Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03021999 - C77 a # Centra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS •_'=-==: Costa FROM: Dennis M. Barry, AICP, County Community Development Director DATE: March 2, 1999 SUBJECT: Bay Area Transportation Blueprint for the 21st Century rrwrrurr rrrr r�crrmrrrrrn■ SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECQMENL)ATIONS REFER the Bay Area Transportation "Blueprint for the 21 st Century" to the Transportation Water and Infrastructure Committee. FISCAL. IMPACT None to the General Fund. BACKGROUNDIREAS_QNS FORRECQMMENI ATIQNS In December, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) approved initiation of a year-long regional planning effort to develop what is being called the Bay Area Transportation Blueprint for the 21 st Century (See Exhibit A). The primary purpose of the Blueprint will be to develop a financial plan that integrates proposed new transportation funding measures with identified projects that may be considered by voters as early as next year. The Blueprint planning effort will be overseen by the MTC's Executive Committee in cooperation with the Bay Area Partnership and its committees. New projects and programs that would be funded through new revenue sources would be added to the recently adopted Regional Transportation CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _X-YES SIGNATURE /RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE IX APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): r rr� r ACTION OF BOARD ON March 2 . 1999 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDEDX OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A XAJNANIMOUS (ABSENT _ - - - - TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT; ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact Person, Steven Goetz, 335-1240 ATTESTED March 2 . 1999 Orig: Community Development PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF Public Works, T.E. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR \ BY , DEPUTY SLG.cAtranscom\bluprint.bc Bay Area Transportation Blueprint for the 21st Century March 24 1999 Page Two R 1 (continued) Flan for the San Francisco Bay Area. New revenue sources of interest to MTC are the proposed regional gas tax for the Bay Area and the statewide transportation bond proposed by Senator Burton of San Francisco. Both measures would require a vote of the electorate. Potential projects that may be considered in this planning effort include new BART extensions, new ferry service, new bus service, and various unfunded highway improvements. A summary of the Blueprint proposal is anticipated for release at the end of March for public comment. MTC will complete its work on the Blueprint by the end of the year. County staff is recommending that the Board of Supervisors refer this project to the Transportation Water and Infrastructure Committee, which can monitor the Blueprint's development and advise the Board of Supervisors as appropriate. irEMIBI Art Bay.Area Transportation Blueprint for 21st Century BACKGROUND The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)adopted the 1998 Regional Transportation Man(RTP)in October 1998. By law,the plann may only include transportation projects that the region can afford with expected federal,state,and local revenue over the next 20 years. More than 80% of the RTP's 88 billion in resources are devoted to operating and maintaining the existing transportation system.,yet even this sizable commitment will leave 6 billion in needed local road repairs unfunded. The Commission has directed staff to prepare an RTP amendment for approval in the Spring of 1999 that will close a currently projected$375 million shortfalll in transit capital projects,but this figure significantly understates the rehabilitation creeds of public transit such as seismic retrofit of the BART system and bus and rail vehicle replacement for San.Francisco Duni. Moreover,the dynamic growth of the Bay Area will not wait until we complete the unfinished business of.maintaining our existing transportation infrastructure. Between 1990 and 2020,the region will add another 1.7 million people and 1.3 million jobs. This additional population and economic activity will place even greater pressures on an already stressed transportation system. As a result,a number of disparate and (until now)uncoordinated efforts have been launched to explore improvements and expansions of the Bay Area's highway and transit networks--all of therm beyond the financial reach of current resources. These efforts include,but are not limited to,the following: • High Speed Rail-The California High Speed Rail Authority is developing a$20+ billion plan for building a high speed rail link between Los Angeles,the Central Valley,and the Bay Area. A financing plan may be presented to state voters in November 2000. • Rapid Water Transit-The business-sponsored Bay Area Council is expected to release a report in spring 1999 proposing a major expansion of passenger ferry service on San Francisco Bay. • Bay Bridge Rail-At the November 1998 election,voters in San Francisca,Oakland, Berkeley,and Emeryville expressed interest in re-introducing rail service on the Bay Bridge. The feasibility of running trains on the existing western span and the possibility of an entirely new rail crossing or tube could be explored. • Alameda, Marin,Sonoma, and Solano Plans- Alameda County was unsuccessful in re-authorizing its transportation sales tax measure in the June election and will likely try again in 2000. Also at the November general election,voters in Marin and Sonoma counties expressed their strong support for adding carpool lanes to U.S. 101 and instituting commuter rail service in the North Bay,but failed to approve the accompanying tax measures to pay for those projects. Voters in Solano county also approved a plan of transportation improvements. • MTC Resolution 1876-The regions existing rail expansion program,which was approved by the commission in 1988,already has delivered the East Bay BART extensions. The Tasman West light rail line in Silicon Valley and the BART extension to San Francisco Airport are under construction. MTC is about to begin a review of the"next generation" of rail,bus,and other public transit extensions in the region. • High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)Master Plan-The region currently has about 270 miles of HOV lanes in place. MTC's 1997 HOV Master Plan identified over 100 miles of HOV lanes that have some programmed funding and another 50 miles of new unfunded HOV lanes. Additional funding will be needed to complete the planned HOV network to provide needed future person-carrying capacity. • Regional Intelligent Transportation System(ITS) Deployment Plan-ITS encompasses a variety of projects to improve the operation,safety and convenience of the existing transportation system. Projects include completion of the regionwide Traffic Operations System(TOS),which provides for"real tune" traveler information,integrated ramp metering plans and incident management.Much of the TOS is funded and underway,but addition funding will be needed to complete this important project. • Transbay Terminal- This transit hub at First and Mission Streets in downtown San Francisco has been the subject of much debate and controversy. MTC has just commenced a study of three improvements options: renovation of the existing building,replacement of the building at the same site,and relocation of the terminal to a new site at Howard and Beale Streets. • Corridor Studies-From time to time,MTC undertakes detailed studies of various highway corridors in the Bay Area. In the last four years,specific improvements have been proposed for the following corridors: I-80 leading to the Bay Bridge, 1-580 over the Altamont Pass,and Hwy. 37 in the North Bay. New corridor studies of the I-680 Sunol Grade and State Route 24--including the possibility of a fourth bore for the Caldecott Tunnel--are now underway. Are all these potential transportation improvements compatible with each other? How will these new transportation initiatives come together with land use planning to help the Bay Area cope with future growth? How will any of these projects be funded? How do we ensure that the region's ongoing commitment to maintain the existing transportation system isn't forgotten in the rush to expand? As the region"s transportation planning agency,MTC is uniquely positioned to answer these questions- -with the assistance of its partners in the public and private sectors. Over the course of the next year,MTC will lead a regional effort to integrate these various plans,strategies,and ideas into a single Bay Area Transportation Blueprint for the 21st Century. The effort will begin immediately and conclude by December 1999. The year 2000 is not only an important symbol of the turning of the new century,it also marks the next opportunity for voters to consider funding measures (either at the March primary or November general elections) to implement projects in the Blueprint. These funding measures could take many forms,such as a statewide sales or gas tax,a statewide bond measure,a regional gas tax,county sales taxes,or a rollover of the BART property tax. The Blueprint planning effort will be overseen by MTC's Executive Committee,which is composed of the Chair,Vice Chair,and committee chairs and vice chairs of the commission. The planning effort will be undertaken in cooperation with the Bay Area Partnership,which is composed of the chief executive officers of the Association of Bay Area Governments and the region's major transportation and environmental agencies (a roster of the Bay Area Partnership is attached). The Partnership's planning work will include outreach to relevant state and federal officials,the business and environmental communities,and the general public. OVERALL WORKPLAN The attached project schedule lays out the specific tasks we believe necessary to produce the Blueprint plan. These specific tasks include: • Develop Blueprint Context-Staff has already initiated this task with the development of this information package. Cather aspects of the context could include ABAG s demographic projections for 2020,additional detailing of corridor travel characteristics,the amount of revenue expected from new funding sources, and environmental trends and issues.We will refine the context package further after 'initial Partnership committee(POC,Finance)and Executive Committee meetings. Product:Discussion Report • Information Gather ir► -It will be necessary that we have more complete information on the plans,programs and projects that comprise the list of potential Blueprint candidates. Staff has already developed some of this information as part of the RTP Track 2 work,initial work on future rail expansion proposals,and the Regional Ferry Plan work.,As in the 1998 RTF',we would propose to consider Blueprint proposals in a corridor context,relating them to the key corridor issues and management objectives described in the current RTP.Key implementation issues would then be identified for various Blueprint proposals. The attached charts illustrate how this would look. Working through the Executive and Partnership committees,we would expect to have this task completed by the mid-April. Product: Summary of Blueprint Proposals • Develop Evaluation Criteria-Since Blueprint proposals will far exceed potential new revenues,we suggest developing some basic evaluation criteria that would help address the relative merits of the various proposals. Potential criteria could include some or all of the following: • Project purpose and need • Market(s) served,mode shares,and projected use • Most effective alternatives to serve the market(s) • Operational feasibility • Financial feasibility + Equity (geographic and social) • Community/Economic benefits • Environmental issues This task would also be completed by the early June. • Public Outreach-Public outreach would be conducted after the Partnership has had a chance to review the initial list of Blueprint ideas.The outreach would solicit input on the draft list as well as input on how proposals should be evaluated. A second round of outreach would be conducted later on in the study to determine the consensus for various Blueprint proposals and funding strategies. • Evaluation/ Funding Strate&ies-As explained above,a very basic evaluation framework would be used to compare the relative merits of Blueprint proposals. An effort would be made at this stage to align Blueprint proposals with various funding strategies. The attached"Proposed Projects Matched to Funding Source" table is illustrative of the type of result that might be expected from this task. Product. Evaluation Report • Consensus Building/Stakeholder Outreach-In addition to outreach effort conducted with the general public,staff would also engage in a parallel effort to assess the receptivity of various stakeholder groups to the Blueprint proposals. Staff would set up meetings and interview key elected officials and stakeholders to review the Blueprint development process and to obtain suggestions on how best to obtain the necessary public support.This step will be one of key tasks in the Blueprint development and is anticipated to cover a three month period. Product. Final Blueprint Report Lv .................. ........... ...... tltl ............. .......... ................ .............. ................. ............... .................... ... .............. .............................. ......................... CL CL ......... ............... .............._.._....«..... ---------------— ..................... cc cc j2 it 15 ai suo{ilaxadp pa;uaup 14!unwwoj 64 uossuz dx 4 qua 2E u � 0 t uossuedx3 pvoN uoptn!jzger{a,d Q Issued suoilvidp I!Stml f-- Gi. �tTEtSa1LTi2 ' ptIoE pue saaail, iV N5 O t7 0o CT t'V G Cs LL. q 46 i4 45 iA K 409 49 49 vV 49 4A 4+'9 69 C, C7 C OG 40 t- O C) 4'7 <7 CN t N w 4� Cs `o CJ`s iiD 5 O 17� C.7 N C7 = V cr JC C C.1" "fid' N H N O LIt �j d � C5 t.,t G? N C`• C+ +n ,... h2 r+� M hS3 +r"A ... vy fN cV ty 64 49 45 49 44 44 49 i/t 49 GY 69 irA GA dl IV IA oq t�tl G CY .0 tS n E a v - cVd o (7 7.s U . . . v rte ' ars C7 s U �i�i. n v e� c' Ll v C4 v ' cna c.. rz QD v ��. Z acs :3 0 � O ti btI r3 �y C ' Cb`� tG � "'n � 'C3 v's '+�° C w •y }, b �'Ca � w � •� w '�` � t'�,7 S9.t A w 'en ) iso t�6 's.. C u'a ''�V' = •�, Com' « d d s. ` anFE i 3 vu , co Op c6. „ chi -In � ca 19 E 06 4 m sn•.. E v5 � ^ &-t «•. « F- � •� C7 c'� � v Z $ o e c o aL 5 r E `b o d c 'Q C7 v a •; =_ e o Z c i u eo o 9 •c E 70Euo �pp c y 'L u c o d o o baa R s c v .p E e •E .E c m "> a a u ry C .e o i 's _ c t7 v o ro c y Cd ca �7 e CL L 6 ice.. ca U L/7 d d] u w •�+ � to � may'. � � `U �` y,,• Ulu- Cd a;Cd a i� cn .� E w is E :; > r�i C x a tom/) H E in �: ar vQL4 p i� ca to a> o O rn 6 y � � o o O c ®o o _ t b u r3 c> ✓� me cce m C4 o a ,� a) v a c . L . cn Ca >, oaai oCL (� i Gn 6 6 ey V] a • ,� V] tn CL is � y ck m p .0 b a u ti a� as c oo CL CL. lu o ' ca chi o zt c c cry a r✓a a L aM > CL u stern 5cnwGl 0 a in . 0 L oD sin ty CL 00 m La O •u dJ L'+, .� Q/ C C C) as v m > L v a m CL ri n as oz 'fl " > u c .?' c a �, a U °3 0 oa tu <c+ ` L 12 a u n C lz cu Ea c X H asc� ' a c L C,3 o e> C7 a gz- u oro In ......................................................... ..................................................................................................... _.. ......... .......... ........ .............................. ..... ......... .......... ............ ............ ..... __ ... ......... ......... ......... .......................... .... ......... ......... ................................ ........................................................................................_____. ..................................................................................... uY a U ae g �a a H ug� r � CY a.. cS 16 ol r tn� en ° ce. 04 o � l K � i t n nvl UA C ' ti cs G es , a , a � _ 1g v C E c tVtt � d �-� •E F� u � c. W E= .� c.c. � ^ _ Ct v7 v 'a u C u � G. xii � C� ✓ s+ �.- C r W n E .`vim g •E u Z r r - -y "' " � .x " C > no O' ti c Q v bD d� s. .r U� -' to •7 y L v x . C/.i �„� F 4- tai •� 6 > r``+ V W � y •`� N w y > W Q, Cc :J Y o fu a. z tom' o ofl rr N rn Q - bll v LL. +`nii 43 y v. y ate.. ate.. ��+ y G .fJ•• ..,�` may, W h d V � U tVU O 4. to .Ly dx v y fi O � y eOV b y U O O O CS C� 05 L � rn u, i r N h m .2 v tS R3 C V c > y14) O. c w o o � � L j u rff a-,) En a 7:1 s� u Z 'J" v i 8 _A . 4; y °w° � v a � � n � � � �' .,Y a � u � eta .� s Fes• ud p G�.' m � U o {}moi a ti E72 c. 72 _ ° ti .1, u s o ,n � '•' � �G fJ V � G�� �' � � �+ �yH� �L � C K � � •Q tT p�p. .Li V .i A A S u ' � ' ro.,U E +� c`� � $ .°°•: •— iu is`. s; w u agni N ?: v 12-0 ci a c cn to - ••ci�s ' " E� °r '�` YC � as "' � c> •y g.. � eA .. c> � ce a C! y CJ mCC, C no ec m c7 y o ar cs > tE 4- E S v C? o y I& y � ai o � �, za "� ax .o U CL ``• CD {� GLi s« (,J ,.: Ls.. .= tV � f1� .� L"3 vs C/1 .6 C.) CL • . � eo � `LS E OAUxcr✓ 3 C.} Cd C? CJa 72 un LL itS _ x Q Lc. i1' v°i f-- .o O c� K3 C � � ,�„ .� Cid o sir, � Cs. Q 7S C,} ;sy'"", CJ � nn o � •v � � � � � � � � � � � � n.•�•° •� � c,� ego c7 — ; ra ti oo t7 ca oCmo • o ssIZ tv to as. 0 _ . c Q as iy ao CL u o e �4 r7 � � "�' � � � •LS !J 3` L7 _,,, �J t:Y 9> . c = sr FE Vi CW 000 V `C v ' +G+ •� C � LO � d N C7 ,G C to a L� .5 > > v, ao 142 d wwiiend z .scrsC,�,) V >Cc '° . s U > C°G O ° U � ' a a ll a �, eo an ar ' m x v > p o L o o oIJ res g; rs o u 0 0 c ° U rz tG .a m rG , c� : : �s Cl. ts O rr 7 W ,tt o to 43 �, .-_-, 'r ani era m c m c t m E c o a as > W b .14 'C3 `� W 0 a." v 0 � ' bo` > e an su n,N cmi �_ ami c u u m C6 .X ^Zs a __. ..� ea.-, o 'c jai W Com) a �° 7 d u u R u y Ad G to yam` zm '` fd � 'v�'j9 � �C .w G �� iY• s�' G � 0�5 d � � p �+ �,y F � �+ rt H 4��Ci � rt •y � w p �. C � � � Y jd. w �-. h'c w as � K'�, •£'+ s u � � o-° �.•° '� `�:. �{'i o � M, 13 in .y Cl. .15 L/: Y V5 0 4- s.. 00 g g e 6- .y n C G � r� •� �' � tak � tt5 � C � qy "CY cC w "" B E. w pop �; E t G ce tl tCd 0 ci M V3 CL. 't r, CS C. td 'Ci p0 C6 o. '..+ 6x 6t 0y.� � .. a5 Ca. 6a i3 d " C? u c + w -t� E yy Oto ca ce- 00 to r� rd CL ce- mi� r> � � `o � „� � � .° � eao � � •duo —L` � � a( w� � = 'c V o m E c c `c r +E E n ' u 'C C G sib 1 W i!7 'g .�.+W L � G 4 V N "'u W � � Yi awn• 3 � � � 1� 1..1 '� y V S ?r �+ PE a "� C c •+v `� "' "�° ^ c, " �° ` C EE ° u w E .� v °u ,E rt E n o a C> nn.E C) •a c s p & a oro ;' a L" rt y u e E o iL •© r� u 'E'e. '> .., a �' _ s E � •v u v sr v c v it y y 04 x 02 04 xs.CIL 0 C LU eA � rJj f.L� L ..� � •ci O ev'i •;� � o C.3 ✓�`'` F� � aC � vii � �, cn � Q z C') N tL _ CIS y =v �a i--, u 00 �, ca tom. N 0 E"' «v � Vim•) ...: � �' .'�..' � N .� OHO � � � > � •C'Ct C .�.. i7 C1 O •Gt!Cs eu Cs.00 N 00 .._' s8 u OG to 0�0 cd _ C ai Cq U " U e0 v d y to 45 e o Y 7. by Ci. oejc's d ea y zs o m " ae m td„ p a`'i e > dy n v c�i y n ca eu b Cl. L cs C� L ay a� C p ro tZ L ca m cis a' n > t n fl a' � a u u w e x. ,._ ••, 4' V J ✓ '� $W C w z ° o Aryry o L V Be i� ,.. 3 Z` YI �3 u O � .G �' 4p tr"• Cc 00 �x at: .° ° v ° a ' Ere >. + ec d GC,. d t 1 €3 L7G 4 43 xq 6A Y i+•e �' +� oa Ca � •,.,, ac � acs o � c ors as) m - 00 u •.`= o TZ ice+ s. = 10 2 . �'• vs o epi � -'ira 9 c '? o 5 a > ° res o c CJ �, '� _ � `�, '� � ^u r� � as � •:., ,�. +�, �,. ,, �^ � � 'G > aux " 4= °' tic' r -ap to M 00 to U ra • w C3 °' t3a rra a> ca c 41cm o on 6 ami � 0 E C:6 b CZ c ' VI �' ra ec ca m u CL s5 C� ca W 7 b ,y `� £ rye , c a C'O ; n w j'S.': L' +�•{ iy�. e -per � CS W Va w 0 � � u u .h' � � L3 � u Si � b F � � O. 0 � 6 .5 •� ir e+t L` o '^ � � � •v ro � 6. � � « e C L' 6 e E sL` L° � :e' •" � u"�� c.m � '�� ° ,�.� '� � � � P $ � ., � oy5', � �" god e � y p .[ 6 Yq" � u u C b •� � 6 s� O C •C � w � '� a •i �yw! � � � y r _} p •+yam" M > i-5 r—r OU b > 'Cy a�j i4- IS tet t7CY Zr rel cC X 0 O " . � - = `in_ , o�`n LCl C4 3 C� Cs COO © U tib ' u � 0 �� a? qp Z &' oC) CA L Qt° o E� CL c� �] d > a �.. .- Q u isLn u. ra a sG u2 r�i Q d b E-- � W •0 :? Q ' .o 15 Q td �eon °c'r1 °v a©u u t 0 °Omr 6° « U tC: W (J vJsZ U y r 00 vtu e � : Lti rz 0 Q. w Z00 t7 f/1 •y u T 0 C on fa y eu 0 :: y et H , : o v d? {.) C.3 c Cz' CT! G0 LT. . d � 4 � a L, o yo a u o r0i 4149 o �` 4J y yt7 00 RE 04 ,� Oto O V 6J97 C.1 h v O C3 ai 0o d cc .n 'v 0 0 o > tz o �' > e CIO u cet t: a> moo. C w. O y s. cv CL E x 0 > v i e• m a to 0 „ c ev CL Ae rY �„� y s .� a .3 �,,� � Z � •r~` a � � � !W 51 f to " R to so • OPr o 4 w.r � CS LU l ess C v z ce yyto carte ri C.J {J o t) CZ ;; cs cxt14 ow tn c t v > Q 0 rn 00 a m Cs be 00 0 CJS o t2 An� 7� cr to � � � �. +- .c v •� � � �."` ;� ,'�' ,c: '� � Lam` p c�a .� y a��i air 43 y� Cd ca Cd J5 41 r- Cko Sxo - = � n o uv � C> t- rJL3 :2 � n o ° i w L LQ p — 'Z a u y c c g u QZ > }� ajg0 +o < yy m o V •L• r C .L V Q G J •+'�+ C lJ V K—'J L .+ E u 10 Chi u-"u- E 1 C cc 10:1- LV N V L n - V C u G .p ?• 6 Y'j ••.7 0 � � -�. � a � eu.4 �. c �i` E c y e a . o e O w£ 5 •� o a �S— EE °v r n ro m a YS�' s � d c •C �u > as cs v � c.E3 •e ,5 ��>++. � c �, " � 'v o �'� L o � � `"e �+ �' •o +�' C "Z. .. ..•7i .n u v u J. f t w u w w E W •at : '�' n d o � "G i �•a M tl7 4U/ SL C •i' Lti F c , b ceyiS r `c >, s cJ o fl a co _ sn `� 3 u, •c,,,p � •y e GSL � v) Ss •� �= '� cn � � tsi � .° is � � C .� c� � r° c°s t� c� .o o crt E= d c C L7 v O t F ... C 'L3 �, c5 o o 5 Ctn cs d3cry v °°2LV b° n 9 o y�S (y cs v may. a sa _x r c Ofd y •� C} ttl .� o r `et ai ar n., v is 0 v o d00 v E c c c c o u {J Ci f= ' ai chi aXi C7 W p nr y >•, � � v o ami o y a = p o ' to CA x o ami c�i w a to u x ty a v vs Ln`i `ti u c� c .L ` 03 c:' c atd -0mi s ci c ami O y d a u c> cn tC ria m '� ..� '!;= >L O, ...................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... ... ......... .......... .. ...... .......................................... .................. ............... _ ..... ......... ......... ......... ........ ........................ _ _ _. ............ .. .............................................................. _................................................................._......... _ ......... .......................... CC � G °°e ag °w ro 'c C c n `° cWy as to ;A4 u G 6 ` € ar 'C rL ' Us 40 gg I;S z 13 Z d � � ^ � � � "� "� ��c'� � � c!) w � a� ami p •� '� �> t� ca a u s' o _ .ca > a P' to 94 03 CS U C) ill ++ C7 ^C3 4.3 tz +"may t� � t� {;may, v �°~ � `� ami *-• Com'' t� �,, � C1„ � es .✓ ca � � � fn C? cc 0 y a s' _2 x ` ani p g = � � to � a ca �... ,� as ,, ... � •v v, v, �$ L. ed � 0 � a. «: r- .� u, -='� •� � 'u `" �' chi � E. � u, is g G at yy C w CA _ b0 CA.'Lg E C +•. ry ;v �' c> a L. tS a> r3 u cel v <9 p i„ �g > os v o tis � t�� � � � s'�i 0 C:as > © o c °' " — v := C- 0 V m C rat , . .5 :6cG c ani t) cs iv co crx 'F Chi c� c f�. q CC d JtL A V rycc s c ._ E u ° r 5 c r Ems •= Os:., c K E= a V .ti � ue < 7ryS c. v t, c e c c c .a u eto LL 79 N t cc 3" � � � � si, c •° « s9�-• � � � w� � 3 <7 �•.:t� � e c � u�i vis :� �i .. .t CYC Efu en U sz d r t`7 4nCJS tj rn � C/1 L J a fl..0 isi p ed t Ln f- Q .� w t0 6 tL C 3 ti w Lo 2 cry c La. :y o Q E c o cis L Ltj ♦� V E � d cj L y r C Z 0 0 G 2 = 2 m �+ u {i. CG [L V] 10" aG rot a d ttCL cm 0 CY %u C3. dt LCI y v: o E b O "s u� o t~ C N L >v d d C O t3 ca 02 Vj CL (I cd rL i ti i. >v C7 C A o E O i. fl., .. �j 1 is l O w n ci rG u c R v ad v n. n �L L � � v U 7 ev Cs CO a u C V 3 3 , aaW . iA co V} ' h a• 6 s ti a Aa e AU G.L Vypa •r— ie ° 43d° aY C cn ° ed ° u 3 .° ". c c - v �'` i V V •b CJ u " E•• a. J y u v 8 aro a ° v ro c c a �+ ° c a N zs s } c a ° . v e L7 1 on u +a m c r v ac `ei O wc` G µ ° `c � V V t'• o ti ° y e a w cc cm fn h� sL vs G t� vnr is �, ea ti 'n lu m w y % n WH G Ow G GP1 C C � yf ri v o° Cd to + v rn ap ..s td yCL on 0 A w C tom. OC :9in d O rJ9 7 s w 0 v U L 'cd ani c cC4 2 y U Lz CL10 to !] cz o as t0 v c> '" CLQ d u W u x� o bp 04 ab cue yrn 'C3 .•�".. tC rap a 00 o i ." .-+ > O ^. yit y 7 3 •c s rs > N C y b apo +� oa c O ce ami ppt = iv v _w i to C> 04— o " v o v 0 :: :•" va y U cz