HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04021996 - D3 b .3
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS F&HS-03 -- Contra
FROM: FAMILY AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE Costa
County
DATE: March 25, 1996
SUBJECT: STATUS OF THE FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES PROGRAM
BUDGET FOR THE 1996-97 FISCAL YEAR
SPECIFIC REGUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. APPROVE the sample format and content to be included for each program in
the Family and Children's Services Program Budget for the 1996-97 fiscal
year, as is reflected in the attached report from staff as well as the other
comments which are included regarding the referral on the Children's Budget,
Budget Office and Children's Accountability Act.
2. UNDERSCORE the importance of:
❑ focussing the presentation of the Family and Children's Budget on
outcomes and the extent to which programs are accomplishing those
outcomes,
❑ recognizing the need, at the same time we focus on -outcomes and
accomplishments, to continue to meet the process requirements
dictated to the County by other levels of government,
❑ monitoring the extent to which departments are accomplishing the
outcomes which have been agreed to and the fact that this monitoring
takes staff time and resources,
❑ holding non-profit agencies with which the County contracts responsible
for achieving the outcomes which are set forth in their contract with the
County.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: __XfYES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF B R JCOI E
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURES: DBSA LNIER J SMITH
ACTION OF BOARD ON_ Arte ll 2, 1996 y
APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER X
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that recommendations 1 through 6 are APPROVED;
and the County Administrator is REQUESTED to report to the Board of Supervisors
on the augmentation of staffing to help implement the Children' s Accountability
Act.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT #5 ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN,
County Administrator ATTESTED_April 2, 1996
Contact: Social Service Director PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
cc: Health Services Director SUPERVISORS AND OUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Community Services Director
County Probation Officer
Sara Hoffman, CAO's Office BY DEPUTY
` 1
F&HS-03 '
3. RECOGNIZE that it is not always possible to precisely divide any given
program into those components which serve children and families versus
those components which do not and that educated guesses as to the proper
proportion of a program that is dedicated to children and family services is
more appropriate than lumping an entire program into children and family
services when it is apparent that doing so is not accurate.
4. RECOGNIZE the difficulty the County Administrator's Office has in providing
the staff resources needed to produce the Family and Children's Services
Program Budget for the 1996-97 fiscal year, much less to monitor the extent
to which departments are able to accomplish the outcomes which have been
agreed to and that this effort may require additional staff resources.
5. REQUEST department heads, in making their annual presentations to the
Board of Supervisors to focus their comments on the extent to which the
department has accomplished the outcomes which were set for the
department the previous year.
6. DIRECT the County Administrator to return the completed Family and
Children's Services Program Budget for the 1996-97 fiscal year directly to the
Board of Supervisors in conjunction with the presentation of the County
Budget for the 1996-97 fiscal year.
BACKGROUND:
On December 19, 1995, the Board of Supervisors approved a report from our
Committee which asked our Committee to continue to provide oversight to the format
and content of the Family and Children's Services Program Budget for the 1996-97
fiscal year.
On March 25, 1996, our Committee met with the County Administrator and Sara
Hoffman, Senior Deputy County Administrator. Mr. Batchelor and Ms. Hoffman
presented our Committee with the attached report and reviewed it with us in some
detail. We had a good discussion of the importance of taking the time and additional
work on the part of staff to focus more of our efforts on the need to outline
measurable, time-limited outcomes for programs and then to monitor the extent to
which these outcomes are achieved. We understand that doing this will require
more effort on the part of staff and perhaps more staff, particularly in the County
Administrator's Office and that this additional work has to be paid for in some
manner.
At the same time, we believe strongly that more of a focus on outcomes and the
extent to which they are achieved is an important way in which we can truly assure
the taxpayer that the money that is being spent is being used in the most productive
manner possible and is, in fact, accomplishing something worthwhile. This
philosophy must extend to contract programs with non-profit agencies as well as to
County-operated programs.
We are very encouraged with the progress which has been made in including
program goals, outcome indicators and data to support the outcome indicators. We
look forward to being able to review these outcomes and the progress which has
been made in accomplishing them as we review the budget and as department
heads appear before the Board of Supervisors over the coming year.
-2-
3
r CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
651 Pine Street, 10th Floor
Martinez, California 94553
Telephone: 646-1390
DATE: March 20, 1996
TO: Supervisor Mark DeSaulnier
Supervisor Jeff Smith
Family and Human Services Committee
FROM: Sara Hoffman Yv'
Senior Deputy Administrator
SUBJECT: FY 1996-97 Children and Family Services Budget
This memo responds to the Family and Human Services Committee (FHS) request to review
the proposed FY 96-97 Children and Family Services Budget. In preparation for this meeting,
departments who submitted material for the FY 95-96 Children and Family Services Budget
were invited to a meeting to discuss the 96-97 budget. Of the fifteen departments invited,
only Social Service and County Counsel availed themselves of the opportunity for comment.
Purpose
In the FY 95-96 budget message, the FHS Committee identified three purposes of the
budget:
1. A tool for advisory commissions and committees in their efforts to improve services
to children and families.
2. A guide for departments in understanding the range of programs operated by other
departments available to help their clients.
3. For the public, a testament to the Board's commitment to supporting children and
families.
On a practical level, the budget also analyzed the allocation of resources and identified
program outcomes. The FY 95-96 budget was first step in moving departments toward goal
setting and outcome accountability. Assuming that this is the direction desired by the FHS
Committee, then an appropriate additions to the purpose statement would be to:
4. Identify program goals and accountability measures.
5. Analyze the allocation of resources.
In addition, with goals and indicators in place, it would be possible to collect data over time
that would:
6. Monitor the well being of children and families
Scope
The FY 95-96 budget included programs which provide a direct service to children and
families. Departments were requested to submit information on programs whose program
eligibility was for persons under the age of 21 or parents/guardians/caregivers of children or
youth. The FY 95-96 budget was not designed to include adult programs where eligibility had
no relationship to the status of the adult as a parent or caregiver.
In actuality, though, the FY 95-96 budget was much more inclusive and included some
programs for which the parenting or children criteria was not met, although the program did
serve a considerable of families. For example, the Neighborhood Preservation Program
provides no or low interest loans for low and moderate interest households to bring their
homes up to code. These households may, or may not, include children, although a
considerable number of them do. The FHS Committee may want to consider whether or not
to continue including these types of programs.
Format
The format of the Children and Family Services Budget parallels that of the program budget.
For FY 96-97, the FHS Committee may want to consider adding a section on goals and
indicator data. (Please see attached) For the goals, departments could be asked to use the
following goals:
Healthy Children
GOAL: Ir'nprove the health and safety status of children.
GOAL: Increase the number of children who succeed in school.
Healthy Families
GOAL: Increase the economic stability and self sufficiency of families.
GOAL: Support, promote and encourage the integrity of families.
2
Healthy Communities
GOAL: Increase the physical safety and improve the aesthetic environment.
GOAL: Expand community capacities to support children and families.
For FY 96-97, it is proposed that the categories be basically the same as for 1995-96, with
a few modifications as follows:
FY 95-96 Categories FY 96-97 Categories
Family Support/Parenting Skills Family Support/Parenting Skills
Economic Support/Self Sufficiency Economic Stability/Employment
Food and Shelter Food and Shelter
Alternative Homes for Children Alternative Homes for Children
Medical Care Medical Care
Other Health Services Child Development/Education
Safety and Justice Safety and Justice
Other Children and Family Services Integrated Services/Community
Capacity
Summary Information
For FY 95-96, the following summary information (attached) was provided on the budget:
1. Summary of all programs by department and funding.
2. Top 20 children and family service programs by gross expenditures.
3. Top 20 children and family service programs by net county cost.
4. Percentage of expenditures by program category.
5. Breakdown of programs by financing and net county costs.
6. Share of net county costs for children and family services by service category.
For FY 96-97, this information could be expanded to include program goals, outcomes and
historic data on outcomes as available.
The attached program indicator list shows the indicators that were included for each program
in the FY 95-96 budget. As can be seen, not all programs were able to identify indicators.
This task is more complex than it may appear on the surface. Many programs are not
required by their funding agencies to report results, but rather are governed by process
3
D .
requirements. Transition to outcome-based accountability will take time. The Children and
Family Services Budget can act as a stimulus for that transition; however, expectations need
to be realistic.
Children's Budget and Budget Office
The Board of Supervisors recently referred the issue of a children's budget and budget office
to the County Administrator's Office for consideration. This referral was a result of the Policy
Academy's suggestion to the FHS that a children's budget be established with dedicated
staff. Apparently, the Policy Academy was envisioning a children's budget that would provide
a dedicated revenue stream for children's programs. As can be seen from the FY 95-96
Children and Family Services Budget, the County has very little discretion over children and
family programs. Most expenditures are required matches of federal and state revenues.
Such a budget may be more feasible after welfare and health care reform, if, in fact, the
state and federal governments provide block grants to counties with greater programmatic
and fiscal flexibility.
Children's Accountability Act
The FHS has scheduled discussion of the Children's Accountability Act for April. Part of the
act calls for an accountability model that includes:
• program goals
• standards for services
•funding to achieve desired results
• indicators for measuring and assessing progress
• a system of frequent reviews and public reporting of results
• a system of rewards and consequences.
This model for accountability is very different than the accountability currently in use by the
federal and state governments for most programs. There are discussions, at least on the
state level, of moving towards accountability based on results rather than process. This is
an effort which the county could encourage. Internally, the county has already taken steps
to move toward outcome-based accountability. The Children and Family Services Budget is
a good step in that direction, especially with the addition of goals and indicator data.
The County's departments are currently struggling to provide services to children and families
with very limited resources. Certainly, it would not be advantageous to the children and
families that we are serving, if the department reporting requirements impacted direct
services. Consequently, the FHS may want to look at the transition to outcome accountability
as a multiple step process that allows time for orderly development of new systems and data
collection mechanisms.
4
V. 3
SAMPLE- PROGRAM INFORMATION
7, Women, Infants and Children Program
Division: Health Services - Public Health
Description: Provides supplemental food and nutrition education to women,
infants and& children. Provides vouchers for food and infant formulas to women
who are pregnant, breast-feeding or within 6 months of delivery, as well as infants
and kids aged 1-5.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children (NEW)
Outcome Indicators: Measured by the improved growth in children, prolonged
breast-feeding, reduction of overweight children.
Indicator Data: Indicator data would be put here as available (NEW}
No. of Clients: 250/month
Level of Discretion: Very Limited
Program Budget Reference: Public Health Grants
Gross Expenditures: $ 25,747
Financing: $ 25,747
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: Federal Funds
Budget Basis: Estimated Actual FY 94-95
Table 1. Summary of Children and Family Service Programs
Service Program Name Department Gross Financing Net County
Category Expenditures Cost
1 Child C ild Development Community Services $3,968,442 $3,968,442 $0
2 M
2 Mead Start Community Services $6,080.902 $6,080,902 $0
• 3 3 Family Preservation Social Service $1.000,000 $1,000,000 $0
4 C Child Care Social Service $1,117,419 $1,061,238 $56,181
5 Family Maintenance Social Service $2,118,777 $1,695,974 $422,803
Family
6 Family Reuncation Social Service $3,145,750 $2,518,014 $627,736
7 Ree
fugee Social Adjustment Social Service $1,371,811 $1,371,811 $0
a
1 Nutrition&Resource Cooperative Extension $37,924 $o $37,924
Management
2 Child Support Enforcement District Attorney $9.859,322 $9,859,322 $0
3 Families for Literacy Library $37,000 $37,000 so
4 DTPA Employment& Private Industry Council 56.796,590 $6,796,590 so
Training
Summer Youth Jobs
5 Program Private Industry Council $28,260 $28,260 $0
6 Greater Avenues for Private Industry Council 5225,000 $225,000 so
independence(GAIN)
7 Cal-Learn Social Service $1.100,000 $1,013,000 $87.000
8 Independent Living Skills Social Service $159,034 $159.034 $0
9 Job Training/Education Social Service $6,169,913 $5,662,980 $506,933
10 Income Maintenance Social Service $127,788,875 $122,654,649 $5,134,026
3
1 Neighborhood Preservation Building Inspection 5700,900 $700,900 so
Program
2 Redevelopment Community Unknown Unknown $o
Development
3 Child Nutrition for Child Community Services 5878,284 $878.284 so
Development/Head Start
4 Section 8 Housing Housing Authority $42,640,000 $42,640.000 so
Assistance
5 Public Mousing Program Housing Authority 52.560,000 52,560.000 so
6 Summer Food Service Health Services 513,334 513.334 so
Program
• 7 Women,Infants&Childrer Health Services S25,747 525-747 so
• (WIC)Program-Brentwood
•
8 WIC-Concord Health Services 5308.962 $308.952 so
9 WIC-Pittsburg Health Services 5411,949 $411.94--- Sr
10 WIC-Richmond Health Services 5540,682 5540-682 K
11 Food Wise Health Services 5143,406 5121.431 521.975
12 Food Stamps/Food Social Service 57.610.892 56.469 256 51,141.634
Distribution
'67
.0;$47'.; _$1,163,609
I Permanent Placement Social Service 54.021.372 53,218 905 5802.467
2 Adoptions Social Service S3 152.535 S2312 008 5839,527
• 3 AFDC/Foster Care Social Service 521,048,486 513.4311 795 $7616,691
Foster Care/Seriously
4 Emotionally Disturbed Social Service S 2.166,667 $86= 300.0�--
• Children
5 Foster Home Licensing Social Service 5618,690 $444183 5174,507,
TOTAL * : I . - 1 1, . . : :
5311-007;760 520,274,558 $10,733,192
Service Program Name Department Gross Financing Net County
Category Expenditures Cost
I California Children's Health Services $4,181,244 $3,146,616 $1,034,628
Services
2 Child Health Screening Health Services $59,530 $56,695 $2,835
Clinic(CHSC)-Concord
3 CHSC-Pittsburg Health Services $40,968 $39,017 $1,951
4 CHSC-Richmond Health Services $26,270 $25,019 $1,251
5 Healthy Start-Pittsburg Health Services $146,512 $105,487 $41,025
6 Healthy Start-Richmond Health Services $153,249 $153,249 so
7 High Risk Infant Follow-Up Health Services 5401.886 $251,88e $150,000
Program
Teen Health Clinic-
8 Concord Health Services $21,510 $20,486 $1,024
9 Teen Health Clinic- Health Services $6.347 $6.045 5302
Richmond
10 Contra Costa Health Health Services 513,237,215 $13,312,523 ($75,308)
Plan/AFDC
16
01 { tST 708
:s111111i I -
1 AB3632 Program Health Services $1,140,000 $722,000 $418,000
2 Born Free Health Services $585,000 $415,000 $170,000
Center-based Infant
3 Program,George Miller Health Services $288,263 $283,326 $4,937
Center East
Center-based Infant
4 Program,George Mille., Health Services $199,831 $196,95-5- 52,875
Center West
5 Central County Child& Health Services $610,000 5175.00,3; S435.000
Youth Services
6 Child Health and Disability Health Services 51,753,249 $1,254.77;- $498.473
Prevention Program
7 Childhood Injury Prevention Health Services 555,000 S55 OC117- so
Program
8 Developmental Disabilities Health Services 545,000 S: $45.000
Council
9 East County Children's Health Services $570.000 5240.0G_- 5330.000
Mental Health
Home-based Infant
10 Program, George Miller Health Services S101,088 S99,e $1,397
• Center Eas,
Home-based Infant
1 Program,George Mie- Health Se-vices 527.693 S19.E
Center West
12 PerLad Poisoning Prevention Health Services S244,945 S244 SS=oject
13 West Contra Costa County Health Se vices 5970.000 S300 G.__ 5670.000
West
Child,en:s Services
I CT
III L14 YlACT Health Services 5720.000 S350.0-_ S370.00r;
Y I
11 Bicycle H S125.938 S!2�398
5
Bicycle
Head Injury Health Services S1 13.ae
5 P, v 'I
Prevention Project
'TOTAL $7,436,007 $4,470,04-6 $2,965,961
' Service Gross Net County
Program Name Department Financing
Category Expenditures Cost
1 Juvenile,and Dependent County Counsel $558,378 $390,665 $167,513
Children Matters
2 Physical Evidence Analysis Criminalistics $50,000 $0 $50,000
Laboratory
3 PACT Violence Prevention Health Services $439,350 $377.492 $61,858
Project
4 Juvenile Community Probation $236,356 $103,320 $133,036
Services Program
Juvenile
5 Probation/Placement, Probation 511,157,281 $4,573,598 56,583,683
Board&Care
6 Juvenile Hall Probation 57.072,959 53.200.123 53.872,836
7 Orin Allen Youth Probation $1,759,758 $817.430 $942,328
Rehabilitation Facility
Public Defender&Alternate public Defender&
8 Defender Office-Juvenile Alternate Defender $1,302,624 542.125 51,260,499
Division
Juvenile/Sexual Assault
9 Team and Special Sheriff 53,039.718 SO 53.039.718
Enforcement Unit(Narcotics
&Vice
10 Emergency Response Social Service $6,453,633 55,165.808 51.287,825
11 Child Abuse Prevention Social Service $212,408 $212,408 $0
=TALK--.. Community 65 517 99 296
1 Keller Mitigation Programs Development Unknown Unknown 50
2 Community Development Community Unknown Unknow: SO
Block Grant Development
3 4H Program Cooperative Extension 537:924 50 537.92
4 Bay Point Family Service Health,Probation& $1,050.974 $78 .494 5263.480
Center Social Service
' S North Richmond Family Health,Probation& 5686.310 5448.924 S237.385
Service Center Social Service
• 6 County Library Library $2,247,000 $2,247,000 SO
-1538,790
IEIC�RENAND FAMILY SERVICES TOTAL 340,831,159
�1
r
Table 2. Top 20 Children and Family Service Programs by
Gross Expenditures
Rank Program Department Gross Expenditure
#1 Income Maintenance Social Service $127,788,875
#2 lection OUSIng Assistance 1 Naustrtg Actti cirify 42,640,1100'
#3 AFDC/Foster Care Social Service $21,048,486
# Contra Crista Neatfh PtanlAFlr}C Health S"rvices '. $13,2374215
#5 Juvenile Probation/Placement , Board & Care Probation $11,157,281
#6 Child Suppoi#En orceme-n Di$trict AttMey $9,859,322
#7 Food Stamps/Food Distribution Social Service $7,610,892
48 'luvenife Hali Pro ation $7,0 2,959
#9 DTPA Employment & Training Private Industry $6,796,590
Council
#10 Emergency Response So.I Service $61453,633
#11 Job Training/Education Social Service $6,169,913
Commuhity
012 Head Start $61080,902
Services
#13 California Children's Services Health Services $4,181,244
#14 Permanent.Placement Social.Service $4;021;372
#15 Child Development Community $3,968,442
Services
##16 'Acloptions Social Service $3,152.535
#17 Family Reunification Social Service 53,145,750
#1$ Juvenile/Sexual Assault Team and Special Sheri $3,039,718
Enforcement Unit (Narcotics & Vices
#19 Public Housing Program Housing Authority 52.560.000
#20 County Library Library $2,247,000
TOTAL GROSS EXPENDITURES OF TOP 20 3292,232,129
' Table 3. Top 20 Children and Family Service Programs by
Net County Cost
Rank Program Department Net County
Cost
#1 AFDC/Foster Care Social Service $7,616,691
42 JuVei ni e Probation Jaeement Saarr�& Cure Pre bat�o
#3 Income Maintenance Social Service $5,134,026
# >JuvenileHaII Pro batRor $3.872,836
#5 Juvenile/Sexual Assault Team and Special Sheriff $3,039,718
Enforcement Unit (Narcotics & Vice)
Foster Caref e.riausI ;Notionally Disturbed
#6 Social Service $1300,400
Children
#7 Emergency Response Social Service $1,287,825
Public De#eider&Alternate Oefende C7ffice Pubf�o D>r€ender&.
#8 $1;260,499
-,lctuentl6 Uivisi4n Aitert�atd Defender_ NX
#9 Food Stamps/Food Distribution Social Service $1,141,634
California Children's Services > Healtf Services $1034628
#11 Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility Probation $942,328
#12 Adoptions Social Service $839;527
#13 Permanent Placement Social Service $802,467
West Contra Costa County Children's
#14 Health Services $6701000
Services
#15 Family Reunification Social Service $627.736
#16 Job Training/Education Social Service $506.933
#17 Child Health and Disability Prevention Health Services $498.473
Program
#18 Central County Child &Youth Services Health Services $435,000
#19 Family Maintenance Social Service $422,803
#20 AB3632 Program Health Services $418,000
TOTAL NET COUNTY COST OF TOP 20 538,434,807
I
. 3
Fable 4. Gross Expenditures and Net County Costs for Children
and Family Services by Department
Department Gross expenditures Net County Costs
($) (°lo) ($) (%)
Building Inspection $700 900 0.2% $0 0.0%
Cerimunity Development t 3nknovir3 i�#1 Dnknawrr hi/A
Community Services $10,927,628 3.4% $0 0.0%
Cooperative Extension $75,848 £3.0 5,848_ 2/
County Counsel $558,378 0.2% $167,513 0.4%
Criminalistics Laboratory . $50,00{3 0 0% $50,000 0.1%
District Attorney $9,859,322 3.1% $0 0.0%
Health Services $274594'16.8:::::::: 8.6°I° $4,207 t32 90.3°I°
Housing Authority $45,200,000 14.1% $0 0.0%
Library $2,284,000 0°Ia
Private Industry Council $7,049,850 2.2% $0 0.0%
Probation - ::$202261354: 5.346 $11,53,1;883 282°l0
Public Defender $1,302,624 0.4% $1,260,499 3.1%
She $3,039,718 1.0% $3,039;718 74°k
Social Service $189,256,262 59.2% $19,997,330 49.0%
Other' $1,737128410.5°l, $500;866 .:1-2%
TOTAL $319,862,336 100.0% $40,831,159 100.0%
Other is Service Integration , a mull!-department effort involving Health, Probation and Social Service.
r
Figure 1. Children and Family Budget by Service
Category
Other Children&
Family Services Family Support/
Safety!Justice 1% Parenting Skills
10% r„ 6%
Other Health p yl
Services
2%
Medical Care
6%
Alternative Homes
for Children
10S£
cconomi
S,,:�port,,'Se;`
Sufficencv
485;
Food & Shelter
17
TOTAL = $319,862,336
t
Figure 2. Breakdown of Children and Family Services
by Financing and Net County Cost
$350,000,000 100%
$300,000,000
I' 87%
$250,000,000
Mill;
,Uj I
$200,000,000
II;
Io:
9
$150,000,000
r
I'l
�i
5100.000.000
lir: i�
,3__
l':I'' illi
$50.000:000
II;; „ IIIA
iil�ir m: til:.
Gross Expenditures Financing Net Co -ty Cos'.
r
Figure 3. Share of Net County Cost for Children and
Family Services by Service Category
Family
Support/Parenting
Other Children and Family Services Skills Economic
°
i to 3°l0
Support/Seff-
Su#f cency
14%
Food & Shelter
3%
Safety/Justice
431°
Alternative Homes
for Children
26-
Other Health Medical Care 3--
Services
`-Services
7°'c
TOTAL NET COUNTY COST = $40,831,159
PRELIMINARY PROGRAM AND INDICATOR LIST
3
FOR FY 1996-97 CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
BUDGET
1. FAMILY SUPPORT/PARENTING SKILLS
PROGRAM DEPARTMENT INDICATORS)
Child Development Community Services # and%of all parents who
completed training
Head Start Community Services # of children who completed
Head Start
Family Preservation Social Service (1)#/%of all FP children
successfully maintained in
home; (2)#/% of FP children
removed from their homes
Child Care Social Service ?
Family Maintenance Social Service (1)#/%of all FM children
successfully maintained in
home; (2)#/% of FM children
removed from their homes
Family Reunification Social Service #/%of children in out-of-home
placement successfully returned
to the home of a parent
Refugee Social Adjustment Social Service (1)#/%of participants placed in
jobs; (2)#/% of participants
who completed youth
employment training program,
home health training and
vocational ESL classes
"T indicates that no indicator was provided last year or it was not clear how the indicator
provided last year could be measured.
Deptinds.doc-NG3 - P.1
2. ECONOMIC SUPPORTISELF SUFFICIENCY
PROGRAM DEPARTMENT INDICATOR(S)
Nutrition and Resource Cooperative Extension ?
Management
Child Support Enforcement District Attorney - Family (1) Amount of child support
Support money collected; (2) % of
child support owed that was
collected
Families for Literacy Library ?
DTPA Employment & PIC (1) #/% of participants placed
Training in unsubsidized employment;
(2) ?
Summer Youth Jobs Program PIC #/%of participants placed in
summer jobs
GAIN PIC #of employment slots
developed per month that are
filled by GAIN participants
Cal-Learn Social Service of participants who
receive their high school
diplomas
Independent Living Skills Social Service 9/0/o of youth leaving the
foster care system who have
successfully completed high
school/GED/vocational
training
Job Training/Education Social Service (1) #//o of GAIN participants
placed in jobs-, (2) #/% of
GAIN participants placed in
jobs that are still employed in
three months
Income Maintenance Social Service ?
indicates that no indicator was provided last year or it was not clear how the indicator
provided last year could be measured.
Deptinds.doc-NG3 -P.2
3. FOOD AND SHELTER
PROGRAM DEPARTMENT INDICA-IOR(S)
Neighborhood Preservation Building Inspection 4 of loans funded per year
Program Department
Redevelopment Community Development ?
Child Nutrition Services for Community Services ?
Child Development/Head
Start
Section 8 Housing Assistance Housing Authority (1) #/I/o of families served;
(2) #of families on the
waiting list
Public Housing Program Housing Authority #/%of housing units
occupied
Summer Food Service Health Services - Public # of participants in the USDA
Program Health Summer Feeding Program
WIC - Brentwood Health Services - Public (1) Average length of
Health breastfeeding for
participating mothers; (2)
#/%of children participating
whom are overweight
WIC - Concord Health Services - Public (1) Average length of
Health breastfeeding for
participating mothers; (2)
#/% of children participating
whom are overweight
WIC - Pittsburg Health Services - Public (1) Average length of
Health breastfeeding for
participating mothers; (2)
#/% of children participating
whom are overweight
"T indicates that no indicator was provided last year or it was not clear how the indicator
provided last year could be measured.
Deptinds.doc-NG3 - P.3
PROGRAM DEPARTMENT INDICATOR(S)
WIC - Richmond Health Services - Public (1) Average length of
Hea .,h breastfeeding for
participating mothers; (2)
41%of children participating
whom are overweight
Food Wise Health Services - Public ?
Health
Food Stamps/Food Social Service ?
Distribution
indicates that no indicator was provided last year or it was not clear how the indicator
provided last year could be measured.
Deptinds-doc-NG3 -PA
4. ALTERNATIVE HOMES FOR CHILDREN
PROGRAM DEPARTMENT INDICATOR(S)
Permanent Placement Social Service (1) #/I/o of children looking
for adoptive placement for
whom placements were
made; (2) #/% of all children
placed who are placed with i
legal guardians
Z-
Adoptions Social Service of all children looking
for adoptive placements for
whom placements*were made
AFDC/Foster Care Social Service Foster Care payment error
rates
Foster Care/SED Social Service Foster Care payment error
rates for children with
emotional problems who are
in foster care as an alternative
to hospitalization
Foster Home Licensing Social Service ?
"T indicates that no indicator was provided last year or it was not clear how the indicator
provided last year could be measured.
Deptinds,doc-NG3 -P.5
P.
S. MEDICAL CARE
PROGRAM DEPARTMENT INDICATOR(s)
California Children's Health Services - Public ?
Services Health
Child Health Screening Health Services - Public (1) # of children screened; (2)
Clinic - Concord Health # of problems identified; (3)
# of referrals made
Child Health Screening Health Services - Public (1) #of children screened; (2)
Clinic - Pittsburg Health # of problems identified; (3)
# of referrals made
Child Health Screening Health Services - Public (1) # of children screened; (2)
Clinic - Richmond Health # of problems identified; (3)
# of referrals made
Healthy Start - Pittsburg Health Services - Public ?
Health
Healthy Start - Richmond Health Services - Public ?
Health
High Risk Infant Follow-up Health Services - Public
Program Health
Teen Health Clinic - Concord Health Services - Public ?
Health
Teen Health Clinic - Health Services- Public ?
Riclunond Health
Contra Costa Health Health Services ?
Plan/AFDC
"T' indicates that no indicator was provided last year or it was not clear how the indicator
provided last year could be measured.
Deptinds.doc-NG3 - P.6
-A
6 OTHER HEAL TH SER VICES
PROGRAM DEPARTMENT INDICATOR(S)
AB3632 Health Services- Mental ?
Health
Born Free Health Services - Drug Abuse #/% of all newborns who are
drug addicted .
Center-based Infant Program, Health Services - Public #/I/o of infants served who
George Miller Center East Health stay with their families (avoid
institutionalization)
Center-based Infant Program, Health Services - Public of infants served who
George Miller Center West Health stay with their families (avoid
institutionalization)
Central County Child and Health Services - Mental ?
Youth Services Health
Child Health and Disability Health Services - Public #/% of clients served/week
Prevention Program Health
Childhood Injury Prevention Health Services - Public ?
Program Health
Developmental Disabilities Health Services - Public ?
Council Health
East County Children's Health Services - Mental ?
Mental Health Health
Home-based Infant Program, Health Services - Public of infants served who
George Miller Center East Health stay with their families (avoid
institutionalization)
Home-based Infant Program, Health Services - Public #//o of infants served who
George Miller Center West Health stay with their families (avoid
institutionalization)
Lead Poisoning Prevention Health Services - Public ?
Project Health
"T' indicates that no indicator was provided last year or it was not clear how the indicator
provided last year could be measured.
Deptinds.doc-NG3 -P.7
PROGRAM DEPARTMENT INDICATOR(S)
West Contra Costa County Health Services - Mental ?
Children's Services Health
YIACT Health Services - Mental #//o of all youth served that
Health are not referred to higher
levels of care
Bicycle Head Injury Health Services - Public ?
Prevention Project Health
"T indicates that no indicator was provided last year or it was not clear how the indicator
provided last year could be measured.
Deptinds.doc-NG3 -P.8
7. SAFETYIJUSTICE
PROGRAM DEPARTMENT INDICATOR(S)
Juvenile and Dependent County Counsel -Juvenile (1) #of contested juvenile
Children Matters Unit hearings and trials handled;
Z:�
(2) average monthly number
of hours of legal services
provided
Physical Evidence Analysis Criminalistics Laboratory ?
PACT Violence Prevention Health Services - Public ?
Project Health
Juvenile Community Services Probation of participants who
Program complete programs
Juvenile Probation/Placement Probation ?
Board & Care
Juvenile Hall Probation ?
Orin Allen Youth Probation ?
Rehabilitation Facility
Public Defender& Alternate Public Defender& ADO ?
Defender Office -Juvenile
Division
Juvenile/Sexual Assault Sheriff-Investigation of criminals successfully
Team & Special Enforcement Division prosecuted
Unit(Narcotics& Vice)
Emergency Response Social Service average response time
between report and
investigation; (2) #/% of
substantiated abuse cases
resulting in voluntan-
servic s
Child Abuse Prevention Social Service ?
"?" indicates that no indicator was provided last year or it was not clear how the indicator
provided last year could be measured.
Deptinds.doc-NG3 -P.9
p.
8. OTHER CHILDREN/FAMILY SER VICES
PROGRAM DEPARTMENT INDICATOR(S)
Keller Mitigation Programs Community Development ?
Community Development Community Development ?
Block Grant
4H Program Cooperative Extension #/% of teachers, agency staff
who successfully complete
training
Bay Point Family Service Health, Probation, Social multiple outcomes will be
Center Services provided
North Richmond Family Health, Probation, Social multiple outcomes will be
Service Center Services provided
Library Library (1) #of patrons registered;
(2) # of items checked out;
(3) # of reference questions
responded to; (4) # of people
participating in Library
programs.
indicates that no indicator was provided last year or it was not clear how the indicator
provided last year could be measured.
Deptinds.doc-NG3 - P.10