Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04141998 - C69 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Centra rI FROM: Costa PHIL BATCHELOR, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR �.' - � s h �V County DATE: April 1, 1998 SUBJECT: LEGISLATION: SB 2055 (COSTA) • CYA FEES SPECIFIC REOUEST(S)OR RECOMMENOATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT a position in SUPPORT of SB 2055 by Senator Jim Costs. BACKGROUND: In adopting the County's 1998 Legislative Program, the Board adopted the following language: "13. Continue to support the efforts of CSAC,the Urban Counties Caucus and the Chief Probation Officers Association to eliminate or moderate in some manner the fees charged for committing youth to the CYA," CSAC is sponsoring SB 2055. As amended March 23, 1998, SB 2055 does the following: Redirects a portion of the fee currently required to be paid to the California Youth Authority (CYA)for committing a youth to CYA (the difference between marginal cost and per capita cost) and returns it to the counter of commitment to be placed in a Local Juvenile Justice Program Development Fund. Monies in the Fund would be earmarked for juvenile programs and facilities dedicated to the punishment, treatment and rehabilitation of juvenile offenders. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: -YES YES SIGNATURE: r � �2( RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEEE APPROVE OTHER l SIGNATURES): r ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE __2L UNANIMOUS(ABSENT V } AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON T E DATE SHOWN, ATTESTED Contact PHIL BA CHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF OO: SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR See Page 2 BY_ Y DEPUTY ............. Freezes the cost CYA can charge counties at the January 1, 1997 level. This would remedy the fact that the per capita cost CYA charges counties has continually increased (as counties send fewer juveniles to CYA, their per juvenile cost increases). Since January 1, 1997, CYA has charged counties fees of up to $35,000 for the incarceration of "low level"juvenile offenders in its facilities. The method used by CYA to calculate its costs appears to charge counties a higher rate per capita as counties comply with the spirit of the law by sending fewer low level offenders to CYA. SB 2055 would make intelligent and creative changes to the application of these charges and would return a portion of the fees to counties to be dedicated to juvenile programs in the County. SB 2055 is consistent with the Board's adopted Legislative Program. It is, therefore, recommended that the Board indicate its support for SB 2055. cc: County Administrator County Probation Officer Senator Jim Costa (Attention Larry Scheingold) Room 5100 State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Steve Szalay, Executive Director California State Association of Counties 1100 K Street, Suite 101 Sacramento, CA 95814 Casey Sparks Kaneko, Executive Director Urban Counties Caucus 1100 K Street, Suite 101 Sacramento, CA 95814 Les Spahnn Heim, Noack, Kelly & Spahnn 1121 L Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95814 -2- AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 23, 1998 SENATE BILL No. 2055 Introduced by Senator Costa (Phase pal coauthor: Senator. ainey) February 20, 1998 An act to amend Seen 94aefSections 912 and912.5 of and to add Sections 912.1 and 912.6 to, the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to the Department of the Youth Authority. LEGLSLATWE COUNSEL'S DIGFS r SR 2055, as amended, Costa. Department of the Youth Authority: county payment rates. Existing law requires each county to pay the state either $150 per month or ewer in specified instances, an alternative rate, for each person committed to the Department of the Youth Authority by a juvenile court in that county. The s er speeified Calculation of the alternative rates paid by the county are is based upon the efeme eft whieh the eex r be se specified percentages of the per capita institutional itut Tonal cost of the department. s bid weuld mike teehrAeah nemebawwtWe ehaftges te these pie v Ms hiff would .instead provide that calculation of the alternative county payment rates shall be based upon specified percentages of an undefined margznal institutional cost of the departrnent, which would be l mited to an unspeci ed m um amount. The bill mould require the Department of the Youth Authority to provide counts with monthly statements of the department's per capita 98 SB 2055 - 2 - institutional "_ 2 - .rnstitutional cost, not to exceed a specified m&dmu m,',and the deparwtrnent's marginal institutional cost: The big would also require counties to deposit sped6ed sures of money in the Local juvenile justice Program Development Fund, which would be required to be created in each county, to be distributed by the county board ofsupervisors for specified ,purposes relating to the housing,punishment, treatment, and rehabilitation ofjuvende offenders. .Because this bill would ` impose new duties on counties, it would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constituti . ......... ......... ......... ......... .....111.1... 11.11..... ................_...... ......... ......... .._...... ......... ......... ......... ............... .11.1.1 ......__...... ......... . ........ ......... —3 — SB 2055 1 applies to any person committed to the Department of a, and the 2 the Youth Authority b juvenile court, other than those voulalso �' y a� the 3 persons who are subject to Section 912.5, including i o d td, n the 4 persons committed to the Department of the Youth ty, to be 5 Authority prior to January 1, 1997,who on or after January specified 6 1, 1997, remain in or return to the facilities described in 7 this section. went, and mewould 8 The Department of the Youth Authority shall present create a 9 to the county, not more frequently than monthly, a claim 10 for the amount due the state under this section,which the »eimburse 11 county shall process and pay pursuant to the provisions of undated 12 Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 29700) of Division �dures for 13 3 of Title 3 of the Government Code. t ofa State 14 SEC. 2. .Section 912.1 is added to the Welfare and es that do 15 Institutions Code, to read.• 'dares for 16 912.1. (a) The .Department of the Youth Authority 17 shall present to each county, not more frequently than on State 18 monthly, a statement ofper capita institutional cost and ndated by 19 a statement ofmarginal institutional cast. be made .° 20 (b) As used in this section, `per capita institutional 21 cost" means the lesser of (1) the current per capita ee•oe yes. 22 Institutional cost of the department or (2) the per capita 23 Institutional cost of the department as of January 1., 1997. Amok 24 (c) As. used In this section and Section 912.5 the is follows• 25 marginal institutional cost of the department shall not 26 exceed dollars (- J . fare and 27 SEC. . 3 Section 912.5 of the Welfare and Institut oxis 28 Code is amended to read: tion 912.5, 29 912.5. (a) For each person committed to the xnitted to 30 Department of the Youth Authority by a juvenile court on unty from 31 or after January 1, 1997, the county from which he or she state one 32 is committed shall pay the state the following rate: time that 33 (1) If the offense on which the commitment is based he direct 34 is listed in.Section 4955 of Title 15 of the California Code thorny, or 35 of Regulations, the rate is 50 percent of the per eaOt or other 36 marginal institutional cost of the Department of the- is placed 37 Youth Authority. parole or 38 (2) If the offense on which the commitment is based �atpense o f 39 is listed in Section 4956 of Title 15 of the California. Code ds section 40 of Regulations, the rate is 75 percent of the per eal 98 98 SB 2055 - 4 - 1 4 -1 marginal institutional cost of the Department of the 2 Youth Authority. 3 (3) If the offense on which the commitment is based 4 is listed in Section 4957 of Title 15 of the California Code 5 of Regulations, the rate is 100 percent of the per eapit 5 marginal institutional cost of the Department of the 7 Youth Authority. r 8 (b) For purposes of this section, "the offense on which 9 the commitment is based" means any offense that has 10 been sustained by the juvenile court and that is included 1 11 in the determination of the maximum term of I 12 imprisonment by the juvenile court pursuant to Section I 13 731. I 14 (c) For purposes of this section,the charge against the 1 15 county shall not apply to periods of confinement that are I; 16 solely pursuant to a revocation of parole by the 'Youthful 1r 17 Offender Parole Board. I` 18 (d) The charge against the county prescribed by this V 19 section shall be in lieu of the charge prescribed by Section h 20 912 and not in addition to that charge. 2{ 21 (e) The Department of the Youth Authority shall 21 22 present to the county,not more frequently than monthly, 2 23 a claim for the'amount due the state under this section, 23 24 which the county shall process and pay pursuant to the 24 25 provisions of Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 25 26 29700) of Division 3 of Title 3 of the Government Code. 26 27 (f) The . Department of the Youth Authority shall 27 28 adopt emergency regulations for implementation of this 28 29 section. 29 30 SEC. 4. Section 912.6 is added to the Welfare and 30 31 Institutions Code, to read: 31 32 912:6. (a) On and aper ,January 1, 1999, for each 32 33 person committed to the Department of the Youth 33 34 Authority by a juvenile court on or after January'1, .1997, 34 35 for an of ense listed m Sections 4955 to 4957 inclusive, of 35 36 Title 15 of the California Cade of fl'eguladons, the county 35 37 from which,he or she is committed shall make a deposit, 37 38 in the amount specif"red in subdivision (b), to the Local 38 39 Juvenile justice Program Development Fund, which 39 40 shall be established In each county. The board of AN 40 98 -5 — SLS 2055 of the y 1 supervisors ofthe countyshalldistribute.r oneysfrom the 2 fund solely for purposes related to programs and facibtres is bad 3 for juveniles dedicated to punishment, ,treatment, and iia. Cade 4 rehabih"tation ofjuvenile offenders and in a manner that ea 5 will allow the county to house the maximum number of of the 6 juvenile offenders in county facrlitYes 7 (b) For each person described in subdivision (a), the a which 8 amount of funds deposited by the county into the Local that. has 9 juvenile justice .Program Development Fund shall be ncluded 10 calculated as follows: :erYn of 11 (1) .If the offense on which the commitment is based ;Section 12 is listed in Section 4955 of Title 15 of the California Code 13 ofBegulatxons, the amount shall be 57 percent of the per anst the 14 capita institutional cost of the Department of the Youth that are 15 Authority, as reported to the county pursuant to Section Youthful 16 912.1, less the amount paid by the county pursuant to 17 paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 912.5. d by this 18 (2) .If the offense on which the commitment is based y Section 19 rs listed in Section 4956 of Title 15 of the Calr"fornia Code 20 ofBegulations, the amount shall be 75 percent of the per i shah � 21 capita institutional cost of the Department of the Youth m:onthly, 22 .Authority, as reported to the county pursuant to Section section, 23 912.1, less the amount pard by the county pursuant to at to the 24 paragraph (2) of subdivrsion (a) of Section 912.5 Section 25 (3) If the offense on which the commitment is based at Code. 26 is listed in Section 4957 of Title 15 of the Ca fornxa Cade .ity shall 27 ofBegulations, the amountshall be 100percent ofthe per rn of this 28 capita institutional cost of the .Departmentof the Youth 29 ,Authority, as reported to the county pursuant to Section Tare and 30 912.1, less the amount paid by the county pursuant to 31 paragraph (3) of subrh'vision (a) of Section 912.5. (or each 32 (c) For each person described?`in subdivision (a), the e Youth 33 county shall make the depot required by this section at 1, 1997, 34 the same time that the county makes the payment with fusive, of 35 respect to that person to the Department of the Youth e county 36 Authority pursuant to Section 912.5 deposit, 37 SEC. 5. Notwithstanding Section 17610 of the he I,oca1 38 Government verrrment Code,if the Commission on State Mandates which 39 determines that this act contains costs mandated by the Board of 4o state, reimbursement to local agencies and school 98 98 SB 2055 — 6- 1 -- 6 -1 districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 2 (commencing with Section 17500) ofDivisiori 4 of Title 3 2 of the Government Code. If the statewide cost of the 4 claim for reimbursement does not exceed one million 5 dollars ($1.,000,000), reimbursement shall be trade from 6 the State Mandates Claims.Fund. 7 Notwithstanding Section 17580 of the Government 8 Code, unless otherwise spedBed, the provr'sions ofthis act 9 shall become operative on the same date that the act 10 takes effect pursuant to the Cal