Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03181997 - C75 / 57 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS F&HS-0 s---.L Contra FROM: FAMILY AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE COSta x� �,�.: :_. ._ •� County DATE: March 10, 1997 SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT ON THE ADOPTIONS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. ACCEPT this report from the Family and Human Services Committee on the status of the Adoptions Improvement Program and EXPRESS the Board's appreciation to the Social Service Director and his staff for the excellent progress which has been made in the Adoptions Program. 2. DIRECT the Social Service Director to make a further report to the Family and Human Services Committee on the Adoptions Improvement Program in September 1997. BACKGROUND: On December 17, 1996, the Board of Supervisors approved a report from the 1996 Family and Human Services Committee which included the following recommendations: 1. ACCEPT the attached report from the Social Service Director on the status of the implementation of the Adoptions Improvement Program. 2. DIRECT the Social Service Director to make a further status report on the various elements of the Adoptions Improvement Program to the 1997 Family and Human Services Program in March 1997. 3. REMOVE this subject as a referral to the 1996 Family and Human Services Committee and instead REFER it to the 1997 Family and Human Services Committee. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD M ITTEE ` APPROVE OTHER t WOOL SIGNATURE(S): MARK DeSAULNIER DONNA GER ACTION OF BOARD ON March 18, 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE qF SUPERVISORS ✓/ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. CC: ATTESTED- 40 C-6 /6 �f) /q 7/ PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF County Administrator SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Social Service Director M382 (10/88) 8Y DEPUTY F&HS-01 On March 10, 1997, our Committee met with the Social Service Director, John Cullen; the Assistant Social Service Director for Services, Danna Fabella; the County Counsel, Victor J. Westman; representatives from SEIU Local 535, members of the 1996-97 Grand Jury and other interested citizens. Mr. Cullen reviewed the attached report with us and noted that the draft report from the Child Welfare Research Center has been received and that the final report is expected shortly. We are generally pleased with the direction the Adoptions Improvement Program is taking. We note the problems which occur in the Juvenile Court with an increase in contested cases, despite a reduction in the number of new dependency cases being opened and the fact that this is apparently due to the tendency of the staff from the Public Defenders Office to request more contests than has been the case in the past with private counsel. We understand staff are discussing this situation with the Juvenile Court Judge. It is apparent that the concurrent planning model being pursued by the Social Service Department is unique in the State and that we are leading the way in this regard. It is apparently that concurrent planning will initially require more staff and other resources until the backlog of cases is handled since resources need to be moved up front in the process in order to speed up the permanency planning decision. It is gratifying to see the progress which has been made in the past year or so in the Adoptions Program. We are asking that the Social Service Director provide a further status report to our Committee in September 1997. -2- SOCIAL SERVICE DEPARTMENT Contra Costa Countv TO Family and Human Services Committee DATE March 4, 1997 FROM John Cullen, Director SUBJ ADOPTION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT UPDATE Per the direction of the Board of Supervisors following our December, 1996, update, the following is a status report on Adoptions and other areas impacting Children's Services. I. ADOPTION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT A. Organizational Structure • Breck & Associates' completion date: December 2, 1996 • Anticipated completion date: July 1, 1997 (pilot) July, 1997 - June, 1998 (expansion) Since our last report where we indicated we would complete this part of the organizational change in May, 1997, we have been faced with many challenges that had a definite impact on workload, and thus we have been unable to restructure staff who have volunteered to pilot the proposed case management system which incorporates concurrent planning into child welfare services delivery. We had 14 new staff not able to go to the districts until mid February after completion of training thus creating a heavy work demand for the districts. Additionally, training on the Child Welfare Services Case Management System (CWS/CMS) for all staff also began in February, which requires staff's time on a weekly basis. However, towards our goal to implement concurrent planning, we completed the following tasks: • Secured funding from the Governor's Adoption Initiative to allow increase in staff, one supervisor, three FTEs for the districts, two FTEs for the Adoption units, one additional County Counsel and a contract for targeted recruitment for concurrent planning families. Family and Human Services Committee March 4, 1997 Page 2 • Provided training in all the districts for staff on concurrent planning and provided information on the design developed by the Concurrent Planning Design Committee. • Developed drafts of assessment tools to be used by concurrent planning worker. • Requested volunteers to pilot the concurrent planning model designed by the Committee. • Developed a Request for Interest (RFI) for a targeted recruitment contract with a community-based organization to develop families to provide for children in a concurrent planning track. • Developed Request for Proposal (RFP) for a receiving center to assist social workers in making a good initial assessment to promote concurrent planning. • Began a foster/adoptive parent recruitment campaign through newspaper articles, billboards and bus stop ads. • Developing legislation through work with our County's lobbyist that would designate Contra Costa County as a pilot for the Governor's Adoption Initiative which focuses on, among other things, implementation of a concurrent planning model. Senator Rainey has agreed to carry the legislation, which is SB 159. We hope to access additional funds which would allow us to more easily expand and integrate our concurrent planning model from the pilot. • Selected our Concurrent Planning Supervisor/Coordinator for the project, Debi Moss, our former Screening Supervisor. She will be responsible for supervising and working with district staff to implement concurrent planning. B. Fost-Adopt Program • Breck & Associates' completion date: October 6, 1997 • Anticipated completion date: Same As mentioned earlier we are doing targeted recruitment in order to identify families who wish to participate in a concurrent planning or "fost-adopt" program. In the next several months, we will adapt our Foster Pride/Adopt Pride curriculum to incorporate concurrent planning Family and Human Services Committee March 4, 1997 Page 3 and to help families make decisions on whether they can participate in this type of care for children. Our contractor will assist us in developing supports for these families and specialized training. C. Home Study As stated in our last report, we have completed the tasks outlined in the Breck & Associates' timelines; however, we are working on the development of a Homestudy Unit as recommended by the Concurrent Planning Design Committee. One of the first assignments of the Project Coordinator is to work on the reclass of the positions in Licensing which will allow that classification to do the type of assessment that Adoption homestudy workers are doing. It is clear that if we are to develop concurrent planning families, the families need both a foster home license and an adoption homestudy. Our plans are for them to be completed by one worker. Rather than have a Licensing worker and an Adoption worker, families will have a Homestudy worker. D. Training As mentioned in previous reports, we see training as an ongoing activity rather than one with an "anticipated completion date." Since our last report training efforts have focused upon two major areas: induction training for new staff; and, automation training in preparation for implementation of CWS/CMS, the statewide computer system. With respect to new worker training, we have now completed two training classes, a total of 388 training hours. We have graduated 33 new workers in those two classes for a total of 6,372 staff hours. Additionally, 41 senior staff and numbers of guest speakers took time from their busy schedules to provide the training for new workers. Evaluations received of training provided has been generally positive. Each graduate has received a series of training binders, or "manuals," during the course of new-worker training. County-specific training material is organized into four binders for graduates to take with them to the districts. Because the training also includes modules provided from U.C. Davis and Fresno State University, new staff also receive binders from those institutions for each module they attend and complete. CWS/CMS training began the first week of February. All child welfare staff, from the Assistant Director to line staff, attend weekly training in Family and Human Services Committee March 4, 1997 Page 4 the various modules of CWS/CMS. Total staff hours involved in attending training will be 8,103 by the time we implement. Attached please find the most recent training calendar for training other than CWS/CMS. Our most recent day-long forum, on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, occurred on Friday, February 28th. Attending were staff, foster parents, relative caregivers and interested people from the community. 110 people were pre-registered for our forum, and 118 actually attended. It should be noted that we have suspended monthly office in-service training until mid summer, after CWS/CMS implementation. E. Caregiver-Agency Relationships As with training we feel we have completed the specific tasks outlined by Breck & Associates in terms of Caregiver-Agency Relationships. Likewise, we see attending to our Department's relationship with the caregivers as requiring ongoing attention. To that end the Agency- Caregiver Committee continues to meet regularly. Their current focus is in revising the Foster Care Handbook and the Caregiver Resource Handbook. F. Juvenile Court As indicated in our last report, we have completed all the tasks outlined in the Breck & Associates' timelines. We continue to meet monthly with the Judge and the Judiciary to discuss policy and operational issues. The Social Worker/Attorney Committee continues to be active working on training and on other procedural issues. Our Director also met with County Counsel to discuss our Department's expectations in respect to representation in Juvenile Court in light of our plans to implement concurrent planning. We have attached for your review statistics given to our Department by County Counsel which validates our perception of the increased litigation in the Juvenile Court arena. In summary, from 1994 to 1996: • Briefs and Appeals: 419% Increase • Contests: 26% Increase Family and Human Services Committee March 4, 1997 Page 5 • New Cases: 16% Increase • Counsel Appearances: 16% Increase • Permanency Hearings: 44% Increase • 388 Petitions: 342% Increase Of particular note is that the increased workload experienced by County Counsel as well as by our staff is related to contests and litigation on existing cases, not due to an increase of work due to an increase in new cases. Additionally, new demands on County Counsel in new areas, such as Briefs and Appeals which went from 21 to 109, result in much less time County Counsel has available to represent staff in court. An increase in the number of contests also means that children do not reach permanency in expedient time frames and increases the amount of time workers must be available to appear in court and thus are not working with clients. Another major area of concern is the number of 388 motions filed. These motions are filed in order to reorder permanency. In other words, a case has been in the permanency planning services program and an attorney (in some cases the Department's) is requesting that the court consider a change in that plan, usually requesting that the parent be given more reunification. If the court orders further reunification, the Department must provide services. However, the case-managed services are funded by the state at the permanency planning level. Therefore, staff must provide services to these families with no additional allocation. We will be providing these statistics, as well as the Child Welfare Research Center's (CWRC) report which discusses the court, to our Presiding Judge for her review. We are not particularly optimistic that contests and the continuances will improve. We will attempt to keep up with the demands created by this by continually reviewing our representation and training to staff to deal with the court system and the adversarial process. G. Children's Services Handbook Revision In January the Children's Services Program Analysts began review and revision of the entire Children's Services Handbook. Their review of the two volumes of Departmental policies and procedures is complete. Manual material has been organized into material that needs only to be Family and Human Services Committee March 4, 1997 Page 6 reformatted and renumbered, material that needs relatively minor updating, material needing major revision and subjects not covered needing new sections to be written. The target for completion of the project was originally the end of this fiscal year. It is anticipated that the majority of the work will be done by that date. However, the long-term illness of one of the Analysts will likely delay some of the manual material. H. CHANGES IN THE ADOPTION SYSTEM IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: 1994-1996 REPORT BY CHILD WELFARE RESEARCH CENTER (CWRC) The Department retained CWRC to complete a review and report of the adoption program and the Department's progress towards implementing the recommendation of their 1994 report. In summary, CWRC reports that the Department has made progress in all but one of the areas that was recommended in their original report. The only area in which we have made no progress is the automation of the adoption program. Because the state is going up with an automated CWS/CMS with adoptions being included in the next release, our Department could not recommend to this Board that we should go forward with implementation since the state and federal government would not participate in funding. The CWS/CMS will eventually include much of what we will need in managing the adoption program. Overall, CWRC's report found that the "Department has made very good progress in implementing the original recommendations" They stated in their summary, 'The Contra Costa County adoption system is in a state of transition, heading toward a well-defined and well-conceptualized program. The current leadership is dynamic and committed to having a superior adoption program. We see good reason to conclude that Contra Costa County can develop a fully integrated system of child welfare services if it maintains its current direction and level of effort and has the cooperation of the court." They did outline additional concerns in the following areas: • Relations with Private Adoption Agencies Their interviews with private agencies indicated a mixed review, some saying we work well with them, others saying it was improving, others saying that they believed it was as much their responsibility as far as the lack of relationship. Our Department recently concluded a meet and confer with Local 535 which approved of our Department's plan to refer Family and Human Services Committee March 4, 1997 Page 7 to private agencies relatives and foster parents who are in need of a homestudy to complete the adoption process. We were in the process of doing this several months ago when the Union requested a meet and confer and asked that we cease any referrals until we had met. • Case Record Review CWRC staff reviewed 79 cases of children who were under the age of six who had a dispositional hearing after CWRC's 1994 review of our program and prior to November, 1995. They wanted to see if the Department had been able to focus on permanency for young children. They found that the services plans were appropriate in all cases, that workers continue to have a difficult time documenting the assumptions that provide their basis for adoptability, that excessive number of court continuances ultimately mean delays in resolving a child's permanence. In respect to court continuances, they found that almost 80% of the children had continuances of their jurisdiction hearing with the number of continuances ranging from none to eight. • Five County Comparison In comparing Contra Costa County to other Bay Area counties using the same administrative data as in the 1994 report, we have made no improvement; i.e., the number of children being adopted in comparison to the number of children remaining in long-term foster care placements continues to be lower than those compared in the last study. However, since the data is using young children who entered foster care in 1990, it is expected that the cohort would not be impacted by concurrent planning practices since they would have entered the system long before implementation of the new adoption assessment tool. Our attempts to seek more permanent solutions for children who earlier entered our system has not been easy since these children have been placed in homes that do not wish to adopt and removing them for an adoptive placement has been thwarted sometimes by the court and other times because the assessment is the child has made significant attachments to the current caretaker. In another type of comparison our Department is doing quite well. An analysis of the number of finalizations and adoptive placements shows that Contra Costa County has had substantial growth in our adoption program. There has been a 92% increase in the number of placements from FY 93/94 to FY 94/from 62 to 119 and nearly an 89% increase in finalization from FY 93194 to FY 94/95 (from 62 to 117). This increase in placements and finalization contrasts with the Family and Human Services Committee March 4, 1997 Page 8 downward statewide trends for the number of placements (2953 to 2799) and finalization (3020 to 2883). • Juvenile Court Concerns CWRC especially noted the number of continuances of court hearings as an issue which impacts permanency for children. A myriad of reasons were given by participants in the study; time to appoint counsel, setting hearings for contest, late court reports, late delivery of discovery, lack of time to prepare, illness on the part of key participants, failure of parents to appear. Time between scheduled hearings was noted as problematic, and reason given were; calendaring conflicts, part-time work schedules, delays in obtaining evidence, waiting for a social service intervention. CWRC indicates that the liberal use of Welfare and Institutions Code 388, which allows any party to petition the court to have a hearing to modify jurisdiction, set aside jurisdiction or terminate jurisdiction based on the allegation that the circumstances of that jurisdiction have substantially changed, has caused an increase in the number of hearings and continuances. The court is required to accept these petitions. Yet according to the Judge (per CWRC report), "rarely had the defense been able to make its case to the court and obtain an order to resume reunification services or return a child to a parent once reunification services had been terminated." The scheduling of additional hearings guarantees that the length of time it will take for a child to get from dependency to permanence is automatically increased. • Resources in the Countv The report mentions that staffing levels at the Agency as a result of the cutbacks and freezes of several years ago have had a serious impact on the ability of staff to provide services to children and families. We are only now able to stabilize the work force, and with the new automated system, clerical staff will be able to provide some of the support to staff that has been missing. The report mentions the lack of resources in the County to meet some of the service needs of our adult clients. It also mentions the need for resources for caregivers in the community. Staff have mentioned the need for more counsel to represent them at hearings as it is their perception there are more Public Defenders and Alternate Defenders Office staff to represent parents. (It should be noted we are adding one County Counsel.) CWRC noted that Contra Costa County has only one Juvenile Court Judge and a Referee to handle dependency matters. Family and Human Services Committee March 4, 1997 Page 9 Their calendars are heavily calendared, thus when matters are continued, there is a long stretch between court dates. CWRC provides recommendations in respect to the court which we will forward for their review. III. CWS CMS Because of difficulties with implementation in pilot counties, the state has pushed back all counties' implementation date for CWS/CMS approximately eight weeks. Rather than coming up on the system in May, we are now scheduled to start up Monday, July 7, 1997. Staff training has been described above and is a major undertaking. Moreover, with available state funding, our Information Technology Division has been hiring additional technical staff to provide support to line workers and to input resource information needed to implement. The enormity of implementation of CWS/CMS should be emphasized. With the exception of direct interaction with clients, every aspect of child welfare is affected by automation. All documentation will be done within the system. Court reports will be generated by the system. Health and school records of every child in County care will be tracked by the system. Supervisory reviews and approvals will be logged into the system. Clients will be cleared on line with all other counties in the state to determine if there is any history of prior abuse or neglect referrals. In addition, any state compliance reviews can be done online. We truly will be changing the way we will do business. In spite of the enormity of the changes awaiting us, social work staff have attended training with very little complaint. Reaction to CWS/CMS ranges from true excitement to good-nature resignation. SUMMARY The Social Service Department has continued to work on the areas that brought this issue to the attention of the Board of Supervisors. While we have given this "project" much focus, our Children's Services Bureau has many other programs which are priorities and which we take much pride in their accomplishments; such as, the Independent Living Skills Program geared toward emancipating teens, the Family Support/Family Preservation Program, the State Family Preservation Program, the Mediation Project and the Heritage Project. The next few months will test the best of our staff as we spend considerable time learning the automated case management system, experience the conversion of the Family and Human Services Committee March 4, 1997 Page 10 data to an online system and change our way of handling our daily workload in order to keep our automated casework up to date. At the same time we are implementing a new way of delivering child welfare, concurrent planning. We would be remiss if we did not mention that we are also in the process of planning the implementation of laws that were passed last year of which there were 35 that impact child welfare. Additionally, Children's Services will be impacted by welfare reform, managed health care and managed mental health care. We expect that this year will be a very busy one. JC:ceb Attachments waipupdatihs f-disk 4 Contra Costa County Children's Services Training 1996 - 1997 Continuing Education Dates Location Speaker/Sponsor Topic/Title 6/4 Hercules Office Trainings: 6/5 Muir/Douglas County Counsel Reasonable Services; The JV forms 6/12 Antioch Office Trainings: 7/10 Antioch Linda Canan AAP and Permanency Planning 7116 Hercules Linda Canan AAP and Permanency Planning 7/17 Muir/Douglas Millie Gilson Working with CASRs 7/10 Antioch District Meeting --- 10:30am 7/24 Hercules Danna Fabella District Meeting -- 8:30am 7/24 Martinez District Meeting --- 10:30am 7/25 Martinez Niki Delson Enhancing Interviewing Skills with Children 8/6 Hercules Office Trainings: 8/7 Martinez Maureen Wallace Understanding Attachment Disorders: Tips 8/14 Antioch for Prevention and Treatment 8/23 Pleasant Hill Byron Kunisawa Forum: Diversity: Community Center The Impact, The Challenge,The Benefits 9/10 Hercules Office Trainings: 9/11 Antioch Robert Ayase School Needs of Foster Children: 9/18 Muir/Douglas AccessingSpecial Education, IEPs, Surrogate Parents, and Foster Youth Services 9/12 Martinez Alice Bussiere Petition Writing 9/17 Martinez Alice Bussiere Petition Writing 9/24 Martinez Alice Bussiere Petition Writing 9/25 2530 Arnold Jane Zeiger Women,Alcohol,and Violence:Breaking the Cycle Date(s) Location Speaker/Sponsor TopiciTift 10/24 Martinez Bruce Gurganus Legal Aspects of Mental Illness Martinez Christie Cooper Caseload Management for Social Workers 12/3 Hercules Office Tralnings: 12/4 Muir/Douglas County Counsel Changes in the Juvenile Court Law: 1997 12/11 Antioch 12/5 Martinez Lorraine Fox Assaultive Children 12/17&18 Martinez Fresno State Placement 1/7 Hercules Office_j[gjnjqM 1/8 Muir/Douglas Danna Fabella Concurrent Planning 1/15 Antioch 1/21 Martinez Lorraine Fox Working with Multi-Problem Families 2/28 Walnut Creek Brad Berman,Sandie Frawley, Forum: AD/HD: Beyond The Labels Garden Center Carlo Rossi, CH.A.D.D. 3/ Martinez Ed Pieczenik Working with Substance Abusing Parents 3/11&12 Martinez Fresno State Placement 4/8&9 Martinez Fresno State Risk Assessment 4/29 Martinez Fresno State Medically Fragile Children 6/12 Martinez Niki Delson Enhancing Interviewing Skills with Children 617&18 Martinez Fresno State Risk Assessment New Worker Training Fall 1996 Dates Location TopicfFtle 9/13 40 Douglas Welcome; Overview 9/17 UC Davis Training Academy Module 1: 9/18 John Muir Inn Development and Behavior 9/19 9/24 30 Muir Rd, Room 205B/C Fresno StateChild Welfare Training Project 9/25 Risk Assessment 9/30 40 Douglas, Room101 Roles;Reporting Law;Screening 10/1 Medical Aspects of Abuse; After hours Program 10/7 30 Muir Rd, Room 205B/C Investigation 10/8 Documentation: Case Planning 1014 30 Muir Rd, Room 20561C Separation and Loss; Placing a Child 10/15 40 Douglas, Room101 Placing a Child; PeparngaCaseForOourt 10/21 30 Muir Rd, Room 205B/C CourtOverview; The Initial Dependency Process 10/22 40 Douglas, Room101 Court Overview; Choosing a Long-term Home 10/28 UC Davis Training Academy Module 2: 10/29 40 Douglas, Room101 Assessment Skills 10/30 11/4 40 Douglas, Room101 Court: Initial Hearings; The Initial Court Report 11/5 11/12 UC Davis Training Academy Module 3: 11/13 1465 Enea Circle Case Planning and Coordination 11/14 11/18 1465 Enea Circle Family Maintenance 11/19 Family Reunification 1/25 1465 Enea Circle Psych Hospitalizations; ILSP;SPP;CRPU 11/26 12-18 months: Choosing a Permanent Pen 12/2 1465 Enea Circle Permanency Planning 12/3 Adoption 12/10 UC Davis Training Academy Module 4: 12/11 1465 Enea Circle Intervention Skills and Techniques 12/12 Training Academy Graduation Date(s) Location Topigfritle 12/16 1465 Enea Circle Special Considerafons for DeperxientChkiren 12/17 volunteerServbm, Wrap-up New Worker Training Graduation Winter 1997 Date(s) Location Topicffitle 1/13 1465 Enea Circle,Concord Welcome; Overview; Reporting Law; Welfare& Institutions Code 1/14 1465 Enea Circle, Concord UCDavis Training Academy Module 1: 1/15 Development and Behavior 1/16 1/17 30Muir Rd, Martinez Room101 Screening;After Hours Program Emergency Response; Working with Police 1/21 30Muir Rd, Martinez Room 101 Medical Aspects of Abuse; Documentation; Confidentiality; Placing Children: Shelter Care 1/22 30 Muir Rd, Mathez Room 101 Separation and Loss;YJACT; EPSDT; Case Disposition;Case Planning 1/23 30 Muir Rd, Marti r*z Roomlbl Juvenile Court: Overview;Petition Writing 1/24 1465 Enea Circle, Concord Negotiating; Mediation; \AbkingwithAttorneys 1/27 1465 Enea Circle, Concord CASR; Mtg with Referee; Reports; Contests 1/28 1465 Enea Circle, Concord Family Maintenance; Substance Abuse; Indian Child Welfare Act ---- - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/29 1465 Enea Circle, Concord Fresno State Child Welfare Training Project 1/30 Risk Assessment 1/31 1465 Enea Circle, Concord Family Reunification; Fiscal Considerations; ILSP;CRPU;SPP 2/3 1465 Enea Circle, Concord PP Review;Choosing Adoption;ChoosingGuadanship; Choosing Long-term Foster Care;.26 Hearing 2/4 UC Davis Training Academy Module 2 2/5 1465 Enea Circle, Concord Assessment Skills 216 D to s Location 7opicfTlUe 2/7 1465 Enea Circle, Concord Adoptions; ICPC, AIDS; Volunteer Services New Worker Training Graduation 2/25 UC Davis Training Academy Module 3: 2/26 1465 Enea Circle, Concord Case Planning and Coordination 2/27 3/18 UC Davis Training Academy Module 4: 3/19 1465 Enea Circle, Concord Intervention Skills and Techniques 3/20 Training Academy Graduation S 7.v*•,3'-.•{n�, cy.�a '-eik•7a"3i: 4 :, y, /=P',c� +.. tm• R` -.`3r'd,"7.r -.:af-h° +"" E ,.v,y +"aA; � C : ' at � yhe 2t a � ? 1 s a 4A N-u.• { '�4 e d& S;t:Y,k y .a... ! rri~x�• t. � tw {Y.. c ` ywE i J •r si''ay,y,t. �2' $isd�.`..r�`4•,: �'f� ' �p ayf' ^z'rldw Kr 4- yw?', y' f+$,Y+"yR�{ ';+ '• ,�+.` t ' 'lig �I� 4F zia-Rll qty WINE �7 �C �M air` + �' mlM. Tur.'+(�t .pew' t..r. - P ,` a4Y _ .tY !s' Apt, µ':'.rb',.s"a rw�='•z.. dam" ,L`fi, `j,' i,. f %'�`�• L", �drN+T4 <+rJ x w• c 4•�' .a":'i.+ `S#r .g;Y . S :' -fi ra.s". zt,*r, -,. cs.,a+f-:.y, > 't a-.c,g�' 4 ✓,.rY.'h s, ?• ? _' sa- •cs. zy� '`__ ' f,' h a a c "xX� �fi�#a.. s. r :W!. £5 t Mx L ik r , " a •.:c., 'Z" _ 4 •�A.� ✓ . .. L�','k, s�€t..,�., x�5� `�k''�#'"Y''tai.. 't,.. ';x,y. 'j {. es�2k-"'r;-'•�•a r' x r1v s:x Y:, Jut y�€ ftr5 ate t4Yg a 1 lnyc �tYs, - Nl C4 t _ `fii1if`,l�e .,tx'�,'-.�Wx ;$: Y 2•, '?d ri � L l�Yr ✓ . d" a, 3 z st1 Ss �Y <lt � z 2111 4# 4 �,�` kr2 00 f c_ j"!' F° � 325ti��',s'.' .. ,✓s _r rt :. P "i:'i X31�`f.,�u 'Msr i ., ' 1`''{,�-,'� •.r ..t: y + +.s+ -1� u,,1y ¢ '�' M �� C. 11� ,+"y a$µ�i Y.' .4.. J t "'�:.K�•f` ��e'� M � cf '� ^�` 4� T'� tfi�: y �� 'A;i� `�` all=da worksho on Attention P"ef%citDWO r r�de r: K.0.r .i u'v +x iJ,52.z >SS� sr n � �4t k � a�a S..�` �F�:.. �"�. 6 .•b• .�� '§�:�..+�,'�+� '>?.. 'l Y'%1sh� 9�L�+atif�1, by , and�AttentionDeficitr zY� erac4t� tDisord r: -t •t V '• v i'' '.r '' " y :. ma �ka'T,r `f�f r�+i f y. .. 's•.' w ! s 3 + r &' w i t atiY t { #i .ty� . .... ..., a� h.5ha�-: nr4.5.v., •,r">.`^,r' ':'".d•'?: k. r` iS;%,g � w �i e > `x # tLearn,lbih V gADD�and ADHD 4Assessmen Dia os><s and lVled�icat><N r Co-exist>�n `D>�sorders andwSocial S�ki�lls• I4E�P and 504 Accomoda�t><on rw gh'ts; y . j7 x , s tfit "x- -4•:.:St ♦.. dt1' -MU-ra off •.. S szE'7., y� f �Techn2ques�andr�Strategilesz�fopq�Success�=� AT Mr�{ °� i-. - t �a g"t 5+�°'. +•^ fcc ks" ' �. r a �' a r s`•, S 4. :s' ,f , j .0 s � sr °'k,��x, ` •t�r�+. st a kv».. I a z� `r w• LK t 3 #t '.'�K $y dtF-w-e �'�'' "3�• �"r •'<, a ,{s`�.E:X� r r4_1 Febr�uar . �_� r$ 9 .,� t� t'a. s w-�.a i, f > : "• s.., a:-.• is"E,.`s eYtx ax;i'ri7,.''`''t.`_,:ck�� �,e ,rhl' .:"r'+ I �b..,,. ,r - i ti 4' r 2 "L4,^.`�,.,.�,y ,�t" '=a l�+'mow w•; �� Y 8 4t �?y1 y0 r�t� el _r ;✓s 1Jig ` Tr s`� 0 t0 4-ik3�b�� - • '�ia xS dsigj.w £ .� p .� �.::s a.+� d ,d+ 6 �r''n� � �MIA it yTq k�. �" 4 ,t5'�• f* a. c r t .�, L .{+,, r '' ..` �I ^lit•,i' ar } Heather nFarm},Gard�e Csenter �5. t:;e',a tt ;��' 3 2 e 2'.39.,fit .,irfT x >E eTS..' ��',+"` � `z'.:K s• � r�� .f+,'n.•:`-�k3>� I;�- ..�ti9,,.-+'."-, "Y+;+-, ,�{, 't>'• f+ }� 5�.i�1 - ��,,4Y t `�} i,,� 7�"�v';�rr� .��ir�i r.; � '= k -�,�,ry �'.�•sslt h»� ,� �..c�i 5; F�•�,.aa�'A� ����,� '�`,'�� ,,� a� � .a .:.. •' -t r+' vi.„ � r �•�'� � F r" fir•, 0 4 17r��c� t -t.,Y-` .,�s f a•. L"r ..yt i 4� ���!•-:.r a �` tz r we# ��'�•� �.-z���3 "�r'" �t w', :y"";,��, �V� .t,JSAS- 4t r-1 r f x�r i' .,au., ���,«i hi •a f � �t �„ -'r � 1+;•_ s r �.H> �,",* `�`•'•'.:�•.F"'3 rY �` ,'F9Jtr y �+z'^''3�•'S�Si�x��y�4{#��4�! t3 .4•oy�•..6,t�' +'�r��,�t"r�`'. ,� .�., }.,rx.u' .�_ ar r: a . r s d' tt � �1'� .S"`� eu3't�»..G,`cr. + � .,�r��., �ic�':'f�.. t��➢, �,�a� . t ;,� �-Fs x •,a,..'�Pv �. �. snti� k x € r$t -"�a�`� _� sg4:.y,�r._ .p�� •`� ,:a,>•,�,,�+p.'.•j xrvr�i, 3�'°` ,,.. S� P������� ,`�'�i',><: e�, y s.ay��_,., i�-v -� �x f �. ��r•*..-:,�-- ' 1:$' ,�� € !?�w.�"€,'`��,. �, ^� `7f'-4v",�••'��+�"y � ��.�tr��t�:� rr�§�'C'' ,'}�.. , ...�. .�::' ..,..�. ,rt Y,4 ?.f+f,+4 S!4 _.,,t � ;r,; ,� _,. ,, ,oaf'�rx`#•t�(�z 4fha;S§'y 7*' ,.``,�y.' ., a'�k'� >a° 2k?" �ygiq'v'�4. ;����rt�*� �' f ""�.t 1 � ��• fi as �{,:s�; +,�..,�'sF i�Z �"�t" h.� Fr•H � >c,t r �'�, � `c�.�u ��:�+,Yt4 PRESENTERS• {g=� r u s � y � '�. 4 '•', ,,.,. • v.;y ` Y .r' a� •S°� x2'S .: ,+r,- .'a��p.t �.�},���.,}"rh V '4 .+,'a5 g'� x {e,;• „r ., '•j;: . n-;`_:ks r r>.- :,qr<+v;«,. >:�£ „F.-k:. .Vn� ,-V .c _ F?i: 3",.^�:se" 's'«,='- '": �t�.'c•. �t'• n�,. ,t ,g:k�4 ' r ,E $rad Berman:X141:D:pis"'R eVelopmental{pediatncian''.ho�willtanswer our quesrions about propert ,+�} .iv<'�.+b.a a.-`.'• „.. t :.' xF,f� -• x TIM �- assessment,`.dia¢j�ostics;an°d medicahons` 1 `' x � y � � '� r .f .: *FF d r i ''i a'k' `3- . J'$� i' � l:im'. ^:t S - :tt, & +y' �•.`1 c .Sandie-Frawley.Ed:D.pis an educationalf: s cholo""tst who5:w.ill discuss w1i r�AD 'children+`1`ack�soc a K S 4 t2 'y '+'"r 'c ° y Y rt1 rkz%s- hz,."g" 'Fvs,.'.'''.° j S skills and what:wecan,do}to help>them learn to socializevithxpeers andRanvl}yla ..y r .y. .`fi y3 n yfi :3„ -4 ,r 1 Y a4,+ ,a 3.r.. x ,F x.,:ri $'11fit J, .,� :� iF` �`A fie,:r 1 s� t 4�i-i t s�=:,� .� ,s „-.-a':;., �-.'��,: �' Ms'f!'�-.r+.+s... x�,e�..s•r--.;�.�{ ';'��! a�.s. '�K. �r�,�.a�r,a`,`�� x.a,_�„s5... .s�.. rwt'��` sk .�f`a �.��'r d. ;a�rs���'-v,�`• '_ �` a5� � ?�.�; .r� aj Parlo Rossi is an kAdvgcate who will talk about ho<w tto twfor=k with.educ�ga4tors to best access-the s ecial ,' «; .•+". �t',x kh. Y � af• tyl,,,.'i rs .y�i°y rcv. ;K':�N�..Ysn,w�,, ". ''� `.�' ? `k,[S,'Tsu7s' ;4'-*S• �" ... `,z"'•�� Z�• .4Nr W ed ucahonlsetvices/accomodattons{cluidren;mayyneed m order to,succeed at=school. ay est r k F' :a � k4 �, moi• ;� 7s + fi3+r' ir a s.� _ 4 yrut ate, Jeanne Hughes;;YR=:N: and Vicka'wCarlson are.parents of A?D/I cidarenkand�1aff ce a of ��- gt ? �M','3*d a'i ''�.�' °rail.P''�3 ,'wy;i'• f }g >who willydiscuss��w/siti�e arenhn it,reall.Y wbrks't` and offer ho e.and su OTTIM,r arents who are f3. _LtF" ,,L gyaNfi i9''.,1'. -.FP ) ,zf.� � ..•.� 'ti .�,$�1'1'F s ':ri,`a S.a"9'"'..z,r'%j :.aJ ..fi ..,4� ap 4p1 p - +' .... +� .5.,. ..,{. o Y ?.`'4, ti$- st;;j',z'ht ., •rx�w.?. •x§3' tk�S"�- �`�d+' �t a�s"M1 1. .. K struggling�to ratse ith,AD/HD x F ,y Y i. x p +•:�, E z��* wsut of :K+, K •W'a^``Ps'.;a.,.:a'„'`fh*"t4 �-#.+,+r•�:• ?<,` m�f`F '>y,�=t' "c ',... ?�' '. � ' ''. �'s :z:, 't,w''r .�a` t S .tu3�.,h"S. � f "�,.-•z+F i., '�"'Sa'£ 44 �:��� -y; Y*�_. era;�� z�, ,.�'.� r�. , �, � � "_�„Ge .1.`�•',$'r¢� ",tn: � "eS � ��� +;�•` �4y r,vt'rE t i'}-'.tr .¢', 'S d s .'",t. k -, ~"ri n. rw,'>+' `,.y 1`i "+t s',F r ,ft, s {=.ti`A£6 •ifa..3z'k'S # '4«, �,� `�."f + ,3�.t , ..b -. � ..:.«p ,; k " u-x �:.�-3"`ir.�" a�, ,.� �,hr a�t``.�t< r .•a,' y r�, � � t,�' z`�S,#`�: >� +F � x ��� �,,. � .ryM.•s5� 'k4 ;a,•• � ,. .4'`+ a� f`y.F''? .g15E Y # � a.` t„ Y,ax x'.45 $ '• Y 'S:1L, 1 .lf` "'•7• rP+} ? 4..•:U= .R ryhh t p�'',.'C4`. e „g `ti.4.t=; "�rLs a� 3'::, } }l a ,a 2 � I. :j4= . * 'Si }� # .hi, s T, F tr 1Y'' >' t .4' x `�•'�` yr"'M4 t A.catered i:unch will be.Dro ided at;n4o cos �-4.1 acl+; ,ants. r xn.' •, "t•m s .4` iT` l "� ,•tg.`� '>da 3z'." , t�•-,a'� �' �^ c6 ,yYss" zr 'C :7:xY. ?v3' F i' r /�3 .'tit�.�:�^.4et v�t4 ?Y`„a,; s� $1 � ro•+:.. � 4'z:�' �t..�±5 _:L2t, � Tt h� Rr�:k4 `{., '.tt+.a ' . �„'�,,.a`�'e ,."t5,'�,• . f ,f. c' a°. .3 '-? ttt•'y' ,y;` Y^`"_tg "3'4i�, :_ .°fie: cc!'•�, ;.,+�Me t�3�r�W., :i .'f3u 9, "4 .s.v<. ,"ia+,+-�. ,iarr ^ss� 4 �. � " kG"'#r-,• .,,{..4. k . '+`. 'yy:'.. inn,,, . a"C*T lu.'xl-, ,x.A'.:�`c;-'!r,t> ::'� ..•.�.� r`ri '`e;`�+'Y' -. ,k`,"-.r 3�r Y�gy�+.h 'z :%.r3v, c 't Cz h �wx.�.. .�xr cg: �n',. # ,+ j.`a":=" :' `�s s a.w, �+'iy.'s='' �l4 xya.af�a 'c•`F a. •.§ rr?.g•, .,�r+• -.4 xf5 -,., ,' t5-.u.,.4 `. a.% a"5'f'F; t✓`'v "�..y ,f`:Aet$i°trs'-. ..k �, : ''�^p r:s;rfla8 , t., yy�•t v :Y Enrollment Spaeesrsf,kmuted. To enroll,�piease.callthe�Staff,.De�elopment�oicetna�l,nu ,5 • Feb. 2I m 92 b ;a.s�'.c., w 5.�{t ,3 '*. 1 ..;rwt ,, .. ,yn yet+,:'r,' zrZ. A... r`r'r'a +`F3 `�"' /4t8= "+' c ^,� VG ' 13l..�Jr.E 'i� >;, - u. �,: '�.+... -.a,.r'•+ r fir.;rd ".�'-,.N "; �ai t„kr � :tlt�i 5c<:a •w., 1997 Youswilltbe askedeto state thexname{of.theamning,date of the�class. your name, �y�s�pon"control number sury rvisor>s ,�.•,t.Y - n .;!; Pf�: j•i.7,a�"...,:+.fi q'�xi5 -s!•:.,.��tY",•,'r.a i.$?!, .n 5, ''k',r•9'>35�.'«+Ea"�>a�.X^,;lt+sgr+.'�s it �i`.''il:i aouracnv"`,�+��Ci:+µrri':` "4r' . .b; ,.•.:X• *;i`' +.? :As.t>r:7' : .ray t ,Barrie,and Vour telephone/voice mai number If oulare nota Count••ken to eek lease state our.htle tnsiead of'(y_s�Uon y h r•.>:.r„p _C,g*:r, Arv_A�{,r ,. -rt Mrr ,.vt ..r -: �§iv.�,F „331rF. z-' ;.,GCyy;, :ywPp^y rye,., r,�,+.A` r • control nuinber�andM„NJenserr�"_dL�w� hen�`asked+forsu _ ivsor Well�attemntto reach`voub"'teIe h neoTIoieema�llawitli'in S ..z t :'� iF - ., . 4'z..r ,Li'"✓ 4,i.# .r2S� s rr,.w„" ,£a I+r�':::.+s,.s...x.3''1 «..1:.:'`,7-�r=fi�rt3.�`{v4<+i3.: s Y:?`"�'4., aa,4nt ," ,k�".�fK"'k. 3..°?cr'" 3w6. •.Sg b'el ;�2' 7,M 48:hoursto;conf rmryour,erii�ollment.t,_xQuestrons� kContacttMary Iensen lCluldren's Services Train�rip Coordtna nlil Rt-96 -yf �,4n•�.3�"�'i 3�r4�d:',?•�'^�°. �.:a`i�r��.#+4f��yy rn�' �'t•76'',�:�,ra7ct -.,'y4 '�"` ,;R£t3 •`i{g�gm"Gys %gds .. yp>2r t ::n-�rps�t.�ba �i7r'`�'t"y�+�,'�+:f�.�,.'� ,s+.,y,x ��_.,`,�c� F a ,tom.,m, �,rz-..=rY, �3 q'�'�••, `� ?,•�,.. �.��tit f,a3�.✓�.?s-a? �* +'d+. +,^�:"� .,L GC �`-.'t a ac ,t � ht4�' .�'.✓', r c.,:,^�;. •w;unv�..r� ..+R+.�.i".i4�" x..e',w#^:�'..,- m�r�'� Y�� a '.� t� x t.�t xt�'j¢ v� R� 3E. SE �/ .,�� }•". #��_.'�f"�"'fr'�: {�. ' :t)e, _ ;; K . ;,, R ,' ; ,�GONT�ItA�COSTA�COfU f� SOCIALSEIZVICE=DEPARTMENTS%CI�ILDItEN�SSER�v°TCES `�t�- �� � .; ..,"•.,s,. • .:.rM'..Fk9'.3> .z',"53°.zr.._'_ ,;:a c::....: ,,,, . a.,a.::.::un�'. .r�,+'' .:,-'.. .,:t..ts.=#. , _.`K.-,t",!`i{;... "."..q.2.bTuK"?ifri'1' '�r 's't,3"•.+-xu.b •.>,?!C+�€:"`. '?,�rari.r +?? Zr Juvenile Services Productivity Report Juvenile Dependency Matters - Briefs &Appeals Number of Juvenile De* endenc Matters Year Briefs&Appeals p y 1994 1 21120 Briefs &Appeals 1995 70 T 1996 109 100 - ---------- — --- - -- --- -- -T. —r----- 80 i 60 ' i 1--� ----- - -- - -- ------I 40 20 "-- --- -- -- ----- 1994 1995 1996 Contests -Antioch, Dept 61, Dept 10, Richmond Number of Contests Year Contests 1994 1,137 1450 Antioch, Dept 10, Dept 61, Richmond 1995 1,316 - 1400 :. .. .. . . !. 1996 1,429 1350 - - 1300 1250 .._. .. .. - - i 1200 -. - i .. .. -, 1150 = 1100 = -�--- --- --- - ---- - ------- 1994 1995 1996 I New Juvenile Dependency Cases Opened Number of New Juvenile Cases Opened Year ew Cases Opened 1994 360 4W 1995 443 ----- --- - ---- - --- 43 - - - -- - - -- - -- -- - -- - ----- 1996 417 � ----- ----- -- ---- --- --- ------ - - - --- - - - - - --- - - - - I420T - ---- - - - - - - - - - -- - - --- 400 380 --- -- -- - ---- - - - = - - - - - - -- ----- - -- 360 1994 1995 1996 HALMARTRQ P W RBUOGETWATSM82 Juvenile Services Productivity Report County Counsel Appearances- Court Hearings Number of County Counsel Appearances Year Appearances 1994 7,564 8800 rmirt Hearings ; 1995 8,449 8600 1996 8,775 - ---- -- - -- - -- --- - 8400 .__...._..._!._.._._ - -._._.. ..... -8200 - 8000 200 -8000 -.. ._ 7800 -...- - 7600 -- _ ------ 7400 1994 1995 1996 I § 366.26 hearings - Permanency Planning Number of § 366.26 Hearing- Permanency Planning Year Hearings Number of Hearings 1994 264 I aoo . � 1995 309 380 . 1996 381 i 360 i 340 ! j 320 300 280 260 1994 1995 I § 388 Petitions - To Reorder Permanency Planning Number of § 388 Petitions - Permanency Planning Year Petitions 1994 1 19 1 90 ,.------,_-------——-----------—-,-- - - --, 1995 53 80 1996 84 70 - - �- ' --- - --- � - -- _ i 60 - -- - ----- - --i- - ------- -1 ---- -� j - - - - -I- -- - - -- - - --I - -- -------- � --- - - I 50 I- -- - ---- -- - -- ------- ----- , 40 - � -------- -- - J-t- -- - - ' 30 j 20 j --1994 ---- 1995_---- 1996 - C:%PR018000Ef\STATS.WB2 000 nnn 000 nnn 000 nnn C— (0 (0 coco co co co co co m co co co co co to co co to co C mcnPk 0) Cn4a 0) cn44. CncnA 0) Cn406 CncnA o Z Z Z 000 to a) ca cos cm cm cos co)c4mIN m 000 =. �. =. wCaw Www Z3000 (D 0 m (D (D 0o 00 0o M rn Cn = i E C_ C_ C_ (ED ('�D N N N 00 0o Co 0) 0) O) n — — Cl) = c c C (A N 09 'p :� NNN 000 (D X rf, t„ n D D D (D (D CD a� rn m 0 0 0 DDD 0CDDm o00' 0) A) a 0Iz 0' (n (vcD 000 asnsd 0 � � = = '� (D vvv y y N y y Y/J O 3 ` 000 N a, (D (D O O O - - - i (O O 0, 0 �o 'o M m fit m (D (D (Ds ?� nnn 000 ? 000 in N (CD C I N W ; (DD ((D (CD Zr co (y_D m O 000 13Vv 000 000 "` oDDD Q. 0. 0 0 0) r« Q. c. 0. a3i w Q� � � 0 (A vi (A v v v L L c• a - 'm n n A CD CD CD O Ct 01 n1 <• (D (D (D (D (D (D c c c (D CD M a `G yycn � � ,� (DCD ((D 333 000 000 ... .� > > 0 d 0 as to su o N N N X N (�D (�D O O O (D (D (D N (�D (3D 0 0 (D CD � � X vDv 0 0 0 003 0d ani 'a CD Q (D C) n n N N (D %< cn ca (a (D (D (D O 333 CDmCD -v -_v -0 000 0 0 0 a0. a 0 0 o a a a -1 -9 m m Q. aa � m D 0 0 aQ. n. `` `` `` cn (n (a 0 0 0 (D c (D ('n cin (ten to cc (e N y y N v W C71 _a .i A A W = 4 -! W W N C) W N 0o 00 .A N N O In W D7 W W O O O V N 00 00 W O N Q. Cn J., O 'A 'A' N W O W J� W O a1 co W ' W N A W A W to, co COTS � =w O -h co cn _ _ --1 �l W O N Co W C) O � � W w 00 O W -4V -N Ui O cin c0 D. 01 -n 0 B 7 W W (~o (WD N W 00 (finN 00 0 a) cn o w � y CD CD N O CA 3 7_ W CJ1 Cn W Cb � W V W n (0 V W A O W O W �! N A W t0 O 0 O O o o c o o \ o c y (D N CY 96 Juvenile Services Productivity Report category1st Qtr 2nd Qtr Half Year 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Half Year Total No.on Calendar-Antioch Mon. 232 255 487 367 250 617 1,104 No.on Calendar-Antioch Thur 568 557 .1,125 464 498 962 2,087 No.on Calendar-Dept 61 Tues. 552 529 1,081 585 591 1,176 2,257 No.on Calendar-Richmond. Wed 640 630 1,270 67.4 688 1,362 2,632 No.on Calendar-Richmond Friday 559 649 1,208 555 534 1,089 2,297 No.on Calendar Dept 10 524 720 1,244 1 638 658 1,296 2,540 araraces Antioch ; "t1Aon' ti6>J, _143 F.273. .. .. .:203 ..._153 356 6Z9.` ±C pearnes. Antioch%.. Tfirr -.3 270 . .-earancesDept 61 Tues 294 3131 607: 329 346: 675 1 X82 pearancesRicinmondWed368 . , :. 39© . 758;. x 69 412: 881 t 639 ,pearnces Richmond�,Fica , r :.� ` 393, >X735 X8,7., 335: 722 .... 5,°7. , ears cess;Det1 p0 rT `459, X01'... X1;06© 530 7 081 �z;141 Contests- Antioch 86 91 177 69 68 137 314 Contests-Dept 61 73 75 148 76 50 126 274 Contests-Dept 10 66 105 171 93 74 167 338 Contests-Richmond 131 144 275 134 94 228 503 Term 232/7017 Petitions Filed 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 ;CCa4ppearances Term. 1 0 1 0 p 0 1 § 388 Petitions 32 28 60 13 11 24 84 66:26 earings: 91 96 187 91, 103 194 381 Juvenile Subpoenas 82 127 209 124 115 239 448 Guardianships of Minors 2 4---j 6 1 0 1 7 Briefs,Appeals, Etc 35 28 1 63 24 22 46 109 TI ?otaFCbqnty Counsel.Appearances; 1,992 2;276 41268 2,279 2,208 4;487 Contests 3561 4151 771 3721 2861 658 1 1,429 CY 95 Juvenile Services Productivity Report Category 1st qtr 2nd qtr Half Year 3rd qtr 4th qtr Half Year Total No.on Calendar-Antioch 321P607 6 637 294 218 512 1,149 No.on Calendar-Antioch 5308 1,078 584 468 1,052 2,130 No.on Calendar-Dept 61 6515 1,336 615 541 1,156 2,492 No. on Calendar-Richmond 6738 1,381 693 719 1,412 2,793 No. on Calendar-Richmond 682 1;289 571 589 1,160 2,449 No.on Calendar Dept 10 1 639 561 1,200 574 633 1,207 2,407 CCAppearaiicesAntiochy= ,419210 :; 389 265 . 177 442 :831 CCA?ppearances . Antioch.;.. ,296 X22 . . .: 18 1317:...: 312 629 124? CG4pptrarances, Delit6 ; „ 3295 40. .,,669 304': 288:: 592 '11,261 CCpp arances_ Richrnonde Off 82k67;` CGppearances 'Richmond �312 320 yr,632 32T 330 657 1.,289 C4ppearancesD:ept10 x =570 ... 51G,, ...y086 = 489:: 557 1, 46`: x;'132 Contests- Antioch 79 83 162 58 80 138 300 Contests-Dept 61 39 53 92 39 66 105 197 Contests- Dept.10 130 96 226 65 108 173 399 Contests-Richmond 87 106 193 115 112 .227 420 Term 232/7017 Petitions Filed 7 1 8 2 4 6 14 Term CG.appeara TT2 4 6 13 Term Trials 8 12 20 13 20 33 53 §`366:26 hearings . 79 62 1'41 71 97 168 309 Juvenile Subpoenas 119 105 224 73 82 155 379 Guardianships of Minors 6 0 6 3 2 5 11 Briefs, Appeals, Etc 10 18 28 17 25 42 70 Appearances 2;054 2;030 ; -4,084 2,177 21188 4;365 8;449 Contests 335 1 338 673 277 366 643 1,316 .t " CY 94 Juvenile Services Productivity Report J Category 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr Half Year 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Half Year Total No. on Calendar-Antioch 347 375 722 404 310 714 12436 No.on Calendar-Antioch 778 682 1460 748 604 1,352 2,812 No.on Calendar-Dept 61 592 665 1257 632 546 1,178 2,435 No. on Calendar-Richmond 744 692 1436 771 672 1,443 2,879 No. on Calendar-Richmond 476 599 1075 637 525 1,162 2,237 No.on Calendar Dept 10 370 364 734 435 530 965 1,699 GCA earande' `Antioch 231,x 414 . :_ 260; =.221 481 895 l.pp.. 183 z v CG ppearances -AnthiocX56; ._ 762 473 338 811 1,5?3_ 406 CC appearances, Dept 61 258.. 264-; 318 244 562 1;084 CC Appeamhc;4s l°Richmond 304 ! 308:.. X612 . 376 332 .708 1;320 IC_C ATppearances-Richmond 287 268 .. 555111;Q6,9„ GCppearances :Dept,10 289 = "283.: 572 . 330: 451 781 1,353 Contests- Antioch 57 77 134 92 90 182 316 Contests-Dept 61 38 66 104 46 52 98 202 Contests-Dept 10 86 63 149 63 86 149 298 Contests-Richmond 60 89 149 88 84 172 321 Term 232/7017 Petitions Filed 0 0 0 6 2 8 8 Term CC;aPpearances 0 0 0 4 2 6 6 Term Trials 3 5 8 6 5 11 19 ,§::366 26 hearings 66 56 "122 : . 69 73 142 264 Juvenile Subpoenas 93 100 193 59 103 162 355 Guardianships of Minors 2 9 11 4 10 14 25 Briefs, Appeals, Etc 5 5 10 6 5 11 21 Appearances 1,707 1,811 3518 2,117 1,929 4,046 7;564 Contests 241 295 536 289 312 601 1137