w o" m b h, • b-y � ba.
3 � GA � o P. Pq C'ta 3 4 c y 3 [��Eti c W� •�� F J'�
U
13'
N`�- `eco;. m v v �, cA _C � � C•o�a � C tib o� �U� ��2
fti..-H o g m �• O o Ei
c Eon
}� 0.... U T C- y, Nti y�q,° C a v`US ti b Tf I �. •4
oV a+- u c v ✓,c-� ❑ .9.� v ° .� E ° q....s I, td' Q
UT1-3
3a'
o V .a_�.c°_. o O d
or 0, 2 gm wv L., C U v v m .b l imrV �' ern C7 0 °oc4 '9 s o.tc °'..i u °onoo". i= d 'oU °u La 9 °4o c y7 w o o S `y.y o'c{UIF o
a Q.= vvp E C t3 y o` �•o ..'.� g
m, c1, 4y -R v aan u `Yd {,'' Q o Z c2 W, $ Q a e b a 2 °W m E'``. C'gg IR�L
e 0 5 o •a ,
b ULIF."F o�U So�v a` `bN '. °c'
U u U � Uwh
,- v a r�°1.r�. s°', .�v •5 a'. o c'�y�, ° ,,a'a, c �' •a `� °.c'° I td
.; � ..rn5 � oa��. o� ot3�` o•�io�ooeo� o3ode� �000 � `c
it :•v�.., Q 5Q�
x.,,'....:+.S.E 3 .5> .9 °U En.,� $.Q�w•La5 SPa� g
is
fly ',W� c •aU
b O O
C1"i V f•
E n o
Q F y s N N V
d ° 3 ° >�
dry 3 V O > ) oto N
T
t 4Wl lCV'O 1. 7
Ao
CO _' d V 7
°ozFmP' I �
r oro;3
d�en rF�
,F"i'f•,TJ .' � E �V Q.Ste.� L O'e�. yS_
w*y
max ; i4 � .s� ss
d u
• �"• d C..r y y tp U
s fd E Quim 0.9 fd
I
i
'��.H � o ff ��y �� c 4� E v o q �, �ry e V •o
y,� ,; �F ❑ qq o e v tlo Q7 W y > a W o a= 0 5 n.j
�.•�S�'aq � � � kR F" a Q a c p >. � `o F,,, 3 �"' qq S � •id'o
.51
q �,¢ � &&& ��` b °o b ' sem,�o is �a p 5 Cl Q,-.�•� .5 m
} �zrRj,
r w ?2 $�•� 2� o a sav o W S ::-o y o'� b•o.a � o o ��o r�c�
du R8 .Z•Ex6 a o b 44;�w q .0 4 4� �w�5 � ��
a;w. � � d¢8 � Scd �tl 3ybo � �a � ❑ Z a�= � oC g� .5m
C)..C' w y`FQ o o ° u i i'' �`Tf u o• c y
Gtr�' Q 9 U U u o� d o a v b u�°q�''•.5�o p °v yt , pa°
qq
-2 78Cg Bn Si
V
SwS S � S3?d t� o $o -� � ooV� oo'ae� rn�=o,o Ooy .0338 .° 9t
_ m
SaOti: c?-
�'l
y
-Uyk, lOd .p.
o.
U0
ayes,°y''
N N O O
I N N 1N
ba
�
CWs •5 p p .1E a> p O
U
�
c.`". p be T X ilii y 00 N O
v
E Q r 0.p.0
FFa
s .
0> au
p 0 C
QIN- C.N iT Gq
Ofi I U o myy •0•�
- ° 3
I
�'x 8 'C
ea•, o T,="
w� d
o by
-
o
7j 4 °
b e�tl N
OR
o
t`! U a axi; �•U o
C
�YGi
115 x
bap R
u
U V
zc
}1
b .0
N
z a
H i a o
aE ° f
Ut En
} p
i
G K N O p
�{ b
�w
o�
wo
C&xxE-
i
Ir
p p
4fi I
1 y ..
a>U ° o
i N f
I
r a a .Uc¢°„
_ S
ta
o�q lit, A.. it cU d m
as a s� o v a os� o o fi
o a L w o ry
s C3
s/ � � ¢ o� ° amu
H y
a, 3 �
7'
p +^ c otSio•ggR o � g ° � H Rm cr - 'I aaNa N Ra
, ,arOS � 6 � r�oma� � 6 v o3Vci U SV
U U
A
t
F 2 0 N N N
VS N
x w v o b o J c a ° = R o x
N yo.N >
75 5pZA
,aui o c N ex
Rd�:� > `1 cC C4� � ?•� N �� � j dp A ° `� V p ca M v a�O >, � � �� dT
yy;Fx o�.�'� H.°c o"°".�.n�w•3wU °c' a, � `�.5 $.a°o� 5 wb'nS
k'
}IGO
'� a m ZT-I QQ a o 'd5' °? .`�(S; oo V] 'S «t. a y
"U.E o a o � E rS x n U g moi, o a
C% o y nom o xiA w s 5 awu
�b a 25 FG
aul
o�Ecl
a nau"U onn c cn cia '"3 Ew vU
niwAw° 33
r �
°' 0.' o ° � 2 co dU ,aac i
3 au a g " n•o '� ;�
�3 � 9 v E '� a-S v^`• G 5.5 `0.a,
o '•E� � aci mcg •• v vge'aE $ � =� �v
d' o- ,•Eo o? �. aat c&'� v'es i�:aU 'a�
d ai..,." ey •� ca"� •off°:° � EVoou� 13
m`� vo „ oy
Q sea. y a i a x rd po ❑ 5 r v y 4,4�•°-�
A'tl o vim .yOv°�F•$ H3 i 'y °.a d h_�.� �G1 o b`ti
cs v °
c
-3
w a fi0 d V p U N Y N�rnc "v, Zvvv �O�°oo� o3s a >
_
�°'{gop'$ Ed a� �UQ�•yb � m�au �Nae o'3.5 � E�•`_ v .�
_N,�,� ti W�� O F o U c,a a B �d oa���a°�a °�'•a �V a��7��.c.°
C j c w o o po
o F o
rt? b5 Uwa �Q N
fes] o 3
o.uo U° .da In a ? a
.q
ra o 0 0
N N O
O o
t�t N N N N
lu p.5=U:5 5 5 =U•5.bD 5 12 bD
A 3 c T ago a°� 25
y; mo o ❑ >v m o o >p o m m.. m..
„v45 `� � c
Ot � $� aio >, oD� voovv° o °.. oa " ,>
E'" vv' ani•� �`per•�''a v m L �.T
° c.T m s•E c 5 A-
2 N
U N ..°C b N
A
N4�.
a a°
Al
4 '
v5 5 ° o a•°vg o Q
F f--'
P 3 Q' S U v.5 c o U o C ° ° o p b
v c m U a �' ° c 3 0.5 v ° x 3 o
3 0 ;° o a a g 7•5 o'a a o Q o a°i
�.N C9y v o
r.
i R o Em bo
o 0 0 o a w E q w° a o S7 0 E 3 0 oa
fL ° o U E a a�n W o c °
v q S v o a v o.« o o
° Nc a c wU r"L�d3Es u n QE ,>, [
v W b�v o 3 > C ro t: `" D.c
r 3U Zia fi o
o Z �>n C 5 � oaaEw
yaa .°'.� H�aO� ���S� E m�whw
m o
i
I
i
RS
"YR d a� ° n > E v c•5 A' > E 4;5
> r m y
V ~ > v �'v c
A;�- ° � e o �. .c u 4k o v aF� $ v � v .e`� b.•`�U > y 4
�,.� •o ry 3 o :5 0 eu O ray b5 0 �._0.'i-25'
w.
Q R mK a�° a•g�c E a'• �V 4 S & > � fU- � c ��:'S o �,
h,,...a+ o' n' °s yb�o �� �•S �i o��+ R$ bra � « �._ '
v�iY�•5o � o .`° dv�i��y - $,o �$'�T o� �o >� �'"`E'�U4
m m'�o §0 0 c � �•tib � n v� o � m g,. � � 3 C
w qd c G fu o
12
P4 tj
•ts r oa s U ro U °d
G 3 W ° o o F E o W '> E" °
Uco =
.+E1
Av
IG u N O N D O 6 p•N ? N ,.c.� �, °� N N G
UUm!•• U 2
¢z i
f �
a�
C C G G F
�i+ U
U V=b � i 'O •O t b
i��R7 y p m
Q
4
i
u
O U U U U
i3 0 0 0. o
N
O O O Ocl) In^
CJ cV O N H 0 F C 0
p u w ao H o W e F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2
X y Gy r' 4' X G Y+ P.•i, y N N ttl N N N at
U
wha;.5 va 'v1 5va�be .: 3 3.� 3 E'3
�P V C p-N 0.03 4.d 0.cl
y 4 0 4 N 4 U 4 U
v 0 v y u 0 0 0
,:-:.f:�:.,�-r¢3:'-Q P't•Ori- Q.O�-O� zo w 2,
r �
p{aid
us
w
-Op -2 .y - - -o
of si N
�3 3 3 3
d c4
cc � 04 °oo �«
^y O .0. E tV ro� 7. G q .� .p.p ❑ O gyg
u ca w n euILI
0" 0or
c a'K ry a
>v 'c U? v... •-1 o v sa — 'y h •5
as oo _ oHC mm �'ydL° o `PG
E,� O N vL W E Oq '�A U
i w N
4 E O 0 O 5' 000'2
K4 X U F,t7 oU �j Rei
Q.1 4 W V1 Y W OO u C C y O O•E''d O ? 5 'O y Q �'. N C
ox C o ❑ D E A 0 4
❑ H v�'.' m 8 m y � >, spy, x A u.� � H
❑ 40 ° � r Co � 4 U
•S.� 8 O v o $ a o
U 4U E V W a'c�3 o m u ri.5..7 m a Pa m V
uar
9 2 -4 t3.1
I
'�'iY •, � � ���� is � � � - I E ou „fip
� s
a U � 3 a 5 U�` U�` U�•`�� v U'o
U
v*'_: �;m v QVe� e v-°e� a•Oi �°> v `a a �y'` � yam, �I ��.,�.E �i�.7a
Azo'.,,: 0 0 3 ��� '� a� o w O m �• `� o `� o `� o v c v y �
ac4c C° � 5c y9
P4 s
R 5 U
-2A4
u
a o U ° o 0o a o ° 'o a U V U ° o
CC: o o U.v UL u o o U.�Uq ° 3 °c 3 °c 3 °c U Uu
F, :yy�`hq >
gym
UC UC
C h o �` o v o i h o 0 0 o i o o N•_ v v 4>
cON �.ryd N,U,cc NU O,UCNG � FW'
Ut-� U F-- d w 5+s, 4 U F�� .°1c.,.a o"i .c.F-� ,5 U a
O a
�3 4d
N4_,,� C V] Vl V]
7 C C I
y,
o 0 o U^ U^ i U
o U0 Q U Q
� aS U ai U I U Q
yti _
>'>C > t E O y° o o
O O a1 O O t E� O O tEd
d#M
U Q Q U AU U7 U UCG
� f I
p F�
yi tY5
.7 T:
V] 1
.-I I
N N N N
0 7 T o = > o n v•pj-F 3 v n v'j' 3 rn o 3
0 5 O N p O C O O OV O A O
V po oo
aVl 0.V1 S m c am ° c ro v
V1 ,� °i• o w F v w 4 3 s y 3 A y E Y s ro y
d . xO
U •° v U o .v 3 0.G 'o '° 3 0.c
w"'n'� V.o � 3 U.o E 3 U.S U o E,Y � V -g U o E� � �•'3 V o �y m
R.O; -
t,. m .Y ° y ° v00i
E.� o E Y Q,o c E.c o '.E d a o c E 0 E d
G C C y C N VI.� 7 .' E .7 C N �/i 7 12 C G N VI
t j d c.. 0 0 o• o m o 0 X w ° O K w ° °� o' K w
> a 8 E > � S 5 > M > a O oU > �9 > � O oU>.5 > A O oU
0 0
p`:'•m U U
' rz�'sbii.
02,
o 0 O O
t.
Uwa
NO' C
D o
Q O _
o s o w v li e
s S
n: E >.ds cw .w aci 9 c
1 � '•v Y L'aci° a � L aGi n.S aGi aEi � ,. �'�
a� ❑ o ❑ y o ❑ � _ E ° o a 0 a m
N ❑I.0. >, �? � a>� O tl ° y�� .p U a^O'$ °LL
13
ti R v'� U.,a A•d > w �, c w E c o y v �....
0-1
v" $b 00 Y,Z O G >> O > O
,o b•5 Ui� 3 V o x 'E d ° a �c. a a o �+� m .
..
-
y
h .•.CLF p,3 N C y a3 >`C N a° �V o o O N r.
U V
u U- ❑ ¢.= � C, o moo .d °ti ..�.�a. $ �
ogo VQ � 4a Uy'ao a3 fiCa ° �"c ° o dao
> j
d�'., ❑� �o A °�� U F«o�� `o.�' A�+c, v a m Q Q w U U m_.c- Ear> onti 4'�
a
(n un ' Lo U
3S 48 aJ
y t U
b o 0
-4u.2 C 0 o U aU
U U+ UUi � u
"ULl U U U U UA VA UA
o o o " o o ° o ° o ° o
C C C C C E C �5ry C E C E
.. ":U r4 U cG U U P: U F4 U CL U Ri U CL
Qw
O �.
Q >�i
Nf I N N
aui s 3 3 ° vn (n En Ln Ln V) c x
0 V 3 V o y•N
O
Oj O O O O N ra y
cC C C G C M C
O. O O O O O
� E
L^ c m vi
O a0+ O' O aO+ N N N d a�. v O C
axi o U U Z ou
gv x
0 A m 0 0 h
O'. O O O O C
F7 O O O O OC y O
Ti
ro y U
5 « a d a v
w 4
N p
en w ou
p Ci o c 0 C ° c o �• tot a
-'V W�iW pq W W W pa W Az Az ..U�n
E °L C -
o m U y v e
o j2 0
u o 8-
-16
°
> "' o vLn a
10
o D "' >•N h m•3 is o - nn o "
OD
c A c o o u o C
E v '". O O) .� y L>` itl p 0.c.0 �v.•C C > v
d Y 4 p 4 C: C a0. � v p p, O•L O V b v
Ec 0 m o e ro p
U I o VA¢U E £ U uAv,•3
;t
M R
I
I
' w u o
y
ESO y4' f' EE� vw � 'F �•� o
E ❑ o ;ss 4 e b c"d U n U ❑
v o m > a �� .5 ❑ c
fi.
y C' �'w, ° �.a.°c•°•a
'ti a,-4 aa,�.��•o A
o.-, ° e a v b O g y Q o E U ¢..w m ti > h ❑
°b o -- P. w n'�, .° -5 a ❑$ ...U ¢,
w F "C �•p "' C 6 °� v Y �� ^° O ai'E 9 tl
A Eo vmc �a cacEbEdco °' ❑ �tl � o`,oa .a yfnay yo '� �h
p..0 > m C C b N. d v a w°a C d TS ti C p p .Z E y-y V Q
p'° ob c.�a' c c'"a � > ° > � .4 °' ��'n� R Nm .d pEp 'p, �
Wt'U F 1J�" A viC O j 0 >p C O u ❑ 'f.' F.0 U rn fi fi
4.'-9 o ca°y.e >;6 "" '° °_j .°-`
z �. ° �� o:� ° u �� �U �.E ��a>,�,'c �esco0 ❑ cages mshL`� vaTzo `oyfi
° O p o.a_ ❑ ❑ o ❑ p o ° ❑ v U o U.O c o'�''U` p N U �d C Zs
Sp tu:L1U U ._ =Uw c c �U o.❑> ❑4�+..'$ o 0
o C .�c'; m --U'� c'�'U o y U oo "5 ❑r° F.�U u x w°'a °❑' p'�U K
.�� s c y'S'N vaQ�'o ° w r �y.e ❑ ; � a, ys'. � .c fi a � d
� 'p-.c F" �,�c �� � c'��+^a•5 0 ,>,,.g .. y� fi �a u� oar.❑ (; s
�y 'c. vo � ppoa��oo u� vo'O.EM yri� o� �"o$ o'Co � cN3dtiyyroh�
q V� 6N > NN >� ddC�N � �yN y0 �«r'iO� vN '� � Co CC�o TIU¢aoa ZO O�b U0O
u..d.�t E >.N >
C4
y
C C C
Oji O O O
°.a+ztaO, 4y v i b
d k U U U
h,F F F
u u'
her•o o i o
F '
V]\tLEV,
A u
E4i v v
A p`a
z v.'l" N ttl a3
x
V7 W I W
W
o o p
7
p y y
1 ��3
�uKtl � ai
oq}
W x C7
d"r"€ O
i
i
v •+` o v u� o
r a`�.:.. 3 w Iv.cb0 m o Z a c o y
-
izt-. 6 � �°
fiU�r'c-.v -
p
e���:•5 V �z N�v�'�I 'S ss � �a,�F�to N�.5 � q.�
r,uv$AUi
d� ,o
C" roN�z � ti ov vasa c`5 muamq
o. S
p; ., q•`-'.cru r5n ,` o c" •,vn^R `
oU.;� ��;9��,��%a � �3 ropy q,aa�.�.�•� ���
Tfj by pop U�� C a.... � �F u �•G� L�� O d.�� Q v O
"aFYP �UNWN > CU. _ YpTU �CKi 08b
oUs
t v¢v a wNa�o � v v v¢.ocv ��a a�N•o �^�
6
w?.
GC C
ZR,
s
> _¢n o
H
I ttl
,z z
I.W.=1
U
y"toj Y vb y
O C O05.5
Gt�Yi
gl"Aull o-a 7B
a uE
o.
c5
"yaE o a3 3
e�
I
i
Q yM rbc, z G y^' D� C Ci yN �•� -.t. fi N Gl. V`❑ �yy+ `[� ;? y
7ryN fr. y '7 V1 EQ"•C i. � rJ' W�' '�' "' '«' D lid y C R �ejly
c �.�'ESe a a° >,� c � w � ooea� as a
f 'Q _H v c7 c w a, c c ^,.y 4 ai U e t a a c
a D o ❑ ti �
yy � ='• >,n °'�c ��n w �° S � fi � �
r,{f„ U.� D d t5i7 ❑ I O ti gy
a^ .°'P.9 �n,v�i otw c� oa vsv woe a et2 '&' �b°".=i'° 0A
.I p. n.a a i,
Q °'`o v^ c v� U• S`'=E, w pn�, �°_' c°, y C n VIA]�] p a fi
m—� c >, u— H a o y W' ., o'a v
�'
x E'.�'''� �'m U L� V� .'�'•" u._ �,m v � oQCti o �a� fi �a0 �,
7;•G��:: � '° �'£d�'.°� v o� ..o a C ��.5.e c S s a, U"-9`:afi. m o !°" o �� 3 o a o `c
V.-s U °w ra �^'—x N ..D._ U_D � U��.� v °'tis c ❑ q `"`;Z a � fig.
Itiiu r «
m a �.5a m o. �!�rn ° oa •�-' ao �._ e; o a onti v °
�o � ,b a pm, �' �i 5 0� �a d 'ou.•�'en o o� ra�y o fi„�°," o e E,'�'y �'o.��a.�.a. o o �'C h
O O"�'.�+N� °��' �rh a N�a�;:.a� �N e�ki � > N m a e�3 0 b'-'• ate' ¢a,��bo� o ❑ o °fi°s o` .
N .�` a�� Cv�.S•5�� aS 3�., c5 c S.°v �w q fi�-"'�� .a,>wq v 4
d
q 'a Z,o
o
viol v
,x, r 4=`3
O Ar
Y-
p;�a
u u
sb„Oa
r
131 _v
-a � �«4 T .� �C4 Q
p � 1 b��rwns
T
G6
L V N
U :Y
to
T E .C..
R760--, O rn N Yt `n A
T X E A.0 d
q ` 1 O a v 1
RONm
Tai^q N iOC_A N i
10
Q E y'.� o u v}�
ansd`� 3
a
SURE av z¢
' q
3a R to O
Mgt g
Ada �
^� �''ESwWw �
u $�
f
o Q� a ° e�,,;d gs �' r �,� •gym 8 � � � � � � �
v o
All
JEN
'85 tg
�' sQ �, v AD^T o � �II� ��.� .�38 v" �� .�•& RC'$� �6b:: o .�. h
v e"Y N o m a Cgi v' o E•� vU aa,
ron? �a ° v ' w � o 8ag o�
O1aU; � �.�a o �jo o `� � o v � C � o �'p •� •o �
5 �'• � pp gd '�.� � 5
k G u.''�`•O�aC $ °c Al
k G C`.U� pQp a V c�°, a�� i�p5" c •�3 �'' �� aa�R V Q_ �c�' a�� v � o q � o��5,�{'pad � S �a'�
"A
m o Q'� v ,"1 g yc o o V o •$ C� ,i� .9 °,b3 q �3 s�. �`y ,.i4 - p
�+�
£ .k. 6 Q J 19G.� 7 C�
cY '
,-34, -
�w �?Z
�L: fid,= �9 'O, �•�
y3 m u
N N N
V (L] O O U p
� y
-f �y �•S O N
0
one'a v 0 U O•-
ova xCa O ¢> o
o w O O -
� tx 4 ,ap WR
v A
U
a
a .
i R
ffia
u
v a.
7 �
I
i
I
y U mT 8'o I
tg
V o
v ;_ w d v•v
�m Sao �o � 3Xv e a & a �
p ° Eg o cQ4 O p o
te�a.v.aZ,°o °�? Dory 1aWw v.4roo � 4v 5.5 oU$omv e% wv •Y1vmU
K' ,om.5v 't4 2.c.5 U vsi•5 P4j
E c
5
V? 5y5 m c �?, °� o�u w 'uU coo �" �w W I� o W �_a'mvi �w.� io
AID Lb y°.y Z c W m .s o �>, .a e o 3 �.� o $� o :3 T •s �,. v
a 'S U `� x,.5 c c 3 v v
� ;:u y....V o� •5,� > °`' c °�cnw�cc `� m� t6 Iu
� •n`Fc t�S.a° •v.� Tt�d ooi-C °c='a�' c`u o� � y� rcvUO
0 5.5 c v Gl a IN, C ° `o `d v c, .-_ 2-0
5•a
i o
Z•cvo'.� ��Mvmm ° �$ v > '�'oU �naS-0m ' U �'
o o.c o C •a o°c°> k o ° o C F m o o- t o m g. 'v m o V m>,o`i'
a ja O•� Y c v s
b pAa� 0.0 N q q, N
c�in Q Q �v 3 �"` C� �n .� 6.F7 v .° v w°•o;� �W'y� z °c? � v W i� �F 5 H'3 5 W °�o °o U m
B
Z
yy a p Au
F,
v
',, O,if''t#.'
L47s
N
v
O T o O T A O
j r U 3:
p
n v] p a o
d =o 7
y `
Vw,a N
6 N
O.0 C �. R
c
a on y °•ai ( c h
3� Ly X = p C
O
'D
L4
y Q
v z vi
W
a tU ; H
QUr� Q¢Q
t p _�.C7 WRQ WWW
o ma' �� a
u)m P4
6vcG off.
qQ 'O .'• p O N
Yo'�: �•$ Q�w �Q'� 3FQ y
E
E g wo
o
a p W7 E a� m x
_
Qc
G O U
po w °.�U Q
�, v
i
p�
RI
�. i'�3ird� �°' v mU 'u.` 0 5 •�.KNK a 3 o
U
Wat-
u as E i G� > o �jv Z`�A ti b`+[„ •� m:? OW
5 ' o FE C
� "N'�
�„�, �Utia � Po �a�UW.g.� a �.c �4�ro cU•o o$' o �'� >v" �._ cgg
Wiv�j
E3 3 ' .5 EFx .5 k A o rrte�.. g W v FFz ami o
o E d 3 6 N o ¢ Q s« o-
C c_ o r u o e o o c U We� � rv� � � 4 � c? •5 U m �.-1 _a°' z >
V e� _ U � � U'« - E x .6 � a 5 �• � w � .S �a,.5 •a .e oa °
o
Y 6 u- 4 o d ci o sa c 3 m o c c o. E c
a � ozgmo � � oF� ; go o'� � � u� o Utv .b� uygyv � o
N'C N U itl
o-zi : W h 'c.a¢1 °v 5 k f% �° 3.� 3 fi F« 8 8 E S
� I
C C C O
Z O 'rte. o tZ O
C
p �a rn rn H
V �V:
N N N N N
1 ST a
FO U N
d S �
Fri `v u _
.1 w `y
Vy .r O L K N V N w0 N
ry O 0
N
po
L to
U
oto
o
F N >b Ci Q W H > DD A H Q a b Q
I
LI)
o
d o°u WW wW O W p¢ aOC to
oma; s a4UZ ° 0
p �
rIAlzw >'=a
tea" �C9 �•ag E•°� ��p °v 3 �� U�U
.5
jq
ig
kms `".v aba
QQ
� 3s6 spy
OHIMp aU
a
i
, I 1
,gt o C o
� .R-; �.a �w $d' c � o � eo�on �� a01 a � �.•ti°c � C
dam'' Go�� So gQvc � 4vo � � 0 0 �„ 0 1
c 8 O ppp o i
An
d�-
d
04"
W
fir' A H
k FI:: y rn V
'O W
N
Y fir: 9
C U
y
I
z W s�: on•— v
31 Cs5;. � P 's �i'.��❑ C i
Y 7
I
I
I
I
I p
m -, E.U. o s� Ti•5 v °c° o c°
plc rME
c Q ° c n°o a c o °J v r, ° .., o.g eu K u'
c�
.o o v m a 9 c m 3 oOi`` d U vb c v.c C
RRRR"'' s
U
a M eC G m L`3: c v 3 y u �roi ° osoli ami ca a'tt 4 s o Ems„ U `L2tl r„ 'O °
ho
U o y E 4 d o,:5 c u° e°n�c ❑ o o
I .y i rn , "'S'. o•�F v 2 ❑
v " `C .5 �C a.o '�"'eoLo o a N_n o ';V H
A EEc F3 °3 c $ v n o �'� X 5 ro a xv w o fQ v Uo
K 0 �
ti d
W " v° u u � o U
� E .55 � r �
j c y c-cv f
y c 0 G `u `0
V � ym 25 ❑ o ❑ alb U U
t% E �.-.ro..� v ro d o c •� � � v'o� '� y � no° 5 u� �.� o w 'v
o
iyCg� E'8au7� & � o� S �Qy S'��i o 6 0 4 E co F i o h
v a m v 5 U m atq 5 O„� w o U y'� w o a'.• v.G
Nv,4 �.. m� � a o�, w o�'o o�x c a o y^3��•�°�= i s,� o�o
,d O�, �f '� 5 a v � v C, °'n �e'a° � N ° v O `E s a ���� �•� ��.o a. `" � � � �
y e $ 8 � i'`o c n � o` o o v ❑ y c ea o 0
.5o« W°.S o o C W U.v E C)
U c o�U �.v �'o �-o?'s v o v o > �°a
V
$ •�00 a .5 O O M .. Oq O "d ° U O O 7 '� M •O d O 4�. M 5 q
"o
M,'SF sSaIIS 3 S a$ ° S �r� Fccl. Fca f� a o Six° o O S.�F S aS o n
�t
OO O
C U F U
•y a,b F ,?�W ,7 .7
F
U
• c U U H y U U
03 3¢3 3 3
N O O N
U ,F p a n
y oo C,
N N
F E O C as 5 yr y y� O O
L G
s t y es E' ayCi� y w 'two �v v iGi
O `
to
pp C
1 C Y
C
�
•VT v T C O
> 00 0
-C R m
v v` a d cn O v v v v rn .n :3C
o O
°' y a m r W v�' a U E m e
0
H O
y^ w .y V yOo°O�ro� w°'•v�'p u Oa q Oa
o a o
to ° m
T O �ttli 7 U'CC T U N U T.a) U'Op 0
t_61a 6 .G O2 ti td 6p'cam �Ci 0.¢Oa 0. ctl V O
_ 00 00
�'•ot«5H' O Fd4 H Ed H
a �p0
w C' yn WWn X04 04
p 23 04 N F e b
o o v E $ U o H to
o v o �°Gqp Yi g
v'd itl O C ,$a
O p� 'l7 0.
H .
p N W-6 D4 N �-�. A] N y .4'�
d>'� FS � �� 3 �o vF, oQ�vg3 � U � $ $
ai' c C oa 45 m
0.bgv❑•�
�O C
au a°° 3 as 3 E 3> cg�s3 3 o ev°
a of c�i v
i
g ~ s
y� R�4: ` o� 'may��p�' U � ❑ � �V� �C Cl o�' IC�_
C Z5'� C YYY bD v .p
? as
F o d,ov
;m ami ;'�3 c U Nuc 'co m$ � •5 °',>'Sa '3 � b
v
x.I,,, i � w
' :��Ot ��� � g�gp�pq Q� � � '� Y`8•'�p•'� o� k�'� o'�c ❑y:,d- �'0���
O
O N y Q5 3
u �I5c CC ra rr7US .9 �� `� \ d 'm
I
U U F
¢ ¢¢¢
d s.
3<y V e
Ey =y o 0 N 0
U � N N
N N
� X
. y>r,u. 4. '°p•gyp G
o W N a
h
Y
O y
N 0
O v T p
t U_ U
tOIO W' � F
�Os�w•, cFi� i� Rei
�4 C� V W
ovo tl ayo
a
olop b
�R: � 3 td g•�� �,�O 9 v
i
i
I
•o •'a oca c o >•o v o v a 'o p 0 c
fj
G
C'O °`a°E v G°'w = A N' •o 0.'
w
•M p;': 5 8.S r�'� 'S �� on�«' 'o � A S c� m w U y
.5 Ln Us10
4-- -0 of C7
O U
mU- °�� � gw. � o „� mcg •'a �� ��'A ° _ dcso
n c o •o " 5 a °v°5.5 a >a
.:.c p... o�a g � ° `� •2 �� 'c � U y c4 sa F `�F c 5 `�.d c �
5
�p+
•p F� ' $U L�,� ? OF M OF~O Q N J V.�Y.V m C L C d cCi
a3 U«S °'N `nom a 3�°n �� acv o 3 E 5d
15
COO
� c
N
w
1.0
b e v o 0 0
0 � 0oU
Uv
w
U U
o � c c Q E U
F ti 0 0 S` o E o a E o U o
luu �U Uaa Uaa a0•a
� d
H
V o 0 Cl 0 0
3 N0 � �
C* ; 3 `
a d O M O a
;! N °•3 v y o T
v
t Or >. � d �a •L" o y
N.
E N b
V .� cy°tl n''= w ti b v Q v
- � o 5 `•c �o o m
o f - •T �v >v a c E v o
y id
O O
U
- O O
' M>ls
0 mo Sao UQ a �ua°
r •�.� y�'
° E 0 a41
o
U c E U n" Edi 3 q 6d O g
co T ° Q
o y F m Q a s v o
R—
CL �. > W > { v
8E tWo a Q o�vccaQenv �w° � vf'
o ° .'c v v v C ❑ � � ra �m .—�u �.5
b FL y a"i E.Sz •ia °'� �' c °' Sa d: ttSSS�dS' w' LO
cw > o
E._ o �°-� C R G U
U voncFo
a V�v E Cy k L U V 9y 8
i
R1 " 3 eo o ❑ �v � c
E w°'U k E a m c o• o Ad o o °
_y p 0 V W N N r G itl F z b 4 R O 6 'k
V1 E ❑ ° W c L U 4 o h b a, y-v ° a.o
�t� ti t. e�'� E❑v 3 '� m � 3 3¢ � E C o e y �o '� � '� �U �o a
M W Y_ ] F c u v v cc
0 k U
';� c m °' ❑ w c 8 v .a° -2Q c v h ra
u e6'� °: ,oma v m v b� F 5 a.3 ° m_, R• ° �'� o F. k y o
9z v O a n 0 c y c o o ¢'7,
.g: ?r� y v" c i° .�. m `a fi' '^ W ,°, e E
o o °
.E E
`tq lU
3;`yamO•, Wu mm ov y�m G5 0av Uvc�.'7.yEN�ao' '`° av— "8 EEjE : u y� 4EfiO� °
jEoYoeyoo v
j
C o «O.sc o`n A ��. `� m•E •vo 4 4 a '>> E h T o u:[O
R m ', cL v a p�+ .a o °•= " y m w d ° d
-d C'�i m� `o•o E � �K �a `� d °v' �''� ° �`v e i U fi > c �'� 'g_ v °'> ° E
�,v O ❑ ° ky' o k O E o v C U u a O
a m y o'� � 10 V y:: U U v a �e �•V U m F u "v c w
w 0-2
ra t °v' -«°.
k v
;'. iF _ U a o m o.�-.n o c U o v o:�o d o` o o.� o n•E
.. N'> z. �uCtl� N m
OO ° C ° C iC ° ° mC
f
O 0 11 ° O^
O
U ° U•° U'O U °'
¢= o �o9 ¢ 0
«� is U.c o c E o c o o U
oU
0w Vaw Vac. 3
F N N N N
u 3i
M ..
l
ky Y1,na•4u;�;
i
V 4
a
1 y 5
op£aW O O O1.4
O
Jaz d'
z�
�a �a V)
> o o is>iv ° v ,s, U o 0 o
�a
xo a 4 T
T O b b U.F V] N W L - 'o y k O C A
to u
0 o U a o 0 3 0 o a F4 0 e U o 0 0 0 O
c� m v o o v �' o c b• �' o.� U ° o m e
Rs C a! w•C.0 k ° 14
ra R c c q v ° 3 v 3.� • o o m
aW� o w o v a O G o c o ❑
x
C
v
G
3s �aVe� pw°�w" g °
' c c � ' °: 'C1 E a � '� v. v v a� � •o c a s c a
O E a y
tl C wv°i
.5 0 > P.. K N y eo
orj
E -13
G C y�P7 uu fi b o v R .c a.5 �'❑ a:tiv �YC
m Q tl y o c c o 0 v133 v m o c
o =
iii w ? •5 wp �.— � p"fi � E o ° y y D v'S o wp b E ;o „ °'A �.a � � v °a
A yki. °3 c •� .t3 o �! c c�•°c.`�' o a v c Q Q c.,� u
� y 3 °.C7 v •�° `'�a a �'° a c e � �'� pp � '' e t a`� � .5'S � aci o g
a @ ° o $
ICO o.o 'tl o W m
V� Y ° °., 7 10 ry 4' �y�y4 3�o eZ�. v o p'' w °
;F N , •7 7
i:•,OC» '' c`°w°°s3 wUOv� _ :e° O
ao ia
G.yv
otl u
a a d o v V �',v— �, .5 y a y u ❑ .o c u
c
fi Az
a ° vim ° 5o � n�sE � F or '�� sv v � �` o ❑ �3 �.c o marc �.5i
I� U v n'a$�uu pp o ci°i Y° o'•'F b o•5'� o � o n `u o o " 0 0 0
E O d N �y N O> Q N p v•C N 9 G.a N p u N O N N a
tt
P.(on 9Na 4i.5(-+w Ei n 1 .5-1 a ,° 4«SPY
$ 3tT
0
m, v� U�
O
o
U U O
' p U L � U L V•�.
O O O
U N N N
U �rT U
�h 1�
3 3k v e
U L O
p Oq
V
bn
b U
� c
LID
� y �
i
dq 5't•`,k w� T a
C
eE O F.
C;�A
... °a max°
0
° y�v bn45'" or
�a
°- aawv � Gue w° 3
C,
S CO b 3 8 C W N V 0
od
a o
N
g o
7d >, v
m G � -S c k i p �,c �, Q k:�o c c � o o F. a •o P.' o C v o
cco v y ,v, .0 3 R1
p« 2 d m
.o
a U'o
vo y « $ a°u
J5
a o °c 9y'y
3 moi' U o
I 1'`._ � 4 O � O O.�? = N V+•'� O � N C C._ O °1J o ❑� ° 'p
ON, `,c °.=' U �. " a v o o N CG a v ro o E v u° 'E
G,� ..°r U 3 tl 'S 'S v c �,v_ t• ,', �`� ro�:o $ 2 Z°
w — Ana D
�'-•a O xi. ° O ° O O Y�y O N ° b0 p N
UN .0 O ^iU a- � a � cvv ° ° cxt°
3G
y � I
.y mss' A U vi
j
m 'Oy I
3 °
y� wN
Id
y pGp y �E N
Q D d aCi
y 5ni 0•G
� G O
r y r 3
d o E
.1L� � � v G A V� •�'= m 8
G N N'G
n }
n
u;
> E`n U•„�-, o o I°.a
°? °' o TmE0 EI o
�u � r• ,E .5 �W a.m y s•� .°.D mx �— aci
o°
C o v
aEi
�o � a❑ EE83a'Go
N N N N N I
I
P J M vJ ❑ 4l�-• '� i F � p r � °�b
7 r •�r S.o.a � O `g L � 5 m.� � � o r/]C xi. -
4'
z, w ; W aci
r o o V(7
o m s o V44
•o .S `° `o.� '�i v a 4 V bR r o
4.gTA
do,,5 p95, o5 0� c8 �
uy, Y V U Q V 3 U b V u
5.5a
a
y s:
4 tV
(f b U b
^gym'
^J Y
f
V kq 5.
U N o 0
U F� u
{
SZ N n n
•d a E E E
o o 0
z o 0 0
m m m
� f
J} t V t
�Wp LW C
x�aa�s�r
L'W 9 N y�F
r. c°� �
�. s'. �V� �'w E p a � 'O m-o �va�3am m•a �,� 'g 'o' cy�Q F
�SV1 � b o Fi V4 o tl •$Y .c'vp.0'3 ,Lv,�..k '3 FG.S � �-°o
�'N m �« �'o v 9 i c� c s v 'v Z e��•S'-'-, 8 � �q v �Q
"� g n a w 3.� � k a •cy .o c 'a m o� 3 v zl'v
SE
¢ 2 V
'w .F _Fo � � co `«> ats �.$g, m° �•Go c.`Y-g' ra � g�`' �3H$ �v
o
Ll o
' a.'ap+ •�+y 3 H o o E'o w •Q
i ed�, °3 w°' E � m •"d b v o b.o Z.ao U` °�' •� a,v F'o ..i h >,a v
' �'o b F N �•o m v� ''3-,o W 4° v 4 0 ��� ' '�' o� � �:H o � c�! �,y>. °'cl `� � �,�°
v
y 'b � � a � cEc ;'� � 4avy o• « SaWoiSA 2. Wv � c'o � � i�
-Eh;
SOs �0. °.opi,, �Wfi� � eo vof� wm °° •oiOa �•.� U �' ��'o•°�
., o? �� cgN3F" r5 �aa $ ov oa.5 &ovunoi
§J r'� u :.s p; � .5 v � °u �' U m � U$ �¢•$ W�•p o GI Q,r.+ G7 � `� 5 m U � '� Fn ; «4
5 � :U $ v•° U " o o a � o`v'O o o "F� T� �B P� a "q-.'� �n 9 a� e:� V��w
F° ❑r� E �ac 53m 53 a:IA S3 3 5.5'ya � °oFooUno
1
46 -
t - nH H E H N N
{" .iUF - OF U USF
�W3¢ 3¢ 3
k4�kb1�C
U
�C aio c� a�
y n 3 Htn E N ti c b o
v o v °
.2 N C CLL ••r]
sr{3 O W W
to O,60 O O
N aJ
yr
? bA W
-5 fwd W
�� � "'�' °' �' ,td � �'td� tgJ� � 3� �' o � °��y �i.�L o v a�vi.E $•O
i a
Ln wz o
-K N M
Lid U
C O U
b o gkn
Jq
14
u'2'
-m � o CI w � � & c V R e ? ❑ �.W a
-v
..�,,, �,.._.- � v'o � F'.� c=y 5 ti ° e'a s`° i�• o E u 4 ra. 3.0 o
U v G_D y
.,;Vl � o °' %W v v o•$ g °'� CU 3 �� vb 5 cock ��°�`n
5•n y y ° E c 3 c v ° ° o .`° W E c 3 A y
O G b E v C 6 'C
12,
uolz
. .coayomYyo � aC ° tly �£o3e`�E� 'fioaowo.
Ft"U•O [-'.D�0..Q9
p O O O
r U ¢ d ¢
3v 3 3 3
b �;C
V
b
0
� U
au a �
"u
v m �
Cn Ca
O O O O
N p N p
aa �
u '
�°a � cn 5 a,� � 6 � � ❑ �8 y rte. g`�
O
C VN
N � �D
ATTACHMENT B I
INFORMATION REQUESTED BY CHECKLIST QUESTION Lb `
MEASURE C COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST:CALENDAR Years 2004&2005
Adversely Affect the Ability to:
Meet Growth
Management ImplementResults of
Element Action Plan Meet RTPC RTPC
General Plan Amendments Standards Policies TSOs Reviewed Review
I Name: Text Amendment to Agricultural
Core
Location:All parcels in Agricultural Core,
located in the Brentwood area
Applicant:County Initiated
County File:GP#03-0004
Description:Text change to Agricultural
Core(AC)designation in Land Use Element
to allow through a land use permit the
operation of a Winery or Olive Oil Mill.It Notice given to.
did not generate 100 or more peak hour trips. No No No TRANSPLAN No Action
Adopted:4/6/2004
Resolution#2004/11
Calendar Year:2004
2 Name: Dougherty Valley Specific Plan
Update and General Plan Amendment
Location: Dougherty Valle
Applicant:Sha ell Ind./Lennar Homes
Count File:GP#03-0006
Description:Specific changes in land use
designations on the Land Use Element Map
to correspond and reflect updated Land Use
Map in the Dougherty Valley Specific Plan.
It did not generated more than 100 peak hour Notice given to
trips. No No No SWAT No Action
Adopted:8/2/2005
Resolution#2005/488
Calendar Year:2005
3 Name: Discovery Bay West Village V
General Plan Amendment
Location:Village V,Lakes at Discovery
Bay,Discovery Ba
Applicant:Hofmann Land Dev.Co.
Count File:#GP#03-0007
Description:Change in various GP land use
designations to reflect re-planned Village V.
GPA application linked to SD#8828.It Notice given to
generated 100 or more peak hour trips. No No No TRANSPLAN No Action
Adopted:7/26/2005
Resolution#2005/369
Calendar Year:2005
I
I
i
ATTACHMENT B
INFORMATION REQUESTED BY CHECKLIST QUESTION Lb
MEASURE C COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST:CALENDAR Years 2004&2005
Adversely Affect the Abiltry to:
Meet Growth
Management implement Results of
Element Action Plan Meet RTPC RTPC
General Plan Amendments Standards Policies TSOs Reviewed Review
4 Name:Kensington Combining Dist.Ord.&
Related General Plan Amendment
Location:Kensington
Applicant:County initiated
Count File:GP#04-0003
Text change in Land Use Element to add
policies in Kensington in support of -
Kensington Combining District Ord.It did Notice given to
not generate 100 or more peak hour trips. No No No WCCTAC No Action
Adopted:12/14/2004
Resolution#2004/649
Calendar Year:2004
5 Name:2004 ULL Boundary.Change
Location:Countywide
Applicant:County initiated
County File:GP#04-0005
Description:Change in ULL Boundary to Notice given to
make it coterminous with City Limits. CCTA,
WCCTAC,
TRANSPAC.
SWAT,and
No No No TRANSPLAN No Action
Adopted:10/5/2004
Resolution#2004/503
Calendar Year:2004
6 Name:Reconsolidation of General Plan,
2005-2020
Location:Countywide
Applicant:County initiated
Count File:GP#04-0007
Description:General Plan Reconsolidation Notice given to
Reflecting separate amendments in GP since WCCTAC,
1996 and extending term,2005—2020.It did TRANSPAC.
not generate 100 or more peak hour trips. SWAT,and
No No No TRANSPLAN No Action
Adopted:1/18/2005
Resolution#2005/31
Calendar Year 2005
ATTACHMENT B
INFORMATION REQUESTED BY CHECKLIST QUESTION Lb
MEASURE C COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST:CALENDAR Years 2004&2005
Adversely Affect the Abilityto:
Meet Growth
Management Implement Results of
Element Action Plan Meet RTPC RTPC
General Plan Amendments Standards Policies TSOs Reviewed Review
7 Name:Humphrey Ranch General Plan
Amendment
Location:Alamo
Applicant:Davidon Homes
County File:GP#04-0010
Description:Change land use designation—
consolidate and expand existing SL on 23
acres of Humphrey Prop.Designate 9 acres
PS.GPA application linked to SD#8905.It Notice given to
did not generate 100 or more peak hour trips. No No No SWAT No Action
Adopted:10/18/2005
Resolution#2005/660
Calendar Year 2005
i
I
i
'II I
j --
ATTACHMENT C
$]gj'^C1F fAl IF(IRNiA.$IIC(t.1�C TRAWCP(7RTp 1
� nON ANTI H()i ICi1J(7 AI"+FN }'
GRAY nAV1C(:ovm�,i
DEPARTAI NT OF HOUSING/1' )COMA UNTTY DEVELO:PA4ENT .�0uslNc 9hO
Division of housing Policy Deveiopment
ndrd St ee Seim 430 v o
P.O.Bu 952058
1600 3 •��'�'
Sacrament.,CA 94252-2053
(916)32 3-3176/FAX:(916)337-2643 Ty DEAF'
02 APR-? AN 10: 42
March 26,2002
Mr.John Sweeten,County Adrniiustrator
Contra Costa County
651 Pine Street,Eleventh Floor,North Wing
Martinez,California 94553
Dear Mr.Sweeten:
RE: Review of Contra Costa County's Adopted Housing Element
Thank you for submitting Contra Costa County's adopted housing element received for our
review on December 31, 2001. As you are aware,this Department is required to review adopted
housing elements and report our findings to the locality pursuant to Government Code Section
65585(1). Telephone conversations with Ms. Kara Douglas, Mr. Patrick Roche, and Ms.
Veronica Tarn,the County's consultant,facilitated our review.
Contra Costa County's adopted element adequately addresses all of the statutory requirements
described in our October 19, 2001 review. Therefore, the element is in compliance with State
housing element law(Article 10.6 of the Govermneut Code). Compliance is conditioned on the
County's implementation of Program 19 to rezone at least 10 acres to M29 zoning to facilitate
lower-income housing development by 2003. We understand the County is in the process of
rezoning a number of parcels(amounting to approximately six acres)near the Pittsburg-Bay Point
BART station to allow densities of 40 du/acre, This proposed re-zoning would clearly meet a
portion of the need addressed in Program 19.
We commend the County for its housing programs and detailed site analysis. The County has and
continues to effectively use a variety of financial and regulatory incentives to encourage lower-
income housing development. Additionally,we recognize the County's successful efforts to work
with non- and for-profit developers to nicrease the supply of housing affordable to low- and
moderate-income households.
While the County does not.need the sites in Dougherty Valley to identify adequate sites, we
recognize the commendable efforts the County has undertaken to facilitate housing development
affordable to lower-income households. Through the County's negotiated development
agreements, 1,377 units will be,affordable to lower-income households. The County's leadership
ensured that the needs of low- and moderate-income households were addressed in this planning
area.
I
'I
i
I
Mr.Sweeten,County Adrn' ',trator
Page 2
However as you know,when allocating housing need to the County and cities within the County,
ABAG considered the agreement between the City and County and determined that any growth
associated with this planning area would be attributed to the City. The housing needs allocation
was clarified in a February 22,2000 memo from Mr. Alex Amoroso, of ABAG. The County's
housing needs contact was also forwarded a copy of this memo. As a result, units built on sites
annexed to the City of San Ramon will be credited to the City.
We wish you much success in implementing the County's housing and land-use programs and
look forward to receiving the amoral general plan implementation report pursuant to Government
Code Section 65400. If we can provide any assistance in implementing your element,please feel
free to contact Paul Dirksen,of our staff,at(916)445-5307.
In accordance with their requests pursuant to the Public Records Act,we are fonvarding a copy of
this letter to the individuals listed below.
Sincerely,
Cathy Creswell
Deputy Director
Enclosure
cc: Veronica Tam,Cotton,Bridges&Associates
Marl,Stivers,Senate Committee on Housing&Conununity Development
Catherine Ysrael,Supervising Deputy Attorney General,AG's Office
Terry Roberts,Governor's Office of Planning and Research
Kimberley Dellinger, California Building Industry Association
Marcia Salkin,Califonria Association of Realtors
Marc Brown,California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
Rob Weiner,California Coalition for Rural Housing
John Douglas,AICP, Civic Solutions
Deanna Kitamura,Western Center on Law and Poverty
Greg Spiegel,Western Center on Law and Poverty
Mr.Sweeten,County Adm. ,trator I
Page 3
Dennis M.Bari-y,AICP,Director,Community Development Department
Alexander Abbe,Law Finn of Richards,Watson&Gershon
Ruben Duran,Law Finn of Neufield,Jaffe&Levin
Dara Schur,Protection&Advocacy,Lc.
David Booher,California Housing Council
Monique K.Doryland,Bay Area Legal Services
Gary Hambly,Building Industry Association
Sue Hestor,Attorney at Law
Gary Hanibly,Building Industry Association
Paul Campos,Home Builders Assoc.of Northern California
Shannon Dodge,Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California
Eve Bach,Arc Ecology
Williaut Litt,Bay Area Legal Aid
I
I
+
9
�. O N `�
n~n k a aCi p
CD
O kn O p
O a.)Cl
b
b N
oo
61
ti o b 0UA G
°� o o
w N q ° :
O o
^b v o y
a�3` [� v N m G y O T d E aCi
0 O� ice.. f.'+
fir$ 0 0 m or
c y pp pp
0.0 sz N cd w cC aoi N m � clj
a)! b O � 0w 5 U U O o 69 a�i
V1' p U U
> N DOAid Ci,M .�+
E of b y F-� > U O
pC7�, w .0 ti .0 y bA� 0
0
O to O U cd U
mOn a�jy ��ii rr� �'t o b04 O a) .b In to �O G'
N �tf6�1, H /-+ �-� U O cwd .� O
cu
bo 'E3
F v � r 000 oq con rl v0�i A >, c
7. pp ,o96.
cu °o o b
i7 U 0
a'
tQ)
v U bA a)
Q C4 a o�Ot s q A o
o b X' o cu o y *" G o
aoi
N o �
aJ a) L L s p
�O P.C
S O Y .U. O O-U aj
>Gyi y.ar rFo vi p O id .9 N C � np pw q N ,
' pl. cOC
c�
b
U O
{hs�`� C7 O O O > iC y
> N a�
3a w O Op id
750.rF�r•!!' R''y y y N, U
O yG3s;. 6l Q''N b D~ =jp w .li O
O F7 - - .N .d 3F+
L'z FJ c0 ° O a)
IS 0 'oRd.
cj
'o rrl'ap "�d O t-. �., H .q a''m •fn Y ,� ' y '� -> 'y ,b vi vUi s.
O N 0 O ° O 4 O
y ^O o O C U R
CC pi ate+ U p �-,+ N w O .rCy�, p U
c� G O id U > U
O N
ep„ Via` o a� �? od a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
xZU
P. pCwdw w
3a V w' x UO
} V V
ani O O T
C
C) . o
O o .
,
ti.y ° O °: 3
b:m'y
�,.a o •o U y °
h o a> mCIS
Tap-pe +N
O '
V' a
to t4
I
to ° 0C7 � bp� w � b
y O CJ) E�f N U b N C O W N O
'b v W m 4 V] 47 �i cncli
0 0 O Q o o Q o ,� O o
at 'F�, p
o
1 w o r.
CD
piani
El
Fes", cid .O .
C's 'Od
yi
O 00 o m .bp 00 O m 'd 4w..� > ,C
abi �N U P. cd W 'U O
� b.
Via: C O .>, bb1+4 cd
O c3 rn N
to
� w °
- Cd3 w °
O c4. to
O p '+
Cd
",ebD•::,..v. vOi '� � ti F. til es' b 0
I.O.
-s p
boo u O •�,
L"en 0 O
O O O
C
b v p C
00
° U
b
OD o O
O O
43
Oyy
w W m
1-0
wU 00 U
° U
N
D N U O N
4 C
.0 p 0 at NO O N
o ti
as C'sCl
° o. N ° v° tr.
a°i x �
° b N b v abi ba �>° .v o aOi o C
O O o U G. O y
y o `n >, O o �0., C � .n
N C cid
ooN a
a cd o
o
dod ro > A> °o CIS 1v1 w o
o �jam. o b Y b " o 0 a
o � > a �q .° q ° d o Qa Hd o H >° U
to
Z 0 o
Ln
ap
r=, °c° °F°
rro C y x c o o a� 0 G M
cn
n Q >
v a
a p o Eves x 6xj¢ b b 00
ru
P4 ti
d 7 cAa ¢ G
0 >
fa0 UQ o °
� U :�.. '' Ux � z Uxx Ucn u:
o bp z x o G ° o° b °U' C
S d tir y v C '> N sk G p N d O > O
° o o > o o y N a'" a� o
o a ° a� U ¢ .b ' 3 oG 3 0 aN b
d info-° V. E w70 o Y" ° a� w y v❑i, W o a� a� oo p vi
WEU b O Rv [�
d a . a� o a� `� CQ � b ° ° ° ° ° `3 0 0o N ° 00 a o
� GUa, � v d Ucnd >
' o cin 0 N o
ao G on (U 0 G
o oyj
.? 3
°C� v Y d w
IRV
fiiA-v
t, z - m 7 oo U
a � 0 �
•w P. O U o O O. d o $:Ll
h Vl O
Q ° � y.i v
o
4w 5n m o
oo 3
o p ° � I o
d hN P � Ob O ° a a0
Q�UAi O U 1 T U
a.o
tn.-5=
O ?: QC�i N V�+l Sri 1yy+ 'b
q qkj bA w L' L1. cd .' U
R -0 23 _ w b U O
U .�
F. N
7 al'
Vf O Rte,.
vD
q _Ng
ou C C
E '�
m i ss O bj) bo to
G C O
a•' d .� vs�Y i
ar w a°Cj
i C b
~. E U fCr on Gq >
a o >
> oa >
fl C qfo k A O a a o o ❑ a o o O Q
Ev WUx w8b '� UA Q UA a °:
rn kn b °
40,
s, R. bb > cdn O D U .f. R i o n �" A ��
PO . G vi U > b ° ° > b m O �w0 a ?: +� y �E'8 O
.El: m:N .b D N U U , ° a 0 " o ".'_' .'O G.' p 'b . s"
� °�'" ". ca ° p .. wcba N W .�°, ¢, a 'y 'OV ° `°
y. a on a.
N o
o �v 3 ' no o ._ ro o o w b y
?�,`3`�: R. P U',O •� 'rn U '> ,xjw p .� N .� .N O 'U N O
al .0 pUq, l a N y p O o aQ C y o OOv) A R > w y P
ge' _
a
O a40 •" o aqi � U
W Q 4y in b0 ." q R 'V
N
C
i
as ti
I
`aot cno
> N
i,�N' r� �• G tf a '�n
y M-1
r•j4.-e N Y
4�
hsy�lk •O Lam` .�
aau�x PA . _T
cd bb
cti�ay'a � �+ •O U
V�1a t ? ;. pry 'p
U w _ G rI� Wl G
FT;hwY..t .�"^"
bll
a H `
� G .
rts{a
() N
c- a c- dt H
A C �� ani G Qw
CL � C3Q a
o W � o 4) m bf)
O c vi N GU-+ V p+ O
S �t Aw H a
T N a) U O '�' A m
In
o �`� a ,a v a+ o w a 6,
Nd
a .oW �' �
N ���4 � �� .j R* 3 v 4 0:� O•+ aH7 a a� O G ,�� G.� o °) C�
a fit ?w o ami Ne s w mar
'� "�' •� ,G-• G +�' O�U 4U-lOj '`7 cc
rL4
�Y Svc:
i� v
w a G o
k t G03 o To
o H a
N G, p `y N't7
.r�r,' �. •� p N d) .rU .A U •0 U
w
to
wo
vg
' > Inno w o 0
< P- -
R- on �•�� G
A-A& N ► + U '7 •�'`d
A __.
Ls o r
Mi 3 x
Y'a? h
yya"AID O �;
a , o p
bb
o
o rd Ui d
0
c q IV �!
o„ad dr o _
i S h kCi
fd N t by
E
MEN
�n� .0.
�' ,. 4.W
VI OCC; 0... O ..
b4
O
p
v a. U k (�
ai U
ra
E U b � CMr7 W
t
-„- -g
K- g o cd ... U U
a' - O w .-. U C R.
to
c1lcl,
G' a
U C O U b O
O c0i a0i O
x rn c o 2 U a
s
a N
g � O
G �'�� � O Cl•,ti
xo .(,�,,,i•� O i Q Lam'. p
� c
O '
Id
Ei
o '
F
—cl Q O a o
10 7 m
Oh N U
�� ' W ¢� a', r� Qa
Housing Need Production Form
Organization: Contra Costa County
Contact: Kara Douglas Title:Affordable Housing Program Manager
Address: 2530 Arnold Drive,Suite 190
City: Martinez Zip: 94553
Email: kdoug@cd.cccounty.us Phone: (925)335-7223
Report year: 2004
Report time period:
0 Calendar Year(January 1—December 31) i]Fiscal Year(July 1—June 30)
Unit Count of Housing Produced
State Identified +' 't I "t t `._ 1e r tib.,
Cu
AffordabilirrUnits Added Current Year Total Units Units Added-tn� Total Units
ty ent p
Categories RHNA Added Prior Years.of Addetl Current-'
(Percent ofarea Allocation Unrestricted Deed Current Year RHNA Cycle, HN Cycle r
Restricted rt s} x
Very Low
(up to 50%AMI) 1101 156 156 97 253
Low
(51-80%AMI) 642 81 81 22 103
Moderate 1401 96 96
(81-120%AMI)
r
Above Moderate
(over 120%AMI) 2292 656 656 1177 1833
roTAL '%' . 5436 656 ,. 237 893 1392
Number of units added determined by building permits.
See reverse for definitions of income categories included in this form.
Optional Locally Identttied Affordability Categories} r
(Alternative bff6ry'y
levels tracked by some jurisdac#oris Lmrrl mformakon to-litle and definition of locally
:derti'ied,cate o" Place'roducliohnuriibers.or'.these,eate`ones:ri-a" ro r7ate-a orddliliycale ar Above'
Housing Need Production Form
Organization: Contra Costa County
Contact: Kara Douglas Title:Affordable Housing Program Manager
Address: 2530 Arnold Drive,Suite 190
City: Martinez Zip: 94553
Email: kdoug@cd:eccounty.us Phone: (925)335-7223
Report year: 2005
Report time period:
El Calendar Year(January 1-December 31) ® Fiscal Year(July 1-June 30)
Unit Count of Housing Produced
.state Identified UnnsAdded Currentlygar
'Affordabil'ity •• Current Total tlnns a Units Added In Total Umts
Categories RHNA, Deed Added Prior Years of Added Current
(Percent of area Allocation Unrestricted Current Year RHNA Cycla: RHNAmCycle
median income(AM!)) Restricted
Very Low 1101 9 9 371 380
(up to 50%AMI)
Low 642 160 160
(51-80%AMI)
Moderate
(81-120%AMI) 1401. 10 10 97 107
Above Moderate
(over 120%AMI) 2292 701 = 701 1657 2358
NOTAL 5436 711 9 720 2285 3005
Number of units added determined by building permits.
See reverse for definitions of income categories included in this form.
Optional Locally 7dentrTied AffoMill ty;Categories
(Alternative affordabrmatzon to,ttle and defnzuon,oflocally ;
identi ed cafe o :Place. rodziction numbers or ttiese cate'ories;in a 'ro nate d o dabili late o' above
,
Housing Need Production Form Description
California State Law mandates that each jurisdiction annually submit a report on the effectiveness of its
housing element,on or before October 1.Reports are to be submitted to the jurisdiction's local governing
body,the Governor's Office of Planning and Research,and the Department of Housing and Community
Development(HCD)pursuant to Government Code Section 65400(b).
The Housing Need Production Form is part of an Association of Bay Area Governments effort to provide
a tool to local jurisdictions to streamline reporting on housing unit production.
Report Time Period
Jurisdictions can report their housing production by either calendar(January 1—December_3 1)or fiscal
(July 1—June 30)year.Whether to report by calendar or fiscal year will depend on a number of factors
including format of existing records,deadlines for other mandated reports,and staff availability.
Allowable housing Units
The reporting of housing unit production is defined by the types of housing that HCD allows to be
counted toward meeting the Regional Housing Need Allocation(RHNA).HCD counts housing as a new
dwelling unit if it meets the Department of Finance(DOF)functional definition for new units.Group
housing cannot be counted toward meeting RHNA numbers.The following,provided by HCD,defines a
housing unit:
Housing Unit-A house,an apartment,a mobile home or trailer,a group of rooms,or a single
room occupied as separate living quarters,or if vacant,intended for occupancy as separate living
quarters.Separate living quarters are those in which the occupants live separately from any other
individuals in the building and which have direct access from outside the building or through a
common hall.For vacant units,the criteria of separateness and direct access are applied to the
intended occupants whenever possible.
Household—A household includes all the people who occupy a housing unit as their usual place
of residence.
Group Quarters(which cannot be counted)-The Census Bureau classifies all people not living in
households as living in group quarters.There are two types of group quarters:institutional(for
example,correctional facilities,nursing homes,and mental hospitals)and non-institutional(for
example,college dormitories,military barracks,group homes,missions,and shelters).
Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2000(same as of March 2002);see"Glossary"link on
Census 2000 portion of the websiteat:hitp.11www.census.govhnainhvww/cen2000.html
Affordability Categories
The categories included in the proposed Housing Need Production Form are those required as part of the
RHNA statute and are determined by household income:very low,low,moderate,and above moderate.
Each affordability category is defined as a percent of the county area median income:
• Very low income—50%or below of area median income
• Low income—between 5 1%and 80%area median income
• Moderate income—between 81%and 120%area median income
• Above moderate income—greater than 120%area median income
To determine the income levels(by household size)for each affordability category for your county,go to
www.hed.ca.gov/hpd/hre/rep/state/incNote.htmi for the latest version of the yearly Official State
Income Limits Report produced by the Department of Housing and Community Development(HCD)
i
The State identified categories are based on the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development's(HUD)income categories developed for Federal housing programs.The State report
includes the'extremely low'category used by HUD so that local communities can submit applications to
relevant Federal programs.However,since the RIINA process does not require that housing need be
distributed to an'extremely low'income category;units produced in this category should be included in
the'very low'income category.
Process to Determine the Number of Units
The reporting of new housing units produced is to be based on the number of building permits issued.
Jurisdictions may base their tracking process on either building permits issued or ftnaled building permits.
State DOF requests that jurisdictions report building permits issued.The State RDA and the Federal
Government request that jurisdictions report on finaled building permit.A jurisdiction may choose which
type of building permit they use for the form depending on which of the State/Federal reports they already
track production for.
Reporting Number of Units Produced
The table on the Housing Need Production Form contains headings for five categories:These headings
have been modified so that the production form can be used in any year of any RHNA cycle.
• Current RHNA Allocation—The number of housing units allocated to a jurisdiction for the
current housing element cycle.
• Units Added Current Year—The number of housing units produced during the current
reporting year.This category contains two sub-categories:Unrestricted and Deed Restricted
o Unrestricted—The number of housing units produced without affordability restrictions.
o Deed Restricted—The number of housing units produced that achieve their affordability
through some form of legally binding restriction on the income levels of owners or
tenants.
• Total Units Added Current Year—The sum of the number of housing units reported in the
"Unrestricted"and"Deed Restricted"categories.
• Units Added Prior Years of RHNA Cycle—The total number of housing units produced in the
previous years of the current RHNA cycle.
• Total Units Added Current RIINA Cycle—The sum of the number of housing units reported in
the"Total Units Added,Current Year"and"Units Added in Prior Years of RIINA Cycle"
categories.
Optional:Locally Identified Affordability Categories
This section of the Housing Need Production Form is added as an option.It is for those jurisdictions that
have developed,and track housing production within,one or more alternative affordability categories.
All production numbers should be incorporated into the table on the proposed form.It is recommended
that the information provided in this section be limited to the title and definition ofthe locally.identified
categories(including percent of Area Median Income).
Note:There are a number of locally identified income categories that some communities find useful in
monitoring housing production in relation to the needs of its residents.These are optional categories that
most jurisdictions do not use.f your jurisdiction does track one or more of these categories,include the
number of new units produced in the appropriate State identified category on the proposed form.
2
ATTACHMENT E
INFORMATION REQUESTED BY CHECKLIST QUESTION 5.a
MEASURE C COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST:CALENDAR Years 2004&2005
Resolution#
Was a Measure for Finding of
C Traffic Study Consistency
Projects Generating 100 or more Peak hour Tris Done? with GMP
1 Name:Windemere Ranch
Location:San Ramon
Applicant:Windemere BLC,LLC
Count File:#SD038510,DP033015
Description:Approval of a vesting tentative map for Phase V to
subdivide 253.4 acres into 895 lots to establish 1,877 single family
residential units,293 apartments,179 Condominiums,141 Town
homes,and ei ht neighborhood parks. Yes 2-2006
Adopted:4/27/04
Calendar Year 2004
2 Name:Gale Ranch Phase
Location:San Ramon
Applicant:Sha ell Industries Of Northen California
County File:#SD04-8856,DP04-3070
Description:Approval of a vesting tentative map to subdivide an
approximately 831-acre parcel into a total of 664 parcels. Parcels
to establish a total of 547 detached single-family units,101 town
homes,458 apartment units,a village center(which includes 200
apartment units),several linear and neighborhood parks,a
community ark,a corporation yard,and recreation center. Yes 4-2006
Adopted: 1/25/05
Calendar Year 2005
3 Name:Pleasant Hill Bart Transit Village
Location:Pleasant Hill
Applicant:Pleasant Hill Bart Transit Village Associates,LIC C/O
Millennium Partners
Count File:#DP043099
Description:A approval of a final development plan to develop 549
multi-family residential units;35,590 sq.ft.of retail;12,130 sq.ft.
(10 units)of live-work/retail;270,000 sq.ft.of commercial office;
19,400 sq.ft.of conference area;and 1,816 structured parking
spaces for the proposed uses. Yes 34-2002
Adopted,5/24/05
Calendar Year 2005
ATTACHMENT E
INFORMATION REQUESTED BY CHECKLIST QUESTION 5.a
MEASURE C COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST:CALENDAR Years 2004&2005
Resolution#
Was a Measure for Finding of
C Traffic Study Consistency
Projects Generating 100 or more Peak hour Tris Done? with GMP
4 Name:Bay Harbor Commerce Center
Location:Bay Point
Applicant:Bay Point Venture One,LLC
Count File:#SD03-8720,#DP04-3042 and#LP02-210
Description: The project includes 23 lots ranging from.93 acres'
to 3.07 acres,with a total of 39.68 acres of developable area.Based
on allowable floor area ratios and lot coverage,the Project could
consist of a maximum of 1,157,554 square feet of building space,
generally comprised of warehouse and office uses.Off-street
parking would he provided as required by the County's
development standards,and would include a minimum of 1,852
spaces Yes 17-2004
Ado ted:4/26/04
Calendar Year 2004
ATTACHMENT F
Contra Costa County
Public Works Department
LIST OF REPORTING INTERSECTIONS AND LOS RESULTS
2005 LOS
Central County AM PM
1. Solano Way/Imhoff Dr/Arnold Ind Way A A
2. Solano Way/Marsh Dr/Olivera Rd -- --
3. Oak Road/Las Juntas Way A A
4. Oak Road/Jones Rd A A
5. Oak Road/BART Station Entrance A A
6. Oak Road/Wayne Dr A A
7. Buskirk Ave/Wayne Dr A A
8. Newell Ave/Olympic Blvd A A
9. Tice Valley Blvd/Olympic Blvd A A
Southwest County
10. Blackhawk Rd/Blackhawk Plaza Cir A A
11. Blackhawk Rd/Silver Maple A A
East County
12. Port Chicago Hwy/Riverside Dr A A
13, Cypress Rd/Sellers Ave -- -
West County
14. Willow Ave/Hawthorne Dr A A
15. Parker Ave/4th St A A
16. Parker Ave/2nd St A A
17. Pomona St/2nd Ave A A
fuy
E-1L0520051LOS list.doc
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/09/06
INTERSECTION 1 Solano Way/Imhoff Dr/Arnold Contra Costa County
Count Date 07/06/05 Time 0615-0915 Peak Hour 0700-0800
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 4-PHASE SIGNAL
----------- 3 10 3
I I I
^ I I I ^
<--- v ---> Split? N
LEFT 2 --- 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.1 --- 34 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 72 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 135 THRU Imhoff Dr/Arnold
RIGHT 46 --- 1.7 1.0 2.0 1.9 1.0 --- 126 LEFT
I <--- ^ ---> I
v I v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 104 27 94 Urb=N, Rur=N
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? Y
STREET NAME: Solano Way
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 94 94 1650 0.0570
THRU (T) 27 27 3300 0.0082
LEFT (L) 104 104 1650 0.0630 0.0630
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 3 3 1650 0.0018
THRU (T) 10 10 1650 0.0061
LEFT (L) 3 3 1650 0.0018
T + R 13 1650 0.0079 0.0079
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 46 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 72 72 1650 0.0436 0.0436
LEFT (L) 2 2 1650 0.0012
T + R 72 1650 0.0436
-----`------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 34 34 1650 0.0206
THRU (T) 135 135 1650 0.0818
LEFT (L) 126 126 1650 0.0764 0.0764
T + R 169 1650 0.1024
------ --------=------------
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.19
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=01-SOLIM.INT,VOL=01-SOLIM.AMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
------------
------------------------------------ ------------
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/09/06
------------
------------------------------ ------------
INTERSECTION 1 Solano Way/Imhoff Dr/Arnold Contra Costa County
Count Date 07/06/05 Time 1530-1830 Peak Hour 1530-1630
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 4-PHASE. SIGNAL
----------- 0 89 42
I I I
I <--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 0 --- 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.1 --- 7 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 115 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 114 THRU Imhoff Dr/Arnold
RIGHT 113 -- 1.7 1.0 2.0 1.9 1.0 --- 124 LEFT
I <-- ^ ---> I
v I v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 58 9 131 Orb=N, Rur=N
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? Y
STREET NAME: Solano Way
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------7-----------------
NB RIGHT (R) 131 131 1650 0.0794
THRU (T) 9 9 3300 0.0027
LEFT (L) 58 58 1650 0.0352 0.0352
SB RIGHT (R) 0 0 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 89 89 1650 0.0539 0.0539
LEFT (L) 42 42 1650 0.0255
T + R 89 1650 0.0539
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 113 0 * 1.650 0.0000
THRU (T) 115 115 1650 0.0697 0.0697
LEFT (L) 0 0 1650 0.0000
T + R 115 1650 0.0697
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT. (R) 7 - 7 1650 0.0042
THRU (T) 114 114 1650 0.0691
LEFT (L) 124 124 1650 0.0752 0.0752
T + R 121 1650 0.0733
--------------------------
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.23
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=01-SOLIM.INT,VOL=01-SOLIM.PMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/09/06
INTERSECTION 3 Oak Rd/Las Juntas Way . Contra Costa County
Count Date 06/22/05 Time 0630-0930 Peak Hour 0730-0830
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 5-PHASE SIGNAL
---- 0 528 149
I I I
<--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 163 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 0 THRU Las Juntas Way
RIGHT 0 --- 0.0 1.0 2.1 1.7 1.1 --- 175 LEFT
I <--- ---> I
v I I v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 0 169 31 Urb=N, Rur=Y
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? Y
STREET NAME: Oak Rd
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 31 0 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 169 169 3300 0.0512 0.0512
LEFT (L) 0 0 1650 0.0000
T I R 169 3300 0.0512
SB THRU (T) 52B 528 3300 0.1600 0.1600
LEFT (L) 149 149 1650 0.0903
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 163 14 * 1650 0.0085
THRU (T) 0 0 1650 0.0000
LEFT (L) 175 175 1650 0.1061 0.1061
T + L 175 1650 0.1061
-------------
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.32
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=03-OAKLJ.INT,VOL=03-OAKLJ.AMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/09/06
-----------------
INTERSECTIONS 3 Oak Rd/Las Juntas Way Contra Costa County
CountDate 06/22/05 Time 1530-1830 Peak Hour 1700-1800
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 5-PHASE SIGNAL
0 238 55
I I I
<--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 266 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 1 THRU Las Juntas Way
RIGHT 0 -- 0.0 1.0 2.1 1.7 1.1 --- 73 LEFT
I' <--- ---> I
v v
N .I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 0 521 104 Urb=N, Rur=Y
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? Y
STREET NAME: Oak Rd
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* , CAPACITY RATIO V/C
NB RIGHT (R) 1.04 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 521 521 3300 0.1579 0.1579
LEFT (L) 0 0 1650 0.0000
T + R 521 3300 0.1579
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB THRU (T) 238 238 3300 0.0121 0.0721
LEFT (L) 55 55 1650 0.0333
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 266 211 * 1650 0.1.279 0.1279
. THRU (T) 1 1 1650 0.0006
LEFT (L) 73 73 1650 0.0442
T + L 74 1650 .0.0448 _
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.36
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON
INT=03-OAKLJ.INT,VOI,=03-OAKLJ.PMV,CAP=
RED
i
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
--------------
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/09/06
INTERSECTION 4 Oak Rd/Jones Rd Contra Costa Count
Count Date 06/23/05 Time 0630-0930 Peak Hour 0745-0845
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT - 6-PHASE SIGNAL
--- 109 284 15
I I I
I I I ^
I <--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 56 --- 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 11 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 29 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.0<--- 34 THRU Jones Rd
RIGHT 38 --- 1.1 1.0 2.1 1.4 1.0 --- 43 LEFT
v I v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 18 593 274 Urb=N, Rur=Y
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? Y
STREET NAME: Oak Rd
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 274 184 * 1650 0.1115
THRU (T) 593 593 3300 0.1797
LEFT (L) 18 18 1650 0.0109 :;
T + R 777 3300 0.2355 0.2355
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 109 53 * 1650 0.0321
THRU (T) 284 284 3300 0.08611 0.0861
LEFT (L) 15 15 1650 0.0091 :
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 3B 38 1650 0.0230
THRU (T) 29 29 1650 0.0176
LEFT (L) 56 56 1650 0.0339
T + R 67 1650 0.0406 0.0406
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 11 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 34 34 1650 0.0206 ;
LEFT (L) 43 43 1650 0.0261 0.0261
------------
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.39
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=04-OAKJO.INT,VOL=04-OAKJO.AMV,CAP=
I
,
I
I
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
-------------
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/09/06
__________________________ -------------_-------_____________
INTERSECTION 9 Oak Rd/Jones Rd Contra Costa County
Count Date 06/22/05 Time 1500-1800 Peak Hour 1700-1800
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL
----------- 100 531 22
I I I
<--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 150 --- 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 78 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 93 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.0<--- 21 THRU Jones Rd
RIGHT 21 '--- 1.1 1.0 2.1 1.9 1.0 --- 110 LEFT
I <--- ---> I
v v
N SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 5 622 387 Urb=Y, Rur=Y
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? Y -
STREET NAME: Oak Rd
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
-------------------------------`----------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 387 297 * 1650 0.1800
THRU (T) 622 622 3300 0.1885
LEFT (L) 5 5 1650 0.0030
T + R 919 3300 0.2785 0.2785
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 100 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 531 531 3300 0.1609 0.1609
LEFT (L) 22 22 1650 0.0133
EB RIGHT (R) 21 21 1650 0.0127
THRU (T) 93 93 1650 0.0564
LEFT (L) 150 150 1650 0.0909
T + R 119 1650 0.0691 0.0691
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 78 56 * 1650 0.0339
THRU (T) 21 21 1650 0.0127
LEFT (L) 110 11.0 1.650 0.0667 0.0667
----------------------------=-----------------------============--------
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.58
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
----------------- -----------------------------------------------------
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=04-OAKJO.INT,VOL=04-OAKJO.PMV,CAP'
I'
i
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
------------------------------
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/10/06
INTERSECTION 5 Oak Rd/SART Entrance Contra Costa Count
Count Date 06/28/05 Time 0630-0830 Peak Hour 0700-0800
------------------------------------------------------ -----------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL
----------- 6 356 25
I I
<--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT I --- 1.1 1.1 3.1 1.0 1.7 --- 30 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 0 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 5 THRU BART Entrance
RIGHT 5 --- 1.1 1.0 2.1 1.4 2.1 --- 116 LEFT
I <--- ---> I
v I v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 61 207 122 Urb=N, Rur=N
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? Y
STREET NAME: Oak Rd
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO' V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 122 32 * 1650 0.0194 '
THRU (T) 207 207 3300 0.0627
LEFT (L) 61 61 1650 0.0370
T + R 239 3300 0.0724 0.0724
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 6 6 1650 0.0036:
THRU (T) 356 356 4950 0.0719
LEFT (L) 25 25 1650 0.0152:
T + R 362 4950 0.0731 0.0731
--------------------------------------------------- --------
EB RIGHT (R) 5 5 1650 0.0030
THRU (T) 0 0 1650 0.0000
LEFT (L) 1 1 1650 0.0006
T + R 5 1650 0.0030
T + L 1 1650 0.0006
T + R + L 6 1650 0.0036 0.0036
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB . RIGHT (R) 30 0 * 1650 0.0000 ,
THRU (T) 5 5 1650 0.0030
LEFT (L) 116 116 3000 0.0387 0.0387
T + R 5 1650 0.0030 '
T + L 121 3000 0.0403
T + R + L 121 3000 0.0403 '
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.19
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=05-OAKBR.INT,VOL=05-OAKBR.AMV,CAP=
I
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/10/06
------------------------ ---------------------
INTERSECTION 5 Oak Rd/BART Entrance Contra Costa County
Count Date 06/28/05 Time 1530-1730 Peak Hour 1600-1700
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL
- 8 495 2
I I
<--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 6 --- 1.1 1.1 3.1 1.0 1.7 --- 54 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 0 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 0 THRU BART Entrance
RIGHT 99 --- 1..1 1.0 2.1 1.4 2.1 --- 105 LEFT
I <--- ---> I
v i v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 30 384 80 Urb=N, Rur-Y
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? Y -
STREET NAME: Oak Rd -
--------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB- RIGHT (R) 80 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 384 384 3300 0.1164 0.1164
LEFT (L) 30 30 1650 0.0182
T + R 384 3300 0.1164
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 8 8 1650 0.0048
THRU (T) 495 495 4950 0.1000
LEFT (L) 2 2 1650 0.0012
T + R 503 4950 0.1016 0.1016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 99 99 1650 0.0600
THRU (T) 0 0 1650 0.0000
LEFT (L) 6 6 1650 0.0036
T + R 99 1650 0.0600
T + L 6 1650 0.0036
T + R + L 105 1650 0.0636 0.0636
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 54 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 0 0 1650 0.0000
LEFT (L) 105 105 3000 0.0350 0.0350
T + R 0 1650 0.0000
T + L 105 3000 0.0350
T + R + L 105 3000 0.0350
------------- -------
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.32
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT, TURN ON RED
INT=05-OAKBR.INT,VOL-05-OAKBR.PMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
-------------------------------------------------
Condition: CCTA intersection LOS Analysis 01/09/06
--- - - ------ -----------------------
INTERSECTION 6 Oak Rd/Wayne Dr Contra Costa County
Count Date 06/21/05 Time 0630-0930 Peak Hour 0715-0815
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL
218 463 83
I I I
I I I
<--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 23 --- 1.0 1.4 2.1 1.0 1..1 --- 8 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 19 ---> 2.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 7 THRU Wayne Dr
RIGHT 33 --- 1.7 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 7 LEFT
v I v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 67 154 94 Urb=N, Rur=N
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? Y
STREET NAME: Oak Rd
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 94 87 * 1650 0.0527 0.0527
THRU (T) 154 154 3300 0.0467
LEFT (L) 67 67 1650 0.0406
------=-----------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 218 128 * 1650 0.0776
THRU (T) 463 463 3300 0.1403
LEFT (L) 83 83 1650 0.0503
T + R 591 3300 0.1791 0.1791
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 33 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 19 19 3300 0.0058
LEFT (L) 23 23 1650 0.0139 0.0139
T + R 19 3300 0.0058
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 8 8 1650 0.0048
THRU (T) 7 7 1650 0.0042
LEFT (L) 7 7 1650 0.0042
T + R 15 1650 0.0091 0.0091
-------------------------------
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.25
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
--------------------
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=06-OAKWN.INT,VOL=06-OAKWN.AMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants'
Condition CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/09/06
---------------------------- - -----
INTERSECTION 6 Oak Rd/Wayne Dr Contra Costa County
Count Date 12/23/02 Time 1530-1600 Peak Hour 1700-1800
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL
----------- 25 321 18
I I I
^ I I I ^
I <--- v ---> Split? N
LEFT 102 --- 1.0 1.4 2.1 1.0 1.1 --- 55 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 32 ---> 2.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 27 THRU Wayne Dr
RIGHT 259 --- 1.7 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 25 LEFT
I <--- ---> I
v I v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 37 443 40 Urb=N, Rur=Y
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? Y
STREET NAME: Oak Rd
----------------
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 40 15 * 1650 0.0091
THRU (T)' 443 443 3300 0.1342 0.1342
LEFT (L) 37 37 1650 0.0224
SB RIGHT (R) 25 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 321 321 3300 0.0973 0.0973
LEFT (L) 18 18 1650 0.0109
T + R 321 3300 0.0973
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 259 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 32 32 3300 0.0097
LEFT (L) 102 102 1650 0.0618 0.0618
T + R 32 3300 0.0097
WB RIGHT (R) 55 55 1650 0.0333
THRU (T) 27 27 1650 0.0164
LEFT (L) 25 25 1650 0.0152
T + R 82 1650 0.0497 0.0497
--------------------------- --------
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.34
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=06-OAKWN.INT,VOL=06-OAKWN.PMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
------ ----------------------
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/09/06
--- -------------------
INTERSECTION 7 Buskirk Ave/Wayne Dr Contra Costa County
Count Date 06/27/05 Time 0615-0915 Peak Hour 0730-0630
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 3-PHASE SIGNAL
- 0 0 0
I I I
<--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 --- 35 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU Wayne Dr
RIGHT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.9 0.0 --- 0 LEFT
<--- ---> I
v v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 0 B54 214 Urb=N, Rur=N
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: Buskirk Ave
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 214 214 1720 0.1244
THRU (T) 854 854 3440 0.2483 0.2483
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 35 35 1720 0.0203 0.0203
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.21
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=07-BUSWN.INT,VOL=07-BUSWN.AMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
----------------------
---------------------------
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/09/06
----------------------
INTERSECTION 7 Buskirk Ave/Wayne Dr Contra Costa County
Count Date 06/27/05 Time 1530-1830 Peak Hour 1700-1800
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 3-PHASE SIGNAL
---=------- 0 0 0
I I I
I <--- v ---> Split? N
LEFT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 --- 190 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO..OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU Wayne Dr
RIGHT 0 -- 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.9 0.0 --- 0 LEFT
V I v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 0 1493 95 Urb=Y, Rur=Y
S - LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: Buskirk Ave
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 95 95 1720 0.0552
THRU (T) 1493 1493 3440 0.4340 0.4340
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 190 190 1720 0.1105 0.1105
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.54
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
} ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=07-BUSWN.INT,VOL=07-BUSWN.PMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/09/06
INTERSECTION 8 Newell Ave/Olympic Blvd Contra Costa County
Count Date 07/20/05 Time 0630-0930 Peak Hour 0745-0845
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL
0 0 0
I I I
^ I I I ^
<--- v ---> Split? N
LEFT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 --- 0 RIGHT
_ STREET NAME:
THRU 772 ---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 2.0<--- 801 THRU Olympic Blvd
RIGHT 0 --- 0.0 1.1 0.0 1.1 0.0 --- 0 LEFT
<--- ---> I.
V I v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 166 0 69 Urb=Y, Rur=Y
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: Newell Ave
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
.MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 69 69 1800 0.0383
LEFT (L) 166 166 1800 0.0922
T + R + L 235 1800 0.1306 0.1306
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB THRU (T) 772 772 3600 0.2144
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB THRU (T) 801 801 3600 0.2225 0.2225
-------------------------
,TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.35
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
-----------------------
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=08-NEWOL.INT,VOL=08-NEWOL.AMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
-----------------------
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/09/06
- ------------------------------------------------=----------------------
INTERSECTION 8 Newell Ave/Olympic Blvd Contra Costa County
Count Date 07/20/05 Time 1530-1830 Peak Hour 1615-1715
------------------ -----------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL
----------- 0 0 0
I I I
^ I I I ^
<--- v ---> Split? N
LEFT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 --- 0 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 865. ---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 2.0<--- 862 THRU Olympic Blvd
RIGHT 0 --- 0.0 1.1 0.0 1.1 0.0 --- 0 LEFT
I <--- ---> I
v I v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 191 0 39 Urb=Y, Rur=Y
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: Newell Ave
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO VIC
NB RIGHT (R) 39 39 1800 0.0217
LEFT (L) 191 191 1800 0.1061
T + R + L 230 1.800 0.1278 0.1278
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB THRU (T) 865 865 3600 0.2403 0.2403
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB THRU (T) 862 862 3600 0.2394
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: - 0.37
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
--------------------------
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=08-NEWOL.INT,VOL=08-NEWOL.PMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/09/06
----------------------
INTERSECTION 9 Tice Valley Blvd/Olympic Blvd Contra Costa County
Count Date 07/20/05 Time 0630-0930 Peak Hour 0815-0915
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 8-PHASE SIGNAL
----------- 34 86 79
I I I
<--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 42 --- 1.0 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.4 --- 97 RIGHT
STREET NAME:.
THRU 208 ---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 239 THRU Olympic Blvd
RIGHT 282 --- 1.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 --- 537 LEFT
I <--- ---> I
v I I v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 254 50 395 Urb=Y, Rur=Y
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: Tice Valley Blvd
--------- ===----------
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT -VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 395 100 1650 0.0606
THRU (T) 50 50 1650 0.0303
LEFT (L) 254 254 1650 0.1539 0.1539
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 34 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 86 86 1650 0.0521 0.0521
LEFT (L) 79 79 1650 0.0479
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 282 282 1650 0.1709
THRU (T) 208 208 3300 0.0630 0.0630
LEFT (L) 42 42 1650 0.0255
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 97 7 * 1650 0.0042
THRU (T) 239 239 1650 0.1448
LEFT (L) 537 537 3000 0.1790 0.1790
T + R 246 1650 0.1491
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.45
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=09-T1COL.INT,VOL=09-TICOL.AMV,CAP-
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/10/06
INTERSECTION 9 Tice Valley Blvd/Olympic Blvd Contra Costa County
Count Date 07/21/05 Time 1530-1830 Peak Hour 1645-1745
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 8-PHASE SIGNAL
----- 36 92 128
I I I
I <--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 31 -- 1.0 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.4 --- 108 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 245 ---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 369 THRU Olympic Blvd
RIGHT 228 --- 1.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 --- 525 LEFT
v v
N SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 302 55 511 Urb=Y, Rur=Y
S - LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: Tice Valley Blvd
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 511 222 * 1650 0.1345
THRU (T) 55 55 1650 0.0333
LEFT (L) 302 302 1650 0.1830 0.1830
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 36 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 92 92 1650 0.0558 0.0558
LEFT (L) 128 128 1650 0.0776
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 228 228 1650 0.1382
THRU (T) 245 245 3300 0.0742
LEFT (L) 31 31 1650 0.0188 0.0188
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 108 18 * 1650 0.0109
THRU (T) 369 369 1650 0.2236
LEFT (L) 525 525 3000 0.1750
T + R 387 1650 0.2345 0.2345
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.49
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED -
INT=09-TICOL.INT,VOL=09-TICOI,.PMV,CAP=
i
i
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
-- ---------------------------
Condition: CCTA CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/10/06
INTERSECTION 10 Blackhawk Rd/Blackhawk Plaza Contra Costa County
Count Date 07/12/05 Time 0645-0945 Peak Hour 0830-0930
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 4-PHASE SIGNAL
----------- 12 596 78
I I
<--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 1 --- 1.1 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 24 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 4 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 3 THRU Blackhawk Plaza
RIGHT 16 --- 1.4 1.0 2.0 1.8 1.1 --- 77 LEFT
I <--- ---> I
v I I v
N I I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 46 451 191 Urb=N, Rur=B
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: Blackhawk Rd
---------------------------
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIOi V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 191 0 * 1650 0.0000 '
THRU (T) 451 451 3300 0.1367
LEFT (L) 46 46 1650 0.0279 ! 0.0279
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 12 11 * 1650 0.0067
THRU (T) 596 596 3300 0.1806 ' 0.1806
LEFT (L) 78 78 1650 0.0473 ,
EB RIGHT (R) 16 0 * 1650 0.00001
THRU (T) 4 4 1650 0.0024
LEFT (L) 1 1 1650 0.0006 ;
T + R 4 1650 0.0024
T + L 5 1650 0.0030 0.0030
T + R + L 5 1650 0.00301
------------------------------------------------------ -----------------
WB RIGHT (R) 24 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 3 3 1650 0.0018
LEFT (L) 77 77 1650 0.0467 0.0467
T + L 80 1650 0.0465 :
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.26
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT-10-BLKPL.INT,VOL=10-BLKPL.AMV,CAP-
❑OL70nl]��OIJLT7000�00001700C70000❑❑����O�OL70�OL7CJ00000000�O00C7C]C70�O�OD000��0000000[70�L?
❑L]CJGOOOOC7000�OOUL70�JL��OOOOO�L7�0000�00�[7C]OL700000000�OODOOOOOOOO����ODOOOO�OOOOC]C]CIL7
❑❑OGO017000000(JOOOO�OOOOOOO���C1000�000000�OOOL70L700L7�O000000000�000�0000�0���OCJ000
I
I
i
i
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/10/06
INTERSECTION 10 Blackhawk Rd/Blackhawk Plaza Contra Costa County
Count Date 07/12/05 Time 1515-1815 Peak Hour 1645-1745
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 4-PHASE SIGNAL
----------- 4 680 90
I I
<--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 1 -- 1.1 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 39 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 9 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 3 THRU Blackhawk Plaza
RIGHT 11 -- 1.4 1.0 2.0 1.8 1.1 --- 119 LEFT
I <--- --->
v I v
N SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 57 487 230 Urb=N, Rur=Y
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N -
STREET NAME: Blackhawk Rd
-------- ---------------
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 230 0 1650 0.0000
THRU (1) 487 487 3300 0.1476
LEFT (L) 57 57 1650 0.0345 0.0345
SB RIGHT (R) 4 3 1650 0.0018
THRU (T) 680 680 3300 0.2061 0.2061
LEFT (L) 90 90 1650 0.0545
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 11 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 9 9 1650 0.0055
LEFT (L) 1 1 1650 0.0006
T + R 9 1650 0.0055
T + L 10 1650 0.0061 0.0061
T + R + L 10 1650 0.0061
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 39 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 3 3 1650 0.0018
LEFT (L) 119 119 1650 0.0721 0.0721
T + L 122 1650 0.0739
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.32
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE.: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=10-BLKPL.INT,VOL=10-BLKPL.PMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Condition: CCTA Intersection. LOS Analysis 01/10/06
INTERSECTION 11 Blackhawk Rd/Silver Maple Dr Contra Costa County
Count Date 07/19/05 Time 0630-0930 Peak Hour 0815-0915
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL
----------- 1 628 11
I I I
^ I I I ^
<-- v ---> Split? N
LEFT 2 --- 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.1 --- 16 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 0 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 0 THRU Silver Maple Dr
RIGHT 21 --- 1.4 1.0 2.1 1.1 1.1 --- 42 LEFT
I <--- ---> I
v I v
N I I I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 5 419 29 Urb=N, Rur=N
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? Y
STREET NAME: Blackhawk Rd
-----------------------------------=------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 29 29 1650 0.0176
THRU (T) 419 419 3300 0.1270
LEFT (L) 5 5 1650 0.0030
T + R 448 3300 0.1358 0.1358
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 1 1 1650 0.0006
THRU (T) 628 628 3300 0.1903
LEFT (L) 11 11 1650 0.0067
T + R 629 3300 0.1906 0.1906
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 21 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 0 0 1650 0.0000
LEFT (L) 2 2 1650 0.0012 0.0012
T + R 0 1650 0.0000
T + L 2 1650 0.0012
T + R + L 2 1650 0.0012
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 16 16 1650 0.0097
THRU (T) 0 0 1650 0.0000
LEFT (L) 42 42 1650 0.0255
T + R 16 1650 0.0097
T + L 42 1650 0.0255
T + R + L 58 1650 0.0352 0.0352
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.36
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=11-BLKSM.INT,VOL=11-BLKSM.AMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 61/10/06
--------- -------------------
INTERSECTION . 11 Blackhawk Rd/Silver Maple Dr Contra Costa County
Count Date 07/19/05 Time 1500-1800 Peak Hour 1630-1730
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTAMETHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL
---------- 4 527 9
i I I
^ I I I
I <--- v ---> Split? N
LEFT 2 --- 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.1 --- 10 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 0 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 0 THRU Silver Maple Dr
RIGHT 9 --- 1.4 1.0 2.1 1.1 1.1 --- 46 LEFT
I <--- I ---> I
v I v
N SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 16 821 50 Urb=N, Rur=N
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? Y
STREET NAME: Blackhawk Rd
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 50 50 1650 0.0303
THRU (T) 821 621 3300 0.2488
LEFT (L) 16 16 1650 0.0097
T + R 871 3300 0.2639 0.2639
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 4 4 1650 0.0024
THRU (T) 527 527 3300 0.1597
LEFT (L) 9 9 1650 0.0055
T + R 531 3300 0.1609 0.1609
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 9 0 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 0 0 1650 0.0000
LEFT .(L) 2 2 1650 0.0012 0.0012
T + R 0 1650 0.0000
T + L 2 1650 0.0012
T + R + L 2 1650 0.0012
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 10 10 1650 0.0061
THRU (T) 0 0, 1650 0.0000
LEFT (L) 46 46 1650 0.0279
T + R 10 1650 0.0061
T + L 46 1650 0.0279
T + R + L 56 1650 0.0339 0.0339
-----------------------------
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.46
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
--------------------------------=----=-- ==== ---------- -----------------------
----------------------------- ------------------------------------
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=11-BLKSM.INT,VOL=II-BLKSM.PMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/10/06
----------------
7-------
INTERSECTION 12 Port Chicago Hwy/Riverside Dr Co,'ntra Costa County
Count Date 07/25/05 Time 0630-0930 Peak Hour 0730-0830
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL
----------- 7 685 14
I I I
^ I I I ^
I <--- V ---> Split? N
LEFT 3 --- 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.0 --- 9 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 11 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 16 THRU Riverside Dr
RIGHT 98 --- 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.1 --- 50 LEFT
I <--- ^ ---> I
v I I v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 93 400 14 Urb=N, Rur=Y
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: Port Chicago Hwy
--------------------------
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 14 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 400 400 3300 0.1212
LEFT (L) 93 93 1650 0.05641
0.0564
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 7 7 1650 0.0042 '
THRU (T) 685 685 3300 0.2076 '
LEFT (L) 14 14 1650 0.0085
T + R 692 3300 0.2097 ! 0.2097
---------------------------------------------- -------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 98 5 * 1650 0.0030
THRU (T) 11 11 1650 0.0067
LEFT (L) 3 3 1650 0.0018 1 0.0018
T + L 14 1650 0.0085
-------------------------------------------------------;-----------------
WB RIGHT (R) 9 0 * 1650 0.0000 ',
THRU (T) 16 16 1650 0.0097
LEFT (L) 50 50 1650 0.0303
T + L 66 1650 0.0400 ; 0.0400
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.31
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=12-PCHRI.INT,VOL=12-PCHRI.AMV,CAP=
I
i
I
1
,r
i
I
I
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
--------------------
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/10/06
------------------------------ ---------------------
INTERSECTION 12 Port Chicago Hwy/Riverside Dr Contra Costa County
Count Date 07/25/05 Time 1530-1830 Peak Hour 1600-1700
--7---------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL
7 338 14
I I I
I, <--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 5 --- 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.0 --- 10 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 15 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 11 THRU Riverside Dr
RIGHT 82 --- 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.1 --- 27 LEFT
<--- --->
v I v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 94 466 39 Urb=N, Rur=N
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: Port Chicago Hwy
-----------------------------
----------
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 1 39 12 * 1650 0.0073
THRU (T) 466 466 3300 0.141.2
LEFT (L) 94 94 1650 0.0570 0.0570
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 7 7 1650 0.0042
THRU (T) 338 338 3300 0.1024
LEFT (L) 14 14 1650 0.0085
T +' R 345 3300 0.1045 0.1045
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 82 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 15 15 1650 0.0091.
LEFT (L) 5 5 1650 0.0030
T + L 20 1650 0.0121 0.0121
----------------------------------------------=-------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 10 0 * 1650 0.0000
THRU (T) 11 11 1650 0.0067
LEFT (L) 27 27 1650 0.0164 0.0164
T + L 38 1650 0.0230
--------------- --------------
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.19
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=12-PCHRI.INT,VOL=12-PCHRI.PMV,CAP
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
---------------
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/10/06
INTERSECTION 14 Willow Ave/Hawthorne Or Contra Costa County
Count Date 06/20/05 Time 0630-0930 Peak Hour 0715-0815
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 3-PHASE SIGNAL
----------- 0 359 1
I <--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 13 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU Hawthorne Or
RIGHT 0 --- 0.0 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.0 --- 163 LEFT
I <--- ---> . I
v v
N SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 0 319 56 Urb=N, Rur=N
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: Willow Ave
-----------------
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 56 0 * 1720 0.0000
THRU (1) 319 319 3440 0.0927
LEFT (L) 0 0 1720 0.0000 0.0000
T + L 319 3440 0.0921
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB THRU (T) 359 359 3440 0.1044 0.1044
LEFT (L) 1 1 1720 0.0006
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 13 12 * 1720 0.0070
LEFT (L) 163 163 1720 0.0948 0.0948
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.20
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
-----------------------------------------------------------------
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=14-WILHA.INT,VOL=14-WILHA.AMV,CAP-
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/10/06
INTERSECTION 14 Willow Ave/Hawthorne Dr Contra Costa County
Count Date 07/20/05 Time 1615-181.5 Peak Hour 1630-1730
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 3-PHASE SIGNAL
----------- 0 569 21
I I I
I I I ^
<--- v ---> Split? N
LEFT 0 ---. 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 10 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU Hawthorne Dr
RIGHT 0 ---h 0.0 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.0 --- 110 LEFT
I <--- ---> I
v I v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 0 606 97 Urb=N, Rur=Y
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: Willow Ave
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 97 0 * 1720 0.0000
THRU (T) 606 606 3440 0.1762 0.1762
LEFT (L) 0 0 1720 0.0000
T + L 606 3440 0.1762
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB THRU (T) 569 569 3440 0.1654
LEFT (L) 21 21 1720 0.0122 0.0122
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 10 0 * 1720 0.0000
LEFT (L) 110 110 1720 0.0640 0.0640
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.25
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
------------------------------------------------------------
_ - * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
. INT=14-WILHA.INT,VOL=14-WILHA.PMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
--- -----------------------------------
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/10/06
---------- --------------- --------------------
INTERSECTION 15 Parker Ave/4th St Contra Costa County
Count Date 06/06/05 Time 0630-0930 Peak Hour 0745-0845
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL
----------- 31 268 17
I I I
I <--- v ---> Split? N
LEFT 33 --- 1.1 1.1 2.2 1.1 1.4 --- 15 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 37 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 36 THRU 4th St
RIGHT 188 --- 1.1 1.1 2.2 1.1 1.1 --- 57 LEFT
I <--- ---> I
v v
N SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 38 199 32 Urb=N, Rur=Y
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: Parker Ave
------ -------------
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 32 32 1800 0.0178
THRU (1) 199 199 3600 0.0553
LEFT (L) 38 38 1800 0.0211 0.0211
T + R 231 3600 0.0642
T + L 237 3600 0.0658
T + R + L 269 3600 0.0747
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 31 31 1800 0.0172
THRU (1) 268 268 3600 0.0744
LEFT (L) 17 17 1800 0.0094
T + R 299 3600 0.0831
T + L 285 3600 0.0792
T + R + L 316 3600 0.0878 0.0878
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 188 188 1800 0.1044
THRU (T) 37 37 1800 0.0206
LEFT (L) 33 33 1800 0.0183
T + R 225 1800 0.1250
T + L 70 1800 0.0389
T + R + L 258 1800 0.1433 0.1433
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 15 0 * 1800 . 0.0000
THRU (T) 36 36 1800 0.0200
LEFT (L) 57 57 1800 0.0317 0.0317
T + R 36 1800 0.0200
T + L 93 1800 0.0517
T + R + L 93 1600. 0.0517
---------------------------
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.28
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=15-PARK4.INT,VOL=I5-PARK4.AMV,CAP-
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/10/06
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERSECTION 15 Parker Ave/4th St Contra Costa County
Count Date 06/06/05 Time 1515-1830 Peak Hour 1630-1730
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL
10 314 23
I I I
<--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 10 --- 1.1 1.1. 2.2 1.1 1.4 --- 37 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 13 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 8 THRU 4th St
RIGHT 53 -- 1.1 1.1 2.2 1.1 1.1 --- 49 LEFT
v v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W'+ E 70 419 92' Urb=N, Rur=N
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: Parker Ave
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C - CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 92 92 1800 0.0511
THRU (1) 419 419 3600 0.1164
LEFT (L) 70 70 1800 0.0389
T + R 511 3600 0.1419
T + L 489 3600 0.1358
T + R + L 581 3600 0.1614 0.1614
SH RIGHT (R) 10 10 1800 0.0056
THRU (T) 314 .314 3600 0.0872
LEFT (L) 23 23 1800 0.0128 0.0128
T + R 324 3600 0.0900
T + L 337 3600 0.0936
T + R + L 347 3600 0.0964
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 53 53 1800 0.0294 -
THRU (T) 13 13 1800 , 0.0072
LEFT (L) 10 10 1800 0.0056
T + R 66 1800 0.0367
T + L 23 1800 0.0128
T + R + L 76 1800 0.0422 0.0422
WB RIGHT (R) 37 0 * 1800 0.0000
THRU (T) 8 8 1800 0.0044
LEFT (L) 49 49 1800 0.0272 0.0272
T + R 8 1800 0.0044
T + 1, 57 1800 0.0317
T + R + L 57 1800 0.0317
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.24
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
---------------------------------------------------------------------
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=15-PARK4.INT,VOL=15-PARK4.PMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/10/06
----------------------------
INTERSECTION 16 Parker Ave/2nd St Contra Costa County
Count Date 07/16/05 Time 0630-0930 Peak Hour 0730-0830
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL
--- 11 190 l
I I I
I <--- v ---> Split? N
LEFT 24 --- 1.0 1.4 2.2 1.1 1.1 --- 1 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 1 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 0 THRU 2nd St
RIGHT 6 --- 1.1 1.1 2.2 1.4 1.0 --- 9 LEFT
v v
N SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 7 175 1 Urb=N, Rur=N
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: Parker Ave
-------------
----------------------------------------------------
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 1 0 * 1800 0.0000
THRU (T) 175 175 3600 0.0486
LEFT (L) 7 7 1800 0.0039 0.0039
T + R 175 3600 0.0486
T + L 1B2 3600 0.0506
T + R + L 182 3600 0.0506
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 11 0 * 1800 0.0000
THRU (T) 190 190 3600 0.0528
LEFT (L) 1 1 1600 0.0006
T + R 190 3600 0.0528
T + L 191 3600 0.0531 0.0531
T + R + L 191 3600 0.0531
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 6 6 1800 0.0033
THRU (T) 1 1 1800 0.0006
LEFT (L) 24 24 1800 0.0133 0.0133
T + R 7 1800 0.0039
------------ -----
WB RIGHT (R) 1 1 1800 0.0006 0.0006
THRU (T) 0 0 1800 0.0000
LEFT (L) 9 9 1800 0.0050
T + R 1 1800 0.0006
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.07
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=16-PARK2.INT,VOL=16-PARK2.AMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/10/06
INTERSECTION 16 Parker Ave/2nd St Contra Costa County
Count Date 06/16/05 Time 1515-1815 Peak Hour 1645-1745
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL
----------- 13 196 3
I I I
<--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 8 -- 1.0 1.4 2.2 1.1 1.1 --- 5 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 5 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 2 THRU 2nd St
RIGHT 9 --- 1.1 1.1 2.2 1.4 1.0 - 13 LEFT
<--- ---> I
v I v
N I I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 10 323 10 Urb=N, Rur=N
S. LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: Parker Ave
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
---------------------------7--------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 10 0 * 1800 0.0000
THRU (T) 323 323 3600 0.0897
LEFT (L) 10 10 1800 0.0056
T + R 323 3600 0.0897
T + L 333 3600 0.0925, 0.0925
T + R + L 333 3600 0.0925
---------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 13 0 * 1800 0.0000
THRU (T) 196 196 3600 0.0544
LEFT (L) 3 3 1800 0.0017 0.0017
T + R 196 3600 0.0544
T + L 199 3600 0.0553
T + R + L 199 3600 0.0553
EB RIGHT (R) 9 9 1800 0.0050
THRU (T) 5 5 1800 0.0028
LEFT (L). 8 8 1800 0.0044
T + R 14 1880 0.0078 0.0078
WB RIGHT (R) 5 5 1800 0.0028
THRU (T) 2 2 1800 0.0011
LEFT (L) - 13 13 1800 0.0072 0..0072
T + R 7 1800 0.0039
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.11
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=16-PARK2.INT,VOL=16-PARK2.PMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
---------------------------------
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/10/06
----------------------------------------------------
INTERSECTION 17 2nd Ave/Pomona St Contra Costa County
Count Date 07/26/05 Time 0630-0930 Peak Hour 0745-0845
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL
----------- 19 6 33
i I I
^ I I I ^
I <--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 10 --- 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 --- 13 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 171 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 138 THRU Pomona St
RIGHT 9 --- 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 --- 21 LEFT
I <--- ^ --->
v I v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 9 8 19 Urb=N, Rur=N
S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: 2nd Ave
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 19 19 1800 0.0106
THRU (T) 8 8 1800 0.0044
LEFT (L) 9 9 1800 0.0050
T + R 27 1800 0.0150
T + L 17 1800 0.0094
T + R + I, 36 1800 0.0200 0.0200
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 19 19 1800 0.0106
THRU (T) 6 6 1800 0.0033
LEFT (L) 33 33 1800 0.0183 0.0183
T + R 25 1800 0.0139
T + L 39 1800 0.0217
T + R + L 58 1800 0.0322
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 9 9 1800 0.0050
THRU (T) 171 171 1800 0.0950
LEFT (L) 10 10 1800 0.0056
T + R 180 1800 0.1000
T + L 181 1800 0.1006
T + R + L, 190 1800 0.1056 0.1056
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 13 13 1800 0.0072
THRU (T) 138 138 1800 0.0767
LEFT (L) 21 21 1800 0.0117 0.0117
T + R 151 1800 0.0839
T + L 159 1800 0.0883
T + R + L 172 1800 0.0956
------------------
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.16
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=17-POMO2.INT,VOL=17-POMO2.AMV,CAP=
CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants
------- --------------------------- --------- - ---
Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 01/10/06
-------------------------- - --------
INTERSECTION 17 2nd Ave/Pomona St Contra Costa County
Count Date 07/26/05 Time 1500-1800 Peak Hour 1615-1715
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL
---- 37 4 18
I I I
I <--- v ---> I Split? N
LEFT 12 -- 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 --- 12 RIGHT
STREET NAME:
THRU 244 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 225 THRU Pomona St
RIGHT 17 --- 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 --- 23 LEFT
I <--- ---> I
v I v
N I SIG WARRANTS:
W + E 13 1 18 Urb=N, Rur=N
S -LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N
STREET NAME: 2nd Ave
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL
MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB RIGHT (R) 18 18 1800 0.0100
THRU (T) 1 1 1800 0.0006
LEFT (L) 13 13 1800 0.0072 0.0072
T + R 19 1B00 0.0106
T. + L 14 1800 0.0078
T + R + L 32 1800 0.0178
----------------------------------------- -------------------------------
SB RIGHT (R) 37 37 1800 0.0206
THRU (T) 4 4 1800 0.0022
LEFT (L) 18 18 1800 0.0100
T + R 41 1800 0.0228
T + L 22 1800 0.0122
T + R + L 59 1800 0.0328 0.0328
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EB RIGHT (R) 17 17 1800 0.0094
THRU (T) 244 244 1800 0.1356
LEFT. (L) 12 12 1800 0.0067
T + R 261 1800 0.1450
T + L 256 1800 0.1422
T + R + L 273 1800 0.1517 0.1517
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB RIGHT (R) 12 12 1800 0.0067
THRU (T) 225 225 1800 0.1250
LEFT (L) 23 23 1800 0.0128 0.0128
T + R 237 1800 0.1317
T + L 248 1800 0.1378
T + R + L 260 1800 0.1444
TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: -0.20
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A
-------------------------------------------
* ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED
INT=17-POMO2.INT,VOL=17-POMO2.PMV,CAP=
Contra Costa County Road Nos.: 3887H
Public Works Department 3884
Traffic Turning Movement Counts
LOCATION: Imhoff Did Arnold Ind Way(a)Solano Wav ev:M.Lennon
Date: Jul 6,2005 Day:Wednesday
Peak Hour: 7:00-8:00 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
06:00 0
06:15 0
06:30 1 3 2 8 34 34 17 12 16 3 11 1 142
06:45 1 1 1 10 23 26 16 9 15 5 10 0 117
07:00 1 1 1 9 27 29 18 7 14 8 10 0 125
07:15:1 .0. 3 1 11 ..1 34 '! 31 19 6 1. 21 1.0 12 :!: 1 I'.i.1:49.:! Hour
07:30:1 2 2 0 12 31 ` 34 23 11 24 12 18 0 169:'ii 0700-0800
07:45: 0 4 1 .. 4 32 'I 29 27 3. 31 13 23 .'! 1 168:::: Volume
08:00:,1 1 1
11:. 7,' 38 ! 32 i Z5::;:: (:7 ...... $..
a f 1.9 ...j'; ,.0 170 656
08:15 0.... 0 2.... ....4 23 30 _. 21 4 25 9 22 2 142
08:30 1 2 0 8 34 28 19 3 24 15 17 1 152
08:45 0 4 1 . 11 30 24 17 10 20 13 16 1 147
09:00 0 1 1 6 32 19 15 7 18 11 15 0 125
09:15 0 0 3 4 27 11 12 3 10 14 12 0 96
09:30 0
09:45 0
Peak 3 10 3 34 735 12& 94 27 ?t74 46!
By:Brian Harrington
Date: Jul 6,2005 Day: Wednesday
Peak Hour: 15:30-16:30 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ii 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
15:15 0
15:30 0
15:45'1 0 -46.,:.: 21 2'' 42 " 41 29. ..:::1 112.. 22' 26 ..- ..0 . .;::242:::: Hour
16.00 0 11 10 1': 29 30 40 d 0 11 211 is 28 0 181 1530-1630
1615 0 17 4 2 24 23 34 3 119 42! ' 32 is . 0. 200:':: Volume
16:30 0 15 T"
7' 19 30 28 5 1:6 28 s 29 0.. 'I 179:.:: 802
.. ....... . ........... ..
16:45 0 17 5 6 30 27 33 0............9 20 21 0 168
17:00 0 15 12 11 20 34 21 5 14 23 20 1 176
17:15 1 13 4 5 30 34 33 4 9 49 28 0 210
17:30 0 8 3 4 21 34 34 5 14 31 21 0 175
17:45 1 13 4 3 19 22 40 3 12 48 13 0 178
18:00 1 12 10 3 16 24 17 3 7 19 11 0 123
18:15 0 3 6 0 10 22 28 1 7 19 7 1 104
18:30 0 3 0 0 13 19 26 2 9 10 10 0 92
18:45 0
19:00 0
Peek 0 89 42 Zii 114:: 124 : fjfiw
Contra Costa County Road Nos.: 4057BT
Public Works Department 4054F
Traffic Turning Movement Counts
LOCATION: Oak Road(a) Las Juntas Way BY:M.Lennon
Date: Jun 22,2005 Day: Wednesday
Peak Hour: 7:30-8:30 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
06:15 0
06:30 0
06:45 0 65 26 11 0 20 2 13 0 0 0 0 137
07:00 0 102 26 22 0 14 3 23 0 0 0 0 190
07:15 0 85 54 26 0 29 9 31 0 0 0 0 234
07:30 0 109 34 27 0 427 20 0 0 0 0 239
07:45 !I 0::: 1'38 38 46: 0 49 11 41 a 0 s 0 0 323 Hour
08:00 0 146 41 53:I 0 52 7 49 0 :S 0 .:I D ::i 0 348 730-830
08:15 0 126 43 32: :0.:.:. 44 5 41 0;; 0 0 0 291 Volume
08:30 0 11 B 27.. 32.:1. 0 .30 8 38 0 ii. 0 =I 0 0 . 253 1144
.
08:45 0 .. .....102..... ...13 22.... 0 42 5..... ....36 0 0 0 0 220
09:00 0 94 17 33 0 28 13 54 0 0 0 0 239
09:15 0 80 4 27 0 22 13 51 0 0 0 0 197
09:30 0 53 17 25 0 26 10 35 0 0 0 0 166
09:45 0
10:00 0
Peak 0 528 749 1631 0 175 31 7:68.. Q I'. 0 0. €.D 11149
by:B.Harrington
Date: Jun 22,2005 Day: Wednesday
Peak Hour: 17:00-18:00 Weather: clear
1 - 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
15:15 0
15:30 0
15:45 0 48 12 30 0 8 21 67 2 0 0 0 188
16:00 1 55 5 23 0 10 21 74 0 0 0 0 189
16:15 0 47 9 27 0 22 19 80 2 0 0 0 206
16:30 1 54 7 53 0 7 22 85 0 0 0 1 230
16:45 0 54 13 55 0 17 22 86 1 0 0 0 248
17:00 2 53 9 62 0 12 21 92 0 0 0 0 251
17:15 'I 0 78 16 80 I! 1 18 :22 133 2 0 0 0 350 '' Hour
17;30 0, 52 1;4 02 0 :'i 16 1:24 140 0 0 : 0 0 314 1700-1800
17:45 0 57 9l: 47 Q 21 25 103 1`: 0 0 0 263 :' Volume
18:00 1 .51 1',(i 77 D 18 33 139 1 'i 1. D, 0., 337 1264
18:15 1 52 7 56 0 16 24 108 3 0 0 0 267
18:30 0 52 5 63 0 21 19 111 3 0 0 3 277
18:45 0
19:00 0
Peak Y 238 55 266 7 73 TQ4 621. 4 1. 0 0 1264
Contra Costa County Road Nos.: 4054B
Public Works Department 4054A
Traffic Turning Movement Counts
LOCATION: Oak Rd Cagy Jones Rd BY:B.Harrington
Date: Jun 23,2005 Day:Thursday
Peak Hour: 7:45-8:45 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
06:15 0
06:30 0
06:45 11 31 0 0 1 6 21 80 2 5 2 14 173
07:00 13 48 1 2 1 9 39 80 3 10 0 18 224
07:15 17 60 1 2 3 6 52 87 2 6 3 16 257
07:30 17 74 1 4 6 12 50 120 5 8 3 9 309
Q7:45: 14 79 4. 6'i 7 it 15. J, 71 1150 5:;.. 7... 7....: 15 380 ! Hour
...
08:00` 24::: 85 5 2 8 I' 13 85 1152 512. 9 11.2 :413:i!! 0745-0845
OS 15: 27 75 1 2'' ` 8 10 66 1':59 3 10 li 7 113 384 i': Volume
08.30: 29 71 3 4:: 10 10 59 1!62 5 9 6 13 382..:': 1559
08:45 29 53 6 3 7 10 64 120 4 10 3 23 332
09:00 25 65 3 2 6 22 47 148.. . 4 20 4 9 355
09:15 30 58 1 3 4 19 33 96 7 8 1 19 281
09:30 19 64 2 3 3 15 38 79 5 6 1 13 248
09:45 0
10:00 0
Peak" 109 €284 15 11' 34 :' 43 274 593 18 38;s' .29 .." 56: 1559::
Date: Jun 23,2005 _.....,,._Day:.Thursday. BY: M.Lennon
Peak Hour: 17:00-18:00 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
14:45 0
15:00 0
15:15 32 78 1 9 5 12 33 82 3 5 11 . 17 288
15:30 19 91 7 11 3 12 45 89 1 6 17 36 337
15:45 26 117 5 8 0 14 61 96 0 3 14 14 358
16:00 15 98 5 12 4 15 69 113 -0 1 22 36 390
16:15 16 99 9 5 4 15 66 15 6 7 20 28 290
16:30 15 90 6 9 5 15 81 135 1 3 31 46 437
16:45 15 127 3 10 4 16 61 1261 4 21 33 421
17:00:' 26 1287 34 7 :i 26 11$.. 1165 2ii 5 31 47 5$$ Hour
17:15:' 21 !150 A 23` 4 34 ':::105. 1:70 1 6 29 42 591.:!: 1700-1800
17:30: 30 141 2 1Q 2 . . 22 ::::92: 151 2: 7 18 ': 34 511 : Volume
47:45:: 23 112 17 11 8 2$ 72 1:36 0; 3 15 27 442 2140
18:00 23 105 6 6 10 25 106 123 3 21 12 28 468
18:15 .._ __ 0
18:30 0
Peak) 1tltl 531 22 78 21 '! 110 3$7 622 5 21 93 150 2740.
Contra Costa County
Public Works Department Road No. 40546
Traffic Turning Movement Counts Private
LOCATION: Oak Road(a_Bart Entrance By: J.Wu
Date: Jun 28,2005 Day: Tuesday
Peak Hour: 7:15-8:15 Weather: Sunny
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9- 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Lek Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
06:15 0
06:30 0
06:45 1 50 6 4 1 18 23 31 4 0 0 0 138
07:00 1 46 4 8 0 25 29 36 13 1 0 0 163
07:15 1 89 11 6 3 31 28 60 14 0 0 0 243M934
07:30 2 81 8 8 1 33 41 54 12 2 0 0 242
07:45 1 92 2 11 1 28. 30 45 15 1 0 0 226
08:00 2 94 4 5 0 24 23 48 20 2 0 1 223
08:15 1 76 1 5 2 16 15 30 13 1 0 0 160
08:30 3 35 0 2 0 10 25 32 1 0 0 0 108
08:45 0
09:00 0
09:15 0
09:30 0
09:45 0
10:00 0
Peak 6 356 25 30 5 116 122 207 61 5 0 1 934
Total 1 387 1 151 390 6
Date: Jun 28,2005 Day: Tuesday
Peak Hour: 16:00-17:00 Weather: Sunny
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left .
14:45 0
15:00 0
15:15 0
15:30 0
15:45 1 100 3 6 0 14 9 85 11 14 0 1 244
16:00 0 105 0 5 0 15 17 81 12 12 0 2 249
16:15 2 128 0 10 0 25 13 115 5 20 0 1 319 Hour
16:30 2 133 0 14 0 31 23 80 10 25 . 0 0 318 1600-1700
16:45 2 108 2 17 0 24 22 99 7 30 0 3 314 Volume
17:00 2 126 0 13 0 25 22 90 8 24 0 2 312 1263
17:15 1 93 4 7 0 17. 7 57 8 16 0 1 211
17:30 3 67 0 7 0 22 10 82 5 12 0 1 209
17:45 0
18:00 0
18:15 0
18:30 0
Peak 8 495 2 54 0 105 80 384 30 99 0 6 1263
Total 505 159 494 105
Contra Costa County Road Nos.: 4057BT
Public Works Department 4057AK
Traffic Turning Movement Counts
LOCATION: Oak Rd(a).Wayne Dr BY:B.Harrington
Date: Jun 21,2005 Day: Tuesday
Peak Hour: 7:30-8:30 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
06:15 0
06:30 0
06:45 8 40 18 3 0 5 23 10 4 0 6 1 118
07:00 23 61 28 3 1 3 26 17 13 2 10 6 193
07:15 17 64 23 2 1 1 26 30 13 5 8 5 195
07:30 28 112 23 4 0 4 25 34 17 5 7 6 265
07:45 36105 34 :i 22 36 12 2....1:. . 6... :I. 5.. 265 Hour
..
08:00', .52 136 21 t 3 3_,. 34 41, 15, 8 :i 4 6.. 324 730-830
08.15:: 68 109 1I7 3 2 0 20 40 20 13 6 4 ::302'..:: Volume
08.30:. 62 .1:113 11. 0 0 3 18 37 20 1tl:-! 3 8 285..:: 1176
.. ......
08:45 34 91 13 5 0 2 9 50 14 7 3 1 229
09:00 47 73 7 0 0 0 14 31 13 11 1 10 207
09:15 20 58 2 1 1 0 9 37 16 7 1 6 158
09:30 10 62 4 1 5 11 39 9 19 0 3 8 171
09:45 0
10:00 0
Peak..i 218 463 83 8 7 :I 7 94 1'54 67 33 19 23 1176::€
BY:M.Lennon
Date: Jun 21,2005 Day: Tuesday
Peak Hour: 17:00-18:00 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910 it 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
15:15 0
15:30 0
15:15 9 50 3 6 1 2 6 59 8 22 4 5 175
15:30 8 51 2 8 2 4 10 72 9 26 2 5 199
15:45 9 65 3 1 0 4 4 49 5 30 5 12 187
16:00 8 60 4 2 0 6 8 76 6 34 2 18 224
16:15 5 48 5 6 9 3 3 64 2 47 7 5 204
16:30 5 64 7 9 7 8 11 84 8 59 3 26 291
16:45 6 68 4 8 7 4 16 80 10 52 9 23 287
17.00:: 8 68 3 16! 5 6 10 1115 14! 95s 7 29 3.76 Hour
17:15" 7. 85 9 111 .. 4.. : 4 8 1109 3" 5d':€ 8 ......li 26 :328'i:i 1700-1800
17 30 7. ....'',91 2 14 4 6 16 1,14..
19.! fit:. . 8
18 349.;;; Volume
1745.:: 3 77 4 14' 14 9 6 1105. 1.Di 48 11 29 331i'; 1384
........ . . .. ........ .... ...:. ..
18:00 6 62 5 14 11 8 8 105 8 51 6 26 310
18:15 0
18:30 0
43
Peak:!;
Contra Costa County Road Nos.: 4051
Public Works Department 4057AK
Traffic Turning.Movement Counts
LOCATION: Buskirk Ave.A Wayne Dr BY:M..Lennon
Date: Jun.27,2005 Day:Jun.27,2005
Peak Hour: 7:30-8:30 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
F
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Lefl 'Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left 0
0
4 40 162 206
06:45 10 52 166 228
07:00 6 46 225 277
07:1513 56 187 256
.... ........ ....... ....... ..........
07,30 1 'i 68 235 302 : Hour
07..45 17 : 48 1:95 260 0730-0830
08 00 9 ! 52 217 278 Volume
08.15 8 48 207 263,: 1103
08:30 10 51 203 264
08:45 7 43 197 247
09:00 11 50 186 247
09:15 3 32 194 229
09:30 0
09:45 0
Peak ai 0 0 Q' 35 0 0 214 854 Q 0 1:103:;!:
by:B.Harrington
Date: Jun.27,2005 Day: Jun.27,2005
Peak Hour: 17:00-18:00 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
15:15 0
15:30 0
15:45 19 17 333 369
16:00 13 21 332 366
16:15 35 32 334 401
16:30 18 32 360 410
16:45 32 22 366 420
17:00 22 27 351 400
17:15 70 380 476 ' Hour
__. ...
1739ii 43!:' 20.. 1355 428 1700-1800
17:46 -.40,::, 27. 380 447 'J Volume
18:00 .37... .: 22 388 427::, 1778
_...
18:15 35 18 329 382
18:30 23 31 275 329
18:45 0
19:00 0
Peak 0 p 0 780 0 Q 95 1493 0 :! 0 0 4 1778
Contra Costa County Road Nos.: 3441
Public Works Department 3844A
Traffic Turning Movement Counts
LOCATION: Olympic Blvd(a)Newell Ave +I BY:M.Lennon
I
Date: Jul 20,2005 Day: Wednesday
Peak Hour: 7:45-8:45 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 X11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound -Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
06:15 0
06:30 0
06:45 190 19 28 168 405
07:00 198 17 29 172 416
07:15 201 16 31 176 424
07:30 199 15 32 181 427
07:45 202 16 34 185 437
Qa.00::
200 : 18 "' 3& 191 447..:11 Hour
08:15'' 204': 17 .41. 198 ;466;;1 0745-0845
08.3200 1$ 43 196_ I' 457:1: Volume
08.43::; :
16 44. ..i.... 187. 444 1808
_. _.
09:00 196 16............ 40... ............. 1.68 ... .. ...... 420
09:15 190 18 42 171 421
09:30 186 19 41 166 412
09:45 0
10:00 0
peak0.... 0 0 O 801.,; 0 69 0 .. ..1fi6 0 7f2 b
By.B.Harrington
Date: Jul 20,2005 Day: Wednesday
Peak Hour: 16:15-17:15 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .;11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
15:15 0
15:30 0
15:45 205 4 0 235 444
16:00 209 20 31 204 464
16:15 205 12 44 206 467
16:30'11 223:1' 9 49 186 ii 4661.is Hour
16:45:: 2U7:! 8 4 220 ::475:.:; 1615-1715
17:00: .. 230. 8 50 22fi.. i .. .. ::512 it Volume
17:15) 2Q2.i 16 52 234..:1 504 1957
__. ._ .._.._......_.
17:30 195 13 47 186 441
17:45 186 11 39 181 417
18:00 193 10 28 170 401
18:15 169 17 24 184 394
18:30 174 7 27 160 368
18:45 0
19:00 0
Peak 0 ;i Q Q t? 8&2 0 99 0 191 0 8ti5_ ;1 0 18ST
I
I
Contra Costa County Road Nos.: 3441
Public Works Department 3851C
Traffic Turning Movement Counts
LOCATION: Olympic Blvdc(a.Tice Valley Blvd BY:B.Harrington
Date: Jul 21,2005 Day:Thursday
Peak Hour: 8:15-9:15 Weather: overcast
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thm Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
06:15 0
06:30 0
06:45 3 2 7 3 14 43 41 7 30 16 11 0 177
07:00 3 7 10 10 17 75 42 6 26 30 15 1 242
07:15 6 13 5 11 23 70 36 10 21 30 13 5 243
07:30 2 9 13 10 36 - 71 32 4 28 39 16 7 267
07:45 6 9 13 12 41 84 60 12 47 58 34 3 379
08:00 6 14 25 26 41 93 79 5 45 69 50 5 458
08:15 8 15 20 21 52 105 83 10 43 54 47 4 462
08.30 'i S 17 1!9 20 61 101 77 $ 74 is 78 5.. 47 10 521 II Hour
08:45 8 13 14 20 56 145 94 7 50 71 T 57 6 541 ::: 815-915
09,00 26 26 .31.: ..71 . :' 152 103 22 71 65 60 13 649 Volume
09:15 is 8 30 20.. 26:! 51 139 . :121 13 S .
09:30 10 25 15 21 51 99 129 23 74 71 50 7 575
09:45 0
10:00 0
Peak 34 I'86 '79 9T 239 M7,:1,]395 50 254:: 282'_: 2de '42 3303
By.M.Lennon
Date: Jul 21,2005 Day: Thursday
Peak Hour: 16:45-17:45 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left 'Right Thru Left- Right Thru Left Right - Thru Left
15:15 0
15:30 0
15:45 6 21 25 19 79 113 121 10 73 43 50 5 565
16:00 3 19 27 21 81 118 125 14 76 45 51 7 587
16:15 7 23 28 22 84 118 128 12 78 47 61 8 616
16:30 8 26 31 21 86 123 120 11 70 45 58 6 605
16:45 5 23 34 28 92 132 131 10 76 48 624 645
......... _ .... .... .....
17.00 : 8 2S 3S 31',.:: 101 '' 135 124 :' :€9 7$I' S1 6t:::F:::51 666::': Hour
17.15 11 i23 34 29 : 9i 132 121 11 76:' 49 62 6 $'45: 1645-1745
17,30 9 i24 36 2$ 80 130 120 12 7$.;' 51 60 7 6'43 Volume
:1745: 8 .:20 :.23:::: 22 87 128'::::'-146 23 70.i . 77.::" 59 13 676 € 2630
_....-
18:00 7.... 19.... .. 27 20 80 117 124 12 74.. 44. 50 6 580
18:15 7 20 25 18 79 118 121 14 73 45 56 11 587
18:30 8 23 23 19 82 115 119 10 71 43 50 6 569
18:45 0
19:00 0
Peak 36 :'92 129. .70$:€ 3G9`. 525 ''.511.. :5S 302': ..228 l 245 '31 2630':
Contra Costa County Road Nos.: 4331D
Public Works Department Private
Traffic Turning Movement Counts
LOCATION: Blackhawk Rd(a)Blackhawk Plaza Cir BY:Brian Harrington
Date: Jul 12,2005 Day:Tuesday
Peak Hour: 7:45-8:45 Weather: clear
14 15 16 2 3 4 6 7 8 10 X11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
06:30 0
06:45 0
07:00 1 81 7 1 0 10 16 43 3 0 0 0 162
07:15 1 114 6 7 0 5 15 48 2 0 0 0 198
07:30 0 104 12 2 0 12 15 54 10 1 0 0 210
07:45 0 156 9 3 0 8 28 49 9 0 0 0 262
08:00 2 155 14 4 0 11 35 84 14 2 0 0 321
08:15 1 147 5 7 1 7 47 84 11 2 0 D 312
08:30 1 123 7 4 0 11 36 81 11 3 0 0 277
08.45= Z 181 22 . 4! .. 1 20 11
'' 53 102 1'5 6;.( 0 .' 0 4tl6._I' Hour
09.00': 4 142 25 5 0 :4 9. 50 135 14 .. 3 3' .. 3 391, : 0830-0930
09,15:;; 5 . 135 17 ti1 Z4 52 912 7 4 1 .: D ,364' Volume
09:30::: 1 138 14 9' 1 1' 24 I! 36 :'.:102 1'0 3 ' 0 0 338'. 1499
._
09:45 0.,..... 123 14 8 3 21 50 ... 84 2 4,., 0,..... 1 310
10:00 0
10:15 0
peak:;;; 12 596 78
BY:M.Lennon
Date: Jul 12,2005 Day: Tuesday
Peak Hour: 16:45-17:45. Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 '11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
15:00 0
15:15 0
15:30 1 121 11 . 7 1 9 25 44 5 2 0 0 226
15:45 2 118 15 9 0 12 32 65 8 1 1 0 263
16:00 3 135 21 13 0 17 35 87 11 0 2 1 325
16:15 0 143 13 12 3 15 42 112 15 3 0 0 358
16:30 2 154 20 10 1 20 36 98 21 0 0 0 362
16:45 4 163 17 9 2 24 44 108 18 5 0 1 395
.
17.00 1 „175 .. 23 . 7j 1. : 28._; :Al 121 1;3 6,;:: 3: 0 429 Hour
1715 0 156 .. 12G32....'„ 54 118 16 3 .: 2 4 ... ::420':1 1645-1745
184 22 90 2 29 64 129
17.30 2 13 2 ',i. 0 '.:! i 458 :: Volume
17.45:: 1 165 19 9: D 30 61 119. 15-:: 0 0 423:::: 1730
18:00 0 145 20 7 0 27 58 105 11 1 2 1 377
18:15 0 150 18 8 0 21 53 97 9 0 0 0 356
18:30 _ _.... 0
18:45 0
Peak 4 680 9p 39 3 119 23Q ..;..187 57 11 9 ..i .. 1.
Contra Costa County Road Nos.: 4331D
Public Works Department Private
Traffic Turning Movement Counts
LOCATION: Blackhawk Rd Silver Maple BY:B.Harrington
Date: Jul 19,2005 Day: Tuesday
Peak Hour: 8:15-9:15 Weather: overcast
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
06:15 0
06:30 0
06:45 0 73 0 0 0 13 2 30 1 2 0 0 119
07:00 0 78 0 1 0 10 3 39 1 6 0 0 132
07:15 0 117 2 1 0 11 5 49 2 4 0 0 187
07:30 1 109 0 3 0 15 2 47 4 6 0 2 .181
07:45 0 161 2 5 0 11 5 86 3 2 0 1 273
08:00 0 143 1 2 0 12 5 94 2 7 0 0 259
08:15 1' 134 3 1 0 10 3 82 0 2 0 0 234
08:30: .1 164 3 6` Q 1.2 5 95 1 0 1 287:I Hour
08.45 S 0 171 2 5 Q 14 6 1'30 1 I! 4 '!€ 0 1 .. . :::329 815-915
09:00 0 1484 '..:' 0 6 0 0 280 Volume
09:15 0 145 2 2 i' Q 9 10 87 O. 3 Q 0 255 :I 1151
1 1.111 .
09:30 0 .....132 1 2. 0...... 10_. ._ 9 ._ ....84 2 2 0 ..--- 1 240
09:45 0
10:00 0
11 96i 0 42 29 4' 9 Si 21 'i 0 2 1951
BY: M.Lennon
Date: Jul 19,2005 Day: Tuesday
Peak Hour: 16:30-17:30 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
14:45 0
15:00 0
15:15 2 114 0 2 0 3 10 150 4 1 0 0 286
15:30 1 117 1 4 0 7 11 156 3 3 0 1 304
15:45 0 130 2 3 0 12 10 166 4 1 0 0 328
16:00 1 121 . 3 5 0 13 14 174 2 6 0 0 339
16:15 0 114 2 3 0- 6 10 189 7 5 0 1 337
16:30 0 123 2 2 0 15 18 192 6 2 0 0 360
.. . ...... .......
16.45' 1 119 0 2:?, 0 12 10 '210 5:11! T 0 1 361Ii Hour
......... ......._ ..
0 17 11 215 4'i 3 4 i 403 1630-1730
17.15 0 135 3 1..'.' Q 8 15. 1199 2'! 1 0 ... i! 0 ::364 ! Volume
17:30 1 130 2 4 Q 9 '.141'97 5 ! 4 Ili 0 0 366 1494
17:45 1 103 2 5 0 8 13 180 6 5 0 1 324
18:00 1 105 1 4 0 12 15 176 4 3 0 0 321
18:15 0
18:30 0
Pr ak ! 4 527 9 10' OF 746 SQ 829 16:1' 9 0 2 1494:':
Contra Costa County Road Nos.: 3481C
Public Works Department 5185AH
Traffic Turning Movement Counts
LOCATION: Port Chicago Hwy(a)Riverside Dr. BY:M.Lennon
Date: Jul.25,2005 Day: Monday
Peak Hour: 7:30-8:30 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
06:15 0
06:30 0
06:45 0 96 1 0 0 9 3 53 6 24 0 0 192
07:00 0 98 1 5 1 11 3 45 4 21 1 1 191
07:15 1 121 0 1 0 14 2 64 7 23 2 0 235
07:30 0 117 4 5 5 12 3 99 11 23 1 3 283
07;45',: 1 135 =3 3' 3 11 4 107 31 25= 5: .: 1 329 Hour
08:00';; 3 213 2 01' 2 16 3 96 1;9 31: 3 D 388 ! 0730-0830
0815:: 0:
201 6 3' 7 10 2 106:* 26i:, 23 3 1 386.::;; Volume
08:301 3 136 3 4' 4 13 5 91 18 i 0 1 297.. 1400
..,......
08:45 4 .... 123. 7 2: 3 12 .. 2 76 12 10 1 0...... 252
09:00 5 134 6 0 1 20 3 80 21 15 2 0 287
09:15 3 141 8 1 6 16 1 86 13 18 6 1 300
09:30 5 132 7 1 1 9 6 92 16 20 3 2 294
09:45 0
10:00 1 1 0
Peak 7 . ::'685 :14 9= 16<` 50 " 14" 400 93 58; 11 3 1400':€
By:B.Harrington
Date: Jul.25,2005 Day: Tuesday
Peak Hour: 16:00-17:00 Weather; clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
15:15 0
15:30 0
15:45 1 73 3 3 1 8 10 106 17 31 2 1 256
16:00 1 89 4 3 2 3 7 121 22 17 1 1 271
16;151 2 103 1 3`€ 1 6 Al.. !1114. .: :'.34 161: 3
3 ;297.1:: Hour
16:30: 3 87 1 4 4 6 it..13 AN 25 17 2 1 293 : 1600-1700
16:45,; 2 102 3 3 1:::::
': 13 12 134 35 24 9 ': 4 334 Volume
17:00,' 3 9tl 4 2= 1 3 9 119 2U 22 ii 1 U 274 1198
... ._ ._....._.... _ ......... ....
17:15 2 85 6 5 2..... 8 9 132 23 21 4 0 297
17:30 1 92 2 2 2 7 14 87 21 20 6 4 258
17:45 3 80 2 1 1 9 8 125 24 17 2 2 274
18:00 1 81 4 3 4 5 8 124 21 27 3 2 283
18:15 2 85 6 4 4 6 9 130 28 18 3 2 297
18:30 4 84 5 5 2 3 6 103 18 18 3 0 251
18:45 0
19:00 0
Peak,' 7 338 . 14 1Q 11
Contra Costa County Road Nos.: 1881A
Public Works Department 1794C
Traffic Turning Movement Counts
LOCATION: Willow Ave(a) Hawthorne Dr av:B.Harrington
Date: Jun 20,2005 Day: Monday
Peak Hour: 7:45-8:45 Weather: clear
1 2 3 •4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right -Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
06:15 0
06:30 0
06:45 81 0 1 36 2 48 168
07:00 77 0 3 29 6 95 210
07:15 72 1 1 28 12 78 192
07:30 s' 80 U, 5 _'. 25 16 73199:::: Hour
07.45 1110 0i 4-: 42 6 79 241..:1 715-815
0800.sl 84 1' 4': 52 s16 88 245 Volume
08:15 85 0 0 44 18 79 226 :' 911
08:30,.._ 72 .._......5 5.... 34 ...::10 71 197
08:45 74 1 3 29 8 81 196
09:00 78 2 1 20 5 73 179
09:15 76 1 1 29 10 52 169
09:30 69 0 1 32 11 84 197
09:45 0
10:00 0
Peak 0 353 1 13 O 163 56 318 0
0.:::;:;; 0 0 911
by M.Lennon
Date: Jun 20,2005 Day: Monday
Peak Hour: 16:30-17:30 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
15:00 0
15:150
15:30 45 4 1 32 34 145 261
15:45 127 3 1 14 28 132 305
16:00 126 3 2 37 23 135 326
16`.15 157 1 2 24 27 112 323
16:30 131 4 2 28 30 140 335
16:45 1'55 9 1 28 24 159:. 376:' Hour
17:00 ! 152 5 .. 2 : 27 23 1:66. 375 1630-1730
!.:15 t32 3' 1,. 21 2Q 1.48325 .i' Volume
pss
17:30 130 d' 6: 34 36:: 1.33 '337.::1 1413
17:45 114 0 2 21 31 160 _ 328
18:00 91 6 3 27 37 134 298
18:15 90 5 3 18 30 144 290
18:30 0
18:45 0
Peak 0 569 21 10 II 0 110 97 606 0 0 0 0 1413
i
Contra Costa County Road Nos.: 0971C
Public Works Department 1794B&1795F
Traffic Turning Movement Counts
I
LOCATION: Parker Ave R)4th St BY:B.Harrington
Date: Jun 6,2005 Day: Monday
Peak Hour: 7:45-8:45 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ill 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right. Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
06:15 0
06:30 0
06:45 0 23 3 6 0 10 4 35 2 8 10 0 91
07:00 1 38 0 4 0 12 8 45 1 8 10 0 117
07:15 3 42 3 4 2 18 3 44 5 13 !2 0 139
07:30 2 62 1 2 0 19 8 34 1 14 !1 2 146
07:45 8 61 4 6 5 11 7 37 5 14 �9 2 169
008:00. 10 18 3 14 12''` 15::: € 4 :i40 8 46'1: Hour
0815 15 67. 6 3 21,;;': 16 TV-.: 56 1;3 84; 19 13..i :324:;;[ 745-845
08:30 2 .. :! 67 5 4 2 14 ,' 9 44 11 42`.. 12 :! 5 218 Si Volume
08:45': 4 56 2 A 1 _ 12 8 59 6' 16 Z 5 175' 951
09:00 3 44 6 10 2 15 5 39 3 13 12 3 145
09:15 2 60 6 1 1 12 9 50 10 7 3 2 163
09:30 2 57 3 3 2 14 8 45 8 6 0 4 152
09:45 0
10:00 0
peak 31 268 ?7 15 36 57 32 199 9`8 i88a 37 i 33 951..:::
I
BY: J.Wu
Date: Jun 6,2005 Day: Monday.
Peak Hour: 16:30-17:30 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 111 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
14:45 0
15:00 0
15:15 0
15:30 1 64 3 4 2 11 12 81 16 9 10 4 207
15:45 2 79 8 7 3 11 13 86 10 10 4 2 235
16:00 3 77 6 4 4 11 17 89 11 12 3 2 239
16:15 0 65 2 4 2 11 17 102 12 4- 5 1 225
16:30 4 69 6 11 1 11 18 87 17 7 :2 5 238
16:45:': 2 ,861: 57 9 2:':.. 13 " 24 106 !14 13:° 4 2 282: Hour
_..
1740:;' 3 75 7 1'll 3................11 26 1D7 1;5 .............3 3...:: :273 1630-1730
17:15:' 3 76 4 11 1 !i 15 :I 15 95 2i 1U: 2 i 25WiF Volume
17:301 2:1
77 5 7: 2 10. II 27 111 2 20; 4 4 289 1098
17:45 2 72 5 5 0 15 20 122 12 12 2 1 268
18:00 2 55 5 9 0 11 21 70 11 14 11 1 200
18:15 0 55 8 10 1 15 24 100 11 3 0 3 230
18:30 4 51 6 1 4 3 11 1 16 78 15 1 11 0 1 200
Peak:a 1b '314 12'3 3Z 8 ; 49 82 ...':419 7_i7 53 s 73 i0 7098
I
1 ;
I
I
III
I
I
Contra Costa County Road Nos.: 0971C
Public Works Department 1795H
Traffic Turning Movement Counts
LOCATION: Parker Ave(a)Second St av:B.Harrington
Date: Jun 16,2005 Day: Thursday
Peak Hour: 7:30-8:30 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIMESouthbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
06:15 0
06:30 0
06:45 0 24 0 0 0 2 0 33 0 1 0 2 62
07:00 2 20 0 0 0 1 1 47 0 0 0 1 72
07:15 2 26 0 0 0 0 0 18 2 1 0 1 50
07:30 2 24 0 0 0 0 0 29 1 3 0 1 60
._.........
;45 4 39 D'' 0 D _ ? 1
.. ...... '0 .41 3 2 0 7 97 Hour
07 ...
08.00 is 3 I56 OII 0 0 4 0 39 1:: 2 D 2 107 I' 730-830
0815 4 51 D' 1 D 3 0 57 1 0 1 7 125 Volume
08.30 0 44 1_' 0 q 1 1 38 2. 2 q 8 97 ! 426
. .........
08:45 1........ 45 0 1 0 1 0 47 . 0.... 1 0..... ......0 96
09:00 3 37 0 0 1 3 3 34 0 2 0 1 84
09:15 3 37 0 0 0 1 2 46 2 4 0 2 97
09:30 0 30 0 2 0 3 0 32 5 2 1 1 76
09:45 0
10:00 0
Peak 11 190 1:' i 3 1 y7S .. .7.. i .. �.. j, 1 24 426
by:M.Lennon
Date: Jun 16,2005 Day:Thursday
Peak Hour: 16:45-17:45 Weather: rainy
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
15:30 3 49 1 1 1 2 2 61 1 2 0 1 124
15:45 5 49 1 0 0 3 2 88 1 4 0 3 156
16:00 0 43 0 0 0 0 2 76 3 4 0 2 130
16:15 3 36 0 0 0 4 1 83 4 5 0 2 138
16:30 4 50 0 1 0 3 2 89 5 2 0 0 156
16:45 3 46 3 5 1 0 2 70 3 5 0 3 141
17:00. 2 40 1!i 75 4.. 0.. .!!. 1 2 132:!:: Hour
1115. 2 43 0 2 0 1 1 1'41 Ii 1645-1745
17:30 3 55 D[. 1 :,', ..1 .. 7... :: '3. 91 3 4 1 3 972 Volume
17:45 .8 .. ',S8 2 1 ! 0.. ! ..1 2 76 0 2 2 2 1:52!' 597
......... .............. ... ...... . . ... .... .
18:00 2 29 1 1....,., 0 0 1 68 1, 4 1 0 108
18:15 2 29 2 1 0 1 1 67 0 1 0 5 109
18:30 0
18:45 0
19:00 0
19:15 0
Pesk' 13 19G 3S ! 2 13 1Q. 323 10 P 9 S J.8 597
Contra Costa County Road Nos.: 2191A
Public Works Department 2295W
Traffic Turning Movement Counts
LOCATION: Pomona St R)Second Ave EY:B.Harrington
Date: Jul 26,2005 Day:Tuesday
Peak Hour: 7:45-8:45 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
06:15 0
06:30 0
06:45 5 - 0 6 1 27 6 3 0 5 1 51 0 105
07:00 7 0 0 0 33 9 7 1 2 1 32 3 95
0715 3 0 10 1 35 4 0 1 2 2 41 0 99
07:30 8 0 4 3 48 6 7 2 3 0 36 0 117
07:45 8 0 5 2 24 5 9 0 1 2 52 2 110
08:00': 5 1 10 21 40 . 7 4 2 3'' 1 45 2 122 Hour
.,
4 2. 8 d i' 30 6 .. 5. 1 3, 4 36 3 106 :I 0745-0845
06:30 . 5 3 5 3 37 4 5:::
2 ppwqqq1. 1 . 36.. ..2 104 a Volume
..
08:45: 5 0 10 4 31, 4 5 3 2; 3 -! 54 3 124 456
09:00 4 0 6 3 28 5 5 0 6 1 38 2 98
09:15 1 2 3 1 39 6 5 1 6 2 39 4 109
09:30 4 1 4 1 36 2 5 0 2 3 38 1 97
09:45 0
10:00 0
peak 19' 6 33 13! 138 29 i3 8 9 '
ev:M.Lennon
Date: Jul 26,2005 Day: Tuesday
Peak Hour: 16:15-17:15 Weather: clear
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TIME Southbound Westbound Northbound , Eastbound TOTAL
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left
14:45 0
15:00 0
15:15 9 1 4 2 41 8 2 1 2 5 50 6 131
15:30 7 1 5 0 39 6 0 2 3 6 54 4 127
15:45 9 2 6 2 32 9 2 0 7 5 59 8 141
16:00 11 3 6 3 41 5 4 1 4 3 45 1 127
16:15 15 0 6 1 46 1 5 1 4 6 52 5 142
16:30. 130 5€i 4 is 67 Hour
:
2 5 5 54 : 7 3
16:45 9 0 7 0:: 58 4 7 1 2:5 2 61 3. 154.x: 1615-1715
17:Q0 S 1 3 4: 61 6 4 0 O: 5 60 4 153..: Volume
17:15 1 D 1 3 3': 52 6 4 0 5 6. . .. 56.. ..: 1. 148 624
17:30 6 0 8 3 43 4 1 2 4 3 55 6 135
17:45 8 1 3 1 47 4 5 1 1 7- -39 4 121
18:00 7 0 4 0 38 3 3 0 5 3 48 0 111
18:15 0
18:30 0
Peak ! 37 225 23.:.. .,',.18 1 13+, 1T 244
w
COPY
CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY C • ��
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Allocation of 18% Local Street Maintenance & Improvement Funds
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
Compliance Checklist
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
1. Action Plans YES No
a. Is the jurisdiction implementing the actions called for in the applicable
Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance for all designated
Regional Routes within the jurisdiction?
b. Has the jurisdiction implemented the following procedures as outlined
in the applicable Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance?
i. Circulation of environmental documents,
ii. Analysis of the impacts of proposed General Plan amendments and
recommendation of changes to Action Plans,and
iii. Conditioning the approval of projects consistent with Action Plan
policies?
c. Has the jurisdiction followed the procedures for RTPC review of ® ❑
General Plan Amendments as called for in Authority Resolution No.
95-06-G(see Exhibit 6).
2. Regional Transportation Mitigation Program YES NO
a, Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a local development
mitigation program to ensure that new development pays its fair share
of the impact mitigation costs associated with that development?
b. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a regional transportation
mitigation program,including regional traffic mitigation fees,
assessments, or other mitigation as appropriate?
Issued January,2006 Compliance Checklist
Page 1
• Vin `•*
Compliance Checklist
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
3. Housing Options and Job Opportunities YES NO
a. Has the jurisdiction adopted a third-revision Housing Element that has ® El
been found by the State Department of Housing an&Community
Development to comply with State Law?
b. Has the jurisdiction adopted a Housing Element that complies with the
requirements of§ 65583 et seq. of the Government Code,by:
■ Identifying local responsibilities for meeting regional housing needs,
■ Establishing goals and policies for meeting those needs,and
■ Outlining a 5-year program of actions to implement the Housing
Element?
c. Has the jurisdiction submitted a report to the Authority regarding
development of an implementation program that creates housing
opportunities for all income levels?Exhibit 7 includes a Sample.
Housing Report.
d. Does the jurisdiction's General Plan—or other adopted policy
document or report—evaluate the effects of planned land uses on local,
subregional and regional travel patterns and propose land use policies
and a pattern of land uses that would promote more efficient use of the
transportation system?
4. Growth Management Element: Performance
Standards YES NO
a. As part of its General Plan,has the jurisdiction adopted a Growth
Management Element which is in substantial compliance with the
Authority's Model Growth Management Element?
b. Does the jurisdiction now comply with adopted performance standards, El
or expect to comply with the standards within the next five years
through implementation of its Capital Improvement Program?
Issued January,2006 Compliance Checklist
Page 2
Compliance Checklist
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
5. Growth Management Element: Traffic Level-of
Service Standards YES NO N/A
a. Using the Authority's Technical Procedures,have traffic impact ® F F
studies been conducted as part of development review for all projects
estimated to generate more than 100 peak-hour vehicle trips?
b. Does the jurisdiction maintain a list of Reporting Intersections on non- ® El El
regional routes,and measure the level of service at those intersections
every two years?
c. Do all Reporting Intersections meet LOS standards through actual ® El El
measurement,or after assuming implementation of five-year capital
improvement program and accounting for changes in travel demand?
d. Does a request for Findings of Special Circumstances for those
intersections that do not and will not meet LOS standards, accompany
this checklist?
e. Has the jurisdiction ever been granted a Findings of Special D
Circumstances by the Authority?
6. Participation in Cooperative, Multi-Jurisdictional
Planning YEs NO
a. Over the past year,has the jurisdiction's Council/Board member
regularly participated in meetings of the appropriate Regional
Transportation Planning Committee,and have the jurisdiction's local
representatives to the Regional Transportation Planning Committee
regularly reported on the activities of the Regional Committee to the
jurisdiction's council or board? (Note: Each RTPC should have a
policy which defines what constitutes regular attendance of
Council/Board members at RTPC meetings.)
b. As needed,has the jurisdiction made available,as input into the
countywide transportation computer model, data on land use and traffic
patterns?
Issued January,2006 Compliance Checklist
Page 3
Compliance Checklist
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
7. Five-Year Capital Improvement Program YES NO
Does the jurisdiction have an adopted five-year capital improvement ® ❑
program(CT)that estimates project costs and includes a plan that
outlines general mechanisms for financing transportation and public
facilities,,including fire,police,parks,sanitary,facilities,water,and
flood control?:
8. Transportation Systems Management Program YES NO
Has the jurisdiction adopted a transportation systems management
ordinance or resolution that incorporates required policies consistent
with the updated model ordinance prepared by the Authority for use by
local agencies?
9. Maintenance of Effort (MoE) YES NO
Has the jurisdiction met the MoE requirements of Measure C as,stated 1171
in Section 6 of the Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and
Growth Management Ordinance?
10. Posting of Signs YES NO N/A
Has the jurisdiction posted signs meeting Authority specifications for 0 0
all projects exceeding$250,000 that are funded,in whole or in part,
with Measure C funds?
11. Other Considerations YES NO N/A
If the jurisdiction believes that the requirements of Measure C have 7. 17
been satisfied in a way not indicated on this checklist,ha's an
explanation been attached below?
Issued January,2006 Compliance Checklist
Page 4
Compliance Checklist
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
12. Review and Approval of Checklist
This checklist was prepared by:
Signature: Date:
Name and Title Hillary Heard, Senior Planner
Phone: (925) 335-1278
The council/board of Contra Costa County has reviewed the completed checklist and found
that the policies and programs of the jurisdiction as reported herein conform to the
requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and Growth
Management Program.
Certified Signature: Date: 02/07/2006
Name and Title: John Gioia, Chair, Board of Supervisors
Attest Signature: Date:
02/07/2006
City/To ounty Cle
Name: Jane Pennington, Chief Clerk
Issued January,2006 Compliance Checklist
Page 5
CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Allocation of 18% Local Street Maintenance & Improvement Funds
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
(Note: This form is available in electronic media in Word O format.)
Information Requested by Checklist Questions
1. Action Plans
a. Please summarize steps taken during last year to implement the actions,programs,and
measures called for in the applicable Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance:
See Attacment A. Please note that Actions,Programs and Measures that do not
include Contra Costa County are not listed.
b. Attach,list and briefly describe any General Plan Amendments that were approved during
the reporting period. Please specify which amendments affected ability to meet the
standards in the Growth Management Element and/or affected ability to implement Action
Plan policies or meet Traffic Service Objectives. Indicate if amendments were forwarded
to the jurisdiction's RTPC for review,and describe the results of that review relative to
Action Plan implementation:
See Attachment B.
2. Regional Transportation Mitigation Program
a. Describe,progress on implementation of the regional transportation mitigation program:
Contra Costa County has been implementing regional mitigation programs in
West, Central, East and South County Areas.
Issued January, 2006 Checklist Attachments
Page 1
Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2004-05 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
3. Housing Options and Job Opportunities
a. Please list the date of State Department of Housing and Community Development(HCD)
compliance finding for the jurisdiction's third-revision Housing Element and attach the
HCD-approval letter:
Contra Costa County submitted its new Housing Element to the state prior to the
December 2001 deadline.The State Department of Housing and Community
Development certified the County's compliance on March 26, 2002 (see
Attachment C.
b. If HCD found that the Housing Element did not comply with State law,please list the date
of adoption and resolution number of the jurisdiction's finding that its third-revision
Housing Element complies with State law. Also state what actions have been taken during
the reporting period to contribute toward achieving the housing allocations established by
ABAG for all income levels.
N.A.
C. Please attach a report on the jurisdiction's development of an implementation program that
creates housing opportunities for all income levels(see Sample Report—Exhibit 7).
See Attachment D
4. Growth Management Element: Performance Standards
a. If the jurisdiction does not currently meet its adopted performance standards,please
describe what actions the jurisdiction intends to take to bring it into compliance within the
next five years,including actions contained in the adopted five-year capital improvement
program:
N.A.
Issued January,2006 Checklist Attachments
Page 2
Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2004-05 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
5. Growth Management Element: Traffic Level of Service (LOS)
Standards
a. Please list all projects that generated more than 100 peak hour trips,indicate whether a
traffic impact study was conducted,and indicate if a Findings of Consistency with
Standards was made(include resolution number):
All projects approved by the County that generated more than"!00 peak hour trips
are listed in Attachment E.
b. Please list Reporting Intersections,dates of counts and LOS monitoring results. Also
attach LOS calculations. Explain reasons for any LOS exceedances and proposed
mitigation through implementation of the 5-year CIP or other mechanism.
See Attachment F. Please note the following two subject intersections are no
longer in the County's jurisdiction: Intersection 2, Solano Way/Marsh
Drive/Oilvera Road is in the City of Concord; Intersection 13; Cypress
Road/Sellers Avenue is in the City of Oakley. For the sake of consistency these
intersections are listed as part of the reporting intersections but no counts were
taken and LOS calculations were not performed. In future Compliance Checklists
they will not be listed with other Reporting Intersections in County.
C. Please list intersections for which the Authority has adopted Findings of Special
Circumstances and describe actions taken over the past year to carryout required"
conditions of compliance:
N.A.
7. Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Please list resolution number and date of adoption of most recent five-year CIP. If CIP
implementation is required to meet traffic LOS or performance standards,state the number
of years for which this condition has prevailed.
The CIP for Parks and Sheriff Facilities,2006-2012, was adopted February 7,
2006.
A draft update of the County Road Improvement Program has also been released
and adoption is anticipated prior to June 30, 2006.
Issued January,2006 Checklist Attachments
Page 3
Checklist Attachments
Reporting.Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2004-05 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
8. Transportation Systems Management Program
Date of Ordinance or Resolution Adoption 1/21/03
Resolution Number 42003-02
9. Maintenance of Effort (MoE)
Please indicate the jurisdiction's MoE requirement and MoE expenditures for the past two
fiscal years(FY 2001-02 and FY 2002-03).
MOE Requirement $420,000 per year
MOE Expenditures $631,639 FY 2003-2004
$555,348 FY 2004-05
11. Other Considerations
Please specify any alternative methods of achieving compliance for any components for
the Measure C Growth Management Program.
N:A.
Issued January,2006 Checklist Attachments
Page 4
LIST OF EXHIBITS
1. List of Acronyms
2. Allocations of Local Street Maintenance and Improvement Funds for FY 2005-06 (estimated)
3. Ordinance 01-01, Amending the Measure C Expenditure Plan with Reference to the Growth
Management Program:Biennial Compliance Reporting and TSM Resolution
4. Authority Resolution 01-01-G(Revision 1)regarding allocation of Measure C Local Street
Maintenance and Improvement(18 percent)Funds
5. Authority Resolution 92-03-G regarding circulation of environmental documents(pertains to
question l.b.i)
6. Authority Resolution 95-06-G regarding the general plan review process(pertains to question
1.c). This resolution includes a flow chart depicting the general plan review process adopted
by the Authority in July 1995
7. Sample Hatising Repai4
8. bledel Tera OFdi,.nee(.e. sed De„e,.,b4 1996)
Issued January,2006 Checklist Exhibits
Page 1
EXHIBIT 1
LIST OF ACRONYMS
ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments
CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority(Authority)
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CIP Capital Improvement Plan
CMP Congestion Management Program
GMP Growth Management Program
HCD The State Housing and Community Development Department
LOS (Traffic)Level of Service
RTMP Regional Transportation Mitigation Program
RTPC Regional Transportation Planning Committee(or Regional Committee)
Issued January,2006 Checklist Exhibits
Page 2
4.
CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
PIN
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Allocation of 18% Local Street Maintenance & Improvement Funds
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
Compliance Checklist
Reporting.Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
1. Action Plans YES NO
a. Is the jurisdiction implementing the actions called for in the applicable
Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance for all designated
Regional Routes within the jurisdiction?
b. Has the jurisdiction implemented the following procedures as outlined
in the applicable Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance?
i. Circulation of-environmental documents,
ii. .Analysis of the impacts of proposed General Plan amendments and
recommendation of changes to Action Plans,and
iii. Conditioning the approval of projects consistent with Action Plan
policies?.
c. Has the jurisdiction followed the procedures for RTPC review of.
General Plan Amendments as called for in Authority Resolution No.
95-06-G(see Exhibit 6).
2. Regional Transportation Mitigation Program YES NO
..... a. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a local development
mitigation program to ensure that new development pays its fair share
of the impact mitigation costs associated with that development?
b. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a regional transportation
mitigation program, including regional traffic mitigation fees,
assessments,or other mitigation as appropriate?
Issued January,2006 Compliance Checklist
Page 1
Compliance Checklist
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
3. Housing Options and Job Opportunities YES NO
a. Has the jurisdiction adopted a third-revision Housing Element that has 177
been found by the State Department of Housing and,Community
Development to comply with State Law?
b. Has the jurisdiction adopted a Housing Element that complies with the. Z El
requirements of§ 65583 et seq. of the Government Code,by:
■ Identifying local responsibilities for meeting regional housing needs,
■ Establishing goals and policies for meeting those needs,and
■ Outlining a 5-year program of actions to implement the Housing
Element?
Z c. Has the jurisdiction submitted a report to the Authority regarding 1171
development of an implementation program that creates housing El
opportunities for all income levels?Exhibit 7 includes a Sample
Housing Report.
d. Does the jurisdiction's General Plan—or other adopted policy
document or report—evaluate the effects of planned land uses on local, VN
subregional and regional travel patterns and propose land use policies
and a pattern of land uses that would promote more efficient use of the
transportation system?
4. Growth Management Element: Performance
Standards YES NO
a. As part of its General Plan,has the jurisdiction adopted a Growth
Management Element which is in substantial compliance with the
Authority's Model Growth Management Element?
b. Does the jurisdiction now comply with adopted performance standards,
or expect to comply with the standards.within the next five years
through implementation of its Capital Improvement Program?
Issued January,2006 Compliance Checklist
Page 2
Compliance Checklist
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005_
5. -Growth Management Element: Traffic Level-of
Service Standards YES NO N/A
a. Using the Authority's Technical Procedures,have traffic impact
studies been conducted as part of development review for all projects
estimated to generate more than 100 peak-hour vehicle trips?
b. Does the jurisdiction maintain a list of Reporting Intersections on non-
regional routes,and measure the level of service at those intersections
every two years?
c. Do all Reporting Intersections meet LOS standards through actual ® El 0
measurement, or after assuming implementation of five-year capital
improvement program and accounting for changes in travel demand?
d. Does a request for Findings of Special Circumstances for those 0 El
intersections that do not and will not meet LOS standards, accompany
this checklist?
e. Has the jurisdiction ever been granted a Findings of Special El F
Circumstances by the Authority? .
6. Participation in Cooperative, Multi-Jurisdictional
Planning YES NO
a. Over the past year,has the jurisdiction's Council/Board member
regularly participated in meetings of the appropriate Regional
Transportation Planning Committee,and have the jurisdiction's local
representatives to the Regional Transportation Planning Committee _
regularly reported on the activities of the Regional Committee to the
jurisdiction's council or board? (Note:Each RTPC should have a
policy which defines what constitutes regular attendance of
Council/Board members at RTPC meetings.)
b. As needed,has the jurisdiction made available,as input into the ® E
countywide transportation computer model,data on land use and traffic
patterns?
I
I
Issued January,2006 Compliance Checklist
Page 3
Compliance Checklist
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07 .
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
7. Five-Year Capital Improvement Program YES No
Does the jurisdiction have an adopted five-year capital improvement 1171
program(CIP)that estimates project costs and includes a plan that
outlines general mechanisms for financing transportation and public
facilities,including fire,police,parks,sanitary facilities, water and.
flood control?
.8. Transportation Systems Management Program YES NO
Has the jurisdiction adopted a transportation systems management ® E
ordinance or resolution that incorporates required policies consistent
with the updated model ordinance prepared by the Authority for use.by
local agencies?
9. Maintenance of Effort (MoE) YES NO
Has the jurisdiction met the MoE requirements of Measure C as stated
in Section 6 of the Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and
Growth Management Ordinance?
10.:Posting of Signs YES NO N/A
Has the jurisdiction posted signs meeting Authority specifications for ® ❑
all projects exceeding$250,000 that are funded,in whole or in part,
with Measure C funds?
11. Other Considerations YES NO N/A
If the jurisdiction believes that the requirements of Measure C have El 7
been satisfied in a way not indicated on this checklist,has an
explanation been attached below?
Issued January,2006 Compliance Checklist
Page 4
Compliance Checklist
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
12. Review and Approval of Checklist
This checklist was prepared by:
Signature: Date:
Name and Title: !Hillary Heard, Senior Planner
Phone: (925)335-1278
The council/board of Contra Costa County has reviewed the completed checklist and found.
that the policies and programs of the jurisdiction as reported herein conform to the
requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and Growth
Management Program.
Certified Signature: Date. 02/07/2006
Name and Title: John Gioia, Chair, Board of Supervisors
Attest Signature: Date:
02/07/2006
City/To ounty Cle
Name: Jane Pennington, Chief Clerk
Issued January,2006 Compliance Checklist
Page 5
0 00� CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Allocation of 18% Local Street Maintenance & Improvement Funds
For Fiscal Years 2005-06 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
(Note: This form is available in electronic media in Word®format.)
Information Requested by Checklist Questions
1. Action Plans
a. Please summarize steps taken during last year to implement the actions,programs, and
measures called for in the applicable Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance:
See AttacmentA. Please note that Actions, Programs and Measures that do not
include Contra Costa County are not listed.
b. Attach,list and briefly describe any General Plan Amendments that were approved during
the reporting period. Please specify which amendments affected ability to meet the
standards in the Growth Management Element and/or affected ability to implement Action
Plan policies or meet Traffic Service Objectives. Indicate if amendments were forwarded
to the jurisdiction's RTPC for review,and describe the results of that review relative to
Action Plan implementation:
See Attachment B.
2. Regional Transportation Mitigation Program
a. Describe progress on implementation of the regional transportation mitigation program:
Contra Costa County has been implementing regional mitigation programs in
West, Central, East and South County Areas.
Issued January,2006 Checklist Attachments
Page 1
Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2004-05 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
3. Housing Options and Job Opportunities
a. Please list the date of State Department of Housing and Community Development(HCD)
compliance finding for the jurisdiction's third-revision Housing Element and attach the
HCD-approval letter:
Contra Costa County submitted its new Housing Element to the state prior to the
December 2001 deadline. The State Department of Housing and Community
Development certified the County's compliance on March 26, 2002 (see
Attachment C.
b. If HCD found that the Housing Element did not comply with State law,please list the date
of adoption and resolution number of the jurisdiction's finding that its third-revision
Housing Element complies with State law. Also state what actions have been taken during
the reporting period to contribute toward achieving the housing allocations established by
ABAG for all income levels.
N.A.
C. Please attach a report on the jurisdiction's development of an implementation program that
creates housing opportunities for all income levels(see Sample Report—Exhibit 7).
See Attachment D
4. Growth Management Element: Performance Standards
a. If the jurisdiction does not currently meet its adopted performance standards,please
describe what actions the jurisdiction intends to take to bring it into compliance within-the
next five years,including actions contained in the adopted five-year capital improvement
program:
N.A.
Issued January,2006 Checklist Attachments
Page 2
Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2004-05 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
5. Growth Management Element: Traffic Level of Service (LOS)
Standards
a. Please list all projects that generated more than 100 peak hour trips,indicate whether a
traffic impact study was conducted,and indicate if a Findings of Consistency with
Standards was made(include resolution number):
All projects approved by the County that generated more than 100 peak hour trips
are listed in Attachment E.
b. Please list Reporting Intersections,dates of counts and LOS monitoring results. Also
attach LOS calculations. Explain reasons for any-LOS exceedances and proposed
mitigation through implementation of the 5-year CIP or other mechanism.
See Attachment F. Please note the following two subject intersections are no
longer in the County's jurisdiction: Intersection 2, Solano Way/Marsh
Drive/Oilvera Road is in the City of Concord; Intersection 13; Cypress
Road/Sellers Avenue is in the City of Oakley. For the sake of consistency these
intersections are listed as part of the reporting intersections but no counts were
taken and LOS calculations were not performed. In future Compliance Checklists
they will not be listed with other Reporting Intersections in County.
C. Please list intersections for which the Authority has adopted Findings of Special
Circumstances and describe actions taken over the past year to carry out required
conditions of compliance:
N.A.
7, Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Please list resolution number and date of adoption of most recent five-year CIP. If CIP
implementation is required to meet traffic LOS or performance standards,state the number
of years for which this condition has.prevailed.
The CIP for Parks and Sheriff Facilities, 2006-2012,was adopted February 7,
. 2006.
A draft update of the County Road Improvement-Program has also been released
and adoption is anticipated prior-to June 30, 2006.
Issued January,2006 Checklist Attachments
Page 3
Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County
For Fiscal Years 2004-05 and 2006-07
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2004 & 2005
8. Transportation Systems Management Program
Date of Ordinance or Resolution Adoption 1/21/03
Resolution Number #2003-02
9. Maintenance of Effort (MoE)
Please indicate the jurisdiction's MoE requirement and MoE expenditures for the past two
fiscal years(FY 2001-02 and FY 2002-03).
MOE Requirement $420,000 per year
MOE Expenditures $631,639 FY 2003-2004
$555,348 FY 2004-05
11. Other Considerations
Please specify any alternative methods of achieving compliance for any components for
the Measure C Growth Management Program.
N.A.
Issued January,2006 Checklist Attachments
Page 4
LIST OF EXH I BITS
1. List of Acronyms
.2. Allocations of Local Street Maintenance and Improvement Funds for FY 2005-06(estimated)
3. Ordinance 01-01,Amending the Measure C Expenditure Plan with Reference to the Growth
Management Program: Biennial Compliance Reporting and TSM Resolution
4. Authority Resolution 01-01-G(Revision 1)regarding allocation of Measure C Local Street
Maintenance and Improvement(18 percent)Funds
5. Authority Resolution 92-03-G regarding circulation of environmental documents(pertains to
question l.b.i)
6. Authority Resolution 95-06-G regarding the general plan review process(pertains to question
l.c). This resolution includes a flow chart depicting the general plan review process adopted
by the Authority in July 1995
8. Model TSM Or-dinanee(r-eN4sed December- 1996)
Issued January,2006 Checklist Exhibits
Page 1
EXHIBIT 1
LIST OF ACRONYMS
ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments
CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority(Authority)
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CIP Capital Improvement Plan
CMP Congestion Management Program
GMP Growth Management Program
HCD The State Housing and Community Development Department
LOS (Traffic)Level of Service
RTMP Regional Transportation Mitigation Program
RTPC Regional Transportation Planning Committee(or Regional Committee)
Issued January,2006 Checklist Exhibits
Page 2