Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05131997 - D1 D.) THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on May 13, 1997, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla and DeSaulnier NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Office of the District Attorney Departmental Performance Report Gary T. Yancey, District Attorney-Public Administrator, presented the Board with both oral and written reports on departmental performance. Mr. Yancey answered questions from Board members and thanked them for the opportunity to make his presentation. The Board members discussed the report and then took the following action: 1. ACCEPTED the report from the Gary T. Yancey, District Attorney-Public Administrator, on departmental performance. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: May 13, 1997 Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and Co my Administrator r e Wampler, Deputy Clerk cc: County Administrator District Attorney D 1997 DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE REPORT District Attorney-Public Administrator ti l Gary T. Yancey District Attorney-Public Administrator May, 1997 s�'•' 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW Departmental Responsibilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Organizational Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ll. RESOURCES Financial Resources: 1996/97 Budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Revenue Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Personnel Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Affirmative Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Sick Leave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Staff Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Automation . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Criminal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Family Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 III. CUSTOMER SERVICES Service Delivery System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 , Criminal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Family Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Customer Profile Criminal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Family Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I. . . . . . 13 Customer Relationships Criminal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Family Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 IV. ANNUAL PERFORMANCE Performance Indicators Criminal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Family Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Accomplishments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 24 V. CHALLENGES AND NEW DIRECTIONS . Criminal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Family Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 -i- I. OVERVIEW A. Departmental Responsibilities The department prosecutes criminal and some civil cases from filing through disposition, with limited pre- and post-filing investigation resources available. The civil cases principally fall into the environmental and consumer fraud areas. Limited discretion. The Family Support Division (FSD) collects child support and prosecutes "deadbeat" parents. Discretion on collection function is essentially zero per federal and state mandates. The Public Administrator function is a two-person operation which handles estates where the deceased has no known heirs. Limited discretion. B. Organizational Structure See attached organization chart. II. RESOURCES A. Financial Resources: 1996/97 Budget Function Unit Adopted Budget Criminal 242 $ 14,072,947 Family Support 245 10,362,408` Public Administrator 364 148,399 *Budget Unit 0245 also includes another $1,118,167 and 13 positions for welfare fraud investigation. -1- Revenue Sources Criminal $ 7,570,320 Sales tax 2,664,524 Grants and other revenue* 3.383.102 Net County cost $14,072,947 *Grants, Revenues, and Expenditure Transfers - 1996/97 Adopted Budget OCJP Regional Anti-Drug $ 175,100 OCJP Career Criminal Prosecution 170,070 OCJP Major Narcotic Vendor 123,631 Prosecution/DA-Net OCJP Statutory Rape Vertical 61,632 Prosecution Attorney General Spousal Abuse Prosecution 110,000 Realignment Juvenile 199,697 Forfeiture Narcotics Forfeiture 91,150 Forfeiture Auto Forfeiture 124,000 Department of Insurance Worker's Comp. Fraud 312,104 Prosecution Department of Insurance Auto Insurance Fraud Prosecution 216,104 Department of Motor Vehicle Theft Prosecution 218,666 Vehicles Penalties Consumer Fraud and Toxic 650,000 Pollution Damages Social Services Welfare Fraud Prosecution 205,070 Miscellaneous P.O.S.T., Discovery 7,300 Non-sales Tax Revenue 2,664,524 Sales Tax Revenue **7.220.480 TOTAL **$9,885,004 **An additional $349,840 in prior year Sales Tax Revenue was added to the 1996/97 Adopted Budget in expenditure appropriations only. -2- This brings the total amount of Sales Tax Revenue available to the District Attorney to $7,570,320, and non-General Fund funding sources to $10,234.844. N.B. The Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Program funded by recording fees began in 1996/97 and added a revenue offset attorney and investigator at $185,000. Additional grants*** secured by the District Attorney DURING FY 1996/97 to enhance domestic violence prosecution efforts: - City of Concord Community Policing to Combat Domestic Violence $ 62,000 1 Fixed-term Attorney Federal Block Grant Enhancing Adjudication 111,250 .75 FTE A-Level Attorney 1 B-Level Clerk Keller Canyon 25,000 .25 FTE A-Level Attorney State of California 1 B-Level Attorney Citizen Option for Public Safety(COPS) 337,000 1 Senior"Inspector 1 C-Level Clerk; related equipment .5 FTE Domestic Violence Counselor at BWA TOTAL $535,250 ***This funding augments the District Attorney's Spousal Abuser Prosecution Program funded by the Attorney General's Office in the amount of$110,000 for an A-Level attorney and .5 FTE Domestic Violence Counselor at BWA. Family Support $11,480,175 100% offset from federal and state government Public Administrator County cost, with some revenue from administering estates Note that the net County contribution to the criminal budget amounts to only 27% and, of the total District Attorney budget, only 15%. -3- B. Personnel Resources Authorized Positions: Adopted Budget 1996/97 FAMILY PUBLIC CRIMINAL SUPPORT ADMINISTRATOR TOTAL Attorneys 84 7 0 91 Investigators 16 *11 0 27 Clerks 55 *71 0 126 Collection 0 53 0 53 Officers Others 2 15 2 19 TOTAL** 157 157 2 316 *Includes 11 Welfare Fraud Investigators + 2 clerks in Welfare Fraud. **3 Deputy District Attorneys and 2 clerks added after adopted budget through grants and other revenue to staff Domestic Violence Prosecution Program. The fixed-term attorney program continues to be both a blessing and a curse. The County saves approximately a million dollars a year when the cost of the 27 fixed-terms is compared to the equivalent cost of the same number of the first level permanent attorney staff. (Recall, the fixed-term are paid a modest, flat salary for their three years of employment.) However, the downside of the program entails aggressive, extensive recruiting, constant training, a continual stream of new faces for judges and police to adjust to, and the heartbreak of having to let people go at the end of their term -- hardworking, loyal, and productive members of the team. One wonders why other County departments which employ professionals (attorneys, doctors, nurses, engineers, etc.) are not forced to enjoy the "benefits" of a similar cost- savings program. C. Affirmative Action The department meets all of the major assigned goals. Year in and -4- year out, it is number one or number two in compliance among the large departments. Meeting the goals within the professional staff while maintaining high hiring standards is accomplished through vigorous recruiting. The low starting salary and "fixed term" program make attracting top quality minorities difficult. Despite this impediment, the attorney staff meets or exceeds minority representation in the Bay Area work force. D. Sick Leave The County-wide employee usage from 1994 was 70.25% (of available hours). Current figures are not available. In comparison, the career sick leave usage for the major employee groups under the District Attorney are as follows: Attorneys 34% (i.e., 66 unused) Investigators 48% Clerical (Criminal Division) 65% Family Support 79% (Collection Officers and Clerical) As can be seen from these numbers, the majority of the staff does much better than the County average. The FSD is'worse than the County average. The stress of the heavy workload coupled with dealing with an angry clientele accounts, in large part, for the problem. However, the continued lack of a County Sick Leave policy that has teeth in it and which supports the managers in their attempts to crack down on sick leave abuse is a major contributor to the lack of success in reducing sick leave usage. A reward system may be the answer. E. Staff Development All employees, professional and support, are evaluated on an annual basis, except top management who work directly for the District Attorney. Those individuals are handled on an informal, face-to-face -5- basis. The office has a formal training program for the lawyers, designed to satisfy both specialized prosecutorial knowledge as well as fulfilling the State Bar mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirements. As an example, on Saturday, April 19, all day mandatory training was conducted for all deputies on the subject of felony sentencing by the leading authority in California, without cost to the County by either trainer or trainees. Contra Costa County, in turn, provides training to other district attorney's offices on ethics, discovery, and Three Strikes. The deputy district attorneys are also encouraged to maintain an active membership in the California District Attorneys Association, and to utilize the County-provided training and book funds to attend CDAA courses offering training in the specialized areas to which the deputies are assigned (i.e., domestic violence, drug labs, consumer fraud, toxic pollution, etc.). As part of the CDAA membership, Contra Costa County deputy district attorneys play an important role in shaping state law and prosecutorial policies through participation on CDAA committees such as ethics, legislation, appellate, environmental protection, etc. Through these activities, Contra Costa County has achieved a reputation as one of the leading district attorney's offices in the state. The investigators are sent to P.O.S.T. required (and financed) training which is necessary to maintain their peace officer status. All are current. In addition, at least two of the inspectors are trained and currently certified as polygraph examiners. The clerical support staff receives both in-house training for each assigned desk they cover as well as training on broader subjects provided by the County Training Institute. The training of new collection officers in Family Support is a formal process lasting some three months before they begin handling actual -6- cases. This training for both collection officers and support staff has been further intensified in anticipation of going on-line with the new statewide automated child support collection system (SACSS). In the past year, Family Support sent 12 team supervisors off-site for six weeks formal SACSS training, including training on how to be a trainer. Further training of at least a month's duration by state SACSS experts is anticipated before SACSS comes on line. F. Automation 1 . Criminal The generation of criminal complaints and subpoenas was automated some ten years ago through the use of "Yanceywriter" software and the County mainframe. The mainframe also is the source of criminal justice information for courts, District Attorney, Public Defender, Probation, and local police departments. Information available includes case charges, calendared court dates, disposition information, etc. The chief drawback to the present system is the lack of ability to readily obtain data for management studies/reports (such as the number of spousal abuse case filings) without making a formal request through Data Processing (and being charged for the service). Within the department, a CD-Rom legal. research system has been installed in each branch office. In addition, the historical goal of putting a personal computer on each lawyer's desk is nearing completion. This equipment saves much clerical time as the attorneys (particularly the newer ones) word process their own legal research papers. 2. Family Support The long-awaited (some ten years in development) State Automated Child Support Collection System (SACSS) has been scheduled to be -7- implemented in Contra Costa County for the past two years. Unfortunately, the system has proven cumbersome and unreliable in all of the counties installed to date. A major evaluation and software program modification is underway by the state and its principle vendor. When SACSS will ultimately be installed in Contra Costa County is anyone's guess. Meanwhile, the Contra Costa County District Attorney's Office FSD will continue to be the largest organization in the state which is neither fully automated nor financially supported by the county. The current state of automation in FSD can be summarized as follows: a) The mainframe merely stores date; it does not process any data and does not do any forms generation, so FSD still receives reams of printouts from the state which must be manually worked. Most other counties, especially large counties, have an automated system which will extract the necessary data from the state's tapes and compare it with the current data to alert staff to changes that require user intervention. b) Judicial Council forms are still typed. Form letters are filled in by hand by Collections to save time required to have clerical type in addresses. c) Word processing is minimal at this point. d) The welfare trust is still worked by hand. e) Though SACSS has not been implemented in this County, FSD has received the SACSS equipment. The office is in the process of building an on-line form production capability to the LAN; has purchased software to allow filling out Judicial Council forms through WordPerfect; has purchased software to access the Worker's Compensation Board's database which will allow filing liens electronically; and, has converted one task specific database tracking program to Access and has plans for several more. -8- Much of this activity has been held up by a lack of resources in the County's Department of Information and Technology (DOIT). This is currently being rectified by Service Level Agreements in which FSD agrees to fund positions in that department. f) An imaging system is planned for the payment processing unit. FSD will use this system later to retain historical data from the mainframe after conversion to SACSS. g) FSD pays DOIT for three full-time and one half-time programmers for the mainframe. However, given the delay of SACSS, the County will face a major hurdle if it does not convert to some system before the year 2000. DOIT has advised that the mainframe programs cannot be converted without an entire re- programming of the mainframe. It would be a colossal waste of money and resources to convert a completely inadequate data storage program. Hopefully, it will not come to that. III. CUSTOMER SERVICES A. Service Delivery System 1 . Criminal The District Attorney is both a state constitutional officer and a local elected official. As such, he represents the "People of the State of California," but not individual citizens. The jurisdiction of the District Attorney includes both investigatory and prosecution functions, and it extends county-wide, covering county, city, and special district areas, including some 25 police agencies (cities, county, college district, BART, and park district), plus serving state agencies and such non-traditional sources of cases such as the Bay Area Water Quality Control Board, etc. The basic function of the District Attorney's Office is to file and prosecute misdemeanor and felony cases. In recent years, infractions (the lowest level criminal charge such as most Vehicle -9- Code offenses and some lesser Penal Code offenses) are directly filed with the court by police agencies, where in most cases, they are adjudicated without participation by a deputy district attorney. The bulk of intake is handled in the two District Attorney municipal court branch offices, one in the Richmond Court complex and the other in Concord on Willow Pass Road near the City Civic Center. The remaining cases representing the many specialized prosecution units in the office are filed,in the District Attorney's Office at 10 Douglas Drive, Martinez, the Special Operations Unit at 651 Pine Street, 12th Floor, Martinez, the old Court House, downtown Martinez, and the FSD at 50 Douglas Drive. The misdemeanor cases are handled from start to finish in the four municipal court jurisdictions in the County -- Bay, Mt. Diablo, Walnut Creek-Danville, and Delta. Conversely, the felony cases start in the municipal court branches and then, following a preliminary hearing or Grand Jury indictment, are transferred to Superior Court Operations in Martinez for all further proceedings .through trial and sentencing. Some felony cases are brought directly to superior court through the Grand Jury indictment process. Typical cases taken to the Grand Jury include multiple defendant drug "buys" and sexual assault cases with sensitive victims. The intake function of the District Attorney is the single most critical workload determinant for the entire county justice system -- including courts, Public Defender, jails, and others. Therefore, every effort is made to place experienced attorneys in both misdemeanor and felony filing positions. The innovative half-time lawyer positions for experienced deputy district attorneys (mostly new mothers) has proven most beneficial for that purpose. The municipal court division will see citizens and police on a drop- in basis. Scheduled appointments are the preferred method for the speciality units. -10- The District Attorney has relatively unlimited discretion in the filing of criminal cases. The law is quite clear that neither the judiciary, the police, citizen victims, nor any other branch of government can interfere with or control the case filing process. In actual practice, the office utilizes the statewide District Attorney Filing Standards which, in brief, require the prospective case to consist of sufficient, legally admissible evidence to convince 12 people beyond a reasonable doubt of the defendant's guilt in the face of the most plausible and reasonably foreseeable defense. It is improper to file legally insufficient criminal cases simply to appease victims and police, for publicity, for political reasons, to satisfy press or public demand, or any other such non-professional reason. The staff is trained in and does, in fact, follow that policy. 2. Family Support The FSD's essential function is to collect child support from non- custodial parents for either the custodial parent or to reimburse the County for welfare payments (AFDC) and child placement costs. The standards and procedures necessary to accomplish this mission (case opening, establishment of paternity, location of assets, obtaining court orders, etc.) are rigidly controlled by federal and state law and regulations. The Family Support budget is built upon a model of two-thirds state reimbursement for approved expenditures coupled with a bonus or incentive system fashioned upon meeting certain audit and collection goals. Historically, the "bonus" money has been sufficient to cover the remaining (one-third) unreimbursed expenditures, hence no net County cost. a. Application for services FSD receives referrals from the County Social Services Department when aid is granted. FSD then provide the services as prescribed by regulation in these cases. This includes Foster Care and MediCal cases. Once the children -11- are off aid, FSD continues to provide these services unless the custodial person requests to close the case. In those cases, FSD will continue to collect for any arrears owed to reimburse the welfare system. In non-aid cases, FSD provides the services as requested by the parent or custodial person of the child(ren). b. Services provided The following services are provided; however, the District Attorney does not represent the applicant or child. There is no attorney-client relationship with either. • Paternity adjudication • child support establishment • MediCal support establishment • child, medical, and spousal support enforcement FSD does not provide services in the following areas: • custody • visitation • spousal support establishment • restraining orders c. Areas of Discretion Family Support is highly regulated and allows for very little discretion in services provided. (1 ) Regulation is by federal law, federal regulation, Federal Office of Child Support Enforcement, state law, state regulation, and California Department of Social Services. The areas of discretion would be limited to office procedures such as: -12- i (1 ) Having field offices with welfare to process referrals. (2) Seeing people by drop-in or appointment. (3) Requiring the applicant to fill out a written application or be interviewed to obtain the information. B. Customer Profile 1 . Criminal Indirectly, the office serves all County residents plus, in certain consumer cases, white collar crimes, and environmental cases, residents of adjoining counties as well as affected victims throughout the state (for example, the Shell Oil spill). Directly, the office serves some 25 police agencies located entirely or partially within the County, including BART, the East Bay Regional Park District, and the Highway Patrol. In addition, three state supported narcotic enforcement teams operate within the County. Other, less frequent, uses of the District Attorney's resources include agencies such as the FBI, the state Attorney General, the County Health Department, and a host of other federal, state, and local agencies on a sporadic basis. Finally, individual victims (both persons, businesses, and other private agencies and groups) use the services on a regular basis. The office, as a whole, serves the courts. 2. Family Support a) Custodial Persons (1 ) Not necessarily a parent, but could be a relative such as an aunt or grandparent, or other caretaker. -13- (2) May be aid or non-aid (a) Aid includes AFDC, Foster Care placement, MediCal. (b) Includes interstate cases. b) Parents (1) May be custodial person. (2) May be opened by non-custodial parent to establish paternity and/or support orders and/or support enforcement. (a) The biggest need for services is by the taxpayer. (b) It is in all taxpayers' interest to help establish the legal obligation to support the child(ren) which in turn allows FSD to obtain orders and collect money for the family to get off of welfare or stay off of welfare. (c) Social policy that all children should know the identity of their parents. (3) Those that cannot afford the legal services of a lawyer or paralegal and who feel intimidated by the legal system need some sort of legal assistance to obtain child support in order to stay off of welfare and establish a parental relationship for their child(ren). (4) Those with acrimonious relationships who need an impartial third party to handle the collection and documentation of payments received. (5) Also needed to separate the payment of support from the exercise of visitation. -14- (c) Customer Needs in Addition to Our Services (1 ) Understanding of how the system works and how to work within its constraints. (a) A -general handbook, which was written by the California Department of Social Services, is available in the lobby at 50 Douglas Drive, Martinez. There is a County-specific pamphlet that provides details of Contra Costa County's services. (b) The issues that arise that are general in nature and not case specific are: • What is needed to respond to (i.e., service of Summons and Complaint). • How to assist FSD (i.e, provide leads). • What must be provided to FSD (i.e., documentary proof or declaration under penalty of perjury regarding payment history). • Limitation of services (what services and - enforcement actions that cannot be provided. (2) Understanding of the legal system. This is an area which is difficult since the office cannot give legal advice. Therefore, a fine line needs to be walked by the collection staff, with error on the side of caution. Currently, FSD refers people to the local Bar Association for their Pro Per Clinic. The issues that arise are: (a) Difference between an IV-D,action, a UPA action, and a dissolution action. (b) How they can represent themselves in our actions -15- or in actions they, or the other party, brings. (c) Legal concepts. (3) The new position of Family Court Facilitator will be of great help in this area. C. Customer Relationships 1 . Criminal A primary function of the District Attorney's Office is to make case filing and disposition decisions on an everyday basis. These decisions affect people's lives, property, employment, reputation, freedom, and workload (in the case of police and courts). Not every decision made is a popular one, particularly ones involving complex legal and factual issues poorly understood by the lay public. There is an appeal process in place for use by police and citizens who disagree with the intake deputy district attorney's filing decision. This process extends to the District Attorney, if necessary. In victim-sensitive cases (sexual assault, etc.), the assigned deputy district attorneys work closely with victim's groups such as Battered Women's Alternatives and Rape Crisis. Every effort is made to keep victims (and their families as appropriate) informed of case progress through disposition. Unfortunately, the District Attorney's Office is not staffed with victims' advocate case workers. The District Attorney's Office has been a leading proponent in the development of an automated access system whereby the courts, Public Defender, Probation, and the District Attorney can share court calendar and disposition information. That system has now been expanded to allow access by police departments. As of this -16- writing, not every police agency had acquired the software necessary to join the system, but all plan to do so. 2. Family Support a. How customers obtain the services provided: (1 ) Application or welfare referral. (2) There is no application fee or means test. (3) About 1 ,000 cases a month are opened. b. Customer access: (1 ) Telephone (a) There is a Voice Mail Messaging within the VRU so that those without answering machines can pick up the answer to their questions in the system instead of waiting by the phone for a return phone call. (b) The Voice Tree provides answers to the most commonly asked questions and access to the payment history for the last five payments received. • 13,000 calls come into the VRU monthly. This averages 788 per workday; 131 on weekends or holidays. • 3,000 calls per month leave messages to be responded to be staff. About 2,000 of these can be handled by specially trained clerical staff. • Payment History accessed 5,000 times a month. This has greatly reduced the flood of calls asking if the check has come in yet. -17- (2) Drop-in (a) Tuesdays and Thursdays; on average, 525 people are seen in a month on these days. (b) Only in special circumstances on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. On average, 200 people a month are seen on these days. (3) Appointments (a) Only if ready to sign stipulation. (b) Attorney. (c) Exceptional circumstances. (4) Writing (a) FSD receives about 10,000 to 12,000 pieces of mail a month and about 550 faxes. (5) On the average, FSD actively works 6,000 to 7,000 cases a month. Approximately 2,000 of those are worked because of mail received on a case. c. Steps to be more accessible/responsible to customers: (1) SLMS packet - FSD created a packet to send to NCP's when they call or come in about a hold on their license. It enables the office to obtain all the necessary information to make a determination on their case. Often the SLMS hold can be handled by mail, instead of the person having to drop in, if they have made contact at least two months before the license suspension goes into effect. FSD has 'dedicated one collection officer to handle these cases for increased efficiency and continuity. -18- (2) Added temporary account clerks to update spreadsheets so that those calling for an update on their arrears do not have to wait for a collection officer to have time to run the spreadsheet. Only those in which the obligation has changed since the last spreadsheet must be sent to Collections. This gives a two to three day turn-around on the balance update requests. (3) Increased payment processing staff to speed up the turn- around time on payments received. (d) Customer Satisfaction Efforts (1 ) Customer Service Questionnaires have been handed out to drop-ins during the past year. It asks them to rate FSD's service and to offer suggestions for improved services. From this, the office is beginning to take steps to make the wait easier. Donations by the Family Support staff are being used to create an area designated as a child play area stocked with toys. (2) Additional clerical staff will be trained to handle more phone calls which will decrease the drop-ins. There have been two retirements, three major worker's compensation leaves, and six temporary collection officers leave in the past year from the collection staff. Six trained clerical phone staff were transferred to collections, which increased the collection staff but left less experienced staff on the phones for the clerical staff. (3) FSD has increased the staff involved in resolving complaints received through outside organizations. The office has been averaging 20 to 25 complaints a month for the last year. In January 1996, fewer complaints were resolved than received. By December 1996, all complaints that came in during a month were resolved. -19- Staff has been meeting quarterly with ACES, a child support advocacy group to educate their membership and to assist their members in bringing problems to the office. IV. ANNUAL PERFORMANCE A. Performance Indicators 1 . Criminal a. An absolute and unquestioned reputation for honesty and integrity. b. Sophistication of Organization/Operations As can be seen from the attached organizational chart, the department has adopted the specialist team concept which characterizes the largest and most modern of district attorneys offices. Typical special units include Sexual Assault, Welfare Fraud, Homicide, etc. The specialization technique allows the office to deliver a'high quality, victim-oriented product. c. Productivity (1 ) Criminal Filings 6,290 felonies; 18,251 misdemeanors The felony filings are down some 8.2% over 1995, primarily due to the beneficial impact of "Three Strikes", and other tough new sentencing laws. (2) A good grasp of the department's morale and work ethic can be gained from the following data taken from the 1996 Annual Report, Judicial Council of California for jury trials in Bay Area counties (fiscal year 1994-95). -20- FELONY MISDEMEANOR COUNTY TRIALS TRIALS TOTAL RANK Contra Costa 246 212 458 1 Santa Clara 200 134 334 2 San Francisco 154 71 225 3 Alameda 126 60 186 4 San Mateo 68 88 156 5 Solano 92 45 137 6 Marin 25 66 91 7 This outstanding achievement is even more impressive when one considers that three of the counties listed have district attorney offices much larger than Contra Costa. Comparing the trials per deputy district attorney (1995 staffing levels); the difference is startling: Contra Costa 5.33 trials/deputy district attorney Average other counties 2.04 trials/deputy district attorney Or, more than two and one-half times the trials per attorney. 3. Efficiency The latest available felony conviction data from the State of California, Department of Justice, Bureau of Criminal Statistics, was published September 30, 1993, for 1992 (the Bureau has not published the data since due to budget problems), showed the following superior court conviction rate: Contra Costa County 97.6% (second highest in the state) Statewide average 94.7% These figures should be fairly representative today and -21- show that this office carefully screens the criminal cases at intake, and then works very hard for convictions. The results are terrific considering that the office maintains a no plea bargaining policy on superior court cases. 2. Family Support a. Performance Indicators (1 ) Annual audit time frames under AB 1033. (2) Percentage of incentives received on collections. Six percent base incentives can be increased to eleven percent when in compliance with the AB 1033 time frames. This can be further increased by three percent for improvement shown on a historical comparison and a statewide comparison. These are called Tier II incentives. (3) Amount of money collected. b. Historical Measures (1 ) AB 1033 Audit The Audit covers 17 criteria, all of which have numerous time frames which must be met. The AB 1033 Audit began in 1991, reviewing actions taken in fiscal year 1990-91. FSD has achieved compliance since AB 1033 began. (2) Incentive Percentage (a) Tier II looks at four factors: locate, paternity, establishment, revenue to administrative cost. (b) Tier II incentives began in fiscal year 1993-94 based on the results of the fiscal year 1992-93 -22- audit. This year, 1996-97, FSD will receive 2.25% Tier II incentives. Prior years: 1995-96 1.5% 1994-95 0.5% 1993-94 0.5% (3) Collections (a) So far, 1996-97 collections have increased over last year at this same point. (b) Five-year comparison - up 32% 1995-96 $30,516,920 1994-95 27,941 ,251 1993-94 27,252,808 1992-93 26,073,609 1991-92 23,181 ,876 c. Barriers to Performance (1 ) Nature of cases (a) California has 2.2 million open family support cases. The state reports that only 52.5% of those cases are collectable. The rest are difficult or impossible to collect due to: • Parent in custody, on welfare, or unemployable. • Parent out of state or out of country. • Important information is not provided by the custodial party, such as the name or date of birth of the father or other identifying information. -23- (2) Inability by regulation to prioritize cases to work (a) FSD has some 71 ,000 cases. This means that only 37,275 of those cases are collectable, yet the state regulations mandates work on all of the cases equally, regardless of the likelihood of collection. (3) Lack of a functional automation system (a) Computers can review and compare information must faster than people. FSD receives between 10 and 15 boxes of printouts each month. If this were on tape, the computer could process this information in a matter of hours. FSD does not have the staff to process this information in the entire month. (b) A forms generation system would speed production by current staff. (c) An automated tickler system would ensure deadlines are not missed. (4) Understaffed Since FSD must function at no net County cost, it cannot staff to the level needed to efficiently handle 71 ,000 cases in a manual environment. If unable to implement SACCS soon, FSD must increase staffing to just provide adequate coverage. To properly staff FSD would require County funding and additional building space. B. Accomplishments Implemented Domestic Violence Prosecution Team (four attorneys, one investigator, one clerk)from five outside sources of revenue after three consecutive budget requests to form the team -24- were denied. V. CHALLENGES AND NEW DIRECTIONS 1 . Criminal The criminal division of the District Attorney's Office needs and deserves a commitment from the Board of Supervisors to provide stable funding of prosecution programs (domestic violence, drug dealers, etc.) that will enable the office to withstand the vagaries of the federal and state grants and other irregular revenue sources. 2. Family Support a. Challenges (1 ) Current challenges (a) SACCS implementation or alternatives during the delay. (b) Implementation of 1058 Court Task Force Legislation. (c) Physical limitations of current floor space includes lack of room to add new staff, and files have outgrown the file room and have to be shipped off site. (d) It is apparent that if the County contributed funds to the budget, those funds could be leveraged by two- thirds. For example, $750,000 in additional staff could be added at a net County cost of $250,000 because the state would reimburse $500,000 (two-thirds of the $750,000). And, since the additional staff would enable Family Support to collect more money and better meet the audit requirements, more incentive money would be received which could, in turn, be used to reduce the County contribution. To date, that very reasonable proposition has fallen on deaf ears. -25- (2) Plans to meet challenges (a) Execute Service Level Agreements so that FSD does not face the lack of data processing resources again. (b) Work closely with court and CFSC on 1058 changes. (c) Explore additional shift work to accommodate need for more staff. (d) Use mainframe to identify (and close, if possible) many old cases in which Collections cannot locate the non-custodial parent after three years of attempts, to make room for new cases. This is a discretionary closing criteria not often used in the past. (b) New Directions (1) Effects of Welfare Reform (a) It places additional emphasis upon the collection of child support to replace welfare. (b) Encourages cooperation by the custodial parent to assist in the obtaining and collection of child support. (c) Will assist parent to obtain employment, which will allow them to be able to pay support for their other children that do not live in their home. (d) May shift the determination of Good Cause and Non-Cooperation to the FSD. Possible legislation to increase the Family Support role to include custody and visitation issues. Also have had indications that, in the future, FSD may be mandated to handle cases when food stamps issued -26- to family. -27 d cu'tic 3� O.-r=Q am 3 TO pro (� N n v 0 T m m O Z i mN r= m�E y E 7 U LL ULL��S� ~ LL Q J lL.07 H = U FNM-4(O(D 4 N N t _ v O U Q N O N m v coQ 3Y c o o 0 2 O > o o� O � mm< 3:W3:in¢� a �= xU a F 2. v Q1-F-d000JUY�« N N M 4 t6 Or-�W O O W �NMIt(C) a O U Y N O ,O in '^ M v Q C cU U c Y v m 3 'O U Q m 3 - m to T (D y v W�.3 O Q E N S N E 3 N — C m V Y N (8 C ` �L Y m Y C c c`n m o m 3.x•0—— m o 006 m �o� O SCy1}L�-D..WLL.mJdJJ —CnU v oaociC6C6 �N(M V t6(6 f- 06 a;0 N e N M 7 Y `•" N .� v Ua. d N v Zp Z m m > j o O (nN O a) 0E 7 Q o Q na� rat v �30mm n Q U M0 06 N c (n a`� o•c.` o a aci a)q ti Z C a 3 m O c > m N m c d o m D- X W cn CL c) _ MLL���,0 E Y�jU;a Y CL 0 N = O Z Z U o��d aoa>�a�pp o�2N d U �NM4�6 titbaio O Q Q N M V N O UU _o (o o Q 0. _ Q UN 2 NO m O_y O E2 CtO Wo m m � N Nm5N•N•5 vmc = m2 OO � oC2 � m N. O l LL( )[" z5Qp()NUW2UQ� U '3O UN(MZ of ci V 6(D r,.:c6 W ONM _ M �rLo(D r-c600 C O) Q-�=Q c Q 2 7 Q ` crJ ~ F CO U N C Q ~ O WQ U a) Z N C m c 0 W O = C Q N v O 3 �Q O .` Y ... O O Q N Q C i N OQ p mQ c mN`o c000 m m O 2i n o > > m y UQ�c( :CLL mU U j