HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05051998 - D15 o . Q16
Contra
Costa
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS County
FROM: DENNIS M. BARRY, AICP °
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: May 5, 1998
SUBJECT-. closed Hearing to Determine if Cause Exist to Revoke LP9S2061 issued
on December 2, 1996 by the County Board of Supervisors. subject property
is addressed #3212 Danville Boulevard, in the Alamo area.
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
BEC-OMMENDATIQNS
Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors revoke Sand Use Permit
#LP952061.
If the Board is not inclined to revoke the Land use permit, the<
conditions could be modified as follows.
A. Without the easement granted over the adjacent property, the
Board of Supervisors reaffirm that the maximum number of cars'
to be displayed on site is limited to 17 including one
recreational vehicle/boat space, outside of view of Danville
Boulevard.
Condition of Approval. #1 would then read as follows:
The application is approved as modified by the Board of
Supervisors on 'date of approval) and subject to a revised
site plan being submitted to the Community Development
Department within 15 calendar days of the approved date
indicating the location of the 17 display cars, including; one
recreational vehicle/boat space outside of view of Danville ,
Boulevard, one customer parking space clearly designated and
accessible to and from Danville Boulevard and one employee
parking space located in the northeast corner of the property. ,
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X. YES SIGNATURE �»
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMM 'TTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S) :
ACTION OF BOARD ON may DzI APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x OTHER
See Addendum for Board action.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
x UNANIMOUS (ASSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES. NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact:Debbie Chamberlain - 335-1213
Orig: Community Development Department ATTESTED May 51 1998
cc: Dale Bridges PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
Building' Inspection THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Public Warks MW COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
County CounselLT
BY O , DEPUTY
2 .
B. A revised sign program acceptable to the County Zoning
Administrator be submitted within 10 calendar days. The
approved sign program shall be installed within 15 days from
the date of the Zoning Administrator's approval.
Modify Condition of Approval #4 to read as follows:
Within 10 days of this approval, submit a sign program for
review and approval of the County Zoning Administrator
meeting the requirements of the S2 Sign Combining District.
The approved program shall be installed within 15 calendar
days of the Zoning Administrator's approval . All non-
conforming signs shall be removed from the property within 10
days of the approval of this permit. The Indian head sign of
any size is not approved.
C. The processing fees associated with this application have not
been paid. The applicant and/or owner should be required to
pay all County processing fees within fifteen (15) days of
this approval.
Add the following Condition of Approval:
Within 15 calendar days of this approval, pay all current
processing fees related to this application .
D. Due to the time spent by the Community Development Department
and Code Compliance Division of the Building Inspection
Department, staff would recommend a compliance report be
submitted for review and approval of the County Zoning
Administrator within 30 days.
Add the following Condition of Approval :
Within 30 calendar days of permit approval, the applicant
shall submit to the Community Development Department a report
demonstrating compliance with the Conditions of Approval and
a $300 .00 deposit for staff review, with the acknowledgment
that additional costs will be billed the applicant if the
charges incurred for the review and monitoring exceed the
deposit. If staff has determined that the applicant is not
in compliance with the Condition of Approval, the applicant
following notice will have 10 calendar days to correct the
violation. If the violation is not corrected within 10
calendar days, the land use permit shall be rescheduled
before the Board of Supervisors for revocation proceedings .
All costs incurred shall be borne by the applicant.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
BACKGRO-UND/REAS 7NS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
The supporting documentation for this project was provided to the
Board of Supervisors with the March 24 , 1998 Board Order. Prior
to the March 24 , 1998 hearing, the applicant requested continuance
to April 21, 1998 . Prior to granting the continuance, the Board
requested that the applicant attempt to satisfy the Conditions of
Approval that are subject to the revocation proceedings. On April
21, 1998 the applicant presented information that may indicate
that he has an easement over the adjacent property. The Board
directed the applicant to submit the documentation to staff for
review, and subsequently closed the public hearing and continued
the matter to May 5, 1998 . To date, the applicant has not
contacted staff or submitted any information to demonstrate
compliance with the Conditions of Approval.
Additionally, staff conducted a site visit on April 29, 1998 to
determine if the applicant was in compliance with the remaining
conditions of approval . Staff could not located the one customer
parking space that is to be clearly designated and accessible to
and from Danville Boulevard as required by Condition of Approval
......... ......... ......... ......... _--
.. ._ .....__........._...._... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......_..
......... ......... ......... ......... ........_.
. . .............................................................
#1 . Additionally, six cars were parked at a 45-degree angle to
Danville Boulevard, one with dealership license plates. It is
unclear if these were vehicles for sale or customer vehicles.
Condition of Approval #9 requires that no display ears be parked
along Danville Boulevard.
DJC/aa
BDBridges.DJC
ADDENDUM TO ITEM D. 15
MAY 5, 1998
On April 21, 1998, the Board of Supervisors continued to
this date the hearing on the recommendation of the Community
Development Director to determine if cause exists to revoke Lane
Use Permit 95-2061 issued on December 2, 1996, Dale 'Bridges,
applicant, Alamo area.
Debbie Chamberlain, Community Development Department,
presented the staff report and commented that the applicant does
have an easement over the adjacent property in order to have the
twenty-three cars on site, and she advised of a letter from the
applicant on his revised sign program and further advised that
she would work with the applicant on the size of the sign. Ms .
Chamberlin commented on the staff ' s recommendations and asked
that recommendation 2A be deleted, and she asked that if the
Board were to approve the land use permit, that the $7, 500 in
expenses be paid within fifteen days, and that the easement be
recorded within ten calendar days.
The Board discussed the matter.
Brian Thiessen, representing the applicant, requested to
speak on the issue of fees that had not been raised until today.
On recommendation of Supervisor Gerber, Option 1 is APPROVED
and Land Use Permit #LP952061 is REVOKED.