HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06241997 - U1-SD6 U. I
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on June 24, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla and DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Re: Uigency Item
Rick Bonner, Health Safety and Environmental Manager, Tosco San
Francisco Area Refinery, addressed the Board and reported on the
implementation of Tosco's corrective measures in response to the January 21,
1997, hydrocracker unit explosion and fire.
Following Mr. Bonner's remarks, Lewis Pascalli, Deputy Director,
Hazardous Materials/Occupational Health Program, County Health Services
Department, stated that the Health Services Department has been working
closely with Tosco representatives in overseeing the implementation of both the
County's recommendations as well as Tosco's recommendations for improved
safety.
Supervisor Smith requested that this issue be introduced as an Urgency
Item. The Board of Supervisors unanimously agreed to consider this matter as
an exception to the Better Government Ordinance.
The Board discussed the issues and took the following actions:
1. ACCEPTED the report from Rich Bonner, Health Safety and
Environmental Manager, Tosco San Francisco Area Refinery, on Tosco's
corrective measures regarding the January 21, 1997, hydrocracker incident; and
2. ACCEPTED the report from Lewis Pacalli, Deputy Director, Hazardous
Materials/Occupational Health Program, County Health Services Department,
regarding acceptance of Tosco's implementation of improved safety measures.
1 hereby certify that this is a true
and correct copy of an action taken
and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED June 24 , 1997
Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors d unTy Administrator
B AC/
Barbara S. TantUAIputy Clerk
c.c. County Administrator
Health Services Director
P.1
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DATE: June 24, 1997 MATTER OF RECORD
-------------------------
SUBJECT: Presentations
On this date the Board of Supervisors heard a presentation of Service Awards to the
following employees: Willie Butter (35 years), Guy Polewaczyk(20 years), Jerry Nichols (25
years), and Lory Lease(25 years).
THIS IS A MATTER FOR RECORD PURPOSES ONLY
NO BOARD ACTION TAKEN
P2
IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Commending )
Waterworld USA Incident )
Response Participants ) RESOLUTION NO. 97/315
WHEREAS, a tragic accident occurred on the afternoon of June 2, 1997 at Waterworld, USA,
Concord, during a senior class high school outing at the water park in which one teenager died and
32 others injured, ten critically, in a sudden disaster requiring immediate attention of extraordinary
medical resources; and
WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Emergency Medical Services Agency was notified of the
incident at 3:30 PM and immediately responded, setting into action the Multi-Casualty Incident Plan
coordinating the conveyance of patients to area hospitals; and
WHEREAS, responding to this tragedy in a highly coordinated, well planned effort were:
Alta Bates Hospital American Medical Response
Antioch Ambulance Brookside Hospital
Cal!prnia Highway Patrol CALSTAR
City of Concord Police CCC Emergency Medical Services
CCC Fire Protection District CCC C}Vice of Emergency Services
CCC Sheriff Department Doctors Hospital of Pinole
Eden Hospital John Muir Medical Center
Kaiser Medical Center-WC Merrithew Memorial Hospital
Mt. Diablo Medical Center Redwood Empire Air Care Helicopter
SR Valley Medical Center SR Valley Fire Protection District
Stanford Lifeflight Stanford University Hospital
Waterworld USA
WHEREAS, the Multi casualty Planning Committee's Chair, CCCFPD Battalion Chief Jerry Fender,
and staff, EMS Trauma Coordinator Barbara Center, RN,worked for years with the agencies involved
in MCI responses; and
WHEREAS, the dedication and compassion of the men and women and their agencies involved in this
incident, demonstrated by their professionalism, skills and training, reflects highly not only on them
but on Contra Costa County;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLVED that those who responded to the Waterworld USA incident
are COMMENDED for their actions and a job well done.
PASSED by unanimous vote of the Board members present on this 24th day of June, 1997.
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution entered in the minutes of said Board of
Supervisors on the date aforesaid.
INTRODUCED BY:
UJrt��
Mark DeSaulnier, Chair
Supervisor, District IV
Witness my hand and the Seal
of the Board of Supervisors
Affixed this 24th Day of lune, 1997
qu J(�zJXLr
PHIL BATORLOR,County
Administrator and Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors
SD, 2
t0: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra
FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON - Costa
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT County
9 UN
DATE: June 24, 1997
SUBJECT: WICKLAND OIL'S CHALLENGE GRANT
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Accept the challenge from the Wickland Oil Company to dedicate a part of the
County property in Crockett (APN 355-160-011) to the East Bay Regional Park
District, if the Wickland Oil dedicates its adjacent 2.83 acre parcel. Acknowledge
Wickland Oil's civic responsibility in undertaking this challenge grant.
B. Request the Public Works Department to prepare the necessary documents to
accomplish the transfer of the more rugged portions of the site to the East Bay
Regional Park District (EBRPD). They should coordinate that review with the
County Counsel office. Costs of the transfer should be borne by EBRPD and not
the road trust fund.
C. Reserve a portion of the site to be kept by the County for road maintenance
purposes and reserve access rights on the property to be deeded to the EBRPD
to allow for County maintenance of the slopes below San Pablo Avenue.
D. Coordinate the transfer of the property with Wickland Oil and the East Bay Regional
Park District. A small ceremony should be held by EBRPD acknowledging the
donations by Wickland Oil and the County upon transfer of the property.
E. Encourage Union Pacific Railroad to participate in the San Francisco Bay Trail
effort.
F. Acknowledge the efforts of the Carquinez Preservation Land Trust for its part in
bringing this trail opportunity to the attention of this Board. yQ�
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATUREJ!)� tJ
ACTION OF BOARD ON June 24, 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED k OTHER
The following persons spoke in support of the recommendations: Dan Hall, Wickland Oil Company; rnd
Steve Fiala, East Bay Regional Park District.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
zUNANIMOUS (ABSENT ----------- AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE
SHOWN.
Contact: Jim Cutler, CDD/ (510/335-1236) ATTESTED June 24. 1997
cc: Community Development PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
CAO THF= MOARD OF SUPERVISO
County Counsel NTY ADMJMV MA OR
Public Works
BY l ,
n Stine Wampler
JWC/:aw
jAaMwickland.bo
Wickland Oil's Challenge Grant
June 24, 1997
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT
There is minor Public Works staff costs associated with the preparation of documents to
cause the transfer to occur. There is also a small dollar value associated with the transfer
of the rugged portion of the site being transferred to EBRPD.
BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION
A. CARQUINEZ PRESERVATION TRUST ACTION
At a Carquinez Preservation Land Trust Strategic Planning meeting on Wednesday,
February 26, 1997, the Wickland Oil Company challenged Contra Costa County
that Wickland Oil would dedicate land to help complete a segment of the San
Francisco Bay Trail, if Contra Costa County would do likewise.
The Carquinez Preservation Land Trust is a non-profit corporation made up of
government representatives (including our County), citizens and governmental
representatives working toward land preservation efforts. The Trust covers both
sides of the Carquinez Straits from Vallejo to Suisun Marsh in Solano County and
from Hercules to Martinez in Contra Costa County. The group indicated that one
main long term goal was to complete the regional trail system serving the area
including the San Francisco Bay Trail and the San Francisco Bay Ridge Trail that
crosses into the area of concern to the Trust.
At the meeting, Dan Hall of the Wickland Oil Company offered to the Trust the
proposal that his company would gift deed an approximately three acre parcel to the
public for the San Francisco Bay Trail if, Contra Costa County would donate an
equal amount of the adjacent property it owns to provide the land to complete this
segment of the trail. The property is located slightly west of Crockett between the
Southern Pacific Railroad tracts and San Pablo Avenue.
The Trust endorsed the challenge grant and strongly urged Wickland Oil, Contra
Costa County and the East Bay Regional Park District to work toward completion
of this trail link.
Since that challenge grant was made at the Carquinez Preservation Land Trust
meeting, Community Development Department, Public Works Department
Maintenance and Real Property Divisions, and East Bay Regional Park District staff
have met on the site to discuss staff views on the proposal. This report is the result
of those staff discussions.
B. PAST ACTIVITY ON THE COUNTY OWNED SITE
The County site is 8.097 acres in size and is located between San Pablo Avenue
(old Highway 40), the Southern Pacific Railroad and Wickland Oil properties
adjacent to the Southern Pacific Railroad tracts. The site has marvelous views of
the Carquinez Straits and of the Carquinez Bridge. Of the eight acres, there is a
level portion along San Pablo Avenue which is currently utilized for road
maintenance purposes. The large remainder of the site is steep downslope toward
the water and railroad tracts (see Map A).
The immediate area is essentially undeveloped and is characterized by steep
downslope. A prior dedication by Wickland Oil Company brings EBRPD lands to
the western boundary of the site. Wickland's approximately three acres, that is the
subject of the challenge grant, is located north of the County parcel. Southern
SD.
Wickland Oil's Challenge Grant
June 24, 1997
Page 3
Pacific owns the remaining lands to the north and east, except for a small sliver of
State property.
The EBRPD had expressed interest in this site decades ago. The issue of ultimate
use for the site was considered as part of the Rodeo General Plan Amendment
process. The Citizen's Committee, established by the Board to make
recommendations for the Rodeo area, designated the bulk of the property as Parks
and Recreation (in anticipation of its transferral to the EBRPD). The remainder of
the site was designated for Commercial Recreation to allow for possible use as a
restaurant site. The Board of Supervisors adopted this as policy in 1980. Since
that time, the County has used the site for maintenance and no actions have
occurred on transferral of the property.
Each of the recommendations of this report are discussed below:
1. ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE GRANT AND ACKNOWLEDGE WICKLAND
OIL'S CONTRIBUTION
Wickland Oil, like the County, is represented on the Carquinez Preservation
Land Trust Board. That trust has made completion of the San Francisco Bay
Trail one of its highest priorities. That trail is planned to cross from San
Pablo Avenue down to the Crockett waterfront. The Wickland and County
properties are logical properties for making this connection.
In response to these needs, Wickland Oil has challenged the County to work
with the EBRPD to help complete this trail link by dedicating the missing trail
links to the EBRPD.
Given the recommendations of the community, now adopted into the County
General Plan, staff feels the transferral of much of the site to the EBRPD to
be desirable. By adoption of this report, the Board would be instructing staff
to take the followup actions necessary to transfer the property.
It would also be appropriate, should the Board decide in favor of the transfer,
to have the Director of Community Development write a letter indicating the
Board's action on the matter and acknowledging Wickland Oil's civic
responsibility in initiating the challenge grant.
2. PREPARATION OF DOCUMENTS
Should the Board approve the concept of transfer of portions of the site to
the EBRPD, Public Works' Real Property Division will need to prepare the
necessary paperwork to accomplish the transfer. Staff anticipates it will take
approximately one month to finalize the transfer after Community
Development processes CEQA and EBRPD has prepared and Public Works
has approved the necessary legal descriptions for the area to be transferred
and easements to be retained. The Public Works Department should
coordinate this review with the County Counsel's office to ensure resolution
of the issues raised in the attached May 28, 1997 memo from the Public
Works Director.
Wickland Oil's Challenge Grant
June 24, 1997
Page 4
3. RESERVE THE LEVEL PORTION OF THE SITE AND ACCESS
EASEMENTS
The level portions of the property, adjacent to San Pablo Avenue, continues
to be utilized for road maintenance purposes. It is possible that the site
might also be needed for storage during the construction of the new
Carquinez Bridge or for some other feature of that project. This portion of
the site should be retained by the County and not be transferred to the
EBRPD at this time.
Additionally, the County will need to retain easement rights to access the
portion given to EBRPD for maintenance of the slide repairs and drainage
facilities. Staff will insure these rights are included as easements in the
transferral documents.
4. COORDINATE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY
When the County and Wickland have completed the transfer of the
properties to EBRPD it would be appropriate for a small ceremony to be held
recognizing the donations of Wickland and the County.
5. ENCOURAGE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD PARTICIPATION IN THE
BAY TRAIL EFFORT
Since the Southern Pacific Railroad owns lands adjacent to the site, which
may be needed for the most efficient location of the San Francisco Bay Trail
through the area, the EBRPD should be encouraged to get the railroad to
also participate in this challenge grant by donating land they own adjacent
to this site.
6. ACKNOWLEDGE THE CARQUINEZ PRESERVATION TRUSTS ROLE
The Director of Community Development should acknowledge, on behalf of
the Board, the County's thanks for the Trust being the catalyst for this
challenge grant.
JWC:aw
j:\wickland.bo
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 30, PH 12: 10
Dc o'El_ F",`i PST DEPT
Date: May 28, 1997
TO: Harvey Bragdon, Community Development Director
FROM: J. Michael Walford, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: CARQUINEZ SCENIC OVERLOOK - P 355-160-011
ROAD FUND PROPERTY - CROCKE T - MAINTENANCE YARD
Jim Cutler recently requested Public Works input regarding a challenge grant proposal
from Wickland Oil Company. Apparently Wickland will donate 2.83 acres of land along the
Carquinez Straits to the East Bay Regional Park District if the County will donate equal
acreage from its adjacent 8± acre road fund right of way.
The Public Works Department heartily supports this effort and in fact would recommend
increasing the challenge by offering an additional 3 acres of its 8 acre site if matched by
Wickland or some ether nearby owner,
The following concerns may impact the outcome of the process and need to be addressed
before a donation(s) can be considered.
1. County Counsel will have to review the legality of a donation. The State Auditor-
Controller's office monitors road fund properties and in the past has been very
sensitive about any transaction related to that funding source. This matter will need
to be reviewed throughly. The road fund should not incur any costs associated with
a donation.
2. As the beneficiary of the donation, Regional Parks should provide the County, at
Park's expense, the necessary survey information and legal description(s) to effect
the transfer. CEQA, General Plan Conformance requirements, staff processing
fees, etc., should be borne by the District or a funding source other than the road
fund.
3. The 2± acres the County retains must be fenced off, at the District's expense, from
the proposed trail. This is a liability, trespass and vandalism issue. Adequate
gating must be installed to allow access to existing slide control facilities.
4. Any trail use over the County's retained area must be covered by a suitable license
protecting the County. Several similar licenses are in place at other locations, this
should not be an obstacle to the transfer.
S D , 2-
5. Any transfer of the property must include a release of liability for damage or injury
to District's property or person therein relative to County's ongoing operation of a
maintenance yard and/or resulting from any future soil movements or corrective
undertakings. There is a long history of slides in the area and the County must not
become liable for damage to Regional Park facilities due to these conditions or
future events related thereto.
6. It must be understood by all parties that the 2t acres retained by the County for its
maintenance yard area are a valuable County asset and in the event they are ever
disposed of, all proceeds will be credited to the road fund.
As stated above, these are obviously significant concerns, but all are addressable.
Hopefully, increasing the challenge to 6 acres will result in further donations of property
to a very worthwhile endeavor. Department personnel are ready to asaist your staff in
effecting this transfer.
JMW:RF:gpp
g:\rea1prop\97-5\FiB.v pd
Map A
� a
IF
z
, t
o
U
0 0
� U
a `
o -
e'`r —
y�ti
h'4.
T`
EXHIBIT A ;V, 1 ,
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT �1py
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ?V.V PH 12: 10
rbc 1Date:_MaE28
y , 1997
TO: Harvey Bragdon, Community Development Director
FROM: J. Michael Walford, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: CARQUINEZ SCENIC OVERLOOK - P 355-160-011
ROAD FUND PROPERTY - CROCKE - MAINTENANCE YARD
Jim Cutler recently requested Public Works input regarding a challenge grant proposal
from Wickland Oil Company. Apparently Wickland will donate 2.83 acres of land along the
Carquinez Straits to the East Bay Regional Park District if the County will donate equal
acreage from its adjacent 8± acre road fund right of way.
The Public Works Department heartily supports this effort and in fact would recommend
increasing the challenge by offering an additional 3 acres of its 8 acre site if matched by
Wickland or some cther nearby owner.
The following concerns may impact the outcome of the process and need to be addressed
before a donation(s) can be considered.
1. County Counsel will have to review the legality of a donation. The State Auditor-
Controller's office monitors road fund properties and in the past has been very
sensitive about any transaction related to that funding source. This matter will need
to be reviewed throughly. The road fund should not incur any costs associated with
a donation.
2. As the beneficiary of the donation, Regional Parks should provide the County, at
Park's expense, the necessary survey information and legal description(s) to effect
the transfer. CEQA, General Plan Conformance requirements, staff processing
fees, etc., should be borne by the District or a funding source other than the road
fund.
3. The 2± acres the County retains must be fenced off, at the District's expense, from
the proposed trail. This is a liability, trespass and vandalism issue. Adequate
gating must be installed to allow access to existing slide control facilities.
4. Any trail use over the County's retained area must be covered by a suitable license
protecting the County. Several similar licenses are in place at other locations, this
should not be an obstacle to the transfer.
� r
1 '
5. Any transfer of the property must include a release of liability for damage or injury
to District's property or person therein relative to County's ongoing operation of a
maintenance yard and/or resulting from any future soil movements or corrective
undertakings. There is a long history of slides in the area and the County must not
become liable for damage to Regional Park facilities due to these conditions or
future events related thereto.
6. It must be understood by all parties that the 2t acres retained by the County for its
maintenance yard area are a valuable County asset and in the event they are ever
disposed of, all proceeds will be credited to the road fund.
As stated above, these are obviously significant concerns, but all are addressable.
Hopefully, increasing the challenge to 6 acres will result in further donations of property
to a very worthwhile endeavor. Department personnel are ready to assist your staff in
effecting this transfer.
JMW:RF:flpp
p:V"1propW7-5WB.v 0
1
Map A
z
J t
o
o � H
X
o a
of
i
r
1
1
1
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on JUNE 24, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: SUPERVISORS ROGERS , UILKEMA , GERBER , CANCIAMILLA and DeSAULNIER
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE RESOLUTION NO.97/330
SUBJECT: Pipeline Franchise to Union Oil Company of California (UNOCAL)
(WO#5128)
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Resolves that:
This Board on May 20, 1997, adopted Resolution No. 97/258, declaring its intention
to grant a franchise pursuant to Ordinance No. 1827 (as amended by Ordinance
No. 79/50 and Ordinance No. 92/64) in the manner provided by law and more
particularly referred to in the " Notice of Sale of Franchise" attached to and made
part of Resolution No. 97/258. The Board fixed June 24, 1997, as the date for
public hearing regarding this franchise grant.
On June 24, 1997, the public hearing regarding this matter was held. No protests
were filed.
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a franchise to operate pipelines on certain
County rights of way as described below pursuant to Ordinance No. 1827 (as
amended by Ordinance No. 79/50 and Ordinance No. 92/64) is hereby granted to
Union Oil Company of California (UNOCAL).
A 6-inch products pipeline, and a 12-inch natural gas pipeline bisecting the County
from East to West and crossing various County rights of way (lineal distance
approximately 56,725 feet.)
I hereby certify that this is a true
and correct copy of an action taken
and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED June 24 199 /
Phil Batchelor Clerk of the Board
of Supervisor and County Administrator
BY
Barbara S Grant puty Clerk
Contact Person: Cliff Hansen (313-2341)
SCH:lv:drg
g:bdord\24-6.wpd
Orig. Dept.: Public Works (AD)
c: County Administrator's Office
Auditor Controller RESOLUTION NO. 9 7/3 3 0
-- 1 01/7
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on MAY 20, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Canciamilla, DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Gerber
ABSTAIN: None RESOLUTION NO. 97/258
SUBJECT: Granting of a Franchise to Operate Pipelines in County Roadways (WO#5128)
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Resolves that:
1. Awritten application has been made by Union Oil Company of California (UNOCAL) to the Board
of Supervisors for a franchise to operate one [1] 6-inch products pipeline, and one (1) 12-inch
natural gas pipeline. It is proposed to grant such franchise in the manner provided by law,
substantially in the form and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the attached "Notice of
Sale of Franchise" and Ordinance No. 1827 (as amended by Ordinance No, 79/50 and Ordinance
No. 92/64), and it is in the public interest to give this notice.
2. The Board of Supervisors hereby fixes June 24, 1997, at 10:30 a.m. as hearing date and time.
The Clerk of the Board is hereby authorized and directed to advertise by publishing the attached
"Notice of Sale of Franchise" in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper of general circulation,
printed and published in this County, at least once within fifteen [15] days after the passage of
this Resolution.
I Iunbl 0W*mat!lw M a 6a and wend OW b
M ao9on lain and *I IN on 1M Minton ca IM
�OaN of&pnrbo an ma�aD.
A1fE8fED.
PHIL RATCH R,Ctrl o1 the boird
at aupnNaaa ant Coity A*Wnla raaw
Contact Person:Cliff Hansen(313-2341)
SCH:N:drg
9:bdordt.5-13.wpd
Orig. Dept.: Public Works(AD)
C, County Administrator's Office
Aud'Ror-Controller's Office
r
RESOLUTION NO. 97/258
SD, �
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on JUNE 24, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: SUPERVISORS ROGERS , UILKEMA, GERBER, CANCIAMILLA and DeSAULNIER
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE RESOLUTION NO.97/331
SUBJECT: Pipeline Franchise to Unocal California Pipeline Company (UNOCAP)
(WO# 5128)
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Resolves that:
This Board on May 20, 1997, adopted Resolution No. 97/259, declaring its
intention to grant a franchise pursuant to Ordinance No. 1827 (as amended
by Ordinance No. 79/50 and Ordinance No. 92/64) in the manner provided
by law and more particularly referred to in the " Notice of Sale of Franchise"
attached to and made part of Resolution No. 97/259. The Board fixed June
24, 1997, as the date for public hearing regarding this franchise grant.
On June 24, 1997, the public hearing regarding this matter was held. No
protests were filed.
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a franchise to operate pipelines on
certain County rights of way as described below pursuant to Ordinance No.
1827 (as amended by Ordinance No. 79/50 and Ordinance No. 92/64) is
hereby granted to Unocal California Pipeline Company (UNOCAP).
A 16-inch steel cruel oil pipeline bisecting the County from East to West and
crossing various County rights of way (lineal distance approximately 2,340
feet.)
I hereby certify that this is a true
and correct copy of an action taken
and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTEDTT rte, 19 9 7
Phil Batchelor, CI k of the Board
of Supervisors n Co tY Administrator
BY
Barbara S. Ca t, D u Clerk
Contact Person: Cliff Hansen (313-2341)
SCH:lv:drg
g:bdord\24-6.wpd
Orig. Dept.: Public Works(AD)
c: County Administrator's Office
Auditor Controller RESOLUTION NO. 97/331
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on MAY 20, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Canciamilla, DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Gerber
ABSTAIN: None RESOLUTION NO.97/259
SUBJECT: Granting of a Franchise to Operate Pipelines in County Roadways (WO#5128)
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Resolves that:
1. Awritten application has been made by Unocal California Pipeline Company (UNOCAP) to the
Board of Supervisors for a franchise to operate one [1] 16-inch crude oil pipeline. It is proposed
to grant such franchise in the manner provided by law, substantially in the form and upon the
terms and conditions set forth in the attached "Notice of Sale of Franchise" and Ordinance No.
1827 (as amended by Ordinance No, 79/50 and Ordinance No. 92/64), and it is in the public
interest to give this notice.
2. The Board of Supervisors hereby fixes June 24, 1997, at 10:30 a.m. as hearing date and time.
The Clerk of the Board is hereby authorized and directed to advertise by publishing the attached
"Notice of Sale of Franchise" in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper of general circulation,
printed and published in this County, at least once within fifteen [15] days after the passage of
this Resolution.
I Imeby ClIf ft 90 Mb b■true and coma OW et
on woon token and emered on ft minutes of ft
boerG or SUPMW�ff/e on the date anowgqn..�
RREStED:��.r.0 `a,N..dS-t�LLrd
PXIL BATCri�@LLCR,CI rk or Me owrd
W 8upenr4 an0 County Administrator
Contact Person: Cliff Hansen(313-2341)
SCH:N:drg
g:bdordl5-13.wpd
Orig. Dept.: Public Works(AD)
c: County Administrator's Office
Auditor-Controller's Office
r
RESOLUTION NO. 97/259
1 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2
3 Re: Condemnation of Property for Public RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
4 Purposes - Sandy Cove Lane Slide No. 97/ 338
Repair-Bay Point Area (C.C.P. Sec. 1245.230)
5
6 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, California, by vote of two-thirds or more of
7 its members, RESOLVES THAT:
8 Pursuant to Government Code section 25350.5 Contra Costa County intends to construct a public
9 improvement to stabilize a landslide area and repair damage caused by earth movement in the Bay Point
10 area and make related improvements and, in connection therewith, acquire certain interests in real
11 property.
12 The property to be acquired consists of two (2) parcels and is generally located in the Bay Point
13 area. The said property is more particularly described in Appendix"A", attached hereto and incorporated
14 herein by this reference.
15 On June 5, 1997, notice of the County's intention to adopt a resolution of necessity for acquisition
16 by eminent domain of the real property described in Appendix "A" was sent to persons whose names
17 appear on the last equalized County Assessment Roll as owners of said property. The notice specified
18 Tuesday, June 24, 1997 at 10:30 a.m. in the Board of Supervisors Chambers in the Administration
19 Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, as the time and place for the hearing thereon.
20 The hearing was held at that time and place, and all interested parties were given an opportunity
21 to be heard. Based upon the evidence presented to it, this Board finds, determines and hereby declares
22 the following:
23 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; and
24 2. The proposed project is planned and located in the manner which will be most compatible with
25 the greatest public good and the least private injury; and
26 3. The property described herein is necessary for the proposed project; and
27 4. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code was made to the owner or
28 owners of record.
1
I The County Counsel of this County is hereby AUTHORIZED and EMPOWERED:
2 To acquire in the County's name, by condemnation, the titles, easements and rights of way
3 hereinafter described in and to said real property or interest(s) therein, in accordance with the provisions
4 for eminent domain in the Code of Civil Procedure and the Constitution of California:
5 Said parcels to be acquired are to be acquired as temporary construction easements to expire
6 September 30, 1997 or upon completion of the County's use of the premises whichever shall first occur.
7 To prepare and prosecute in the County's name such proceedings in the proper court as are
8 necessary for such acquisition;
9 To deposit the probable amount of compensation, based on an appraisal, and to apply to said
10 court for an order permitting the County to take possession and use said real property for said public uses
11 and purposes.
12 PASSED and ADOPTED on June 24, 1997, by the following vote:
13 AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla, DeSaulnier
14 NOES: None
15 ABSENT: None
16 ABSTAIN: None
17 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed
18 and adopted by the vote of two-thirds or more of the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County,
19 California, at a meeting of said Board on the date indicated above.
20 Dated: June 24, 1997
21 Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors and County Administrator
22
23 By: . Q
24 Dep
cc: Public Works Department
25 Real Property Division
Auditor-Controller
26 County Counsel (certified copy
County Administrator
27
H:\GRGUPS\cLER\GREGG•RN.WPD
28
2
Hill 310 Land Creep
Drawing M-417-96
Gregg et ux.
APPENDIX "A"
Parcel 1-A-T
Temporary Construction Easement (to expire at end of construction or September 30,
1997, whichever occurs first)
Portion of the northwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 15 Township 2 North Range
1 West Mount Diablo Meridian, Contra Costa County, California described as follows:
Commencing at the northwest section corner of section 15 Township 2 North Range 1
West, Mount Diablo Meridian; thence along the west section line south 0035"24" west
661.61 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence from said Point of Beginning, north 47041'54"
east 68.88 feet; thence north 62058'25" east 98.74 feet; thence north 72058'23" east
200.12 feet; thence north 48012'25" east 67.25 feet; thence south 11 003'06" east 80.62
feet; thence south 76°04'33" west 314.45 feet; thence south 72°43'59" west 34.14 feet;
thence south 64°58'21" west 22.22 feet; thence south 57030'22" west 44.98 feet to said
west section line; thence along said west section line north 0035'24" east 3.84 feet to the
Point of Beginning.
Containing an area of 15,666 square feet of land more or less.
Parcel 1-B-T
Temporary Construction Easement (to expire at the end of construction or September 30,
1997, whichever occurs first).
Portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 16 Township 2 North Range
1 West Mount Diablo Meridian, Contra Costa County, California described as follows:
Commencing at the northeast section corner of section 16 Township 2 North Range 1
West Mount Diablo Meridian; thence along the east section line south 0035'24" west
597.08 feet; thence leaving said section line south 63010'24" west 21.00 feet to the Point
of Beginning; thence from said Point of Beginning along the parcel of land offered for
dedication for drainage purposes, recorded March 11, 1983 in Book 11160 of Official
Records at page 189 and accepted by the County, recorded July 17, 1996, by series
number 96-133245 the following courses (1) south 34010'24" west 66.50 feet, (2) south
40030'44"west 61.55 feet, (3) south 72059'15" east 8.36 feet and (4) south 22018'48"west
48.88 feet to the northerly right of way line of Evora Road; thence along said northerly right
of way line north 8600717" west 183.73 feet to the boundary of subdivision 7152 "Sea
Breeze" filed May 17, 1990 in Book 347 of Maps at page 5; thence along said boundary
north 63010'24" east to the Point of Beginning.
Containing an area of 13,446 square feet of land more or less.
Bearings and distances are based on the California Coordinate System Zone III (CCS27)
to obtain ground distance multiply distance given by 1.0000593.
RZ:NW:gpp
g:\cle rica I\exhibits\HiI3.ex
July 1, 1997
s o s-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
ate: June 17, 1997
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: J. Michael Walford, Public Works Direc///11997
SUBJECT: Report Re: Condemnation Hearing, Ju
Sandy Cove Slide Repair Project, Bay Point Area
Pursuant to procedure approved by Board Order, dated November 1, 1988, the Public
Works Director sent a Notice of Intention to Adopt a Resolution of Necessity for acquisition
by eminent domain of real property in the Bay Point area to stabilize a landslide and repair
damage to public road improvements, and set June 24, 1997, at 10:30 a.m. and thereafter
as the date and time affected owners may appear and be heard as to matters specified by
law under C.C.P. Section 1245.235 as set forth below.
Upon recommendation of County Counsel, the following report is made for the Board's
information and consideration prior to taking action upon said hearing.
I. Proposed Proiect - In late February 1996, a large bedrock landslide began to
manifest movement between Beaulieu Drive, Beaulieu Place and Sandy Cove Lane
in Bay Point. As interim emergency measures, storm runoff and sewer facilities
were diverted and temporary above-ground utility service was established to some
of the uphill residences.
After extensive study of the complex geologic nature of the site and the multiple
factors associated with landslide movement, the County's engineers developed a
plan to stabilize the slope. As part of this plan, contractors built a large earthen
buttress at the bottom of the failing slope. A total of eight houses were purchased
by the County in order to provide sufficient space to construct the buttress. Its
construction necessitated the infilling of approximately 600 lineal feet of creek
channel, and a 575-foot-long five-foot diameter culvert was placed as part of the
buttress so that lateral soil pressures would be transmitted across the creek
channel. At the top of the slope the County's contractors constructed a "drainage
gallery," a series of wells designed to intercept groundwater and conduct it away
before it reaches the slide area. The outfall for this gallery is located the toe of the
buttress immediately upstream of the new culvert.
Due to the emergency nature of the project, the owner of the property sought to be
acquired was very cooperative, granting the County interim rights to construct as
quickly as possible. Subsequently, however, the County's agents and the owner
have been unable to reach agreement as to permanent rights.
1
Contra Costa County, through the Real Property Division of the Public Works
Department, has made an offer of just compensation to the owners of record for the
rights required for this project. The offer was based on an appraisal of the fair
market value of said property rights.
In order to secure temporary property rights required for the construction of the
project, it is necessary for the County to exercise its power of eminent domain.
Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil Procedure, notice was given to
the following persons whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized
County Assessment Roll:
Hugh Gregg
Go Scott E. Jenny
Sanders, Dodson, Rives & Cox
2211 Railroad Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
This notice consisted of sending by first-class and certified mail on June 5, 1997,
a Notice of Intention which notified these owners that a hearing is scheduled for
June 24, 1997 at 10:30 a.m. and thereafter in the Board's Chambers, at which time
they may appear to be heard on the matters referred to in the notice.
II. Scope of Hearinq Per C.C.P. Section 1245.235
A. Public Interest and Necessity require the proposed proiect.
Because all sewage and storm runoff for the Sea Breeze subdivision is
conveyed through Beaulieu Place within the landslide headscarp, the public
health and safety of all 138 upslope homes were impacted by the slide.
Twenty-six of the homes were directly impacted by temporary utilities
service, and ten upslope homes were in immediate peril. On the downslope
side, four residences were also affected, though not as severely as those
above. Lateral movement was occurring beneath Sandy Cove Lane,
towards the open creek channel behind the residences. It was essential that
the County proceed expeditiously to effect a long-term solution to the
massive earth movement before the onset of the next rainy season.
B. The proiect is planned and located in the matter that will be most compatible
with the greatest public good and the lease private injury.
Prior to construction, an extensive surface and subsurface geotechnical
investigation of the site was conducted. During the analysis, a number of
slope repair alternatives were considered. The alternative which was
selected provides the optimum combination of drainage measures at top of
slope to permanently lower the groundwater levels and the construction of
an earthen buttress to restore slope support. These measures were
2
determined to be the most feasible to repair the landslide and ensure
restoration of the remaining residential units.
C. The property sought to be acquired is necessary for the project.
It was necessary to fill a portion of the creek in order to prevent the
triggering of a shallow slide on a weak plane which was discovered during
the site investigation. The infilling also provides support for the southerly
portion of the earth buttress. The size and depth required for the earth
buttress were controlled by the existing geologic features and the extreme
depth of the failure plane. The property sought to be acquired is to be used
during the period of construction, and is the minimum necessary to effect the
repair while also minimizing the impact on the existing creek.
III. Recommended Action
A. Board to ask if any notified property owners wish to be heard as the three
items specified in Section II above, whether the offer of compensation
required by Section 72672.2 of the Government Code has been made, or on
any other issue which they would like the Board to consider when deciding
whether to adopt the proposed Resolution of Necessity, except for the issue
of compensation.
B. Upon completion and closing of the hearing, it is recommended that the
Board make the findings and determinations listed under II A, B and C
above, make an additional finding that the offer of compensation required by
Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been made to the owner or
owners of record, adopt a Resolution of Necessity to acquire the required
property by eminent domain and direct the Board Clerk to file a copy of this
report.
JMWJ`W 9pp
9:Yealpropl97-6Uennybd.wpd
CC: County Administrators Office
County Counsel
Real Property
Board Clerk-If approved by the Board,please file a copy of this report in your records.
3
To: Board of Supervisors Contra
f '
FROM: Warren E. Rupf, Sheriff-Coroner Costa
DATE: May29, 1997 County
SUBJECT: Modification of Fee Schedule
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt the attached Resolution adjusting fees for forensic laboratory services, effective July 1, 1997.
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT
The adoption of the attached Resolution will allowthe County to recover the costs associated with the listed
activities.
III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND
In the 1994-95 fiscal year the Criminalistics Laboratory was required to recover costs of our services from
laboratory users. A fee schedule was established defining the costs of evidence examination services to
users of laboratory services.
The Criminalistics Section has experienced increases in the costs of salaries and supply costs since this
fee schedule was established in July 1994. Salary increases from the DSA contract which ended in
October 1995 added an 8% increase in salary costs for that period. The current DSA contract resulted in
a 2.5% increase in salary costs for FY 96-97 and a 3.5 % increase in FY 97-98. During the same period
the cost of supplies has also increased.The proposed fee schedule provides for a $7 increase (5.2%) in
the hourly fees for Criminalistics examinations.
Latent fingerprint comparisons have previously been charged on a per case basis. Modification of the fee
schedule to an hourly rate will permit collection of actual costs.
Modification of the fees for blood withdrawal services will permit the collection of overhead costs associated
with this service. Overhead activities include contract negotiation,supplies and invoicing.
This action supersedes any prior evidence examination fees set by the Board.
IV.CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION
Negative action will result in insufficient revenue to offset the cost of these activities. The Office of the
Sheriff will bear the burden of the increased cost of providing laboratory examination services to police
agencies within Contra Costa County.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT? X Yes SIGNATURE: arren E. RUpf, heriff-Coroner
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIONATURE(S)
ACTION OF BOARD ON June 24 , 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER_
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT
COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT - - - - ) MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE
AYES: NOES: SHOWN.
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
ATTESTED: June 24 , 1997
PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
1
SUPERVISORS 'I D,�COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR I�1
By. M1� I{•.(.�1✓ °4 �� ,Deputy
Contact:: Gerald T. Mitosinka x3-2810
cc: Sheriff-Coroner
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on June 24, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN: RESOLUTION NO. 97/332
SUBJECT: Forensic Services Fees
WHEREAS, the Forensic Services Division of the Office of the Sheriff
provides forensic services to the law enforcement agencies in Contra Costa
County; and
WHEREAS, in Fiscal Year 1994-95, a fee schedule was established to
recover the costs of providing services to laboratory clients; and
WHEREAS, certain costs of providing forensic services to law
enforcement agencies in Contra Costa County has increased since the Fiscal
Year 1994-95, fee schedule was established;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that effective July 1, 1997, the
attached fee schedule dated June 12, 1997, be presented as the fee schedule by
which forensic services will be provided in Contra Costa County and that this
resolution supersedes and replaces any prior Forensic Services Division fee
schedules approved by the Board.
I hereby certify that this is a true
and correct copy of an action taken
and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED June 24 - 1997
Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors d,County Administrator
J t
Barbara S.e
rant, puty Clerk
V
Contact: Gerald T. Mitoskinka (510) 313-2810
c.c.: Sheriff-Coroner
County Administrator
June 12,1997
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
FORENSIC SERVICES DIVISION
FEE SCHEDULE-NON-CONTRA COSTA AGENCIES
FISCAL YEAR 1997/98
Proposed increases indicated by bold italics
General Criminalistics Services
All services,per hour $142
Billed activities include the analysis time of samples and standards, preparation of the report, and marking
and packaging of evidence. Those activities which are not billed are supervisory review, clerical support,
consultation. Testimony is billed portal to portal, plus travel expenses.
Services include:
Crime scene processing Gunshot Residue analysis
Crime Scene reconstruction Tool marks
Firearms Prints and impressions (except latent fingerprints)
Serology Hair and fiber analysis
DNA testing Arson analysis
Trace evidence Explosives analysis
Drug Testing
Qualitative identification of drugs, per sample $75
Quantitative identification of drugs, per sample $100
Clandestine drug lab analysis, per hour $135
Testimony, per hour $135
Alcohol Testing (contract pricing and quantity discounts are available)
Cost per blood, breath or urine sample $60
Blood withdrawal services $52
Sample preparation fee, per sample $40
Testimony, per hour $135
Toxicoloov (contract pricing and quantity discounts are available)
Drugs of Abuse only
The following drugs are tested for all 11550 cases. Positive results will automatically result in a
confirmation and/or quantitative analysis.
Methamphetamine/Amphetamine
Cocaine/Cocaine Metabolite
Codeine/Morphine (Heroin)
Urine/Blood screen only $50
Urine confirmation only/drug $40
Blood confirmation &quantitation only/drug $50
All Division Cases: Rush analysis-needed within 5 Court days, add $200/case. 1
June 12,1997
Other Toxicology Analysis
Urine/Blood-Expanded screen only $50
The following drugs are tested for all 23152 V.C., and felony cases. Confirmation and quantitative analysis
will be performed on positive results unless specified otherwise.
Methamphetamine/Amphetamine
Cocaine/Cocaine Metabolite
Codeine/Morphine(Heroin)
Benzodiazepines
Barbiturates
Urine/Blood-Special screens/drug $35
Cannabinoids (Marijuana) - Urine Only
Phencyclidine (PCP)
Urine/Blood-Comprehensive screen $175
This screen is designed to detect most commonly encountered drugs. Confirmation will not be performed
unless requested. The test includes the following:
Expanded screen: see above description
Basic drugs: see below description
Acid/Neutral drugs: see below description
Basic screen only $75
Overdose conc.-common Antidepressants,
Antihistamines,some Synthetic Narcotics
Meperidine, Propoxyphene, Methadone)
Acid/neutral screen only $65
High concentrations;Meprobamate, Glutethimide
Phenytoin,Acetaminophen,Salicylates, Diazepam,
Nordiazepam, Methaqualone, Chlordiazepoxide
Confirmation only/drug $60
i.e., Hydrocodone, Hydromorphone, PCP, Prozac,
Zoloft,Carboxy THC,etc.
Note: all urine samples will be confirmation only
unless specified otherwise.
Blood-Confirmation and quantitation/drug $75
See above for drugs of abuse
All other drugs:
i.e., Hydrocodone, Oxazepam, Barbiturates
(Pheno/Seco/Amo/Butalbital/Pento), PCP,
Carboxy THC
All Division Cases: Rush analysis-needed within 5 Court days, add $200/case. 2
June 12,1997
Special Drug Testing
Blood/Urine-Confirmation only $60
Drugs that the Laboratory can only identify,
i.e., Carbamazepine,Triazadone,Dilantin,
Amyltriptyline...
Quantitation: Cost of outside lab fees only+
Confirmation and/or quantitation requiring special $10 handling fee
instrumentation will be forwarded to an outside
laboratory for analysis. i.e., Lithium, LSD
Blood/Urine-Others/each $B0
Acetone
Carbon mono)dde
Latent Prints
Comparison of latent prints,per hour $90
Latent print processing, per hour $90
Computerized latent print search, per case $300
Testimony, per hour $100
All Division Cases: Rush analysis-needed within 5 Court days,add $200/case. 3
June 12, 1997
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
FORENSIC SERVICES DIVISION
FEE SCHEDULE
FISCAL YEAR 1997/98
Proposed increases indicated by bold italics
General Criminalistics Services
All services,per hour $142
Billed activities include the analysis time of samples and standards, preparation of the report, and marking
and packaging of evidence. Those activities which are not billed are supervisory review, clerical support,
consultation, and testimony.
Services include:
Crime scene processing Gunshot Residue analysis
Crime Scene reconstruction Tool marks
Firearms Prints and impressions(except latent fingerprints)
Serology Hair and fiber analysis
DNA testing Arson analysis
Trace evidence Explosives analysis
Drug Testing
Each drug activity per submission $65
Clandestine drug lab analysis, per hour $120
Alcohol T in
Cost per blood, breath or urine sample $34
Blood withdrawal services $42
Toxicology
Drugs of Abuse only
The following drugs are tested for all 11550 cases. Positive results will automatically result in a
confirmation and/or quantitative analysis.
Methamphetamine/Amphetamine
Cocaine/Cocaine Metabolite
Codeine/Morphine (Heroin)
UdneBlood screen only $30
Urine confirmation only/drug $25
Blood confirmation &quantitation only/drug $45
All Division Cases: Rush analysis- needed within 5 Court days, add $150/case. Does not apply to
investigative leads needed before case is filed.
June 12, 1997
Other Toxicology Analysis
Urine/Blood-Expanded screen only $40
The following drugs are tested for all 23152 V.C.,and felony cases. Confirmation and quantitative analysis
will be performed on positive results unless specified otherwise.
Methamphetamine/Amphetamine
Cocaine/Cocaine Metabolite
CodeinelMorphine (Heroin)
Benzodiazepines
Barbiturates
Urine/Blood-Special screens/drug $30
Cannabinoids (Marijuana) -Urine Only
Phencyclidine (PCP)
Urine/Blood-Comprehensive screen $145
This screen is designed to detect most commonly encountered drugs. Confirmation will not be
performed unless requested. The test includes the following:
Expanded screen: see above description
Basic drugs: see below description
Acid/Neutral drugs: see below description
Basic screen only $55
Overdose conc.-common Antidepressants,
Antihistamines,some Synthetic Narcotics
(Meperidine, Propoxyphene,Methadone)
Acid/neutral screen only $50
High concentrations;Meprobamate, Glutethimide
Phenytoin,Acetaminophen, Salicylates, Diazepam,
Nordiazepam, Methaqualone,Chlordiazepoxide
Confirmation only/drug $45
i.e., Hydrocodone, Hydromorphone, PCP, Prozac,
Zoloft,Carboxy THC, etc.
Note: all urine samples will be confirmation only
unless specified otherwise.
Blood-confirmation and quantitation/drug $60
'.e., Hydrocodone, Oxazepam, Barbiturates
(Pheno/Seco/AmoButalbital/Pento), PCP,
Carboxy THC
Special Drug Testing
Blood/Urine-Confirmation only $45
Drugs that the Laboratory can only identify,
i.e., Carbamazepine,Triazadone, Dilantin,Amyltriptyline...
All Division Cases: Rush analysis-needed within 5 Court days, add$150/case. Does Mt apply to
investigative leads needed before case is filed. 2
June 12, 1997
Quantitation: Cost of outside lab fees only+
Confirmation and/or quantitation requiring special $10 handling fee
instrumentation will be forwarded to an outside
laboratory for analysis. i.e., Lithium, LSD
Blood/Urine-Others Volatiles $50
Acetone/Carbon monoxide
Intoxilyzer Maintenance Fee
Service charge
No charge when a minimum of 48 subject
tests per year are conducted
Each test less than 48/Fiscal Year(July-June) $100/Test
will be charged.
Latent Prints
Comparison of latent prints,per hour $90
Latent print processing, per hour $90
In-custody inked print verification, normal work hours $25
In-custody inked print verification, after hours $80 minimum + $30/hour after 2 hours
ALPS examination on non-complying cases, per hour $50
Inked print verification on non-complying cases, per hour $50
Comparisons of latent prints with named suspects are not funded by the CAL-ID program.
All Division Cases: Rush analysis-needed within 5 Court days, add $150/case. Does not apply to
investigative leads needed before case is filed. 3
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS , CONTRA COSTA COUNTY , CALIFORNIA
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
In the Matter of )
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am now, and
at all times herein mentioned have been , a citizen of the
United States , over age 18; and that today I deposited in the
United States Postal Service in Martinez , California , postage
fully prepaid , a certified copy of UoTiC.G, VV 4(=5A A0& +- -!�OARDORpLJQ�,
to the following :
Home Builders Association Jeff Lawrence
of Northern California Braddock & Logan
P.O. Box 5160 4155 Blackhawk Plaza Cir.
San Ramon, CA 94583 Suite 201
Danville , CA 94506
Albert D. Seeno Const. Co.
Attn: Legal Dept.
4021 Port Chicago Highway
Concord, CA 94524
David Lennon
Hofmann Company
P.O. Box 907
Concord, CA 94522
Dennis J. Razzari
Davidon Homes
1600 So. Main Street #150
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing
is true and correct.
Dated at Martinez , California.
14 9.4 P.* J
eputy Clerk
3
Gfnuitty of Ctnntra Tosta
(Office of the -";1jrriff-T-orotter
Warren E.Rupt
snn-ca.oar
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AVAILABILITY OF DATA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on June 24, 1997 at 10:45 am, in the Board of Supervisors'
Chambers at 651 Pine Street, I st Floor, Martinez, California, a public hearing will be held to
increase certain Criminalistics Laboratory fees of the Forensic Services Division of the Office of
the Sheriff of Contra Costa County. A copy of the fee proposal is on file with the Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors' Office at 651 Pine Street, 1 st Floor, Martinez, California.
L
Gerald F, Mitosinka, Chief
Forensic Services Division
Criminalistics Laboratory
1960 Muir Road, Suite 201 •Martinez, California 94553-4800
Tountu of Toutra Tosta
(Offire of tyre ,'�*Iferiff-&rotter
Warren E. Rupt
shef,P,�mner
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AVAILABILITY OF DATA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on June 24, 1997 at 10:45 am, in the Board of Supervisors'
Chambers at 651 Pine Street, 1 st Floor, Martinez, California, a public hearing will be held to
increase certain Criminalistics Laboratory fees of the Forensic Services Division of the Office of
the Sheriff of Contra Costa County. A copy of the fee proposal is on file with the Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors' Office at 651 Pine Street, I st Floor, Martinez, California.
L
Gerald . Mitosinka, Chief
Forensic Services Division
Criminalistics Laboratory
1960 Muir Road,Suite 201 •Martinez, California 94553-4800
I a
Tauntn of (1-mttrea To5ta
(Office of the ,"�-Iteriff-Torvnrr
Warren E.Rupf
Sheriff-Coroner
June 3, 1997
Contra Costa Times
Attn: Norma- Legal Publications
Shadeland Drive
Walnut Creek, California
Dear Norma:
The following notice needs to be published in the legal section on June 13, 1997, and June 22,
1997.
Immediately upon expiration of the publication, please send an affidavit to:
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors & Office of the Sheriff
651 Pine Street, Room 106 Forensic Services Division
Martinez, California 94553 1122 Escobar Street
Martinez, California 94553
Please forward an invoice for services to.
Office of the Sheriff
Forensic Services Division
1122 Escobar Street
Martinez, California 94553
Any questions, please call me at 313-2800.
Sincerely,
WARREN E. RUFF, Sheriff
�T.1�Iito inka, Chie
Forensic Services Division
by: Diane Daubenspeck, Supervising Clerk
enclosure
Criminalistics Laboratory
1960 Muir Road, Suite 201 •Martinez, California 94553-4800