HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05022000 - SD2 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ''
Centra
CosrQ
FROM: TRANSPORTATION, WATER & Count
INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE Y
Supervisor John Gioia, Chair
Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema
DATE: May 2, 2000
SUBJECT: REPORT FROM TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CHANGES IN THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
SERVICE AND RATES IN THE UNINCORPORATED COUNTY AREA SERVED BY
PLEASANT HILL BAYSHORE DISPOSAL
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS:
APPROVE changes in the solid waste collection service and rates in the
unincorporated County franchise area served by Pleasant Hill Bayshore Disposal as
recommended by the Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee. The
proposed monthly solid waste rates are as follows: 20 gallon ($13.14), 32 gallon
($21.14), 64 gallon ($42.23), 95 gallon ($63.42) and 32 gallon for mobilehome
residents ($17.30). These rates include solid waste, greenwaste and recycling
collection and the cost of carts.
FISCAL IMPACT
No impact to the general fund.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
This matter had been originally presented to the Board of Supervisors on March 7, 2000.
At that time,the item was referred to the Transportation, Water& Infrastructure Committee
(TW&1 Committee) for review and recommendations.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR X RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
X APPROVE OTHER
41A, r
SIGNATURE(S): MftRV1SOF;0MN GIOIA, CHAIR S kWVISO GAYLE B. UILKEMA
ACTION OF BOAR"N APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
IT'IS"Y'THE BOAU OPMEM. that this matter is CONTINUED to May 9, 2000.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE
SHOWN.
Contact: Linda Moulton (925-335-1238) ATTESTED
cc: Community Development Department (CDD) PHIL BATC OR, CLERK OF
County Administrator's Office THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
D COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BYDEPUTY
Approval of Changes in the Solid Waste Collection Service
May 2, 2000
Page 2
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS (CONT'D)
Transportation, (Nater& Infrastructure Committee Recommendation
The TW&I Committee has reviewed the background information concerning
changes in services and rates in the Pleasant HIII Bayshore Disposal (PHBD)
franchise area during meetings on March 10 and April 17, 2000. The Committee
recommended approval of changes in the solid waste and recycling collection
service and rates in the unincorporated County franchise area served by PHBD.
The background information contained in the original Board Order dated March 7,
2000 is shown below.
Background Prior to TW&I Committee Review
On July 27, 1999, the Board of Supervisors directed the Community Development
Department to coordinate with Pleasant Hill Bayshore Disposal (PHBD) to develop a
collection program which would facilitate the achievement of the County's solid waste
reduction goals. Exhibit A is a copy of the July 27, 1999 Board Order. Staff was directed
to do the following:
A. Simplify and Standardize the types of service offered in the unincorporated areas
served by PHBD so all the customers in the service area have the same services.
B. Redesign the rate structure and standardize the rate schedules in the unincorporated
areas in order to provide all customers with the same rates.
C. Institute variable can rates in accordance with the County's waste reduction goals as
outlined in the County's Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE).
D. Institute greenwaste curbside collection service in accordance with the County's
waste reduction goals as specified in the SRRE.
E. Expand curbside recycling to include mixed paper in accordance with the County's
waste reduction goals as specified in the SRRE.
Previously, the Community Development Department had surveyed all of the customers in
the communities served under the County's franchise with PHBD. The communities
surveyed were Alhambra Valley, Clyde, Pacheco, part of Bay Point, unincorporated areas
in the Central Sanitary District(CCCSD), Morgan Territory, unincorporated Concord and
Canyon. Eighty percent of the respondents indicated they would recycle mixed paper and
chipboard and 73% indicated that they would use a greenwaste program. Over 40% of
the respondents indicated that they would be interested in having mini-can service (20-
gallon can) at a reduced price.
During the fall of 1999, the Community Development staff and a representative from
PHBD held community meetings in the various communities to discuss the proposed
changes in service. The meetings were as follows:
Date Place Communities Invited
October 13 Pacheco Community Center Pacheco/Alhambra Valley/CCCSD
October 14 Clyde Community Center Clyde
October 28 Ambrose Community Center Bay Point
November 4 Canyon Elementary School Canyon
November 8 Clayton Library MorganTerritory/Unincorp. Concord
Exhibit B is a copy of the postcard notices sent to all customers regarding the above
meetings. At the time of the fall meetings, the exact costs of the new services were not
available and customers were informed that another meeting would be held concerning
the rates. Postcards were sent to all customers and the meeting was held on February
16, 2000 (see Exhibit C).
Approval of Changes in the Solid Waste Collection Service
May 2, 2000
Page 3
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS (CONT'D)
Below is a summary of the proposed service/rate changes related to the Board's direction
of July 27, 1999:
A. Simplify and Standardize Rates
Current rates include 44 different types of service ranging from 20-gallon (g.) cans (only
three customers are using this service)to three 95-gallon cans. The rate structure shown
in Exhibit D has been changed to five basic rates for 20 gallon, 32 gallon, 64 gallon and 95
gallon service and mobilehome service. The five basic rates are:
20 g. $18.14/month
32 g. $21.14/month
64 g. $42.28/month
95 g. $63.42/month
32 g. (mobilehomes in parks) $17.30/month
B. Redesign and Standardize the Rate Structure
The redesigned rate structure would apply to all the communities served underthe County
franchise. Currently some areas are paying $16.66 for 32 g. monthly service and some are
paying $19.51 for the same service. The new rate structure assures that consistent rates
are charged to all customers based on their level of service.
C. Institute Variable Can Rate
This rate structure implements variable can rates for 32 g., 64 g. and 95 g. customers. The
64 g. rates are twice that of the 32 g. rates and the 95 g. rates are three times the 32 g.
rate. Variable can rates(rates based on volume)are called for bythe County's SRRE. The
County's ERRE also calls for mini-can service (20-gallon). Lower rates for smaller can
sizes should serve as an incentive to reduce solid waste.
D. Institute Greenwaste Service
Every customer, except mobilehome residents, will receive 95 g. carts for greenwaste
which will be picked up on alternate weeks. The cost of the 95 g. carts is included in the
overall rates. Mobilehome parks are responsible for the landscaping in the parks.
Therefore the mobilehome residents' rates do not include the cost of the greenwaste
service. Staff from the County and PHBD has met with customers from Canyon
concerning the service constraints related to the roads in that community and has worked
out a solution to the greenwaste collection issue.
E. Expanded Recycling
Recycling will be expanded to include mixed paper and chipboard as well as the currently
collected cardboard and newspaper. Customers will receive 14 g. bins for all paper
products. There will be unlimited paper recycling as extra paper can be put in bags.
Customers will keep their current recycling bins for glass, plastic and metal cans.
Conclusion
The proposed rates will be volume based variable can rates and will be uniform for all
areas served by PHBD. Included in the rates will be the following:
1. Weekly collection of solid waste in 20 g., 32 g., 64 g. or 95 g. carts
2. Bi-weekly collection of greenwaste in 95 g. carts
3. Bi-weekly (on alternate weeks from greenwaste) of glass, plastic, cans and mixed
paper in recycling bins.
4. The cost of carts and the new bin are included in the monthly cost.
Approval of Changes in the Solid Waste Collection Service
May 2, 2000
Page 4
BACKGROUNDlREASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS (CONT'D)
Customers will be sent a notice which informs them about the rates and offers a choice of
service. Exhibit D shows the projected number of households in each of the service
categories. It is expected that most customers will reduce the size of cans they will need
for solid waste. In other areas of the County approximately 10%to 15%of customers have
opted to use 20 g. can service. Thus it is projected that approximately 400 (13%) of the
non-mobilehome customers will choose the 20 g. cart.
Currently a customer with 32 g. service has 128 g. of solid waste picked up in four weeks.
If the same customer chose 20 g. service, they could have 80 g. of solid waste and
190 g. of greenwaste picked up for a total of 270 g. Table 1 demonstrates that the addition
of greenwaste would allow customers to decrease the size of the solid waste container
while increasing the total amount of solid waste and greenwaste collected. Thus if
customers are currently putting yardwaste in their solid waste containers, they can choose
to have a smaller solid waste container but actually have even more volume in the two
containers combined. This does not include increased volume of expanded recycling
services (e.g. unlimited quantity of paper).
TABLE 1
Volume/Week Current Volume/Month Proposed Volume/Month
Solid Waste + Greenwaste = Total
20 g. 80 g. 80 + 190 = 270 g.
32 g. 128 g. 128 + 190 = 318 g.
64 g. 256 g. 256 + 190 = 446 g.
95 g. 380 g. 380 + 190 = 570 g.
After the program has been in effect for several months, (probably at the end of the year
2000) staff and PHBD will review the number of households using each service type
compared to the projected number of households assumed in Exhibit D and actual and
projected revenue. At that time there could be an adjustment of the rates.
Exhibit E is attached to show current(as of February 2000)solid waste rates and services
in various cities and communities in the County.
Exhibit A July 27, 1999 Board Order
Exhibit B Postcard notices for Pall 1999 meetings to announce proposed services changes
Exhibit C Postcard notice for 2/16/2000 meeting to announce new proposed rates
Exhibit D Current PHBD rates and services as well as assumptions of customers'service changes
Exhibit E Current solid waste/recycling collection rates for jurisdictions in Contra Costa County
s:conserv/linda/5-2-00 bo
AEXHIBIT ,. ��. Contra
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ostM
FROM: DENNIS M. BARRY, AICP County
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: July 27, 1999
SUBJECT: DIRECT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO INSTITUTE CHANGES
IN THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE IN THE UNINCORPORATED COUNTY
AREA SERVED BY PLEASANT HILL BAYSHORE DISPOSAL
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
ACCEPT the report concerning the survey of the unincorporated areas served by Pleasant
Hill Bayshore Disposal.
DIRECT the Community Development Department to coordinate with Pleasant Hill
Bayshore Disposal to develop a solid waste program which will facilitate the achievement
of the County's solid waste goals.
A. Simplify and standardize the types of service offered in the unincorporated areas
served by Pleasant Hill Bayshore Disposal so that all customers have the same
services.
B. Redesign the rate structure and standardize the rate schedules In the
unincorporated areas In order to provide all customers with the same rates.
There may be some differences for hard to service areas where smaller trucks
are necessary.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: -kYES SIGNATURE
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMM1 E1
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON 1" ,27/1 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED ,, OTHER „A
APPROVED the above recommendations with the understanding that a proposal will be presented to the
Board of Supervisors for consideration before any changes are implemented.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
! HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
L� UNANIMOUS (ABSENT�jj AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION
TAKEN AYES:. NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:__,__ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE
SHOWN.
Contact: Linda Moulton (925) 335.1235 ATTESTED l
CC: Community Development Department (CDD). PHIL CHE OR, CLERK OF
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
` BY , DEPUTY
Changes in Solid Waste Collection Service
Page 2
C. Institute variable can rates in accordance with the County's source reduction goals
as outlined in the County's Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE).
D. Institute green waste service in accordance with the County's ERRE,
E. Expand recycling to include mixed paper.
FISCAL IMPACT .
No impact to the general fund.
BACK ROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
On June 23, 1998 the Board of Supervisors adopted changes to the solid waste collection
rates charged to the customers in unincorporated Contra Costa County served by Pleasant
Hill Bayshore Disposal and instituted a five percent franchise fee. At this time the Board
directed the Community Development Department to survey all the unincorporated areas
as to service preferences and incorporate suggestions into the service plans as
appropriate. Surveys were sent to customers in these unincorporated areas along with
their bills in April, May and June of 1999. Table 1 shows the results of the surveys for the
various communities. Overall there was a 16.3% response rate.
1. allRVEY RESULTS
Table 1 shows the results of the Customer survey and Exhibit A is a copy of the
questionnaire which was mailed to the customers. The results are grouped by
communities with the same billing periods. Some of the results are.
(1) Seventy-four percent of the respondents rated their service as good or excellent.
(2) Twenty-five percent of the respondents felt that once a month greenwaste service
would be adequate while 28% favored twice a month service and 20% felt they
needed weekly greenwaste pickup.
(3) Eighty percent responded that they would recycle mixed paper and chipboard
(including magazines and cereal boxes). Many customers (68%) also would recycle
plastic containers (plastic codes#3, #4, #5, #7) and 49%would recycle polystyrene
(code #6).
(4) Most of the respondents live in single family detached housing (84%) or single
family attached (11%) .
(5) When asked if they would consider mini-can service if additional recycling
and greenwaste programs were added, 43% of the respondents answered yes.
(6) Of the 6686 households which were sent surveys, 1089 or 16.3% replied. The
results for the three groups are similar. For example, the respondents from the
communities of Mt. View and Alhambra Valley had the highest proportion (64%)
responding that they would recycle mixed paper but the other areas responded
positively too with 77% and 78% answering that they would recycle mixed paper.
(7) There was an open-ended question asking for suggestions concerning expanded
service. Although a limited number of customers answered this question, there
were 39 comments concerning the need for more recycling, 34 concerning the need
for adding greenwaste and 53 suggesting weekly recycling. Seventy-three
respondents were concerned about cost of service.
(8) Question 1 concerning rating of service also had an open-ended question
concerning ,service. Fifty-four respondents expressed the need for more recycling
and fifty-nine expressed the need for weekly recycling. The comments concerning
service delivery varied with 34 respondents expressing a need for containers, 26
respondents reporting recycling misses, and 30 respondents having concerns
about litter or spills. The replies to the open-ended questions have been
Changes in Solid Waste Collection Service
Page 4
Implementing the five tasks should be a big step in helping to meet the County's AB939
goals. Although the implementation of all five tasks at once will be a major change,staff
feels that the piecemeal changes would probably take two or three years. Pleasant Hill
Bayshore disposal has indicated that they are willing to work with staff to implement these
programs. As part`of the process, staff plans to have public meetings in the various
unincorporated areas to explain the need for these programs and to allow community input
concerning the program changes.
The cost of the new services could be offset for customers who elect to have mini-can
service and maximize the use of their recycling and greenwaste opportunities. The most
significant rate increases would be for those customers who continue to dispose of the
most solid waste. The use of 64 gallon and 96 gallon containers for solid waste would
become more expensive when variable can rates become effective. The arcane service
structure would be standardized such that all customers could choose either 20 gallon
mini-can, 32 gallon, 64 gallon or 95 gallon solid waste service in combination with
recycling and greenwaste service. Other services would also be standardized such as the
number of cleanups.
The target date for the implementation of these recommendations is January of the year
2000.
WP:h/7-27-99.bo
�i+aag�q ter-
TABLE 1 - -
Results of Customer Survey > '
I. How do you rate your garbage and recycling service?
a)Poor 7% 8% 8% 7.10
b)Fair 20% 19% 19% 19%
c)Good 50% 51% 51% 51%
d)Excellent 23% 22% 24% 23%
2.What level of greenwaste would meet your needs?
a)64g/monthly 20% 25% 29% 25%
b)64g1twice a month 30% 25% 28% 28%
c)64g/weeky 27% 22% 14% 20%
d)compost/no yard waste 13% 15% 3% 18%
e)would use a Christmas tree program 34% 32% 30% 31%
3.What of the following items would you recycle t(service was
available?
a)plastic containers(codes 03-#5,#7) 72% 71% 64% 88%
b)polystyrene(#6) 55% 49% 44% 49%
c)mixed paper&chipboard 84% 77% 78% 80%
4. in what type of housing do you live?
a)single family detached 88% 78% 84% 84%
b)single family attached 9% 10% 13% 11%
c)condo/townhouse 2% 5% 1% 2%
d)apartment 1%
e)other 1% 7% 1% 3%
5,
If you had expanded recycling and greenwaste service,would you
be interested In having mini-can service(20-gallon can)at a
reduced price?
Yes 39% 42% 47% 43%
No 41% 45% 48% 44%
No answer 20% 13% 7% 13.10
Number of returns 358 251 480 1089
Number of customers 2038 2304 2344 6886
%responding 18% 11% 20% 16.3%
Word/h/custsurtbl
EXHIBIT A
.1 eg.-lingMore
' l'
Customer ury
Let Us Anow What You
,^ )� w ?'pink v,f Cr:rnrnntS�rt►z'ces renter
�f`l�roposed Semsce Ch4nger
PIeaes till out the questionnaire below,told
and tape shut and mall back to us,The
>� aurwy Is asff-addressed and postage paid.
ti. r
04116 k ontra Costa County franchises the hauling of solid waste with Pleasant Mill Bayshore
Disposal for your community.
The Board of Supervisors has directed County staff to survey an the unincorporated
communities receiving service from Pleasant Milt Bayshore Disposal oncoming current
service and proposed service changes.
In order to meet the State waste reduction requlraments,the County plans on Instituting
greanwasts service and expanding recycling to Include all materials Rated in the County'$
materiels diversion ordinance and is interested In the customers'opinions concerning this
expanded service.
1. Mow do you rate your garbage and recycling service?(✓check appropriate One)
(a) poor
(b) fair
(c) good _..�
(d) excellent
If you have any comments on your service,please oomment:
2, What level of grsenwasts eollaeflan Would meet your needs?(se check appropriate tine)
(a) a 64-gaiton container conacted monthly
(b) a 64-gallon contalner collected twice a month
(c) a"gallon caro�s�nttainer collected weekly
Sdj d.riwt t�YMre yrs&mwarta 41iNl7Uikmi Lwasuse �
I compost or have no yard wast*
(a) would use a Christmas tree collection program
3. Which of the following Items would you recycle N#*rvtce was available?W check
appropriate Rn*)
(a) plastic containtra(plastic codes 03 through#S and
(b) polystyrene(cod*$d,Includes cups,pecking materials)
(c) Mixed paper a chipboard(Includes msgattlne$,cartel boxae)
4. In what"a of housing do you IW?(✓chock appropriate litre)
(a) single family detached
(b) single family attached
(c) condo or townhouse
(d) apartment
(a) other
a, What is your xlp cods(optlonall?
d. if you had expanded recycling and gr**nwasts$#nice,would you be Interested In
having mini-con service(20•9atlon Can)of a reduced price?W chock appropriate one)
yes
7. iso you have any suggestions concerning expanded service?N#o,please comment:
pleasant Hill EXHIBIT B
BayshoreZ
D I S P O S A L
July 12, 1999
TO: Linda Moulton
Contra Costa County Community Development
FROM: Susan Hurl
Community Affairs Manager
RE: Customer Survey Results for Clyde,Pacheco,Bay Point and Central San
1 have attached a copy of the Customer Survey sent out to 2,304 customers in the Clyde/Pacheco/Bay
Point/Central Sanitary District areas and a detailed report of customer responses. There were 251
responses or an 11%return,which is fairly good. The results were from 6/2/99-6/23/99.
Overall, 72.5%of our customers rated their service good or excellent. The 27.5%that rated their service
poor or fair had comments about our service delivery or the type of service offered:
#/Type of Comments #/Type of Comments
Service Delivery Type of Service Offered
5 Larger recycling bins 15 Not enough recycling
7 Litter/spills 10 Clean ups
10 Need containers 10 Weekly recycling
2 Don't pick up extras 7 Need yard waste program
8 Recycling nuss_M10 Costs too much
12 Miscellaneous 2 Part time yard waste program
1f a customer had service complaints or issues and gave us his/her name,the customer was called.
Customers would prefer biweekly yard waste recycling and would definitely like to recycle more material
and more often. The mini can met with a mixed response.
The suggestions for expanded service ranged form more recycling to composting:
# Comment
2 More mixed paper
3 Recycle oil and oil filters
10 Cost is too high
2 Part time yard waste program
2 Compost
15 More recycling
0 Pick up extras
7 Add greenwaste
3 Senior/disabled rate
10 Weekly recycling
7 Litter
10 Scheduled clean-ups
11 Miscellaneous
441 N. Buchanan Circle J Pacheco, CA 94553 J 925.685.4716 J Fax 925.685.4735
30%Posf•ConsVmor
Pleasant Hill
10,01
[Bayshorez
ID l S P 0 S A L
July 12, 1999
TO: Linda Moulton
Contra Costa County Community Development
FROM: Susan Hurl
Community Affairs Manager
RE: Customer Survey Results for Morgan Territory,Concord,.and Rodeo
I have attached a copy of the Customer Survey sent out to 2,344 customers in the Morgan Territory,
Concord and Rodeo areas and a detailed report of customer responses. There were 480 responses or a 200/6
return,which is very good. The results were from 5/4/99-6/20/99.
Overall, 75%of our customers rated their service good or excellent. The 25%that rated their service poor
or fair had comments about our service delivery or the type of service offered:
#/Type of Comments #/Type of Comments
Service Delivery- Type of Service offered
9 Larger recycling bins 14 Not enough recycling
13 Litter/spills 7 Clean ups
I I Need containers 35 Weekly recycling
3 Don't pick up extras 14 Need yard waste program
7 Recycling missed 16 Costs too much
13 Happy with service 6 Patz time yard waste program
16 Miscellaneous
If a customer had service complaints or issues and gave us his/her name,the customer was called.
Customers would prefer biweekly yard waste recycling and would definitely like to recycle more material
and more often. The mini can met with a mixed response.
The suggestions for expanded service ranged form more recycling to composting.
# Comment
5 More mixed paper
5 Recycle oil and oil filters
22 Cost is too high
6 Part time yard waste program
5 Compost
14 More recycling
3 Pick up extras
15 Add greenwaste
6 Senior/disabled rate
35 Weekly recycling
13 Litter
7 Scheduled clean-ups
16 Miscellaneous
441 N. Buchanan Circle J Pacheco, CA 94553 J 925.685.,4716 J Fox 925.655.4735
30%hoConto"r
. 7-57-yr
PLEASANT HILL BAYSHORE DISPOSAL,
May 27, 1999
TO: Linda Moulton
Contra Costa County Community Development
FROM: Susan Hurl
Community Affairs Manager
RE: Customer Survey Results for Alhambra Valley/Mt. View
I have attached a copy of the Customer Survey sent out to 2,038 customers in the Alhambra
Valley/Mt. View area and a detailed report of customer responses. There were 358 responses or
an 18%return which is very good. The results were from 4/5/99=5/4/99.
Overall, 73% of our customers rated their service good or excellent. The 27% that rated their
service poor or fair had comments about our service delivery or the type of service offered:
#/Type of Comments #/"Type of Comments
Service Delivery Type of Service Offered
14 Quality of work 25 Not enough recycling
10 Litter/spills 4 Clean ups
13 Need containers 14 Weekly recycling
8 Don't pick up extras 3 Need yard waste program
1 I Recycling misses 4 Costs too much
11 Misc.
If a customer had service complaints or issues and gave us his/her name,the customer was called.
Customers would prefer biweekly yard waste recycling and would definitely like to recycle more
material and more often. The mini can met with a mixed response.
The suggestions for expanded service ranged from more recycling to composting:
# Comment
1 More mixed paper
3 Recycle oil and oil filters
41 Cost
29 Misc.
11 Limited greenwaste material
6 Compost
10 More recycling
1 Pick up extras
12 Add greenwaste
2 Disabled/senior rate
8 Weekly recycling
2 Mini can
I Litter
2 Scheduled clean ups
441 N. BUCHANAN CIRCLE • PACI-iECO. CA 94553
(923) 685-4716 • FAX (925) 685-4735
ew waste collection and recycling services!
EXHIBIT B
Come to a neighborhood meeting to Learn about new
9 9
and expanded services, including:
C; collection of mixed paper
ci collection of yard waste
Cp new waste containters
Wednesday, October 13 at 6:30 p.m. =i
Pacheco Community Center '.
5800 Pacheco Blvd. in Pacheco
Questions? CaU (925) 335-1238
Sponsored by the Contra Costa County
Community Development Department
New waste collection and recycling services!
Come to a community meeting to Learn about new
and expanded services,including:
Q# collection of mixed paper
C'p colLection,of yard waste
C"; new waste containers
Monday, November 8 at 7:00 p.m.
The Clayton Community
Library Meeting Room
6125 Clayton Road
Questions? CaU (925) 335-1238
Sponsored by the Contra Costa County
Community Development Department
N9 waste co►llecti6n dnd r6 cli a seiv cies
Y � Come to- neighborhood sneetrng to tearn about new µ.
and expaindeo:sirvicei inctu'ding.
coite on of mixed paper
cottection ofyard waste
47 .. 5
"If's
new waste containters
Thursdays October.14 at 7:00 puri.
Clyde Civic Improvement Association .
Ctyde Community Center
109 Wettingtoo Avenue
x
• Questions? CaU (925) 335-•1238 -
Sponsored by the Contra Costa County
Community Devetopment Department.
New waste collection and recycling services
Come to a neighborhood meeting to Learn about new
and}expanded services,including:
C# cottection of mined paper
Co collection of yard waste `
` C# new waste containters
Thursday, October 28 at 7:00 p.m.
Ambrose Community tenter (Dining Room)
3105 Widow Pass Road'in Bay point
Questions? CaU (925) 335-1238
Sponsored by the Contra Costa County
Community Development Department
4WVWV fl► 7i1► +ry► +�rr.,w► rr,+�r +r�r►.'�r- ."ter r. -.f...r. ^.,." "'*f ""r' -.....• .,,,r. -... r.• .o. �.. �.
*11�LL1`
Contra Costa. Community Devetopment Dept. +4 presorted
X51 fine Street y FiR�u1'-CLASS NIAtL i
4th Roor, North Wing U.S. PAID � 1
PAID
Martinez, CA 94553 pleasant Hig,CA
perrnit No. 122
.. r
pleesf n� ersi�•
,Pose[ gusto �vember 4!
D community meeting.
9Aatsdon recycled WP��
w ,ra `%�Pl�T ��,� 'r'. � �"`'u`�`..',•''V �4�i.j��r� ro.;."Sr'!to r .,'r�T,:�„?, �`• �Y.+. Y i;'��.i
�ia ire: OC
'•. ,.ri�+t�. . •L'i-r•
�w ! sIe ff I vrr«an etyt n ► service
:Co
WAY Ya ca .10@02r ,about n w �
�r '�eart d se,. cess ud n ; ` ,•:` '�
'' Rrij-_.- r-'?:i►i+ t`4wn i d`y o a a �.y�'?Co .a
m , 3
t t 4q. i '! IS•a.i',yy!�::.w .� .
a ♦ s;, r.`�. ti... aF�-rd~` i, _ R,. c'� *`�ij,d x.9•S f' •k a' .K•y'z i. ri
K��!�� `� `�:i�!I C1�..�t�,i����$�J,'�'�''.a w -�"p'�I ,•r.'�4"�'�r�.. '+t `• �'�� �t�'1,+•t k�` :.
'1t -:.�'• .•.�`�y��'��;' �` �i { .r � X�rt�•.� r.as w •`• •F�. y..} : � , ��#jt•,` .
i J �r�',y, s ...'J' " �a � bar r, 1 '`''r. �•a�'"• lt,._:,5,._� ��tiy,.
tTh" r 8ayrvve,�rtber,4'at7:t30 m., . - yy
' {' Cl e`to SC i+ed ` r!'iy,rr tirr,�..... .,•,, 'fr'+i` .� `.,
.*�,1`'Y'',. 'Co �:• ....a;`w"S�y "'�p•• v�r`i•Ksr:...�.�i.,=�~ a: !'T:"..�w��:�i,��� {=��'••{:'
"�.�T . „e n�`�a N f'1 {r• y;. 1} �.r' t t�..�. �, r`�xrL'��'., 's..'F' - aX` {'� !.•
"�a J��',��'r'r`�"�"-.;,,',a•';�' *'S'.+�"'''��ti ti':as`'o.{`•''� f � t 4� r ,fi#,
r rtQruest�LtopnS�sCdt! 925) 33 - ?38yt
+'`;aF." ��`�"'YS"`ijr y twA' +'f'.4+�'S�+• ;l•y'*}j +5+y �r•� •• ., +Y ++s �., + 'r ea _ _P r
4 'r y i s-•�r4 W� t fwr 4-!�`{ � 4 i , 1 , •{ �",• a t d
' V. as .t r#,. " 4 t ' rr «ha, t y .,:,,r{•''�y.v ... Y 7 � fM cY r 'a
r� . 5 r p��' - S .^"T'•+.,r L ti. .! {!•,y,�r ,,era S� •R5pansofid by thf Cantu tt�sta`County,
h�a
+ horn utrty ae etopment'DO—
arten
m` �'�9tj "v'"�,..
f;,.,;:;.�b'• � +t="m•.•$+7,`l.:`� ,.,�;':.' tv;@".r4 .t., c$��R;l3, .'�'a''„a�; h Y'i=:..?"4. S ...�.,..;: .J ..., .. '.�
1
EXHIBIT C
New waste collection and recycling services!
New services include:
C,; biweekly collection of mixed paper & other curbside recyclabtes
Co biweekly collection of yard waste
Co new carts for solid waste &yard waste
plus an additionat 14g. bin for mixed paper
New rates inctude all recycling, yard waste, sotid waste & carts
Mobilehomes $17.30
2Og. solid waste containers $18.14 M
32g. solid waste containers $21.14
1549. solid waste containers $42.28
959. solid waste containers $63.42
(all service types except mobliehomes will receive 95g.carts for yard waste)
Wednesday, February 16 at 7:00 p.m.
Count Supervisors' Board Chambers (Room 107)
651 Pyne Street in Martinez
Questions: Concerning the Meeting 8 Rates
call COD (925) 335-1238
Concerning New Services
Sponsored by the Contra Costa County call PHBD (925) 685-4711
Community Development Department
EXHIBIT d
Residential Rate Structure
Current Service Current Current New Service Projected Proposed
Categories Number of Rates' Categories Number of Rates
Households Households
1-20 gallon 3 $16.48-17.51 1-20 gallon 403 18.14
1-32 gallon 1434 $16.66-19.51 1-32 gallon 2029 21.14
1-32 gallon for 900 $12.20-13.60 1-32 gallon 900 17.30
mobilehomes for
mobilehomes
(no
reenwaste
1-64 gallon 164 $19.01-38.21 1-64 gallon 359 42.28
2-32 gallon 190 $24.38-33.01
1-95 gallon 1086 $19.66-28.06 1-95 gallon 112 63.42
3-32 gallon 7 $30.3846.51
2-64 gallon 4 $37.71 2-64 gallon 84.56
4-32 gallon 1 $60.01
2-95 gallon 13 $42.38-66.01 2-95 gallon 126.84
3-95 gallon 1 $63.38 3-95 gallon 190.26
Total 3803 3803
Varies by service area due to pre-existing rate structures in place before the County
franchised the service.
sxonservAindalres rate struc
+,r W v fpr v %W V+.r�,✓ +i.rv v v+✓v wwr •w ,�,r a
G 03 �y
a
.� O
Zi
"o C C7 d► cn �N Z N
r i
�+ � o d
tp ✓ D � '�► �, CL
+T
v�
7 r O
t�f
M t"'
UM eq
Ul)
M
d � N
) z
4 ..
ran
r
'n o
cd o a� c
_ w
w3�
yla
am.
os
06
C u`► �Z;o
to �+ O
tp
N