HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03072000 - C.167-170 TO: Board of Supervisors Contra
FROM: Dennis M. Barry, AICP Costa
Community Development Director County
DATE: March 7, 2000
SUBJECT: Paratransit Services In Contra Costa
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
Refer to the Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee the issue of paratransit
operations in Contra Costa County.
FISCAL IMPACT
None to the General Fund.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
On February 14, 2000, the Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee met and
reviewed its calendar for 2000. The Committee requested staff to report to the Committee
on the status of paratransit services available to elderly and handicapped residents in
Contra Costa, and the current arrangements for planning and funding these services. This
referral authorizes the Committee to investigate this issue and report back to the Board if
appropriate.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE
ACTION OF BOARD ON March 7 2000 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED XX OTHER
_4
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND
.XAJNANIMOUS (ABSENT _ - - CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND
AYES: NOES: ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: (John Cunningham, 9251335-1243) ATTESTED March 7 . 2000
cc: PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Vy DEPUTY
File: 250-9842IB.4.1 '
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order of March 7,2000,by the following vote:
AYES: SUPERVISORS GIOIA, UILKEMA, DE SAULNIER, CANCIAMILLA AND GERBER
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE RESOLUTION NO. 2000/89
SUBJECT: Approving Plans and Specifications for
Parking Lot Expansion at 30 Glacier Drive,
Martinez for Sheriff-Coroner
(CP#00-25)
Budget Line Item No. 4407-4354
Authorization No. 0928-WH354H
WHEREAS plans and specifications for Parking Lot Expansion at 30 Glacier Drive,
Martinez, for Sheriff-Coroner, have been filed with the Board this day by the Director of General
Services; and
WHEREAS plans and specifications were prepared by Marcy Li Wong, Architect; and
WHEREAS the cost estimate for the initial construction contract is $154,000.00; and
WHEREAS the Board has obtained the general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be
the minimum rates paid on this project; and
WHEREAS the Board hereby DETERMINES that the project is a California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Class 11b Categorical Exemption; DIRECTS the Director
of Community Development to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk; and DIRECTS
the Director of General Services to arrange for payment of the$25.00 handling fee to the County
Clerk for filing the Notice of Exemption and a $25.00 handling fee to Community Development
for administration processing costs.
IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that said plans and specifications are hereby
APPROVED. Bids for this work will be received on April 6, 2000 at 2:00 p.m., and the Clerk
of this Board is directed to publish a Notice to Contractors in accordance with Section 22037 of
the Public Contract Code, inviting bids for said work, said Notice to be published in
CONTRA COSTA TIMES . The Director of General Services is
directed to mail notices to the construction trade journals specified in Section 22036 of the
Public Contract Code at least 30 days before the date of opening the bids.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of General Services, or his designee, is
AUTHORIZED to issue bid Addenda, as needed, for clarification of the contract bid
documents, provided the involved changes do not significantly increase the cost estimate for the
initial construction contract.
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct
copy of an action taken and entered on the
minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the
Orig. Dept.: General Services Dept. -Architectural Division date shown.
cc: General Services Department ATTESTED:_t . -o ? c
Architectural Division PHIL BATCHI-i.R, uerk of the Board
G.S. Accounting of Supervisors and County Administrator
File: 250-9842/A.5 ,��'��' �Oeputy
Auditor-Controller By
Community Development
Debi Foley
Sheriff-Coroner Department(Via A.D.)
RESOLUTION NO. : 2000/89
SJ:bg
HA1998L2509842\8L.042134b.doc
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS t
FROM: John Gioia, Supervisor, District I
DATE: February 24, 2000
SUBJECT: REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSE
wrrrw..wrrrrrwiwwrrrrwww.rarrrrrrrrwr.rrwwwwrrswwr+rw.rrr.rrrw..rr..w...w......ww........rw.r.....r................................
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION:
AUTHORIZE the County Auditor=Controller to reimburse the Past Chair of the North Richmond
Municipal Advisory Council for a one-time expense in the amount of$162.38 that was incurred.
BACKGROUND:
On behalf of the North Richmond Municipal Advisory Council, the Past Chair incurred a one-time
expense when flowers were ordered for North Richmond Municipal Advisory Councilmember
Willie Spears who was deceased on November 22, 1999. The Auditor-Controller's Office needs
authorization in order to process the demand for reimbursement.
The funds used to reimburse the North Richmond Municipal Advisory Council will come from their
own budget that the County fiscally manages.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMEN TON OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON March 7, 2000 APPROVE AS RECOMMENDED XX OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
XX UNANIMOUS(ABSENT — — — ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE
AYES: NOES: SHOWN.
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
ATTESTED March 7. 2000
CONTACT:Gina Martin, CAO(925)335-10139 PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
CC: County Aelftnistrator
Audllor-Controller
North Richmond Advisory Council
B DEPUTY
cis
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS »
Centra
FROM: Phil Batchelor I Costa
�r County
MATE: March 7, 2000
SUBJECT: TAX EXCHANGE AGREEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED NORTH CONCORD AREA ANNEXATION
TO THE CITY OF CONCORD (LAFC 99-29)
Specific Request(s) or Recommendations) & Background & Justification
RECOMMENDATIONS
ADOPT the attached resolution that determines the tax exchange for the Proposed North Concord
Area Annexation to the City of Concord (LAFC 99-29). (REsolution No. 2000199
FINANCIAL_IMPL)CAT(ONS
Under the terms of the agreement, the County will transfer what amounts to approximately
22.79% of its base property tax revenues and 35.84% of its increment revenues (based on an
Increment Allocation Factor of 8.45882% for the City and 11.58214% for the County) from the
area to be annexed to the City of Concord. However, the sales tax generated in the affected area
will be allocated between the City and County as to maintain an overall tax allocation (sales and
property tax) of 51% to the City and 49% to the County.
Utilizing different development scenarios and altering the mix of sales and property tax generating
parcels, staff estimates that as much as approximately $8.8 million in property and sales tax
revenues could be generated in the area over a ten year period (in a very high property tax
generating environment, with the average acre valued at $5.8 million, and sales tax growing at
5%). Using the allocation formula developed by staff, approximately 34% of the property tax and
70% of the sales tax would go to the City. Overall, however, the total taxes generated in the area
would be split so that the City would receive 51% of the revenues, the County 49%.
Continued on Attachment:.. YES Signature: ,
Recommendation of County Administrator Recommendation of Board Committee
Approve tither
Signature(s):
Action of Board on: 3/7/2000 Approved as Recommended x Other
Vote of Supervisors: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
X Unanimous(Absent ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
Ayes: Noes: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON DATE SHOWN.
Absent: Abstain:
Contact:Tony Enea(335-1494) Attested: March 7, 2000
cc: County Administrator Phil Batchelor, Clerk of
Auditor-Controller the Board of Supervisors
County Counsel d C ty Adm' i rator
LAFCO
City of Concord By: , DEPUTY
Page 24
March 7, 2000
North Concord Area Annexation
BACKC R UND
The Proposed North Concord Area Annexation to the City of Concord requests the annexation of+/-90.6
acres generally located north of Bates Avenue and west of Port Chicago Highway. The amount of
property tax to the County generated from the land, with total assessed value of the area at$25.7 million,
currently totals $41,791. The sales tax from the area is approximately $65,000. Estimating an increase
in sales tax per acre of Sala each year, the area could potentially generate as much as $3.5 million
(cumulative) in sales tax in ten years. In a moderate development scenario, whereby the assessed value
per acre would increase from the present $1.4 million average to $3.5 million, the area could generate
about $3.6 million in property tax over a ten-year period; a high development scenario forecasts more
than $5.4 million in property taxes. (See chart below.)
The City is requesting annexation in order to facilitate office space development of the area.
Considering the development potential of the area and prior tax sharing agreements with other
jurisdictions, CAO staff proposed a unique tax sharing agreement to City staff. The proposal utilizes the
Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement as the basis of the agreement, with a special provision for
sharing sales tax. Rather than establishing a fixed percentage of sales tax allocation, the agreement
would allocate sales tax between the City and County so that 51 ala of total sales and property tax revenue
generated in the area would accrue to the City, and 49% of total tax would accrue to the County.
The chart below illustrates the revenue potential of the area under three different development scenarios.
J= 10 YEAR BUILD OUT
City County Total
Sales $ 2,669,778 77.1% $ 794,242 22.9% $ 3,464,020
Property $ 1,861,935 34.3% $ 3,559 758 85.7% $ 5,421,693
Tota! $ 4,531,713 5s.o% $ 4,354,000 49.0% $ 8,885,713
Sales $ 2,392,969 69.1% $ 1,071,051 30.9% $ 3,464,020
Property $ 1,207,378 33.6% $ 2 388 106 664% $ 3,595,484
Tota! $ 3,640,347 51.o% $ 3,459,157 49.0% $ 7,059,504
Sales $ 2,116,159 61.1% $ 1,347,861 38.9% $ 3,464,020
Property $ 552,822 31.2% $ 1,216,453 e8.a% $ 1,769,275
Total $ 2,668,981 si.o% $ 2,564,314 48.o% $ 5,233,295
t 9; =Prop"Tax @ $10,000/acre $5.6 M in AV
=Property Tax @ $5,288/acre $3.5 M in AV
ltd Property Tax @ $2,576/acre $1.4 M in AV
Staff believes this tax sharing agreement is both equitable and advantageous to the City and County.
Therefore, staff proposes Board of Supervisor adoption of the resolution specifying the terms of the
agreement. The Concord City Council is expected to pass a similar resolution on their March 7, 2000
agenda.
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A Resolution Authorizing the inclusion
of the North Concord Annexation Area
in the baster Property Transfer Agreement
Subject to Additional Terms and Conditions
Between the City of Concord and Contra
Costa County to Allow a Division of Property
Tax and Sales Tax Revenues Upon the
Annexation of the North Concord
Annexation Area to the City of Concord
(LAFC 99-29) Resolution No. 2000/99
1
WHEREAS, Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides that a city and
county shall agree by Resolution to exchange property tax revenues among themselves and any
affected agencies in the event of a jurisdictional change; and
WHEREAS,the North Concord Annexation to the City of Concord(LAFC 99-29)
involving annexation of territory to the City of Concord is excluded from the application of the
Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement between the City and County because the assessed
value of the affected territory exceeds ten million dollars; and
WHEREAS,the City of Concord and Contra Costa County have agreed that
notwithstanding the amount of the assessed value of the territory the subject annexation,the
Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement, subject to additional terms and conditions regarding
the exchange of sales tax revenues as set forth herein, shall apply to the annexation.
NOW,THEREFORE,THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DOES RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section l.. This agreement applies to all territory included in the North Concord
Annexation to the City of Concord(LAFC 99-29), as approved by the Local Agency Formation
CAMY DCCUMENTS\ANNEXATr\NCONCORDRESCOUNTY.DOC 1
Commission.
Section 2. This resolution does not change the property tax revenues accruing to other
agencies serving the subject territory or the affected districts' rights to collect taxes for existing
bonded indebtedness.
Section 3. Notwithstanding Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 95 through 100, or any
other law, the City and County hereby agree to an exchange of both property tax and sales tax
revenues as set forth hereinbelow:
a. Subject to subparagraphs b. through e. hereinbelow,the Master Property Tax Transfer
Agreement(Exhibit A hereto) shall be used to allocate property taxes between the City
and County,
b, Sales tax generated in the affected area will be allocated between the City and County
as to maintain an overall tax allocation(sales and property)of fifty-one percent(51%)to
the City and forty-nine percent(49%)to the County. If there is insufficient sales tax to
bring the overall tax allocation to the City to fifty-one percent(51%)of the total,the City
will retain all of the sales tax.
c. The percentage of sales tax to be received by the County and City will be evaluated on
an annual basis to maintain the 49/51 percent split of overall tax revenues.
d. The property tax shall be allocated by the County. Sales tax is received directly by the
City. The City will remit to the County its share of sales tax as set forth herein above.
County shall forward property tax information to City as soon as it is available, and City
shall pay to County any sales tax required to be paid to County by the later of December
31 of the current fiscal year, or within 30 days of receipt of property tax information. The
County Auditor-Controller shall have the right to audit the City's books to verify the sales
tax amount.
e. Definitions:
For purposes of the foregoing calculation,sales tax shall mean the sales tax
revenue received by the City during the preceding tax year from the
area annexed; and property tax shall mean the current year base tax amounts
for the County and City in the area annexed.
Section 4. The Clerk is hereby directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution to
the Auditor/Controller of Contra Costa County and to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency
Formation Commission.
Section 5. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and
adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa
on March 7, 2000,by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors-Gioia, Uilkema,DeSaulnier, Canciamilla and Gerber
NOES: Supervisors-None
ABSTAIN: Supervisors- None
ABSENT: Supervisors-None
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the forgoing Resolution No. was duly and regularly
adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa on
March 7 , 2000.
CAMY DOCUN ENTS\ANNEXAT1INCONCORDRESCOUNTY.DOC 3
Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
ByJ a
P.4 J
erk
CAMy Documents\ANNEXATIInconcordrescounty.doc
CAMYDOCUMENTSWATNEXA'TriNCONCORD",SCOUNTY.DOC 4