Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05222001 - C.121 =` ' == • Contra Td: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - :a Costa Ott FROM: John Cullen, Director IN4 Xx'' County Employment and Human Sery c -Department °�;•; ;�;-�Ty,I a roux DATE: April 18, 2001 SUBJECT: ACCEPT.the Job Creation Investment Fund Final Report. SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDED ACTION: -ACCEPT the Job Creation Investment Fund Final Report. FISCAL: No County cost. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The program supported community outcomes #3 "Families that are Economically Self Sufficient" and #4 "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing" by the expansion of the job market and the creation of opportunities for CaIWORKs participants to obtain unsubsidized employment. BACKGROUND: Ca1WORKs legislation, AB 1542, established the Job Creation Investment Fund and named the California Trade and Commerce Agency as the lead State agency for the administration of the fund. The Trade and Commerce Agency disbursed funds on a grant basis for planning, development and implementation of job creation strategies. Contra Costa County applied for and received grant funds totaling $80,492 for the development and implementation of a Job Creation Plan. The Board established a Job Creation Task Force with leadership from the Contra Costa County Employment and Human Services Department and the Contra Costa Economic Partnership to develop and implement the Job Creation Plan. The Job Creation Investment Fund Implementation Plan was adopted by the Board, April 6, 1999. Implementation of the plan created significant long term community benefits for job development by expanding the connections between the small business community in West Contra Costa County, the Richmond Chamber of Commerce, West Contra Costa Business Development Center and the Employment and Human Services Department job development staff. The needs of small businesses were identified and, by recognizing and meeting those needs,jobs were created for low income and Ca1WORKs recipients. The Final Report prepared by the Contra Costa Economic Partnership identifies the mechanisms used in the development of the job creation program and program outcomes. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT:XYES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE `kPPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BO D May 22, 2001 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED XX OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE XX UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ----- ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. ATTESTED May 22, 2001 JOHN SWEETEN,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Contact: DON CRUZE,3-1582 -- cc: EHSD CONTRACTS UNIT(EB) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BY DEPUTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER CONTRACTOR FINAL REPORT December 29, 2000 JOB CREATION IMIESTMENT FUND State Of California Trade & Commerce Agency Grant No. C98-0104 Contra Costa County Prepared By Don Manning Contra Costa Economic Partnership 1001 Galaxy Way (Suite 102) Concord, CA 94520 (925) 681-3266 MAR-22-2001 11=45 95% P,03 JCIF FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS PaRe introduction 1 Summary 1 Discussion 2 Positive Outcomes 4 Lessons learned 5 Table of Performance Indicators 6 SUPPLEMENTARY ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 JCIF Grant Application Attachment 2 JCIF Implementation Plan Attachment 3 Members of the Job Creation Task Force Attachment 4 Minutes of JCTF Meetings Attachment 5 Memorandum.of Understanding Attachment 6 Small Business Survey Attachment 7 Small Business Noeds Agent Attachment 8 Minutes of JCIF Implementation Team Meetings Attachment 9 Quarterly Reports to California Trade&Commerce ' Not included with the Final Report. For copies of any of the Supplementary Attachments,call Don Manning at(925)681-3266. 1 C:1DVM DoanenM1s10CFPUCWundUCIF Final Repo&TABLE OF CONiENTS.doc PIAR-22-2001 1145 95% P.04 INTRODUCTION On behalf of all the participants in the Contra Costa County JCIF project,and especially on behalf of those CalWORKS recipients who have benefitted from the project, we wish to thank the California Legislature,and the California Trade&Commerce Agency, for providing the funding and support to make this a very worthwhile project. Special recognition should be given to the members of the JCIF Implementation Team who participated so diligently in achieving the JCIF objective: Judy Morgan,Richmond Chamber of Commerce;Alex Gomez,West Contra Costa Small Business Development Center;Karen Morgan,Contra Costa County Social Services Department;Tom Brafford,General Chemical Corporation;and Don Manning,Contra Costa Economic Partnership. For more information on this project,call Don Manning at the Contra Costa Economic Partnership,925-681-3266. SUMMARY As part of California's Welfare-to-Work Act,in 1997 the Legislature passed AB-1542,which created the Job Creation Investment Fund(JCIF). The purpose of this fund was to stimulate economic development activity to create jobs for CalWORKS recipients. Contra Costa County received a grant of$80,492 under this program(refer to Supplementary Attachment 1,JCIF Grant Application). The Contra.Costa County Board of Supervisors designated the Contra Costa Economic Partnership as the specified countywide economic development organization to coordinate development of the Plan. The Contra Costa County Social Services Department was designated as the fiscal agent for the grant,and functioned as the lead County department, providing staff support and expertise. The JCIF grant required the establishment of a Job Creation Task Form(JCTF),a diverse group representing many organizations involved in job creation and employment of Ca1WORKS recipients.The JCTF was established in mid-1998 as a sub group within the Workforce Development Advisory Panel,which was the predecessor to the Workforce Investment Board (established by the Workforce Investment Act). Don Manning,representing the Contra Costa Economic Partnership,was designated to chair the Job Creation Task Force. The JCTF established the mission,developed the Implementation Plan(refer to Supplementary Attachment 2,JCIF Implementation Plan),and designated the JCIF Implementation Team to progress the project.The mission of the JCIF Implementation Team was to"crcate jobs for Ca1WORKS recipients in the small business sector in West Contra Costa County"_ Membersof the JCIF Implementation Team included the: ■ Judy Morgan,Richmond Chamber of Commerce, ■ Alex Gomez,West Contra Costa Business Development Center, ■ Kareen Mangan,Contra Costa County Social Services Departrncnt, ■ Tom Brafford,General Chemical Co.and Board Chair of the Richmond C of C ■ Don Manning,Contra Costa Economic Partnership. These members were chosen because they represented existing organizations that had as part of their mission the support of small businesses to grow and create jobs in West Contra Costa County,including jobs for CalWORKS recipients. The JCIF Project Implementation Team developed various approaches to job creation for CalWORKS recipients in the small business sector in West Contra Costa County,utilizing business surveys,cluster analysis, interviews,task teams and focus groups. A real strength of the C:1DVM Docum—L rFFUC1FuadUC1F Finer RcpoK\Dmft Finan Rcpot022900.doc MAR-22-2001 11=46 95% P.05 I I GL V1 1V. .JVa approach is that it utilized existing organizations. The groundwork has been put in place such that the Richmond Chamber of Commerce and the West Contra Costa Business Development Center are continuing to take actions that will create job opportunities for Ca1WORKS recipients. The objective of the JCIF Implementation Project was job creation for CaIWORKS recipients. Quantifying the success of the project in this regard has proven to be extremely challenging. Actual job creation depends on the businesses growing and creating those jobs,which takes time. . Following up with the individual businesses would take time and money,especially considering how diverse and scattered these small businesses are. The JCIF Implementation Project had neither the time nor the money to determine with any certainty how many jobs were actually created. However,we did make an educated guess as to the hiring impact. This estimation is shown in Table 1. We estimate a total of 44 jobs were created in the saraff business sector in West Contra costa County,with 22 of those jobs going to CaIWORKS recipients. There are admittedly some very broad assumptions that had to be made to arrive at those figures,but we are convinced that it is a good approximation of the probable results. This number exceeds the JCIF Implementation Plan goal of creating 20 jobs for CaIWORKS recipients in West Contra Costa County. Besides these projected benefits,perhaps even more important in the long-term is the strengthening of two organizations that will continue to be strong supporters of job creation for Ca1WORKS recipients,the Richmond Chamber and the WCC BDC. Other long-term benefits will be gained firm strengthening communications between the County Social Services Department and the small businesses and their organizations,to faciilitate hiring of Ca1WORKS recipients in the future. The distribution of the budget for the JCIF Implementation Project is shown below: Richmond Chamber of Commerce $30,000 West Contra Costa Business Development Center 30,000 Contra Costa Economic Partnership 20,492 TOTAL $80,492 The final meeting of the Contra Costa County Job Creation Investment Fund Implementation Team took place on October 27,2000. This concluded a two-year collaborative effort to achieve; the objective ofthe Contra Costa County Job Creation Investment Fund Implementation Project, which was to"create jobs for CaIWORKS recipients in the small business sector in West Contra Costa County". DISCUSSION The JCIF required the establishment of Job Creation Task Force,a diverse group representing many organizations involved in job creation and employment of CalWORKS recipients.The JCTF was established in raid-1998 as a sub-group within the Workforce Development Advisory Panel(WDAP),the countywide organization committed to coordinating workforce development activities in Contra Costa County. Don Manning,representing the Contra Costa Economic Partncxship,was designated to chair the Job Creation Task Force. On May 20, 1998,a presentation was made to the Workforce Development Advisory Panel Of Contra Costa County,proposing that the JCIF be established as a task force within the WRAP. This proposal was accepted. Membership in the JCTF was designated to be a wide cross section from the business,education,government and community-based organizations. Membership in the JCTF is shown in Supplementary Attachment 3. C:IDV%f Documents%CCEFVC1FundVC1F Final ReportOra(t Final RepoR1229W.doc 7 NEAR-22-2081 11=47 95% P.06 The first meeting of the JCTF was held on September 10, 1998,at the Contra Costa Economic Partnership. The main objective was to narrow the focus of the JCIF project, recognizing the ' limited funds and timeframe available. A subsequent meeting of the full JCTF was held on November 24 at the City of Richmond. Minutes from these meetings are contained in Supplementary Attachment 4. These two meetings narrowed the focus to "create jobs far Ca1WORKS participants in the small business sector in West Contra Costa County,utilizing c sting organizations':The small business sector was identified because it is a dynamic part of the Contra Costa County economy that has great potential for job creation for CaIWORKS participants. This sector is extremely dynamic and diverse---it is very difficult to connect with these businesses. This sector also has very special obstacles to hiring CaIWORKS participants. Innovative approaches were needed,which hopefully could serve as a model for other JCIF programs. West Contra Costa County was selected because that area has the greatest concentration of CaIWORKS recipients in Contra Costa County. The intention was to conduct similar projects in Central and Fast Contra Costa County,if funding was made available.The JCTF wanted to utilize existing organizations to avoid new bureaucracies and build on existing efforts. The Plan defined by the JCTF for accomplishing "Job creation for CaIWORKS recipients in the small business sector in West Contra Costa County un�zing existing_orgar:izations"wri defined as follows: 1. Establish a JCIF West County Implementation Team to finalize this Plan and oversee implementation of the Plan,including expenditum of funds. 2. Designate roles and responsibilities for parties involved in implementing the Plan. 3. Develop a database of small businesses in West Contra Costa.County. 4. Identify 3—5 business clusters that exist in West Contra Costa County that have the most potential for job creation for CaIWORKS participants. 5. Identify 3—5 companies in each business cluster to interview regarding what is needed for those businesses to carate jobs,some of those jobs to be filled by CaIWORKS participants. 6. For each business cluster,identify the highest priority needs that must be addressed in order to create jobs for CaIWORKS participants. 7. Develop a plan to address those high priority needs,which would create jobs for CalWORKS participants if those needs were met Two organizations were identified whose missions were closely aligned with the objective of"job creation for CaIWORKS participants in the small business sector in West Contra Costa":the Richmond Chamber of Commence,and the West Contra Costa Business Development Center. These two organizations,along with the Contra Costa County Social Service Department and the Contra.Costa Economic Partnership,were designated as the JCIF Project Implementation Team. The implementation of the JCTF directive was accepted by the members of this group.A "Memorandum of Understanding"was drafted and signed by all parties,and is included in Supplementary Attachment 5. The Richmond Chamber of Commerce coordinated development of a database of over 5,000 small businesses in West Contra Costa County. A survey(Supplementary Attachment 6)was mailed to each of these businesses,questioning what each business needed to grow and hire more people. Over 300 responses were received. A consultant,Dr. D.K.Simmons, was retained to analyze the responses and group the respondents according to a"business needs assessment". The responses were analyzed according to business needs,and business cluster. The Small Business Needs Assessment is shown in Supplementary Attachment 7. For each of the eight areas of business needs,a plan was established to meet those needs,and support the growth of those small businesses and create jobs,some of which would be for CADVM Dmum=tarCCMC1Fund1JCIF Fined RgmtlDmft Final Report122900.doc 3 MAR-22-2001 1148 95% P.O? CaIWORKS recipients. The top three needs were identified as"Expand my customer base", Improve my business operations",and"Find good people to hire". Each of these needs was addressed with specific actions. For example,any business indicating a need to hire people was referred to the Contra Costa County Social Services Department Job Outreach Coordinator,a follow-up phone call was made,and the benefits of hiring a CaIWORKS recipient was discussed. Three clusters were identified as offering the most potential for job creation for CaIWORKS recipients were: Small Manufachuing,Automotive Cardrepair,and Care Providers. For each of. these clusters,a plan was established for job creation there. For example,a Small Manufacturers Task Force has been established to address the particular needs of small manufacturers m West Contra Costa.County. Four meetings have been held,with the objective of helping those businesses to prosper,and create high-paying jobs for CalWORKS recipients. An innovative approach to job creation in the small business sector was the initiative to the non- English-speaking business community,which is very significant in West Contra Costa County. The`Business Needs Survey"that was mailed to 5,000 small businesses was also translated into Spanish,Vietnamese and Mandarin Chinese. This survey was delivered by surveyors who spoke the native language of the business. In this way,for perhaps the first time,an effort was made to conned these businesses to the West Contra Costa Business Development Center and the Richmond Chamber of Commerce,so that they could benefit from the many services.and support activities that could be available. Inasmuch as many of the CalWORKS recipients are of these ethnic groups,this could have proven to be an especially fruitful approach to job creation for CalWORKS recipients,if time and money had been available. There were 20 monthly meetings of the JCIF Project Implementation Team between March 1999 and October 2000. Minutes from these meetings are shown as Supplementary Attachment 8. Three Quarterly Reports issued to California Trade&Commerce are included as Supplementary Attachment 9. POSITIVE OUTCOMES 1. Jobs were created for CalWORKS recipients,although it has been very hard to quantify how many. Best estimate at this point is about 5 new job placements. 2. The JCIF Project helped the Job Developers in Employment&Human Service make contact with potential employers,possibly setting up contacts for fudme employment of CalWORKS recipients. 3. Small.businesses had an opportunity to make their needs known,and benefitted from the assistance from the Richmond Chamber and the WCC BDC. 4. Survey respondents,through their contact with the Chamber,learned more.about the services offered by the Chamber. This has resulted in 3—5 new Chamber members. 5. A methodology has evolved for job creation for CaIWORKS recipients: work with existing organizations(Chamber and BDC)to identify the needs of small business(survey and interviews),and support those businesses in growing and creating jobs for CaIWORKS recipients,utilizing business cluster analysis and focus groups. This model could be used in other parts of the County. 6. The database of 5,000 small businesses in West Contra Costa County is a valuable tool for continuing contact with small businesses for a variety of purposes. For example,County Employment&Human Services may want to use it for continuing job development. 7. The Survey was an excellent tool for identifying the needs of small business. The good response(about 300 were returned)indicates that small businesses are interested in utilizing resources to help grow their businesses. 8. Breaking the survey information into business clusters,and categories of needs,was very useful in determining how to meet the needs of a particular sector for job creation. C:OV.M Do umeats\CCEPVC1F=&JCIF Final RepaatOraft Find Repon122M.doc 4 MAR-22-2001 11=49 95% P.08 1 9. At least one small business cluster group was formed,to continue to work for the prosperity of that sector(small manufacturers)in West Contra Costa County. Other clusters are being reviewed to possible focus on(e.g.,ceramics,day care,automotive). 10. The JCIF Project provided an opportunity for communication and cooperative efforts among four of the principal job creation/business activity organizations in West Contra Costa County. 11. The make-up of the JCIF Project Implementation Team was good--participation included the key organizations to address the issue,and was not too large to be cumbersome. 12. The Richmond Chamber was able to expand its contacts with small business,and gain more insights into the needs and aures of small business. Even though the JCIF Project is finished, the Chamber will continue to follow up on a number of leads developed during the Project. 13. The West Contra Costa Business Development Center had the opportunity to reach many small businesses through the JCIF Project. These businesses were then able to take advantage of the counseling and training offered by the BDC,and will confume.to do so for quite some time. They will also provide proof of the value of the BDC services to an increasing number of other small businesses. 14. As a result of worldng together,the County has a better understanding of the services offered by the WCC BDC,and may utilize the BDC for bmining,especially skill improvement for moving up the employment ladder. 15. A real strength of the approach is that it utilized existing organizations. 16. A third party facilitator was necessary to keep focused and on track. LESSONS LEARNED 1. Connecting with the small business community is very difficult. They are scattered, diverse and changeable and focused on their business with no time available for other activities. Probably the major accomplishment of the JCIF Project was to establish a significant connection to the small business community. 2. The difficulty in tracking actual job creation and hiring has been frustrating. Quantifying the actual hiring that resulted from the JCIF Project has proven to be quite difficult. In most cases,hiring of CaIWORKS recipients will take some time to happen. 3. The booming economy changed the priorities from needing job creation to needing qualified workers_ Impacting the creation of new jobs became much more difficult. 4. It may have been beneficial if the City of Richmond and the Chambers of the other cities in West Contra Costa.County had staff available to participate. 5. The"one-shot"nature of JCIF funding only allowed for a project of very limited scope. Longer term funding would have allowed for a longer planning horizon,more time to realize the benefits,and application to other areas.For example,a similar JCIF Project could have been started up in Central and East Contra Costa County. However,the limited funding did force participants to be very efficient regarding time expended. The worthwhile results of the project were then carried on by the participating organizations on their own,without the need for additional funds. This was probably better than establishing a bureaucratic program with the associated inefficiencies. CADVM Dowmoras\CCEPUCIFundUCIF Fain RePat%Draft Fimt Rcportr22900.doc 5 MAR-22-2001 11=53 95% P.02 �y N M M N M N N 02 V L t \O No 't \O Q 141 41 F W 1+1 V at c c `n iln o 156 go to E-4 E.4 O o � u u W 1rQ�r. � �j QQ7� � Y+ ^a' y y VyJ M � e�'�� •� � �v+ � it •V ..i'� aw E 8.np v 5 = a u o y O a� �53 vii O U m 7t r o w 4-. w py pw a p o of ayeC pV� w a O LL �Tr O Y w w .�"1. cq y O w C.l w5 w 1� 0 u uNGo4. Ov © � ua' cGi 67 'moo uw 0 u -- r- � F ,.~� N O 00 00 M 0 z 10 O (�WWyI O O a0 In C r '. v O [ .� r� G ra ri O d W ami e� 0 0 o bel p4 8 °r,, V � UU. v� u An 'g O eo -5 22 i3 y 9 ra3 � 0 Q Co � o c w N 4? Ou y •Jr- Q v y Q wA � � �4�� ►� '� 3 y I.n N a.. a.. y0 O b O w 7 O w w a 5 .= N u o N y G z tG� ..1 N p w to b0 mcd u c� 'p •� d V do v �e' juU. bl � U '� G � E. aC+ 3 w y� �- c �•/.' o �,wUcOU 'N� 5 , °' °C°- O w cm 'A C1. �.+ c W w u 3 � S 3 cd A P. y > G�+ GA 6 MAR-22-2001 11=53 94% P.03 :4; ��al � `�To: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS • FROM: Barton J. Gilbert, Director of General Services Contra Costa DATE: May 22, 2001 ---- County StZ COUM ' SUBJECT: REQUEST TO PURCHASE VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT ON BEHALF OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY SPECIFIC REQUESTS OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION(S): L . APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Fleet Manager to purchase (1) Ford Explorer on behalf of the District Attorney for the replacement of a 1991 Chevrolet Blazer with 115,000 miles. BACKGROUND: In accordance with Administrative Bulletin No. 508: "County Vehicle and Equipment Acquisition and Replacement Policy with Guidelines," approval is requested for the purchase of the above-referenced vehicles and equipment. Based on a review of the need for the new vehicles/equipment and consideration of alternative fiieled vehicles, the Fleet Manager recommends approval of this request. This request has been reviewed and approved by the County Administrator for consideration by the Board of Supervisors. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON May 22. 2001 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AYES: NOES: ABSENTS: ABSTAIN: MEDIA CONTACT: CC: General Services—Admin I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN Fleet Division AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD County Administrator OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Auditor-Controller District Attorney ATTESTED May 22 , 2001 JOHN SWEETEN,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BY DEPUTY F:\VehicleReplacementBoardOrders\DistAttorney\BrdOrder Purch 1 FordExpl Per DistAttorneyMay222001.doc Page 1 of 1 M382(10/88) ~ AUDITOR-CONTROLLER USE ONLY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY J FINALAPPROVAL NEEDED BY: APPROPRIATIONS ADJUSTMENT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TIC 27 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ACCOUNT CODING BUDGET UNIT: SLESF-CRIMINAL PROSECUTION (BU 0241) EXPENDITURE SUB-ACCOUNT ! ORGANIZATION EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION < DECREASE> INCREASE i 0241 2310 Non-Cnty Prof/Spclzd Svcs 24,306 00 0241 4953 Autos and Trucks 24,306 I I I I II i I I I I j I i I I j TOTALS 24,306 24_,306 oc APPROVED EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER )NAL SIGNED 13y: p�/►Y 0 20U1 By: J P r;ARj4E* Date To replace a Ford Explorer whose high mileage and frequent COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR repairs make it unavailable for needed transport of large amounts of evidence (non-general fund). By: Date i BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUPERVISORS GIOIA,UILKEMA, YES: GERBER,DESAULNIER,GLOVER I NO: None _IA.A.,_ChAdmin nni &Plang 4/23/01 SIGNATURE TITLE DATE John Sweeten,04§fthe Board Lof Super:.Viso s:��4 4,,u.,. Admii'h trator APPROPRIATION AP 00 By: Date-"May 22 , 2001 ADJ JOURNAL NO. (M129REV2/86) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE • VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT REQUEST FORM (Use a separate request for each vehicle request) Department: District Attorney Date 4/17/01 Authorized Signatory 1.Description of vehicle or piece of equipment requested: Ford Explorer with cold plates 2.Reason for vehicle request: Replacement for Vehicle # 3610, which has become undependable with its high mileage. 3.Funding Source: State COPS funds Is an appropriation adjustment needed? Yes X No 4.Is an alternative fueled vehicle acceptable? Yes No X If answer is no, reason clean air vehicle will not work. The limited range does not meet our law enforcement needs. 5.If replacement vehicle, please show the following for vehicle to be replaced: ♦ vehicle number # 3610 ♦ odometer reading 115,000+ i 6.Reason purchase can not wait until next budget cycle: Vehicle needs to be replaced ASAP because frequent breakdowns and repairs make it unavailable when needed to transport large amounts of evidence. FOR FLEET MANAGEMENT COMPLETION: 1. Inspection /evaluation by Fleet Mana ent to condition of vehicle: Date of Inspti n: 6P/• Make: `J Model ♦ Year: • Depreciation: • Salvager J DUD Estimated cost of request: Conditi n of v icle/equipment and fife expectancy: .�u,,,,,., J� G, a 2. Fleet Management Signatory: 3. CAO Signatory: / Approved Not Approved 4. Date for Board Order r VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT REQUEST FORM (Use a separate request for each vehicle request) Department: District Attorney Date 4/17/01 Authorized Signatory 1.Description of vehicle or piece of equipment requested: Ford Explorer with cold plates 2.Reason for vehicle request: Replacement for Vehicle # 3610, which has become undependable with its high mileage. 3.Funding Source: State COPS funds Is an appropriation adjustment needed? Yes X No 4.Is an alternative fueled vehicle acceptable? Yes No X If answer is no, reason clean air vehicle will not work. The limited range does not meet our law enforcement needs. 5.If replacement vehicle, please show the following for vehicle to be replaced: • vehicle number 4 3610 • odometer reading 115,000+ 6.Reason purchase can not wait until next budget cycle: Vehicle needs to be replaced ASAP because frequent breakdowns and repairs make it unavailable when needed to transport large amounts of evidence. FOR FLEET MANAGEMENT COMPLETION: 1. Inspection /evaluation by Fleet Management as to condition of vehicle: • Date of Inspection: • Make: el • Year: • Depreciation: • Salvage: • Estimated cost of request: Condition of vehicle/equipment and life expectancy: 2. Fleet Management Signatory: 3. CAO Signatory: Approved Not Approved 4. Date for Board Order VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT REQUEST FORM (Use a separate request for each vehicle request) Department: District Attorney Date 4/17/01 Authorized Signatory 1.Description of vehicle or piece of equipment requested: Ford Explorer with cold plates 2.Reason for vehicle request: Replacement for Vehicle # 3610, which has become undependable with its high mileage. 3.Funding Source: State COPS funds Is an appropriation adjustment needed? Yes X No 4.Is an alternative fueled vehicle acceptable? Yes No X If answer is no, reason clean air vehicle will not work. The limited range does not meet our law enforcement needs. 5.If replacement vehicle, please show the following for vehicle to be replaced: o vehicle number # 3610 o odometer reading 115,000+ 6.Reason purchase can not wait until next budget cycle: Vehicle needs to be replaced ASAP because frequent breakdo,,vns and repairs make it unavailable when needed to transport large amounts of evidence. FOR FLEET MANAGEMENT COMPLETION: 1. Inspection /evaluation by Fleet Management as to condition of vehicle: o Date of Inspection: o Make: el o Year: o Depreciation: ,,. o Salvage: o Estimated cost of request: Condition of vehicle/equipment and life expectancy: 2. Fleet Management Signatory: 3. CAO Signatory: Approved Not Approved 4. Date for Board Order