Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06052001 - C.167 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FROM: Stephen L. Weir, County Clerk-Recorder DATE: May 15, 2001 SUBJECT: CONSOLIDATION OF EL SOBRANTE AND NORTH RICHMOND MUNICIPAL ADVISORY COUNCILS r� ciux'' WITH STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTIONS SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S)AND BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: 1. APPROVE request of the EI Sobrante and North Richmond Municipal Advisory Councils to consolidate elections with Statewide General Elections. 2. FIND that the Clerk-Recorder has made progress that will accommodate consolidations in the following ways: a. The increased number of ballot cards requires additional vote-counter stations. Due to space limitations and the capacity of the current Data General computer, the Clerk secured six (6) additional machines from Multnomah County, Oregon, for 20% of new cost. In addition, the Clerk has acquired a P.C.-based tally system (B.C. WIN) that will allow for these machines to be used. 3. CONSIDER the following qualitative issues that are expected to result from the requested consolidation(s): a. Timeliness. With the B.C. WIN system and a new streamlined ballot-delivery system, ballots will arrive and be counted faster than in the past. It should be noted that with consolidation, a slower vote count will take place than without consolidation. b. Accuracy. Additional extra staffing help will be needed to conduct consolidated elections. However, the demand for the staff will go down in odd-numbered years. There are concerns about having trained temporary staff; however, we believe that we can bring on temporary staff early enough to train them for each election. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: ® Yes SIGNATURE RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMEND TION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE _OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION ON BO R ON June 5, 2001 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED XX OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS: UNANIMOUS . (ABSENT: --- ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND XX CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND AYES: NOES: ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. ATTESTED: June 5, 2001 JOHN SWEETEN, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BY: �_IA &/� cc: Elections Office DEPUTY Board of Supervisors May 15, 2001 Page 2 c. Voter Impact. While turnout at a general election is higher than the turnout at an 'off-year" election, high voter turnout and long ballots result in long lines at the polls and "voter drop off" towards the end of the ballots and issues on the backs of some ballot cards. 4. ACKNOWLEDGE that the Clerk-Recorder attempted to find a way to "work with local agencies to develop a fee structure that does not penalize agencies that choose to hold elections in the odd-numbered years." While this issue was a directive of a 1997 Board Order, County Counsel has determined that the Clerk cannot structure a pricing mechanism that would favor one election year over another. 5. ACKNOWLEDGE that with consolidations off of odd-numbered years onto even-numbered years, revenues will go down significantly for odd-year elections and will go up slightly for even- numbered year elections. (The first impact will be noticed in budget year 1999-2000. It is not possible to determine the impact at this time until the full impact of consolidation is considered. However, it is safe to assume that when a major district moves its.election off of the November odd-numbered year, any district that remains on that ballot will have to pay a higher election charge.) 6. ACKNOWLEDGE amortization of the cost of equipment identified in item 1 (above) over a five- year period (Elections in November 2000, 2002 and 2004) and the spread of those costs among those agencies seeking consolidation off of November odd-numbered years onto November even-numbered years. This funding proposal was approved by the Board of Supervisors on March 24, 1998. BACKGROUND After lengthy discussion in March 1997, the Board of Supervisors denied eight requests for consolidation upon the recommendation of the Clerk-Recorder. The Board directed the Clerk to work with the districts to see if a way could be found to equalize costs between even and odd years. The Board also asked the Clerk-Recorder to review capital and. space requirements. The Clerk has determined all concerns have been addressed. Upon recommendation of Supervisor Gioia, and to keep MAC elections cost efficient, it is recommended to consolidate the election of directors for the EI Sobrante and North Richmond Municipal Advisory Councils with the November General Election commencing in 2002. SW:ceb r:elections\correspondence\EI Sobrante and North Richmond MAC.BOS