Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06122001 - SD.2 FHS#44 CONTRA � - :.� COSTA TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS •' ::srra ..K_ COUNTY _. .� 2'z FROM: Family&Human Services Committee DATE: June 12,2001 SUBJECT: Challenges in the Employment and Human Services Department SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. ACCEPT the attached report on the status of efforts to address social service delivery challenges in the Employment and Human Services Department. 2. EXPRESS particular concern about the issues of ➢ affordable housing for low-income families ➢ increasing complexity and length of court processes in child welfare cases ➢ foster care licensing and placement. . 3. REQUEST the Employment and Human Services Director to make a presentation to the City/County Relations Committee on the relationship between the availability of affordable housing and the ability of CalWORKs clients to become economically self sufficient. 4. REQUEST the Employment and Human Services Director to work with the State of California for relief from new federal licensing requirements for relative caregivers of children in out-of-home placement CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR_RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE _APPROVE _OTHER SIGNATURE($): MARK DESAULNIER ACTION OF BOARD ON jUnp 12. Inni APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A XX UNANIMOUS(ABSENT --- j TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ON MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact:Sara Hoffman,335-1090 cc: GAO ATTESTED June 12, 2001 John Cullen,EHSD JOHN SWEETEN,CLERK OF Danna Fabella,EHSD THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Bob Sessler,EHSDAND C UNTY D I ISTRATOR Wendy Therrien,ENDS BY i DEPUTY Ron Wetter,EHSD I� BACKGROUND/REASON(S)FOR RECOMMENDATION(S1: On May 24, 2001, the Family and Human Services Committee considered the attached report from John Cullen, Director, Employment and Human Services Department(EHS) on challenges facing his department in the areas of Workforce Services, Workforce Development Board, Children and Family Services and Aging and Adult Services. Workforce Services Wendy Therrian, Director of Workforce Services, gave an overview of areas of primary concern in her bureau, particularly job retention services, assisting the hardest to serve clients and the need for child care transportation and housing. In response to a question by Supervisor Mark DeSaulnier, Ms. Therrian explained that the department currently provides a maximum of $1500 per family to meet housing assistance needs. Supervisor DeSaulnier stated that CaIWORKs needs to be linked to the larger issue of the availability of affordable housing. He suggested that EHS become involved with the Affordable Housing Task Force and, particularly , increase coordination on the availability of tax incentives. He suggested that the department make a presentation to the City/County Relations Committee explaining the scope of County responsibilities and challenges with regard to CaIWORKs and low-income families and,particularly,challenges in housing,transportation and child care. Workforce Development Board John Cullen 'reviewed the challenges of the Workforce Development Board, which include not only meeting employment needs within the community, but also retention of board members. Children and Family Services Danna Fabella, Director of Children and Family Services, discussed the need to meet growing child protective service demands, expand early intervention services, improve the juvenile court process and refine service quality. She reported that the number of emergency response calls has increased by more than 20%. In her opinion, the courts are one of the biggest challenges to the time commitment and complexity of cases. The court process takes between 4-5 months to get to disposition on a case. The number of hearings and contests on each update review hearing has also increased, adding more time Social Workers must spend writing court reports, attending hearings and other court related matters. This delays efforts to move cases toward permanency; i.e., reunification, adoption or kinship care. In addition, the court process consumes a large amount of worker time, which is then diverted from case management. There is also a cost implication since the County must bear the full burden of case management after 12 months. In response to a question by Supervisor DeSaulnier, Ms. Fabella stated that some of the delays are due to"practices"not regulation or legislation. Currently,the Bay Area Association of Social Service Directors is commissioning a year-long study of child welfare services in courts. It should be completed sometime within the next year. Supervisor DeSaulnier indicated an interest in attending a child welfare court to better understand the issues. Ms. Fabella also discussed increasing difficulties in finding out-of-home placement resources. High housing costs make it more difficult for families to become foster parents (with the need for two incomes per family). Currently,there is no federal/state funding for child care for foster parents. In addition, group homes are not expanding due to high rents. Kinship care, which has grown from 20% to 45% of all out-of-home placement slots, is also facing difficulty with new federal licensing requirements. This could affect 800-900 relative caregivers. Aging and Adult Services Bob Sessler, Director of Aging and Adult Services, reviewed challenges of meeting growing Adult Protective Service demands, expanding health and nutrition services and redesigning the adult services delivery system. His bureau is very dependent on partnerships with community-based organizations to provide adult protective services,.including money management. He said that the bureau relies on County Mental Health to provide conservatorship services, but they only serve institutionalized seniors. The department would like to expand it to the homebound in order to allow seniors to remain longer in their own homes. Mr. Sessler also noted that the State is expected to make major revisions to the rules and regulations under which his bureau operates, the impact of which is currently unknown. 2 r Department-wide Challenges John Cullen reviewed service delivery issues that cross bureau lines, including recruitment and retention of staff, acquisition and improvement of facilities, accountability for performance, departmental infrastructure and the need for additional revenues. Supervisor DeSaulnier thanked Mr. Cullen and members of the department for an excellent report and asked that it be put on the short discussion calendar of the Board of Supervisors with a focus on the issues housing,the courts and foster care. 3 r EMPLOYMENT & HUMAN SERVICES CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Date: May 8, 2001 MEMO TO: Family & Human Services Committee CC, Sara Hoffman Federal Glover Mark DeSaulnier FROM: John B. Cullen SUBJECT: EHSD Challenges RECOMMENDATIONS ACCEPT the report presented by the EHSD Director and staff on the status of efforts to address social service delivery challenges; KEEP this item on referral to FHS for another update in six (6) months; REPORT OUT to the Board of Supervisors that progress is being made in these areas; and, SUPPORT Department efforts in the 2001-2002-program year to better address critical service delivery issues within the Workforce Services, Children & Family Services and Aging & Adult Services areas. BACKGROUND Last calendar year, the Department presented the full Board with a report entitled Changes, Growth and Challenges. Included within the report was a comparison of our N:\Cullen\ConeswndencaMlecWomorandums\Fenily 3 Human Sys Corrm=301.doc growth and changes over the past five (5) years; a listing of our major programs; County demographic realities that are driving challenges; and, a review of critical service deliv- ery issues. The Board was very impressed with the information and desirous of continu- ing the discussion on progress in addressing these challenges. A Board referral to the FHS Committee now provides the opportunity to regularly discuss and update these issues. WORKFORCE SERVICES The service delivery areas of primary concern to the Workforce Services Bureau are pro- viding job retention services, assisting the hardest to serve clients and the expanding of childcare, transportation and housing supports. The following points outline the actions and activities taken.to date this year in each of these areas. • Job Retention Service ✓ Currently working with approximately 1,500 former Ca1WORKs participants to help with job retention/career advancement ✓ Provided at least one full-time Retention Worker in each District Office ✓ Provided retention.services for a maximum of 12 months following the termina- tion of Ca1WORKs cash aid ✓ Introduced and reinforced the concept of Job Retention to program participants early in the process of applying for Ca1WORKs assistance • Hardest to Serve ✓ Provided proactive case management resulting in more frequent contacts with par- ticipants ✓ Provided Assessment Services to a cumulative 4,753 CalWORKs participants H:1Cu0en\Comrepoodeoce-Mifc\Mcnnnndmns\Femily&Hamm Sve CommOS0301.doc 2 ✓ Provided Outreach Services to individuals who failed to fully participate, which netted an agreement to participate from 53% of those contacted ✓ Increased the number of referrals to Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services from 48 referrals per month to 67 referrals per month for the period April 2000 to January 2001 ✓ Gathered data to better understand why families apply for CalWORKs, why they leave the program and why individuals identified as having a welfare-to-work re- quirement fail to participate ✓ Provided Domestic Violence services in one district office and plan to expand to all offices, which among other things, helps address barriers to work resulting from domestic violence ✓ Increased engagement of CalWORKs participants as evidenced by Work Partici- pation Rate increases from 5.3% to 33%. • Childcare, Transportation and Housing Supports ✓ Developed a close working relationship with the child care community ✓ Experienced a $7 million increase in the child care budget, allowing all eligible families to receive child care ✓ Gathered data via a survey about the transportation needs of CalWORKs families ✓ Supported two successful Low Income Flexible Transportation (LIFT) grants, al- lowing the expansion of transit services in the Monument Corridor and between Richmond and job-rich areas of San Rafael ✓ Implemented the.Children's Transportation Project providing CalWORKs children a way to school and/or daycare ✓ Graduated 24 CalWORKs participants from grant-funded bus driver training, in- creasing employment opportunities as well as available transportation services ✓ Worked closely with the Housing Alliance to produce an intensive study of the housing needs of Ca1WORKs families H:1CuUen\Comspiodeoce-MixVdemofmd=\Family&Hu Svc Co=050301.doc 3 ✓ As a result of the study, developed the CalWORKs Housing Assistance Action Plan and Implementation Strategy to begin implementation in June ✓ Obtained funding to implement housing initiatives, including: Emergency Housing Assistance, Housing Referral System, Transitional Housing Support, Tenant Housing Counseling, Relocation Grants and Housing Scholarships Challenges continue to present themselves as the bureau works to provide primary ser- vices and as the economy declines. Job Placement and Retention services, though more widely available and effective, still need to be enhanced with a focus on long-term em- ployment and career advancement. Identifying and addressing all barriers of the hardest to serve continue to present service challenges, as more intense and focused case man- agement and supportive services are required to aid them in their move from welfare to self-sufficiency. The shortage of licensed childcare for infants/toddlers and special needs children is of continuing concern. Transportation poses problems for participants that live in remote areas of the county. While participants in other areas have transportation issues due to inadequate bus routes, infrequent service and lack of late night and weekend service. Finally, in the area of housing, while various housing initiatives are being im- plemented, our families are still faced with a short supply of decent, safe and affordable housing that will meet their needs as they move to self-sufficiency. Workforce Development Board The Workforce Development Board identified their critical service delivery issue as meeting the community's employment needs. The following are activities this year to date that address these issues: Community's Employment Needs H;%CuUenlCovenondc=-Mix\MermraWu=\Famly R Humor Svt Co=050301Am 4 ✓ Certified the Workforce Development Board of Contra Costa County by the State Board in July 2000 ✓ Certified the Board's five-year strategic plan ✓ Entered into a One-Stop Partner Memorandum of Understanding with the nine partners detailing the provision of Workforce Investment Act-funded services as well as other services required to be provided by the various partners ✓ Coordinated Rapid Response employment services to 1,660 employees whose em- ployers faced closure or significant"down-sizing" ✓ Sought and received a 130% increase in Rapid Response funding over the previ- ous year ✓ Initiating studies of the effects of a thriving versus weakening economy on job dislocations ✓ Received a $2.2 million grant to work with various partners to enhance work skills of current health care professionals as well as provide job skills training to low in- come persons aspiring to enter the health care field ✓ Served over 4,300 new clients since July 2000 at the One-Stop Centers ✓ Provided WIA-funded youth development services to 108 county youth ✓ Increase community awareness of the Board and its services through two newly developed marketing and communications brochures The Workforce Development Board has its own set of challenges with which to deal. The retention of voluntary.board members who come primarily from the private business sector is difficult because of competing demands on the members' time. There is the challenge of developing innovative and effective strategies for meeting the needs of a workforce faced with multiple barriers to sustained employment as well as those seeking economic.self-sufficiency, repositioning or reconnection .with the workforce. Add to these concerns the possible downturn of the economy and the resulting need for cost- H:\Cu0en)CortespoWeme-Miec\Memmmdum\f;amdy&Hu=Svs Comm0503014m 5 .i efficient and effective strategies for dealing with the potential employment dislocation. These are the issues and concerns the Board must address and overcome. Children and Family.Services The principle service delivery goals set by the Children and Family Services Bureau are meeting growing CPS service demands, expanding early intervention services, improving the Juvenile Court process and refining service quality. The following are activities this year to date in meeting these goals. • Child Protection Service Demands ✓ Added 30 Social Workers and 12 Social Casework Assistants positions to address growing workloads ✓ Provided an average of 18 hours of job-related training per worker ✓ Signed MOU with law enforcement agencies throughout the county regarding child welfare protocols ✓ Hired three Domestic Violence Liaisons to better manage child welfare cases that involve domestic violence as part of the Zero Tolerance Domestic Violence Policy ✓ Collaborated with law enforcement and health care on development of a protocol on responding to methamphetamine laboratories when children are present ✓ Provided licensing assistance to Master level social workers to encourage their job retention with the department • Early Intervention Services ✓ Expand staffing of the Independent Living Skills Program supporting emancipat- ing youth, 65% of whom are pursuing post-secondary education ✓ Held a Child Welfare Redesign Community Conference on needed strategies to focus on prevention and early intervention H:\Cullen\Cormgondeme-MiuVHemmmdumsTe ally&Human Sva Conffi050301.doc 6 ✓ Expand Welcome Home Baby program to other geographic areas after success- fully serving families in the Monument Corridor ✓ Worked with and funded CBO's to provide early intervention and prevention ser- vices throughout the county ✓ Co-located public health foster care nurses in each District Office to provide health.case management for foster children • Refine Service Quality ✓ Passed five of six areas of Child Welfare Service Div. 31 regulations and was in the 86 percentile of compliance on the sixth ✓ Enhanced services to Workforce Service/Child Welfare clients by coordinating case planning and better utilizing existing funds ✓ Added public health nurses at receiving center to provide health screening for children ✓ Added adoption support services with increased Federal funds ✓ Created Educational Liaison positions to assure the educational needs of adoptive children are met ✓ Developed a protocol for piloting coordinated case management with providers of service for mothers in substance abuse treatment ✓ Improved working relationships with foster parents through a Foster Parent/Social Worker Conference ✓ Implemented the KinGAP program to assure permanency for children placed with relatives ✓ Enhanced Kinship Care support service through TANF funding ✓ Developed a workgroup to implement combined jurisdictional/dispositional hear- Ings to reduce the number of court hearings H:\Cullen\Comspondewe•Misc\Memomendums\Fs®ly&Human Svs Co�0509OL&x 7 Providing child welfare service is complex and emotionally charged, making effective service delivery difficult at best. To compound the difficulties found in this service de- livery climate are unresolved challenges that continue to present themselves. Calls to the Emergency Response Hotline continue to increase. Additionally the negative impact of substance abuse on families and children has resulted in more complex problems requir- ing a more skilled workforce with greater resources. Placement resources continue to be a challenge despite our continuing foster parent recruitment efforts. Many children need high level group home placements which are increasingly more difficult to find. Child welfare is increasingly litigious and the bureau is faced with finding ways to meet the ex- pectations of the court as well as legal timeframes. Ideally, preventative services can be provided to help reduce the incidence of child abuse. However, that requires additional resources to provide services in targeted areas, implement the Child Welfare Redesign and expand programs like Welcome Home Baby, Shared Family Care and Family Pres- ervation. Clearly the bureau faces issues that will require some intense focus and in- creased resources. Aging and Adult Services Aging and Adult Services has identified several service delivery areas they consider criti- cal for meeting the needs of seniors and other vulnerable adult populations. Those ser- vice areas include meeting growing APS service demands, expanding health and nutrition services and redesigning the adult services delivery system. • Adult Protection Service Demands ✓ Hired and assigned an additional ten staff to provide adult social services ✓ Obtained Board of Supervisors' approval to expand APS to focus on early inter- vention with adults at risk because of self-neglect issues H:NCuaenVCarteapoodewwMisc%Mc mnodu XFa®ly&Hu Sve Co=050301.dm 8 ✓ Assumed responsibility for staffing multidisciplinary consultation teams that bring together public and private agencies that serve APS clients ✓ Contracted with Elder Abuse Prevention, Inc. to provide training to bureau staff, community partners and community advocates in how to deal with domestic vio- lence issues experienced by seniors • Medi-Cal/Food Stamps Eligibility ✓ Trained approximately 45 new eligibility staff for the Medi-Cal and Food Stamp programs ✓ Trained Ca1WORKs participants as Medi-Cal Advocacy Workers to assist Medi- Cal applicants to successfully complete the eligibility determination process ✓ Established a new Medi-Cal Program Assistant classification as a means to recruit and retain skilled staff ✓ Joined with Health Services and local foundations to conduct Medi-Cal and Healthy Families outreach ✓ Reported to the directors of the Health Services and the Employment and Human Services Departments about long term care integration recommendations and ob- tained funding for third year of integration planning • Redesigned Adult Services Delivery System ✓ Developed Bureau staff work groups to implement recommendations to enhance internal communications, community outreach and customer service ✓ Evolved the Senior Information Program into an Information and Assistance (I&A) Program serving both seniors and adults with disabilities ✓ Expanded I&A services to include integrated screening of consumers for Adult Protective Services, Multipurpose Senior Services, Linkages and In-Home Sup- portive Services H:NCu0enCoffeWnde=.Mi=XMemoraMd %Family&HumanSvtCon==301.&c 9 ✓ Provided, through a contract with Crisis Center, Inc., a web-based community re- .sources database in collaboration with Health Services and Community Services Departments Like Children and Family Services, Adult and Aging Services deals with complex and emotional service delivery issues. When problematic issues and concerns are added to this complexity the result can be daunting. Some problem issues needing to be dealt with include: finding ways to handle the increasing demand for Adult Protection if State fund- ing remains stagnant and finding ways to build an effective partnership with Health Ser- vices to coordinate delivery of guardianship and conservatorship services; monitoring the accuracy and accessibility of the web-based resource database; developing an implemen- tation plan for long term care integration; training staff to accurately perform Medi-Cal and Food Stamp eligibility determination in the face of increasingly complex program regulations; enhancing outreach and advocacy efforts to make Medi-Cal and Food Stamps benefits accessible to potentially eligible individuals and families, and imple- menting the Family Caregiver Support program authorized under the Older Americans Act. Employment and Human Services (Department-wide) Some service delivery issues cross bureau lines and become concerns for the entire de- partment. The issues identified that meet these criteria include expanding recruitment and retention of staff, acquiring and improving facilities, improving accountability and support and identifying additional revenues. Following are some actions taken to date this. year: • Recruitment and Retention of Staff H:Cuncn\Cortespondeme-MiuWleunsaodums\FaaWy&Hu Svs ComnMX Ldw 10 ✓ Developed new recruitment and retention incentives for Social Casework Special- ists ✓ Reached a larger number of job seekers through campus recruitments, professional conferences and website information ✓ Improved responsiveness with timely recruitment, expedited hiring, new classifi- cations, and competitive salary and benefits • Acquired and Improved Facilities ✓ Began the construction of new facilities in East and West county to serve Family, Adult and Children service delivery ✓ Vacated the substandard facility on Harbor Boulevard, Richmond ✓ Began the remodel of all major Department facilities ✓ Enlarged the Staff Development Center to provide additional training and staff space • Accountability and Support ✓ Continued to define and measure performance outcomes ✓ Gathered input from our client base through customer surveys ✓ Built the capacity of Information Technology to capture and provide accurate and concise data in a timely manner ✓ Expanded internal security staff and quality control staff • Additional Revenues ✓ Searched out new sources of revenue such as Prop 10 and local foundation grants ✓ Leveraged existing funding with Mental Health, SIT, Workforce Development and Schools ✓ Collaborated with other agencies to develop grant proposals ✓ Worked through State Association to gain favorable allocations/changes H:%CuUcnlConvgowk=.MircV&mraWu m%Family&Humm Svi CDumO30301.dm 11 Like each of the bureaus and the service delivery issues they face, department-wide areas of concern must also deal with additional challenges. We will need to develop strategies for effectively competing for the services of skilled staff in child welfare, adult services and information technology. We must adjust training programs to prepare both internal staff and newly hired employees for changing job requirements. We need to address the space needs of Central county staff, both those at headquarters and those providing client services. We will also work to continue to expand in the improvements being made in quality assurance, performance evaluations, internal security, contract and procurement support services. Additionally, I have identified nine themes that we will concentrate on as we make future organizational and service delivery changes. These themes have been defined as the re- sult of my organizational assessment and staff and community input surveys. Over four hundred persons have provided written observations, ideas and recommendations on how we can become a more effective, successful organization. This input falls into nine theme areas, which are: ■ Accountability ■ Continuing Education ■ Workspace and Equipment ■ Internal Responsiveness ■ Reasonable Workloads ■ Community Resource Development ■ Recruitment and Retention ■ Opportunities for Clerical Staff ■ Communications and Information Sharing H:kCulknlComsponden -MiscNMemrmdu %Feerily&Hamm Svs Cnmn050301.dnc 12 I have instructed our managers and shared with all Agency staff, that we must routinely place additional attention in these areas. The following are some of the current processes underway that will help us improve in these areas. ✓ Performance evaluations and regular performance assessment discussions ✓ Case review and quality assurance processes ✓ Expanded staff development and off site education programs ✓ Workload reviews,reassignments, specialization ✓ Additional casework, line and support staff ✓ Many facility and workspace acquisitions, remodels and relocations ✓ Capacity building with CBO's ✓ Expansion of contract-out resource development ✓ Reclass reviews of clerical support duties/assignments and career ladders ✓ Regular Department-wide, Bureau, Division and Unit meetings to share informa- tion and receive input ✓ Publication of internal and external information/education materials, In closing, a more immediate concern regarding our ability to continue progress in ad= dressing these critical service delivery challenges, is the Governor's May budget revi- sions and countywide spending plans. Our 2001-2002 budget request assumes that the State will continue its funding of Fed- eral/State programs,and provide increases to cover mandated growth. Likewise, we ex- pect that increased local resources will also be available to match and realize Fed- eral/State revenues, and continue funding for county priority investments in Children's and Adult programs. H:%Cti1knVCortespondercs•MiseWemorm)t=lFemity B Human Svs Cmrm050MI.doc 13 r THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIFORNIA AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY �UU1�I 3 FLOOD CONTROL &WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Adopted this Resolution on June 12, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Gioia, Gerber, DeSaulnier, Glover and Uilkema NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None RESOLUTION NO. 2001/257 SUBJECT: Adoption Of Stormwater Utility Assessments For Fiscal Year 2001-02, For Stormwater Utility Areas No. 1 Through 18, Countywide. Project No. 4500- 6X7072-CDD CP#95-37. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, as the Governing Body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control& Water Conservation District, RESOLVES THAT; The Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Act,hereinafter referred to as Act, provides authority for said Governing Body to establish Stormwater Utility Areas, and adopt ordinances and resolutions for Stormwater Utility Assessments; and This Board on June 22, 1993, established Stormwater Utility Areas 1-(Antioch), 2-(Clayton), 3- (Concord),4-(Danville), 5-(El Cerrito), 6-(Hercules), 7-(Lafayette), 8-(Martinez), 9-(Moraga), 10- (Orinda), 11-(Pinole), 12-(Pittsburg), 13-(Pleasant Hill), 14-(San.Pablo), 15-(San Ramon), 16- (Walnut Creek), 17-(Unincorporated County), and on May 9, 2000 established Stormwater Utility area 18-(Oakley). These areas consist of that real property located in the incorporated limits of the cities indicated and the unincorporated County; and On May 15, 2001, this Board set a public hearing to consider adoption of Stonnwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2001-02, for Stormwater Utility Areas No. 1 through No. 18; and On June 12, 2001,pursuant to the Board's Resolution of May 15, 2001, this Board held a hearing to consider the proposed Stormwater Utility Assessments, and at that time all written and oral objections presented concerning the proposed Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2001- 2002 were considered; and DE:pam G:\GtpData\F1dCtl\SWUM\BO\SUA 01-02 Rcs.doc I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an Orig.Dept:Public works(FC) action taken and ent on the minutes of the Board of Contact: Pamela Miller (925)313-2238 c: County Administrator Supervisors on th a shown. County Assessor(certified copy) County Auditor/Controller(certified copy) ATTESTED: County Counsel County'rreasurcr/Tax Collector JOHN SW N,Clerk of the oard of Supervisors Public Works: and Cou dministrator Dean Eckerson,Flood Control Cece Sellgren,Engineering Svcs By Deputy RESOLUTION NO. 2001/257 r SUBJECT: Adoption of Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2001-02,for Stormwater Utility Areas No. 1 through 18, Countywide. DATE: June 12, 2001 PAGE: 2 of 2 It appears from the affidavits of publication on file with this Board that all notices required to be given for such a hearing have been duly and regularly given and all procedures to be followed have been followed, all in accordance with Sections 11 and 12.8 of Act and in accordance with the provisions of the Board's Resolution of May 15, 2001; and This Board has received copies of resolutions approved by a majority of the members of the city councils,town councils, and Board of Supervisors representing the geographic areas of Stormwater Areas No. 1 through No. 18,and said resolutions request that this Board adopt the annual assessment rate denoted herein for their jurisdiction for Fiscal Year 2001-02. This Board found that the activity, adoption of Stormwater Utility Assessments and adjustments based on equivalent runoff units are not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) pursuant to Article 5, Section 15061(b)(3)of the CEQA guidelines on June 13, 1995. A Notice of Exemption was filed on June 14, 1995. This Board FINDS that the proposed assessment rate for each Stormwater Utility Area does not exceed the maximum annual assessment rate established for the area; and This Board, in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-47, ADOPTS by this resolution annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2001-02 within Stormwater Utility Area No. 1 through No. 18 based on the following rates per ERU for each area: Ston-nwater Utility Area(SUA) Assessment Rate per Equivalent Runoff Unit SUA No. 1 (Antioch) $17.00 SUA No. 2 (Clayton) $29.00 SUA No. 3 (Concord) $35.00 SUA No. 4(Danville) $22.00 SUA No. 5 (El Cerrito) $23.50 SUA No. 6 (Hercules) $24.00 SUA No. 7 (Lafayette) $24.00 SUA No. 8 (Martinez) $30.00 SUA No. 9 (Moraga) $20.00 SUA No. 10 (Orinda) $30.00 SUA No. 11 (Pinole) $35.00 SUA No. 12 (Pittsburg) $24.00 SUA No. 13 (Pleasant Hill) $30.00 SUA No. 14(San Pablo) $38.84 SUA No. 15 (San Ramon) $28.00 SUA No. 16 (Walnut Creek) $22.50 SUA No. 17 (Unincorporated area) $30.00 SUA No. 18 (Oakley) $20.65 This Board hereby DIRECTS the Chief Engineer to file with the County Assessor and the County Auditor/Controller a list of the parcels subject to the assessment levied for Fiscal Year 2001-02; and This Board hereby DIRECTS the Clerk of the Board to file with the County Assessor and the County Auditor/Controller a certified copy of this resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 2001/257 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 255 GLACIER DRIVE,MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA DATE: May 23, 2001 TO: Recipients of the Engineer's Report for the Adoption of Fiscal Year 2001/2002 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Stormwater utility Areas Nos. 1 through 18. FROM: Dean Eckerson Assistant Public Works Director,Flood Control 'Da. SUBJECT: Revision of Page Two (2) of Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2001/2002 Attached please find a revision of Page two (2) of the Engineer's Report for the Adoption of Fiscal. Year 2001/2002 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Stormwater utility Areas Nos. 1 through 18. Note there has been a change that does not have any fiscal impact on the proposed Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) rate or the projected revenue. In the table for Proposed vs. Existing ERU Rates, within Stormwater Utility Area No. 15 (San Ramon), the change is to correct a typographical error in the column for Existing ERU Rate for FY 2000/2001. The table currently shows the rate at $23.00 and the correct figure should be $28.00. This is the rate that has been charged throughout the current fiscal year and will remain in the upcoming fiscal year, thus having no impact on any revenue figures. Please replace your current page two (2)with the one attached. Should you have any questions regarding this, please contact Pamela Miller of my staff at 313- 2238. Thank you. Dl E:pam G:\GrpData\P1dCtl\SWUF\BO\revised engineer report memo 0501.doc C: M.Shiu,Public Works M.Avalon,Public Works •1. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that: a. The Stormwater Utility Assessment Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) rates for Fiscal Year 2001- 2002 be adopted for the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Stormwater Utility Areas (SUA)for the following incorporated and unincorporated areas: PROPOSED VS. EXISTING ERU RATES X. STORMWATER ; MAXIMUM EXISTING ERU PRQPOSED ERU UTILITY AREA:. ERU RATE FOR..Y RATE FOR AREA:NO RATE ?000-01 FY 2001=02 1 Antioch $25.00 $17.00 $17.00 2 Clayton $29.00 $29.00 $29.00 3 Concord $35.00 $29.00 $35.00 4 Danville $30.00 $22.00 $22.00 5 EI Cerrito $38.00 $23.50 $23.50 6 Hercules $35.00 $24.00 $24.00 7 Lafayette $35.00 $22.00 $24.00 8 Martinez $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 9 Moraga $35.00 $20.00 $20.00 10 Orinda $35.00 $30.00 $30.00 11 Pinole $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 12 Pittsburg $30.00 $24.00 $24.00 13 Pleasant Hill $30.00 $25.50 $30.00 14 San Pablo $45.00 '$35.84 $38.84 15 San Ramon $35.00 $28.00 $28.00 16 Walnut Creek $35.00 $21.50 $22.50 17 Unincorporated $30.00 $25.20 $30.00 County 18 Oakley $30.00 $20.65 $20.65 2. NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM(NPDES) PROGRAM: Congress adopted the Federal Water Pollution Control Act generally referred to as the Clean Water Act in 1972. It specifically prohibits the discharge of any pollutants (e.g., herbicides, pesticides, oil, 2 DG/pam U WS4\S HA RDATA\Grp DataT1dCtAS W URAnnualFccAdoptTNGRPT01-02.doc 05/23/01 DRECEIVEDCONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 255 GLACIER DRIVE,MARTINEZ,CALIFORNIA DATE: May 23, 2001 TO: Recipients of the Engineer's Report for the Adoption of Fiscal Year 2001/2002 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Stormwater utility Areas Nos. 1 through 18. FROM: Dean Eckerson Assistant Public Works Director Flood Contr of La.4 SUBJECT: Revision of Page Two(2) of Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2001/2002 Attached please find a revision of Page two (2) of the Engineer's Report for the Adoption of Fiscal Year 2001/2002 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Stormwater utility Areas Nos. 1 through 18. Note there has been a change that does not have any fiscal impact on the proposed Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) rate or the projected revenue. In the table for Proposed vs. Existing ERU Rates, within Stormwater Utility Area No. 15 (San Ramon), the change is to correct a typographical error in the column for Existing ERU Rate for FY 2000/2001. The table currently shows the rate at $23.00 and the correct figure should be $28.00. This is the rate that has been charged throughout the current fiscal year and will remain in the upcoming fiscal year, thus having no impact on any revenue figures. Please replace your current page two (2)with the one attached. Should you have any questions regarding this, please contact Pamela Miller of my staff at 313- 2238. Thank you. DHE:pam G:\GrpData\FldCtl\SWUF\BO\revised engineer report memo 0501.doc C: M.Shiu,Public Works M.Avalon,Public Works • 1. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that: a. The Stormwater Utility Assessment Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) rates for Fiscal Year 2001- 2002 be adopted for the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Stormwater Utility Areas (SUA)for the following incorporated and unincorporated areas: PROPOSED VS. EXISTING ERU RATES STORMMAXIMUM; EXISTING ERU ,PROPosED ERU . UTILITY- AREA. ERU . RATE FOR FY RATE.FOR AREA<NORATE' 200.0 01 FY 2001=02 1 Antioch $25.00 $17.00 $17.00 2 Clayton $29.00 $29.00 $29.00 3 Concord $35.00 $29.00 $35.00 4 Danville $30.00 $22.00 $22,00 5 EI Cerrito $38.00 $23.50 $23.50 6 Hercules $35.00 $24.00 $24.00 7 Lafayette $35.00 $22.00 $24.00 8 Martinez $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 9 Moraga $35.00 $20.00 $20.00 10 Orinda $35.00 $30.00 $30.00 11 Pinole $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 12 Pittsburg $30.00 $24.00 $24.00 13 Pleasant Hill $30.00 $25.50 $30.00 14 San Pablo $45.00 $35.84 $38.84 15 San Ramon $35.00 $28.00 $28.00 16 Walnut Creek $35.00 $21.50 $22.50 17 Unincorporated $30.00 $25.20 $30.00 County 18 Oakley $30.00 $20.65 $20.65 2. NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PROGRAM: Congress adopted the Federal Water Pollution Control Act generally referred to as the Clean Water Act in 1972. It specifically prohibits the discharge of any pollutants (e.g., herbicides, pesticides, oil, 2 DE/Pam \\P W S4\S HARDATA\GrpData\FldCtl\S WURAnnualFeeAdopt\ENGRP'r01-02.doc 05/23/01 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AS GOVERNING BOARD OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT FROM: MAURICE SH1U, CHIEF ENGINEER DATE: May 15, 2001 SUBJECT: SET HEARING FOR ADOPTION OF STORMWATER UTILITY ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-02, COUNTYWIDE SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. Recommended Action: 1. ACCEPT the Chief Engineer's report for the adoption of Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2001-02 .for Stormwater Utility Areas Numbers 1 through 18; 2. ACKNOWLEDGE receipt of resolutions requesting adoption of Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2001-02 from the following municipalities and corresponding Stormwater Utility Areas: Antioch " Hercules Pinole Walnut Creek Clayton Lafayette Pittsburg Unincorporated Contra Costa County Concord Martinez Pleasant Hill Oakley Danville Moraga - San Pablo El Cerrito Orinda San Ramon Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE: _RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE _OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON May 15, 2001 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I hereby certify that this is a true and correct X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT none ) copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of AYES: NOES: the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTESTED: May 15, 2001 10HN52117EETEN,,Qcrk of the Board Of S e isors an County Administrator DIIE:pam G:\GrpData\F1dCtl\SWUF\BOI,SctHrg-50Ldoc , P Orig.Div:Public Works Flood Control Contact: Pamela Miller -(313-2238) By Deputy c: Dean Eckerson,Public Works County Assessor County Auditor-Controller County Counsel Treasurer-Tax'Collector File copy SUBJECT: SET HEARING FOR ADOPTION OF STORMWATER UTILITY ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-02, COUNTYWIDE DATE: MAY 15, 2001 PAGE: 2 of 3 I. Recommended Action (cont.): 3. ADOPT the attached Resolution setting June 12, 2001, at 9:00 a.m. in the Board chambers as the time and place for the Public Hearing on the adoption of Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2001-02 for said areas. II. Financial Impact: The proposed assessments for Stormwater Utility Areas 1 through 18 will provide approximately $11,105,535 in funding for the cities and unincorporated County for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program and drainage maintenance activities. III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: The Contra Costa Clean Water Program consists of Contra Costa County, its incorporated cities and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District working collectively under a Joint Municipal Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)Permit issued by the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. This Permit is federally mandated through the Clean Water Act, which was amended in 1987 to specifically address stormwater pollution. The current five-year permit from the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board began in September 1999. Public education on pollution prevention, inspection of construction sites, as well as commercial and industrial facilities, street sweeping, catch basin cleaning and other forms of drainage maintenance are examples of actions taken to meet Permit requirements. An Annual Report is written each year to summarize accomplishments. The Contra Costa Clean Water Program is currently in its second Joint Municipal Stormwater NPDES Permit from the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board and received its second five year permit from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board for the cities of Antioch, Brentwood, Oakley and unincorporated East County in June, 2000. The Permit includes, for each municipality, a Stormwater Management Plan outlining intended activities designed to reduce or eliminate pollutants from entering the storm drain system. The Regional Boards indicated the need for a restricted funding source to finance implementation costs. In order to meet this need, Contra Costa County proposed legislation providing a financial option for municipalities to use through the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. The bill, AB 2768 (Campbell), was passed by the legislature and signed by Governor Pete Wilson on August 30, 1992. The legislation specifically allowed a municipality to request formation of a Stormwater Utility Area and an assessment to pay for implementation costs.. SUBJECT: SET HEARING FOR ADOPTION OF STORMWATER UTILITY ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-02, COUNTYWIDE DATE: MAY 15, 2001 PAGE: 3 of 3 The Board of Supervisors, acting as the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, provided public notice to all affected property owners before the establishment of the Stormwater Utility Areas on June 22, 1993, creating 17 Stormwater Utility Areas. This 1993 Board action also set the first-year assessment rates for each Stormwater Utility Area, as well as maximum rates. Assessments were collected for Fiscal Year 1993-94 through 2000-01. On May 9, 2000, the Flood Control District separated the City of Oakley from Stormwater Utility Area 17. The City of Oakley was established as Stormwater Utility Area 18 at that time and assessments were collected for Fiscal Year 2000-01. IV. Consequences of Negative Action: If the proposed assessments for the 2001-02 Fiscal Year are not implemented, the program would have to be funded by the general funds of the cities and County to ensure compliance with NPDES permit requirements. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL 8r WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Adopted this Resolution on May 15, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: SUPERVISORS GIOIA, GERBER, DESAULNIER, GLOVER, AND UILKEMA NOES: none ABSENT: none ABSTAIN: none RESOLUTION NO. 2001/194 (West Water Code App. Ch. 63 Sec. 12.2 and 12.3) SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF STORMWATER UTILITY ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 FOR STORMWATER UTILITY AREAS NO. 1 THROUGH 18, COUNTYWIDE. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County; as the Governing Body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, RESOLVES THAT; The Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Act, hereinafter referred to as Act, provides authority for said Governing Body to establish Stormwater Utility Areas, and adopt ordinance for Stormwater Utility Assessments; and The Board, On June 22, 1993, established Stormwater Utility area 1 (Antioch), 2 (Clayton), 3 (Concord), 4 (Danville), 5 (EI Cerrito), 6 (Hercules), 7 (Lafayette), 8 (Martinez), 9 (Moraga), 10 (Orinda), 11 (Pinole), 12 (Pittsburg), 13 (Pleasant Hill), 14 (San Pablo), 15 (San Ramon), 16 (Walnut Creek), 17 (Unincorporated County), and on May 9, 2000 established Stormwater Utility area 18 (Oakley). These areas consist of that real property located in the incorporated limits of the cities indicated and the unincorporated County; and DHE:pam G:\GrpData\FldCtl\S WU F\BO\ResoSetHrg501.doc Orig.Dept.:Public Works(FCD) Contact: Pamela Miller(925)313-2238 cc: Dean Eckerson,Public Works County Assessor County Auditor/Controller County Counsel County Treasurer-Tax Collector Public Works—NPDES File copy RESOUMON NO. 2001/194 SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF A STORMWATER UTILITY ASSESSMENT FOR STORMWATER UTILITY AREAS NO. 1 THORUGH 18, COUNTYWIDE DATE: MAY 15, 2001 PAGE: 2 of 2 This Board also has before it the Chief Engineer's report providing an estimate of the cost of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit activities to be borne by property in the individual Stormwater Utility Areas. This report will be on file within 30 days of the public hearing to adopt FY 2001-2002 Stormwater Utility Assessments, and may be examined at the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Administration Building, Martinez, California. It is proposed that Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 be adopted for Stormwater Utility Areas 1 through 18; and At 9:00 a.m. on June 12, 2001, in the Chambers of the Board of Supervisors, Administration Building, Martinez, California, this Board will conduct a public hearing on the adoption of Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Stormwater Utility Assessments. At the hearing, this Board will hear and pass upon any and all written and oral objections to the adoption of the proposed Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Stormwater Utility Assessments. Upon conclusion of the hearing, the Board may abandon the proposed actions, or proceed with the same. The Clerk of the Board is DIRECTED to publish a Notice of Hearing, pursuant to Government Code 6066, once a week for two (2) successive weeks prior to the hearing in the West County Times, Contra Costa Times, and Antioch Daily Ledger newspapers of general circulation, circulated in areas proposed to adopt Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Stormwater Utility Assessments. Publication shall be completed at least seven (7) days before said hearing and said notice shall be given for a period of not less than twenty (20) days. The exterior boundaries of the Stormwater Utility Areas include lands within the cities indicated above. The Clerk of the Board is DIRECTED to forward to the governing body of said cities a copy of this Resolution at least twenty (20) days before the above noted hearing. The mailing addresses and individual recipients are listed in the attached Exhibit A. The Clerk of the Board is further DIRECTED to mail a copy of the Notice of Public Hearing to any interested party who has filed a written request for mailed notice with the Clerk of the Board or with the District. I hereby certify that this is a true and corrc ,.t copy of an action taken and entered on'the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTEST D Aga 5 2001 JO N WEET , Clerk of the Board lt� s an u dministrator Resolution No. 2001/194 Qy Deputy ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2001 -02 ASSESSMENTS FOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT STORMWATER UTILITY AREAS NOS. 1 THROUGH 18 Prepared by the Staff of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553 April 2001 1. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that: a. The Stormwater Utility Assessment Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) rates for Fiscal Year 2001- 2002 be adopted for the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Stormwater Utility Areas (SUA)for the following incorporated and unincorporated areas: PROPOSED VS. EXISTING ERU RATES STORMWATER MAXIMUM EXISTING ERU a SEo'ERIJ UTILITY`. AREA:. ERU RATE FOR FAY � RATE3FOR 'i{ AREA Np` RATE 2000 01 x �C ;FY 200'1 X02 ti tk ,. s Y6 s< j 1 Antioch $25.00 $17.00 $17.00 2 Clayton $29.00 $29.00 $29.00 3 Concord $35.00 , $29.00 $35.00 4 Danville $30.00 $22.00 $22.00 5 EI Cerrito $38.00 $23.50 $23.50 6 Hercules $35.00 $24.00 $24.00 7 Lafayette $35.00 $22.00 $24.00 8 Martinez $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 9 Moraga $35.00 $20.00 $20.00 10 Orinda $35.00 $30.00 $30.00 11 Pinole $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 12 Pittsburg $30.00 $24.00 $24.00 13 Pleasant Hill $30.00 $25.50 $30.00 14 San Pablo $45.00 $35.84 $38.84 15 San Ramon $35.00 $23.00 $28.00 16 Walnut Creek $35.00 $21.50 $22.50 17 Unincorporated $30.00 $25.20 $30.00 County 18 Oakley $30.00 $20.65 $20.65 2. NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM(NPDES) PROGRAM: Congress adopted the Federal Water Pollution Control Act generally referred to as the Clean Water Act in 1972. It specifically prohibits the discharge of any pollutants (e.g., herbicides, pesticides, oil, 2 DE/pam UP WS4\S 1IARDATA\GrpData\FldCtl\S W UI--\AnnualFecAdopt\ENGRPTOI-02.doc 04/26/01 grease, etc.) to the "navigable waters of the United States." The initial focus of the Clean Water Act was to prohibit these pollutants from industrial process wastewater and municipal sewage. The Act was amended in 1987 mandating the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish regulations setting forth the NPDES Permit Application requirements for stormwater discharges for municipalities, industries and construction projects. Contra Costa County, its incorporated cities and the Flood Control District joined together to form the Contra Costa Clean Water Program in order to marshal the necessary resources and develop the most cost-effective program to comply with these federally mandated requirements. One of the requirements of the NPDES permit process is to identify funding sources for implementation of the program activities. The Contra Costa Clean Water Program Management Committee identified the formation of stormwater utilities as the most practical method for meeting the funding requirements. Sixteen city councils and the County Board of Supervisors adopted resolutions requesting the District form a Stormwater Utility Area for their city territory. The governing board of the District established Stormwater Utility Areas 1 through 17 on June 22, 1993, and Area 18 on May 9, 2000. 3. STORMWATER UTILITY: A stormwater utility is similar to other utilities. It has a purpose, a geographic boundary, and a method for spreading the utility costs to benefiting properties or recipients. The purpose of the stormwater utility is to fund the implementation of the NPDES program activities required by the permit and the maintenance of the government owned storm drain systems. In development of the stormwater utility legislation, the construction of capital improvements was excluded as a purpose. Stormwater utility assessment revenues can only be spent on the NPDES program activities and storm drain system maintenance. Replacement of a failing storm drain system is considered a maintenance activity as long as the replacement facility is equal in capacity and a comparable type of facility, i.e., pipe storm drain is replaced by another pipe storm drain. The NPDES program activities have been tailored to meet the respective city or county NPDES problems based on their land use activities; thus each program is different. Also, the cities and county on an individual basis will perform most of the NPDES activities. Consequently, each city comprises a separate stormwater utility area. This facilitates the setting of the utility rates and the transfer of funds to the cities who perform most of the work. The same applies for the unincorporated county NPDES program which is implemented by county staff. Stormwater utilities generally distribute program costs to the benefiting landowners on the basis of stormwater runoff quantity or the amount of impervious surface associated with various land uses. The Stormwater Utility Areas utilize the latter method. Staff prepared the report entitled, "Report on Stormwater Utility Assessment (March 1993)," which is incorporated into this Engineer's Report by reference. The report explains in detail the rationale for using impervious surface area as the basis for allocating costs, the development of the utility rate standard of one Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) and the relationship between land use, parcel size, and the number of ERUs assigned to individual parcels in each Stormwater Utility Area. A typical single family residence (5,000 SF to 20,000 SF lot) is used as the standard for one ERU. The cost to the typical single family landowner will be the ERU rate shown in Section 1(a) above. 4. PROPOSED STORMWATER UTILITY BUDGETS FOR FY 2001-02: Indicated below are the estimated budgets for each stormwater utility area. The District's administration and collection costs are estimated at $1.80 per parcel which includes the County Tax Collector's line item cost for the tax bills. Each year, the District provides city staff with an estimate of the number of ERUs assessable in the new year. The agency corresponding with each Stormwater Utility Area then prepares a budget for their NPDES and drainage maintenance program for the forthcoming fiscal year. Using this budget, plus the estimated cost for entity administration and assessment collection, city staff calculates the 3 DGpam \\P W S4\SHARDATA\GtpData\FldCtl\S W UF\AnnualFccAdopt\ENG RYT01-02.doc 04/24/01 • ' required ERU rate by dividing the estimated total cost by the estimated ERUs in the Stormwater Utility Area. The agency governing board approves the rate and requests the District approve and implement the desired assessment. The ERU rate in future years can not exceed the maximum rate shown in Section 1(a) without completing the public notice/hearing process required by SB 1977 (Bergenson) and Proposition 218 (California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 4). PROJECTED EXPENDITURES .STORM-WATERGROUP AGENCY "`DISTRICT ;;UTILITY AGENCY NPDES NPDES A�IuiIN1 TAX TOTAL AREA: COST FUNpING.(1::) COLLECTION COLLECT FUNDING(1) `.; COST OR CQST 1 Antioch $162,229 $449,345 $12,785 $21,386 $645,745 2 Clayton $21,773 $99,745 $2,052 $3,508 $127,078 3 Concord $220,410 $1,672,172 $18,332 $29,171 $1,940,085 4 Danville $77,634 $300,026 $7,411 $12,579 $397,650 5 EI Cerrito $45,688 $184,171 $4,387 $7,123 $241,369 6 Hercules $37,479 $137,149 $3,340 $5,512 $183,480 7 Lafayette $46,759 $249,807 $4,369 $6,961 $307,896 8 Martinez $71,031 $510,442 $6,738 $10,199 $598,410 9 Moraga $32,660 $128,362 $2,771 $4,727 $168,520 10 Orinda $33,552 $271,167 $3,368 $5,683 $313,770 11 Pinole $35,872 $264,596 $3,548 $5,279 $309,295 12 Pittsburg $104,405 $506,267 $7,093 $11,635 $629,400 13 Pleasant Hill $63,535 $407,021 $5,597 $9,277 $485,430 14 San Pablo $51,578 $309,101 $3,533 $5,234 $369,446 15 San Ramon $87,628 $534,595 $7,514 $12,471 $642,208 16 Walnut Creek $124,215 $632,389 $11,441 $18,848 $786,893 17 Unincorporated County $293,225 $2,318,838 $25,034 $40,283 $2,677,380 18 Oakley $49,614 $222,653 $3,372 $5,841 $281,480 TOTAL: $1,55.9,287 $9;197,846 $132;685 $215,717 $11,105,5358 (1) Agency funding for NPDES includes storm drain system maintenance and contingency costs. 4 DE/pam \\P W S4\SH ARDATA\Grp Data\FldCtl\S W OF\AnnualFccAdopt\ENGRPTOI-02.doc 04/24/01 5. ESTIMATED STORMWATER UTILITY ASSESSMENT REVENUES IN FY 2001-02: Indicated below are the estimated revenues for Fiscal Year 2001-02 based on the proposed assessment rates in Section 1(a). The proposed ERU rate is the rate recommended in each municipality's resolution requesting adoption of Stormwater Utility Assessments for their municipal area. A listing of each assessor parcel number and proposed 2001-02 assessment is on file with the Clerk of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. PROJECTED ERU RATES and REVENUES STORMWATER, .:: NUMBER,OF PROPOSED<ERU ESTIMATED UTILITY=AREA AGENCY EROS : RATE,FOR REVENUE .. FY.2001 :02 1 Antioch 37,985 $17.00 $645,745 2 Clayton 4,382 $29.00 $127,078 3 Concord 55,431 $35.00 $1,940,085 4 Danville 18,075 $22.00 $397,650 5 EI Cerrito 10,271 $23.50 $241,369 6 Hercules 7,645 $24.00 $183,480 7 Lafayette 12,829 $24.00 $307,896 8 Martinez 19,947 $30.00 $598,410 9 Moraga 8,426 $20.00 $168,520 10 Orinda 10,459 $30.00 $313,770 11 Pinole 8,837 $35.00 $309,295 12 Pittsburg 26,225 $24.00 $629,400 13 Pleasant Hill 16,181 $30.00 $485,430 14 San Pablo 9,512 $38.84 $369,446 15 San Ramon 22,936 $28.00 $642,208 16 Walnut Creek 34,973 $22.50 $786,893 17 Unincorporated County 89,246 $30.00 $2,677,380 18 Oakley 13,631 $20.65 Y TOTAL: 406,991 $:11,105;535,. 5 DE/pam \T WS4\SHARDATA\GrpData\FIdCtl\S W UF"\AnnualFeeAdopt\ENGPPTO l-02.doc 04/24/01 • • RESOLUTION NO. 2001/36 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH ESTABLISHING THE RATE PER EQUIVALENT RUNOFF UNIT FOR FY 2001/02 AND REQUESTING THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT TO ADOPT AN ANNUAL PARCEL ASSESSMENT FOR DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE AND THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PROGRAM WHEREAS, under Federal Water Pollution Control Act, prescribed discharges of stormwater require a permit from the appropriate California regional water quality board under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program; and WHEREAS, the City of Antioch (CITY) did apply for, and did receive, a NPDES permit which requires the implementation of selected Best Management Practices to minimize or eliminate pollutants from entering stormwaters; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the CITY to utilize funds received from its Stormwater Utility Area (SUA) for implementation of the NPDES program and drainage maintenance activities; and WHEREAS, at the request of the CITY, the Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (DISTRICT) has completed the process for formation of a SUA, including the adoption of the Stormwater Utility Assessment Drainage Ordinance No. 93-47; and WHEREAS, The SUA and Program Group Costs Payment agreement between CITY and DISTRICT requires that CITY annually, by May 1, determine the rate to be assessed to a single Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) for the forthcoming fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Antioch does determine that the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for FY 2001/02 shall be set at seventeen dollars ($17.00). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby request the DISTRICT to adopt SUA levies based on said amount. HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Antioch at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 10th day of April, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Davis, Kalinowski, Conley and Simonsen NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Mayor Freitas Xc'� tee. - Jlk--�-' ` L. JOLENE MARTIN, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 19-2001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLAYTON CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISHING THE RATE PER EQUIVILANT RUN-OFF UNIT (ERU) FOR FY 2001-2002 AND REQUESTING THE CONTRA COSTA FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT TO ADOPT AN ANNUAL PARCEL ASSESSMENT FOR DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE AND THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM WHEREAS, under the Federal Water Quality Act, prescribed discharges of Stormwater require a permit from the appropriate federal or state authorities pursuant to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)program; and WHEREAS, the City of Clayton, in conjunction with other affected jurisdictions within Contra Costa County, applied to the State Regional Water Quality Control Board and received a Joint NPDES Permit which requires the implementation of a Storm Water Management Plan via Best Management Practices to minimize or eliminate pollutants from entering stormwaters; and WHEREAS,Assembly Bill 2768 authorizes the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District(District)to establish Stormwater Utility Areas(SUA)and to levy annual benefit assessments for the purpose of carrying our activities required under the NPDES program; and WHEREAS,it is the intent of the City to utilize funds received from its Stormwater Utility Area(SUA)for implementation of the NPDES program and drainage maintenance activities; and WHEREAS, at the request of the City, the Contra Costa County Flood Control District and Water Conservation District(District)has completed the process for the formation of a SUA,including the adoption of the Stormwater Utility Assessment Drainage Ordinance No.93-47; and WHEREAS, the SUA and Program Group Costs payment agreement between the City and the District requires that the City of Clayton annually, by May 1, determine the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for the forthcoming fiscal year. 1 NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Clayton City Council hereby determines that the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for FY 2001-02 shall be set at$29.00 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of Clayton does herby request the District to adopt the SUA levies based on said amount. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Clayton at a regular meeting of said Council held on April 17, 2001,by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Laurence, Littorno, Vice:`.Mayor Manning, Mayor Pierce NOES: None ABSENT: Council Member Walcutt ABSTAIN: None Mayor, Julie Pierce ATTEST: Frances Douglas, City Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly passed by the City Council of the City of Clayton at a regular meeting held on April 17, 2001. Frances Douglas, City Clerk Reso 24-00 2 . • � COPY 1 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 A Resolution Requesting the Contra Costa County Board of 3 Supervisors to Direct the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District to Increase the 4 Annual Parcel Assessment for Drainage System Maintenance and for Carrying Out Activities under the National Pollutant 5 Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program in Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Resolution No. 01-34 6 / 7 WHEREAS, under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, [33 U.S.C. Section 1342(p)], 8 certain municipal storm water discharges require a permit from the appropriate federal or state 9 authorities pursuant to the National Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program, and 10 WHEREAS, the City of Concord, in conjunction with other affected jurisdictions within 11 Contra Costa County, applied to the State Regional Water Quality Control Board and received a Joint 12 NPDES Permit and developed a Storm Water Management Plan; and 13 WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 2768 (West's Water Code Appendix, Section 63-12 and 63-12.9) 14 authorizes the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) to 15 establish storm water utility areas and to impose annual benefit assessments for the purpose of 16 carrying out the activities required under the NPDES Program; and 17 WHEREAS, the District has completed the process for formation of a Stormwater Utility 18 Area (SUA), Including the adoption of the Stormwater Assessment Drainage Ordinance No. 93-74; 19 and 20 WHEREAS, the SUA and Program Group Costs Payment Agreement between the City of 21 Concord and District requires the City of Concord, annually, by May 1, to determine the rate to be 22 assessed to a single Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) for the forthcoming fiscal year; and 23 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 93-14, which established the range of 24 annual assessment to be imposed by the District within the storm water utility area not to exceed $35 25 per Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU). 26 27 !/ 25 Res. No.01-3 t 1 I NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI'T'Y OF CONCORD DOES 2 RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 3 Section 1. The annual assessment to be imposed by the District within the storm water utility 4 area shall be$35.00 per Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) for fiscal year 2001/2002, and shall not exceed 5 a maximum of$35.00 per ERU for subsequent fiscal years. 6 Section 2. The City Council requests the District to adopt stormwater utility area levies based 7 on said amount. 8 Section 3. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. 9 PASSED AND ADO.I'1'ED by the City Council of the City of Concord on April 24, 2001 by 10 the following vote: .11 AYES: Councilmembers—B. McManigal, M. Pastrick, M. Peterson, L. Hoffineister 12 NOES: Councilmembers—None 13 ABSTAIN: Councilmembers—None 14 ABSENT: Councilmembers —:1-1. Allen 15 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 01-34 was duly and regularly 16 adopted at a regular joint meeting of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of 17 Concord on April 24, 2001. 18 Lynnet Keihl, CMC City Clerk 19 20 By 21 Mardie Traver, CMC Assistant City Clerk 22 23 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Certify that this Is a true Copy of 24 _ • t on fb In this offlCa. 25 Craig Laba 'e SEA60eputy City Clerk 26 City Attorn City of Concord, California 27 28 Res. No. 01-34 2 1,Marie Sunseri,City Clerk of the Town of Danville,hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 37-2001. Marie Sunseri, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 37-2001 AUTHORIZING THE CONTRA COSTA FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT TO ADOPT THE 2001-02 FEE FOR THE TOWN'S STORMWATER UTILITY AREA WHEREAS, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act requires dischargers of stormwater to obtain a permit from the appropriate California Regional Water Quality Control Board under the Stormwater Pollution Control Program (SPCP); and WHEREAS, Danville has joined 19 other Contra Costa County agencies, including the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District to secure the required permit effective through fiscal year 1998-2003; and WHEREAS, the funding necessary to implement this permit has been established at $22 per Equivalent Residential Unit(ERU)through the Stormwater Utility Assessment(Town ofDanville Resolution No. 24-93); and WHEREAS, said assessment rate must be set each year by the Town Council; and WHEREAS, the Town Council appoints the City Engineer, or his/her designee, as its official representative to the Contra Costa Clean Water Program; and WHEREAS, the Town Council wishes to continue participation in the SPCP program and continue to fund the program through the assessment of individual properties;now,therefore,be it RESOLVED,that the Danville Town Council authorizes continuance of the Stormwater Utility Assessment to be set at$22 per ERU for all properties within Danville; and, be it further APPROVED by the Danville Town Council at a regular meeting on April 17, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: Doyle, Waldo, .Arneric , Greenberg NOES: Shimansky ABSTAINED: None ABSENT: None MAYOR APPROVED AS TO ORM: - ATTEST: ^4T �r CITY ATTORNEY '" CITY CLERK • TIFIED A TRUE C TV �..:.............- LINnAi M. GIDDI G Clerk RESOLUTION 2001-23 d the City of EI errito, U RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CERRITO APPROVING CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM, ESTABLISHING AN INDIVIDUAL STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM IN EL CERRITO, INCLUDING GROUP COSTS FOR ACTIVITIES PERFORMED THROUGH THE CONTRA COSTA CLEAN WATER PROGRAM, ESTABLISHING THE RATE PER EQUIVALENT RUNOFF UNIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002, AND REQUESTING THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT TO ADOPT AN ANNUAL PARCEL ASSESSMENT FOR DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE AND THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PROGRAM. WHEREAS, under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, prescribed discharges of stormwater require a permit from the appropriate California Regional Water Quality Board under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program; and WHEREAS, the City of EI Cerrito did apply for, and did receive, an NPDES permit which requires the implementation of selected Best Management Practices to minimize or eliminate pollutants from entering storm waters; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of EI Cerrito to utilize funds received.from its Stormwater Utility Area (SUA)for implementation of the NPDES program and drainage maintenance activities; and WHEREAS, at the request of the City of EI Cerrito, the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) has completed the process for formation of an SUA, including the adoption of the Stormwater Utility Assessment Drainage Ordinance NO. 93-47; and WHEREAS, the SUA and Program Group Costs Payment Agreement between the City of EI Cerrito and District requires that EI Cerrito annually, by May 1, determine the rate to be assessed to a single Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) for the forthcoming fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of El Cerrito does determine that the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 shall remain at $23.50. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of El Cerrito does hereby request the District to adopt SUA levies based on said amount. BE IT ALSO FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. H:1Engineering\RESOS\Reso2001-23-AB-ERU-NPDES.doc j i I certify that at a regular meeting on March 19, 2001 the City Council of the City I of EI Cerrito passed this Resolution by the following vote: i AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Abelson, Brusatori, Friedman, Perka, Damon NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None . ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS. None IN WITNESS of this action, I sign this document and affix the corporate seal of the City of EI Cerrito on March 19, 2001. I I I da M. Giddin , ity Clerk APPROVED: i I iqZjfamon, Mayor Attachments: Exhibit A- EI Cerrito NPDES Storm Water Pollution Control Program Exhibit B - Estimated Stormwater Utility Assessment Revenues I I i i I I H:\Engineering\RESOS\Reso2001-23-AB-ERU-NPDES.doc 2 I EXHIBIT A City of EI Cerrito NPDES Storm Water Pollution Control Program Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Activities Cost (Includes Management and Administration Costs, Technical Support Services Permit and Compliance fees, Water Quality testing and Monitoring Programs, Special Studies, Public Education and Outreach Programs, and General Services and Supplies) Subtotal Group Activities $44,000 City of EI Cerrito Individual Activities: City-wide Street sweeping, Catch Basin Stenciling, Illicit Discharge Inspection Program, Underground Video Inspection, Recycling, Recycle Center Support, Phase out Herbicide Use, Cleaning and Maintenance of Storm Drain Lines and Open Channels, Storm Drain Waterways Litter Control, Creek Restoration Efforts, and Erosion Control Inspection Subtotal Individual Activities $185,000 Total $229,000 H:\Engineering\RESOS\Reso2o01-23-Ata-ERU-NPOES.doc 3 s i � • i I I ' r:.::..w 0.. o'?` O fir'� •' n:: Q W w W o w:;.-: O I N o > to w p w Y.'%;c W o z o Q y z p N U LLJ N _ m - to-- ""s'�?;Y O N n M O Oe N d O O N N0 W 0 ry t� tD J 1 rnO OM (� nInd nNOtotraONM to JW d �'^'� N /7 r N d N tD M O t0 d M t0 O N N YI (D O p Q] U W n :.0: r to tD t7 N !']In d t0 .- t` to CO O V O O N dNrOd WtnOtOOro OvtDntr T w _J > " j COtD M N N cD '- r- M M 10 Cl) W) LO c7 Ot 'rn. www U w � Hwivww wwNwv/ 00 W l w : i9 w H �- O j Z _ #W`'"`` 00000000000000dotDo 00 W O O O O Wl O O O O N O O O M e0 O M N O n 01 tT NO •v 1c:14, O O 1D O � N vi � ri l7f tD d d . r q N N N N M N M M N N M N N W(;(L? v► ww6% 61w a� v� www60 " w6? `� O1 O �y to d t� a0 .- e'1 N t/I O d N M 1� t0 h 1� O d N a7 �"lu '- �j p fy O Oi th tD 'V c'1 nl tV tD (V n M n V 1� '7 n ai Z r N N N n r M O N O n w M O M O V M O N W >' M n M n COM t0 n .-- d 07 % a0 Q1 O d N W W N 0: m p,{ _ J Q.`.�:� an d N n O n cV N co Of O oU N tD 1T N rdi to to J C) ~ " M 0o Z N w — 7>�s .<.. O .- N O .- 1D r d vl n .- 00 d n 1� oD n lT W -.Z d ~ .: ^;`:k: t7f M n M d O N t� 6 d fV Q1 O O n t0 O 1D ^ W U n O d M r r N M r 01 M O w 3 �w'S tD d �- M tD QI J J O 1 w w �( W !n Z o F-- :: .6'.' o :co 0 0 Z w W oEn z z i F C, 0 !2 iia z 1 a1 0 F= a z 0 Z 1 F >- F- [] �'a Y w to I w - LL � � z."� W > w - W i.`. m WU z _ o M o iv O Z U O w N J Z O Q F- a w d wcc w z �..; zi`„°"� t7 tD Ot 17 r t0 tD O? N N *- v� O n N 1� t? to z LL n tD Cl 01 n O K to a0 tri N n a O n r V W LL ocnN M tD M 10 tp o v r O M m 0 M d r � U � p Mt� NnP,- - hrn� rnmod , vin m ►- Z (Y Z n. ton O n N O a0 (A O tO N tD lT M ? M N U W Z) M t�1 t0 r r N N �- N M 00 m D J U y J W w F W K Z p- co I fI.1J1 � lz F- Z- p0ZU a W Q pp I SUpO ` � JI�jZ � � QwDZm �QF- F- to 0 w i > U T O -J N pC Q U Z tt ?p � V w � F- 13. � � tmn n = d j U0Uow= g 0OOa v< U) 00 O � 1 w I � m�P RESOLUTION NO 01-020 Continuing The Rate Per Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) For FY 2001-2002 At $24.00 And Requesting The Contra Costa County Flood Control And Water Conservation District To Adopt An Annual Parcel Assessment For Drainage Maintenance And The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program WHEREAS, under Federal Water Pollution Control Act, prescribed discharges of Stormwater require a permit from appropriate California regional water quality board under the National Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)program; and WHEREAS, the City of Hercules County of Contra Costa did apply for, and did receive, a NPDES permit which requires the implementation of selected Best Management Practices to minimize or eliminate pollutants from entering stormwaters; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Hercules to utilize funds received from its Stormwater Utility Area (SUA) for implementation of the NPDES program and drainage maintenance activities; and WHEREAS, at the request of the City of Hercules, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) has completed the process for formation of a SAU, including the adoption of the Stormwater Utility Assessment Drainage Ordinance No. 93-47; and WHEREAS, The SAU and Program Group Costs Payment agreement between the City of Hercules and District requires that the City of Hercules annually, by May 1, determine the rate to be assessed to a single Equivalent Runoff Unit(ERU) for the forthcoming fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council for the City of Hercules does determine that the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for FY 2001-2002 shall be set at $24.00. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council for the City of Hercules does hereby request the District to adopt SUA levies based on said amount. The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted at regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hercules held on the 10' day of April 2001 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: Balico, Batara,Valstad, Ward, Segerberg NOES: Of H AB �Oh1e `f J +Trry e on Segerberg, Wyor 41�� D ec l thews, C•Ey �t tl \4 CCUrNl�,;.' BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE IN THE MATTER OF: Establishing the Rate per Equivalent Runoff Unit for ) RESOLUTION NO. 17-01 Fiscal Year 2001-2002 and Requesting the Contra Costa ) County Flood Control and Water Conservation District ) To Adopt an Annual Parcel Assessment for Drainage ) Maintenance and the National Pollutant Discharge ) Elimination System Program ) WHEREAS, under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act,prescribed discharges of stormwater require a permit from the appropriate California regional water quality board under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)program; and WHEREAS, the City of Lafayette (City)did apply for, and did receive, an NPDES permit which requires the implementation of selected Best Management Practices to minimize or eliminate pollutants from entering stormwaters; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City to utilize funds received from its Stormwater Utility Area (SUA) for implementation of the NPDES program and drainage maintenance activities; and WHEREAS, at the request of the City, the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) has completed the process for formation of an SUA, including the adoption of the Stormwater Utility Assessment Drainage Ordinance No. 93-47; and WHEREAS, the SUA and Program Group Costs Payment Agreement between City and District requires that City annually, by May 1, determine the rate to be assessed to a single Equivalent Runoff Unit(ERU) for the forthcoming fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lafayette does determine that the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for FY 2001-2002 shall be set at $24 (twenty-four dollars). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lafayette does hereby request the District to adopt SUA levies based on said amount. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Lafayette on April 9, 2001, by the following vote: AYES:Mayor Samson,Councilmembers Horn and Strauss NOES: Vice Mayor Tatzin,Councilmember Federighi ABSENT: None ABSTAIN:None APPRO Ivor Samson, ayor ATTEST: CERTIFILD AS AT'RUE COPY CLERK OF CITYa OF I '';=, f FT CA QFORI 91iDa /fie Robbins,City Clerk r ' Resolution 17-01 f i RESOLUTION NO. 036-01 ESTABLISHING THE RATE PER EQUIVALENT RUNOFF UNIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 AND REQUESTING THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT TO ADOPT AN ANNUAL PARCEL ASSESSMENT FOR DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE AND THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PROGRAM WHEREAS, under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, prescribed discharge of stormwater requires a permit. from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program; and WHEREAS, the City of Martinez (CITY) did apply for, and did receive an NPDES permit which requires the implementation of selected Best Management Practices to minimize or eliminate pollutants from entering stormwaters; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the CITY to utilize funds received from its Stormwater Utility Area (SUA) for implementation of the NPDES program and drainage maintenance activities; and WHEREAS, at the request of the CITY, the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (DISTRICT) has completed the process for formation of an SUA, including the adoption of the Stormwater Utility Assessment Drainage Ordinance No. 93-47; and WHEREAS, the SUA and Program Group Costs Payment agreement between the CITY and the DISTRICT requires that. CITY annually, by May 1, determine the rate tobe assigned to a single Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) for the forthcoming fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Martinez does determine that the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 shall be set at $30.00; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby request the DISTRICT to adopt SUA levies based on said amount. I HEREBY CERTIFY that this ins�mnot L a tsno and correct Dopy of the adsw on fik in this ofte. RICHARD O.HERNANDEZ,CITY CLERK CITY OF MA I Z I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Martinez at a Regular Meeting of said Council held on the 4th day of April, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers .Lewis, Ross, Schroder, Vice Mayor Woodburn and Mayor Menesini NOES: None ABSENT: None RICHARD G. "H�ERNANDITY CLERK CITY OF MAR is 10 Ya3x- s tires:uac�a iii r�r:.rr.:�?�?r' l BEFORE THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MORAGA A Resolution of the Town Council of the ) Town of Moraga Establishing the Rate per ) Resolution No. 12 - 2001 Equivalent Runoff Unit for FY 2001-2002 } At $20.00 and Requesting the Contra Costa ) County Flood Control and Water } Conservation District to Adopt an Annual ) Parcel Assessment for Drainage Maintenance ) And the National Pollutant Discharge ) Elimination System (NPDES) Program ) WHEREAS, under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1987, prescribed discharges of stormwater require a permit from the appropriate California Regional Water Quality Board under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Town to utilize funds received from its Stormwater Utility.Area (SUA)for implementation of the NPDES program and drainage maintenance activities; and WHEREAS, on September 1, 1993, the Town of Moraga did apply for, and did receive an NPDES permit which requires the implementation of selected Best Management Practices to minimize or eliminate pollutants from entering stormwaters; and WHEREAS, at the request of the Town, the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (DISTRICT) has completed the process for formation of an SUA, including the adoption of the Stormy,^rater Utility Assessment Drainage Ordinance No. 93-47; and WHEREAS, the Town Engineer has determined an Equivalent Run Off Unit (ERU) rate of $20.00 will provide sufficient funds to undertake the FY 2001- 2002 program needs. NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town of Moraga does determine that the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for FY 2001-2002 shall be set at$20.00. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Council does hereby request the DISTRICT to adopt SUA levies based on said amount. ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Moraga on the 14th day of March, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: Mayor William Vaughn, Vice Mayor Mike Majchrzak, Councilmember Lori Landis, Councilmember Dale Walwark and Councilmember Dennis Cunnane NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT:- None - William Vaugh , Mayor ATTEST Carol J. Lau, ToM Clerk BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORINDA In the Matter of: Establishing the Rate per Equivalent ) Runoff Unit for Fiscal Year 2001/02, ) and requesting the Contra Costa ) County Flood Control and Water ) Conservation District to Adopt an ) Resolution No. 22-01 Annual Parcel Assessment for ) Drainage Maintenance and the ) National Pollutant Discharge ) Elimination System Program ) WHEREAS, under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, prescribed discharges of stormwater require a permit from the appropriate California regional water quality control board, under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)program; and WHEREAS, the City of Orinda did apply for, and did receive, a NPDES permit which requires the implementation of selected Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize or eliminate pollutants from entering storm waters; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Orinda to utilize funds received from its Stormwater Utility Area (SUA) for implementation of the NPDES program and drainage maintenance activities;and WHEREAS, at the request of the City of Orinda; the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District ("District") has completed the process as required in order to form an SUA,including the adoption of the Stormwater Utility Assessment Drainage Ordinance No. 93- 47; and WHEREAS, the SUA and Program Group Costs Payment Agreement between the City of Orinda and the District requires that the City of Orinda annually,by May 1,determine the rate to be assessed to a single Equivalent Runoff Unit(ERU)for the forthcoming fiscal year. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Olinda does hereby determine that the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for FY 2001/2002 shall be set at $30.00. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Olinda does hereby request the District to adopt SUA levies based on said amount. Resolution 22-01, Page 1 of 2 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Orinda at a regular meeting of said Council held on April 17,2001, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Abrams,Hawkins,Tabor,Wheatland,Worth NOES: COUNCH-MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None Amy Wo h,Mayor Attest: OvdttA a . 61ith A. Hansen,City Clerk `ESD A`fRt IF t;rrY Resolution 22-01,Page 2 of 2 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PINOLE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of ) Establishing Stormwater Utility Equivalent ) Runoff Unit Rate for Fiscal Year 2001/2002 ) RESOLUTION NO. 118-2001 WHEREAS, under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, prescribed discharges of stormwater require a permit from the appropriate California regional water quality board under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)program, and WHEREAS, the City of Pinole did apply for, and did receive, a NPDES permit which requires the implementation of selected Best Management Practices to minimize or eliminate pollutants from entering stormwaters; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Pinole to utilize fiends received from its Stormwater Utility Area(SUA) for implementation of the NPDES program and drainage maintenance activities; and WHEREAS, at the request of the City of Pinole,the Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District(DISTRICT)has completed the process for formation of a SUA, including the adoption of the Stormwater Utility Assessment Drainage Ordinance No. 93-47; and WHEREAS,The SUA and Program Group Costs Payment agreement between the City of Pinole and the DISTRICT requires that the City of Pinole annually,by May 1,determine the rate to be assessed to a single Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU)for the forthcoming fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE BE 1T RESOLVED, by the Pinole City Council that it does determine that the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for FY 2001/2002 shall be set at$35.00. X\City AMm1R—bU0mU00IWPDES 01-0Z ERU Rata doc BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,by the Pinole City Council that it does hereby request the DISTRICT to adopt SUA levies based on said amount. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17TH day of April 2001 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Boyle, Cole, Murray, and Horton NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Alegria ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None DAWN G. B HAMSON, CMC/AAE DEPUTY CITY ERK her€.,4 c , y 1,nt nia for.,cai g is a true and correct copy of tPe original document on file in the City Clerk's Office, City of Pinole, Contra Costa County,State of California. Dawn 0,Abr am n,b uty Clerk of the City of Pinole XACity Aaiun\Reso1u ionsC001\NPDES 0102 ERU Raies.do April 18, 2001 State of California County of Contra Costa City of Pittsburg I, Alice E. Evenson, Deputy City Clerk in and for said City Council, City of Pittsburg, County of Contra Costa, State of California, do hereby certify that the hereto attached and foregoing document is a full, true and correct copy of the City Council Resolution No. 01- 9363, on file in this office of said City. This Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pittsburg on April 16, 2001. WITNESS, my hand, and Official Seal this 18`b day of April, 2001. Alice E. Evenson Deputy City Clerk BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG Resolution of the City Council of the ) City of Pittsburg Establishing the ) Rate Per Equivalent Runoff Unit ) for FY 2001/2002 and Requesting ) the Contra Costa County Flood ) Resolution No. 01-9363 Control and Water Conservation ) District to Adopt an Annual Parcel ) Assessment for Drainage Maintenance ) and the National Pollutant Discharge ) Elimination System Program ) WHEREAS, under Federal Water Pollution Control Act, prescribed discharges of stormwater require a permit from the appropriate California Regional Water Quality Board under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program; and WHEREAS, the City of Pittsburg (City) did apply for, and did receive, a NPDES permit which requires the implementation of selected Best Management Practices to minimize or eliminate pollutants from entering stormwaters; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City to utilize funds received from its Stormwater Utility Area (SUA) for implementation of the NPDES program and drainage maintenance activities; and WHEREAS, at the request of the City, the Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (District) has completed the process for formation of a SUA, including the adoption of the Stormwater Utility Assessment Drainage Ordinance No. 93-47; and WHEREAS, the SUA and Program Group Costs Payment agreement between City and District requires that City annually, by May 1, determine the rate to be assessed to a single Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) for the forthcoming fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg does determine that the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for FY 2000/2001 shall be set at $24.00. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg does determine that the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for FY 2001-2002 shall be set at $24.00. Page 1 of 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby request the DISTRICT to adopt SUA levies based on said amount. PASSED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 16'day of April, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: Council Member Aiello, Beals, Lewis, Rios and Mayor Quesada NAYES: None ABSTAINED: None ABSENT None Frank R. sada, Mayor ATTEST: Lillian J. Pride, City Clerk Resolution No. 01-9363 Page 2 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 24-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN THE STORMWATER.POLLUTION MANAGEMENT UTILITY DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING THE CONTRA COSTA FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT TO ADOPT THE FISCAL YEAR 2001/02 FEE FOR PLEASANT HILL'S STORMWATER UTILITY AREA WHEREAS, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act requires that stormwater discharges are to be regulated in urbanized areas by a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit; and Aarurn V e S, 4, 1099, the Cit, of Pleasant Hill, as a member of the Contra II aliarLa� Costa Clean Water Program, received a NPDES permit which requires the implementation of its Stormwater Management Plan to minimize pollutants from entering stormwaters; and WHEREAS, in 1993, the Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District established a Stormwater Utility Area at the request of the City of Pleasant Hill to provide funds to implement requirements of the NPDES permit; and WHEREAS, the City is required to annually renew its participation in the Stormwater Pollution Utility District and authorize the Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District to set the rate for the Pleasant Hill Stormwater Utility Area; and WHEREAS, the rate is the fee for one Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that: 1. The City Council desires to continue participation in the Stormwater Utility District and determines that the rats to be assigned to a single ERU for Fiscal Year 2001/02 shall be set at $30.00. 2. The City Council authorizes the Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District to adopt Stormwater Utility Fees on behalf of the City of Pleasant Hill. 3. The City of Pleasant Hill shall continue to participate in the implementation of the permitted Stormwater Pollution Control Program and agrees to provide support and to share costs associated with the implementation of group activities. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 16th day of April , 2001, by the following vote: AYES: Brandt, Durant, Escover, Williamson, Angeli NOES: None ABSENT: None 1 •r- SUZA E N E " Myor ATTEST: DORIS P. NILSEN, ity Clerk CEP' Fi:ER-ATRUCE COPY APPROVED AS TO FORM: l GFPU'IY CITY CLE ,CITY OF PLEASANT HILL DEBRA S�MARkOLI�, ity RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -49 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN PABLO ESTABLISHING THE STORMWATER UTILITY ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2001/2002 AND REQUESTING THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT TO ADOPT AN ANNUAL PARCEL ASSESSMENT FOR DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE AND THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT ACTIVITIES FOR THE CITY OF SAN PABLO. WHEREAS, under Federal Water Pollution Control Act, prescribed discharges of municipal stormwater require a Permit from the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations; WHEREAS, the City of San Pablo is a member agency in the Contra Costa Clean Water Program, which has developed a Stormwater Management Plan; WHEREAS, the Stormwater Management Plan serves as the basis for the NPDES Permit which is jointly held by the members of the Contra Costa Clean Water Program; WHEREAS, under the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Act, the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (.District) has specified duties and powers to implement and administer the Contra Costa Clean Water Program; WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 2768 (AB 2768) authorizes the Contra Costa County Flood Control District to establish, by resolution, stormwater utility areas within the District; as prescribed, and to impose, except as specified within AB 2768, an annual assessment within a stormwater utility area in conjunction with the NPDES program on behalf of the City of San Pablo; WHEREAS, the District has therefore established a stormwater utility assessment (SUA) to pay for the implementation and administration of the Stormwater Management Plan as requested by the City of an Pablo, including the adoption of the Stormwater Utility Assessment Drainage Ordinance No. 93-47 by the County; WHEREAS, prior to imposing any assessments within any public entity, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors must have authorization from the public entity as described in AB 2768; WHEREAS, the SUA and Program Group Costs Payment agreement between the City of San Pablo and the District requires that the City of San Pablo annually by May 1, determine the rate to be assessed to a single Equivalent Runoff Unit(ERU) for the forthcoming fiscal year; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Pablo adopted Resolution No. 93-21 in 1993, establishing a maximum SUA rate of$45.00 per ERU; JAW PF'ILES\2001I49npd—doe WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of San Pablo for fiscal year 2001-2002, to increase by $3.00 the stormwater utility assessment on parcels of property within the limits of the City of San Pablo, by which to continue to fund the City's NPDES Permit activities and drainage maintenance; WHEREAS, such NPDES assessment is exempt from the provisions of.Proposition 218, as California Constitution Article XIIIC, Section 5 exempts assessments formed exclusively to finance sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems or vector control. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Pablo hereby determines that the SUA rate for the City of San Pablo shall be set at $38.84 for each ERU for Fiscal Year 2001/2002. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Pablo hereby requests the Contra Costa County Flood Control District to process SUA levies based on $38.84 per ERU. ********** i Adopted this 16`h day of April 2001,by the following vote to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS Wysinger, Palmer, Brown, Vigil, Gomes NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS None ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/ Genoveva Garcia Calloway /s/ Joseph M. Gomes Genoveva Garcia Calloway, City Clerk Joseph M. Gomes,Mayor I hereby certify that the fo in is a full, true nd correct copy Precious Perry, Deputy City Clerk Assistant Executive Secretary. JAW PFILES1200I\Rnolmims\0149np&s.d- RESOLUTION NO. 2001-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCII, OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON ESTABLISHING A RATE OF$28 PER EQUIVALENT RUNOFF UNIT FOR FY 2001/02 FOR THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM STORMWATER PROGRAM AND REQUESTING THE CON'T'RA COS'T'A COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVA'T'ION DiST'It1CT 1'O ADOPT AN ANNUAL PARCEL ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, under Federal Water Pollution Control Act, prescribed discharges of stormwater require a permit from the appropriate California regional water duality board under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program; and WHEREAS, the City of San Ramon (CITY) did apply for, and did receive, a NPDES permit which requires the implementation of selected Best Management Practices to minimize or eliminate pollutants from entering stormwaters; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of San Ramon to utilize funds received from its Stormwater Utility Area (SUA) for implementation of the NPDES program and drainage maintenance activities; and WHEREAS, at the request of the City of San Ramon, the Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (DISTRICT) has completed the process for formation of a SUA, including the adoption of the Stormwater Utility Assessment Drainage Ordinance No. 93-47; and WHEREAS, The SUA and Program Group Costs Payment agreement between the City of San Ramon and DISTRICT requires that the City of San Ramon annually, by May 1, determine the rate to be assessed to a single Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) for the forthcoming fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT' RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Ramon does determine that the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for FY 2001/2002 shall be set at $28.00. B11" IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the .City Council does hereby request the DISTRICT to adopt SUA levies based on said amount. PASSED, APPROVL+'D, AND ADOPTED, this 24'x' day of April, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmernbers Kinney, Raab, Tatarka, Wilson and Mayor Hudson NOES: ABSENT: 1 hereby certify that this is a Jilt,true and accurate copy of a Resolution adopted by the City ABSTAIN: Council of the ltyofSan Ramon ° 7 � 7y Clerk David E. I-ludson, Mayor i'TEST: Judy h�� farlane. C t Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 01-11 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WALNUT CREEK ESTABLISHING THE CLEAN WATER PROGRAM RATE PER EQUIVALENT RUNOFF UNIT FOR FY 2001/2002 AND REQUESTING THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT TO ADOPT AN ANNUAL PARCEL ASSESSMENT FOR DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE AND THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PROGRAM WHEREAS, under Federal Water Pollution Control Act, prescribed discharges of stormwater require a permit from the appropriate California regional water quality board under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program; and WHEREAS, the City of Walnut Creek(CITY) did apply for, and did receive, a NPDES permit which requires the implementation of selected Best Management Practices to minimize or eliminate pollutants from entering stormwaters; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the CITY to utilize funds received from its Stormwater Utility Area(SUA) for implementation of the NPDES program and drainage maintenance activities; and WHEREAS, at the request of the CITY,the Contra Costa County Flood Control &Water Conservation District(DISTRICT)has completed the process for formation of a SUA, including the adoption of the Stormwater Utility Assessment Drainage Ordinance No. 93-47; and WHEREAS, The SUA and Program Group Costs Payment agreement between CITY and DISTRICT requires that CITY annually,by May 1, determine the rate to be assessed to a single Equivalent Runoff Unit(ERU) for the forthcoming fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Walnut Creek does determine that the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for FY 2001/2002 shall be set at$22.50. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby request the DISTRICT to adopt SUA levies based on said amount. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Walnut Creek at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of April 2001,by the following called vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Abrams, Skrel, Regalia, Rainey, Mayor Hicks NOES: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None /s/ Kathy Hicks Mayor of the City of Walnut Creek Attest: /s/ Barbara M. Rivara City Clerk of the City of Walnut Creek I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Walnut Creek, County of Contra Costa, State of California, at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 17th day of April 2001. Ci Clerk of the City of Walrut Creek THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Resolution on April 24, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Gioia, Gerber, Glover, and Uilkema NOES: Done ABSENT: Supervisor DeSaulnier ABSTAIN: Nene RESOLUTION NO. 2001/ 163 SUBJECT: ESTABLISH THE RATE PER EQUIVALENT RUNOFF UNIT FOR STORMWATER UTILITY AREA 17 (UNINCORPORATED COUNTY) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-02 AND REQUEST THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT TO ADOPT AN ANNUAL PARCEL ASSESSMENT FOR DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE AND THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PROGRAM The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT; WHEREAS,under Federal Water Pollution Control Act,prescribed discharges of stonnwater require a permit from the appropriate California regional water quality control board under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)program; and WHEREAS,the COUNTY of CONTRA COSTA did apply for, and did receive, a NPDES permit which requires the implementation of selected Best Management Practices to minimize or eliminate pollutants from entering stormwaters; and I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: April 24, 2001 DE\SW\:pam JOHN SWEETEN,Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and G:\GrpData\FldCtl\NPDES\BO\ County Administrator adoptResSUA17 REVISED 4-01.doc Originator: Public Works(FC) Contact: Pamela Miller(925)313-2238 c: D.Eckerson,Public Works By .Deputy RESOLUTION NO. 2001/163 SUBJECT: ESTABLISH EQUVALENT RUNOFF UNIT RATE FOR STORMWATER UTILITY AREA 17 (UNINCORPORATED COUNTY)FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 AND REQUEST CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT TO ADOPT ANNUAL PARCEL ASSESSMENT. DATE: APRIL 24,2001 PAGE: PAGE 2 of 2 WHEREAS, it is the intent of the COUNTY to utilize funds received from its Stormwater Utility Area(SUA)for implementation of the NPDES program and drainage maintenance activities; and WHEREAS, at the request of the COUNTY, the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (DISTRICT) has completed the process for formation of a SUA, including the adoption of the Stormwater Utility Assessment Drainage Ordinance NO. 93-47; and WHEREAS,the SUA and Program Group Costs Payment agreement between COUNTY and DISTRICT requires that COUNTY annually,by May 1,determine the rate to be assessed to a single Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) for the forthcoming fiscal year in the unincorporated County; and NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the COUNTY Board of Supervisors of the COUNTY of CONTRA COSTA does determine that the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for Fiscal Year 2001-02 shall be set at$30.00. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the COUNTY Board of Supervisors does hereby request the DISTRICT to adopt SUA 17 levies based on said amount. RESOLUTION NO. 38-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY ESTABLISHING THE RATE PER EQUIVALENT RUNOFF UNIT FOR FY 2001/2002 AND REQUESTING THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT TO ADOPT AN ANNUAL PARCEL ASSESSMENT FOR DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE AND THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PROGRAM WHEREAS, under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, prescribed discharges of stormwater require a permit from the appropriate California regional water quality board under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) program; and WHEREAS, the City of Oakley did apply for, and did receive, a NPDES permit which requires the implementation of selected Best Management Practices to minimize or eliminate pollutants from entering stormwaters; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Oakley to utilize funds received from its Stormwater Utility Area (SUA) for implementation of the NPDES program and drainage maintenance activities; and WHEREAS;,;at-the reques+of the City of Oakley, the.-Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (DISTRICT)'.has completed the process for formation of a SUA, including the adoption of the Stormwater Utility Assessment Drainage Ordinance No. 93-47; and WHEREAS, the SUA and Program GroupCosts:Payment agreement between the City of Oakley and DISTRICT requires that the City of Oakley annually, by May 1, determine the rate to be assessed to a single Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) for the forthcoming fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, that the City Council of the City of Oakley does determine that the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for FY 2001/2002 shall be set at $20.65. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Oakley does hereby request the DISTRICT to adopt SUA levies based on said amount. The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oakley, California this 91h day of April, 2001 by the following vote, to wit: Resolution No. 38-01 Page 1 AYES: Anderson, Nix, Vanek NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: Huffaker, Rios APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST: CIT LE I hereby certify that this is a true and accurate copy of Resolution No. IX U j adopted o ,v„�r,,,_T by the City Council of the City of Oakley. Rhonda Basore, Assistant City Clerk Resolution No. 38-01 Page 2 s� 4- • • . LEGAL PUBLICATION REQUISTION Contra Costa County Sr�•cduN`� From: Clerk of the Board To: Ledger Dispatch 651 Pine St., Room 106 PO Box 2299 Martinez, CA 94553 Antioch, CA 94549 Requested by: Patty Molloy Date: May 16, 2001 Phone No: 335-1907 (925) Reference No: 523 Org: 1100 Sub Object: 2190 Task: sAs Activity: Publication Date (s): May 22 and 29, 2001 No. of Pages: 2 LEGAL PUBLICATION- Notification of Hearing to Consider the Adoption of Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal, Year 2001-2002 for Stormwater Utility Areas 1-18, Countywide. Item C.20, 5/15/01 PLEASE CALL 10 ONETRM RECEIPT ****Immediately upon expiration of publication,* send in one affidavit for each publication in order that the auditor may be authorized to pay your bill. Authorized Signature: Please confirm date of publication & receipt of this fax. `fit.. .0,, • • LEGAL PUBLICATION REQUISTION Contra Costa County Jj•- •1 From: Clerk of the Board To: Contra Costa Times 651 Pine St., Room 106 PO Box 5124 Martinez, CA 94553 Walnut Creek, CA'94596 Requested by: Patty Molloy Date: May 16, 2001 Phone No: 925-335-1907 Reference No: 524 Org: 1100 Sub Object: 2190 Task: SAS Activity: Publication Date (s): May 19 and 26, 2001 No. .of Pages: 2 LEGAL PUBLICATION- .Notification of. Hearing to Consider the Adoption of Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 for. StormwaterAtility Areas -1-18, Countywide. Item C.20, 5/15/01 •!"lmmediately upon expiration of publication,**** send in one affidavit for each publication in order that the auditor may be authorized to pay your bill. Authorized Signature: Please confirm date of publication & receipt of this.fax. -"L1161... 's LEGAL PUBLICATION REQUISTION Contra Costa County Op •GPS .t'TA COIIN•� From: Clerk of the Board To: West County Times 651 Pine St., Room 106 PO Box 100 Martinez, CA 94553 Pinole, CA 94564 Requested by: Patty Molloy Date: May 16, 2001 Phone No: 925-335-1907 Reference No: 525 Org: 1100 Sub Object: 2190 Task: SAS Activity: Publication Date (s): May 19 and 26, 2001 No. of Pages: 2 LEGAL PUBLICATION- Notification of Hearing to Consider the Adoption of Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 for Stormwater Utility Areas 1-18. Item C.20, 5/15/01 P1 EASE C-A-T ,T , TO ONFIRM RECEIPT ""Immediately upon expiration of publication,"" send in one affidavit for each publication in order that the auditor may be authorized to pay your bill. Authorized Signature: Please confirm date of publication & receipt of this fax. PRLICATION OF NOTICE OF HEAR*G NOTIFICATION OF HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF STORMWATER UTILITY ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001- 2002 FOR STORMWATER UTILITY AREAS NO. 1 THROUGH 18, COUNTYWIDE. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County; as the Governing Body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, RESOLVES THAT; The Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Act, hereinafter referred to as Act, provides authority for said Governing Body to establish Stormwater Utility Areas, and adopt ordinance for Stormwater Utility Assessments; and The Board, On June 22, 1993, established Stormwater Utility area 1 (Antioch), 2 (Clayton), 3 (Concord), 4 (Danville), 5 (EI Cerrito), 6 (Hercules), 7 (Lafayette), 8 (Martinez), 9 (Moraga), 10 (Orinda), 11 (Pinole), 12 (Pittsburg), 13 (Pleasant Hill), 14 (San Pablo), 15 (San Ramon), 16 (Walnut Creek), 17 (Unincorporated County), and on May 9, 2000 established Stormwater Utility area 18 (Oakley). These areas consist of that real property located in the incorporated limits of the cities indicated and the unincorporated County; and This Board also has before it the Chief Engineer's report providing an estimate of the cost of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit activities to be borne by property in the individual Stormwater Utility Areas. This report will be on file within 30 days of the public hearing to adopt FY 2001-2002 Stormwater Utility Assessments, and may be examined at the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Administration Building, Martinez, California. It is proposed that Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 be adopted for Stormwater Utility Areas 1 through 18; and At 9:00 a.m. on June 12, 2001, in the Chambers of the Board of Supervisors, Administration Building, Martinez, California, this Board will conduct a public hearing on the adoption of Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Stormwater Utility Assessments. At the hearing, this Board will hear and pass upon any and all written and oral objections to the adoption of the proposed Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Stormwater Utility Assessments. Upon conclusion of the hearing, the Board may abandon the proposed actions, or proceed with the same. The exterior boundaries of the Stormwater Utility Areas include lands within the cities indicated above. -r BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIFORNIA AFFADAVIT OF MAILING In a Matter of Adopting Resolution 2001/194) Fixing June 12,2001 at 9:00 a.m.for a Public) Hearing on Stormwater Utility Assessments for) FY 2001/2002 for Stormwater Utility Areas) 1 through 18,Countywide.) I declare under penalty of perjury that I am now, and at all times herein mentioned have been,a citizen of the United States,over age 18;and that today I deposited in the United States Postal Service in Martinez, California, postage fully prepaid, a certified copy of Notice of Public Hearing To the following: See Attached Exhibit A I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated May 18, 2001 at Martine',lifomia. eputy } EXHIBIT A • Julie Haas-Wajdowicz Laura Hoffmeister Mike Vogan City of Antioch City of Clayton City of Concord P.O. Box 5007 6000 Heritage Trail 1455 Gasoline Alley Antioch, CA 94531-5007 Clayton, CA 94517 Concord, CA 94519-2578 Bruce King Erwin Blancaflor Jeff Roubal City of EI Cerrito City of Hercules City of Concord 10890 San Pablo Ave 111 Civic Drive 1455 Gasoline Alley El Cerrito, CA 94530 Hercules, CA 94547 Concord, CA 94519-2578 Julia Dos Santos Jim Zumwalt Bob Dunn City of Lafayette City of Martinez Town of Moraga P.O. Box 1968 525 Henrietta Street Santina & Thompson Lafayette, CA 94549-1968 Martinez, CA 94553-2394 1355 Willow Way, #280 Concord, CA 94520-5728 Maria Robinson Bill Mattick Ken Strelo City of Orinda City of Pinole City of Pittsburg P. O. Box 2000 2131 Pear Street 65 Civic Ave. Orinda, CA 94563 Pinole, CA 94564 Pittsburg, CA 94565 Todd Teachout Scott Christie Janice Carey, City of San Ramon City of Pleasant Hill City of San Pablo 2222 Camino Ramon 100 Gregory Lane One Alvarado Square P.O. Box 5148 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 San Pablo, CA 94806 San Ramon, CA 94583 Rinta Perkins Steve Wright Christine McCann City of Walnut Creek Contra Costa County Town of Danville P.O. Box 8039 255 Glacier Drive 510 La Gonda Way Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Martinez, CA 94553 Danville, CA 94526 Jason Vogan, City of Oakley Angela EI-Telbany P. O. Box 6 City of San Pablo 3633 Main Street One Alvarado Square Oakley, CA 94561 San Pablo, CA 94806 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AFFADAVIT OF MAILING In a Matter of Adopting Resolution ) 2001/194 Fixing June 12, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. for a Public Hearing on Storm- ) Water Utility Assessments for FY 2001/) 2002 for Stormwater Utility Areas 1-) 18, Countywide. ) I declare under penalty of perjury that I am now, and at all times herein mentioned have been, a citizen of the united States, over age 18; and that today I deposited in the Untied States Postal Service in Martinez, California,postage fully prepaid, a certified copy of Notice of Public Hearing To the following: RANDY BURKE C. TAYLOR DAVIDSON HOMES SEENO CONSTRUCTION CO. 1600 SOUTH MAIN ST#150 4021 PORT CHICAGO HWY WALNUT CREEK,CA 94596 P.O. BOX 4113 CONCORD, CA 94524-4113 JEFF LAWRENCE BRADDOCK&LOGAN 4155 BLACKHAWK PLZ CIR#201 DANVILLE,CA 94506-4613 GUY BJERKE HOME BUILDERS ASSN. OF NO. CALIFORNIA P.O. 5160 SAN RAMON,CA 94583-5160 DENISE PANTELES ROBERT SELDERS HOFMAN LAND DEVELOPMENT DIR OF FORWARD PLANNING P.O. BOX 758 1210 CENTRAL BLVD CONCORD,CA 94522 BRENTWOOD,CA 94513 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: May 18, 2001 Martinez, aliforni . By: Deputy Clerk 03/19/01 MON 08c51 F-AX 925 313 2333 CCC PITRUC WORKS 0001 Contra Pa'alliee rsDi PuDAe Worlca DSrectar Carta Public Works Department Patricia R.MaNamee 255 Glacier Drive Dcputy Divww County Mardi=.CA 945534897 Mitch Avalon (925)3 i3-20Gu Deputy Due= Julie Buaon Deputy Director FAX TRANSMITTAL (925)313-2333 DATE: 3-19-01 TLNM,. IDELMER TO: June—CIerk of the Board's OfE5i _._ _ FIRM. COB FAX NO.: 5-1913 SUBJECT: Rearing Reauest and ConfiTwation FROM: Pamela iller—Flood Control Division PHONE- 3-2238 NUMERR OF STdllrE+TS: 5 (Including Cover) If you have any probleins with this transmittal,please call 3-2000 MESSAGE- June—H(ae is the hearing request form I am uncertain as to whether or fiat we supply you with the verbiage foringtice of the hearing. Therefore I have attached three documents which I found in the file regardin is. at anoexrs they were generated from Voul� ffiice rather than oms). I will calla bit later to ensure refit of the fai and to unswer any questions Vnu may have In the iaterimlplease contact me if 1 failed to nxpvide an_y necess2ry documents. Itis my undetandingthe board order resolution an all other documents pining to this are due two weeks DriQt(4/25 in this case)to the actual request for the hearing(to occur oSf8 . Thank you. [ I original to follow 03/19/01 MON 08:52 FAX 925 313 2333 CCC PUBLIC WORKS 1a002 HEAFING C01 MA'I'ION FORM clearing Date: Ilme 12-2001(a)9:00 e.m_ Name of Pardon plwninB to Itrquest Heating: Pamela Miller Phone No.: 313-2239 _ Hearing nate Confirmed With; June of Clerk of the Board Staff on:March 19,2001. Agenda Language(how it Will read on the calendar): ADOPT STOR..M)V 4TFR UTILITY ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-02,FOR STORMWATER UTSLITY AREAS NO.1 THROUGH 18,COUNTYWIDE. 1. Anticipated length of the hearing: 5 minutes or less X or more 2, is it controversial? Yes No �C 3. Noticing Requirements: Publish Notice of hearing once a week for two(2)successive vveeks prior to the heaHng. Cede Section; Govprnment Cade 6066 4. Publication Requirements: Publication shall be completed at least seven(7)days before hearing and notice shall be given far a period of not less than twenty(20)days, 5. Who is to Publish the Notice? COB X_YWI)_ It is the responsibility of the department to provide the appropriate notice. Some noticm are adopted by Board Resolution.;the publication cannot be ordered until the ResohrNon is adopted by the Board of Supervisors. 6, If posting of notice is required,who will post? _/g 7. If utailinb the notice is required,who will provide the clerk with the correct mailing list and labels? Public Works will inchhde an Exhibit of mailing list and labels in set hearing materi s, 8. When will this"fix hearing item►'be listed on the Board agenda as a consent item? May_8 2001. PROOF OF PUBLICATION N OF(2015.5 C.C.P.) NG 1FICATITO CONS DER�THE ADOPTION OF STORM- . WATER UTILITY ASSESS- STATE OF CALIFORNIA M E NTS FOR FI SCAL YEAR 2001-2002 FOR County of Contra Costa AREAS WA 7ETR11ROUGH I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the 18,COUNTYWIDE. County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and The Board of supervisors of not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. Contra Costa County" as the Governing Body of the; Contra Costa County Flood; I am the Principal Legal Clerk of the Contra Costa Times, a Control a Water Conserve- newspaper of general circulation, printed and published at tion,RESOLVES THAT; 2640 Shadelands Drive in the City of Walnut Creek, County The Contra Costa County of Contra Costa,94598. Flood Control and Water Conservation District Act, hereinafter referred to as' And which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of Act,.provides authority for general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of iebliish storm anter Uteryl Contra Costa,State of California, under the date of October Areas, and adopt ordi-I 22, 1934.Case Number 19764. nance for Stormwater Utili- ty Assessments;and The notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in The Board on June zz, type not smaller than nonpareil),has been published in each 1983, established storm- , P water Utility area 1 (Antl- regular and entire issue of said newspaper at d riot in any uch), 2 (Clayton),.3 (Con- supplement thereof on the following dates,to-wit: cord), 4 Danville) s (EI Cemto)),6 ercules),7(La- rayette), (Martinez), 9 May 19,26 rvlora a), 1D (orinda, 11 Pinole, 12 iPittsburg; 13 all in the year of 2001 Pleasant Hill), Ramon>, 16 (walnut Creek), 17 nin- I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the corporated County),and on May 9, 2D00 established foregoing is true and correct. Stormwater Utility area 16 (Oakley).These areas con- Executed at Walnut Creek,California. 1_ cai d tiinathealIcorpporated n this 26 day Of May, 2001limits of the cities indicated and the unincorporated ` County;and .....:................ .. ................................... . Signature This Board also has before g it the Chief Engineer's re- Contra Costa Times port n9 an estimate of thea cost cost of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimi- P O Box 4147 nation System (NPDES) Walnut Creek,CA 94596ermit activities to be (925)935-2525 dome bysproperty in the In- d ividual tormwater Utility Areas.This report will be on Proof of Publication of: Assessments,and may be (attached is a copy of the legal advertisement that published) the Clerk or the Board of Supervisors,Administration Building, Martinez, Califor- nla. It is proposed that Storm- water Utilery Assessments for Fiscal tyear 2001-2002 be adopted for Storinwater -Utility Areas 1 through 18; and At 9:00 a.m. on June 12 2001 in the Chambers of r the 6oafd of Supervisors, Administration Building, Martinez California, this Board will conduct a pubic hearing on the adoption sof Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Stormwater Utility Assess- ments.At the hearing,this Board will hear and pass upon any and all written and oral oblectlons to the adoption of the proposed Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Stormwater Utility Assess- ments.Upon conclusion of the hearing the Board may abandon t a proposed ac- tions, or proceed with the same. The exterior boundaries of the Stormwater Utility Ar- eas include lands within th titles indicated above. Legal CCT 2091 Publish:May 19,26,2001 PROOF OF PUBLICATION NOTIFICATION OF HEAR-- (2015.5 C.C.P.) A OPTION OF STORM- WATER UTILITY ASSESS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA MENTSFORFISCAL YEAR 2001.2002 FOR County of Contra Costa AREAS NO. TER UTILITY THROUGH I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the 181COUNTYWIDE. County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and The Board of Supervisors of nota art to or interested in the above-entitled matter. Contra Costa County as party the Governing Body of the Contra Costa County Flood P 9 9 P tion,RESOLVES THAT; I am the Principal Legal Clerk of the Ledger Dispatch and Control&Water Conserve- Brentwood News. Newspapers of general circulation, printed and published at 2640 Shadelands Drive in the City of The Contra Costa County Walnut Creek,County of Contra Costa,94598. Connserva Control District Act, hereinafter referred to as Act, provides authority for And which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of said Governing Body to es- general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of tablish Stormwater Utility Contra Costa, State of California, under the date of March Areas, and adopt ordi- nance26, 1870. Case Number 746370. essments ands utile-. The Board on June 22, The notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in 1993, established Storm- type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each water Utility area 1 (Anti- ular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in an cord, 2 (Clayton), 3 (con re 9Y cord), 4 (Danville) 5 (El supplement thereof on the fol!owing dates,to-wit: Cerrito),6(Hercules},7(La- faYette), 99 (Martinez), 9 ((Morag9))a), 10 (Orinda), 11 MaV 22,29 fPleasant1HilljPlttsburg�. 11 f0 15 (San Ramon), 16 all in the year of 2001 alnut Creek), 17 (Unin- corporated County),and on May 9, 2000 established I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the Stormwater Utility area 18 foregoing is true and correct. (Oakley).These areas con- sist of that real property lo- cated In the incorporated Executed at Walnut Creek,California. limits of the cities indicated On this 29 dv of May 2001 and the unincorporated ( ty; This Board also has before �.................. it the Chief Engineer's re- Signature port providing an estimate of the cost of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimi- Ledger Dispatch and Brentwood News nation System (NPOES) P O Box 2299 permit activities to be home by roperty in thein- Antioch,CA 94531-2299 dividual Stormwater Utility (925)757-2525 Areas.This report will be on Assessments,and may be examined at the office of Proof of Publication of: the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors,Administration (attached is a copy of the legal advertisement that published) Building, Martinez,Califor- nia. It Is proposed that Storm- water Utility Assessments for Fiscal.Year 2001-2002 be adopted for Stormwater Utility Areas 1,through 18; and At 9:00 a.m: on June 12 2001 in the Chambers of the Board of Supervisors, Administration Building, Martinez California, this Board will conduct a public hearing on the adoption of Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Stcrmwatar Utility Assess- ments.At the hearing,this Board will hear and pass upon any and all written and oral objections to the adoption of the proposed Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Stormwater Utility Assess- ments.Upon conclusion of the hearing,the Board may abandon the proposed ac- tions, or proceed with the same. The exterior boundaries of the Stormwater Utility Ar- t eas Include lands within the cities indicated above. Legal LD80 6523 Publlsh:May 22,29,2001 St • 3D5 LEGAL PUBLICATION REQUISTION / Contra Costa County U/ From: Clerk of the Board To: Ledger Dispatch 651 Pine St., Room 106 PO Box 2299 Martinez, CA 94553 Antioch, CA 94549 Requested by: Patty Molloy Date: May 16, 2001 Phone No: 335-1907 (925) Reference No: 523 Org: 1100 Sub Object: 2190 Task: SAS Activity: S' ill Publication Date (s): May 22 and 29 2001 1 ` . No. of Pages: 2 LEGAL PUBLICATION- Notification of Hearing to Consider the Adoption of Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 for Stormwater Utility Areas 1-18, Countywide. Item C.20, 5/15/01 PLEASE CALL T C.O._LVEIRM RECEIPT ****Immediately upon expiration of publication,**** send in one affidavit for each publication in order that the auditor may be authorized to pay your bill. Authorized Signature: Please confirm date of publication & receipt of this fax. LEGAL PUBLICATION REQUISTION Contra Costa County sT'9 COON" From: Clerk of the Board To: West County Times 651 Pine St., Room 106 PO Box 100 Martinez, CA 94553 Pinole, CA 94564 Requested by: Patty Molloy Date: May 16, 2001 Phone No: 925-335-1907 Reference No: 525 Org: 1100 Sub Object: 2190 Task: SAS Activity: Publication Date (s): May 19 and 26, 2001 No. of Pages: 2 LEGAL PUBLICATION Notification of Hearing to Consider the Adoption of Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 for Stormwater Utility Areas 1-18. Item C.20, 5/15/01 PT E A SE CALL TO CONFIRM RECEIPT ""Immediately upon expiration of publication,"" send in one affidavit for each publication in order that the auditor may be authorized to pay your bill. Authorized Signature: Please confirm date of publication & receipt of this fax. PROOF OF PUBLICATION NOFICATINGnTO CONS DER TH (2015.5 C.C.P.) ADOPTION OF STORM- WATER UTILITY ASSESS- STATE OF CALIFORNIA M E N TS FO R F I S CA L County of Contra Costa STORMWATERO02 UTILIITTY AREAS NO. 1 THROUGH I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the 1e,COUNTYWIDE. County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and The Board of supervisors of as nota art to or interested in the above-entitled matter. Contra costa County he party the Governing Body of the Contra Costa County Flood I am the Principal Legal Clerk of the West County Times, a C n,t of&Water TCHonnTerva- newspaper of general circulation, printed and published at 2640 Shadelands Drive in the City of Walnut Creek, County oContra dauntoControl of Contra Costa,94598. 1 Conservation District Act, hereinafter referred to as Act, proJides authority for And which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of said Governing Body to es- general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of tablish Stormwater Utility Contra Costa, State of California, under the date of August Areas, and adopt ordi- nance for Stormwater UUII- 29, 1978. Case Number 188884. ty Assessments;and The Board on June 22, The notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in 1993, established Storm- type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each water utility area 1 Antl- ypp och), 2 (Clayton, 3 Con- regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any cord), 4 Danv!,le) (EI supplement thereof on the following dates,to-wit: cemto)),6 ercules),7(La- pp g layyette), A (Martinez), 9 (frloraga), 10 (Orinda, 11 May 19,26 (Pinole), 12 (Pittsburg; 13 Pleasant Hilo,14(San�ab- o 15. San Ramon), 16 all in the year of 2001 (Walnut reek), 17 (unin- corporated County),and on May 9;:2000.established I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the Stormwater Utility.area 18 foregoing is true and correct. tftrelplsiothaaproertyo- cated in the incorporated Executed at Walnut Creek,California. limits of the titles indicated On this 26 day of May, 2001 l and thendunincorporated CountyThis Board also has before ........... ............................................ ...... ............ it the Chief Engineer's re- Signature port providingp an estimate of the cost oT the National Pollutant Discharge Eliml- West County Times nation System (NPDES) P O Box 100 ermit appcwitles to be Pinole,CA 94564 di�ntlua y5tormwatertUtil in (510 262-2740 Areas.This report will be on ) Assessments,and may be examined at the office of Proof of Publication of: the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors,Administration I (attached is a copy of the legal advertisement that published) Building, Martinez,.Califor- nia. It is proposed that Storm- water Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 be adopted for Stormwater Utility Areas 1 through 18; and At 9:00 a.m. on June 12 ' 2001 in the Chambers,ot the hoard of Supervisors, Administration Building, Martinez California, this Board will conduct a public hearing on the adoption of, Fiscal Year 2001-2002; Stornv+atcr Utflity Assess- ments.At the hearing this Board will hear and pass upon any and all written and oral objections to.the adoption:of.the proposed Rscal Year 2001-2002 Stormwater Utility Assess- ments.Upon conclusion of the hearing,the Board may abandon trie.proposed ac- tions, or proceed with the same. The exterior boundaries of the Stormwater Utility Ar- eas Include lands within the titles indicated above. Legal WCT 2146. Publish:May 19,26,2001