Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04062004 - SD.3 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra FROM: Warren E. Rupf, Sheriff-Coroner +' / Costa DATE: April 6, 200 SUBJECT: Law Enforcement Training Center ..'. ounty SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: ACCEPT informational report on the status of the Sheriffs Office Law Enforcement Training Center. FINANCIAL IMPACT: NONE. BACKGROUND: In August 2001, the Board of Supervisors, among other actions, authorized the Sheriffs Office to develop and operate the Office of the Sheriff Law Enforcement Training Center(LETC)to meet the Sheriff's Office and other agencies law enforcement training needs and directed the establishment of an enterprise fund for the Training Center. The Sheriff's Office officially assumed responsibility for the basic academy and in-service law enforcement training in January 2002. For the first 18 months of operation, the LETC operated at a significant deficit. The deficit resulted from (1) higher than expected building and grounds improvements, (2) payment of instructors at their previous rates, prior to negotiating lower rates; (3) a lack of marketing of the Training Center offerings as well as a period of time to review which course offerings would be successful; and (4)the financial decision by Los Medanos in late 2002 that the College would be Unable to fund LETC programs for the remainder of FY 2002-03. In September of 2003, the Board of Supervisors accepted an informational report from the Sheriff's Office regarding the status of the Law Enforcement Training Center and the Training Center Enterprise Fund. In than Board Order, the Sheriff outlined the various measures implemented to operate the LETC in a more efficient manner, including the professional preparation of a comprehensive business plan. Also part of that Board Order, the Board authorized the transfer of funds from the Sheriff's capital acquisition account to the Training Center Enterprise Fund to balance the fund. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE: vf' ['RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ❑RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE [-APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURES}: ACTION OF BO ON April 6, 2004 t k..' APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED p OTHER VOTE^rSUPERAIISORS- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT None ) ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF AYES: NOES: SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTESTED April 6, 2004 Contact: JOHN SWEETEN,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR cc: B y: ( t Deputy DATE: April 6,2004 SUBJECT: Law Enforcement Training Center Page 2 The Sheriff's Office is pleased to report the progress made toward profitability in the LETC programs in just eight short months under the new business plan. The gains in credibility as a regional training center and the improvement in the financial situation for the In-Service Programs have exceeded expectations. The budget established after completion of the Business Plan projected a net loss this fiscal year of approximately $120,000 for the In- Service Programs and a small projected loss for the Basic Academy Program. Further projections indicated breaking even in FY 2004-2005 and an ability to begin repayment of the deficit in FY 2005-2006. Information on Attachment One shows a net loss to-date of ($75,665) for the In-Service Programs, a 21% improvement over budget projections for this point in the fiscal year, while the Basic Academy Program shows a 22% greater loss than projected. As part of the changes implemented, staff reviewed in detail the budget of every class that has been scheduled. The Sheriff's Office Training Center staff now know the classes that are profitable, the number of sessions to offer, and the number of students to schedule for the highest profitability. The LETC has branched out into non-POST classes that increase revenue and maximizes in-kind instructors to reduce overall expenditures. Staff has solicited corporate sponsors and plan to increase our firing range contracts. Additional significant events during the first eight months of this fiscal year include: • Successful completion of the POST academy audit and re-certification that found our program to be excellent. This is an impressive turnaround for a program that was on the verge of being decertified when the Office of the Sheriff assumed management. Academy test scores now exceed state averages in all categories. The graduation in January of the 151 st academy set a record with 51 graduating recruits. • Creation of a new civilian driving course (Thrills and Skills) that provides training in critical skills such as braking, backing and steering. The target clients are inexperienced and at- risk drivers. Thus far, two classes are scheduled each month and registrations have each class full through April. • POST certification for the Mutual Aid Mobile Field Force basic training, which was successfully completed in november. More than one hundred officers representing almost every law enforcement agency in the county participated, making it the largest and most successful joint law enforcement training effort in county history and a major advancement in homeland security preparation. • Designation as the Operational Area coordinator for all training provided through State Homeland Security Grants. The first training courses (Emergency Response to Domestic Biological Incidents) were held in January and February. Additional courses scheduled include Emergency Response to Terrorist Acts (including train-the-trainer courses) and Weapons of Mass Destruction classes. Lastly, i would be remiss not to remind you that without the LETC, the Sheriff's Office would be required to send all of our officers out of county for all training. This cost has been conservatively estimated at $750,000 per year. Office of the Sheriff Contra Costa County Law Enforcement Training Center July 1, 2003 - February 29, 2004 In-Service Program Classes Held 93 Attendance 1587 Budgeted Actual Difference Revenue 268,754 315,773 47,020 Expenditures 200,826 180,482 (20,344 Gross Profit/(Loss) To-Date 67,928 135,291 67,363 Indirect/Fixed Casts 163,854 210,956 47,102 Net Profit/(Loss) To-Date (95,926) (75,665) 20,261 Academy Program Students 151 st Academy Class 51 Class graduated in December 152nd Academy Class 28 Class began in January 153rd Academy Class 37 Class to begin in May Total 116 Projected' Budgeted Actual Difference Revenue 605,718 626,296 20,578 Expenditures 218,778 253,496 34,719 Gross Profit/(Loss) 386,940 372,800 (14,141} Indirect/Fixed Costs 449,610 449,702 (92) Net Profiti(Loss) (62.,669) (76,903) (14,233) Projected' Totals Budgeted Actual Difference Revenue 874,472 942,069 67,597 Expenditures 419,604 433,979 14,375 Gross Profiti(Loss) 454,868 508,091 53,223 Indirect/Fixed Costs 613,464 660,659 47,195 Net Proflt/(Loss) (158,596) (152,568) 6,028 ' Based on actual number of students in two Academy Classes and an estimate for the third Attachment One Personnel and Finance Division