Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 07141998 - D12 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING IN THE MATTER OF } LIEM HHU LE } } } } Re: APPEAL } } I declare under penalty of perjury that I am now, and at all times herein mentioned have been, a citizen of the United States, over age 18; and that today I deposited Certified Mail with Contra Costa County Central Service for mailing by the United States Postal Service in Martinez, California, postage fully prepaid, a copy of the Board of Supervisor's final decision by Board Order in the above matter to the following: LIEM HIEU LE at 713 Caskey Street Bay Point, CA 94565 or P.O. Bax 91.5 Danville, CA 94526 or 151 Ambrose Avenue Bay Point, CA 94565 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated; July 20, 1998, at Martinez, California. Depu C k A s £ m rn �� Y i > i i t 4 Ox Ct1 j•. i it v { TO: 'BOARD OF SUPEW i%wOORS contra FROM: CARLOS BALTODANO, DIRECTOR S. Costa BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT County By: Timothy B. Griffith, Building Inspector I DATE: June 17, 1998 SUBJECT: Appeal of Abatement action at 151 Ambrose Ave., Bay Paint APN# 097-041-004 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS After hearing the appeal, it is recommended to deny the appealand affirm the determinations of the County Abatement Officer and direct the County Abatement Officer to proceed and perform the work of abatement. FISCAL IMPACT None if voluntary compliance. Approximately $28,000 if the County continues and completes the abatement. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS On March 12, 1997 the Building Inspection Department began an investigation regarding complaints of a substandard dwelling and insect/rodent infestation. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE RECOMMENDATION OF CM7Y ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON July 14 , 1998 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED Z,OTHER_ The hearing was OPENED , and Liem Hieu Le , Appellant , commented on the matter ; the Chair read comments from Florence Bentley, ' 164 Ambrose Avenue , Bay Point , into the record ; all personsAesiring to speak having been heard , the hewing was CLOSED; The Board APPROVED the recommendations as set forth above . VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE x UNANIMOUS (ABSENT -- - - AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: /(510/335-12/) ATTESTED- , Ju l V 14 . , 4 9 cc: Community Development Department (CDD) PHIL BATCHELOR, ,'CLERK OF THE BOR OF SUPERVISORS A COU DMI 1STRATOR BY �-- , DEPUTY l:ptc bos Appeal of Abatement action at 131 Ambrose Ave., Bay Point page 2 A site inspection was conducted on March 26, 1997 and the dwelling was found to be substandard having multiple building and zoning violations. Further investigation of both parcels revealed major changes to all structures without the benefit of required permits and inspections. Structural dilapidation, electrical and plumbing deficiencies were determined to exist within the (5)five units, by the Building Inspection Department and based on the circumstances surrounding this property it was declared a public nuisance in violation of Title 7 Section 712.2-002 and Section 712.2-004. The owner has been duly notified and advised of the violations and corrective measures needed to correct the deficiencies through a series of letters which commenced on March 26, 1997. Additional correspondence was sent on September 26, 1997, January 23, 1998 and February 10, 1998. A response was received from the property owner on February 13, 1998 disputing the findings stating, "The properties are in good condition". On March 11, 1998 another letter was sent by the Building Inspection Department to the owners reiterating the violations. On March 31, 1998 correspondence was received disputing the building, electrical, mechanical and plumbing violations indicating that some work had been performed. On April 8, 1998 the Building Inspection Department sent a letter to the owner stating abatement procedures would begin in (15)fifteen days if substandard conditions were not corrected. On April 16, 1998 a letter was received from the property owner stating " The Building Inspection Department was abusing our power by imposing sanctions against this home". On June 4, 1998 the Building Inspection Department posted the property and began the abatement process against both parcels. In summary four of the five units are severely dilapidated with extensive electrical, plumbing and structural problems i.e. illegal exposed electrical wires, illegal exposed electrical wires supplying power from unit to unit, illegal expansion of sewer and plumbing lines that are inadequate to meet the demand of all the units, failing foundation and collapsing structural floor members underneath the units. The owner, while performing some miner repair, has yet to address the serious deficiencies, which led the Building Inspection Department on June 1 1998 to request P.O. & E. remove the utility service to 151 Ambrose Ave #A. Presently, the units are occupied and all the tenants have been informed of the need to vacate the premises due to the pending abatement. REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before, addressing the Board. N& " ? Name: ' � - phone. �°' Address: ' ` _ + ..._ City;_ ' ', a ` I am speaking for myself or organization: (neje of orpni:stion) CHECK ONE: U--- I wish to speak on ,Agenda Item ' .- Date: My comments will be: general for against z - 7'6 Z 'wish to speak on the subject of � ..�.., I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider: Bay Point, the 3rd of July, 1998. To: The Board of Supervisors 1)In February 1998, Mr Tom Gonzales came to inspect the house located at 151A Ambrose Ave in Bay Point by the request of tenants who had not paid the rent in December 97, January and February 1998 (and evicted in March). Within hours after receiving his notice to comply I came to this house but tenants did not let me in. The fallowing day I called Mr Tom and informed him I wanted to repair the defects he listed in his notice but I were unable to enter this house. He told me send them the 48 hour notice. I gave them this notice and came in two days later. I saw them turn on the stove for heating, I asked "why don't turn on the beater". They said they don't know how to do it . I toldthem "you have to call PG&E or call me to help you". Then I lighted the pilot and turned on the heater and it worked right away. And within days I fixed everything that Mr Tom wanted me to do: heater, shower'head, receptacle, kitchen faucet. The only thing I did not fix is two window glass cracks, because the tenants had broken them and I thought they had to fix them (I fixed them recently after the tenants moved out). Then I wrote a letter to Mr Tom, to report what I repaired, and complained about the heater (He did not try to turn it on before giving me the notice to comply, in other words, He did not verify the complaint of the unlawful detainers). And due to the eviction lawsuit against them, I requested him to communicate with me in writing so that I can have a proof to submit to the court. In fact I were expecting an apology letter from Mr Tom about the heater and really wanted to know whether what I repaired were OK. I have never received any answer from Mr Tom or from anyone else in Building Inspection Department about these issues. In 1977 When I were a graduate student in Paris, I wrote a letter to Mr Jimmy Carter, President of the U.S.A and althought it was just a letter of a foreign student, the White House sent me an answer. Now I wrote a letter to county officer about a house I managed and received the notice of violation, but no one answered me. My questions: Why didn't county inspectors verify the complaints of the tenants (who always need an excuse not to pay rent and live free at other people's property as long as they can)? If they verify them, they will discover the truth. If Mr Tom spent just one minute to turn on the heater, he would ' have r not determined this house violated the substandard living conditions. Why didn't inspector Tom or the Building Inspection Department answer my letter and let me know whether I were wrong or right and what else I had to do, or everything was fine?If I received an answer letter clarifying these issues, I am sure that everything would have been resolved long time ago. A letter only takes 20 minutes to write, and as a citizen and manager of this property, I have the full right to receive an answer from people who imposed the notice of comply against this property and already received a report from me. ( Note. In my letter I did not mention units B and D because Mr Tom had not inspected them and I were informed that the county inspection is only legally carried out if there are tenants complain, or some one filled and signed the complaint form or there are inspection warrant issued. None of them happened to these two units. Besides, his notice concerning unit B "Broken windows" it was not correct, because I did not see any window glass of this unit broken.)) 2) I sent my letter by mid February 1998, within a few days after I had received the notice to comply of Mr Tom. For over one month I'heard nothing from Mr Tom and I thought everything was fine. By mid- March, I received a letter (no date) from another inspector, Mr Tim and strangly it did not mention any issues raised in my letter. And it just repeated the notice to comply signed by M Tom, in which , among others, the heating permit was required ,even I had already reported the heater working and other defects had been repaired. Does it needs a heating permit to turn on the heater? Obviously, no one came there to verify my repair works. This second notice was limited to unit 151 A only and disregarded the previous notice concerning units B and D that had not been inspected. do the 8`h of April, 1995, almost two months after my letter sent, I received a letter from Mr Tim (dated 418/98). In my first letter, I informed Mr Tom about the eviction lawsuit ( The eviction lawsuit trial often happens within 2 weeks) and the unlawful detainers will use his notice to accuse me. Therefore I requested an answer in writing to defend myself before the judge. But the answer came too late and it did not resolve any issues raised by inspector Tom and by me. In fact, Mr Tim, the second inspector, was definitevely sent there due to the notice to comply signed by Mr Tom and by my complaint. Both raised the issues concerning heater, faucet leaks, GFCI receptacles, broken windows. All of them are located inside the house. Mr Tim did 2 not inspect or verify the problems. Instead, in his letter, the first one I received from the Building Inspection Department, he raised new issues, that are the failing foundation, the laundry room, the moisture and the water heater vent. All of them are located outside of the house. My questions are: Why didn't he resolve, or at least give his opinion about the issues raised by inspector Tom and by me, that are the reason of his inspection on March 25, 1998 and the source of all the mess? Specifically, he had to inspect to see the heater working or not working, the faucet leaks, the receptacles, the glass cracks fixed or not fixed. All these things, if any one entered inside the house and spent 10 minutes to inspect can know clearly yes or no. He failed to do it, failed to perform his job —continue the unfinished works of Mr Tom- —the reason of his presence at this property on March 25,1998. 1 would like to ask his boss or his supervisors: Why did you send Mr Tim to this property on the March 25? what were the instructions you gave to him? Did you question him why he did not resolve any issues raised by the former inspector and by me? In his letter, after listing the new violations concerning the exterior of the house, he wrote he will request his supervisors to abate this house. In other words, he did not resolve anythings —all of them are minor things after I successfully turned on the heater— there were only a few small things left: the faucet leaks, the receptacles and window cracks- And he just made a retaliation: find new defects and rind a reason to abate this house. I think he did not enter the house on March 25, therefore he was unable to see and resolve what Mr Tim and I were talking about. In the meeting on June 26 with his boss, Mrs Micki and 1, he said he did go inside the house. I think it 's not true: If he did enter inside why did not he say any thing about the defects that Mr Torn told the to fix and I already fixed them? This is a crucial question because they were the beginning of this trouble and the reason of his intervention. Mr Tim was sent there to do something, but he did not do it, and do something else. And so far no one in Building Inspection Departmnent resolves the issues raised by its first inspector, Mr Tom and by me, manager of the house imposed improperly the order of abatement. Before the aggressive intervention of Mr Tim, the problem was very simple: Inspector Tom cited some small defects and I reported I fixed them. If he was satisfied with my report, he should write me a letter to say it is OK. If he was not satisfied, he should come back to inspect a second time to verify what I fixed wrong or right and tell me what 1 3 have to do. He failed to do both. This is alsolutely the fault of Building Inspection Department and of its employee. As far as the cost to fix these defects is concerned, l can say it cost under $50: to light the pilot of heater, it costs me nothing, to fix the faucet leaks, it costs $1 to buy the washer, to install two CFCI receptacles, it costs $15 and to repair two window glass cracks, it costs $30. Can you abate a house due to these tiny defects were already fixed and I already wrote a letter to report what I had done? The Building Inspection Dept did not answer my letter for almost two months after they received my letter ,anti did not resolve the issues raised by its first inspector and by me. Instead, they sent another inspector who did not touch anything that he had been instructed to do , and just listed other defects and threatened to abate this house. 3) Within days after I received Mr Tom's letter, I answered him by reporting that I already fixed the water heater vent that fell clown due to last storm. I also told hint the moisture is normal because it was raining a lot (last 12 moths, it rained 112 days, I ,just recently fixed this defect by installing new trims and painting the exterior) and the foundation crack is normal for any old house. I did not received his answer during the three following weeks. I thought he agree with me and everything was fine. As I mentioned, his letter dict not touch any issues raised by Mr Tom and by me, all of them are inside the house and raised the new issues, all of them concerning the exterior of the house. When I wrote this letter, dated April 15, I slid not see a hole, as small as a computer keyboard,in foundation that was covered by a tree and overlapping by the bedroom. If Mr Tim answered my letter and let me know a hole in foundation is not common for any old house and let me know the location of this hole, I think this problem was resolved. He has never answered my second letter. Agai,i, no one resolves and let me know anything about my first letter, slated on 2/12/98 and no one answered my second letter dated on 4/15/98 and let me know whether I was wrong or right. 4) By the 29th of.May, 1 received by mail the Notice to Vacate the Premises For Abatement of Nuisance and with it, Notice of Disconnect and/or Removal of Utility Service dated on May 27,1998 and no hearing allowed for both notices. I were so surprised and went to Building Inspection Derp on 6/1/98. They told sae they posted the Substandard Building Notice and Notice and Order to Abate on the 5/12 at the property. I told them it is a rental property and I did not received that notice. They gave me that notice 4 ......... (on 6/1) which allows 14 days to appeal. I made a appeal right away, within minutes after I reveived it, but they rejected and told me the deadline expired. So, this house will be abated and we, the owner and manager of this house, had no right to appeal. Therefore the order to vacate and abate against this house on 5/27 is not legal as well as the disconnect of PGE service. County abatement officer violates article 14-2.406 about service ("written notice shall be served" by mail) and article 14-2.408 about Proof of service ("serving service conforming to the code") as well as violates chapter 14-4 about Appeals of Abatement Procedure. 5) A few clays later, on 6/4/98, Mr Tim posted the second time the notice to abate at this house (15IA Ambrose Ave) and posted the same notice at all other houses in this property. He told me only one house (151) Ambrose Ave was built with a permit, other houses will be abated because they were built without a permit. It is obviously a retaliation about my complaint they had violated the abatement procedure and law a few previous days . No good company revenges its customers and no good government revenges its citizens, especially ones who just make a request about something they don't understand. In this case, I only questioned Mr Tom about the heater and I received the first retaliation: the second inspector gave me another notice to comply about something else. I made a complaint, they never answeres me and made the second retaliation: abate the jrouse and disconnet PG&E service without informing me by mail and without giving me the right to appeal. After my protest, they made the third retaliation: post the order to abate at all other houses with a vague reason: these houses were built 50 years ago without a permit. I made an appeal and I received the fifth retaliation: the house was built with a pernlit (78 years ago) has no foundation etc....Let going on with the land use issue. 6) According to Mr Tim `s assumption, only the house locatedat 151 Ambrose Ave was built with a permit. So Why did he post the order to abate against this house?. So far I have not reveived any notice to comply against this house. Does he admit his mistake? 7) I wrote a petition to Mr Carlos, director of Building Inspection Dept and I had a meeting a I*ew weeks later with Mrs Micki on the 26th of June. In this meeting, Airs Maureen Toms, planner , told Mr Tim and me the house located at 1510 Ambrose Ave was built with a permit. So, Mr Tim did an illegal action in posting the order to abate at this house. So far, I have not received any notice to comply against this house. Does s he admit he did a wrong and unfair thing to this p-roperty.9.The tenant wrote a letter to complain .about this order to abate but no one answered him and gave him an apology. 8) Now I will prove the two houses located in the back (151A and 151B Ambrose Ave) were built with permit and the assumption of Mr Tim is wrong and the orders to abate against these houses, as well as the two houses in front, are illegal and they are the unfair retaliation of a county officer against its citizens and there is the discrimination against us, the minority Americans. Building Inspection Dept only maintains its records from 1947 to present. In other worsts, it destroyed all its records before 1947. The house at 151 was built in 1920., 1510 was built in 1930 and County's Assessor found the two liouses, 151A and 151B in 1.949. Every 5 years, assessor office sent inspectors to assess the property in County and they found it in 1949. That reams theses houses must be built before 1949, or either in 1948, 1947, 1946 ,1945 or 1944. If we take an average year-- 1946 1946 -, that is 52 years ago. Building Inspection Dept does not keep any records before 1947. Su, Why does Mr Tim assume that these houses were built without a perinit? Every one is considered innocent until there is a judgement against ainst him. The same, every house is considered to be built with a permit until you find solid and concrete proof to prove they were built without permit. I want to see the proof and Mr Tim must show it to prove his assumption. Can you abate a house because you think it was built without a permit over 50 years ago, that means abate a house drat has existed over 50 years and during five decades no one questio,is its legal construction? As far as the county records concern, they Nvere not maintain properly and completely. I paid almost $50 to asl: IVIrs Judi, researcher, to send me all documents concerning this property. Sliesent ine eN,ery thing she found, after a careful research, but slie still missed wary important documents, like the building permit iul' u.estorage shed (I found it at county assessor record with building perniii number and Mrs Judi only found a copy after I gave her the perwit number of this sited, only 240 square feet and its value was assessed $960 rias built with permit number 48443 issued on 6.25.1958. This is a very important proof but researcher of building inspection dept was unable to found it. So, even these houses were built after 1947, 'to one can say they were built without permit because no records foutid. A perinit issued in 1958 you still missed it, that means it misses a lot more, especially the older ones. 6 8) I have at least three proofs to prove these house were built with a permit. The first one is the building permit of the storage shed. The previous owner built a shed with permit, how can we believe he built two houses without permit? According to the building code and; procedure of any addition and construction, it require owner to draw a site plan with the dimension of the lot and of all existing constructions. So when the permit issued for this shed, the four houses in this.property had already existed there long time ago and must be shown up in the site plan. Planning Dept and Building Inspection Dept never issued a permit for the shed if the two houses in the back had been built without a permit. As far as the owner concerned, he was trever stupid enough to apply for a permit to build a shed if the two existing houses were not legally built, because he knew for sure the Plarrrrirrg Dept will rejected and for any construction, including a shed, the inspector will come many times and will find out the dwellings were not legally built. In sum, no one wants to have a stora;e sired, worth $960 and produces no income at the .risk of losing two houses, worth about 540,000 and produce an income of over S 1,00 a mouth. Therefore the building permit issued in '1958 for a shed cortstructiutr proves the two houses in the back were legally built, u,• at least legalizing the existence of them. - the second prool'is iiie reltabiiitation permit, number 189628, issued on 8.6.1981 i'o,• rfie front house (1>1 Ambrose Ave). This construction was aiiowed to add up to 402 square feet and certainly a site plan of all dweiirrrgs, iacit,ding two houses in the back, was dr•aw,n and submitted to Planning Dept and was approved before the building permit issued. So, Building Inspection .Dept recognized at least the second time the legal existence of the two houses in the back by issuing the rehatuili€ation peewit in 1981. - - The third proof is the electrical and mechanical permits for the electrical works and gaz line installation for the house located at 151E that the previous owner, Nlrs Florence Bentley told me recently she got them by late 7U's orearly 1980's. She does not keep the record and renmerrrt ei die perrrrit number but she confirmed she got those permit l'or' ties nouse about 19 years ergo (Her, letter its attached). No perti,lt issued lt,r any permit application if the house itself was built witi,%jui perrt.it. The above electrical and mechanical permits of 151A AA11oruse Ave proved this house was built with permit. Mrs Floret,ce gust toid we site remembers the name of 7 inspector, Mr Ventarino who inspected the works legally done and the house as well as the .addition in 1981 were built with foundation and had the inspection passed. Due to the existence of over 50 years of theses houses, it is hard to find proofs, especially the witnesses, but three proofs plus letter of Mrs Florence that Bust listed are strong enough to prove theses houses were built with a permit and the order of abatement against them are illegal. Besides, in reel estates, people recognize the legal ownweship by occupation or by ti.,: lu.,g tithe e.iismiee. It'some ones occupy a property for over- 2u ilii y' ark considered by law as the legal owners. The four iwases ria tit: existed at this property over 50 years ago, county has coliccted property tax over a half of century. It is not reasonable and fail• to yuestioii the permits that even Building Inspection Dept does irut inaintain. These four houses have their own 8vater meter, gas iiseier alio puwver meter. Their addresses in the tax bill and in the building dept record are 151A and 151. C Ambrose Ave, that means 151 Awbrose and 151 B Ambrose legally exist. If there .are only two riouses err this property, we will have their address are 151 and 151 A ugly. 50 feet front this property is a three unit property on a small piece of land, and 200 feet from this property is a S unit complex ori a lot as big as twvo parcels of the property I manage . So, for these tw�,u parcels, four houses and a shed were legally built is re.rsurrable acid conform to the zoning. In sung, as far as tt,4 iiouse located at 151 A Ambrose Ave, I already fixed every thhig listt:J in the first notice to comply signed by inspector Torn. l atsu r','tt.iired the four defects in the Second notice to comply signed by, alis crouse, its well as the other houses in this proltL"Lt ' wwere peeved built with permit. Due to these facts, i i,tluw r.ii%4 to regtiest: The order to .t#1.it. . gaiiisi tcit:se four louses rescinded and IGF service restored at I.-IIA Ah,bruse Awfe. - it is a discrirniri.rtiu., and a aafair retaliation against us if building inspectors wants us to ttx any ttairag existed before our ownership. The previous owvriei•s are white Americans and Building Inspection Dept received sorb, %:utapiitiiats and sent inspectors there .many times but they did not qustioa about the permit last 50 years. Now, we only own .and ntana e this property 10 months but they dig the fifes, wrongly, and impose uirfairly the sanctions against us, the minority 8 Americans, what they failed to do with the previous owners. I would like to stop this disc riinination and retaliation. . - The inspector carie ai dozen times lest few weeks, disturbed my tenants and told my ten.-ints do not Baty the rent. Therefore the tenants at 151A Nvei'e evicted, tenants at 151 B moved out, tenants at 151, refuse to pay. 'I'lie rent is bone of his business, that is the job of lawyers and legal advisors, and concerns only the landlord-tenant relAtions. He encouraged tenant to break the contracts and the law, that allow me to evict tenants if they do not pay the rent. Besides, the law is not simple: te,iants may aot pay the rent but they must open an account and depusii the reit into this separate account. County officer can not violates tiie law and tell people violate the law. I like this harassenient Intal tris illegal intervention stop. In my leter to Mr Carlos, I said only ti►is ti,ing, about the rent, is seriously enough to file a lawsuit against the county, because it makes this property foreclosed and c.,t,ses iit,ge tluncial damages to us. And the order to abate will ruin 01:e i,r.,►,ket �'alue of this property, because no one wants to buy a t).`ut►.'riy iii ti`oublz. The way inspector pcei`orwcil tliis job and broke the law, including the law of abaitei,teiii, a,iid impuseu the severe, unfair and illegal sanctions against bits pi•opecty, in fa,:t the reheated retaliations, constitutes ai discci,,ii,ia,iioii aiaii,si as and against this low income area. If we were the �o liiie Anti i icons, or if this property locates in Blackhatwk or i.i Ocii,ctai, I aiili sure tris property be treated differently. 1n this corse, %County officers involve a certain degree of the discrimination ais tr'eil as the abuse of bower. - To*abate at house w:iti iiiiiioe defects is like to condemn to death an innocent people anu i,.ive tiie execution carried out. Therefore please be careful in deaii,,. ►Vitli I)eol)le I)'roperty, especially the real estates, the most expensive iiss,S is iiiat people cath own ,and the ownership right is guaratitteeii o), the C. oi,stitution. - Thank you for yogi c„iisidei•ation. - 'Truly Yours WP�� Liens Le P.0 Bot 91.5, I.la aviii,,..: 545" 1 ° 1. � 709..14G3. DETACH THE BAR CODED COUPL, s &MAIL WITH YOUR PAYMENT DUE NOV. 1, 1997 DELINQUENT AFTER DEC. 10, 1997 5:00 PM LE HOA HIEU P O BOX 915 DANVILLE CA SECURED PROPERTY TAXBILL A. FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 (JULY 1, 1997 TO JUNE 30, 199, BILL NUMBER ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(APN) STIFF I TAX RATE AREA I TAX AGENT 97-064749 1 097-041-004-9 00 1 79024 f ASSESSEE ~- REMARKS: ASOF JANUARY PURCELL EARL J & SUEANN JAARY, 1997 YPT SITUS: BA1 AMBROSE AVE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: EKES AMBROSE #2 POR LOT 26 PROPERTY TYPE FULL-,VALUE ,LEVIES AND BONDS AMOUNT LEVIES AND BONDS AMOUNT LAND 54,281 EI MT D MELLO ROOS 67.00 IMPROVEMENTS 21,713 AY CC WTR LEVY LAND 5.59 PERSONAL PROPEM DB FED STORMWATER FEE 16.20 V MOSQUITO & VECTOR 7.32 GROSS VALUE 76,000 Y EMERGENCY MED B 20.00 SEWER USE CHARD 397.08 A EASTBAY TRAILS LLD 5.44 I LESSEXSfAPT»raS O SERV AREA L-100 14.94 SEE RPvsflsE MD AMBROSE PARKS LLD 36.72 NET VALUE j 'TAX REDUCTION DUE TO STA FINANCED HOMEOWNER 7AX TOTAL LEVIES AND BONDS RELIEF: 00 L> NET VALUE X RATE=TAX TAX DESCRIPTION RATE COUNTYWIDE TAX 1.0000 759.99 OWNERS NAME& ADDRESS LOS MEDANOS HOSP .0398 30.24 LE HOA HIED BART .0220 16.72 P O BOX 915 EAST BAY REGNL PK 0081 6.16 DANVILLE CA 94526 1 TOTAL MATE 1.0699 * SEE ENCLOSURE FOR INQUIRIES ADCC: DELINQUENT PENALTY 69.17 REGARDING THESE LEVY CHARGES. DELINQUENT COST LESS: PAYMENT RECEIVED - ___ _____------------------_.--- ---------------__-- NET AMOUN r 1,452.57 -- _ r ----------------- — BILL NO. I PARCEL NO. SUFF TAX RATE AREA �ftf 97-064749-2 'I 097-041-004-9 00 79024 r�irrrrrr+rrrirr�trirrrr`r`rrr�rry J COft7AC C?ATA t0 MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: DETACH THE BAR CODED COUPON VVV I RETURN THIS PORTION ALFRED P. LOMELI & MAIL WITH YOUR PAYMENT ! WITH PAYMENT: SECURED PROPERTY TAX HILL TAX COLLECTOR Iti 145257 P0.BOX 631 .rrrrrrrrrwrr+�rrn+rirr ir�irrrwr}% t MART;NE.Z,CA 94553 E Contra DUE FEB. 1, 1998 COStCt DELINQUENT AFTER APR. 10, 1998 5:00 PMI County I FISCAL YEAR —SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR OTHER I r ! 7(1f IMPORTANT INF(ORNt ATKtt,i s++ •^^~ _ rr.rwrr�rwirr� BAR CODED COUPON V TH YOUR PAYMENT 1, 1997 :NT AFTER i 997 5:00 PM i ,L EARL J & SUZANNE . E HOA HIED )X 915 LLE CA ! SECURED PROPERTY TAX BILL FISCAL YEAR • .•._ "" 2947-98 (JULY 1, 2997 TO AME 30, 2498J BILL NUMBER ASSESSOR PAR MBER APN BUFF I TAX RATE AREA TAX AGENT 97-064743 -041-003-1 . • 00 79024 , MARKS: 11997 LPURCELL EARL J & SUZANNE iUS: ROSE AVE C me►ESCRIPTIO AMBROSE #2 PCR LOT 26 'E FULL VALUE AMOUNT LEVIES AND BONDS AMOUNT CS4,28EI MT D HELLO ROOS 67.00 AYCC WTR LEVY LAND 5.59 ,rrBFEU STORMWATER FEE 16.20 VMOSSOVITO & VECTOR 7.32 IE DY EM GENCY MED B 20.00 GG SEWER USE CHARG 397.08 NS KA EASTEAY TRAILS LLD 5.44 LO SERV AREA L-100 14.94 MD AMBROSE PARKS LLD 36.72 UE 70, )CTION DUE TO STA �. .., HOMEOWNER TAX TOTAL LEVIES AND BONDS $.00.0C3 NET VALUE X RATE=TAX ------> TAX DESCR#PT#CJN RATE NAME & ADDRESS f COUNTYWIDE TAX # 1.0000 705.71 LOS MEDANOS HOSP 0398 28.08 tCELL EARL J & SUZANNE J BART .0220 15.53 LE HOA HIED EAST BAY REGNL PK .0081 5.71 J BOX 915 9VILLE CA 94526 TOTAL RATE _ 1.0699 SEE ENCLOSURE FOR INQUIRIES ADD: DELINQUENT PENALTY REGARDING THESE LEVY" CHARGES. DELINQUENT COST LESS: PAYMENT RECEIVED NET AMOUNT 1,325.32 N rrr,irrrrrrrrr�rrrrwri � ETACH THE BAR CODED COUP V & MAIL WITH YOUR PAYMENT DUE FEB. 1, 1998 DELINQUENT AFTER Z, 10, 1998 5.00 PM EE REVERSE SIDE FOR OTHER f ,.._ nrndnAATtf"5N Contra Office of Assessor Gus S. Kramer Cosh Assessor * 834 COURT STREET MARTINEZ CALIFORNIA 94553• (510)313-7400cculy t e 3 a t Ps"/Of"Cr1TYLOCATION: «........�.. `c. Y�i1r5.�.'�l•.'1..}'�1:., .•.i I':.��t'r:i . ._ r ......_wu_ _.. `HIS IS NOT A TAX BILL '. NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENT THE SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAW BEGAN ON JULY 1, 1983. IT REQUIRES THE ENROLLMENT OF VALUE CHANGES DUE TO CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP AND COMPLETION OF NEW CONSTRUCTION AS OF THE DATE OF THESE OCCURRENCES RATHER THAN THE FOLLOWING JANUARY 1 AS HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN THE CASE. THIS IS BEING ACCOMPLISHED BY LEVYING"SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS.,' FISCAL EXISTING EXEMPTION NEW(BASE YEAR) CURRENT ROLL SUPPLEMENTAL YEAR AMOUNT* VALUE VALUE ASSESSMENT THE SUPPLEMENTAL BILL IS IN ADDITION TO THE REGULAR TAX BILLS BASED ON THE PRIOR ASSESSMENT AS OF JANUARY 1. THE BILL WILL BE CALCULATED USING THE SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENT, WHICH IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE NEW BASE YEAR VALUE AND THE PRIOR TAXABLE VALUE, AND WILL BE A PRORATED AMOUNT BASED ON THE NUMBER OF MONTHS REMAINING IN THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30. OWNERSHIP CHANGES OR COMPLETED NEW CONSTRUCTION OCCURRING BETWEEN JANUARY 1 AND MAY 31 WILL RECEIVE A SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL BILL FOR THE FOLLOWING FISCAL YEAR. SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER OF RECORD AS OF THE DATE OF OWNERSHIP CHANGE OR COMPLETION OF NEW CONSTRUCTION.IF THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN SOLO, YOU WILL RECEIVE A PRORATED BILL BASED ON THE TIME YOU OWNED THE PROPERTY. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE BEFORE COMPLETING CLAIM FC --iCVEO'vWiE��'S PPOPEPT'/ PARCEL NUMBER FOR ASSESSORS USE ONLY GUS S.KRAMER,ASSESSOR Contra Cnsta County Martinez.California 94553 RECEIVED (Phone.313-7400) ADDRESS OF DWELLING DENIED 1 If Exigible.Sign and File This Form s-The Assessc� NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS Within 30 Days of the Date Printed at the Top of this`.ot,ce or By Whichever Comes Fl. SEE IN TR CT—, )NS GE ORE COMPi E, ,— Print your Social Security number and name here: If you are married and this property is "both your and your spouse's principal residence. print your spouse's Socia!Security number and mane here (THIS CLAIM FORM IS NOT SUBJECT TO PUBLIC,NSPECTIC' ur)VF PHONF WORK PHONE r - k-luI It€ UtTice Cit Assessor uus 6. Krainer Cost Assessor • 834 -AT STREET MARTINEZ,CALIFORNIA 94553+ (510, 7400+ County k.i 91 f.€_.€.. PROPERTY LOCATION: � a'�``�.r.'r,•I THIS IS N()T A TA,': BILL NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENT THE SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAW BEGAN ON JULY 1, 1983. IT REQUIRES THE ENROLLMENT OF VALUE CHANGES DUE TO CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP AND COMPLETION OF NEW CONSTRUCTION AS OF THE DATE OF THESE OCCURRENCES RATHER THAN THE FOLLOWING JANUARY 1 AS HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN THE CASE, THIS IS BEING ACCOMPLISHED BY �4 LEVYING"SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS." r .. ,. i: I:. FISCAL. EXISTING EXEMPTION NEW(BASE YEAR) CURRENT ROLL SUPPLEMENTAL YEAR AMOUNT* VALUE VALUE ASSESSMENT THE SUPPLEMENTAL BILL IS IN ADDITION TO THE REGULAR TAX BILLS BASED ON THE PRIOR ASSESSMENT AS OF JANUARY 1. THE BILL WILL BE CALCULATED USING THE SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENT, WHICH IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE NEW BASE YEAR VALUE AND THE PRIOR TAXABLE VALUE, AND WILL BE A PRORATED AMOUNT BASED ON THE NUMBER OF MONTHS REMAINING IN THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30. OWNERSHIP CHANGES OR COMPLETED NEW CONSTRUCTION OCCURRING BETWEEN JANUARY 1 AND MAY 31 WILL RECEIVE A SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL BILL FOR THE FOLLOWING FISCAL YEAR. SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER OF RECORD AS OF THE DATE OF OWNERSHIP CHANGE OR COMPLETION OF NEW CONSTRUCTION.IF THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN SOLD, YOU WILL RECEIVE A PRORATED BILL BASED ON THE TIME YOU OWNED THE PROPERTY. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE BEFORE COMPLETING _ CLAIM FOR HOMEOWNER'S PROPERT`t T;X EXEMPT?—`'l l PARCEL NUMBED FOR ASSESSOR'S USE ONLY GUS S.KRAMER,ASSESSOR — —— Contra Costa County Martinez,California 54553 RECEIVED (Phone:313-7400) ADDRESS OF DWELLING DENIED If Eligible.Sign and File This Form With The Assessor NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS Within 30 Days of the Date Printed at the Top of this Notice or By Whiaheyer Comes First SEw tN TRL1CTl5N 13EFC1 ECC) PL ING Print your Social Security number and name here: if you are married and this property is both your and your spouse's principai residence, print your spouse's Social Security number and name here: f (THIS CLAIM FORM IS NOT SUBJECT TO PUBLIC INSPECTIONt HOME PHONE. WORK PHONE ! SBE-ASCI AH 266 CARE}FRONT 12-11-83(REVISED 11-30-94? f 9R5 'Rid j." !°s _ IV, Til x x j ; H i � r f n � Cir y x. „ � a 1, s T-4 .. . ca n 44 46 40 tid 3 ` swam ca o `-•, ...t � � 1 � . . ST rat Ito A& 40D "�.• :e ME w wc .� : ... :. lij Cma VN ca t mom CA co M ca F- T, I ILA ma ? s rAW CN NC WPM maid �; ONr'1e'do•ora 866 "'CLIENT CALL-IN INPUT T HAS NON ACTIVE STATUS WARNING ON THIS DOCUMENT IT: CC BI T ZA90551 PARCEL: 097 041 004 9 TRACT: LOT: SAN DIST: DELTA DIABLO ZN 1 BENTLEY FLORENCE J SITE : 151 AMBROSE AVE ##A PITTS 94509 ED: 08 06 81 GEN CTR: LIC: UPDATED: 03 05 84 ST: C HAZMAT/AIR Q. C. : DUE: OVERRIDE : GRAD: ---------------- - ---------------------------------------------- ------- ----- PERMIT: TRACT: LOT: AREA: OVR ST INIT REMARKS R INSP DATE 07 10 98 07 10 98 07 10 98 07 10 98 07 10 98 9/98 179- 41 ef.--perxtts, ' � 1"''►n -tµ„L.%,%go r[]CW- -5 f 7: G ` C' , -' )"AJ t r17 t ` J1rrclCATIWt�tkl PEI�MtT. -BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT Per t" 90551 A Tnlr APitlicrtkm bretrrrrs! tt4 pxmit CONTRA COSTA COUNTY . wh4l" by 9ulkatt@ Dttpomhotnt P.O.Box 748 Drtr:. Mtrttittsz,CA 04583 lov* ro lir" o • ----• `Mev na D t Osmr wn o (415)372-2300 bwtwnp /� PARK DED, CHOOL DIST. r s'PS LQCITIOM: /T ploc6m r: �b 4G Yes_....NO � . ry Pyrsp; Cron ttil. T Acarw - r Y #.b.tss OMAIx1t: B s.• Powe NMbr Addrwrrr TOTAL ! TOTAL It VA'A t Car ` !l ESC Tans. t PER 9XIS M 4 WW ATIDM(Henri Maw) CCSN'MACTOII: ,f} �,,.,�, i7J 7-96 � stmw - ono IEsnAnr» , Nraw' • t s+'�d l....r.6 * .. Address of Can$ .it ✓""'7ldaraws , 11 City - toffm ba Omen: f Gmai w M.asioiN r j/ iwretaa If n '"'�- CU.Yap.of Erray. frrrrQ fill r j#3.9 Cu,vdt uP fill ` .l"� ARCwEtlt3: V"at graded las - - ._..v.,..v.... vakdalIt nwrvad s CftTo Lwrrtw♦ ...••."..ar+.c,.._.� l•.Orrt�iM th 1,61.0 Mm.ratbrak , ,±w Lina Use Dw ;Z shit QNU.' - Min.Srlr Yard Apy MinAdore" r Gg........_ r -- rz Mir rue ��. CIM Lk,+srsKr + Canaur Tr 'r •''l� \sriamta. ` T41.0 Troy U"���it.,- ,A-ji'1-� fkaad MlrsrntllJiYoAr �Qrr�..�IM.�/C.. """.ry+ ! M 0111d. t bbtw Cahsro t ws Weenw No. , P1rrt Chock a M•tkwwdMy: DIMYt, TDtra ttra'd $tsp. •+•�."-"'"••- �jtw �wa 'S Las f WeNo of na_.....�_....-, .. _. iS.iC�errra fast a " ocau" y Trtwt Carwx. fallifto ihok .{,bM1M Pugh ----L✓4'1 4 MMD llfb'LEG.2.: �- ..a— PAIM-0 t,ICEtM A C�I3MTMr>1ZTQIt!b[ UWit rIDYf! J t earrrby rfxrnt fwrtirnt krrrnrrd uhWrw* M Chao",ltaammana• rng..itb 9ict+rr+Rm tKONMiwtsat rfnd#roMnawkCa ft.ane fttsna!H 1htWi tow arw ri'P�I.•.-" `.� . y .� .( ( r._.r.-. . 1ra'rAM..C,l`lkoor^,y.A -- _ Lac NumWtr;.�....,-.�.-.�.._...:_._ ...:-« • f twrtrbt'rnrrrt bit t rnr-�rirPt trap Nur Crtnaaala�s itew'w Lasw Mx sed tai- � � �.... ._ bw+W rartawt tsero MIA vAinow and Froths want C4404 A(w oft or~tytwo. trwfrttraflr rtoo.aa4feQuOaper,wtPraw.errwrtax.aata±urtwrratnrc- f-.3''.... °,t .-•,.._... .,,,L.,��,,,, . tta�►.PMcrtaart�aweto* a+an+sMMrr►W rom+rrwfr of th Coottewpn- ae ra itt Law C t kw w hrrrrrrd eunrrw tobn liah?=a et tpr,ion 3 of the {f Lwtrwr Saw#Cvwptrr#- wNs br mw wof d Dknrwer s al the . iurrrtwrtit�lrratraranaG�M+ritsrtitltihrrrirrmaramrbrr+alar - Me&%"d esarrphon.AM wbiohon al Macon table bT rnv spplwrrtt tw a liar- � ma ts»apP+wrMt Pa r aiwt prnwtr at ort rnarvw+trMr riu+rarradte+un i a t,of avPrrer W trN pWPattr.M nor attlpp�s wah wrpts r tliFr raa two+• �` pr+nMort.wet do No work.Mat the rtrumm 4 tart uttwward ar aHrt"to ram - 16eet�t buW>rw ant!Parr Cook:The Cantrr�ah Lwanw law don nix taMawrrrar whaeulMrarrtprowivttwwan.via*ft son mill twk tinbara a tttreu h no own r"Poea,Prowfred vw rrah ropes. . ewrsrttr rrr rat hWdwt M arYMtrd tar alfa.M,twrwrvrP,tow►b+rpFnq o rnPrwAr• 1` ; � % hrrtrilraebfwlbtedosyatmoodorlowin.nraw "wpoarwswtrav;rAwauwr t arf pKMeQ Ntrt ted the rrlt btfad o alto tar bio Ptr m ar rrftf. a t,ra eMom qt awl Ion *W am rktnuk�wimrrern#en -r ,mo irsan+■a eon-' tr.+rtatrtaarrrirPaatiltPpvirrt�Or�t.'twa. a�Pror..krasrcaw:Tw, t COrltrt%!e'rtcflilNCNNaAIG"t' Cartlrrcwr dal!no spot'to on owfw of pbgrtr who tow"of 1 M rbv Job'"'pwI mite#r dbnlUuo"an „ rtltt�l,� ttradraY tar'.auah a aaMrrebr4k3 of 7M we lar wNM tMt ftrWm+It N I+Mufa! . Drtr r iyMNN:1wI+M rYIMl tpia inttaM' ►tlWYr61M! ' M t' r Nttwtt a otrt orarttb pit ( wtbtanrpi aept+rnrtrrtdfxwlaw MMMatrtrakrM •. , ,'yatlartiMirweeatlt3rrteol�G3. �b anwr reaae at4al s3 OYMlitld W}'ty M+t h+rrMMtrd. -. a Crt.►Mwt a 1010 bo"lerrrauatt drprtwikwrrt er t. aet rthr. ....w ._.-gbgatfnarit _ + t 'tulle" II61lk bIMAltttlf Ibbrwtrw r;Ilwtrtttf dfMbMr,�� r ' iO ' ' v't 3 5- LEF2844 BI PROPERTY tACTERISTICS UPS:;. WARNING ON THIS DOCUMENT ,PERMIT: CC BI RF RF890791 PARCEL: 097 041 004 9 TRACT: LOT: CITY: SAN DIST: DELTA DIABLO ZN 1 PERMIT ISSUED: 11 29 89 SITE: 151 AMBROSE OWNR: LE HOA HIEU NOTF: P 0 BOX 915 94526 DANVILLE CA ************************ GRAD PMT. ****************************** AREA PITTS TRA.: 79024 OVERRIDE TRA: 79 101 ZONE: M-29 C.T. : 3141 . 00 TRACT LOT LUP# : ST. : 151 AMBROSE AVE #A CROSS ST: MAX HT: *05 STORIES : *05 MIN SETBACK: 25' MIN SIDEYARD: 20' AGG MIN: TOTAL 40 ' REAR YARD: 20 ' HAZARDOUS MAT/AIR Q.C. : SCHOOL DIST: MT DIABLO UNI DRAINAGE FEE: 2574 FIRE DIST: RIVERVIEW FIRE SEISMIC ZN: PARK DED: FLOOD ZN: AREA OF BENEFITS : AOB W PITTS RD ECCTC (SR4) AOB NOTIF 3105 LONE TREE WAY #D ANTIOCH CA 94509 CHECK ALL UNITS FOR DAMAGE. UNIT A CHECK GAP IN FLOOR, IN UNIT C CHECK BEDROOM CEILING. PER BILL MARTINDALE STATUS : C APPROVED: PGT {AS OF: 11 29 89 OVR: DATE: 11 29 89 06/23/98 LEF2844 ' BI PROPERTY rZ.A.CTERISTICS ul,, WARNING ON THIS DOCUMENT PERMIT: CC BI RF RF970116 PARCEL: 097 041 004 9 TRACT: LOT: CITY: SAN DIST: DELTA DIABLO ZN 1 PERMIT ISSUED: 03 26 97 SITE: 151 AMBROSE ANTE OWNR: PURCELL EARL J & SUZANNE J NOTF: P 0 BOX 915 94526 DANVILLE CA * *** * * * * ** * GRAD PMT. AREA BAYPT TRA: 79024 OVERRIDE TRA: 79 024 ZONE: M-29 C.T. : 3141 .01 TRACT LOT LUP#: ST. : 151 AMBROSE AVE #A CROSS ST: MAX HT: *05 STORIES : *05 MIN SETBACK: 25 ' MIN SIDEYARD: 20 ' AGG MIN: TOTAL 40 ' REAR YARD: 20' HAZARDOUS MAT/ATR Q.C. : SCHOOL DIST: MT DIABLO UNI DRAINAGE FEE: 2574 FIRE DIST: SEISMIC ZN: PARK DED: FLOOD ZN: X AREA OF BENEFITS : AOB EAST CC MIT ECCTC (SR4) AOB AOB W PITTS RD NOTIF P 0 BOX 117 DIABLO CA 94528 SUBSTANDARD LIVING CONDITIONS TO INCLUDE SEWAGE LEAKS--BAD ELECTRIC-BAD WINDOWS STATUS: 1Y APPROVED: DCF (AS OF: 03 26 97 OVR: ) DATE: 03 26 97 06/23/98 1, BLDG INSP INQUIRY -- ENT. PARCEL NBR 097 - 041 - 0�-. WARNING ON THIS PARCEL ,PCL NO 097 -041-004-9 SITE 151 AMBROSE AVE #A BAYPT USE CODE 13 100. 0% S OWNR LE HOA HIEU NOTF P O BOX 915 94526 DANVILLE CA **************************** BUILDING INSPECTION SITE DESC ENES AMBROSE #2 POR LOT 26 NTC TO FROM SCHOOL FEE ACRE **** TRA 79024 **** PARS{ DED CEN-TRT 3141 . 01 CONSOLIDATED FIRE DRNGE FEE 2574 ZONING M-29 DELTA DIABLO ZN 1 SEISMIC ZN FLD HZD ZN EL CONTRA COSTA WATER SUP DIST 5 TRACT MT DIABLO UNIFIED **PERMITS** AG DP AR NUMBER CD TYPE SP ISSUED LAST ACT ST CLASS LIC NO CC BI 5 RF970116 RF 03/26/97 05/27/98 1Y CC BI 5 RF890791 RF 11/29/89 12/14/89 C CC BI ZA90551 T R3ALT 08/06/81 03/05/84 C 06/22/98 HIT PA1 FOR TAX DIST OVERFLOW LFF2765 LEF2844 Bl PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS UPDATE ,PROCEED WITH UPDATE. . . PERMIT: CC BI RF RF930399 PARCEL: 097 041 003 1 TRACT LOT: CITY: SAN DIST: DELTA DIABLO ZN 1 PERMIT ISSUED: 08 18 93 SITE: 151 AMBROSE AVE #C BAYPT OWNR: PURCELL EARL J & SUZANNE J NOTF: P O BOX 915 94526 DANVILLE CA ******+********** ****** GRAD PMT` AREA PITTS TRA: 79024 OVERRIDE TRA: 79 101 ZONE: M-29 C.T. : 3141 . 01 TRACT LOT LUP#: ST. : 151 AMBROSE AVE #C CROSS ST: MAX HT: *05 STORIES : *05 MIN SETBACK: 25' MIN SIDEYARD: 20' AGG MIN: TOTAL 40' REAR YARD: 20' HAZARDOUS MAT/AIR Q.C. : SCHOOL DIST: MT DIABLO UNI DRAINAGE FEE: 2574 FIRE DIST: RIVERVIEW FIRE SEISMIC ZN: PARK DED: FLOOD ZN: AREA OF BENEFITS: ECCTC (SR4) AOB AOB W PITTS RD NOTIF P O BOX 117 DIABLO CA 94528 ' SEWAGE BACKING UP INTO TUB & TOILET FLOORS THROUGH OUT HOUSE UNSTABLE UNIT B STATUS : C APPROVED: DCF (AS OF: 08 18 93 OVR: } DATE: 08 18 93 06/22/98 j 1 r LEM2842 COMMENTS INQUIRY/UPDATE COMMENT KEY: RF RF930399 ST DATE NER AG DP INT S CD TEXT PR 08 18 93 3 CC BI PMS SEWAGE BACKING UP INTO TUB & TOILET FLOORS THROUGH OUT HOUSE UNSTABLE UNIT B 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 LAST PAGE BLDG INSP IN( UIRY -- ENTER PARCEL NB 097 - 041 - 003 PCL NO 097-041-003-1 S 1 AMBROSE AVE #C BAYPT USE CODE 13 100. 0% S OWNR LE HOA HIEU NOTF P 0 BOX 915 94526 DANVILLE CA **************************** BUILDING INSPECTION SITE DESC ENES AMBROSE #2 POR LOT 26 NTC TO FROM SCHOOL FEE ACRE 0. 166 **** TRA 79024 **** PARK DED CEN--TRT 3141 . 01 CONSOLIDATED FIRE DRNGE FEE 2574 ZONING M-29 DELTA DIABLO ZN 1 SEISMIC ZN FLD HZD ZN EL CONTRA COSTA WATER SUP DIST 5 TRACT MT DIABLO UNIFIED **PERMITS** AG DP AR NUMBER CD TYPE SP ISSUED LAST ACT ST CLASS LIC NO CC BI 5 RF930399 RF 08/18/93 09/24/93 C 06/22/98 HIT PA1 FOR TAX DIST OVERFLOW �'' LFF+2765 Y i .1.11.1. ......... ......... ......... ......_.........._...... ......... _ . ...._ ......... ......... ........ ......._.. ............. .......... ............. .111.1....... ...._.... ..._..... PUNNING INQUIRY -- ENT. PARCEL N R 097 - 041 PCL NO 097-041-004-9 SITE 151 AMBROSE AVE #A BAYPT USE CODE 13 100 . 0% S OWNR LE HOA HIEU NOTF P 0 BOX 915 94526 DANVILLE CA ******************************** PLANNING **************** r******************** PLAN AREA TO **** TRA. 79024 **** SPEC/RED PLAN FROM CONSOLIDATED FIRE PARK DED LAND- 40, 000 CO SERV AREA L--100 ZONING M-29 E-17 IMPR- 29, 000 EMS - 1 ZONE B CENSUS TRACT 3141 , 01 TOTL- 69, 000 EMS - 1 ZONE C SEISMIC ZN EMS - 1 ZONE D GENRL PLAN TBD FLD HZD ZN EL CO SERV AREA P-6 SCHOOL FEE DRNGE FEE 2574 CC RES CONSV SUP DIST 5 ACREAGE MOSQUITO ABATE 1 DESC ENES AMBROSE #2 POR LOT 26 DELTA DIABLO ZN 1 **APPLICATIONS** AMBRSE RECR & PARK AG DP PL NO. CD DESC LOT C APP RCVD HRNG/FNL ST CONTRA COSTA WATER EAST BAY REGNL PK EAST BAY REG PK BD MT DIABLO UNIFIED 06/23/98 HIT PA1 FOR OVE � LFF2763 lb �ti 'til l ! ......... ....... ........... ._....._..... .._...._. ....... ..... ._....... ......... _ __ ...._...... ...... ....._...._... .............................................. ENTER PCL: 097 041 004 BLDG 2 BLDG 2 OF 2 :.PCL NO 097-041-004-9 SITUS 151 AMBROSE AVE #A BAYPT USE/RSP 13-1 100.0% S ACRES NBHD 3113 ZONE M-29 OWNER LE HOA HIEU FROM PCL DESC: ENES AMBROSE #2 POR LOT 26 UPDATED 04/25,/97 ********* RESIDENTIAL DATA RECORD ********** IMPR EFYR RCN ** RCLND CLASS 3. 50 F CEN A/H N LDPROB N RES1 1920 �t480 MODEL GAR CON N TOPOG L RES2 BED 1 YR BLT 1949 NUISANCE N BSMT BATH 1.0 MOD S'I'R N TLA $ 52. 5 480 25,200 15,246 TOT RMS 3 SETTING T UNF COND P AREA 6240 GAR/CP GAR/CP NN USABLE 6240 PPD 144 STALLS 0 BLV 50000 POOL ADD N TEMP VAL N BLF 1.00 POOL REMODEL A LAND$ 50000 MB RMK: 2 HOUSES IN POOR GOND 6-25-=92 SALE TOTAL 25,200 15,246 RMK: AAB 96-4098 WD 4-24-97 RMK: BONDS **ROLL********LAND********IMPR*******TOTAL***USE*****APPR# **VRC****LAST VALUED* 99 40,800 29, 580 70, 380 13--1 IF 10--08-97 06/29/98 (HIT PA1 FOR ACTIVITY) LCF0951 _. 1111..... _.._..... ............_._.. __......111.11,11,11111.111, . .. . .......... ...._....... ........ ............. . ......... ......... ......... ......... ........_..__. ....... ........._.......__................ ENTER PCL: 097 041 003 BLDG 2 BLDG 2 OF 2 PCL NO 097-041-003-1 SITUS 151 AMBROSE AVE #C BAYPT USE/RSP 13-1 100.0% S ACRES . 166 NBHD 3113 ZONE M-29 OWNER LE HOA HIED FROM PCL DESC: ENES AMBROSE #2 POR LOT 26 UPDATED 04/25/97 ********* RESIDENTIAL DATA RECORD ********** IMPR EFYR ** SQFT ** RCN ** RCLND CLASS 3.50 F CEN A/H N LDPROB N RES1 1929 480 MODEL GAR CON N TOPOG L RES2 BED 1 YR BLT 1949 NUISANCE N BSMT BATH 1.0 """ MOD STR N TLA $ 52.5 480 25, 200 16, 380 TOT RMS 3 SETTING N UNF COND P AREA 7500 GAR/CP GAR/CP NN USABLE 7500 PPD 144 STALLS 0 BLV 50000 POOL ADD N TEMP VAL N BLF 1.00 POOL REMODEL P LAND$ MB RMK: 2 HOUSES IN POOR COND 6-25-92 SALE TOTAL 25,200 16,380 RMK: AAB 96-4099 WD 4-24-97 RMK: BONDS **ROLL********LAND********IMPR*******TOTAL***USE*****APPR# **VRC****LAST VALUED* 99 30, 600 18,360 48,960 13--1 IF 10-08-97 06/29/98 (HIT PA1 FOR ACTIVITY) LCF0951 ENTER PCL: 097 041 003 BLDG 1 BLDG 1 OF 2 PCL NO 097-041-003-1 SITUS 151 AMBROSE AVE #C BAYPT USE/RSP 13-1 100. 0* S ACRES . 166 NBHD 3113 ZONE M-29 OWNER LE HOA HIEU FROM PCL DESC: ENES AMBROSE #2 POR LOT 26 UPDATED 04/25/97 ********* RESIDENTIAL DATA RECORD ********** IMPR EFYR ** SQFT ** RCN ** RCLND CLASS 4.00 F CEN A/H N LDPROB N RES1 1920 663 MODEL GAR CON N TOPOG L RES2 BED 1 YR BLT 1930 NUISANCE N BSMT BATH 1.0 MOD STR N TLA $ 51. 6 653 34,211 20, 698 TOT RMS 3 SETTING N UNF GOND P AREA 7500 GAR/CP GAR/CP NN USABLE 7500 PPD 57 STALLS 0 BLV 50000 POOL ADD N TEMP VAL N BLF 1. 00 POOL REMODEL P LAND$ 50000 MB 1958 $ 1530 3, 949 711 RMI . 2 HOUSES IN POOR COND 6-25-92 SALE TOTAL 38, 160 21,409 RME: AAB 96-4099 WD 4-24-97 SUMMATION 87,789 RMK: BONDS **ROLL********LAND********IMPR*******TOTAL***USE*****APPR# **VRC****LAST VALUED* 99 30, 600 18, 360 48,960 13-1 IF 10-08-97 06/29/98 (HIT PAl FOR ACTIVITY) LCF0951 ENTER PCL: 097 041 004 BLDG 1 BLDG 1 OF 2 PCL NO 097-041-004-9 SITUS 1.51 AMBROSE AVE #A BAYPT USE/RSP 13-1 100.0% S ACRES NBHD 3113 ZONE M-29 OWNER LE HOA HIEU FROM PCL DESC: ENES AMBROSE #2 POR LOT 26 UPDATED 04/25/97 ********* RESIDENTIAL DATA RECORD ********** IMPR EFYR ** SQFT ** RCN ** RCLND CLASS 4.00 F CEN A/H N LDPROB N RES1 1900 1173 MODEL OAR CON N TOPOG L RES2 -�-- BED 4 YR BLT 1920 NUISANCE N BSMT BATH 2.0 MOD STR N TLA $ 44.4 1173 52,081 26,301 TOT RMS 8 SETTING T UNF COND P AREA 6240 GAR/CP GAR/CP NN USABLE 6240 PPD 126 STALLS 0 BLV 50000 POOL ADD Y TEMP VAL N BLF 1.00 POOL REMODEL A LAND$ 50000 MB TOTAL 52, 081 26, 301 RMK:(- 2 HOUSES)IN POOR COND 6-25-92 SALE RMK:� 98 WD 4-24-97 SUMMATION 91,547 RMK: BONDS **ROLL********LAND********IMPR*******TOTAL***USE*****APPR# **VRC****LAST VALUED* 99 40,800 29,580 70,380 13-1 IF 10-08-97 06/29/98 (HIT PAI FOR ACTIVITY) LCF0951 i -� -► ' 04 7-6 .11�lell-IIT� .................. ......... ............ .....................I.......................................................... evv /j- / vir J -' � ,/ l ems- �' 7t4 -.2 CIL Wee .1111._. ......... ......... ......... 1.111.. ... .......... ....11.1.1. .. .... ........ .............._......._.. ..................__....._.............._. .......... ......_.. ......... ......... ......... ___ ............................ ,4,,• c�,.��� � L�-�-�-_ �C r. mac. L-v z.�.�,.�G: ' t wee ' 4 51 kt so �''`�- _. _.. ......... ......... ....._... ...._.... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ....... ......... ........ ........ ....... . ........ ......... ............ ........._........_...._..._.......... The I I"' of.lune, 1998. To Mr Carlos Baltidano Director of Building Inspection Dept (Re: 151 A Ambrose Ave, Bay Point) Dear Mr Carlos, Your inspector, Mr Tim, believes there is only one house legally built at this property, that includes two parcel 097-041-003-1 and 097-041-004-9,therefore he posted the notice and order to abate against all four houses. I will prove his assumption is wrong and these ordersto abate are illegal.. -According to county assessor who sent the property tax bill for fiscal year 1997-1998 this property has two parcel and BOTH HAS IMPROVEMENTS. The first parcel (07-041-004-9) was assessed for land and improvements of$76,000. The second one { 9097-041-003-1) has the net value of$70,572 for land and improvements. So, they prove that the assumption of only one house was allowed to buili is wrong and prove there is at least two houses were legally built. - The office of assessor sent us two tax bill, one for the first parcel with the address 151 A Ambrose Ave. If there is only one house on this parcel, there is no reason to give it number 151 'A. The correct address must be 151 Ambrose . When county assessor put the address 151 A, that means there is 151 Ambrose house exist,or there is two houseslegally built on this parcel. - The same with the second parcel, they sent us tax bill to the address 151 C Ambrose. That means it does exist 151 B Ambrose Ave. If there is only one house on this parcel, its address must be 151 B, there is no reason to have it the address 1510. With address 151 C , that means there are two house,(151 B and 151 C) legally exist on this second parcel. ' s '� .0 r .._...... ...................... ......... ......... ......... ...._.... _. _. .. ......... ......... ......... ........................................................................................ - Therefore I request you rescind these orders to abate against this property and send us a letter to clarify this problem so that we present to tenant who are panic.. - The tenants report the complaint about your inspector who came and disturd them every day. These harassements are against the law. And they also report your inspector told them do not pay the rent.. That means this property will be foreclosed sooner or later. Again, your order to abate issued on 27`x' of May and the disconnection of PCE service at 151 A are not right. 'I want the PCE service restored. Thank you for your attention Respectfully Yours, Liem Le Manager of 151 Ambrose Ave, Bay Point. P.0 Box 915 Danville, CA 94526. (925)709-1063. PS: I just met Mr Tony Azores, a general contractor who built quality houses in Blackhawk and Orinda. He made a careful inspection of this small one bedroom house, about 480 'sghre feet (20 fl by 24 ft). His opinions and suggestions are: - Inside, this house is in good condition and looks nice. Only some minor things need fixed: install closet door, replace two windows with crack glass, relate kitchen faucet. - Outside, it need repair the foundation that has a hole as big as a computer keyboard (about 6 inches wide and 14 inches high, I did not see it when I wrote a letter to Mr Tim because it was covered by bush) and a gap, about 2 inches.high and 4 feet long between concrete and lumber.). - There is an attached shed, 7ft by 10 ft that looks like a storage area, but many years ago, some one intalled the washer hoof tip, that means converted it into a utility room.. It needs rebuild it , or disconnect the plumbing and convert it back to a storage shed. - Besides, he recommanded to rebuild the porch and install ivew siding. - PS 2: Mr Tim just posted again on June 4h the NOTICE AND ORDER TO BATE at this 151A house with allow me to appeal. He told nye he did it on the 12"' of May (that I didn't know). Why he posted it the second time? Whether the first one is not legal? How about the notice to vacate and abate he posted on the 27`1' of May? And is it legal the order to disconnect the PCE service issued on the 271h of May.? - Anh he posted this notice at all other houses that mares the tenants frightened and makes me confused. It seems that all the notice and order to abate has the same address (151 Ambrose) but the mailing addreswf thixhouses are different. I would like to iMow your Department wants to debate one house located at 151 A Ambrose or all the four house (151, 151 A, 151 B, 151 C and a studio at 15 1 D Ambrose)? And I has to make an appeal or four appealtLease give Anil an explanation. Thank you very much. RECEIVED IN JUL 1 4 W8 XDSu s s , f 14 i �- V ' - IYY 71 RLQC EST "'Y O 8'PEAj;F©RM (3) XZ TZ LIXIT ► � Cam lete this form and place it' in the box near the,, speakers' rostru-m before addressing the Board. Phone: N ame City. Address tion. n for myself yr organisa Z tem speaks. ECIC 01m: ,,� Date. wish to speak 'on Agenda item # Z --- against against My comments will be general for Z wish to speak on the subJ Oct of ; ea then cry n f�r the Z do not wish toepee b Board to consider. July 13, 1998 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: During Richard P. Groff and Florence J. Bentley's ownership of 151 Ambrose Avenue we made the following major repairs that required a permit and at all times we had a permit: 1. Replaced the roof, the kitchen foundation and the front bedroom fecundation at the big house. Norm Ventorino was the building inspector. 2. Replaced the electrical service to the big house and the small house directly behind the big house, 3. Replaced the gas line to the small house directly behind the big house. At all tithes during our ownership of the property located at 151 Ambrose Avenue a building permit was obtained if the repairs necessitated it at 151, 151A, 15111, 15 IC. ' J Florence J, rt e s. � '� `� {y- � '--'�'•' � ,� CjF'�� ,�"-?"fir,.. �,, �� ��„� -ilk"..'}''./�m�-{�'�,_'."'""1.... tr��"j'`� C..,.-.'.��G�'� ¢.,'Z-f'• �.�^" >�t-°'.,�'�`""'r i., REQUEST TO ePEAX FORx "` (THREE (3) KINUTA LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the rostra before addressing the Board. speakers,* / 2sme: Phone: F�` AddressZ�4 City: _.. I an speaking for myself ' or organization: (now of orwitation) CHECK ONE: - I wish to speak on Agenda Item # Ti e. My comments will be: general for agai , I wish to speak on the subject of .. , I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to considers ................... ..................... ....... ............ ................ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING IN THE MATTER OF HOA HIEU LE P.O. Box 915 DANVILLE CA Re: Appeal ........ 1' SENDER: 1 also wish to receive the a Unipislo items I aridlor 2 for addllicnal se-vi-.es. I v Comple'ts Perris 3,4a.and 4b. lollowing services(for an I declare under penz vt Pnrt your nam.6 and address or the reverse of this form so that we ca h return!his extra fee): Ailach+!is fors-.to the front of n he maliplace,or en the back q apace does not I E3 Addressee's Address card to�vo'u a have been, a citizen of the 11� Permit. s PJ "Ret�;rn Reveipf Peque,5ted'on,triie rnaipiece b9iow the ar"cie number. 2.0 Restricted Delivery 0 Mail with Contra Costa Cor 1; 0 z sire Return Raceiptw;i;show to whom t'16 arlide was delivered are,'the date Service in Martinez,followil Califoi d"'-n5d Consult postmaster for fee. above matter to the 5 3 Article Addressed to: 4& m Article Number P 160 254 223 ir 4b.Service Type E 0 Registereo LAN HUYNH DO LIEM HIEU LE ........................... 0-E)MIess. . ..... 5 713 CASKEY ST. BAY POINT CA 94565 r, SENDER: i #a;s-,,,,vi;h to'receivehe a Complete items 1 andior 2`or additional ssrvic, a comp;ets items 3.4a,a-so 4o, to"Ming services(folar CJ ?tin?yo ", m ur naaad&ess on the reverse of iNa 10,1.m so that vie can reex. 14;rn this I LAN HUYNH DO ?tin?rlira;-- i —1. 713 CASKEY ST. s Attach—,form,!o tne front of the snailplece,or on the back if s�,aca does -,ot 0 Addressee's Address a ow is numb-1 2,0 Restricted Delivery I the anic BAY POINT CA 94565 consult postmaster for too. o 3.Article Addressed to: __fin. Number HOA HIEU LEP 1-6.0.....7-9;.& 71q P.O. BOX 915 DANVILLE CA 94526 "0' SENDER- I also wish to receive e !ve tr1e '0 is�ornp!ete iterns 4 and/of 2 for add;sopa;services. follo�Nring services(for an i Sas a Compiate terns 3 4a,and 4b, 0 *pr!n4 yo oma and address on the revers..of thr;$form.so that we can,return this extra fee) M LIEM HIEU LE ca;to you. a All lach ths form to the front of the rnailpiece,or on the back if space does no, 1.0 Addressee's Address P.O. BOX 915 perWrIte'Peturn F?--cajp,'Requestea'on.,the ma:06ce belo-0 the artiole number. 2�D Restricted Delivoty DANVILLE CA 9452 0 = a The swum Revair,wi:i sfiew,to whom the artic�lz was cialivered am the daza 6 delivered, Consult postmaster for fee. C 5 3.Article Addressed to: Y —4aXrticle Number LAN HUYNH DO It P 160 254 226 'R : P.O. BOX 915 LIEM LE 4b,Service Type DANVILLE CA 94526 151 AMBROSE AVENUE Registered -4r`fied BAY POINT CA 94565 Express Mai, 0 Insured Ej nett#r receipt for k%rchandjse 0 COD 7 Dat f Do" LIEM LE -- ate 0 151 AMBROSE AVENUE re: 7/14 AGDM Id' BAY POINT CA 94565 :Z —57.Re iv;d 13}� 8.Addrossee:s Address(0?7!y if requested and fee'spad) HOA HIEU LE 4 8 Signature- Wr-A g,9,1, 7KIA ftP o X 151 AMBROSE AVENUE Z� BAY POINT CA 94565 PS Form 3811,December 199-4 Domestic Return Receipt .................... .......... 6,Signature: (� "dr-0 eorA ;nt) Z` X I declare under penaltForm 3811,De,-9mbif994 'A102595�98- -G229 Domestic Return Receipt 2 PS --r L4 Dated: June 26, 1998, at Martinez, Californ a. 05, jt &A4&-W$W`S A wes 0 TOTAL Postage a F:. ePuty"Clerk co $ posifna4k OVC-sla 0 The Board of Supervisors Contra f`sowd Co wnty AdmInWtmbon Suiitiing Costa o{s000 i 651 Pine SVeet,Room 106 Ma rdnez,CWHomis 94553-1263 County ."ft we'fat m*10 GiryM&ua�iaiwna,aa�d oiatriat ' '.' Dorm fAa bW'Std aNOtriCt Wilt oatl{at**W,4th Di trial .Moa Gnoitrrtitla 6th Diftid June 26, 1998 Hoa Hieu Le Liern Hieu Le Lan Huynh Do P.O. Box 915 Danville CA 94526 Dear Mr.Le, Mr. Le and Mr. Do: In accordance with Contra Costa County Ordinance Code Section 14-6.414, you are hereby notified that lluesday, July 14, 1998, at 2:00 p.m., is the slate and time set for the hearing in the Board of Supervisors` Chambers, 651 Pine Street, Room 107, Martinez, California, of your appeal from the decision of the County Abatement Officer declaring the substandard buildings, located at 151 Ambrose Avenue, Bay Point, CA in violation of Section 712-2.004 and 712-2.006 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code and declaring said violation a public nuisance (Contra Costa County Ordinance Code Section 14-6.410)• The hearing will be conducted in accordance with procedures set forth in Contra. Costa County Ordinance Code Section 14-6.418. A copy of the Uniform Public Nuisance Abatement Procedure is enclosed for your reference. If you challenge this matter in Court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the County at, or prior to, the public hearing. Very truly yours, PHIL BATCHELOR, County Administrator aniClerk of the Rnard B. A,1j, )14,4,X LDF-PUTY(TE attachment cc:County Counsel Building Inspection File List CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Clerk of the Board Inter-Office Memo TO: Carlos Baltodano, Director Building Inspection Department Attn: Tim Griffith, Building Inspector I DATE: June 9, 1998 FROM: Barbara Grant, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Board of Supervisors SUBJECT: Appeal by Hoa Hieu Le from the decision of the County Abatement Officer declaring as a public nuisance (C.C.C. Ordinance Section 14-6.410) substandard buildings in violation of(C.C.C. Ordinance CodeSection 712- 2.004 and 712-2.006) on property located at 151 Ambrose Ave. Bay Point. This office is in receipt of the attached Appeal and Filing Fee by Hoa Hieu Le from the decision of the County Abatement Officer (Tim Griffith) declaring as a public nuisance (C.C.C. Ordinance Code Section 14-6.410) substandard buildings in violation of(C.C.C. Ordinance Code Section 712-2.004 and 712-2.006) on property located at 151 Ambrose Ave., Bay. This appeal has been tentatively scheduled for hearing by the Board of Supervisors on Ady 14, 1998 at 2:00 p.m. in the Board Chambers. Please notify this office in writing by June 15, 1998, whether this appeal should be heard or if it is untimely or there is any other reason it should not be heard by the Board of Supervisors. If the appeal is timely and should be heard, please include the names and addresses of parties to be notified in addition to the Appellant. If the appeal is to be heard on July 14,1998 at 2:00 p.m. as scheduled, please submit the appropriate material for Board consideration to this office by June 22, 1998.. Thank you. B:bg attachment cc: County Counsel L.- 4 19 N.O/ r 4 a 5/5 �. ' -/ 6 0395 LIEM HiEU LE LAN HUYNH DO ao-rana�y 713 CASKEY ST. 51D-709-1063 HAY POINT,CA 94565 '64� 39 PAY TO THE ' ORDER OF 4 $ DOLLARS"Z�o X��414 --4- W cn■cera oma 13901 v�.,u3v�r,�ss go,►n.xv. Ca CORM CALWORMA%S20 BANK&�EST FOR 1: 12110071321: 039S 13 2110453n' 6113 IV OWNER: -- ftq xieu Le *•N 0 T Z C S AON D a R. D $ R T O A B A T Ell C. C. C. ORDINANCE CODE 14 -6.410 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the substandard buildincxs are in violation of Section 712-2.004 & 712-2.006 of the Centra Costa County Ordinance Cade. The violation has been declared a public nuisance byTimothy-B. Griffith. , -Building Inspector I and must be abated immediately. The public nuisance is on property located at 151 Ambra a Ave, Ba P 'nt APN# 097--041-004 & 097-041-003. YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED TO ABATE SAID PUBLIC NUISANCE within 10 ten consecutive calendar days from the issuance of this order. The issuance date is specified below. You may abate the nuisance by legally rehabilitating or dgmolishing-all structures. If you fail to abate the public nuisance within the number of days specified, the county may order this abatement by public employees, private contractor, or other means. The cast of said abatement, if not paid, may be levied and assessed against the property as a special assessment lien and may be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary county taxes are collected, subject to the same penalties, procedures and sales in case of delinquency. YOU MAY APPEAL FROM THIS ORDER OF ABATEMENT, but any such appeal must be brought prior to the expiration of the number of days specified above for completion of abatement. The appeal must be in writing; specify the reasons for the appeal; contain you name, address and telephone number; be accompanied by an appeal fee of ONE. HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE dollars ($125.00) ; and be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at the following address. Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, County of Contra Costa 551 Pine Street, 1st Floor, Martinez CA 94553 One who is legally indigent may obtain a waiver of the appeal fee. Upon timely receipt of the appeal and accompanying fee, or waiver, the Clerk of the Board will cause the matter to be set for hearing before the Board of Supervisors and notify you of the date and location of the hearing. If you have any questions regarding this matter, you may direct them to the county officer issuing this notice at the address or telephone number listed below. ISSUANCE DATE: June 4. 1998 Timoth fit. Griffith. . Building Inspector I 651 fine st, 4th floor, Martinez, CA 94553 (925) 335-1113 MINI FORM.ABT _.,.,,.,,....,.....�... RECEIVED c C��a4 8WOO 03 GO 33H t Isla K 7 I { i r ' __ 1 I i r i J l i i I t e ., ►