The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 04052005 - C57 r h ! r TO: BOARD OF SUPER`ISORS - CONTRA COSTA FROM: John Sweeten,County Administrator COUNTY DATE, April 5,2005 SUBJECT: Allocation of Proposition 36 Funds I SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION OPPOSE the preliminary allocation of Proposition 36 funds (Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000). BACKGROUND/REASON[S)FOR RECOMMENDATION The 2005 Contra Costa County State Legislative Platform includes the following policy position: Support efforts to ensure that Contra Costa County receives its fair share of State allocations. . . . The State Department of Alcohol and Dreg Programs recently released its preliminary allocation of FY 05-06 funds to counties under Prop 36 (Substance Abuse Treatment Trust Fund). Under the new formula, Contra Costa County's allocation would be reduced from$2,838,359 to $411,279, an 85%reduction. A reduction of this magnitude would wreck havoc on the County's alcohol and drug abuse programs, causing massive service reductions and layoffs. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: C. RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMMTRATOR"RECOMMEMATK !Of®OARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ONV L/I Loop APPROVED ASRECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A &UNANIMOUS ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ON MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: Sara Hoffman,336-1090 4 <7 ATTESTS J �V cc: CAO -S JOHN SWEE EN,CLERK OF Health Services ' THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Nielsen Merksamer(via CAO) AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BY, � PUTY r! ' Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs ALLOCATION of$116,513,956 Substance Abuse Treatment Trust Funds FY 2005-06 SACPA Governor's Budget (Preliminary)Allocation Count Allocation County Proposed Winners&(Losers) FY 05-06 Base Allocation A B Alameda $61496,562 $19429,116 $5,067,446 Alpine $154,332 $0 $1549332 Amador $1391858 ($109,334) $2491192 Butte $13224,844 $310,079 $914,765 Calaveras $2929756 $0 $292,756 Colusa $73,999 ($1469529) $220,528 Contra Costa $411,279 ($2,427,080) $2,838,359 Del Norte $235,505 $0 $235,505 EI Dorado $675,304 $111,675 $563,629 Fresno $31175,179 $0 $331751179 Glenn $288,649 $0 $288,649 Humboldt $640,280 $124,981 $515,299 Imperial $787,349 $0 $787,349 Inyo $0 ($207,585) $207,585 Kem $2,6881643 $0 $216889643 Kings $663,071 $134,704 $528,367 Lake $534,155 $106,290 $427,865 Lassen $216,316 ($57,438) $273,754 Los Angeles $30,023,127 $0 $30,0239127 Madera $334,115 ($1912015) $5259130 Marin $6881274 ($84,108) $7721382 Mariposa $226,143 $16,795 $209,348 Mendocino $6979175 $149,960 $547,215 Merced $813,417 $0 $813,417 Modoc $0 ($178,708) $1781708 Mono $204,069 $8,069 $1961000 Monterey $565,733 ($595,986) $1,161,719 Nap $499,032 $0 $4991032 Nevada $3609452 $0 $360,452 Orange $10,3111710 $29421,894 $71889,816 Placer $593,239 ($299,851)1 $8931090 Plumas $249,494 $0 $249,494 Riverside $49300,844 $0 $4,300,844 Sacramento $4,291,714 $0 $4,2919714 San Benito $1401985 ($131,044) $2721029 San Bemardino $50860,405 $0 $5,860,405 San Diego $6,317,580 ($2,528,986) $8,846,566 San Francisco $1,671,622 ($2,296,593) $3,9689215 San Joaquin $2,665,051 $641,662 $2,023,389 San Luis Obispo $1,015,248 $201,537 $813,711 San Mateo $2,373,512 $465,680 $1,907,832 Santa Barbara $1,9191073 $0 $19919,073 Santa Clara $6,107,887 $11453,383 $4,6549504 Santa Cruz $1,237,357 $263,781 $973,576 Shasta $862,172 $1861762 $675,410 Siena $168,060 $0 $168,060 Siskiyou $333,605 $0 $333,605 Solano $19452,369 $0 $114529369 California Houle Tuesday, March 22, 2� AW Home AI)QUI Us &(cohol!Drub Programs Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000(Prop. 36) My CA Contact ADP_ STATE OF CALIFORNIA- ARNOLD Criminal Justice Comments I Comola� HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES SCHWARZENEGGER, Collaboration: Site AGENCY Governor !Dallf ► (Prop-36) - _ ��li groin Drug C ,fob Onoortuniu," DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOL AND DRUG PROGRAMS pq e ated Web Sites 1700 K STREET • All CoupALLCa Ageng Resource Cell SACRAMENTO,LA 95$14-4037 (ACOA TDD(916)445-1942 • Audit Bulletins &�! Sits Map (916)445-7456 • California Alcohol_. , P11W. .A�.,f, M lpEP r•;t,.,�. = � �` �r DATE: March 18,2005 ACLA Letter No.05-04 (CAD ug-jand ,r.• 0 .�' TO: Alc hal Treatment Ilkc All County Lead Agencies(ACLA) Access R�pp rt(DA TAR SUBJECT! SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND CRIME PREVENTION ACT OF • Counly Allocations_ 2000(SACPA)—STATE FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 GOVERNOR'S BUDGET(PRELIMINARY)ALLOCATIONS • County Plan$ 25 YEARSREFERENCE: Sections 9515�9520 and 9525,Cha 2.5,Division 4,Title Evaluation Adv� Chapter _� 9,California Code of Regulations(CCR),and D.�v.�s. • vaua�ons 10.8 nRuo and 10.9, Health and Safety Code a F cilyy Licensure S Pwgrarn Celli Ica an This letter transmits the Fiscal Year(FY)2005-06 Governor's Budget • Fre ue f Asked (preliminary)allocation of funds to counties.Preliminary allocations are made Questions for implementation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000 a Lead AeenmContacts (SACPA)and the Substance Abuse Treatment and Testing Accountability (SATTA)program, a Local Treef eW 11 AWARment Contacts SACPA Allocations • Proositlon 36 Ballot InifilWye-Qr1alnal Text The Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs(ADP)has developed a • Ro-gulations roosal to recover excess SACPA funds from counties and distribute them to • Repo counties with little or no excess funds:The purpose is to redirect unspent funds a SACPA-Related inks to counties that arp experiencing service demands exceeding their available funds.In general,counties that carried over 20 percent(20%)or more excess • SACPA Repo_ ogt funds from FY 2003-04 to FY 2004-05 will see reductions in their FY 2005-06 Informatlon svetern allocations.Counties with less than 20 percent(20%)of carryover funds will be • Atatewide_Adv y eligible to participate in the distribution of recovered excess funds.These funds OEQUR will be distributed based on 50 percent population,40 percent SACPA Technical A�$istance treatment caseload,and 10 percent drug arrests. • Regulations to implement the proposed changes have been developed.ADP • E-mail SACPA expects emergency regulations to take effect for the FY 2005-06 allocations. Accordingly,ADP Is issuing two allocations with this letter.The first(Attachment A)is based on ADP's proposed excess Funds regulations. Featured Links • SACPA Evaluat+oil_ The second allocation(Attachment B)is based on the current methodology If the excess funds regulations are not adopted.Factors used to calculate the Websits(UCLAI preliminary allocations under the current methodology are Included(Attachment • Judicial Council f C). Califon a California,S�t ADP encourages counties to develop their plans using the preliminary Au9-c-lauon of Counties allocations based on the proposed excess funds regulations(Attachment A). (CSAC) - ADP has received input from the SACPA Statewide Advisory Group,the County Alcohol and Drug Program AdmInlstrators Association of California • Services To Native (CADPAAC),and the Fiscal Work Group,which is advisory to ADP,in the Arinerlcans http://www.adp.ca.gov/SACPAJACLA Letter 05-04.shtml 3/22/2005 MAR-29-2005 15:33 CCHS ADMINISTRATION 9253705099 P.03 of theproposed chap e6.The preliminary allocations based on ble Pro rs X7 development9 P �Qrnpara a the excess funds proposal will be used If approved by regulatory action. Counties subject to recovery of excess funds,as well as counties eligible to participate in the distribution of recovered excess funds,are noted on Attachment A.The form for eligible counties to request funds is Included with this letter(Attachment E)and due to ADP by April 30,2006. SATTA Allocatlons Also attached to this letter is the FY 2005-06 prellminary allocation of funds under the Substance Abuse Treatment and Testing Accountability(SATTA) program(Attachment D). Funds are allocated at the FY 2004-05 historical level of$8.63 million. Due Date Lead agencies must submit a county plan to ADP by May 1 j 2005,as specified by Section 9515,Chapter 2.5,Division 4,Title S,California Code of Regulations.The plans must be approved by the county board of supervisors, unless authority to approve the plan has been delegated.ADP must approve the plan before funds will be distributed. .. If you have questions on your allocations or submission of your county plan, contact your SACPA county analyst or the Office of Criminal Justice Collaboration (OCJC)at(916)445-7456 or 5,��„PA�Qa_do.state&a.us. Sincerely, /sl Del Sayles-Owen Deputy Director Office of Criminal Justice Collaboration Attachments: Attachment A FY 2005-06 SACPA Governor's Budget(Preliminary) Allocation:Proposed Methodology (PDF) Attachment B FY 2005-OS SACPA Governor's Budget(Preliminary) Allocation:Current Methodology (PDF) Attachment C FY 2005-06 SACPA Governor's Budget(Prellminary) Allocation:Data Factors (PDF) Attachment D FY 2005-06 SATTA Governor's Budget(Preliminary) ._�_.W Allocation (PDF) Atteghrnent E Request for Allocation of Recovered Excess Funds(for eligible counties as noted on Attachment A) (PDF) Back to Top of,PggQ Conditions of Use I Privacy Notice I Email Webmaster ®2005 State of California,The content found herein may not necessarlly represent the views and opinions of the Schwarzenegger Adminiavatlon. http://www.adp.ca.gov/SACPA/ACLA_Letter 05-04.shtml 3/22/2005 M_AR-29-2005 15=33 CCHS ADMINISTRATION 9253705099 P.U4 �S Attachment A Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs ALLOCATION of $116,513,856 Substance Abuse Treatment Trust Funds FY 200546 SACPA Governors Budget (Preliminary)Allocation Proposed Methodology County Alloceitlon TOTAL County ALLOCATION ALAMEDA^ 56,496,562 ALPINE- $154,332 AMADOW 5139,858 BUTTE" 51,224,844 CALAVERAS $292,750 COLUSA7 $73,999 CONTRA COSTA' $411,270 DEL NORTE $235,SOS EL DORADO" $676,304 FRESNO 53,175,179 GLENN $288,649 HUMBOLDT" $640,280 IMPERIAL $7e7,369 INYO' SO KERN $2.688.643 KINGS" $663,071 LAKE" $534,155 LASSEN' $216.316 LOS ANGELES 530,023.127 MADERA' $334.115 MARIN' $888.274 MARIPOSA" $226,143 MENDOCINO^ $697,175 MERCED $813,417 MODOC' s0 MONO" $204,009 MONTEREY' S56S.733 NAPA $499.032 NEVADA S360.452 ORANGE" $10,311.710 PLACER' 5593,239 PLUMAS 5249,494 RIVERSIDE $4,300,844 SACRAMENTO S4,201,714 SAN BENITO* S1d0.085 SAN BERNARDINO $5,860.406 SAN DIEGO" $6.317.580 SAN FRANCISCO' $1.871,822 SAN JOAQUIN" $2,865,051 SAN LUIS OBISPO" $1,015,248 SAN MATEO" $2.373,S12 SANTA BARBARA $1,819,073 SANTA CLARA^ 56.107.807 SANTA CRUZ" $1,237,357 SHASTA" $862,172 SIERRA 5168,060 SiSKIYOU S333.60S SOLANO $1,4S2.369 SONOMA $1,724,822 STANISLAUS'% $1,979.333 SUTTER $384,925 TEHAMA $372,453 TRINITY" $214.074 TULARE^ $2,269,721 TUOLUMNE^ $363.495 VENTURA $2,856,660 YOLO S834,449 YUBA^ $532,669 STATEWIDE TOTAL 116 13 986 Reflects appllcatlon of proposed excess funds re9ulatlons 'CountleS Subjed to recovery of excess fundis "Counties eligible fbr a dlslrlbvtion of excess funds Data Usea- January 1.2004 Population;2003 Arreat Data;FY 2003.04 SACPA Treatment Caseload 0318 a - • Attachment A CS Department of Alcohol and Drug programs ALLOCATION of $116,594,956 Substance Abuse Treatment Trust Funds FY 2004-05 SACPA Budget Act Allocation County Allocatlon TOTAL. County ALLOCATION ALAMEDA $5,064,727 ALPINE $154.918 AMADOR 3245.172 BUTTE 5881.597 CALAVERAS $294,259 COLUSA $220,410 CONTRA COSTA $2,893,080 DEL NORTE 5233,360 EL DORADO $571.289 FRESNO $3,030,652 GLENN $276,743 HUMBOLDT SSIS1023 IMPERIAL 5786.926 INYO $210,285 KERN $2,744,164 KINGS $536.311 LAKE $427,835 LASSE N $261.768 LOS ANGELES $30,007,020 MADERA 5503,387 MARIN S760,657 MARIPOSA $200,235 MENDOCINO $SS4,669 MERCED $786,211 MODOC $179,495 MONO $197,215 MONTEREY $1.143,179 NAPA 5496.764 NEVADA $360.259 ORANGE $8,181.639 PLACER $892,611 PLUMAS $247,875 RIVERSIDE $40298,537 SACRAMENTO $4.289.412 SAN BENITO $270,013 SAN BERNARDINO $51ES7,261 SAN DIEGO $8,749,987 SAN FRANCISCO 53.994,891 SAN JOAOUIN $1,984,212 SAN LUIS OBISPO 5813,274 SAN MATEO $1,906,608 SANTA BARBARA $2,017,825 SANTA CLARA $4,652,007 SANTA CRUZ 51,001,017 SHASTA $685,095 SIERRA $168,316 SISKIYOU $333,426 SOLANO $1,395,553 SONOMA $1.723.69e STANISLAUS $1.551.154 SUTTER $384,719 TEHAMA 5377,673 TRINITY 5200,484 TULARE $11,644.414 TUOLUMNE 5320,216 VENTURA $218551127 YOLO 5834.001 YUBA S4161,715 STATEWIDE TOTAL $119.594,956 Dale Used- .lanusry 1,2003 Population;2002 Arrest Data;FY 2002-03 SACPA Treatment Caseload Data 15 34 ?GJJ r w Attachment 13 er7 Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs ALLOCATION of S116413,956 Substance Abuse Treatment Trust Funds FY 2005-001 SACPA Governor's Budget (Preliminary)Allocation Current Methodology County Allocation TOTAL County ALLOCATION ALAMEDA $5.087,440 ALPINE $154.332 AMADOR $249.192 BUTTE $914,765 CALAVERAS $292,756 COLUSA $220,528 CONTRA COSTA $2.838,359 DEL NORTE S235,505 ELDORADO $563l620 FRESNO $3.175o179 GLENN 3288.649 HUMBOLDT $515.299 IMPERIAL $707,349 INYO $207,585 KERN $2,688.643 KINGS $528.367 LAKE 5427,805 LASSEN $273,754 LOS ANGELES $30,023,127 MADERA 5525,130 MARIN $772,382 MARIPOSA 5209,348 MENDOCINO 55411,215 MERCED $813,417 MODOC $178,708 MONO S196.000 MONTEREY S1A61.719 NAPA $499,032 NEVADA $360,462 ORANGE S7,809$816 PLACER 5803t090 PLUMAS, $249,494 RIVERSIDE $4.300.844 SACRAMENTO $4,291,714 SAN BENITO $272,029 SAN BERNARDINO $5,860r405 SAN DIEGO $8,846.566 SAN FRANCISCO $308.215 SAN JOAQUIN $2,023,389 SAN LUIS OBISPO $013,711 SAN MATEO $1.907.032 SANTABARBARA 31,919,073 SANTA CLARA $4,054,504 SANTA CRUZ $973,576 SHASTA 5675,410 SIERRA $168.060 SISKIYOU 5333,606 SOLANO $1.452.3G9 SONOMA $1.724,622 STANISLAUS S116S1,987 SUTTER $384,925 TEHAMA 5372,463 TRINITY $126,792 TULARE $1,645,297 TUOLUMNE $320,388 VENTURA 52,e56.660 YOLO $834,449 YUBA $418,930 I I STATEWIDE TOTAL- $1181513,950 Date Used- .January 1,2004 Population;2003 Arrest Dara;FY 2003-04 SACPA Treatment Caseload Data TOTAL P.06