Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05062003 - C75-C79 . . Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Robert J. Kochly,District Attorney Costa DATE: April 22,2003 -County . 75 SUBJECT: Approval to Submit and Execute a Grant Award Agreement with the State Office of Criminal Justice Planning for Funding of the Regional Anti-Drug Program for the Period July 1,2003 through June 30,2004 in the Amount of$ 724,145 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve and authorize the District Attorney to submit an application and execute a grant award agreement, and any extensions or amendments thereof, pursuant to State guidelines, with the State Office of Criminal Justice Planning for funding of the Regional Anti-Drug Program in the amount of$ 724,145 for the period July 1,2003 through June 30,2094(100%►federal funds). FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. The Regional Anti-Drug Program has three components operated by the District Attorney, Sheriff= Coroner, and County Probation Officer, respectively, and has been in effect since fiscal year 1995/96. As in prior funding cycles, the State is rewiring that a single application be submitted under the authority of one department.. Therefore, as in past, the District Attorney is submitting a unified application for all three participating agencies. Pursuant to State guidelines, the Program is governed by a Steering Committee, including the District Attorney, Sheriff:-Coroner, County Probation Officer, and the County Drug Administrator, which approves distribution of the funds. Grant funds are used by the District Attorney to fund two experienced attorneys and clerical support; by the Sheriff's Office to fund one toxicologist, one toxicologist aide and one clerk; and by Probation to fund two deputy probation officers and one probation aide. Expenditures and revenue are built into the 2003/04 budget submissions for the respective agencies to implement their portion of the grant award. Grant conditions require that the County accept responsibility for any liability arising out of the performance of the grant award, including civil court action for damages. Supplantation is prohibited. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: 2S YES SIGNATURE: MYJ::::�ECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOA C .^ITTEE a.—_APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ' _..._.. _ alfa u--ma`....._ __. ........._. _... _.w...._—._..._.. ...._..__w._...._. ACTION OF B . ON ' ..µ APPROVE AS RECOMMENDED Y, OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE (t AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN UNANIMOUS(ABSENT, Ai } AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE AYES:' NOES: SHOWN. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: w t-L _t -A'I-" U{�CC✓ ATTESTED CONTACT: Jose Merin,DDA(6461-2395) JOHN SWEET N CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISOR AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CC: District Attorney-Attn:Rene Goldstein County Administrator-Attn:George Roemer Auditor-Controller l _ BY t/'� ll DEPUTY 4 REASONSFOR RECOMMENDATIONIBACKGROUND: The Regional Anti-Drug Program will be continuing the strategy begun four years ago,pursuant to State and federal.guidelines. All three program components will be concentrating on a prioritized and integrated drug enforcement effort coordinated through the State-led Narcotics Enforcement Teams operating in the County. Grant activities focus on middle- and high-level narcotic dealers and manufacturers, violent and repeat offenders, and drug trafficking gangs and organizations, to interdict the importation, manufacture and distribution systems which have, in recent years, become more sophisticated in their methods of operation. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to approve the recommendation will result in the loss of$ 724,145 in federal funds available to combat the drug problem in Contra Costa County. I'll,................................................................................................................. .......................................... TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra FROM: Robert J. Kochly, District Attorney Costa DATE: April 22, 2003 7�Qounty SUBJECT: Approval to Submit and Execute a Grant Award Agreement with the State Office of Criminal Justice Planning for Funding of the Contra Costa DA-NET(Major Narcotic Vendor Prosecution Program) in the Amount of$ 129,614 for the Period July 1,2003 through June 30,2004 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve and authorize the District Attorney to submit an application and execute a grant award agreement, and any extensions or amendments thereof, pursuant to State guidelines, with the State Office of Criminal Justice Planning for funding of Contra Costa DA-NET(Major Narcotic Vendor Prosecution Program) in the amount of$ 129,614 for the period July 1,2003 through June 30, 2004 (State funds-budgeted). FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. The grant application is in the amount of$ 129,614 to fund salaries and benefits for an attorney and investigative support for the project. The District Attorney's Office has operated its DA-NET project for thirteen years. As in prior years, expenditures and revenue have been built into the District Attorney's 2003/04 budget to implement the grant. Grant conditions require that the County accept responsibility for any liability arising out of the performance of the grant award, including civil court action for damages. Supplantation is prohibited. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND: The goal of the State program is to enhance prosecution of major drug vendors through vertical prosecution, thereby increasing the likelihood of convicting offenders and ensuring appropriate sentences for their crimes. Chapter 1424, Statutes of 1984, authorized the State program and set forth its basic guidelines. If the grant is approved by the State, the District Attorney will continue to use the project to concentrate on the investigation and prosecution of methamphetamine man. Contra Costa County. The law I CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE: -------------- _�RKOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOA OMMITTEE -- PROVE OTHER SIGNATURE{S). ----------- ACTION OF 13 ON A4 g —APPROVE AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN UNANIMOUS(ABSENT AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE AYES: NOES: SHOWN. ABSENT ABSTAIN: J�'- \j ATTESTED /VVV CONTACT: Jose Marin,DDA(646-2395) JOHN SWEET N,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORgAND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CC: District Attorney—Attn:Rende Goldstein County Administrator—Attn:George Roemer Auditor-Controller BY t�] `�14-6EPUTY enforcement Western States Information Network(WSIN)estimates that Contra Costa is one of the most active methamphetamine manufacturing areas in Northern California. The grant has allowed the District Attorney to assign a skilled and committed team to pursue these time-consuming and complicated cases. For the first half of the current grant year,41 new cases were referred l to the project, while 109 defendants still had cases in progress from the previous periods. 4f the 46 cases completed through December 31, 2002, all but one resulted in convictions; all 45 convicted defendants were sentenced to incarceration in State Prison or County Jail. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to approve the recommendation will result in the inability of the District Attorney to apply for $ 129,614 in State funds available to combat major narcotics production and trafficking the Contra Costa County. Since funds for this project have been included in the District Attorney's 2003/04 budget,disapproval of the recommendation would create a significant revenue shortfall. ----........................................................................................ .......................................... Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Robert J. Kochly, District Attorney Costa DATE: April 22, 2003 , County SUBJECT: Approval to Submit an Application and Execute a Grant Award Agreement with the State Office of Criminal Justice Planning for Funding of the Contra Costa County Statutory Rape Vertical Prosecution Project in the Amount of$ 130,500 for the Period July 1,2003 through June 30,2004 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve and authorize the District Attorney to submit an application and execute a grant award agreement and any extensions or amendments thereof, pursuant to State guidelines, with the State Office of Criminal Justice Planning for funding of the Contra Costa County Statutory Rape Vertical Prosecution Project in the amount of$ 130,500 for the period July 1, 2003 through June 30,2004 (State funds-budgeted). FINANCIAL IMPACT: The grant application, in the amount of$ 130,500 is designed to fund salaries and benefits for an attorney to implement the project. It is anticipated that the 2003/04 State budget will appropriate $ 6,775,725 to the State Office of Criminal Justice Planning, for assistance to local district attorneys' offices for the vertical prosecution of individuals accused of unlawful sexual intercourse with minors. This is the eighth renewal of the Statutory Rape Vertical Prosecution Program grant which began December 1, 1995. Expenditures and revenues for the project have been included in the District Attorney's 2003/04 budget. Grant conditions require that the County accept responsibility for any liability arising out of the performance of the grant award,including civil court action for damages. Supplantation is prohibited. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND: As many as two-thirds of children born to unwed teen mothers are fathered by adult men. A substantial number of these mothers are receiving AFDC funds and thefatherse neither paying child support,nor CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X—YES SIGNATURE: COMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARqOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ---OTHER .m SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOA APPROVE AS RECOMMENDED K OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN UNANIMOUS(ABSENT nA J,, AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE AYES: NOES: SHOWN. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTESTED CONTACT: Dara Cashman,DDA(646-4468) JOHN SWEEDEN,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CC: District Attorney-Attn:Ren6e Goldstein County Administrator-Attn:George Roemer Auditor-Controller BY DEPUTY a 4 taking responsibility for their children. Moreover, there are a substantial number of instances of adults having sexual intercourse with minors,where there exists a significant age disparity between the adults and the minors. These instances often involve troubled teens, between the ages of fourteen and seventeen,and predatory adults who use their positions of power to exact sexual favors and contribute to the minors' delinquency. Many of these minors fail to complete their high school education and are subjected to greater health risks associated with teen pregnancies, drugs, alcohol, and sexually transmitted diseases. This vertical prosecution project has been designed to address the problems and risks attendant upon adolescent sexual activity and the victimization by predatory adults. This is accomplished through the prosecution of these sexual predators, in order to deter their conduct and hold them responsible for their actions. Additionally, the project works closely with other county agencies to accomplish the goals of the program. These agencies include local police departments, Child Protective Services, the Rape Crisis Center and the Victim-Witness Assistance program. Moreover, since April 1, 1996, the project has reviewed over rive hundred sixty cases and successfully prosecuted over two hundred and forty cases to completion. In these cases,the District attorney's Office has obtained,as conditions of probation, orders to comply with child support,orders to participate in counseling and parenting classes,restitution orders, testing for various sexually transmitted diseases,and time in County jail or prison. It is the, District Attorney's goal to continue to network with the community in an effort to combat the victimiztion of minors and combat teen pregnancies. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to approve the recommendation will result in the inability of the District Attorney to receive $130,500 in State funds available to assist in combating the problems and costs associated with teen pregnancies and statutory rape in Contra Costa County. Since funds for this project have been included in the District Attorney's 2003/04 budget, disapproval of the recommendation would create a significant revenueshortfall. , -............................................................................... ....................................................... .� Contra Tb: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Robert J. Kochly,District Attorney Costa DATE: April 23,2003 County SUBJECT: Approval to Submit an Application and Execute a Grant Award Agreement with the State Office of Criminal Justice Planning for Funding of the Elder Abuse Vertical Prosecution Program in the Amount of$ 155,000 for the Period April 1,2003 through March 31, 2004 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve and authorize the District Attorney to submit an application and execute a grant award agreement, and any extensions or amendments thereof, pursuant to State guidelines, with the State Office of Criminal Justice Planning for funding of the Elder Abuse Vertical Prosecution Project in the amount of$ 155,000 for the period April 1, 2003 through March 31, 2004 (State funds). FINANCIAL IMPACT: The grant application, in the amount of$ 155,000, is designed to fund salaries and benefits for an attorney to implement the project. This will be a new grant program for the District Attorney. The State has indicated that our concept proposal for funding will be approved, contingent on compliance with formal application requirements and provided that there are no successful appeals of the selection process. Grant conditions require that the County accept responsibility for any liability arising out of the performance of the grant award, including civil court action for damages. When formal approval is received by the State, the appropriate budget and position adjustments will be submitted to the Board . Supplantation is prohibited. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONIBACKGROUND: The District Attorney launched his vertical Elder and Dependent Adult Abuse Prosecution Unit in January 2001, as part of the County's Zero Tolerance of Domestic Viooaee4iftkiiia�e. That nit collaborates with CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _X--,YES SIGNATURE: COMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BO C PROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): D ON ACTION 0 B APPROVE AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN UNANIMOUS(ABSENT AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE AYES: NOES: SHOWN. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTESTED CONTACT: Dana Filkowski,DDA(646-4867) JOHN SWEET N,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISOR 9 AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CC: District Attorney—Attn:Ren6e Goldstein County Administrator—Attn:George Roemer &4 Auditor-Controller BY DEPUTY other agencies and non-profits to organize aggressive State- and County-wide community outreach and training programs to raise awareness and increase the quantity and quality of elder abuse reports. The program's success is reflected in the steady, significant increase in reports to Adult Protective Services and law enforcement and in the District Attorney's conviction rate for felony cases. To enhance the County's Zero Tolerance efforts, the District Attorney submitted a proposal to the State Office of Criminal Justice Planning (OCJP) for funding of an additional attorney dedicated to outreach, training, and prosecution, within the context of the multi-disciplinary approach to combating elder and dependent adult abuse. OCJP has notified the District Attorney that the proposal has been selected for funding in the maximum amount available ($ 155,000)to a county of Contra Costa's size. Now formal grant application procedures need to occur and application forms prepared before the grant award can be finalized. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to approve the recommendation will result in the inability of the District Attorney to receive $155,000 in State funds available to assist in combating elder and dependent adult abuse. The State will reappropriate the Bands to another county with a lower rank in the competitive process. This will result in the inability of the District Attorney to expand Zero Tolerance-Domestic Violence efforts in the area of elder abuse. TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS .° Contra FROM: Steven L. Bautista, County Probation Officer Costa DATE: May 6, 2003 SUBJECT: Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act ------- ;,Founty s (Schiff-Cardenas Crime Prevention Act of 2000) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION': Adopt the attached Resolution which authorizes County Probation Officer Steven L. Bautista, or the Chairperson of the Board of Supervisors to submit and/or sign Contra Costa County's application for approval of the County's Comprehensive Multiagency Juvenile Justice Pian Modification and related contracts, amendments, or extensions with the State of California Board of Corrections. This Resolution also assures that Contra Costa County's Comprehensive Multiagency Juvenile Justice Plan Modification has been developed, reviewed and provided to the Board of Corrections, and provides necessary assurances to the State of California Board of Corrections as required in the grant application. FISCAL IMPACT: $3,258,037 is available to Contra Costa County through the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act (Schiff-Cardenas Crime Prevention Act of 2000). There are no match requirements for the award. BACKGROUND: The State of California Board of Corrections, pursuant to the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act (Schiff-Cardenas Crime Prevention Act of 2000, Assembly Bill 1913) as signed into law by the Governor of the State of California on September 7, 2000, is providing a total allocation of $116,300,000 to enable local government units to develop and implement a Comprehensive Multiagency Juvenile Justice Plan. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE: ----____-----------------_-_------------------------------------------------------------------ --------_-- - - --------- v'#`2EG011J1MENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENi7 TION OF BOAR COMMITTEE PROVE OTHER SiGNATUE29;BD -, ACTION OF ON i i APPROVE AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN UNANIMOUS(ABSENT� �t i} ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE AYES: NOES: SHOWN. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ' ATTESTED f - CONTACT: DAVE GROSSI,3-4199 JOHN SWEET, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CC: COUNTY PROBATION OFFICER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER " BOARD OF CORRECTIONS VIA PROBATION ? BY �PUTY - 2 — The legislation requires that this plan be developed by the local Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council. Contra Costa County's allocation for this purpose is $3,258,037. The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act requires that the local Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council be chaired by the County Probation Officer and that the Comprehensive Multiagebcy Juvenile Justice Plan developed by this body be approved by the Board of Supervisors. Funding from the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act {JJCPA} will allow Contra Costa County to maintain funding for significant children's services. Funding through JJCPA for fiscal year 2003/2004 will allow for the continuation of the majority of the programs established during the initial year of the grant. The following summarizes the programs proposed for continuedfunding under JJCPA. 1. Deputy Probation Officers in High Schools Program Initially funded through Challenge Grant 1, the Deputy Probation Officers in High Schools Program has been continued the past two years with funding from JJCPA. The program places probation officers in selected high schools and special necessary schools to provide supervision and intervention services for juvenile offenders and other at-risk youth. The program strongly stresses collaboration among schools, Probation and police agencies to provide supervision and treatment services for youth. The proposed comprehensive multiagency Juvenile Justice plan recommends adding two probation officers to this program, thereby allowing services to be expanded to two additional high schools in the county. II. Deputy Probation Officers in Middle Schools Program The Deputy Probation Officers in Middle Schools Program has been based on the high school model to provide intensive supervision for offenders and an array of early intervention services for at-risk youth. This program was initiated during the the first year of JJCPA funding and is being recommended for continuation. Ill. Community Probation Program Continued JJCPA funding will allow the eight probation officers currently out-stationed in various police agencies throughout the County to continue their focus on high risk youth, at-risk youth and chronic offenders. The deputy probation officers implementing this program work non-traditional hours and collaborate closely with police agencies, schools and community-based organizations to help prevent offending behavior and provide appropriate accountability. IV. Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility Aftercare Continued funding will allow for the aftercare program at the Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation facility to continue, allowing for a 90 day period of close supervision and support for these minors graduating from the program. A portion of the aftercare program was initially funded by the SafeFutures grant and was continued and enhanced through JJCPA funding. V. Summit Center Program The Summit Center program represents a collaborative effort between the Probation Department, Children's Mental Health Services, and the County Office of Education to provide residential' treatment services for youth in the juvenie justice system in need of mental health and counseling services. Initial funding for this program was, in part, through the SafeFutures grant. Continued JJCPA funding will allow the County to continue to fund the Probation staff working at the facility and to allow for the continued leveraging of other funding sources. VI. Volunteers in Probation Program JJCPA funding will allow for the continuation of the recruitment, training and matching of volunteer mentors with youngsters in the juvenile justice system. Volunteers continue to provide a variety of services for at-risk youth. This program was initially - 3 - funded through the SafeFutures grant and has been continued through JJCPA funding. VII. Fee for Service Funding To more effectively respond to the needs of clients, $206,000 of the JJCPA funds has been designated for the purchase of services on an as-needed basis. This approach is intended to effectively address the service needs of youth on an individual basis in order to provide necessary interventions and services. The County continues to work with a number of community-based organizations in providing this support to children in the justice system. VIII. Family Intervention Program Due to increased costs, the JJCPA allocation for fiscal year 2003/2004 will not cover the entire expense for existing programs. In order to meet budget requirements, it is recommended that the Family Intervention Program be discontinued. This will result in the elimination of one Probation Supervisor I and three deputy probation officer positions. These employees will be reassigned to other vacancies in the Probation Department. Two of the five deputy positions currently allocated for the Family Intervention Program will be reassigned within JJCPA to the Deputy Probation Officers in High Schools Program. B0UR.flcpa2403bo.03 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AYES: SE71:'F?MSORS GIOTA, LIII:[ZFi%, MMM & DeSAilL= NOES: NM ABSENT: NM ABSTAIN: NM DlSMCr III IS VAGM',T Resolution No, 20031 2, 4 Subject: Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act) {Schiff-Cardenas Crime Prevention ) Act of 2000) ) WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa desires to continue programs designated under the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act to be funded in part from funds made available through the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act program administered by the Board of Corrections of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County hereby continues County Probation Officer Steven L. Bautista as the Chair of the Contra Costa County Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council; and AUTHORIZES said County Probation Officer, or the Chairperson of the Board of Supervisors, to submit and/or to sign Contra Costa County's application for approval for the County's Comprehensive Multiagency Juvenile Justice Plan Modification and related contracts, amendments, or extensions with the State of California; and IDENTIFIES the following individuals as members of the Contra Costa County Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council: Mark DeSaulni r, Chair, Board of Supervisors David Coleman, 111, Public Defender John Cullen, Director, Dept. of Employment and Human Services Shirley Marchetti, Executive Director, REACH Project, Inc. Ruth Ormsby, Child/Adolescent Program Chief, Dept. of Mental Health Joe Chick, County Superintendent of Schools Warren Rupf, Sheriff-Coroner Dave Cutaia, Chief of Police, City of Martinez and Representative, Police Chiefs' Association Robert Kochly, District Attorney Taalia Hasan, Executive Director, Youth Service Bureau Marianne Jameson, Community Member ASSURES that the County of Contra Costa's Comprehensive Multiagency Juvenile Justice Plan Modification has been developed, reviewed and provided to the Board of Corrections in a format determined by the Board of Corrections not later than May 1, 2003; ASSURES that the County of Contra Costa Board of Supervisors and the Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council have reviewed and approve the County's Comprehensive Multiagency Juvenile Justice Plan Modification; - 2 - ASSURES that the County of Contra Costa will adhere to the requirements of the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act (Chapters 353 and 475 of the Government Code) regarding the submission of the Comprehensive Multiagency Juvenile Justice Plan Modification application, investment of allocated monies, including any interest earnings, expenditures of said funds, and the submission of required reports to the Beard of Corrections. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD ON May 6, 2003 i hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown: AT'T'ESTED: INAy 6, 2003 JOHN SWEETEN, Clerk of the Board of Supe' s s and CguntyyAdminis"tor ,F sy f Contact: Dave Grassi, 3-4193 cc: County Probation Officer County Administrator County Auditor-Controller Board of Corrections via Probation RESOLUTION NO. 2003! k .... JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT APPLICATION FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING AND PLAN MODIFICATION Section 1. County Information Date of Appl'icati'on: April 24, 2003 Plan Year Modified: 2003-2404 County Name Contra Costa Board of Chief Probation Officer Corrections' Name Steven L. Bautista Address 50 Douglas Dr., Suite 201 City/State/Zip Martinez CA 94553 Telephone (925) 313-4023 JUVENILE JUSTICE FAx (925) 313-4191 CRIME PREVENTION ACT E-mail sbaut@prob-co-contra-costa.ca.us APPLICATION FOR Plan Coordinator CONTINUATION Name Lionel D. Chatman FUNDING Address 50 Douglas Dr., Suite 201 AND PLAN City/State/Zip Martinez CA 94553 MODIFICATION Telephone (925)427-8384 FAX (925) 427-8490 E-mail khatr@prob.co.contra-costa.ca.us P:l(B)St PP/KstoiVChaip475.Sectl.doc 1220/01 1 JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT APPLICATION FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING AND PLAN MODIFICATION Section 2. Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council Have there been any members added or deleted to the Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council (JJCC)since submittal of the original CPA 2000 Application for Approval? (Place an x in the proper box and follow instructions) ❑ No There are no changes to the JJCC membership. No further information is neededin this section. Go to Section 3. ® The following changes have been made to the JJCC: Yes NamelAoency Added Deleted 1. John Goin, Chair. Board of Supervisors ❑ 2. Mark DeSautn er, Chair, Board of Supervisors ❑ 3. Gary Yancey, District Attorney ❑ 4. Robert ttochly, District Attorney ® ❑ 5. ❑ ❑ 6. [] ❑ 7. ® ❑ 6• ❑ ❑ 9. © ❑ 10. ❑ ❑ 11. ❑ ❑ 12. ❑ ❑ Note: Section 749.22 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, Chapter 325. Statutes of 1998 mandates the following membership on theJuvenile justice coordinating council. Additional members can be added If the County wishes, ~The coordinating councils shall, at a minimum, include the chief probation officer, as chair, and one representative each from the district attorney's office, the public defender's office, the sheriffs department, the board of supervisors, the department of social services,the department of mental health, a community-based'drug and alcohol program, a city police department, the county office of education or a school district, and an at-large, community representative. In order to carry out its duties pursuant to this section, a coordinating council shall also include representatives from nonprofit community-based organizations providing services to minors." P:/(B)StaffCPP/Kstot!/Chap475.Sectf.doc 12/20/01 2 JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT APPLICATION FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING AND PLAN MODIFICATION Section 3. Plan Modification Will all programs currently funded in the existing BOC approved Comprehensive Muklagency Juvenile Justice Plan (CMJJP) continue as originally designed and be funded from FY 2002-2003 continuation funding? No We want to make substantive program changes and/or add new programs. Changes must be summarized in Section 3.1, 3.11 and 3.111, and 3.V. ❑ We will continue all programs, but may make some program adjustments. Yes Skip to Sections 3.1 and 3.IV and complete. And/Or ❑ We will continue all program, but will only make budget changes. Skip to Yes Sections 3.11 and 3.V and complete. Section 3.1 Modification Summary — to be completed by all counties Summarize the proposed modification(s) including a discussion of the key activities and events leading to the decision to modify the CMJJP. if deleting or adding new programs provide an explanation. (No more than 3 pages,double-spatted, 12 point font) See attached narrative Section 3.11 Communities Facing Risk This section is to be completed by only those counties where there has been a change to the schools, neighborhoods, or communities facing risk that differs from the information providedin the existing CMJJP. Describe the need to modify the plan, identify or re-prioritize the areas impacted, and describe the effect on the new areas. (No more than 3 pages,double-spaced,12 paint font) n/a Section 3.111 New Program(s) A. Which existing programs will be added, deleted/amended to allow for the implementation of the proposed new program(s) 9. Family intervention Program Added Deleted Amended � Q 2. High School Challenge Team Program 3. © ❑ ❑ P:/(B)Ste#fCPP/Kstoll/Chsp475.Seetl.doc 12/20101 3 JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT APPLICATION FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING AND PLAN MODIFICATION If the modified plan proposes a new program(s) complete the following information for each new-rouram and also complete Section 3.V, "Budget Modification,"which requests information on the deleted/reduced program and also for the new program: 1. New Program Name a. Target Population b. Number of Clients Projected c. Program Category: (check all that Apply) ❑ Prevention intervention ❑ Suppression ❑ Incapacitation 2. Detailed description of the program(s) Narrative): a. Describe collaborations with other agencies, including a description of how information sharing will be coordinated. b. Describe the basis upon which the program(s) has been determined to be effective, citing the specific programs or approaches that have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing delinquency and addressing juvenile crime for any elements of response to juvenile crime and delinquency. c. Include time frame(s) for major program activities, including a schedule for implementation. d. Detail the goals of the program and how they are related to the outcome measures. P:/o1)StafICPP/Kstoll/Chap475.Sectl.doe 12/20/41 4 JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT APPLICATION FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING AND PLAN MODIFICATION e. Detail speck objectives and outcome measures to determine effectiveness of the local juvenile justice action strategy and the program. outcome measures to determine the effectiveness of the proposed program shall at a minimum address each of the following mandated outcomes: • The rate of successful completion of probation; • The rate of successful completion of restitution and court- ordered ourtordered community service responsibilities; • Arrest, incarceration, and probation violation rates of the program participants; and • The quantification of the annual per capita costs of the program (for programs using multiple funding sources, the entre program per capita cost and the JJCPA only per capita cost must be reported separately). Section 31V Current Program(s) Modification Provide a narrative discussion of substantive and non-substantive program changes for each program in the approved C'MJJP'that will be modified. For each program include: a) Program Name: see attached narrative b) Detailed description of the modification and reasons for change: see attached narrative c) Impact on collaborations and partners: see attached narrative d) Changes or modifications in outcome objectives and outcome measures: see attached narrative Section 3.V Budget Modifications Utilize the budget grid on page s to identify the current bu4getet as shown in the approved CMJJP plan and the new proposed budget. Indicate',the modification type (check appropriate). E] Budget Modification only 0 Now, enhanced, deleted or reduced program (describe on budget page). Submit separate budget pages for each program modified. P:I(B)St: PPWswil/Chap47S.See(l.doe 12/20/01 5 ................................................................................................-...''I'll .................................................................................................................................... ....................................... Contra Costa County Probation Department JJCPA Third Year Funding Application Section 3.1—Wodt) tion Summary The Contra Costa Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council proposes to eliminate one program and modify another existing Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act Program. A review of our JJCPA state allocation, indicate that these finite funds do not address an increased in employee benefit costs which required us to examine our funding resources for each program,that resulted in, the submitted change in programmatic services. Section 3.13 Current Oram(s)Wodj)rwatjoiVDefetion a)Tyqgram 9vame. Family Intervention Program(Formerly the Family Intervention in Substance Abuse Program). 6) Detaded description of the modifi' ration1de-retion and reasons for change., Family Intervention Program is a community-based program that used JJCPA funds to provide services to adult substance use offenders and their families throughout Contra Costa County. As the result of budgetary increases in employees benefit cost,the Contra Costa County Probation Department cannot continue to fund this program and, regretfully,it must be terminated. The elimination of this program will result in one Probation Supervisor and three deputy probation officer positions eliminated and two deputy probation officer positions will be reassigned to the High School program. The Family Intervention Program has experienced a fair amount of success during its one and half years of operation. Although full staffing of the program was delayed,due to circumstances beyond our control,the probation supervisor and his staff worked hard to facilitate positive change for substance abusing parents and their children. Data from the first year of the program operation reveal the following positive outcomes. 1 of JUVENILE .JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT APPLICATION FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING AND PLAN MODIFICATION A. Program to be added n enhanced 0 Program Name: Deputy Probation Officers in High Schools B. Program to be deleted Q reduced � Program Name: i $524921 $6885 $ $29500 $ e $ $ k $ $ $2950 $ $28588 $ $590804 $ $344440 um $8x86/0+47 $ $11803 $ $43'194 $ $ $ $ $ $18001 $15000 $959044 $15000 $538710 P:f(B)StaifCPP/Kstall/Chap475.Sectl.doc 12I2i310t 6 i s R [ 1t♦ 4 • ! i • i i i . • Old � • s � • � • • 4 � i r • i • s • a s - - i � ' e - • ■ • i State Non-CPA Current Budget et Fundi Interest Funds Salaries and Benefits Services and Supplies R A Professional Services • t s Comm tin ity-Based Organizations Fixed Assets/Equipment Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of a State Ford ) Cather; Fund Totals: • � . r � Proposed Budged State 'Interest Non-CPA Funds Funds Salaries and Benefits Services and Supplies : r Professional Services Community-Based Organizations Fixed Assets:!Equi meat Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of State Funds) Other a a Fuad Totals A .t' - t• 1 f R F R $ $ f • $ ss Current Budget State Non-CPA Funds 1r�t�r�st Salaries and Benefits Funds Services and Supplies , p M Professional Services Community-Based Organizations Fixed Assets/Equipment Administrative Overhead (Maximum O 5% of State Funds) Other: Fund Totals: M p �rE3t state Interest Non-CFA Funds Funds Salaries and Benefits a l Services and Supplies � Professional ssional Servic s a Community-Based r anizatio s Fixed AssetslEgui meat Administrative Overhead (Maximum m 0.5% € f State Funds) Other fill Fund Totals 1 ! A ! a o s a - s a - • ■ s s : s • • e • a ' e x • �� s s ■ Current Budget Stag Interest Non-GPA Funds Funds Salaries and Benefits t Services and Supplies t Professional Services Community-Based Organizations Fixed Assets/Equipment Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of b State Funds) Other- . . Fund Totals: . • t i Stag Non-CP� Pro d Ei €� Fundi Interest Funds Salaries and Benefits t Services and Supplies t Professional Services t Community-Based Organizations Fixed Assets/Equipment Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of t Stag Funds) Other t Frond Totals t t t • t Current Budget State Interest Nora-CPA Funds Funds Salaries and Benefits Services and Supplies Professional Services s Community-Based Organizations Fixed Assets/Equipment Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of * 1 9 f State Funds Other. k Fund Totals, . t `ro osed Budget State Interest Non-CPA. Funds Funds Salaries and Benefits . . Services and Supplies Professional Services Community-Based Organizations Fined Assets/Equipment Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of State Funds) OtherS E E Fund Totals • • • e : s - - • . : s - s s t Currant Budget State Interest Non-CP-A Funds Funds Salaries and Benefits : r Services and Supplies $ Professional Services Community-Based Organizations Fixed As etslEquipment Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of State Funds Other: Fund Totals, • : . E Proposed ��tdget State Interest Noy-CPQ ------ Fends Funds and Benefits � . Services and Supplies E < Professional Services Community-Based Organizations Fixed Assets/Equipment .Administrative Overhead (Maximum o.5% of State Funds) Other Fund Totals e .e t• ! ! s • ' ' i i s r - a i - i � - • � M ! f • ! i t N ♦ • •' i i i Current Budget State Interest Non-CPB Funds Funds Salaries and Benefits Services and Supplies Professional Services Community-Based Organizations Fixed Assets/Equipment Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of , 6 State Funds Fund Totals. . : Proposed Budge State Interest Non-CPA Funds Funds Salaries and Benefits Services and Supplies Professional Services Community-BasedOrganizations Frac! Assets/Equipment Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of State Funds) Other Baa : Farad Totals , • a Contra Costa County Probation Department JJCPA Third Year Funding Application Section 3.1-- ' Xi cation Summary The Contra Costa Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council proposes to eliminate one program and modify another existing Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act Program. A review of our JJCPA state allocation, indicate that these finite funds do not address an increased in employee benefit costs which required us to examine our funding resources for each program,that resulted in, the submitted change in programmatic services. Section 3.IV Currrrrt Ovgram(s}9WOd f icatian1Oefn*n a)Ovgmm Name:Family Intervention Program(Formerly the Family Intervention in Substance Abuse Program). b) Oetaifed descTtion of thefuatiarnldefetwn and reasomfir cfiaVe.• Family Intervention Program is a community-based program that used JJCPA funds to provide services to adult substance use offenders and their families throughout Contra Costa County. As the result of budgetary increases in employees benefit cost,the Contra Costa County Probation Department cannot continue to fund this program and, regretfully, it must be terminated.The elimination of this program will result in one Probation Supervisor and three deputy probation officer positions eliminated and two deputy probation officer positions will be reassigned to the High School program. The Family Intervention Program has experienced a fair amount of success during its one and half years of operation. Although full staffing of the program was delayed, due to circumstances beyond our control,the probation supervisor and his staff worked hard to facilitate positive change for substance abusing parents and their children. Data from the first year of the program operation reveal the following positive outcomes. I of 4 Contra Costa County Probation Department JJCPA Third Year Funding Application Adult participants experienced reductions in felony and misdemeanor convictions and a curbing of drug problems through participation. Youth participants benefited also, as we observed a reduction in habitual truancy and school attendance problems among the client population. However, it was notable that delinquency outcomes did not apply to these youth clients as none were involved in the juvenile justice system at intake or became involved during the evaluation period. The adult clients in this population were typically parents of preschool age children. c) Impact on collaboration and paw As indicated in our application submitted for the second year of funding, modification to this program eliminated the "multidisciplinary teams". As implemented,these `teams„ acted in a variety of organizational settings, ranging from informal discussions among caseworkers from various agencies,to target case screenings by regional mental health/probation/social services teams. Therefore,we do not anticipate any negative or positive impact on existing collaboration and partnerships. d) Changes or moduations in outcome objectives and outcome measures: There is no six-month follow-up data collection for the Family Intervention Substance Abuse program. However, we will stop collecting program evaluation data for this program as of June 30,2003. ,Section 3.IV Current Otgram{s)Wo&jicadon a) Otgram 9Vame:High School Challenge Team Program 6) Oetuiteddescription of the mod:', kation acrd reasons far change. The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act currently supports the High School Program. The High School Program is an expansion of the Challenge Grant I program in Contra Costa County. Beginning in fiscal year 2003-2004,the two remaining Family 2 of 4 Contra Costa County Probation Department JJCPA Third Year Funding Application Intervention Deputy positions will be reassigned to the High School Program. We believe this is an opportunity for the Department to provide services to local area high schools, and at-risk youth in school. During the first fiscal year of JJCPA,the High School Program in Contra Costa County performed well yielding promising outcomes for highschool age youth involved in the court system. Program outcomes during the first year included improvements in grade point averages, a reduction in days missed from school, days with one or more class cuts, the rate of arrest, habitual truancy, school attendance problems, alcohol and other drug problems. This program focuses directly on the prevention of juvenile crime in the short-term. c) Impact on coQaborations andpartnem The addition of two deputy probation officer positions will expand and enhance existing partnerships with School Districts and the County. The collaboration/partnership among school personnel, resource officer and the deputy probation officer create the school safety team that employs a variety of preventive strategies design to keep youth from entering or re-entering the formal juvenile justice system. This collaboration will enhance services to the targeted high schools. d) Cfianges or modify ations in outcome o0ectims and outcome measures: With the added two high schools to this program, data collection will remain the same but with additional clients, the number of client to be served will increase. Section 3.IV Cwnw Ovgram(s)Modijl cation a)0rogrum Name. Fee for Service Funding 6) Oet fed descriptiom of Me mod:fuatum and r=ons fear cfiatW Due to increased costs,the JJCPA allocation for fiscal year 2003/2004 will not cover the entire expense for existing programs. In order to meet budget requirements, it has been 3 of 4 Contra Costa County Probation Department JJCPA Third Year Funding Application determined that a reduction in the fee for service funds is needed. Originally, 312,000 were designated for the purchase of services on an as-needed basis,however that amount has been changed to 206,000.Therefore, approximately 106,000 have reduced these funds. c) Impact on codfa6orations andpartnerx We do not anticipate any impact of these changes on the collaboration and partners d) Changes or modtfuatiom in outcome o4fwtives and outcome measures: We make no proposed changes or modifications in the outcome objectives and outcome measures. 4 of 4