HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05251999 - D3 t
TO BOARD OF.SUPE PvisoRS
trt; Keith B. Richter, Fire Chief&William B. Walker, MD, Health Officer
May 25, 1999
DATE: cost
SukWitc-r; Report on Integration of c1t:CFPD Fire Paramedic Program and the
ty
American Medical Response (AMR)Paramedic Services
SPECIrIC (S) PIR RECIM-OAY IONS
{ } a, BAC
KGROUND ATV JUST I r I CA'T I ON
RECOMMENDATION:
ACCEPT status report on current provision of Advanced Life Support services within the Contra
Costa County Fire Protection District and the overall impact on ambulance services within the
American Medical Response contract area.
REASONS:
On February 2, 1999, the Board of Supervisors received a status report on the integrated fire
based paramedic program and the feasibility of establishing paramedic licensure as a minimum
qualification for firefighters. The Board directed staff to come back in 90 days with a progress
report and directed the District to proceed with developing recommendations on the feasibility of
requiring paramedic licensure for firefighters. This report fulfills that request.
On February 1, 1999, the Fire District began integrating paramedic services with AMR by adding
three additional paramedic stations (Stations 3, 9, 11) for a total of seven (7) operating paramedic
stations. An eighth station (Station 2), also slated to come on line, has encountered delays that
have withheld its opening. These delays are based on the lack of availability of field internships as
well as limitations on the availability of state licensing exams leaving the District with insufficient
paramedic personnel to staff the eighth station.
Concurrent with this integration was an amendment to the existing ambulance contract with
American Medical Response that adjusted the ambulance response criteria to 10 minutes on 90%
of all emergency calls (the criteria is 10 minutes 95% in other areas) in Central County. East and
Nest County responses remained unchanged.
The integration of the Fire District's and AMR's paramedic services is aimed at improving patient
care and increasing system efficiency through the use fire-based paramedics who arrive ahead of
the ambulance to initiate lifesaving or stabilizing medical care. Using data collected from both
AMR and the Fire District, we have compared response times, on-scene times, and transport
times before and after the program integration. As the year continues, we will gather additional
information to document improvements to the system.
CONTINU= ON ATTACHMKN'rJ
YUS <J
...o
�et�tsAYtsns: --
_.__ RrCcratcsN�Ar t ON or COUNTY ADM i!s t sx'RA9`oR � '
— AtliltL�7/� — RCCpl4tii ttCXAY 1 ON OP IBOARiS COMM t TTitcl
,..,` OTHlCR
I
ACT I ON sipxKloAlti3 ON
A1rt►ROV�ti AS PtXCimMKN0XO XX
matter ;
Miguel Mendonca, 21019 Athene give , Concord , commented on the oT►act� �.
Following testimony and Board discussion, IT IS BY THE BOARD
ORDERED that the shove recommendation is APPROVED.
VC4Z OF SUPEWISORS
X X UNAN I MOUS (ABSENT H DM 13Y CERT I ry THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AYES• r AND CORRECT CCVY CSF' AN AC'TIaN 'TAKEN
Ate+ AI38TA
TI AND ENTERM ON THE M I WTES Op THE SoApm
I N H
CSP' SLIPERV i SOBS ON TM DATE SH'JYrN.
Cbnt=t't: Fire Chief Reith Richter & EMS Director Art ya.throp
CC;: Co=ty Ac1�st>oator AT'TIfSTED Ma v 25 1999 .� .._
PHIL BATCHELOR. CLERK 'OF THE BOARD Op
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
DEPUTY
BACKGROUND:
The Fire District's paramedic program began in August 1997 with three paramedic units in
Lafayette and. Walnut Creek. In February 1998, a fourth unit in Martinez was implemented.
During 1998, the Fire District, the Emergency Medical Services Agency, and. AMR worked to
develop a method of integrating the fire-based paramedic program within the confines of the
existing ambulance contract. On November 3, 1998, the Board of Supervisors accepted a status
report on such an integration and approved moving forward with the program.
STATUS:
Data has been collected on the paramedic program's first four engine companies. However, as of
this report, only two months of data (Feb. & March 99) is available for use in evaluating the
impacts of the expanded fire paramedic program on the current EMS system.
An analysis of the preliminary data concludes that the integration of fire-based paramedic services
(from four units to seven units) combined with the modification to the AMR response times in
Central County has not delayed the time spent on scene treating patients. There was a 30 second
increase in "on-scene times" from 1 st quarter 1998 to 1 st quarter 1999. This reflects the same
increase from 1st quarter 1997 to 1st quarter 1998 prior to the program expansion. A
comparison of all transports over the first quarter of the previous three years indicates that overall
system times in the West Bounty have slightly improved, The following is a summary of system
impacts.
Overall System Times (avg. Jan-March) Time spent on scene(avg. Jan-March)
(Time of dispatch to arrival at hospital)
West County decreased by 24 sec. West County decreased by 24 sec.
Central County increased by 48 sec. Central County increased by 30 sec.
East County decreased by 24 sec. East County no changes
According to information from the County EMS Agency, we can estimate (with minimal data)
that while there were no changes to the East and Nest County responses, the Central County
experienced a six second improvement in ambulance responses, a thirty second increase in scene
times and a twenty four second increase in transport time to the hospital. These times are
consistent with increases from 1997 to 1998 as well as from 1998 to 1999. Therefore, the fire-
based paramedic program has had no impact on the ambulance responses while having delivered
aramedic services from firefigbter paramedics approximately two minutes sooner on all
responses.
Additionally, an overall analysis of the Fire District's paramedic units indicates that Advanced Life
Su ort Services` are at the scene on 57% of all EMS calls prior to the arrival of AMR units On
17% of all EMS calls, advanced procedures were implemented; while on 3% of the calls the
patient's condition warranted two paramedics attending the patient enroute to the hospital. Since
January 1998, the fire-based paramedic program has responded to over 3400 calls for service,
resulting in 2886 trips to the hospital of which fire-based ALS services were provided to 1959 of
these cases. During the next quarter, we will have implemented a comprehensive electronic
system for collecting patient data which will broaden our ability to review performance.
Relative to the task of conducting a firefighter job analysis, a request for proposal was awarded
to a contractor who is in the development stages of preparing a work plan that will develop
alternatives and recommendations regarding any changes to the firefighter qualifications. This
may present some opportunities to provide a cost effective method of adding paramedics, through
attrition, within the current fiscal constraints. Lastly, during this quarter, we will begin the
process of meeting with all County fire districts/agencies to begin work on developing a proposal
for a countywide integration of fire-based paramedic services.
1 IALS services are defined by the County EMS Agency as the performance of any procedure identified in the pararredic scope
of practice. —m=.s includes EKG monitoring and/or the delivery of any advanced procedures or medications.
2
SUMMARY:
The analysis of the fire-based paramedic services system indicates a significant improvement in the
response times for Advanced Life Support service. On average, patients had ALS-level care
available to them two minutes sooner than the system provided prier to this change. This
improvement has occurred without any increase to the response time of the ambulance transport.
This would indicate an improved quality of care within the overall Emergency Medical Services
system..
ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT PROGRAM
RESPONSE SUMMARY - 1998/99
Medic Eng Eng Eng Eng Eng Eng Eng I TOTAL
115 3 1 ' 14 5 9 11 2
Total Calls 668 1272 701 432 157 110 69 0 3409
100%
of Pt. 613 1270 694 431 155 109 60 0 3332
Contacts 98%
of Pt. 514 1164 549 P 372 133 96 58 0 12116
Transported 85%
ALS care
prior to amb. i 326 844 372. 243 83 50 41 0 1959
is ostic .5N
ALS care
prior to amb, 112 185 115 98 27 14 22 0 573
(Procedural) 17%
P1v1iFF ride to , 16 47 18 23 6 7 0 0 117
hospital j � 3'°
Medic 115 in service-8/1/97 Engine 5 in service-2/1/99
Engine 3 in service-8/1197 Engine 9 in service-211199
Engine 1 in service-9/1/97 Engine 11 in service-2/1/99
Engine 14 in service-2/1/98 Engine 2 not in service-est. 71`99
ixz-
uj
rl—
C140 0
m co
0) m � c) � Lo N
:` to co
t3 a C-i C6 C6 c r c
E �
In
C; co v- N C�
Ct: co m I- _N 0 t� �
Qt
iia.
Cil to CM? C`'3 C"5 .'
did E E
YC �
�sW^
«d
E 0
w
2M
U
✓s M
C 0 G G} r- e
O
C� r
0 Cif 0 CL CL
M CN
CN r-
Qf
' CL Z Cl` USS
® , 00
co C,
' to
M �
s - co '�'•
c rl-3 -
Ui
to
t �e- �
o
U.
CO
40
to
Violw
ep
U
AINIR Emergency Ambulance Response Times
.January-February 1997, 1998, and 1999
Central County
40
35
30 T_*�nspnY. x�pott
Tu a 11 Time Timm- J
25 333 j
S 20Time on
Time on
J
15 Scare, ss
seem
1Q
5 Xr
an-Fab 1997 Jen-Feb 1998 Jan-Fab 1999
West Country
40
35
30F 7_ 7
25 Time Time
TLne,
29
15 Tune Q. Tints on Time,on
10 = smote
Seas-Feb 1997 Jan-Feb 1995 en-Feb?999
East County
Oft
35
30 TMap-
Time Time t
25
120
(_ Tune atx JJ Tim rnr
15 # acersaTuaem
3# gcerm; :� ..
19 �
5
Jan-Feb 1997 Jan Feb 1998
Jan-Nair 1899
Source: Contra Corsa En'argtncy Medical Services Agency.
REQUEST TO SPEAK ?ORE
TMMC 3 X11=Z hIKIT
Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakersi
rostrum before addressing the board.
Name: Phone:
y,
Address: IL A'q -city:
�a
I.am speaking for myself , or organization:
(now of orwfisci«n)
+SCE ONE s
I wish to speak on Agenda Item # Date
My comments will be: general _ for against-
I wish to speak on the subject of .
I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the
Board to consider: