HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05202003 - SD2 ? S
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA
FROM: John Sweeten,County Administrator -� - COSTA
.r
COUNTY
DATE: May 20,203
SUBJECT: State Budget May Revise
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONM:
ACCEPT the oral report of the County Administrator on the California State Budget May Revise
BACKGROU YD/REASON' S FOR RECOMMENDATION (S):
Each year, the Governor issues his revisions to the January State Budget Proposal in mid-May called the "May
Revise."
The May Revise revises the estimates of revenues and expenditure needs for the State of California for the
coming fiscal year, as well as the Governor's proposed spending plan. Recent reports indicate that the May
Revise may indicate a need for cuts even deeper than proposed in the January budget. Most expect that County
government will bear a substantial portion of the cuts necessary to balance the state budget. The May Revise
will provide insights into the Governor's latest thinking on his budget balancing plan as it affectsContra Costa
County.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: —YES SIGNATURE: f
RECOMMENDATION'OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR_,RECOMMENDATION Off F r COMMITTEE
PROVE ,OTHER
SIGNATURE MY
ACTION OF BO 1sw i 9l3f3 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED , OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS(ASSENT Goin I I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ON MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
Note: District IIT Seat Vacant SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Sara Hoffman,335-1090
ATTESTED�v,0, 2W3
cc: CAO JOHN SWEETEN,CLERK OF
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BY, b�'�, t.... DEPUTY
h
�� ��`
r +r F�! '�"fes '^FM'2t"dr r, `4o4
pant on County Services
Mate Budget Gap
was $34.6 billion
now$38.2 billion
Budget Balancing
Strategy
-0000
➢Borrowing,one-time revenues
>New takes
➢Program realignment,reductions
1
.......................................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................
S,0
Vehicle license Fees
(VLF)
sumes trigger pulled
*. .Thning not certain
. . .Funding gap concern
45.2 million-CCC General Purpose Revenues
17.7 million-CCC Current Realignment
Revenues
$1.8 Billion Realignment
Funded by
10.3%Personal Income Tax
23C/pack tobacco tax(03-04)
63C/pack tobacco tax(04-05)
oposed ReaUgned Programs
Current P-posed
resat Share Lmd
MH aMdren's
4,steut of care -0- 100% $20M
MR Homeless Adults
DaMrated Services .0- 100% S55M
COFbIlMINu-se(CAPM -0- 10096 112M
Car
Foster Cam Graits 6096 8096 S237M
F p
.X Car
*net Care Admin 30% SON $11M
C:"".If
hild Welfare Services 30Y. 50% $197M
t Protectwe Svcs MOE 100% $61M
Calwom Grants 2.5% 3G% $782M
CaiWORKs
MOE 30% MOM
EMOwment Services
Admiulatration
2
Concerns - ReaUgnment
➢Caseload Growth
➢Adequacy of Revenues
➢volatility of Revenues
➢Lag in Revenue Start-up
P :
-$30.5 Million
[From $56.9 million in 00-01 to
$I.0 million in 03-04
ut $1.39 M to $25,000 for CCC
Na payments for 34 mandates
-open Meetings Act-repeat 03-04
-26 Mau&tes-repeal 04-OS
- 7 mandates-suspend
January est. $4.8 million toss to CCC
3
C h
-$31 Million
own Toss-CCC Courts do not track these
separately
� 4
17% fee increase
est $150-180,000 cost to CCC
{
=25% share of cost
=$51.8 Million charge
est. $'1.34 million cost to CCC
4
)f
C
`.R 'a. iy5,.; y.5` as'+✓��'�5�' '�.�ro t
3%increase-Managed Care Plans
3.8%increase-Long-term care rates
I5%decrease-Medi-Cal provider rates
$35.6M increase-County administration
$23 Mone-time increase-Indigent Health
Care(Prop 99)
4
d C��
+$69M federal monies, as required
by federal law(AB3632 services)
$120M cost to counties
.. . and growing
est.$1.6 M lost mandate reimbursement
to CCC
$7.2B>total in 02.03
$7-OR proposed for 03-04
-Lower caseloads,-$307M
.Fewer employment services,485M
,Child care counted in TANF MOE,-S57M
t ;
r$24.I M net loss for CalWt7RKs' 3
stages
-More for welfare-to-woork
*Reliance on orae-bine revenues
*,Program changes reduce services,
l nft eligibility,acid family share-
of-cost
*$938M'loan" from Transportation
Fund to State General Fund
+$87M of spillover S diverted to State
General Fund
+$207M to Traffic Congestion Relief Fund
for 121 of 141 existing projects(vs.
Assembly$546M)
est. $2.9M loss to CCC for local projects
I Will
� a
• Subject Redevelopment to ERAF
(property tax slut to schools)
• 25%in O3-04,increasing 5%per
year
est. $906,700 lass in 03-04,
$2.8M with full shift
------------
➢Timing critical
>No structural solution
➢Legislative responses
7