The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 06151999 - C164 O P BOARD�F SUPERVISORS RS Y : � FROM: Warren E. Rupfo Sheriff-Coroner Contra BATE: Junel, 1999 Costa County SUBJECT: Setting Special Tax Levies for County Service Area P-6 Zones SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: Set the Special Tax for Police Services: in County Service Area P_6 for the fiscal year 1999-2000 as follows: Zones 100, 101; 102, 200 Vacant lot m $ 67.73 Single, small or large multiple residential - $135.51 Apartments up to 24 units - $271.00 Apartments up to 50 units m $406.51 Apartments 60+ units - $542.02 Commercial/industrial/institutional - $542.02 Leery determined by the initial assessment fee as outlined in the County Ordinance creating the Zone and authorizing the special tax levy, the property use code, the original Exhibit C, and the consumer price index (all as attached or referred to in the hereinafter listed County Ordinance creating the Zone and authorizing the special tax levy). Zones 104, 105, 106, 107, 106, 109, 110, 111 Vacant lot m $ 56.65 Single, small or large multiple residential - $117,30 Apartments up to 24 units m $234.60 Apartments up to 50 units - $351.91 Apartments 60+ units - $469.21 Commercial/industrial/institutional - $469.21 CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: FtECOfelU3ENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECO? ENDATiON OF BOARL7 COIVIAhITTEE ' APPROVE —OTHER �f SIGIVA—URE S ,T_� ACTION OF BOARD ON _ V e- ' y .s APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS �, I HERESY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS (ABSENT .�� AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact Person:Kathy Mart n 5-1,529 =� CC:CAO,Justice Administration ATTESTED ef "y" tri Auditor/Controller Community Development Treasurer-Tax Collector Sheriff(for distrbution) PHI BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVRS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Levy determined by the initial assessment fee as outlined in the County Ordinance creating the Zone and authorizing the special tax levy,the consumer price index, the property use code and the original Exhibit C (ell as attached or referred to in the hereinafter listed involved Ordinance). Zones 113, 114 Vacant lot - $117.30 Single, small or large multiple residential - $234.60 Apartments up to 24 units - $469.21 Apartments up to 59 units - $703.81 Apartments 60+ units - $938.42 Commerciallindustrial/i nstitutional - $938.42 Levy determined by the initial assessment fee as outlined in the County Ordinance creating the Zone and authorizing the special tax levy, the consumer price index, the property use code and the revised Exhibit (all as attached or referred to in the hereinafter listed involved Ordinance). Zone 116 Vacant lot - 58.16 Single, small or large multiple residential - $116.35 Apartments up to 24 units - $232.70 Apartments up to 59 units - $349.05 Apartments 60+ units - $465.41 Commercial/industrial/institutional - $465.41 This Zone is in its sixth year of levy. It is held to a 1988 version of the Conditions of Approval for the provision of police services. Levy determined by the initial assessment fee as outlined in the County Ordinance creating the Zone and authorizing the special tax levy, the consumer price index,the property use code and the original Exhibit O (all as attached or referred to in the hereinafter listed involved Ordinance). Zones 115, 201, 1000, 2700 Vacant lot - $116.35 Single, small or large multiple residential - $232.70 Apartments up to 24 units - $465.41 Apartments up to 59 units - $698.11 Apartments 60+ units - $930.81 Commercial/industrial/institutional - $930.81 These Zones are in their sixth year of levy, Levy determined by the initial assessment fee as outlined in the County Ordinance creating the Zone and authorizing the special tax levy, the consumer price index, the property use code and the revised Exhibit C (all as attached or referred to in the hereinafter listed involved Ordinance). Zones 120, 2900 Vacant lot - $ 56.83 Single, small or large multiple residential - $113.66 Apartments up to 24 units - $227.33 Apartments up to 59 units - $340.99 Apartments 60+ units - $454.65 Commercial/Industrial/institutional - $454.65 These Zones are in their fifth year of levy. They are held to an old version of the Conditions of Approval for the provision of police services. Levy determined by the initial assessment fee as outlined in the County Ordinance creating the Zone and authorizing the special tax levy, the consumer price index, the property use code and the original Exhibit C (all as attached or referred to in the hereinafter listed involved Ordinance). Zones 117, 118, 119, 121, 122, 500, 700, 1100, 1500, 1600, 1601, 1800, 2300, 260' 0, 2601 Vacant lot - $113.66 Single, small or large multiple residential - $227.33 Apartments up to 24 units - $454.65 Apartments up to 59 units - $681.98 Apartments 60+ units - $909.31 Commercial/Industrial/institutional - $909.31 These Zones are in their fifth year of levy. Levy determined by the initial assessment fee as outlined in the County Ordinance creating the Zone and authorizing the special tax levy, the consumer price index, the property use code and the revised Exhibit C (all as attached or referred to in the hereinafter listed involved Ordinance). Zones 123,1501,1602, 1603, 1601, 2701, 3000 Vacant lot - $111.89 Single, small or large multiple residential - $223.78 Apartments up to 24 units - $447.56 Apartments up to 59 units $671.35 Apartments 60+ units - $895.13 Commercial/Industrial/institutional - $895.13 These Zones are its their fourth year of levy. Levy determined by the initial assessment fee as outlined in the County Ordinance creating the Zone and authorizing the special tax levy, the consumer price index, the property use code and the revised Exhibit C (all as attached or referred to in the hereinafter listed involved Ordinance). Zones 202, 4080, 701, 702, 1502, 1604, 2500, 2901, 3100 Vacant lot - $107.89 Single, small or large multiple residential - $215.79 Apartments up to 24 units - $431.58 Apartments up to 59 units - $627.70 Apartments 60+ units - $836.94 Commercial/industrial/institutional - $836.94 Thes `'ones are in their third year of levy. Levy determined by the initial assessment fee as outlined in the 0;ounty O3rdinance creating the Zone and authorizing the special tax levy, the consumer price index, the property use code and the revised Exhibit C (all as attached or referred to in the hereinafter listed involved Ordinance). Zones 124, 1605, 1606, 2702 Vacant lot - $104.62 Single, small or large multiple residential - $209.23 Apartments up to 24 units - $418.47 Apartments up to 59 units - $627.70 Apartments 60+ units - $836.94 Commercial/Industrial/institutional - $836.94 These Zones are in their second year of levy. Levy determined by the initial assessment fee as outlined in the County Ordinance creating the Zone and authorizing the special tax levy, the consumer price index, the property use code and the revised Exhibit C (all as attached or referred to in the hereinafter listed involved Ordinance). Zones 1001, 1503, 1504, 1607, 17080, 1803 Vacant lot - $100.00 Single, small or large multiple residential - $200.00 Apartments up to 24 units - $400.00 Page 3 of 4 Apartrhents up to 59 units - $600.00 Apartments 60+ units - $800.00 Commercial/Industrial/institutional - $800.00 These Zones are in heir first year of levy. Levy determined by the initial assessment fee as outlined in the County Ordinance creating the Zone and authorizing the special tax levy, the property use code and the revised Exhibit 0a (all as attached or referred to in the hereinafter listed involved Ordinance). ZONE AND INVOLVED ORDINANCE NUMBER ZONE 100 ORD. NO. 89-30 ZONE 1000 ORD. NO. 94-19 ZONE 101 ORD. NO. 89-45 ZONE 1001 ORD. NO. 98--17 ZONE 102 ORD. NO. 89-51 ZONE 1100 ORD. NO. 94-7 ZONE 104 ORD. NO. 92-27 ZONE 1500 ORIS. NO. 95.24 ZONE 105 ORD. NO, 92-39 ZONE 1501 ORD. NO. 95-49 ZONE 106 ORD. NO. 92-28 ZONE 1502 ORD. NO. 96-29 ZONE 107 ORD. NO. 92-61 ZONE 1503 ORD. NO, 98-4 ,ZONE 108 ORD. NO. 92-30 ZONE 1504 ORD. NO. 97-4 ZONE 109 ORD. NO. 92-40 ,ZONE 1600 ORD. NO. 94-6 ZONE 110 ORD. NO. 92-41 ZONE 1601 ORD. NO. 92-25 ,ZONE '111 ORD. NO. 92-42 ZONE 1602 ORD. NO. 95-10 ZONE 113 ORIS. NO. 92-59 ZONE 1603 ORD. NO, 95-40 ZONE 114 ORD. NO. 2-60 ZONE 1604 ORD. NO. 96-23 ZONE 115 ORD. NO. 93-46 ZONE 1605 ORD. NO, 97-20 ZONE 116 OR03. NO. 3-57 ZONE 1606 ORD. NO. 97-26 ZONE 117 ORD. NO. 94-5 ZONE 1607 ORD. NO. 98-12 ZONE 118 OROS. NO. 94-13 ZONE 1700 ORD. NO. 98-20 ZONE 119 ORIS. NO. 94-51 ZONE 1800 OROS. NO. 95-11 ZONE 120 ORD, NO. 94-61 ZONE 1801 ORD. NO. 95-50 ZONE 121 ORIS. NO. 95-13 ZONE 1803 ORD. NO. 98-47 ZONE 122 ORIS, NO. 95-14 ZONE 2300 ORD. NO. 94-6 ZONE 123 ORO. NO. 95-30 ZONE 2500 ORD. NO, 96-14 ZONE 124 OR®. NO. 97-6 ZONE 2600 ORD. NO. 95-12 ZONE 200 ORD, NO. 89-44 ZONE 2601 ORD. NO. 93-81 ZONE 201 ORD. NO. 93-45 ZONE 2700 ORD. NO. 93-44 ZONE 202 ORD. NO. 95-60 ZONE 2701 ORD. NO. 95-4 ZONE 400 ORD. NO. 96-12 ZONE 2702 ORIS. NO. 97-40 ZONE 500 ORD. NO. 94-18 ZONE 2900 ORD. NO. 94-50 ZONE 700 ORD. NO. 94-12 ZONE 2901 ORD. NO. 96-15 ZONE 701 ORIS. NO. 96-16 ZONE 30010 ORIS, NO. 95-26 ZONE 702 ORD. NO. 96-22 ZONE 3100 ORD, NO. 96-17 FISCAL IMPACT; There is no impact on the County General Fund. The addition of new Zones and application of consumer price index increases revenge available to the Office of the Sheriff for County Service Area P-6. BACKGROUND: On June 2, 1987 the Board of Supervisors authorized the County Administrator to develop a plan to fund additional Police Services in the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa 0;ounty. Subsequent to that decision, various Zones within the existing County Service Area P-6 were authorized. According to the Ordinances, each July the Board of Supervisors shall determine the amount of taxes to be levied upon the parcels in each Zone. That amount is, also according to the Ordinances, to be adjusted annually based upon the consumer price index. The above action fixes the tax rate per parcel in the P-6 Zones as outlined in their respective Ordinances. Page 4 of 4 ADDENDUM ENDUM to the MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION for the Oakley Light-industrial Infrastructure-Phase I (Carol Lane Extension and Cul-de-sac) Project County File # CR 98-5 Prepared by: Maureen Toms, Senior Planner Contra Costa County Community Development Department 651 Pine Street, 4th Floor-North Wing Martinez, CA 94553 June 1998 Approved: Title: Senior Planner Lead Agency: Contra Costa County Date: -June 3. 1999 ADDENDUM to the MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION for the Oakley Light-Industrial Infrastructure - Phase I Project PREFACE The Mitigated Neqaiive Declaration for the Oakley Light-Industrial infrastructure - Phase I fCarol Lane Extension and Cul-de-sic) Pro (County File #CR 98-5) evaluated the proposed project which involves the extension of Carol Lane from its existing terminus west of State Route 4 westward to Live Oak Avenue. The project also includes creating an east west cul-de-sac extending east from Live Oak Avenue approximately one block south of Carol Lane. The project includes approximately 820 m (2,690 ft.) of full width pavement construction, curb and gutter, underground drainage, sewer and water facilities, street lights, striping and traffic signs. These improvements are necessary to encourage economic development to the Oakley Light-Industrilal area. This document serves as an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Oakley Light- Industrial Infrastructure- Phase I (Carol Lane Extension and Cul-de-sac) Project, Consequently, the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project consists of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, comments received, responses to the comments raised, and the Addendum. The Contra Costa Community Development Department (CDD) is the lead agency for the project, and on December 15, 1998: the Board of Supervisors approved the project and filed a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. CEQA PROCESS The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) prescribes that an Addendum (CEQA Guidelines Section 15164) to a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration shall be prepared by either the lead agency or the responsible agency if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 have occurred: 1. No substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2. No substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3. No new information of substantial importance shows that the project will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed, nor will mitigation measures or project alternatives previously examined be substantially more severe than previously shown. In addition, there is no new information showing that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, and there is no such new information suggesting that new mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, 2 In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(d), the Board of Supervisors shall consider the Addendum along with the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to making a decision on the project. According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 (c) an Addendum does not require circulation for public review but can be included in or attached to the Mitigated Negative Declaration, As noted in the Preface, the Addendum is attached to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Oakley Light- Industrial Infrastructure - Phase I (Carol Lane Extension and and Cul-de-sac) Project(County File #CR 98-5), EXPLANATION OF THE ADDENDUM The Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Oakley Light-Industrial Infrastructure -Phase I (Carol Lane Extension and Cul-de-sac) Project identifies the need to acquire a 15 ft, permanent easement for utilities and an additional 15 ft. temporary construction easement. In the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Oakley Light-Industrial Infrastructure -Phase I (Carol Lane and Cul-de-sac) Project, the utilities were proposed to be located in the Live Oak Avenue road right-of- way. More precise engineering of this area determined a problem in providing sanitary sewer facilities from the cul-de-sac. The solution to this situation is to provide utilities via an easement from the end of the cul-de-sac to Carol Lane. The Addendum is consistent with County policies and does not lead directly or indirectly to significant physical changes in the project, nor does it alter the adequacy or the completeness of the environmental impacts and mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Therefore, the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate, ADDITION TO THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION This section identifies the language which is added/or changed (bold face type) or deleted (strikeout) to the text and figures of the Mitigated Negative Declaration: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, p 1, Paragraph 1 (Project Location/Description): The proposed project is located in the Light industrial area of Oakley in east Contra Costa County. The proposed construction would extend Carol Lane its existing terminus west of State Route 4 westward to Live Oak Avenue (see Figure 1a). The project also includes creating an east west cul-de-sac extending east from Live Oak Avenue approximately one block south of Carol Lane. The proposed project includes approximately 820 m (2,690 ft.) of full 48 ft. width pavement construction, curb and gutter, underground drainage, sewer and water facilities, street lights, striping and traffic signs. A 15-ft. utility easement and 15 ft. temporary construction easement are proposed from the terminus of the proposed cul-de-sac to the proposed Carol Lane. Wheelchair ramps are included at the Live Oak Avenue/Carol Lane and Live Oak/cul-de-sac Intersections. A sound wall and some landscaping is proposed along the south side of the roadway extension, adjacent to the existing single-family homes. ENVIRONMENT AL CHECKLIST- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, p 1, Paragraph 5 (Plant Life):The proposed project will result in the removal of approximately 15 - 20 orchard trees, some vineyards, and up to six coast live oaks (varying in size from 12 - 18 inches diameter). The orchard trees and vineyards will not be replaced since they do not contribute significantly to the plant life in the project area. The vineyards removed as a result of the easements may be replanted. The coast live oak trees will be replaced at a 3:1 ratio within the project area. CADATAMPSMAKLEYPI\CAR0LANE=R0L.ADD 3 FIGURE la lo d60d 1 1 1 } v�nha�a 4 LU I 1 nN'i NV03)i > N`1 NVO3 f�dd 1 a, R� �14 p a� q 't dd f� add c YP fS3Y �''Pd'd ul CDrd 1 ax > 6: j 8ddd` Ii 131 } > ocrd� xa ?3DSt Nim$ r a� v i a�'3aa t'�°'d z Nrd srrd j ray ..r IN038VIO1INON3.awlo oPr2 ---------------------- A I CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT 1, NOTICE OF DETERMINATION .99 f- P11 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 39 651 PINE STREE," 4TH FLOOR NORTH WING MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553-0095 Tele hone: _(925) 335-1250 Contact Person:Maureen Toms Project Description, Common Name (if any) and Location, OAKLEY LIGHT-INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE-PHASE I (CAROL LANE EXTENSION AND CUL-DE-SAC) PROJECT, County File# cr#98-5: The proposed project is located in the Light Industrial area of Oakley in east Contra Costa County. The proposed construction would extend Carol Lane its existing terminus west of State Route 4 westward to Live Oak Avenue. The project also includes creating an east west cul-de-sac extending east from Live Oak Avenue approximately one block south of Carol Lane. The proposed project includes approximately 820 rn (2,690 ft.) of full 48 ft. width pavement construction, curb and gutter, underground drainage, sewer and water facilities, street lights, striping and traffic signs. Wheelchair ramps are included at the Live Oak Avenue/Carol Lane and Live Oaklcul-de-sac intersections. A sound wall and some landscaping is proposed along the south side of the roadway extension, adjacent to the existing single-family homes. The project was approved on I& . I'e-- q �) Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act: An Environmental impact Report was prepared and certified. The Project was encompassed by an Environmental Impact Report previously prepared for A Negative Declaration was issued indicating that preparation of an Environmental Impact Report was not required. exa n Copies of the record of project approval and the Negative Declaration or the final El 7exae I 9 a 1 711 Contra Costa County Community Development Department. L The Project will not have a significant environmental effect. The Project will have a significant environmental effect. ED)E C 17 1998 Lj Mitigation measures were made a condition of approval of the p, eject. A statement of overriding considerations was adopted. 01-WEIR,'�'OUNTY k'LERK t""' "'y Findings were adopted pursuant to Section 15091 of the State tGuldp� By _��E P U.�TY Date: 16, 1,?qgl By: e Comay n!!y-Development D�p - Artment Representative AFFIDAVIT OF FILING AND POSTING I declare that on DEC 17 1998 1 received and posted this notice as required by California Public Resources Code Section 21152(c). Said/notice will remain posted for 30 days from the filing date. Signature Ae Applicant: I0e artr ant of Fish&Game Fees Due: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 'EIR-$850 Total Due:$ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Neg. Dec.-$1,250 Total Paid:$_ A—TN: MAUREEN TOMS X DeMinimis Findings-$0 County Clerk-$25 Receipt Contra Dennis M.Barry,AICP Community Community Development Director Development Costa Department 1. - Counly County Administration Building 651 fine Street 4th Floor, North Wing Martinez,California 9469'3-0095 V Sri`ceuK'� (925)335-1250 October 26, 1998 NOTICE OF PLT13LIC REVIEW AND INTENT TO ADOPT A PROPOSED NIITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Carol Lane Extension and Cil-de-sac Project - County File: 8-5 Pursuant to the State of California Public Resources Code and the "Guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended to date, this is to advise you that the Community Development Department of Contra Costa County has prepared an initial study on the following project: The proposed project is luted on Carol Lane in the Oakley area of east Contra Costa.County. The proposed construction would extend Carol Lane its existing terminus west of State route 4 westward to Live Oak Avenue. The project also includes creating an east west cul-de-sac extending east from Live Oak Avenue approximately one block south.of Carol Lane. The proposed project includes approximately 820 in (2,690 t.)of full width pavement construction, curb and gutter,underground drainage,sewer and water facilities,street lights,striping and traffic signs. Wheelchair ramps are included at the Live Oak Avenue/Carol Lane and Live Oak/cul-de-sac intersections. A sound wall and some landscaping is proposed along the south side of the roadway extension,adjacent to the existing single-family homes. The proposed development will not result in any significant impacts. A copy of the mitigated negative declaration and all documents referenced in the mitigated negative declaration may be reviewed in the offices of the Community Development Department, and Applications and Permit Center at the Mclrien Administration wilding,North Wing, Second Floor,651 Pine Street;Martinez,during normal business hours. Public Comment Period-The period for accepting comments on the adequacy of the environmental docarnsen`ats extends to 5.00 P. ., Wednesday, November 18, 1998 Any comments should be in writing and submitted to the following address: Maureen Toms,Planner Contra Costa County Community Development Department 651 fine Stmt,North Wing,4th Floor Martinez,CA 94553 If you require further information regarding the project itself;please contact Ms.Dianne Spoto of the Contra Costa County PublicWorks Department,Design Division, at(925)313-2308. If you have any comments regarding the environmental review of this Notice of Intent,please contact me at(925)335-1250. It is anticipated that the proposed Negative Declaration will be considered for adoptions at a meeting of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday,December 1, 1998. The meeting is anticipated to be held at 10:00 a.m. at the Board Chambers at 651 Pine Street,Martinez,CA. Sincerely, Maureen'Toms �CT 2 6 �� 9 8 cc.bounty C:es3t's Office(2 copies) Planner Public works-Sieve Wright O &L,WEIR,COUNTY CLERK Off ice Hours Monday- friday:8:00a.m. 5:00p.rr. 0Q0i�dTY c:�nTA\w�sca\oaaz�,E�teiti.nxoa,a*�e\cA fie is closed the 1 st, 3rd&5th Fridays of each mons 13Y IiOTy CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL. CHECKLIST FORM (INITIAL. STUDY) t. Background 1. Name of Proponent: Contra Costa County Community Develogment Department 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 651 Pine Street 4th Floor. forth Wing artinez, CA 94553 c/o Maureen Tomas Planner (925) 335-9250 3. Date Checklist Submitted: October 26, 1996 4. Name of Proposal: Oakley Ll-ght Industrial Infrastructure - Phase I 5. Special Circumstances: Oakley Redevelopment Area In the process of preparing the Checklist and conducting the evaluation, the following references (which are available for review at the Contra Costa County Community Development Department, 651 Pine Street 4th Floor-North Wing, Martinez) were consulted: REFERENCES: 1. Contra Costa Resource Mapping System - Quad Sheet Panels Jersey Island, CA* 2. The(Reconsolidated)County General Plan (July 1996) and EIR on the General Placa (January 1991) 3. Oakley Redevelopment Plan and EIR (September 1969) 4. Oakley Old Town Specific Plan and EIR ( February 9996) 5. Oakley Light Industrial Feasibility Study(September 9 997) 6. USFWS Species List 7. RAREFIND- California Natural Diversity Data Base (January 94, 1997) 6e Contra Costa Water District Interim Service Area Listed Species Occurrences and Potential Habitat Map (April 1997).. 9. Acoustical Analysis for the Oakley Light€ndustrial Infrastructure Phase 1 Project (October 23, 1996) *Note: Panel numbers indicated below refer to 7,5 minute USGS quadrangle reap sheets located in the Community Development Department offices at 651 Pine Street 2nd floor, North Vying, Martinez, California 94553. II. Environmental Impacts S I 1. Earth. Could the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? v x Project Description See additional information S=Signif€€cant I=Insignificant Environmental Checklist- Page 1 of 10 S I b. The creation of objectionable odors? X BAAQMD letter dated: N/A Project Description Same as 2.a. C. /alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ X Project Description 3o Water. Could the proposals result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X Project Description b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of.surface runoff? � X Project Description Same as 3.a. See additional information C. Alterations to the course or flaw of flood waters? X F.E.M.A. Flood Map - Panel#16—M Flood Zone C d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X Project Description Sarre as 3.a. e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X Project Description Same as 3.a. f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X Project Description Sarre as 3.a. S=Significant 1-Insignificant Environmental Checklist- Page 3 of 10 5. Animat Life. Could the proposal result in: a. Change in diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? X Project Description USGS Quad Overlay No. 5 b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X Project Description Same as 5.a. USGS Quad Overlay No. 5 C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Project Description Same as 5.a. 6. Noise. Could the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X Project Description See additional information b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X USGS Quad Overlay No. 16 Project Description Same as 6,a. 7. Light and Glare. Could the proposal produce new light or glare? X Project Description 8. Land Use. a. Could the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X General Plan Land Use Designation: Light-industrial S=Significant Mnsignificant Environmental Checklist- Page 5 of 10 S I d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? x USGS Quad Overlay No. 17 Project Description See Additional e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? x Project Description Same as 13.a. f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? x USGS Quad Overlay No. 17 14. Public Services. Could the proposal have an effect upon, or result in need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? x Fire District Memo Dated N/A b. Police protection? x Project Description C. Schools? x Project Description Same as 14.b. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? x Project Description Same as 14.b. e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x Project Description Same as 14.b. f. Other governmental services? x Project Description Same as 14.b. 8=81gnificant I=Insignificant Environmental Checklist- Page 7 of 10 b. Could the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? X Project Description Same as 20.a. C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? � X Project Description Same as 20.a. d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses Within the potential impact area? X Project Description Sane as 20.a. 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the qualit the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? -- X Project Description b. Does the project have potential impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of these impacts on the environment is significant.) X Project Description Same as 21.a. C' Does the project have environmental effects which could cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Project Description Sane as 21.a. 1I1. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation. S=Significant 1=€nsignificant Environmental Checklist m Page 9 of 10 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Project Location/Description: The proposed project is located in the Light Industrial area of Oakley in east Contra Costa County. The proposed construction would extend Carol Lane its existing terminus gest of State Route 4 westward to Live Oak Avenue (see Figure 1). The project also includes creating an east west cul- de-sac extending east from Live Oak Avenue approximately one block south of Carol Lane. The proposed project includes approximately 820 m (2,690 ft.) of full 43 ft. width; pavement construction, curb and gutter, underground drainage, sewer and water facilities, street lights, striping and traffic signs. Wheelchair ramps are included at the Live Oak Avenue/Carol Lane and Live Oak/cul-de-sac intersections. A sound wall and some landscaping is proposed along the south side of the roadway extension, adjacent to the existing single-family homes. Items 1 and 3: Earth and Air According to the County Resource Flapping System, Delhi Sand is found in the project area. The project will temporarily increase the exposure of the sand to wind and water erosion which has the potential to result in minor temporary air quality impacts during the construction phase. Adherence to standard dust and erosion control practices including, but not limited to general watering of exposed areas, use of chemical stabilizers, and constructing the project during periods of lour or no flow will minimize this impact. Dust and erosion control Treasures shall be incorporated into the construction contract. Item 3: Water According to the Contra Costa Resource Flapping System and FEMA Flood maps, the project area is not in a flood hazard area. The proposed project will result in an increase in the impervious surfaces in the project area due to the development of vacant land. Due to the requirement to collect and convey runoff, the resulting changes in drainage pattern will be insignificant. Item 4: Plant Life The County Resource Rapping System, field reviews, DSFWS Species List, RAREFIND, and the Contra Costa Water District Interim Service Area Listed Species Occurrences and potential habitat reap, showed no unique, threatened, or endangered species of plants in the project area. Plant life in the project area consists of an orchard/vineyard with some crust live oak trees scattered throughout, and vacant land with non-native grasses and weeds. The proposed project will result in the removal of approximately 15 - 20 orchard trees, some vineyards, and up to six east live oaks (varying in size from 12 - 18 inches diameter). The orchard trees and vineyards will not be replaced since they do not contribute significantly to the plant life in the project area. The coast live Irak trees will be replaced at a 3:1 ratio within the project area. Item 5: Noise Extending Carol Lane and constructing a new cul-de-sac will bring two roadways closer to existing residences. The 43 ft. wide Carol Lane extension is proposed to be located within the existing 80 ft. wide P.C. & E. easement on the north side of the existing residences. It is anticipated that the remaining 32 ft. of easement area will act as a buffer between the road and the existing residences. A noise study prepared for the project recommends that a sound wall be installes along the southern Environmental Checklist-Additional Information - Wage °I of County Growth Management Considerations -Measure C- 1990 resulted in the County adopting a Growth Management Program which establishes minimum levels of service for the typical urban services which are needed to support proposed development. Since the project area is already contained wi#iin the existing service area boundaries (i.e., fire, police, sanitary sewer, water, flood control, school facilities, and parks)for the major urban services needed to support the proposal, the concerns relating to these considerations have been addressed. The proposed change would not affect the County's 65135 Land Preservation Standard since it is merely a change in land use of an existing urban designation and does not result in the conversion of land under a non-urban designation. Environmental Checklist-Additional Information - Page 3 of c a aaa a er C3 'd { CLAREMONT CT CLAREMONT LN . a z ita S k ft +-yy f' Yitff+iDSOR CTKELSEY LN " Ptl� r ^b �y GZ , i' N t � i !{¢GAN L < KEt3AN LN € a 11 3 � a c .a 0 s � z t C3 m # emR3C3P ST Z CNEDIA ST a k 8 S > - Q �m Z, tI ,� t i Erp j CAYSiGA ST t t a * mo � yyyst 1 `Ft } OTSEGO ST s trs � Y -4 Y � E0 ST Y �t yy IS Nf ;N l CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXENTTION De Minimis Impact Finding Project Title/Location (Centra Costa County): O A K L E Y LIGHT-INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE-PHASE I (CAROL LADE EXTENSION AND CELL-DE-SAC) PROJECT, OAKLEY AREA Applicants Name and Address: Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency 651 Pine Street, 5th Floor, forth Ming Martinez, CA 94553 Project Description: The proposed project is located in the Light Industrial area of Oakley in east Contra Costa County. The proposed construction would extend Cared Lane its existing terminus West of State Route 4 Westward to Live Oak Avenue. The project also includes Creating an east West cul-de-sac extending east from Live Oak Avenue approximately one black south of Carol Lane. The proposed project includes approximately 820 m (2,690 ft.) of full 48 ft. Width pavement construction, Curb and gutter, underground drainage, sewer and water facilities, street lights, striping and traffic signs. Wheelchair ramps are included at the Live Oak Avenue/Carol Lane and Live Oak/cul-de-sac intersections. A sound Wall and some landscaping is proposed along the south side of the roadway extension, adjacent to the existing single-family homes. Findings of Exemption: An Initial Study has been Conducted by the lead agency, Which determined that the project will not have an adverse effect on wildlife resources. Consideration of the record as a whole provides no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse effect on Wildlife resources or the habitat upon Which the Wildlife depends. Certification: I hereby Certify that the lead agency has made the above finding and that the project Will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Maure n Toms Title: Project Planner Lead Agency: Community Development Date: Se&tlon 711.2,Fish and Game Code DFG:8/91 C.iDATA1WP6010AKLEYP1iCAROLANEE CR98-5,OEM MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR OAKLEY LIGHT-INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE-PHASE I (CAROL LANE EXTENSION AND CUL-DE-SAC) PROJECT This Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared for the Oakley Light-Industrial Infrastructure-Phase I (Carol Lane Extension and Cul-de-Sac) Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, requiring the establishment of mitigation monitoring or reporting programs for projects approved by a public agency. Assembly Sill 3180 requires public agencies to report on or monitor mitigation measures adopted under the California Environmental Quality Act process to ensure compliance daring project implementation. (contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency agrees to be bound by the following mitigation measures. Section 21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code requires the Board of Supervisors to adopt a monitoring or reporting program regarding CEQA mitigation measures in connection with these findings. The Board of Supervisors adopts the following program in fulfillment of this requirement: NOISE IMPACT, The proposed Carol Lane Extension would result in a significant noise impact to sensitive receptors along Windsor Lane and in the Eagle City Mobile Home. MITIGATION MEASURES: MITIGATION ION MEASURE `IA. Using the Transportation Noise(Model, the acoustical consultants tested the effectiveness of various soundwall heights to determine the soundwall that mould mitigate the impact to a less-than- significant level. -It was assumed that the soundwall would be located near the southern boundary of the PG&E easement. It was further assumed that the base of the soundwall would be at approximately the same elevation as the new roadway. Calculations confirmed that an 8-font high soundwall with limits approximately where shown on Figure 2 would provide about 10 dBA of noise reduction in the rear yards of the Windsor Lane residences and at the most affected mobile homes, and about 5 dBA of noise reduction at the second-story of the Windsor Lane residences. Noise levels would be reduced to the Normally Acceptable category at all sensitive receptor locations. To be effective a soundwall must have a minimum surface weight of three pounds per square foot, have no cracks or gaps over the face of the wall, and be sealed to the ground at the base of the wall. Suitable materials include masonry block, concrete or masonry panels, or a heavy airtight wood construction. MITIGATION MEASURE 1B The final design of the soundwall should be completed during the design of the roadway. This is necessary to confirm the assumptions regarding plan and profile information for the roadway section. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: These mitigation measure will be implemented by the Redevelopment Agency in conjunction with the Public Works Department. C:\DATA\WP60\OAKLEYPI\CAROLANE\MTIGATE.MON E.MON CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACS` NOTICE OF DETERMINATION CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 651 PINE STREET 4TH FLOOR NORTH,LIVING MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553-0095 Telephone: 925 335-1250 Contact Person:Maureen Toms Project Description,Common Name(if any)and Location- ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE OAKLEY LICIT-INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE-PHASE I (CAROL LANE EXTENSION AND CUL-DE-SAC) PROJECT,County File#CR#98-5: The Addendum to the Mitigated Negative declaration for the Oakley Light-industrial Infrastructure -Phase I (Carol Lane Extension and Cul-de-sac) Project identifies the need to acquire a 15 fl:. permanent easement for utilities and an additional 15 ft. temporary construction easement. In the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Oakley Light-Industrial Infrastructure -Phase I (Carol Leve and Cul-de-sec) Project, the utilities were proposed to be located in the Live Oak Avenue road right-of- way. More precise engineering of this area determined a problem in providing sanitary sewer facilities from the cul-de-sec. The solution to this situation is to provide utilities vie an easement from the end of the cul-de-sac to Carol Lane. The project was approved on Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act: An Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified, The Project was encompassed by an Environmental Impact Report previously prepared for An Addendum to a Mit ated Negative Declaration was issued indicating that preparation of an Environmental Impact€ eport was not required. Copies of the record of project approval and the Negative Declaration or the final EIR maybe examined at the office of the Contra Costa County Community Development Department. rL The Project will not have a significant environmental effect. I� The Project will have a significant environmental effect, Mitigation measures were made a condition of approval of the project. A statement of overriding considerations was adopted. Findings were adopted pursuant to Section 150391 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Date: By: Communi Develo ment Department Reoresentative AFFIDAVIT OF FILING AND POSTING declare that on I received and posted this notice as required by California Public Resources Code Section;21152(c). Said notice will remain posted for 30 days From the filing date. I Signature Title Applicant: De er<ment of Fish Game Fees Due: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EiR-$850 Total Due:$ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Neg. Dec.-$1,250 Total Paid:$_ ATTN: MAUREEN TOMS X DeMinlmis Findings-$U County Clerk-$25 Receipt CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXENTTION De Minimis Impact Finding Project Title/Location (Contra Costa County): ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE OAKLEY LIGHT- INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE-PHASE I (CAROL LANE EXTENSION AND CUL-DE-SAC) PROJECT, County File # CR 8-5, OAKLEY AREA Applicants Name and Address: Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency 651 Pine Street, 5th Floor, North Wing Martinez, CA 94553 Project Description: The Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Oakley Light-Industrial Infrastructure -Phase I (Carol Lane Extension and Cul-de-sac) Project identifies the need to acquire a 15 ft. permanent easement for utilities and an additional 15 ft. temporary construction easement. In the Mitigated Legative Declaration for the Oakley Light-industrial Infrastructure -Phase I (Carol Lane and Cul-de-sac) Project, the utilities were proposed to be located in the Live Oak Avenue road right-of- way. More precise engineering of this area determined a problem in providing sanitary sewer facilities from the cul-de-sac. The solution to this situation is to provide utilities via an easement from the end of the cul-de-sac to Carol Lane. Findings of Exemption: An Initial Study has been conducted by the lead agency, which determined that the project will not have an adverse effect on wildlife resources. In addition, the minor changes identified in the addendum do not result in any adverse effects. Consideration of the record as a whole provides no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Certification: I hereby certify that the lead agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Maureen Toros Title: Prosect Planner Lead .Agency: Community Development _--__ - Section 711.2,Fish and Came Cade DFC:6l91 C:\0ATA\WP60\0A,KL.EYP1\CARO LAN E\CRW5.D2