The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 06062000 - C122-C126 File: 205-0001/13.4.4 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on June 6, 2000 by the following vote: AYES: SUPERVSIORS GIOIA, UILKEMA, DESAULNIER, CANCIAMILLA. AND GERBER NOES: NOME ABSENT: NONE SUBJECT: Award of Contract for Stone Valley Road Landscape Mitigation Project, Alamo, California Authorization No. WWO024 Bi Total AmQunt Bond mounts Cleary Bros. Landscape, Inc. $79,543.00 Payment: $79,543.00 521 Diablo Road Performance: $79,543.00 Danville, California 94526 RMT Landscape Contractors, Inc. Alamo, California Lone Star Landscape, Inc. Alviso, California The above-captioned project and the plans and specifications therefor having been previously approved, Addendum No. 1 having been issued and approved, and bids having been duly invited and received by the Director of General Services on May 18, 2000; and The Director of General Services recommending that the bid listed first above, Cleary, is the lowest responsive and responsible bid, and this Board concurring and so finding; NOW,'THEREFORE, the Board ORDERS that the contract for the furnishing of labor and materials for said work is awarded to Cleary at the listed amount and at the prices submitted in said bid, and that said contractor shall present two good and sufficient surety bonds as indicated above, and that the General Services Department shall prepare the contract therefor; and The Board FURTHER ORDERS that after the contractor has signed the contract and returned it, together with the bonds as noted above and any required certificates of insurance or other required documents, and after the Director of General Services has reviewed and found them to be sufficient, the Director of General Services is authorized to sign the contract for this Board; and The Board FURTHER ORDERS that in accordance with the project specifications and/or upon signature of the contract by the Director of General Services, any bid bonds posted by the bidders are to be exonerated and any checks or cash submitted for security shall be returned; and The Beard. FURTHER ORDERS that the Director of General Services is authorized to sign any escrow agreements prepared for this project to permit the substitution of'securities for moneys withheld by the County to ensure performance under the contract, pursuant to Section 22300 of the Public Contract Code; and Dept.- General Services Dept. - Architectural Division 1 hereby certify that this is a true end correct Ori g. p p copy of an action taken and encored on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the cc: General Services Department date shown. ,r Architectural Division ATTESTED: ?,t G.S. Accounting PHIL BATC L0R, C!en< of the Board File: 205-0001/A.5 of Super sors and Co my dministra.tor County Counsel By Deputy Contract Compliance Officer(Via Arch.Div.) Public Works Dt:pt. (Via Arch. Div.) Contractor(Via Arch. Div.) 1la2004\2054001100B04t22b.doc Page 1 of 1 cnJb GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Architectural Division 1220 Morello Avenue, Suite 100 Martinez, California 94553-4711 (925) 313-7200 FAX (925) 313-7299 File: 205-0001B.4.4 Date: May 23, 2000 TO: Board of Supervisors &*JAWQLt& FROM: Barton J. Gilbert, Director of General Services SUBJECT: CONTRACT AWARD RECOMMENDATION; Agenda Date June 6, 2000; Authorization No. WWO024 Bids for Stone Valley Road Landscaping Mitigation Project, Alamo, California were received and opened at the County Architectural Division Offices on Thursday, May 18, 2000. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors award the construction contract to the low bidder, Cleary Bros. Landscape, Inc. of Danville, in the amount of$79,543.00. The consultant architect's estimate was $97,600.00. Other bids received were as follows: Base Bi 1. RMT Landscape Contractors, Inc. $ 94,995.00 San Leandro, California 2. Lone Star Landscape, Inc. $104,069.00 Alviso, California GB:tb cc: County Administrator's Office County Counsel Clerk of the Board(w/bids) Contract Compliance Officer H:12000\2050001100B00121 m.doc TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS +'r. . ..'. C'✓QCI ` ,- FROM: Dennis M. Barry,AICD � Costa Community Development Director County DATE: June 6, 2000 SUBJECT: Request for Reallocation of HOME Investment Partnership Act Funds SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS (1) APPROVE the termination of HOME Project Agreement 97-03 with Community Housing Opportunities Corporation(CHOC)for the Rivertown Court Affordable Homeownership Project; (2) APPROVE the reallocation of $300,000 in FY 1997198 HOME Investment Partnership Act (HOME)Funds and$100,000 in FY 1999/00 HOME funds from the Rivertown Project to the FY 1999/00 HOME Housing Development Assistance Fund(HDAF); and (3) APPROVE the reallocation of$48,321 in remaining FY 1998199 HOME/HDAF resources to the FY 1999/00 HOME/HDAF. FISCAL IMPACT No General Fund impact. HOME funds are provided to the County annually on a formula allocation basis through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD). BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS On April 8, 1997 the Board of Supervisors approved the allocation of$300,000 in FY 19 7/98 HOME funds to Community Housing Opportunities Corporation(CHOC)fo the Riverto urt Affordable CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATO COENDATION OF ARD COMMIT'T'EE 7 PPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF B00b ON Jum 6, 2WO _ APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT -----------} TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN ANIS ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: Kathleen K. Hamm(925) 335-1257 ATTESTED June 6, 2000 Orig/cc: Community Development Dept. PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF cc: County Administrator THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS County Counsel AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CHOC via Community Development BY ,� , DEPUTY Homeownership Project. The purpose of the project was to provide affordable homeownership opportunities for lower-income households through the new construction of 16 single-family homes in Antioch.The HOME funds were to be used for site acquisition and construction.Following completion, the HOME funds would be rolled over into equity share mortgages to assist very-low and low-income households in purchasing the units. On May 4, 1999,the Board of Supervisors approved an additional $100,000 for this project to help cover increased development costs.To date,no HOME funds have been expended. On May 5, 2000, CHOC informed the Community Development Department that the Rivertown Court Project is no longer feasible due to additional,substantial increases in construction and other related development costs. CHOC has therefore requested that the County terminate HOME Project Agreement 97-03 and rescind the allocation of$400,000 in HOME funds previously approved for this project. On April 28, 1998,the Board approved the allocation of$818,300 in HOME funds for the FY 1998199 HOME/HDAF. The purpose of the HOME/HDAF is to provide resources to assist affordable housing projects that develop during the program year.During FY 1998199,HOME/HDAF funds were used to fund a variety of projects including affordable rental housing for seniors in Antioch and families/households in Concord. The current balance of the FY 1998/99 HOME/HDAF is$48,321. It is recommended that the$400,000 in HOME funds originally allocated to the Rivertown Court Project and the $48,321 in remaining FY 1998/99 HOME/HDAF funds be transferred to the FY 1999/00 HOME/HDAF to consolidate funds and provide resources for the development of additional affordable housing projects as they develop during the current program year.If approved.,the current balance of the FY 1999/00 HOME/HDAF will be$467,503. Based on current information,the potential demand for HOME/HDAF funds is $1.5 million, including a current application for $467,500 for an affordable rental housing project in Antioch. kkh1k25/bos97-03 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra FROM: DENNIS M. BARRY, AICP �tc COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR County DATE: June 6, 2000 SUBJECT: Draft FY 2000101 Budgets of the Congestion Management Agency and the Regional Transportation Planning Committees. SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS AUTHORIZE the Auditor Controller to pay from the County's Measure C-1988 funds the County's share of the Fiscal Year 2000101 budgets for regional transportation planning committees based on the invoiced amounts and acknowledge that the invoice amounts may vary from the estimated amounts where indicated: $19,569 for TRANSPAC (estimated) $14,978 for West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee $1,616 for Southwest Area Transportation Committee (estimated) AUTHORIZE the Chair of the Board of Supervisors to sign a letter to the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) requesting that the CMA include in its FY 2000101 Budget preparation of a Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan, and AUTHORIZE the Chair of the Board of Supervisors to sign a letter to the Tri Valley Transportation Council requesting it adopt an administrative procedure to annually reimburse the responsible jurisdiction for providing administrative services to the Tri Valley Transportation Council, sharing the cost equally among member jurisdictions, and making this procedure effective as of January 1, 2000. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE . ACTION OF BOARD ON June 6 2000 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED xxOTHER See the attached letters . VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE xxUNANIMOUS (ABSENT - _ - _ j AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE Contact: Steven Goetz (92513351240) SHOWN. cc: Community Development Department (CDD) ATTESTED_ June 6 , 2000 PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR sAadv-tran\Board Order Shell.doc BY' � '+Xx , DEPUTY FY 2000101 BUDGETS FOR THE CMA AND THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING COMMITTEES June 6,2000 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT None to the General Fund. The County contribution to the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) is $60,059. The Public Works Department will budget gas tax revenue for this contribution. The County's share of the cost to operate Regional Transportation Planning Committees, except for the Tri Valley Transportation Council, is estimated $44,390. The Community Development Department will use Measure C-88 Retum-to-Source funds to pay for the County's contribution. The request to the Tri Valley Transportation Council will ensure that the County does not bear the full cost for providing their administrative support; and the request to the CMA will increase the ability of every jurisdiction in Contra Costa to obtain grant funding to construct bicycle transportation projects. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The agreements that created the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) and the Regional Transportation Planning Committees require referral of their budgets to their member jurisdictions. In past years, these budgets have been of interest to the Board of Supervisors. A comparison of the proposed contributions from the participating agencies is provided in Exhibit A. In most cases the proposed contributions for FY 2000101 are comparable to the contribution for Fiscal Year 1999/00. Congestion Management Agency Budget The County and the cities designated the Contra Costa Transportation Authority as the CMA and agreed to help fund its operating costs. The difference in the proposed contribution for the CMA compared to FY 1999/00 is a result of a mid year budget revision for FY 1999/00 which accounted for less expenditures than anticipated at the beginning of that fiscal year. Historically the CMA's estimate of local contributions has usually been less than the actual amount invoiced. This Board Order includes a request to the CMA to include preparation of a Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan in its budget for FY 2000/01. County staff has requested that this effort be included in the preparation of the 2000 Update of the Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan. However, the current draft only includes a map of regional bikeways and a list of some bicycle project. The Draft 2000 Update recommends preparation of a more comprehensive bicycle plan in FY 2002/03. There are a number of funding opportunities available to local agencies annually for construction bicycle transportation facilities. Preparation of a comprehensive bicycle transportation plan in FY 2000/01 would enable local agencies to compete more effectively for these funds two years sooner than the schedule proposed by the CMA. County staff believes that there is sufficient information available to enable the CMA to prepare a plan in FY 2000/01. Several of the Regional Transportation Planning Committees are considering making a similar request to the CMA. Southwest Area Transportation Committee Budget The SWAT Committee has not distributed a proposed budget for FY 2000/01. Administrative support for the Committee is anticipated to transfer from the Town of Moraga to the City of San Ramon. The City of San Ramon anticipates their proposal to be similar to the previous contract between the member jurisdictions and Moraga. This assumption is reflected in Exhibit A. Trans Ian Committee Budget The County provides staff support to the TRANSPLAN Committee pursuant to a joint powers agreement. The County's share of that budget is handled administratively. FY 2000101 BUDGETS FOR THE CMA AND THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING COMMITTEES June 6,20100 Page 3 Tri Valley Transportation Council Bucket The Tri Valley Transportation Council (TVTC) has not had a budget since it was formed. For the past 10 years the City of Pleasanton has provided administrative support to the TVTC without charge. In January, the City of Pleasanton requested that the annual rotation of this responsibility be re-instated as provided by the TVTC joint powers agreement. The County was selected to provide administrative support for 2000. At that time, County staff explained to the TVTC that the Department, in contrast with the cities, does not have access to general fund sources and would need an identified funding source in order to provide the administrative support to the TVTC. (Bee Exhibit B). County staff further pointed out that Section 10 of the TVTC joint powers agreement states: "Each Party to the Agreement shall pay upon demand of the Finance Director, its appropriate share of all expenses incurred in the performance of the activities called for by this Agreement The appropriate share of each Party shall be an equal amount for all expenses." The Contra Costa jurisdictions have indicated that the County's request is reasonable. The Alameda County jurisdictions have concerns since the City of Pleasanton never requested reimbursement. The TVTC has not made a decision on the Department's request. This Board Order elevates this request for reimbursement to the Board of Supervisors and acknowledges the provisions of the TVTC joint powers agreement. Alternatively, the Board can consider funding the Department's cost from the General Fund through its procedure for unfunded mandates. West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee Bud-ge The Board of Supervisors authorized the contribution to the WCCTAC budget on May 23, 2000 when it approved an amendment to the WCCTAC joint powers agreement. r r � r r r r y r a ROO :t,.: Inv r h z CIO U r C3 a zW " 02 r � P 0 a J N a �= LL Z oz z N N o ; ` dF mm mm m m a to Er iLR V) r r r r r m mm m m 116 � lOt1 01 l'9 IANrr rr Nw'tr NN m �' t39:10Pi i0 ~ �iWtri� LttL iYU < U' Si W ti: 67DL d' ViHF-� F- EXHIBIT B CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 651 Pine Strut, N. Wing - 4th Fier Martinez, CA 94553 Telephone: 335-1290 Fax: 335-1299 TO: Supervisor Donna Gerber, District III Tri-Valley Transportation Council Representative FROM: Dennis M. Barry, AICD, Community Development Director By: Daniel J.Pulon, AICD, Senior Transportation Planner DATE: February 2, 2000 SUBJECT: Staffing the TVTC and TVTC-TAC The TVTC at its January 26, 2000 meeting elected County Staff to provide the TVTC and TAC staffing responsibilities without funding for the calendar year 2000. County staff, before the election, explained to the TVTC that the County, in contrast with the TVTC cities, lacks access to general fund sources and would need an identified funding source in order to provide the staffing responsibilities at previous levels. In staffing RTPC's and TAC's in the County, there are three types of models: • Both `'West and Central Counties have hired independent staff on contract; the annual budgets for each are about $140,000 a year; East County jurisdictions contribute toward the salary of County planning staff on an hourly basis; the contract amount for the FY 99/00 budget is $46,000 or $9,200 for each jurisdiction; and The SWAT Committee currently contracts with Moraga for administrative services only. SWAT's annual cost is $9,200, or about$1600 for each jurisdiction. The TVTC has been very forttTnate to have the city of Pleasanton provide staff support services for these many years without charge. Unfortunately, the County is not in a position to do so. The County cannot devote additional time to provide staff support to TVTC without reallocated staff time from other projects. Furthermore, we cannot agree to support the TVTC for free when we require TRANSPLA,N jurisdictions to pay for our services. y„ The TVTC needs to be willing to pay for the staff that no one is willing to volunteer. .County staff`recommends that the TVTC consider using the Model adopted by the SWAT Committee, where they contract for administrative support only (e.g. agendas and minutes), and not include planning services. This would help minimize the impact to participating jurisdictions but allow the TVTC to continue meeting with the support of its TAC. Through contractual, arrangement, the County could provide such service to the TVTC for about$5,000 a year, equating to $1,143 a year for each jurisdiction. We would propose this recommendation at the next TAC meeting. I would anticipate this will be discussed when the TVTC meeting on February 23, 2000 at 4 PM. Please call Dennis M. Barry or Steven Goetz if you have any concerns with our approach. dmb\sg\dp cc. Members of the Board of Supervisors, County Administrator's Office, Clerk of the Board. CAWP5IVvtcistaff 7. 2 hil The Beard of Supervisors Contra `° R' �� '} / Clerk off the Board z,: Costa and County Administration Building county Administrator 651 Pine Street, (doom 106 (925)335-1900 Martinez, California 94553-1.293 County John Gioia, I,'District Gayle B.Uilkema,2'd District Donna Gerber, 310 District Mark DeSsuinler,41' District 4 Joe Canciamllla, 51' District _ W„ Mr. Scutt Haggerty, Chair t.. .ti June 6, 2000 Tri Valley Transportation Council c/o Community Development Department County Administration Building 651 Pine Street, 0 Floor,N. Wing Martinez, CA 94553 Dear Mr. Haggerty On June 6, 2000, the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors authorized the Chair to sign a letter to the Tri Valley Transportation Council requesting that it adopt a procedure to provide for the administrative support of the Council. Specifically, my Board has requested your Council to adopt an administrative procedure that ensures annual reimbursement to the jurisdiction responsible for providing administrative services to the Council, shares the cost equally among member jurisdictions, and becomes effective as of January 1, 2000. We understand the following circumstances associated with our request to the Council: - For the past 10 years the City of Pleasanton has provided administrative support to the Council without charge, - In January, the City of Pleasanton requested that the annual rotation of administrative support for the Council be re-instated as provided by the Council's joint powers agreement; - The Council rotated this responsibility to the County; - Pursuant to the joint powers agreement, each jurisdiction agreed to pay an equal share of all expenses incurred in the performance of the activities called for by the agreement; and - County staff requested that the member jurisdictions equally share in the cost of administrative support for the year, estimated at$8,000, or$1,143 per jurisdiction. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors appreciates the generosity of the City of Pleasanton for providing this service to the Council free of charge. Unfortunately, not all jurisdictions have the resources to carry this burden. This is acknowledged in the Council's agreement as well as similar agreements the County has with cities in other parts of Contra Costa. The Contra Costa Board of Supervisors believes that by adopting an administrative procedure,the Council can ensure that support services to the Council in the future are provided in an orderly manner consistent with its joints powers agreement. Thank you for considering this request. Please call me at 820-8683 if you have any questions. Si a ly, onna Gerbe , h it Contra Cost rd of Supervisors Fi1eAtwicltvtc.1tr The.Board of Supervisors Centra C**of to Word WW CoatntyAdministration Widftt St o x* ti 651 Fine Street,Room toe Martlnez,Caiifomia 9455 -1293 j o u n ty Jim ftWo,10 D"id �fit.tN ,xnd t�tat Dom Usrbw,Std Dist O Mw*D+NIW"t1w..401 DWId Jos C8rAAWW t .tw#tt Dtstriet Ms. Millie Greenberg, Chair June 6, 2400 Contra Costa Transportation Authority 1340 Treat Boulevard, Suite 150 Walnut Creep, CA 94596 Dear Ms. Greenberg On June 6, 2000,the Board of Supervisors authorized the Chair to request that the Congestion Management Agency include in its FX 2000/2001 budget preparation of a countywide bicycle transportation plan. This request is based on our review of the proposed budget, as well as the implementation schedule of the Draft 2000 Update of the Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The Draft 2440 Update includes a map of regional bikeways and a list of some bicycle projects. The Draft 2000 Update recommends preparation of a more comprehensive bicycle plan in FY 2002/03. There are a number of funding opportunities available to local agencies annually for construction bicycle transportation facilities. These include the Transportation Development Act Pedestrian/Bicycle Facility Program, the Transportation Fund for Clean Air, and the State Bicycle Transportation Account. Preparation of a comprehensive bicycle transportation plan in FY 2000/01 would enable local agencies to compete more effectively for these funds two years sooner than the schedule proposed by the Congestion Management Agency. Furthermore, the TRANSPLAN Committee is considering initiation of a bikeway plan for the East County area in FY 2000/01. The County is concerned about developing such a plan without developing similar plans for other parts of the County. As the Congestion Management Agency, the Authority can plan an important lead role in coordinating such an effort countywide. 9Sin ely, Donna Gerb air Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors File:tp6cmabudget.ltr TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra Costa FROM: Dennis M. Bary,AICD County Community Development Director w, DATE: June 6, 2000 SUBJECT: Mortgage Credit Certificate Application for 2000 Authority SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) &BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION'S AUTHORIZE the Deputy Director—Redevelopment to prepare and submit the necessary applications and certifications to the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee(CDLAC) for up to $6 million in Private Activity Bond Authority for Mortgage Credit Certificates (MCC). FISCAL IMPACT None.No General Fund monies are involved. All costs associated with the issuance and administration of this program is paid through fees assessed of program participants. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS Contra Costa County began operation of a MCC program in June 1991. MCCs are an alternative means of assisting low and moderate-income first-time homebuyers in achieving home ownership.The Contra Costa County MCC program has provided assistance to over 2,000 households. Recipients of a MCC are eligible for an income tax credit from the federal government that effectively reduces their net mortgage payment by 200 basis points(2%). The County's application to the CDLAC for up to$6 million in Private Activity Bond Authority for MCCs is based on State allocation procedures. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: SIGNATURE: 11 _t-"RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR OMMEN ATION OF BO COMMITTEE ✓'APPRO'VE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED $T VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A UNANIMOUS (ABSENT Z z ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS O THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: Kara Douglas, 335-1253 ATTESTED Orig: Community Development PHIL BAT LOR, CLERk cc: County Administrator OF THE B ARD OF SUPERVISORS County Counsel AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Auditor-Controller BY � _�'+^ � DEPYJTY TO:~ BOARD OF SUPERVISOR ,- Contra FROM: PHIL BATCHELOR, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Costa a, DATE: June 6, 2000 �'+ rA County SUBJECT: RESCIND MAY 23, 2000, BOARD ACTION(ITEM NO. C.78) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)6 BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I2, EC QIMMEhIDATION: RESCIND May 23, 2000, Board Action (Item No.C.78) on adoption of a resolution authorizing the sale and issuance of 2000-2001 tax and revenue anticipation notes by the Antioch Unified School District in an amount not to exceed$11,000,000. FIMCIAL IMPACT: No financial impact to County. BACKOROUND: The County originally received correspondence from Antioch Unified School District (AVSD) Bond Counsel (Janes Hall) notifying the County that AVSD had adopted its resolution for the District's Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes(TRANS)for 2000/2001 on April 26,2000. The District requested the County`s adoption of its TRANS by resolution of the County Board of Supervisors on May 23, 2000. A draft of the resolution was included on the Contra Costa County's Board of Supervisors' agenda for May 23,2000. Subsequent to the Board action on May 23`d, the School District contacted the GAO's office to notify us that the District had actually adopted the TRANS resolution on May 20,thus necessitating the rescindment of the May 23`d Board action. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X_ SIGNATUR RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOA COMMITTEE -APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURES: ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED v„',ral VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS(ASSENT. f - ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. ATTESTED �L ,�7 ��•�v.', ®_ Contact: PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF GC: Laura Lockwood, CACI 335-1093 SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BY A DEPUTY