HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06262001 - C.129 C.129
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on June 26, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Gioia, Gerber, DeSaulnier, Glover and Uilkema
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The Board ACCEPTED the Grand Jury Report No. 0104, "Juvenile
Detention Facilities," and REFERRED to the County Administrator.
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
Attested:June 26,2001
John Sweeten,Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors and County Administrator
By: &4-1
Deputy Clerk
. z9
Court
—Grand Jury Contra 725RO. Boxtreet 911
Costa Martinez, CA 94553-0091
County
AN—A
r"•'C
x. 'r
`•F.s 'v
Cou
June 12, 2001
Board of Supervisors
651 Pine Street, 1 st Floor
Martinez, CA 94553
Re: Report No. 0104
Dear Board of Supervisors-
Attached is Contra Costa County Grand Jury Report No. 0104 for your information. No
response is required.
CAROL THEWS, Foreman
1999-00 Contra Costa County Grand Jury
CW:
Enclosure
• —Grand Jur 725 Court Street
Y Contra P.O.Box 911
Costa Martinez, CA 94553-0091
County
June 71 2001 ::':=
Steven Bautista, Probation Officer
Probation Department
Contra Costa County
50 Douglas Drive, Suite 201
Martinez, CA 94553
Dear Mr. Bautista:
Attached is a copy of Grand Jury Report No. 0104, "Juvenile Detention Facilities" prepared by
the 2000-2001 Contra Costa Grand Jury.
In accordance with California Penal Code Section 933.05, this report is being provided to you at
least two working days before it is released publicly.
Section 933.5(a) of the California Government Code requires that (the responding person or
entity shall report one of the following actions) in respect to each finding:
(1) "The respondent agrees with the finding."
(2) "The respondent disagrees with the finding."
(3) "The respondent partially disagrees with the finding."
In the cases of both (2) and (3) above, the respondent shall specify the portion of the finding that
is disputed, and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefor.
In addition, Section 933.05(b) requires that the respondent reply to each recommendation by
stating one of the following actions:
1. The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary describing the
implemented action.
2. The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the
future, with a time frame for implementation.
3. The recommendation requires further analysis. This response should explain the scope
and parameters of the analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for
discussion. This time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of the publication
of the Grand Jury Report.
Steven Bautista
June 7, 2001
Page 2
4. The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not
reasonable, with an explanation thereof.
Please be reminded that Section 933.05 specifies that no officer, agency, department or
governing body of a public agency shall disclose any contents of the report prior to its public
release. Please insure that your response to the above noted Grand Jury report includes the
mandated items. We will expect your response, using the form described by the quoted
Government Code, no later than September 5, 2001.
To aid you in responding to this report, we have attached a copy of "Guidelines for Responding
to a Grand Jury Report." Failure to conform to these requirements could result in your having to
resubmit your response. You are also advised that your response becomes a public record upon
receipt by the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court.
Sincerely,
CAROL THEWS, Foreman
2000-2001 Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury
CW:
Enclosures
cc: Board of Supervisors
Silvano Marchesi, County Counsel