HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05181999 - C6-C8 B'yw
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: J. MICHAEL "ALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
MATE: May 18, 1999
SUBJECT: DELTA ROAD OIL AND CAS LEASE — KNIGHTSEN AREA
Project No.: 067-6U4200 Task: Account:
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
1. Recommended Action:
APPROVE Extension of Subsurface Oil, Cas and Mineral Lease with Capitol til Corporation and
AUTHORIZE the Board Chair to sign said extension of lease on behalf of the County.
11. Financial lmaact:
The proposed Lessee has paid a $500 processing fee to the County. The lease.provides for a
$80.00 per acre annual rental fee and a one-fifth royalty on production, if any. The primary term
of the lease was for 5 years. Capitol Oil has consistently paid its annual rental fee and requests
an additional 5 year term.
Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE: LIZ,
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON May 18, 1999 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT )
AYES. NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct
copy of an action taken and entered on the
minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the
PS:fn date shown.
g:\RealProp\9999-Filesl99-5\SO51 sDeitand011.doc
Orig.Div: Public Works(RP) ATTESTED: a
Contact: Pat Smyers(313-2222) PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of the Board
c: county Administrator ofervisMand Coul?tydrninistrator
P.W.Accounting
By 0 1 4Ld Deputy
DELTA ROAD OIL AND GAS LEASE — KNIGHTSEN AREA
May 18, 1999
Page 2
Ill. Reasons for Recommendations and Background:
The County entered into a lease with Capitol Oil for the production of natural gas located under
a 12.21 acre portion of Delta Road and Syron Highway near Knightsen. No surface rights are
involved. The State Lands Commission on March 8, 1994, approved this lease for exemption
from competitive public bidding requirements pursuant to Sections 7052 and 7053 of the
California Public Resources Code. Capitol Oil requests an extension of the primary term from five
(5)to ten (10) years. On April 13, 1999, the State Lands Commission approved the extension for
an additional five year term.
IV. Consequences of Negative Action:
Loss of revenue as outlined in Section ll above.
i
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: )
CAPITOL OIL CORPORATION }
3838 WATT AVE, SUITE C-300 )
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95821 }
(916) 454-3900 }
LEASE NO.1138-2-111
EXTENSION OF OIL AND GAS LEASE
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 23rd day of January, 1999, by
and between Contra Costa County, hereinafter referred to as "First Party", and
CAPITOL OIL CORPORATION, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"Capitol";
WITNESSETH THAT
WHEREAS, on the 19th day of April, 1994, Contra Costa County, as "Lessor",
and Capitol, as "Lessee", entered into an Gil and Gas Lease, hereinafter called "said
Lease", covering certain real property situated in Contra Costa County, California,
particularly described in said Lease, a short form of which said Lease was recorded on
May 16, 1994, in Instrument No. 94133327, of Official Records of Contra Costa
County, California; and
WHEREAS, First Party is the current owner and holder of all of the Lessor's
interest in and to said Lease; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to modify and amend said Lease as to
certain of its terms and conditions, as hereinafter provided;
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, said Lease is and shall be modified as follows:
(a) That portion of the primary term of said Lease contained in the habendum
which reads "five (5) years" is hereby extended and modified to read "ten (1 Q) years";
Said Lease as herein modified and amended is and shall be in full force and
effect and First Party hereby grants, lets, leases and demises unto Capitol the lands
covered by said Lease, as amended, subject to the terms and conditions of said Lease
as herein modified and amended.
This Extension of Oil and Gas Lease and all of its terms and conditions shall
inure to and be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, successors and assigns.
This Extension of Oil and Gas Lease may be executed in counterparts with the same
force and effect as though all parties had signed the same document.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
duly executed as of the day and year first hereinabove written.
"Capitol" "First Party"
CAPITOL OIL CORPORATION C TRA CAST C tUNTY
Ey. e
Ti e: ir$ oard of Supervisors
STEPHEN Q. BROOKS
President
Stag of California
County of Contra Costa
On May__182 1999 , before me,
Phil Batchelor,_ Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors and County Administrator, Contra
Costa Count r personally appeared
Jos PFT luanc4iamil_la
personally known to me (or proved to me on
the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the
person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to
the within instrument and acknowledged to me
that helshetthey executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(les), and that
by his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument,
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of
which the person(s) acted, executed the
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
CSignature (Seal)
eputy Clerk
G:iGrpData\RealProp11999-F;lesi99-41AKI LEASE EXTENSION.doc
�t7
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: May 16, 1999
SUBJECT: Approve the recommendation for allocating the Transportation Development Act,
Article 3 Funding for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects for Fiscal Year 1999/20010.
Project No.: 0676-6P1025
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
1. Recommended Action:
APPROVE the recommendation for allocating the Transportation Development Act, Article
3 Funds for bicycle and pedestrian projects for Fiscal Year 1999/2000 and DIRECT the
Public Works Director to forward the list to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for
final approval and allocation of funding effective July 1, 1999.
11
Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE;
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMM EE
—APPROVE —OTHER
SIGNATURE Ste_ -_
ACTION OF BOARD ON MaY 18, TM APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I hereby certify that this is a true and correct
x UNANIMOUS {ABSENT ) copy C7f an action taken and entered on the
AYES: NOES: minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: date Shown.
JB:je
9:\transeng\bobrtelbotda19992000 ATTESTED: May 18, 1999
Orig.Div: Public Works(TE) PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of the Board
Contact: Julie sueren(92 )313-2342 JurSors a ourtt Administrator
cc: Public Works Accounting yM.Jackson,GO-Bike �
C.Simpson,Health Services €�
Bob, sates,MTC By , Deputy
City County Engineering Advisory Committee Members 1
Countywide Bcycie Advisory Committee Members '
SUBJECT: Approve the recommendation for allocating the Transportation Development Act, Article
3 Funding for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects for fiscal Year 1999/2000.
DATE: May 18, 1999
FACE: 2
Il. Financial impact:
No impact to County General fund.
Ill. Reasons for Recommendations and Background:
In 1978, a procedure was recommended by the Mayors Conference and adopted by the County
Board of Supervisors to ensure countywide consensus in allocating the Transportation
Development Act (TDA), Article 3 funds for bicycle and pedestrian projects. In 1991, the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) required TDA applicants to have the proposed
projects reviewed by a city or countywide bicycle advisory committee. The cities and the County
were solicited for projects in October 1998. The proposed projects were reviewed by a city's
bicycle advisory committee or by the Countywide Bicycle Advisory Committee (CBAC) in
November and their input was incorporated into the final applications submitted in December
1998.
MTC estimated that $ 538,126 is available for programming in Fiscal Year 1999/2000. Twelve
applications were submitted totaling $1,231,130. The proposed projects were field reviewed by
a committee made up of the City County Engineering Advisory Committee's TDA Subcommittee
and a CBAC Subcommittee. The Field Review Committee developed a recommendation on
funding and forwarded it to the City County Engineering Advisory Committee (CCEAC)for their
consideration and approval.
The CCEAC approved the funding recommendation at their February 5, 1999 meeting and
forwarded it to the Mayors Conference. The Mayors Conference heard and approved the
recommendation at their April 1, 1999 meeting. CCEAC now requests that the Board of
Supervisors approve the following funding recommendation for the 1999/2000 TDA, Article 3
funds and forward it to MTC for final approval and funding allocation.
SUBJECT: Approve the recommendation for allocating the Transportation Development Act, Article
3 Funding for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects for fiscal Year 199912000.
DATE: May 18, 1999
PAGE: 3
FUNDING RECOMMENDATION
Project Project Sponsor Requested Recommended
Funding Funding
1 Contra Costa Bicycle Safety Project ;County Health Services $26,000 $26,000
2 Muir Road/Muir Station Road City of Martinez $314,0001: $01
Bike Lanes
31 North Richmond Curb Ramps - County (West County) $40,0001: $40,0001
.Phase I I '
4'El Portal Sidewalk and City of San Pablo $70,000 $70,0001
Bike Route Project
S,Ohlone Greenway Lighting City of EI Cerrito $53,130 $53,130
Enhancement Project
6;Happy Valley Road Walkway City of Lafayette $300,000 $100,000
7 Old Ranch Road Bicycle Path, City of San Ramon $40,000 $0
Phase 2
8 Iron Horse Trail Gap Closure - c@ City of Concord $36,000 $36,000
242 Crossing
9 Arnold Industrial Way Bikeway ;County (Central County) $44,000 $0
To be funded from TFCA
10 Buchanan Road Class 11 City of Pittsburg $78,0001 $52,996;
Bikeway Extension
111 L Street School Walkway City of Antioch $30,000; $30,000;
12 Delta Road Bike Lanes, Phase III County (East County) $200,000; $130,000
TOTAL. $1,231,130 $538,126
The Field Review Committeee had the following comments on the proposed projects:
1. Bicycle Safety Education Program
The Committee was very supportive of the efforts of this program and recommended full funding
of$26,000.
2. Muir Road/Muir Station Road Bike Lanes ($314,000 requested)
The Committee recommended no funding for this project at this time. Although a portion of the
project could be constructed as a first phase, there were significant issues (such as elimination
of on-street parking) that remain to be resolved, and further phasing did not seem feasible.
3. North Richmond Curb Ramps, Phase II
The Committee supported the effort to upgrade the sidewalks in North Richmond to provide curb
ramps that comply with ADA standards and recommended full funding of$40,000.
SUBJECT: Approve the recommendation for allocating the Transportation development Act, Article
3 Funding for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects for fiscal Year 1999/2000.
DATE: May 18, 1999
PAGE: 4
4, El Portal Sidewalk and Bike Route Project
The Committee recommended full funding ($70,000) for this project. It improves the pedestrian
and bicycle access to Centra Costa College, San Pablo Avenue businesses, the new International
Marketplace, the new Community Resource Center (which will house a library, P.A.L. program,
day care and community center), and a new soccer field.
5. Ohlone Greenway Lighting Enhancement Project
The Committee recommended full funding ($53,130)for this project. The Ohlone Greenway/BART
path provides pedestrian and bicycle access to the two BART Stations in EI Cerrito. This project
will complete the lighting and enhance the use of the trail.
6. Happy Malley Road Walkway
The project consists of constructing a retaining wall and constructing a section of path to close
a gap. It also includes upgrades to the existing path and provides a separation of the path from
the traveled way with a berm. The Committee supported this project, however, the TDA request
is high and the City of Lafayette was asked about the possibility of phasing the project. The
recommended funding of$100,000 allows the City to build the retaining wall and close the clap
in the existing path, but does not fund the upgrades, This gap closure will complete the loop
providing pedestrian access to the Lafayette Reservoir, BART and downtown Lafayette.
7. Cold Ranch Road Bicycle Path, Phase 2 ($40,000 requested)
The Committee recommended no funding for this project. The number of potential users
appeared to be limited, and there were concerns about accessibility to and use by the general
public.
8. Iron Horse Trail Gap Closure
The Committee strongly supported this project and recommended full funding ($36,000). This
project will close a gap and complete the section of the Iron Horse Trail between Willow Pass
Road and Monument Boulevard in Concord.
9. Arnold Industrial Way Bikeway
The Committee supported this project and recommended full funding ($44,000). The project will
provide a bike route in the Highway 4 corridor between Martinez and Concord and improved
access to the North Concord BART Station.
(The County since learned that the project is likely to get TFCA funding and the
$44,000 of TCCA was reallocated to other projects.)
10. Buchanan Road Class 11 Bikeway ($78,000 requested)
The Committee supported this project to extend the bike lanes on Buchanan Road and
recommended partial funding of $52,996 to accomplish the first phase of a project to provide
connect two existing sections of Class 11 bikeway from East City limits to Crestview Drive.
SUBJECT: Approve the recommendation for allocating the Transportation Development Act, Article
3 Funding for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects for fiscal Year 1999/2000.
DATE: May 18, 1999
PANE: 5
11. L Street School Walkway
The Committee considered this to be a good project as it would complete the sidewalk along the
frontage of the Antioch High School and recommended full funding of$30,000.
12. Delta Road Bike Lanes, Phase III
The Committee supports this project. However, the $200,000 requested is high and the committee
recommended partial funding of$130,000 The County has made a verbal commitment to funding
the balance to complete this segment of the project.
IV. Consequences of Np_gative Action:
Failure to approve the funding recommendation will result in a delay in the MTC process of
allocating TDA.funds in the Contra Costa County area.
a
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
MATE: May 18, '1999
SUBJECT: Agreement to provide services to the City of Orinda, Orinda area.
Project No. 4500-6X3003
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
IY Recommended Action;
APPROVE Agreement to provide surveying, map checking, and right of way engineering
services to the City of Orinda for various projects and AUTHORIZE the Board Chair to sign the
Agreement on behalf of the County.
11. Financiallmoact:
The City of Orinda will pay the actual casts for staff for the requested services.
Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE. `
RECOM ENDATIOR 6F CMNTY ADMINISTRAT611
_ RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION 6F BOARD ON May 18, 1M APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT I hereby certify that this is a true and correct
AYES: _ NOES: ca of an action taken and entered on the
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 13y
minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the
date shown.
i r I\SRA DATA\GrpData\esign\Board Orae s\ ATTESTED: May 18, 1999
So 199MSurvey Service Agreement 5-18.doc PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of the Board of
Orig.Div: Public Works(Design)
Contact: Ray Zwernmer (313-2314) sup d ouAC�ministretor
cc. County Administrator
Auditor-Controller(via FLIP) By A Deputy
A
.. i
SUBJECT: Agreement to provide services to the City of Orinda, Orinda area.
DATE: May 18, 1999
PAGE: 2
Ili. Reasons for Recommendations and Background:
The City of Orinda requires a variety of surveying services but has no surveying staff supervised
by a licensed land surveyor. The City of Orinda desires to contract with the County for these
services. The City of Orinda authorized the Mayor to execute the agreement per City agenda
Rem L-3, February 16, 1599.
IV. Conseguences of Negative Action:
The City of Orinda would have to hire these services from private consultants.
i
AGREEMENT
1. Effective .bate and Parties. Effective on , the COUNTY OF
CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as
"County"), and the CfTY OF ORINDA a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as
"City:') hereby promise and agree as follows:
2. KMXkose. The City needs surveying services during the corning years. The City has no
surveying staff and desires to contract with the County for land surveying, map checking and
right of way services.
3. Services by-County. The services to be rendered by County to City may include final and
parcel map checks, monumentation boundary control recovery, field surveys, topographical
mapping, preparation of appraisal maps, writing legal descriptions, and preparation of right of
way maps.
4. Payment for Services. City agrees to reimburse County for all labor costs and appropriate
overhead for County staff including overtime rates for evening or weekend work (see
,Appendix"A" for rate schedule). City shall pay all other incidental fees. Such payments shall
be matte within 3Q days of billing by County.
5. Indemnification. City agrees to defend, indemnify and save harmless County, its officers,
and employees :against any and all loss, damage, liability, expense, claims or demands of
whatever character, direct or consequential, directly or indirectly contributed to or caused by
County assuming and acting as time City Surveyor for and on behalf of the City.
6. Independent Status. 'nothing herein shall be construed to imply that any County employee
providing services hereunder is a City employee.
7. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the effective date hereof and shall
end upon termination by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice. The rights and
obligations of Paragraph 5, "Indemnification" shall survive any such termination.
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA CITY OF OII.INDA
By By
C air, pard o Supervisors Mayor
REST: hil Batchelor, ATTEST Mary Ellsworth,
Clerk of the Board of City Clerk
Supervisors and County
Administrator
By # f By
Depu
Recommended to the County Board of Recommended to the City Council for
Supervisors for Approval. Approval:
By Assistant County Surveyor Public Works Director/City Engineer
By
Pu� cork Ire r
Approved as to Form: Approved as to Form:
Victor J. Westman, County Council Linda Roodhouse, City Attorney
By
Deputy
APPENDIX "A"
Pei. OT
Assistant County Surveyor $99.70 $99.70
Supervising Engineering Technician -Ladd Surveyor $79.85 $78.93
Senior Engineering Technician $70.06 $58.70
Journey Engineering Technician $59.61 $57.78
Entry Engineering Technician $52.00 $49.82
Computer Aided Drafting Operator $64.34 $62.71
Note: Rates will change periodically due to contracted salary increases and increases
in overhead charges.
RZ:&d
G,. ataZ"VW?ftmps%Doca,iibwWPENDtX A doa
IC ION