Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MINUTES - 03092004 - C.42
ro: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra FROM: DENNIS M. BARRY, AICP !` Costa COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 4; , County DATE: March 2, 2004 SUBJECT: Request to AdoLt the Tri-Valley Trans rtation Council's Update to the St r #e is x22ndIture Plan SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPT the 2004 Update to the Tri-Valley Transportation Council's (TVTC) Strategic Expenditure (see Exhibit B) Plan Update as requested by NTC (see Exhibit A), and AUTHORIZE the Chair of the Board of Supervisors to sign a letter relaying this action to the Chair of TVTC (see Exhibit C). FISCAL IMPACT None BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The Tri Valley Transportation Council (TVTC) includes Contra Costa and Alameda counties, and the cities of Danville, San Ramon, Dublin, Pleasanton and Livermore. The TVTC was formed to address transportation issues of common interest. In 1907, the TVTC unanimously recommended to its member jurisdictions the adoption of a uniform development fee, known as the Tri Valley Transportation Development Fee(TVTDF).All participating jurisdictions supported this recommendation by adopting ordinances establishing uniform development fees in the Tri- Valley area dedicated to specified regional transportation projects. On January 28, 2004, the TVTC unanimously approved (Exhibit A) an update to its Strategic Expenditure Plan(SEP—Exhibit B).The SEP was subsequently distributed to member jurisdictions for local adoption. The SEP is a policy document that guides the expenditure of the Tri-Valley Development Fee (TVTDF) revenue and represents a statement of priorities for transportation projects in the Tri-Valley Area. Any disbursement of TVTDF revenue to a project sponsor for a project must be consistent with the funding amounts identified in the SEP. The most substantial change in this update that the Board should be aware of is the provision for a loan of up to $0.5 million to fund the utility relocation component of the Vasco Road Safety Improvement Project. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE "-- RECMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURES : ACTION OF BO t ON March 9, 2004 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT I, TV ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN, Contact: John Cunningham (925/335-1243) March 9, 2004 cc: Community Development Department (CDD) ATTESTED M. Shiu, PWD JOHN SWEETEN, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINI RATOR, BY .r � c . 'DEPUTY G:\Transgortation\Board Orders&Greenies\2004\TVTC SEP tlodate.doc ,_ EXHIBIT A TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL Transportation Services Division 510 La Ganda Way, Danville,CA 94526 ,:7 Millie Greenberg Date: January 30, 2004 Supervisor District 3 Contra Costa County (W)(925)820-8683 To: Tri-Valley City Managers and County Executives Subject: 2004 Strategic Expenditure Plan Update .:, Scott Haggerty Supervisor c t Alameda County r; (W)(510)272-6691 On January 28, 3004, the Tri-Valley Transportation Council (TVTC) unanimously approved an update to its Strategic Expenditure Plan (SEP). The Newell Arnerich TVTC's SEP is a policy document that guides the expenditure of the Tri-Valley Councilmember Transportation Development Fee (TVTDF) revenue and represents a statement Danville (925)837-3231 of priorities for transportation projects for the Tri-Valley area. Consistent with the requirements of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Claudia McCormick (JEPA) pertaining to the SEP, this letter is to request that your agency place the Councilmember 2004 Strategic Expenditure Plan Update on your next available Council or BoardDublin (W)(925)833-6650 meeting for local adoption. (H)(925)828-1672 We appreciate your on-going participation in this collaborative regional Steve Brozosky transportation planning process. Councilmember Pleasanton SinceWmerich, (925)846-3727 Tom Reitter Councilmember Neweir Livermore TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL (W)(925)422-1468 (H)(925)443-3326 Attachment: 2004 Strategic Expenditure Plan Scott Perkins Councilmember San Ramon (925)973-2544 EXHIBIT B TR.I-VALLEY TRANSPOR.TATION COUNCIL STRATEGIC EXPENDITURE PLAN 2004 UPDATE WITH INTERIM FEE ADJUSTMENT "PROPOSAL FOR ADOPTION" I. Introduction II. Project Descriptions and Status Reports III. Project Priorities IV. Project Funding V. Project Sponsors Table I - TVTDF Funding Plan Table 2 - Project Revenue Sources I. INTRODUCTION The Tri-Valley Transportation Council (TVTC) and its constituent members adopted the "Tri- Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance" (TVTP/AP) in 1995. The Plan marked a common understanding and agreement on the Tri-Valley's transportation concerns and directions for improvements. Among other things, the TVTP/AP presented eleven specific transportation improvements to be given high priority for funding and implementation (Table 1). These eleven projects were subsequently included in the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee (TVTDF), which was adopted by the TVTC and ratified by all seven-member jurisdictions in 1998. In 1999, the TVTC adopted a Strategic Expenditure Plan ("Expenditure Plan") for the TVTDF to establish a funding plan for the regional fee projects. Since that adoption, a total of$20,085,877 million in fees and $131,383 in interest were remitted by member agencies through June 30, 2003, bringing the subtotal of revenue remitted to $20,217,260. The TVTDF Trust Fund earned $754,461 in interest income over this time period to bring the total revenue credited to the fund to $20,971,721, From these funds a cumulative total of$10,453,082 has been disbursed, leaving a balance of$10,518,639 to spend on the TVTDF projects at the end of fiscal year 2003-04. In July 2000, the TVTC updated the TVTP/AP, which was included in the 2000 Update to the Contra Costa Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Subsequently, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) issued the 2001 Update to the Regional Transportation Plan. In addition, new funding sources, such as the renewal of Measure B in Alameda County, have been approved by the voters. This update to the Expenditure Plan incorporates and builds upon these updates to the regional and sub-regional transportation outlook for the Tri-Valley area. In addition, some of the original list of transportation improvement projects have been completed, and schedules and funding for others have changed. Furthermore, an interim fee adjustment, approved by the TVTC at its April 2003 meeting and subsequently adopted by all seven member jurisdictions, are reflected in this plan. This report summarizes progress-to-date on implementation of the original projects and includes revisions to the Expenditure Plan. Amendments to the Expenditure Plan require the unanimous approval of the seven TVTC member jurisdictions. Following approval of this Final Revised Draft Strategic Expenditure Plan by the TVTC, it will be referred to the member jurisdictions for comment and ratification. Revenues from the TVTDF program have been applied to several of the 1999 Expenditure Plan's original list of high priority projects: • I-580/1-680 Interchange The Expenditure Plan appropriated $5.6 million to the Alameda County Transportation Authority (ACTA) as the "local match" for this regional improvement during fiscal years 1998/99 and 1999/00. This amount included approximately $4.2 million in funds provided to the project to fulfill its funding needs and $1.4 million in reimbursements to the Cities of Dublin and Pleasanton for prior contributions. This project was completed in June 2002 and the TVTDF obligation for the funding of the project has been satisfied. 2 Revised: 2/12/2004 • State Route 84 Corridor Improvements The Expenditure Plan initially programmed $1.5 million to the City of Livermore for completion of preliminary engineering and environmental review for improvements to State Route 84 between I-580 and 1-580. During fiscal year 1999/00, $1.2 million was appropriated to the City of Livermore, as requested, for preparation of a Project Study Report (PSR). The PSR has been prepared and is expected to be approved by Caltrans in Spring 2003. • I-680/Alcosta Boulevard Interchange The Expenditure Plan appropriated $1.6 million in fiscal year 2002/03 for improvements to the 1-680/Alcosta Boulevard Interchange on the Dublin/San Ramon border. Design of this project was completed in 2003, with construction to expected begin in Winter 2004. • West Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station The Expenditure Plan appropriated $4.0 million to West Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station project in fiscal year 2003/04, This project has moved closer to implementation as an innovative private/public partnership involving the Cities of Dublin and Pleasanton, BART, and a partnering private developer. Additionally, several of the remaining Expenditure Plan projects have been completed or are advancing toward construction: • I-680 Auxiliary Lanes (Diablo Road to Bollinger Canyon Road) Preliminary Engineering and Environmental review for this project have been completed. Final design is nearly complete, with construction slated to begin in fiscal year 2004/05. • I-580/Foothill Road/San Ramon Road Interchange Modifications The Expenditure Plan initially programmed a total of$1.6 million for this project. $0.8 million was appropriated in fiscal year 2003/04, with the remaining to be appropriated in fiscal years 2009/10 and 2010/11. Project construction is currently underway for the proposed improvements on the Dublin side of the freeway only. This portion of the project is referred to as Phase 1, and Phase 2 will consist of all of the proposed improvements on the Pleasanton side of the freeway. Pleasanton has elected not to implement Phase 2 at this time. The Dublin side of the freeway currently experiences safety issues related to traffic weaving from the diagonal westbound off-ramp to make a left turn at the San Ramon Road/Dublin Boulevard intersection. This traffic weaving condition is critical due to the close proximity of Dublin Boulevard to the 1-580 interchange. The project will create a signalized ofd ramp intersection, which would eliminate this weaving problem. Phase 1 project construction is expected to be completed in Winter 2004. The Phase 2 project on the Pleasanton side will occur in the future. • I-680 HOV Lanes (Sunol Grade) High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes on northbound and southbound I-680 over the Sunol Grade were included in the TVTP/AP and in the Expenditure Plan, although no funds were appropriated for this project. Subsequently, the I- 680 HOV lanes over the Sunol Grade benefited from Federal and State attention, and were funded by those sources. At this time, the HOV lanes are under construction, and no TVTDF funding appears to be needed to complete this project. 3 Revised: 2/12/2004 • Crow Canyon Road Safety Improvements The City of San Ramon recently completed improvements to Crow Canyon Road from Bollinger Canyon Road to the Alameda County Line. The improvements included an extension of the westbound track climbing lane, and widening in the eastbound direction to provide for an exclusive right-turn lane at Bollinger Canyon Road. The transition to a two-lane roadway at the County Line was also improved, and a major landslide was stabilized. The remaining work on this project includes safety improvements on approximately 7 mile segment of Crow Canyon Road from East Castro Valley Boulevard in Alameda County to the vicinity of the Alameda County/Contra Costa County limit line. This project will consider design alternatives for roadway alignment, lane and shoulder widths, and roadway curvature for enhanced traffic safety and operations on Crow Canyon Road within Alameda County. • Vasco Road While this project was initially included as part of the Expenditure Plan, no funding was initially programmed for this project. During fiscal year 2003/04, the Tri-Valley Transportation Council authorized a loan of up to $0.5 million for the utility relocation portion of the project from the I-580 HOV Lane Project, contingent upon certain conditions detailed in the TVTC action of October 22, 2003. Further, the TVTC directed that this project will be included for consideration in the next update of the Fee Nexus Study. Following are updated summaries of the remaining Expenditure Plan projects, focusing on revisions to their schedules and funding plans. The project summary sheets include the projects' descriptions, schedules and funding plans, No new projects are proposed to be added to the Expenditure Plan at this time. The funding and scheduling targets from the individual projects have been compiled in Table 1, yielding an estimate of the cash flow requirements and revenue estimates for the TVTDF Expenditure Plan. Table 2 shows sources of funding for the eleven high priority projects, including TVTDF funds. Since the TVTDF is a development fee, which is not appropriate for securing bonded debt, the Expenditure Plan is based on a "pay-as-you-go" balancing of projected revenues and expenditures over the term of the Plan. 4 Revised: 2/12/2004 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS AND STATUS REPORTS The eleven projects included in the TVTDF Program are described on the following pages. These descriptions include the involved agencies, the current cost estimates, the status of the project, the current funding situation for the project, the schedule, and a synopsis of the need for the project. This information has been obtained from a variety of sources and represents the most current available information on each project. The locations of these projects are described in Figure A. Maps showing the location and limits of each project area are included for reference. The TVTDF projects are as follows: 1. I-5 80/1-680 FLYOVER AND HOOK RAMPS 2A, STATE ROUTE 84 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS-I-580 TO 1-680 2B. ISABEL ROUTE 84/1-580 INrERc--3ANGE 3. I-680 AI.x IARY LANES BETWEEN BOLLINGER CANYON ROAD AND DIABLO ROAD 4. WEST DUBLN-PLEASANTON BART STATION 5, 1-580 HOV LANES FROM TASSAJARA ROAD TO VASCO ROAD 6. 1-680 HOV LANES FROM STATE ROUTE 84 TO TOP OF SUNOL GRADE 7. 1-580/FOOTHILL ROAD-SAN RAMON ROAD INTERCHANGE MODIFICATIONS 8. 1-680/ALcosTA BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE MODIFICATIONS 9. CROW CANYON ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 10. VASCO ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 11. EXPRESS BUS SERVICE 5 Revised: 2/12/2004 E .+r�� Cq�� moi. �r9 1.680 Auxiliary LanesND RD. _ 10. � $ 8. 01 a �� Vasco # 8. Lia 1-6801AIcosta "`�' • ' Rd. crow � Interchange Canyon --y" 7. 1S. 1-880ffoothill/San',,- Flyover 1.580 HOV fi Ramon Interchange :Y 4. EASTAVE, o BART Station .STANLEY SLYO. 2. Rt. 84 -- ,, Corridor �Y 6. 1.680 HOV`-* LEGEND North Not to Scale Project Locatlon TVTC Expenditure Plan Figure Index Map A 89.202.5/99-LH Project No. 1 I-580/1-68O Flyover and Hook Ramps Involved Agencies Caltrans and the Alameda County Transportation Authority Description The project consists of the construction of a southbound to eastbound flyover, a northbound to eastbound direct connector, southbound on and off hook ramps and a northbound on ramp. Cost Estimate The total project cost is approximately$120 million. Status The project is COMPLETE. Funding Most of the project is funded by Measure B. TVTC initially appropriated $5.6 million in TVTDF match funds, including approximately$4.2 in funds provided to the project to fulfill its funding needs and$1.4 million in reimbursements to the Cities of Dublin and Pleasanton for prior contributions. Schedule The project is COMPLETE. Need The project was approved by the voters of Alameda County as a portion of the Measure B sales tax program. 6 Revised: 2/12/2004 } i DUBUN BLVD. Construct ` i Nook Ramps } I ST.PATRICK wv. Previous Improvement Remove Ramp i! a E Construct Flyover I Remove Ramp ; Remove Ramp Construct Direct Connector LEGEND North r� Project Location Not to Scale TVTC Expenditure Pian Figure 1-580A-880 Flyover and Hook Ramps (Completed June 2002) 1 8&242.8102-CK Proiect No. 2A State Route 84 Corridor Improvements: I-580 to I-680 Involved Agencies Cities of Livermore and Pleasanton, Alameda County, and Caltrans Description This road improvement project will be constructed in several stages with a variety of funding sources. The ultimate configuration is expected to consist of six lanes on Isabel Avenue from I-580 to Stanley Boulevard and four lanes from Stanley Boulevard to I-680. The total length of the project is approximately 10 miles. Cost Estimate Total project cost is $254 million for the roadway portions of the project. (See Project No. 2B for the companion 1-580 interchange portion). Status In December 2003, State Route 84 was relocated from First and Holmes streets through downtown Livermore to the Isabel Avenue Corrdior connecting to 1-580 at the Airway Boulevard Interchange. Route 84 is mostly a two-lane undivided roadway between I-580 and I-680 with short four-lane divided sections between Jack London Boulevard and Airway Boulevard, and also approaching I-680. The PSR identifies Route 84 to be improved to expressway standards with four lanes between 1-680 and Stanley Boulevard and six lanes between Stanley Boulevard and a new interchange at 1-580. The TVI'C funded ($1,164,000)preparation of a Project Study Report (PSR) for this project. The PSR is complete and was approved by Caltrans in Scptcinber 2003. The PSR dcfincs this project and identifies implementation phases and the costs associated with those phases. Alameda County's new Measure B program includes $70 million for a four-lane facility from 1-580 to Vallecitos Road plus possible improvements through the Pigeon Pass section of Route 84. Funding The TVTC allocates $24 million in future TVTDF funds for this project. Schedule An initial phase project ($41,9 million) from Isabel Avenue through Pigeon Pass could begin in 2003/04 and be completed in 2009/10. This initial phase includes truck-climbing lanes, which could be constructed by Caltrans as part of their SHOPP funded safety improvement project to be completed in 2006. There is no current schedule for completion of the new Measure B project to widen Isabel Avenue to four lanes between 1-580 and Vallecitos Road. Project Need The project would relieve traffic congestion on portions of I-680 and I-580 in Tri-Valley as well as improve access to regional routes from portions of Livermore and Pleasanton. The existing two-lane roadway between Livermore and 1-680 is operating at capacity during peak commute periods. 7 Revised: 2/12/2004 Segment Stade 1: Construct Initial interchange with 2 lana overpass; extend Portola See Project 2B to Isabel and remove Portoia ramps. description Stage 2: Construct 6 lane overpass and ultimate Interchange. � t Pleasanton .:f STXlsLf:Y eLVo• Livermore Segment r`J Construct 4/6 lane expressway. P3 rnrn s � Segment Stage 1: Construct uphill truck lanes; improve deficient curves. Stage 2: Construct 4 lane expressway. Note: Segment is TVT€3F Project 26 Segments and are TVTdF Project 2A LEGEND North Not to Scale Project Location TVTC Expenditure Plan Figure State Route 84 Corridor Improvements 1-580 to 1-8801 2 ► 89-202-3/02-LH Project No. 2B Isabel Route 84/1-580 Interchange Involved Agencies City of Livermore and Caltrans Description This project consists of a new partial-cloverleaf interchange on Isabel Avenue/Route 84 at 1-580. The ultimate configuration includes a 6-lane overcrossing. The interchange project will be constructed in two phases. The project includes removal of ramps at the adjacent Portola Avenue interchange and construction of a new roadway connection on the north side of I-580 between Portola Avenue and the new interchange. Cast Estimate The total cost of the interchange is $98 million. The initial Phase I project is estimated to cost $70 million, and the Phase II project to complete the interchange is estimated to cost $28 million. Status A Project Study Report for the interchange has been approved. The ED/PR for Phase I is underway, and it is expected to be approved in 2004. Phase I design will begin in 2004. Construction is expected to be complete in 2008. Funding Funding for the Phase I interchange includes Measure B ($25 million), STIP ($27 million), TEA 21 ($10.4 million), and City of Livermore Trak Impact Fees ($7.6 million). Funding for Phase II will be City of Livermore Traffic Impact Fees and other funding that may become available. Schedule The initial Phase I interchange will be complete in 2008, and the full interchange is expected to be complete by 2025. Project geed The interchange project will provide direct access from I-580 to future State Route 84 located along the Isabel Avenue corridor in Livermore. This project will improve traffic conditions in downtown Livermore as well as partially relieve traffic conditions in the I-580 and I-680 corridors in Tri- Valley, 8 Revised: 2/12/2004 t i N.CANYON PKWY. Construct New interchange \ To N.Livermore Ave. AVON" \ �" 4--To Airway Blvd.Interchange y� AIRWAY BLVD. r Z M LEGEND North map= Project Location Not to Scale TVTC Expenditure Flan Figure Isabel Route 84/I-580 Interchange 2B 8g-202.W02-LH Project No. 3 I-680 Auxiliary banes between Bollinger Canyon Road in San Ramon and Diablo Road in Danville Involved Agencies Contra Costa.Transportation Authority and Cities of Danville and San Ranson Description This project will construct both northbound and southbound auxiliary lanes in the I-680 corridor from Bollinger Canyon Road in San Ramon to Diablo Road in Danville. These improvements include an additional 12-foot lane between interchanges in the northbound and southbound directions, retaining walls, and sound walls in the corridor. Also included are ramp improvements and structure widening over Laurel Drive between Sycamore Valley Road and Diablo Road. The project will be constructed in three segments: (1) Diablo to Sycamore, (2) Sycamore to Crow Canyon; and(3) Crow Canyon to Bollinger. Cost Estimate Segment 1 $13.8 million Segment 2 $33.2 million Segment 3 $8.6 million TOTAL. $55.6 million(includes project development and construction.) Status A Caltrans Project Study Report (PSR) was completed in February 2000. The envirori nental document was approved in October 2002. Funding The project will be fiinded with a variety of sources, including STIP, Measure C, and development fees (TVTDF: $12.0 million and SCC .TEPA: $8.5 million). The TVTC programmed$12 million in future TVTDF funds for this project. Schedule Final Design for Segments 1 and 3 is nearly complete. Assuming that regional fees can be advanced, construction of both of these segments could begin in fiscal year 2004/05. Construction of Segment 2 is scheduled to start in 2007, and is dependent upon securing additional STIP funds. Project Need Traffic studies of future conditions along I-680 indicate that peak hour traffic volumes on the existing six mixed flow lanes and two HOV lanes already exceeds capacity at some locations. The auxiliary lane project is not intended to increase freeway capacity per se, but will mitigate operational problems caused by merging and diverging vehicles at interchanges. The highest need, in terms of alleviating existing congestion, is in Segment 1. 9 Revised: 2/12/2004 TYPICAL AUXILIARY LANE SCHEMATIC L on-ramp I I ee. i I auxiliary I I I ' lane I I 1 1 1 i ©IABLO I I f I I I I I off-ramp I 1 ��aa• i I SYCAMORE VALLEY 4q1 Npr�s� R� 1 y Construct Auxiliary Lanes �y o a� QSy p04NYON RD. O F0. North Not to Scale LEGEND � project Location TVTC Expenditure Pian Figure IN 1-680 Auxiliary Lanes 89.202-11198-LH Pr9ject No, 4 Nest Dublin-Pleasanton BART Station Involved Agencies BART, City of Dublin, and City of Pleasanton Description The project is the construction of the West Dublin-Pleasanton BART Station and related transit improvements. The project is a joint public and private venture to build a station on the active BART line, in the median of I-580. The related transit improvements such as the patron parking garages, kiss-ride and bus drop- offs will be located on both the north(Dublin)and south(Pleasanton)sides of the freeway on property owned by BART. Cost Estimate $53 million($58 million-escalated to midpoint of construction)in 2003 dollars. Status Included in Track 1 of the adopted MTC 2001 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). Included in Track 2 of the adopted renewal of the Measure B Alameda County transportation sales tax. The West Dublin Specific Plan(including the transit oriented development)was adopted by the City of Dublin in December 2000. The EIR for the station was certified by the BART Board in April 2001. The agreement between the Master Developer and BART has been negotiated for the project. The proposed transit village around the West Dublin/Pleasanton Station will likely include residential units, hotel facilities, and office space. Funding The project will be funded utilizing public and private financing mechanisms available under the California Infrastructure Finance Act. Fund sources include lease revenues, tax increments, station revenues and grant sources. The Alameda County Congestion Management Agency has a $10 million commitment to the project (all of which has been programmed as of January 2004). Though the project is included in the Measure B program, its placement in Tier 2 makes it unlikely to receive actual revenues without a dramatic increase in sales tax receipts over the next twenty years. The TVTC has allocated $4 million in TVTDF funds for this project during fiscal year 2003/04. Schedule Bonds to finance the project have a target sale date of Fall 2004, with final design and constriction activities to commence within a year of the bond sale. The project has a current planned opening date in Spring of 2007. Project Need The construction of the proposed West Dublin/Pleasanton BART station will address demand that exists within the Tri-Valley for BART service. 10 Revised: 2/12/2004 _..._. D Existing Dublin-Pleasanton r7 BART y� *NOW" fn S70NER1Da���' Construct W. Dublin-Pleasanton BART Station e A North Not to Scale LEGEND Protect Location TVTC Expenditure Plan FigureIN West Dublin-Pleasanton BART Improvements 4 89-202.11198-LH Pr9ject No. 5 I-580 HOV Lanes from Tassajara Road to Vasco Road Involved Agencies Cities of Pleasanton, Dublin and Livermore, Alameda County, and Caltrans Description Construction of approximately 8.2 miles of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes on I-580 from Tassajara Road to Vasco Road. After addition of these HOV lanes, this segment of I-580 will have a total of four mixed lanes and one HOV lane in each direction. Three alternative locations for the HOV lanes are being considered: Alt. 1) in the existing median, Alt. 2) designating the inner-most lanes as HOV lanes and widening for an additional mixed lane on the outside of the existing roadway, and Alt. 3) widening the median for future BART and constructing an additional lane on the outside of the roadway. Cost Estimate Costs of the three alternatives are $80 million for Alternative 1, $127.8 million for Alternative 2, and $200.5 million for Alternative 3, Status A Project Study Report for the project has been completed and approved by Caltrans. Caltrans is proceeding with environmental studies of the three alternatives. The environmental work should be complete by 2004. The Policy Advisory Committee on the I-580 Corridor/BART To Livermore Study has passed a motion recommending that a future transit alternative in the corridor should be located in the I-580 median and that Alternative 3 is the preferred alternative for the future HOV lanes. Funding $25 million in state Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) funds have been appropriated for this project. $45 million of future STIP funding is planned. Additional funding is needed, The TVTC programmed $8 million in future TVTDF funds for this project. Schedule The environmental work for this project should be complete in 2004. At that time, a decision on which alternative to pursue probably will be made. Project Need This project is needed to increase overall person-trip capacity in the 1-580 corridor. Traffic forecasts show that travel demand on I-580 through the Tri-Valley will exceed the capacity of the existing freeway. Adding HOV lanes would encourage carpooling and provide travel timesavings for existing as well as future express bus services in the corridor. 11 Revised: 2/12/2004 x *� vAsco s0. � CL VLo IL N.UVERMORE AVE. Q� +q 6231F1�(iFV'N Cc V o r � Z vMA" K f cc��yr m LM -b m 0 V PAL I uuj 0 2= o CLm s � 'pa vavrvssv� 3 � � SANTA�RP�O�r Z _ _ Project No. 6 1-680 HOV Lanes from State haute 84 to Tap of Sunol Grade Involved Agencies Caltrans and Alameda County Description Construct approximately 3.5 miles (seven total lane-miles) of HOV lanes on I-684 from SR 84 ramps to the top of Sunol Grade at Mission Pass. After adding these lanes, I-684 would have three mixed lanes and one HOV lane in each direction of this segment. Cost estimate Construction of the southbound I-684 HOV lanes between SR 84 and Calaveras Boulevard in Milpitas is expected to cost approximately $90 million. The portion within the Tri-Valley area (SR 84 to the top of the Sunol Grade) constitutes about 35 percent of the total mileage, or approximately $29 million. Status This project to construct the highest priority southbound HOV lanes has committed funding from other sources. It is likely that the northbound HOV lane will receive outside funding also. This is a regional project that involves three counties, the CMAs, Caltrans, and MTC. In addition, the I- 684 Phase II Corridor Study will address future needs of the corridor. Funding STIP, Federal, TORP, and potential ACTIA funds will be utilized. No TVTDF funds are included for this project. Schedule The southbound project was environmentally approved in September 2444. The northbound project environmental studies are underway and a draft document was circulated to the public in 2042. Project Need The southbound lanes of I-684 through the Sunol Grade constitute the second most congested commute in the Bay Area. Congestion occurs for a period of three to four hours each weekday. 12 Revised: 2/12/2004 __..... Nom . a I • a NILE$CANYOIN, i SCS t I sri v Construct HOV Banes '90 Vqq� E J LEGEND North Project Location Not to Stile TVTC Expenditure Plan Figure 1-880 HOV lanes From S��nw��(■ l 84 to Top of Sunol Grad (Tri-Valley Portion) 6 69.202-11196•LH Project No. 7 I-580/Foothill Road/San Ramon Road Interchange Modifications Involved Agencies City of Dublin and City of Pleasanton Description To enhance safety and improve traffic operations at the interchange, the design of the existing I-580/Foothill Road/San Ramon Road four-quadrant cloverleaf interchange will be modified, replacing the westbound and eastbound off loops with diagonal ramps. The two remaining off-ramps would be signalized at their intersections with the local street. In addition, the eastbound diagonal off-ramp will be widened to two lanes and a 700- foot eastbound auxiliary lane on I-580 will be constructed. The project is located within the Cities of Dublin and Pleasanton. Cost Estimate $4 million for the entire project Status Project construction is currently underway for the proposed improvements on the Dublin side of the freeway only. This portion of the project is referred to as Phase 1, and Phase 2 will consist of all of the proposed improvements on the Pleasanton side of the freeway. Pleasanton has elected not to implement Phase 2 at this time. Funding The total cost to construct Phase 1 is approximately $2.0 million; the City of Dublin will use $1.2 million of its 20% set-aside TVTDF revenues to partially fund. Phase I construction. The TVTC appropriated $0.8 million in TVTDF funds in fiscal year 2003/04 for the Phase 1 project in Dublin. The TVTC also allocates an additional $0.8 million in future TVTDF funds for the Phase 2 project in Pleasanton. Schedule Construction of Phase 1 is expected to be completed in Winter 2004 to address traffic safety issues. Project Need The project is needed to ensure adequate access to/from West Dublin- Pleasanton BART station. In addition, both the Pleasanton and Dublin sides of the freeway currently experience safety issues related to traffic weaving from the diagonal off-ramps to make a left turn at the first intersection removed from the interchange. This traffic weaving condition is more severe on the Dublin side of the freeway due to the close proximity of Dublin Boulevard to the I-580 interchange. The project would create a signalized off-ramp intersection, which would eliminate the weaving problem. 13 Revised. 2/12/2044 _. _. ------fhase 2 Phase y�. ♦` install Relocated Ramp O ♦ yy Remove Ramps Install Traffic Signals 1 `•.,�� ►� $AN RAMON RC. r `4„,. .•,� 4`i ! Remove Ramps Install Install Traffic Relocated Signals -,,Ramprr , r r ♦ r i Construct 700 foot r' Auxiliary Lane r r ► r ► r r ► r r r ► r ► Not to Scale TVTC Expenditure Plan Figure 1-580/Footh'ill Boulevard Interchange Modifications 7 89-202-2102-GK Project No. 8 I-680/Alcosta Boulevard Interchange Modifications Involved Agencies Caltrans and City of San Ramon Description Reconstruct the southbound off ramp and add a new on ramp at the I-680/Alcosta Boulevard interchange to improve operations at the interchange. This project includes closing the existing southbound off ramp and removing a traffic signal, building new southbound on/off ramps to the north of Alcosta Boulevard, and connecting to San Ramon Valley Boulevard with a new signalized intersection. Cost Estimate' $9.6 million Status The PSR for this project, which was funded by Measure C, is complete. This project is included in the City of San Ramon CIP program and project design was completed in 2003. The SCC JEPA designates $2.66 million for the project. TVTC appropriated $1.6 million to this project in fiscal year 2002/03. Project construction is expected to start in Winter 2004. Funding $2.66 million is identified in the Southern Contra Costa JEPA for this project. The TVTC appropriated $1.6 million to this project in fiscal year 2002/03. Other funding sources include $4.34 million in local funds and $3.5 million in 1998 STIP funding. Schedule See Status above. Project Need The current interchange is a tight diamond with a busy intersection of two arterials immediately adjacent to the interchange. Reconstruction of the southbound ramps into a buttonhook design will remove the middle of three closely spaced traffic signals on Alcosta and improve safety and capacity in the area. The interchange traffic volumes are projected to increase as a result of growth in the area. ' $13.5 million including improvements to the northbound on and off ramps. 14 Revised: 2/12/2004 ......................... i I Construct New Ramps / and Traffic Signal ! Remove Ramp �° RemoveA� srA13 Traffic t''° Signal { 1 North Not to Scale TVTC Expenditure Plan Figure 1-680latcosta Boulevard interchange Modifications 8 88-262.11198-LH __ _. Project No. 9 Crow Canyon Road Safety Improvements Involved Agencies Alameda County Description Safety improvements on approximately 7 miles of Crow Canyon Road from East Castro Valley Boulevard in Alameda County to the vicinity of the Alameda/Contra Costa County Iimit line. This project will identify alternatives that address considerations such as roadway realignment, lane and shoulder width, roadway curvature and design speed to improve traffic safety and operations. Cost Estimate $25 million Status Project is currently in an advanced stage of project development. Funding The Alameda County CMA has identified $3.4 million of Tier 1 funds and $2.7 million of Tier 2 funds for this project in the Alameda Countywide Transportation Plan. Schedule The Development Phase is expected to be finalized by Winter 2004, Project Need This project will provide improved roadway safety by straightening sharp curves as well as improving traffic flow 15 Revised: 2/12/2004 . . 1 '`,-gCompjeted c Oo E Construct t�, o Safety Improvements GOO- i W North Not to Sale LEGMNfl rr Pronject Location TVVYC Expenditure Plan Figure Crow Canyon Road Safety Improvements 9 W202.3102-CK Project No. 10 Vasco Road Safety Improvements Involved Agencies Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Contra Costa Transportation Authority, and the Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority Description This safety project will straighten the alignment of the most northerly one- mile segment of Vasco Road. This project includes shoulder widening, curves, grade modifications, and the addition of truck climbing lanes to improve traffic operations. During the environmental phase, the need to relocate underground high-pressure gas lines was identified and the project cost was increased. A PSR for Phase II is currently being prepared. Cost Estimate $40 million for a three-mile segment Status A PSR, Survey, Preliminary Design and Mitigated Negative Declaration for Phase I have been completed. The next phase of right of way acquisition and utility relocation will start during Summer 2004. Design is approaching 70% completion. The NEPA process will be completed during Summer 2004. The construction cost estimate for Phase I, whine includes the utility relocation, is $19.2 million.) Funding Funding for the project was included in the Traffic Congestion Relief Program, 2002 STIP, and local funds, which includes government tax and developer fees. However, there is a shortfall for this project due to relocation of underground high-pressure gas lines, overhead power transmission lines, and telephone lines that conflict with the proposed roadway alignment, Schedule Construction is expected to start Summer 2004 Project meed This project is needed as a safety improvement. It is intended to match recent two lane improvements completed in Contra Costa County. It would eliminate sharp curves, narrow lanes and add shoulders. Although the projected 2010 volumes exceed capacity of the existing and planned two-lane roadway, this project is not intended to address the potential capacity deficiency. Additionally, this project will allow a proposed express bus route between the City of Brentwood, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and business centers along the I-580/I-680 corridors. 16 Revised: 2/12/2004 i I i ° Construct Vasco Rd. Q" Improvements M RAYMOND RD. Livermore City Limit DALTION HARTFORD AVE. AVE. M AMM" < m a7 O North Not to Scale LEGEND ®rr Project Location TVTC Expenditure Plan Figure Vasco Road Safety Improvements 10 88.262-=2-CK project No. 11 Express Bus Service Involved Agencies Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority Description Capital costs to cover express routes. Service will be provided to the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station from the BART owned Greenville Road property. Service to run on weekdays during AM and PM peak hours with headways consistent with BART train headways and timed to meet all trains during the scheduled service hours. Project implementation is contingent upon construction of T-580 HOV lanes (see Project No. 5). Cost Estimate $2.5 million, for capital costs only Status LAVTA has proposed this as an alternative (both short and long term) to the I-580 Corridor study group charged with examining future BART-to- Livermore options. This option will assist in the development of mitigation efforts for the I-580 corridor traffic congestion issues. Funding The Alameda County CMA has identified $5.0 million of Tier I funds for this project in the Alameda Countywide Transportation Plan. This project may be eligible for the Regional Gas Tax, and may be included in the new Alameda County Measure B sales tax program. In addition to other existing transit funding sources, private sector funding from either the business or residential development community could be cultivated to match specific express route costs. No TVTDF funding is currently programmed for this project at this time, Schedule To be determined. Because this project requires no PSR or preliminary engineering work, the amount of time from concept to implementation is relatively short. Project Need Express Bus Service will provide the Tri-Valley with a flexible alternative to heavy rail or auto facilities. Flexibility is a benefit, allowing for changes in the access of successful employment centers. As development in and beyond the Tri-Valley continues, congestion and commute times will grow and frustrated commuters will continue to seek out alternate ways to get to work. Express bus routes can transport riders directly to job sites and they can link people to existing and highly successful fixed transit lines such as BART and the Altamont Commuter Express. 17 Revised: 2/12/2004 111. PROJECT PRIORITIES In 1999, the Tri-Valley Transportation Council established nine priorities as part of the First Amendment to the Strategic Expenditure Plan. Priority I was to fund the local share of the I- 580/1-680 Flyover and Hook Ramps Project. Approximately $5.6 million in TVTDF funds was provided as the local match for this regional improvement. This project is now complete and the TVTDF obligation for the funding of the project has been fulfilled. The TVTC has also provided $1,164,000 in TVTDF funds for the preparation of the Project Study Report (PSR) for the State Route 84 Corridor Improvements project between 1-580 and 1- 680 (Project 2A). This PSR is complete and was approved by Caltrans in September 2003. Caltrans has prepared the PSR for the 1-580 HOV Lanes project from Tassajara Road to Vasco Road (Project 5) using State Traffic Congestion Relief Programs funds. Caltrans has also prepared the PSR and the Project Report (PR) for the 1-680 Auxiliary Lanes project between Bollinger Canyon Road and Diablo Road (Project 3). Since the last Expenditure Plan update, the TVTC has appropriated $1.6 million for Project 8 (1-680/Alcosta Boulevard), $0.8 million for Project 7 (1-580/San Ramon Road), and $4.0 million for Project 4 (West Dublin/Pleasanton BART station). TVTDF funding is limited, and it is important to direct the funds to the highest priority projects. A balance of $10,518,639 (as of June 30, 2003, and does not reflect all of the appropriations listed above) is currently available in the TVTDF Trust account to spend on the TVTDF projects. Criteria identified in the JEPA to guide priorities are Project Readiness, which is the ability to move directly to final design and construction; Project Funding, which is the ability to leverage outside funding for the project; and Project Effectiveness, which is the ability of the project to address congestion and/or safety concerns. Based on these criteria, the priorities established by the Tri-Valley Transportation Council for this Second Amendment to the Strategic Expenditure Plan are as follows. A. INITIAL PRIORITIES Priority 1. Fund $0.8 million of the "Phase 1" I-580/Foothill Road/San Ramon Road Interchange :Modifications project (Project 7) in 2002/03. Project construction is currently underway for the proposed improvements on the Dublin side of the freeway only. This portion of the project is referred to as Phase 1, and Phase 2 will consist of all of the proposed improvements on the Pleasanton side of the freeway. Pleasanton has elected not to implement Phase 2 at this time. The total cost estimate for the Phase I project is $2.0 million. It will be funded with approximately $1.2 million in Dublin's 20% set-aside TVTDF funds and the $0.8 million in TVTDF funds. The Dublin side of the freeway currently experiences safety issues related to traffic weaving from the diagonal westbound off-ramp to make a left turn at the San Ramon Road/Dublin Boulevard intersection, This traffic weaving condition is critical due to the close proximity of Dublin Boulevard to the 1-580 interchange. The project would create a signalized off-ramp intersection, which would eliminate this weaving problem. This project meets the criteria of readiness to move 18 Revised: 2/12/2004 directly to final design and construction, funding leverage, and effectiveness in addressing safety concerns, This priority has been fulfilled with the appropriation of $0.8 million to the project during fiscal year 2003/04. Priority 2. Fund $1.6 million of the I-680/Alcosta Boulevard project (Project 8) in 2002/03. This project is located between the I-580/I-680 Flyover project and the 1-680 Auxiliary Lane project. The project has a cost estimate of$9.6 million and it will be funded with $2.66 million in SCC TEPA funds, $3.5 million in 1998 STIP funds, $4.34 million in local funds, and the $1.6 million in TVTDF funds. The PSR and project design is complete, with construction to begin in Winter 2004. This priority has been fulfilled with the appropriation of$0.8 million to the project during fiscal year 2002/03. B. PRIORITIES TO BE RECONSIDERED IN THE FUTURE Priorities to be reconsidered in the future by the TVTC are listed below. Priority 3. Fund $4 million for public transit projects, which include the West Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station project (Project 4) and/or the Express Bus project (Project 11) in 2003/04. The West Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station (Project 4) benefits both the 1-580 and I-680 corridors. Funding sources for this project include lease revenues, tax increments, station revenues and grant sources. The Alameda County Congestion Management Agency has a $10 million commitment to the project (as indicated in the RTP). Though the project is included in the Measure B program, its placement in Tier 2 makes it unlikely to receive actual revenues without a dramatic increase in sales tax receipts over the next twenty years. Any TVTDF funds allocated to the project should be on the same timetable as other funding for the project. This priority has been fulfilled with the appropriation of$4.0 million to the project during fiscal year 2003/04. Priority 4. Start accumulating funds for the initial phase of the Route 84 Expressway project (Project 2A). No TVTDF funds are allocated to the Isabel Route 84/1-580 Interchange project (Project 2B). Priority 5. Start accumulating funds for the design and construction of the 1-680 Auxiliary Lane project in Contra Costa County (Project 3). Priority 6. Start accumulating funds for construction of the I-580 HOV project (Project 5). Priority 7. Fund the"Phase 2" 1-580/Foothill/San Ramon Road interchange project (Project 7). Priority 8. No TVTDF funds are allocated to the I-680 HOV Lanes from SR 84 to Top of Sunol Grade project (Project 6). The Crow Canyon Road project (Project 9) is a lower priority project that is not recommended for TVTDF funding for the next ten years of the program. The Vasco $13,5 million including improvements to the northbound on and off ramps 19 Revised: 2/12/2004 Road project (Project 10) will be considered for funding as part of the next Fee Nexus Study update. IV. PROJECT FUNDING Under the previous SEP, dated January 1999, the TVTDF was projected to raise approximately $70 million through year 2413. Eighty percent of this TVTDF revenue was allocated by the TVTC, while 20% of the fee revenue may be designated by member agencies for one or more of the projects listed in the TEPA. Each agency may designate up to 20% of the funds it collects for the specific project. TVTDF revenue projections under the current SEP 2004 Update include an adjustment to the TVTD Fee amounts for ",MF Residential" "Office" and "Industrial" uses to match the percent level of the Nexus Fee for "SF Residential", effective 2002/03. Based on this fee adjustment, the TVTDF is projected to raise approximately $93.9 million through year 2013, including $75.1 million in 80% TVTDF revenue. The TVTC has committed $56.9 million out of the projected $75.1 million in 80°/a TVTDF revenue to fund the following projects, which are deemed the highest priority for funding in the next ten years. The TVTC commitments include the initial TVTDF project allocations from the previous SEP (totaling $56.8 million) plus an additional $0.1 million for updating the 1996 fee nexus study, as shown in Table II. The non-committed portion of the 80% TVTDF revenue (see projected cash flow in Table 1) can be used for expansion of funding for the next, more extensive SEP update to fulfill unmet project funding needs and possibly fund new TVTDF projects, as deemed appropriate by the TVTC. Project 1. 1-580/1-684 Interchange: $5.6 M in total local share provided Project 2A. Route 84 Expressway, I-584 to 1-680: $24.0 M Project 3. 1-680 Auxiliary Lanes in Contra Costa County: $12.0 M Project 4. West DPX BART Station: $4.0 M Project 5. I-580 HDV Lanes: $8.0 M Project 7. I-580/Foothill/San Ramon Road Interchange: $1.6 M ($0.8 M for Phase 1) Project 8. 1-680/Alcosta Boulevard Interchange: $1.6 M Project 10. 'Vasco Road: $0.5 M4 Project 11. Express Bus: a portion of the $4.4 M for Project 4 The funding and scheduling targets for these projects have been compiled in Table 1. The other eligible TVTDF projects either will be funded by other funding sources or have a lower priority for TVTDF funding at this time and may be funded beyond the ten-year timeframe. 3 These projections are based on the build-out of certain jurisdictions during steady economic environments. A more detailed analysis of forecasted revenues will be conducted during an upcoming fee nexus study update. This reflects an advance of up to a$0.5 million loan from the I-580 HOV Lanes to be repaid in the future. 20 Revised: 2/12/2004 The Contra Costa agencies designate their 20% portion of TVTDF revenue collected to the I-680 Auxiliary Lane project. The four Alameda County agencies will direct their 20% funds to other projects. Since the adoption of the TVTDF program in 1998, the total 20% funding collected by the Alameda County jurisdictions is approximately as follows: • Pleasanton: $1.04 million (project use to be determined) • Livermore: $1.91 million (to be used on the SR 84 project) • Dublin: $1.35 million (to be used on the I-580/San Ramon Interchange project) • Alameda County $0.03 million (project use to be determined) Other potential funding sources for the TVTDF projects are described below. A. New Nleasure B— The new Measure B program includes major funding for TVTC projects in Alameda County including the West Dublin-Pleasanton BART Station (Project 4) in Tier 2 funds, Express Bus Service (Project 11), State Route 84 Corridor Improvements (Project 2A), and Isabel Route 84/I-580 Interchange (Project 213). B. TEA-2I - Funding is available for a variety of transportation projects in the new federal transportation legislation. C. STIP - This is a State funding program that is available on a competitive basis for a variety of transportation projects. D. Local Funds - This source includes local Traffic Impact Fee programs, developer contributions, and other local funds. E. Measure C - This funding source includes only those projects designated for funding in the half-cent sales tax program in Contra Costa County F. SCC JEPA - This is a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement in Southern Contra Costa County that provides funding from new development for transportation projects in southern Contra Costa County. Funding sources for TVTDF projects are shown in Table 2. 21 Revised: 2/12/2004 V. PROJECT SPONSORS Project sponsors have been designated for each of the eleven TVTDF projects. The Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement pertaining to TVTD Fees for Traffic Mitigation demes ":Project Sponsor" as"the Party designated in the Strategic Expenditure Plan (SEP)to oversee the use of Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee revenues in the development of a specific regional Transportation Improvement Project. The Party designated as Project Sponsor may be, but need not be, the lead agency for environmental clearance or the agency responsible for the design or construction of the project itself" Project sponsors are listed below. Project 1. 1-584/1-680 Local Share (Complete) ACTA Project 2A. Route 84 Expressway, I-580 to 1-680 Livermore Project 2B. Isabel Route 84/1-584 Interchange Livermore Project 3. 1-680 Auxiliary Lanes Danville Project 4. West Dublin/Pleasanton (DPX) BART Station Dublin Project 5. 1-580 HOV Lanes Pleasanton Project 6. 1-680 HOV Lanes, SR 84 to Top of Sunol Grade Pleasanton Project 7. 1-580/Foothill/San Ramon Road Interchange Dublin Project 8. 1-680/Alcosta Boulevard Interchange San Ramon Project 9. Crow Canyon Road Improvements Alameda County Project 10. Vasco Road Safety Improvements Alameda County Project 11. Express Bus LAVTA 22 Revised: 2/12/2004 o + a a a c+ c+ C3 (qCO to d Lt^i a sN r Cq CL N `t d 69, N e5 ra Cl) N 00 =_ o u7co C E N 49 p,,- +� llj NEf� It 14�64 CGf Ctq CL g. N LQ b uj L17 t69k N !`- LUZ f.191 W W w.... 69. ° aU uj ,fir EA tt3 c`e. 'p4 ` W O LL 0 o o Lo P"' ZLO LO ja J u? ih Lr? ci U } 1.4 co CS p C p Gas uU• 0 co ems- q E w O U o oc C ° > t'7 N 'm vy y E c» a ° o r7 c gy O Ln N ca. `w � ci J 0 cz to c c ata cu _ U3 43 c aJC cc cu wN O c c � ui ct Ln ro C7 U �co C c > cU m U p ° n ro ' N cx7 x c Cs N E 00 � 5x Da. 0 Q � � � m0 (D Z 0 o � � 0 c � 0 X 00 00 0 ° Cia7 0 C) (D 0 a) � t Vj C`i �C�(3 tL CL � � O 0 — v — — _ < 0 III Oo v 'N vi v Lri cci r: ai ai I Lil �- p o to a Fas bs ; N C.> W1 44 �. ioq vz � rn tri c 613 U G1 ap o V1 kn o + >. 06 ..r 69 IR o 0 ov to o i 69 69 Hi 6A 4fq b*3 ro 4i6TA > 25, H 3 a > g +1 Q' CA 4s b4 64 55 Fd} 6A Qq &i4 ioi 6�9 ° $ � 4,9 CIS ,9 , 00 44 00 �a be C4 Egg tri W00 oooc on r- S N __ EXHIBIT C The Board of' Supervisors Contra John sweeten Counly Administration Building � � Clerk of the Board 651 fine Street,doom 106 and Martinez,California 94553-1293 - v County Adm5-19 rator �]f (925)835-'E 900 John Gloia,1st District Gayle B.Ulikerna,2nd District Millie Greenberg,3rd District x `� Mark DeSaulnier,4th District /( Federal D.Glover,5th District March 2, 2004 Scott Haggerty, Chair Tri-Valiey'f ransportatiori Council 399 Elmhurst Street Hayward, California 94544-1395 Lear Chair Haggerty, The Board of Suliervisors has autliorized me to inform yoit that on March 2, 2004 our Board acted to adopt the Tri-Valley Transportation Council's 2004 Strategic Expenditure flan Update. Attached you will find official documentation of this action. if yoti leave any questions on this please contact John. Cunmrigharn at 925-335-1.243. Sincerely, Federal D. Clover, Chair Contra. Costa County Board of Supervisors Attachment c: M. Shin, PWD W. Lai, PWD Members,TVTC c/o Ruben Tzon, AC;PWD MDeS\,TC The Board of Supervisors Contra Jahn Sweeten County Administration Building Costa Clerk o€the Board 651 mine Street,Room 106 and Martinez,California 94553-1293 County Administrator �����sus-i9aQ Jahn Gioia,1st District County Gayle B.Ulikema,2nd District Millie Greenberg,3rd District Mark DeSaulnier,4th District Federal D.Mover,5th District ; March 2, 2004 Scott Haggerty, Chair Tri-Valley Transportation Council 399 Elmhurst Street Hayward, California 94544-1395 Dear Chair Haggerty, The Board of Supervisors has authorized me to inform you that on March 2, 2004 our Board acted to adopt the Tri-Valley Transportation Council's 2004 Strategic Expenditure Pian Update. Attached you will find official documentation of this action. If you have any questions on this please contact John Cunningham at 925-335-1243. Sincerely, ederal D. Glover, Chair Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Attachment c: M.Shiu,PWD W. Lai,PWD Members,TVTC c/o Ruben Tzon,AC PWD MDeS\JC Y1�ts ��r,:r:.i,r ( :,,nit.Li�u��'sc��;itr;vic Ich(id duc