HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04151997 - C7-C16 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on April 15, 1997 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Ganciamilla, DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Completion of Warranty Period for Subdivision 7840, Pacheco area.
On June 6, 1995, this Board resolved that the improvements in Subdivision 7840 were
completed as provided in the Subdivision Agreement with Braddock and Logan Group and now on
the recommendation of the Public Works Director;
The Board hereby FINDS that the improvements have satisfactorily met the guaranteed
performance standards following completion and acceptance and that the Public Works Director has
previously refunded the $3,400 cash deposit from deposit permit#241843 dated April 12, 1994.
1 hereby team that me is a hue and ca*ecc 7 d
an action ta6:on and entered ..n the minaW M tlN
$pard of So""
u " ed,on the este She"-
pTl'ESTEtL�
�r palvaasa d�Count�'l of nWV*Wr
COP N
RL:KF:mw
g:\engsvc\bo\bo4-15
Originator: Public Works(ES)
Contact: Rich Lierly(313-2348)
cc: Public Works -Accounting
-R. Bruno,Construction
Director of Community Development
Braddock&Logan Croup
4155 Blackhawk Plaza Circle,Suite 201,Danville,CA 94506
Insurance Company of the West
%Saylor Hill Company
1939 Harrison Street,Oakland,CA 94612
C.S
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on April 15, 1997 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla, DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Completion of Warranty Period for Subdivision 7818, Alamo area.
On October 10, 1995, this Board resolved that the improvements in Subdivision 7818 were
completed without the need for a subdivision agreement. Now on the recommendation of the Public
Works Director;
The Board hereby FINDS that the improvements have satisfactorily met the guaranteed
performance standards following completion and acceptance.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the subdivision agreement and surety performance
bond, submitted for the maintenance period, are hereby EXONERATED.
It f>atesY eeafN Met Mb b e"a end Consol copy of
an actlon taken ens entered on Me minutes al Me
Board of Supe lam on the da o shorn.
ATTESTED:�..gbere'd
PHIL CHE and
o or me Otlera
N Supery eon ens county AWNn4trator
bl'.���Do"
RL:mw
g:\engsvc\bo\bo4-15
Originator: Public Works(ES)
Contact: Rich Lierly(313-2348)
cc: Public Works -Accounting
-R.Bruno,Construction
Director of Community Development
WhitecliffHomes
11B Orchard Court,Alamo,CA 94507
Reliance Insurance Company
580 California Street,#1300,San Francisco,CA 94104
c. y
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on April 15, 1997 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla, DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Completion of Warranty Period and Release of Cash Deposit for Faithful
Performance, Minor Subdivision 29-90, Walnut Creek area.
On April 16, 1996, this Board resolved that the improvements in Minor Subdivision 29-
90 were completed as provided in the Subdivision Agreement with Larks Trust for Tiffany J.
Larks and now on the recommendation of the Public Works Director;
The Board hereby FINDS that the improvements have satisfactorily met the guaranteed
performance standards following completion and acceptance; and
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED
to refund the $1,000 cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit No. 180448, dated October 17,
1990) plus interest in accordance with Government Code Section 53079, if appropriate, to Larks
Trust for Tiffany J. Larks, pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 94-4.406 and the Subdivision
Agreement.
1 hereby eanIfy Brat this Is•true utd mraut taq d
an action taken and entered on the minuW q yy
Board of Supentwn on the dat sh m.
ATTESTED• 4
PHIL B CHELOR,Cle c of the board
of Supervbore and County Adminisindor
y
cr
RL:mw
g:\engsvc\bo\bo4-15
Originator: Public Works(ES)
Contact: Rich Lierly(313-2348)
cc: Public Works -Accounting
-R. Bruno, Construction
Director of Community Development
Larks Trust for Tiffany J. Larks
%Mr. Gale Larks
305 Montecello Drive,Walnut Creek, CA 94595
Ctlo
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on April 15, 1997 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla, Desaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN:None
SUBJECT: Exonerating Acquisition of Off-Site Right of Way Agreement and Corporate
Surety Bond for Minor Subdivision 59-83, Alamo area.
The Public Works Director has notified this Board that the Acquisition of Off-Site Right of
Way Agreement with Raymond Suppe and the surety securing the agreement (Amwest Corporate
Surety Bond No. 1257306)is no longer necessary. The Public Works Director recommends that the
Board of Supervisors exonerate the agreement and release the surety bond.
NOT THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Acquisition of Off-Site Right of Way
Agreement, approved by the Board on November 5, 1991, is hereby EXONERATED.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Amwest Surety bond (No. 1257306), is hereby
RELEASED.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to refund
the $3,000 cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit No. 188432, dated April 5, 1991) plus interest
in accordance with the Government Code Section 53079, if appropriate, to Raymond Suppe.
RL:KF:mW an sedan taken n coma
kenand enthis tered nen the minnuta, pt aN
g:\engsvc\bo\bo4-15 Board of SuPsmi�sor_s on the date shownb
ATTESTED:
Originator: Public Works(ES) PHIL UA MEL^a,c:_,-;rTr mu—oee^r'a'
Of SaPeNIS rs and County kdminlstodar
Contact: Rich Lierly(313-2348) rj
cc: Director of Community Development 01,111
, {s )
Public Works -Accounting Deputy
-R.Bruno,Construction
-I.Millar,Construction
Raymond Suppe
P.O.Box 256,Alamo,CA 94507
Amwest Surety Insurance Company
100 California Street,Suite 720,San Francisco,CA 94111
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on April 15, 1997 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla, DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Exonerating subdivision agreement and performance bond for MS 59-83,
Alamo area.
The Public Works Director has notified this Board that the improvements for Minor
Subdivision 59-83, guaranteed in the subdivision agreement with Raymond Suppe have also been
bonded and are presently being constructed by the developer of Subdivision 7456. Therefore, the
Public Works Director recommends that the Board of Supervisors exonerate the existing subdivision
agreement and surety bond with Raymond Suppe.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the subdivision agreement approved by the
Board on November 5, 1991, is hereby EXONERATED.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Amwest Surety bond (No. 1257305) for, faithful
performance and labor and materials, is hereby EXONERATED.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to refund
the$1,000 cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit No. 188432, dated April 5, 1991), plus interest
in accordance with Government Code Section 53079, if appropriate, to Raymond Suppe.
I hereby ceffly that mr b a true aha sweet T W
an action taken and Mtered on the minulN a1 ry
Board of SupeN:.:Ora M the dab clown.
RL:KF:mw PHIL BAT HELOR Ith�e W
g:\engsvc\bo\bo4-15 of
�oS�upsmeon and County AdminwaaW
Originator: Public Works(ES) �J p,�++d DWp
Contact: Rich Lierly(313-2348)
cc: Director of Community Development
Public Works -Accounting
-R. Bruno,Construction
-J. Millar,Construction
Raymond Suppe
P.O.Box 256,Alamo,CA 94507
Amwest Surety Insurance Company
100 California Street,Suite 720,San Francisco,CA 94111
C. Z
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on April 15, 1997 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla, DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Grant permission to completely close portions of Second Street, Home Street,
Third Street, Acme Street, and O'Hara Avenue for the purpose of Holy Ghost
Parade, Oakley area.
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that permission is granted to The Holy Ghost Committee
to completly close portions of Second Street, Home Street, Third Street, Acme Street, and O'Hara
Avenue, except for emergency traffic, on Sunday, July 20, 1997, for the period of 9:30AM through
1:30PM, subject to the following conditions:
1. Traffic Will be detoured via neighboring streets.
2. All signing to be in accordance with the State of California Manual of Traffic Controls.
3. The Holy Ghost Committee shall comply with the requirements of the Ordinance Code of
Contra Costa County.
4. Have on file with the County a Certificate of Insurance in the amount of$1,000,000 for
Comprehensive General Public Liability which names the County as an additional insured.
5. Obtain approval for the closure from the Sheriff's Department, the California Highway Patrol
and the Fire District.
1 nereai r mat mb b a WN and W as 0°0�et
as wuoe taken and entered on the minutes ma
Board of suvemaoro 01 the data ShOWn.n 9 9
ATTESTED:
f HIL Supa BATCHELOR,and CounC190ty
the
of supervlcon end county AominlatratM
er
RH:mw
g:\engsvc\bo\bo4-15
Originator: Public Works(APC)
Contact: Robed Hendry(646-1607)
cc: CHP
Sheriff-Patrol Div.Commander
Cr/3
Recorded at the request or:
contra cod,cowry CONTRA COSTA Co Recorder's Office
Retor„m: STEPHEN L. WEIR, County Recorder
Public works Department
Fngitteaing Services
DOC - 97-0065213-00
MondaY, APR 21, 1997 13:36:35
FRE $0.00; ;
Ttl Pd $0.00 Nbr-0000038211
lrc /R9
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on April 15, 1997 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla, DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RESOLUTION NO.: 97/180
SUBJECT: Declaring Certain Roads as County Roads in Minor Subdivision 7-95, Oakley
area.
On January 28, 1997, this Board accepted improvements as complete for Subdivision 7640
and Minor Subdivision 7-95. Certain roads were declared County roads.
NOW THEREFORE BE IS RESOLVED that Oregano Court the hereinafter described road,
as shown and dedicated for public use on the previously recorded Offer of Dedication for Road
Purposes(recorded August 17, 1995, in Volume 95, Page 135620, Official Records of Contra Costa
County, State of California) is ACCEPTED and DECLARED to be a County road.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the widening of O'Hara Avenue is ACCEPTED and
DECLARED to be a County road;the right of way was conveyed by separate instrument, recorded
on August 17, 1995, in Volume 95 of Official Records on Page 135620.
As previously stated on the January 28, 1997, board order, the warranty period and
performancelmaintenance surety are covered under Subdivision 7640.
1 hereby am*Md tbb Of e btfe eed eafea Door of
o,w.«: rru Vw M) en adW t ken and entered on the MbVAM iM
G...: aidli.lynn.uul @Md of SWW_SM ort On date , ■11.
-,es,or.ms
PHIL CHELOR GI hof the oeN
a.es.rN.Cialr.fueuc woereppMMT+ra««aa«sw srsra W6uperrWra and 6&TntyAdrNnWatp
e:..r.rcaeonrlw..lLill
.,
errer.u..«cra.
pe,Mrjy�r 141]IJ.
pw10Ke�wl GfUll
r«wc.e. .wr
❑lf�«&.d.R I.f.�Gf9U
0#
' TO. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AS THE GOVERNING BOARD OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, CHIEF ENGINEER
DATE: APRIL 15, 1997
SUBJECT: APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT AND BRIDGEHEAD CENTER PARTNERSHIP FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION 5-85
IN DRAINAGE AREA 29G.
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. Recommended Action:
Approve a reimbursement agreement in the amount of$ 28,902.33 between the Flood Control District
(DISTRICT) and Bridgehead Center Partnership (DEVELOPER) and authorize the Chair of the Board to
execute the agreement on behalf of the District.
H. Financial Impact:
Future drainage fees will be obligated to payment of the reimbursement.
III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background:
The Developer has been required to construct drainage area improvements at a cost which exceeds the
amount of drainage fees required to be paid by the developer under the terms of the drainage area fee
ordinance. The Developer is entitled to a partial reimbursement of the excess costs as provided for in the
drainage area credit and reimbursement policy.
IV. Consequences of Negative Action:
Non approval of the agreement would be inconsistent with the adopted Credit and Reimbursement Policy.
Continued on Attachment: SIGNATURE: //ITX k�
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
_RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON C f,;A 1.5J 1991 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VO OF SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT )
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
RB:cI
g:Fld0I\tbbo\4-15
Orig.Div: Public Works(FCE) 1 hereby earUN that thN M t ttae 4W UNW 07,e(
m action taken uq enWM en to wftfin W .IN
c: County Administrator BeatC d _04 b do 1110M
Community Development
Building Inspection PMEA ELC^.
County Counsel 0l9upervY4r - _ tato
County Assessor
County Treasurer-Tax Collector ry puq
County Auditor-Controller
Chief Engineer
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
1. PARTIES. Effective , the Contra Costa County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District, a body corporate and politic of the State of
California, (hereinafter called Bridgehead Center Partnership, a Partnership, (hereinafter
called "DEVELOPER"), mutually agree as follows:
2. INTRODUCTION.
A. DEVELOPER is subdividing the property designated as Minor Subdivision 5-85
within Drainage Area 29G. Said development is within the jurisdiction of the County
of Contra Costa(hereinafter called "COUNTY"). To satisfy COUNTY's conditions
of approval for said development, DEVELOPER must install a portion of the
drainage facilities shown on the adopted Drainage Plan for Drainage Area 29G.
B. The cost to install these facilities exceeds the amount of drainage fee required by the
drainage fee ordinance for said drainage area, Ordinance No.93-19,
C. DISTRICT has adopted a Drainage Area Credit and Reimbursement Policy for said
drainage area.
D. Since DISTRICT has an effective Drainage Plan and a Drainage Area Credit and
Reimbursement Policy for said drainage area, DEVELOPER has requested that the
DISTRICT enter into this agreement with DEVELOPER, pursuant to said policy.
3. TERMS. DISTRICT shall reimburse DEVELOPER for eligible costs exceeding the amount
of fees required by said ordinance, in accordance with the terms of this agreement and the
DISTRICT's above-mentioned Drainage Plan and the Drainage Area Credit and
Reimbursement Policy for said drainage area, which policy is attached as Exhibit "A" and
made a part hereof by this reference.
4. ELIGIBLE COSTS. The drainage facilities, right-of-way, and other items eligible for
reimbursement and their estimated costs are outlined on Exhibit "B", attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
5. DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS. Easements containing the drainage facilities covered by
this agreement shall be offered for dedication to COUNTY.
6. CONFORMANCE TO PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. The drainage facilities covered
by this agreement shall be installed in conformance with the plans and specifications prepared
by DEVELOPER and approved by COUNTY. DISTRICT shall be under no obligation to
perform under this agreement unless the drainage facilities are accepted as complete by
COUNTY.
7. HOLD HARMLESS. DEVELOPER shall defend, indemnify, save and hold DISTRICT, its
governing body, officers, agents and employees absolutely free, clear, and harmless from any
claims, actions, or costs arising from any property and/or rights acquisition which may be
necessary hereunder, or arising from any and all damage to property, injury to persons,
including death, or any other type of liability arising as a result of DEVELOPER's installation
of the drainage facilities required by the conditions of approval for said development.
8. NON-RESPONSIBILITY OF DISTRICT. The installation of drainage facilities covered by
this agreement is the sole responsibility of DEVELOPER, except for the normal inspection
provided by the COUNTY. DISTRICT assumes no responsibility whatsoever for
construction procedures and methods utilized by DEVELOPER in constructing the drainage
facilities.
1
9. PAYMENT. Payment terms are set forth in Exhibit "A", except that the first payment shall
not be made until DEVELOPER submits to DISTRICT acceptable evidence that
DEVELOPER has paid for the installation of the drainage facilities covered by this
agreement.
10. TERMINATION. This agreement shall remain in effect either(1) for 40 quarters as provided
in Section V.B. of Exhibit "A", or (2) until DEVELOPER has been reimbursed for the total
eligible reimbursement amount, whichever first occurs. Non-submittal of the acceptable
evidence of payment required by Section 9 shall not result in an extension of the termination
date.
11. NO OTHER RECOURSE AGAINST DISTRICT.
A. This agreement constitutes the total statement of rights between DISTRICT and
DEVELOPER concerning payment or reimbursement for costs of installing the
drainage facilities exceeding the required drainage fees.
B. If, after the expiration of the 40 quarters described in Section V.B. of Exhibit "A",
DEVELOPER has not received the total reimbursement amount, DEVELOPER shall
have no right to further reimbursement by DISTRICT from any drainage fees
thereafter collected by the DISTRICT, or from any other source of DISTRICT
funding.
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DEVELOPER*
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Bri ehead Center Partnership
BY
Chair of the Board of Supervisors,as governing body of
the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water I1� '
Conservation District
And By 4�11t 4
ATTEST: Ct 1! l 1991
*Corporations require two signatures, one by the
Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and President or Vice President,and one by the Secretary or
County Administrator Treasurer. Signatures by DEVELOPER must be
notarized.
By��� )'A Q, ���� 0.�
Deputy erk
Recommended for Approval:
J.Michael Walford
Chief Engineer �/
By ft� 9"- t//kJNW
Approved as to Form:
Victor J. Westman
County Counsel
By
eputy
Exhibit"A"-Drainage Area Credit and Reimbursement
Policy
Exhibit"B" -Calculation of Reimbursement Amount
2
0,141
Note to Developer: For corporations,the contract must be signed by two officers. The first signature must be that of the
chairman of the board,president or vice-president;the second signature must be that of the secretary,assistant secretary,
chieffnancial officer or assistant treasurer. (Civ.Code,Sec. 1190 and Corps. Code, Sec. 313.) The acknowledgment below
must be signed by a Notary Public.
CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
ss.
County of�rT�
On the date written below, before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared the
personal signing above for Developer, personally known to me (Gr-greved to me on the basis of
sa*sf ctQU evidence) to be the person(s) whose name( is/are subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he/she*hey executed the same in his/herAheir authorized capacity(ie�s),
and that by his/her"r signature(s) on the instrument the person(,,} or the entity upon behalf of
which the person(@)acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Dated: 4144-
[Notary's
- l
[Notary's Seal] �
Notary Publ c
CARLA L.BARTER
aComm�ion#1066594 Z
Z &- - �' Notary Public—CaliforniaCONTRA COSTA COUNTY
QMV Comm.Expires JUL 27,1999
RB:cl
g:\fldctl\da\ms 5-S 5.t 11
3
E)97E r-r "A"
DRAINAGE AREA CREDIT AND REINIMSEME P ?�ITCY
Adopted June, 1989
The following policy adopted by the Board of Supervisors, as the governing body
of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, . shall
be used to determine credits and reimbursements as provided for in various
Drainage Area Fee Ordinances.
I. DEF:{2=ONS:
1. Drainage Area Plan. The engineering plan which shows arra lists the
size, length, and location of drainage facilities adopted for a
Drainage Area..
2. Drainage Area Fee Ordinances. An ordinance adapted for a Drainage
Area specifying the drainage fee necessary to =pI pte construction of
the planned facilities.
3. Drainage Area Fee Obligation. The drainage fee due on a development as
determined fry the Drainage Area Fee Ordinance.
4. Eligible costs. The cost of installing drainage facilities which are
part of the Drainage Area Plan.
5. ln==ct Drainage Facilities. Drainage facilities req red within the
Limits of the development.
6. off tract Drainage Facilities. Drainage facilities required outside
the limits of the development.
7. Credit. When a Drainage Fee ordinance allows construction of drainage
facilities in lieu of the payment of drainage fees, the eligible
construction costs may be applied as a credit against the drainage area
fee obligation.
8. P4inbursement. Payment to the developer for the eligible cost of
installing drainage area facilities in ewers of the drainage area fee
obligation.
Ir. 9Et1ERUA irustallation of drainage facilities rapnired as a conditicsr of
property development can be very costly, and in many cases benefits other
properties within the water-.:heti. A Drainage Fee Ordinance spreads the costs
of the drainage facilities to all of the benefitting properties and ensure,,
through a system of fees, credits, and reitbursements, equitable financial
participation-
The drainage fee ordinary creates a fee obligation on all properties
Within the Dra.Lwge Asea. The ordinance becomes oparrative upon a request to
1
develop or iirprove a parcel of land- The drainage area fee obligation is
limited to the fee due and is payable either in the form of cash or the
installation of a portion of the drainage facilities shown on the adopted
drainage area plan.
When a condition of development requires the construction of drainage
facilities with a cost in excess of the drainage fee Obligation imposed by
the fee oxdinanrce, a portion of the excess cost may be eligible for
reimburseuent.
Eligible Costs. A portion of the cost to ins drainage facilities shown
on the adopted drainage area plan may be eligible for credit against the
required drainage fees and for reimbursement of costs in excess of the
drainage fee obligation. Credit or reimbursement shall be limited to the
following eligible costs-
1- Actual in-tract and off-tract construction costs plus a fixed amount of
7 percent of the in-tract construction cost and 14 percent of the off-
tract construction cost for allowance of miscellaneous developer's
costs, including contract preparation, engineering, bondixg, etc.
C=istraction costs do not include utility relocations or the
acquisition of rights of way.
2- Actual public agency project inspection fees for only those drainage
area facilities shown an the adopted drainage plan.
3- Actual a utility relocation costs.
4- Actual ===CI: right of way acquisition costs needed for the
installation of drainage area facilities, provided the developer does
not have a beneficial interest in the off-tract property.
the. determination of constz:uction c=ts will be based on at least three
independent bids. Mie- developer shall sutmit said bids to the District for
review and cwc=mvxx:>e. Upon District C3naMTenC-- With the bids, the lowest
bid shall be the basis for determination of the credit and reimbursement
amount.
Mle- District reserves the right to reject the developer's bids or any other
proposed value of said eligible its and to calailate said costs and the
fixed mar)c.rps using then auxent prices-
If the developer elects to install a more costly drainage system than shown
car the adopted drainage area plan, the District reserves the right to
calCUlate .said eligible costs usirq the then current prices for only the
facilities shown on the adopted plan.
IV. credit- The developer may apply as a credit toward the drainage fee
Obligation the eligible coststo construct drainage area facilities-
2
V. Reimbursement-
A. Vkier)e the amount of said eligible costs exceed the drainage fee due,
the developer, upon entering into a reimbursement agreement with the
District, shall be eligible for a percentage reimbursement on the
amount of the eligible costs dete=mined by section -rTT- above, in
excess of the drainage fee due as follows:
Off-tract work: 100% (One Hundred Percent)
On-tract work : 500 (Fifty Percent)
Prior to the application of the above percentages, the eligible costs
in ex�,ess of the drainage fee due shall be prorated between off-tract
work and on-tract work in the saw proportion as the total eligible
costs for off-tract work and on-tract work are to the total eligible
costs.
B_ The reambursement shall be subject to the following limitations:
1. Reimbursements shall be paid only from drainage fees collected
pursuant to a Drainage Fee Oidinanoe.
2. If more than one reimbursement agreement is in effect in a
Drainage Area, the rsimbn-senant payment to each agreement shall
be based on the ratio of each agreement's original amount to the
total original amount of all outstanding reimbursement agreements.
3. The District reserves the right to utilize not mare than 80
percent of the drainage fees collected aurivally, on a fiscal year
basis, for the purpose of ma)cLng reimbursement payments.
4- Reimbursement payments shall be rode, quarterly, apt that,
during any quarter the District reserves the right not to make
said payments if the amount of available funds to be disbursed is
less than $5,000-
S. agreements shall remain, in effect for 40 quarters.
The first quarter shall be the one following the quarter in which
the first reimbursement payment is made- Any outstanding balance
owed at the end of the 40 quartexs shall be waived by the
developer.
6. Reinbursement agreen?xrts executed nriar to a government loan
shall share with the gove=m)ent loan and other reimbursexent
agreement(s) the payments calculated in paragraph B.2 above.
7. Reimbursemant agreement(s) executed sort ueent to a government
loan(s) shall have payments "calculated' using the pro-rata basis
of paragraph B.2. above. However, in order to acx>--lerate
repayment of the government loan(s) , the "calculated" payment
shall be applied to repayment of the government loan(s) , rather
than be disbursed to the subsequent reimbursement agreement(s)
3
Upon full repayment of the goverrment loan(s) , reimbursement
payments shall commence to the subsequent reimbursement
agreement(s) . The forty quarter time limit for a subsequent
reimbursement agreement shallnot start until the datee the first
payment is made to the reimbursement agreement_
VI. AAmlicability_ upon adaption by a drainage area, this policy shall be the
basis for all dirt reimbursement agreements in that drainage area.
`Ibis policy will not alter any reimbursement agreement executed pursuant to
a different policy.
RSC-sj
DA:Rei=PoIC
Maw 8, 1990
4
Exhibit "B"
Calculation of Reimbursement Amount
Drainage Area: 29G
Development: MS 5-85
Developer: Bridgehead Center Partnership
Dale C. Adams
P.O. Box 852
Concord, CA 94522
Assessor's Parcel: 051-052-067
Drainage Area 29G Fees
Lot Lot Area AC Fee /AC Total
Parcel A .84 $11,925 $10,017.00
Parcel B 1.0 $11,925 11,925.00
Parcel 1.1 $11,925 13,117.50
Parcel D 4.88 $11,925 58,194.00
Total $93,253.50
Credit for Existing Impervious Surface -$6,250.48
Drainage Fees Due $87,003.02
Off-Tract Work'- Line D
Description Quantity Unit Cost Total
30" ADS 415 LF $38 /LF $15,770.00
36" ADS 965 LF $45 /LF $43,425.00
Type II Manholes 6 $2,650 EA $15,900.00
Outfall Structure 1 $8,750 EA $8,750.00
Fence 1 LS $750.00
Sub-Total $84,595.00
Engineering (14%) 11,843.30
Eligible County Inspection Fee 6,126.40
Permits 840.00
Right-of-Way Acquisition 12.500.65
Off-Tract Total $115,905.35
Total Eligible Costs $115,905.35
Drainage Area Fees 87.003.02
$28,902.33
Off-Tract Reimbursement @ 100% $28,902.33
TOTAL REIMBURSEMENT $28,902.33
g:fldctl\work\exb.t 1 I
c, i,60
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, Chief Engineer
DATE: April 15, 1997
SUBJECT: Approve Project, Approve Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact
Report (FEIR) for Drainage Area 57 (87-132) (Pacheco/Martinez Area),
Approve Plans and Specifications and Advertise for bids for the Drainage
Area 57 Detention Basin Primary Spillway Project, in the Martinez area.
Project No.7538-6D8463-94, CDD-CP #97-25
Specific Request(s) or Recommendation(s) & Background & Justification
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
APPROVE Project, and
APPROVE the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), CP
#97-25, (the custodian of which is the Chief Engineer and is located at 255
Glacier Drive, Martinez).
DIRECT the Director of Community Development to file a Notice of
Determination with the County Clerk, and
DIRECT the Chief Engineer to arrange for payment of the $25.00 handling fee to
the County Clerk.
DIRECT the Chief Engineer to arrange for the $850.00 Fish and Game filing fee
to be transferred to the County Clerk.
APPROVE the Plans and Specifications for the Project and
ADVERTISE for bids to be received on Tuesday, May 20, 1997 at 2:00 p.m.
DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to publish the Notice to Contractors in
accordance with Section 22037 of the Public Contract Code.
Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE:
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
_RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ONO f,;C-/S) 1571 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOT'P OF SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT )
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
KE Jlg
g:\design\bo\DA57bo.t4
Orig.Div: Public Works(Design Division)
Contact: Kevin Emigh-313-2233
cc: County Administrator 1 hereby eeryry that thle is a true and correct copy Of
Attn: E. Kuevor en action taksn and en's,A --, rnn nInutes p yM
Auditor-Controller Word of Sup om on Ca r:;;;q�y(�
PW Accounting /t7y . -Q 1.5- I`f 97
Design-J. Frattini PHIL ��orthe
Construction
Community Development-G. $lusher \
Ca
y eWt9r
Approve Project, Approve Addendum, Approve Plans and Specifications and Advertise
for bids for the Drainage Area 57 Detention Basin Primary Spillway Project, in the
Martinez area
April 15, 1997
Page # 2
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The estimated project cost is $300,000, funded by DA-57 funds 100%.
III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND:
The project includes pipe installation, embankment work, a concrete outfall
structure, rock slope protection and hydroseeding.
It is needed to provide an outfall to the new detention basin facility being
constructed on the south side of the AT&SF railroad tracks by Citation Homes.
The Addendum to the FEIR for the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for
Drainage Area 57 (Pacheco/Martinez Area) consists of the following design
changes or additions:
1. There will be less extensive excavation of the proposed basin.
2. Approximately 150' of rock slope protection will be installed downstream
of the outfall.
3. Mitigation for loss of wetlands and riparian habitat will be included.
4. An earthern berm will be constructed around the Mt. View Sanitary
District's pumping station.
The Addendum is consistent with County policies and does not lead directly or
indirectly to significant physical changes in the project, nor does it alter the
adequacy or completeness of the environmental impacts identified in the FEIR.
In addition, none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA
Guidelines, calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.
Therefore, an Addendum to the FEIR is appropriate to address some changes or
additions to the previously certified FOR. Upon Board approval, the Addendum
would be attached to the FEIR for Drainage Area 57.
The Public Works Director has filed with the Board of Supervisors the Plans and
Specifications for the project.
The general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum rates paid on
this project, have been filed with the Clerk of the Board and copies will be made
available to any interested party upon request.
IV. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Delay in approving the project will result in a delay of design and construction
and may jeopardize funding. If the project is not approved for advertising, it will
not be constructed.
ADDENDUM
to the
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FEIR)
for DRAINAGE AREA 57 (PACHECO/MARTINEZ AREA)
County File CP#87-132
SCH# 88062107
CP# 97-25
Prepared by:
Vickie Germany, Environmental Planner
Contra Costa County Public Works Department
255 Glacier Drive
Martinez, CA 94553-4897
April 1997
41
CDIZ111
Dean Eckerson
Public Works Department Community Development Department
Title: S`'/ntior !:�0-n(�W—
Lead Agency: County of Contra Costa
Date:
ADDENDUM
to the
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FEIR)
for DRAINAGE AREA 57 (PACHECO/MARTINEZ AREA)
County File CP# 87-132
SCH# 88062107
CP# 97-25
Prepared by:
Vickie Germany, Environmental Planner
Contra Costa County Public Works Department
255 Glacier Drive
Martinez, CA 94553-4897
April 1997
ADDENDUM
to the
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FEIR)
for DRAINAGE AREA 57 (PACHECO/MARTINEZ AREA)
County File CP# 87-132
SCH# 88062107
CP# 97-25
PREFACE
The Draft and Final Environmental Impact Report (DEIR and FEIR, respectively),
evaluated the proposed project--construction of a detention basin, outlet, emergency
spillway--located immediately south of the AT&SF railroad and west of Morello Road in
Martinez, Contra Costa County.
This document serves as an Addendum to the FEIR for Drainage Area 57
(Pacheco/Martinez Area) (County File CP# 87-132; SCH# 88062107). Consequently, the
FEIR for the project consists of the DEIR, comments received on the DEIR, responses to
the comments raised, and this Addendum.
The Contra Costa Community Development Department (CDD) is the lead agency for the
project, and on November 8, 1988, the Board of Supervisors (Board) as the Governing
Board for the Contra Costa County Flood Control District (FCD) certified the EIR and filed
a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the County Clerk. The Contra Costa County
Planning Commission acting as the hearing body certified the FEIR under Resolution No.
58 -1988 on August 23, 1988.
CEQA PROCESS
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) prescribes that an Addendum (CEQA
Guidelines Section 15164)to a previously certified environmental impact report (EIR) shall
be prepared by either the lead agency or the responsible agency if some changes or
additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section
15162 have occurred:
1. No substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major
revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously
identified significant effects;
1
2. No substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which
the project is undertaken which require major revisions of the previous EIR
due to the involvement of new significant effects or a substantial increase in
the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
3. No new information of substantial importance shows that the project will
have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the EIR, nor
will significant effects previously examined be substantially more severe than
previously shown in the EIR. In addition, there is no new information
showing that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be
feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or
more significant effects of the project, and there is no such new information
suggesting that mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably
different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce
one or more significant effects on the environment.
In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(d), the Board shall consider this
Addendum along with the FEIR prior to making a decision on the project. According to
CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 (c) an Addendum does not require circulation for public
review but can be included in or attached to the FEIR. As noted in the Preface, this
Addendum is attached to the FEIR for Drainage Area 57 (Pacheco/Martinez Area)
(County File CP# 87-132; SCH# 88062107).
EXPLANATION OF THE ADDENDUM
This Addendum to the FEIR for Drainage Area 57 (Pacheco/Martinez Areal identifies
some changes to the project, environmental inventory and environmental impact analysis
sections of the EIR.
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project described in the EIR for Drainage Area 57 included excavation of
approximately ten feet in depth from the basin site. The inlet to the primary spillway (PS)
was designed for elevation +16.5 feet. In response to the concerns of the regulatory
permitting agencies regarding the downstream creek and adjacent areas (i.e. wetlands),
the basin design and PS have been modified to reduce impacts to those areas. The
revised plan includes excavation of approximately five feet in depth from the basin site,
thereby reducing the depth of excavation by approximately five feet. The inlet to the PS
has been modified and raised to elevation +22.0 feet to avoid the relocation of existing
utilities and reduce the necessary excavation and associated impacts to the existing
downstream channel, as described in the EIR. Minor grading will be required in the
immediate downstream channel and a small amount of rock slope protection will be placed
to protect an existing masonry wall. In addition, the following changes to the design will
result in a reduction of the overall impacts to the project site:
2
(1) design modifications in response to the concerns expressed by the
regulatory permitting agencies resulted in reduced excavation of the basin,
thereby preserving considerable existing riparian habitat, wetlands and
vegetation identified in the EIR;
(2) installing approximately 150 feet of rock slope protection downstream of
the outfall;
(3) mitigating for the loss of wetlands and riparian habitat; impacts due to
loss of riparian corridor and adjacent areas (i.e. wetlands) habitats have
been reduced and California Fish & Game (CFG)/Army Corps of Engineers
(ACOE) permit conditions have not changed.
(4) constructing an earthen berm around the Mt. View Sanitary District's
pumping station.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY
Within the Vegetation and Wildlife Section, two subsections require updating:
Marshland and Riparian, and Sensitive Species.
1. Since the EIR was prepared several species have been added to both the
state and federal endangered species lists and their presence or absence
must be determined prior to project initiation.
2. The EIR described the riparian corridor and adjacent areas (i.e, wetlands)
habitats found in the proposed detention basin, but did not specifically
discuss how they were affected by the proposed project. In the original EIR,
it was noted that"conditions imposed by the California Fish & Game (CFG)
or the permit would ensure that the wildlife and aquatic habitat value is not
compromised by the flood control project" (p. 77). In addition, a CFG
Streambed Alteration Agreement was issued in April of 1997.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Because of the changes noted to the ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY section
above, the "Vegetation and Wildlife" section subsequently changes as well. The
proposed changes are described below under ADDITION TO THE FEIR,
This Addendum is consistent with County policies and does not lead directly or indirectly
to significant physical changes in the project, nor does it alter the adequacy or the
completeness of the environmental impacts and mitigation measures identified in the FEIR.
Therefore, this Addendum to the FEIR is appropriate.
3
ADDITION TO THE FOR
This section identifies the language which is addedtor changed (bold face type) or
deleted (strikeout) to the text and figures of the FOR consistent with the changes or
additions noted above:
p. II, 2. California Fish & Game and Army Corps of Engineers
p. II, 6th para., 3rd sentence The CFG has considerable expertise relating to
the types of plantings and construction practices
needed to mitigate damage to the riparian
corridor and adjacent area (i.e. wetlands).
p. IV, after 2nd para., after 1 st sentence
Constructing the outlets and the berms result
in the loss of 0.21 acres of wetland habitat
and 19 trees. Creating the new creek channel
results in the loss of another 0.08 acres of
jurisdictional area as noted in the EIR, which
reduces impacts and no new impacts will
occur. Placing rock slope protection along
the west bank of the downstream channel
results in the coverage of 150 linear feet of
streambank.
p. IV, 3rd para., after 1 st sentence - Mitigation
The redesigned project preserves 87 of the
originally identified 106 trees slated for
removal within the proposed basin, so most
of the trees as well as most of the
jurisdictional habitats in the basin will be
avoided. Approximately 0.43 acres of new
seasonal marsh habitat, 0.09 acres of new
jurisdictional riparian habitat, and planting
trees at a minimum of a 3:1 ratio (i.e.,
planting 3 trees for every 1 removed) are part
of the redesigned project.
p. 4, 2nd para., 2nd sentence - Figure 5 shows the details of the proposed
detention basin at a scale of 1" = 160' (ultimate
improvements), while Sheet 1 shows the
interim basin improvements. Sheet 1
supersedes Figure 5 for the interim basin.
4
5th sentence - The inlet for the PS would be at an elevation of
1 !6:5 22.0 feet.
p. 43, following 1st para. - 3. Federal Agencies
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. Proposed
activities that require the discharge of
dredged or fill material into wetlands or
waters of the U. S. require a Section 404
permit, unless specifically exempted by law.
p. 46, 2nd para., after 6th sentence - The species listed are wetland indicators.
p. 49, 2nd para., after last sentence - Suitable habitat was also found for the
following species: California red-legged frog,
Western burrowing owl, tri-colored blackbird,
and northwestern pond turtle. These species
were not observed during subsequent
surveys performed by Dr. Glen Holstein and
Ms. Rosie Dyste of Zentner and Zentner
(February 4, 1997).
p. 80, 3rd para. 1 st sentence - Grading to create a low-flow channel, to install
the primary spillway and outfall, and the
berms through basin would require the
removal of herbaceous cover, 0.29 acres of
seasonal marsh, riparian vegetation, and the
and 19 trees (almost all of which are under 3
inches diameter breast height (dbh)). Sheet
1 shows the impacts associated with the
proposed basin improvements.
8th para., after 1 st sentence - For instance, by preserving 87 of the
originally identified 106 trees slated for
removal within the proposed basin, most of
the trees as well as most of the jurisdictional
habitats in the basin will be avoided.
Approximately 0.43 acres of new seasonal
marsh habitat, 0.09 acres of new
jurisdictional riparian habitat, and planting
trees at a minimum of a 3:1 ratio (i.e.,
planting 3 trees for every 1 removed) are part
of the redesigned project.
5
Sheet 2 shows the proposed changes to the
riparian corridor and adjacent areas (i.e.
wetlands) associated with the redesigned
basin construction. The redesigned plan is
based on informal consultation with the
ACOE and CFG.
6
RESOLUTION of the PLANNING COMMISSION of the COUNTY of
CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING the
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for the CONTRA
COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL and WATER CONSERVATION
DISTRICT DRAINAGE AREA 57, MARTINEZ AREA,
INCORPORATING FINDINGS and MITIGATION MEASURES.
RESOLUTION NO. 58-1988
The resolution for the Drainage Area 57 project was prepared by the Planning Commission
of the County of Contra Costa to comply with Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines and
are incorporated herein by reference.
7
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ADDENDUM FINDINGS for the
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for
DRAINAGE AREA 57 (PACHECO/MARTINEZ AREA)
The following information is added to the findings prepared for the previous EIR and is
presented to comply with Section 15091 and 15164(e) of the CEQA Guidelines for the
FEIR for the Drainage Area 57 (Pacheco/Martinez Areal project.
1. Environmental Effect: Modifications to the project description, environmental
inventory, and the environmental impact analysis sections as described in this
Addendum, are not substantial changes to the project and will not result in any
additional environmental effects not previously discussed.
Findings: There are no significant environmental impacts associated with the
changes or additions to the project description for which this Addendum was
prepared. There are no new state or federal species that could be affected by the
proposed project and impacts to wetlands and riparian habitat are mitigated.
Statement of Facts:
a. The project to be developed pursuant to this Addendum to the FEIR for the
Drainage Area 57 (Pacheco/Martinez Areal project is substantially similar to the
project analyzed in the FEIR.
b. The FEIR for the Drainage Area 57 (Pacheco/Martinez Areal project consists of
the DEIR, comments received on the DEIR, responses to the comments raised,
and this Addendum. The FEIR was completed in compliance with the CEQA.
c. There are no substantial changes, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162
(a)(1), in the project which require major revisions of the FEIR due to the
involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects. The project is substantially
similar to the project analyzed in the FEIR.
d. There are no substantial changes with respect to the circumstances, pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (a)(2), under which the Drainage Area 57
project is undertaken which require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the
involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects. Those circumstances remain
substantially similar to the circumstances analyzed in the FEIR.
e. There is no new information of substantial importance, pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15162 (a)(3), which shows that the project will have one or more
significant effects not previously discussed in the EIR, nor will significant effects
previously examined be substantially more severe than previously shown in the
EIR. In addition, there is no new information showing that mitigation measures or
alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would
substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, and there is no
8
such new information suggesting that mitigation measures or alternatives which are
considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially
reduce one or more significant effects on the environment.
f. None of the conditions calling for the preparation of a subsequent or
supplemental EIR have occurred (see items 1 c - e above). Therefore, it is
appropriate to adopt this Addendum to the FEIR to make some minor changes to
the project description, environmental inventory, and the environmental impact
analysis sections (CEQA Guidelines 15164). This Addendum shall be considered
along with the FEIR prior to the Board making a decision on the minor changes to
the project, and in considering the minor changes, the Board is considering the
identical or substantially similar underlying project.
The findings are supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record and are
based on the FEIR for the Drainage Area 57(Pacheco/Martinez Areal project which was
subject to public review.
In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(d), the County Board of Supervisors
shall consider this Addendum along with the FEIR prior to making a decision on the
project. According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 (c) an Addendum does not require
circulation for public review but can be included in or attached to the FEIR. As noted in
the Preface, this Addendum is attached to the FEIR for the Drainage Area 57
(Pacheco/Martinez Area) project (County File CP# 87-132; SCH# 88062107).
9
AGENDA DATE ��� � ITEM NO. G,
BACKGROUND NOT AVAILABLE AT
THE TIME AGENDA PACKET COMPILED
INFORMATION FOR THIS ITEM PREVIOUSLY
FURNISHED
ORAL REPORT TO BE GIVEN AT BOARD MEETING
ERROR IN NUMBERING AGENDA ITEM
DELETED
DOCUMENTS ON FILE WITH
CLERK
Envicovne�Aa1 -Trnpac-4- Peport
is on P le, vvl4 h +h' e l �.
00
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Adopted this Order on April 15, 1997 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla, DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None RESOLUTION NO. 97/181
SUBJECT: Approve Deposit by Drainage Area 3013,48C and Flood Control and Water
Conservation District to the Flood Control Revolving Fund and a Loan from
the Fund to Drainage Areas 29G, 30A, 30C, 40A, 56, 57, 105, 106,
Countywide.
WHEREAS the following entities have funds that are temporarily not needed and are
available for deposit into the Flood Control District Revolving Fund:
Drainage Area 30B (2546) $ 80,000
Drainage Area 48C (2572) $133,000
Flood Control District (2505) $530,000
$743,000
WHEREAS the following entities need loans in the amounts indicated:
Drainage Area 29G (2568) $ 60,000
Drainage Area 30A (2557) 14,000
Drainage Area 30C (2558) 118,000
Drainage Area 40A (2565) 133,000
Drainage Area 56 (2566) 78,000
Drainage Area 57 (2538) 300,000
Drainage Area 105 (2590) 20,000
Drainage Area 106 (2591) 20,000
$743,000
WHEREAS Revolving Fund loans are needed to eliminate negative cash balances and
refinance existing Revolving Fund loans in Drainage Areas 29G, 30A, 30C, 40A, 56, 105,
106; and
WHEREAS a Revolving Fund loan is needed for Drainage Area 30C to repay a portion of
the basin right of way costs to Liberty Union High School District in accordance with the
November 19, 1996 board order; and
WHEREAS a Revolving Fund loan is needed to complete the Detention Basin Projecton
Pacheco Creek in Drainage Area 57; and
WHEREAS said loans shall be repaid to the depositing entities within four years from the
date of disbursement from the fund from monies available to said entities through drainage
fees. Repayment shall include interest on the unpaid balance at 6.6 percent per annum,
which is the current rate received on similar types of investments by Contra Costa County
as determined by the County Treasurer.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT REVOLVED, as the Governing Board of Contra Costa County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District, that said deposits and loans are approved.
Ong.Dept.: Public Works(AD)
Contact Person: M. Kubicek(313-2203) 1 harohf arty that that Is•faro and eornot M jyl of
an aoten taken and entered on the rolntdp t e
MFK:drg Bard of Supervisors on the data shown.
g:\admin\rnilt:res15.t4 ATTESTED:�'- =�-yam•• �C/9rT
PHILa CHELCn, ^rk�ftna7
of Supervisors and County Administrator
cc: County Administrator
County Counsel �
Auditor-Controller
PW-Accounting
PW-Flood Control
RESOLUTION NO. 97/181