The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 06212005 - C93 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS :�.• -_�,•,, Contra .;• .,. , { i FROM. SCOTT TANDY, INTERIM DIRECTOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT C .)S- t 6011 DATE: JUNE 21, 2005 County SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT THE CY 2006 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Specific Request(S)or Recommendation (S)& Background and Justification RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the Community Action Plan for CalendarYear 2006, AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, on behalf of the Community Services Department, to submit the Community Action Plan to the State of California Department of Community Services and Development, and AUTHORIZE the Chair, Board of Supervisors to sign the Community Action Plan. (All Districts) FINANCL4JL IMPACT: The Community Action Plan(CAP) is a planning document only, and contains no consideration for the provision of services. REASONS FOR RECO}MMENDATIONSIBACKGROUND: The Contra Costa County Community Services Department is the federally designated local Community Action Agency for the County of Contra Costa. It is responsible for developing programs for the County which works towards the elimination of poverty. As a Community Action Agency the Community Services Department is responsible for developing every two years a Community Action Plan that outlines the Department's strategies to assist County residents out of poverty. Public hearings for the proposed CY 2006 Community Action Plan were held on May 11 and 12, 2005. It is due to the State Department of Community Services and Development by June 30, 2005. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: Y SIGNATURE: ----a---.�______,._–-----�.---------------,�---.�---- ------______---------------------------------------------------- -- - -----___________________-_- ---_--__ RECOMMENDATION OF COU ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): _ _a.�_ ___�—_—_____ ACTION OF BOARD ON f APPROVE AS RECOMMENDED P 11f,R VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ...' ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE AYES: NOES: SHOWN. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTESTED CONTACT: Al Prince,645-5940 JOHN SWEETEN,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CC: CAO CSD (3 orig.,signed,sealed copies) BY -�"""'"� ,DEPUTY COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN REQUIREMENTS Summary/Checklist The 2006/07 Request for Community Action Plan (CAP) must meet specific requirements as defined by law, and described in detail in this package. The CAP forms,, with specific instructions on how to complete each form are assembled separately for ease in preparing. Once you have completed your CAP, submit to CSD one original document (marked "original") and one copy (marked "copy") postmarked no later than June 30, 2005. Please allow adequate time for CAP development, review and approval prior to the due date. The following is a checklist of the components that must be included in the CAP your agency submits to CSD: * CAP Cover Page * CSD 410-1 a: Agency Vision and Mission Statement ® Requirement 1: 2006/2007 Statewide PriotitylStrategy Statement is Requirement 2: Contingency Planning for Reduced Federal Funding a Requirement 3: Federal and State Assurances a Requirement 4: Documentation of Public Hearings a Requirement 5: Needs Assessment and Goal Setting a Requirement 6: Monitoring and Evaluation Plan a CSBGINPI Programs Report Instructions a Preliminary Agency Checklist a CSD 801: CSBGINPI Programs Report a NPI Work Group Supplemental Definitions COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT 2006/2007 PROGRAM YEAR COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN COVER PAGE TO: Department of Comumunity Services and Development Attention: Field Operations Services 700 North 10th Street,Room 258 Sacramento, CA 95814 ISI FROM: Agency: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Address: 2425 BISSO LANE, SUITE 260 City:_CONCORD, CA 94520 Agency Contact Person Regarding Community Action Plan Name: AL PRINCE Title: ADMMSTRATIVE SERVICES OFFICER Phone:(925) 646-5940 FAX: (925) 646-5551 E-mail address: gprinceQccccsd.org CERTIFICATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN AND ASSURANCES The undersigned hereby certify that this agency complies with the Assurances and Requirements of this 2006/07 Community Action Plan(CAP)and the information in this CAP is correct and has been authorized by the governing body of this organization. ioard CWairrpoerson Date �v tor Date Execu \eNWc State of California Department of Community Services and Development CSBG Community Action Plan—Agency Vision and Mission Statement CSD 410-1 a(Rev.2/05) AGENCY VISION AND MISSION STATEMENT The Vision Statement describes a desired future based on your agency's values. The vision is broader than what any one agency can achieve; the agency collaborates with others in pursuit of the vision. Provide your agency's Vision Statement. VISION STATEMENT: To assist low-income people to become self-sufficient, to alleviate the effects of poverty in Contra Costa County and to assist tow-income people to participate in the decisions that affect their lives. 01 The Mission Statement describes the agency's reason for existence and may state its role in reaching its vision. Provide your agency's Mission Statement. MISSION STATEMENT: To support individuals and help families to thrive as contributing members of the community by providing high quality services and learning opportunities. Department of Community Services and Development CSBG Community Action Plan—Statewide Priority/Strategy Statement CSD 410-2a(Rev.2/05) Requirement 1 2006/2007 STATEWIDE PRIORITY/STRATEGY STATEMENT Did your Agency accept the Family Self-Sufficiency Statewide Priority.? MYes Q No Include a narrative description of the Family Self-Sufficiency strategies used by your agency in the local planning process as required by Government Code Section 12745(e). If your agency rejects the statewide priority, state the reason(s)for your agency's rejection. Both the Economic Opportunity Council and the Board of Supervisors have again accepted the Department of Community Services and Development's Statewide priority for making Family Self Sufficiency the number one priority for the County Community Services Block Programs for CY 2006 and 2007. The planning, development and implementation of Family Self Sufficiency programs with CSBG funds will continue to focus on enabling and empowering program eligible families to break the cycle of poverty and dependence on public assistance programs. The Department will continue it's successful partnerships with such entities as the County's One Stop Centers and Workforce Development Board as well seek out and develop additional partnerships and collaborative opportunities with other County Departments, local governmental entities and local community based organizations to combine our resources in a team approach to provide an enhanced level of comprehensive program services, that, over time will enable them to become more self sufficient and less dependent on government programs. State of California Department of Community Services and Development CSBG Community Action Plan—Contingency Planning for Reduced Federal Funding CSD 410-2a(Rev.2/05) Requirement 2 CONTINGENCY PLANNING FOR REDUCED FEDERAL FUNDING Include a description of how your agency will respond in the event of reduced federal funding, as required by Government Code Section 12747(a). Provide your agency's contingency plan for reduced federal funding. Contra Costa Community Services Department (CSD) is proud of its uninterrupted history of quality services to low-income residents. In the event of reduced federal funding, CSD will enact several strategies. Among the planned steps are to: 1) Explore additional collaborative partnership opportunities with Community Based Organizations (CBos) at reduced costs. To the maximum extent possible, coordinate programs with and form partnerships with other organizations serving low-income residents of the communities and members of the groups served by the State, including religious organizations, charitable groups, and community organizations. 2) Leverage and acquire additional grant dollars for services to low-income individuals through affiliating with existing nonprofit organization(s) and/or creating a nonprofit for such purposes. 3) Continue its ongoing efforts to reduce operational and program costs by designing innovative program models that efficiently use qualified staff to serve low-income families . 4) Achieve additional cost efficiencies through judicious use of organizational information technology systems. 5) Develop fee-based models for early childhood education and childcare services. 6) Consider the development of a non-profit arm [501(C)(3)] to access grant funds presently not available to governmental entities. State of California Department of Community Services and Development CSBG Community Action Plan—Federal and State Assurances CSD 410-2a(Rev.2/05) Requirement 3 FEDERAL ASSURANCES COATES Human Services Reauthorization Act of 1998: Public Law 105-285 To the left of Federal Assurances 676(b}(1}(A} and 676(b}(1}(B) please indicate what activities your agency administers by placing a check in the box provided. Additionally, provide a narrative description of the agency activities for each of the Assurances chocked below: I Section 676(b)(1)(A): To support activities that are designed to assist low-income families and individuals, including families and individuals receiving assistance under part A of Title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), homeless families and individuals, migrant or seasonal farm workers and elderly low-income individuals and families, and a description of how such activities will enable the families and individuals— i. remove obstacles and solve problems that block the achievement of self- sufficiency, (including self-sufficiency for families and individuals who are attempting to transition off a State program carried out under part A of title IV of the Social Security Act); ii. secure and retain meaningful employment; iii. attain an adequate education, with particular attention toward improving literacy skills of low-income families in the communities involved, which may include carrying out family literacy initiatives; IN iv. make better use of available income; Ll v. obtain and maintain adequate housing and a suitable living environment; ® vi. obtain emergency assistance through loans, grants or other means to meet immediate and urgent family and individual needs; and Q11 vii. achieve greater participation in the affairs of the communities involved, including the development of public and private grassroots partnerships with local law enforcement agencies, local housing authorities, private foundations, and other public and private partners to: Ll (1) document best practices based on successful grasstoots intervention in urban areas, to develop methodologies for widespread replication; and ❑ (11) strengthen and improve relationships with local law enforcement agencies, which may include participation in activities such as neighborhood or community policing efforts. State of California Department of Community Services and Development CSBG Community Action Plan—Federal and State Assurances CSD 410-2a(Rev.2/05) Federal Assurances (cont.) 2. Section 676(b)(1)(13): to address the needs of youth in low-income communities through youth development programs that support the primary role of the family, give priority to the prevention of youth problems and crime, and promote increased community coordination and collaboration in meeting the needs of youth, and support development and expansion of innovative community-based youth development programs that have demonstrated success in preventing or reducing youth crime, such as.- o (i) programs for the establishment of violence-free zones that would involve youth development and intervention models (such as models involving youth mediation, youth mentoring, life skills training, job creation, and entrepreneurship programs); and (ii) after-school childcare programs; and 3. Section 676(b)(1)(C): to make more effective use of, and to coordinate with, other programs related to the purposes of this subtitle (including State welfare reform efforts). State of California Department of Community Services and Development CSBG Community Action Plan—Federal and State Assurances CSD 410-2a(Rev.2/05) FEDERAL ASSURANCES REQUIRING NARRATIVE DESCRIPTIONS COATES Human Services Reauthorization Act of 1998: Public Law 105=285 Provide a narrative description of the agency activities for each of the Assurances listed below: 1. Section Will provide, on an emergency basis, for the provision of such supplies and 676(b)(4): services, nutritious foods and related services, as may be necessary to counteract conditions of starvation and malnutrition among low-income individuals; 2. Section Entities will coordinate and establish linkages between governmental and other 676(b)(5): social services programs to assure the effective delivery of such services to low- income individuals and to avoid duplication of such services and a description of how the State and eligible entities will coordinate the provision of employment and training activities, as defined in section 101 of such Act, in the State and in communities with entities providing activities through statewide and local workforce investment system under the Workforce Investment Act of 1998. 3. Section is 676(b)(6): Will ensure coordination between antipoverty programs in each community in the State, and ensure, where appropriate, that the emergency energy crisis intervention programs under title XXVI (relating to low-income home energy assistance) are conducted in such community. 4. Section 676(b)(9): Entities will to the maximum extent possible, coordinate programs with and form partnerships with other organizations serving low-income residents of the communities and members of the groups served by the State, including religious organizations, charitable groups, and community organizations. 5. Section 676(b)(10): Each eligible entity to establish procedures under which a low-income individual, community organization, or religious organization, or representative of low- income individuals that considers its organization, or low-income individuals, to be inadequately represented on the board (or other mechanism) of the eligible entity to petition for adequate representation. 6. Section 676(b)(12): All eligible entities will not later than fiscal year 2001, participate in the Results Oriented Management and Accountability System (ROMA), or another performance measure system for which the Secretary facilitated development pursuant to section 678E(b), or an alternative system for measuring performance and results that meets the requirements of that section, and a description of outcome measures to be used to measure eligible entity performance in promoting self-sufficiency, family stability, and community revitalization. 7. Section 6781)(a)(1)(13): Ensure that cost and accounting standards of the Office of Management and Budget apply to a recipient of the funds under this subtitle. STATE ASSURANCES California Government Code 1. Section 12730(f)u Eligible beneficiaries are the following: (1) all individuals living in households whose income is at or below the official poverty income guidelines as defined by the United States Office of Management and Budget; (2) All individuals eligible to receive Temporary Assistance to Needy Families or Federal Supplemental Security Income benefits, and (3) Residents of a target area or members of a target group having a measurably high incidence of poverty and which is the specific focus of a project financed under this chapter. 2. Section 12745(f): If no other entity in the community provides such services; grantees under Article 6 (commencing with Section 12750), Article 7 (commencing with section 12765), or Article 8 (commencing with Section 12770) receiving CSBG funds shall provide a minimum level of services to help the poor receive the benefits for which they are eligible under health, food, income, and housing assistance programs designed to meet the basic survival needs of the poor. These services shall include, but shall not be limited to, all of the following: 1. A service to help the poor complete the various required application forms, and when necessary and possible, to help them gather verification of the contents of completed applications. 2. A service to explain program requirements and client responsibilities in programs serving the poor. 3. A service to provide transportation, when necessary and possible. 4. A service, which does all things necessary to make the programs accessible to the poor, so that they may become self-sufficient. 3. Section 12760: Community Action Agencies funded under this article shall coordinate their plans and activities with other eligible entities funded under Articles 7 (commencing with Section 12765) and 8 (commencing with Section 12770)which serve any part of their communities, so that funds are not used to duplicate particular services to the same beneficiaries and plans and policies affecting all grantees under this chapter are shaped, to the extent possible, so as to be equitable and beneficial to all grantees and the populations they serve. State of California Department of Community Services and Development CSBG Community Action Plan—Documentation of Public Hearings a CSD 410-2a(Rev.2105) Requirement 4 DOCUMENTATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS Government Code Section 12747(d) Agencies holding public hearings pursuant to this Article shall identify all testimony presented by the poor, and shall determine whether the concerns expressed by that testimony have been addressed in the Community Action "Plan" (CAP). If the agency determines that any of the concerns have not been included in the CAP, it shall specify in its response to the CAP information about those concerns and comment as to their validity. This section shall include the following: 1. Clear description of your agency's public hearing process. Agencies should describe the methods used to invite the local community to the public hearings. Note: public hearing(s) shall not be held outside of service area(s). 2. Copy of public notice(s), which were published in the media to advertise the public hearings. 3. Summarize all testimony received and provide a description of how the testimony will be addressed by your agency. The Department scheduled a total of four public hearings in Contra Costa County to seek and receive public input on the proposed CY 2006-2007 Community Action Plan. Public Notices for one of the meetings was published in the Contra Costa Times. In addition, written invitations were mailed to a wide audience of community leaders and community based organizations to seek both their participation and input. The hearings were held on the following dates and locations: May 11, 2005, Pacheco, Ca May 12, 2005, Richmond, Ca May 19,.2005 Pacheco, Ca (Head Start Parent Policy Council) Here is a summary of the findings from the public hearings: 1. There was widespread appreciation for the work already done by the Department in the areas of providing full day/full year child care and adding so many new child care centers across the County over the past five years; 2. More child care is needed that what is currently available in the County; 3. Clients need additional assistance in being able to access services that are available to 2. More child care is needed that what is currently available in the County; 3. Clients need additional assistance in being able to access services that are available to them. Clients also wanted to see either the Department and/or EOC host training sessions that helped them become more self sufficient. 4. Service providers at two of the hearings stated that they needed additional assistance to have better access to potential clients in the community. Ironically, in one hearing, we had a representative from a legal aid organization lament the fact that they do have enough clients for their free legal aid services, yet in two of our other sessions we had citizens complaining that they were not able to find and access free legal aid to assist them with personal issues. 5. The high cost of living in the County continues to make it extremely difficult to find and maintain quality housing for our clients. For many low-income people, the possibility of becoming homeless remains a reality. 6. Lack of consistent, full time employment that pays a living wage continues to be an issue. 7. Lack of adequate public transportation continues to be a challenge In response to public input, the CAP team has begun to work with the EOC to develop a series of educational forums to provided expanded training services to clients on a variety of relevant subject matters. The child care, housing, homelessness, employment and transportation issues will all be shared with the appropriate County agencies to determine if further action can be taken. State of California Department of Community Services and Development CSBG Community Action Plan—Description of Needs Assessment and Goal-Setting Process CSD 410-2a(Rev.2/05) Requirement 5 DESCRIPTION OF NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND GOAL-SETTING PROCESS This section shall include a description of the community needs assessment, which may be coordinated with other community-needs assessments conducted for other programs, and a description of the goal-setting process. Based on the needs assessment and goal-setting process, formulate the problem statements and program activities and delivery strategies on the appropriate CSD forms. A. Section 676(b)(3)(A), provide a description of the service delivery system, for services provided or coordinated with funds made available through grants under section 675C(a), targeted to low- income individuals and families in communities within the State. B. Section 676(b)(3)(B), provide a description of how linkages will be developed to fill identified gaps in the services, through the provision of information, referrals, case management, and follow-up consultations. C. Section 676(b)(3)(C), provide a description of how funds made available through grants under section 675C(a)will be coordinated with other public and private resources. D. Section 676(b)(3)(D), provide a description of how the local entity will use the funds to support innovative community and neighborhood-based initiatives related to the purposes of this subtitle, which may include fatherhood initiatives and other initiatives with the goal of strengthening families and encouraging effective parenting. NOTE: Attach your needs assessment and goal-setting process and relevant statistical information supporting your assessment, as needed. Please refer to the Community Assessment Document f f f � t s ry.. `. In OWMWMW CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ',, comMUN ITY SERVICES } DEPARTMENT w �z G F ortunit r Y m entl u�4 Council r�. AAA ,j 3A �9 k�r k� �{ i5 'raa d. Y? �a Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Ta I of Cont nts f TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 TABLE OF FIGURES 4 CONTRA COSTA DEMOGRAPHICS 7 CONTRA COSTA DEMOGRAPHICS 7 CONTRA COSTA DEMOGRAPHICS 7 CONTRA COSTA DEMOGRAPHICS 9 DISABILITY STATUS 9 HEAD START 11 HEAD START 12 HEAD START 13 HEAD START 15 SELF-SUFFICIENCY 15 UNEMPLOYMENT 17 UNEMPLOYMENT 18 UNEMPLOYMENT 19 4 EMPLOYMENT 20 FREE AND REDUCED COST MEALS 21 PUBLIC ASSISTANCE 22 t PUBLIC ASSISTANCE 23 POVERTY STATUS 24 POVERTY STATUS BY SELECTED CENSUS TRACT 25 F POVERTY STATUS BY SELECTED CENSUS TRACT 26 POVERTY STATUS BY SELECTED CENSUS TRACT 27 POVERTY STATUS BY SELECTED CENSUS TRACT 28 POVERTY STATUS BY SELECTED CENSUS TRACT 29 HOUSING 30 HOUSING 31 HOUSING 32 TRANSPORTATION 33 IMMUNIZATIONS 34 CONTRA COSTA BIRTHS 35 CONTRA COSTA BIRTHS 36 F TEEN BIRTHS 37 2 4 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN ASTHMA 38 PEDIATRIC NUTRITION 39 HEALTH INSURANCE — CHILDREN 39 r HEALTH INSURANCE — ADULTS 41 SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES 42 PHYSICAL FITNESS 43 SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, DATA QUEST 2004. HTTP://WWW.CDE.CA.GOWTA/TG/PF/DOCUMENTS/HEALTHFITZONES.PDF 43 r STAR SCORES 44 DROPOUT RATES 44 ENGLISH LEARNERS 47 TEACHERS WITH EMERGENCY PERMITS 48 CHILD CARE AVAILABILITY 49 THE MAPS INCLUDED IN APPENDIX 1 DEMONSTRATE THE DISTRIBUTION OF SLOTS BETWEEN THE AREAS OF HIGHEST NEED AND THE HIGHEST AVAILABILITY, PARTICULARLY IN THE EASTERN PORTIONS OF THE COUNTY. CHILD CARE AVAILABILITY 49 CHILD CARE AVAILABILITY 50 CHILD CARE AVAILABILITY 51 CHILD CARE AVAILABILITY 52 CHILD CARE AVAILABILITY 53 CHILD CARE AVAILABILITY 54 CHILD CARE AVAILABILITY 55 CHILD CARE AVAILABILITY 56 FOSTER CARE 57 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 58 CHILD ABUSE 58 JUVENILE ARRESTS 58 ADULT ARRESTS 59 r 3 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Ta I of ■ Fi ur Table 1 - Population by Ethnicity 7 Table 2 - Household Characteristics 7 Table 3 - School Enrollment 9 Table 4 - Educational Attainment (ages 25 and over) 9 Table 5 - Disability Status of Civilian Non-Institutionalized Population 10 R Table 7 - Age of Head Start Enrollees, 2003-2004 11 Table 8 - Ethnicity of Head Start Enrollees, 2003-2004 12 Table 9 - Percentage Enrolled Families by Family Type, 2003-2004 12 Figure 1 - Actual Enrollment of Early Head Start Children (ages 0-3) by Type of Eligibility, p 2003- 2004 13 Figure 2 - Actual Enrollment of Head Start Children (ages 4-5) by Type of Eligibility, 2002- 01 2003 14 Table 10 - Number of Disabled Preschool Students in Head Start by Type 15 Table 12 - Annual Income for Family in 1999 16 Figure 3 - Unemployment Rates 17 Table 13 - Annual Unemployment Rates by Sub-Area, Contra Costa County 18 Table 14 - Top 10 Cities in Contra Costa County with Highest and Lowest Unemployment Rates, July 2004 19 Table 15 - Employment by Industry Sector, Contra Costa County 2003 20 The percentage of Contra Costa County students receiving free and reduced cost meals was trended higher through 2003-04 over previous years. Almost thirty percent (29%) of Contra Costa County students received free or reduced cost meals in 2003-2004 h compared to 49% of California students. The top three districts with the highest percentage of students receiving free or reduced cost meals continued to be Pittsburg Unified (61.4%),, West Contra Costa Unified (53.9%), and John Swett Unified (34.2%).21 Table 16 - Percentage of Students Receiving Free and Reduced Cost Meals 21 Table 17 - Public Assistance Recipients by Program, Contra Costa County 22 Table 18 - CaIWORKs Recipients Aged 16 and over by Ethnicity, Contra Costa County 22 Table 19 - Percentage of Students Receiving CaIWORKs 23 Figure 4 - Percentage of Children Ages 0-5 in Families Participating in CalWORKs, Contra Costa County, 2000 23 Table 20 - Poverty Status in 1999 24 Table 21.1 - Poverty Status and Median Income in 1999 for Selected Census Tracts with Family and Children's Services Centers 25 Table 21.2 - Poverty Status and Median Income in 1999 for Selected Census Tracts with Family and Children's Services Centers 26 Table 21.3 - Poverty Status and Median Income in 1999 for Selected Census Tracts with Family and Children's Services Centers 27 Table 21.4 - Poverty Status and Median Income in 1999 for Selected Census Tracts with Family and Children's Services Centers 28 Table 21.5 - Poverty Status and Median Income in 1999 for Selected Census Tracts with Family and Children's Services Centers 29 Table 22 - Percentage of Homes Affordable to Median Income Households 30 Table 23 - Median and High Sale Price of Single Family Residences, Condos, and New Homes, and Change over previous year.Contra Costa County, June 2004 31 Table 24 - Median Monthly Rents, Fiscal Year 2004 32 Figure 5 - Monthly Income Spent on Housing, Contra Costa County, 1999 32 Table 25 - Clustered Modes over Time, Contra Costa County 33 4 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Table 26 - Workers 16 Year and Over Commuting to Work, 2000 33 Table 27 Immunization 34 Table 28 - Number of Births by Ethnicity, Contra Costa County 35 Table 29 - Percentage of Births that are Low Weight 35 Table 30 - Percentage of Women Receiving Prenatal Care in the First Trimester 36 Figure 6 - Percentage of Women Receiving Prenatal Care in the First Trimester, by Ethnicity, 2001 36 Table 31 - Percentage of Births That Are to Teen Mothers (Aged 15-19), Contra Costa County 37 Table 32 - Teen Births by Ethnicity, Contra Costa County, 2001 37 Table 33 - Low Weight Births to Teen Mothers (aged 15-19), Contra Costa County 37 Table 34 -Percentage of Teen Mothers (aged 15-19) Receiving Prenatal Care in the First Trimester, Contra Costa County 37 Table 35 - Asthma Hospitalizations Rates, 1999 38 Table 36 - Persons Diagnosed with Asthma, 2003 38 Table 37 - Persons Diagnosed with Asthma by Federal Poverty Level (FPL), Contra Costa County, 2001 38 Table 38 - Indicators of Nutritional Health, 2003 39 i. Table 39 - Health Insurance Coverage of Children, 2001 40 Table 39 a Health Families Enrollment 40 Figure 7 - Health Insurance Coverage of Nonelderly Adults (Ages 18-64) 2001 41 Table 40 - Health Insurance Coverage of Nonelderly Adults (Ages 18-64) 2001" by Federal Poverty Level (FPL) 41 Table 41 - Sexually Transmitted Disease Incidence Rates for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea, All Ages 42 Table 42 - Percentage of Students who are Physically Fit 43 Table 42 a - Percentage of Students not in Healthy Fitness zone on Body Composition Test43 Table 43 - Percentage of Third Grade Students Scoring Above the 50th NPR in Reading By Districts with Elementary Students 44 Table 44 - Percentage of Students who Dropout of High School, 4-year Derived Rate 45 Figure 8 - Percentage of Students who Dropout of High School by Ethnicity, Contra Costa County, 4-year Derived Rate, 2002-03 46 Table 45 - Percentage of Students who Dropout of High School by Ethnicity, Contra Costa r County, 4-year Derived Rate 46 Table 46 - Number and Percentage of Students Who Are English Learners 47 Table 47 - Top Languages Spoken by English Learners, Contra Costa County 2001-2002_47 Table 48 - Percentage of Teachers with Emergency Permits 48 Figure 9 - Total Population of Children Ages 0-23 Months, Contra Costa County, 2000 50 4 Figure 10 - Total Population of Children Ages 2-5 Years, Contra Costa County, 2000 50 Figure 11 - All Licensed Care: Total Capacity per 100 Children Ages 0-5, Contra Costa County, 2000 51 Table 49 - Child Care Supply and Demand 52 Table 49 a - Subsidized Child Care Centers in Contra Costa County By Zip Code 2002 53 Table 49 b - Subsidized Child Care Centers in Contra Costa County By Zip Code 2002 54 Table 50 - Child Care Statistics, Contra Costa County, 2000 55 Table 51 - Child Care Statistics, Contra Costa County, by Fiscal Year 56 Table 52 - Rate of First Entry into Foster Care 57 Table 53 - Rate of First Entry into Foster Care, by Ethnicity, 2001 57 Table 54 - Rate of Domestic Violence Calls for Assistance 58 r Table 55 - Rate of Substantiated Child Abuse Cases 58 Table 56 - Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrest Rate 59 5 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Table 57 - Juvenile Felony Arrest Rate 59 Table 58 - Number of Juvenile Arrests by Age, Contra Costa and San Mateo Counties, 200159 ` Table 59 - Adult Misdemeanor Arrest Rate 60 Table 60 - Adult Felony Arrest Rate 60 K R W 6 01 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN ontra Costa Contra Costa County's population in 2000 was 948,816. In Contra Costa County, 65.5%of the population is Caucasian compared to 59.5%in California.The percentage of Latino residents in Contra Costa County is about half that of the state(17.0%vs. 32.4%,respectively). CENSUS 2000 TABLE 1 - POPULATION BY ETHNICITY CONTM c"A' E !TH1V C Y Nt1M8ER '11 ur''. p4R l Nr � 4 ....,.,....::.....e......1w.:...:,......yN.....«.....•�..>..,......,y...... ........r:...,..............,......«ter.-...,.-..--.. One Race 900,102 94.9 I 95.3 __... _ _______ ___. s z Caucasian 621,490 65.5 59.5 African American 881,813 9.4 6.7 American Indian and Alaska Native 5,830 0.6 1.0 i Asan 103,993 11.0 10.9 }_ Pacific Islander and Native Hawaiian31,466 0.4 0.3 ---------- Some other race 76,510 8.1 16.8 Two or more races r 48,714 5.1 4.7 r Hispanic or Latino 167,776 17.7 32.4 Total population 948,816 - 33,871,648 ^i Source: U.S.Census Bureau,Profile of General Demographic Characteristics,2002. ontra mographmics CENSUS 2000 The household characteristics of Contra Costa County and California are similar. Family households account for about 70%of the households in both Contra Costa County and California. Female- headed households (with no husband present) account for 11.5%of the county's households compared to 12.6%in California. TABLE 2 - HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS lco COO&A E� iPli N k"'111"', ' "£ A PER *"V_ fi Family households (families) 242,233 70.4 1 68.9 r With own children under 18 years 121,884 35.4 35.8 Married-couple family �,. 187,613 54.5 51.1_1 With own children under 18 years 91,975 26.7 ' 26.0 Female householder, no husband present 39,683 11.5 1 12.6 a With own children under 18 years 22,363 6.5 1 7.3 1 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Nonfamily households 101,896 29.6 31.1 Householder living alone 78,759 22.9 23.5 Householder 65 year and over 27,559 8.0 7.8 Households with Individuals under 18 years 133,372 38.8 39.7 Households with individuals 65 years and over 76,255 22.2 22.3 Total households 344p 129 11,502,870 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,Profile of General Demographic Characteristics,2002. CITY/COUNTY POPULATION ESTIMATES WITH ANNUAL CHANGE 2004 TABLE 2B POPULATION BY CITY 2003 2004 - 'zx,� ANTIOCH 99,100 100,600' �Al M :`;4 R,� 4 MNII, f § A-A it 4 V-`4 CLAYTON 10,950 11,000 t: 2, M 0 C 0� g �N 5 DANVILLE 43,100 43,250 23A-- M 0`14116J�T�', 41, HERCULES 20,450 211700 j 'I"I" 3 t MARTINEZ 36,800 36,660'' N"I"R-4 J, 5, 4. OAKLEY 26,950 27,550 -ei�I WU, tv F 4� 'Rk Nn, PINOLE 19,500 19,550 4V PLEASANT HILL 33,600 33,600 I".1 1'qz FRAIK SAN PABLO 30,750- 31,050 17 �41 -7 �17 WALNUT CREEK 65,800 66,000 1.0 Anil Source: California Department of Finanace. 8 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Contra Costa D o ra h Almost eighty-seven percent of the Contra Costa County population ages 25 and over are high school graduates,compared to 76.8%of California residents.Thirty-five percent of Contra Costa County residents ages 25 and over have a bachelor's degree or higher,while 26.6%of California residents ages 25 and over have a bachelor's degree or higher. CENSUS 20100 TABLE 3 - SCHOOL ENROLLMENT " , CN' RA CIS t�"R A_ NU 15R = Pl'k.CE " .PERCEMT s Nursery school, preschool 18,809 7.0 5.4 ._ Kindergarten 14,134 5.2 1 5.5 Elementary school (grades 1-8 119,161 44.1 1 42.9 High school (grades 9-12) 56,052 20.7 20.9 College or graduate school 61,975 22.9 25.2 Tota! population 3 years and over I enrolled in school 270,131 100.0 10,129,990 TABLE 4 - EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT (AGER 25 AND OVER) + ONTR&CWTA CONTRA . NUMORK PEI " ' PERCENT F t Less than 91h grade 32,804 5.2 11.5 .,_ 9th to 12''grade, no diploma 49,063 i7.8 11.7 High school graduate (includes _ __. i equivalency) 123,956 . ,.. 1 20 1 Some college, no degree 152,680 24.4 22.9 Associate degree�..�._._.�__� .�.....� _..��__.......�mn.�.__.__.....a.� ._.�.. .a�_.M .a... 481090_;..�_�_..,.....b..P.,_.�.�...,_._ ..._....,� .�.w�_,�.�. ........_,.m,�...�,.._... ._�..__..._...� 7.7 7.1 1 Bachelor's degree 142,909 22.8 17.2 Graduate or professional degree 76,139 12.2 _m _ _ 9.5 4 Total population 25 years and over 625,641 1 100.0 1 21,298,900 Percent high school graduate or higher - 86.9 76.8 Pi--er-c--ent bachelor s degree or higher 35.0 26.6 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,Profile of General Demographic Characteristics,2002. ' I "ty ta t u s im s i The Contra Costa population ages 5 to 20 with a disability is 6.9%,while those ages 21 to 64 with a disability account for 16.4%of the population. Fifty-eight percent of those ages 21-64 with a disability are employed while 77%of those ages 21-64 without a disability are employed. 9 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Children With speech or language impairment disabilities account for most of the children ages 2 through 5 enrolled in Special Education. Other common disabilities of Special Education students include mental retardation and orthopedic impairment. TABLE 5 — DISABILITY STATUS OF CIVILIAN NON-INSTITUTIONALIZED POPULATION DUMBER, PERcENT cA_Plllkcaw Population 5 to 20 years with a disability 15,112 6.9 7.5 Total population 5 to 20 years 218,776 - 81172,459 a L Population 21 to 64 years with a disability 91,254 16.4 2080 Percent employed (with a disability) N/A 57.8 54.9 Population 21 to 64 years with no disability 463,892 83.6 8 on a p0.0 Percent employed (with no disability) N/A 77.4 73.1 s Total population 21 to 64 years 555,146 - I 19,210,794 Population 65 years and over with a disability 41,206 39.6 1 42.2 Total population 65 years and over 103,969 - 3,469,810 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,Profile of General Demographic Characteristics,2002. F Table 6 — Countywide Special Education Enrollment by Age and Selected Disability., 2001 ' YPB ► �A�L 'i'1C A6E kGIB"1 AG AC /tiB�'4 A49'5 Mental retardation F 0 s 0 2 ; 22 26 32 Hard of hearing e 0 26 1 5 3 3 s Deaf 1 5 5 6 3 10 Speech or language Impairment 1 10 71 i 406 673 617 Visual impairment 2 3 5 5 7 9 F Orthopedic ' 1 Impairment 3 14 18 19 25 26 ` Other health a � impairment 4 0 1 f 2 8 8 6 z Specific learning disability 0 0 0 7 2 7 E Deaf-blindness 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 Multiple disability 0 0 7 Autism 0 = 0 0 1 21 32 33 Traumatic brain 1 Injury 1 0 0 0 i0_ ... 0__ Total 7 35 116 511 785 754 I Source: California Department of Education,Special Education Division,2003. 10 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN 4 tart Early Head Start programs serve children ages 0-3 years,while Head Start programs serve children ages 4-5.There were 288 Early Head Start enrollees ages 0-3 in 2003-2004 while there were 2,212 Head Start enrollees ages 4-5. HEAD START DEMOGRAPHICS Enrollee Demographics TABLE 7 — ACE OF HEAD 'START ENROLLEES, 2003-2004 KARL'' . .EAP S�'ART, B : R a, a WWW } �s+.'w.+^w.Yr +M.. �` .. ipyw�.y�a:•eiareyw.. ,,_ ..«x�.wM. M"aW`w'°.'^. } . N '` F` t l l T N FIBER P9R ENT E Under 1 year 1 87 30 0 0.0 ar old 45 33 0 0.0 1 ye _��_____.._ .. 2 years old 86 30 0 0.0 3 years old 20 7 686 31 4 years old 0 0.0 11172 53 5 ..._ rs and older 0 0.0 354 16 � 5 yea Total enrollees 288 100.0 21212 1 100.0 Source: Contra Costa County Head Start,2004. Note: Table does not include"other"or"unreported/unspecified."Actual enrollment includes turnover. 11 Contra Costa County k COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN p tart Most Early Head Start and Head Start enrollees are Latino (48%and 42.%,respectively),followed by African American (36%and 33%,respectively)and Caucasian (10%and 12%,respectively).Three- quarters (77%)of families of enrolled Early Head Start children are single-parent families,while 70% of Head Start enrollees are from single-parent families. HEAD START DEMOGRAPHICS Enrollee Demographics TABLE 8 — ETHNICITY OF HEAD START ENROLLEES, 2003-2004 t .,.-....= '$ R t.:y x +�$ky>a �`i�f. :..:+r.,• .';A't.. ,,>> ` i;x's i y y�s ..-:. <•.., .; T9a 'k r ,'.. <.: ...,,., .,at y ...:.< ...,. ♦.r. -M ,�£a+r✓° .:' .. --."e ;§... >.L k. d .x�;>:.+.X,, #' < .6'Y'p. .,,. .- �";..@°..;..,.1"•s�;,.,. v. _.,...,,,,,u,t,..... .,-°._ �. x �y �t .a--a¢3 � {` _ �° +3�e`� � s ��f��ws,t d a« t �• < h : a NUMBER PERCENT NUMBER PERCENT .'k W"z . tr °'as�:�,"' :7„,W#3 CPv, ir 4 �,tai , 3I African American 88 29 620 28 'x�,«"N;5* .4 at y.. Bi-or Multi-racial 25 7 67 3 s�. .� ». i,,... .�•...,;. r"t.t:'-,.... :.,qr.,a=. �+,� �;`✓, ,«.«+..fl„".r.,.�... .,.: e.,.. t 5 h }.i w.a, .., a«.a•.w3 , ..,k:. %, R':..it. ,...+._ �, x.+? ,,. 7, .1•'.,p ,t,a5#.:'.x.»+4«..;.�-F '}v .,�. �.. ,, s�>.,,'i,•c.,e,,�k a ..�, Pacific Islander/ 3 <1 6 <1 Native Hawaiian x .,>. �$.g 7Afli.9i�a'#. '`, �,^xt.,. y•.,..:"s .r',.. :'.: rx:; .�,',.. � #'..as ,''_� ,s.:...: ,.r.. : } 4 x i;. Other 4 1 44 2 �. �4. ' t�. -. �°�. ��t �_9r',.-_ x«<:p � ,�?' �m+,,,,p 'r i,r. �„�, +fir x:: •r; t:,, s,�, `R � ::i � .:�<''�, x• t_K,� 4 .. �,r. '�43:fig �•... ,# �i:' �w� £.'.. aG.�r Lx_, .ti,t�,§..,a '-„.,.:. ��_. W .r „ ,- .,.. TP, Total �� $ �9�� s«.#,,e�.''�.�'��>n6'^��• Total enrollees 307 100.0 21212 100.0 Note: Table does not include"other”or"unreported/unspecified."Actual enrollment includes turnover. Total>100%due to rounding. FAMILIES OF ENROLLED CHILDREN TABLE 9 — PERCENTAGE ENROLLED FAMILIES BY FAMILY TYPE, 2003-2004 4m c Two-parent families 44 18 587 28 Single-parent families 207 82 11499 72 Total families 251 100.0 2086 100.0 Source: Contra Costa County Head Start,2004 12 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN H a tart Of those children enrolled in Early Head Start,88%were enrolled based on income eligibility(below 100%of the federal poverty line),while 10%were enrolled based on receipt of public assistance. Comparatively,22%of children enrolled in Head Start were enrolled based on income eligibility,and 68%were enrolled based on receipt of public assistance. FAMILIES OF ENROLLED CHILDREN FIGURE 1 — ACTUAL ENROLLMENT OF EARLY HEAD START CHILDREN (AGES 0-3) BY TYPE OF ELIGIBILITY, 2003- 2004 Total actual enrollment: 307 EHS Children by Type of Eligibility 5% 5% 10°l0 10 m Public Assisstance m Income Eligibility Ei Over income N Foster children 80% Source: Contra Costa County Head Start,PIR,2004. Note: Actual enrollment includes turnover. 13 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN FIGURE 2 — ACTUAL ENROLLMENT OF HEAD '.START CHILDREN (AGES 4-5) BY TYPE OF ELIGIBILITY, 2002-2003 Total actual enrollment: 2212 HS C byType of fi 3% 3% 16% ■ Pudic Assisstance ■ Income Eligibility F o Over income Foster children 78% Source: Contra Costa County Head Start,2004. Note: Actual enrollment includes turnover. ti 14 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN H a tart DISABILITY STATUS The types of disabilities among preschool students in Head Start have increased in number from 165 to 182 in 2001-02 and to 238 in 2002-2003. Speech or language impairment has been the top disability of preschool age students in Head Start (221),followed by learning disabilities (5),and orthopedic impairments (4). TABLE 10 — NUMBER OF DISABLED PRESCHOOL STUDENTS IN HEAD START BY TYPE TYPE'Off`'DX ADZUTY,� '2001-2002 2002'11003� w�. _20034004 ' 132 221 199 Speech or language impairment 3 Multiple disabilities (including deaf-blind) 15 r 001 0 oil Emotional / behavioral disorder 10 1 Learning disabilities 10 5 0 Health impairment 7 1 6 43 4 Orthopedic impairment Non-categorical i developmental delay 2 3� 2 _ ._._ _.._ .w._.._._.. Autism t 1 0 1f Visual impairment (including blindness) 1� Mental retardation 0 1° ncng 0 1 Z 0 Hearing impairment (including deafness) .�._�.._�__..�...��...�_.�...��.__.__.�...�.. .�. _ __� Traumatic brain injury 0 0i 0; P = Tota! 182 � 238. 21 Source: Contra Costa County Head Start,2004. Note: All of the preschool program students received special services. t Ifm uff"ici ncy The annual self--sufficiency wage has increased up to$77,702 for a family with 1 adult,an infant and a preschooler. Table 11 shows the annual self sufficiency wage for various family types in Contra Costa County in 2003. 15 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Table 11 - Annual Self-Sufficiency Wage for Various Family Types, Contra Costa County, 2003 Adt�r+ A"+ A"+ ki" 2AcMb+ 2Adkfs+ Aakilt+ A"+ kftlf s+r cx a Acre Yang preecal`uaw A&MM G' cta Ak9wo presrica ft py wchacft ohge 1132 1420 1420 1420 1420 1947 1420 1420 chwc r 0 758 840 1596 440 2038 1598 1290 ` Fkx d182 27f� 473 481 515 5+65 ,.m ..v. ..rv�.a....P., . F. :. ,µ..:..w „ xan 80 60 60 60 60 50 120 120 t 0 f7 182 194 201 232 220 239 250 Albpow144 269 27'9 364 262 475 389 3644 .p.,�.._ .�.�� . ..,. n.....�. w._.,.��.�r��. ... .. .. .0*..ww.. x4* =w �.�,�.�,w�Fl�.�..�. Tmea 1% � M6 445 19nA 807, 691 � � b .re. .n.M a. ., dyW. . . . r.rn M ...N pm... ..... ax.wm _ _ ... TorOea*H 0 0 01 0 01 0 0 0 TarOec*H 0 -551 -100 . --wl -100 a -100 -100 ted TwCm* 0 -83 -83 -167 -167 -250 167 -167 3d4u xftnay M*p -Howly $1'1.001 $19.,4291 $20.221 : 121 $17.6+6 X7191 $13.70 ►1257 per adW per at** E $119371 U395 $30569 $ 997' $x,108 $6,475 $4 Vl � -Anmal $40,7M36' 701 X1621 now, 71M $67, I $68,OE Source: Self-Sufficiency Standard Report for California Self-Sufficiency Standard Report for California Diana Pearce,PhD with Jennifer Brooks National Economic Development and Law Center December 12,2003 TABLE 12 - ANNUAL INCOME FOR FAMILY IN 1999 ::x e, „,. .r. r. , ;a„ ,�.. a :..- ,.: :r ..,. xt,. ,.mow :r 3",+ .j ^+�xsi ,.,•w{¢'sx x,;aa , k t , Less than $10,000 71788 3.2 5.7 $10,000 to $14,999 5,817 2.4 4.6 $15,000 to $24,999 14,033 5.8 10.4 $25,000 to$34,999 17,236 7.1 10.9 $35,000 to $49,999 30,256 12.4 15.1 $50,000 to$74,999 50,014 20.5 20.2 $75,000 to $99,999 40,142 16.5 13.0 $100,000 to $149,999 44,270 18.1 12.0 $150,000 to 199,999 16,522 6.8 3.9 $200,000 or more 17,893 7.3 4.1 Median family income - $73,039 $53,025 Total families 243,971 100.0 7,985,489 01 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,Profile of General Demographic Characteristics,2002. 16 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN In 20001 the unemployment rate in Contra Costa County was almost half of the state's unemployment rate(2.7 vs. 4.9,respectively). However,the unemployment rate in Contra Costa County increased over 93%from 2000 to 2002 from a low of 2.7 in 2000 to 5.2 in 2002. During the same time period,the unemployment rate in California increased 37%from 4.9 in 2000 to 6.7 in 2002. By 2004 YTD unemployment has receded to 5.2%in the county but hovers around 10%in Richmond and San Pablo. FIGURE 3 — UNEMPLOYMENT RATES 7- 6.7 6.4 JC 6k ® ®- 12 5.2 5- 4.1t# r: a A 3.6 "T 4- 3.3 3 2.7 3- 2- 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 YTD m California [3 Contra Costa ----------- 0 ' 19 1999 262 20001 200t, 2992- 12004 VTO 5 Contra Costa County 4.1 . 3.6 3.0 2.7 3.3 5.2 5.5 .•2 ............. California 6.3 1 5.9 6.7 5.2 4.9 5.3 6.7 6.4 Source: California Employment Development Department,Labor Market Information Division,2003. 17 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Uneploy en TABLE 13 - ANNUAL UNEMPLOYMENT RATES BY SUB-AREAS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ___.__ __.._._____ __.______.... _.__ w_.,_. 2000 2001, 2062 2003 Alamo - CDP1 14 . . .3 5 2 } Antioch - city 3.6 4.4 6.9 7.4 _ _ _ Bayview-Montalvin - CDP 4.0 4.8 ' 7.5 8.0 4 Bethal Island - CDP 3.5 4.2 15.6 7,0 Biackhawk - CDP 1.0 1.3 2.0 1 2.2 j Brentwood - city 4.2 5.0 7.8 8,4 F E Clayton - city 1.0 1.2 1.8 2.0 Concord -city 2.5 3.0 4.8 f 5.1 Crockett - CDP 2.0 2.4 3.8 4.1 Danville- city 1.3 1.6 2.5 2.7 t Discovery Bay - CDP 1.0 1.2 1.9 2.0 E East Richmond Heights- CDP 1.9 2.2 3.6 1 3,8 j t i El Cerrito - city 2.0 2.4 3.8 4,0 El Sobrante - CDP 3.7 4.4 7.0 7.5 Hercules - city 2.4 2.9 4.6 i 4.9 Kensington - CDP 1.8 2.2 3.6 3,8 Lafayette - city x 1.21.5 2.3 2.5 E i 3 Martinez- city 2.2 2.7 4.2 ( 4.5 Moraga Town - city E 0.9 1.1 1.8 1,9 Oakley - CDP 2.8 3.3 5.3 5.7 Orinda - city 1.6 1.9 3.1 3.3 Pacheco - CDP 2.0 2.5 3.9 4.2 Pinole - city 2.4 2.9 4.6 5.0 Pittsburg - city 3.9 4.6 1, 7.3 7,8 Pleasant Hill - city 1.7 2.1 3.3 3,6 Richmond - city 5.3 6.3 9.8 1 10.4 a Rodeo - CDP ! 2.8E 3.3 5.2 5.6 ' San Pablo - city 5.7 6.8 10.5 11.2 San Ramon - city 1.5 i 1.8 ! 2.9 3.1 4 t Tara Hills - CDP 3.3 4.0 ' 6.3 6.7 Vine Hill- CDP 5 2.8 3.3 ' 5.2 5,6 Walnut Creek- city --------------- 1.8 2.1 3..4_ __.___ 3.6 ----------- West Pittsburg - CDP 4.6 5.5 8.5 9.1 E Source: California Employment Development Department,Labor Market Information Division,2004. Note: CDP stands for Census Designated Place. 18 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN n loy nt TABLE 14 — Top 10 CITIES IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WITH HIGHEST AND LOWEST UNEMPLOYMENT RATES, ,ULY 2004 HIGH1:: TT LOWEST UN MP t�r'Y INT UN1111110 rY' HT RANK 1_ CST' "IrE SANK CT Y RA" E 1 San Pablo 10.3 1 Moraga Town 1.7 2 Richmond 9.6 2 Clayton 1.8 3 West Pittsburg 8.3 2 Discovery Bay + _ _ 1.8 4 Brentwood 7.6 3 Blackhawk 2.0 5 Bayview-Montaivin 7.3 4 Lafayette 2.3 3 6 Pittsburg 7.7 5 Alamo 2.4 7 El Sobrante 6.8 6Danville 2.4 8 Antioch 67 . 7 _ San Ramon 2.8 9 Bethel Island 6.4 8 Orinda 3.0 10 Tara Hills 6.1 9 Pleasant Hill 3.2 10 Walnut Creek 3.3 Source: Contra Costa County Workforce Investment Board,2004. 19 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN ployment Most industry sectors experienced slight decreases in m em to p y ent from 2002 to 2003-The largest industrial sectors in Contra Costa Count were retail trade,,government,and construction. Finance, insurance and real estate,and manufacturing are also significant industrial strial sectors within the county. The data supports the conclusion that i employment is still n recession despite other signs of economic recovery. TABLE 15 — EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY SECTOR CON � TRA COSTA COUNTY 2003 �,�, ,r:.^w" g,d"`;` .. ,: 7' 77. . z...,�.. is .... ..... ,r. ,. g x ,.:d',.;a• :::.. 6a .-•�,g u«,..:F'..,.d . ";'�t-�>x 'R>t»fi w ,� t,d"�� h nA w"�4 F� r a,t,'+�'�� :x a a�4'✓�'r� d i+�}'.�ka � ? INDUSTRY SECTOR NUMBER PERCENT BER PERCENT Wholesale trade �.. 10,100 2.9 9r3002.7 -4- 3 z rt +i'r° r .. .... r,,.r '.}� .,. ,,,... ,... ,..z.... ,.L>v,.. ..b�,...c..+i ,2 ._ ::- ':t, - t:._ r& .f '•'�z .. .. ..„a ., 4..w.:' .,,.s .:�,.,e,t.-.x... .. .. ..J ,., ,.♦ .i4a �rr .b'r ..�s R .6,. �,t,..,.. Hance, insurance and real estate . . � R �� •: ,: � �" 00 8.4 00 306 9.0 P e , e , .t n...... '.. , •, e.' 'Y,,,.., x.. .p,...-1". x " f I .}{ f:; f x ». ¢.�,.::A..:. rTf Y.,.:r....< >r� ., x17.'._ .,.. .,♦ .rt� �:y.......-.n. ..r r. ci:::f. ... :. :4,, �.:1� Y Government � � � 50,500 14.7 50,600 15.1.0 s ,r` h''t a 77,'^,.:,:io Construction and mining � n 30,000 8.7 27,60 0} ®r ."'% ' .....y ,...�.v,-a.>t...,},�`�S+"r" ,.,_k 1,3?...e;. ,� .:.: L a.r•f�S x.:;,, t.. 4 J'. ,.,.. 7,�fi <2t f ',�.: Total civilian employment „ 519,900 - 517,700 Source: California Employment Development Department,Labor Market Information Division 2004. 20 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Fr an R uc Cost M als THE PERCENTAGE OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY STUDENTS RECEIVING FREE AND REDUCED COST MEALS WAS TRENDED HIGHER THROUGH 2003-04 OVER PREVIOUS YEARS. ALMOST THIRTY PERCENT (29%) OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY STUDENTS RECEIVED FREE OR REDUCED COST MEALS IN 2003-2004 COMPARED TO 49% OF CALIFORNIA STUDENTS. THE TOP THREE DISTRICTS WITH THE HIGHEST PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED COST MEALS CONTINUED TO BE PITTSBURG UNIFIED (61.4%), WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED (53.9%), AND JOHN SWETT UNIFIED (34.2%). TABLE 16 - PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS RECEIVING FREE AND REDUCED COST WEALS ixRrit O0 2000aft 260 � 22�a o c� - Acalanes Union High 0.7 0.4 0.6 0. 0.6 : Antioch Unified 30.9 ' 30.9 30.0 31.71 39.21 _ .......... ._._ Brentwood Union Elementary 26.6 i 28.1 25.2 25.21 21.01 Byron Union Elementa..ry 15.6 11.6 : 11.3 11.511, 16 ........ Canyon Elementary 5.1 2.7 3.4 7.9 Contra Costa Co. Office of E Education N/A 0.0 0.0 11.11 0.0 Sohn Swett Unified 27.7 24.7 35.5 33.61 34.21 i ? j Knightsen Elementary 34.9 32.0 31.5 13.6 9.31 Lafayette Elementary 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.21 Liberty Union Hi _...._ gh 5.5 8.3 8.4 Martinez Unified 17.9 16.5 17.2 17.1 15.2: _ Moraga Elementary 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.8 1.7 F Mt. Diablo Unified 23.0 a 23.7 23.7 27.11 27.3 Oakley Union Elementary 25.1 20.3 25.7 23.21 27.6; .__.__ _.._._._, _ Orinda Union Elementary 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.7 Pittsburg Unified 57.3 56.5 56.8 59.71 61.4 San Ramon Valley Unified 1.3 1.0 1.2 .4' 1.2 1 s Walnut Creek Elementary 7.5 _ ?•9 6.3 6.6 8.0 West Contra Costa Unified 50.6 49.6 51.6 48.3 53.9£ Contra Costa County 26.8 26.6 27.1 ' 215. 29.0 .. . ...... ____ _._ ._ 46.8_ _ 8.7 California 47.3 47 1 49.0� 4 Source: State of California,Department of Education,Educational Demographics Unit,2002 Note:latest data available,July 20104 21 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Public Assi'stanc From 1999 to 2003,the number of Ca1WORKs, Food Stamps,General Relief,and P Welfare to Work recipients declined in Contra Costa County. Refugee Cash Assistance recipients remained mained fairly consistent from 1999 to 2001 and then decreased in 2002-2003. In 2003 over one third of Ca1WORKs recipients aged 16 and over were African American /)followed 44400 ( owed by Caucasians (29.6%) and Latino (19.1%). TABLE 17 — PUBLIC ASSISTANCE RECIPIENTS BY PROGRAMr CONTRA COSTA COUNTY �, `+kk ,'�.,' � -a.._'r. �.i ,% F�.T^R'a.,.. � ��; ,.,,%,4a•f�^a(�" '>: a�w,c�`�rs � :� i'� ;F:. h � ,.,,,;.« 51,n" a v. i+ „q -.,g, _..,,g-�, :z.•,-- .- -:-? �#'. cit 2'". ,<as. s}p. -::.r ..yte ,-, .: ..... .: '2' ,g�}e, ,.. .>.♦ ....... a ;�. a. ad a;,.� „ z -:c ,. �.:�,. ... A♦� wb'._: ��,�,rr� `� - ,:.. Y'..- $�.a$.4.._ 1 ,.:,. ,(.. ,. t e't;,',,t :.,. :v.S. t".,,"T�`'f. .$%, w -•Ya,.:+....,Y- x , -,.. ;: - ,:' .2 .2. ,$' ,�,4d .�,'a, y�,.1.. ..,e .... .• .o-: {°R.,:....,, ..,b3^` -'"' - l -.+ }-.i��. >iE '#'`?$.�'.:�m%+,� z �:. � -5,P1"� e.p CaIWORKs 311275 25,922 20 448 n181619, 18,110 0 Food Stamps 29,222 23,554 19,422 19,392 n/a General Relief 913 603 513 446 443 Refugee Cash Assistance 18 14 15 14 0 FWelfare to Work 91750 41783 31345 2905 21219 Note: Data is from July of each year;2001 General Relief data is from March 2001 and Refugee Cash Assistance data are fo third quarter and exclude Ca1WORKs recipients. r the TABLE 18 — CALWORKS RECIPIENTS AGED 16 AND OVER BY ETH NICITY, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY a r <,.�.��:,� ..,.# a'" r 3� '"stn,i��i-#_� rd��-:: rr r _}a t+}; a�aa�'_ ....:.... .r y ',rb 'a,.:� a�: .r, 't r;� •c* -.. .. •s. ..,.t.....,�y .t. ... a. .a• .: � ..... ,. ..,a. .«. ..,.. .. �v�... s. .; .. ,..- �,' .s,.��:. - .:. - :�.. ,.,..., r,. >~..> .... .moi`€'. wx *s; ,.:. a...rr :H$"v<..,..-'.r,.,,. ,.,,.. `^cs'A:n�. b::.d-.. ,, v ,+.. ,,. .,. w... ,..... s-$...3F�' n, :,t... .,r :..✓.,.. ,; ,,. fi. S .. f" Caucasians 3,760 O t� 19 30 1197011860 •`�., e t,.:? v5 3 i d:�.yak <.,,f`.ta..." SU .,a " r�,rt.< 1 Cy x Q.,�+L-i^.•_}L,s^C, 3'�S°'; v $3� .._( 1 F> ,� t,..,✓.-. C v,,y. s¢�} x>. ..v-. a..t 4..u.- <_ .,.. 'i. r.. ,..A. - ^,r s ".k n"m�E :1T)t ..N„tr: el.. ,...,$ .Yl ..n"-.,x - _., ..`CC ....... .- ,..at k'.- ...+,, ....v# ,.. ,,,. ..... ...:.: .. ,.r r..;".r . .a,l;V:�. f at•. i .....t...� -.a.,.. :.,., ,.., .., ..,ds ,... �.. _.a4...wx „n_.. ,.s ,.:L. : Y . :,,.. ... , ,.. � .4..<... . �, .,�}Y• :- �? t� -.t'' <.a `.:.gip n ,:'�g`a"54�,i_ ��a� Latino 1,440 , 11110 11200 a �- , .. ,'..:i. #X• S.„r.aa�i' ia, 4t- American Indian x. 20 10 � rt:�-t+.a-"a:.'; �i'- `�,i•t _ 'tw.-, ', �t+aw. NVJIIMV�I'E`l af,iE•: : xv a a''......,...:.,..,...,-3....: ..r ., t:,.,.fi,}-n.,,yy.�,��,,tA`�.�.,,•i-'...�.*,,.�5,,et.=..z.:#�6t,..(.9:<..c,^7sµ.*-u4..-..a.,..:.:_...<�..;..�.,.$,�.,.. ..:r,�.:c.:..<�,.�'�c.,.!.,...<..,,�.,<-..,..�-.,.,...b,..,�.,,v.,,,.,,.',,i,F..'..+,.z4:r ".2 ea4}}�.ra.....A.a,„,,„,:y,,::....,r-.k.-«.,,.r,-r.s..,..,,,.�,.,.....r....>"..-..a:::::...".,s,4,.r..ati,»...x.,,.1`4 �. e..y.r.>«_...,i. �. ,.c.z..,.....,;„.9�x +�+•f: ...1 <+-,:R:'�. k�,,-.,.a'� �,-• �`,S2`'�4�' N'§a�3},ti�,� �� _ y�s,f �� gj�,�`n �{{ Total recipients aged 16 and '`,,` • ”. 10,830 8,980 7,080 6 450 over 6,270 Source: California Employment Development Department,Labor Market Information Division reporting data from th California Department of Social Services,http://www.calmis.cahwnet-gov/FILE/demos&e/ContrPIP.pdf e p January,2004. Note: Data is from July of each year. 22 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Pu 101C Assmistanc The percentage of students receiving CaIWORKs in Contra Costa County and California has steadily declined from 1997-98 to 2001-02. However,almost twice as many California students receive CaIWORKs compared to Contra Costa County(11.0%vs. 6.2%,respectively). TABLE 19 — PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS RECEIVING CALWORKs Mw Contra Costa County Number 18,476 18,022 13,398 11,613 10,056 8,218 7803 Percent 12.2 11.5 8,4 73 6.2 511 4.7 California Number 1f043,839 935,195 850,379 768,F175 682,879 622,845 585,991 Percent 18.2 16.0 14.3 12.7 11.01 10.1 9,31 Source: State of California,,Department of Education,Educational Demographics Unit,2002. FIGURE 4 — PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN AGES 0-5 IN FAMILIES PARTICIPATING IN CALWORKs,, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2000 v. 1-11 1-0 04% aim M 'INJIL r It Source: California Child Care Resource&Referral Network,California Child Care Portfolio,2001,www.rrnetwork.org. 23 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Pov rty tatus Contra Costa County ranks 55th Out of 58 counties (with one having the highest percentage in poverty)for their percentage of the population below the federal poverty level.' However,the percentage of families living in poverty in Contra Costa is about half the percentage of families in California (5.4%vs. 10.6%,respectively). A higher percentage of families with a female head of householder with no husband present lived in poverty (16.8%)than families or individuals (5.4%and 7.6%,respectively). The percentage of children living in poverty is higher than the percentage of the general population;almost 10%of children live below the federal poverty level.' While 7.6%of Contra Costa residents overall lived below the poverty level in 1999,there were many census tract areas in the county that had much higher poverty. Brookside,Las Deltas,Silver Verde had the highest percentage with 38.8%of residents living below the poverty level followed by Greater Richmond at 31%. TABLE 20 - POVERTY STATUS IN 1999 90 C p V A Families 13,068 5w4 10,6 With related children under 18 years 10,565 70 15.3 1 I With related children under 5 years 5,114 9.7 19.0 1 i Families with female householder,, no husband present 6,333 1 16,8 2590 1 With related children under 18 years 5,586 22.2 1 32.5 With related children under 5 years 21416 31.3 1 44.0 Individuals __.___ 71,575 1 7,6 14,2 18 years and over 46,471 63 12.3 65 years and over 1 6,224 6.0 8.1 With related children under 18 years 23,980 9.8 _____w19.0 With related children 5 to 17years 17,162 9.4 18.5 Unrelated individuals 15 years and over 23,661 15.7 23.1 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,Profile of General Demographic Characteristics,2002. 'Medi-Cal Policy Institute,Medi-Cal County Data Book,2002. 2 Children Now."The Children of Contra Costa County."California County Data Book,2001,taken from Contra Costa Child Care Council,The Economic Impact of the Child Care industry in Contra Costa County,2002. 24 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN ov rty tat nsus T TABLE 21.1 — POVERTY STATUS AND MEDIAN INCOME IN 1999 FOR SELECTED CENSUS TRACTS WITH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES CENTERS CERs06" A►CT old � i 'it ""t "�"' hi► "' N + CSE 02t.o 30TRAr6 , !1 � ► "'1 '`i +C" ► ' INCOME gTA3 U8 t.O .# I►�< Ai o + con ANISo 8 CRIN N LIM Cit �,'tASONW co oi[ Number of individuals with income In 1999 below poverty level: 636 862 912 11277 427 71,575 Under 5 years 57 143 104 158 54 61818 5 years 9 10 0 44 23 1,418 6 to 11 years 69 145 150 148 75 9,249 12 to 17 years 111 90 156 147 48 71619 18 to 64 years 344 471 375 693 198 40,247 65 to 74 years 15 32 70 57 12 2,501 75 years and over 31 11 57 30 17 31723 Number of individuals with Income in 1999 at or above poverty level: 71783 71442 20,621 51189 7,067 866,735 Under 5 years 630 678 21000 492 429 57,229 5 years 203 147 384 185 65 12,820 6 to 11 years 975 845 2,351 554 777 78,669 12 to 17 years 713 735 11869 365 719 73,172 18 to 64 years 41694 41467 12,132 31147 41461 547,100 65 to 74 years 374 379 11216 225 371 51,776 75 years and over 194 191 669 221 245 45,969 Total population in Census tract: 81419 8,304 21,533 6,466 71494 938,310 Percent of individuals In Census tract below the poverty level 7.6 10.4 4.2 19.7 5.7 7.6 Median household income $58,769 $50,4491 $73,622 $31,6921 $64,1721 $73,039 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,2003;Contra Costa County Community Services Department,2003. Please see Appendix I for a list of Family and Children's Services Centers by Census tract number.To view poverty and median income data for all Census tracts in Contra Costa County,please see Appendix II. 25 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Pov rty nsus TABLE 21.2 — POVERTY STATUS AND MEDIAN INCOME IN 1999 FOR SELECTED CENSUS TRACTS WITH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES CENTERS CENS06 VRA"' TWO CANSUS '$ R �C" I t P10"I - 31 .l FIP*W, t'14 C11"Llo1ci�i 'Rows ►lY CQIMl�R14► COOTA No C 'Umt= SAIF ST AN ' ft0914"l til*of COURW Number of individuals with income In 1999 below poverty level: 520 304 11756 254 254 71,575 Under 5 years 74 24 299 21 0 61818 5 years 8 8 27 0 8 1,418 6 to 11 years 113 11 317 6 4 91249 12 to 17 years 49 17 148 10 19 71619 18 to 64 years 197 224 879 179 194 40,247 65 to 74 years 29 13 55 22 7 2,501 75 years and over 50 7 31 16 22 31723 Number of individuals with Income in 1999 at or above poverty level: 2,057 31501 51397 11849 31151 866,735 Under 5 years 127 232 374 89 164 57,229 5 years 74 60 91 9 46 12,820 6 to 11 years 213 376 519 151 170 78,669 12 to 17 years 227 390 467 103 256 73,172 18 to 64 years 11143 2,291 31469 1,306 21059 547,100 65 to 74 years 182 113 269 79 204 51,776 75 years and over 91 39 208 112 252 45,969 Total population in Census tract: 21577 3,805 71153 211+013 31405 938,310 Percent of individuals in Census tract below the poverty level 20.2 8.0 24.5 12.1 7.5 7.6 Median household income $27,3991 $51,6671 $31,850 $40,052 $4516471 $73,039 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,2003;Contra Costa County Community Services Department,2003. Please see Appendix I for a list of Family and Children's Services Centers by Census tract number.To view poverty and median income data for all Census tracts in Contra Costa County,please see Appendix II. 26 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Poverty nsus T TABLE 21.3 — POVERTY STATUS AND MEDIAN INCOME IN 1999 FOR SELECTED CENSUS TRACTS WITH FAMILY AND CHILDREN`S SERVICES CENTERS C11114SUS CNN,U C111"O S X11"3346,E MCI Tit 0 X76, `;�►111LO "C TM, C f " GOP it': C0041010INIVY �NI11�3�wA►�� d .t1� ��'�,► CONTRAS '1101RHATiONAL COSTA, MARY I�AY ADO:)" 1 ��. CNIL( ,RW 1�t�R1� Cf; Co+� '1C Number of individuals with income In 1999 below poverty level: 706 336 420 764 766 71,575 Under 5 years 52 19 36 56 79 61818 5 years 35 0 0 15 5 11418 6 to 11 years 41 11 56 143 120 91249 12 to 17 years 101 14 33 86 77 71619 18 to 64 years 429 234 279 455 448 40,247 65 to 74 years 9 23 0 0 31 2,501 75 years and over 39 35 16 9 6 31723 Number of individuals with Income in 1999 at or above poverty level: 61238 5,292 71113 41399 31567 866,735 Under 5 years 377 374 416 460 302 57,229 5 years 52 61 68 75 106 12,820 6 to 11 years 523 434 585 394 378 78,669 12 to 17 years 474 479 643 302 333 73,172 18 to 64 years 3,819 31353 41393 21978 2,093 5471100 65 to 74 years 524 311 604 104 238 51,776 75 years and over 469 2801 404 86 117 45,969 Total population in Census tract: 61944 51628 71533 5,163 41333 938,310 Percent of Individuals in Census tract below the poverty level 10.2 6.0 5.6 14.8 17.7 7.6 Median household Income 1 $42,063 $58j9431 $61,0531 $38,2711 $36,2131 $73,039 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,2003;Contra Costa County Community Services Department,2003. Please see Appendix I for a list of Family and Children's Services Centers by Census tract number.To view poverty and median income data for all Census tracts in Contra Costa County,please see Appendix II. 27 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Pov rty C nsus Tract TABLE 21.4 — POVERTY STATUS AND MEDIAN INCOME IN 1999 FOR SELECTED CENSUS TRACTS WITH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES CENTERS E044 i ON80 TRACT CT' # + "1"` IR '- �� t►TA S �T f� +l�"�'1�#t' COMM CO"Al Y lilt VI '1"A X41`.ii l' V tR?#E iM+Ofi r C00j"TY Number of individuals with income In 1999 below poverty level: 11564 175 11578 21322 71,575 Under 5 years 205 15 157 311 61818 5 years 61 0 44 75 11418 6 to 11 years 193 9 256 418 9,249 12 to 17 years 126 9 286 240 7,619 18 to 64 years 924 111 802 1,165 40,247 65 to 74 years 0 0 15 47 2,501 75 years and over 55 31 18 66 31723 Number of individuals with Income in 1999 at or above poverty level: 71390 21917 21491 5,158 866,735 Under 5 years 678 83 2861 456 57,229 5 years 166 34 67 119 12,820 6 to 11 years 645 164 290 534 78,669 12 to 17 years 531 202 205 370 73,172 18 to 64 years 4,881 21018 11386 31359 547,100 65 to 74 years 314 202 141 207 51,776 75 years and over 175 214 116 113 45,969 Total population in Census tract: 81954 3,092 4,0169 7,480 938,310 Percent of individuals in Census tract below the poverty level 17.5 5.7 38.8 31.0 7.6 Median household income $39,352 $49,364 $22f6501 $30,389 $73,039 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,2003;Contra Costa County Community Services Department,2003. Please see Appendix i for a list of Family and Children's Services Centers by Census tract number.To view poverty and median income data for all Census tracts in Contra Costa County,please see Appendix II. 28 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Poverty ensus ract TABLE 21.5 — POVERTY STATUS AND MEDIAN INCOME IN 1999 FOR SELECTED CENSUS TRACTS WITH FAMILY AND CHILDREN`S SERVICES CENTERS C5'8 T1 ell►+ 1iR y $04%.CR 3 CINSUS T, ' "' CONTRAC4 '"�E BAY PARK 3830`SAI. A COUP" Number of individuals with income In 1999 below poverty level: 11825 11679 280 71,575 Under 5 years 252 220 25 6,818 5 years 33 20 17 11418 6 to 11 years 260 398 30 9,249 12 to 17 years 209 209 25 7,619 18 to 64 years 924 721 176 40,247 65 to 74 years 74 54 0 2,501 75 years and over 73 57 7 31723 Number of individuals with Income in 1999 at or above poverty level: 41391 5,531 41195 866,735 Under 5 years 410 277 177 57,229 5 years 109 52 78 12,820 6 to 11 years 428 482 208 78,669 12 to 17 years 387 491 147 731172 18 to 64 years 21576 31634 2,957 547,100 65 to 74 years 262 363 252 51,776 75 years and over 219 232 376 451969 Total population in Census tract: 61216 71210 4,475 938,310 Percent of individuals in Census tract below the poverty level 29.4 23.3 6,3 7,6 Median household income $27,207 $37,3961 $47,786 $73,039 Source. U.S.Census Bureau,2003;Contra Costa County Community Services Department,2003. Please see Appendix I for a list of Family and Children's Services Centers by Census tract number.To view poverty and median income data for all Census tracts in Contra Costa County,please see Appendix II. 29 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN 0 Housing Home ownership has become increasingly difficult in Contra Costa County with less than one- fourth of median income households able to afford a home in 2002. Further,the percentage of homes affordable to median income households decreased by fifty percent from 48.6%in 1998 to 23.9%in 2002. In December 2002,the median sale price of single-family residences,condos,and new homes in Contra Costa County was $364,000. In November 2002,the median sale price varied greatly throughout the county from$978,000 in Alamo (zip code 94507)to$222,000 in Richmond(zip code 94801). TABLE 22 - PERCENTAGE OF HOMES AFFORDABLE TO MEDIAN INCOME HOUSEHOLDS -200:Z, 2000 2041 Oakland PMSA 48.6 48.6 32.1 26.1 23.9 San Francisco PMSA 24.8 21.3 10.3 7.3 9.2 San Jose PMSA 41.7 41.0 18.3 14.5 20.1 Santa Rosa PMSA 41.9 40.0 21.9 13.9 15.3 Vallejo - Fairfield - Napa PMSA 59.2 57.4 36.1 27.7 17.9 Source: National Association of Builders,Housing Opportunity Index,8/5/2003. Note: Oakland PMSA includes Contra Costa and Alameda Counties;San Francisco PMSA includes Marin,San Mateo and San Francisco Counties;San Jose PMSA includes Santa Clara County;Santa Rosa PSMA includes Sonoma County;Vallejo- Fairfield-Napa PMSA includes Solano and Napa Counties.Data is from I"quarters. Most recent data available as of July 2004 30 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Housin TABLE 23 - MEDIAN AND HIGH SALE PRICE OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, CONDOS, AND NEIN HOMES, AND CHANGE OVER PREVIOUS YEAR.CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, JUNE 2004 4W lif'%a t x ,, , w €; a v<. s'4 t S r} s ' =>' �... x- a <,. r.�. ........... ,._. .. .: k......: ., w °d,. .. �... x... .... �" .- "..,. '..., ......, r..... v, a .:r• e n.r '::,..,r.". ,. .� .s:': _a..,.. a. y 51 Alamo 94507 43 19.4% $1,254,004 14.6% $21995,000 $433 12.4% RIO N. .. -.>>a...'s •air•. r .._,.:, a.u% �$_� #yr �m,. a �'�' E.i:,.a E':,.a Brentwood 94513 150 2.7% $4493000 12.1% $1,475,000 $233 14.5% .�•:,. .��'.;: :..... � .,e a».-X.. 44 • .,..:.„«_. �' ':- r„> t b +k r. r e 'i". .. r. :. a .. t f .<.« ..,,a•"- ,..:. t..3�. 5,.`.. .i �'�° A k Y .;, kh <,_.", s. ,- ��;..,..,.rr �;,+rs_ - aS:w.L•-t r,:" ,.%,.:., � »,..t~�„'�... .... a e�'",�,^r�,. ..� z }�' `; `tia Clayton 94517 40 48.1% $6255000 11.0% $1,020,000 $310 17.8% '-` ,y01. •;�� _I� a .. x w £�^s��'"v, Concord 94519 48 128.6% $4159000 20.3% $585,000 $321 14.1% 01 Ow p ,ka E +... ,.. ,. :..:. ,... k ,: C',.�. ...� •:x. ,...... ... R .... �.. .:v......,2x.k,4, .F,,... ,' ...c. .:..2.. Concord 94521 122 62.7% $460,000 27.4% $9011000 $304 15.0% ,,- F,..> , ': "5:,,�"`>>. ..>,�. ,,. ,..{„,., �"..,..,�i... w�.> .r, ",i.°2' fiy':fi ':X 5'itaK'.ii''�"„.,:' 3•.. . �.n„x.- .f. ��:, �yas;:3 �..... 4>.xx,.: ...� V 4 M t•;..�. �''�:, a Y r . If ;1-....�... .r..,c. '.,y _,..w�..},�«m•> .t.;,✓r...�ie�.,s.t.r,s':?, f..`=_a .,.. vs`L,°.:.."�..� a � �'� ku`>-.rr ',�:<.`�, A .`::.a� ukt�{t .,{a*�.ai s,f r hos.err k�sw Danville 94526 80 0.0% $7969000 17.6%� � $258759000" $402 26.4% W11 - �; .. .„ #{ i" ]. .t bx.�� x'� .:'%„R ac t�`t '10104, i El Cerrito 94530 42 50.0% $568,500 23.3% $151055000] $410 14.1% >.s.. .: ... ., ..::*.�.5 ,:. 5, ,.. ,.,.,i .,., ,. �.C s�:a�,� .. ,,.t •'.,....:�. i�'`sola` r-+,x£. ...,. .' a � �• . eA„'.+a,a+:.Kor.. .• 3,� ?�.4..,x , }#,.. „x _t,< T.a'.2 .;�,T4� ,5�b'4� �),_ � X' ., :-... ._ - ,.. �f 2,. x,l_.,•:,,a,ax#i � L. ,'� s& i,�,. �.�. Hercules 94547 76 13.4 010 $485,000 52.5010 $8269000 $284 16.0% xe_ a T Ok .n Martinez 94553 118 32.6% $4465500 27.1% $1,950,000 $306 14.6% ..... V.?tr4 -i},�,:: ".�.,'...;x '..,e+- .•.., ..e:.aV �,..t. ..,.06, { r YY v; Oakley 94561 74 2.8% $365,500 19,8% $29140,000 $254 32.3% �,..��, ,. � a4.:"t-n, s`n"'s�x ro*,:.,i... ..,P.,a,:.�... 5 'S' S t' •.4+.: "�;. a �x M. r" a _4- ,.+,-0F,att.�,zY.. �:a,.,•.Gf�_..��R. �.,.. ,3 z-±.. _cU,.k. �.��.` `....>:°�.'"•fit,., Pinole 94564 21 -34.4% $4509000 21.6% $5609000 $332 35.1% ,. r.. �.$,..po .,,. b". E. 'r t fsa 41 Pleasant Hill 94523 82 28.1% $505,000 "k 13.5% $9005000 $356 4.5% ,1..... ... :.M. .,..,..a., ,... .c. ..,. - ,. k�{ .0 ,�:....i.. a ,.e,:.. stq' .4 ..:;j 1Ti"..r... 4^,� FS+ $eT P) „t { Ai•s;1.., `�,�i ...., .. Yr�, C E:`�8 �#� � _ Richmond 94804 80 37.9% $3399500 20.2% $635,000 $319 15.4% sK. -.. Rodeo 94572 14 40.0% $385,500 10.3% $623,000 $314 20.7% v ,....�, 34 3 `Ya t ,..,.,,ax s• 4wtl� y ,,. r •¢.ii}a •�' x ��.�<.....�...E Ti"ak=kA«,""� ,&...<,v"xr,,•^'*." '.'-, „E�'':;."�..�>Yn;.s..`_kk1'..,,_ .- ��F° ?�k t�� {+y�� San Ramon 94583 189 29.5% $6351,000 �> 5.0%� $11465,000y $350 18.6°/0 st�. .. s.. x tU �Y':..,`?•, � N , Walnut Creek 94596 55 -36.0% $3409000 � 0,0% � $114509000 $395 � �21.5% Walnut Creek 94598 63 43.2% $705,000 13.3% $1,650,000 $363 14.7% W. 0 ti-k. -11"'L Source: Data Quick Information Systems,San Francisco Chronicle Charts for the month of November 2002,2003, *Data from December 2002;percent change from December 2001 to December 2002. 31 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Housin HUD defines affordable housing as that which costs no more than 30%of household income. In 1999) the percentage of owners spending more than 30%of their income on housing in Contra Costa County was 29.9%,while 40.6%of renters spent more than 30%of their income on housing. The median rent for a two-bedroom apartment in Contra Costa County(in the Oakland PMSA)was $1,420 in 2004 compared to Santa Rosa PMSA at $1,215 and San Francisco PMSA at $1,848. TABLE 24 — MEDIAN MONTHLY RENTS, FISCAL YEAR 2004 P WD0IO 1 B5EDROON 2 111E Rift 1DR IO,, 4 B►EDR00148 Oakland PMSA __. $936 $113.2 $1,420 $1,947 $2,325 i f San Francisco PMSA $1,297 $1,f680 $1,848 $2,,124 $3,083 r San 3ose PMSA $1,294 ' $1,289 $1,475 $2,496 f $2,803 F Santa Rosa PMSA $828 $938; $1,215 $1, 690 $1.,996 { _. Vallejo - Fairfield - Na pa PMSA $845_ x $960 $1,171 $1,626._ $1,918 Source: Department of Housing and Urban Development,HUD User,501h Percentile Rent Estimates,2004. Note: Oakland PMSA includes Contra Costa and Alameda Counties;San Francisco PMSA includes Marin,San Mateo and San Francisco Counties;San Jose PMSA includes Santa Clara County;Santa Rosa PSMA includes Sonoma County;Vallejo- Fairfield-Napa PMSA includes Solano and Napa Counties. FIGURE 5 — MONTHLY INCOME SPENT ON HOUSING, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 1999 50% 40% 27.4 31.9 30% U2 21.4 ■owners a(„ 20%l0 15.1 14.914.3 i5.0 14,5 0 Renters 12.211.4 10% 8.5 8.7 0% 1 Val I Less than 15.0 to 20.0 to 25.0 to 29.9 30.0 to 35.010 or 15.0% 19.9% 24.9% 34.9% more Source: U.S.Census Bureau,Profile of General Demographic Characteristics,2002. 32 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Trans r in The number of people carpooling to work in Contra Costa County increased from 17%in 1996 to 23%in 2002 and decreased to 20%in 2003. However,during the same time period,the percentage of people using transit(includes busses,trains and ferry boats)decreased by almost half from 15%in 1996 to 8%in 2002,but increased to 13%in 2003. However,in 2000 more people used public transportation in Contra Costa County than California overall (9%vs.5.1%,respectively). In 2000,almost half(42.4%)of Contra Costa residents worked outside of the county compared to 17.1%statewide. By 2003,the mean travel time to work was higher in Contra Costa County at 38 minutes,the longest travel time in the nine Bay Area counties. TABLE 25 — CLUSTERED MODES OVER TIME, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 199000 2001 �:;002, -" MODE "1996 9 A Drive alone 67% 66% 66% 70% 66% 64% Carpool 17% 13% 16% 19% 23% 20% Transit 15% 16% 16% 9% 8% 13% Other 2% 5% 3% 2% 4% 4% Source: RIDES for Bay Area Commuters,Inc.,Commute Profile 2032:A Survey of San Francisco Bay Area Commute Patterns,October 2003. TABLE 26 WORKERS 16 YEAR AND OVER COMMUTING TO WORK, 2000 MIA Percent using carpools 13.5% 14.5% Percent using public transportation 9.0% 5.1% Percent worked outside of county of residence 42.4% 17.1% Mean travel time to work in minutes (if worked outside of home) 34.4 1 27.7 1 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,Census Summary File 3,2002. 33 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN 0 to uniza ions Historically,the percentage of fully immunized kindergarteners in Contra Costa County has been higher than the percentage of fully immunized California kindergarteners. From 1998 to 2000 in Contra Costa County,the percentage of kindergarteners with all required immunizations increased from 92.4%in 1997 to 94.75%in 2003. TABLE 27 IMMUNIZATION 9 91" 98 200, 00� Number of students 13,413 13,3021 13,282 11 13,666 13,740 t Percent with Personal Medical Exempti0. ons (PME) 2 0.3 i 0.2 0102 0.17 Percent with Personal Belief Exemptions (PBE) 0.2 0.6 0.9 1 N/A1.33 1 Percent requiring one or more Immunization6.74.9 4.4 4.6 3.74 1 1 Percent with all required immunizations.. Contra Costa County 92.4 1 94,2 94.5 94.1 94.75 Percent with all required Immunizations,, California 89.3 91.9 92.2 90.9 92.53 Source: State of California Department of Health Services,Division of Communicable Disease Control, Immunization Branch,2004. 34 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Contra Costa irths The number of overall Contra Costa births decreased slightly by 0.6%from 2000 to 2001. Further, the number of births by all ethnicities except by Latinos also decreased during the same time period. The total number of African American births decreased by 5.3%,while the total number of births by Asian/Pacific Islanders and Caucasians decreased 2.3%and 1.6%,respectively. A baby is considered to be low weight if it weights less than 2,500 grams(51b. Boz.).The percentage of low birth weights in Contra Costa County has been slightly higher than the state from 1997 to 2001. In 2001,the percentage of births that were low weight was 6.6%in Contra Costa County and 6.3%in California.The Healthy People 2010 Objective is that no more than 5%of births will be low weight. TOTAL BIRTHS TABLE 28 — NUMBER OF BIRTHS BY ETHNICITY, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 1901 19 African American 10,337 i 1,401 1,4311,339 1 1,268 -5.3 Asian/Pacific Islander N/A N/A 1,573 11816 1,775 -2.3 + Caucasian 6,556 6,646 6,226 g61,346 1 6,244 -1.6 Latino 2,934 21998 3,317 3,664 3,839 4.8 Native American N/A N/A 39 39 0 -100.0 Other 1r467 1,461 N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 12,294 12,506 12,586 13,204 13,126 -0.6 Note: From 1997 through 1998,the"Other"category includes Asian,Pacific Islander and American Indian. LOW WEIGHT BIRTHS TABLE 29 PERCENTAGE OF BIRTHS THAT ARE Low WEIGHT 10' 10' 20OV: Contra Costa County 6.3 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 California 6.1 6.2 6.1 6.2 6.3 Source: State of California Department of Health Services,Center for Health Statistics,Birth Records,2003. 35 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Contra Costa irths From 1997 through 2001,the percentage of women receiving prenatal care in the first trimester has been higher in Contra Costa County than in the state. In Contra Costa County in 2001,the percentage of women receiving prenatal care is higher among Caucasians (94.0%)and Asian/Pacific Islanders (91.1%)than African Americans (84.6%)and Latinos (82.8%).The Healthy People 2010 Objective is that at least 90%of pregnant women will receive prenatal care in the first trimester. In 2001,Contra Costa County was close to meeting this goal with 89.4%of women receiving adequate prenatal care. PRENATAL CARE TABLE 30 — PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN RECEIVING PRENATAL CARE IN THE FIRST TRIMESTER 0, Contra Costa County 86.0 86.1 88.1 1 89.3 89.4 California 80.8 81.1 82.2 1 83.1 84.0 1 FIGURE 6 — PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN RECEIVING PRENATAL CARE IN THE FIRST TRIMESTER, By ETHNICITY, 2001 100% - 91.1%87..5% 84.6%80.6% 82.8%80.8% 94.0°l0 88.0% 75% - (V 50% - E Contra Costa DCallfornla 0- 25% - 0% Asian Pacific African American Latino Caucasian Other Islander "44 CAO, -old i Contra Costa County 91.1 84.6 82.8 1 94.0. ............ California 87.5 80.6 80.8 88.0 Source: Source: State of California Department of Health Services,Center for Health Statistics,Birth Records,2003. 36 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN T n ■ irths There was a steady decrease in teen births in both Contra Costa County and California from 1997 to 2001. Contra Costa had almost fifty percent less teen births than the state in 2001 (6.7%vs. 10.0%, respectively). In 2001,Latinos in Contra Costa County had the highest percentage of teen births (48.8%),followed by Caucasians (23.2%). In Contra Costa County from 1997-2001,there was a decrease in low weight births to teen mothers (ages 15-19)from 8.4%in 1997 to 5.3%in 2001. The percentage of teen mothers receiving prenatal in the first trimester stayed relatively the same from 1997 to 2001 and is well below the Healthy People 2010 Objective of 90%. TABLE 31 - PERCENTAGE OF BIRTHS THAT ARE TO TEEN MOTHERS (AGED 15-19), CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 199,7 1 1596 19992000''1 2001 2002r-4 Contra Costa County 8.6 8.0 7.8E 7.1 6.7 6.661 California 11.4 11.2 10.9 10.4 10.0 .._._.. ._._. _ .__ TABLE 32 - TEEN BIRTHS BY ETHNICITY, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2001 00RC 1 'r.1 ,TO�AAt INICIt'' ` " E SI1$T�s African American 20.2 i Asian/Pacific Islander 7.8 _ t Caucasian 23.2 Latino 48.8 h TABLE 33 - LOW WEIGHT BIRTHS TO TEEN MOTHERS (AGED 15-19), CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 200 1997 Under 1,5000 grams(2.2 lbs.) 18 13 10 12 7 1 1,500-2,499 grams(5.5 lbs.) 71 67 61 70 40 Total low weight (under 2,500 grams) 89 80 71 82 47 2 births 1 055 883 1 004 978 941 Total teen b s � ; ..n.___ -] Percent low weight 8.4 1 8.0 7.3 8.7 Note: Low weight births are less than 2,500 grams. TABLE 34 -PERCENTAGE OF TEEN MOTHERS (AGED 15-19) RECEIVING PRENATAL CARE IN THE FIRST TRIMESTER, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY z . : 1997 1991 1099 209 2t�8 w......w«.....r tr. . k-"%e ......av..w......rr.ae__-,w,....u....d ...,..uw.+.._.+........�.._..r ...i.,.._.i .-.i.............s._i.r�u'.«....ua. ..a.'v....r....u.r». - r.«wn. «...ae«...rrrw.> ...,..w,wabsw.M.,.,-r+i,.... ..r«,..wi� Number with prenatal care 784 728 718 705 655 ; Total teen births 1,055 1 1,004 978 941 883 Percent with prenatal care 74.3 72.5 73.4 74.9 1 74.2 Source: Source: State of California Department of Health Services,Center for Health Statistics,Birth Records,2003. 37 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Asthma In 19991)the rate of asthma hospitalizations per 100,000 population was higher in Contra Costa County for children(ages 9-14)and for all ages than in California. Further,the asthma hospitalization rate for children in Contra Costa County was about one and a half times higher than the asthma hospitalization rate for people of all ages (224.3 vs. 137.1,respectively). In 2001,the percentage of persons diagnosed with asthma living at 0-199%of the federal poverty (FPL)level was 14.4%compared to 16.5%of persons living at 200-299%percent of the FPL and 13.6%of people living at 300%or above the FPL. TABLE 35 — ASTHMA HOSPITALIZATIONS RATES, 1999 �'+"' #'+[; ��P c'N.• ��, a �^ 8 §� n a' ,S � Contra Costa County 224.3 137.1 California 183.6 115.8 Source: California office of Statewide Health Planning and Development,Inpatient Discharges,Asthma with Status Asthmaticus and Asthma without Status Asthmaticus,2002. TABLE 36 — PERSONS DIAGNOSED WITH ASTHMA, 2003 Asthma incidence in Contra Costa County is twice the statewide average for children 2-4 years old. Contra Costa Count State of California �.Lo opwao- ------------ E i Y 1 _ �..... ----- '. it f*4 poo ■s.t ©SONOWN 104"Wo ■sa,rwis Mfg► Source: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research,AskCHIS(2001 CA Health Interview Survey),2003 TABLE 37 — PERSONS DIAGNOSED WITH ASTHMA BY FEDERAL POVERTY LEVEL (FPL), CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2001 38 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN 0-199% of FPL 26,000 14.4 200-299% of FPL 18,000 16.5 300% of FPL and above 86,000 13.6 Source: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research,AskCHIS(2001 California Health Interview Survey),2003. Note: Question was"Has a doctor ever told you that you have asthma?" 0 diatric Nutroitmion Nutritional status (weight,height,hematology),among low income,high-risk infants and children is an important indicator of general health and well being. There is also a significant correlation between poor nutritional status and poverty. In 2003,children in Contra Costa County exceeded the statewide average for underweight (7.3%and 5.4%respectively),and anemia(13.8% and 13.7% respectively). While Contra Costa County did not exceed the statewide average for children above the 95th percentile for weight,the county did rank 39th out of the 58 California counties.These data are consistent with the results of physical fitness tests, (see Table 42,) done in grades five, seven, and nine,demonstrating relatively low levels on state administered physical fitness tests TABLE 38 — INDICATORS OF NUTRITIONAL HEALTH, 2003 OR W" ' $� s a5y. .rx.F...,...'„ .. :., .....,m � ,, w.. ,Y,. .. '. ;�, ... f 5,^tti- ate•' Nig�„�: .,e..,.:.....,a;�., >,a.,..,,,, ,s ...., Y' ,..., ,.. r..,., ✓,.r�:�•. t' _,,": i n Low High n Short n Underweight Overweight n low Stature Hb/Hct ::x,.i'Y. ......x..k,::.,.,x.n.s F�...'...a,..-.,.Y:..,t.:otf,fr.,,a.....,......,_.._,,..�<�dRya,'4g`,e.,,....,r...:...'.{e.<,n.,...... .:,..+x,,s....,...'.4,:-:sr�,¢.rt-5fVi,:a1w.,.., .P: " Y 't^'tS}..,:..+ ...:�..., t.,4 . ...::C .4 .. ,., >.A.f.€a a' "St � �i..^(;,. A�'x}:• V 3 e q , r y (rank) (rank) (rank) :., t a ,.,u.. , _...,^1,<. ....... ..:, >. :. >x .N_,„.a T� •#d iP ..,..:; .. R 5 ,.S $,<'7Y,A , 3 ,....».. ,., . Y"...,. �, ,r., x... x_nw t<::.,,, '�...... :,i:�'iaW°...d.... y.�.,a.�°*�,r, �-ts._.Y,r. ...-, .2<}*� ..5. ,.::.Ytt�,'A".+... , 4, ka1"fa ., '.I „4 ^5;• �,�' Contra 29511 6.5 11.4 13,283 4.5(29) 7.3(39) 14.3(34) 59092 13.8(30) Costa (20) (45) Co. * .�, �.., :..» ,".,, �F a. ., �q,�g ,' �t•�.aN,,.k'<.,� .,,.. ,�z.w ,.:,:.. ...Y•. �, .>j .rm.. �`✓,t €*,.x � * `#y j., - r Source:2003 Pediatric Nutritional Surveillance http://www dhs.ca.gov/Dcfh/cros/onlinearchiye/pdf/chdp/informationnotices/2004/ChdpinO3g/tableO6b.pdf alth I - r n Contra Costa County has more children ages 0-17 covered by their parents employment-based insurance than California children. Less than one-percent (0.4)of the population of Contra Costa 39 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN County is enrolled in Healthy Families.'The county ranks 57th out of all California counties for their number of Healthy Families enrollees as a percentage of the county's population.' TABLE 39 - HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE OF CHILDREN, 2001 V+0NTR&Ct'3s"'r/ 0NVY CALIFORNIA Age 0-4 years Uninsured 2.2* 6.9 Medi-Cal 19.9 29.1 Healthy Families - 3.5 Employment-based 70.9 56.4 Privately purchased 6.4 2.7 Other public coverage - 1.3 Total 69,000 21474,000 Ages 5-9 years Uninsured 2.4* 9.6 Medl-Cal 9.5* 21.4 Healthy Families - 6.1 Employment-based 86.1 58.8 Privately purchased 1.9* 3.2 Other public coverage N/A Q.9 Total 72,000 21667,000 Ages 0-17 years Uninsured 4.2* 9.6 Medi-Cal 14.3 22.8 Healthy Families 0.7* 4.7 Employment-based 75.6 58.8 Privately purchased 3.8 2.9 Other public coverage 1.5* 1.2 Total 251,000 91203,000 Source: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research,AskCHIS(2401 California Health Interview Survey),2003. *Statistically unstable. Contra Costa County Healthy Families enrollment for 2003 showed a net increase of 11,044 families TABLE 39 A HEALTH FAMILIES ENROLLMENT Zip Current Zip Current Zip Current Zip Current Zip Current Zip Current Code Enrollment Code Enrollment Code Enrollment Code Enrollment Code Enrollment Code Enrollment 94506 15 94507 4 94509 797 94511 11 94513 373 94514 47 94516 4 94517 12 94518 183 94519 114 94520 598 94521 231 94523 137 94525 22 94526 20 94529 1 94530 121 94531 267 94547 135- 94548-1 3 94549 1 40 94553 215 94556 13 94561 304 3 Medi-Cal Policy Institute,Medi-Cat County Data Book,2002. 4 Ibid. 40 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN 94563 12 94564 170 94565 1378 94572 83 94575 1 94583 122 94595 13 94596 79 94597 48 94598 54 94801 600 94802 3 94803 190 1 94804 1 630 94805 171 94806 1 1134 Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board httt://www.mrmib.ca.go H alth Insuranc - Adults Theg p ercenta e of uninsured nonelderly adults in Contra Costa County(7.1%)is less than half that of California (17.7%). Further,there are more county residents covered by employment-based insurance 78.3% than California(65.1%)and a lower percentage of residents covered by Medi-Cal or Healthy Families (6.8%)than California (10.3%). FIGURE 7 - HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE OF NONELDERLY ADULTS (AGES 18-64) 2001 100% 78.3% 75% 65.1% c ■Contra Costa 50% 13 California W a 0 17.7% 25/o 0 6.8% 10.3% 7.1% k,= _70 0% Percent uninsured Percent with job-based Percent with Medi-Cal or insurance Healthy Families .. ..�: .R,:w:'. n «,.,a.-.c.. ✓ .;�T... � E:; �.'�' , .h-.-:u�- :�,.e.,Y. s:. 6, .: ,,....,.2� ....,. .,`I,r ��,. 4 ,R.,. 9,1 r p y � syn s„y,y-� < a} �#t' 1�.. -,.�� -.,;.::M*,.�' -• � �n�.s'. y y^:- g. 'i �C > i s H r. Contra Costa County 7.1 78.3 6.8 California 17.7 65.1 10.3 Source: The State of Health Insurance in California:Findings from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey,UCLA Center for Health Policy Research,2002. TABLE 40 - HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE OF NONELDERLY ADULTS (AGES 18-64) 2001, BY FEDERAL POVERTY LEVEL (FPL) RE ,,x- �,..t. 'a -+"�. �:.�... t ,,..,. � ,,,. ,: •�s,•... „ '� i; :'.:�' zwt-..x .;,& +:.. ha, <t,a 'a?r;, �},`,yF� *.�, �`'�+�"^�- 2 k6 4 �M t q i Contra Costa County 0-99% of FPL 18.6* 45.4 31.6 100-199% of FPL 22.6 38.7 24.7 California 0-99% of FPL 38.9 18.6 37.0 100-199% of FPL 33.0 42.5 17.7 41 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Source: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research,AskCHIS(2001 California Health Interview Survey),2003. Statistically unstable. "tte is as s xually rans i D" From 1999-20031,Contra Costa County has had consistently lower rates of Chlamydia than California. In 1999,the Gonorrhea incidence rate in Contra Costa County(63.2 per 100,000 population)was higher than that of California (56.3 per 100,000 population).The rate fell below the state rate in 2000,increased in 2001,fell again in 2002 and remained below the statewide rate in 2003 at 58.2 per 100,000. TABLE 41 — SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE INCIDENCE RATES FOR CHLAMYDIA AND GONORRHEA, ALL AGES 2003 lir Wass th' h*%lW*dW Contra Costa 196.4 63.2 194.2 60.6 242.3 69.5. 239.4 65.2 260.1 58.2 State Total 256.61 56.31 282-81 64.11 293.3 671 312.31 69.7 324,8 71.7 Source: State of California,Department of Health Services,STD Control Branch,2003;Population based on California Department of Finance Demographic Research Unit,E-4 Revised Historical Population Estimates,June 16,2004. Note: Rate is per 100,000 population. 42 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Physmical Foltn ss Students who meet all six of the six fitness standards on the California Physical Fitness Test are considered to be fit. Contra Costa County's percentage of 5th,7th and 9th grade students who were physically fit was slightly higher than the state in 2003. The percentage of students in grades five and seven found not to be in the healthy fitness zone was slightly lower than the statewide average. However,students in the Pittsburg Unified School District,the West Contra Costa Unified School District,and the Byron Union Elementary School District were found significantly exceeded the statewide average. The healthy fitness zone for body composition is 17%- 32%body fat for females and 10% - 25%body fat for males. Source:http•//www.cde.ca.gov�/ta/�tg/pf/documents/healthfitzones.pdf TABLE 42 - PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS WHO ARE PHYSICALLY FIT - ,:EY k.':F'.k" k •Y.x f 'f. a'L 'K•': }. 'L'L ; <'g�� I�J•.� E `!s:�r E d i ll:x' .£:`. �,x,.§� *,�`'� ,� `� 3 §#� �` r:. t•:ar c t�, t`;, � z��a a r��^,a=,t� f�k ri�-'r,r r .:` a: z- '+r "q .� .y .•..',4°,5...� �y i1 ih.,i: �. ,-:# �"5� :x� _"•. '. .bh'"a xj� -':��k s,.. ��. ,A'' k^j 4^C ,�'...� t L'�., • rt, ,x �. ^.,^^ ..>. a.Jam. ...s.,a3 ,. ,.,-..:.{'., r�. x4K.#..,.. *Yi:� ';'M �, }, �f N'.. A•J ••.-tAt:e'. .,,. t., ,t � � .ct::�S �..;.�' ,...at>. ;,3 ".�iv,� *... :.i Y'� ,zo .�•6.,�, :"#, Sf�s �E xr• � •k tt"�� I...,.:+r :h° d ��..�35. .,.,.<�: ,^,6>,.. ..a#�, ' �`j�"Z ,.< �t. „- y*4��.s.M >4 z� :A�,'r�' � Lird„+�g�i ts,>*ak�:. �j 3s a� r';({ h .��y y JW � '.u�,. }:•_ '-':,R�..��... .E ..,.'^�_ ^tF....`.: k5 ',x".,xi+::.. k ,... n� .SF J`+E:., �•L.,f � •F��•v,. 8 Eg °-.a.=`T4, >.,.:', �:Y..++`� t> :-- x... �> _.. ,'� -.� .&l.: s.,t �G,:r w �' ys$. .i .�r.. ;�fl�:; � 'r .t,�;• 4+.�,.....,; ,,.,,.�b.��r,�:=`✓'{ :'°�.�i:'r-�r b �.. �. "ti 4e�> s."_: � - �e'�zm3e£d .�;.,,. ....:+i�,�' ¢:s6Y. � s^Sii"�-.�� §c.:'":a.§`:i { ,c� r� `��" ��,;:r& ,�§�e.�x� �,: .y:�,� .� k�§.s'a'' �"P+ �Sxk w�"ts^., ��*�.� "+� ...�'-�- '�f•'. Grade 5 25.4 21.3 19.9 21.3 22.6 24.9 Grade 7 25.6 27.1 20.4 22.6 Grade 9 27.2 25.0 Grade 5 28.3 24.8 22.3 23.8 Grade 7 32.2 28.8 26 27.8 Grade 9 1 28.3 25.5 1 22.8 24.8 Source: California Department of Education,California Physical Fitness Test,2003 Note: Students meeting six of six fitness standards are considered fit. TABLE 42 A - PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS NOT IN HEALTHY FITNESS ZONE ON BODY COMPOSITION TEST Grade 5 Grade 7 Y ,i Body 0.1 Pittsburg Unified Composition 737 54.4 45.6 672 49.9 5 West Contra Costa Unified 21573 58.1 41.9 29511 58 42 Byron Union Elementary 142 52.8 47.2 107 64.5 35.5 Moraga 218 89.4 10.6 263 81 19 Lafayette 414 86.5 13.5 433 88 12 Orinda 275 82.9 17.1 279 86.7 13.3 Contra Costa County 119764 69.1 30.9 119940 71.1 28.9 California 4689882 66.7 33.3 463,1051 66.81 33.2 Source:California Department of Education,Data Quest 2004. http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/pVdocuments/healthfitzones.pdf 43 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN TAR r s Students reading at or above the 50,h National Percentile Ranking(NPR)are considered to be reading at the appropriate grade level. Several factors contribute to higher test scores,including early childhood experiences such as quality licensed child care.'Contra Costa County has a higher percentage of 3'd graders reading above the 50th NPR than California (60%vs. 47%,respectively). From Spring 1998 to Spring 2002,the percentage of 3rd graders reading at or above the 50th NPR increased from 52%in 1998 to 60%in 2002. TABLE 43 — PERCENTAGE OF THIRD GRADE STUDENTS SCORING ABOVE THE 50TH NPR IN READING BY DISTRICTS WITH ELEMENTARY STUDENTS spluke SPIUNO SP040 SPRING SP RING, spitt" 2 01WRICT 1998 , 990' . 2000 2001, 20 = Antioch Unified 44 43 54 56 51 40; Brentwood Union Elementary 56 53 54 58 63 45 Byron Union Elementary 40 54 59 69 4 58 45 Canyon Elementary N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A n/a; Home Smart Kids of Knighten N/A N/A N/A 70 64 45 John Swett Unified 44 42 44 53 41 22 Knightsen Elementary 45 58 50 71_ 62 50 Lafayette Elementary 89 91 93 9289 80 Martinez Unified 57 64 71 73 68 50! Moraga Elementary 3 88 1 89 95 94 82, 93 Mt. Diablo Unified 53 61 63 62 62 45' Oakley Union Elementary 39 53 5558 j 60 39' Orinda Union Elementary 88 f 88 89 92 93 84= Pittsburg Unified 25 25 36 36 36 21 San Ramon Valley Unified 81 80 86 E 88 91 73' Walnut Creek Elementary k 79 1 82 80 79 84 E 65 West Contra Costa Unified 32 35 38 37 38 Contra Costa County a 52 55 59 60 60 45! 1 California 38 41 44 46 47 a 25i Source: State of California Department of Education,STAR District/School Summary Report,2003. Dropout Rates In the 2002-03 school year,Contra Costa County's 4-year derived high school dropout rate (dropouts per 100 high school students)exceeded the dropout rate of California (13.3 vs. 12.7, respectively)for the first times since 1997. From 1996-97 to 2002-03,West Contra Costa School District's dropout rate by more than a factor of 4 from 7.9 per 100 to 37.8 per 100. 5 Contra Costa Child Care Council,Summary of The Economic Impact of the Child Care Industry in Contra Costa County,2003. 44 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN TABLE 44 - PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS WHO DROPOUT OF HIGH SCHOOL, 4-YEAR DERIVED RATE D !!i"i"i 199 6-01A, 1 97r-98 199849 1"90 � 2I�t Q-Qt 2041-0 0 Acaianes Union High 1.8 2.8 1.1 0.8 0.3 ` 0.6` 0.4 Antioch Unified 3.7 2.7 2.9 1 1.8 2.6 4.0' 4.2 E Contra Costa Co. Office of q,q q,q Education 84.6 77.2 92.0 45.3 0.0 F John Swett Unified 7.8 11.3 13.6 ' 8.8 10.2 8.81 4.9 Liberty Union High ' 10.1 14.1 7.5 4.9 5.2 i 3.31 5 Martinez Unified 2.4 13.1 13.8 10.1 1.0 17.3 17.5 _ _ Mt. Diablo Unified 4.9 5.8 = 5.9 3.7 6.5 7.6 15.0; Pittsburg Unified 7.6 ' 10.2E 9.2 18.6 9.8 10.31 9.9 _ _ San Ramon Valley Unified 5.3 1 4.3 3.6 3.2 1.3 1.21 0.6 West Contra Costa Unified 7.9 12.5 15.8 7.7 16.5 10.8; 37.8, Contra Costa County 6.9 8.5 8.7 5.7E 6.4 6.11 13.31 California 13.0 11.7 11.1 11.1 11.0 10.8 12.7 Source: State of California Department of Education,California Basic Educational Data System,2003. 45 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Dro out Rates From 1996-97 to 2000-03,Latino and Caucasian students had decreases in their high school dr rate (per 100 high school students). African Am g dropout American and Native America dropout at higher rates than n high school students g an other ethnic groups. The rate for Pacific I high in two of the sevenslanders is extraordinarily years studied. Since the data is based o y n 4 year derived methodology, (see note below)a caveat should be applied to interpretation rpretation of data from groups re resented b small numbers. p y very FIGURE 8 - PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS CONTRA COST WHO DROPOUT OF HIGH SCHOOL BY ETHNIC A COUNTY, 4-YEAR DERIVED RATE 2002-03ITY, 60% 50% A 40% - 346%, 0% ,. �-' ��6 30% a 20% { 10% Y$ :0°,ro ` 7r . 0% American Asian Pacific Filipino His Indian or panic African White(not County Islander or Latino American Hispanic Alaska Native TABLE 45 - PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS WHO DROPOUT OF HIGH SCHOOL BY ETHNIC-TTY, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 4-YEAR DER DERIVED RATE 777 African A merican 14.7 18.6 21.3 13.2 15.2 Latino 11.6 14.4 14.1 3.1 g,3 9.4 8.6 2.0 Filipino 3.3 3.7 Ca u 4.6 6.3 3.7 7.7 1.2 ------ Caucasian 4.7 4.1 5.6 5.0 3.7 4.0 1.1 Asian 2.8 1.0 4.7 5.5 2.8 4.2 Native American 0.5 2.4 11.3 8.7 7.7 7.4 15.2 Pacific Islander 12.5 2.2 32.6 6.0 5.6 2.9 5.9 Source: State of California Department of Education California .3 56.0 alifornia Basic Educational Data System,2004. Note: The 4-year derived dropout rate is an estimate of the percent period,based on data collected for a single year. P cent of students who would dropout during afour-year y 46 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN English L arn rs Historically,the percentage of students who are English Learners in Contra Costa County has been about half that of the state. In 2002-03,14%of the students in Contra Costa County were English Learners compared with 25.6%in California.Among the languages spoken by English Learner students in 2002-03,the most common language was Spanish(78.2%)followed by Tagalog,(3.5%). TABLE 46 — NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS WHO ARE ENGLISH LEARNERS { z{..moi.-- .�. .,� -:, . � r:. „ , a' ... :.. .-. M.... a .,gyp..,,�,.,,...:�� ..:: :iP t'' °f: •2':� +*i};, s'�.. ;.s,•+ r.�.::.rr...,�"..,T t'* ,...� ... z b: ,"2 bR s, �"?`r'>c�ii: t x�:�z, �}� k�gr�� ,y'� a'.e. w Number of students who are English Learners 15,832 16,517 170,310 19,526 21,925 23,121 Percent of students who are English Learners 10.5 10.7 11.0 12.2 13.6 14. California percent of students who are English Learners 1 24.6 1 24.7 24.9 1 25.4 25.6 TABLE 47 — TOP LANGUAGES SPOKEN BY ENGLISH LEARNERS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 2001-2002 Spanish 78,2 k'� ',}p'. �' �it Mein g r 1.8 � �j■� a ' •" u ff?: :' rk ;y#R^ra;F' x ' ',..« ^�' r"r tib 'a'Y x.�y.�"S ' f t''�1� � x Vietnamese 1.7 n Source. State of California Department of Education,California Basic Educational Data System,2004. 47 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN 0 0 Ch'11 Car Va'llah.... Illty According to the Economic Impact Report published by the Contra Costa Child Care Council', parents who use licensed child care play a huge role in Contra Costa County's economy. In fact, according to the same report,the increased economic output from licensed child care: ■ Increases industry output by$4.92 million; ■ Contributes$2.66 billion value added to the gross product in the county; ■ Creates$1.58 billion total direct,indirect and induced income; ■ Generates$255 million indirect tax revenues;and ■ Supports approximately 35,600 jobs. Further')licensed child care centers,including centers and family child care homes,generates approximately$231.4 million in gross revenues in the county.The child care industry also directly supports 4,757 full-time equivalent(FTE)in Contra Costa County,which equates to more child care professionals than police officers or lawyers in the county. The need for child care does not correspond well to the availability of licensed slots in centers and family child care settings. There are only approximately 1432slots available for children under 2 years of age and 21,491 for children 2-5 years of age. The maps included in Appendix 1 demonstrate the distribution of slots between the areas of highest need and the highest availability, particularly in the eastern portions of the county. 6 Contra Costa Child Care Council,Summary of The Economic impact of the Child Care Industry in Contra Costa County,2003. 49 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Chiml Care Availability FIGURE 9 — TOTAL POPULATION OF CHILDREN AGES 0-23 MONTHS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2000 1, sib 4 M .u. ,.: ` !1�Drlr �/NYrw1Mr FIGURE 10 — TOTAL POPULATION OF CHILDREN AGES 2-5 YEARS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2000 J k� @ ,n n" G E 4 "sy i•1�i Mr a11� M s Source: California Child Care Resource&Referral Network,California Child Care Portfolio,2001 www.rrnetwork.org. 50 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Choi r 1 Cae Ava ilability FIGURE 11 — ALL LICENSED CARE: TOTAL CAPACITY PER 100 CHILDREN AGES O- 5, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2000 law Aim �10 pm y �, y tNA ^c' �f 4aMa6 UM d-34 ME"34-M h1 W-R llf�D� M •s s 4 6r.. Source: California Child Care Resource psi Referral Network,California Child Care Portfolio 2001, www.rrnetwork.org. 51 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN 1 01 oty Choll Car V l 1 According to the 2001 Child Care Portfolio,the average annual cost of full-time child care for an infant (under two years)is $8,521.The average annual cost for full-time care for one infant and one preschooler(ages 2-5)is$14,440. Licensed child care supply in Contra Costa County increased by 7.7 percent from 1998 to 2000.The percent of children ages 0-13 receiving care that need it increased very slightly from 29.4%to 29.5%while the state increased slightly from 21.1 vs. 21.8 from 1998 to 2000. TABLE 49 — CHILD CARE SUPPLY AND DEMAND 1998, 2 2000,� CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Licensed child care supply 32,623 35,132 35,81 Percent of slots in child care centers 63% 60% 62% Percent of slots In family child care homes 37% 40% 389/0- Children needing child care 110,.850 119.0092 110J'900 Percent of children ages 0-13 receiving care that need it 29.4% 29.5% 32.0% CALIFORNIA Percent of children ages 0-13 receiving care that need it 21.1% 21.8% 25%1 Source: California Child Care Resource&Referral Network,California Child Care Portfolio,2003, www.rrnetwork.org. Note: Percent of Supply Meeting Demand is determined by dividing Child Care Supply by Children needing care(Ages 0-13);Child care centers include Head Start programs. 52 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2407 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN 0 1 a 0 1 0 tholl Car Avai bi i y TABLE 49 A — SUBSIDIZED CHILD CARE CENTERS IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BY ZIP CODE 2002 ARM ANV AB98S RVgD �SLWM ENROLL M.gNT 94509 - 2 centers Infant 28 28 Preschool 78 78 94513 - 1 center Preschool 40 38 94516 - 1 center Preschool 62 57 94519 - 3 centers Preschool 137 122 School Age 48 48 94520 - 4 centers Infant 57 57 Preschool 118 102 School age 94 94 94548 - 1 center School age 30 27 94553 -6 centers Infant 16 16 Preschool 108 107 School age 454 414 94561 - 2 centers Preschool 72 70 94565 - 8 centers Preschool 396 386 School age 37 32 94572 - 1 center Preschool 60 55 Source: California Child Care Resource&Referral Network,California Child Care Portfolio,2001,www.rrnetwork.org. 53 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Ch '11 Car Aval" la =b§qW I' I m t TABLE 49 B — SUBSIDIZED CHILD CARE CENTERS IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BY ZIP CODE 2002 AREAANDAGNO.,SERVED SLOTS. ENROLLMENT 94801 - 9 centers Infant 47 47 Preschool 375 331 94802 - 1 center Infant 36 34 Preschool 48 44 94804 - 6 centers Infant 12 12 Preschool 612 550 94806 — 3 centers Infant 24 19 Preschool 143 133 Source: California Child Care Resource est Referral Network,California Child Care Portfolio,2001,www.rrnetwork.org. 54 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN i miNt Choll Car Avaulab.,. i i y Of the children living in Contra Costa in 2000,children ages 0-5 account for 80,169 of the population and children ages 6-13 account for 116,931 of the population.Of those children ages 0-5,fifteen percent of them live in poverty and twenty percent are headed by a single parent. Sixty percent of children ages 0-13 are children living with working parents. In Contra Costa the cost of annual licensed child care full time for an infant(0-24 months)is $9,727 where the minimum wage of a fun time child care worker is$11,960. TABLE 50 — CHILD CARE STATISTICS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2000 2000 THE PEOPLE Total number of children ages 6-13 116,931 Total number of children aged 0-5 80.,169 Percent of children ages 0-5 living in poverty' 15% Families with children 0-5 headed by single parent= 20% CHILDREN LIVING WITH WORKING PARENTS3 Percent of children ages 0-134 60% Percent of children ages 6-13 65% Percent of children ages 0-5 54% THE COSTS OF CHILD CARE Average annual cost of full-timer licensed care in a center for Infant (0-24 months) $9,,727 Annual minimum wage of full-time worker $11,960 Care for an infant as % of minimum wage 81% Source: California Child Care Resource&Referral Network,California Child Care Portfolio,2001. 1.Percentage based on 1997 average poverty threshold for a family of four:$16,050. 2.Included male and female head of households with own children. 3.Nationally,15%of children 0-5 with working parents are estimated to be in child care. 4.Children living with two employed parents are estimated to be in child care. 55 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Chl" I Car Ava "ilab.... i In 2001-02, 10,116 families requested child care.Of those families requesting care,6,040 requested infant care (under 2 years),3,621 requested preschool care (ages 2-5 years,11 months), and 2,453 requested school age care (ages 6 year and older)."Employment"was given by parents as the top reason for child care referral requests followed by"looking for work,"and"in school/training." TABLE 51 — CHILD CARE STATISTICS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTYr BY FISCAL YEAR 200/201, 2ft%/200X REQUESTS FOR REFERRALS Number Number Infants under 2 years 51900 61040 Preschoolers,ages 2-5 years, 11 months 31761 31621 School age children ages 6 years and older 21529 21453 Total number of families requesting referrals 10,223 10,116 REASONS PARENTS MAKE CHILD CARE REFERRAL REQUESTS Employment 81 162 81188 Looking for work 480 604 In school / training 471 458 Other parental needs 344 340 Child Protective Services (CPS) / respite referrals 57 6 Alternative / back-up care 160 79 Mildly ill child 133 78 Enrichment and / or child development 326 363 Source: Contra Costa Child Care Council,2003. 56 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Fost r a r From 1996 to 2000,the rate of first entry into foster care (per 1,000 children ages 0-17)in Contra Costa County was lower than the state rate. In 2001,Contra Costa County's foster care rate increased and became slightly higher than the state rate (3.3 vs. 3.2,respectively). In 2001,the rate of first entry into foster care was much higher for African American children in Contra Costa County and California(8.9 and 8.7,respectively)than for any other ethnicity. Further,in 2001 in Contra Costa County,the rate of first entry into foster care for African American children was almost three times higher than the overall rate. TABLE 52 — RATE OF FIRST ENTRY INTO FOSTER CARE i�► 2 aot Contra Costa County 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.3 2.9 3.3 -j California 3.8 4.0 3.8 3.5 1 3.3 3.2 Note: Rate per 1,000 children(0-17 years). TABLE 53 — RATE OF FIRST ENTRY INTO FOSTER CARE f BY ETHNICITY, 2001 r �"l�i►��' I� >� =:� A` I'M I� � Contra Costa County 8.9 1 2.6 ; 3.1 1.0 California 8.7 2.8 3.1 1 1.0 Source: Needell,B.et al(2002).Child Welfare Services Reports for California.Retrieved April 2002,from University of California at Berkeley Center for Social Services Research website. Note: Rate per 1,000 children(0-17 years);the foster care entries in some counties were between 1 and 4 and therefore masked to protect confidentiality. 57 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN 0 stmic m Vlmol nc The rate per 1,000 population of domestic violence calls for assistance decreased in Contra Costa County from 6.1 per 1,000 in 1997 to 4.7 per 1,000 in 2001. Further,the rate of domestic violence calls for assistance in Contra Costa County has been lower than the rate for California from 1997 through 2001. TABLE 54 - RATE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CALLS FOR ASSISTANCE lMiW 20�% 2062 Contra Costa County 6.1 5.7 5.3 5.1 4.7 4.9 California 6.8 6.0 5.6 5.8 5.7 5.5 Source: California Department of Justice,2002;Department of Finance,California County Population Estimates,July Estimates, 2003. Note: Rate per 1,000 population.San Francisco Police Department did not report a full year for 1997 and did not report at all in 1998 which would influence the California rate. hi' l Abus Over the past six years,the rate per 1,000 children ages 0-17 of substantiated child abuse cases in Contra Costa County has been lower than the rate of substantiated child abuse in California. The rate has shown a steady decrease since 1998,with the exception of 2001 when it increased transiently to 10.1 per 1,000. TABLE 55 - RATE OF SUBSTANTIATED CHILD ABUSE CASES 2003zI� A Contra Costa County 9.6 9.4 9.1 10.1 8.7 7.7 California 1 11.7 12.0 11.6 10.7 12.2 11.5 Source: Needell,B.et al(2002).Child Welfare Services Reports for California.Retrieved April 2002,from University of California at Berkeley Center for Social Services Research website. Note: Rate per 1,000 children(ages 0-17);the substantiated child abuse rate measures the number of child abuse reports that warrant an in-person investigation and are determined to have occurred. uv ni" Arr sts 58 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Juvenile misdemeanor and felony arrest rates decreased from 1997 through 2001 in both Contra Costa County and California. Contra Costa County's juvenile misdemeanor arrests decreased from 40.1 rates per 1,000 juveniles ages 10-17 in 1997 to 27.8 per 1,000 juveniles in 2001. Felony juvenile arrest rates also decreased in the county from 22.0 per 1,000 juveniles in 1997 to 15.3 per 1,000 juveniles in 2001. Contra Costa and San Mateo counties have a fairly similar sized juvenile population (107,972 and 80,399 juveniles aged 10-17,respectively),'however,more Contra Costa juveniles are arrested for felony level crimes than San Mateo juveniles. In 2001,66,10-year olds were arrested for misdemeanor offences in Contra Costa County compared to 3410-year olds in San Mateo County. Further,almost two-times as many Contra Costa County 17 year-olds (417)were arrested for felony crimes compared to San Mateo County 17 year-olds (227). TABLE 56 - JUVENILE MISDEMEANOR ARREST RATE 1997 _06- 19$! 21' Contra Costa County 40.1 35.1 32.5 29.4 27.8 California 42.0 40.9 38.1 34.9 32.6 TABLE 57 - JUVENILE FELONY ARREST RATE 9 5 1+ 1919. B 2001 Contra Costa County 22.0 19.8 17.1 15.5 14.4 California 22.5 20.2 17.8 15.9 15.3 Source: California Department of justice,2002;California Department of Finance,2002. Note: Rate per 1,000 juveniles(10-17 years). TABLE 58 - NUMBER OF JUVENILE ARRESTS BY AGE, CONTRA COSTA AND SAN MATEO COUNTIES, 2001 k Contra Costa County Misdemeanor 66 63 127 250 432 589 706 770 Felony 31 18 61 103 212 322 394 417 Total arrests 99 86 197 383 700 990 11183 11245 San Mateo County Misdemeanor 34 34 104 158 239 332 442 412 Felony 26 19 50 78 114 195 236 227 Total arrests 72 65 172 282 422 620 752 725 Source: California Department of justice,2002. Adult sts 7 Department of Finance,2003. 59 Contra Costa County COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR CY 2006-2007 COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Adult felony arrests per 1,000 adults ages 18-69 years decreased in both Contra Costa County and California from 1997 through 2001. In 2001,the adult felony arrest rate was the same in both Contra Costa Counxy and California (18.1 per 1,000 adults).While the adult misdemeanor arrest rate decreased in California from 41.5 per 1,000 in 1997 to 34.2 per 1,000 in 2001,the adult misdemeanor arrest rate increased in Contra Costa County during the same time period. In 1997,29.9 per 1,000 adults were arrested for misdemeanor level crimes and in 2001, 32.8 per 1,000 adults were arrests for misdemeanor offences. TABLE 59 — ADULT MISDEMEANOR ARREST RATE 1998 1999 2000 2001 Contra Costa County 29.9 29.7 30.0 28.6 32.8 -- California 41.5 40.5 38.4 35.4 34.2 TABLE 60 — ADULT FELONY ARREST RATE X999 t 1,00 2 : Contra Costa County 19.4 18.4 17.5 18.0 18.1 California 22.0 20.1 18.3 17.8 18.1 Source: California Department of Justice,2002;California Department of Finance,2002. Note: Rate per 1,000 adults(18-69 years). 60 State of California Department of Community Services and Development CSBG Community Action Plan--Monitoring and Evaluation Plan CSD 410-2a(Rev.2/05) Requirement 6 MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN Describe a specific method(s) of evaluation and monitoring that ensures program and fiscal performance in accordance with the objectives in your Community Action Plan. The plan must include the following: 1. A process to ensure that data are collected to document the positive impact made. 2. A process to ensure that reports are prepared and submitted to CSD in accordance with contract requirements. All of the finalized outcome measures resulting from the approved CY 2006-2007 Community Action Plan will incorporated where possible into the Department's computerized data collection system [COPA (Child and Family Outcomes)] to ensure that all documented program relevant data will be systematically collected and stored and reported throughout the program year. In those instances where data cannot be collected via the Department's computerized data collection system a manual collection system will be established so that it can be collected and measured appropriately. This manual data will be added to the computer generated reports manually. PRELIMINARY AGENCY CHECKLIST Community Action Program National Performance Current ROMA Direct or Activity Indicator Measure (May be found at www.RONIA1.org) Adult Basic Education 1.2 1 Advocacy 2.192.2 2g, 3e After school Programs 1.29 2.116.3 6f Agency Capacity 5.114.1 5a Aging Programs 6.1 6a Asset Formation 1.3, 3.2 1n Board Membership 3.2 3a Childcare 1.212.1 1n Child Development-Health 6.3 6i Child Development Nutrition 6.3 6i Child Development School Readiness 6.3 6i Child Support 1.3 1h Childcare Tax Credit 1.3 1g Civic Involvement 3.2 3a Community Enhancement Businesses 3.2 3c. 3d Community Enhancement Community 2.2 2d Facilities Community Enhancement Housing 2.1 2e Community Enhancement Jobs 2.1 2a Community Enhancement-Safety and 2.2 2g Health Community Enhancement-Schools 2.2 2d Community Enhancement--Transportation 2.1 2f Community Investments 3.2 2b Community Organizing 3.2 3g Daycare 1.292.1 1n Disability(Independent Living) 6.1 6b Disaster Relief 6.2 6c Earned Income Tax Credit(EITC) 1.3 1g Domestic Violence Prevention/Intervention 6.2 6i Economic Develop ent 2.1 3c, 3d Emergency Medical Care 6.2 6c Emergency Services 6.2 6c Employment 1.1 la, 1d, 1 Faith Based Organizations 4.1 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d Family Development 1.19 1.211.3, 6.3 6i, 6' Family Functioning 6.3 6" Food and Nutrition 1.2, 6.12 6.216.3 6i GED 1.2 1 Head Start 1.111.213.19 3.29 6.3 1 a, 11, 1m Health Care 1.29 2.1 9 6.29 6.3 1 n, 2f, 6c, 6i -Higher Education 1.252.1 1 m Home Budget Management 1.3 6' Home Ownership 1.213.2 1j, 3a Homeless Pro rams 6.2 6d Housing .1.20 2.11 3.2 1iq 1j, 1k Community Action Program National Performance Current ROMA Direct or Activity Indicator Measure (May be found at www.ROMAl.org) Housing Rehabilitation 2.1 2h Individual Development Accounts (IDAs) 1.313.2 1n Income Increase Employment 1.1 if Income Increase Non-Employment 1.3 lgv 1h Job Placement 1.1 la Job Skills Training 1.2 1m Legal Assistance 6.2 6c, 6i Leveraging Resources 5.1 5a Life Skills Training 1.376.3 6' LIHEAP 6.2 6g Mental Health 1.212.19 6.2 1 n, 1 f, 5o,6c . Parent Involvement 3.113.2 3e, 3f Parenting Skills 6.3 6i . Partnerships 4.1 4a,4b, 4c,4d Post-Secondary Education 1.212.1 1M . Public Safet 2.2 2g . Recreational.Resources/Facilities 2.2 2g Section 8 Housing 1.212.1 ii, 1j, 1k, 29 Self-Employment 1.11 2.113.1 3.2 3c Self-Sufficiency 1.19 1.29 1.3 5f Shelter 6.2 6d Substance Abuse 1.2, 2.11 6.2 1 n, 1 f, 5o, 6c Surplus Food 6.2 6c TAN 1.111.212.1 la, 1n Transitional Housing 1.21 2.1 1 i Transportation 1.212.1 1 n Vendor Payments 6.2 6c Volunteers 3.113.2 3g Women, Infants and Children (WIC) 6.3 6i Weatherization 2.1 6g Workforce Investment Act(WIA) 1.111.2 la, 1n Youth Pro grams 1 1.2, 2.19 2.21 6.3 6f State of California OCommunity Action Plan Deoartment of Communitv Services and Develooment Contract No. CSBGINPI Proarams Reoort Mid-Year Report(Jan-June) CSD 801(Rev.2/06) Annual Report(Jan-Dec) Contractor Name: Contra Costa County Community Services Department J Contact Person and Title: Al Prince,Administrative Services Officer Phone: (925)646-5940 E-mail: 4pri Fax:(925)646-5551 �nce@,ccccsd.org Goal 1: Low-income people become more self-sufflcient. NPI 1.1: Employment Problem Statement: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) The Contra Costa County Community Services Department administers and operates a unique yet highly successful array of programs specifically designed to improve the lives of the low-income families and children residing in the County.Low-income people have a difficult time living in Contra Costa County,where the average family income exceeds$73,000.00 a year and the average home in 2002 sold for$364,000.Despite these seemingly positive statistics,a number of the County's census tracks report that 40%or more of the families residing in those census tracks live below the poverty line. Program Activities and Delivery Strategies: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) CSD's programs stress a high degree of community collaboration,focusing on the County's vulnerable young population;its children.CSD directly administers 19 child care centers County wide while funding approximately 22 different child care contracts with a number of community based organizations,thus creating numerous community hub opportunities for empowering residents to improve the quality of their lives with a wide array of client appropriate services. A. Unemployed and obtained a job 40 B. Employed and obtained an increase in 200 employment income C. Achieved"living wage"employment and benefits In the rows below,please include an additional indicators or NPI 1.1 that were not captured above. 6/16/2005 National Performance Indicators,Goal 1 Page 1 State of Califomia C=Cormumty Action Plan Denartment of Communitv Services and Develoornent Contract No. CSBGINPI Proarams Reoort Mid-Year Report(Jan-June) CSD 801(Rev.2/061 Annual Report(Jan-Dec) Goal 1: Low-income people become more self-sufficient NPI 1.2: Emplo-yment Supports Problem Statement: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) The extremely high cost of living in the San Francisco Bay Area requires that both single and married parents to work and/or go to school on a full time basis,which results in a significant demand County-wide for quality,full year,,full day child care education and day-care while the parents are at work,enrolled in school,or both. Program Activities and Delivery Strategies: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) CSD continues to provide high quality,full year/full day child care and development services County-wide through a total of 19 directly operated centers and nine centers managed by partners that are funded by CSD.In addition to full day/full year childcare,all of the children enrolled in our centers are screened to determine if they require any health,including dental,mental health,medical, nutritional or other neccesary services.All families enrolled in CSD's programs are entered into Family Partnership Agreements to ensure that all needs are addressed. A. Obtained pre-employment skills/competencies required for employment and received training program certificate or diploma B. Completed ABE/GED and received certificate or diploma C. Completed post-secondary education program and obtained certificate or diploma D. Enrolled children in"before"or"after"school programs,in order to 80 acquire or maintain employment E. Obtained care for child or other dependant in order to acquire or 800 maintain employment F. Obtained access to reliable transportation and/or driver's license in order to acquire or maintain employment G. Obtained health care services for themselves or a family member in 29400 support of employment stability(Pg.22) H. Obtained safe and affordable housing in support of employment stability I. Obtained food assistance in support of employment stability 21,000 In the rows below,please include any additional indicators or NPI 1.2 that were not captured above. 6/16/2005 National Performance Indicators,Goal 1 Page 2 State of California Community Action Plan Deoartment of Communitv Services and Develooment Contract No. CSBG/NPI Proarams Reoort Mid-Year Report(Jan-June) CSD 801(Rev.2/051 Annual Report(Jan-Dec) Goal 1:Low-income people become more self-sufficient. NPI1.3: Economic Assert Enhancement and Utiliza Problem Statement: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) Many low income families fail to claim valuable tax credits to which they are legally entitled to by law,but do not receive them because they are either not aware of these benefits,or,are not sure of the process for how to obtain them.In serveral public hearings it was requested that CSD expand it's services in 2005 and 2006 to include training classes for credit counseling,creating and maintaining a budget and savings plan,and legal assistance for a variety of economic asset enhancement and protection issues. Program Activities and Delivery Strategies: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) CSD will work with the Contra Costa County's private and public collaborative partners County-wide who provide each year free tax services through VITA(Voluntary Income Tax Assistance).The current collaborative has 12 centers Countywide serving thousands of individuals and families each year. A. ENHANCEMENT 1. Number and percent of 1600 5 participants in tax preparation participants programs who identify any type receiving a total of Federal or State tax credit of$1.5 M in and the aggregated dollar federal tax amount of credits credits 2. Number and percentage obtained court-ordered child support payments and the expected annual aggregated dollar amount of payments 3. Number and percentage enrolled in telephone lifeline and/or energy discounts with the assistance of the agency and the expected aggregated dollar amount of savings. In the rows below,please include any additional indicators or NPI 1.3 that were not captured above. 6/16/2005 National Performance Indicators,Goal 1 Page 3 State of California Community Action Plan Department of Communitv Services and Develooment QContract No. CSBG/NPI Proarams Reoort Mid-Year Report(Jan-June) CSD 801(Rev.2/05) Annual Report(Jan-Dec) B. UTILIZATION 1. Number and percent demonstrating ability to complete and maintain a budget for over 90 400 days 2. Number and percent opening an Individual Development Account (IDA)or other savings account and increased savings,and the 300 aggregated amount of savings 3. Of Partici ants in a community action asset develo meat proeram DA and others): a. Number and percent capitalizing a small business due to accumulated 5 savings b. Number and percent pursuing post-secondary education due to savings c. Number and percent purchasing home due to accumulated savings In the rows below,please include any additional indicators or NPI 1.3 that were not captured above. 6/16/2005 National Performance Indicators,Goal 1 Page 4 State of California Community Action Plan Deoartment of Corrinxinitv Services and Develoornent Contract No. CSBG/NPI Proararns Rewd Mid-Year Report(Jan-June) CSD 801(Rev.2/05) Annual Report(Jan-Dec) Contractor Name: Contra Costa County Community Services Department 'y Contact Person and Title: Al Prince,Administrative Services Officer Phone: (925)646-5940 E-mail: aprince@ccccsd.org Fax: (925)646-5551 g Goal 2: The conditions in which low-income people live are improved. NPI 2,1: Community Improvement,and Revitalization Problem Statement: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) The need for high quality subsidized child care County-wide for children ages birth to five far exceeds the number of subsidized slots available in the County. Program Activities and Delivery Strategies: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) The CSD continues to offer annually the nationally recogni mied Head Start program,State Child Development,Early Head Start and School Readiness.activities to more than 2,400 children and families County-wide. A. Accessible"living wage"jobs created or retained in the community B. Safe and affordable housing units created in the community C. Safe and affordable housing units in the community preserved or improved through construction,weatherization or rehabilitation achieved by community action activity or advocacy D. Accessible and affordable health care services/facilities for low-income people created or maintained E. Accessible safe and affordable childcare or child development placement opportunities for low-income families created or maintained 2,404 F. Accessible"before school"and"after school"program placement 240 opportunities for low-income families created or maintained G. Accessible new,preserved or expanded transportation resources available to low-income people,including public or private transportation H. Accessible preserved or increased educational and training placement opportunities for low-income people in the community,including vocational, literacy and life skill training,ABE/GED,and post-secondary education In the rows below,please include any additional indicators for NPI 2.1 that were not captured above. 6/16/2005 National Performance Indicators,Goal 2 Page 1 State of California I z Community Action Plan Deoartrnent of Conymnitv Services and Develoornent Contract No. I CSBG/NPI Proararns Reoort I _jMid-Year Report(Jan-June) CSD 801(Rev.2/051 Annual Report(Jan-Dec) Contractor Name: Contra Costa County Community Services Department Contact Person and Title: Al Prince,Administrative Services Officer Phone: (925)_ 46-5940 E-mail: aprinceQccccsd.org Fax: (925) 46-5551 Goal 3: Low-income people own a stake in their community. NPI 3.1:Civic Investment Problem Statement: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) Intergenerational poverty,perceptions of helplessness and powerlessness continues to exist in certain populations served by CSD. In addition,the lack of a positive and constant involvement by significant males in the ongoing lives of their gm children can have a negative impact on these children throughout their lives. Program Activities and Delivery Strategies: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) Parents and family members of the children in CSD's programs are strongly encouraged to participate in the array of special programs CSD hosts to educate and improve the lives of young children.Examples include:literacy festivals, children's festivals and events and school readiness kits.CSD actually purchased in 2004 a 32 foot mobile home vehicle that is taken to all of these events to better promote our many programs.CSD has also hired two fatherhood coordinators who are working Countywide to involve more adult males with the children in our programs. A. Total number of hours volunteered to Community Action* 3,000 In the rows below,please include any additional indicators for NPI 3.1 that were not ca turgid above. This number will be reported in Part 1: Section F, Subsection IV(g) of the CSBG/IS Survey. 6/16/2005 National Performance Indicators,Goal 3 Page 1 State of California Community Action Plan Deoartrnent of Cornffxjnitv Services and Development Contract No. I I CSBG/NPI Proararns Reoort Mid-Year Report(Jan-June) CSD 801(Rev.2/051 Annual Report(Jan-Dec) Goal 3: Low-income people own a stake in their community. Maximum NPI 3.2: Community Empowerment Through Maximum Feasible Participation Problem Statement: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) CSD recognizes the neccesity of providing additional support to low-income members of our communities in order to assist them with their much needed participation and representation in community organization,boards and councils to be able to provide their unique prepsective,input,and decision making abilities on issues impacting their communities. Program Activities and Delivery Strategies: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) CSD provides staffing support,training,mileage reimbursement and childcare for the County's Economic Opportunity Council(15 members)and the Head Start Policy Council(60+members)to meet monthly to assist CSD to better direct the Community Action Programs administered and operated by CSD.Focus is placed on developing not only the advocacy skills of low-income parents,but to also assist them to better understand the complex environment in which many of these decisions are made. A. Number of low-income people participating in formal community organizations, government,boards or councils provide input to decision-making and policy 80 setting through community action efforts B. Number of low-income people acquiring businesses in their community as a result of community action assistance C. Number of low-income people purchasing their own homes in their community as a result of community action assistance D. Number of low-income people engaged in non-governance community activities 300 or groups created or supported by community action In the rows below,please include any additional indicators for NPI 3.2 that were not ca otared above. 6/16/2005 National Performance Indicators,Goal 3 Page 2 State of California Community Action Plan Deoartment of Community Services and Develoornent Contract No. CSBG/NPI Proorarns Reoort Nfid-Year Report(Jan-June) CSD 801(Rev.2/051 Annual Report(Jan-Dec) Contractor Name: Contra Costa County Community Services Department Contact Person and Title: Al Prince,Administrative Services Officer Phone: (9 25)646-5940 E-mail: aprince@ccccsd.org Fax: (925)646-5551 Goal 4.- Partnerships among supporters and providers of services to low-income people are achieved. NPI 4.1: Expanding Opportunities through Community-Wide Partnerships Problem Statement: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) One of the challenges facing CSD is the ability to create and maintain a wide range of working partnerships with the supporters and providers of services to low income people in a County such as Contra Costa that is both geographically and ethnically diverse. Program Activities and Delivery Strategies: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) One of the CSD's strengths as a Community Action Agency has been ifs ongoing focus on building and nurturing a wide range of succesful collaborative relationships with numerous non-profit and govermnenal organizations and the customers we serve.CSD enjoys multiple partnerships with other County Departments and approximately 30 non-profit and faith based community organizations County-wide. A. Number of organizations community action agencies work with to expand family 40 and community outcomes In the rows below,please include any additional indicators for NPI 4.1 that were not ca i2tured above. 6/16/2005 National Performance Indicators,Goal 4 Page 1 State of California Conmwity Action Plan Deoartment of Community Services and Develoornent Contract No. CSBG/NPI Proararns Reoort Nfid-Year Report(Jan-June) CSD 801(Rev.2/051 Annual Report(Jan-Dec) Contractor Name: Contra Costa County Community Services Department Contact Person and Title: Al Prince,Administrative Services Officer Phone: (925)646-5940 E-mail: qprince@ccccsd.org Fax: (925)646-5551 Goal 5.- Agencies increase their capacity to achieve results. NPI 5.1: Broadenine the Resource Base Problem Statement: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) Head Start Grantees such as CSD face the continued challenge of operating a quality program in light of increasing operating costs due to rising fringe benefits(examples include workers compensation and heath insurance),salaries,and other costs impacted by inflation.In addition,Head Start Grantees also face the continued challenge of generating sufficient in-kind contributions from non-federal sources to meet ifs statutory obligations. Program Activities and Delivery Strategies: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) For 2006 and 2007 CSD will continue to collaborate with other County Departments(examples include the County's Health Services and Employment and Human Services Department)along with other County organizations that provide quality services to low-income residents in conjunction with existing collabaorations with private and public community partners. CSD will also continue to look for addititional revenue sources in an effort to either maintain or expand existing services. I isA. Community Services Block Grant(CSBG) $6419225 B. Non-CSBG Federal programs $1955895011 C. State programs $953861,396 D. Local public funding $12,557,261 E. Private sources(including foundations-and individual contributors, goods and services donated) F. Value of volunteer time TOTAL In the rows below,please include any additional indicators or NPI S.1 that were not captured above. These totals will be reported in Part 1: Section F, Subsection I-IV of the CSBG/IS Survey, 6/16/2005 National Performance Indicators,Goal 5 Page 1 State of California Cornrnunity Action Plan Deoartment of Community Services and Develooment Contract No. I I CSBGINPI Proararns Reoort Mid-Year Report(Jan-June) CSD 801(Rev.2/05) Annual Report(Jan-Dec) Contractor Name: Contra Costa County Community Services Department Contact Person and Title: Al Prince,Administrative Services Officer Phone: (925)646-5940 E-mail: aprince@ccccsd.org Fax: (925)646-5551 Goal 6: Low-income people,especially vulnerable populations,achieve their potential by strengthening family and other supportive environments. NPI 6.1: Independent Living Problem Statement: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) The cost of living in Contra Costa County,combined with high energy burdens can negatively impact low income individuals and families,and even more so with the disabled and elderly population who are on a fixed income. Program Activities and Delivery Strategies: (If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet.) CSD continues to operate its highly succesful Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program(LIHEAP)and weatherization services to eligible County residents County wide. A. Senior Citizens 600 B. Individuals with Disabilities 800 In the rows below,please include any additional indicators f or NPI 61 that were not captured above. 6/16/2005 National Performance Indicators,Goal 6 Page 1 National Performance Indicator (NPI) Work Group Supplemental Definitions The California NPI Work Group defines the following: Barriers to Initial or Continuous Employment: Any obstacle preventing a person from obtaining or continuing employment. Disaster Relief: Any form of disaster awareness,preparedness or emergency assistance and response. Employed: Employment that is unsubsidized, part-time, seasonal, full-time or self-employed with or without benefits. Increase in Employment Income: Upward movement from a baseline income. More money, more hours, more benefits or permanent increase in hours, benefits, or wages received. Living Wage: Earnings that are sufficient to allow an individual or family to meet basic needs without public assistance. Obtained a Job: Self-employed or secured a job with the expectation of long-term employment. Quality of Life Increased: Communities are improved by participation of all their members (i.e., households,businesses, faith based organizations,public and private organizations). Safe and Affordable Housing: Housing that complies with local building codes, safety and environmental regulations, and should be fully accessible to persons with physical disabilities. An individual or family should not spend more than 30 percent of its total household income on housing (percentage can be determined by local areas). Self-Sufficiency: Able to provide for basic needs of self and household, without ongoing public assistance. Unemployed: Having no earned income from wages or self-employment.