Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06102003 - C.84 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra FROM: INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Costa DATE: JUNE 2, 2003 � Count SUBJECT: MULTILINGUAL CAPABILITIES OF THE EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NOTIFICATIONS (RINGDOWN) SYSTEM SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION($)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. ACKNOWLEDGE that on December 13, 1999, the Board of Supervisors requested the Internal Operations Committee to provide oversight to the Health Services Department on the development and implementation of a method to identify individuals living in the immediate vicinity of local refineries who do not speak English, and provide that information to the County's emergency telephone notification system vendor(Community Alert Network)to ensure that individuals can understand emergency messages and take appropriate defensive action. 2. ACKNOWLEDGE that the Internal Operations Committee has continued to provide oversight on this project and has reported to the Board of Supervisors on the project status on December 19, 2000, and January 6, March 12, and December 10, 2002. 3. ACKNOWLEDGE that the County secured grant funds from the California Air Resources Board and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District totaling $140,000 to fund a pilot project on multilingual emergency messaging involving the Laotion community. 4. RECOGNIZE the cooperative efforts of the Hazardous Materials Program and the Laotion Organizing Project to gather the data required for the project; and most recently, the Sheriff's Emergency Services Division in exploring how technology can help to meet the project's goals. 5. ACCEPT attached report prepared by the Hazardous Materials Program Director, Health Services Department, on the history of the project, and the current status of efforts to develop and implement emergency telephone messaging capabilities in multiple languages, including the identification of new technology that has the potential of meeting the project's goals. 6. DIRECT the Health Services Department and the Office of the Sheriff to proceed with the pilot project to provide multilingual emergency telephone messaging capabilities, to explore the use of public safety messaging devices as a possible element of a Countywide emergency telephone notification (ringdown) system, to explore the use of fines as a potential funding mechanism for associated costs, and to report back to the Internal Operations Committee in September 2003. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR~~ &�_AECOMME ION OF BOARD COMMITTEE - ,kPPROVE OTHER SIGNATU { •' - f A AYLE IL EMA, Chair FED5RAL D. GLOVER ti ACTION OF BOARD ON 7i7N ZQ� ZCK�3 APPROVE AS RECOMMENDED X_ OTHER N� VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN UNANIMOUS{ABSENT ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE AYES: NOES: SHOWN. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DISMIC'I III SEAT VACMr ATTESTED: JUNE 10,2003 CONTACT: JULIE ENEA (925)335-1077 JOHN SWEETEN,CLERK OF THE BOARD CC: INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE STAFF OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR LEWIS PASCALLI,HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PROD DIRECTOR MICHAEL KENT,HAZARDOUS MATERIALS OMBUDSMAN LIZ KLUTE,OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF GRACE KONG,LAOTION ORGANIZING PROJECT BY 's �' ��,r DUTY FAX:(510)236-4572 Emergency Telephone Notification(Ringdown)System June 2, 2003 Internal Operations Committee Page 2 BACKGROUND: On December 13, 1999, the Internal Operations Committee was asked by the Board to receive updates from, and provide additional direction to, the Health Services Department on the status of implementing the multilingual capabilities of the Community Alert Network, the current provider of emergency telephone notification services to the County. The IOC has overseen, and received regular reports on, the progress of the project. Costs of the project are funded by grants received from the California Air Resources Board in the amount of$100,000 and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District in the amount of$40,000. During the course of the project, responsibility for managing the emergency telephone notification system was transferred from the Health Services Department to the Office of the Sheriff. Since the transfer, the Health Services Department and the Office of the Sheriff have worked collaboratively on obtaining and providing emergency notification services. Attached is a report prepared by Lew Pascalli, Hazardous Materials Program Director, which provides a comprehensive history of the department's efforts to develop and implement a system that is capable of communicating emergency messages in the language spoken at each home contacted. Mr. Pascalli advises that the biggest challenge encountered thus far in the project is the maintenance of information about what language is spoken at each home. In any system that relies on a central database of information, it is essential that the data be kept accurate and current. The Sheriffs Office was recently introduced to a new product called a "public safety messaging device"that can deliver emergency messages in many languages. The product connects to an ordinary telephone, detects the special frequency of emergency messages, and can announce an emergency situation or an "all clear„ signal in any language specified without the resident having to pick up the receiver. At staffs first assessment, the new device has the potential for being placed in any household or businessin the County for the purpose of receiving emergency messages. Since the use of such a device, if it can perform as described, would obviate the need for maintaining a central database, our Committee believes it is important to fully evaluate both the current pilot project and the new device to determine which provides the best solution for the County. The IOC will also consider the BAAQMD's policy that fines for violations of air quality standards be applied to help communities affected by reduced air quality, as a possible model for funding expenses related to a Countywide emergency messaging solution. The Laotion Organizing Project(LOP), at our June 2 meeting, indicated that it fully supports the County's',efforts to look at all potential solutions and will continue to actively participate in the County's pilot project. The IOC recommends, therefore, that staff be directed to work with the LOP to further evaluate the current methodology and the potential for utilizing public safety messaging devices, and report back to the IOC in September 2003. �r CONTRA COSTA HEALTH SERVICES HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PROGRAMS 2JUN 0 TO : BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Internal Operations Committee From : Lewis G. Pascalli, Jr., Director Haz us Mat als Programs Subj : CONTINUING REPORT ON THE E NCY TELEPHONE RING-DOWN SYSTEM MULTIPLE ANGUAGE CAPABILITY Reference is made to our prier Reports beginning on 13 DEC 99 and continuing with periodic updates with the last Report to the I.O. on 10 DEC 02, subjects essentially the same. While we have been progressing on this challenging project, I had anticipated that we would be close to finalizing the project by this time. Fortunately, we have been made aware of a devise,which could salve the one remaining question which we have been struggling to resolve: "Flow does an Agency maintain and keep current, a language specific data base, after it has been initially formulated to assure that the correct language message goes to the correct home". We believe that there may be an answer to this question and request, after reading this Report,that the Internal Operation Committee to direct us to proceed in evaluating the effectiveness of this devise. BACKGROUND On 25 MAY 99, a fire at the Chevron Richmond Refinery caused the activation of the County's Community Warning System. After the wind direction,wind speed and type of chemicals and materials that would be involved with the fire were ascertained; the Emergency Telephone Ring Down System(ETRDS)was activated to the down wind residents instructing them to Shelter in Place. 1 In the dawn wind direction, a number of non-English speaking Laotian residents received the ETRDS phone message and proceeded to hang up. In the aftermath of that incident, various Reports were made to the Board of Supervisors on the investigation of the causes of the fire and various Agencies' responses. On several of those occasions,the Board became aware,through the efforts of the Laotian Organizing Project(LOP)representing the Laotian Community,that there was an issue of whether the ETRDS could make calls in non-English languages, so that a non-English speaking person receiving the call,would understand the message and take appropriate defensive action. Within a few months,the ETRDS vendor had contracted with a multi-language company that could translate any message we would want into any or all of 242 languages. In the 13 DEC 99 Report to the I.O., I reported back that the vendor could translate the CWS messages and all they needed was a listing of the resident's address,telephone number and the language they spoke at that residence. I noted in our Report that it was necessary to update the information regularly to insure that it(the data base)remains accurate. I further noted,that it would be more of a problem in gaining the confidence of the target community groups to obtain this information than it is with the technology of providing messages in a resident's native language. With direction from,the I.O., Mr. Michael Rent,the Hazardous Materials Programs Ombudsman,and I went back to the Laotian Organizing Project to discuss our recent upgrade of the ETRDS. When I described the information that I needed from the LOP to make the ETRDS language capability upgrade work.,the beginning of Mr. Dent's and my cultural and ethnic understanding"upgrade"began. The meeting ended with our agreeing to meet further to discuss a plan for obtaining the needed information from the community. Many meetings followed. Each meeting with the representative elders of the LOP and their staff required an interpreter and took, at a minimum of two(2)hours. There was an agenda, for the discussion, and at the conclusion of each meeting,an action plan with dates,times and responsible parties was agreed to by all present. With that set up, Mr. Dent and I returned to our offices to develop a strategy for accomplishing the tasks assigned. The tasks eventually rolled out to be. s Develop a plan; +► Ascertain the budget needed; • Obtain the funding needed; • Hire a Project Coordinator; + Hire and train the appropriate staff; • Obtain the necessary office space,equipment and supplies; • Do training for the staff on the time reporting and work practices of the county; + Set the plan in motion with reporting date requirements; • Hold periodic meetings with the Project Coordinator and staff; 2 • Monitor the progress of the project and assemble the information; • Write the report to the LO. Committee; and • Report. While no element of this project was easy for everyone involved, I found,by far,the most difficult parts were: Obtaining the funding needed, and Write the report to the I.O. Committee. Mr. Dent deserves and should take any and all praise for persevering through many months of trying to get funding for this project from a number of private foundations, Public Agencies and several West County cities, known for their work with community groups. Unfortunately, even after they were told that there was no funding available in the County's Budget, when the foundations heard the facts, they all felt that it was county government's responsibility to solve the problem. Finally, with the help of the Board members serving on the California Air Resources Board.(CARB) and.the Bay Area Air Quality Management District Board(BAAQMD), we were aide to get the funding needed for the project from: the GARB, $100,000.00, and the BAAQMD, $40,000.00-totaling $140,000.00. With the help of the LOP and by Mr. Dent's hanging signs in locations frequented by the Lao community in the East Bay Area, we were able to recruit a number of people for the position of Project Coordinator. In a collaborative interview process with the LOP, Ms. Phaeng Toommaly Andersen was selected for the position. The next process was to use the same community contact points to attract applicants for each of the four Lao languages: Lao, Mien, Hmung, and Khmu. Applicants were jointly interviewed by Ms. Andersen and the representatives of the LOP and four successful candidates hired. After extensive training, which included mock interviews and presentations, staff was assigned to the field. Each of the four Lao languages represents a unique set of social, cultural, and community dynamics,which directs the interaction needed to obtain their cooperation and acceptance. As an example, one group is more accepting of a visit to their home to receive information on the Community Warning System, and then provide the needed information needed for the ETRDS; while others are more approachable in a community or church setting. Staff and the Project Coordinator, met with elder and leadership groups of the four languages to gain their trust and acceptance of our need to contact members of their community and obtain information from them.. While I first believed that there would be accessible printed lists of their members,this did not prove to be a fact in a majority of the cases. Information was given orally or introductions were made to the head of the family to gain access to the family location. 3 Prior to and concomitant with the staff going out to do the field work,posters in the four Lao languages and a video,in all the languages,were produced and distributed by the staff to educate the families in all aspects of the Community Warning System. Several of the Lao communities are more understanding of pictures and the acting out of the message being delivered,than by the written word making posters and videos more effective communication instruments. Staff conducted meetings in homes,community meeting rooms and church halls. While we had originally understood that there were approximately 10,000 Laotians in the Richmond area, our results did not support that figure. We gained access to approximately 750 family residences, including single family homes and apartment houses. Each residence had anywhere from one to three or more families. Each residence would have a number of family members,which brought the number of people contacted to approximately 3,500 to 4,004. The 2000 Census supports this lower number range of Laotians in this area. With the information gathered and transmitted to the vendor, along with the four recordings made in each language,we then set up a test of the Laotian data-brise with the vendor which was conducted.Initial reports are favorable. A survey of all homes called is being compiled and is expected to be completed within the next few weeks.. The one lingering question,is how do we maintain and update a culturally diverse language database in a county our size.No model could be found for this magnitude of a task..No community organization is able to perform this task for their total community. With the approximately$30,000.00 remaining for the project, we were expecting to do further discovery and inquiry into various methods available for such a task. The task remains extremely labor intensive and complex when we anticipate going forward with other languages and ethnic communities.No new technology was on the horizon. LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL Several weeks ago Lis K ute,the Community Warning System Administrator, was at a national conference concerning Community Notification in Washington.D.C. At this meeting she observed a demonstration by a company out of Concord,New Hampshire, called VoiceAnnounce. The system uses a device connected to existing phone lines and can sound the Emergency Alert System alarm followed by a short audible alert message in any language. Immediately,Ms. Aute thought of our issue and arranged a meeting in Contra Costa County with the president of the Company on FRI,23 MAY 03. After seeing the demo, it became apparent that this device and system needed to be explored further. 4 I If the device and system answers questions raised at the meeting and is able to pass a real time test with our ETR.DS vendor,then this is something we want to explore. The devise and system presents an opportunity to have all languages announce an emergency condition without the residents picking up the receiver. Supporting systems, interoperability and:costs of the devise and telephone service have to be investigated. Ms. Flute will be available for questions. RECOMMENDATION Accept this report and direct the Sheriff s Office and the Health Services Department to work with this company and an ETR.DS vendor to evaluate the potential use of these devices and system to provide emergency notifications, through the Community Warning System,in any language present in Contra Costa County. The cost of this evaluation will be borne by the budget established for the LOP project. CC:WILLIAM B.'WALKER,M.D.,HEALTH SERVICES DIRECTOR 5