Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03062001 - C.64 007 0/ s, Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Costa sT�"F iirr�. FROM: TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE County Supervisor Donna Gerber, Chair Supervisor John Gioia, Member DATE: March 6, 2001 SUBJECT: REPORT ON GRANT APPLICATION SUBMITTED FOR FUNDING FROM PROPOSITION 13, THE CALIFORNIA WATER BOND APPROVED BY VOTERS IN MARCH OF 2000 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: DECLARE the Board of Supervisors' support for a grant application submitted by the Community Development Department for$80,000 from the State Water Resources Control Board to support watershed mapping and GIS development. FISCAL IMPACT None. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The Community Development Department, in coordination with the Public Works Department and on behalf of the Contra Costa Watershed Forum, submitted a grant application to the State Water Resources Control Board on February 1, 2001 under two programs funded by Proposition 13, the Watershed Protection Program and the Non-Point Source Pollution Control Program. If the grant were successful, the funds would be used to perform the West County Watershed Mapping project initiated by Supervisor Gioia, and the development of a countywide Watershed Atlas and Creek Restoration Strategy conceived by the Contra Costa Watershed Forum. These GIS development activities would an important first step toward understanding how our watersheds function and developing plans for enhancing creek corridors. An excerpt from the grant application is attached and provides additional background. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE HER IL SIGNATURE(S): Supervisor Don Gerber (Chair) upervisor John Gioia ACTION OF BOARD ON March 6 , 2001 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDEDxx OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE xx UNANIMOUS (ABSENT - - - - ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: John Kopchik (925) 335-1227 ATTESTED March 6 . 2001 cc: Community Development Department (CDD) JOHN SWEETEN-. CLERK OF County Administrator THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Public Works Department, attn: Mitch Avalon AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR WAPersonal\John main\twibopropl3grant.doc B , DEPUTY ' APPLICATION PART A CCC COMMUNI•TY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATERSI4EDS INVENTORY AND CREEKS RESTORATION STRATEGY PART A - COVER PAGE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD SFY 2001 Costa-Machado Water Act of 2000 Chapter 6,Article 2, Watershed Protection Program APPLICANT: Contra Costa County Community Development Department (on behalf of the Contra Costa Watershed Forum) ADDRESS: 651 Pine Street 4 Floor, North Wing Martinez, CA 94553 PROJECT DIRECTOR: John Kopchik E-MAIL jkopc@cd.co.contra-costa.ca.us FAX NO.: (925)335-1299 ADDRESS: PHONE NO.: (925)335-1227 FEDERAL TAX ID. NO.: 94-6000-509 PROJECT TITLE: Contra Costa County Watersheds Inventory and Creeks Restoration Strategy PROBLEM(S) BEING ADDRESSED: Non-point source pollution (including diazinon, sediment, and pathogens), riparian habitat degradation and fragmentation, and creek channel modifications which impede fish passage and impair naturl hydrological processes. WATERBODY/WATERSHED: All watersheds in Contra Costa County FISCAL SUMMARY: Prop 13 Funds Requested $80,000 (minimum [$50,000]/maximum [$5,000,000]) PROJECT SUMMARY: We propose a substantive first step toward comprehensive and coordinated enhancement of creeks and water quality in the watersheds of Contra Costa County. Valuable efforts to restore creeks and control non-point source pollution are underway and will continue. We seek to aid and expand these efforts in the following main ways: • Provide baseline maps and data for all watersheds in the County. We will construct this information foundation with an eye toward identifying key watershed problems and opportunities for solving these problems. • Develop consensus-based strategies for restoring'creeks and water quality in each watershed. • Educate County citizens on creek, watershed, and water quality issues.. Expose the hidden value of creeks to our communities. Identify the potential benefits of enhancing these resources. This proposal would yield the following key products: 1) Contra Costa County Watershed Atlas and Creek Restoration Strategy 2) Pilot West County Watershed Advanved GIS and Map-Based Analysis Product The Contra Costa County Community Development Department submits this proposal on behalf of the Contra Costa Watershed Forum, a broad partnership of government agencies and private organizations that seeks to identify common solutions to problems affecting all of our creeks and watersheds. ' APPLICATION PART B CCC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAWRTMENT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATERSHEDS INVENTORY AND CREEKS RESTORATION STRATEGY PART B - BUDGET SUMMARY SHEET STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD APPLICANT: CCC Community Development Department PROJECT TITLE: Contra Costa County Watersheds Inventory and Creeks Restoration Strategy Total Budget Prop 13 SWRCB Share 1. Personnel Services $29,000 $0 2. Operating Expenses $0 $0 3. Property Acquisitions a. Equipment b. Furniture c. Portable assets d. Electronic data e. Processing equipment f. Misc. (document&map publishing $10,000 $10,000 g. Real Estate/easements h. Real Estate 4. Professional and Consulting $81,000 $70,000 Services 5. Construction Expenses $0 $0 6. CEQA/NEPA $0(exempt) $0 7. Overhead (%) $0 $0 TOTAL BUDGET $120,000 $0 Note: The SWRCB reserves the right to adjust project awards. Applicants may be asked to reduce theirproject budgets. Applicants should be prepared to provide detailed justification of costs by task for their project. -1 Contra Costa County Watersheds Inventory and Creeks Restoration Strategy Table of Contents for Project Proposal i. Part A— Cover Page (previous pages) ii. Part B — Budget Summary Sheet (previous page) 1. Part C — Project Questionnaire which includes: • Figure 1. Sample Layout for a Chapter in the Proposed Document (Supplement to Question 5c in Part C) • Table 1. Tasks, Detailed Budget, and Schedule (Supplement to Part B and to Question 5d in Part C) 2. Map of Watersheds in Contra Costa County (Attachment for Question 8 in Part C) 3. Locator map of Contra Costa County within the state of California 4. Copy of front page of WMI Integrated Plan Chapter for Region 2 (Attachment for Question 9 in Part C) 5. List of Contra Costa Watershed Forum Participants 6. Seven Letters of Support APPLICATION PART C CCC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATERSHEDS INVENTORY AND CREEKS RESTORATION STRATEGY PART C - PROJECT QUESTIONNAIRE FlIff U.T971w4wim Contra Costa County Watersheds Inventory and Creeks Restoration Strategy Contra Costa County Community Development Department(on behalf of the Contra Costa Watershed Forum) • - 651 Pint Street 4 1hFloor, North Wing Martinez, CA 94553-1229 • - •- John Kopchik, Senior Planner(Project manager) Ann Cheng, Contract Water Resource and GIS Specialist(Project coordinator) Mitch Avalon, Deputy Director for Flood Control, Public Works Dept. (Project guidance) Lis Klute, Contract GIS Coordinator, Public Works Department(Technical guidance and GIS Analysis) • �' jkopc(D-cd.co.contra-costa.ca.us • (925)335-1299 • • (925)335-1227 All Watersheds in Contra Costa County, including: �xX. Watersheds Sub-Watersheds Alhambra Creek Franklin Creek and Arroyo del Alhambre Rodeo Creek Refugio Creek Pinole Creek Garrity Creek Rheem Creek - San Pablo Creek Wildcat Creek =� Baxter Creek Cerrito Creek Walnut Creek Pacheco Creek, Grayson and Photo by Pat Solo Murderer's Creeks, Galindo and Pine Creeks, Las Trampas, Reliez Creek, Tice Creek, Grizzly Creek San Ramon Creek(Green Valley Creek, Sycamore Creek, Bollinger Creek, San Cantanio Creek) Mt Diablo Creek Kirker Creek East Antioch Creek West Antioch Creek Marsh Creek Sand Creek, Deer Creek, Dry Creek, Briones Creek Kellogg Creek Brushy Creek S. San Ramon Ck West Alamo and Alamo Creeks San Leandro Ck Moraga Creek, Indian Creek About 70% of the proposed project will occur in Region 2 of the SWRCB while the remaining 30% is within the jurisdiction of Region 5. • --• - Contra Costa County --•-• --• • • X yes no �. . . - . .-. . . --. X yes no -• -•-- • • _X_Agriculture Forestry X Urban(Construction, Roads, Septic Systems) X Stormwater/Urban Runoff –X—Marinas and Boating Activities X Hydromodification Resource Extraction Other: Pagel of 8 APPLICATION'PART C CCC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATERSHEDS INVENTORY AND CREEKS RESTORATION STRATEGY '•'•+ `N 9 • 'Key Problems Our Creeks Have Been Drastically and Repeatedly Modified Over the Last 150 Years o Agricultural and rural settlers re-routed creeks, reclaimed flood plains with levees, and increased sediment levels. o Towns sprung up in major valleys and reclaimed flood plains. :. Massive floods throughout the County in the 1950's hit places like downtown Concord very hard and led to emergency action by Governor Earl Warren. o The Army Corps of Engineers and newly formed Flood Control District controlled flood risks by transforming miles of creek into .*} " — .. concrete u-shaped channels, by building bigger levees and by developing energy-dissipating drop structures. Market St. in Concord, 1957 Rapid Urbanization Has Dramatically Increased Non-Point Source Pollution and impervious Surfaces s• � ,. °"",` : �' o Outside of San Francisco County, Contra Costa County has the - highest percentage of developed land.' o Urban settings such as those in Contra Costa County foster a thousand points of non-point source pollution. From pesticides and fertilizers on lawns and gardens, to petrochemicals on roads and parking lots, to pathogens from leaking septic systems, the +` cumulative impacts of small environmental insults is substantial. 7 The 303d list of impaired water bodies defines all major surface waters in the county as impaired by diazinon, and the sections of the Bay to which they drain are listed for many other constituents. o Increased impervious surfaces decreases soil percolation, increases the rate and magnitude of surface runoff, and causes scouring, channel incising and stream bank destabilization. Destabilized banks are often armored, compounding the scouring problem downstream. Mobilized sediments settle in slow water, burying habitat and reducing capacity. Important Water-Dependant Terrestrial Habitat Has Been Lost and Fragmented o Riparian habitat and permanent and seasonal wetlands have been paved; buried by rip-rap, undercut by scouring, and blanketed with sediment. The loss of habitat and habitat connectivity disrupts ecological functions, threatens wildlife and obscures natural scenery. Challenges and Opportunities • The County's urban growth will continue. The Association of Bay Area Governments ("ABAG") predicts the County's population will grow 24% in 20 years, the County will have 4 of the region's 10 fastest growing cities, and the County has the largest percentage of land available for development in the Bay Area. 2 • The Board of Supervisors recently tightened existing growth control measures by shrinking the voter- approved Urban Limit Line. Such policies present opportunities for minimizing the impacts of future growth and for promoting in-fill development. But many in-fill opportunities lie in harder to develop parcels along creeks. Careful planning will be necessary to incorporate creek enhancements as features in revitalization strategies. Otherwise, creeks may be viewed as obstacles to housing. • Many of the County's 40 year-old flood control facilities have silted-in or need repair. Will they be dredged and rebuilt? Or will they be enhanced or replaced with alternative designs with more ecological and aesthetic value? • The recently created Contra Costa Watershed Forum has forged many partnerships within the past year and a half. Interest in creeks is high and coordination on watershed issues is better than ever. • Significant advances in Geographic Information System ("GIS") capability are occurring throughout the County. The Public Works Department recently produced countwide aerial orthophotos (1:400 scale), 26.2%,according to the Association of Bay Area Governments"Status and Trends 2000"report. Z ABAG"Status and Trends 2000" Page 2 of 8 APPLICATION PART C CCC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATERSHEDS INVENTORY AND CREEKS RESTORATION STRATEGY and the Community Development Department is building a land-use GIS. These and other improvements may be a boost to watershed analysis. • Contra Costa County Supervisor John Gioia has made creeks and creek mapping a priority. He initiated a committee called the West Contra-Costa County Watershed Mapping Group. They view maps as a tool for educating the public on the connection between watershed and stream. Current Needs • Baseline information on the physical conditions in each watershed. • Effective and efficient spending of watershed protection and restoration dollars. • A common understanding of key actions are needed to begin to restore each watershed. - • ITETOT-190 GTI VLSI Iwo By Patricia Mathews, EBMUD Waterbodies in Contra Costa County have serious water quality problems. All significant creeks in the County are designated as impaired for Diazinon by the 303d list. Likewse, all creeks in the County are tributary to the Bay-Delta, which is designated as impaired for numerous pollutants. The proposed project will provide data and enhancement strategies that will help address the following water quality objectives: • Sediment—increased sediment loads and turbidity may result from grading and channel modifications. • Heavy Metals— including trace elements such as mercury, copper, nickel, gold and silver mine tailings. • Nutrients—high nutrient loads often stem from agricultural and urban fertilizer application • Dissolved Oxygen—High nutrients levels can lead to algal blooms (etc.)that use up the D.O. • Oil and Grease—From myriad non-point sources such as parking lots and roads. • Pathogens--Ghiarrdia, cryptosproidium, bacteria and others often from leaking septic tanks. • Floating, Suspended & Settleable Materials—Trash &debris are often dumped intentionally in creeks. • Other Chemicals and Toxic substances — Including sulfides, organo-phosphates such as diazinon and other household pesticides, and PCBs. Potential and existing beneficial uses identified in the Basin Plan addressed by this project include: • Fish Migration—the project will identify barriers to fish migration. • Contact and non-contact recreation — the project will identify opportunities for multi-purpose creek enhancements that include trails and creek parkways. • Spawning Habitat—the project will identify strategies and locations for restoring gravel beds. • Warm water Habitat—the project will address protection of permanent wetlands and related habitats • Cold water Habitat—the project will consider means for restoring riparian cover • Wildlife Habitat—the project will examine riparian habitat connectivity. Overview We propose a substantive first step toward comprehensive and coordinated enhancement of creeks and water quality in the watersheds of Contra Costa County. Valuable efforts to restore creeks and control non-point source pollution are underway and will continue. We seek to aid and expand these efforts in the following main ways: 1) Provide baseline maps and data for all watersheds in the County. We will construct this information foundation with an eye toward identifying key watershed problems and opportunities for solving these problems. 2) Develop consensus-based strategies for restoring creeks and water quality. 3) Educate County citizens on creek, watershed, and water quality issues; Expose the hidden value of creeks to our communities; Identify the potential benefits of enhancing these resources. The specific meaning of"we" in the above proposal is the Contra Costa County Community Development Department. But we are acting on behalf of the Contra Costa Watershed Forum, a broad partnership of government agencies and private organizations that has been formally recognized by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and that seeks to identify common solutions to problems affecting all of our creeks and watersheds (see attached list of Watershed Forum meeting participants). Conducting this project through this broad, collaborative process is essential if the project is to have an impact. Page 3 of 8 APPLICATION PART A CCC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATERSHEDS INVENTORY AND CREEKS RESTORATION STRATEGY PART A - COVER PAGE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD SFY 2001 Costa-Machado Water Act of 2000 Chapter 7, Article 2, Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program APPLICANT: Contra Costa County Community Development Department (on behalf of the Contra Costa Watershed Forum) ADDRESS: 651 Pine Street 4 Floor, North Wing Martinez, CA 94553 PROJECT DIRECTOR: John Kopchik E-MAIL jkopc@cd.co.contra-costa.ca.us FAX NO.: (925) 335-1299 ADDRESS: PHONE NO.: (925)335-1227 FEDERAL TAX ID. NO.: 94-6000-509 PROJECT TITLE: Contra Costa County Watersheds Inventory and Creeks Restoration Strategy PROBLEM(S) BEING ADDRESSED: Non-point source pollution (including diazinon, sediment, and pathogens), riparian habitat degradation and fragmentation, and creek channel modifications which impede fish passage and impair naturl hydrological processes. WATERBODY/WATERSHED: All watersheds in Contra Costa County FISCAL SUMMARY: Prop 13 Funds Requested $80,000 (minimum [$50,000]/maximum [$5,000,000]) Capital Cost Match N/A (if applicable) Contribution Total Project Budget $120,000 PROJECT SUMMARY: We propose a substantive first step toward comprehensive and coordinated enhancement of creeks and water quality in the watersheds of Contra Costa County. Valuable efforts to restore creeks and control non-point source pollution are underway and will continue. We seek to aid and expand these efforts in the following main ways: • Provide baseline maps and data for all watersheds in the County. We will construct this information foundation with an eye toward identifying key watershed problems and opportunities for solving these problems. Develop consensus-based strategies for restoring creeks and water quality in each watershed. • Educate County citizens on creek, watershed, and water quality issues. Expose the hidden value of creeks to our communities. Identify the potential benefits of enhancing these resources. This proposal would yield the following key products: 1) Contra Costa County Watershed Atlas and Creek Restoration Strategy 2) Pilot West County Watershed Advanved GIS and Map-Based Analysis Product The Contra Costa County Community Development Department submits this proposal on behalf of the Contra Costa Watershed Forum, a broad partnership of government agencies and private organizations that seeks to identify common solutions to problems affecting all of our creeks and watersheds. • APPLICATION PART B CCC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAWRTMENT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATERSHEDS INVENTORY AND CREEKS RESTORATION STRATEGY PART B - BUDGET SUMMARY SHEET STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD APPLICANT: CCC Community Development Department PROJECT TITLE: Contra Costa County Watersheds Inventory and Creeks Restoration Strategy Total Capital Cost Prop 13 SWRCB Budget Match Share Share (if applicable) 1. Personnel Services $29,000 $ $0 2. Operating Expenses $0 $0 3. Property Acquisitions a. Equipment b. . Furniture c. Portable assets d. Electronic data e. Processing equipment f. Misc. (document&map publishing $10,000 $10,000 g. Real Estate/easements h. Real Estate 4. Professional and Consulting $81,000 $70,000 Services 5. Construction Expenses $0 $0 6. CEQA/NEPA $0(exempt) $0 7. Overhead (%) $0 $0 TOTAL BUDGET $120,000 $0 8. Match Share in dollars—See previous example to calculate match share. N/A(no construction costs) Describe the source, nature of capital expenditures for construction. N/A(this is a planning project.) Note: The SWRCB reserves the right to adjust project awards. Applicants may be asked to reduce their project budgets. Applicants should be prepared to provide detailed justification of costs by task for their project. APPLICATION PART C CCC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATERSHEDS INVENTORY AND CREEKS RESTORATION STRATEGY Products There are two main products that will result from this proposed project. • Contra Costa County Watershed Atlas and Creek Restoration Strategy • Pilot West County Watersheds Advanced GIS and Map-Based Analysis Project I. Contra Costa County Watershed Atlas and Creek Restoration Strategy("Atlas") This document would provide an overview of the current status and future needs of all significant watersheds in the County. Each watershed would be covered in a separate chapter. The proposed content of the watershed chapters is summarized in Figure 1. The Atlas would be published in written form and on the web. The proposed budget would cover the publication and distribution of 350 copies at no charge (additional copies would be sold at cost). The budget also includes funds ,to publish the document on the Watershed Forum website (www.cocowaterweb.org) in an interactive format. A detailed list of the tasks involved in creating the Atlas is provided in subsection (d). II. Pilot West County Watersheds Advanced GIS and Map-Based Analysis Project This project would develop a more-detailed watershed database and would produce a series of maps documenting and analyzing watershed conditions. This pilot effort would build on the baseline GIS that will be created for the Atlas by adding additional detailed data layers. The project will also include substantial GIS analysis and modeling, intended to diagnose and document key watershed functions, problems and enhancement opportunities. This project is an outgrowth of the West County Watershed Mapping Group created by Supervisor,Gioia and responds to the mapping needs identified by that committee. We would hope to extend the methods and data sets created for this project to remainder of the County at a latter date. The proposed budget for this project anticipates the development of 15 wall-sized display maps to document the range of information in the GIS and the outcomes of the GIS modeling runs. A detailed list of tasks and more information on modeling possibilities is provided in subsection (d). B neB efits and Desired=AutcomeKoof thisJPropo as 1 o Provide the CCWF with a point of focus and a process for developing its vision of the future of creeks and watersheds in the County; Create a document to explain and describe this vision to those not involved in the Forum. ombyearsoro� o Provide a consolidated reference document on County creeks, watersheds, and past/future restoration projects with statistics, maps, and contacts. , o Provide an overview of future needs and goals for each , watershed. o Help specific projects to secure grant funds by documenting how those projects fit in to a regional context and by } demonstrating that those projects have broad recognition 4 , o Provide a tool for prioritizing watersheds for restoration or detailed planning, should that be desired. o Diagnose watershed problems and explore innovative solutions using the relatively inexpensive tool of GIS modeling. o Support the CCWF's Mitigation Coordination Program by providing a coordination tool. o Document the need for, and the potential use of, new funds for creek restoration and pollution control. o Help the Forum, the County and others expand their base of GIS information on watersheds. o Identify creeks and watersheds in need of more attention. o Supply content for the CCWF web page. o Support the work of Regional Boards and other regulatory agencies, by providing additional context for reviewing 401 water quality certifications and additional data to support the task of developing TMDLs for impaired waterbodies. Page 4 of 8 LV s m �{ O rt { rD (D O r ni j C ° rD 3 Al Z n cDm D n w -h (D m S J. v iia w aK CO 3 3 M M 0 0) N v �. iv q• TI 3 to A� rt m cD > > O Z) w :3 a in N (D m cn a n a a :3 cn cn s in i rt c rxt x Pine Creek i rt < I Las Trampas Ck i rD 'n LA y CD ` r "� �+ s Grayson Ck i m Murderer's Ck z s o_ W X San Ramon Ck i (D J. J. O- C NN m 3 CD I. ry' :1►�► C I I 07 y a) O (C. CD j CCD a) 41 0 O.. 7C" H n 0. .0 3 � N y 3. 5 c ` n Co 0 3 � �' oCD . 0 rD O (n m '0 L- CD rn vA r cn oo TM. I < o 3 CD LA cn v .. i = cn =rN a) !n d d o N A n' CL o (D Al y n y �. lmn F: o `z Q c d r. cD OCD cn S' 4` C (D 7 n � rt co 3 n (D i CD iss o x 'z d co rt ,. 1 ,. .' '.. �...." :J..l'.,.' it'"':ji:j�: ':$'a .')'.;;.:.:. '=g •.�".'k-.x:�y• .::y,;.;. -h?.:�5. N #. ... _r.. ... _.. y� Vimm..... %,�. {�Y ..... �.... .. :. ... .w +•6• 3i e. .. +'�t K Ta, PY++ :�''.: .... :: _a..•X...':..:�.....•. 1-.k..�:�,iSk uAa�� x...i ... Y:t. ��'�-� s� ':..�:::.1'!� H'`'.l<v"'- ��."i. _ Zr Y' �► �► -p Watershed Features Flow Length of Creek D " 2 E: X �Z � m t t i Z m z =i (n t t 2 v� ni 8 Area Within: ZG) c: 0 Q i t 2 my m m ( m O (� \ x c COam C,. t t 2 m O D _ 3CD 2 t t '. o Z o° °0 CD 0 7 3 3p J. � nmi 3 � � �� c C� CD.: D 6, 0 _� p d C O. a D 3 (D N O n — (D 7 (D (D V1 .. ca oo C fn O O co cn c < .*. m Pine Creek > D > °—' CD °� °� cn a) CD 0 CD '; o.CD c. c. c. (. a o_ s0 c CD CL CD a v t t ! CD O Las Trampas Ck Pine Creek :31 t i l 1 o Grayson Ck LasTrampas m 1 -Zi Murderer's Ck Grayson Ck t t ! D 0 San Ramon Ck Murderer's Ck o m v San Ramon Ck o CD 3 `m' CD 0 � rt w wn W J•tn Ar NJ -- 3 Tl rt o ;r, H � n k-., v s > > rt < 7 O D O m J•-0 (D a 0 r O -0 Al o.to O O rn �c H � X Z 0 10 `< 'D - 1 n O j p 7 -3 rS frD Q S 7 S . A p ° v a. n < (D m .< w fl- rt x D rt O In �.` 'o rt J. rD (� c O a x = r c rD x o s e w to �•° rt -h rt o m c o my ° rD rt o rt cD .. rt rt r) O pJ (D n.(D (D S M rD 1 1 t �, �� �, � �LA ° � rt > o � D Q. . m rt � 3 J. . � o z 3 O w � { � J '• -h &to (D w C Z s v, :3 -1 J.AI 3 '� -.n X- rt -4 O °. O rt 3 t0 O c o w J• N D fD W rt � � In �, Pf ° CL <rt n � a o rt v, o t t 2 = W m Z O t i t aa) -2 rt -h rrDD � � � rt x N Ar �' 1 A+ O_ _I C O rt I •! t •! %l n W rt O J•ta rD (D 3' I << g � I I - �rD ! 1:.