HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04081997 - C33-C47 POSITION ADJUSTMENT RE�Qi6U�ST C J� DAT 10
Department No./0540 See COPERS
Department HEALTH SERVICES/Mi Budget, Unit No.0301 Org No.AtcbgtAgency No. 54
Action Requeste See Attachment X -,
Proposed ective ate: ` c2-'
mr
Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes ❑ No
Cost is within Department's budget: Yes irk No ❑
Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $ -O-
Estimated total cost adjustment (salary/benefits/one time:
Total annual cost $ 14 760.00 Net County Cost $ -0-
Total this FY $ �00 N.C.C. this FY $ -0- a
ut
SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT patient revenues.
Department must in1date neoeesery adjustment and submh to CAO. V
Use addidonel sheat for further explanations or comments, h,
PAUL KUNKEL, Pers Svcs Asst.
orDepartment Head
------------------------------------------------ --------- ---------------------------_____
REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES RTMENT // q
LS
epu y o nAdministrat6r Uate
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION DATE 3//Gj/9 7
(OVER)
Amend Reedutton 71/17 establishing poeitlons and resolutions alloceng classes the BaalQeKempt salanrule as described V'
Effective: ❑ Da / following Board Action. �`�
( (Date)
ory uir ctwr of Human Resources
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION DATE:
' Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources
❑ Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources
❑ Other:
or) Lorty Administrator
____________________
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Adjustment APPROVED DISAPPROVED ❑ _ anqCpuntv Administrator
DATE: BY:
APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL/ ALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION
Adjust classes)/position(s) as follows:
P300 WM7)Flev 511195
Y POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NOT17a_;-45' C-31'
Department No./ COPERS
DlT �Ctent Probation Budget Unit No.0308 Org No. 3000 Agency No. 30
Action Requested Establish one Probation Supervisor I postiod an cancel Deputy probatioT n
Officer III position No. 211.
Proposed Effective Date: 4115 9
Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes o No ia(Cost is within Department's budge: Yeso Noci
Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: S -o-
Estimated total cost adjustment (salary/benefits/one time:
Total annual cost t13,524 Net County Cost $' 13,524
Total this FY $ 3.1N N.C.C. this FY $ 3,381
SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJOSTMMENI —
Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO.
Use additional sheet for further explanations or cm aents.
r
See attached memo dated 3/12/97. Fp-r)-De-partment Head
10/
REVIEWED BY CAD AND RELEASFT► TO HUMAN RI—MOURCES D TME
t
AdministratorDate
_ HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION DATE 3/„27157
Add one Probation Supervisor I position, Salary Level G5 2150 ($3898-4738) and cancel
Deputy Probation Officer III posiiton #30-168, Salary Level C5 1994 ($3335-4054),
i
SOW M440M nM 606112MF4 pa0ltk=Ord rONOWAOaa 8MCB 0y
o )
oeassox pc 8017
Effective: ay following Board Action.
(DateIr 0-
r�erirloe.
Human Resources
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOhffi MTION
o�pco Recommendation of Director of Human Resources 2S .
Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources
a Other:
(for) qbufmy Admanistrator
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors . .
Mju APPf�VEO}d� DISAPPROVED o • and u y Admin'strator
DATE: R )I R9 7 BY: a �a a..
APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEUSALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT
pOSMON ADJUSTMENT.ACTION To BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION
Adjust classes)/position(s) as follows:
if Request is to Add Project Positions/Classes, please complete other side
rata man saw woes
POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
Department No./ COPER
Department Social Service Budget Unit Na. 0500 Org No 5000 Agency No: 53
Action Reques a EANEET one 1 Senior Program Aide (Pasf_rfnj; ADD one—M Administra ive
alvst position v
Proposed Effective Date: y a � avprovE
Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes ❑ No IR o :=xr
Cost is within Department's budget: Yes JR No ❑ pn
Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: S 0
Estimated total cost adjustment (salary/benefits/one time: -o .i-
Total annual cost $ 45,4-44 Net County Cost 3 516
Total this FY $ 27. 722 N.C.C. this FY t�
E "=
SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT_:!a "& Federal Funds kin,,
DepWb tffd mud Mtdats rro nwy adjuttrnerd and submtt to CAO.
Um add1dwW shad for Rather explanstlons or comment.
(for) Deptme ea
ld
sorsa—assxxssasmsxxxmxxmxxsxxxxmxxssxxsxaaxsamxm sxxassxxa _ csxsxxxxxxsxsxxxasssssssssttmasaas
REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES RTMENT
Deputy t yminis ra or Date`
sxamssmsmmxasasssxsxxxxxmxxxsmxxmxxmxwsxxsmxxmssassss_ssssssexs�=cxsssssssssttsasssssxsssmxx
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION DATE February 12. 1997
Add one Actninistrative, ,Analyst position at salary level C5-1770 ($2666-3241)
AffaW HaokNan TW este ehIng poettiom and motudom attooa ttp creases to the BOWWT6 mpt Wary schedule as described armor.
Effective: Way following Board Action.
❑ (Date) or) f.
Director of Human Resources
sxsmasaassssaxmsxxxsmsxxmasxxxssxxmsxxxsaaxsms_sssaattsmxxxsttxmasss_sx-=attxsttsxssssasasxxxmttttttsa
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION DATE: 3)�5 7
R Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources
❑ Disapprove Recottmendation of Director of Human Resources
❑ Other:
U-00 County its ra or
s_-caxzsmxttasxsaamxxassxxxxxssmsmxaxmsxnxacros—aaxxscsssm�ssssxsmsssassmascsttss�asasssssssssssttsss
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Adjustment
h_APPROVED�Z DISAPPROVED ❑ �7 and County Administrator
DATE: "`"�"-_� 1"151 BY: ����Itra�.saA. ,�.�
APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONMEL/ ALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT
isC�aGcss�asC-xsxssc�ssssassssssasssassssaaaaaaaasmmmaasxmaammsasmttsssasasaaaamssaaaaa
POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT"FOLLOWING'BOARD ACTION
Adjust class(es)/position(s) as follows:
1
Pam til Fav rnNs
- . 3-20-97 POSITION AD.7USIlENT VBQUEST 5201 N0.
DATr5400Department °2
t Social Service No/ �- 5302 COPE}ZS
BudgetUnit0500 I�pp 5206Agency No. '53
Action Requestedocla Worker (XOVC), +�7�0/40 FMrST Proe Asst.-(` M-A5 --
(4) 40 t.0 T I)��1.Q tTE, .S o � a ys t and ki) 4UT47 FIE
bocial WorkSup I �XOHB) for GAIN program _Proposed ttr :4- 5- or ay a er
boa�d -ap rova.l
y Classification Questionnaire attad*d: Yes o No Cost is within Department s : Yes$ woo
Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: S 76,800 �-
Estimated total cost adjustment (salary/benefits/one time: —- a
' Total annual Cost S 483 576 Net County Cost S• 056
Total this FY S 120!894 NC.C. this FY Ste—
SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJTTMM1l�i million GAIN allocation rom State
Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO.
Ilse additional sheet for further explanations or comments. cn
r
co r
or epar men a
KVIE10 BY•CAO AND REL.EASU) TO HUMAN RESOURCESJuepDEPAR Tf
3 �
u un inistraw luate
'MUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION DATE March 31 , 1997
Add twot (2) full time Social Worker (X0v0 positions salary level C5-1888
($3000-3646) and four (4) full time Social Service Program Assistant (XOSA)
positions at salary Level C5-1785 ($2706-3290) , Four (4) full time Clerk-
Experienced Level (JWXB) positions at salary level C5-1454 ($1944-2363) , one (1)
Full time Social Service Analyst (X4SH)position at salary level C5-2159
($3933-4781) and one (1) full time Social Work Supervisor I (XOHB) position
at salary level C5-2056 (3548-4313) for GAIN program.
sed s neiman niv e"ii* 0 pmtsm ed rgeoll m dlwtlr lyes is tle Me16=pt alq mbn@&L
Effective: ie Cay following Board Action.
n (Date) ,dn: /,/..
(tor) Di o r an Resources
ADMINISTRATOR RECOME MTION DATE: 3/31157
Recommendation of Director of Human Resources
a sapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources
a Other:
Wo County x1ministrator
SM OF SUPERVISORS ON: Phil Batd(el
or. Clerk of the Ward of Supervisors
Adjustment APPROVED DISAPPROVED a - Administrator
WE: $ BY:
APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTk^S A PERWM km ARY RESOLUTION AMUD ENT
POSITION ADJUSTMENT'ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUNAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT f01JAHING BOARD ACTION
Adjust classes)/position(s) as follows:
:f Bequest is to Add Project Positions/Masses. please complete other side
e•X00)M f/1/!S
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: PHIL BATCHELOR
County Administrator
DATE: March 25, 1997
SUBJECT: Authorize the Sheriff to Submit Grant Application to Department of Boating & Waterways
to Fund Marine Patrol Services
Specific Request(s) or Recommendations(s) & Background & Justification
RECOMMENDATION:
1. DIRECT the Sheriff to prepare an application package to submit to the State Department of Boating
and Waterways for funding provided under Section 663.7 of the Harbors and Navigation Code.
2. AUTHORIZE the Chair, Board of Supervisors, to sign the required application documents in order
that the application can be submitted by the deadline of May 15, 1997.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This Financial Assistance Program does not have an annual set grant award. The Sheriff's Department
received in excess of $379,000 from this grant in the 1996-97 fiscal year.
REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND:
In recent years, due to budget cuts and revenue losses, the ability to provide an adequate level of Marine
Patrol services in Contra Costa County has been very difficult. In an effort to maintain an adequate level,
the Sheriff's Department has continued to identify and pursue other sources of funding to supplement its
current Marine Patrol budget. Applying for this grant has been successful in the past, and has allowed
Contra Costa County to enhance its Marine Patrol Services.
CONTINUED ON A ENT:
Signature:
Recommendation of Co y Administrator
_ Recommendation of Board Committee
Approve _ Other
Signature(-):
Action of Board on: -p Q, i q 9 7 Approved as Recommended Other
Vote of Supervisors: 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
Unanimous (Absent AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
Ayes:— Noes:_ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON DATE SHOWN.
Absent:_Abstain:_
Attested: 1��7
cc: CAO-Justice System Programs Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of
Auditor-Controller of Supervisors and County Administrator
Sheriff-Coroner
Contact: Lt. Jim Hatchell 427-8507 By: DEPUTY
Y 77 e , 37
Agreement for Fiscal Year 1998-99 Financial Assistance Program
The County Board of Supervisors representing contra costa
County, a participant of the Department of Boating and Waterways
Boating Safety and Enforcement Financial Aid Program, agrees to
the following:
a. ] SIXTY [60] DAYS To BILL for reimbursement of allowed
expenses incurred on behalf of the participant after
each fiscal quarter [quarters ending September 30th,
December 31st, March 31st and June 30th] ;
b. ] A 5 PERCENT [5%] PENALTY FEE is assessed if the
participant exceeds the 60-day billing period, and an
additional 5 percent [5$] for every 30 days thereafter
that the claimant is late in filing the Claim For
Reimbursement, forms 802 , and Quarterly Activity
Reports form 803 ; and
c. ] Penalty monies levied against the participant shall be
deducted from that participant's TOTAL State Financial
Aid Budget as approved by the Department of Boating and
Waterways.
I
chairman Date
Board of Supervisors
Director Date
Department of Boating and Waterways
pa.-*«Keee7
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: PHIL BATCHELOR, County Administrator
DATE: March 26, 1997
SUBJECT: LIBRARY SERVICE CONTRACT WITH LAFAYETTE SCHOOL DISTRICT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION:
AUTHORIZE the Assistant County Librarian to execute a service contract between the Contra Costa County
Library and the Lafayette School District for library services provided to the Lafayette School during the
1997-98 school year.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no financial impact to the County. The Lafayette School District will reimburse the County for the
cost of a 20 hour per week Library Assistant-Advanced Level or Librarian to provide this service.
BACKGROUND:
The Lafayette School, which is adjacent to the Lafayette Library, will be under construction during the 1997-
98 school year. As a result, the school library will be unavailable for use by the students. The County will
open the Lafayette Library for use of Lafayette Elementary School students during the 1997-98 school year
on regular school days between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. County will staff the library with either
a Library Assistant-Advanced Level or a Librarian having the following responsibilities: operate the Lafayette
Library for use by the Lafayette Elementary School students at times that the Lafayette Library is closed to
the public, work with District staff to provide instruction and assistance in the use of library resources by
students, and assist District staff and volunteers in learning library procedures and in assisting students in
using library resources. In addition, in the Spring of 1997, County Library staff will work with District staff
to issue library cards to all Lafayette Elementary School students, with special coding so that fines will be
waived.
The Lafayette School District will assign staff to assist County Library staff and students during the hours
of 8:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. during the 1997-98 school year operating under the direction of the County
Library staff.
School District staff responsibilities shall include, but not be limited to. assisting students in selecting
materials, providing instructional programs for student visits, supervising and controlling students Internet
use, shelving materials and otherwise assisting with maintaining the library environment, and assisting
County Library staff regarding lost and/or damaged materials.
The contract will be administered by and be under the ongoing supervision of Anne Henley Cain, Assistant
County Librarian. /)
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT:_YES SIGNATURE:
----________------_----_---------------------__________________ __ ______----------- ✓
-----------
---------------------------------------_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD
COMMITTEE
APPROVE _OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
- -------------- ------ACTION OF BOARD ON Q „_,Q j I��`j APPROVE AS
RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
,// AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
_UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE
AYES: NOES: SHOWN.
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTESTED L.A�-
CONTACT:Anne Cain(510)646-6423 PHIL BATCHEL R,CLERK O HES
cc: COUNTY LIBRARY OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR
AUDITOR-CONTROLLER ,-
BY , DEPUTY
SHORT FORM CONTRACT Number
It. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or
performance of this Contract shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County
Department for which this Contract is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if
any)required by the State or Federal Government.
12. Access to Books and Records of Contractor. Subcontractor. Pursuant' to Section 1861 (v) (1) of the Social
Security Act, and any regulations promulgated thereunder, Contractor shall, upon written request and until the
expiration of four years after the furnishing of services pursuant to this Contract, make available to the Secretary
of Health and Human Services, the Comptroller General, the County, or any of their duly authorized
representatives, this Contract and books, documents and records of Contractor that are necessary to certify the
nature and extent of all costs and charges hereunder. Further, if Contractor carries out any of the duties of this
Contract through a subcontract with a value or cost of $10,000 or more over a twelve-month period, such
subcontract shall contain a clause to the effect that upon written request and until expiration of four years after
the furnishing of services pursuant to such subcontract, the subcontractor shall make available, to the Secretary,
the Comptroller General, the County, or any of their duly authorized representatives, the subcontract and books,
documents, and records of the subcontractor that are necessary to verify the nature and extent of all costs and
charges hereunder.
This special condition is in addition to any and all other terms regarding the maintenance or retention of records
under this Contract and is binding on the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor.
13. Reporting Requirements. Pursuant to Government Code §7550, Contractor shall include in all documents or
written reports completed and submitted to County in accordance with this contract, a separate section listing the
numbers and dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation of each such document
or written report. This section shall apply only if the payment limit under this Contract exceeds$5,000.
14. Indemnification. The Contractor shall defend, indemnify, save, and hold harmless the County and its officers
and employees from any and all claims, costs and liability for any damages, sickness, death, or injury to
person(s) or from or connected with the operations or services of the Contractor or its agents, servants,
employees or subcontractors hereunder, save and except claims or litigation arising through the sole negligence
or sole willful misconduct of the County or its officers or employees. Contractor will make good to and
reimburse the County for any expenditures, including reasonable attorneys fees,the County may make by reason
of such matters and, if requested by the County will defend any such suits at the sole cost and expense of the
Contractor.
15. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California
Government Code Sections 26227 and 31000.
16. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto:
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR
By By. A3q+AA4'Des
ignee
SU6 F S7ct-b0L-S
(Designate Official Capacity)
o:\forms\contract\1afdoe March 18, 1997
SHORT FORM SERVICE CONTRACT
Contra Costa County Number
Standard Form 1/87 Fund/Org# 3858
Account# 2310
1. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION. Other#
Department: County Library
Subject: Library Service to Lafayette Elementary School Students
2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the following
named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows:
Contractor: Lafayette School District(District) Taxpayer I.D. # 68-0055630
Capacity: School District
Address: 3477 School Street, Lafayette, CA
3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is September 1, 1997 and it terminates on June 30, 1998, unless
sooner terminated as provided herein.
4. Termination. This Contract may be terminated by the County or Contractor upon thirty-day advance written
notice, or canceled immediately by written mutual consent.
5. Payment Limit. District's total payments to County under this Contract shall not exceed$17,000.
6. District's Obligations. In consideration of County's provision of services as described below, and subject to
the payment limit expressed herein, District shall pay County, upon submission of a properly documented
demand for payment as follows:
(Check one alternative only)
( ) a. FEE RATE: per service unit: [ ] hour; or
NOT TO EXCEED a total of_service unit(s) [ ] session, as defined below; or
[ ] calendar (insert day,week or month)
( ) b. Payment in full after approval by the Department.
(X) C. As set forth in the attached Payment Provisions.
7. County's & Contractor's Obligations. County and Contractor shall provide the following described services:
See attached Service Plan
8. Compliance with Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and
regulations applicable with respect to its performance under this Contract, including but not limited to, licensing,
employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment, including
nondiscrimination.
9. Nondiscriminatory Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be
available to all qualified persons regardless of age, sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic
background, or handicap, and that none shall be used,in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction.
10. Independent Contract Status This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not
intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship between the parties of agent, servant, employee,
partnership,joint venture, or association.
o9fo=s\contract\1u..doe March 18, 1997
ACKNO W LEDGMLN 1 C.3 g
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA )
On / C before me, �A) - A 14A.-
-(insert
(insert name and title the officer), etsonally appeared
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be th erso (s) whos+ s is re
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/they execute the same 1 his er/ eir
authorica ac y(ies), and that b3fhisherftheir s atures ) on the instrument tl< erso s), or the entity upon behalf
of which th erso ) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESSND AIC SEAL
L. —' UL (Seal)
Signature
ANN W.aANER
COMM.i 1630701 J(� z` Notary PUb Ic—CG"Omic
f..CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
My Comm.Expires JUN 19.1998
ACKNOWLEDGMENT(by Corporation, Partnership, or Individual)
(Civil Code §1189)
o:\forms\contract\Iaf.doc March 18, 1997
Contra Costa County Standard Form (Rev. 1/95)
APPROVALS/ACKNOWLEDGMENT
APPROVALS
RECOMMENDED BY DEPARTMENT FORM APPROVED
COUNTY COUNSEL
By i It/i4! (/J �- _r ( Conti By 41
Desig ee Deputy
APPROVED: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR V
By:
Designee
o9forms\contract\lafdoc March 18, 1997
SERVICE PLAN
County will open the Lafayette Library for use of Lafayette Elementary School students during the
1997-98 school year on regular school days between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and I:30 p.m. County
will staff the library with either a Library Assistant - Advanced Level or a Librarian having the
following responsibilities: operate the Lafayette Library for use by the Lafayette Elementary
School students at times that the Lafayette Library is closed to the public, work with District staff
to provide instruction and assistance in the use of library resources by students, and assist District
staff and volunteers in learning library procedures and in assisting students in using library
resources. In addition, in the spring of 1997, County Library staff will work with District staff to
issue library cards to all Lafayette Elementary School students, with special coding so that tines
will be waived.
District will reimburse County the actual cost of the twenty {20} hour per week Library Assistant -
Advanced Level or Librarian who will be an employee of the County.
District will assign staff to assist County Library staff and students during the hours of 8:30 a.m.
and 1 :30 p.m. during the 1997-98 school year operating under the direction of the County Library
staff.
District staff responsibilities shall include, but not be limited to: assisting students in selecting
materials, providing instructional programs for student visits, supervising and controlling student
Internet use, shelving materials and otherwise assisting with maintaining the library environment,
and assisting County Library staff regarding lost and/or damaged materials.
oAfia=s\wntracA1afdoc March 18, 1997
PAYMENT PROVISIONS
District shall reimburse County all costs direct costs (salary and benefits) of one twenty (20) hour
per week Library Assistant - Advanced Level or Librarian during this contract.
County will invoice District as follows:
INVOICE DATE TIME PERIOD FOR SERVICES BILLED
February 1, 1998 September 1, 1997 through December 31, 1997
August 1, 1998 January 1, 1998 through June 30, 1998
Charges to District are limited to a total of$17,000.
oAforras\contract\1af.doc March 18, 1997
C•39
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: William Walker, M.D. , Health Services Direct
CContrao
By: Ginger Marieiro, Contracts Administrator /z County
Costa
DATE: March 20, 1997
SUBJECT: Approval of Standard Contract #23-220 with William M. Mercer, Inc.
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, to execute on
behalf of the County, Standard Contract #23-220 with William M.
Mercer, Inc. , effective March 1, 1997 through December 31, 1997,
in an amount not to exceed $143, 000, for consultation and
technical assistance with regard to physician reimbursement and
staffing.
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Funding for this Contract is included in the Health Services
Department' s Enterprise I Budget.
III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS/BACKGROUND:
Contractor will provide consultation and technical assistance to
the Department with regard to physician reimbursement and staffing
of the Merrithew Memorial Hospital Replacement Project.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: .YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S)
ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED 7t OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
JUNANIMOUS (ABSENT > I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AYES: NOES: AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Patrick Godley (370-5007) � � ()
CC: Health Services (Contracts) ATTESTED _ 0- "'^'� 1199/''j
Risk Management Phil Batchelor,Clerk of the Board of
Auditor-Controller Supervisors and County Administrator
Contractor
G'. 4/d
. Contra
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Costa
FROM: Harvey E. Bragdon County
Director of Community Development
DATE: April 8, 1997
SUBJECT: City of San Pablo Redevelopment Plan Amendments
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
AUTHORIZE the County Administrator or his designee to execute a Cooperation Agreement
with the City of San Pablo regarding the City's adoption of its Legacy Redevelopment Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT
California Redevelopment Law permits cities to adopt and amend Redevelopment Plans.
Recent amendments to California Redevelopment Law stipulate the amount of fiscal pass
through that must be provided. The adoption of the Legacy Redevelopment Plan
Amendments by the City of San Pablo results in a diversion of County revenues from the
General Fund, Library, Fire District, Flood Control, and Water Agency. The net diversion of
County revenues is estimated at$60 million over the next 45 years. Pass through back to the
County over those same 45 years is estimated at $55 million.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
The City of San Pablo has proposed a number of actions relative to their edevelopment
programs that are designed to address the significant blight that exists in that ommunity. The
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _.�_ YES SIGNATURE: t
n i t./ i'
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATORR OMMt DATION OF ARD
COMMITTEE _APPROVE _ OTHER
i
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON S u' `i APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED _ OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
_ UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Source: Jim Kennedy
335-1255
cc: Community Development ATTESTED_ ` I, I I 7
Redevelopment Agency PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
County Administrator THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
County Counsel AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Auditor-Controller
Flood Control District /
Water Agency BY <et n � DEPUTY
Library
Contra Costa Fire Protection District
JKfh
smMsanpabio.bos
City has adopted Redevelopment Plan Amendments which propose the following:
1. Merge their existing Sheffield Redevelopment Project with existing Alvarado
merged Redevelopment Project Area, and call this the "Tenth Township
Plan".
2. Add additional territory to the Tenth Township area, and call this the "Legacy
Plan".
3. The intent of the City is to have the two redevelopment projects in existence
at the same time. The Legacy Plan would not be activated until the
component parts of the Tenth Township Plan terminate. The City is adopting
the Legacy Plan at this time in order to permit the 1996-97 equalized tax
rolls to be the base year for determining property tax increment. This would
permit the Redevelopment Program to have significant annual revenues
when the existing Tenth Township Plan terminates.
4. The City has made findings of blight on a prospective basis. In order to
make these findings, the City has established the existence and persistence
of blight in the project area that is so pervasive that it is unlikely to operate
as a precedent. The Cooperation Agreement makes reference to the
pervasive nature of blight within the community. A summary of those
findings is attached.
CP
ATTACHMENT A
SAN PABLO LEGACY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT-
SUMMARY OF BLIGHT FINDINGS
The City of San Pablo developed a report documenting the significant and nearly unprecedented level
of blight that exists within the San Pablo community. The redevelopment program that is embodied
in the Legacy Redevelopment Plan Amendments is designed to address these set of circumstances.
The following highlights the blight indices.
• San Pablo is 19th of 19 jurisdictions in the County in terms of growth in taxable sales.
Taxable sales in San Pablo have declined 25% over the last five years (Table B-1).
• San Pablo has the highest crime rate, and is 19th among 19 jurisdictions in the County
in terms of crime rate(Table B-2).
• San Pablo has the largest number of liquor stores per capita in the County(Table B-
3).
• San Pablo is 17th among 23 County communities in terms of age of housing stock
(Table B-4).
• San Pablo is last among 35 communities in the County in terms of average sales price
of single family homes (Table B-5).
• San Pablo is 22nd among 23 communities in the County in terms of median gross
monthly rent(Table B-6).
• San Pablo is last among 23 communities in the County in terms of persons below the
poverty line(Table B-7).
• San Pablo is last among 33 jurisdictions in the County in terms of median household
income in the County (Table B-8).
• San Pablo is last among 23 jurisdictions in the County in terms of percent of
households receiving public assistance (Table B-9).
=25/s&Tabllbo
r._
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
FOR THE
LEGACY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
February, 1997
Prepared for-
Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Pablo
One Alvarado Square
San Pablo, California 94806
(510)-215.3040
Prepared by:
Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc. Piper Jaffray
540 North Golden Circle, Suite 305 345 California Street, Suite 2200
Santa Ana, California 92705 San Francisco, California 94104
(714) 541-4585 (415) 984.5139
Jill
pq,1009 eB
Bece ""dari
rl
r.
3
pigEjg 950494
sa,Fab Yi
TOO
e �So}ep Area
Feet
JklA
Legacy Redevelopment Project
Report to the City Council
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TAXABLE SALES -ALL OUTLETS
(TAXABLE TRANSACTIONS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
City Change Pctg.
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 19.91 -1995 Change
1 Pittsburg 241,654 288,944 292,883 328,475 489,066 247,412 102%
2 Hercules 29,478 42,704 41,026 42,210 44,499 15,021 51%
3 Brentwood 61,154 78,212 79,364 85,772 87,786 26,632 44%
4 Clayton . 19,538 22,188 21,113 24,279 23,884 4,346 22%
5 Other Communities 1,466,091 1,404,278 1,434,058 1,556,830 1,746,163 282,072 19%
6 Antioch 374,119 399,956 405,498 428,969 438,336 64,217 17%
7 Walnut Creek 919,273 966,526 938,097 994,863 1,066,464 147,191 16%
8 EI Cerrito 158,040 165,139 172,481 174,727 180,703 22,663 140/6
9 San Ramon 471,586 505,268 472,578 525,729 518,036 46,450 10%
10 Martinez 239,393 251,113 252,319 250,758 260,316 20,923 9%
11 Orinda 51,608 55,533 53,748 55,694 55,581 3,973 8%
12 Danville 218,106 226,505 228,380 .228,786 234,558 16,452 8%
13 Pinole 129,365 130,057. 125,947 126,652 138,424 9,059 7%
14 Concord 1,467,383 1,495,209 1,505,116 1,532,132 1,553,214 85,831 6%
15 Moraga 55,134 57,813 58,975 57,403 57,213 2,079 4%
16 Richmond 737,520 740,439 696,905 . 725,405 757,179 19,659 3%
17 Lafayette 154,625 163,610 149,574 148,839 155,962 1,337 1%
18 Pleasant Hill
394,924 396,027 394,666 390,397 387,111 ,813 -2%
EVEN
:,,;f:..:.K.! ssxMS..r.:g'�,'SiH MS;:<L`:: ytt�w�. v�<a. ..<i.,. ..:::�fi%fkn:<..y .:,IudL`'fJ R,«<.
�,"rs sap ax s< < >> � � s sz �ego u a r. vgg z tar ; . • " ,
County Totals 7,360,566 7,565,171 7,476,420 7,818,165 8,324,232 963,666 13%
Source:
California State Board of Equalization and Department of Finance.
Note:
All 1995 taxable sates amounts are preliminary figures from the State Board of Equalization.
Rosenow Spevacek Group,Inc.
Sales tables 217/97 I o1 I
` . TABLE B-2
Legacy Redevelopment Project
Report to.the City Council
CRIMES RATES PER 1,000 PERSONS
(1994)
City 1994 California CCI FBI FCI
Population Crime Crime Crime Crime
Index(CCI) Rate Index(FCI) Rate
1 Moraga 16,300 86 5.28 269 16.50
2 Orinda 16,850 79 4.69 290 17.21
3 Danville 35,750 193 5.40 736 20.59
4 Clayton 8,750 67 7.66 189 21.60
5 Lafayette 23,550 190 8.07 559 23.74
6 San Ramon 36,950 303 8.20, 1,020 27.60
7 Hercules 18,600 255 13.71 520 27.96
8 Walnut Creek 62,000 957 15.44 2,877 46.40
9 Martinez 35,100 716 20.40 1,652 47.07
10 other Communities 172,650 3,391 19.64 8,418 48.76
11 Brentwood 11,550 227 19.65 626 54.20
12 Antioch 73,200 2,107 28.78 4,241 57.94
13 Pinote 18,100 520 28.73 1,084 59.89
14 Pittsburg 50,400 1,646 32,66 3,300 65.48
15 Pleasant Hill 31,500 825 26.19 2,130 67.62
16 Concord 111,900 3,265 29.18 8,478 75.76
17 El Cerrito 23,250 708 30.45 1,792 77:08
18 Richmond 90,900 5,024 55.27 9,300 102.31
Contra Costa County Totals 863,300 22,186 25.70 50,557 58.56
Sources:
California Department of Justice, Division of Law Enforcement, 1994, and California Department of
Finance
Notes:
California Crime Index (CCI) includes willful homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault,
burglary,and motor vehicle theft. The FBI Crime Index(FCI)also includes larceny-theft and arson.
Rosenow Spevacek Group,Inc.
Crimes tables 2!7/97 r or 1
Legacy Redevelopment Project
Report to the City Council
NUMBER OF LIQUOR STORES PER 10,000 PERSONS
(1 ST QUARTER 1995)
City 1995 Number of Establish.
Population Liquor Per
Establish. 10,000
1 Walnut Creek 62,000 3 0.48
2 Other Communities 244,700 14 0.57
3 Danville 35,750 3 0.84
4 Lafayette 23,550 2 0.85
5 Ei Cerrito 23,250 2 0.86
6 Antioch 73,200 7 0.96
7 Concord 111,900 12 1.07
8 Martinez 35,100 4 1.14
9 Pittsburg 50,400 6 1.19
10 Richmond 90,900 11 1.21
11 Pleasant Hill 31,500 4 1.27
12 San Ramon 36,950 6 1.62
13 Pinole 18,100 4 2.21
z:.
Contra Costa County Totals 863,300 87 1.01
Sources:
California State Board of Equalization and California Department of
Finance
ct
Rosenow Spevacek Group,Inc.
Liquor tables 217/97 t of i
TABLE B-4
Legacy Redevelopment Project
Report to the City Council
PERCENTAGE OF HOUSING STOCK OVER -
50 YEARS OLD
City/Census Desig. Place (CDP) Total Units % of Units
Housing Built Built
Units Before 1950 Before 1950
1 Hercules City 5,652' 37 0.7%
2 San Ramon City 13,531 102 0.8%
3 Moraga Town City 5,687 460 8.1%
4 Danville City 11,466 1,520 13.3%
5 Walnut Creek City 29,968 4,949 16.5%
6 Oakley CDP 6,110 1,050 17.2%
7 Pinole City 6,496 1,469 22.6%
8 Antioch City 22,973 5,352 23.3%
9 Pittsburg City .16,709 4,206 25.2%
10 Alamo CDP 4,337 1,130 26.1%
11 Martinez City 13,002 3,706 28.5%
12 Concord City 43,715 12,828 29.3%
13 West Pittsburg CDP 6,291 2,006 31.9%
14 Tara Hills CDP 1,825 594 32.5%
15 Pleasant Hill City 13,653 5,052 37.0%
16 Rodeo CDP 2,804 1,235 44.0_%
18 EI Sobrante CDP 4,011 2,028 50.6%
19 Vine Hill CDP 1,163 626 53.8%
20 Lafayette City 9,270 5,054 54.5%
21 Richmond City 34,532 19,462 56.4%
22 Orinda City 6,475 3,871 59.8%
23 EI Cerrito City 10,311 7,208 69.9%
Contra Costa Co.Totals 279,398 88,115 24.0%
Source: 1990 U.S. Census
Rosenow spevacek Group,Inc.
Housing Age(2) Tables 216197 1 or I
C. �D
p
TABLE B-5
Legacy Redevelopment Project
Report to the City Council
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AVERAGE SALES PRICES
OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SINCE JANUARY 1993
City Number Average
of Sales Sales Price
1 Diablo 45 589,900
2 Alamo 478 527,153
3 Orinda 666 460,671
4 Moraga 445 432,524
5 Danville 3,196 424,048
6 Lafayette 898 421,188
7 Canyon 3 340,000
8 Walnut Creek 1,950 317,738
9 Kensington 172 307,712
10 San Ramon 2,017 300,301
11 Clayton 643 279,446
12 Discovery Bay 562 260,052
13 Byron 72 238,285
14 EI Cerrito 627 233,649
15 Clyde 1 229,500
16 Pleasant Hill 985 223,644
17 Hercules 528 212,203
18 Martinez 1,420 196,007
19 Concord 3,229 184,911
20 Port Costa 8 183,750
21 Pinole 514 180,883
22 Brentwood 1,159 178,138
23 Pacheco 93 172,941
24 EI Sobrante 390 169,324
25 Crockett 74 168,169
26 Antioch 3,751 159,918
27 Bethel Island 55 154,218
28 Oakley 1,460 150,160
29 Rodeo 259 148,961
30 Point Richmond 1 148,000
31 Knightsen 5 145,600
32 Richmond 2,188 139,569
33 Pittsburg 1,471 129,229
34 Bay Point 523 125,944
35 SanPabtp s��" s �z�uw ���;�� X947 � i2�`465
Contra Costa Co. Totals 30,835 240,937
Source: Transamerica/MetroScan,April 1996
Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc.
Home Sales Tables 2(6/97 1 of 1
Legacy Redevelopment Project
Report to the City Council
MEDIAN GROSS MONTHLY RENT BY CITY
IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
City/Census Desig. Place(CDP) Median
Gross
Rent
1 Orinda City 1,001
2 Danville City 1,001
3 Alamo CDP 1,001
4 Hercules City 983
5 San Ramon City 903
6 Moraga Town City 871
7 Tara Hills CDP 796
8 Lafayette City 767
9 Pleasant Hill City 759
10 Pinole City 744
11 Walnut Creek City 720
12 Oakley CDP 715
13 EI Cerrito City 695
14 Concord City 677
15 Martinez City 676
16 El Sobrante CDP 664
17 Vine Hill CDP 657
18 Antioch City 635 ,
19 Pittsburg City 622
20 West Pittsburg CDP 601
21 Richmond City 566
OR ift I
23 Rodeo CDP 497.
Source: 1990 U.S.Census
Rosonow Spe"cek Group,tnc.
Rents Tables 2/6/97 7 of 7
TABLE B-7
Legacy Redevelopment Project
Report to the City Council
POVERTY STATUS IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
(PERSONS OF AGE 18 OR OLDER)
City/Census Desig. Place(CDP) Persons Persons % of Persons
Above Below Below
Poverty Poverty Poverty Line
1 Alamo CDP 12,025 202 1.7%
2 San Ramon City 34,622 615 1.7%
3 Vine Hill CDP 3,147 67 2.1%
4 Danville City 30,451 652 2.1%
5 Hercules City 16,427 353 2.1%
6 Orinda City 16,185 392 2.4%
7 Moraga Town City 14,103 514 3.5%
8 Pleasant Hill City 29,983 1,129 3.6%
9 Pinole City 16,764 643 3.7%d
10 Walnut Creek City 57,470 2,276 3.8%
11 Lafayette City 22,303 967 4.2%e
12 Tara Hills CDP 4,726 253 5.1%
13 EI Cerrito City 21,610 1,178 5.2%
14 El Sobrante CDP 9,318 522 5.3%
15 Oakley CDP 16,969 1,011 5.6%
16 Martinez City 28,872 1,826 5.9%e
17 Concord City 102,438 7,349 6.7%
18 Antioch City 55,936 5,612 9.1%
19 Rodeo CDP 6,854 698 9.2%
20 Pittsburg City 41,924 5,071 10.8%
21 West Pittsburg CDP 14,887 2,396 13.9%
22 Richmond City 72,468 13,909 16.1%
mpoq W#1 mammmmm W4,
Contra Costa Co. Totals 649,440 52,324 7.5%
Source: 1990 U.S. Census
Roserww Spevacek Group,Inc.
of
Poverty Tables 216/97
Legacy Redevelopment Project
Report to the City Council
1989 MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOMES
IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
City/Census Desig. Place(CDP) Median
Household
Income
1 Blackhawk CDP 129,135
2 Alamo CDP 93,089
3 Orinda City 80,968
4 Danville City 74,472
5 Moraga Town City 69,767
6 Clayton City 69,710
7 Discovery Bay CDP 65,494
8 Lafayette City 64,806
9 San Ramon City 63,607
10 Kensington CDP 61,330
11 Hercules City 56,098
12 Pleasant Hili City 46,885
13 Oakley CDP 46,091
14 Martinez City 45,964
15 Pinole City 45,820
16 Walnut Creek City 45,529
17 Tara Hills CDP 41,678
18 Concord City 41,675
19 Brentwood City 41,455
20 Antioch City 40,936
21 East Richmond Heights CDP 40,613
22 EI Cerrito City 39,538
23 EI Sobrante CDP 39,496
24 Rodeo CDP 38,919
25 Crockett CDP 38,750
26 Pittsburg City 38,532
27 Bayview-Montalvin CDP 37,528
28 Vine Hill GDP 37,012
29 Bethel Island CDP 35,731
30 Pacheco CDP 33,712
31 West Pittsburgh CDP 32,322
32 Richmond City 32,165
Contra Costa Co. Median '45,087
Source: 1990 U.S. Cdnsus
Rosenow spevacek Group,Inc.
incomes Tables 216197 °�
Legacy Redevelopment Project
Report to the City Council
% OF HOUSEHOLDS RECEIVING PUBLIC ASSISTANCE INCOME
(PERSONS OF AGE 18 OR OLDER)
City/Census Desig.Place(CDP) Households Households % of Households
Receiving Receiving Receiving
Income Pub.Asst. Pub.Asst.
1 Alamo CDP 4,254 44 1.0%
2 Moraga Town City 5,596 81 1.4%
3 Danville City 11,167 190 1.7%
4 San Ramon City 12,806 226 1.8%
5 Lafayette City 9,033 227 2.5%
6 Orinda City 6,308 161 2.6%
7 Walnut Creek City 28,340 728 2.6%
8 Pleasant Hilt City 13,061 454 3.5%
9 Pinole City 6,295 282 4.5%
10 Hercules City 5,331 247 4.6%
11 Martinez City 12,583 633 5A%o
12 Tara Hills CDP 1,756 96 5.5%
13 El Sobrante CDP 3,863 212 5.5%
14 EI Cerrito City 9,990 563 5.6%
15 Concord City 42,095 2,808 6.7%
15 Vine Hill CDP 1,130 80 7.1%
17 Oakley CDP 5,903 452 7.7%
18 Antioch City 21,390 1,905 8.9%
19 Pittsburg City 15,753 1,895 12.0%
20 Rodeo CDP 2,676 341 12.7%
21 Richmond City 32,798 5,147 15.7%
22 West Pittsburg CDP 5,964 998 16.7%
Contra Costa Co.Totals 266,902 19,852 7.4%
Source: 1990 U.S. Census
Rosenow Spevacek Group,inc.
Public Assistance Tables 7!6197 1 or t
Legacy Redevelopment Project
Report to the City Council
UNEMPLOYMENT RATES
IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
City/Census Desig. Place(CDP) tabor Employed Unemployed Unemployment
Force Persons Persons Rate
1 Moraga Town City 8,850 8,730 120 1.4%
2 Lafayette City 13,700 13,460 240 1.8%
3 Danville City 18,890 18,530 360 1.9%
4 Alamo CDP 6,740 6,610 130 1,9%
5 San Ramon City 23,160 22,650 510 2.2%
6 Orinda City 9,020 8,810 210 2.3%
7 Pleasant Hili City 20,000 19,490 510 2.6%
8 Walnut Creek City 34,310 33,410 900 2.6%
9 EI Cerrito City 12,920 12,540 380 2.9%
10 Martinez City 19,380 18,750 630 3.3%
11 Hercules City 10,430 10,060 370 3.5%0
12 Pinole City 10,260 9,890 370 3.6%
13 Concord City 67,380 64,890 2,490 3.7%
14 Vine Hill CDP 1,740 1,670 70 4.0%
15 Oakley CDP 9,580 9,190 390 4.1%
16 Rodeo CDP 3,930 3,770 160 4.1%
17 Tara Hills CDP 2,900 2,760 140 4.8%
18 Antioch City 33,660 31,870 1,790 5.3%
19 EI Sobrante CDP 5,440 5,150 290 5.3%
20 Pittsburg City 24,920 23,510 1,410 5.7%
21 West Pittsburg CDP 8,680 8,100 580 6.7%
22 Richmond City 45,200 41,750 3,450 7.6%
Contra Costa Co. Totals 402,930 386,460 16,470 4.1%
Source: State of California Employment Development Department, January 24, 1997.
Rosenow Spevacek Group,Inc.
Unemployment Tables 2097 1 of I
Legacy Redevelopment Project
Report to the City Council
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
(PERSONS OF ACBE 18 OR OLDER)
City/Census Desig. Place(CDP) Total Less Than Above 9th Adults % of Adults
Adult 9th Grade No Diploma Without Without
Population Diploma Diploma
1 Moraga Town City 12,473 118 301 419 3.4%
2 Orinda City 12,952 75 429 504 3.9%
3 Lafayette City 18,192 230 598 828 4.6%
4 Alamo CDP 9,203 67 378 445 4.8%
5 Danville City 23,331 244 936 1,180 5.1%
6 San Ramon City 25,825 276 1,149 1,425 5.5%
7 Walnut Creek City 50,519 867 2,332 3,199 6.3%
8 Pleasant Hili City 25,118 569 1,515 2,084 8.3%
9 Hercules City 11,761 435 779 1,214 10.3%
10 EI Cerrito City 19,277 633 1,501, 2,134 11.1%
11 Martinez City 24,695 721 2,335 3,056 12.4%
12 Concord City 84,103 2,977 7,958 10,935 13.0%
13 Pinole City 13,073 450 1,515 1,965 15.0%
14 Antioch City 42,872 2,263 5,782 8,045 18.8%
15 Tara Hills CDP 3,878 160 575 735 19.0%
16 El Sobrante CDP 7,565 259 1,231 1,490 19.7%
17 Oakley CDP 12,182 1,052 1,575 2,627 21.6%
18 Rodeo CDP 5,332 344 847 1,191 22.3%
19 Pittsburg City 32,836 3,236 4,653 7,889 24.0%
20 Richmond City 64,627 5,768 9,825 15,593 24.1%
21 Vine Hill CDP 2,312 221 402 623 26.9%
22 West Pittsburg CDP 11,9_94 1,310 2,180 3,490 29.1%
Contra Costa Go.Totals 531,616 24,648 52,654 77,302 14.5%
Source: 1990 U.S. Census
Rosenow spevacek Group,Inc.
Educational Tables 716/97 1 of f
TABLE B-12Legacy Redevelopment Project
Report to the City Council
DEPENDENCY RATIOS IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
(PERCENTAGE OF PERSONS UNDER 18 AND OVER 64 YEARS)
City/Census Desig. Place (CDP) Total Population Population Total % of
Population Under 18 Over 64 Dependent Dependent
_ Population Population
1 Tara Hills CDP 4,998 1,120 409 1,529 30.6%
2 San Ramon City 35,303 9,478 1,510 10,988 31.1%
3 Martinez City 32,038 7,343 2,827 10,170 31.7%
4 Pleasant Hill City 31,585 6,467 3,802 10,269 32.5%
5 Moraga Town City 15,852 3,379 1,901 5,280 33.3%
6 Concord City 111,348 27,245 10,405 37,650 33.8%
7 Alamo CDP 12,277 3,074 1,088 4,162 33.9%
8 Danville City 31,306 7,975 2,658 10,633 34.0%
9 Hercules City 16,829 5,068 725 5,793 34.4%
10 Pinole City 17,460 4,387 1,723 6,110 35.0%
11 EI Sobrante CDP 9,852 2,287 1,209 3,496 35.5%
12 Vine Hili CDP 3,214 902 242 1,144 35.6%
13 Lafayette City 23,501 5,309 3,207 8,516 36.2%
i 14 EI Cerrito City 22,869 3,592 4,894 8,486 37.1%
( 15 Richmond City 87,425 22,798 9,987 32,785 37.5%
16 Orinda City 16,642 3,690 2,706 6,396 38.4%
17 Antioch City 62,195 19,323 4,679 24,002 38.6%
18 Pittsburg City 47,564 14,728 3,661 18,389 38.7%
19 West Pittsburg CDP 17,453 5,459 1,352 6,811 39.0%
20 Walnut Creek City 60,569 10,050 13,764 23,814 39.3%
21 Oakley CDP 18,225 6,043 1,124 7,167 39.3%
22 Rodeo CDP 7,589 2,257 797 3,054 40.2%
Contra Costa Co.Totals 711,252 179,636 77,328 256,964 36.1%
Source: 1990 U.S. Census
Rosenow Spevacek Group,Inc.
Dependency Ratio(2) Tables 2857 i of 1
CTABLE B-13
Legacy Redevelopment Project
Report to the City Council
PERCENTAGE OF OVERCROWDED HOUSING UNITS
IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
City/Census Desig. Place (CDP) Total Units With % of
Occupied 1.01 or More Units
Units Persons/Room Overcrowded
1 Orinda City 6,305 7 0.1%
2 Moraga Town City 5,562 13 0.2%
3 Alamo CDP 4,219 13 0.3%
4 Danville City 11,064 66 0.6%
5 Lafayette City 8,976 83. 0.9%
6 Walnut Creek City 28,347 440 1.6%
7 San Ramon City 12,845 208 1.6%
8 Pleasant Hill City 13,004 314 2.4%
9 Martinez City 12,539 311 2.5%
10 EI Sobrante CDP 3,904 100 2.6%
11 EI Cerrito City 9,924 319 3.2%
12 Pinole.City 6,259 219 3.5%
13 Antioch City 21,401 892 4.2%
14 Concord City 41,940 1,932 4.6%
15 Rodeo CDP 2,702 151 5.6%
16 Tara Hills CDP 1,777 105 5.9%
17 Oakley CDP 5,890 355 6.0%
18 Hercules City 5,308 349 6.6%
19 Vine Hill CDP 1,121 83 7.4%
20 West Pittsburg CDP 5,967 557 9.5%
21 Richmond City 32,749 3,248 9.9%
22 Pittsburg City 15,643 1,715 11.0%
Contra Costa Co. Totals 266,149 12,947 4.6%
Source: 1990 U.S. Census
Rosenow Spevacek Group,Inc.
Overcrowding Tables 2/6/97 1 of 1
Toe BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Contra
FROM: WARREN E. RUPF, Sheriff Cwa
DAT-- March 6, 1997 7l`" "^
SUBJECT: Marine Patrol Boat Acquisition
SPECIFIC REOUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) R BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Authorize the Sheriff, on behalf of the County, to enter into
an agreement with the California State Department of Boating
and Waterways for the purchase of a patrol boat and related
equipment.
Authorize the Sheriff, on behalf of the County, to make and
sign for any amendments to the contract with the State which
may come about in the grant.
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The State would provide a financial grant totaling fifty-five
thousand dollars ($55, 000. 00) to the County.
The estimated cost to replace a recently decommissioned patrol
boat assigned to the Sheriff' s Marine Services Bureau is
sixty-seven thousand five hundred ($67, 500. 00) .
The cost to the County is estimated at twelve thousand five
hundred dollars ($12 , 500. 00) .
III . REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIQLI/BACKGROUND:
Since 1992 , two state-owned patrol boats have been
decommissioned with only one boat being replaced.
Currently, we have a state-owned boat that has been declared
unsafe by the state and needs to be replaced.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: �����/���� -��
r
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _ RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURES)
ACTIONOFBOARDON <2 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
✓_/ UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AYES: NOES: AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC: ATTESTED
County Administrator
Auditor-Controller /
Sheriff-Coroner
IV. Consecruences of Negative Action:
The patrol boat declared unsafe, a 1988, 22 foot Almar, needs
a new hydraulic shifting system, bottom paint and a steering
correction to be put back into service. The cost of these
repairs would be $15,551.00. The patrol boat was declared
unsafe by the State and has been out of service leaving Marine
Patrol with only three serviceable state-owned patrol boats.
The remaining three boats are one to thirteen years old.
The state currently has the money to grant to the County. The
money may not be available at a later date. The building time
fora new boat is ninety to one hundred days.
C �Z
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM; William Walker, M.D. , Health Services Director
By: Ginger Marieiro, Contracts Administrator f,'l=' Contra
DATE: March 25, 1997 Costa
_ County
SUBJECT: Approve Standard Contract #22-401-12 with
Pittsburg Preschool Coordinating Council
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee
(Wendel Brunner, M.D. ) , to execute on behalf of the County, Standard
Contract #22-401-12 with Pittsburg Preschool Coordinating Council,
for the period from April 1, 1997 through March 31, 1998 , in the
amount of $41, 250, to provide HIV Case Management Services for
people living with HIV in East County.
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This Contract is funded by the State Department of Health Services,
under the Ryan White CARE Act, Title II (HIV Care Consortium) . No
County funds are required.
III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS/BACKGROUND:
In April 1996, the County Administrator approved, and the Purchasing
Services Manager executed Standard Contract #22-401-8 with Pittsburg
Preschool Coordinating Council, Inc. , to provide HIV Case Management
services for persons in Contra Costa County diagnosed with HIV
Disease, for the period from April 1, 1996 through July 31, 1996.
Subsequent Contract Amendment Agreements #22-401-9, #22-401-10, and
#22-401-11 extended the term of the Contract through March 31, 1997 .
Approval of Standard Contract #22-401-12 will allow the Contractor
to continue to provide case management services to County-referred
clients through March 31, 1998.
CONTINUED
ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE.
j `
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _ RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S)
ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT > I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AYES: NOES: AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Wendel Brunner, M.D. (313-6712) p 4
CC: Health Services (Contracts) ATTESTED Ci eP P0 - lpll
Risk Management Phil ettAelm,Cle►k the B and of
Auditor—Controller SuCen'isorsand ountyAdmiristrator
Contractor ����n ��a�/I
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: William Walker, M.D. , Health Services Director
By: Ginger Marieiro, Contracts Administrator f / j Contra
' Costa
DATE: March 27, 1997
- County
SUBJECT: Approval of Contract #26-920-4 with James A. Rael, M.D. , Inc.
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his
designee, (Frank Puglisi, Jr. ) , to execute on behalf of the
County, 'Standard Contract #26-920-4 with James A. Rael, M.D. ,
Inc. , for the period from April 1, 1997 through March 31, 1998,
with a payment limit of $156, 000, for the provision of
professional services as Medical Director for the County Adult
Detention Facility.
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This Contract is 100% County funded, and is included in the Health
Services Department's Detention Budget.
III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS/BACKGROUND:
On May 21, 1996, the Board of Supervisors approved Standard
Contract #26-920-3 with James A. Rael, M.D. , Inc. , for provision
of professional services as Medical Director for the County Adult
Detention Facility. During the term of this Contract, Dr. Rael
attained the status as a Certified Correctional Health
Professional.
Approval of Standard Contract #26-920-4, will allow Dr. Rael to
continue to provide professional services through March 31, 1998.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE:.
�(lt1£mac
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE _ OTHER
SIGNATURE(S)
ACTION OF BOARD ON JPU APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED V1 OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AYES: NOES: AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Frank Puglisi, Jr. (370-5100)
CC: Health Services (Contracts) ATTESTED A DA, L ) q�
Risk Management Phil BateWor,Clerk the Board of
Auditor-Controller SupervisorsandC gntyAd/JmlrS!rator
Contractor V"-u� ( C1 a.C�¢-✓
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: William Walker, M.D. , Health Services Directo
By: Ginger Marieiro, Contracts Administrator �- ' / Contra
DATE: March 27, 1997 - Costa
County
SUBJECT:
Approval of Unpaid Adult Education Agreement #26-265-1 with
Martinez Unified School District for its Adult Education Program
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his
designee, (Frank Puglisi, Jr. ) , to execute on behalf of the
County, Unpaid Adult Education Agreement #26-265-1 with Martinez
Unified School District, for its Adult Education Program, for the
period from February 1, 1997 through January 31, 2000, for
provision of adult education services for County's patients and
staff at Merrithew Memorial Hospital, at no cost to the County.
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. This is a non-financial agreement.
III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS/BACKGROUND:
For a number of years, Martinez Unified School District, through
its Adult Education Program, has provided Adult Education Classes
for patients and nursing staff at Merrithew Memorial Hospital, at
no cost to the County, through a verbal agreement between the
staffs of the Hospital and the School District. With the
exception of those classes conducted under the Adults with
Disabilities Program, classes are also open to the public.
On March 22, 1994, the Board of Supervisors approved the Unpaid
Adult Education Agreement #26-265 with Martinez Unified School
District, for its Adult Education Program, for the period from
February 1, 1994 through January 31, 1997 .
Approval of the Unpaid Adult Education Agreement #26-265-1 will
allow the Contractor to continue the formalized arrangement, in
order to meet the requirements of JCAHO.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: �
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE _ OTHER
SIGNATURE(S)
ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED _ OTHER _
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AYES: NOES: AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTIONCTAKEN
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Frank Puglisi, Jr. (370-5100) cf c�' c) -
CC: Health Services (Contracts) ATTESTED CL�e.�.�.c� o ) c,I
Risk Management Phil Batchelor,Clerk of the Board of
Auditor-Controller Supervisors and County Adminis!rator
Contractor
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
,. Contra
FROM: Arthur C. Miner, Executive Director I \' Costa
Contra Costa County Private Industry Council _6"
e
DATE: Count
Y
�>+{-::.,,...,...-.;r
March 20, 1997
SUBJECT:
Authorizing Execution of 1997 JTPA Title II-B SYETP Contract Amendment With
Contra Costa County Office of Education (County#19-1231-1)
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)8 BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Authorize the Executive Director, Contra Costa County Private Industry
Council, to execute on behalf of the County, a standard form contract
amendment (County #19-1231-1) with the Contra Costa County Office of
Education for operation of the County's 1997 Summer Youth Employment
Training Program (SYETP) under Title II-B of the Job Training
Partnership Act (JTPA) to decrease the payment limit of the contract from
$1,757,500 to a lower payment limit of $1,579,941 with no change in the
term of the contract.
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. One hundred percent federal funds.
III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONBACKGROUND:
By its order dated January 14, 1997, the Board authorized the Executive
Director of the Private Industry Council to execute a 1977 Summer Youth
Employment Training Program (SYETP) under Title IIB of the Job
Training Partnership Act for the term beginning January 1, 1997 and
ending September 30, 1997, with a maximum payment limit not to exceed
$1,757,500. Since that action, the Private Industry Council has approved a
transfer of $250,000 from Title IIB to Title IIC and approved the
incorporation of $78,950 in 1996 carry-over SYETP funds into the 1997
program. This amended SYETP contract will provide work experience,
vocational assessment, counseling, academic enrichment activities and job
placement services to approximately 1,000 disadvanta ed youths residing
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: Contra Costa County, excludingSIGNATURE;City of Rlchmo
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE _OTHER
SIGNATURE (S);
ACTION OF BOARD ON `�"1 '�"� c5 i �9 9 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
ATTESTED�f' ti �� Tf 7
Contact: Bob Whatford 646-5373 PHIL BAT�HELo R.CLERK OF THE BOARD of
CC. private Industry Council SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
County Administrator „ 0
County Auditor-Controller BYE-- DEPUTY
Contractor
Y\nimfr,e\di.vkette\hd.,&,\.Fe .m dnc
TO:a BOARD OF SUPERVISORS _ Contra
FROM: Arthur C. Miner, Executive Director l Costa
Contra Costa County Private Industry Council
DATE: County
lty
rJ i� C
March 25, 1997
SUBJECT:
Authorizing Execution of )TPA PY 96/97 Title II Contract Amendments with Various
Service Providers.
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)8 BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Authorize the Executive Director of the Private Industry Council to execute
standard form Job Training Partnership Act QTPA) Title II contract Amendments
with various service providers (Contractors) by increasing the payment limits as
indicated on the attached "DTPA Title II Specifications Chart" effective, April 1,
1997, while the term of these contracts (7/1/96-6/30/97) remains unchanged.
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. 100 percent federal funds.
III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND:
By its Order dated July 16, 1996, the Board authorized the Executive Director of
the Private Industry Council to execute Program Year 1996/97 JTPA Title II
contracts with various service providers for the payment limits indicated in the
Board Order.
By its Orders dated October 1, 1996, and March 4, 1997 the Board authorized
execution of contract amendments to increase payment limits to the 100%
funding level and to incorporate carryin funds from the prior year.
At its meeting of March 17, 1997, the Private Industry Council approved the
transfer of $76,5000 from Title IIB to the Title II-C youth program contractors to
provide services during the current programyear to nal eligible
participants. °
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _YES SIGNATURE: pA tI
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE _OTHER
SIGNATURES:
ACTION OF BOARD ON 9 Cl 7 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
✓_UNANIMOUS(ABSENT____; AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: _NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
cc- Bob Whatford, 646-5373 ATTESTED R- 1 1
Private Industry Council PHILCHELOR,CLERKOFTHE BOARD OF
County Administrator SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
County Auditor-Controller
Contractors )
M382 (10188) #Y:\picoffice\diskette\bdorders\TI196AMD.doc Y .Deourr
L, M o 00
� N 00
C 0 N Ln U)
U EA EA EFT
H
Q
V
� � o
O 7
N n M
L `v
OC N N N N
V d U + + + +
U
W
CL
W J N h O
O co O n
C d Ln O
HE Ui
Qn O Mm Ln
CL 46q ua e»
L
� L
>O
� � O
Q t U CL
C Ln O C U d C V
C y _
7 pO
Q p V O c - U m U
U c o c m o
N u - Y o U . UJ UO a
Z wme
3 0 rm- U (Y, LU LL
Q
H
cu
L -O
'O c GO
O O O _0
-2 u0 O U
cop p LM _ C N
u L2
m C WO W - C m C
7
O w a) U U
+- O NN N U d L M U
C 3 N 3 N w N 'p - .N N w
N c L -O V "d V O N i C O
L0 C O 0 Z aT. C m bLA C� U
C .47
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on April 8, 1997 by the following vote :
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla, DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Approving Engagement and Contingency Agreement with
MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HEYNES & LERACH and LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN in the Tobacco Litigation regarding intervention in
Mangini v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. , et al .
WHEREAS, the County of Contra Costa joined in litigation initiated
by the City and County of San Francisco against the tobacco industry
to enjoin certain practices, including the marketing of cigarettes
targeted at minors; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors previously authorized the County
Counsel to retain the law firm of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann &
Bernstein to co-counsel said litigation on a contingency fee basis
(with Lieff Cabraser to bear the direct costs of this litigation,
even if plaintiffs do not prevail) , with the County Counsel
retaining the right to add additional law firms under the retainer
agreement; and
WHEREAS, on February 11, 1997, the Board of Supervisors authorized
the County to join the other plaintiff counties in intervening in
Mangini v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. , et al . San Francisco Superior
Court No. 93959; and
WHEREAS, the County Counsel, San Francisco City Attorney, and Lieff,
Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein have decided to add as co-counsel the
law firm of MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HEYNES & LERACH;
Now, therefore, it is by the Board ORDERED that :
The Engagement and Contingency Agreement with MILBERG WEISS
BERSHAD HEYNES & LERACH and LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN in
the Tobacco Litigation regarding intervention in Mangini v. R.J.
Reynolds Tobacco Co. , et al . is APPROVED and the County Counsel is
AUTHORIZED to sign the agreement .
I hereby certify that this is a true
and correct copy of an action taken
and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date
shown.
Attested:
PHIL ATCHv�ELOR,r Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors and County
Administrator
By: 1AP1 4
Deputybr
Orig. Dept: County Counsel (Vickie Dawes)
cc: Health Services Department
County Administrator
TL:a:\tobaco3.ord