HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06041996 - C93 C. 91 , C. 92 & C . 93
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on June 4, 1996 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Bishop, DeSaulnier, Torlakson and Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Correspondence
C.91 LETTER dated May 9, 1996, from Casey Kroon, Chairman, Board of Supervisors, Sutter
County, 1160 Civic Center Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993, requesting counties to join in
supporting HR 3401 for a 33 -cent commemorative postage stamp for breast cancer
research.
****REFERRED TO HEALTH SERVICES DIRECTOR
C.92 LETTER dated May 19, 1996, from Fred Clerici, Chairperson, Crockett Community
Foundation, P.O. Box 155, Crockett, CA 94525, transmitting Resolution 96-1 adopted by
the Board requesting the immediate allocation of property taxes from the Crockett
Cogeneration Plant to three specified uses of benefit to Crockett.
****REFERRED TO COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
C.93 LETTER dated May 17, 1996, from Mitch Jenkins, DANECO Corporation, P.O. Box 460,
Walnut Creek, CA 94597, submitting a proposal on behalf of his client offering to sell to the
County five acres of land in the vicinity of the Pine Creek Detention Basin site.
""REFERRED**REFERRED TO PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendations as noted (****) are
approved.
1 hereby certify that this is a true and conectcopy of
c.c. Correspondents an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Health Services Director Board of Suon the wn9.
County Administrator A TTESon
ELOR Clerk oft Board
Public Works Director sulXrOsontuM Administrator
uty
/r
t t , it I t r f. P v✓ ! � {` 1 „_ T
CORPORATION/� ,�/ rel t� =} , � �� ,( ' � CEIVED�
Y YJ i t �" J i ��*� Y 1 f y
MAYt• (� �.,`� ,0 1 .� t i' i y „,� t -..— 7 ��,� ��� �` ✓ �� 2
ill � � ��
l?rNtAY9fix� ��,� ���� r ,, • s." ` ,u t ,� — ;t -31 1P
"
1sor Jeff mihSu eiv ;1•, " / �- �'Nt '2 796
,-Cha
( ContrarCosta;Board of Supervisors y
Count Administrat-1on Buildin arty ' , „rr, _)SIa.
`Jt I r f r
} ' �65_l,Pine/Street � '� �� f ,ti .�� j . �? .` 1
r'jMartinez;'CA 94553
RE: , . ffer to se11, acres,o6ntfguous,to'36 acres of�excess county!,land'at
Fine Creek'D'e'teritionBasin in Walnut Creek.
s t 7
. -
-,Board:Members ofh
,Dear Cha&Smithan � � ,r
A little ovena year7hgo'my client;4Edward Madigan; in'communications with;Siapervisor
-DeSaulnier,-offered to,sell-to the.county the five 4cres which"are contiguous to'and the 3
1` keyway to the caunty's,excess,proper`ty at.the Pine Creek Detention Basin site;Thisbffer .
was made in recognition of,the county's,need-to sell'its excess propertyvand.the`draft L
-subdivision,maps,by.the ,countytwhich ,eonsistentlytintluded-my,,clients's five,acres..�,
}, SupervisarjDeSaulnierrequested county,staff'to analyze the possibility.of acgiiiring this ))
five,acres}and to determine-the value of these properties. ) i S
'
meanwhile staffhas-moved.forward with;yet anothermap;�this time excluding my clie'nt's T`
five acres. � } `" �� , /� ,,�.• ''1 r"i `� � ' � �
p
,,T,herdbre ray client has directed me io•offe" ._again to sell to-the cotzn th'e sub'e�ct fire
,acres for � 0�0,000� TYie�benefits to�the,"cowr�tr;area ' �j ���
J / a '
Li
`"The;coup ' ' ends'a with a,su `ertor ina ofs40/lot�s"and,the_ referee-d loop r . d,'`
7 rinstead'of�essentially along cul/de sac with 3,4.16ts.
S r 2: k the'acquisit on,'price hof$500;000, or 5 lots @,$1
00,'000 bei 1,6t,, the
p e c�ounty`will
make m6heyl6n ithis transaction: Thfe county`s yestima`t"e�bf�value`of these'lots'is r -
"t{ ,,C, $I40,000 per raw 1ot:-tFur;ther,when,the parcels'ate combined anjadditional lot is '< F
;> created; the county really endsup"with'six/lots Selling�those six lots for$1140,000 r
} gen'e'rates $844;000 representing-a.profit of',$340'040 ta;
VJ
J '-Board/of Supervisors'
�) 'Contra Cos_ta�'COL`ulty' ( (� .�.
17MAY96
` •� ; page,2�;
�.
`3.
0)"
he combined; larger�subdivision'would.be,rriore.attractive-'tobu builder-s'.", �
r � x �, � �� tip, ., ,'
The fire departmentprefers.more than one'access to-ariy/large subdivision)and(. j.
'this.acquisition woiuld provide two)accessesivia a loop (6�d,as;opposed to a single
r' access.
�jW`e' recognize the county..islnot typically in the business of• assembling, parcels, for i�,,
development However\,„circumstarices,,th'e existence ofthecoun`ty's excessrproperty,�and` r'
a need,to,'maximie public'return for-tax dollars invested in�that`'excess property,make-
1
.,the _county s .purchase of'this five, acres, both,,prudent and) reasonable."-IIri"today's
� . �, I . �,i: , . �,,,
_ , r improving housing market the .resultirig subdivision will be; easily marketable at. a,` ,
�i �., •. �
substantial`prof t� Fact of the matter is,'I,have-a buyer_for the`40'lots�when approved. V,
Tlerefore,�my;client and I respectfully regbest.the countypurchase this fivac
e res,for the
reasons outlined above'. EdrMadi&iAhdI wish to thank you'for"your consideration and
< <, ' .� Nook forward to,your�responsel ' •
' t
> , ;Best.regards,
, .
,MITCH-;,JENKIN, S?
enclosure' p ). \
i t .
�,. e Clerk of the,'Board)
IJ
IV
J�( / ! .. � �• I� r �) /
pp-
pp-
W!MWA 0 TOO Me j I
PW
Vol
001,
��� �. � , 11,E �. � --' �,�:-..�''' :��� .-�
WAM
fy
WOu
ZI
--odd
.p W
r-A .
0
Al , .�► ',
x
4PA
Ilk s
t
Iola
i
tJ ✓ o
i
8
N • r �
w
• , v
' m
r ,1.
its
0
L
a
ui --
�
1 Y
r
SZ, `
�r i>
' b
1
0
M
i � �� mss•'-' �� .�-"� �
�a• � ' N
iq s
L• � R; t � V
t ♦ r
TANS � w'
a� . -�Q U .�'`'"' .rte, •'
/ 1
ci j 5
P
ON '
1 �{
{
33 s
a '
t j
R
{ m
a
1
y 1
lw
't ,Uj
J '
t
• i
t ♦ � w
1
o 0 o
M
M
1 �V ��
� g l
t �
a t
t
H
P
Nw
N t,
. w
I p
♦ Y
1
SAL
y. y w
"V Ot
y
o i 15 N
�• 1
L
1
x ` /
f _ o
of ; y
1' �► 4• S�. 1 25w
►. a i
I Z
a _
o �
• �To'.
r s
P
S � Y
a
N�
p
t �
1 >r M ty•o
b
J�,t ����� g off.
Al.M ism
y 3
�+ r
L � �♦ t N N
� r
t yb
i
' �•r � r e* `i��1
r
Ar
i
i
P
r
4 t,+
♦ a
f \
a C, O 5 % •p
�N r1 `•
It
s
d � y
k � O
t • . Y
i
N
x. / I
Iz
iVA
w
• � 6
N
"10 to
• 3 4'1 � X s �
f
0
� p
C �•
� r