HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04062004 - D1 D.1
TIFF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Date: April 6, 2004 Public Comment
On this date,the Chair invited those who wished to address the Board for Public Comment. The
following people presented testimony:
Barbara Lambarida, California Nurses Association, 2000 Franklin Street, Oakland,
regarding proposed changes within the Pediatric Unit at the Contra Costa County
Regional Medical Center;
Rachel DeGuzman, 3617 Rocky Shore Drive, Vallejo; regarding proposed
changes within the Pediatric Unit at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center;
Ann Johnson, 3721 Hobby Court, Concord; regarding proposed changes within
the Pediatric Unit at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center;
Dianne Cole, Friends of Concord Airport, 2420 Tornar Court, Pinole;
regarding the Buchanan Airport in Concord;
J. Ben Paredes, Neighborhood Committee to oversee Crestwood, 510 Patterson
Blvd., Pleasant.Hill; regarding the report on the Crestwood Facility.
THIS IS A MATTER FOR RECORD PURPOSES ONLY
NO BOARD ACTION WAS TAKEN
f
•:f::frr' .y,•:: •.?rfo-••.r,i::<;:;:i .;..::.:,.::,,...i......... Vl
:{:f.::rfr::.j::i r.k'i• i'{r :rf• fj
SS .
�..w ::...
fi
�wh
:..<:
. ' to
cuJ
�.�.....
l�irn�.
4-4
' »; > » i
iiik•A''•)':Q:�:fr r'rijiiS:yjii>: ((�.�/�)
All
.�Jk
�-
I d %(]Ah*11*1 Ir V d
Sponsored By: The Friends of Concord Airport Coalition
Hosted By: Walt rind Janet Lyall of AIM Security
Saturday April 24, 2004
11 :30AM - 2:30 PM
"F" Hangar Row - East Ramp
Enjoy .Raffle
Walt .Lyalls .For .Lunch at
Famous Chili .. ;r:°: Pine Mt. Lake
Join your fellow pilots and friends for an
afternoon of camaraderie, laughs and learn about
the latest efforts to keep Buchanan Field open.
i
And of course, there is the wonderful chili that made Walt Lyall
famous.
Participate in a. ramie for a Gourmet .Lunch served.
at Ken & Dianne Cole's fine Mt. Fake aviation
themed. home.
For More information visit www.BuchananAirport.com
Q
4-4
CN
to
m dt
a, �+
..
a
y m �`..o.c.,....
a 3
.,
....::::
'.:.::•::::.........�.....
1�
CSS
(0
ftS —
E!S Yk� F`
I
::.
••:::.
dS ::::r
�.
tJ?
C
Q1 ♦r�
<.....
to •:.<•:::•;:.:.::.;;:,:;;;;:
RS
f..y
x.
ti ;
w 0
X a rn
n�
CL
E 32v
�' +
(D
MD
fiS
j
to �-+
O
C>
as y. a
o EMs �
a
." CLE 'o
�``" @ /',�C<• '. c� cin y�
12
CL
Sf ca fi tS
co
a ro
CL
Ei
s, ti is o r
>. rsa: O
rn
G �
�o
.r
3
d
>> >.
a
c
ew
0
L
C
L
KIM
Ilk"
4i
d+
aY
. .. ;.;:
.C. 0
L
....' dam+
ff R
f`$:::•'
L
Im
:.......................:.....:......
IQ
41
C
.;
ro ""
Lv �, a
} >: to
M fAM! ai� ' v °cam
ao m Et} O v tYco
F- v Csy ui
ul 13
73
a:
44-14d c m4jin
cn
to 0
'$ s• .p IV
U) vtu
t C CLU ' V it u ttS
ON Cc 0
,:;•.. < ::.;,y:.; e� t17 ,_, ice. cn
LL
w: 0 ,1
c sem+ '� tuana + 0 � isrsaaa —� .
ri ` .. sc L u cu v a Ln v
t <a < Yl fl v G3 > CL
t11
` y + 04T) salZzz
v res
egs siW sem+fl a+ Y R3 v u C7f r. S'.
biz ;{ra:`•r:•r:•r sM t F— e r (} C II
.
C13 C tCI Cp v. RS S7
� tr
N
. T.
to
c
zs c3 c' to
46 LA
IWO
cu
._
`cs
> C
> > o
C � cu �!� curoEn
4-1
NL �,
= f0 O N
L7 >
> 4) tU 0
0Y C a+ rrr
C3 Vl C C tB x ++ tB s r C C C7
L _
iL3CS fA i 4� C + Q1
rn
O CS Cl 7r 3 tli 2 lU
(}
} (� (1. Y t. u
M C C w N C 1.0 C
t W A (0 t- i0 M Ln O .L1
(a
C v0 'Uami C3 a ;3 4-4t) ro
to 17 Ci V
Cl to
UT .0 is O ii C ifl
C of.fa cu ai Y es
Zj U-
0
Ij to
7�
,.0
�t
Q
<t
rn
C
��
,� t �`,
f—;
�` � �`
„�'`
� �,
� �
� � ax
��
� '� � ,�.
� � ` �
�'
�'
c�
...�
a�
.�
.�
�.
...�
.a=
`�
f
•a
r
f
d
w
A
r y
w
•
F
4'.
� � N
•
S:
w � • f f.-.5
� 4
a
4
w
t /
� w
w rr
• �` / J
5/1197 AC 150/5200-3
SECTION 1. HAZARDOUS WILDLIFE ATTRACTANTS ON, OR NEAR
AIRPORT'S.
1-1, TYPES C1lF HAZARDOUS WILDLIFE 1-2. LAND USE PRACTICES. land use
ATTRACTANTS ON OR NEAR AIRPORTS. practices that attract or sustain hazardous wildlife
l-lurnan-iriade or natural areas. such as poorly- 1x�pullitions on or near airports cr,n significanti iFi-
drained areas,retention:?ands,roosting habitats on Crease the potential for wildlife-air£rait collis]011S.
buildings, landscaping, putrescilale-waste disposal Flkak recommends against land use practices, within
operations, wastewater treatment plants, the sitinta enwria stated in 1-3,that attract or susta.111
:3 rlt;.tilur£il e)r i!{li]a£iil{llitil a43$i�'itics, titir ale'.e populations of hazardous wildlife within the
irining;, or tvctlands, may he used lav ttiildhic for Vicinity of airports or cause; movement of haiz-
escape., feeding;, loafing., or reproduction. Wildli`f'e ardous wildlife onto, into, or across the approach or
use of areas w7thlnan uiiwrt's approach or dep<ar- departure ai7spaie, aircraft ?T3C1vernent area, tc%adlin`g,
titre airspace, aircraft rriotiement- areas, ioadiini; nurip ,ter E3ircraff parlmngarca of a lx ris.
ramps, or aircraft parking areas ma}, cause condi-
tions hazardous to aircraft safety. Airport operators, sponsors, planners, and land use
d4eyciopers should consider x Nether prc)pe)sed land
All specie-1; of wildlife can pose a1 thrcat to aircraft uses, including new airport developineni protects,
safety. I ToNvever, some q cics are more would increase the w'ildiife hazard. Caution should
commonly involved in aircraft strikes than cothert. be exercised to ensixe Ulat land use practices 011 oi'
'fable I lists the wildlife groups commonly reported Pear airports do not enhance the attractiveness oi`
as being involved in damaging, strikes to ts.S. .lcarea to hazordzous wildlife.
aireralt front 1993 to 1995,
1-3. SITING CRiI*ERiA. IFAA recommends
Table 1. Wildlife Groups Involved in Damagingseparations wheia siting <inz of tl:e ;t Edlif'c
Strikes to Civilian Aircraft,USA, 1993-19954 aitr63ct<ri� iwrtioned in Section " c> agnea,
plar min4)_ new tiirport aevelopmeint pro ecis t:)
Wildlife Percent involvement in a=oinr3mdaite aircraft rnovmcnt. The distance
Groups reported damaging bctwe€tl all airport's aircraft Mo`'{'i2'icnt areas,
strifes Imdi-na mirip7, or fiircraft parking areas and the
Gulls 28 wildlife auractanat should be as Follows:
waterfowl 28 a. Air-ports serving; piston-powered
lZaptars l l aircraft. A distance of 5,000 feet is recommended.
.......`.. 3` :.?
Eii::»:>?Dies s .....
.......
aircraft. �Vultures 5
i„ _ .._ _ ........ __........
..
Blackbirds- 5
Starlingsc. tr Bz:. 13e r.t ;» ce »» ?:»»>:.....
Druids
} 1 f y
i
ft
Wading l>irrts ` the <pprchodeparture
Feer l l
Canids
t and 2 i
5I1t97 AC I30/5200-33
SECTION ?, LAND RISES THAT .E INCOMPATIBLE WITH SAFE
AIRPORT OPERATIONS.
2-1. GENERAL. 'file v6ldlife species and zh>w t), Existisi„ wastewater treatment
size of the populations attracted to the airport facilities. FAA recommends corructinu ant
environment are highiv variable and =Zai, depend %vi'dlife haz:zrds arising from existing wastewat-or
on several factors, including lard-use -practices (ill treatmeal facilities located on or near ai'Jorts
or near the airport. It is important to idenniy those vv ithout delay, using appropriate wildlife hazard
:Find use practices in the airport area that attract mitigation techniques. Accordingly, measures to
J tzardous wildlife. This section discusses land vase` liiinimize hazardous wildlife aaraction should be
practices knoxvn to threaten aviation safety. developed in consultation with a wildlife damage
inanagement biologist. FAA recornmends that
2-2. PUTRE-SCIBLE-WAS-M DISPOSAL waste" iter treatment facility operators ncorlxo-ate
OPERATIONS. a'utrsrs iblc vv<<fs'a disfxasal :al.propri ate -wildlife hazard rpitignon techniques
olvrations are known to attract large nw-ibe.rs of into their operating practices. Airport operators
,,vildhfe that are hazardous to aircraft. Because of also should Oncouraue those operators to
!,his. these operations, ;when Immed within the incomporate; these mitigation techniques in their
separations identified In the siVing criteria in I-3 operating practices.
are considered incompatible ,vith sale airport
operations. e. Artificial marshes. Waste-water
treatment% facilities may create artificial marshes
I.'AA recommends against locating ;and use, s tlJ taergent and er Iergent aquatic
putrescible-waste disposal operations inside the vegetation as natural :filters. These artificial
sCparattc}t'.$ 1Cientiflf3d in lr� ailing Criterla inarAle s, may be used by some: species of flocking
mentioned above. a'Ai? also re otnmends Wagairist byrds, such as blackbirds and. water"o 1, Cor
neve airport development pr<, is that: L,voujd breeding or roosting? activities. FAA recommends
increase the number of _3.lifer3fl. ope,ra6ar, or tlhz i : !sinst ostablishing, artificial inarshes within tile
would accommodate larger or faster aircraft, near se-arations Identi io{I
in the SItIng Criteria stated In
putrescible-waste disposal operations located I-3.
within the separations identified in the siting
criteria in I-3. d. Wastewater discharge and sludge
disposal. IAA recommends against :he discharge
2-3. WASTEWATER `€R1Ek;•;;4'EN'F EACH.£- «l' waste;a-ater or sludge on airport oropertN
Tl ES. Wastewater treatinent facilities and. Regular spraying of vvastet3rats r or sludge disposal
associated settling ponds often attract large on .unpaved areas may improve soil, moisture and
numbers of wildlife that can pose a threat to_aircraft quality 'i'he resultant turf grotsih requires more
safety usher:they are located on or near an wgxlln. fse titaent mot.S`ii'si7 enllicla in tun may mutilate or
flush insects or small animals and produce strati'.
a. New wastewater treatment faculties. The Enaimed or flushed organisms a d the sura o;
FAA, recommends against the cc lstiiaciion of Ire,,v can. attract hazardous wildlife and jeopsrdi e
wastewater treatment facilities or associated settling aviation safety. In addition, the improved turf play
xiiads within the separations identified i, the siting attract grazing wiidaife such as deer and geese,
criteria in 1-3. fluring, the siting analysis for
wastewater treatment facilities, the; potcntial to Problems may also occur when di eharges saturate
attract hazardous wildlife should zxs considered if unl-.axed airport areas, The resu tant soft, muddy
an at"m is in the vicinity of a prosOsed site. conditions can severely restrict or prevent
Airport operators should voice their opposition to emergency vehicles from reaclung accident sites in
such sitingTs. In addition, they should consider the a tinicly mcanner.
existence of v.astevvater treatlr_cni lacilit cs when
ev=aluating proposed sites for nein girl-k t e. Underwater waste discharges, The
development prc,iects and avoid such sites when unden.vater discharge of any Food tv agte, e.p;., fish
practicable. processing off%il, that could attract say;°ertt?ing;
e'itdli'e
is
not recommended within 10-1s parat3 Sns
identified in the siting criteria in 1-3.
AC 15015200-33 5/11197
2-4. WETLANDS. ilei til ed, iii the siting criteria in 1-3. Weiland*
mitigation ;ranks meeting these siting criteria offer
a. Wetlands on or near Airports. an ecologically sound approach to raitigation in
(1) Existing Airports. Normally,
wetlands are attractive to many wil&li SG.ceifiw. (2) Exceptions to locating mitigati('rl
Airport operators 1,vith wetlands located on or activities outside the separations identities in the
7nearn., airport propert- tlla�Lild. be aS.E`.5"t t'i: aiI siting Criteria i-, 1-3 ma"y` le Considered it file
wildlife use or habitat changes in these areas that affected ,vetl_ands provide unique ecological
could affect safe aircraft operations. liinctions, such as critical habitat for threatened or
endai?gered species or ground vA ater recharge.
(2) Airport Development. INhen Such mitigation must be compatible with sate
practicable, the FAA recommends siti„g new airport operations. Enhancing such mitigation
airlxirts using the separations identified in the siting ureas to attract hazardous wildlife should be
criteria in 1-3. Where, alternative sites are not avoided. tan-site mitigation plans may be reviewed
practicable or when expanding existi_?g airports in by the i:A.& to determine cow atibility vNith sate
it i?e=ar 1t'etiands, the ;k1lite hazards should lv Import op.ertl ons.
evaluated and miramize( through a -,Niid11I c
n?anas?eineut plan prepared by a - ldhlc dwnagc; (33 Wetland mitigati(�n projects ti?ead are
management bialagist> in t'C?i* a ltafia)t? ifh talc t . nec;dcd i(, protcel unigi.t. wetland functions see
Fi h and Wildlife Se.os.e (i_isSFWSanal 6ic CT-S. and that iriust be locate:! in the siting en-
Arn�v Co rpsotl ngineers {3€j feria in l-3 should be identified and evaluated by a
i-.ildlifc darnagke rrianagement biologist before
N£?E: If questions exist as to whetl: r or not an implementirog the nuti`<ti{=r. h <vi(_Mile ci_ii??age
area would qualify its a ,vetland, contact the IJ.S. management plan should, be developed to reduce
Arinv CC>I--_ the Natural Resource Con +crv.ation this wildli-c hazards.
Service, or a wetland consultant ceniziec."+ to
delineate wetlands. NO`VF_: AC 150/5000-3,Address List jbr Iiegionai
Air,porls Division and Airports Distriet/Field
b. Wettand mitigation. Mil!5gatiOn May Qfifi i' , pro,ides iniorivo ion on the location of
be nceessam when i.iniavoi(fiablc; wwfltand these oilices.
disturbances result from now airfx)rt devidop-nerit
proiects. Wetland rr_•itigation should he sfesigi_cd so 2-5. DREDGE SPOIL CONTAINMENT
:t does not create i.E v\'?ldlife??22arCl_ AREAS.S. IFtA,"i r(coniniends agtiifis! iocating
c`r€dgc s pail containment areas wi[hin the
(1.) FAA recommends that wetland scparanlons Identified in the siting Criteria in 1-3, it:
i"faitigation _t7i'OlEc's hat ma'y attract hazardous tie spout Contains niatelial :t?tm `�ouldt a, Ct
wildlife be sited outside of dic; separations hazardous tivildliie.
s