The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 07131999 - SD11 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Resolution on July 13, 19991 by the following vete: AYES: SUPERVISORS GIOIA, UILKEMA, GERBER, DESAULNIER and CANCIAMILLA NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE RESOLUTION NO. 99/ 343 (Government Code § 25350) SUBJECT: Consummate purchase and Accept Grant deed from the City of Antioch Social Services Expansion and Transitional Housing Antioch Area Project No. 0928-4420-ACQ WH420B The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, RESOLVES THAT: This Board on May 25, 1999, passed Resolution of Intention No. 99/275 and Notice fixing July 13, 1999, at 9:00 a.m. in its Chambers, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, as the time and place where it would meet to consummate the purchase of the real property described therein from the City of Antioch, said property being required for the expansion of the Social Services facility and construction of a transitional housing facility, Said Resolution was duly published in the Contra Costa Times in compliance with Govt. Code Section 6063. The Board hereby consummates said purchase and approves the purchase Agreement dated June 22, 1999 between the City of Antioch and the County, and authorizes the public Works Director to sign the Purchase Agreement on behalf of the County. The County Auditor-Controller is hereby DIRECTED to issue a check in favor of Placer Title Company, 1981 N. Broadway, Suite 302, Walnut Creek, CA 94596, Escrow No. 6153500, for $994,219.00 for said property for payment to Grantors, upon their conveying to the County a Deed therefor. ao:en G:1GrpGata\ReaiRrop11998-Fites199-718R17-T rans,tional Hcusfng.doc i hereby certify that this is a true and correct Crig.Dept.: Public Works(R/P) copy of an action,taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the Contact: Donna Dawkins(313-2224) date shown. cc: County Administrator Auditor-Controller(via R/P) AT'T'ESTED: July 13 , 1999 County Recorder(via R/P) PHIL BAT: I=LCR, Clerk of the Board of Grantor(via R/P) Supervises and County Amtnistrator General Services(LJtv#) , ' Public works accounting By ,> Deputy 9' RESOLUTION NO. 9913 4 3 page I of 2 Consummate Purchase and Accept Grant Deed from the City of Antioch July 13, 9999 Page 2 Said Deed, dated June 22, 1999, is hereby ACCEPTED and the Real Property Division is ORDERED to have it recorded, together with a certified copy of this resolution. This Board hereby FINDS that there is no substantial evidence that the proposed project will have a significant effect on the environment, and that it has reviewed and considered the Initial Study and Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and this Board approves its adequacy for California Environmental Quality Act purposes. This Board DIRECTS the Director of Community development to file a Notice of Determination and a Certificate of Fee Exemption; De Minimis Impact Finding with the County Clerk, and DIRECTS the Public Works Director to arrange for payment of a $25.00 handling fee to the County Clerk for filing and a $25.00 fee to Community Development for processing of the Notice of Determination. The City of Antioch has determined that the project conforms to the City's General Plan. RESOLUTION NO. 991_3 pace 2 of 2 SDA I 7-I3-99 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT NOTICE ICE OF DETERMINATION CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 651 FINE STREET 4TH FLOOR NORTH WING MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553-0095 Telephone: (925) 335-1213 Contact Person: Debbie Chamberlain Project Description, Common Nerve (if arty) and Location: Construction of a 30,000-square foot government office building to provide for expansion of an existing government office building and construction of a 20 unit Transitional Housing Center. (County File CP 99-43) The project was approved on Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act: An Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified {SCH # t The Project w: s encu—sled by an Environmental Impact Report previously prepared for (SCH # ). ' A Ne—Wa .`ae Declarat:on :1u; iss�:ed ind ;ating tl ut pre;arat=on of ., , w,^.vtrun enta€ Impact Report was not required. Copies of the record of project approval and the negative Declaration or the final EIR may be examined at the office of the Contra Costa County Community Development Department. The Project will not have a significant environmental effect. The Project will have a significant environmental effect. Mitigation measures were made a condition of approval of the project. A statement of overriding considerations was adopted. Findings were adopted pursuant to Section 15091 of the State C:EQA Guidelines. Hate: By: Community Develo went Department Representative AFFIDAVIT OF FILING AND POSTING I declare that on I received and posted this notice as required by California Public Resources Code :Section 211152(c). Said notice will remain posted for 30 days from the filing date. I € Signature Title l Applicant's Department of Fish and Carrie Fees Due: Name: Contra Costa County € EIR o$850 Total. Due: $ Address: Administrator's Office Neg. Dec. -$11.250 Total Paid: � 651 Pine St., 1'#'''' floor DeMinirnis Findings-$0 Martinez CA 94553 K County Clerk-$25 Receipt# SD 11 7-13-99 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding Project Witte/Location (Contra Costa County): Contra Costa County Social Service Addition and Transitional housing Center Applicants Name and Address: Contra Costa County Administrators Office 6151 Pine St., 11 th Floor Martinez CA 94555 Project Description: Construction of 30,000 square foot government office building to provide for expansion of an existing government office building and construction of a 20 unit Transitional housing Center. Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): An Initial Study has been conducted by the lead agency, which determined that the project will not have an adverse effect on wildlife resources. Consideration of the record as a whole provides no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Certification: i hereby certify that the lead agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Project Planner Lead Agency: Q.Q_mm nity y-elopment _ Date: Section 711.2, Fish and Game Code DFG:8/91 SD.11 7-13-99 Communityt��r�na Cltl.BIrty,AICD, Contra a Comm, ity NaMlopm6t Director' Development Cot Department Count ., ._ t ;.. County Administration Building 651 Pine Street 4th door, North Wing COINMiA COSIA COUNTY Martinez, California 94553-0095e1i.. Ty Phone: .� (925) 335-1213 ° June 16, 1999 NOTICE OF PUBLIC REVIEW I,:eW AND INTENT E1' T TV ADOPT A PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION County File # CIT-CP 99-43 Pursuant to the State of California Public Resources Code and the "Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended to date,this is to advise you that the Community Development Department of Contra Costa County has prepared an initial study on the following project: Project Names Contra Costa County Social Service Addition and Transitional Housing Center Descriptions Construction of a 30,000-square foot government office building to provide for expansion of an existing government office building and construction of a 20 unit Transitional Housing Center. Location: Antioch,California 94509 The proposed development will not result in any potentially significant impacts. A copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all documents referenced in the Negative Declaration may be reviewed in the offices of the Community Development Department and the Application and Permit Center at the McBrien Administration Building,North Wing, Second Floor, 651 fine Street, Martinez, during normal business fours. Public Comment Period: The period for accepting comments on the adequacy of the environmental documents extends to 5:00 P.M., July 7. 1999 Any comments should be in writing and submitted to the following address: Debbie Chamberlain,Principal Planner Community Development Department Contra Costa County 651 Pine Street,North Wing,2°a Floor Martinez,CA 94553 It is anticipated that the proposed Negative Declaration will be considered for adoption before the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday,July 13, 1999. For confirmation regarding this date,please contact Carol Chan, Contra Costa County General Services,at(925)313-7226. cc:County Clerk"s Office(2 copies) Office Hogs Monday - Friday:8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Office is closets the Is , 3rVf_� 5th Fridays of each month E ' SDAI 7-i3-99 Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Contra Costa County Social Service Addition& Transitional Housing Center WLP 378 CP 99-43 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: Contra Costa County General Services Dept. 1220 Morello Ave., Suite 100 Martinez, CA 94553 3. Contact Person and Phone Number-, Carol Chan(925)313-7226 4. Project Location: Antioch 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Contra Costa.County Administrators Office 651 Pine St., 1 Vh floor Martinez, CA 94553 6. General Plan Designation: Service/Commercial 7e Zoning: C3 General Commercial 8. Description of Project: Construction of 30,000 sq.ft. government office building to provide for expansion of an existing government office building and construction of a 20 unit Transitional Housing Center 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The surrounding land uses consist of government office, Los Medanos Community College,publicly owned vacant land, single family residential dwellings 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required(e.g.,permits, financing approval, or participation agreement). None ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. — Land Use and Planning _ Transportation/ Public Services ® Population&Housing Circulation Utilities &Service Geological Problems — Biological Resources Systems Water _ Energy&Mineral Aesthetics W Air Quality Resources _ Cultural Resources ® Mandatory Findings of Hazards Y Recreation Significance Noise SD.i1 7-13-99 2 DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effects)on the environment,but at least one effect(1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and(2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a"potentially significant impact" or"potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. _ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signature to 01 Carol Chan Printed Name For ............................... _......................................................................................................................................................................................... - ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ...._... ......... ......... ...... .. ......... ......... ....... ........... ........ ................... ......_.. .............. ......_.. SD.11 7-13-99 3 SOURCES In the process of preparing the Checklist and conducting the evaluation,the following references (which are available for review at the Contra Costa County Community Development Department, 651 Pine Street 5th Floor-North Wing, Martinez)were consulted: 1. Contra Costa Resource Mapping System-Quad Sheet Panels , CA 2. Focused EIR for Delta Pair property Rezoning;& General Plan Amendment, November 7, 1984 3. Field Review June 8, 1999 4. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, June, 1999 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL,IMPACTS Potentially Significant Potentially sinless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No immt Inr=omtion I=RCimpw Less than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation significant leo Impact Incorporation Impact impact 1. AESTHETICS-Would the project. A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (Source I Overlay# 13, 14) X (Source 2,pg.1 1) B. Substantially damage scenic resources,including,but not limited to,trees,rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Source refer to A) C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Source refer to A) D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Source refer to A) SUMMARY: 'Phis project will be shielded from Highway 4 Scenic Corridor by the already existing Social Service building. However further shielding from Highway 4 and roadways will be accomplished by landscaping and liberal use of trees which will be incorporated as part site plans for the commercial building and transitional housing site. SD.I l 7-13-99 4 if. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES:in determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects,lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model(1997)prepared by the California Dept.Of Conservation as an optional anode!to use in assessing impacts on agricultural and farmland. Would the project: A. Convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland or Statewide Importance(Farmland),as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non-agricultural use? (Source 1,Overlay#4,#13) _X_ (Source 2,page 11€1 (Source 3) B. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,or a Williamson Act contract? (Source refer to A) --}`- C. Involve other changes in the existing environment which,due to their location or nature,could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? X (Source refer to A) SUMMARY: III, AIR QUALITY-Where available,the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relief upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: A. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (Source 2,pg.33-38,Appendix C) - -— B. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (Source refer to A) -- - - C. Result in a cumulatively considers- i. 7-U-99 able net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? _X_ (Source refer to A) D. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? _X_ (Source refer to A) E. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X_ (Source refer to A) SUMMARY: Short-term impacts of the proposed project on surrounding air quality would result from grading during construction. Emissions during construction will be limited by using watering dust control on equipment and work areas,especially during morning hours(stable atmospheric conditions)and during high wind;requirement that all dirt loads exiting the constriction site will be well-watered after loading. Site planning will consist of liberal planting of street trees and other roadside landscaping to help filter particulates from the local atmosphere and reduce radiated heat from street pavements. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES-Would the project. A. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications,on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive,or special status species in local or regional plans,polices, or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife _.X (Source I Overlays#5&6,Source 2 pg.11) B. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,policies,regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? _X_ (Source refer to A) C. Have a.substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(including,but not limited to,marsh,vernal pool,coastal,etc.)through direct removal,filling,hydrological interruption,or other means? _X_ (Source refer to A) SD.11 7-13-99 6 D. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? .___.X— (Source refer to A) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,such as tree preservation policy or ordinance? --- -- (Source refer to A) F. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,Natural Community Conservation Plan,or other approved local,regional,or state habitat conservation plan? -�— (Source refer to A) SUMMARY: V. CUL'T'URAL RESOURCES-Would the project? A. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in§154}64.5? ---�— (Source 2,pgs. l 1&54) B. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to§15064.5? ---�-- (Source refer to A) C. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? (Source refer to A) D. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside X of formal cemeteries? -— (Source refer to A) SUMMARY: V1. GEOLOGY AND SOILS-Would the project? A. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse SD.11 7-13-99 7 effects,including the risk of loss,injury,or death involving: 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault,as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the state Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology special Publica- tion 42. (Source 1 Overlay#2&4) 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? X (Refer to Source i ) 3. Seismic-related ground failure,including liquefaction? X 4. Landslides?() �}{� (Source i Overlay#3) B. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X (Source 1,Overlay#4) i C. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,or that would become unstable as a result of the project,and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide,lateral spreading,subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X (Source 1,Overlays#2,3&4) D. Be located on expansive soil,as defined in'gable 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X (Refer to Source C) E. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or aitemative waste disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? X SUMMARY: SID.11 7-13-99 8 VII. HAZARDS ANIS HAZARDOUS MATERIALS- Would the project: A. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport,use,or disposal of hazardous materials? X (Source 1&3) B. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X (Defer to Source A) C. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,substances,or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? ){ (Refer to Source A) B. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65862.5 and,as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Refer to Source A) E. For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. _X_ F. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? _X_ G. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? _X_ H. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of'loss,injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X _...................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... - .......... . . ......... . ..... .. ........ . ........ . .............._........ ............................ SD.11 7-13-99 9 SUMMARY: Viii. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY- Would the project: A. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? X (Source 1,Overlay#1&12) a (Source 2,pg.12) B. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that tinere would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level(e.g.,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)?() -x- (Refer to Source A) C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration,of the course of a stream or river,in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off- site? X (Refer to Source A) —D. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site? x (Refer to Source A) —E. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? —X— (Refer to Source A) E. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? -X— (Refer to Source A) SD.1 I 7-I3-99 10 G. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation reap? X (Refer to Source A) H. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Refer to Source A) I. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? }; (Refer to Source A) 3. inundation by seiche,tsunami, or mudfiow? X (Refer to Source A) SUMMARY: Site is identified as a major watershed,no flood control zone planned or formed.Construction of office building and residential center will include engineering study that calculates runoff from site before and after development and a drainage plan that will accommodate runoff from a 50 year peak storm. IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING-Would the project: A. Physically divide an established community?O X (Source 2 pg.42-48) B. Conflict with any applicable land use plan,policy,or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project(including,but not limited to the general plan, Specific plan,local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X (Refer to Source A) C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X— (Source 1,Overiay#6,Source 2) SUMMARY: ...................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . _. ..... SD.11 7-13-99 X. MINERAL RESOURCES-Would the project: A. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X (Source 2,pg.54) B. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,specific plan or other land use plan? X (Refer to So=urce A) SU'MMARY: The proposed project is within the City of Antioch incorporated city limits. It appears that the use is consistent with the City's .general Plan,however the City of Antioch has final authority in determination of General Plan conformance. X1. NOISE-Would the project? A. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,or applicable standards of other agencies? X (Source 2,pg.22-32) —B. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground- borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? X (Refer to Source A) C. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X (Refer to Source A) D. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X (Refer to Source A) E. For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or SD.11 7-13-99 12 working in the project area to excessive noise levels? N/A (Refer to Source A) - F. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? NIA (Refer to Source A) SUMMARY: The commercial office building will be sited in the front section of the parcel,fronting Delta Fair Boulevard. This facility and the already existing Social Service building to the west,will provide noise screening to the transitional housing project. XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING- Would the project: A. Induce substantial population growth in an area,either directly(for example,by proposing new homes and businesses)or directly(for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X (Source 2 pg.54-55) B. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X (Refer to Source All C. Disr)lace substantial numbers of people,necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Refer to Source A) SUMMARY: XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES A. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities,reed for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: —X_ ........................................................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......... ..... ..... ..... ........ ............. ....... ...... ..._ __ SD.11 7-13-99 13 (Source 2,pg 39-41 ) 1. Fire Protection? X 2. Police Protection? ®� �X� 3. Schools? �?{_ 4. Parks? X S. Other Public facilities? SUMMARY: XIV. RECREATION- A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? }t (Source 1,Overlay 13) —B. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? 3� (Refer to Source A) _ — SUMMARY: Xv. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC-Would the project: A. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial to relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e.,result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips,the volume to capacity ratio on roads,or congestion at intersections)? �{ (Source 2,pg. 12-21) — — B, Exceed,either individually or cumulatively,a level of service standard established by the county congestion manage- ment agency for designated roads or highways? X (Refer to Source A) a C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns,including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in Iocation that results in substantial safety risks? }{ (Refer to Source A) SDAI 7-13-99 14 D. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature(e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? E. Result in inadequate emergency access? X (Refer to Source A) F. Result in inadequate parking capacity? X (Refer to Source A) G. Conflict with adopted policies, plans,or programs supporting alternative transportation(e.g., bus turnouts,bicycle racks)? (Refer to Source A} `m SUMMARY: Planning for both the government office building and residential center include adequate off-street parking. The Focused EIR for Delta Pair Property Rezoning and General Plan Amendement,approved November 7, 1984 by the Antioch City Council calculated 2000 vehicle trip ends(vte)for Social Service Expansion Building and potential commercial development.The vtes for the transitional housing center will be less than commercial development since not all residents of the transitional housing center have access to automobiles. XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS- Would the project: A. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? }; (Source 2,pg.39-40) B. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction or which could cause significant environmental effects? (Refer to Source A) (Source 1,Overlay 12) C. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X (Refer to Source A) (Source 1,Overlay 112) D. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlement and resources, or are new or expanded entitlement needed? X _.._. ... .............................................................................................................. . .. ..................... .. .... .................................... ... .... ............................... . ....................................................................................................... Sid.l l 7-13-99 15 (Refer to Source A) E. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? -X— (Refer to Source A) F. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? —X— (Refer to Source A) G. Comply with federal,state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?0 -X– SUMMARY: XVIL MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE- A. hoes the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish and wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? -X— B. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable„ means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects,and the effects of probable fut~are projects)? X— C. Does the project have environ- mental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either directly or indirectly?{) X_ SUMMARY: j:\groups\cdadpool\shells\Cheekiis.n99 _w..� ...: ..__.. S➢.i l - - 7-13•-99 - vu ,,.-; '�.maw. �.�saxrseeec�Rs� 'll/��YlYi9Y4lY'•g„ . „ >,�*ee�apr�; +c..:.rc�r.. .. .-. -:.e--a_—.tc_,ac- ..x•r�ao�-vanrrxM:..i...�;x. :'�cr., p2$ _ _.____-: -:-:,. • 002. 003 034 031 14S - 002 _._ 013 143 - 001 01A oo2 tit 5 003 61(o 14G- CICP 01`7 152- ocG 019 001 002 _ 02 c. 003 w____-- 023 'at' 212 . O2'? s0 028 a� ' =-7:7-7- ...................................... _ ...................................................................................................................................... ......... ......... _....... ........ ....._._... .......... _ _ _.... ......... ......... ......... ......... ........ ......... ........ ........ _ _ __ _. ......... ......... ................ ............. ..... ....... .. _ _ _ _ ................. ... ............._......... _ SDAI 074 080 005 074 080 026 074 080 028 7-13-99 CHEVRON USA INC RIVERVIEW FIRE PROTECTION DI ANTIOCH CITY OF PO Box 285 315 W 10Th St PO Box 5007 Houston,TX 77001 Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94531 074 080 029 074 080 030 074 080 031 ANTIOCH CITY OF CALIFORNIA STATE OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PO Box 5007 Delta.Fair Blvd 1220 Morello Ave##100 Antioch,CA 94531 Antioch,CA 94509 Martinez,CA 94553 074141002 074 142 002 074 143 001 Mildred Whitworth Richard&Maria Vanrooyen Sr. Dionicio&Leticia Agbayani 4516 Belle Dr 4600 Belle Dr Chanes Cab Agbayani Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 4515 Delta Fair Blvd Antioch,CA 94509 074 143 002 074 143 903 074 146 016 James Ferris&M C Kathryn Alexander Neil Graham Mathew&Florence Savage 4511 Delta Fair Blvd 2400 Kennedy Way 4500 Delta Fair Blvd Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch, CA 94.509 074 146 017 074 152 006 974 152 007 William&Joanne Haggard George Venegas Phillip&Romola Luna 4514 Delta Fair Blvd 4507 Belle Dr 4511 Belle Dr Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 0741,53001 074 153 002 074 153 003 Edward Montanez Robert&Tammy Kleppe Jr. Trudy Eves&Marcia Sloan 4512 Belle Dr 4508 Belle Dr 4504 Belle Dr Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 074 211 013 074 212 012 074 212 013 Tiberio&Ana Perez Timothy&Jennifer Watson John&Millicent Carini Carmen Perez 4818 Belle Dr 4814 Belle Dr 4700 Eisenhower Way Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 074 212 014 074 212 015 074 212 016 Bernice Hain Lorraine Cordova& Priscilla Ross Patricia Heredia&Patricia Diaz 4810 Belle Dr 4601 Regina Ct 4605 Regina Ct Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 074 212 017 074 212 018 074 212 019 Cesar Rodriguez Louis&Carolyn Verduzco Rubin& Erundina Diaz 4609 Regina Ct 4613 Regina Ct 4612 Regina Ct Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 074 212 020 074 2112 921 074 212 022 Stanley& Dorothy McDonald Ted& Lolita Felipe David&Brenda Keane 4608 Regina Ct 4308 Null Dr 4600 Regina Ct Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch, CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 074212023 _ 074212025 074 212 026 SDA I Vicky Jeserich t 7-1349 Joe&Thelma Lawson Robert Witt 4712 Belle Lar 4704 Belle Dr 1312 C St Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 074 212 027 074 212 028 074 212 029 Dominador&Lucille Pajarito Salvatore&Carol Aiello Ethel Dinelli&Ethel Family Minelli 4612 Belle Dr 4608 Belle Dr 4604 Belle Dr Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 074 213 001 074 213 002 074 213 003 Family Trust Green Keith&Alice Cordy Delbert&Kaye bean 4701 Eisenhower Way 4705 Eisenhower Way 4709 Eisenhower Way Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 Antioch,CA 94509 088 152 001 088 161 003 MC MATSU INVESTORS CCC JUNIOR COLLEGE DISTRICT 1320 Breakwater Way 2700 E.Leland Rd Brentwood,CA 94513 Pittsburg,CA 94565 Y s I 9 f a ; Z"q ri '1 7 m i l t% i r gig '` . It e t3 ,yFt at�rr ram ' � ° r N eR a 1 ..w }) {j � ♦ 1 l� 1 ♦ ♦ rt �` 3 J W Public Works Dept. +�. ..o.. � w e r r - V CiNIT 5D.11 7-13-99 e I e E BASIS QF BEARINGS : SUBDIVISION MS 19-$4 CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM 7-1-0-1586 123 PM 1 ZONE III MONUMENT LINE IN I A� i�EL.LE DRIVE AT EISENHOWER WAS°. PAROL ''B" �,�°•� °� AS SHOWN ON SUBDIVISION 32;5 ( 96 M 36 ) TAKEN AS N 5., 51 47"'E 9 � 0 SEE DETAIL "A" m { AREAr 4.35 ACRES SCALE 1"= 200' PARCEL A" 1l : r<aaoana--------------------- b � W E T A T I rr. a� r SCALE 1 "= 40' Lij 46 \ i SITE LOCATION ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... SI7.I • 7-13_999 i Existing op s r� fr ag 3 t i i 8 el Social Services wilding or Famili�Les t r 3 t {{ Proposed � d Social Services i ` # Addition r r 4, d 20 �qo 4X:7 � PROJECT SITING SDAI 7-]3-99 Recorded at the request of: Centra Costa County s Return to: Contra Costa County Public Works Department i Real Property Division 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553 ` Attn: Donna Dawkins Assessor's Parcel No. 074-080-032 (portion) Title Co. Order leo. 6153500 GRANT DEED For Value Received, THE CITY OF ANTIOCH, a municipal corporation, GRANTS) to CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, a political subidivision of the State of California, the following described real property in the City of Antioch, County of Contra Costa, State of California, FOR DESCRIPTION SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. GRANTOR: The City of Antioch Late June 22, 1999 By Mar ti Rocha, Mayor By , ATTACH APPROPRIATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT \\PWS 10Sl.ARDATA1GroData\RealProp!1995-Files199-61DP"antioch.doc SB.11 7-13-39 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA (cc§ 1181, 1184} June 22, 16999 On Jbefore me, L. Jolene Martin, personally appeared Nary He erg Rocha , personally known to me for proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the some in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signatures(s) on the instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Gated: June 22, 1999 L. Jolene in Antioch City Clerk SDAI 7-13-99 Portion Parcel"B„ Miner Subdivision 19-84 - 123PM1 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Title Ileal property in the City of Antioch, County of Contra Costa, State of California, Being a portion of Parcel "B" as shown on the reap of Minor Subdivision 19-84, fled July 9, 1986, in Book 123 of Parcel Maps at Page 1 described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly comer of Parcel"A" of said Minor Subdivision. 19-84 (123 PM 1); thence from said Point of Beginning along the northwesterly line of said Parcel "A" (123 PM 1), south 55°51'47"west 576.46 feet; thence leaving said northwesterly line north 3'52'16"east 105.89 feet; thence along the arc of a tangent curve, concave to the southeast,having a radius of 580.00 feet, through a central angle of 51°5931", a distance of 526.31 feet; thence tangent to said curve north 55°51'47" east 260.46 feet to a point on the easterly line of Parcel "B" of said Minor Subdivision 19-84 (123 PM 1), said point also being the westerly right of way line of Delta Fair Boulevard; thence southeasterly along the easterly line of said Parcel "B" (123 PM 1) along the arc of a non- tangent curve, concave to the west, having a radius of 735.00 feet, a radial to said point on curve bears north 62°42'04"east,through a central angle of 25°09'42", a distance of 322.78 feet to a point of reverse curvature; thence continuing along said easterly line of Parcel "B" (123 PM 1) along the arc of said curve, concave to the east, having a radius of 856.06 feet, a radial to said point on curve bears south 8751'46"west, through a central angle of 23'41'53", a distance of354.07 feet, to the most southerly corner of said Parcel "B" (123 PM 1), also being the most easterly corner of said Parcel "A" (123 PM 1); thence leaving said westerly line of Parcel "B", along the northeasterly line Of said Marcel "A"being the arc of a non-tangent curve, concave to the southwest, having a radius of 2,390.00 feet, a radial to said point on carve bears north 63°31'47" east, through a central angle of 7417'00", a distance of 319.80 feet; thence tangent to said curve north 34'08'13" west 6.88 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing an area of 189,375 square feet(4.35 acres) of land, more or less. Bearings are based on the California Coordinate System Zone III (CCS27). This real property description has been prepared by me or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signature: :t---^�- Lice urveyor Contra Costa County Public Works -CIO Ex; _ �t Date: GAGrpData\C1eHca:\BXH1BETS\1999\DBLTAFAIR.doc I ' 7-I3-99 EXHIBIT " B . .E i I i i i 6AS I_S OF-6EAR I NGS . /SUBDIVISION M� 19-854 0 CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM E 7-9-1986 123 PIW ZONE III MONUMENT 1 � I = INE i N BELLE ISR I VE AT E i S'NHOWER WAY, PARCEL "B" °• ° AS SHOWN ON SUIBD I V I S I CN 32 5 , ` t 96 M 36 3 TAKEN AS N 55° 51 47 9E 1 s ! SEE DETAIL "A"' 7r, AREA AREA I 4=.33 ACRES 6 l• U� SCALE 1"= 200' PARCEL "A" jfR c a w 61 S� yg' `� SCALE I "= 40' ! 20.00 r M3.03"2814Y � 3 � L 6.198 N34•08 13 W Parcel Number: 074-080-032 (portion) Grantor: The City of Antioch Project Name: Social Services Expansion Address: P.O. Box 5007 Transitional Housing Antioch, CA 04531-5007 Project Number: 40170-5G5495 PURCHASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND GRANTOR NAMED HEREIN A document in the form of a Grant Deed dated June 22, 1999 , covering the property particularly described in said instrument, has been executed and delivered to Donna Dawkins, Agent for Contra Costa County. In consideration of the above-mentioned instrument and the other considerations herein- after set forth, it is mutually agreed as follows: 1. This Agreement is effective on the date of approval of the Board of Supervisors. �. The consideration to be paid by County for the property which is the subject of this Agreement is as follows: A. County shall pay to grantor the sum of Nine Hundred Ninety Four Thousand Two Hundred Nineteen Dollars, ($994,219.00) for the property as conveyed by the Grant Deed when title to said property vests in the County in fee simple, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, assessments, leases (recorded and/or unrecorded), and taxes except: (1) Covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations of record, if any. (2) Easements or rights of way of record over said property. B. Provided that a family transitional center is successfully constructed and operates on any portion of the property purchased under this Agreement, County agrees, as additional consideration for the purchase of the subject property, that it will not construct housing of any type on the property known as (APN 074-080-026) [referred to hereinafter as the "Fire District Site"]. The Fire District Site is currently owned by the Centra Costa County Fire Protection District. This agreement not to construct housing on the Fire District Site is a covenant personal to the County only. It shall not apply to any owner of the Fire District Site other than the County. - C. County shall pay all escrow and recording fees incurred in this transaction and, if title insurance is desired by the County, the premium charged therefor. This transaction may be handled through an escrow with Placer T itle Co., Walnut Creek, CA. Order# 6153500. 3. Grantor warrants that there are no oral or written leases on all or any portion of the property being conveyed exceeding a period of one month, and the grantor further agrees to hold the County harmless and reimburse the County for any and all of its losses and expenses occasioned by reason of any lease of said property held by any tenant of grantor for a period exceeding one month. 4. It is understood and agreed that this agreement is subject to approval by the County Board of Supervisors after the publication of a notice of intention to purchase real property, as required by the Government Code, Section 25350. Said notice will specify a definite time for consummating this transaction, which time will be within sixty (60) days from the date hereof. 5. The Grantor hereby represents and warrants that during the period of Grantor's ownership of the property, there have been no disposals, releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances or hazardous waste on, from, or under the property. Grantor further represents and warrants that Grantor has no knowledge of any disposal, release, or threatened release of hazardous substance or hazardous waste on, from, or under the property which may have occurred prior to Grantor taking title to the property. The acquisition price of the property being acquired in this transaction reflects the fair-market value of the property without the presence of contamination. if the property being acquired is found to be contaminated by the presence of hazardous waste which requires mitigation under Federal or State law, the County may elect to recover its clean-up costs from those who caused or contributed to the contamination. 6. Grantor acknowledges that the County is exempt from City building regulations and zoning ordinances. However, as the owner of the property, Grantor wishes to ensure acceptable design of the project. Therefore, County shall submit contemplated uses on the property to Grantor's Community [development staff for informal (staff) review and acceptance of site design. Site design shall include the appearance of buildings, site layout, landscaping, signage, traffic and parking circulation, and the potential need for public transit bus turnout. Grantor's acceptance of these matters shall be reflected in a letter from Grantor to County. In the event of any dispute or disagreement between Grantor and County regarding site design acceptance, the dispute shall be submitted to the Mayor of the city of Antioch for resolution of said dispute. If County remains unsatisfied with the Mayor's resolution of the dispute, a panel shall be convened consisting of the Antioch Mayor, the District 5 Supervisor, and a third person selected by the Mayor and Supervisor. The panel, by majority vote, shall conclusively and finally decide any disputed matter. T All of the terms, provisions, representations, warranties and covenants of the parties under this Agreement shall survive the assignment, expiration or termination of this Agreement and shall not merge in the deed or other documents fallowing the delivery and recordation of said deed or other documents. 8. The parties have herein set forth the whole of their agreement. The performance of this agreement constitutes the entire consideration for said document and shall relieve the County of all further obligation or claims on this account, or on account of the location, grade or construction of the proposed public improvement. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY GRANTOR: THE CITY OF ANTIOCH Recommended to the Board of Supervisors for Approval: By By /4 � roperty gent Mary H. Rocha, Mayor By By Principal Real Property Agent Date: June 29, 1999 APPROVED AND ACCEPTED: ate Signea yGrantor) By J. c- ael a oro Public Works Director Resolution No. Date: ate of BoaFaApproval NO OBLIGATION OTHER THAN THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN WILL BE RECOGNIZED G:1GrpDataNRea1Prop11999-FiEes199-51AG3anbcc t.doc