Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05022000 - C51-C55 File: 250-9514/B.4.1 C.61 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order of May 2, 2000,by the fallowing vote: AYES: SUPERVISORS GIOIA, UILKEMA, DESAULNIRR, AND GERDER NOES: NONE ABSENT: SUPERVISOR CANCIAMILLA RESOLUTION NO. 2000J212 SUBJECT: Approving Plans and Specifications for Kitchen and Cafeteria Air Conditioning at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, 2500 Alhambra Avenue, Martinez for Health Services Department (CP#98-23) Budget bine Item No. 6971-4529 Authorization No. 0927-WH529B WHEREAS plans and specifications for Kitchen and Cafeteria Air Conditioning at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, 2500 Alhambra Avenue, Martinez for Health Services Department, have been filed with the Board this day by the Director of General Services; and WHEREAS plans and specifications were prepared by Combined Electrical Resources, Engineering Consultants; and WHEREAS the cosi estimate for the initial construction contract is $231,600.00; and WHEREAS the Board has obtained the general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum rates paid on this project; and WHEREAS the Board hereby DETERMINES that the project is a California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Class lA Categorical Exemption; DIRECTS the Director of Community Development to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk; and DIRECTS the Director of General Services to arrange for payment of the $25.00 handling fee to the County Clerk for filing the Notice of Exemption and a $25.00 handling fee to Community Development for administration processing costs. IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that said plans and specifications are hereby APPROVED. Bids for this work will be received on June 1, 2000 at 2:00 p.m., and the Clerk of this Board is directed to publish a Notice to Contractors in accordance with Section 22037 of the Public Contract Code, inviting bids for said work, said Notice to be published in CONTRA COSTA_ TIMES . The Director of General Services is directed to mail notices to the construction trade journals specified in Section 22036 of the Public Contract Code at least 30 days before the date of opening the bids. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of General Services, or his designee, is AU'T'HORIZED to issue bid Addenda, as needed, for clarification of the contract bid documents, provided the involved changes do not significantly increase the cost estimate for the initial construction contract. Orig. Dept.: General Services Dept. - Architectural Division cc: General Services Department Architectural Division G.S. Accounting File: 250-9514IA.5 i hereby certify that this is a true and correct Audile: 25 -951 / copy of an action taken and entered can the Auditor-Controller llen minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the Debi Foley Developmentdate shown. MAY 2, 2000 Health Services Department(A.D.) ATTESTED: PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of the Board Mcm of Supervisors and Cou y Administrator By Deputy H.t 1995\250951415 L01412b.doc 61 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS C(7 NTRA x� y.,,,r . COSTA FROM: PHIL BATCHELOR, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR , . COUNTY DATE: May 2, 2000 SUBJECT: Juvenile Hall Renovation, Tama{pais Wing, 2012 Glacier Drive, Martinez (WH399B) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION($)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION(S) DETERMINE that there is a need to continue the emergency action taken by the Board on August 10, 1999 pursuant to Public Contract Code Sections 22035 and 220150, to complete the Juvenile Hall Renovation, Tamaipais Wing project at 202 Glacier Drive, Martinez. FINANCIAL IMPACT Funding for this project has been budgeted. Per the Board's authorization on August 10, 1999, County Counsel is pursuing appropriate legal remedies against Patrick M. Donaghue, Insurance Company of the West and any other parties responsbile for damages and expenses incurred by the County in excess of the previous construction contract balance. BACKGROUND 1. On December 1, 1998, the Board awarded the construction contract for the Juvenile Hall Renovation, Tamalpais Wing (Tamaipais) project, located at 202 Glacier Drive, Martinez to Patrick M. Donaghue (Donaghue) for $1,034,570. The contract required the placement of a considerable amount of exposed concrete within specified tolerances, consistent with industry standards. 2. Donaghue performed extensive concrete work that was seriously defective. The resulting work threatened to compromise the security and appearance of the facility. Donaghue repeatedly failed to either remove the defects or develop a viable plan for their correction. On August 10, 1999, the Board declared Donaghue to be in material breach and terminated Donaghue's rights under the contract. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR __RECOMMENDATION OF 96 COMMITTEE PPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S)- ACTION OF BOAR N MAPPROVED AS RECOMMENDED XX OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A __XX UNANIMOUS(ASSENT 95 f TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ON MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. ATTESTED M a Y 2, 2000 PHIL BATCIJELOA,CLERK OF E BOA SUPERV ORS BY ,DEPUTY Contact: cc: See Page 2 BACKGROUND (continued) 3. On August 10, 1999, the Board declared that, due to the public safety threat posed by the temporary closures at the project, and due to the possible loss of state grant funding, a state of emergency exists. Furthermore, the Board delegated authority to the County Administrator or designee to complete the project and to enter into contracts without the need to re-solicit competitive bids. 4. The County received the bonding company's (Insurance Company of the West; "ICW') response to the County's claim on November 5, 1999. In its response, ICW recognized the seriousness of the defective work and recognized that it likely will cost the County at least $510,985.05 over and above the contract price to fix the defective work. Despite this, ICW gave two unreasonable alternatives to the County—either accept back the original contractor (Donaghue) who did the defective work or accept a "low ball' payment of $118,004.31. ICW s bad faith response amounts to a rejection of the County's claim. Therefore, the County is left with no viable choice but to hire its own contractor to properly complete the contract work in strict accordance with the plans and specifications. This will involve removing the defective construction down to the slab and rebuilding the concrete from that point up. 5. On November 30, 1999, the County Administrator's Office executed a contract with Taber Construction of Martinez for the completion of the project, and issued a Notice to Proceed effective December 6, 1999. The contract amount is $1,198,435, and the contract duration is 150 calendar days. Contact: George Roemer, CAO—County Construction Administrator (5-1055) cc: CAO Finance Auditor/Controller GSD (Accounting)—Terry Mann O'Brien-Kreitzberg Inc. (via CAO) Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Costa FROM: Dennis M. Barry, AICP ufty Community Development Director DATE: May 2, 2000 SUBJECT: Inducement Action for Multifamily Projects SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RE OMMENDATIQ S ADOPT resolution conditionally providing for the issuance of revenue bonds to finance multifamily rental housing developments to be owned by the parties listed as the ownership entity of Exhibit A attached. FISCAL IMPACT None. In the event that the bonds are issued, the County is reimbursed for casts incurred in the issuance process. Annual expenses for monitoring of Regulatory Agreement provisions are accommodated in the bond issue, in the event that no bond issue occurs, the County has already been paid an "Inducement Fee" to offset expenses. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The owners of prospective multifamily rental housing developments desire to be included in a future multifamily revenue bond financing program. In order to provide financing eligibility for costs incurred, the development must be induced, i.e., a conditional statement of intent by the Board of Supervisors must be adopted. The inducement action does not obligate the County or the owner without future discretionary actions. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: ECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE OPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOA APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED 19TRE VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A „ UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Source: Jim Kennedy 335-1255 prig: Community Development ATTESTED cc: County Administrator PHIL SATCHEL , CLERK OF County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Redevelopment Agency AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Housing Authority via Community Development BY DEPUTY JK1h dnducbos.shl til EXHWrr A Name of Maximum Location Number of Named Development Amount of Units Developer/ of Bond Development Initial Issue Owner— Pinecrest $2.0 million 1949 & 1945 24 A limited partner- Apts Cavallo, Rd. , ship to be formed Antioch with Resources for Community Development as managing General Partner Camara Circle $4.0 million 2501, 2513, 2525, 52 A limited partner- 2530, 2531, 2536, ship to be formed 2537, 2549, 2554, with Resources for 2555, & 2566 Community Development Camara Circle, as managing General Concord Partner amdu'ta4.shi =. -A& THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Resolution on May 2. 2000 by the following vote: AYES: SUPERVISORS GIOIA, UILKEMA, DESAULNIER and GERBER NOES: NONE ABSENT: SUPERVISOR CANCIAMILLA ABSTAIN: NONE RESOLUTION NO.2000/218 SUBJECT: Resolution of the County of Contra) Costa Conditionally Providing for ) the Issuance of Revenue Bonds to ) Finance the Construction of ) Multi-Family Housing Developments ) WHEREAS, the County of Contra Costa (the "County") is a legal subdivision and body corporate and politic of the State of California, duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County, after careful study and consideration, has determined that there is a shortage of safe and sanitary housing within the County, and that it is in the best interest of the residents of the County and in furtherance of the health, safety and welfare of the public for the County to assist in the financing of housing developments; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, and particularly Chapter 7 of Part 5 thereof (the "Act") , the County is empowered to issue and sell bonds for the purpose of making mortgage loans or otherwise providing funds to finance the development of multi-family rental housing, including units for lower-income households and very-low income households; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has now determined to provide financing for the multi-family developments identified in Exhibit A hereto (the "Developments") , and in order to finance the Developments the County intends to issue, at one time or from time to time, revenue bonds pursuant to the Act; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa as follows : 1 . The Board of Supervisors hereby determines that it is necessary and desirable to provide construction and permanent financing for the Developments pursuant to the Act or other appropriate authority, by the issuance of Mortgage Revenue Bonds (the "Bonds") , in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit A, subject to the conditions that with RESOLUTION NO. 2000/218 respect to any development to be financed, (I) the County by resolution shall have first agreed to acceptable terms and conditions for the bonds (and for the sale and delivery thereof) , and for an indenture and all other agreements with respect to any of the foregoing; (ii) all requisite governmental approvals shall have first been obtained; (iii) the bonds shall be payable solely from revenues received with respect to loans or other investments made with the proceeds of such bonds, and neither the full faith nor the credit of the County shall be pledged to the payment of the principal of, or interest on any such bond; (iv) the County and the respective developer/initial owner thereof identified on Exhibit A hereto, or any partnership, corporation or other entity to be formed by such developer/initial owner or by any principal thereof, or any successor to the interests thereof approved by the County (in any such case, the "Owner" ) , shall have entered into a preliminary agreement concerning the financing, in substantially the form attached thereto as Exhibit B, with such additions or deletions as are considered necessary or appropriate by the County Director of Community Development or the County Administrator, and the Owner, and the Chair of the Board, the County Administrator, and the Director of Community Development are hereby authorized to execute said preliminary agreement for in the name and on behalf of the County; (v) any occupancy and other requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code" ) are satisfied with respect to bonds, the interest on which is intended to be excluded from gross income for federal tax purposes; (vi) any occupancy and other requirements of the Act are satisfied; and (vii) any occupancy and other requirements of the County applicable to such financing are satisfied. 2 . The Chair of the Board of Supervisors, the County Administrator and ex-officio Clerk of the Board, the County Director of Community Development, County Counsel and their deputies and other officers of the County are hereby authorized and directed to take whatever further action consistent with this resolution may be deemed reasonable and desirable, including participating in the preparation of any resolution, indenture, bond purchase agreement, official statement and/or other documents or agreements necessary or appropriate to effect such financing, and any actions necessary to obtain an allocation of the volume cap for the State of California to the extent required by the Code for the issuance of bonds, the interest on which is intended to be excluded from gross income for federal tax purposes . 3 . It is the purpose and intent of the County that this Resolution constitute official action toward the issuance of obligations by the County to finance the Developments in accordance with Sections 1 . 103-8 (a) (5) (iii) , and 1 . 150-2 of the Regulations of the United States Department of the Treasury, or any successor regulation promulgated under the Code. The County hereby declares its official intent to use proceeds of the Bonds to reimburse the Owner for certain expenditures made prior to the issuance of the Bonds. 4 . This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption. T hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on-P-eoatc shown. ATTESTED; Phil I r,C�,Bo,,d Orig. Dept• Redevelopment Agency of Supervisors and County Administrator Contact: By eputy cc: Director of Community D By/ County Counsel County Administrator JK:1hlc:bosres.sh1 RESOLUTION No. 2000/218 EXMrr A Name of Maximum Location Number of Name of Development Amount of Units Developer/ ofBond Development Initial Issue dwner Pinecrest $2.0 million 1949 & 1945 24 A limited partner- Apts Cavallo, Rd. , ship to be formed. Antioch with Resources for Comity Development as managing General Partner Camara Circle $4.0 million 2501, 2513, 2525, 52 A limited partner- 2530, 2531, 2536, ship to be formed 2537, 2549, 2554, with Resources for 2555, & 2566 Community Development Camara Circle, as managing General Concord Partner rxJn RESOLUTION NO. 2000/218 EXHIBIT B James Kennedy, Deputy Director Contra Costa County Community Development Development 651 Pine Street, 4th Floor, N. Wing Martinez, CA 94553 Dear Mr. Kennedy: RE: Preliminary Agreements Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Financing The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth certain terms and conditions under which the County of Contra Costa, a legal subdivision and body corporate and politic of the State of California (the "County"), will agree to assist in the financing of a housing project for persons of low income (the "Project")for (the "Owner") or for a related entity, or for a successor to the interests thereof approved by the County, by issuing bonds (the "Bonds"), subject to the conditions set forth herein and in Resolution No. of the County. In consideration of the County's expression of willingness to provide such financing, the Owner agrees as follows: 1. The Owner agrees to pay, or to make arrangements for persons other than the County to pay, all costs involved in the issuance of the Bonds, including by way of example and not limitation, fees and disbursements of bond counsel, the County, underwriters, or financing advisors and any other experts engaged by the Owner or by the County in connection with the issuance of the Bonds,bond printing and other printing costs, publication costs and costs incurred in order to obtain a rating for the Bonds. Such costs may be paid from proceeds of sale of the Bonds. In the event that the Bonds are not issued for any reasons, the Owner agrees to pay all of such costs and assume the County's obligations, if any, for payment of such costs. Pursuant thereto, the Owner agrees to pay a fee upon demand of the County in an amount equal to the lesser of 1/10 of one percent of the amount of the proposed Band issue or $2,000, as consideration of the County conditionally expressing its intent to issue Bonds for the Project. Any amount so paid is to be credited toward the County's cost of issuance. 2. The Owner agrees to pay the cost of preparation of any studies, reports or other documents necessary to be prepared by or for the County to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act. 3. The Owner agrees to pay any and all costs incurred by the County in connection with any legal action challenging the issuance or validity of the Bonds or use of the proceeds thereof, or challenging proceedings or determinations by the County under the California Environmental quality Act. The County agrees to proceed, and to direct bond counsel to proceed, with the planning and preparation of the necessary proceedings for the offering of the bonds for sale to finance the Project. The Owner understands that this Agreement does not exempt it from any requirements of the County or any department or agency thereof or other governmental body that would apply in the absence of the proposed Bond financing, and compliance with such requirements is an expressed precondition to the issuance of the Bonds by the County. RESOLUTION NO. 2000/218 �- Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS "` Costa County FROM: PHIL BATCHELOR County Administrator DATE: May 2, 2000 SUBJECT: EMERGENCY UPGRADE OF COUNTY TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE Specific'Request(s) or Recommendation(s) & Background &Justification RECOMMEND TIONS: DETERMINE there is a need to continue with the emergency action continued by the Board on April 18, 2000 on the Emergency Upgrade of County Telecommunications Infrastructure. FISCAL IMPACT: The financial impact remains as stated to the Board on 10/28795. RE SONS FOR RECOMMEN.1(AAMN/ AA GROUfi�D: On 10/26/99 the Board acknowledged that an emergency exists related to the seismic safety of the County telecommunications infrastructure and that the emergency will not permit a delay resulting from competitive solicitation of bids, and delegated to the County Administrator, or designee, authority to immediately proceed with implementation of the "high priority actions" recommended by C.S.I. Telecommunications, Inc. The County Administrator's Office in conjunction with the County Telecommunications Division is currently proceeding with the delineation of specifications for the requiredork, as well as the identification of appropriate vendors to complete the work. This item was last noticed 418/00. Continued on Attachment: ---- YES Signature: Recommendation of County Administrator Recommendation of Board Committee Approve Other Signature(s): Action of Bo on: May , _2000 Approved as Recommended: XX Other: Vote of Supervisors: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN XX Unanimous(Absent zIt 5 ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE Ayes: Noes: ) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON DATESHOWN. Contact: George Roomer(925-335-1055) Attested MA,y 2, 2000 cc: County Administrator Phil Batchelor, Clerk of Bob Fraga, County Telecommunications the Board of Sup rvisors C.S.I.Telecommunications, Inc. (Via CAO) nd County Ad I rator By: �. , DEPUTY Centra TO: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Costa FROM: Phil Batchelor County Executive Director DATE: April 25, 2000 SUBJECT: Contract with Fraser &Associates SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Deputy Director-Redevelopment to execute a contract with Fraser &Associates for preparation of the Annual Report for 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds in an amount not to exceed $7,010. FISCAL IMPACT No General Funds are involved, Funding has been budgeted in the Redevelopment Project Area budgets (Redevelopment Project Areas of Pleasant Hill BART, North Richmond, Bay Point, Rodeo and Oakley). BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS Submittal of the Annual Report for the Tax Allocation Bonds is mandated by the Disclosure Certificate for the bond issue. Preparation of the report necessitates the formulation of a 10- year projection of tax increment revenues estimated to be annually allocated to the Redevelopment Project Areas. Execution of this contract will allow the Redevelopment Agency to fulfill the legal mandates of the bond issue regarding this Annual FXieport. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: r, RECOMMENDATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR � ECOMMATION OF ENCY COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER 7 SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF AGENCY ON May 2. 2000 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF COMMISSIONERS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT #5 ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: Jim Kennedy 335-1255 ATTESTED May 2, 2000 cc: County Administrator PHIL BATCHELOR County Counsel AGENCY ECRETARY Community Development Redevelopment Agency via Redevelopment BY� , DEPUTY Fraser &Associates Abblfras€srbos