Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 07182000 - C167 V+ TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Con a. FROM: PHIL BATCHELOR, Count Administrator Caste County County DATE: July 18, 2000 SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY REPORT NO. 0002 ENTITLED "ADULT DETENTION FACILITIES"-------------------------------------- "" SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT the attached report prepared by the Sheriff-Coroner, Warren E. Rupf, as the Board of Supervisors' response to Report No. 0002 of the 1990-2000 Grand Jury entitled, "Adult Detention Facilities". BACKGROUND: The 1999-2000 Grand Jury filed the above report, which was reviewed by the Board of Supervisors and subsequently referred to the County Administrator and Sheriff-Coroner. After reviewing the report, the Sheriff-Coroner prepared the attached response that clearly specifies: A. Whether the finding and recommendation is accepted or adopted; B. If the finding and recommendation is accepted, a statement as to who will be responsible for implementation and a definite target date; C. A delineation of the constraints if a recommendation is accepted by cannot be implemented within a calendar year; and D. The reason for not adopting a finding and/or recommendation. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: r' RfUMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMEND N OF BOARD COMMITTEE PPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): " ACTION OF BOON J u l y 1$ , 2 0 0 0 APPROVE AS RECOMMENDED X X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN XX UNANIMOUS(ABSENT #1 ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE AYES: NOES: SHOWN. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTESTED July 18 , 2000 CONTACT:JULIE ENEA(925)335-1077 PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CC: SHERIFF-CORONER COUNTY COUNSEL COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL SERVICES DIRECTOR CAPITAL FACILITIESIDEBT MGMT DIRECTOR DEPUTY The following is the Office of the Sheriffs response to Grand Jury Report No. 0002: County Detention Facilities Recommendation No. 'I The Sheriff should continue working with the County Administrator to Implement expansion of the West County Detention Facility to eliminate overcrowding at the Martinez Detention Facility. Response No. 1 The recommendation is accepted. The Office of the Sheriff continues to seek alternatives for additional housing at the West County Dtention Facility. The Office of the Sheriff has been working internally to explore options such as a construction grant but the responsibility and authority for obtaining construction capital lies with the County Administrative Officer. Recommendation No. 2 Some organization, not affiliated with the Sheriff's Office, should audit the expenditures from the Inmate Welfare Fund regularly to assure that the Fund is not being abused. Response No. 2 The Office of the Sheriff accepts but is puzzeled by this recommendation. The County Auditor has always performed audits on this Fund. Our last audit, October 23, 1999, reported all accounting practices met County standards. The next audit is scheduled for June 30, 2000.