HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03152005 - C.94 Is B.A.D. Good? Open Space Benefit Assessment Balloting Process March 15, 2005
Board of Supervisors Supplemental Response to Grand Jury Report No. 0502 Page 1
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE
TO GRAND JURY REPORT NO. 0502:
IS B.A.D. GOOD? OPEN SPACE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
BALLOTING PROCESS
On December 74, 2004, the Board of Supervisors responded to the above-referenced report filed by the
2004/2005 Grand Jury. The Board of Supervisors indicated that recommendation 2b, which
recommended that the County Clerk/Recorder assume additional responsibility in the administration of
future similar assessment ballot proceedings, required additional analysis. Recommendation 2b is
reprinted below. A response to item 2b follows.
2. If the decision is made to have other similar benefit assessment district measures in the
future, revise the process to improve the public's understanding and perceptions of
fairness by including the following features that are present in a general or special
election process (and are not prohibited in a benefit assessment district process) as
follows:
b. Have the existing office responsible for handling balloting, i.e., the Registrar of
Voters, be responsible for preparing and mailing the ballot and Official Notice and
Ballot Information Guide and tabulating the vote, using subcontractors where
appropriate.
Response: The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not
reasonable. The Clerk/Recorder's Office has no expertise and no interest
in conducting assessment ballot proceedings.
Assessment ballot proceedings are not elections and differ from elections
in several significant ways. Key differences that impede effective use of
the C/erk/Recorder's balloting expertise include:
• The outcomes of assessment ba/lot proceedings are determined by
property owners, not by registered voters. The Clerk/Recorder's
Office does not work with property owners as a class of ballot
respondents and has no authority to maintain property owner
databases for balloting purposes.
• Assessment ballots are public records. The Clerk/Recorder's Office
conducts elections involving secret ballots.
• The outcomes of assessment ballot proceedings are determined by
weighting ballots according to the amount of the proposed
assessment. The Clerk/Recorder's Office has no experience in
weighting ballots, has no software to perform such tabulation, and
has no equipment to process ballots that must record not only a yes
or no vote but also a parcel number and assessment amount.
• The California Elections Code does not apply to assessment ballot
proceedings. The Clerk/Recorder's Office conducts elections
pursuant to the provisions of the Elections Code.
Is B.A.D. Good? Open Space Benefit Assessment Balloting Process March 15, 2005
Board of Supervisors Supplemental Response to Grand Jury Report No. 0502 Page 2
Additional reasons why the Clerk/Recorder's Office should not play a
larger role in future assessment ballot proceedings similar to the Open
Space Funding Measure include:
2'f Clerk/Recorder's Office were to supervise assessment ballot
proceedings, the public may be more likely to misconstrue the
proceedings as an election, undermining the important distinctions
between the two processes.
• The ClerkjRecorder's ability to conduct elections could be comprised
by assuming responsibility for conducting assessment ballot
proceedings because assessment ballot proceedings have no fixed
schedule and can be initiated at any time.
• The Clerk/Recorder's Office has no experience in the formation of
assessment districts or in the preparation of ballot measure
summaries. Unlike the state agencies that prepare ballot guides for
statewide elections, the ClerkjRecorder's Office does not perform a
legislative analyst role; that is, its duties do not include drafting
neutral summaries of ballot proposals. Subcontractors and County
Departments that are familiar with assessment district formation
requirements and the details of the proposed assessments are
better able to manage the preparation of ballot information guides
at the direction of the Board.
As noted above, the ClerkjRecorder's Office has no experience in
tabulating weighted ballots submitted by property owners and
would need to hire a subcontractor. Regardless of which county
Department hires the tabulation subcontractor, that contractor
would be designated by the Board as the entity to tabulate the
ballots, and the subcontractor by law would ultimately be
responsible for determining tabulation procedures and for
determining the final outcome of the assessment ballot proceeding.