Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04011997 - C95-C107 TO* BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - Contr FROM: Barton J. Gilbert, Director of General Services -- f COSI Coun DATE: April 1, 1997 ` SUBJECT: LICENSE - 586 PARKER AVENUE, RODEO SPECIFIC REQUESTS OR RECOMMENDATION(S)8 BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. RECOMMENDED ACTION APPROVE a License commencing February 1, 1997, with Shirley Moirano, for the premises at 586 Parker Avenue, Rodeo, California, under the terms and conditions more particularly set forth in said License, and AUTHORIZE the Director of General Services to EXECUTE said License on behalf of the County. II. FINANCIAL IMPACT Payments required are in the budget of the General County Building Occupancy Costs Budget (0077). III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS / BACKGROUND This License will provide office space as requested by the Supervisor, District 2. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON C-j �,,..� l l_1 9`) 7 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTEQF SUPERVISORS y' J/ UNANIMOUS(ASSENT� V S, k ) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN MEDIA CONTACT: BARTON J.GILBERT(313-7100) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. CC: Clerk of the Board ATTESTED PHIL B�HE R,CLERKOF�THE BOARD OF County Administrator(via UM) SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR County Auditor-Controller(via UM) Lessor(via UM) Supervisor,District 2(via UM) BY ,DEPUTY Orig:General Services Dept.-UM SBV 586Bdoi.wpd M382 (10188) - C91 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra Costa FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON Coss a DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT County DATE: April 1, 1997 SUBJECT: Browman Development Company, Inc. (BDC) Request to Amend the County General Plan in the Richmond/Pinole Area SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) fi BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS . Authorize a review of the BDC General Plan Amendment request from Multiple Family Residential High Density to Commercial in the Richmond/Pinole area; the authorization of a General Plan Amendment study does not imply support for the requested General Plan change. This study request will be subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the amendment will be considered by the County Planning Commission prior to being scheduled for a decision before the Board of Supervisors. FISCAL IMPACT The amendment study cost will be covered by developer fees. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS BDC has requested a General Plan Amendment study to be authorized covering a less than two acre site (APN# 405-170-004) located adjacent to the intersection of San Pablo Avenue and Atlas Road. Lands to the south of the site are within the city of Richmond, the site is in the unincorporated area within the Pinole Sphere of Influence. The property is currently zoned commercial uses. This is an existing General Plan/Zoning inconsistency which needs to be resolved. The amendment study will need to be develope with input from both the cities of Richmond and Pinole. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X_ YES SIGNATURE RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _ RECOMMENDATI69 OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) : ACTION OF BOARD ON ApriiAPPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT) V AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN _ AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE _ ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: Jim Cutler (335-1236) Orig: Community Development Department ATTESTED April 1, 1997 cc: CAO PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE County Counsel BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND Public Works COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BDC (100 Swan Way, Suite 205 Oakland, CA 94621-1459) BY 94 , DEPUTY J:\audrey\richpin1.bo Browman Development Company, Inc. Request to Amend the County General Plan in the Richmond/Pinole Area March 12, 1997 Page 2 The project will be reviewed for the appropriate CEQA documentation and when complete, the study will be scheduled for public hearing before both the County Planning Commission for a recommendation and the Board of Supervisors for a decision. Authorization of a General Plan study does not imply support for the requested change in policy. As the study proceeds, staff may need to expand the boundary of the area to be studied to provide for a reasonable planning boundary. C9� TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORSContra ' Costa FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON ~ County DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: April 1, 1997 SUBJECT: Trumark Homes Request to Amend the County General Plan in the Walnut Creek Area SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) 6 BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS Authorize a review of the Trumark Homes General Plan Amendment study from Single Family Residential High Density to Multiple Family Residential Low Density. The authorization of a General Plan Amendment study does not imply support for the requested General Plan change. The study request will be subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the amendment will be considered by the County Planning Commission prior to being scheduled for a decision before the Board of Supervisors. FISCAL IMPACT The amendment study cost will be covered by developer fees. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS Trumark Homes has requested a General Plan Amendment study to be authorized for approximately five acres in the Saranap area of Walnut Creek. They have control over nine parcels of land located on the south side of Boulevard Way which they wish to redevelop with a product whose density fits within the County's Multiple Family Residential Low Density category. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE _ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) : ACTION OF BOARD ON ApriiAPPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT) V AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE _ ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: Jim Cutler (335-1236) Orig: Community Development Department ATTESTED April 1, 1997 cc: CAO PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE County Counsel BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND Public Works COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Trumark Homes (6375 Clark Ave. , Suite 205 BY C , DEPUTY Dublin, CA 94568) J: \audrey\trumark.bo O.V Trumark Homes Request to Amend the County General Plan in the Walnut Creek area March 12, 1997 Page 2 This portion of Saranap consists of older homes which are highly variable in terms of their appearance. Staff feels the request for study is warranted. The project will be reviewed for the appropriate CEQA documentation and when complete the study will be scheduled for public hearing before the County Planning Commission for a recommendation and the Board of Supervisors for a decision. Authorization of a General Plan study does not imply support for the requested change in policy. As the study proceeds, staff may need to expand the boundary of the area to be studied to provide for a reasonable planning boundary. TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IOC-O$ INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE =' ;" Contra FROM: &� 1 !3 Costa March 18, 1997 ''" DATE: County APPROVE THE CHARGE, VISION AND MISSION STATEMENT FOR THE SUBJECT: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AND EXPAND THE ROLE OF THE COMMITTEE SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. APPROVE the attached charge to the Economic Development Committee, the attached vision statement for the Economic Development Committee, and the attached mission statement for the Economic Development Committee. 2. EXPAND the role of the Economic Development Committee beyond the economic development activities related to the Community Development Block Grant to include all aspects of economic development for the County which are consistent with the attached charge, vision statement, and mission statement. 3. DIRECT the Economic Development Committee to provide a status report to our Committee in December, 1997 on their activities and accomplishments to date. 4. DIRECT staff from the Community Development Department to continue to recruit for the three remaining vacancies on the Economic Development Committee and return recommendations for appointments to our Committee as they are available. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: -YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE _APPROVE _OTHER SIGNATURE s: JIM ROGERS C; .; L f' <� DONNA GERBER ACTION OF BOARD ON April 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X_, OTHER - ( VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ----- ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. CC: County Administrator ATTESTED April 1 , 1997 Belinda Smith, CDBG Program Manager, CDD PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF Manny Ungson, Economic Development SUPERVISORS AN CO TY ADMINISTRATOR Program Manager, CDD M382 (10/88) BY DEPUTY Cqg IOC-08 BACKGROUND: On December 3, 1996, the Board of Supervisors referred to our Committee the responsibility to recommend to the Board the mission statement for the Economic Development Committee and to establish goals for the Committee. On March 18, 1997, our Committee met with Belinda Smith, Program Manager for the CDBG Programs in the Community Development Department, and Manny Ungson, Economic Development Program Manager for the County. We discussed the attached report from Ms. Smith which outlines the proposed charge, vision statement and mission statement for the Economic Development Committee. We have explored other alternatives for accomplishing the work of the Economic Development Committee without having to have an additional advisory committee and have been convinced that the use of the Economic Development Committee is the best and most effective method of accomplishing the County's economic development goals. There continue to be three vacant seats on the Committee, for a banking representative, a small business representative, and a non-profit agency representative. Staff are continuing to recruit for these vacancies. To date, the Board of Supervisors has restricted the activities of the Economic Development Committee to the economic development activities of the CDBG until more of the Committee members were in place. We believe that since six of the nine seats are now filled, it is appropriate to open the role of the Economic Development Committee to all aspects of economic development which are consistent with the attached charge, vision statement and mission statement for the Committee. -2- CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIVISION Date: March 18, 1997 TO: Internal Operations Committee Supervisors Rogers and Gerber FROM: Economic Development Committee By: Belinda Smith, CDBG Program-Mariager SUBJECT: Mission and Vision Statement of the Economic Development Committee BACKGROUND The Economic Development Committee (Committee) was created pursuant to the Board Order of June 27, 1995. The charge of the Committee is to work with the County Community Development Department to develop recommendations regarding the use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds and to act as a policy advisory body to the Board of Supervisors economic development matters referred to it by the Board. The nine member committee is composed of representatives of education, small business, public utility, labor, banking, training, and non-profit organization. Up until October of 1996, due to limited membership, the Committee has focused on CDBG related matters. With an increase of Committee membership to six and the hiring by the Community Development Department of an Economic Development Program Manager, in October 1996, the Committee began work to develop a Mission Statement and establish goals for the Committee in their capacity as an advisory body to the Board of Supervisors. At the November 18, 1996 Internal Operations Committee, staff was directed to continue to recruit members for the Committee, establish communication between the Committee and other advisory bodies dealing with economic development, and work with the Committee to finalize the mission statement. Staff was requested to return to the Internal Operations Committee for their review of the Mission statement. CHARGE OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE The Committee has been very diligent in its efforts to develop its role as an advisory Committee that can effectively assist the unincorporated county in achieving economic development objectives as directed by the Board of Supervisors. The Committee also felt it was necessary to make some distinction between their responsibilities in economic development to the unincorporated county and their role as an advisory body for CDBG and its service to the Urban County'. The charge of the Committee, and the vision and mission statement (attached) were approved and referred to the 'The Urban County is comprised of the unincorporated area of the County and the cities of Brentwood, Clayton, Danville, EI Cerrito, Hercules, Lafayette, Martinez, Moraga, Orinda, Pinole, Pleasant Hill, San Pablo, and San Ramon. Internal Operations Committee by the Committee on February 5, 1997. Dependent on approval of the Statement the Committee will be developing a work plan for FY 1997/98. MEMBERSHIP Staff is currently seeking qualified applicants to fill vacant seats for the banking, non-profit, and small business (1) representatives. Staff, through a variety of methods including, published newspaper notices, announcements at commerce and industry group meetings, and solicitation recommendations from cities, has attempted to fill the last three vacancies on the Committee. At the same time staff has been sensitive to maintaining gender, ethnicity and geographic balance to the Committee. The adoption of a charge and mission statement is expected will generate new interest in Committee membership and result in the remaining positions will be filled. A roster of the current membership is attached. COMMUNICATION WITH OTHER ADVISORY BODIES The Internal Operation Committee raised issues of communication between the Committee and other advisory bodies dealing with economic development such as the Private Industry Council and the Economic Partnership. The Committee mailing list has been expanded to include several other advisory bodies, including the Private Industry Council, the Economic Partnership, Urban County cities, and non-profit organizations. In addition, Manny Ungson, the County Economic Development Program Manager, regularly attends meetings of the Economic Partnership and other professional business organizations and therefore maintains a vital communication link with those bodies. Further, the County Administrator is on the Board of Directors of the Contra Costa Economic Partnership. RECOMMENDATIONS ♦ Adopt the charge, vision and mission statement as submitted by the Economic Development Committee. ♦ Direct staff to continue to solicit membership that reflects diversity with respect to ethnicity, gender, and geographic balance. Attachments cc: Val Alexeeff, GMEDA Harvey Bragdon, Director - Community Development Jim Kennedy, Deputy Director - Redevelopment Claude L. Van Marter, Assistant County Administrator Manny Ungson, Economic Development Program Manager Economic Development Committee 2 The Charge of the Economic Development Committee From a County perspective,this Committee will serve as an advisory body to the Board of Supervisors on economic development issues referred to it by the Board. This may include: • Advising the Board on overall County business development or on.the attraction of new businesses; • Advising on policies effecting businesses,permits,or processes etc. Economic Development Vision Statement The Economic Development Committee will serve as a forum for developing concensus regarding economic development issues referred to it by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) Purpose Statement for Economic Development Assistance Fund • to evaluate and provide funding for eligible economic development projects throughout the Urban County' as they arise during the program year; • provide"gap"financing for projects that create new jobs for low and moderate income persons; • stimulate micro-enterprise'development;provide seed money; • increase economic opportunity through job training and placement; • provide revolving loan funds and grants to eligible economic development projects and programs as the need arises during the program year. CDBG Mission Statement This Committee will pursue economic development projects by: • Determining the most effective ways to outreach and gain an understanding of client need,issues, and barriers to development. • Identifying areas of focus and prioritize based on scope,size,and opportunity. • Overcoming issues and obstacles in areas of defined need to ensure that funding gets to impact areas of focus as identified by the Committee. • A closer staff focus to work through application development with identified projects where skill sets may otherwise prevent submission. • Focus on projects that help to develop skill sets in eligible clients,to increase functioning capabilities to obtain and keep higher paying jobs which lead to economic independence. 'The Urban County includes all unicorporated areas and cities except Antioch,Concord,Pittsburg, Richmond,and Walnut Creek. 2Micro-enterprise means a business that has five or fewer employees,one or more of whom owns the enterprise. w ' \ Cc, 2 \ \ � / all d \ w § 00 � § \ § E � w © kA kA 0 0 / / Ln § \ \ / ) k ( ) ) § ) & \ 0 ) ) \ }\ \\ b k U 2 / / } ! aQe \ ( / J _ J 004 ) § 7 5 } j ] / ( k ) / ( , ) ] $ / § � A to P. § \ 4 ± r ] ; k \ \ Eg / / \ \ \ ) ƒ \ ) \ \ } §\ c. qq Contra Costa TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ; County K � t FROM: Harvey E. Bragdon Director of Community Development DATE: April 1, 1997 SUBJECT: Audit of Financial Statements 1991 Contra Costa Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS ACCEPT Audit Report on the Financial Statements completed by Maze and Associates for Fiscal Year 1995/96 of the following programs: 1991 Contra Costa Home Mortgage Finance Authority Bonds and the 1992 Delta Counties Home Mortgage Finance Authority. FISCAL IMPACT None. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The Indentures for the above referenced Home Mortgage Revenue Bond Programs provide that an annual audit of the financial statements be completed. Maze and Associates have completed the audit of the respective programs as of June 30, 1996 and submitted its report. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: A, RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR R COMMENDATION OF BOARb _ COMMITTEE _APPROVE _ OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON a p 9 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER_ VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A UNANIMOUS (ABSENTJw V ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Source: Don Steinweg 335-1261 cc: Community Development ATTESTE CAO (via Risk Management) PHIL BATCHELOR, CLE K OF County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Auditor (Go Nona) AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Contractor BY aJ, DEPUTY DS:Ih m25/bondaud.bos C.lod TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra FROM: Barton J. Gilbert, Director of General Services Costa DATE: March 17, 1997 "' `"' County SUBJECT: Disposal of Surplus Property SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)8 BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. RECOMMENDATION Declare as surplus and authorize the Purchasing Agent to dispose of equipment and vehicles as specifically set forth below. 11. BACKGROUND Section 1108-2.212 of the County Ordinance Code authorizes the Purchasing Agent to dispose of any personal property belonging to Contra Costa County and found by the Board of Supervisors not to be further required for public use. The items are A) obsolete, B) worn out, C) beyond economical repair, or D) wrecked beyond repair and are appropriate for disposal. Dept• Descri tion County Tag# Comments Comm Svcs- Motorola MaxTrac 800 Series A Head Start Trunked Mobile Radios (3) Comm Svcs- Motorola Control Station with A Head Start Power Supply Unit CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _YES SIGNATURE: 6WW)'�i/�ww _RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE _APPROVE _OTHER SrONATURE 5: ACTION OF BOARD ON 1.4 I I -197 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS JI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE +J 'UNANIMOUS(ABSENT']T ZJ 1h Ct V _� AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. MEDIA CONTACT: BARTON S. GILBERT (313-7100) cc: County Administrator ATTESTED -ACU . LI I Auditor Controller PHIL BAT HELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF General Services Department SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Administration Accounting ` Purchasing \ M382 (10/88) BYy "�'�"��T-- 4++'����-� ,DEPUTY c, ioi Contra Costa TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS County FROM: Harvey E. Bragdon ' " Director of Community Development DATE: April 1, 1997 SUBJECT: Carry Forward unexpended Community Development Block Grant Funds SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller to transfer unexpended FY 92/93, 93/94, 94/95, and 95/96 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds as listed in attachment A to program administration for FY 1997/98 ($75, 668) , and to the unallocated fund account for allocation in FY 1997/98 ($35,000) . FISCAL IMPACT No General Funds are involved. All funds are from allocations from the U.S . Department of Housing and Urban Development BACKGROUND/REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION For a variety of reasons such as, project infeasability, financial problems of project sponsor, completion of project under budget, and project abandonment, previously allocated CDBG funds are unused. Staff has identified fifteen project that fall CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: XX YES ' SIGNATURE:` / RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CO ENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE_ APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) : _ ACTION OF BOARD ON q APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A UNANIMOUS (ABSENT IS r , V ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES : NOES : ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: Belinda Smith 335-1260 Original : Community Development ATTESTED cc: CAO PHIL BATCHED, CLERK OF County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Auditor (c/o Nona) AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR DEPUTY Carry Forward CDBG April 1, 1997 Page 2 into the above categories, plus program income from FY 1995/96 , for a total of $110, 668 that can be utilized in FY 1997/98. The Community Development Department estimates a shortfall of administrative funds for FY 1997/98 in the amount of 75,700. Administrative costs are increasing due to inflation and cost-of- living adjustment, and due to the evolving and complex federal oversight responsibilities the County must adhere to. In addition, the total amount has been decreasing in an absolute sense, therefore the amount derived by the Board's adopted percentage allocation (see below) has been dropping. The number of funded projects, and therefore the number of contracts to administer, has not been dropping. The transfer of funds as recommended will permit the Board to adhere to its adopted CDBG program allocation formula for FY 1997/98 as follows : Housing 50% Economic Development 15% OPEN 5% Public Service 15% Administration 138 BOS Contingency 2% The remaining $35,000 in recovered funds are to be added to the Board contingency for allocation with the FY 1997/98 CDBG grant. hs bs/c:data/wp60/refv ds.BO G CJDI Attachment A Project # 18-40* Early Childhood Mental Health $ 6 ,500 18-38 Phoenix Programs $ 25, 000 Acquire Facility 19-30 Amerson Corporation $ 10, 000 Recreation Center Renovation 20-63 United Concillo West $ 6, 000 Information and Referral 20-54 Neighborhood House of N.R. $ 1, 237 Senior Citizens Center 20-32 UCSSO $ 20, 000 Delta Youth Center 21-2069 Catholic Charities English Action $ 556 Asian Literacy 21-1963 Marsh Creek Vista Homeowner Assn. $ 10 Sweat Equity 21-55 City of San Ramon $ 6, 780 Villa San Ramon 21-57 Pacific Community Services $ 2,088 Housing Counseling 21-66 Family and Community Services $ 739 Senior Escort 21-67 UCSSO $ 1,484 Brentwood Martinez Referral 21-70 Catholic Charities English Action $ 9,500 Family Literacy Program 21-72 Hospice $ 5, 378 AIDS Patient Care 21-84 United Concillo West $ 4, 000 21-95 Program Income $ 11, 388 $110, 668 * Year 18 - FY 1992/93 Year 19 - FY 1993/94 Year 20 - FY 1994/95 Year 21 - FY 1995/96 /021 TO: TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: APRIL 1, 1997 SUBJECT: Determine the Need to Continue the Emergency Action Regarding the Repair of"Hill 310" Land Creep, Bay Point Project No.: 4500-6G5094 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. Recommended Action: DETERMINE that there is a need to continue the emergency action taken by the Board of Supervisors on June 4, 1996, pursuant to Public Contract Code Sections 22035 and 22050, to repair the "Hill 310" Land Creep, Bay Point. II. Financial Impact: Total cost of repairs cannot be fully determined at this time, but staff is developing an estimate for completion of the repair. III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: A. On February 26, 1996, Public Works and Building Inspection were notified that cracks were occurring in Beaulieu Court. The County hired a geotechnical firm to identify the cause of the slide, and recommend and direct remedial actions to mitigate land movement. B. On March 19, 1996, the Board of Supervisors concurred in the County Administrator's proclamation of a local emergency. C. On June 4, 1996, the Board of Supervisors declared an emergency and authorized the Public Works Director to proceed in the most expeditious manner to repair the area subject to creep. Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE: i�, _RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE (S): ACTION OF BOARD ON I ) �`7`t 7 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER_ VOTE OF SUPERVISORS UNANIMOUS (ABSENT Jb . t-.y- V ) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JPM:tt glconst\BO\H310-11.t3 Orig.Div: Public Works(Construction) am*pial tat M•Was and cam"07 d Contact: Joseph P.Murphy(313-2320) an a�adon taken and a�woe spa Mmnto aa cc: CAD qrd a SapM_ I 9 c Auditor/Controller TqNELoq,C ark o1 me aoar0 County Counsel M&W and CormtY Adad GMEDA ( Design Div. 1 G§PBV Construction Div.-R.Bruno (Original to rile) Maintenance Div. Contractor Determine the Need to Continue the Emergency Action Regarding the Repair of"Hill 310"Land Creep April 1, 1997 Page Two Ill. Reasons for¢tecommendations and Background (cont'd): D. Repair status: After some difficulty, the critical directional boring was completed. The estimated completion date is now mid-April. IV. Consequences of Negative Action: This project is part of a series of sequential construction projects that will stabilize the landslide and restore the streets and sidewalks of the affected neighborhood. A negative action would stop this process. TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS C•/o3 FROM: William Walker, MD Health Services Director ' Contra Costa DATE: March 25, 1997 County SUBJECTi Contra Costa Health Plan provider credentialing and recredentialing SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) at BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the providers (listed on the attachments) recommended by the Contra Costa Health Plan Quality Council on February 24, 1997. II. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. III. BACKGROUND: The National Committee on Quality Assurance (NCQA) has requested evidence of Board Approval for each Contra Costa Health Plan provider be contained within the provider's credential file. The recommendations were made by the Contra Costa Health Plan Credentialing Committee and approved by the Contra Costa Health Plan Quality Council. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENTI X YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _ RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE _ APPROVE _ OTHER SIGNATURE(S) ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS A UNANIMOUS (ABSENT1�Ic1Fin d V ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AYES: NOES: AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: Milt Camhi / aq CCI Auditor Controller ATTESTED County Administrator Phil atchelor, Cleth of the Board of Health Services Director SupervWt3911dCounty Adm!O* tOf C.C.H.P. Provider Affairs (att. Susanne Penfold) Q4 . U Mee]/s•en ov i)A J d 0 o . A w. a 0 o . / noelIry C,l03 February, 1997 Name S ecialt Bach, Truong, Thi, MD Pediatrics Banks,Norman,MD Family Practice Becker, Mervyn,MD Gastroenterology Chiu, Kwang, MD OB/GYN Cho, Myung,Rae, MDPediatrics Coleman, Frederick, DDS Pediatric Dentistry Corona, Mario, MD Internal Medicine; Nephrology; Critical Care Medicine Davies, Robert, MD Internal Medicine; Nephrology DePalma, Ralph, MD ` OB/GYN; Maternal & Fetal Medicine DiRaimondo Carol, MD Internal Medicine; Nephrology Doud, Robert,MD Internal Medicine; Nephrology Drucker,Mark,MD Ophthalmology Faucett, Rodney,DO Internal Medicine; Nephrology Grant, Joseph, MD Orthopedics Graves,Gretchen, MD' Pediatrician Greenwald,Roger, MD Ophthalmology (Spec...Cataract& Refractive Surgery) Grosserode, Robert, MD Ophthalmology Hancock, Jamie, OD + Optometry Hanson, Kenneth, OD' Optometry Helms, Ileana, MD Internal Medicine &Nephrology Hosny, Ayman, MD Internal Medicine; Cardiosvascular ; Critical Care Medicine Hsu, Hwei Jung, MD Family Practice Kerns, Jon, MD Family Practice King, William, DC Chiropractor Lai Donald, MD Internal Medicine; Cardiovascular Levine, Michael, MD Psychiatry Lewis, Stephen, MD Internal Medicine; Endocrinology Lin, David, MD, PhD Internal Medicine Gastroenterology Linker, Henry, OD Optometry London, Stuart, MD Diagnostic Radiology Lovett, Stuart, MD OB/GYN Mandavi, Abbus,MD Pediatrician/Allergist Meador, James, MD ` Ophthalmology /03 February, 1997 Melbourne-McGraw, MD Psychiatry Menut,Gerard, MD General Surgery Messian, Richard, MD Internal Medicine; Gastroenterology Mill, Philip, OD Optometry Miller, Terina, MD Internal Medicine/ Nephrology Mollberg, Richard, DPM Podiatry (Surgeon) Morrissey, Ellen, MD Internal Medicine/ Nephrology Morse,Bruce,M. D. Internal Medicine/ Nephrology Nan,Allen,MD OB/GYN Nguyen, Mary, DDS General Dentistry Oberlander, Michael, MD Orthopedic Surgeon/ Sports Medicine Pagtalunan, Marie, MD Internal Medicine / Nephrology Powell,Lyle,MD Ophthalmology Raszadeh, Mary, MD'; General Practitioner Rovner, Robert,MD r Orthopedic Surgeon Schroff, Edmund, MDOtolamgology; Head &Neck Surgeon Serebrakian, Armen, MD Otolamgology; Reconstructive Surgery Smith, Gordon, MD Ophthalmology Smith, Warren"Byron", MD, Ph.D. Pediatrics; Pediatric Hemotology Oncology Sorem,Kimberlee, MD OB/GYN Steiner, Robert, MD Orthopedics Sucher, David Frank, OD Optometry Takekuma, Hiromi, DO Internal Medicine Pulmonary Turman, Steven, MD Internal Medicine/Medical Oncology Tysinger, Jr. James, MD Ophthalmology and Cataract Implant Surgery Weaver, John, MD Internal Medicine / Nephrology Weis, Theodore, MD Internal Medicine / Nephrology Weiss, Johnathan, MD OB/GYN Werner-Crohn, Mindy, MD Psychiatrist Wong, Brian; MD Internal Medicine/ Nephrology Yu John, MD Family Practice Zwerdling,Michael MD Pediatrics C,la3 January 1997 Name Specialty Curzi, Mario, MD Nephrology/ Internal Medicine Cohen,Norman,MDI Internal Medicine/Oncology Draper-Praetz, Robyn, Psy Psychology Knight, Robert, MD Psychiatry Salazar, Mary Jane,DDS General Dentistry Sundar, Sam; MD Internal Medicine Wallach, Andrew, MD Family Practice Weinstein,Richard DDS Endodontist No new profiles were presented in December, 1996 November, 1996 Name` S ecialt BRANDES,P, MD Psychiatry CAICEDO, ANDRES MD Surgery CECCHI,GARY R, MD Internal Medicine/ Medical Oncology/Hematology GONG,HENRY, MD Internal Medicine/Cariovascular GRACE JAMES, MD Psychiatry & Internal Medicine KELEDJIAN, AREK,'MD Internal Medicine/Gastroenterology LEVINE MICHAEL, MD Therapuetic Radiologogy Name Specialty STEPHENS RAYMOND,MD-- Psychiatry TRACY MARTHA MD Medical Oncology C./off Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Costa FROM: Harvey E. Bragdon, County Director of Community Development DATE: March 20, 1997 SUBJECT: Quarterly Reports on GO BIKE! Program SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS Refer to the Transportation Committee the review of quarterly reports on the GO BIKE! program. FISCAL IMPACT None. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The GO BIKE!program was established by the County in 1996 to promote the use of the bicycle for transportation purposes and to develop the supporting facilities needed to better accommodate bicycle transportation. The program is funded y t grants, CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _ YES SIGNATUR arve a _ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR_ RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD CO ITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURES): ACTION OF BOARD ON ApriAPPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT V TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Orig Dept: Community Development ATTESTED April 1. 1997 Contact: Ernest Vovakis, 335-1243 PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF cc: Jack Champlin, Health Services THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY(/J ADMINISTRATOR BY n/ DEPUTY GO BIKE! Program March 20, 1997 Page 2 one administered by the Community Development Department and one by the Health Services Department. The Public Works Department is also a participant in the program. A memorandum of understanding among the three departments was approved in April 1996 which established the framework of the GO BIKE! program. In supporting the submission of Health Services' grant application in July, 1995, The Board of Supervisors requested the Transportation Committee to monitor the grant in terms of actual bicycle commuting taking place. Quarterly reports were submitted to the Transportation Committee throughout 1996. The recommendation of this board order is to continue this practice in 1997. C./off Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS '%: Costa W FROM: Harvey E. Bragdon, Count Director of Community Development DATE: March 20, 1997 SUBJECT: Amendment of County Transportation Demand Management Ordinance SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS Refer to the Transportation Committee the matter of amending the County's Transportation Demand Management(TDM)Ordinance to bring it into compliance with state law and with the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's policy. Refer to the Transportation Committee reports by the Community Development Department on the County's Employee TDM program. FISCAL IMPACT None. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The County has administered a Transportation Demand Management Ordinance for the unincorporated area since 1987, which was directed at reducing peak hour traffic CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _ YES X SIGNATURE: Harvey E. Bragdon _ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR_ RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A UNANIMOUS (ABSENT V TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. c:\ev\wp51\tdm\ordrev.brd - Orig Dept: Community Development ATTESTED . I 1-) 97 7 Contact: Ernest Vovakis, 335-1243 PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF cc: Val Alexeeff, GMEDA THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BY DEPUTY C.lo5 County TDM Ordinance March 20, 1997 Page 2 congestion by providing information on commute alternatives to employees and residents and by requiring large employers to participate in a TDM program which included annual employee surveys and preparation of a plan to reduce peak hour trips. This ordinance has been amended several times to bring it into conformance with the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's (CCTA) policy on TDM and to serve as the local implementation device for the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's Employer- based Trip Reduction Rule. This rule was invalidated by state law in 1996, and the Transportation Authority has revamped its TDM policy to require an ordinance that is based on voluntary compliance with trip reduction efforts. Each local jurisdiction in the County must amend its ordinance during this year to be in compliance with CCTA policy. c.M/0 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra ,. FROM: Costa i Finance Committee " - �: County DATE: April 1, 1997 SUBJECT: SHERIFF FACILITY STANDARD REQUIREMENT FOR MEASURE C TRANSPORTATION FUNDS SPECIFIC REGUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)3 SACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: 1. ACCEPT the attached report from the Community Development Department regarding the Sheriff Facility Standard Requirement of Measure C Transportation Funds. 2. MODIFY the current Sheriff facility space requirement to include support facilities within the patrol and investigation definition such as dispatch. 3. REQUEST the Sheriff, in cooperation with the County Administrator, to prepare a master plan that addresses the long term needs for patrol and investigation activities in the unincorporated area and evaluates potential revenue sources to fund implementation of the master plan. The plan may include additional facilities to be developed within the next five years. BACKGRCIUND: On March 3 and March 17, the Finance Committee reviewed a report from the Community Development Department on the Sheriff Facility Standard Requirement for Measure C Transportation Funds (see attached report). Representatives from the Community Development, Sheriff and County Administrator departments were present to discuss the issue. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMF,.r: _,.._YES SIGNATURE: —RECOMMENDATION OF COUY ADMINISTRATOR —RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Q APPROVE _..., THE \ 4 SIGNATURES: ciamilla Gayle Uilkema ACTION OF BOARD rll Z 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED _ OTHER _ VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT V j AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN, ATTESTEDApr�� Contact: PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF CC: Sheri f SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Community Development-Steve Goetz GMEDAj4`� .,Y7 Gi5 County Administrator-De Bell BY �— � 'DEPUTY O'1o6 Page 2 The Committee decided to recommend short term and long term actions. First, it was decided that the current County requirement for patrol and investigation facilities was defined to narrowly, and left out essential support services such as dispatch and records. Second, the Committee felt a long term plan should be developed by the Sheriff and County Administrator. 0./oho CONTRA COSTA COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: March 11, 1997 TO: Finance Committee FROM: Community Development Staff SUBJECT: SHERIFF'S FACILITIES There is no current plan for long-term or mid-term Sheriff's Facilities. The Sheriff's Office has responded to immediate need or funding opportunity. Most of the budgetary emphasis in the Sheriff's Department has been placed on maintaining personnel and responding to hot spot crime areas. Adequate Sheriff s Facilities are a requirement for Measure C - 1988 sales tax dollars. There is a need to identify additional Sheriff facilities to accommodate approved and planned population growth. Failure to resolve this issue will jeopardize the County's 1.5 million dollar annual allocation in measure C-1988 sales tax dollars used for transportation purposes. The Board standard for police facilities, 155 sq. ft. per thousand, was adopted in 1991. Since 1991 a total of 211,687 square feet of new facilities have been added including the Richmond Detention facility, addition to the crime lab and addition to coroners office. These facilities do not count by the County standard because the County includes only patrol and investigation facilities in their standard. The County operation is viewed similar to a city and does not reflect the broader responsibility and function. The current top need is a new dispatch facility. The County may spend as much as 2 million dollars but receive no credit toward the Measure C goal. Current Problem 1996 totals for Measure C. Appropriate facilities need to be expanded by 858 square feet to meet the County's growth management standard for 1996. The Sheriffs Office does not wish to count temporary facilities as annexed because they may disappear quickly or they do not provide substation needs such as changing rooms, evidence lockers and temporary incarceration. They have been included in the count. Near-Term Conditions 1997 - 2001 There is a near term need of another 4,219 square feet in patrol investigation facilities if projected growth occurs by 2001. ivy No program of sheriff facility expansion is provided that will address existing or near-term needs by 2001. Opportunities available to expand sheriff facilities in the near term include: Dougherty Valley has a condition of approval to pay$61 per unit for construction of sheriff station facilities. (These facilities have to benefit the immediate area.) Discovery Bay West has a condition of approval to fund 50%of a community center which could include sheriff facilities. Pending development applications with sheriff facilities include, the Oakley Downtown Specific Plan,North Richmond Senior Housing Project, and the Junction project at Pleasant Hill Bart. Long-Term Conditions 2001 - 2010 Long-term development allowed by the General Plan requires approximately 3623 square feet of sheriff facilities for patrol and investigative services. Opportunities to expand sheriff facilities in the long-term include: - Land dedication in the Cypress Corridor development agreement for public facilities. - County-owned land at Lindsay flood control basin for public facilities. - County-owned land at West County Justice Center for expanded facilities. - County-owned land at Muir Road for expanded facilities. Sheriffs Office Concerns Growth Management Standard In reviewing the County's Capital Improvement Program for Provision of Parks and Sheriff's Facilities, we find the program does not adequately address the needs of the Sheriff's Office or the citizens who rely on this Office for public safety. We understand the Growth Management Standard of 155 square feet per 1000 population is intended to include only patrol and investigation space. Not only is this standard not an accurate reflection of the actual space devoted to patrol and investigation activities when the standard was developed, it does not include those essential functions necessary to deliver police services to the public such as dispatch and records. Although these functions are centrally located,they work interactively with patrol and investigation and should be considered in any facility needs. Another concern relates to the inclusion of the square footage from the storefront patrol annexes in the growth management standards. Multiples of these little storefronts do not to reduce the need for space in regional substations. The storefronts are intended primarily as a point of presence statement to the public. Merchants like them because they reduce minor crimes in the shopping center. They give the citizens the sense that police assistance is close at hand. But these annexes do not have enough space to function as patrol substations. They should not be used to mitigate the County's growth management standard. Likewise, space occupied by patrol staff in special district should not be included in satisfying the growth management standards because that space has been provided to offer enhanced services to the residents of the district at their expense. Patrol Substations We have included a prototype of a functional patrol facility. The facility must include such things as a locker room, a line up room, storage for evidence and equipment, administrative space, interview rooms, a temporary detention space, report writing space and secure space for vehicles. Operationally, the number of patrol facilities we can operate is limited because of the need for unified supervision and management, because of the need for our swom staff to share vehicles, equipment and information, and because of our limited staffing relative to the geographical areas served. We currently have four patrol substations in the west, east, central and south areas of the County. We do not foresee the number of substations changing. The Bay Station was temporarily moved to space in the West County Detention Facility when the latter opened and the old substation was closed. Although the location is suitable, the space is inadequate. Should the West County Detention Facility open its booking operation, the Bay Station will lose its space and need to be relocated in the same general area. The Central Station has been located in the Field Operations building in Martinez since 1989. The location is good,but the space is crowded. The Valley Station is located in leased space in an Alamo shopping center. Again, the location meets our operational needs, but the space is barely adequate. The Delta Station is located in an extremely old and inadequate building in Oakley. The general location meets our operational needs but much more space is needed. Future Needs We anticipate that we will not want to add more patrol substations in the foreseeable future. Rather our need is to expand and improve the existing substations. Using the prototype patrol station at about 9500 square feet,cost for site improvement,construction and project management is estimated to be about $3 million for each station. (The cost estimate was provided by the General Services Department Architectural Division and includes $100 per square foot for project design and management, $25 per square foot for site improvements and $175 per square foot for construction of an essential facility. D. Bell indicates the overhead can be reduced for new construction.) In addition,the Sheriff s Office needs to expand the existing Communications Center where dispatch services are provided. The Sheriff's Office has received a 2.4 million dollar grant to replace equipment in dispatch. Approximately 4000 more square feet of space is needed to house the equipment at an estimated cost of$2.2 million. It should be noted that design studies have been conducted for building a facility to house Sheriff's Administration and Records on the corner of Glacier Drive and Muir Road in Martinez. There is inadequate space in the County's Administration building for these functions (at 10,300 square feet). Approximately 40% of the administrative unit supports the Patrol and Investigation operations and the Records unit operates in direct support of Patrol and Investigations. Any long range facility planning should include the construction of a new Administration and Records facility. Additional operations that provide support to patrol and investigation have been provided to you in the inventory of Sheriff's Facilities. In the immediate term the Board has several options: 1. The Board can seek to rent, purchase or build an additional 858 square feet in the West County, East County, Martinez or Alamo facilities within 6 months. 2. The Board can seek to rent, purchase or build new facilities in any of the four (4) areas within 6 months. 3. The Board can modify the standard to include support facilities within the patrol and investigation definition such as dispatch 4. The Board can allocate available county buildings to house patrol and investigation activities. 5. The Board can adopt a capital improvement program that includes additional facilities to be developed within the next 5 years. 6. The Board can request the Sheriff,in cooperation with the CAO, to prepare a master plan that addresses the long term needs for patrol and investigation activities in the unincorporated area and evaluates potential revenue sources to fund implementation of the master plan. In the near term the Board should encourage a master plan for Sheriffs Facilities to be prepared. Preliminary information and concepts have been developed between Community Development and Sheriff's departments. The plan must be incorporated into a 5 year CIP. V A:lz Alexeefflsheriff.mem TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AS GOVERNING BOARD OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, CHIEF ENGINEER DATE: APRIL 1, 1997 SUBJECT: DECLARE AN EMERGENCY FOR THE REPAIR OF THE FAILING CREEK BANK ON SAN RAMON CREEK, ADJACENT TO ST. ISIDORES CHURCH, DANVILLE Project No.: 7520-6B9L74-97 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. Recommended Action: 1. FIND, based on the evidence set forth below and as contained in the minutes of the Board meeting, pursuant to Public Contract Code Sections 22035 and 22050, that an emergency exists, commencing early January 1997, that the emergency will not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation for bids, and that the action described in this order is necessary to respond to the emergency. 2. DELEGATE to the Chief Engineer the authority to proceed in the most expeditious manner to repair the area subject to bank failure to prevent further slippage in the area adjacent to the St. Isidores Church. 3. DIRECT the Chief Engineer to make reports to the Board of Supervisors, as required by Public Contract Code 22050, stating the reasons justifying why the emergency will not permit a delay resulting from competitive solicitation for bids and why the action is necessary to respond to the emergency, in order to enable the Board of Supervisors to review the emergency action and to determine that there is a need to continue the action. 4. DECLARE that the project, as an emergency, is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act under Resources Code Section 15269 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE: '� _RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ONQ�t `(`j 7 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED_OTHER_ VO OF SUPERVISORS UNANIMOUS(ABSENTNabu.e� Y ) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MC:cI g:tictl\fcbo\src reek.wpd Contact: Mike Carlson 313-2311 t n acts take an entered b e nue and miner oar of M eetlon taken and Isaw the minuanrad n Ulf Orig. Div: Flood Control Bart M SuM o a a3 t3 w)n9 y cc: Auditor Controller moo' PHIL BA XELOR,CIe. cl the and County Counsel q s V&mmm and CotnN AdmNUARnx D. Eckerson,Design C JLil�LG <J�PN S.Matsumoto,Maintenance b C /01 DECLARE AN EMERGENCY FOR THE REPAIR OF THE FAILING CREEK BANK ON SAN RAMON CREEK ADJACENT TO St. ISIDORES CHURCH, DANVILLE Page 2 April 1, 1997 5. DIRECT the Chief Engineer to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk and to arrange for payment of the $25 filing fee. 6. RATIFY the actions of the County Administrator and the Chief Engineer taken to date in response to the creek bank failure. 7. WAIVE the County Minority Business Enterprise and Women Enterprise Program requirements for construction contracts, purchasing and professional service contracts. 8. DIRECT the Chief Engineer to take appropriate actions to provide opportunities for minority and women-owned businesses to participate in bidding on any contract work and/or materials, and in the selection of any consultants associated with the repair. 9. AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, or his designee, to sign on behalf of the Board of Supervisors any, and all, real property-related documents, including but not limited to right of entries, slope and drainage easements, and temporary construction easements, as required to allow repair of failing creek bank. H. Financial Impact: There will be no impact to the General Fund. The project will be funded from Flood Control District's Zone 3B. The total cost of repairs cannot be fully determined at this time, but staff is developing estimates to complete expeditious stabilization of the slide. Staff will seek to recover costs from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). M. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: A section of the east bank of San Ramon Creek within the Flood Control District's right of way has begun to fail. The bank failure is downstream from the La Gonda Way bridge crossing in the Town of Danville. The slide was first noticed after the January storms of this past year. The banks have continued to move during this past winter. The failure plain has extended beyond the top of the creek bank, and is threatening adjoining private property. In order to stabilize this slide, geotechnical investigations must be performed (immediately). This analysis will better define the problem and assist our Engineers in developing a solution. If we were to follow our standard design and construction contract advertisement and approval process, the repair could not be made prior to the rainy season. This repair must occur during this summer. If the work was delayed to 1998, the failure would encroach onto the adjacent property and could jeopardize existing structures. Pursuant to provisions of Sections 22035 and 22050 of the Public Contract Code, when the appropriate findings of an emergency are made by the Board of Supervisors, the normal bidding procedures are waived and repairs can begin immediately. We are, therefore, recommending that the Board make such findings and direct the Chief Engineer to proceed with the project and enter into any necessary contracts. IV. Consequences of Negative Action: Non-concurrence of the above recommendations will significantly and adversely, delay stabilization of the area.