Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05132003 - D6 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra FROM: DENNIS BARRY, AICP, Costa Community Development Director DATE: MAY s 2003 •• 'J SUBJECT: SHAPING OUR FUTURE PROJECT SUMMIT ON MAY 17, 2003 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION($)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDED ACTION: CONSIDER providing comments to the Shaping Our Future project regarding the Urban Limit Line in any inter jurisdictional compact the project may propose; and authorizing the Chair to provide a letter transmitting any Such comments the Board of Supervisors may wish to provide at the May 17"', 2003 Shaping Our Future Summit. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION 1 BACKGROUND: On May 17, 2003, the Board of Supervisors may attend the Shaping Our Future Summit, to which it is proposed that the Board adjourn from the May 13, 2003 regular meeting. A principal issue has emerged with respect to the way in which the Shaping Our Future project will treat the Urban Limit Line in any possible inter jurisdictional compact it may propose. Some cities have taken formal positions regarding the matter and ethers have not. It may be advantageous for the Board of Supervisors to be prepared to present a unified position;regarding the treatment of the Urban Limit Line at the May 17, 2003 Shaping Our Future Summit. In the event that the Board of Supervisors arrives at a unified position, the Chairman could be authorized to Sign a letter transmitting that position to the Shaping Our Future project for distribution at the summit. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: ® YES SIGNATURE: 0 RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 0 RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COM E 2 APPROVE ❑OTHER SIGNATU'RE(S): (I.:,r�_ 1 ACTION OF a D ON Ni5y 13, 2003 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED 0'OTHER See attached addendum VOTE OF SUPERVISORS: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND X UNANIMOUS(ASSENT Kane ) ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF AYES: NOES: SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTESTED: MAY 13,2003 UISMCT IIT SEAT VACANT Contact: DENNIS BARRY(925)335-1290 JOHN SWEETEN,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF cc: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR COUNTY COUNSEL By: puty ADDENDUM TO ITEM D.6 May 13, 2003 On this day,the Board of Supervisors considered providing comments to the Shaping Our Future project regarding the Urban Limit Line in any inter jurisdictional compact the project may propose and considered authorizing the Chair to provide a letter transmitting any such comments the Board of Supervisors may wish to provide at the May 17, 2003 Shaping Our Future Summit. Supervisor Glover suggested a ballot initiative that he is calling the voter limit line, in which the voters of Contra Costa County would vote on any project outside of the Urban Limit Line (ULL). What that means is that the vote would be 50%plus 1. If anyone looks to develop outside the ULL,the measure would have to go before the voters of Contra Costa County. The city or the developer that is interested in the project would pay for the measure. No tax dollars would be used for this. Supervisor Glover suggested that staff would have to develop procedures for true "minor" adjustments to the ULL. Those minor adjustments could be approved by a 4/5 vote of the Board of Supervisors. Again,those details would need to be worked on in terms of"minor" adjustments. Supervisor Glover suggested to the Board that the County Administrator's Office staff work with Supervisor DeSaulnier and Supervisor Glover and their staff to develop a ballot initiative. Language for this measure would have to be prepared by November 2003 to meet the March 2004 ballot measure. Supervisor Gioia commented on the existing ULL. The line is the line and to expand the line would be what Supervisor Glover is calling the voter limit line. He suggested that staff find a way to lmake the lime legally binding on the cities and to include exploring legislation that would make voter approved ULL binding on the cities. The current line's effectiveness is fragile based on the Local Agency Formation Commission's membership. Currently LAFCo's policy is to not approve annexations outside the line. However,that could change if LAFCo's membership changed. The Chair of the Board invited the public to speak. The following individual presented testimony: Ron Brown, Save Mount Diablo, 1196 Boulevard Way#10, Walnut Creek, in support of the Urban Limit Line. Supervisor Glover made the motion to have staff bring back language that would give direction to staff to provide a ballot measure that would have a voter limit line consisting of 50%of vote +l prepared and ready for the March 2004 election;to have language that would identify that any movement of the line go before the voters and that the ballot measure would be paid for by the developer with no taxpayers' dollars; to develop procedures to be put in place for minor adjustments to the line to and that staff work with Supervisor Glover and Supervisor DeSaulnier to develop the initiative to ensure uniform applicability across the county. The motion also includes direction to the Community Development Staff to draft a letter for the Chair's signature for transmittal to the Saturday, May 17, Shaping Our Futures Summit, incorporating the comments of the voter limit line proposal and that the Board is directing that the Voter Limit Line measure item be placed on next week's agenda in order for the Board to consider giving direction to staff with respect to the development of the ballot measure. There was a second to the motion by Supervisor DeSaulnier. The vote was unanimous by all supervisors present. Note: 'District III Seat Vacant The Board of Supervisors Contra John Sweeten woad tJSa and County Administration Building County Administrator 651 Pine Street, Roam 106 (925)335-1900 Martinez,California 94653-1293 County ""�1 1�''!t / John Glola,1 st District tJl.#! !��l Gayle B.Ullkema,2nd District Donna Gerber,3rd District Mark DeSaulnier,4th District ` y Federal D.Glover,5th District May 15,2003 Don Blubaugh,Project Manager Shaping Our Future 1867 Ygnacio Valley Road#370 Walnut Creek., Ca. 94598 Dear Mr. Blubaugh, I am writing on behalf of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors to convey the comments of the Board members regarding the draft compact proposed by the Shaping Our Future (SOF) project. The Board discussed the draft compact on Tuesday, May 13, 2003. There is substantial support among the Board members for the pursuit of an inter- jurisdictional compact. Much discussion will be needed before the specifics of the compact will be acceptable to a sufficient number of jurisdictions for the Board to express a position. In general, the Board felt that the Draft Compact should include the Urban Limit Line (ULL,) concept, and welcome the opportunity to engage the city representatives in discussions on this critical policy issue. Among the approaches that should be investigated, the Board members would include the following: 1 Adopt the current ULL, and provide for a review process in the future. In any event, the criteria for changing the line should be objective, clearly defined and understood by all parties. 2. Consider minor modifications to the ULL, with a clear understanding of the definition of the term "minor". Such modifications should be compensatory, adding and subtracting equal areas inside and outside the ULL (i.e., "Housekeeping" changes requested by the cities). 3. Adopt the current ULL, and rely upon the voters to decide whether to expand it. 4. Explore mechanisms to ensure that the ULL provisions are applicable to Cities as well as the County. Please be aware that the Board of Supervisors has scheduled consideration of the development of a ballot measure regarding voter approval of expansions of the ULL on our agenda for June 3, 2003. The proposal also includes potentially restricting the use of public funds to finance such measures, and:procedures for minor adjustments to the ULL. The Board of Supervisors looks forward to an engaging discussion of these matters at the SOF Summit meeting on Saturday,May 1'7,2003. Sincerely yours, Mark DeSaulnier Chairman Board of Supervisors CC: Board Members CAO Clerk of the Board SHAPING OUR FUTURE POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING May 7, 2043 5:00 P.M. Concord Police Department Community Room it AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER—JULIE PIECE, CHAIR x 2. REVIEW REVISED DRAFT COMPACT AND DRAFT VISION AND PROVIDE FILIAL DIRECTION TO STAFF 3. MAY 17 AGENCY SUMMIT... 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.n-L at the Holiday Inn--- 1050 Burnett Ave. - Concord 4. PUBLIC COMMENT 5. ADJOURN to May 17 - 8:30 a.m.; –Holiday Inn– 1054 Burnett Ave. - Concord C d it epi ti a � S H A P I N G 0 U R F U T U R E Contra Costa County: Shaping Our Future Memorandum TO: Policy Committee FROM: John Fregonese,Principal-Fregonese Calthorpe Associates Radcliffe Dacanay,Project Manager,Fregonese Calthorpe Associates SUBJECT: ULL,Sphere of Influence,and Municipal Boundaries discussion BATE: May 7,2003 A study of the urban limit line (ULL),sphere of influence {SOI},and city boundaries shows various relationships amongst them.An accompanying map shows the interaction amongst the three boundaries,and an accompanying table summarizes the acres in each boundary combination. The map and table can serve to facilitate discussion about which areas may require closer inspection with respect to reconciliation of municipal boundaries and spheres of influence with the urban limit line. Note: ULL and city boundaries are from Contra Costa County GIS data.Sphere of Influence (SOI) boundary was provided.by ABAG. 421 S.W.Sixth Avenue,Suite 1250 Portland,OR 97204 503-2.28-3054 Fax 503.525-0478 ......... _..... ..................._ .............................. _ ........... ......... .................... .......................... ......................... ............ a Oma' De O O 4e'T O D 1S"8 Opg+p p L n tow.m rnrnrrnotD CtNbToi<- atpNN® O P v, +na; irrr- r. r-. TrnoMr. n �o 0 C a m Q Nc Cl CV — PP oniavci .- cv� o OD R C%4 grnrn spy o R tCl -'RvT .G c>ADf N CCMtr}t� Cd Ptp[ r Goa, "°� ria tts T M C7 k-I m-" - sF M o ,3j'.P-CO N rn�- N �t rnP•g7 P• OCi M rn V"Ob r 00 N p v` r P it7 co to G Lei _ z N Z N O Z Z i ZZI � U 0 to e M b ZD ti n t0 n Z N 10Q. Z FA m N Q } ai taxi, Z Z N co c r G V � !i1 P• rn M1OCl) Mrn 0 MMNM <6 1- -'t C'i t�t9 q CDNq Pfl'; ON Of OD 0 00 v corn QtS'f C!'+m to vu7 AMP co in fD M aD f` sD M O 41D *-:M N N.t� 1`+.rn rn O U P CD VF 0 01^7 0 OO " N tl' -C N tf/ •} tO c CO Op M � . J..t0 aD N N r N'w:OO 0 40 N ti M OCt •!'@ T w o th Z !- P P P S w ti m J w t0 0 00 ":C4 00 co an OO tID to V' Pf t17 N er tt7 LD rn 'R t7 47 G01, .i ❑ VirNOP ' 00 0) 000P PCN ' Ql ' P• ca V cli 00 ar Q Cts T N cb V b CU Z (`g r vN0O 0O tt') mP• P- (n0W N co N M o`Q � gcic! yry PCD to" N" Cloo P OR co M M 0) P-000 �6'OQMP�RV rt QC1006 ' C! ' co m ' co M O Q �! N N lC P• N tY9 to N C'� co ul td> tii Q GY Qy � C1 Z W �- -C V 00 N CO V tD A t� r to p .. P tp '' `r N No y U V Z Mtorn tts rn CO .T P- cD rn cc M o M O M O t4 rnT, P VP', O V M oO CS1 '? V H r ' Ci tai O tai M o0 r CJ O N O P- O r= Z o O J � N z y J ]C r W U 0 Oto t� ��C, oZI � Zys'" 1Y 1LL�J�12J'ry � Z Zm � H e J �M O �aJZ �u3n.w.�mai�Q +a , .t �to all , U NW ZZUt 1<1_CZ ❑}1�� .s��Z t 2 QmLJV�I'LL t700. Lt m[1:l�l1v�? S�CyF 2 JI' 3 % l _ ..''" t f f ::.. }.: ;.< . 3: x . .. ............... ................... ............. cC F I _ ..... ............... ............... Er ! x , Y I -2: DRAFT ULL Section Revision for Shaping Our Future Compact (by Dennis Cunnane, Councilmember, Town of Moraga, 517103) Urban Limit Line. The Urban Limit Line (ULL) is a key tool of Contra Costa's Growth Management. We agree that the ULL is a shared management tool between the cities and the County. The signatories acknowledge that the ULL may be revised in the future to accommodate growth'. The intent of this compact is that the expected growth of Contra Costa County will be accommodated in the local general plans of the cities and the County, and be in general agreement with the Shaping Our Future Vision. The first review of the ULL alignment shall occur in 2008 as part of the of the renewal process of the TILL, which is scheduled to expire in 2010. Based on actual progress in achieving the goals, an assessment will be made of any needed changes in the ULL for longer range growth forecasts. The signatory parties agree to cooperate on the ULL renewal process. Before 20108 any signatory may seek minor changes of the ULL to accommodate the expected growth for each community. DRAFT ULL Section Revision for Shaping Our Future DRAFT Compact (May 7, 2003) Urban Limit Line. The Urban Limit Line is a key tool of Contra Costa's Growth Management. We agree that all general plans should acknowledge the Urban Limit Line(ULL). We agree that the ULL is a shared management tool between the cities and the County,and should be consistently adopted and implemented across the County. The ULL will continue to serve as a means to protect important agricultural and open space resources outside the ULL,and promote the efficient use of urban land within the ULL. The intent of this compact is that the expected growth of Contra Costa County will be accommodated in the local general plans of the cities and the County, and be in general agreement with the Shaping Our Future Vision. In same cases, minor adjustments of the Urban Limit Line may need to be made in order to accommodate the expected growth for each community. Based on the agreed location and kind of housing and employment growth expected, targets,for the expected amount and type of growth will be agreed to fbr each jurisdiction far the year 2008, and the year 2020. Thefirst review of the agreed upon ULL alignment shall occur in 2668. Based on actual progress in achieving the goals, an assessment will be made of any needed changes in the ULL for longer range growth forecasts. It is the intent of this section that the signatory parties will cooperate on the renewal of the TILL by the voters before the year 2010,and to,ensure its long range viability as a key shared growth management tool for the Contra Costa community. AFT Sierra Club & Save Mount Diablo & Greenbelt Alliance May 5,2003 Re: Joint Statement of Greenbelt Alliance, Save Mount Diablo and the Sierra Club-S.F.Bay Chapter To: Don Blubaugh,Project Manager,Shaping Our Future (For distribution to: Members of Policy,Management and Oversight Committees) Dear Don, We have all actively participated in and have appreciated discussions related to the Shaping Our Future project, as well as related discussions about the reauthorization of Measure C. We are greatly concerned about proposals to weaken the County's Urban Limit Line,and have enclosed a joint statement by our organizations,which include nearly 20,000 Contra Costa households among our supporters. In brief,we oppose language and policies that would weaken the Urban Limit Line that was adopted on July 25, 2000 by the County Board of Supervisors following extensive environmental and public review. We believe that Shaping Our Future and the concurrent Measure C reauthorization process must work together to require adoption of city urban growth boundaries supporting the County's ULL,and that any proposed changes to the 2000 Urban Limit Line must require a vote of Contra Costa residents. The position our organizations take on both Shaping Our Future and Measure C Reauthorization are tied directly to strengthening of the Urban Limit Line. We believe that both Shaping Our Future and the Reauthorization of Measure C can potentially benefit Contra Costa County. It would be a shame if that potential were compromised by proposals to weaken Contra Costa County's most important growth management tool. Sincerely, Michele Perrault Ron Brown Evelyn Stivers International Vice-President, Executive Director .East day Field Representative Sierra Club& Save Mount Diablo& Greenbelt Alliance& Member, Shaping Our Future Member, Measure C Member,.Measure C Oversight Committee Reauthorization Expenditure Reauthorization Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee flan Advisory Committee .............I........................................................................................................................................................................ 11.1 ­­­­­­.­,......................................................................... SHAPING OUR FUTURE MAY 5, 2003 GREENBELT ALLIANCE, SAVE MOUNT DIABLO AND THE SIERRA CLUB, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY'S LEADING ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS— OPPOSE WEAKENING OF THE URBAN LIMIT LINE In May, Greenbelt Alliance, Save Mount Diablo and the Sierra Club agreed jointly to oppose weakening of Contra Costa County's Urban Limit Line. The Shaping Our Future project confirms that there is more than enough room within the County's Urban Limit Line for twenty years ofprojected growth. We believe that consideration of Shaping Our Future should both preserve the Line and require its adoption by Cities. We can conceive of equal exchanges often acres or less along the Urban Limit Line to allow minor adjustments. A vote of the people should be required for any other change to the existing Line. Shaping Our Future,a"Smart Growth"vision and compact for regional growth management being considered by Contra Costa County and its Cities holds promise for our area. Smart Growth is an opportunity to transition from sprawl to more efficient development patterns. Our County's Urban Limit Line marks the boundary between urban development and agricultural and open space areas. It was last reviewed in July 2000 and Shaping Our Future's own analysis confirms that there is more than enough room within the Urban Limit Line to accommodate twenty years of projected growth. The Shaping Our Future project could offer us these twenty years to learn to live within our means while protecting the foundation of our quality of life locally-our County's livable communities,great natural beauty,clean air and clean water,and recreational areas for our expanding population. In addition,the current Urban Limit Line includes a 65/35 Policy that recognizes that there are certain areas within the Urban Limit Line that also should also be preserved. The 65%measure is a minimum of what should remain non-urban,on either side of the Urban Limit Line. One of the proposals in Shaping Our Future is extremely threatening. Proposed language in the draft compact would weaken the Urban Limit Line by allowing more frequent review and expansion of the Line,for future growth in agricultural and open space areas outside of the Line. These same concepts were proposed,reviewed and rejected during the County's year 2000 tightening of the Line. (The original Urban Limit Line was adopted by Contra Costa's voter in 1990.) Following an intense process of environmental analysis and extensive public debate,on July 25,2000,the Line was further tightened. Some of the County's most precious areas would be threatened by a weakening of the Line,since intense land speculation would be renewed. Shaping Our Future holds promise,but that promise must actively support strengthening the balance between development and open space that the Urban Limit Line represents. Further,as a planning compact decided by elected officials,any attempt to include guidelines affecting the Line is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act,and requires environmental analysis and public consideration. We believe that the Shaping Our Future Project should strengthen the County's existing Urban Limit Line,not weaken it,should require Cities to adopt the line,and should make clear that any change in the Line,other than minor 10 acre exchanges,should require a vote of the people. * GrembaAgiance's mission is to make the nine-county San Francisco Buy Area abetter place to live by protecting the region's greenbelt and improving the livability of its cities and towns. Greenbelt includes more than 5,000 members Bay Area-wide. * Save MountDiablv,including nearly 7000 supporters, is dedicated to the preservation of Mount Diablo,its surrounding foothills,and the more than twentyparks and preserves found there., through acquisition and land use preservation. * 77#eSlerm Club is the Nation's leading environmental organization, including 750,000 members, 40,000 in the S.F.Bay Area,and 8,000 in Contra Costa County. ............. ....................... Message Page l of 2 Don & Betty Blubaugh From. Don &Betty Blubaugh[blubaugh@rdo€rlton.com] Sent. Tuesday, May 06,2003 4:24>PM To: Tim Farley (Tfhri@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us);Alice Evenson (aevenson{,,'3a ci.pittsburg.ca.us);Ana Gutierrez; Brian Swisher(bswlsher@ci.brentwood.ca.us); 'Carol Federighi Garolfeds@p peline.com)'; 'David Durant(Durant4ph@aol.com)1; 'Dennis Cunnane (dcmoraga@msn.com)'; `Don Freitas(dpfreitas c attbLcom)';'Federal Glover (dist5 a@bos.co.contra- costa.ca.us)';Genoveva Calloway (gcalloway§sbcglobal.net), 'Gerry Cambra (gpcambra@sanramon.ca.gov)'; 'Gwen Regalia(Gwenrwc@aol.com); 'Helen Allen (maryrae@d.concord.ca.us)'; 'Irma Anderson (irma_anderson ci.richmond.ca.us)'; 'Janet Abelson (AbelJanet@aol.com)';jgloia@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us; 'Joanne Ward Qoanne@joanneward.com); 'Joyce Hawkins fjoycehawkins sbcglobal.net); 'Julie Pierce (JulieSews@aol.com)';'Lisa Williams(lwilliams c@i ci.brentwood.ca.us)';'Maria Alegria (malegria@attbi.com)'; 'Mark DeSaulnier(dist4@bos.co.contra-costa.ca.us)'; 'Mark Ross (votefrmdly@aol.com)';Michael Kee (mkeearch@attbLcom);'Millie Greenberg (milliegreenbo g earthknk.com)';1.Nancy Parent (nparent@cl.pittsburg.ca.us);'Pat Anderson (plpa@ecis.com)';'Peg Kovar(Fred Kov c@astound.net)'; Steve Falk(sf lk a@lovelafeyette.org); Bill Lindsay (wlindsay@ci.orinda.ca.us); Bob McCleary (rkm<@.ccta.net), Dennis Barry (dbarra@.cd.co.cbntra-costa.ca.us);Ed James(ebcalt@ci.concord.ca.us), Isiah Turner (isiah_tumerCci<richmond.ca.us);John Sweeten aswee c o.co.contra-costa.ca.us); Mike O Iver (6liver cl.oakIey.ca. s);Mike Parness (parness&l.walnut-cteek.ca.us) Cc. "rim Rood (E-mail)'; 'Glen Bolen (E-mail)'; 'John Fregonese (E-mail)' Subject. Tomorrow's (Wednesday's) Policy Committee Meeting You have received an agenda for this meeting but not a back up packet. This is due largely to the consultant's move to a new building with promised internet and telephone service in place. Unfortunately, telephones were not moved as promised and thus no internet connections. I am supposed to receive material today but I may not get it until late this evening. John Fregonese and I have had conversations about possibly crafting a slightly different approach to bringing this project to a final decision in light of what is becoming a significant point of contention.'...the ULL. dearly, this issue needs to be identified, dealt urith and hopefully resolved within the next six months. In the meantime we have been discussing an interim Vision approval stage which would be done through a statement of principles and the vision map. One of the principleswould be the importance of an ULL but that the specifics of such a tine are subject to further discussion and negotiation over the next six months. No one would be asked to sign the final Compact until the ULL issue is resolved. In the meantime we could keep the momentum of this process alive by having agencies adopt the Vision through a statement of principles. We would continue work on the Compact language and hopefully resolve all issues there before the ULL matter is resolved. Language regarding the Principles will be made available tomorrow at the meeting. It is not likely to come today. If other background material arrives today, I will forward it later this evening.. (I am off to . a council meeting in Pinole). I am also forwarding two documents received today. One is a joint statement of environmental groups re the ULT.. Itis attached as a word document. The other is a joint message fro€n the Home Builders, Save Mount Diablo, Centra Costa Council and the Contra Costa Economic Partnership who suggest we 517/2003 Message Page 2 of 2 focus the May 17 meeting on the Vision and not the detailed language of the Compact. This suggestion is a good one in light of the alternative approach of Principles now and a Compact in six months as noted above. See text of the e-mail below. Please continue to check your e-mails, See you tomorrow at 5:00 at the Concord PD Conference Room. Don Don Blubaugh Project Manager- Shaping Our Fixture 1867 Ygnacio Valley Rd Walnut Creek.CA 94599 925-256-1583(T)925-945-1687(F) e-mail:inanagea+rLshapingotirfulftire.org ©ear Don: As a group we met recently to discuss the Shaping Our Future project, We all agree that this is an important program that is reaching a critical crossroad.The next steps may well determine the success of this whole effort. We would like to make a few recommendations that we feel would greatly enhance the prospects for implementation. ** The May 17 session should focus on being an educational workshop that provides City Council members and planning commissioners an overview of the SOF vision. The session should not focus on the elements of the "draft compact". ** Consideration should be given to a phased approach for next steps. More specifically that a second phase be created that will focus on fine tuning the compact and,implementation. Within the implementation portion specific impediments to carrying out the vision must be identified. These include things such school availability and quality, market receptivity,infrastructure elements and political realities. ** More time and effort be allocated to the coordination of the SOF program and the extension of Measure "C" process currently underway. The two must reflect the work of each other to the maximum extent possible. These thoughts are general and all of our organizations have many other very specific thoughts and ideas about SOF. We think these suggestions might help all of us move forward together to the next step.This may also be a good time to consider reconvening the original stakeholders group to get additional input. Please let us know your thoughts and thank you for letting us share our ideas with you at this critical time. Jim Jakel,Contra Costa Council Linda Best, Contra Costa Economic Partnership Ron Brown, Save Mount Diablo Guy Bjerke, Home Builders Association of Northern California 5/7/2003 :::::.:.. Wit.:. x,.yr :x:: :u?.y MCXti{"i;wn+.w...a+•rnv:.v .y. i,:ktifitIXKC. +.{;tti M4Xv S H A P I N G d U R F U T U R E T SUN .;_K& May z SHAPING OUR FUTURE IN CONTRA COSTA +y Shaping Our the cooperative efforts Future is a of community leaders, citizens, elected officials, collaborative business leaders, and regional jJ1ca117iI2g local area planning and , launched by the effort transportation experts. County of Contra Costa Shaping Our Future Good communities and 19 participating addresses growth-related cities, that will help issues. such as: using dont Just happen.: land more efficiently, Contra Costa and its require time, Contra make decisions preserving the integrity energy) focus, and about how they want to of many existing commitment. Strong manage growth wisely neighborhoods, reducing during the next 20 to traffic congestion in key Communities become areas, developing transit stronger when man 30 Future is a regional,years. Shaping Our strategies and funding F ideas, opinions unified approach to sources, redeveloping and viewpoints are shaping future growth business districts used to develop that will be based on that may be under- thcJu � andacommunity-oriented used or run down, and "vision." This vision preserving open spaces workable solutions. is emerging through and hillsides. 1 "Metropolitan regions that promote and manage growth, educate their populations, and maintain thae quality of life will succeed. Those that remain - mired in conflictand inaction will fail." Robert.Fishman GETTING N TO "SHAPING NG OEC"R FUTURE" The genesis of The CCRC convened all 19 cities and the Shaping Our a stakeholder Board of Supervisors. group including In early 2001 The Future began in environmental, labor, , Fregonese-Calthorpe early 1998 when a education, agricultural regional planning firm group pf Contra Costa and government of Portland, Oregon City Managers and the leaders to discuss was chosen from three County Administrator and highlight goals firms interviewed to began a series of and challenges. In perform the work of meetings on how to May of 1999 a Forum this project. deal with quality of life was convened of all issues in this County interests groups. given forecasted Major presenters were population growth. Phil Angelides, State It,was clear that a Treasurer, Joseph sense of direction Levy, a noted Bay Area: was needed. A study economist, and Carl paper was prepared Guardino of the Silicon and presented to the Valley Manufacturer's City County Relations Association. Committee of the Mayors' Conference From this Forum (CCRC),. There were numerous ideas of how vigorous discussions to approach the future on all sides about were advanced. The sprawl, congestion, Stakeholder leaders the need for more distilled the list and jobs and economic decided to tackle the development and issue of where we lack of jurisdictional should grow. coordination. The Contra Costa. In 2000 the Mayors' Transportation Conference decided Authority also issued to move forward with sobering news that what is now known congestion would''get as the Shaping far worse in spite of Our Future effort. massive investments Participation and a in new roadways and financial commitment transit improvements. were sought from stn'> Data compiled from the workshops a revealed a generally strong consensus of where development should occur over time. Based on citizen and stakeholder participation, the results were used to generate COMMON VISION In the Spring of 2002, � o Shaping Our Future tm h w launched the regional yqy planning process ` `" �-" by asking people in Contra Costa what they would want for } 4 their community t during the neat 20 ' years; to share their { thoughts and concerns about growth and ;; x livability issues; and to ;ricatiorts o w ere at'last one'development pmen share their ideas on how ,chip"was placed during the workshops. to manage growth. growth should occur over preliminary "consensus" In early May 2002, a time in Contra Costa. maps, showing from countywide visioning Participants were also a broad perspective, workshop was held and asked to outline which that Contra Costa was followed in late lands they believed residents feel strongly May and early June should be preserved and about accommodating by five sub-regional remain undeveloped. growth in specific areas workshops. Over 600 And lastly, they were within the urban limit participants attended asked to delineate line and protecting these workshops. Each where transportation much of the open space workshop included improvements should and agricultural lands a hands-on mapping occur, ranging from beyond it. exercise that allowed pedestrian and bicycling participants to place enhancements to new Based on the results "development types" on highway, transit, and from the survey and the maps signifying where rail projects. workshops, 4 the Shaping Our Future project team farmed an initial draft concept growth scenario --,a rough sketch of where the next 20 years'growth could be accommodated in the region. In latesummer, fall, and winter, a series of meetings were held with management and oversight committees, stakeholders, local f,Cr r. z •., +may,. Z County General Plan used in combination with workshop development "chip'placements to guide draftingof preliminary concept. interest groups, interested citizens, and local area planners to gather feedback- comments and criticisms - on the scenario. In conjuction with the feedback, transportation modeling was conducted to test the effectiveness of4 � the land use pattern being refined. Overall, , refinements and revisions � � to the draft scenarioNM have been incrementally r Ff = x incorporated and is emerging as the DRAFT VISION. 5 ... . _. _ ha 4 9 J� # l UL V-.. 9 y c7 � X � 1 f, *O' ti s g 3 4• O5 Y � � .•••Si4;.;r.. .m{xvrnm;.,wf.SSSt. ?{. ....... KEY CONCEPTS TO THE SHAPING OUR FUTURE VISION + Valued open space, moon- taro views, parks, trails, and other legacies will be preserved -- protection of additional open space will coincide with existing local plans and efforts Reinvestment and charac- ter preservation will help to improve existing urban c�. areas while protecting stable neighborhoods • Mixed-use development will bring employment, shops, services, and enter„ tainment close to residen- tial areas and encourage access by walking, biking, ,• .• and transit Multi-modal-streets will 16& increase the capacity of the transportation system r_ to move people'and will result in more active corri- dors that are attractive to a variety of land'uses, and Can serve as a catalyst for economic development throughout the region + Interconnected and di- verse transportation op- tions will improve the con- venience and accessibility of rapid transit 7 SHAPING OUR T There are a number of important factors that work together in shaping a strong, viable, livable community. No factor is more important than the other.In fact,the best strategy for shaping such a community is to consider Housing and )obs <4< � S Shaping Our Future envisions � Pwk accommodating housing ; ' and jobs in a way that reflects Community values and increases choice and access for all members of the Contra Costa regional community. Growth will be directed toward areas that want change while preserving existing and € xa stable neighborhoods that are less interested in change, The Shaping our Future vision promotes Contra Costa's residents. '" locating jobs in strategic At a regional scale, a areas that are closer better balance in the to where the working location of jobs and population live--in the housing means reduced East and South County congestion on area - and also in places freeways and reduced open to reinvestment commute times for many in the West County. It residents. By bringing avoids building homes jobs closer to housing on prime open space and integrating a ` and hillsides. it also variety of land uses into encourages a variety development patterns of housing styles and (e.g., having small shops' choices that offer a.wide and services located m' range of affordability, or near neighborhood in both urban and areas), residents will suburban settings, have improved access thereby responding to and choice to jobs and the needs and desires of services. 8 ----------- � .. N... ::, ..., VISION. MAJOR a'range of important factors in conjunction with one another.All of these major elements mustbe melded together thoughtfully and innovatively to shape the type of community Contra Costa residents want for their future. d Open Space f k C k Significantly important in the minds of many Contra Costans is the preservation of valued open spaces -agricultural land, environmentally sensitive areas, and scenic landscapes. To protect and preserve important open spaces, the vision Proposes integrating major open space Planning and acquisition v efforts (including the y � �� � c County's Open Space/ t t O � e rnyfi� Agriculture tgg �v Protection and Enhancement Measure and the East County Habitat Conservation Plan). Preserving earmarked lands can help establish a connected open space system, extensive Parkland network and native habitats. Combined with land- use policies that allow k' for higher densities, additional open space may be preserved and can enhance the quality of life in adjoining neighborhoods. 9 ......... ........................... ............. .......... .......... .......................... ........................... SHAPING OUR FUTURE Transportation x Transportation concerns remain at the `` forefront of regional livability issues for. many Contra Costa County residents. The Shaping Our Future vision stresses the need to examine and help solve - transportation issues ti in conjunction with other related issues, instead of trying to solve transportation , problems in a vacuum. The vision cabs for a strong network of transportation ~` choices;that improves accessibility and shopso offices and< dollar's and resources mobility for all Contra services'would benefit wisely. But regardless Costans regardless more from transit of the type of density of where they live or accessibility, for or land-use type, all work, their income areas within the region level, or where they example, than would le small,;fairy remote neighborhood have,increased want to travel. A neighborhood in a options forgetting from primary element suburban area. Being one place to another of shaping such a strategic about where -whether it includes strong transportation place the highest having inviting places network is to look at areas of transportation, to walk or high- how future land use accessibility also capacity of transit, or a and transportation means the region, range of other options. will work together. will be pending its New areas of relatively limited transportation high-density housing, 10 VISION ,*, M ELEMENTS Land Use The vision encourages a land-use pattern that connects the varied and unique places in Contra Costa and helps safeguard the regional economy. xa Within existing city a, centers and strategic transportation corridors, it.promotes infill development, restoration and redevelopment. Accommodating some provide improved mixed land uses and growth in this way transportation compact development conserves land and connections and will is paramount to infrastructure and offer a variety of ways creating improved can hers revitalize to get from place mobility, access, blighted or under;-used to place, including and connections areas. Within urban walking, bicycling in new suburban portions of the region, and transit. The car developments. the vision encourages always will play a Although the term an increased. density major role in residents' "land use- often in some residential transportation choices, suggests land areas- as long as that but this new suburban consumption, the very growth meets good pattern of development strong reality is that design standards. will provide a range some lands should be While suburban of other attractive, protected.. Preservation areas will continue viable transportation of important industrial to accommodate new options and choices. and working growth,'the proposal The result will be less agricultural core is to begin a. new reliance on the car lands is integral to the pattern of suburban as the sole means of region's prosperity and development getting around the heritage. This pattern will region. Allowing for SMALL AREA TEST SITE To test the smart growth concepts indentified in the Shaping Our Future Vision, four sites were selected for public workshops. Participants conecptualized how such concepts could be applied and configured at these sites. The Richmond Hilltop Hilltop Mall would be redeveloped gradually into a mLxec-use town center, with structured parking and new buildings containing office space and apartments above ground-floor retail. A vacant anchor store would be converted into a community center, and a grocery store u would be located within the neighborhood. Streets will be reconfigured to bring care and people into the center of. Hilltop. At the heart of the neighborhood would be a major new public green space and transit stop (potentially a <<DRAFT Illustrations ONLY.Final continuation of AC Transit's maps will be,placed in final document.>y planned San Pablo Avenue BRT), surrounded by new three- to four-story buildings with ground-floor retail and apartments or offices above. i Walnut Creek The Almond-Shuey neighborhood is preserved under the vision, with"in-law," or accessory units, as a possibility for some homeowners.New buildings would be clustered near BART and along Mount Diablo Boulevard,where Alpine Avenue is realigned and where new streets would be added to create smaller, more pedestrian-friendly blocks. New projects would include four-story apartments with underground parking and mixed-use buildings with office over ground-flour retail along major streets. Scattered infill housing projects would include s townhouses and small-lot single-family homes. 12 ILLUSTRATIVE PLANS illustrations below are concepts only — they are for illustrative purposes and not intended specify what would be built. They show how smart growth concepts can be applied to form compact development where people can live, work, and shop. East County Brentwood, Oakley and Antioch's planned employment, retail and residential areas would be linked by walkable streets to a. planned "eBARI' rail, transit station.>West* of the tracks, office and R&D buildings would face streets and 3" green spaces, with parking in the interior of blocks. East of the tracks, a mixed-use neighborhood neighborhood would include a retail center with k w f major anchors as well as 'Main Street"shops,a village green,and a variety of housing types, including apartments, townhouses and a r .>_. � . range of single-family lot sues. <<DRAFr Illustrations ONLY.Final maps will be placed in final document.» Martinez A greenway and trail would be built along Alhambra Greek to enhance the center of Contra Costa's oldest city. Historic buildings would be preserved and rehabilitated, providing a rich fabric of design and aesthetics, as well as making wise use of land resources. New buildings on scattered infill sites would include apartments with parking tucked below and ground-floor retail, townhouses and small-lot single-family homes. Some industrial properties near the train station would be redeveloped into snits that accommodate live-work housing, apartments and townhouses. 13 the DRAFT COMPACT How do we achieve the vision One of the most challenging aspects to Elements include: Shaping Our Future is how to implement • Coordinating local this concept in Contra general plans Crista County. Local governments 'have Consistent agreement a responsibility on the Urban Limit Line' ' to preserve their independence, but Using Shaping local leaders in Contra Our Future for Costa also realize transportation that individual goals investments can be achieved without cooperationCoordinating open from neighboring space protection communities. To address these * Developing housing contradictory goals plans based on Shaping Shaping Our Future Our Future proposed forming a "compact," a tool' used * Coordinating economic successfully in other developments on a parts of the country:` county"wide basis The key elements of Shaping Our Future Developing a county are boiled' down' housing trust fund into 16 policies that for affordable housing require cooperationprojects and coordination. Speaking with one void to regional, state and federal agencies when it comes to growth management, 14 .r,,.a,,,.... ......... :::.._. ...... ........ ......:.,.,csuK ......,.,n..,,.....,,.�,ac�>e Nx.,;.;..w.nr ...,:,... ...;..:,xc.:uocc emw.......;,..,,.�.nwant^xc++rr.+......a> ...,u ,+.vin:.:y�+.•..,ger,.uxxeoe�..,.....:....•,.,,..sox,.<c The Compact Policy Topics: The compact would 1. Nature of the Compact provide a mechanism for the Contra Costa region 2 The Contra Costa "Shaping to work cooperatively Our Future" Vision on important livability issues. If an agreement 3 Comprehensive Data can be reached, the compact will serve 4. Implementing the Vision as the foundation for county=wide 5 Coordinated Housing cooperation on the Elements most pressing growth management issues'. 6. Urban Limit Line Shaping Our Future's 7. Reinvestment and Infill final action would be the signing of 8`. Regional Transportation this document by Planning and Growth a large majority of Management local governments in Contra Costa, ensuring 9. Open Space that it will be an ongoing and effective 10. Collective Voice vision for the future. 11. Economic Activities 12. Social Equity 13. School District Coordination 14. Dispute Resolution 15. Term. 16. Intent of Agreement 15 HAT TOMORROW HOLDS FOR COCOSTA How will Contra Costa g xwrK, look, feel, and func- tion in the decades to come? The Shaping Our Future process engages the Contra Costa regional com- munity to attempt in crafting an answer to that question. Much of the region that we know and love today will remain the same, but changes are cer- tain. With planning, the Contra Costa region The Contra Costa can grow in a way that Shaping Our Future complements the val- ues of its citizens and document and will be the unique character updated to respond to of each city within the changing conditions County. Using land and to more detailed wisley, providing choir- recommendations. This es for various modes guidebook is merely a of travel, preserving summary to the con- the natural environ cepts and ideas Shap- ment, and reinvesting ing . Future offers in strategic areas can to positively shape springboard the region change and growth in toward its desired fu- Contra Costa. tune. 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS City of Antioch Proposed Urban Limit Line Revision May 7 2003 • The City is requesting that the Urban Limit Line be moved as depicted on the attached maps. The total area involved is 1035 acres, of which 220 acres is the existing Roddy Ranch golf course. This leaves 815 acres of potentially developable land.. The actual amount of land ultimately developed would be less than the 81.5 acres, die to site specific environmental constraints. • The requested 1.035 acre shift to the Urban Limit Line is broken down by existing property owners in the following manner: • Roddy Golf Course: 220 acres a Roddy Ranch Property (exclusive of golf course): 575 acres o Ginochio Property (west of Beer Valley Rd.). 190 acres a Smith Property: 50 acres • It should be noted that the City's request to shift the Urban Limit Line respects the 895 acre dedication of development rights to the County on the Roddy property. This dedication was required by the County in 1998 as a condition of approval for the Roddy Ranch Golf course. This dedication area is shown on the attached maps. • It is also important to note that the requested shift in the Urban Limit Line would leave 1455 acres of the Roddy property still outside of the Urban Limit Line. Thismeansthat 65% (actually 64.6%) of Roddy would remain outside the ULL, while 35% would be shifted to inside the ULL. • Attached is a brief chronology outlining the City's historic interest and involvement in the Roddy property. ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ..........._..._.. ......... ......._... ......... ............................... .... .. ..... ........ ......... ......... ......... _ ......... .......... ........ ........ ...... ... .. . ....... ......... Chronology of Roddy Prouerty • 1969—Antioch City Council votes to include the Roddy Ranch within the ultimate City boundary. • 1979 — Roddy Ranch is annexed to the Contra Costa Nater District (CCWD) Service Area. 1988 — City General Plan update includes Lone Tree Valley (FUA#1), immediately north of Roddy Ranch. • 1990 - County voters approve the 65/35 ballot initiative to preserve 65% of the County in open space uses and to establish an Urban Limit Line(ULL). 1990 — County Board of Supervisors approves the location of the ULL. The ULL splits the Roddy property at ridge between Horse and Deer Valleys. This action places approximately 800 acres of the 2250 acre Roddy property inside the ULL,with the remaining 1450 acres outside the ULL. • 1990 - Antioch re=states its desire in a letter to the County to include Roddy Ranch within the ultimate boundary of the City. 1992 — Brentwood and Antioch adopt a Memorandum of Understanding agreeing on the ultimate boundary of each City. Roddy Ranch is located within future Antioch based on this agreement with Brentwood. • 1993 - LAFCo requests that each city in the County identify lands that would likely be included within their Sphere of Influence (SOI) in the next 10 years. In response to this request, Antioch identifies the Roddy Ranch as an area appropriate for development of low-density executive homes. The City suggests a "City Urban Limit Line"at the base of the ridge, south of Deer Valley. 0 April 1998 — Roddy Ranch files an application with Contra Costa County to construct a golf course w=ithin Horse Valley. • October 1998 — County approves the golf course with the condition that development rights, over the golf course and a portion of Horse and Deer Valleys totaling approximately 895 acres,be deeded to the County. 0 January 1999—The County initiates a review of the Urban Limit Line(ULL). March 1999—LAFCo initiates a Countywide Sphere of Influence (SOI) update. + April 1999 — In response to LAFCo's Sphere of Influence update request, the City of Antioch asks that all of Roddy Ranch, approximately 2250 acres, be placed within the City of Antioch's SOI. • August 1999—In order to address concerns raised by LAFCo members, the City of Antioch revises its SOI request to include only those lands on the Roddy property currently inside the ULL This action reduces the City's request for an SOI change from 2250 acres to the 800 acres of the Horse Valley portion of the Roddy Ranch property. + September 1999 — The County modifies their review of the ULL to include new options that affect Roddy Ranch. One option would move the lands within Horse Valley from inside to outside the ULL. October 9, 1999 — Roddy Ranch files a Preliminary Development Plan application with the City of Antioch. 4 • October 17, 1999 — City Council holds workshop on Roddy Ranch Preliminary Development Plan. • November 17, 1999- LAFCo, as part of the Countywide SOI update, considers the City's request to include the approximately 800 acre portion of the Roddy Ranch property in its Sphere of Influence. After some deliberation, LAFCo continues the item for 2 months to get answers to legal questions raised. • January,2000-LAFCo takes no action on the City's Sphere of Influence request for the 800 acre portion of the Roddy Ranch property. Instead, LAFCo directs that an environmental impact report be prepared before LAFCo can make a decision on the City's request. • September, 2000- The County Board of Supervisors approve a General Plan Amendment to shift the Urban Limit Line in several areas of the County. Most of the ULL changes impact East County. Part of this change results in the Roddy property being placed entirely outside the Urban Limit Line. .,' x�K' '- sq�Y /; 1 f,,f , Yf) ;'Y. k `F%,satF":,£.. O�r.:r:$ 1 y, F?::�5° '<W 5:12•' ": ,y a'.�yt )c ::1£} r h ?.6',,� Y wf x p rl,,F 1 sw.1. f•^.".Oti72 aa5..: ,1 '..'ti;, { -}l ` _Ppb . x I .11 1, I 11 a.. y f1 g6{: : ytk<�I' ll1w k ?y1f i:Yf t i:.5. l $36 { { ff x $ ) A �fs � ' { a 1 3 ., f y q`� p m # { fr} ;3 � efcl �" Pro`' Oor t�, d: Z ', { {tt° ,,yyff aa..l� , �ll� ^ .. "J. +✓i.O..w«.1,P y�� 4 > +` -• s.;y : ^a:� -,P'^' '�'' t .,e,{'s Yti '�%::"r,'+� F e fsdr F fC{, I.. p r . 9 :q y„ ? 5._' �4'w.°,�P09xian .,r, :..:.:11 ...:::n. :,... f i » s. �S.? "a } {�.. e 11 � . s .. 11 I i- f t - $ ,.Y F 1 $ F 4 S - 11 f Yw�..'� S $ i d$'O ^o, ? �. ,{ Ak ui,,1 1... @3� ,� � { V. I t ods:.: :` f :Rf'. 1. $O .',m. ^' ," .':gy'$ s t .1 ;� s . r �Y d £ f .. t @" 2 .# 1. _ 6 8 i :. f ~ f . , v.g $' ?Sb f f e n 4}. )- ^C �Q P•. e j iii '}1 'A..l 'Ki('- I-1 :• ) ,,: Y }d f � � f : _ _: 1p 5 .:ems:. 1. f•ry $� 1. .... Y st. Y ££ . k. 1. F 9 { 1 1 k' is a�� O f,:11c`r } 7 H k O': : ; .{ { s { :. .. .c ,- N off .d3 s y _ 1 r '1 f .. o f / f Y J �y 1 ' w. I 11 a, £w tf Y _ h., f1. /, t:. .: I Ilk °,. 4 # .. f,1 f "�d.•t 1f 11 x ; > {{' - :" < wO f, rhf ,( 1F 5 f11 d se'sfl.% '�f ,{C` ,^ /1 f : . £ f / # 1. I'llf s �. 41 I - 1. 1.If. 11- • 4 { �: fry 3 t1. ; . . f s;' 1: I 1 is .Itb F . 9 1• 1. ,• x' {. a {C: 0.4 $ f 4 '@ '• .� 1. .Ou i s :� I'll . °,°.u.�..,, .. _ 11 I 11 . <.}" d t l 4. ' F �I 'rib t Y .f2�' ey.. 2 a , ' pmw., 1 It x, F ,I J O P R . - ��r'Y� 34 ,r bF �w,, fff{hf{tFF 2S k L : : ,Mti'a-0� t. .. ,f - - 4 A. p S ' / ' S X t I b �1 I 11 j. .1 11 * _ j2P f 1. t p l 4 1. .) , $], ZSR ,r ` .... f � 1. 1. F. 1 I ;!g,, .. ,.. },: f :: i :fi h> 1, . : .. .y. .: ., t :: 1.{ - x : s ,: ,. �:, ,,:•.. f: j11 z. Y y d:, K %r / Yet YT 'Jx : r �F f K F ' { . . A1. . ' / y's . �l % 1?u" `'�cfr r . ry 2 x of O xx : {j o b 1. . j1.1. ; , " ' ? pp 4 K -0 b a5•�wCN.A . . 4 r 3�� y1. y k w } R. > i F k 2 1 ai }" r y j �•it' ?t J,c i $;✓ ,fir N .� to ,t .." F 1. }f ,ofw ':. X Y.? �y Y'yy��i'j�Y3 S } .{.. : F .r{: 6Y/. h f yf. 11 I .�F' 'F1 C ,k s„' ''W}?,`4 4�t 1 N• �",a'f J+"r.�/rf9 r a '" „-./ `' Y.w,{, dry, f { nb'x A '/.f,�3.�.. y i "C�' 4, q d : t )' '.+. S r f xJ ,�?y( 2. `<.F J l )`2. ' '� •/x4' Q sP $' 'a.10. i< R. ? s, i ' " Jl k S``' YT Y a ' K x Y Sr, G �� < F I-X: . -.--', .--..l9 t 't 3^ rt"o',o �t Al- !. 1. E ,,tea ;3F' ig z, ' `Zy, , ' s s _°t . ✓ s' . f' ( : r r f K f I . � , "� ,.,�,F:i].. .. " ,�", I , _�::;:�::.� ....7�:!,-�� :-: ....,,.n., ... {4 11, 4 ar :f ,� i .5i¢pF/F :�� e F" :}`5. F i .f }• r r y. o L. :i{y , ' `T24 f'` %F" f r %:,. fq• :: ;; %" J x t�.:{ ,. x ., ",# ftr /Ff Y ,c i lrxo. l,S.; .y wF 'i ,ti Y"{ FF i } t' 1 ;c r%rr ,}:_ F F f Y <, t /f r, l '?3+^ }a, S' a .v t.�+ S i : tt `} < i.." ( T / l,+g- -0 !. ., F '+F' "�`. �. Y t: • C T" � '�.'� 1. { .. <.� F r t` : 3 k .a .L { 4 Jl fr + i� 'J ,.. S ,, 1 4 Y M, -S1. ... /. S, xl S : r f %- I. f 4f f v 4 yr .. S ..:, E Y r ? : �' err :. w ': ... :: ...., > ;" ^may_ Yom" }fi: . 11y 2 f lry "+;/.:.' 'ii"'r" r rf} 1. a y.rG'; w .:yc. ,� .. 6iE {'7 c�: f :r ,7 F•5°F r,T a r 4F} y X. fv f' F fe�. tgFrp, :33 e r r.- /£,�y} .:.:{v/rr r' JF/ - 'h ..yq Z:K1' �t,K a A { f F a t - o. `": '}�. .Y .C' F11 I il� rii%: fi.'.:: ".y' Y3: Y / Ff Y >.i+lam' {$$:��� F ':f ff]] r rF/ F . r i I 11, if is F v U. r src}Eht'. ..:.a� '::Y _> f: r °"" ",t,: ¢ F FrFr $`'F '. 3�t,, g 34 0 :rb,+," 7c`- ' } -JY�++c# a"'4�„f::+F-yeL, 3 frs' r "4 ./r �,r fi Rw +r I 1- i ` / i.. .{.,, f zw,,.' ea. ` 'k < 1f{ .6:• "': /F`rf 11- } N >' 7 r Tk' �11.11 / x 1. 1.5 r % 11 6I I '. 'kf ,``r/.a' �,•, "S ::'+t 'f`F r. y rY q.. 6 :�°°+r9"` .:.ts" .% y i.f 95r""l'�.f.Ylr �,- 'r .. 1. ,J 1 :�. <; r "Y t, ct in a� , �F' f �y^ L F n � 117 • !gf .¢'. ,fa,t 9' ,;F - 1}7 JbH ''` S / iFa , l F d :aO r f # /j / 3 Ks ff <. Ff. tG �• ;`o `rf S."..- 'ck'F 2 r+ „1 -0.• ""` 'o- F rr/r r11 .,✓, yT9i' r.4{,+ y,+s,v� r -; 5: .y{„ }} yy },; '•a{p 6- ;� '! ? r/ Ary 4 :e YY" N4 1. } fry' '"J ?!a 4 T < �.2. y�. Ir: ;"/�.. ,.r : .�. s y. ,lw .4k,}. .,.5 ';;,F .b.-:-:"f', '` -`:ti >;lY : s{a t` ? a, <} ::l F ;5`d f'. ,. W, I t 1. t s ` f j f 3� " si raj `yi Y £ ( } :a < {: #..it.t..cy'✓o+' '::� i-:'. j en{Y'•',v�ar,X ::# <y > 5nL";... r 7}jri`; ,r !' 2;,i ts.. d .) ,V ..r' ./.-.- ".`:? %F`w Yiw} `F:'h,.d'+h✓!a �' '2�.r ? :ir/5 1. xy-1.Y if� ;v .: M k a^ ;.4 - / :° , :�.:, t ":�Y.1 4f „�' ': .::rSi ;.'ry r,. I i, ' ''"'k,lx r f ,.F:rf�; :. > ; .,�+ '',,"9"> -}`:'u .::.c"^{r J' ', ' ' '' f :�b i ,M ;:: / c. < s r . 4 F, . y `/S:. •, '" :'li f $4 _.'y91t '`., ` ¢QSk ' qb, � '/ �`' :f�¢ �. .'b" _.g .L:? - 3 -;;� ,:,-'f'' 'Y. 'T'+,.5 ' > yt Y .� rr /� f Y.. fi c,.A. a.P '4h%}.z t"" t :w},:£ r'S...^yr iYv%^ { :ip,Frk >* .+ aad'J":"x^J'"y, F4. p,,qw,. {a "' '^' :Fh„�, R:t fi1�,;'!`. r..nk �c'� .k ,Fe 9.. } �C S T '. �-0�tr^�' ^ur' 1 r�.i'per'- /y �65.. kg Y '9 > a .�, ;av(' .tN :u{'{i {�"a ii" f .c.1, ':Y 'tk'r f �',' w o':c o { * ":R"r _ r > 1. 1. ,.2• rF�{"'4'' k ,:,�{ a."� ,S• ,},,:.( r?. ogr�: eta/r.. `` � .3j F `,+��F' `;.;ty '}•4�, p 2'°,3.` ,c.+,}3y: "a" �? w ryo we : b y�:'> :r kM('}3_ t 6 rs xf,'k. P; > r d :Eix¢°y'.� ^Ra -'% t aCa rr ,w;{; u:F{� f y Fri°• r v,., 5. s --Y x ::.T t r'+(,f, nr ,. r, k A 6?: ,!¢'11 , t}rf} < yJ "";{ Q r F 4:} _ `f " �#;:/ { }:3••.'{ 11 � f�: f ry.,;} r'rF �g. ,' ,:Y dip• r�3? ;.. ,,'�f'.- �" [ a:r c ;y #'� s :9Ff ".('+, 74 »f ` 1. <.: F _ �: TT.43 � a is a } } . t. ' T K :f";�R➢➢,' 'oG9: "i o° r ,y^,e ..�y�,,�"%".T .,,,y $` '�'y` I" c.11 yr - ,y Tk o F -f9n t .,'R t } d /,_ o���g'l r t ,dff A:: 4 .S'-. R' {y i 1>< ,� . fjn I 5 r'aa r .S`: ru "s,f"J - �_."� ''°' - � F F { ,, ,c x 'r . t :,<.•� /t ';%,:i^ c•.:" ,. �r r a,£.' 'x' Y: ,s::_2p¢ r "+y.x:. e$R}Q/y:£1' , 11 . :''�/'r +. S A,c,f?:'' GS�r' �/�y A- ,`�" :{:: .k�'?�`yp, �"` `,d,' S3. ;}"'..fy 'e ..e rfn +{..r p. ,ys; / ?2.. l'.'' a. ,T}r'� J, ''v`. ,1''n. r t 1:yy` t t �' , :E��r :S:" I I-i,% T-y '{}, A... ".- ?: ,,, Y .ry.' t,, l b,i.. .. : I J :1. I �::'° "j.•r. :;,_ r:.. �rG f 3 ..cv '01vw .: `/: i r • f,. V2.: qa, x W' H x r rF s. �. :...h. - ',:�. ,•IIR.,$ 9x . I'�Y",. .;Iry../ ��`- y ;i: A,G: J rs,5.: o o-. S,;" x :`F' t.: •5 3. h K$ ' "4:: :::�iyd Y F„r: - "' ,/�„ y A s y� ,`.,,' :': x.; ry" .3 "' '>' J v �' 'f ;a r �t r `ri '.:/ {".:•+f �. - %..,,r x ;F' F L :' ..:i'+Y`r. ; s •, k..,.-*._: r ;:�> ,,..3 ,c -,. . .,�' ,Y t' ,G .:';SN r t ,.. .. /..; > :�J.rJ: j' .+,r. .r,:c� +S':oya :.._:/,'F ,;,.r F ".:�1; "'< ..{.:i:.Y;J.��{ ` "''u `�5/Q[ �i }3.." qy' .G ji4`:" ,j l: ,. �/, .. ::S; ^ J'..Q. - 'i" *Y y` L•:h ..M �, }'r. ,4S.rY.FN,,: ../�" 1pp ..j S. OY "..Js$.}E:-\ Sr "'F'+, :f " ; .;X' r'r; - :{: v"{ n "`'1. UX.. .{: .yea rr.'?.I I I- 2r ':3;fJ X' f `.f }'_ ..;'. 'p'�. 4 44,��i/.t -"..,$f'6 Ifs,��$g�E'.:�I .- I, ,}�;,J .:"k-11�"` ":r. 7�.s" -. r "h" i .�.�tk+ P 'r}'�, /. rr..9.:f' tC£�:Y.�ir + yi ;�,�"..���.0 "x✓ ,� :F' R'X TT f.. YrAf y. ..ga `• :.5: { XIll, } 5 +16 _"::f� F, h t.. Y{,:tXn N Y"�. Y'T�. �:� 11 . ;Y. b::. g yno o: 6 "'2 tr , Yx+. S 4°' Pg x°fi', o` f .. w.': }.a,,. :,. �` :�.a -.., `:s:F' ,f{,>. ` � ,, f:• f'A' _ r, jtfrr