Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03231999 - C13 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, CHIEF ENGINEER DATE: March 23, 1999 SUBJECT: Accept Report on the Collection of Drainage Fees for Vesting Tentative: Maps and refer the matter to the Finance Committee for Recommendation SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICAT ION I, Recommended Action: A. ACCEPT this report by the Chief Engineer on the collection of adopted drainage Ordinance fees for vesting tentative maps. B REFER report to Board of Supervisor's Finance Committee for review and recommendation to the Board. C DIRECT the Chief Engineer to send a notice to the Homebuilders Association to give them the opportunity to discuss the proposal with the Finance Committee. Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE: _RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE —APPROVE —OTHER SIGNATURE{S): ACTION OF BOARD ON Yllarch 23, 1999 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X . VOTE OF SUPERVISORS X UNANIMOUS {ABSENT None ) AYES: NOES: ABSENT:_ ABSTAIN: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy RMA:ci of an action taken and entered on the minutes of g\admin\rnitch\drmfce.doc IE the Board of Supervisors on the date shown, Orig.Div: Public Works(FC) E Contact: Mich Avalon(313-2203) I f'! cc CAO Auditor Controller ATTESTED: /�}`_� PW Acceuriting PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of the Board of Flood D.Bac°CDD Supervisors and County Administrator Coul'ty Counsel C.Baltodano,Building Inspection BY ,Deputy Policy on Drainage Fee Collection Page ®2 March 23 1999 Ill. Financiallmpact: No impact on the General Fund. All drainage fees are restricted funds that can only be spent on drainage improvements within the designated drainage area. Strict interpretation of the ordinance will insure that each new subdivision will bear its fair share of the needed drainage infrastructure required by urbanization. Ill. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: County staff, on behalf of the Flood Control District, has been collecting drainage fees required by adopted flood control drainage fee ordinances under Section VI "Subdivisions" of the fee ordinance. A copy of the standard ordinance is shown in Attachment A. County staff has been collecting the drainage fees in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act, which does not apply to the District. This business practice results in unnecessary loss of revenue to the District. Staff recommends that we collect the drainage fee amount in effect when the fees are collected. The Subdivision Map Act regulates the subdivision of land proposed by developers and processed by County government. Special districts, such as the Flood Control District, are not subject to this Act. For many years, County staff, acting on behalf of the Flood Control District, has been collecting drainage fees for subdivisions following the Subdivision Map Act. The Act states that the fee amount due on filing the final or parcel map is the fee amount in effect when the vesting tentative map was deemed "substantially complete." Typically, this is twelve months before the vesting tentative map is approved. Tentative maps are generally valid, with extensions, for nine years, and can extend to more than ten years. The Subdivision Map Act does not provide any provision for fee increases to reflect inflation or changed conditions over time. Outlined below are three cases illustrating how provisions in the Act regarding fee collection result in future inequities. The inequities described are based on our current business practice of collecting Flood Control District drainage fees the same as other County development fees under the Map Act. Case One: Growth Management Requirements As a result of the voters approving Measure C in 1988, the County incorporated Growth Management standards into its General Flan and has developed policies and practices to insure we meet the growth management requirements. Measure C states that "... Growth management is needed to insure that new growth pays for the facilities required to meet the demands resulting from that growth." Flood Control was one of the six performance standards adopted by the Measure. The County must certify each year that we have met the performance standards for the six critical services in addition to traffic management. Development typically meets its growth management obligation by paying an impact fee, or in the case of Flood Control, a drainage area fee. The inequity occurs when development that was approved ten years ago under a vesting tentative map, now files their final map and pays drainage fees that are ten years old. The Flood Control District finds itself unable to finance infrastructure improvements and meet its other obligations in the drainage areas, such as repaying loans and reimbursements, with a funding stream that is made up of revenue ten years out of date. Policy on [drainage Fee Collection Page —3- March 23, 1999 Case Two; Vesting Tentative Map deemed "substantially complete" prior to adoption of a drainage, park. or road fee ordinance. After the vesting tentative map is accepted as complete, but before the final or parcel map is filed, the local government agency initiates proceedings and adopts a fee ordinance that requires an infrastructure fee to be paid prior to recordation of the final map. The agency cannot collect the fee because it did not exist when the tentative map was deemed complete. The lots in the subdivision do not pay the fee, yet an existing vacant lot that has existed for many years must pay the fee. We see no justification for this inequity. In the case of drainage fees, which are based on new impervious surfaces, a significant portion of the fee due is lost because the fee due on the new streets (impervious surfaces) is not paid. New subdivision lots that pay the drainage fee include their share of the impervious surface of the new subdivision street, but existing vacant lots only include the impervious surface of their lot. You can see the amount of loss for each fee category by comparing the fee amounts in the two columns "Building Permits" and "Subdivision" in Section V of the ordinance, for the various lot sizes in Attachment A. The "Building Permit" column is the fee an existing lot would pay and the "Subdivision" column is the fee a subdivision lot would pay. Case Three: Existing fee ordinance is amended to increase fee after tentative map deemed complete. In this case, a fee exists when the vesting tentative map is deemed complete. Before the final map is submitted, the local government agency initiates proceedings and increases the existing fee by a new ordinance to reflect inflation in construction costs. Even though the new ordinance may have been in effect for several years prior to submittal of the final map, the fee due is calculated under the old ordinance. The amount of fee lost must be offset by higher fees paid by developers that follow, or by developers that are required to install improvements beyond their fair share and are not reimbursed for the extra cost, or a portion of the system is not installed and we have streets that flood when it rains. Attachment B is a map of the Oakley area illustrating this problem. Eight years ago many tentative maps were approved prior to the last economic down turn in building. These tentative maps are still valid and many of them will still be valid four years from now. Attachment C lists the tentative maps, indicates the number of lots, and the age of each tentative map for six drainage areas in East County. As of January 1999, the average age of these tentative maps is 79 months or 6.5 years. Summar County staff has been collecting Flood Control District drainage fees the same as other County development fees that fall under the regulation of the Subdivision Map Act. The three cases Poky on Drainage Fee Collection Pace —4- March 23, 1999 described above outline some of the inequities that occur by continuing with this current business practice. The Flood Control District is not subject to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act with regards to the collection of drainage fees. In addition, the District has some latitude in adopting and modifying fee ordinances that the County does not have with its development fees approved through authority of the Subdivision Map Act. It is staffs recommendation that we modify our current business practice to collect the drainage fee amount in effect when the fees are collected and separate the collection of drainage fees from the "artificial" provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. €V. Conseau€ences of Negative Action: if the current business practice is continued, the District would be collecting fees less than required by the law, and the remaining undeveloped properties without tentative maps will have to pay a disproportionately higher drainage fee for drainage improvement costs, or the needed drainage systems will not be installed and new developments will flood. •ate el m+.+ 9? At7>y C X -h 6r t$S.9 iSG X $e dw®n dd N OCJ a roo � -t rn C9 s -+.....c+a�'�to is n x st cs t�v -•v t a •t b � -s � b< rr rn ro ...rn n w�.� c -•,a r.7 0 »v w'^I O a cs.eae u.a 'S e+ro 8. 3 R 4 3 `i O w Gb--s 'S7 w w ••r•�•i'ti r'r r. R 7 ?b t'�' N �+w w r•r _� 7°n.n rtr w O e...7 :7 1•C $• y # Y a rn b r) y y ro Ga N w Z A u N b N O N O V t+4 C K 3 rn ^ C +•9•i O a t® tt G X CS.ea ID eq .0 i'+t b ?Cfl i99 7 R _..P5 Y S V3 ^t� 9� r't a am rn N �.s w ®rn w�i rn rn Cy �`Ft�rn• � b at'n n C7 ac 6 C` <tOi..• -O+1 A s r 3 d.Xi.r. 'Op b.5 f3 6 3 ev eP rn 0,-2.9 s m y re°+ �'b b .•e'26 B N m w -.•proOrn v+ ,os m = -�',7�- mw f7 w o O rt rny _ s 3 a rn R G tl w b ta•p, N m s.+ N C9. 0 C, Z � �rn mwm ��`m�d��'� y � +"�'�... >r C� Oiyi °" Q° »4 yC)O ro _M`� v,y+ �,o e`° CL e$ a�r" a a tai'oe a,C 1=2 tq 9 m w r �.•'h ,,,O b t® b cr. n •t N». P'7 N C7 w O `b '�ra;�^�" +7 O �-•,� '�`of 'b»r. '•t X b '1'S Y7 w m w +, Q 4-0 ro R3 M t3 C,+f y .O dD C t"t r YR 8t y CS w ro O tae v..° rn C79rr fp "�f •'S yY 42 mM »rn b 7 L '�r °' n aern G • <..., Z '.'�'O C M SCI 0-0 SL 0+1 m N KS w Sm ''try 2 Se e+_i 7 vt Y ttr ro N 8i Q sai-t O ~µ41 CL O O fi y rn C` C.y wi• .-t Yt9 :G mf6 1-a.[ ro m A d •..``°. a. N r°ti C.Z C 7 ' lZ 2 G de t7 a rn 45 q 99 e°o ro •.e ro -w< OS A • "� 7 u0i G G „,� '` O m n`_'.tY N G.,p -� 7 w O Ci.t'9 b C b t'h Ft "°, r6 ,�• ,v,iir C1.N. b e•°e+w t71 r 7 v O rn ltr S 6 r+r• C,0 �t� o rn rn S. -t ,n w ne CTO b w 7 rn t9 O 3 b x ]>• w d d� rs ro ]7't �• ro a CA b C ly,v�;`Ce w "" 6 Na "mo- '{g 'S yS l sal twf-8-r C $° `" �` a rro sue c yroeo rn -' r`t w 3 O' J f0 -N•+x C C ® '.A a ,,,t O '^f p N b "t e+ ; 7P�7 i� Ir 9`tbde w ro 6 titer m4 to,+a � .m a,y+ Ye c-2 a c•'i n rn '�`®, s ro ^t a b :t O N = tw ""•O o - N w »' ii. Z '4 Cl ajs 9u 7°"2 yes 1'$ t�9 1'71 n 6` C 3a tyi` t0.e.j a L7 6 G Oe C. cr 6 3>< i�0 rtP 7 ro rte+ G tC .'t^ -06= tp m w:� ��� aw� ro urns ur th 3 � �, 4 .7S�t tr c ^°t tm q, tx�. d m +� ea r+ G3 -•y +$Y C°t"Ca N !'j w N M 0 ie ew t7 rt is 'S 3' �.w e°'J ''6 7. Y 2.•�C -" 2 O S t>7» N ®O"C h7 C w w YY Ca A iv t$d G y i [$ C [7 *dam ta7v s mo. o -•!"aar �,n � n Xem+'d. `�twt O•rod my a to ®in m Zn» e'e'7 C r5 1Cd ra m r1't$7 m ..t r $ L7 w 7+.7 w b fid a ro r$ n ev �®'-t ��� o,ray ••„rn �, {»''� o � � g +$ ,•a s g ro ^� +;7.-� -s »� w,t b y ro a ,.°-^"�-s „+.+ � e. w � rn r> :�r°t o v Ca ro e9 tT g .+ t7.a � rn!° o 't ^i cx n c s ... m ro A O i nm _ t>s y O v µ �t 9 3 n`.� a `° .0 t>t, -•t Nt° '"a•sro m g ssr-�rn m aro o b ro ro n w v o W. CL m� c � -rot t96 n o e a v O 6� � ~9 eae c7 ' < o +o o a '`'fit'$ro y's ...n •+. o m O a.-w a -s rtr m eea r°us CO - O`a c9 d o a o"rt 'tr �a ->s e. O 7 d N O '� C* w w ¢.sOC •+7 t3 O es ro r+'.s y 7 r9 7 "e O eti 5 rn r+ 0 es O A •'t Z 7 s t4 d•.C rn 7 O A O G..a' 7`»? 9 rn ty' 7 C o..e.O rt'b -.<O id »C]. ro w a V. 61,6 f$w •Ie B 7 a. •w b.7 rn m ro r`1r O 2 P4 Z 37 N ttc ca. aweeser ar°.aealue. QSVa1tltAwNr 2 e's v. tn,-.v-.,avc++.. .en muoee'� �.ywa. 'q 1 - dddd d�N CG.C•SC 00 cm S i t+b r.ro C O. .®.3 C i � bu% •...ro iii. y ro d ac}c}od r,csao dt�c C:) }t �10 »,'t In O CS O O CS 101:3 0 O�a CJ d CG O O Q,= 'O-.••• e's 7 n t0 •+x.r.e y. r+ »C •+,'t 6„ y r CY 0 d o o . f rn a b t7b° s _ ♦ »r i'N r�rt W`rF�n r+»r•i b n m 't d€ai.-3 �,.,° m a »e'0 e+3 +'e'G N m 41f m G ae»w O d3 i$ C G 1p, O O :3 O Ci O y rn 3 -"• l"S ev' ` 7 itt" OO m,O �I�� -7 Sro �.a°. C9 w y a Ow' mg::. �O. h _ ^t eli V tT lat.C1.'•vf V f71 t55 A t..7 N h�N3 a c ro eb s9 p yy-t C7 O,ai b� O�^ }t3. 'Si -."y..n,tt] 9 CTC w 3" c01N tta W to 1,n.n w ub tna 3 s}••. .Y 7 - ro 51 'i >♦ x �.. . m en_ m u9 v9.n m tr i.v w 3 t7 .++�ro O ro•"•x e rro.t~ O at9 sC w V 6n. 'a W tp a I as W 1D ro 3 g C_ N j t7 7 O a -' 10+17 n Va d 0�"•�... ° yS C w w X ra y O d 1D t0+79 ° 33 -a t+ w7So w+ d1a rw+' .�.iy, z+�4 cTd srn ro�6»u3 3'"9row 133 i�. s rr �i CL X p 3 w :Il 6 +U ••�J r 3 ar w OI 10 r$ E 9 Y i ffi Y Y Y�a t9. E E Y Y 9 Y�•f i ✓°i ry �'s w ff 7 e `..' -t E »iro P'F by C2 i+'1 w 5`O ^ wn. .moi.m® u !$C D® O`d '•} C Y e E Y E ffi R E Y•MI b` 8 Y Y ffi $ 6 Y� i� � S •_� "eY V�6 �G`l7 �a 7 N� m w � a r° rn w ro 3 ,��b � ea_O �1C w b fl•u. G7 rs w .m � c �oYno.c..nm w 3 A C +A t� e.eO 9 w 7 G e9t E E Y 8 to E E 8 6 Y Y E e :i 8 E }}�. e`et tU "•rn 3 s c/t YE _ M- .y • 8 Y .. 3 Y 8 8 8 . Y Y E Y 3 E 3 tT^ '� C y t° CC 9. y .e �. ey � � � a,ro � �• � m» x ry r+ rn •t O » 9 7 y d rn!S •"''l w �• rt y YL wa a'O Y 3 w rn b C 6� sro r+ [T C7 eta r as• __ tTd ro G ro -+tr O m N eq n m 0 a •a b•oy itr rtr ,..srn ya w amt N N w.�.,..,... >_+s-e.. „-° C++-- ..• en r9'"; r rt .wa a C ro r° cv r...,c<a ns...o en ete w N s-..C7 to••+ere x_s c�w.o etr <tr ate.,,c ve a' ,v-t o W N175'�'YNNO11 Ott' "J ibN1Xi'W C,CT a+ Nen of r w ea• 7 7M 6 w ro m O b C 1v z5 rev 6 cn v w CS O•-e vs vt�ti C}6 a�u+C)CTa e11:n N C5 G e -! r. a. iq ecc tcc eC: e lu CCC CCC m oemm` ro O � av mr»»»»»»»t+ »»rw r e+e».+eq rn rn PJ � ����,yq � _..3 y ��9'C � .~•N � ^ae » b Q l cc, 3'telt r�ua y .N.. y m :3ro < 3 y -. 3 v0 � n e..ctr -' wit» PY«+ �w a 3 0 � OO '3 s�•�»e..� C b b w a O CY w O 3 A r nC: CLrn � rn..,.'7r Nto•.ea N+r a WNr.1om Vt9e°' '_07... O eJt iJt C3 eJy t>r V5 lJt Ve t:9 C t7 tP O CJ it:•9 07 r ^'"C 2 N Y't w 3•`• IU rn 'F b •M w m n i� ew ....... t+•+1 -t�+» C9 e9- »ro»»— m .-+»»»»»is r. 3 =1 3 t+ r+'» tY$ ro eo n�3 N N e3•...�l r9 ro 7 O CJ a'C a ro `n.d n � 3 R 9 G e 'S 5 Atf w w 3'•C t li 3 r+ •' ✓ 3a 'cam wrn ,,,-+ � ay ,av owro >� 6'91�4 `a,,ch m "°� a � •^'"' '' •'"r.N� 2 tt w� � 'r^..,� t: tea, `7't>we ap tv O 7 r+' B i z r•h h G s r .''ay '�'"'' N w r 'S "' �� � �Q,� aR �fi "t 9 y�ct N xt' � � L!` s +s.a+" �w 3 r tr ^✓K C `J o�.r� d.gp "t � �W tD to� Ga,O•G��L n"�.t� � w��+• � W�1� W fl fP °[' ?N C3` o dCo „ � �•i. G. +r,� C+ ro ee 3�.�7 a p'G a '� � �,w� w o*'p ,p w ry t+ a Lx6 �9 ;� �� O. 's em r `^ ano a w �a� ; rr'e,wew• 7 > 9 yw �°'rda n � ro r a y" a rn e'eros � '-.Tr, 9 N .hroN t o� ro �t a°c*� a ', � W +� ?r tatstr 10 tv n 9�v�� w1°� �� s• .ag 1 w• cr �.+'W O• i,ro C' N roi` .�,a t'',b +.G y p.,a O to tY 3 0 f> �u °' a' m R'N S 7 N is N W •As d,o. to 0 to eo•„y =y ".r Y* ,y > ®a t7, r y, 0fi ? G CO �i#.wL ra'✓•""'- 6N � �d�yrN a t to Ift To 'q�a mr,m t tr ye' Lf• 8 G id W isf i'e N W C +�e"p t "gin p mN,. K.p I'd C Cf d e�iG k 9 A A �✓•14 ^W 19C O O "��' �* p4 t ��„ W do`Me N a v n S� pt 1 N w, iA^ !� t,p✓'�, to N 3 l"+ Tw wel er 1�0 i4 to to w q;, a f'ti i •ry. �y may, �� � i wi at, tldf 4t W W O rt tv A X+ O N yt �R R° s.V � � •dt's t�'i a.til Z , ra a Rte` O r3 W7��d «+ W�d vt � ��tT• p% *1 b to 00 m y cr �• ro r 1p • a 6 +� w to.&c v to e ro r w C+ rn ATTACHMENT C OAKLEY DEVELOPMENT LOG 7232 Mar-90 Oct-98--F- 03 10 2H 2 7359 Ma -90 Oct-98 101 37 29H 3 7495 Sep-90 Oct-98 97 11 29H 4 7235 Oct-90 Oct-98 96 13 29H 5 7467 Nov-90 Oct-98 95 11 29H ! 6 1 6968 Dec-90 Oct-98 94 34 30A ' 7 7358 Jan-91 Oct-98 93 42 29H 8 7567 Jan-91 Oct-98 ! 93 6 30C 9 7626 A r-91 Oct-98 90 3 29J 10 7572 Au -91 Oct-98 86 7 29H 11 7655 Dec-91 Oct-98 82 37 29H 12 7758 Mar-92 Oct 98 79 26 30A 13 7426 Apr-92 Oct-98 78 27 29H 14 7645 Oct-92 Oct-98 72 38 30A 15 7630 Nov-92 Oct-98 71 128 30A 16 7657 Feb-93 Oct-98 68 220 30A 17 7658 Feb-93 Oct-98 68 1 44 30A 18 7662 Au -93 Oct-98 62 251 30A 19 7681 Se -93 Oct-98 61 39 30A 20 7590 Mar-94 Oct-98 55 91 29H 21 7760 Mar-94 Oct-98 55 91 29H 22 7906 1 Aug-94 Oct-98 50 124 29G 23 7689 Mar-95 Oct-98 43 225 30S 24 7865 Sep-96 Oct-98 1 25 18 30S Total number of developments 24 Total number of months 1817 Average age per development months 76 Total number of lots 1593 MFK:drg g:leladmWmike Moeklsyldatslog Rev(4/6198) yl� 16 �1a_°y) i1 U �li � 14 � <•; � / ����/��13 I( ��� ���! L,, ,.5. �� �� }� ,j.."J� ! ff it ��� d �� � �� �� �i —}I �,t�/ /V �:SI ,-< i � ;� l -( j' / � �,�� ; :�.:�� �• �i U� t ,lyf ,�/) (�IW�'�� 1�.. ��I��.�.�� t� If 11- �✓�� �\'ff� ,`�.����J� f. �' �r� I '�l � �'�, i aj I�_ , �. r`r '1 111I I �I kk J-n j I 1 L i rl I' I� + t 0 h � v j 1 I f l - ` 1 ,l� � s U'`l( ) }I ,lko'll ._.• i! � � I f I r ICI�.�.�{ ,��( �I I�tl y ;��7 j � 11�II �," , j �0) tcg � 7 Y C } I If I 1 Ii II r. l IfIF���, $�I I k ': t ... j P I � , �� } } JI l L lit ,, I ba — 1lid �I {' I( �j rN �y J711. lit A rrArc f- 4 , */4