Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06221999 - C52-C56 TO: BOARD OF S1v PERN71SORS Al. Contra FROM: PHIL BATCHELOR, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Costa County DATE: r''rr•..,._; Mune 14, 1999 <> SUBJECT. LEGISLATION: SE 1154 (Speier) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT a position in SUPPORT of SB 1154 by Senator Jackie Speier which would enact the California Breast and Gynecological Cancer Treatment Program for low income women. BACKGROUND: The Board's 1999 Legislative Program includes the following item: "19. Support efforts to increase funding for breast cancer awareness, public education, and treatment. (Supported AE 40 on 115199, and SB 193 on 3/23199)„ SB 1154 has been introduced by Senator Speier. As amended Jude 3, 1999, SB 1154 would do the following: 1. Establish a California Breast and Gynecological Cancer Treatment Program. 2. Make all women 10 years of age or over eligible who are diagnosed with breast or gynecological cancer and have an income below 300% of the Federal poverty level, who are not eligible for Medicare, no cont Medi-Cal, have no other insurance coverage for breast or gynecological cancer or have insurance that requires a deductible of more than $1,000 for breast or gynecological cancer treatment. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR -RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER r" 'LGNATURE Sj: ACTION OF BOARD ON June 22, 1399 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x� OTHER MOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS _ ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. See Page 2 ATTESTED— June 22, 1999 Contact PHIL BATCHELOR.,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF O` SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADIV.?NiSTRATOR BY DEPUTY ACALL ............. ........................ ..... 3. Establish a presumptive eligibility period during which the woman can receive treatment while eligibility is being determined. 4. Provide for 24 months of treatment for each diagnosed condition. 5. Provide for an extension of the 24 month period when medically required. 6. Provide that funding is dependent upon an annual appropriation by the Legislature. 7. Require an advisory committee of specified composition to advise the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board regarding the Program. In view of the fact that SB 1154 appears to be consistent with the Board's adopted Legislative Program, it is recommended that the Board indicate its support for SB 1154. cc: County Administrator Health Services Director Public Health Director Senator Jackie Speier 8th Senate District Room 2032 State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Les Spahnn; beim, Noack, Kelly & Spahnn 1121 L Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95814 -2- AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 3, 1999 AMENDED LN SENATE APRIL 19, 1999 SENATE BILL No. 1154 Introduced by Senator Speier February 26, 1999 An act to add Article 1.5 (commencing with Section 104160) to Chapter 2 of Fart 1 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and to add Section 14021.8 to the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to cancer, LEGISLATIVE GOL'hSM:S DIGEST SB 1154, as amended, Speier. Breast and gynecological cancers treatment services. Existing law establishes the Breast Cancer Control Program that provides early breast cancer detection services for uninsured and underinsured women. This bill would enact the California Breast and Gynecological Cancer Treatment Program to be administered by the :Managed Bask Medical Insurance Board. This bili , eeld meets eerfain et4wria to ereafe the treatment program. This bill would describe the treatment services to be provided, and would establish eligibility criteria and require that a presumptive eligibility period apply to individuals seeking services, as described. This bill would authorize each program participant to receive up to 24 months of comprehensive 97 I i SB 1154 —2— medical --2medical care coverage for each newly diagnosed condition, and would allow extension of this coverage in certain circumstances. This bill would require the , eemirAt+ee appointed by speeified x board to establish an advisory council to perform certain functions relating to implementation of the program. flenprefif erganitafi n ' meos ee sari-eriteria—iv--ereai e $16,000,000 Fund to the depfftment fer the pwpeses of these pregraffis. .Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the department, which provides health care services for certain low-income individuals. This bill would require the department to provide breast and cervical cancer treatment under the Medi-Cal program, but only if certain federal law is enacted. Vote: 43 majority. Appropriation: yft no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Article 1.5 (commencing with ,section 2 104160) is added to Chapter 2 of Part 1 of Division 103 of 3 the Health and Safety Code, to read: 4 5 Article 1.5. Universal Breast and Gynecological 6 Cancer Treatment Act 7 S 104160. (a) The California Breast and Gynecological 9 Cancer Treatment Program is hereby created. The 10 program shall be administered by theState - partm 11 deal`°- S.ryiee Managed Risk Medical Insurance 12 Board. 13 (b) For purposes of this article, the following 14 definitions shall apply: 97 -3— SB 1154 1 (1) "Covered conditions" means breast and 2 gynecological cancer. 3 (2) "Breast cancer" includes primary, recurrent, and 4 metastatic (with a primary diagnosis of breast 5 carcinoma) cancers of the breast, whether infiltrating or 6 in sitar. 7 (3) GytteeelegieeA ea er "Gynecological cancer" 8 includes all primary, recurrent, and metastatic (with a 9 primary diagnosis of gynecological origin) cancers of the 10 cervix, ovaries, endometrium, or uterus, whether 11 infiltrating or in situ, as well as cervical dysplasia. 12 (4) "Berard" means the Managed Risk Medical 13 Insurance Board 14 (c) The program shall be open to all California 15 residents diagnosed with breast or gynecological cancer 16 (positive pathology), 18 years of age or older with income 17 below 300 percent of the federal poverty level who are 18 not eligible for Medicare, not eligible for no-cost 19 Medi-Cal, and have no other insurance coverage for 20 breast or cervical cancer treatment or have insurance 21 coverage that requires more than a one thousand dollar 22 ($1,000) deductible or copayment per year for breast or 23 gynecological cancer treatment. 24 (d) There shall be a presumptive eligibility period. 25 The presumptive eligibility period shall begin on the date 26 that a qualified entity determines, on the basis of 27 preliminary information, that the individual is eligible to 28 participate in the program, and shall end on the day that 29 a determination is made with respect to the eligibility of 30 the individual for services within the program, or, in the 31 case of an individual who does not file an application by 32 the last day of the month following the month during 33 which the entity determined presumptive eligibility, on 34 the last day of that following month. For purposes of this 35 subdivision, "qualified entity" means any entity that is 36 eligible for payments by the program established by this 37 article, that provides breast or gynecological 38 cancer-related treatment services, and is determined by 39 the program to be capable of making presumptive 97 I SB 1154 —4- 1 41 eligibility determinations pursuant to paragraph (1) of 2 subdivision(f) of Section 104163. 3 (e) Each program participant may receive up to 24 4 months of comprehensive medical care coverage for each 5 newly diagnosed covered condition. In the event of 6 treatment needs beyond 24 months, coverage may be 7 extended with medical review under the direction of the g — )tmeil board. 9 (f) Services to be covered by the program shall include 10 all services provided as benefits under Medi-Cal, plus 11 additional services including, but not limited to, hospice, 12 nutritional counseling, home health, reconstruction, 13 prosthesis, pain management, and other ancillary 14 services as needed, arising from treatment and 15 complications as determined by the eeetteil 16 board. 1 e (g) To the extent California Law requires, whether at 18 present or in the future, health care service plans or 19 disability insurers that provide hospital, medical, or 20 surgical coverage to .provide access to clinical trials for 21 patients, the program shall cover participation in 22 approved clinical trials. 23 104161. The deparenent board shall only implement 24 this article during fiscal years in which the Legislature has 25 appropriated funds to the depw4men board for the 26 purpose of this article. The dent board may 27 expend no more than 5 percent of funds appropriated to 28 it for purposes of the program in any fiscal year for 29 administrative costs of the program.. 30 31 32 33 pfagrem modeled after the exisfiitg Breast Gmteer Fund 34 35 36 seeeeg9fit! of it similar pmgraffi far at le"t 37 eee ef the eevered eendifiens, epermed en a statewide 38 ievei, serving a pepelatien ef at least 4 909 pa4erttq. 97 --- SB 1154 r1 9 2 tie 4.LT,s« Febmary- S Cb 2f1f- o9 in fieeeid;—�.ee,'...— '4L. tL 3 wing preeedtwe— 7 10 f{9 , CF' 44_a Gc.""'LF1the"""members�'CTX.' 2T1'e 11 13 eeitditiea. 14 15 16 media are used te seliek aeffl and interest 17 ei4 and R eefthwt r r r+ s 18 20 . 21 22 23 (,.. e 24 104162. For purposes of administering the program, 25 the board may utilize a purchasing pool model, 26 purchasing credits, and supplemental coverage to 27 provide comprehensive health coverage for eligible 28 program participants. 29 104163. (a) The board shall establish an advisory 30 council to advise the board. The chair of the advisory 31 council shall be appointed and commence the 32 performance o,f his or her duties by April 1, 2000. 33 (b) The advisory council shall consist of at least 17 and 34 no more than 19 voting members representing a range of 35 expertise and experience, and 3 ex officio nonvoting 36 members, as follows: 37 (1) At least five members who are breast and 38 gynecological cancer survivors or advocates representing 39 an organization that actively participates in cancer 40 advocacy or women's health advocacy. 97 SB 1154 —6- 1 -6-1 (2) At least five members who are clinicians treating 2 breast and gynecological cancer patients, including one 3 whose practice includes clinical trials. 4 (3) At least two members who are county health 5 officers, one from an urban area and one from a rural area, 6 each representing different California regions. 7 (4) At least three members from the Breast Cancer 8 Early ]Detection Program, one of whom is a patient care 9 coordinator, and one each representing the north, south, 10 and central California regions, 11 (5) At least two members who are program 12 participants. 13 (6) One ex officio, nonvoting member from the 14 Cancer Detection Section of the California Department 15 of Health Services. 16 (7) Two ex officio, nonvoting members, one from the 17 Breast Cancer Research Program and one from the 18 Cancer Research Program. 19 (c) If more than 17 voting members are appointed to 20 the governing council, it is the intent of the Legislature 21 that the proportional representation among the voting 22 members remain substantially the same as set forth in 23 subdivision(b). 24 (d) Members of the governing council shall serve 25 without compensation, but may receive reimbursement 26 for travel and other necessary expenses actually incurred 27 in the performance of their official duties. 28 (e) Terms of membership on the governing council 29 shall be staggered in such a way as to maintain a full 30 council while ensuring a reasonable degree of continuity 31 of expertise and a consistency of direction. 'Terms shall be 32 no longer than three years. 33 (f) The eetteeil advisory council shall elect 34 its chair from among its members. 35 ('g) The advisory council shall do all of the following: 36 (.l) Advise the board regarding all policies, 37 regulations, operations, and implementation of the 38 programa. gr I -7— SB 1154 1 (2) Consider all decisions of the ward and respond in 2 writing when the board rejects the advice of the advisory 3 council. 4 (3) Meet at least quarterly, unless deemed 5 unnecessary by the chair. b (h) Members of the advisory council shall be 7 reimbursed for all necessary travel expenses associated 8 with the activities of the council. .Members of the advisory 9 council who represent the program participants may 10 receive per thein compensation if these members are 11 otherwise economically unable to meet council 12 responsibilities. 13 104164. The board may do all of the following 14 consistent with the standards set forth in this article: 15 fH– 1€a (a) (1) Determine the eligibility criteria for 17 applicants for program participation. The eewteR­sh� 18 19 (2) .direct the development of a simple application 20 and application , 21 process. 22 (3) Determine the qualification mechanism for 23 entities to be authorized to determine presumptive 24 eligibility. 25 26 27 28 29 30 +31 d year at a -The Soy 32 eetineil shall3 SrepeA eft the 33 eppfeyed 149t of eaveted serviees, 34 . 35 36 37 3 g eeYered eeft4ifiea. 97 SB 1154 —8- 1 2 3 (3) Researeh and vftL-M of Persons diagnosed 4 5 6 deliyery systeffis, 7 ircirria". ;; �.�itt+�,irs .trlara.na (j d 3 Q (4) Approve , and 9 (c) Approve plan rates, and establish program 10 contribution and copayment amounts for individuals 11 covered by the programa 12 f-S-)- 13 (d) Provide medical coverage for individuals with the 14 covered conditions or contract with a participating health 15 plan or plans to provide or administer medical coverage 16 for individuals with the covered conditions. 17 18 (c) Set rates for reimbursement for services, and 19 authorize expenditures from the fund to pay program 20 expenses, as necessary. 21 22 Contract for administration of the program or any 23 portion thereof with any public agency, including any 224 5 age of state government, or with any private entity. 26 (g) Adopt rules and regulations to carry out the 27 purposes of this article. 28 (.c*- 29 (h) Exercise all powers reasonably necessary to carry 30 out the powers and responsibilities expressly granted or 31 imposed upon it under this article. 32 0 - 33 (i) Can an annual basis, evaluate, or contract for the 34 evaluation of, the program, 35 eeardiftatiee and outreach services required under 36 Section 104165, and report on the satisfaction rate of 37 patients and providers, the efficiency and efficacy of 38 services provided, and any continued barriers to 39 achieving comprehensive coverage for all eligible 40 individuals. 97 I -9— SB 1154 1 (44-)- 2 (j) Establish procedures for filling vacancies on the 3 advisory council. 4 104464 -en 5 1€4155. No more than 10 percent of the funds 6 appropriated for treatment services covered by this 7 article shad be 10 Mer ll 12 13 eeer-diftatieft wand — r" 14 15 16 1' 18 efte of the eeyered eenditiefts, epefated eft 1y 20 —urseam to r21 G2 ,23 r Bremf 24 25 preyiden, 26 27 p pert: 2 29 30 31 32 x 33 x 34 35 36 4%e a9sistaftee may 37 38 d9 39 40 97 l SB 1154 —10 1 ; 2 . 3 4 el sobseribersr Y 6 designated � Program proyiders, and eo7wmniv� partners to patient e—are 10 11 y12 hem . 13 14 not - , 15 stibseribef, 16 ' y 17 plans and eeer&nating treatment and seppeq* gerviee 18 19 ! 2te 21 essin 22 23 for regeletien efforts. 24 25 26 27 28 apprepriate to the subseriber. 23 (B) Pmient eare eeerdinafien staff may be in the 30 3335 32 geegraphiea4 areas where 33 stibgeriber velurne is low or when other eensiderations 34 allocated ,for the purposes of 35 outreach services. 36 SEC. 2. Section 14021.8 is added to the Welfare and 37 Institutions Code, to read; 38 14021.8. (a) The State Department of Health 39 Services shall provide breast and cervical cancer 40 treatment services under the Medi-Cal program to all 97 I SB 1154 1 persons specifically eligible for those services under Title 2 XIX of the Social Security Act, to the extent that federal. 3 financial participation is available. 4 (b) For purposes of this section, "breast and cervical 5 cancer treatment services" shall be those services defined 6 as such in Title XIX of the Social Security Act. 7 (c) This section shall be implemented only upon the S passage of federal legislation that authorizes the provision 9 of breast and cervical cancer treatment services to 10 specified persons under Title XIX of the Social Security 11 Act. 12 (d) if this section is implemented, the director shall do 13 both of the following. 14 (1) Execute a declaration, that shall be retained on file 15 by the director, stating that the condition set forth in 16 subdivision (c) requiring implementation of this section 17 has occurred. 18 (2) Adopt regulations to .implement this section. 19 Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 20 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government 21 Code, the adoption of the regulations shall be deemed to 22 be an emergency and necessary for the immediate 23 preservation of the public peace, health and safety, or 24 general welfare. The director shall transmit these 25 emergency regulations directly to the Secretary of State 26 for filing and the regulations shall become effective 27 immediately upon. filing. Upon completion of the formal 28 regulation adoption process and prior to the expiration of 29 the 120-day duration period of emergency regulations, 30 the director shall transmit directly to the Secretary of 31 State for filing the adapted regulations, the rulemaking 32 file; and the certification of compliance as required by 33 subdivision (e) of Section 11346.1 of the Government 34 Cade. 35 (e) This section shall not be construed to limit the 36 treatment program described in Article 1.5 37 (commencing with Section 104160) of Chapter 2 of Part 38 1 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code to provide 39 only supplementary services for those individuals who 40 qualify for services under this section, nor to prohibit that 97 I SB 1154 d-- 1 1 program from continuing to operate with regard to 2 covered conditions not included in this section.. 3 SEC. 3. 1t is the intent of the Legislature that hospitals 4 and clinics operated by the University of California 5 should participate in this program. +p ($15,009,000) a p� 11 12 . 0 97 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS t Contra FROM: PHIL BATCHELOR, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR os ta ,lane 17, 1999 County DATE: SUBJECT: LEGISLATION: AB 34 (Steinberg) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMIENDAT€ON(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT a position in SUPPORT of AB 34 by Assemblyman Darrell Steinberg of Sacramento which would fund an expansion of mental health services to seriously and persistently mentally ill adults. BACKGROUND: The Mental Health Director, Donna Wigand, reports that AB 34 will fund needed expansions to services for seriously and persistently mentally ill adults. Older adults are of particular concern to Contra Costa County since services to them have been reduced in recent years. In addition, we are finding it increasinglydifficult to serve low-income individuals who are not Medi-Cal eligible, another situation that AB 34 will remedy. It will also support many components of the Mentally Ill Offender Crime Redaction Local Plan developed recently in conjunction with the Sheriff's Office and Probation Department. This will mean funds to obtain and maintain housing thus reducing criminal justice system involvement and costs. AB 34 appropriates $12 million in 1999-2000 and $41 million in 2000-2001 for these programs. AB 34 has passed the Assembly and is currently in the Senate Health & Human Services Committee. The Mental Health Director recommends that the Board indicate its support for AB 34. CONTINUED C4?ed AT?AC#iid?oNT: YES SIGNATURE: r RECOMMEN3ATION O�COUN -Y AO-M,N:STRATOR -RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER A�;W SIGNATURES : , 4'k ACTION OFF BOARD ON June 22 9999 APPROVED AS RECOMMIENDED —X)L OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE !X UNANIMOUS{ASSENT "' ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: -- NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. County Administrator Health Services Director ATTESTED June 2 2 1999 Contact: Mental Health Director PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK of THE BQA9D of cc: Assemblyman Darrell Steinberg su�EFIVISOla AND coin i Y ADMI T BATOR Room 2176 State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95614 Les Spahnn; Heim,Noack, Kelly&Sp ahnn 1121 L Street,suite 190 B DEPUTY Sacramento, CA 95814 AB 34 Assembly Bill- Bill Analysis Page 1 of 5 AB 34 Page _ ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 34 (Steinberg) As Amended June 1, 1999 2/3 vote. Urgency HEALTH _-- 14-0 APPROPRIATIONS 17-4 j.Ayes: €Gallegos, Baugh, €Ayes: €Migden, Cedilio,-Davis, ®� € Janestad, Bates, Corbett, jPescetti, Hertzberg, 3 €Firebaugh, Kuehl, i Kuehl, Maldonado, Papan, € €Steinberg, Strickland, €Romero, Shelley, € €Thomson, Vincent, Wayne, € iSteisberg, Thomson, €Wildman, Zettel € ;Wesson, Wiggins, Wright, € € Aettel, Aroner I ----------------------------------+-----+----------_---__-----_---_-- € €Nays: Brewer, Ashburn, Battin, E € € IRunner € € i !----------------------------------------------------------------- I SUMMARY Revises county mental health service standards to include access to integrated services, and establishes fiscal incentives for counties to engage in outreach to mentally ill persons. Specifically, this bill . 1)Revises county mental health service standards to be developed by the Department of Mental Health (DMH) , to include coordination and access to medication, substance abuse services, supportive housing, veterans' services and vocational rehabilitation services. 2)Requires, as funds become available, the three demonstration projects established in the Adult and Older Adult Mental Health System of Care Act to be expanded to counties with significant populations of homeless mentally ill persons. 3)Hstablishes Tour-year planning and outreach grants to counties, provides for increased funding reflecting the number of adults receiving mental health services for at least four months in a six-month period. 4)Requires outreach grants to be sufficient to provide mental health services, medications, alcohol and drug services, housing assistance, vocational rehabilitation_, financial management assistance and stipends to attract and retain AB 34 ---- -- _ Page 2 http://vwww.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab-00.../ab-34—cfa19990603-022833_asna floor.htm 6/16/99 AB 34 Assembly Bill -Bill Analysis Page 2 of 5 professionals to provide services. 5)Permits an outreach grant to be renewed if the county demonstrates to DMH that the services are successfully reducing mental health reeds and reducing law enforcement, criminal justice system, and state corrections expenditures on severely mentally ill persons. 6)Permits grant reductions based upon benchmarks for a 20% or larger reduction in incarceration rates over the four-year grant. Permits DME: to approve grant renewal if the benchmark is unmet and the county is stabilizing more mentally ill and reducing homelessness, achieving the maximum feasible reduction in incarceration, or meeting other performance criteria specified in the county contract. 7) Permits subsequent funding to be limited, or for conditions for improvement to be imposed upon a county that received a grant, but did not reduce criminal justice expenditures or greet other performance benchmarks as a result. Requires DMH to provide annual oversight of grants for compliance with contract standards. 8)Requires the DME: Director to establish an advisory committee to provide advice regarding the development of grant award criteria, and to identify performance measures for evaluating the effectiveness of grants. The committee shall include, but not be limited to, representatives from veterans' services programs, law enforcement, county and private mental health providers, the Board. of Corrections, the Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, substance abuse service providers, the Department of Rehabilitation, and providers of employment services. Requires criteria for grant awards to include, but not be limited to: a) A strategic plan for providing outreach, prevention, intervention, and evaluation in a cost appropriate manner; b) A description of the population to be served, ability to administer an effective service program., and the degree to which local agencies and advocates will support program efforts, and W Mechanisms to award grants in a manner that supports better county performance, by restricting grants based on AB 34 ------------ Page 3 the extent to which the current number of people receiving extensive menta'_ health services with funds provided other than through this part in the county are significantly below those of other comparable counties, and by rewarding counties that are able to provide mental health services to more people with other resources. 9)Requires local strategy committees composed of, but not http://ENNv"nleginfb.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab-00.../ab-34—cfa19994603_022833`asrn_floor.htm 6/1659 AB 34.Assembly Bill-Bill Analysis Page 3 of 5 limited to representatives of local government and providers of housing assistance, mental health services, outreach for mental health services, veterans' services, law enforcement, substance abuse services and employment services. 10?Requires the local strategy committee to develop a comprehensive plan to from the basis for a performance-based contract with DMH. Requires the plan to identify specified outcome and performance measures identified by DMH and the local committee. !_)Permits grant amounts to be increased to reward counties that are providing mental health services to significantly more mentally ill adults with funds other than state appropriations, relative to other comparable counties. Permits grant amounts to be decreased to penalize counties serving a number of severely mentally ill adults significantly below that of comparable counties. .2)Permits outreach grants to be renewed, if the county demonstrates to DMH that the outreach services are successfully bringing into treatment the number of persons projected in the contract. Permits contracts to be modified as necessary. 13)Requires, beginning on or before November 1, 2001, and annually thereafter, the Director to report to the Legislature about the impact of grants in reducing incarceration of mentally ill persons, and to make recommendations regarding improving county performance and state mental health policies. 14)Appropriates $12 million from the General Fund during the current (1999-2000) fiscal, year to DMH. Requires $500, 000 to be allocated for training, $500, 000 to be allocated for homeless outreach training for counties, to be offered through an organization with significant success with homeless outreach programs. Requires $9 million to be allocated for 0 AB 34 --- — Pace 4 county planning grants. 15)Appropriates $41 million to DMH from the General Fund for the 2000-2001 fiscal year. Requires, of the amounts appropriated each year, $500, 000 to be allocated to DMH for administrative purposes. 16)Expresses legislative intent that the future funding be allocated to counties based on the amount due under the applicable county's contract, according to net increases in the number of persons served in the prior fiscal year, adjusted by the amount the county's prior fiscal year allocation was greater or ,less than the amount required to fund the county's actual increase in number of persons served. If the total amount of allocations due to all counties would exceed the previous year's appropriation by more than $50 h4://www.leg fo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_00-`/ab--34_chi 19990603_022833_astn—floor.htin 6/16/99 AB 34 Assembly Bill-Bill Analysis Page 4 of 5 million, each county shall receive a percentage of a $50 million increase over the previous year's appropriation. EXISTING LAIC . l) Requires counties to relieve and support poor, indigent and incapacitated persons, when such persons are not supported and relieved by relatives, friends, or other public or private institutions. 2) Establishes three mental health care demonstration projects in the Adult and Older Adult mental Health System of Care Act. FISCAL EFFECT According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee analysis, the bill appropriates $12 million General :Fund in 1999-2000, and $41 million in 2000-2001. in addition, this bili expresses intent to provide state funding, with annual increases not to exceed $50 million annually. — COMMENTS a The author is proposing this bill to reduce homelessness of people with severe mental illnesses. The author notes that the mentally ill frequently become disoriented and unable to recognize the need for medical assistance. When medical care is not sought, a cycle of hospitalization, return to the streets, arrest, and return to homelessness ensues. This bill is sponsored by the Mental health Association in California. AB 34 -- – Page 5 AB 3777 (Wright) , Chapter 982, Statutes of 1988, authorized two types of pilot programs for delivering mental health services to seriously mentally ill adults. a system of care model, which has been piloted in Ventura County, and the integrated service agencies (TSA) model, piloted in Stanislaus and Los Angeles Counties. These programs have helped clients become functional through coordinated services to address multiple problems, such as mental illness, substance abuse and homelessness. SB 659 (Wright) , Chapter 153, Statutes of 1996, reauthorized the demonstration projects, and required DMH to issue requests for proposals for additional projects in any year in which the state provides funds for that purpose. The California Council of Community :Mental. Health Agencies (CCCMHA) argues that the only way to step the cycle of homelessness due to untreated illness is to provide incentive funding for county programs. The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department believes this ;Dili will provide resources to keep mentally ill patients from weighing down our criminal justice system. The California dental Health Planning Council argues that this bill will reverse a pattern of underfunding that has continued since deinstitutionalization of the mentally ill in the early 1970's. http://v,rww.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab-00.../ab34—cfa 19990603_022833—asrn_#1oor.htni 6/16/99 AB 34 Assembly Bill -Bill Analysis Page 5 of 5 Analysis Prepared by Ann Blackwood I :HEALTH / (916) 319-2097 FN 0001584 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_00.../ab-34—cfa-19990603-022833—asm—floor.htm 6/16/99 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JUNE 1, 1999 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 26, 1999 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL,5, 1999 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 4, 1999 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY FEBRUARY"4, 1999 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE--1999--2(!tl(?REGULAR SESSION ASSEMBLY BILL No. 34 Introduced by Assembly Members Steinberg and Baugh (Coauthors; Assembly Members Alquist, Calderon, Cedillo, Gallegos, Hertzberg, Honda, Jackson, Keeley, Kuehl, Lowenthal, .Mazzoni, Romero, Strom-Martin, Thomson, and Washington) (Coauthors: Senators Alpert, Baca, Chesbro, Johnston, Perata, and Solis) December 7, 1998 An act to amend Sections 5802, 5806, and 5814 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to mental health, aft4 making an appropriation therefor, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S NICEST AB 34, as amended, Steinberg. Mental health funding: local grants. Existing law provides for the allocation of state funds to counties for mental health programs. 94 r— AB 34 —2 This bill would make various statements of legislative findings and intent regarding the need to provide sufficient funds to counties for adult mental health and related services. Existing law requires the State Department of Mental Health to establish service standards relating to mental health services. These standards are required to include, among other things, plans for services and evaluation strategies. This bill would also require these standards to include coordination and access to related medications, substance abuse services, housing assistance, vocational rehabilitation, and veterans' services. The bill would also provide for the award, by the department, of planning grants, outreach grants, and service expansion grants to counties for adult mental health programs. The bill would appropriate funds to provide planning grants, outreach grants, and expansion grants for counties with significant populations of homeless mentally ill persons through the 2000-01 fiscal year. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. Vote: 2/3. Appropriation: yes. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local programa no. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of 2 the following: 3 (a) Recent estimates indicate that there are 50,000 4 homeless severely mentally ill Californians, including 5 10,000 to 20,000 homeless mentally ill veterans. 6 (b) Presently there are no financial incentives for 7 counties to provide outreach to homeless mentally ill 8 adults to increase the number of people they serve with 9 severe mental illness. 10 (b�- 11 (c) County dollars are generally fixed, so that 12 treatment of a higher than expected number of Medi-Cal 13 recipients, who are entitled to treatment by the county, 94 -3— AB 34 1 reduces the amount of funds available to serve other 2 individuals. 3 4 (d) Counties should be provided an amount of funds 5 to establish systems of care for severely mentally ill adults, 6 and provide mental health services and related 7 medications, substance abuse services, housing assistance, 8 vocational rehabilitation, and other nonmedical 9 programs necessary to stabilize homeless mentally ill 10 persons, get them into regular treatment or access to 11 veterans' services, and off the streets. 12 (d-- 13 (e) When people who suffer from severe mental 14 illness do not have access to the services they require they 15 frequently wind up in the criminal justice system. 16 However, those who receive extensive community 17 treatment are ev much less frequently 18 incarcerated. The Department of Corrections is 19 expending $400 million annually for the incarceration and 20 treatment of people suffering from severe mental illness. 21 In addition, the Department of Corrections and the 22 criminal justice system are responsible for the placement 23 of more than 3,000 of the total of approximately 4,500 24 persons in the state mental hospitals, for an additional 25 annual state cost of over$300 million. 26 � 27 (f) People suffering from severe mental illness receive 28 sentences that are sift tifftes frequently longer than those 29 received by others convicted of the same crimes. 30 {4-- 31 (g) There arethat insufficient 32 funds car programs to ensure that people suffering from 33 severe mental illness can receive the treatment they 34 needs 35 -)- 36 (h) Increasing funding for an adult mental health 37 system of care will result 38 in significantly reduced Department of Corrections, 39 criminal justice system, and local law enforcement 40 expenditures for people with severe mental illness. 94 AB 34 —4- 1 4-- 1 SEC. 2. Section 5802 of the `welfare and Institutions 2 Code is amended to read: 3 58032. (a) The Legislature finds that a mental health 4 system of care for adults and alder adults with severe and 5 persistent mental illness is vital for the sueeess of mefft-1 6 llh fttmed successful management of mental hearth 7 care in California. Specifically: 8 (1) A comprehensive and coordinated system of care 9 includes community-Lased treatment, outreach services 10 and other early intervention strategies, case 11 management, and interagency system components 12 required by adults and older adults with severe and 13 persistent mental illness. 14 (2) Mentally ill adults and older adults receive service 15 from many different state and county agencies, 16 particularly criminal justice, employment, housing= 17 public welfare, health, and mental health. In a system of 18 care these agencies collaborate in order to deliver 19 integrated and cost-effective programs. 20 21 22 (3) The recovery of persons with severe mental illness 23 and their financial means are important for all levels of 24 government, business, and the community. 25 (4) System of care services which ensure culturally 26 competent care for persons with severe mental illness in 27 the most appropriate, least restrictive level of care are 28 necessary to achieve the desired performance outcomes. 29 (5) Mental health service providers need to increase 30 accountability and further develop methods to measure 31 progress towards client outcome goals and cost 32 effectiveness as required by a system of case. 33 (b) The Legislature further finds that the integrated 34 service agency model developed. in Los Angeles and 35 Stanislaus Counties and the countywide systems model 36 developed in Ventura County, beginning in the 1989-90 37 fiscal year through the implementation of Chapter 982 of 38 the Statutes of 1988,6--fides provide models for 39 managing care for adults and older adults with severe 40 menu illness that are -Yita4 to the implemeftw6an etfid 94 -p-5-- AB 34 2 C i r o, aftd have, and have successfully met the 3 performance outcomes required by the Legislature, 4 (c) The Legislature also finds that the system 6 7 pie components established in adult systems o,f care 8 are of valve in ,providing greater benefit to adults and 9 older adults with severe and persistent mental illness at 10 a louver cast in California. ll (d) Therefore, using the guidelines and principles 12 developed under the demonstration projects 13 implemented under the adult system of care legislation 14 in 1989, it is the intent of the Legislature to accomplish the 15 following. 16 (1) Encourage each county to implement a system of 17 care as described in this legislation for the delivery of 18 mental health services to seriously mentally disordered 19 adults and older adults. 20 (2) To promote system of care accountability for 21 performance outcomes which enable adults with severe 22 mental illness to reduce symptoms which impair their 23 ability to live independently, work, maintain community 24 supports, care for their children, stay in good health, not 25 abase drugs or alcohol, and not commit crimes. 26 (3) Maintain funding for the existing programs 27 developed in Los Angeles, stanislaus, and Ventura 28 Counties as models and technical assistance resources for 29 future expansion of system of care programs to other 30 counties as funding becomes available. 31 (4) Provide sufficient funds for counties to establish 32 outreach programs and to provide mental health services 33 and related medications, substance abuse services, 34 supportive housing or other housing assistance, 35 vocational rehabilitation, and other nonmedical 36 programs necessary to stabilize homeless mentally ill 37 persons or mentally ill persons at risk of being homeless, 38 get them off the street, and into treatment and recovery, 39 or to provide access to veterans' services that will also 40 provide for treatment and recovery, 94 AB 34 —6- 1 SEC. 3. Section 5806 of the Welfare and Institutions 2 Code is amended to read: 3 5806. The State Department of Mental Health shall 4 establish service standards that ensure that members of 5 the target population are identified, and services 6 provided to assist them to live independently, work, and 7 reach their potential as productive citizens. The 8 department shall provide annual oversight of grants 9 issued pursuant to this part for compliance with these 10 standards. These standards include but are not limited to: 11 (a) A service planning process that is target 12 population based and includes the following: 13 (1) Determination of the numbers of clients to be 14 served and the programs and services that will be 15 provided to meet their needs. The local director of 16 mental health shall consult with the sheriff, the police 17 chief, the probation officer, the mental health board, 18 contract agencies, and family, client, ethnic and citizen 19 constituency groups as determined by the director. 20 (2) Plans for services including outreach, design of 21 mental health services, coordination and access to 22 medications, substance abuse services, housing assistance, 23 supportive housing or other and . .t:..na ehabi,:a..iet 24 vocational rehabilitation, and veterans' services. Plans 25 shall also contain evaluation strategies, which shall 26 consider cultural, linguistic, gender, age, and special 27 needs of minorities in the target populations. Provision 28 shall be made for staff with the cultural background and 29 linguistic skills necessary to remove barriers to mental 30 health services due to limited English speaking ability 31 and cultural differences. 32 (3) Provisions for services to meet the needs of target 33 population clients who are physically disabled. 34 (4) Provision for services to meet the special needs of 35 older adults. 36 (5) Provision for family support and consultation 37 services, parenting support and consultation services, and 38 peer support or self-help group support, where 39 appropriate. 94 -7— AB 34 1 (b) Each client shall have either a clearly designated 2 meatal health case manager or a multidisciplinary 3 treatment team who is responsible for providing or 4, assuring needed services. Responsibilities include 5 complete assessment of the client's needs, development 6 of the client's personal services plan, linkage with all 7 appropriate community services, monitoring of the 8 quality and followthrough of services, and necessary 9 advocacy to ensure each client receives those services 10 which are agreed to in the personal services plan. Each 11 client shall participate in the development of his or her 12 personal services plan, and responsible staff shall consult 13 with the designated conservator and, with the consent of 14 the client, consult with the family and other significant 15 persons as appropriate. 16 (c) The individual personal services plan shall ensure 17 that members of the target population involved in the 18 system of care receive age, gender, and culturally 19 appropriate services, to the extent feasible, that are 20 designed to enable recipients to: 21 (1) Live in the most independent, least restrictive 22 housing feasible in the local community. 23 (2) Engage in the highest level of work or productive 24 activity appropriate to their abilities and experience. 25 (3) Create and maintain a support system consisting of 26 friends, family, and participation in community activities. 27 (4) Access an appropriate level of academic education 28 or vocational training. 29 (5) Obtain an adequate income. 30 (6) Self-manage their illness and exert as much control 31 as possible over both the clay-to-day and long-term 32 decisions which affect their lives. 33 (7) Access necessary physical health care and 34 maintain the best possible physical health. 35 (8) Reduce or eliminate antisocial or criminal 36 behavior and thereby reduce or eliminate their contact 37 with the criminal justice system. 38 (9) Reduce or eliminate the distress caused by the 39 symptoms of mental illness. 94 AB 34 —8- 1 -8-- 1 (1€1) Reduce or eliminate the harmful effects of alcohol 2 and substance abuse. 3 SEC. 4. section. 5814 of the Welfare and Institutions 4 Code is amended to read: 5 5814. (a) (.l) This part shall be implemented only to 6 the extent that funds are appropriated for purposes of this 7 part. To the extent that funds are made available, the first 8 priority shall go to maintain funding for the existing 9 programs developed in Los Angeles, Stanislaus, and 10 Ventura Counties. 11 (2) The director shall establish a methodology for 12 awarding grants under this part consistent with the 13 legislative intent expressed in Section . 802, and in 14 consultation with the advisory committee established in 15 this subdivision. 16 (3) The director shall establish an advisory committee 17 for the purpose of providing advice regarding the 18 development of criteria for the award of grants, and the 19 identification of specific performance measures for 20 evaluating the effectiveness of grants. The committee 21 shall include, but not be limited to, representatives from 22 state, county, and community veterans' services and 23 disabled veterans outreach programs, supportive housing 24 and other housing assistance programs, law enforcement, 25 county mental health and private providers of local 26 mental health services and mental health outreach 27 services, the Board of Corrections, the State Department 28 of Alcohol and Drug Programs, local substance abuse 29 services providers, the Department of Rehabilitation, 34 and providers of local employment services. The criteria 31 for the award of grants shall include, but not be limited 32 to, all of the following: 33 (A) A description of a comprehensive strategic plan 34 for providing outreach, prevention, intervention, and 35 evaluation in a cost appropriate manner corresponding to 36 the criteria specified in subparagraph (C) of paragraph 37 (.l)of subdivision (b). 38 (B) A description of the local population to be served, 39 ability to administer an effective service program, and 94 ._.9...._ AB 34 1 the degree to which local agencies and advocates will 2 support and collaborate with program.efforts. 3 (C) Memoranda of understanding for referral and 4 coordination with county probation program parolees 5 and all severely mentally ill individuals being released 6 from custody of the Sheriff, the .Department of the Youth 7 Authority, or the .Department of Corrections. 8 Memoranda of understanding with local housing and 9 redevelopment agencies and other programs to provide 10 housing assistance and other appropriate interagency 11 coordination. 12 (D) Mechanisms to award grants in a manner that 13 supports better performance by counties by restricting 14 the availability and level of grants for counties based on 15 the extent to which the current number of people 16 receiving extensive community mental health services 17 with funds provided other than through this part in the 18 county are significantly below those of other comparably 19 sized counties with comparable resources, and by 20 rewarding counties who are able to provide extensive 21 community mental health services to more people within 22 other available resources. 23 (b) As funds become available, this program shall be 24 expanded to provide gaining and funding for counties 25 with significant populations of homeless mentally ill 26 persons , which may include the 27 following types of grants: 28 (1) P4miting Strategic planning grants for new 29 aunties to create, and for existing system of care counties 30 to expand, an adult system of care that meets the 31 requirements of this part. 32 { 33 (A) Strategic planning grants shall require a strategy 34 committee composed of, but not limited to, 35 representatives of the local government and private 36 providers of housing assistance, mental health services, 37 outreach for mental health services, veterans' services, 38 outreach to disabled veterans, law enforcement, 39 substance abuse services and employment services. An 40 existing local committee may be utilized to serve as this 94 AB 34 _10— I 10- 1 strategy committee if it includes or is expanded to include 2 the required representation. 3 (B) The strategy committee shall develop a 4 comprehensive plan for providing services pursuant to 5 this part. The strategic plan shall be suitable to form the 6 basis for a performance-based contract with the 7 department. 8 (C) The strategic plan shall identify specific outcome 9 and performance measures and annual reporting that 10 will allow the department to evaluate, at a minimum, the 11 effectiveness of the strategies in providing successful 12 outreach and reducing homelessness, and involvement 13 with local law enforcement, and other measures 14 identified by both the department and the strategy 15 committee. The outcome and performance measures 16 shall include, but not be limited to all of the following. 17 (i) The number of persons served, and of those, the 18 number who are able to maintain housing, and the 19 number who receive extensive community mental health 20 services for at least four months in a six-month period. 21 (ii) The number of persons with contacts with local 22 law enforcement and the extent to which local and state 23 incarceration has been reduced. 24 (iii) The number of persons able to demonstrate an 25 increase in stability of income including competitive 26 employment. 27 (2) pour-year outreach service grants in accordance 28 with a contract between the state and approved counties 29 that reflects the number of anticipated contacts with 30 people who are homeless or at risk of homelessness, and 31 the number of those who are severely mentally ill and 32 who are likely to be successfully referred for treatment 33 and will remain in treatment until successfully 34 discharged. 35 (3) (A) Four-year service expansion grants in 36 accordance with a contract between the state and 37 approved counties that provides a formula for annual 38 increased funding reflecting net increases in the total 39 annual number of severely mentally ill adults, as 40 described in Section 5600.3, who receive extensive 94 AB 34 1 community mental health services in at least four 2 eeeseeutiye wh months in a six-month period. As 3 used in this section, "receiving extensive community 4 mental health services" mans having a case manager as 5 described in subdivision (b) of Section 5806, having an 6 individual personal service plan as described in 7 subdivision ('c) of Section 5806, and receiving service 8 pursuant to that plan in four months of a six-month 9 period. 10 (B) The formula incentive funding provided pursuant 11 to subparagraph (A) shall be sufficient to provide mental 12 health services, medically necessary medications to treat 13 severe mental illnesses, alcohol and drug services, 14 supportive housing and other housing assistance, 15 vocational rehabilitation, money management assistance 16 for accessing other health care and obtaining federal. 17 income and housing support, accessing veterans' services, 18 and stipends to attract and retain sufficient numbers of 19 qualified professionals as necessary to provide the 20 necessary levels of these services. These grants shall, 21 however, pay for only the portion of the costs of those 22 services not likely to be provided by federal funds or 23 other state funds. The amount of the grants may be 24 increased to reward counties that are providing extensive 25 community mental health services to significantly more 26 severely mentally ill adults, with funds other than those 27 provided pursuant to this part, relative to other 28 comparable counties based on size, location, and 29 resources, and may be decreased to penalize counties, 30 and in some cases make theta ineligible for participation 31 in these grants, if the numbers of severely mentally ill 32 adults to wham a county is providing extensive 33 community mental health services relative to its size, 34 location, and resources is significantly below that of other 35 comparable counties. 36 (C) Grants provided pursuant to subparagraph (A) 37 shall include provisions measuring the base level of the 38 number of people suffering from severe mental illness 39 who are arrested and serve in jail, prison, or a state 40 hospital as a result of their arrest in the applicable county, 94 AB 34 -- 12 1 and measuring how the grant and increased mental 2 health services provided by the grant reduces the portion 3 of criminal justice system resources required to be 4 expended on people with severe mental. illness. Grants 5 shall also include a projection of the number of persons to 6 be served annually. Beginning in the 20012-03 fiscal year, 7 funding shall be based upon each county's successful 8 demonstration that the county has served the number of 9 adults projected for the prior fiscal year. 10 (D) Four-year outreach grants, provided pursuant to 11 paragraph (2), may be renewed upon their expiration 12 provided that the applicant county demonstrates to the 13 satisfaction of the department that the outreach services 14 are successfully reaching and bringing into treatment the 15 numbers of persons projected in the contract. The 16 contract may be modified as necessary based upon the 17 results being achieved, bath in the outreach program and 18 in the program expansion grant. 19 (E) Four-year program expansion grants provided 20 pursuant to subparagraph (A) may be renewed upon 21 their expiration, provided that the applicant county 22 demonstrates to the satisfaction of the department that 23 the services provided are successfully reducing the 24 unmet mental health need and providing for reduction in 25 the amount of law enforcement, criminal justice system, 26 and state corrections expenditures that would otherwise 27 be expended upon persons with severe mental illness 28 from the applicable county in accordance with a process 29 included in the grant for measuring these reductions and 30 setting forth benchmarks for reducing the expenditures 31 as mental health expenditures increase, and for meeting 32 other performance objectives established in the contract. 33 The benchmarks for reduction in incarceration rates shall. 34 require each county to reduce incarceration rates by 20 35 percent or more over the four-year period. In reviewing 36 a county program for renewal of a grant, the department 37 may approve the renewal even if the perf-efmeftee 38 befi-ehm.ftrk is —user reduction in incarceration rates 39 does not meet the required performance, if the 40 department finds that the county program is meeting 94 I - 13— AB 34 1 other performance benchmarks established in the 2 contract, and is successfully stabilizing more people with 3 severe mental illness, improving the community by 4 reducing homelessness, and achieving the maximum 5 feasible reduction in incarceration of people with severe 6 mental illness, fl;)- 8 (F) In any county in which the director determines 9 the program has not resulted in a reduction of criminal 10 ,justice expenditures or is not meeting other performance 11 benchmarks in accordance with the previous four-year 12 grant, the director may limit the funds available for a 13 continuation of the grant, or an expansion of the grant, or 14 impose other conditions upon the grant in order to 15 improve the performance of the county in reducing the 16 incarceration of people suffering from severe mental 17 illness. 18 )-- 19 (G) On or before November 1, 2001, and annually 20 thereafter, the director shall report to the Legislature 21 regarding the impact of grants funded pursuant to this 22 section in reducing the incarceration of people suffering 23 from severe mental illness, and make recommendations 24 to the Legislature regarding how counties can improve 25 their performance and whether state policies regarding 26 severe mental illness should be changed. The director 27 may establish standards and a reporting format for county 28 reports to the director on annual progress toward 29 attaining expansion grant,goals. 30 31 32 33 ft4equ= te meef t1te tteed, 34 35 irt the 2094 08 fisee4 year &td subsequent ftsea4 years MAAF 36 37 g g , provided 38 39 , 94 AB 34 — 14- 1 - 14--1 (c) Contracts awarded pursuant to this part shall be 2 exempt from the Public Contract Code and the state 3 administrative manual and shall not be subject to the 4 approval of the Department of General Services. 5 (d) .Notwithstanding any other provision of law, funds 6 awarded to counties pursuant to this part and .Fart 4 7 (commencing with Section 5850) shall not require a local 8 match in funds. However,, counties shall demonstrate a 9 maintenance of effort in adult and childrens mental 10 health services. 11 (e) No county shall reduce existing system-of-care or 12 .roman-McCorquodale service funds provided under 13 this part and Part 4 (commencing with Section 5850) if 14 adult or childrens system-of-care funds are accepted by 15 the county. 16 SEC. 5. (a) The sum of +tee twelve million dollars 17 33,9 9,000) ($12,000,000) is hereby appropriated from 18 the general. Fund to the State Department of Mental 19 Health. Five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) shall be 20 allocated for training, by or through the programs 21 established pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 5814 of 22 the Welfare and Institutions Code. Five hundred 23 thousand dollars ($500,000) shall be allocated for training 24 to counties in homeless outreach to be offered through an 25 organization with significant success with homeless 26 outreach programs, and two million dollars ($2,000,000) 27 shall be allocated for grants to counties for 28 implementation of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of 29 Section 5814 of the Welfare and Institutions Code during 30 the 1999-2000 fiscal year. Nine million dollars ($9,000,000) 31 shall be allocated for implementation of paragraphs (2) 2 and (3) of subdivision (b) of .Section 5814 of the Welfare 33 and Institutions Code for grants to counties that enter 34 into contracts to establish or expand their programs on or 35 before April 1, 2000. 36 (b) The stun of , forty 37 one million dollars ($41,000,000) is hereby appropriated 38 from. the General. Fund for the 2000-01 fiscal year to the 39 State Department of Mental Health for implementation 94 - 15— AB 34 1 of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 5814 of the 2 Welfare and Institutions Code. 3 k- ) � -=nei to e3keeed-oft hefl—dre weft dellars 4 100,000,0()0) is hereb tted for the 2001-02 r'vn1 ! Fund to the ,Lft �Lz OL paragraph 10 ($150,009,000, is 11 , 11 r.� �V LLL�...... t eny d 4 t�. C t 4 yA L� 12 Department -of Mented Health for ex 13 Pof subeft (b) ef Seetion 1.14e� 14 iAMl V iL1244 11Z­LL,LefIR Code. 15 " ee' ed- Y' s 16 , is hereby a"rrepfiftted fer the 2003--94 1$ 1 div zsjaft r of-geetr��4� e 20f a ye 1L41V t4d1YJ.lALs7 Lt Li1L.LeftsT,�ed yam. r1 )r the 22 23 200406 fiseal year the --R. � t r d--tV--t--e —fate 24 Depafuftettt of paragraph4ZLF oft Of25 2Jys6)� Welfare and Ristitutie... G d . (9 J4AlA 11VL 28 3 ; is hereby appreprioed fef 29 fi seal year frem - ~ e-n Rand fe thetam 31 32 33 34daliffs , 35 -2006 - je- and an -equal aftiount is hereby 36 37 &em the Genere4 Fund te the State Department -of 3 39 sem ---(b)-epee iee`-3 14of the 40 94 AB 34 —16- 1 16--1 2 (c) The State Department of Mental Health shall 3 allocate to counties, from the amount appropriated 4 pursuant to subdivision (a), for the first year of initial 5 grants to counties, the amount projected by each county 6 that would be required to fund first-year costs pursuant 7 to paragraph (2) of subdivision. (b) of Section 5814 of the 8 Welfare and Institutions Code. If the total of the 3 projected first-year casts of all counties exceeds the 10 maximum appropriation, each county shall receive a It percentage of the maximum appropriation equal to that 12 county's percentage of the total projected costs for all 13 counties. 14 � 15 (d) It is the intent of the Legislature that the amounts 16 appropriated to the State Department of Mental Health; 17 , iftelesivez, for the second and all 18 subsequent fiscal years of Binding for expansion of the 19 county mental health programs pursuant to Section 5814 20 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, shall be allocated. to 21 counties 'based on the actual amounts due under the 22 contract with the applicable county for the actual. net 23 increases in the number of persons served during the 24 prior fiscal year, adjusted by the amount that the 25 allocation to the county in the prior fiscal year was greater 26 or less than the amount required to fund the county for 27 the actual increase in number of persons served. If the 28 total amount of the allocations due to all counties would 29 exceed the allewable appmpAft6en previous 30 year's appropriation by more than fifty million dollars 31 ($50,000,0001 for that year, each county shall receive a 32 percentage of t--niftimufn a fifty million dollar 33 ($50,000,000) increase over the previous year's 34 appropriation equal to that county's percentage of the 35 total costs for all counties for that year. 36 to eettefies are redueed, th The balance of each county's 37 costs fftery shall be paid to that county in the following 38 fiscal year to the extent funds are available. 39 (e) Of the amounts appropriated each year, ,five 40 hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) shrill be allocated to 94 -17— AB 34 1 departmental support for administrative casts associated with the programs described in this section. 3 SEC. 6. This act is an urgency statute necessary for 4 the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, S or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the 6 Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts 7 constituting the necessity are: b In order for the State Department of trental Health to 9 have the program established and grants awarded within 10 the time frames set forth in this act, and to ensure that the 11 state is able to begin promptly achieving reductions in 12 incarceration and homelessness in accordance with this 13 measure, it is essential that this act take effect 14 immediately. 0 94 1 0 To: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra FROM: Costa PHIL BATCHELOR, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Count Jane 17, 1999 SUBJECT: LEGISLATION: AB 88 (Thomson) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR PECOia9M5NDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION ADOPT a position in SUPPORT of AB 88 by Assemblywoman Helen Thomson of Davis which would require health service plans to provide coverage for severe mental illnesses, and for the serious emotional disturbances of achild under the same rates, terms, and conditions applied to other medical conditions. BACKGROUND: The Mental Health Director, Donna Wigand, reports that AB 88 will require health service plans to contract to provide coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness under the same rates, terms and conditions applied to other medical conditions and specifically states that children with severe emotional disturbances are covered under the same terms. This bill will benefit mentally ill adults, emotionally disturbed children, and publicly funded mental health systems. Among other benefits, parity in insurance coverage for the treatment of serious mental illness or emotional disturbances will allow covered individuals and families to receive needed treatment in the private sector, preserving public resources for those who have no insurance coverage. AB 88 has passed the Assembly and is currently awaiting a committee assignment in the Senate. The Mental Health Director recommends that the Board indicate its support for AB 88. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: o� RECOMMENDATION OF COt,'N-Y AD,VfiNISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER S#GNAT L#"rddlS ACTION OF BOARD ON June 22, 19 9 APPROVED AS RECOMNIENOED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT _ ® - ® ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES:__ NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: _ ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. County Administrator ATTESTED June 22 , 1999 Contacts Health Services Director PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD Or cc: Mental Health Director SUP RWSORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Assemblywoman Helen Thomson Moore 4140 State Capitol Sacramento,CA 95814 Les Spahnn;Heim, Noack, Kelly&Spahnn B DEPUTY 1121 L Street,Suite 100 Sacramento,CA 95814 AB 88 Assembly Bill- Bill Analysis Mage 1 of 4 AB 88 pace 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 88 (Thomson) As An-ended February 24, 1.999 Majority vote HEALTH _ 10.-3 � APPROPRIATIONS 14.-6 ----------------------------------------------------------------- #Ayes. Gallegos, Aanestad, ;Ayes. #Migden, Cedill.o, Davis, ( ;Corbett, Firebau.gh, i {:Hertzberg, Kuehl, Papan, # !Kuehl, Steinberg, I #Romero, Shelley, 3 1-Thomson, Cedill.o, Mayne, ISteinberg, Thomson, # #Wildman ( #Wesson, Wiggins, Wright, i ? # # IAroner ----------------------------------------------------------------- #Nays. IBaugh, Bates, Strickland JNays: IBrewer, Ashburn, Battin, I I # # #Pescetti, Maldonado, I f # I #Runner I ( I 1 - SUMMARY .--Requires a health care service plan (health plan) contract or disability insurance policy to provide coverage for severe :rental illnesses, and for the serious emotional disturbances of a child. Specifically, this :bill 1)Reauires every health plan or disability insurer contract issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2000, that provides hospital, medical-, or surgical coverage, to provide coverage for diagnosis and medically necessary treatment-- of severe mental illnesses and for the serious emotional disturbances of a child. 2)Defin.es `severe mental illnesses" as including. a) Schizophrenia, :b) Schizoaffective disorder, C) Bipolar disorder (manic depressiveness) : d) Major depressive disorders; C' AB 88 �J Page 2 e) Panic disorder; http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab-00.../ab88 cfa 19990601-101239 asm €loor.btm 6/16/99 AB 88 Assembly Bill-Bill Analysis Nge 2 of 4 °f) Obsessive-compulsive disorder; g) Pervasive developmental disorder or autism; h) Anorexia nervosa and, i) Bulimia nervosa. 3) Refines "serious emotional disturbances of a child" as one or more mental disorders, other than substance abuse or developmental disability, identified in the Diagnostic and Statistical. Manual. of Mental Disorders. 4)Requires severe mental illness benefits to include outpatient and inpatient services, hospital services, and prescription drugs if a plan contract or insurance policy otherwise covers prescription drugs. 5)Requires terms for maximum lifetime benefits, copayments and deductibles to be applied equally to all benefits under a plan contract or insurance policy. 6)Exempts specialized health plan contracts and insurance policies, including Medicare supplement policies, and Medi-Cal contracts from the requirements of this bill. ___E-_XISTI4Nq requires a hearth plan contract or disability insurance policy covering hospital, medical or surgical services to cove:: the diagnosis and treatment of specified physical conditions. FISCAL EFFECT . According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee analysis, the Public Employees Retirement System indicates a one-half of 1% premium increase that could occur would result in annual state costs of $1.6 million. COMMI TS 1)The author intends this bill to prohibit discrimination against people with biologically-based mental illnesses, dispel scientifically unsound distinctions between mental and C _AB 88 Page 3 physical illnesses, and require equitable mental health coverage among all plans and insurers to prevent adverse risk selection.. 2)At least 19 states require equitable coverage for mental illnesses. Benefits range from all mental illnesses, plus chemical dependency, to covering only selected severe illnesses. This bill requires equitable coverage for selected severe mental illnesses. t#,p //www,le info.ca.gov/p b/bill/as /ab E 0-*/ab_88—cEi 19990601_101239_asni—floor.htni 6/1699 AB 88 Assembly WE-Bill Analysis Nge 3 of 4 3)An April 1998 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services report indicates that full parity for mental health and substance abuse in managed care plans would increase premiums less than 1%. In 1996, the Congressional Padget Office (CBO) projected premium increases of 3.2% would result from mental health parity, and increases of 4% would result from full parity including chemical dependency coverage. These findings are disputed by the RAND Corporation, because the CPC projections "did not incorporate any cost distinction between managed care or fee-for-service care" and concluded the CBO projections likely "overestimate the cost effects of parity legislation . 4)The California Alliance for the Mentally Ill (CAM!) , the sponsor, argues that this bill would benefit employers by improving worker productivity, reducing homelessness, and lowering criminal justice costs. The California Psychiatric Association (CPA) argues that nearly all health plans discriminate against patients with brain disorders such as schizophrenia, depression and manic depression. The California Psychological Association supports this bill in concept, and is sponsoring SB 468 (Polanco) , which would require coverage for all mental illnesses. 5)The California Association of Health Plans (CAHP) opposes this bill unless amended. CARP is urging the author to exclude individuals and small employers from the coverage requirements in this mill. The California Network of Mental Health Clients is opposed to this bill unless amended to exclude coverage of involuntary treatment. The Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) , established by the Church of Scientology to address AB 88 Page 4 psychiatric violations of human rights, argues this bill will mandate dubious science, increase the ranks of the uninsured, and provide a gateway to insurance fraud. Analysis Prepared by : Ann Blackwood / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097 EDT: 0001253 http-//www.leginfo.ca.gov/ ub/bill/as /ab_00-*/ab_88—cit 19990601_101239 as floor.htm 6/16/99 REQUEST TO PLACE AN ITEM ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' AGENDA (Do not use this form for Planning Hearings) TO: CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: DONNA WIGAND, MENTAL HEALTH DIRECTOR STAFF MEMBER TO CONTACT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: (Name & Telephone Number) Claude L. Van Marter (5-1002) REQUESTED BOARD AGENDA DATE: June 22, 1999 IS THERE A CRITICAL DEADLINE FOR BOARD ACTION AND, IF SO, WHAT IS IT: X NO YES DEADLINE DATE. THIS IS A NOTICED HEARING: X NO YES SUGGESTED AGENDA LANGUAGE: Bill No. Subject Position AB 88 (Thomson) Requires that mental health services for SUPPORT children who are seriously emotionally disturbed be provided by a health plan on the same basis as treatment for l other medical conditions. I THIS ITEM BELONGS IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY (Check One) (See attached for further definition of categories) CONSENT: No_discussion, no speakers, no opposition. PRES T ON - Brief: Less than five minutes. SHORT DISCUSSION: Less than five minutes. DELIBERATION: Longer than five minutes. Estimated amount of time required AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY FEBRUARY 24, 1999 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE-1999-2000 REGULAR SESSION ASSEMBLY BILL No. 8$ Introduced by Assembly Member Thomson (Principal coauthor: Senator Perata) (Coauthors. Assembly Members Alquist, Aroner, Cardoza, Corbett, Davis, , Knox, Kuehl Dickerson, Dutra, Frusetta, Granlunl, Hertzberg, Jackson, Knox, .Kuehl, Lempert, Lvngville, Lowenthal, .Machado, Mazzoni, Migden, Papan, Romero, Scott, Shelley, Steinberg, Strom-Martin, Villaraigosa, Washington, Wayne, and Wright) (Coauthors: Senators Alpert, Chesbro, Of-fiz, Rainey Escutia, Ortiz, Rainey, Saps, and Vasconcellos) December 10, 1998 An act to add Section 1374.72 to the Health and Safety Code, and to add Section 10144.5 to the Insurance Cade, relating to health care coverage. LEGISLATIVE COUNSELS DIGEST AB 88, as amended, Thomson. Health care coverage: mental illness. Under existing law, a disability insurer or health care service plan may not discriminate based on race, color, religion, national origin., ancestry, marital status, or sexual orientation. An insurer is also prohibited from refusing to insure a person or from charging a different premium because of that person's blindness. 98 AB Sg —2— This 2—This bill would require a health care service plan contract or disability insurance policy issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2000, to provide coverage for the diagnosis and medically necessary treatment of severe mental illnesses, as defined, of a person of any age, and of serious emotional disturbances of a child, under the same terms and conditions applied to other medical conditions. The bill would exempt from the provision relating to a health care service plan contract, a contract between the State Department of Health Services and a health care service plan for enrolled Medi-Cal beneficiaries. The bill would also specify exemptions from the provision relating to a disability insurance policy. Because a willful violation of the provisions relating to health care service plans is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. (a) The Legislature finds and declares 2 all of the fallowing: 3 (1) Mental illness is real. 4 (2) Mental illness can be reliably diagnosed. 5 (3) Mental illness is treatable. 6 (4) Treatment of mental illness is cost-effective. 7 (b) The Legislature further finds and declares all of 8 the following: 9 (1) There is increasing scientific evidence that severe 10 mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, 11 and major depression, are as effectively treated with 12 medications as other severe illnesses. 99 -3— AB 88 1 (2) Most private health insurance policies provide 2 coverage for mental illness at levels far below coverage 3 for ether physical illnesses. 4 (3) Limitations in coverage for mental illness in 5 private insurance policies have resulted in inadequate 6 treatment for persons with these illnesses. 7 (4) Inadequate treatment causes relapse and untold 8 suffering for individuals with mental illness and their 9 families. 10 (c) The Legislature further finds and declares all of 11 the following. 12 (1) Lack of adequate treatment and services for 13 persons with mental illness has contributed significantly 14 to homelessness, involvement with the criminal. justice 15 system, and other significant social problems experienced 16 by individuals with mental illness and their families. 17 (2) The failure to provide adequate coverage for 18 mental illnesses in private health insurance policies has 19 resulted in significant increased expenditures for state 20 and local governments. 21 (d) The Legislature further finds and declares that 22 other states that have adopted mental illness parity 23 legislation have experienced minimal additional costs if 24 medically necessary services were well managed. 25 SEC. 2. Section 1.374.72 is added to the Health and 26 Safety Code, to read; 27 1374.72. (a) Every health care service plan contract 28 issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2000, 29 that provides hospital, medical, or surgical coverage shall 30 provide coverage for the diagnosis and. medically 31 necessary treatment of severe mental illnesses of a person 32 of any age, and of serious emotional disturbances of a 33 child, as specified in subdivisions (d) and (e), under the 34 same terms and conditions applied to other medical 35 conditions, as specified in subdivision(c). 36 (b) 'These benefits shall include the following. 37 (1) Outpatient services. 38 (2) Inpatient hospital services. 39 (3) Partial hospital services. 98 AB 88 —4- 1 -4-- 1 (4) Prescription drugs, if the plan contract includes 2 coverage for prescription drugs. 3 (c) The terms and conditions applied to the benefits 4 required by this section, that shall be applied equally to 5 all benefits under the plan contract, shall include, but not 6 be limited to, the following: 7 (1) Maximum lifetime benefits. 8 (2) Copayments. 9 (3) Individual and family deductibles. 10 (d) For the purposes of this section, 'severe fne 11 i4neases` "severe mental illnesses" shall include: 12 (1) Schizophrenia. 13 (2) Schizoaffective disorder. 14 (3) Bipolar disorder(manic-depressive illness). 15 (4) Major depressive disorders. 16 (5) Panic disorder. 17 (6) Obsessive-compulsive disorder. 18 (4) Befder4ift 19 ¢8}-- 20 (7) Pervasive developmental disorder or autism. 21 (9+- 22 (8) Anorexia Nervosa. 23 24 (9) Bulimia Nervosa. 25 (e) For the purposes of this section, a child suffering 26 from, 'Rei4etts em t. a d h betw e f E child' "serious 27 emotional disturbances of a child" shall be defined as a 28 child who (1) has one or more mental disorders as 29 identified in. the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and 30 Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, other than a 31 primary substance use disorder or developmental 32 disorder, that result in behavior inappropriate to the 33 child's age according to expected developmental norms, 34 and (2) who meets the criteria in paragraph (2) of 35 subdivision (a) of Section 5600.3 of the Welfare and 36 Institutions Code. 37 (f) This section shall not apply to contracts entered 38 into pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 39 14000) or Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200) of 40 Division 9 of Dart 3 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, 98 -5— AB 88 1 between the State Department of Health Services and a 2 health care service plan for enrolled Medi-Cal 3 beneficiaries. 4 (g) Nothing in this section shall be construed to 5 prohibit or limit a health care service plan in utilizing case 6 management, managed care, or utilization review in the 7 provision of benefits required in.this section. 8 SEC. 3. Section 10144.5 is added to the Insurance 9 Code, to read: 10 10144.5. (a) Every policy of disability insurance that 11 covers hospital, medical, or surgical expenses in this state 12 that is issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 13 1, 2000, shall provide coverage for the diagnosis and 14 medically necessary treatment of severe mental illnesses 15 of a person of any age, and of serious emotional 16 disturbances of a child, as specified in subdivisions (d) 17 and (e), under the same terms and conditions applied to 18 other medical conditions, as specified in subdivision (c). 19 (b) These benefits shall include the following: 20 (1) Outpatient services. 21 (2) Inpatient hospital services. 22 (3) Partial hospital services. 23 (4) Prescription drags, if the policy or contract 24 includes coverage for prescription drugs. 25 (c) The terms and conditions applied to the benefits 26 required by this section that shall be applied equally to all 27 benefits under the disability insurance policy shall 28 include, but not be limited to, the following: 29 (1) Maximum lifetime benefits. 30 (2) Copayments and coinsurance. 31 (3) Individual and family deductibles. 32 (d) For the purposes of this section, 'severe ffien+e 33 ire "severe mental illnesses" shall include: 34 (1) Schizophrenia. 35 (2) Schizoaffective disorder. 36 (3) Bipolar disorder(manic-depressive illness). 37 (4) Major depressive disorders, 38 (5) Panic disorder. 39 (6) Obsessive-compulsive disorder. 40 . 98 AB 88 —6- 1 6- 1 (-S}- 2 (7) Pervasive developmental disorder or autism. 3 (9)- 4 (8) Anorexia Nervosa. 5 0%- 6 (9) Bulimia Nervosa. 7 (e) For the purposes of this section, a child suffering Q V from, 's ist etio a ..b of .-ltil.aE "serious 9 emotional disturbances of a child" shall be defined as a 10 child who (1) has one or more mental disorders as 11 identified in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and 12 Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, other than a 13 primary substance use disorder or developmental 14 disorder, that result in behavior inappropriate to the 15 child's age according to expected developmental norms, 16 and (2) who meets the criteria in paragraph (2) of 17 subdivision (a) of Section 5600.3 of the Welfare and 18 Institutions Code. 19 (f) Nothing in this section shall preclude coverage of 20 all or part of mental health services through a separate 21 specialized health care service plan, mental health plan, 22 or mental health field test. 23 (g) Nothing in this section shall be construed to 24 prohibit or limit a disability insurer in utilizing case 25 management, managed care, or utilization review in the 26 provision of benefits required in this section. 27 (h) This section shall not apply to accident-only, 28 specified disease, hospital indemnity, Medicare 29 supplement, dental-only, or vision-only insurance 30 policies. 31 SBC. 4. No reimbursement is required by this act 32 pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California 33 Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred 34 by a local agency or school district will be incurred 35 because this act creates a new crime or infraction, 36 eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty 37 for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 38 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition 39 of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article 40 XIII B of the California Constitution. 98 -7— AB 88 1 Seet4sn 17580 of—the--Govemmm 2 Code, unless e4terwise speeified, the previsions of this aet 0 98 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra FROW Costs PHIL BATCHELOR, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR County DATE: 3TA CC;UN'� June 17, 1999 SUBJECT: LEGISLATION: SB 468 (Polanco) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT a position in SUPPORT of SB 468 by Senator Richard Polanco of Los Angeles which would require health service plans to provide coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of meatal illness under the same rates, terms, and conditions applied to other medical conditions. BACKGROUND: The Mental Health Director, Donna Wigand, reports that SB 468 will require health service plans to contract to provide coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness under the same rates, terms and conditions applied to other medical conditions. This bill will benefit mentally ill adults, emotionally disturbed children, and publicly funded mental health systems. Among other benefits, parity in insurance coverage for the treatment of serious mental illness or emotional disturbances will allow covered individuals and families to receive needed treatment in the private sector, preserving public resources for those who have no insurance coverage. SB 468 has passed the Senate and is currently in the Assembly Health Committee. The Mental Health Director recommends that the Board indicate its support for SB 468. CONTINUED ON ATTACH HENT: YES SIGNATURE:':Smodi2z 'A � REC0PaI0AENDAT€ON OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD CO'a4WTTE£ APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE'S,: gt ACTION OF BOARD ON June 22, 1999 -APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED XX OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HERBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE YLX UNANIMOUS(ASSENT - - -- ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACT*N TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE IVINUTES OF THE BOARD ASSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SH0WN, County Administrator ATTESTED June 22 , 1999 Contact: Health Services Director PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE B0ARD OF Mental Health Director cc: Senator Richard Polanco SUPERVISORS ANr COUNTY AD?V1!N!STa#7OR Room 313 State Capitol Sacramento,CA 95814 Les Spahnn; Heim, Noack, Kelly&Spahnn B DEPUTY 1121 L Street,Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95814 SB 468 Senate Bill- Bill Analysis Wage 1 of 10 ------------------------------------------------------------ SENATE RULES COMMITTEE SB 468€ ;Office of Senate Floor Analyses € 11520 N Street, Suite 524 € 1 (916) 445-6614 Fax: (916) € 327-4478 # ------------------------------------------------------------ THIRD READING Bill No: SB 468 Author: Polanco (D) , et al Amended: 4/27/99 Vote: 21 SENATE HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV. COMMITTEE 6-2, 4/7/99 AYES: Escutia, Figueroa, Hughes, Pol.anco, Solis, Vascor_cellos NOES: Morrow, Mountjoy NOT VOTING: Baynes SENATE INSURANCE COMMITTEE 6-1, 4/21/99 AYES: Speier, Escutia, Figueroa, Hughes, Schiff, Sher NOES: Lewis NOT VOTING: Johnson, Johnston, .Leslie _SEDATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE . 8-4, 5/27/99 AYES: Alpert, Bowen, Burton, Escutia, Karnette, McPherson, Perata, Vasconcellos DOES: Johnson, Kelley, Leslie, Mountjoy NOT VOTING: Johnston SUBJECT Health care coverage: mental illness SOURCE_: California Psychological Association_ _DIGEST_ This bill seeks parity for health insurance coverage of mental illness by requiring certain health care service plans and disability insurance policies to provide coverage of medically necessary treatment of mental illness, under the same rates, terms, and conditions as are CONTINUED _SB 468 Page 2 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb-045-`/sb_468—cit 19990529_161947_sen floor.htm 6/16/99 SB 468 Senate Bill=IMI Analysis Page 2 of 10 generally applied to other medical conditions. _ANALYSIS . Current waw contains minimum coverage requirements for health care insurance plans (health care service plans) and for disability insurance plans. This bill requires that, commencing 3uly 1, 2000, health care service plan contracts and disability insurance policies that cover hospital, medical or surgical expenses must also include coverage of the diagnosis and medically necessary treatment of mental illness. Coverage of mental, illness would be required to be provided under the same rates, terms and conditions as the plan generally applies to other medical conditions; thus, cost sharing, or benefit limitations, such as lifetime payment limits, inpatient or outpatient service limits, and co-payments would be the same for mental illness as for other health conditions. This mill also specifies that, for those plans and policies providing hospital, medical or surgical coverage and prescription drug coverage for other health conditions, the minimum coverage for mental illness would include inpatient hospital services, outpatient services and prescription drugs. For the purposes of this bill, "mental illness" would be defined as the mental disorders included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV or subsequent editions. Disorders that would be specifically excluded under this bill include substance arouse disorders and the "V" codes. in addition, this bill allows health care plans and disability policies to exclude or limit certain services including: marital or education services deemed not medically necessary; and custodial care. Also exempted from the provisions of this bill would be Medi-Cal contracts (which already cover mental illness) . Under this bill, health care service plans or disability policies could include managed care procedures designed to limit mental health services to those determined to be "medically necessary and clinically appropriate", such as preadmission screening and prior authorization. In addition, a health care plan or disability policy would not be prohibited from providing mental health services through a "carve out" plan, under which a separate agreement with mental health providers with separate reimbursement rates SB 468 Page 3 is negotiated. Thus, while a plan could have separate reimbursement rates for mental health providers, from the point of view of the patient, this bill requires parity between limitations on mental health care and other health care. The bill specifies that no person suffering from mental illness covered by the bill shall be denied benefits for that rental illness because the person also had a disease h4://www.leginfo.ca.gov/ptdWbHVsviOb 045-`/sb 468 cRt 19990529_16194°7_sen floor.htm 6/16/99 SB 468 Senate Bill_Bill Analysis Page 3 of 10 or condition that is not covered by the bill. According to the Senate Health and Human Services Committee: Mental Health Statistics According to the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) , over the course of a lifetime, approximately 20% of Americans will experience a mental disorder or illness. Among the most frequently experienced mental health disorders are anxiety and depression. Depression, for example, is estimated by the National Institute for dental Health to affect 9.5% of the population each year; treatment is effective in 80% of cases. A Rand Corporation study estimated a loss of $12 billion in missed work days -nationally each year due to depression. In recent years, research increasingly has demonstrated a biological basis for many rental disorders, often involving neurological abnormalities of the brain. If a biological basis for a mental disorder is established, the recommended treatment typically consists of prescription medications in addition to psychological counseling or therapy. Managed Care and Mental Health Under managed care, a trend of reduced coverage for mental health care has been observed. According to a report prepared for Congress by the National Advisory Mental Health Council, in 1-981 58% of employees with any health insurance also had coverage for mental health inpatient care comparable to that for other illnesses. By 1993, only 16% of employees had such coverage. This has resulted in higher out-of-pocket expenses for employees for mental heath care than for other health care. For example, the report stated that an acute episode resulting in a week of inpatient care followed by weekly outpatient therapy would cost $3, 892 out of pocket Ll SB 468 Page without mental health parity legislation, versus $866 under parity. According to the American Psychological Association, approximately one-half of health plans limit mental health treatment by l.Limiting the number of days of coverage to 20 to 60 days. 2.11imiting the number of outpatient mental health counseling or consultation visits to 20 to 30 sessions annually. 3.Imposing lifetime expenditure caps (for example, limiting mental health expenditure to $50,000 but allowing $1 million caps for lifetime other health expenditures) . 4.Excluding certain mental health conditions from coverage. httpo//www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_045.../sb 468—cfa 19990529_16194?_sen floor.htm 6/16/99 SB 468 Senate Bill-Bili Analysis Page 4 of 10 Purpose of Parity Legislation According to the above mentioned National Advisory Mental Health Council study, the purpose of parity legislation under debate in Congress and in a number of states is to address several goals: !.Overcome discrimination against persons with mental illness "based on artificial and scientifically untenable distinctions between mental and physical disorders. 2.Prevent "adverse selection". 3.Lessen out of pocket expenses for persons with mental illness. 4.Reduce disability through effective treatment. 5.increase the economic productivity and social contributions from persons with mental illness. _Costs of Lack of Coverage As with any non-covered health condition, out-of-pocket costs for treatment, including medications, can be a severe financial hardship for families. Also, as with any serious health condition, lack of insurance coverage can limit the ability of the affected individual to be regularly employed and support their D SB 468 Page 5 families. For example, it was estimated that a number of persons receiving benefits under the CalWORKs program would require mental health services in preparation to becoming employed prior to the 5-year time limit (January 1, 2003 for most current recipients) . Thus, for KY 1999-2000, over $50 million has been allocated for mental health services for CalWORKs recipients. Public/Private Cost Shift in general, lack of private health insurance coverage for mental illness shifts the cost of treatment for some low income patients to the public sector, especially state and county government. Parity legislation is likely to result in an unknown amount of cost shift from the public to the private sector, potentially offsetting some of the cost increase to public employee benefit plans. The National Council study cites research indicating that for every dollar spent on treatment of mood disorders between $3 and $9 could be realized in net economic returns due to employee earnings; a one-to-one net economic return was reported for less common and more severe mental illnesses. federal Law and Report to Congress . Recent federal legislation, the Domenici--Wellstone parity amendment to the federal FY 1997 appropriations bill. (H.R. 3666 /P.L. 104-204) , requires group health care plans which contain some mental illness coverage must not impose more limits on http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_045-`/sb 468_cht 19990529_161947_sea Boanhtn 6/16/99 Ski 468 Senate Bill-Bill Analysis Page 5 of 10 mental health coverage than are imposed for other health conditions. However, that legislation did not require health plans to cover mental illness and applied only to dans serving 50 or more employees. Subsequent to the legislation, the federal Senate Appropriations Committee requested the National Advisory Mental Health^, Council to report on (1) the cost of providing equitable coverage for persons with mental illness, and (2) the National Institute of Mental Health's investigation of mental health coverage under managed care. The Council's initial report to Congress states that mental health parity, adopted in combination with managed care, is likely to result in Lowered costs and lowered premiums or, at most, very modest cost increases within the first year of implementation. The report also notes that while parity legislation enhances access to mental health services, SB 468 Page 6 under managed care access can still be restricted if insurers utilize "behavioral health plans" and aggressive utilization reviews as "gatekeeping" functions. Cos s a py Issue Previous debates over legislation in Congress and in the legislature have prompted conflicting studies of the cost of providing mental health coverage. The federal study requested by Congress in 1997 found that most previous studies failed to account for the impact of managed care, which can impose cost controls when parity legislation is enacted. Supporters of this bill point to a recent Price Waterhouse study, commissioned by the California Psychological Association and the American Psychological Association, that found the cost of a comprehensive mental health parity requirement (similar to the one included in SH 468) would increase base medical plan costs by between 1% (for HMOs) and 3% (for Fee-For-Service plans) . Considering the type of plans and likely employer responses, the Price Waterhouse actuarial analysis predicted an average, net employer contribution cost increase of 94 cents per member per month. (an average of $3 per family) . In addition, for small employers, defined as those with 5 employees or less, the study predicted an increase in cost of $84 per year. Opponents point to previous studies reporting that for every 1 percent real increase in health care costs, as many as 40,000 Californians could lose their insurance coverage (Barents Croup. study) . In addition, they report a 1998 Wellness Foundation Study found that business with 50 employees or less cite cost as the overwhelming reason for not providing health coverage. Full Parity, Spread aealth Care Costs . This bili requires "full parity" for menta' health, allowing health plans to http://vrvvw.le info.ca.gov/pub/hill/sen/sb 445,../sb 468_cit 19990529_161947_sen floor.htm 6/16/99 SB 468 Senate Bill w Bill Analysis Paye 6 of 10 restrict mental health only to the extent coverage is also restricted for other health conditions, rather than extending coverage only to a limited number of mental health disorders, Current law allows "adverse selection", under which health or disability insurers offer :;trental health coverage in only a few plans, forcing persons or families needing mental health coverage to enroll in only those few plans. When the type of mental, disorders covered SB 468 Page 7 by plans is severely limited, families also are forced to choose from among the few plans that cover the disorder found in their family. This has the effect of congregating those most in need of mental health coverage in those few plans offering such coverage, thus artificially raising the average, per person cost of providing mental health coverage under those plans. According to the sponsors, by requiring all health plans to provide coverage for a range of mental illnesses, with the same limitations imposed for other health conditions, the cost of the benefit will be spread over the widest number of payors, thus minimizing the average cost per person. Related Legislation . A3 88 (Thomson) would also require health ;clans to cover mental illness but would limit such coverage to a more narrow range of mental health disorders. _FISCAL EFFECT Appropriation: No Fiscal Com. : Yes Local: Yes According to the Senate Appropriations Committee: Fiscal Impact (in thousands) Major Provisions 1999w-2000 2000-0 2001--02 bund State employee and 3, 000 61000 6,000 General retiree health benefits 3,000 6, 000 6, 000 various Healthy Families 188 375 357 General. 375 750 750 federal -SUPPORT (Verified 5/27/99) California Psychological Association (source) American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees http://vvww.leginfo.cs.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb 045.../sb 468_cEi 19990529_161947_sen floor.htm 6/16/99 SB 468 Senate Bill-Bill Analysis Page 7 of 14 c� SFS 468 Page 8 Association of Regional Center Agencies California Alliance for the Mentally Ill California Association Health Facilities California. Council of Community Mental Health Agencies California Firefighters California Health Care Association California Mental Health Directors Association California Mental Health Planning Council California Psychiatric Association California Physicians Croup Council California Professional Firefighters California School Employees Association California State Employees Association California State Association of Counties California Teachers Association Central. Coast Psychological Association City and County of San Francisco County of .:dos Angeles DiDi. Hirsch, Community Mental Health Center Family Service Council of California Friends for Survival, Inc. J'ERICHO National Association of Social. Workers San Diego Psychological Association San Francisco Psychological Association Santa Barbara County Psychological Association Santa Clara County Union of American Physician: and Dentists United Nurses Association of California. 3 individuals CPPJSIAION (Verified 5/27/99) Association of California Life and Health Insurance Companies Blue Cross of California California Association. of Health Plans California Association of Health Underwriters California Chamber of Commerce Californians for Affordable :health Reform Citizens Commission for Human Rights .Health Insurance Association of America and New York Life Printing industries of California Union of American Physicians and Dentist C7 SE 468 Page 9 hq://www.le in b.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb 445.../sb 468 chi 199905 9-161947_sen floor.htm 6/16/99 B 468 Senate Bill-Bili Analysis f1age 8 of 10 California Network of Mental Health Clients The following groups were listed in opposition on the Senate Health and Human Services Committee analysis: Bamboo Grove Publishers California Manufacturers Association Chula Vista Junior High School Coalition Against Mandated Mental Treatment of California David Morse & Associates Dutcher Studio KNOT Anymore Leo Hamel and Company, Inc. Lexis international 'Translations Peter Heer Video Productions Precision Design Precision Systems, Inc. Smith and Company ARGUMBNIS IN TUPPORT Supporters of SB 468 argue: 1 .Under managed care, many HMO's are not providing coverage for mental :health disorders or are imposing severe limits on coverage. 2.Requiring access to mental health insurance coverage will reduce financial burdens on families and allow more prompt, complete treatment of disorders. 3.Treating serious disorders of the brain differently from other disorders is discriminatory, when many mental disorders are physical in origin and, with recent medical advances, more treatable than many other physical disorders that are routinely covered by health plans. 4.Substantial public :savings will result from parity, as currently treatment for serious mental illness is three times more likely to be paid for by Medi-Cal or publicly funded indigent care. S.Diagnosis and treatment of mental illness is an important part of a person's overall, health care and cannot be separated from it. C� _SB 468 Page hG 6.Discriminatory health insurance policies force persons with treatable mental illness into lifelong disability and public dependency. 7.Lack of access to treatment can cause persons to suffer recurrence of acute mental illness, resulting in homelessness or involvement with the criminal justice system, often for non-violent crimes. Parity for mental http://www.le fo.ca.gav/putVbilVser&sb 45-dsb 468—cfa 1999052 _161947_s n_ oor.htm 6/16/99 SB 468 Senate Bill a Bill Analysis 'age 9 of 10 health treatment could prevent some mentally ill persons from becoming victims as well as perpetrators of cri:re, resulting in government savings due to crime prevention and reduced placements in state mental hospitals and correctional facilities. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION Opponents of SB 468 argue: 1.Reauiring *rental health parity would increase the cost of health care premiums, which would in turn result in more Californians losing health insurance coverage entirely (opponents estimate that for every one percent real increase in the price of health insurance premiums, up to 40,900 Californians could lose health insurance coverage) . 2.Approximately 7 million Californians currently have no health insurance, with the cost of premiums often cited as the reason. 3.The financial burden of adding mental health parity would be greatest on small employers, most of whom now offer only minimal ::ental health coverage--however, large employers would also be affected as 30% now offer only minimal coverage and only 20% of large employers currently offer generous mental health benefits. 4.The definition of :dental illness in SB 468 is broad -- for example, anorexia and bulimia do not create the functional disorders that other "severe mental illnesses" do and the physical effects could be covered under current coverage. CP:cm 5/29/99 Senate Floor Analyses SB 468 Page xA SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_045.../sb-468—cfa-19990529-161947—sen—floor.htm 6/16/99 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 27, 1999 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 13, 1999 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 5, 199'9 AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 22, 1999 SENATE BILE No. 468 Introduced by Senators Polanco,Alpert,Figueroa,Ortiz, and Rainey (Coauthors: Assembly Members Cardenas, Ducheny, Firebaugh, Kuehl, Romero, Shelley, and Wildman) February 17, 1999 An act to add Section 1374.72 to the health and Safety Code, and to add Section 10144.5 to the Insurance Code, relating to health care coverage. I EGISL,ATIVE COUNSEUS DIGEST SB 468, as amended, Polanco. Health care coverage. Dental illness. Under existing law, a disability insurer or health care service plan may not discriminate based on race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, or sexual orientation. An insurer is also prohibited from refusing to insure a person or from charging a different premium because of that person's blindness. This bill would require a health care service plan contract or disability insurance policy issued, amended, or renewed on or after July 1, 2000, to provide coverage for the diagnosis and medically necessary treatment of mental illness under the 95 C SB 468 —2— same -2—same rates, terms, and conditions as generally applied to other medical conditions, as specified.. These requirements would not apply to a contract between the State Department of Health Services and a health care service plan or a disability insurer for the benefit of enrolled Medi-Cal beneficiaries. Because a willful violation of the bill's provisions relating to health care service plans would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Section 1374.72 is added to the Health 2 and Safety Code, to read: 3 1374.72. Every health care service ,plan contract 4 issued, amended, or renewed on or after July 1, 2000, that 5 provides hospital, medical, or surgical coverage shall 6 provide coverage for the diagnosis and medically 7 necessary treatment of mental illness under the same 8 rates, terms, and conditions as generally applied to ether 9 medical conditions. 10 (a) Coverage, at a minimum, shall include all of the 11 following: 12 (1) Inpatient hospital services. 13 (2) Outpatient services. 14 (3) Partial hospital services. 15 (4) Prescription drugs, if the plan contract includes 16 coverage for prescription drugs. 17 (b) "Mental illness" includes mental disorders defined 18 in the Diagnostic and ,Statistical Manual IV or subsequent 19 editions published by the American Psychiatric 20 Association., except those codes defining substance abuse 95 -3— SB 458 1 disorders (291.0 to 292.9, inclusive, and 303.0 to 305.9, 2 inclusive) and the "V" codes. 3 (c) "Rates, terms, and conditions" means any lifetime 4 limits, annual payment limits, episodic limits, inpatient or 5 outpatient service limits, out-of-pocket limits, 6 coinsurance, copayments, or any other cost sharing or 7 benefit limitations, or other limitations that restrict 8 access to services which are medically necessary and 9 clinically appropriate. 10 (d) The commissioner may disapprove any contract 11 that the commissioner determines to be inconsistent with 12 the purposes of this section. 13 (e) Nle4tiftg Subject to conformance to the 14 requirement that the sane rates, terms, and conditions 15 shall apply to amental illness as generally apply to other 16 medical conditions, nothing in this section shall be 17 construed to-provi -for do any of the following: 18 (1) Pfehibi6tig Prohibit a health care service plan 19 from negotiating separate reimbursement rates and 20 service delivery systems for mental illness coverage, 21 including, but not limited to, a mental health carve-out 22 program. 23 (2) Prohibiting Prohibit a health care service plan 24 from managing the provision of benefits through 25 common methods, including, but not limited to, 26 preadmission screening, prior authorization of services, 27 or other mechanisms designed to lime =- 28 ensure that coverage is provided only for those services 29 for mental illness _ 'y fe t p - - t o_ ate_d.,R.ftd 30 that are medically necessary and clinically appropriate. 31 The methods shall not be utilized to deny or limit access 32 to services that are medically necessary and clinically 33 appropriate. 34 (3) Prohibiting Prohibit the use of a case management 35 program for mental illness benefits to evaluate and 36 determine medically necessary and clinically appropriate 37 care and treatment for each patient. 38 (4) Re4rie6ftg Restrict coverage only to those services 39 provided by physicians and surgeons or to alter the scope 40 of practice of any health care professional. 95 SB 468 —4- 1 41 (f) A health care service plan shall not be in violation 2 of this chapter if the plan applies different limits or 3 entirely excludes from coverage any of the following: 4 (1) Marital, family, educational, or training services, 5 unless those services are medically necessary or clinically 6 appropriate. 8 hettse, 9 ef the staff ef my of these eftfities. 10 11 (2) Care that is substantially custodial in nature. 12 (4} 13 (3) Services and supplies that are not medically 14 necessary or clinically appropriate. 15 16 (g) This section does not apply to contracts between 17 the State Department of Health Services and a health 18 care service plan for the benefit of enrolled Medi-Cal 19 beneficiaries that are entered into pursuant to Chapter 7 20 (commencing with Section 14000), or Chapter 8 21 (commencing with Section 14200), of Division 9 of Part 22 3 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. 23 (h) No person suffering from a mental illness covered 24 by this section shall be denied benefits for that mental 25 illness because the person also has a disease or condition 26 that is not covered by this section. 27 SEC. 2. Section 10144.5 is added to the Insurance 28 Code, to read: 29 10144.5. Every policy of disability insurance that 30 covers hospital, medical, or surgical expenses and that is 31 issued, amended, or renewed on or after July 1, 2000, shall 32 provide coverage for the diagnosis and medically 33 necessary treatment of mental illness under the same 34 rates, terms, and conditions as generally applied to other 35 medical conditions. 36 (a) Coverage, at a minimum, shall include all of the 37 following: 38 (1) Inpatient hospital services. 39 (2) Outpatient services. 40 (3) Partial hospital services. 95 — - SB 468 1 (4) Prescription drugs, if the policy includes coverage 2 for prescription drugs. 3 (b) "Mental I(ental illness" includes mental disorders defined 4 in the .�Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV or subsequent 5 editions published by the American Psychiatric 6 Association, except those codes defining substance abuse 7 disorders (291.0 to 292.9, inclusive, and 303.0 to 305.9, 8 inclusive) and the "V" codes. 9 (c) "Rates, terms, and conditions" means any lifetime 10 limits, annual payment limits, episodic limits, inpatient or 11 outpatient service limits, out-of-pocket limits, 12 coinsurance, copayments, or any other cost sharing or 13 benefit limitations, or other limitations that restrict 14 access to services which are medically necessary and 15 clinically appropriate. 16 (d) The commissioner may disapprove any contract 17 that the commissioner determines to be inconsistent with 18 the purposes of this section.. 19 (e) Nedting Subject to conformance to the 20 requirement that the same rates, terms, and conditions 21 shall apply to mental illness as generally apply to other 22 medical conditions, nothing in this section shall be 23 construed provide for do any of the following: 24 (1) Prohibiting Prohibit an insurer from negotiating 25 separate reimbursement rates and service delivery 26 systems for mental illness coverage, including, but not 27 limited to, a mental health carve-out program. 28 (2) Prehibififtg Prohibit an insurer from managing the 29 provision of benefits through common methods, 30 including, but not limited to, preadmission screening, 31 prior authorization of services; or other mechanisms 32 designed t ensure that coverage is 33 provided only for those services for mental illness erAy to 34 that are 35 medically necessary and clinically appropriate. The 36 methods shall not be utilized to deny or limit access to 37 services that are medically necessary and clinically 38 appropriate. 39 ( ) Prei4bittmg .prohibit the use of a case management 40 program for mental illness benefits to evaluate and 95 SB 468 —6- 1 determine medically necessary and clinically appropriate 2 care and treatment for each patient. 3 (4) Restriefing Restrict coverage only to those services 4 provided by physicians and surgeons or to alter the scope 5 of practice of any health care professional. 6 (f) An insurer shall not be in violation of this part if the 7 insurer applies different limits or entirely excludes from 8 coverage any of the following. 9 (1) Marital., family, educational, or training services, 10 unless those services are medically necessary or clinically 11 appropriate. 12 13 Mqttse, 14 of the staff of afly of these entities. 15 (4) 16 (2) Care that is substantially custodial in nature. 17 + 18 (3) Services and supplies that are not medically 19 necessary or clinically appropriate. 20 21 (g) This section does not apply to contracts between 22 the State Department of Health Services and an insurer 23 for the benefit of enrolled Medi-Cal beneficiaries that are 24 entered into pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with 25 Section 14000), or Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 26 14200), of Division 9 of Part 3 of the Welfare and 27 Institutions Code. 28 (h) No person suffering from a mental illness covered 29 by this section shall be denied benefits for that mental 30 illness because the person also has a disease or condition 31 that is not covered by this section. 32 SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act 33 pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California 34 Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred 35 by a local agency or school district will be incurred 36 because this act creates a new crime or infraction, 37 eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty 38 for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 39 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition 95 -7— SB 468 1 of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of .Article 2 XIII B of the California Constitution. 0 95 b TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra PHIL BATCHELOR, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROW Costa County DATE. June 17, 1999 SUSJECT: LEGISLATION: SB 405 (Ortiz) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT a position in SUPPORT of SB 495 by Senator Deborah Ortiz of Sacramento which would fund a statewide, 24-hour suicide prevention hotline connected to local agencies. BACKGROUND: The Mental Health Director, Donna Wigand, reports that SB 4035 will fund a statewide, 24-hour suicide prevention hotline connected to such agencies as the Contra Costa Crisis Center, a large-scale public awareness campaign to de- stigmatize suicide and increase awareness about what leads someone to contemplate suicide,pilot training and treatment programs,and statewide databases of suicide statistics and resource information. There is growing interest in a national suicide prevention bill. Should that happen, SB 405 will put California in a unique position to qualify for Federal matching dollars by virtue of already having a statewide program in place. SB 4015 has passed the Senate and is currently in the Assembly Health Committee. The Mental Health Director recommends that the Board indicate its support for SB 405. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: el RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PECOMMENDATICN OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE S, ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED XX OTHER une , VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTSFY THAT TH• S IS A TRUE XX_UNANIMOUS(ABSENT _ __ � AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. County Administrator ATTESTED J n n e 22 , 1999 Contact, Health Services Director PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD 0= ��: Mental health Director Senator Deborah Ortiz SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Room 4032 Mate Capitol ell 'A Sacramento,CA 95814 ,' Les Spahnn; Heim, Noack, Kelly&Spahnn BY �� y � DFPUTY 1121 l_Street,suite loo Sacramento,CA 95814 SB 405 Senate TH-Bi11 Analysis Page 1 of ------------------------------------------------------------ iSENATE PULES COMMITTEE ( SB 4051 €Office of Senate Floor Analyses € i 11020 N Street, Suite 524 € j € (916) 445-661.4 Fax: (926) I €327-4478 € i ------------------------------------------------------------ THIRD READING Bill No: SB 405 Author: Ortiz (D) , et al Amended: 5/28/99 Vote: 21 SENATE HEALTH & HUMAN SERV. COMMITTEE 5-2, 4/14/99 AYES: Escutia, Figueroa, Hughes, Solis, Vasconcelios NOES: Haynes, Mountjoy NOT VOTING: Morrow, Polanco SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE 8-4, 5/27/99 AYES: Johnston, Alpert, Bowen., Burton, Escutia, Karnette, Perata, Vasconcellos NOES: Kelley, Leslie, McPherson, Mountjoy NOT VOTING: Johnson SUBJECT Suicide treatment and prevention_ SOURCE Author DIGEST This bill establishes a 24-hour central suicide crisis line that links callers to local suicide prevention and treatment resources. The bill sunsets June 303, 2004. ANALYSIS . This bill requires the State Department of Mental Health to establish and implement, or contract with an outside agency for the development of, a multicour_ty, 24-your, centralized, seamless suicide crisis line integrated network. The bill authorizes existing crisis lines that meet CONTINUED 0] SB 405 _ Pane 2 ttp:// w.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_040-`/sb 405—cEi 19990529_180757_sen floor.htin 6/16/99 SB 405 Senate Bi11 o Bill Analysis Page 2 of 4 specifications of the State Department of Mental Health and the American Association of Suicidology to be included in this integrated Network. The bill requires the crisis line to link persons at risk of committing suicide with local suicide prevention and treatment resources. The above provisions sunset June 30, 2004. The bill states legislative intent to appropriate $600,000 from the General Fund to the department for purposes of implementing the crisis lire. According to Senate Health and Human Services Committee analysis: The seriousness of suicide --More people die from suicide than from homicide in the United States. --In 1996, suicide was the ninth leading cause of death in the United States. --On average, ten Californians complete suicide each day. --In 1996, 3, 408 people in California died from suicide. -P-It is estimated that each suicide leaves behind at least ten family members and friends who are emotionally devastated and permanently scarred. Age, Gender, Ethnicity --In 1996, suicide was the third leading cause of death among persons 15-24 years of age, following unintentional injuries and homicide. --The highest suicide rate in 1996 was for white men over 85 years of age. --73 of all suicides are committed by white ren. SB 405 Page 3 --According to the Surgeon General of the United States: --"Between 1980 and 1995, the rate of Black suicide for 15-19 years-olds more than doubled from a rate of 3.6 per 100,000 to 8.1 per 100,000. -Region -- Suicide rates have been consistently higher in Western ttp://lvvtaLleginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb 040.../sb 405—ctt 19990529_180757—sen floor. t 6/16/99 SB 405 Senate rill -Bill Analysis Page 3 of 4 states, 70% higher than in the Northeast. Most western states have an adjusted suicide rate between 13.4 - 22.2 per 100,000, while many states in the Northeast and Midwest have rates as low as 0 - 10.9 per 100, 000. Causes and risk factors Mental illness: --"Most suicide results from untreated or undiagnosed clinical depression." (Suicide Prevention Advocacy Network) ---"Scientific research has shown that almost all people who kill themselves have a diagnosable mental or substance abuse disorder; and the majority have more than one disorder." (National institute of Mental Health) Firearms --Nearly 60% of all suicides are committed with a firearm. --"Over 90% of the increase in suicide among Black youth is attributable to the use of firearms." (Surgeon_ General) Other risk factors: --Prior suicide attempt, firearm in the home, incarceration, exposure to the suicidal behavior of others (family members, peers, media, and entertainment) , and family history of mental or substance abuse disorders, suicide, and violence, including physical or sexual abase. United States Surgeon General. SB 405 Page 4 Last year, recognizing the serious and pervasive problem of suicide, Davie. Satcher, the U.S. Surgeon General., called for the development of a rational suicide prevention strategy and convened a conference of survivors, health care researchers and providers, policy makers, and activists to begin developing such a strategy. The conference produced a document laying the foundation for a national prevention strategy which focused on: (1) enhancing access to services and programs; (2) broadening the public's awareness; and (3) advancing the science of suicide prevention.. FISCAL EFFECT Appropriation: No Fiscal Com. : Yes Local: No States legislative intent to appropriate $600, 000 from the General Fund .for purposes of implementing the suicide to pJlNvvr"olel inib.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb 040.../sb-405_cti I9990529 180757_sen floor.htm 6/16199 SB 405 Senate Bill-Bill Analysis Page 4 of 4 crisis line. SUPPORT (Verifiers. 4/14/99) (per committee analysis) (unable to reverify at time of writing) California Catholic Conference California Mental Health Directors Association Suicide Prevention Advocacy Network CFasl 5/29/99 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/ser/sb_040-`/sb 405 cti 19990529_180757 sen_floor.htm 6/16/99 AMENDED IN SENATE MAY 28, 1999 A,M, E�'�DED IN SENATE MAY 3, 1999 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 7, 1999 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 5, 1999 SENATE BILI leo. 405 Introduced by Senator Ortiz (Coauthor: Senator.Perata) (Coauthors: Assembly Members Bock, Firebaugh, Mazzoni, Romero, Strom-Martin, and Thomson) February 12, 1999 An act to add and repeal Divisiea 109 (eentmeneittg with , therefor.E4 beftift and ffla6ftg an Section 4028 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to meatal health. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 405, as amended, Ortiz. Suicide treatment and prevention. Existing law provides for suicide prevention counseling services in a variety of contexts. This bill would establish the---C'empr—ehensiv lifer.i» --r establish and impleffient gatelteeper trtAnirtg pilot programs to pro-vide sttieide preveftAett training to eer+ain s paraprefessietteAs9 95 SB 405 —2— programs, (2) eefAraet with aft autsideawareness and edtteaki -a on sateide prever�gen and freatment, and implement a multicounty suicide crisis line integrated network, (5) establish a data on sttieide in California effid speeified reseurees, and (6) Mareh s s ert en or before s 9 regarding the pilet programs. These provisions would become inoperative on June 30, 2004, and would be repealed as of January 1, 2005. The bill would also state the intent of the Legislature fege&ding -h-e ----d make eeftain legislative findings and k Ile W1 weuld deelare the intent ef the Legislature to appropriate from the General Fund $4,800,000 $600,000 to the State Department of Mental Health for purposes of the bill. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no. The people of the State of California do enact as�follows: 1 'c8.'�L�?4 1."."' ..,....L "1,�aaf finds nd d. e' is 2 fees: 4 5 7 appYe 8 9 5401 GaRfernians lest their lives to t 7 an average of-nine residents per day: 14 estimated Fl....,t 10 diefe are betweett 45,W@ 11 12 . 14 than their elder GaIiI.-M.-i ee­ft"fffs. Data indie 15 95 -3— SB 405 1 . 2 14siftg this were likely mare doleseems, (m 449 r6 jleading eauses of de As, respeetive4r. Both 44:p8 g p90 1aftdy 11 efted for yeeth. E-videnee is -.1. terms of 12 13j 14 15 es youth sttiei4e affempts and the 16 17 18 progTaffts to identify aftd refer yoWAt a+ risk fe 19 behtwioe 20 21 eoftftrY-fitii,4y estimates that the lives of at least si3t X22 pefseas related to or eemeet—ed to Wh-o 23 24 ,644 25 26 sttieide. 2/ 28 29 . 3£l 3y/1} 32 ediea4 affemiert are less likely to ` 33 34 3 36 37 38 Myett, eenwmnity based, 39 40 sttieifle are likely to rise. 95 SB 405 --4—p Dwitit it 109 With tseoion f to rea4,3 4 'xi^r rt. jo"q. c"v® rr7 rREVEn4rv. _ nrD 5 TRE h mMIBNT 6 10 130205. (a) The State Deparwiftf ef M- emal 14 11 12 y �--.'1'c�tk'Fc7feG`t7'Si"t3'LSZ'Ci 7.L IY'C"B'[.'i�.'GYC7'ziasrsc�Z'z'4ztica�ticWsz� 1 14 15 . y16 (2) Four members by the Sena*GefffffAt*e ott Reles.1 1 190 21 22 of the needs, 23 -or indiyidtials at. 24 2s 26 . 2 2 2 3 31 32 33 tnediee4 eeffflt 34 35 35 37 138 - 3 { 39 se.eebea, 95 -5— SB 405 1 2 '24".5: 3 4 S 9 d S S 10 laaark 11 (6) Ad-vise the State Deparoft"t of 12 g 13 14 e 0230: 15 "4') Prepare -f-eports that 16Per 14e4th aft the StaW 17 vg 130-220, 1 t 19 140210. (a) 44te State Depar"neat of Hediobt 20 shf4l establish and implement gatekeeper- t4tittiftg pi 21 progrmns pw9ttant te eantreets with eetm6es, ttoWefi 22 5ftsefe the- iatif4s, and- 23 5 24 pfafessioneAs in the behayiera4 heaM eare, 25 edueation, -4 -religious, 26 g 5 27 2 g 2 5 30 g 31 32 88ffift— to 33 34 g S S 35 36 3.1rN 38 agettey may be5eaeh of 39 iftdiyi4uf4s 40 95 SB 405 —6- 1 61 , ef- it eembiftatieft of e*istifig and pilot 2 programs. 3 (e) Pilot programs established purstte&A te this seefieft 4 shall ...,..rae for three years-. 5 6 7 8 preseribed by the department. The seleetion of 10 mode4s that eart be repReated in other eeniffmitifies,. 11 (e) Gatekeeper training pilot haH build on 12 etiffent krrowledge of exAstiftg,- 13 14 15 16 , 17 2004- 1$ 130-245. (a) The State Department of Mental 14eaM 19 shed! establish and implemefft evidenee based, preven 20 21 22 23 treatment ef suieidal behaviors. 24 (b) The sttieide treaftr&nt pilet programs established 25 under this seetion shaR operftfe for diree years. 26 (e) The suieide treatment pilot programs shall have -filft' 27 of the feHowiftg geals,. 2$ (1) To ---=-ease ------fing knowledge of _.;a=-___ based, integrated29 sttiei4e treatment appreaehes that eaft be with30 eetinty health S feplieffted by publie and private 31 pregrems, or beth, to address popttla6ens at risk of 32 . 33 (2) To pro4ttee geidebeeks and other material-s 34 35 treatment progrants, the modifieatieft of existing 36 progrants, or beth. 37 (3)– ineltid--erisis eenter eentpertent that servess 38 several .tt. 33 (d) 4he State Department ef Mental Health sha 4{9 95 -7— SB 445 1 2 preserribed by the diThe-- zet4Q�of 3 8pplieants shall SeflGet se,,rey.�✓ide treatment ...4..'I.. 4 . �j� f 7 8 N01. A under 10 shall provide at least 215 pereent eetsh or ia-k4nd fnfttehing 11 12 seeend yeaf 4 the pilot pregram, 13 ease ,�C'P7fe l .y[Iell feeeived "" " TJ 14 . 15 130-2-20. W The State Department of Menta4 HeaM 16 17 18 sttieide preyetA4en and tre&tment. 19 20 high seh Q fA _w4d. 21 22 ability itt seeiB4 marketing, media adyeeaey, wtd thee 23 24 . 25 2/ pritit, peint of 7 and } and 7 7 28 bef nef lifftited fe, paid platements, free media, 29 30 edueatie 31 1;0226.SECTION I. Section 4028 is added to the Welfare and 33 Institutions Cade, to read: 34 4028. (a) The State Department of Mental Health 35 shall establish and implement, or contract with an outside 36 agency for the development of, a multicounty, 24-hour, 37 centralized, seamless suicide crisis line integrated 38 network. 39 (b) Existing crisis lines that meet specifications of the 40 State Department of Mental Health and the American 95 SB 405 —8- 1 8- 1 Association of Suicidology may be included in this 2 integrated network. 3 (c) The crisis line established under this section shall 4 link persons at risk of committing suicide with local 5 suicide prevention and treatment resources. 6 (d) The er-isis line netwerk shall wilize data available 7 ptffstiant to Seetion 130240-. 10 130240. The State Depaftment ef Health, in 11 eallabera4ett with the State Department ef HeaM 12 Sefyiees, shfdl establish it eentredized Internet based deAft 13 14 eftd fesetffees for- persefts who are at risk of eeffhvpAtfing 15 16 17 . 18 19 puTese, 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ew4uft6e : 27 2 , 29 30 established purstiwtf te t4tis divisien.- 31 13024 isioa 32 (d) The crisis line shall maintain appropriate data to 33 evaluate its effectiveness. 34 (e) This section shall become inoperative on June 30, 35 2004, and as of January 1, 2005, is repealed, unless a later 36 enacted statute that is enacted before January 1, 2005, 37 deletes or extends the dates on which it becomes 38 inoperative and is repealed. 39 SEG. 33. It is the intent of the Legislatere tha eAl of the 40 ft4lewingee ss -9— SB 405 1 , 3 4 5 . 6 (b) The State DepWcmen+ of MenteA lie 7 8 10 (e) The programs established by the divisieft b-e 11 eensistent with the pttblie he&M made! proposed by th-e 1 ! and the system-of 13 14 16 (d) The pilot pregframs established ptff&uan+ to the 17 division be sustainable beyeitd the pilot fimdiftg period. 18 19 20 Ll c.CY�7RL if`v_"_7}!4!i [_f c.if[.[�R_RS[� S" 21 22 eefttraeted pilot pre iders tinder the diyision 24 25 f-evention end treafftnt programs and other wvailable fiands. 26 SE G. 4. (ft) Gatekeeper training pRot programs 27 28 29 30 8eptember 39, 2004. 31 32 33 34 , 35 (e) The State Department of Mettta4 llea4th s 36 submit to the I=egislatitre a fi --report .-5ep+effiber 39; 37 2004, 38 regardift the results of the pilot programs 39 Sttieide PfevefAiaa and Treatment Aet of 1999, 95 SB 405 _ 10- 1 10— 2 saf6ty Gede: 3 SEG. R. is the intent ef the begislawre that 4 5 6�p I % % for --the pwposes of implementiftg/ 18 of the Health and Safiety Gede. l 10 ($800,000) for- the 11 ; pr 12 13 the Health md Safety Gede. 14 15 ($3,!00,000) far- the purposes of implefneft4ng ft targeted 16 17 Seetien 130220 of the Health aftdSAfPA;OMP 1 19 11 13A 20 netwerk parstiant to At Reft .2-25 Of 21 Safety Goder 224590,9W) fer 23 24 data base per-suaftf to Seetieft 430230 of the 14eakh end- 25 26 ,0W) for the 2 +28 i"Ieftteti6ng Division 109 (e . - with See 29 13020-0) -1 the Health aftd Safety Gede. it is the iftteftt 30 31 32 33 ; ; 34 35 36 e JVa aV a140225 o f the Healthw i Safety Gede 37 38 eelffif-erenee eensisting of gra-at. a-11-1 fttftded wit 39 Diyisteft 109 (eaffffnetteing with Seetion 139200) of the 44 Health md Safety Gode, members of the Advisery Titsk 95 SB 405 1d ill Preveetieft 2 Seetieft 130225 of the 14 aM and i 4 SEC 20 It is the intent of the Legislature that six 5 hundred thousand dollars ($601,000) be appropriated 6 from the General Fund to the State Department of 7 Mental Health for the purposes of implementing a suicide 8 crisis lute integrated network pursuant to Section 4025 of 9 the Welfare and Institutions Code. 95