Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 07141998 - C181 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD,PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: JULY 14, 1998 SUBJECT: CONTRA COSTA CLEAN WATER PROGRAM AGREEMENT and SECOND MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT, 1998 -2003, COUNTYWIDE L Recommended Action: 1. ADOPT the attached Resolution to apply for reissuance of the Municipal Stormwater NPDES Permit and ACCEPT and ADOPT the Contra Costa Clean Water Program Stormwater Management Plan for 1998-2003, 2. AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director to execute a program agreement with the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the eighteen incorporated cities of Contra Costa to jointly administer the Contra Costa Clean Water Program(Program)for the period July 1, 1998 through the life of the Program, or until such time as the agreement is terminated or amended. IL Financial Impact: None to the General Fund. The unincorporated County's participation in the Contra Costa Clean Water Program is funded with Flood Control District assessments from Sto water Utility Area 17. Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE: w ~- RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION July 14, 1998APPROVED AS RECOM ENDED—x I hereby certify that this is a true and correct VOTE OF SUPERVISORS copy of an action taken; and entered on the X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT None ) minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the AYES: NOES: date shown. ABSENT; ABSTAIN: ATTESTED:_ / �Board* MI/LMs:c1 PHIL{�BATD#i�LOf , Cierk ofthe g:GrpData%fldcdflLind&\BON798PrimAgt of Supervisors and �d unty Administrator Oris.Div: Public Works(PCE) Contact: Linda Balkeley,(925)333-2238 cc: Public Wotics-Flood Control Engineering By Deputy County Administrator County Counsel _. .. _ SECOND JOINT MUNICIPAL NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION, 1998-2003 8t CONTRA COSTA CLEAN WATER PROGRAM AGREEMENT, COUNTYWIDE JULY 14, 1998 PAGE - 2 - III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: The County is completing implementation of its first five year Municipal Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)Permit and has developed,in coordination with the other nineteen (19)co-permittees, a Stormwater Management Plan for submittal to the State for reissuance of the Permit. This Permit is federally mandated through the Clean Water Act which was amended in 1987 to specifically address stormwater pollution. The Permit's goal is to stop the discharge of pollution from storm drain systems. Adoption of this Resolution will begin the formal application process with the San Francisca and Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Boards for reissuance of the Permit. Adoption of the Resolution on July 14, 1998 is essential. The Contra Costa Clean Water Program Manager plans to submit the Resolutions from the County and the other co-permittees to the State on July 16, 1998. The San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board asked for the submittal several months ago. Because the Permit requires co-permittees to work together as one program,the Board of Supervisors is also being asked to authorize execution of a Contra Costa Clean Water Program Agreement (Program Agreement). Together the County,its 18 incorporated cities, and the Flood Control and Water Conservation District form the Contra Costa Clean Water Program. The Program Agreement outlines the organizational framework of the joint Clean Water Program,responsibilities of Group Program staff and of participating agencies, and cost allocation of the Group Program to the participating agencies. This Board Order is requesting the Board of Supervisors to authorize the County to enter into the Program Agreement as a participating agency. The Program Agreement encourages consistency between the different agencies' activities, enables Group Program staff to represent agency members at State and other governmental meetings, and provides for joint activities such as monitoring and payment of Permit fees. Specific tasks to be performed by the participating agencies and Group Program staff are outlined in detail in the Stormwater Management Plan. The Board of Supervisors approved a similar Program Agreement in 1993 for the first Permit. At that time, the agreement included both program and cost payment components. During revisions of the Program Agreement,most of the cost payment component was removed and will be sent',separately as a stand alone agreement to the Board of Supervisors at a later date. The central and substantive core of the application is the Stormwater Management Plan. It is an exhaustive list of tasks the County plans to undertake during the next five years to prevent,reduce and/or eliminate the discharge of pollution from the storm drain system. The tasks include: 1) Inspection and regulation of commercial and industrial operations,with a strong focus on new development and construction; 2) In-house maintenance activities of the Public Works and General Services departments; 3) Public education outreach to explain stormwater pollution and to encourage voluntary pollution prevention; 4) Controls on illegal dumping; 5) Monitoring activities to determine the effectiveness of various 'pollution prevention and reduction practices; and 6) Watershed management activities that will involve both citizens and government agencies. Many of the tasks were begun under the Stormwater Management Plan for the first five year permit, e.g. mobilizing the Planners, Building and Grading Inspectors to enforce a new County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Ordinance, contracting with the Health Services department for stormwater inspections of industry,public education outreach,and routine street sweeping in targeted areas of the County. Other tasks, such as watershed management activities, are new. SECOND JOINT MUNICIPAL NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION, 1598-2003 & CONTRA COSTA CLEAN WATER PROGRAM'AGREEMENT, COUNTYWIDE JULY 14, 1998 PAGE - 3 - The Storrnwater Management Plan has undergone some public review. It will be more thoroughly reviewed during the Permit reissuance application period that requires a formal public hearing process. The proposed Stormwater Management Plan and Annual Reports summarizing County and other co-permittees accomplishments are available for review in the Public Works department.The Annual Report is submitted each year in September to the Regional Water Quality Control Boards.Both documents are several hundred pages long. IV. Conseguenees of Negative Action. The County will most likely be found not in compliance with the Federal Clean Water Act. Administrative fines by the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for non-compliance can be in the thousands of dollars per day. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIFORNIA Adopted this Resolution on July 14, 1998 by the following vete: AYES: Supervisors Uilkema, Gerber, DeSaulnier, Canciamilla, and Rogers NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Norte RESOLUTION NO. 98/ 3 71 SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR REISSUANCE OF THE COUNTY'S MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT and TO ACCEPT AND ADOPT THE CONTRA COSTA CLEAN WATER PROGRAM STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR 1998-2003 WHEREAS, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, under amendments to the 1987 Federal Clean Water Act, imposed regulations mandating local governments to reduce to the maximum extent practicable the amount of pollutants in stormwater discharged from municipal storm drain conveyance systems; and, WHEREAS, the San Francisco Bay and Central Valley Regional Wafer Quality Control Beards have specifically required all municipalities in Centra Costa County to have municipal stormwater NPDES permit coverage; and, WHEREAS,under the authority of California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act,the State Water Resources Control Board and its regional boards have been delegated the authority to adopt NPDES permits and waste discharge requirements for municipal stormwater discharges; and, WHEREAS, in April 1991, the San Francisco Bay and Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Boards notified all municipalities in Contra Costa County of the requirement to submit a NPDES Permit Application by May 17, 1993; and, WHEREAS, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board adopted a municipal stormwater NPDES permit CA0029912 and waste discharge requirements for all municipalities within its jurisdiction in Contra Costa County on September 15, 1993; and, the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board adopted a municipal stormwater NPDES permit CA0083313 and waste discharge requirements for all municipalities within its jurisdiction in Contra Costa County on January 28, 1994 with both permits remaining in effect for five years; and, WHEREAS,the adopted NPDES permits require all affected municipalities in Contra Costa County to apply for reissuance of their municipal stormwater NPDES permits by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board on September 15, 1998 and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board on January 1, 1999; and., RESOLUTION NO. 98/ 371 Application for Reissuance of Municipal Stormwater NPDES Permit and Adoption of Contra Costa Clean Water Program.Stormwater Management Plan for 1998-2003. July 14, 1998 Page Two WHEREAS, the Contra Costa Clean Water Program's Management Committee has prepared and approved a new Contra Costa Clean Water Program Stormwater.Management Plan for the period of September 1998 through August 2003; and, WHEREAS,the Contra Costa Clean Water Program Stormwater Management Plan 1998- 2003 mainly represents a continuation of the stormwater pollution prevention and control activities and costs that are currently being implemented. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the County of Contra Costa that 1. The County of Contra Costa hereby agrees to apply to the San Francisco Bay and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board(s) for reissuance of its municipal stormwater NPDES permit(s)to discharge water from its municipal storm drain system, and 2. The County accepts, adopts and commits to implement the Contra Costa Clean Water Program Stormwater Management Plan 1998-2003 and requests the Contra Costa Clean Water Program Manager to submit the plan to the San Francisco Bay and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Boards as part of the application for NPDES permit(s)reissuance, and 3. The Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to forward three certified copies of this Resolution to the Contra Costa Clean Water Program.Manager. LB:cl:sd g\rrrpData\Fldctl\L.inda\bo\Newpermit79sxes f hereby certify that this is a true and correct Orig.Dept.: Public Works(FC) copy of an action taken and entered on the Contact: Linda Bulkeley(925)313-2238 minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the c: County Administrator date shown. 1 /119 Public Works,Flood Control Engineering ATTESTED: Public Works,Clean Water Program Manager(Certified-3) PHIL BATCH, Clerk of the Board g�' g ( d 3) of Supervisors and County Administrator By r *a l Deputy RESOLUTION NO. 98/ 371 CONTRA COSTA CLEAN WATER PROGRAM AGREEMENT (1998-2003) Contra Costa Clean Water Program Agreement between The Contra Costa County Flood Control &Water Conservation District and Contra Costa County THIS AGREEMENT is jointly entered into by the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the cities of Antioch, Brentwood, Clayton, Concord, Danville, El Cerrito, Hercules, Lafayette, Martinez, Moraga, Orinda, Pinole, Pittsburg, Pleasant Hill, Richmond, San Pablo, San Ramon, Walnut Creek and County of Contra Costa (sometimes individually referred to herein as "co-permittee"or"agency"). It is dated for administrative convenience April 1, 1998. Recitals A. The parties are joint holders of National Pollution Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") Permit, Nos. CA0029912 and CA0093313. The cities previously have entered into individual agreements with the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District ("District") for the first five-year NPDES permit. The parties now wish to enter into this joint agreement for the upcoming NPDES permit, 1998 - 2003. B. The parties (except the City of Richmond) intend to enter into a separate cost payment agreement regarding the stormwater utility fee assessment financing. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: -2- A. Grou2ACtivities Deiinestivn. The Management Committee ("MC") is the decision-making body of the Contra Costa Clean Water Program. It shall be responsible for setting policies, providing directions and authorizing expenditures. The second NPDES permit program, and the activities to be jointly carried out pursuant to this Agreement by the parties, shall include, but not be limited to, the following tasks. 1. Provide the necessary administrative,technical and clerical resources to implement all Program activities directed by the Management Committee in order to implement the second joint municipal NPDES permit (1998 - 2403). Administrative activities may include attending all Management and sub-committee meetings, preparing committee minutes and/or summaries of committee actions. 2. Administer all consulting services contracts (technical, legal, public relations and associated services) including the coordination, billing and monitoring of all such activities. 3. Represent the Program at federal, state, regional and local governmental, civic, professional and political organizations and agencies. 4. Coordinate the yearly compilation of the Annual Report to the appropriate Regional Water Quality Control Boards. 5. Conduct monitoring activities which may include the purchase, installation and testing of equipment at designated sites. 6. Ensure that all regulatory fees and assessments necessary to obtain and maintain the Joint Municipal NPDES Permits are appropriate and, if so, paid. 7. Ensure uniform implementation of a comprehensive stormwater management ordinance and its regulations between all co-permittees. 8. Implement a comprehensive public education and industrial outreach program on behalf of all co-permittees. The Public Education and Industrial Outreach Committee in the Program will be responsible for developing the original materials and co- -3- permittees shall be responsible for producing and distributing these items. 9. Participate in special studies determined by the Program, the Regional Water Quality Control Boards, the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA)or other appropriate entities. 10. Ensure implementation of a comprehensive program for field inspection and investigation activities for unauthorized connections and illegal dumpings. 11. Ensure a comprehensive program for new development and construction activities specifically focusing on soil erosion and sedimentation practices, post-construction facilities and developing financial mechanisms needed to maintain such facilities. B. Termination. Should a co-permittee want to stop participating in the group program and terminate its obligations under this Agreement, the following conditions must be met: 1. The co-permittee shall provide written notice of its intention to terminate its participation in the group program by no later than 5:00 p.m., December 31 prior to the commencement of the following fiscal year of which it is seeking to terminate its obligations (July 1 - June 30). To ensure an orderly transition, the departing co-permittee shall also obtain written confirmation from the Regional Board's Executive Officer that an individual NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit will be issued to the co-permittee and provide a copy to the Program with the notice of termination. 2. The co-permittee shall be committed to fulfill all of its financial obligations outlined in this Agreement to the end of the fiscal year(June 30). C. Subcnmrnitt" Structures. The following subcommittees are hereby established, but may be changed by the Management Committee: -4- _ 11.11_. . ......... ......... . ..... ... . .. .... .._.._._. ......... ......... ......... 1. Administrative Committee ("AC") is a sub-committee responsible for administration, strategic planning, personnel, budget recommendations and conflict resolution. 2. Monitoring and Inspection Committee ("MIC") is a sub-committee responsible for baseline monitoring, special study coordination, inspection activities, inspection training, volunteer monitoring and water quality analysis and evaluations. 3. New Development and Construction Controls Committee ("NDCCC") is a subcommittee responsible for erosion/sedimentation control measures, construction site management practices, new development guidelines and recommended planning procedures. 4. Public Education and Industrial Outreach Committee ("PEIO") is a subcommittee responsible for development of materials and products, information dissemination, technical workshops, marketing and public outreach. D. Management Committee Rearesentattves. 1. The city/county manager, prior to May 1, 1998, shall designate Management Committee representatives which may be by job classifications rather than named individuals. The manager shall designate up to two (2) individuals who may vote on behalf of their agency at any Management Committee deliberation. Each co-permittee shall have one vote on the Management Committee. Co-permittees shell be permitted to send substitutes to any Management Committee meeting, permitting the individual to vote on behalf of the agency when the representative is absent. Written confirmation from the city/county manager indicating the identity of the substitute shall be provided to the Program prior to the meeting. The substitute's decisions shall be binding upon its agency. 2. Each Management Committee representative shall consist of an engineering representative or designated individual responsible for directly administering the stormwater management program for their agency. 3. Management Committee representatives shall continue for the entire term of the Agreement unless changed by the city/county manager by providing timely written notification to the Program. 4. Any decision made by the Management Committee shall be binding upon all co-permittees. E. Committee Membership. 1. Each co-permittee shall have one representative on the Management Committee and at least one representative on either the Administrative Committee, Monitoring and Inspection Committee, New Development and Construction Committee, or the Public Education and Industrial Outreach Committee. 2. Co-permittees may have membership on any subcommittees as full voting members if approved by the Management Committee at its June meeting upon the recommendation of the Management Committee chairperson for the following year. Each co-permittee shall only be allowed one vote per committee. Participants at committee meetings, other than approved co-permittees, shall not be allowed to vote on any item under consideration. 3. Any co-permittee not designated as an approved voting member may participate in the discussions of any subcommittee but shall not be allowed to vote on recommendations. Co-permittees may participate on any committee. 4. Each sub-committee shall, at a minimum, consist of the following membership: • Administrative Committee 7* • Monitoring and Inspection 5 New Development and Construction 5 • Public Education and Industrial Outreach Committee 5 (*Concord, Contra Costa County and Richmond shall be permanent members of the Administrative Committee, but shall also participate on at least one additional subcommittee.) 5. The Management Committee chairperson and vice-chairperson shall be chosen at the June Management Committee meeting for the following fiscal year. -6- 6. The Management Committee chairperson shall be chairperson of the Administrative Committee for one fiscal year(July 1 to June 30). 7. The Management Committee chairperson, in accordance with established guidelines, shall by May 31 of each fiscal year recommend, after consultation with all co-permittees, membership on all sub-committees effective July 'I of the next fiscal year. Recommendations shall be considered by the Management Committee at its June meeting. Sub-committee members shall be encouraged to rotate every two years. 8. The first order of business for each sub-committee at its July meeting is to choose a chairperson and vice chairperson for the remainder of the fiscal year and to establish the sub-committee's work plan for the fiscal year dealing with its goals, objectives, time lines and related items, as outlined under the Permit. 9. Attendance at all Management and sub-committee meetings shall be published monthly. Co-permittees are expected to attend at least 80% of the meetings. Two consecutive absences shall cause the Management or sub-committee chairperson to request new membership from the designated co-permittee by contacting either the Management Committee representative or the co-permittee's city/county manager. Attendance of all committees shall be added to the Annual Report provided to the Regional Water Quality Control Boards. 10. The Administrative Committee shall consist, at a minimum, of the following membership, conditions, and shall generally follow the rotations contained in Exhibit "A": a) Management Committee chairperson 1** b) Concord, County and Richmond 3/2 c) Other co-permittees 3f4** Total 7 d) Geographical representation will be encouraged e) Administrative Committee vice-chairperson shall be selected at the first meeting in July of each fiscal year. The Management Committee vice-chairperson does not have to be the Administrative Committee vice-chairperson. **(i) These designated co-permittees shall rotate annually. (ii) These co-permittees shall meet their sub-committee obligation by serving as designated representative for the fiscal year(see Section E1). (iii) Should the chairperson be from Concord, Contra Costa County or Richmond, then the "other co-permittees" category shall be increased to four members; and the "Concord, County and Richmond" category shall be decreased to two members. 11. Permanent sub-committee voting membership can only be changed by the Management Committee Chairperson following established guidelines (see following section). 12. The selection of permanent sub-committee voting membership shall consider the following guidelines: a) The minimum number of members per committee (see Section E4). b) Balance membership from large, medium and small jurisdictions. c) Balance membership from geographical areas as follows: ....................................................................................I................ .... ........................................................................................................................................................ ............. (i) West County: El Cerrito, Richmond, San Pablo, Hercules, Pinole and unincorporated county. (ii) East County: Antioch, Brentwood, Pittsburg, and unincorporated county. (iii) Central/North County: Concord, Clayton, Pleasant Hill, Walnut Creek, Martinez, and unincorporated county. (iv) Lamorinda/South County: Lafayette, Orinda, San Ramon, Danville, Moraga and unincorporated county. d) Attempt to have one sub-committee member represented on the Administrative Committee to act as a liaison. e) Rotation of sub-committee members shall be encouraged at least every two years. f) Membership shall be chosen to enhance the sub-committee's manageability and overall effectiveness of attaining goals and objectives. 13. A quorum for each committee or subcommittee shall consist of a majority of its members. F. Program Costs PaEfigipation,and Allocation. All program costs shall be allocated on population numbers annually obtained from the State of California's Department of Finance. The population data published in January of each year will be used to form the cost allocations of the following fiscal year. (See Exhibit "B" for the 1998/99 Fiscal Year Allocations.) G. Optional-Services, Additional services requested by a co-permittee and consistent with carrying out tasks outlined in the Joint Permit may be provided by Program staff as long as it minimally impacts Program staffing and is approved by the Management Committee. Such requests shall be in writing and detail tasks to be accomplished. Such;services shall be completely financed by the co-permittee. H. Contracting. 1. All contracts shall initially be administered through the Flood Control District on behalf of the Program. Other co-permittees may be permitted to contract on behalf of the Program upon Management Committee approval. All contracts through the District shall strive to achieve a "good faith effort"as specified by Contra Costa County's Minority Business Enterprise/Women Business Enterprise guidelines, but shall not be bound by such guidelines. 2. All contracts shall include a provision allowing for one or two-year extensions based on satisfactory performance. The appropriate subs-committee shall recommend to the Management Committee when a consultant contract should be extended. The aforementioned contracts are for services, not products.. 3. Procuring technical services shall be accomplished in the following manner: a) A formal Request for Proposal ("RFP") shall be developed for all required technical services detailing goals, objectives, budget, tasks and time lines. b) All co-permittees)will be asked if they wish to respond to the RFP. if so, the co-permittee(s) must respond in writing to the appropriate sub-committee. c) The sub-committee can either recommend' approval of the submitted co-permittee(s)' proposal to the Management Committee;or, may send the RFP to outside vendors and review all submittals before making a final determination to the Management Committee. d) The appropriate sub-committee shall be responsible for recommending a consultant to the Management Committee. _1p_ 1. StaffingL.. 1. Program staff are employees of Contra Costa County, employed on behalf of all co-permittees constituting the Clean Water Program. The Management Committee may contract for Program staff through another co-permittee, an institutional arrangement (such as joint powers agreements), or consultants. 2. The County shall obtain input from the Management Committee regarding staff evaluations, job classifications and salary ranges. The Administration Committee shall be responsible for soliciting input from the Management Committee members. 3. The Management Committee shall negotiate an administrative overhead rate with any appropriate agency providing services to the Program. 4. Program staff shall provide a written record of all policies, rules and regulations duly adopted by the Management Committee. J. lndemn Each party to this Agreement agrees to protect, indemnify and save harmless the other parties and their officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all claims, demands and causes of action by third parties on accountof personal injuries or death or on account of property damages arising out of the work to be performed under this Agreement and resulting from the negligent act or omission of the party, its contractors, agents, employees or subcontractors. Dated: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL&WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT: By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney Dated: CITY OF ANTIOCH By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney Dated: CITY OF BRENTWOOD By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney Dated: CITY OF CLAYTON By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney Dated: CITY OF CONCORD By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney Dated: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney Dated: TOWN OF DANVILL.E By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attomey Dated: CITY OF EL. CERRITO By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney Dated: CITY OF HERCULES By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney Dated: CITY OF LAFAYETTE By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney Dated: CITY OF MARTINEZ By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FARM: By: Attorney Dated: TOWN OF MORAGA By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney Dated: CITY OF ORINDA By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney Dated: CITY OF PI'NOLE By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney -14_ Dated: CITY OF PITTSBURG By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney Dated: CITY OF PLEASANT HILL By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney Dated: CITY OF RICHMOND By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attomey Dated: CITY OF SAN PABLO By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney ....................I............................................................................................................... . ................................................................................................................................................................................. Dated. CITY OF SAN RAMON By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney Dated: CITY OF WALNUT CREEK By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Attorney gA...\NPDES\Contract9\GaJstan.agr 02/18198 Rev.:03/27/98 .. ........ EXHIBIT "A" CONTRA COSTA CLEAN WATER PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE C NTMI TEE*PARTICIPATION GUIDELINE 5 da }g� h Large Munlcipalitias Countywide Contra Costa County X X X x X CentraUNorth County Concord X X x X X West County Richmond X X x X x East County Antioch x x Central/North County Walnut Creek x East County Pittsburg x Medium Municipalities Lamodnda/South County San Ramon x Lamodnda/South County Danville x Central/North County Martinez x Central/North County Pleasant Hill x West County San Pablo x x Lamorinda/South County Lafayette x Small Municipalities East County Brentwood x x West County El Cerrito x West County Hercules x West County Pinole x Lamorinda/South County Orinda x Lamodnda/South County Moraga x Lamorinda/South County Clayton x Countywide Flood Control District x * Minimum of sevenmembers per fiscal year EXH'I'BIT "B" CONTRA COSTA CLEAN WATER PROGRAM GROUP COST METHODOLOGY & ALLOCATION FOR THE 1998199 FISCAL YEAR ENTITY POPULATION(" PRORATA SHARE OF BUDGET GROUP COSTS42) ALLOCATION Antioch 76,500 8.70% $ 132,730.89 Brentwood 14,500 1.65% $ 25,158.14 Cla on 10,050 1.14% $ 17,437.20 Concord 111,800 12.72% $ 193,977.96 Contra Costa County 172,200 19.59% $ 298,774.84 Contra Costa County -0- -0- $ -0- Flood Control&Water Conservation District(31 Danville 38,100 4.33% $ 66,105.19 El Cerrito 23,300 2.615% $ 40,426.53 Hercules 18,800 2.14% $ 32,618.83 Lafayette 23,600 2.68% $ 40,947.05 Martinez 35,350 4.02% $ 61,333.82 Mora a 16,350 1.86% $ 28,367.98 Orinda 16,900 1.92/0 $ 29,332.25 Pinole 18,150 2.06% $ 31,491.06 Pittsburg50,800 5.78% $ 88140.25 Pleasant Hill 31,450 3.58% $ 54,567.15 Richmond 91,300 10.38% $ 158,409.55 San Pablo 25,900 2.95% $ 44,937.65 San Ramon 41,950 4.77% $ 72,785.11 Walnut Creek 62,200 7.07% $ 107,919.76 879,200 100.00% $ 1,625,451.00 Population figures based on State of California Department of Finance-January 1, 1997. Percentages based on prorate of population. Prorata share not based on population, but as a direct financial contribution.